JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109673200 on November 5, 2001

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 2, 943-948, January 11, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/2/943    most recent
M109673200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mengerink, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vacquier, V. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mengerink, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Vacquier, V. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

suREJ3, a Polycystin-1 Protein, Is Cleaved at the GPS Domain and Localizes to the Acrosomal Region of Sea Urchin Sperm*

Kathryn J. MengerinkDagger, Gary W. Moy, and Victor D. Vacquier

From the Center for Marine Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0202

Received for publication, October 5, 2001, and in revised form, October 25, 2001


    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The sea urchin sperm acrosome reaction (AR) is a prerequisite for sperm-egg fusion. This report identifies sea urchin sperm receptor for egg jelly-3 (suREJ3) as a new member of the polycystin-1 family (the protein mutated in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease). suREJ3 is a multidomain, 2,681-amino acid, heavily glycosylated orphan receptor with 11 putative transmembrane segments (TMS) that localize to the plasma membrane covering the sperm acrosomal vesicle. Like the latrophilins and other members of the secretin family of G-protein-coupled receptors, suREJ3 is cleaved at the consensus GPS (G-protein-coupled receptor proteolytic site) domain. Antibodies to the extracellular 1,455-residue NH2-terminal portion identify a band at 250 kDa that shifts in electrophoretic mobility to 180 kDa upon glycosidase digestion. Antibodies to the 1,226-residue COOH-terminal portion identify a band at 150 kDa that shifts to 140 kDa after glycosidase treatment. Antibodies to both portions of suREJ3 localize exclusively to the plasma membrane over the acrosomal vesicle. Immunoprecipitation shows that both portions of suREJ3 are associated in detergent extracts. This is the first report showing that a polycystin family member is cleaved at the GPS domain. Localization of suREJ3 to the acrosomal region provides the first suggestion for the role of a polycystin-1 protein (components of nonselective cation channels) in a specific cellular process.


    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Substantial progress has been made in understanding the molecular mechanisms of fertilization in both echinoderms and mammals. Upon contact with the jelly layer surrounding the egg, sea urchin sperm undergo the exocytotic acrosome reaction (AR).1 The AR involves Na+ and Ca2+ influx and H+ and K+ efflux. This results in increases in intracellular Ca2+ and pH values and elevation of cAMP and inositol triphosphate (1). In sea urchin sperm, suREJ1 was identified as a 1,450-amino acid type I transmembrane glycoprotein that is involved in the signaling cascade leading to the AR (2). suREJ1 binds to the fucose sulfate polymer of egg jelly, and the isolated polymer is capable of inducing the acrosome reaction in a manner similar to whole egg jelly (3, 4).

Sequence analysis of suREJ1 identified several extracellular domains including an epidermal growth factor domain, two carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs), and the REJ module, a region of ~1,000 amino acids that is homologous to only one other protein, polycystin-1 (2). Polycystin-1 is a multidomain glycoprotein of 4,303 amino acids with 11 putative TMS (5). The last six TMS are homologous to polycystin-2 and to voltage-activated calcium channels (6, 7). Human polycystin-2 is a 968-amino acid protein with six putative TMS (6). Mutations in the human polycystin-1 gene account for ~85% of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, whereas mutations in the polycystin-2 gene account for ~15% of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. This disease affects an estimated 1 in 400 to 1 in 1,000 individuals and is one of the most common hereditary disorders. All autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients have renal cysts, and other manifestations include pancreatic and hepatic cysts and cardiovascular abnormalities (8, 9). Along with sequence homology to voltage-gated ion channels and transient receptor potential channels, there is accumulating functional evidence that mammalian polycystin-1 and -2 interact to form a calcium-modulated nonselective cation channel (10-12).

Several homologs of both polycystin-1 and -2 have been reported in mammals, fish, and invertebrates (7, 13, 14), demonstrating that these proteins are a new gene family whose function remains ill-defined. Recently, another human polycystin-1 homolog, hPKDREJ, has been identified. This homolog contains the ~1,000-residue REJ module plus the COOH-terminal 11 TMS of polycystin-1 (15). Most interestingly, hPKDREJ is only expressed in testis, and transcripts first appear during sperm differentiation. The homology between the sea urchin sperm suREJ proteins and mammalian hPKDREJ suggests that both animal groups may share a common signaling pathway in fertilization.

