![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 943-948, January 11, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Scripps
Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La
Jolla, California 92093-0202
Received for publication, October 5, 2001, and in revised form, October 25, 2001
The sea urchin sperm acrosome reaction (AR) is a
prerequisite for sperm-egg fusion. This report identifies sea urchin
sperm receptor for egg jelly-3 (suREJ3) as a new member of the
polycystin-1 family (the protein mutated in autosomal dominant
polycystic kidney disease). suREJ3 is a multidomain, 2,681-amino acid,
heavily glycosylated orphan receptor with 11 putative transmembrane
segments (TMS) that localize to the plasma membrane covering the sperm
acrosomal vesicle. Like the latrophilins and other members of the
secretin family of G-protein-coupled receptors, suREJ3 is cleaved at
the consensus GPS (G-protein-coupled receptor proteolytic site) domain. Antibodies to the extracellular 1,455-residue
NH2-terminal portion identify a band at 250 kDa that
shifts in electrophoretic mobility to 180 kDa upon glycosidase
digestion. Antibodies to the 1,226-residue COOH-terminal portion
identify a band at 150 kDa that shifts to 140 kDa after glycosidase
treatment. Antibodies to both portions of suREJ3 localize exclusively
to the plasma membrane over the acrosomal vesicle. Immunoprecipitation
shows that both portions of suREJ3 are associated in detergent
extracts. This is the first report showing that a polycystin family
member is cleaved at the GPS domain. Localization of suREJ3 to the
acrosomal region provides the first suggestion for the role of a
polycystin-1 protein (components of nonselective cation channels) in a
specific cellular process.
Substantial progress has been made in understanding the
molecular mechanisms of fertilization in both echinoderms and
mammals. Upon contact with the jelly layer surrounding the egg, sea
urchin sperm undergo the exocytotic acrosome reaction
(AR).1 The AR involves
Na+ and Ca2+ influx and H+ and
K+ efflux. This results in increases in intracellular
Ca2+ and pH values and elevation of cAMP and inositol
triphosphate (1). In sea urchin sperm, suREJ1 was identified as a
1,450-amino acid type I transmembrane glycoprotein that is involved in
the signaling cascade leading to the AR (2). suREJ1 binds to the fucose
sulfate polymer of egg jelly, and the isolated polymer is capable of
inducing the acrosome reaction in a manner similar to whole egg jelly
(3, 4).
Sequence analysis of suREJ1 identified several extracellular domains
including an epidermal growth factor domain, two carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs), and the REJ module, a region of ~1,000 amino acids that is homologous to only one other protein, polycystin-1 (2). Polycystin-1 is a multidomain glycoprotein of 4,303 amino acids
with 11 putative TMS (5). The last six TMS are homologous to
polycystin-2 and to voltage-activated calcium channels (6, 7). Human
polycystin-2 is a 968-amino acid protein with six putative TMS (6).
Mutations in the human polycystin-1 gene account for ~85% of
autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, whereas mutations in the
polycystin-2 gene account for ~15% of autosomal dominant polycystic
kidney disease. This disease affects an estimated 1 in 400 to 1 in
1,000 individuals and is one of the most common hereditary disorders.
All autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients have renal
cysts, and other manifestations include pancreatic and hepatic cysts
and cardiovascular abnormalities (8, 9). Along with sequence homology
to voltage-gated ion channels and transient receptor potential
channels, there is accumulating functional evidence that mammalian
polycystin-1 and -2 interact to form a calcium-modulated nonselective
cation channel (10-12).
Several homologs of both polycystin-1 and -2 have been reported in
mammals, fish, and invertebrates (7, 13, 14), demonstrating that these
proteins are a new gene family whose function remains ill-defined.
Recently, another human polycystin-1 homolog, hPKDREJ, has been
identified. This homolog contains the ~1,000-residue REJ module plus
the COOH-terminal 11 TMS of polycystin-1 (15). Most interestingly,
hPKDREJ is only expressed in testis, and transcripts first appear
during sperm differentiation. The homology between the sea urchin sperm
suREJ proteins and mammalian hPKDREJ suggests that both animal groups
may share a common signaling pathway in fertilization.
While screening a sea urchin testis cDNA library with
suREJ1 probes, two new homologs were discovered, suREJ2 and suREJ3. Of
these, suREJ3 is unique in that it contains all 11 TMS found in
mammalian polycystin-1 (5) and hPKDREJ (15).
DNA Sequencing--
A suREJ1 clone isolated from a Lambda ZAP
cDNA library of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus testis (2)
was used for screening. Overlapping clones of suREJ3 were obtained and
sequenced. After repeated rounds of screening with suREJ3 specific
probes, the full-length sequence was obtained and both ends confirmed
by rescreening the cDNA library.
Sequence Analysis--
suREJ3 homologs were identified using
BLAST (16). Specific domains and glycosylation sites were found using
the ProfileScan web site
www.isrec.isb-sib.ch/software/PFSCAN_form.html and the PredictProtein web site
dodo.cpmc.columbia.edu/predictprotein/predictprotein.html. The signal
sequence was predicted using the SignalP web site (17). Random jumble
analysis was performed using the Biology Workbench web site PRSS
program biowb.sdsc.edu/CGI/BW.cgi. ClustalX and ClustalW were used
to make multiple sequence alignments (18), and shading was done using
BoxShade www.ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html. Percent identity
and percent similarity (includes identical and conserved amino acid
changes) were calculated using the program GeneDoc (19). TMS were
predicted using hydropathy plots that were generated by the method of
Kyte and Doolittle with a window of 14 amino acids (20).
GenBankTM accession numbers used are as follows: suREJ3,
AF422153; human polycystin-1, P98161; human polycystin-2, Q13563;
hPKDREJ, XP_010050; rat latrophilin-1, T14324; Anthocidaris
crassispina SUEL, P22031; human flamingo-1, AAG00080; and human CD97, AAB36682.
Antibody Production--
Recombinant proteins were made by
amplifying DNA with exact match primers that correspond to the
following amino acids: Glu32 to Lys241,
SUEL/CRD; His1757 to Pro2039, IH. The forward
and reverse primers contained the restriction sites NdeI and
BamHI. The amplified DNA was digested with restriction enzymes and ligated into the expression vector pET15b (Novagen), which
contains an NH2-terminal His tag. The vector was
transformed into BL21(DE3) cells (Novagen), the protein expressed by
isopropyl-1-thio-
Cys-Phe219-Ile-Asn-Leu-Thr-His-Gly-Gln-Trp-Ser-Trp-Arg-Asp-Cys-Glu-Asn-Arg235
was used to generate the R3p antibody. The peptide was attached to maleimide-activated keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Pierce) and rabbit
antibodies raised commercially (Cocalico). The resulting R3p antibody
was purified using the peptide conjugated to Sulfo-Link (Pierce).
Protein Preparation--
All procedures were on ice or at
4 °C. Sea urchins were spawned by injection with 0.5 M
KCl, and the undiluted sperm was collected with a Pasteur pipette. The
sperm was resuspended in 0.45 µm filtered seawater (FSW).
Coelomocytes were removed by three 5-min centrifugations at 200 × g, and sperm cells were sedimented at 5,000 × g. For isolation of sperm heads and flagella, undiluted
sperm was resuspended in 20 volumes of FSW containing 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 6.7 and 50 mM KCl to block the AR. Resuspended
sperm were homogenized with a Teflon glass homogenizer to break
flagella from heads. The flagella and heads were separated by
differential centrifugation for 10 min (800 × g for
heads and 5,000 × g for flagella). Separation procedures were repeated until the samples were maximally enriched for
heads or flagella, as determined by phase contrast microscopy. Whole
sperm, heads, and flagella were resuspended in membrane solubilization
buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 2 µg/ml of
leupeptin, and 1% Nonidet P-40, pH 7.4). For immunoprecipitation,
0.5% w/v of Zwittergent 3-10 was used instead of Nonidet P-40.
Solubilized protein was obtained after centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 1 h (4 °C). Sperm membrane vesicles were
made according to the pH 9 method (23).
For wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) chromatography, solubilized sperm
protein was applied to a WGA-agarose column (EY Laboratories). The
column was washed with wash buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, pH 7.4), and the protein
eluted in wash buffer containing 100 mM
N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. SDS-PAGE was performed (24), and gels were stained with silver (25) or Coomassie Brilliant Blue.
For protein-N-glycosidase-F (PNGase-F) treatment of sperm
protein, 40 µg of WGA eluate containing 0.5% SDS and 50 mM Immunoprecipitation--
2-10 µg of affinity-purified IH
antibody was incubated on ice overnight with 1 mg of Zwittergent 3-10 solubilized sperm protein in a total volume of 0.5 ml. Twenty
microliters of prewashed Pansorbin (Calbiochem) was added, and the
samples were rotated at 4 °C for 1 h. The Pansorbin was
sedimented at 12,000 × g for 1 min. Supernatants were
then removed, and the Pansorbin was washed three times (5 min each)
with solubilization buffer. The samples were resuspended in Laemmli
sample buffer, separated on SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF
membranes. Membranes were probed with S/C and IH antibodies, followed
by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Calbiochem).
Membranes were detected with SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration
Substrate (Pierce).
Immunolocalization--
Freshly spawned sperm were diluted 1:100
and incubated 10 min in FSW containing 3% paraformaldehyde and 0.1%
glutaraldehyde. Fixed cells were washed three times for 10 min with
phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4. Permeabilized sperm were incubated
for 10 min in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.2% Nonidet P-40
and were then washed three times. Nonspecific sites were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 30 min, and
were then incubated for 1 h with primary antibody in a blocking solution. This was followed by three 10-min washes, a 1-h incubation in
Alexafluor 546 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes), and three
additional washes.
suREJ3 Is a Multidomain Protein--
The deduced amino acid
sequence of suREJ3 reveals a 2,681-amino acid multidomain protein (Fig.
1). Based on Met-1 as the start site and
following the 27-residue signal sequence, the presumed mature protein
begins at Gly28. From the NH2 to COOH terminus,
suREJ3 contains the following domains: an 84-residue sea urchin egg
lectin domain (SUEL, Ref. 26), a 117-residue CRD (27), a 55-residue PKD
repeat (5, 28), a 37-residue G-protein-coupled receptor proteolytic
site (GPS, Ref. 29), TMS 1, a 124-polycystin/lipoxygenase/alpha-toxin domain (PLAT, Refs. 29 and 30), TMS 2-11, and a 44-residue putative
cytoplasmic segment. The REJ module found in suREJ1 and polycystin-1
family members extends from Arg539 to Lys1476
(Fig. 1, vertical lines; 2). The extracellular
portion of the 1,485 residues preceding TMS 1 contains 23 potential
N-linked glycosylation sites, and the region between TMS 1 and 11 contains eight such sites (asterisks). suREJ3
contains several domains found in polycystin-1 and hPKDREJ, as well as
domains unique to suREJ3 among the polycystin family members (Fig.
2).
The SUEL domain was originally described as a galactose-binding sea
urchin egg lectin (26). SUEL domains are also found in fish eggs (31,
32), and latrophilins, members of the secretin family of
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs, Ref. 33). The SUEL domain of suREJ3
is 44-48% similar to the SUEL domain from the mammalian latrophilins.
The suREJ3 CRD is a C-type lectin domain containing the six diagnostic
Cys residues (27). Its specificity for carbohydrate binding is unknown.
suREJ3 contains a region of 55 amino acids that have distant homology
to 16 repeat sequences present in polycystin-1, called PKD repeats. A
multiple sequence alignment with the 16 repeats from human polycystin-1 and suREJ3 shows 16-26% similarity; the human PKD repeats are 20-30% similar to each other. A random jumble analysis shows that the
relationship is statistically significant. suREJ3, polycystin-1, and
hPKDREJ all possess a REJ module of ~1000 amino acids of unknown function. suREJ3 contains a PLAT domain between TMS 1 and 2, which is
also present in polycystin-1 and hPKDREJ. The PLAT domain is homologous
to the NH2-terminal suREJ3 Is Cleaved at the GPS Domain--
Prior to the first TMS is
the GPS domain. This domain is present in several members of the
secretin family of GPCRs, including latrophilins (33). Three members,
latrophilin-1, hFlamingo-1, and CD97 are known to be proteolytically
processed, with cleavage between the Leu and Thr residues of
latrophilin-1 (Fig. 3, Refs. 36-39). If
suREJ3 was cleaved at the GPS domain, the unglycosylated NH2 portion of 1,455 amino acids would be ~160 kDa and
the COOH portion would be ~140 kDa. Sperm membrane proteins were
solubilized in Nonidet P-40, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to
PVDF membrane. Immunoblots were then performed. An antibody to the S/C
in the NH2-terminal region reacted with a single component at ~250 kDa, whereas the IH antibody to the internal loop between TMS
3 and 4 reacted with a single band at ~150 kDa (Fig.
4A). Digestion of the
preparation with PNGase-F resulted in electrophoretic mobility shifts
of the S/C-reacting band to ~180 kDa and the IH-reacting band to
~140 kDa (Fig. 4B). The most likely explanation for these results is that, like the GPCRs, suREJ3 is cleaved into approximately equal halves at the GPS domain, the NH2-terminal portion
being heavily glycosylated. Association of the two halves of suREJ3 with each other was confirmed by immunoprecipitation of both proteins from Zwittergent 3-10 extracts of sperm using the IH antibody (Fig.
5). Like suREJ1, the NH2
terminus of suREJ3 can be partially removed from the membrane by
incubating sperm in pH 9.2 FSW (23), whereas the COOH terminus is
exclusively associated with the membrane fraction (Fig. 7). This
indicates that the interaction between the NH2 and COOH
termini is not because of disulfide bonds, but rather because the
interaction is noncovalent.
suREJ3 Localizes to the Plasma Membrane Covering the Sperm
Acrosomal Vesicle--
Immunofluorescence on whole sperm using Fab
fragments of rabbit anti-R3p and rabbit anti-IH IgG show that both
halves of suREJ3 co-localize exclusively to the acrosomal vesicle
region of sperm (Fig. 6). Reaction with
IH antibody occurred only after treatment of the fixed sperm with 0.2%
Nonidet P-40, supporting the putative intracellular location of the IH
antigen. The exclusive localization to sperm heads was supported by
Western blots showing that suREJ3 antigens are present in sperm heads,
but not sperm flagella (Fig. 7).
The extracellular portion of suREJ3 contains three domains: SUEL,
CRD, and the PKD repeat, all of which indicate a role in extracellular
matrix interactions. The SUEL domain and CRD suggest a lectin-like
interaction with carbohydrates, presumably from the multicomponent egg
extracellular matrix known as egg jelly (3). We do not know the
identity of possible ligands binding these three domains. The SUEL
domain was first identified as an The single CRD of suREJ3 has the diagnostic structure of a
calcium-dependent lectin (27). suREJ1 has two
NH2-terminal-located CRDs, which are only 50% identical to
each other over an alignment of 120 residues (21). The single CRD of
suREJ3 is 52% identical to CRD-1 of suREJ1 and 47% identical to the
suREJ1 CRD-2. The sequences of these CRDs do not disclose their sugar
binding specificity. suREJ3 has only one PKD repeat, whereas human
polycystin-1 has 16. PKD repeats are not found in Lov-1, the
Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of polycystin-1 (13, 14). The
most likely explanation is that duplication of PKD repeats occurred in
the evolution of the vertebrates on the way to mammals. NMR studies
show the PKD repeat has a The REJ module was originally described as a domain of 707 amino acids
found in suREJ1 and human polycystin-1 (2). The addition of other
polycystin-1 homologs to the data base showed that the REJ module was
~1,000 amino acids (7). This domain also occurs in the mammalian
testis-specific PKDREJ. The GPS cleavage site is within this domain in
suREJ3. The REJ module is not found in the secretin family of GPCRs,
which have the GPS domain; therefore, possession of the REJ module is
independent of possession of a GPS site. Because the GPS site is known
to be extracellular, and PLAT is exclusively intracellular, the
positions of these two domains support the topology presented herein
for the TMS of suREJ3. Also, the IH antibody to the putative
intracellular sequence between TMS 3 and 4 binds only to the acrosomal
regions in sperm that have been detergent permeabilized.
Among the secretin family of GPCRs, latrophilins are unique in their
relationship to suREJ3, because they contain both the SUEL and GPS
domains. This report demonstrates that suREJ3 is cleaved and that the
deglycosylated halves correspond to their predicted sizes based on
cleavage at the GPS domain. Although we do not experimentally show the
exact point of cleavage of suREJ3, based on work with other
GPS-containing proteins, we believe that suREJ3 is cleaved at the
consensus Leu-Thr site (Fig. 2). This is the first evidence that a
polycystin-1-like protein is cleaved. The presence of this domain in
suREJ1 may also explain the previous observation that 70% of suREJ1
can be removed from sperm by treatment with pH 9.2 seawater for 5 h (2). Whether mammalian polycystin-1 and hPKDREJ are also cleaved at
the GPS domain remains to be demonstrated. The two halves of suREJ3,
although associated in detergent extracts of sperm membranes (Fig. 5),
are not as tenaciously associated as are the two halves of
latrophilin-1. Unlike latrophilin-1, the two halves of suREJ3
dissociate in SDS-mercaptoethanol sample buffer without the addition of
8 M urea (39). Also, like suREJ1, the
NH2-terminal half of suREJ3 can be partially removed from sperm by treatment with pH 9.2 seawater, showing that it is a peripheral component of the cell membrane. The relationship between suREJ3 and latrophilins and the location of suREJ3 over the acrosomal vesicle suggests that suREJ3 may regulate AR exocytosis. In addition to the location of suREJ1 and suREJ3 on the cell membrane
covering the acrosomal vesicle, the exocytosis regulatory proteins,
soluble NSF attachment protein (SNAP)-25, vesicle-associated membrane
protein (VAMP), and syntaxin are all exclusive to the acrosomal region
of sea urchin sperm (46, 47). Antibodies to suREJ1 induce the
exocytotic AR of sea urchin sperm (2). However, neither the S/C and R3p
antibodies made to the extracellular NH2-terminal half, nor
the IH antibody made to the intracellular COOH-terminal half of suREJ3
induce the AR. suREJ1 is known to bind to the fucose sulfate polymer of
egg jelly (2, 3). Two different isotypes of this polymer exist that
differ in the placement of sulfate groups. Both are linear polymers of
From the similarities of the proteins shown in Fig. 2, and
the fact that polycystin-1 and -2 (11), polycystin-2L (10), and
polycystin-2 from syncytiotrophoblast (12) form nonselective cation
channels, it is valid to speculate that suREJ3 may form an ion channel
or be a component of the regulatory apparatus of a channel. Both
polycystin-2 and transient receptor potential channels (TRPCs) are
excellent candidates for components of such a channel in the sperm AR.
TRPCs were first described in Drosophila photoreception as
store-operated cation channels (49). TRPC-1, a mammalian TRP homolog,
associates with polycystin-2 through the COOH-terminal coiled-coil
domain and also TMS regions (50). Mouse TRPC-2 has been shown to
mediate the sustained increase in calcium associated with the sperm AR
(51).
Unlike polycystin-1 and -2 (50, 52), sea urchin suREJ3, mammalian
PKDREJ (15) and C. elegans Lov-1 (13) do not have a
predicted coiled-coil domain in their COOH-terminal ends. Thus, these
three proteins, which are all involved in male reproduction, might
interact with proteins through other domains. Although clearly related
to each other in their COOH-terminal halves, there is much less
relationship among them in their NH2-terminal halves. Until
the discovery of the sea urchin REJ proteins, the proteins associated
with gamete recognition in sea urchins have been unrelated to known
mammalian proteins. The smaller genomic size of the sea urchin (800 megabases) and the characteristic of fewer duplicated genes than found
in mammals may make the sea urchin a more tractable model for
discovering the pathways of signal transduction leading to the
deuterostome sperm AR. Further study of suREJ3 may help clarify the
function of polycystin-1 and its role in the genesis of polycystic
kidney disease in humans, as well as contribute to the understanding of
the molecular mechanisms of sperm-egg interactions in both sea urchins
and mammals.
We thank W. J. Swanson and J. R. Schulz for
many important discussions.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant HD12986.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF422153.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 5, 2001,DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109673200
2
N. Hirohashi and V. D. Vacquier,
unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
AR, acrosome
reaction;
CRD, carbohydrate recognition domain;
FSW, filtered seawater;
REJ, receptor for egg jelly;
GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptor;
GPS, G-protein-coupled receptor cleavage site;
hPKDREJ, human PKDREJ;
PLAT, polycystin/lipoxygenase/alpha-toxin;
PKD, polycystic kidney disease;
PNGase-F, protein-N-glycosidase-F;
S/C, SUEL/CRD;
SUEL, sea
urchin egg lectin;
suREJ, sea urchin receptor for egg jelly;
TMS, transmembrane segment;
TRPC, transient receptor potential channel;
WGA, wheat germ agglutinin;
PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride.
suREJ3, a Polycystin-1 Protein, Is Cleaved at the GPS Domain and
Localizes to the Acrosomal Region of Sea Urchin Sperm*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) induction,
and purified using Ni2+-NTA resin (Qiagen). Two milligrams
of the purified protein was separated on SDS-PAGE and visualized by
cupric chloride staining (21). The acrylamide-embedded protein was used
for antibody production. For SUEL/CRD (S/C), chicken antibodies were
raised commercially (Cocalico, Reamstown, PA) and initially purified from egg yolks as described (22). Antibodies were further
affinity-purified on an S/C-conjugated Affi-Gel-10 column (Bio-Rad).
Anti-IH rabbit antibodies were raised commercially (Strategic
BioSolutions, Ramona, CA) and affinity-purified on an IH-conjugated
Affi-Gel-10 column. (Dr. Charles G. Glabe generously provided the
peptide.)
-mercaptoethanol was boiled for 5 min. Nonidet P-40
was added to 7.5%, followed by 2.4 µl of PNGase-F and 27.6 µl of
distilled water. The sample was incubated overnight at 37 °C.
Following deglycosylation, the sample was separated on SDS-PAGE and
transferred to PVDF. Western blots were then performed using S/C and IH antibodies.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (78K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The 2,681-deduced amino acid sequence of
suREJ3. Domains are highlighted in gray, with the
exception of the REJ module, which is denoted by arrows
(| 
|) above the sequence. Names of domains appear at the
beginning of the sequence. The putative cleavage site within the GPS
domain (Leu1455) is labeled with an arrow (
). The
underlined SUEL/CRD region denotes the bacterially expressed
antigen for the S/C antibody. The line above 17 residues of
the CRD shows the synthesized peptide antigen used for the
R3p antibody. The underline between TMS 3 and 4 indicates
the bacterially expressed antigen for the IH antibody.
Asterisks (*) above the sequence indicate the Asn-linked
glycosylation sites. Arrows (v v v v) above the sequence
indicate two protein kinase A sites, both in the cytoplasmic loops.
Putative transmembrane segments (TMS1-11) are bold in
italics and labeled above the sequence. The
GenBankTM accession number is AF422153.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The domain structure of suREJ3, suREJ1,
polycystin-1 and -2. The key defines each domain. TMS are numbered
above suREJ3. suREJ3, polycystin-1, and PKDREJ are homologous to
polycystin-2 in the region with the last 6 TMS.
-barrel domain of lipoxygenases (34), enzymes that peroxidize lipids (35). Of the lipoxygenases, the
suREJ3 domain is most closely related to the NH2-terminal domain of mammalian 5-lipoxygenase (48% similar).
![]()
View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Alignments of GPS domains.
Dashes are included for alignment. Black boxes
denote identity and gray boxes similarity. The
arrow above the alignment indicates the GPS cleavage site.
The GenBankTM accession numbers are as follows: suREJ3
(AF422153), human polycystin-1 (P98161), hPKDREJ (XP_010050),
latrophilin-1 (T14324), human Flamingo-1 (AAG00080), and human CD97
(AAB36682).

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Immunoblots with suREJ3 antibodies.
A, immunoblot of Nonidet P-40 solubilized total sperm
protein identifying the NH2 terminus (S/C) and
COOH terminus (IH) of suREJ3. The relative molecular masses
are shown on the right. B, immunoblots with S/C
and IH antibodies after PNGase-F digestion of WGA eluate of Nonidet
P-40 solubilized sperm protein (+, with enzyme;
, no enzyme). Five
micrograms of protein were loaded per lane.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Both halves of suREJ3 remain associated in
detergent extracts of sperm heads. IH antibody (+) was used for
immunoprecipitation with 2 mg of Zwittergent 3-10 solubilized protein
from isolated sperm heads. The washed Pansorbin containing the attached
antibody/antigen complex was boiled in Laemmli sample buffer. The
supernatant was separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF
membrane. The blots were probed with either the S/C or IH antibodies.
Control immunoprecipitates with no IH antibody (
) did not bind either
half of suREJ3.

View larger version (110K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Immunolocalization of the NH2-
and COOH-terminal halves of suREJ3. Phase contrast images are
shown on the left (A, C, and
E), and immunofluorescent images on the right
(B, D, and F). B, anti-R3p
Fab; D, anti-IH IgG; and F, no primary antibody.
White arrows indicate the same sperm. Both halves of suREJ3
localize exclusively over the acrosomal vesicle. The suREJ3 antigen is
present as a collar around the acrosome. In thumb-squashed
preparations, it sometimes appears as two dots of fluorescence, one on
each side of the acrosomal vesicle, as in B.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Immunoblots of isolated sperm heads and
flagella membrane fractions. Sperm heads and flagella were
separated and resuspended in pH 9.2 FSW. The high pH causes the plasma
membrane to bud off the cell component as tightly sealed vesicles (23).
After removing the cellular debris by two 30-min centrifugations at
6,000 × g, the resulting supernatant was centrifuged
at 200,000 × g for 1 h. The pellet-containing
sperm membrane vesicles and the supernatant were separated on gels and
transferred to PVDF membrane. Probing the blots with anti-S/C antibody
showed that the NH2-terminal half of suREJ3 was in both the
head supernatant (Hs) and head vesicle fraction
(Hv). The flagellar fraction did not react with this
antibody (Fs, Fv). The IH antibody to the
COOH-terminal half of suREJ3 reacted only with the sperm head vesicle
preparation (Hv). Five micrograms of protein were loaded per
lane.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-galactose-specific
lectin in eggs of the sea urchin A. crassispina (26). SUEL
is a 105-amino acid protein that forms a homodimer that localizes to
the egg cortex after fertilization. SUEL binding is calcium-independent
and does not require reduction. The mammalian orphan GPCRs, known as
latrophilins, also contain SUEL domains. Latrophilin-1 binds
-latrotoxin (black widow spider toxin) in a calcium-independent
manner, resulting in massive exocytotic release of neurotransmitter
(40). Comparison of rat and bovine latrophilins shows that the SUEL
domain is the most conserved part of the protein, suggesting that it is
important in latrophilin signaling (41). Although G-protein subunits
have been found in sea urchin spermatozoa, there is no evidence that
they are involved in triggering the AR (42).
-sandwich fold, similar to the
immunoglobulin fold, but it is evolutionarily unrelated to IgG
molecules (28). The PKD repeats from polycystin-1 mediate both cis- (on
the same cell) and trans- (cell-to-cell) calcium-dependent,
homotypic interactions (43). The aforementioned data suggest that the
single PKD repeat of suREJ3 could act in homotypic clustering of the
protein in the acrosomal region.
-Latrotoxin does not induce the AR of sea urchin sperm (data not shown). This is
not surprising, because black widow spider toxins show phylogenetic specificity (44). Also, recent work suggests that
-latrotoxin does
not activate latrophilin-1 to cause exocytosis, but instead functions
by tethering to latrophilin-1 and inserting itself into the membrane to
form pores (45).
-L-1,3-linked fucose with a molecular mass of
approximately one million (4). We do not know if the fucose sulfate
polymer, or other ligands in egg jelly, bind to suREJ3. The AR always
requires the fucose sulfate polymer; however, oligosaccharide chains of
egg jelly glycoproteins greatly enhance the fucose sulfate
polymer-induced AR, suggesting that other sperm receptor proteins are
involved in the inductive mechanism
(48).2 Many scenarios are possible for the involvement of
both suREJ1 and suREJ3 in the AR. They may represent redundant
signaling pathways, or the two sea urchin sperm receptors could
interact in the same pathway.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
858-534-2146; Fax: 858-534-7313; E-mail: kmengeri@ucsd.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Darszon, A.,
Labarca, P.,
Nishigaki, T.,
and Espinosa, F.
(1999)
Physiol. Rev.
79,
481-510
2.
Moy, G. W.,
Mendoza, L. M.,
Schulz, J. R.,
Swanson, W. J.,
Glabe, C. G.,
and Vacquier, V. D.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
809-817
3.
Vacquier, V. D.,
and Moy, G. W.
(1997)
Dev. Biol.
192,
125-135
4.
Alves, A. P.,
Mulloy, B.,
Moy, G. W.,
Vacquier, V. D.,
and Mourão, P. A.
(1998)
Glycobiology
8,
939-946
5.
Consortium, T. E. P. K. D.
(1994)
Cell
77,
881-894
6.
Mochizuki, T., Wu, G.,
Hayashi, S.,
Xenophontos, S. L.,
Veldhuisen, B.,
Saris, J. J.,
Reynolds, D. M.,
Cai, Y.,
Gabow, P. A.,
Pierides, A.,
Kimberling, W. J.,
Breuning, M. H.,
Deltas, C. C.,
Peters, D. J. M.,
and Somlo, S.
(1996)
Science
272,
1339-1342
7.
Sandford, R.,
Sgotto, B.,
Aparicio, S.,
Brenner, S.,
Vaudin, M.,
Wilson, R. K.,
Chissoe, S.,
Pepin, K.,
Bateman, A.,
Chothia, C.,
Hughes, J.,
and Harris, P.
(1997)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
6,
1483-1489
8.
Harris, P. C.
(1999)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
8,
1861-1866
9.
Calvet, J. P.,
and Grantham, J. J.
(2001)
Semin. Nephrol.
21,
107-123
10.
Chen, X.-Z.,
Vassilev, P. M.,
Basora, N.,
Peng, J.-B.,
Nomura, H.,
Segal, Y.,
Brown, E. M.,
Reeders, S. T.,
Hediger, M. A.,
and Zhou, J.
(1999)
Nature
401,
383-386
11.
Hanaoka, K.,
Qian, F.,
Boletta, A.,
Bhunia, A. K.,
Piontek, K.,
Tsiokas, L.,
Sukhatme, V. P.,
Guggino, W. B.,
and Germino, G. G.
(2000)
Nature
408,
990-994
12.
González-Perret, S.,
Kim, K.,
Ibarra, C.,
Damiano, A. E.,
Zotta, E.,
Batelli, M.,
Harris, P. C.,
Reisin, I. L.,
Arnaout, M. A.,
and Cantiello, H. F.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
1182-1187
13.
Barr, M. M.,
and Sternberg, P. W.
(1999)
Nature
401,
386-389
14.
Barr, M. M.,
DeModena, J.,
Braun, D.,
Nguyen, C. Q.,
Hall, D. H.,
and Sternberg, P. W.
(2001)
Curr. Biol.
11,
1341-1346
15.
Hughes, J.,
Ward, C. J.,
Aspinwall, R.,
Butler, R.,
and Harris, P. C.
(1999)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
8,
543-549
16.
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410
17.
Nielsen, H.,
Engelbrecht, J.,
Brunak, S.,
and von Heijne, G.
(1997)
Protein Eng.
10,
1-6
18.
Higgins, D. G.,
Thompson, J. D.,
and Gibson, T. J.
(1996)
Methods Enzymol.
266,
383-402
19.
Nicholas, K. B.,
Nicholas, H. B., Jr.,
and Deerfield, D. W., II
(1997)
EMBNEW News
4,
14
20.
Kyte, J.,
and Doolittle, R. F.
(1982)
J. Mol. Biol.
157,
105-132
21.
Lee, C.,
Levin, A.,
and Branton, D.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
166,
308-312
22.
Gassmann, M.,
Thömmes, P.,
Weiser, T.,
and Hübscher, U.
(1990)
FASEB J.
4,
2528-2532
23.
Vacquier, V. D.
(1986)
Methods Cell Biol.
27,
15-40
24.
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
25.
Morrissey, J. H.
(1981)
Anal. Biochem.
117,
307-310
26.
Ozeki, Y.,
Matsui, T.,
Masami, S.,
and Titani, K.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
2391-2394
27.
Drickamer, K.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
9557-9560
28.
Bycroft, M.,
Bateman, A.,
Clarke, J.,
Hamill, S. J.,
Sandford, R.,
Thomas, R. L.,
and Chothia, C.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
297-308
29.
Ponting, C. P.,
Hofmann, K.,
and Bork, P.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
R585-588
30.
Bateman, A.,
and Sandford, R.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
R588-590
31.
Tateno, H.,
Saneyoshi, A.,
Ogawa, T.,
Muramoto, K.,
Kamiya, H.,
and Saneyoshi, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19190-19197
32.
Hosono, M.,
Ishikawa, K.,
Mineki, R.,
Murayama, K.,
Numata, C.,
Ogawa, Y.,
Takayanagi, Y.,
and Nitta, K.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1472,
668-675
33.
Bockaert, J.,
and Pin, J. P.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1723-1729
34.
Gillmor, S. A.,
Villaseñor, A.,
Fletterick, R.,
Sigal, E.,
and Browner, M. F.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
1003-1009
35.
Kuhn, H.,
and Thiele, B. J.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
449,
7-11
36.
Usui, T.,
Shima, Y.,
Shimada, Y.,
Hirano, S.,
Burgess, R. W.,
Schwarz, T. L.,
Takeichi, M.,
and Uemura, T.
(1999)
Cell
98,
585-595
37.
Gray, J. X.,
Haino, M.,
Roth, M. J.,
Maguire, J. E.,
Jensen, P. N.,
Yarme, A.,
Stetler-Stevenson, M. A.,
Siebenlist, U.,
and Kelly, K.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
5438-5447
38.
Sugita, S.,
Ichtchenko, K.,
Khvotchev, M.,
and Südhof, T. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32715-32724
39.
Krasnoperov, V. G.,
Bittner, M. A.,
Beavis, R.,
Kuang, Y.,
Salnikow, K. V.,
Chepurny, O. G.,
Little, A. R.,
Plotnikov, A. N., Wu, D.,
Holz, R. W.,
and Petrenko, A. G.
(1997)
Neuron
18,
925-937
40.
Davletov, B. A.,
Shamotienko, O. G.,
Lelianova, V. G.,
Grishin, E. V.,
and Ushkaryov, Y. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23239-23245
41.
Matsushita, H.,
Lelianova, V. G.,
and Ushkaryov, Y. A.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
443,
348-352
42.
Cuellar-Mata, P.,
Martinez-Cadena, G.,
Castellano, L. E.,
Aldana-Veloz, G.,
Novoa-Martinez, G.,
Vargas, I.,
Darszon, A.,
and Garcia-Soto, J.
(1995)
Dev. Growth Differ.
37,
173-181
43.
Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya, O.,
Bukanov, N. O.,
Donohue, L. C.,
Dackowski, W. R.,
Klinger, K. W.,
and Landes, G. M.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
1641-1649
44.
Schiavo, G.,
Matteoli, M.,
and Montecucco, C.
(2000)
Physiol. Rev.
80,
717-766
45.
Hlubek, M. D.,
Stuenkel, E. L.,
Krasnoperov, V. G.,
Petrenko, A. G.,
and Holz, R. W.
(2000)
Mol. Pharmacol.
57,
519-528
46.
Schulz, J. R.,
Wessel, G. M.,
and Vacquier, V. D.
(1997)
Dev. Biol.
191,
80-87
47.
Schulz, J. R.,
Sasaki, J. D.,
and Vacquier, V. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
24355-24359
48.
Keller, S. H.,
and Vacquier, V. D.
(1994)
Dev. Growth Differ.
36,
551-556
49.
Montell, C.
(1997)
Mol. Pharmacol.
52,
755-763
50.
Tsiokas, L.,
Arnould, T.,
Zhu, C.,
Kim, E.,
Walz, G.,
and Sukhatme, V. P.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3934-3939
51.
Jungnickel, M. K.,
Marrero, H.,
Birnbaumer, L.,
Lémos, J. R.,
and Florman, H. M.
(2001)
Nat. Cell. Biol.
3,
499-502
52.
Qian, F.,
Germino, F. J.,
Yiqiang, C.,
Zhang, X.,
Somlo, S.,
and Germino, G. G.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
16,
179-183
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Harada, Y. Takagaki, M. Sunagawa, T. Saito, L. Yamada, H. Taniguchi, E. Shoguchi, and H. Sawada Mechanism of Self-Sterility in a Hermaphroditic Chordate Science, April 25, 2008; 320(5875): 548 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wei, K. Hackmann, H. Xu, G. Germino, and F. Qian Characterization of cis-Autoproteolysis of Polycystin-1, the Product of Human Polycystic Kidney Disease 1 Gene J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2007; 282(30): 21729 - 21737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Darszon, J. J Acevedo, B. E Galindo, E. O Hernandez-Gonzalez, T. Nishigaki, C. L Trevino, C. Wood, and C. Beltran Sperm channel diversity and functional multiplicity. Reproduction, June 1, 2006; 131(6): 977 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. O. Hernandez-Gonzalez, J. Sosnik, J. Edwards, J. J. Acevedo, I. Mendoza-Lujambio, I. Lopez-Gonzalez, I. Demarco, E. Wertheimer, A. Darszon, and P. E. Visconti Sodium and Epithelial Sodium Channels Participate in the Regulation of the Capacitation-associated Hyperpolarization in Mouse Sperm J. Biol. Chem., March 3, 2006; 281(9): 5623 - 5633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Mah, W. J. Swanson, and V. D. Vacquier Positive Selection in the Carbohydrate Recognition Domains of Sea Urchin Sperm Receptor for Egg Jelly (suREJ) Proteins Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 533 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-H. Lin, G.-W. Chang, J. Q. Davies, M. Stacey, J. Harris, and S. Gordon Autocatalytic Cleavage of the EMR2 Receptor Occurs at a Conserved G Protein-coupled Receptor Proteolytic Site Motif J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31823 - 31832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. F. Cantiello Regulation of calcium signaling by polycystin-2 Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): F1012 - F1029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T Neill and V. D Vacquier Ligands and receptors mediating signal transduction in sea urchin spermatozoa Reproduction, February 1, 2004; 127(2): 141 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Schultz, F. K. Hamra, and D. L. Garbers A multitude of genes expressed solely in meiotic or postmeiotic spermatogenic cells offers a myriad of contraceptive targets PNAS, October 14, 2003; 100(21): 12201 - 12206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Berteau and B. Mulloy Sulfated fucans, fresh perspectives: structures, functions, and biological properties of sulfated fucans and an overview of enzymes active toward this class of polysaccharide Glycobiology, June 1, 2003; 13(6): 29R - 40R. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Hogan, M. D. Griffin, S. Rossetti, V. E. Torres, C. J. Ward, and P. C. Harris PKHDL1, a homolog of the autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease gene, encodes a receptor with inducible T lymphocyte expression Hum. Mol. Genet., March 15, 2003; 12(6): 685 - 698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Qian, A. Boletta, A. K. Bhunia, H. Xu, L. Liu, A. K. Ahrabi, T. J. Watnick, F. Zhou, and G. G. Germino Cleavage of polycystin-1 requires the receptor for egg jelly domain and is disrupted by human autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease 1-associated mutations PNAS, December 24, 2002; 99(26): 16981 - 16986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Mengerink and V. D. Vacquier An ATP-binding Cassette Transporter Is a Major Glycoprotein of Sea Urchin Sperm Membranes J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 40729 - 40734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Igarashi and S. Somlo Genetics and Pathogenesis of Polycystic Kidney Disease J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2002; 13(9): 2384 - 2398. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Abe, T. Fukuzawa, and S. Hirose Cleavage of Ig-Hepta at a "SEA" Module and at a Conserved G Protein-coupled Receptor Proteolytic Site J. Biol. Chem., June 21, 2002; 277(26): 23391 - 23398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hirohashi and V. D. Vacquier Egg Sialoglycans Increase Intracellular pH and Potentiate the Acrosome Reaction of Sea Urchin Sperm J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 8041 - 8047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||