While screening a sea urchin testis cDNA library with suREJ1 probes, two new homologs were discovered, suREJ2 and suREJ3. Of these, suREJ3 is unique in that it contains all 11 TMS found in mammalian polycystin-1 (5) and hPKDREJ (15).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA Sequencing-- A suREJ1 clone isolated from a Lambda ZAP cDNA library of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus testis (2) was used for screening. Overlapping clones of suREJ3 were obtained and sequenced. After repeated rounds of screening with suREJ3 specific probes, the full-length sequence was obtained and both ends confirmed by rescreening the cDNA library.

Sequence Analysis-- suREJ3 homologs were identified using BLAST (16). Specific domains and glycosylation sites were found using the ProfileScan web site www.isrec.isb-sib.ch/software/PFSCAN_form.html and the PredictProtein web site dodo.cpmc.columbia.edu/predictprotein/predictprotein.html. The signal sequence was predicted using the SignalP web site (17). Random jumble analysis was performed using the Biology Workbench web site PRSS program biowb.sdsc.edu/CGI/BW.cgi. ClustalX and ClustalW were used to make multiple sequence alignments (18), and shading was done using BoxShade www.ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html. Percent identity and percent similarity (includes identical and conserved amino acid changes) were calculated using the program GeneDoc (19). TMS were predicted using hydropathy plots that were generated by the method of Kyte and Doolittle with a window of 14 amino acids (20). GenBankTM accession numbers used are as follows: suREJ3, AF422153; human polycystin-1, P98161; human polycystin-2, Q13563; hPKDREJ, XP_010050; rat latrophilin-1, T14324; Anthocidaris crassispina SUEL, P22031; human flamingo-1, AAG00080; and human CD97, AAB36682.

Antibody Production-- Recombinant proteins were made by amplifying DNA with exact match primers that correspond to the following amino acids: Glu32 to Lys241, SUEL/CRD; His1757 to Pro2039, IH. The forward and reverse primers contained the restriction sites NdeI and BamHI. The amplified DNA was digested with restriction enzymes and ligated into the expression vector pET15b (Novagen), which contains an NH2-terminal His tag. The vector was transformed into BL21(DE3) cells (Novagen), the protein expressed by isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside (IPTG) induction, and purified using Ni2+-NTA resin (Qiagen). Two milligrams of the purified protein was separated on SDS-PAGE and visualized by cupric chloride staining (21). The acrylamide-embedded protein was used for antibody production. For SUEL/CRD (S/C), chicken antibodies were raised commercially (Cocalico, Reamstown, PA) and initially purified from egg yolks as described (22). Antibodies were further affinity-purified on an S/C-conjugated Affi-Gel-10 column (Bio-Rad). Anti-IH rabbit antibodies were raised commercially (Strategic BioSolutions, Ramona, CA) and affinity-purified on an IH-conjugated Affi-Gel-10 column. (Dr. Charles G. Glabe generously provided the peptide.)

Cys-Phe219-Ile-Asn-Leu-Thr-His-Gly-Gln-Trp-Ser-Trp-Arg-Asp-Cys-Glu-Asn-Arg235 was used to generate the R3p antibody. The peptide was attached to maleimide-activated keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Pierce) and rabbit antibodies raised commercially (Cocalico). The resulting R3p antibody was purified using the peptide conjugated to Sulfo-Link (Pierce).

Protein Preparation-- All procedures were on ice or at 4 °C. Sea urchins were spawned by injection with 0.5 M KCl, and the undiluted sperm was collected with a Pasteur pipette. The sperm was resuspended in 0.45 µm filtered seawater (FSW). Coelomocytes were removed by three 5-min centrifugations at 200 × g, and sperm cells were sedimented at 5,000 × g. For isolation of sperm heads and flagella, undiluted sperm was resuspended in 20 volumes of FSW containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.7 and 50 mM KCl to block the AR. Resuspended sperm were homogenized with a Teflon glass homogenizer to break flagella from heads. The flagella and heads were separated by differential centrifugation for 10 min (800 × g for heads and 5,000 × g for flagella). Separation procedures were repeated until the samples were maximally enriched for heads or flagella, as determined by phase contrast microscopy. Whole sperm, heads, and flagella were resuspended in membrane solubilization buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 2 µg/ml of leupeptin, and 1% Nonidet P-40, pH 7.4). For immunoprecipitation, 0.5% w/v of Zwittergent 3-10 was used instead of Nonidet P-40. Solubilized protein was obtained after centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 1 h (4 °C). Sperm membrane vesicles were made according to the pH 9 method (23).

For wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) chromatography, solubilized sperm protein was applied to a WGA-agarose column (EY Laboratories). The column was washed with wash buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM HEPES, 0.1% Nonidet P-40, pH 7.4), and the protein eluted in wash buffer containing 100 mM N-acetyl-D-glucosamine. SDS-PAGE was performed (24), and gels were stained with silver (25) or Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

For protein-N-glycosidase-F (PNGase-F) treatment of sperm protein, 40 µg of WGA eluate containing 0.5% SDS and 50 mM beta -mercaptoethanol was boiled for 5 min. Nonidet P-40 was added to 7.5%, followed by 2.4 µl of PNGase-F and 27.6 µl of distilled water. The sample was incubated overnight at 37 °C. Following deglycosylation, the sample was separated on SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF. Western blots were then performed using S/C and IH antibodies.

Immunoprecipitation-- 2-10 µg of affinity-purified IH antibody was incubated on ice overnight with 1 mg of Zwittergent 3-10 solubilized sperm protein in a total volume of 0.5 ml. Twenty microliters of prewashed Pansorbin (Calbiochem) was added, and the samples were rotated at 4 °C for 1 h. The Pansorbin was sedimented at 12,000 × g for 1 min. Supernatants were then removed, and the Pansorbin was washed three times (5 min each) with solubilization buffer. The samples were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer, separated on SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were probed with S/C and IH antibodies, followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Calbiochem). Membranes were detected with SuperSignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate (Pierce).

Immunolocalization-- Freshly spawned sperm were diluted 1:100 and incubated 10 min in FSW containing 3% paraformaldehyde and 0.1% glutaraldehyde. Fixed cells were washed three times for 10 min with phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4. Permeabilized sperm were incubated for 10 min in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.2% Nonidet P-40 and were then washed three times. Nonspecific sites were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 30 min, and were then incubated for 1 h with primary antibody in a blocking solution. This was followed by three 10-min washes, a 1-h incubation in Alexafluor 546 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes), and three additional washes.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

suREJ3 Is a Multidomain Protein-- The deduced amino acid sequence of suREJ3 reveals a 2,681-amino acid multidomain protein (Fig. 1). Based on Met-1 as the start site and following the 27-residue signal sequence, the presumed mature protein begins at Gly28. From the NH2 to COOH terminus, suREJ3 contains the following domains: an 84-residue sea urchin egg lectin domain (SUEL, Ref. 26), a 117-residue CRD (27), a 55-residue PKD repeat (5, 28), a 37-residue G-protein-coupled receptor proteolytic site (GPS, Ref. 29), TMS 1, a 124-polycystin/lipoxygenase/alpha-toxin domain (PLAT, Refs. 29 and 30), TMS 2-11, and a 44-residue putative cytoplasmic segment. The REJ module found in suREJ1 and polycystin-1 family members extends from Arg539 to Lys1476 (Fig. 1, vertical lines; 2). The extracellular portion of the 1,485 residues preceding TMS 1 contains 23 potential N-linked glycosylation sites, and the region between TMS 1 and 11 contains eight such sites (asterisks). suREJ3 contains several domains found in polycystin-1 and hPKDREJ, as well as domains unique to suREJ3 among the polycystin family members (Fig. 2).


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The 2,681-deduced amino acid sequence of suREJ3. Domains are highlighted in gray, with the exception of the REJ module, which is denoted by arrows (|right-arrowleft-arrow |) above the sequence. Names of domains appear at the beginning of the sequence. The putative cleavage site within the GPS domain (Leu1455) is labeled with an arrow (Down-arrow ). The underlined SUEL/CRD region denotes the bacterially expressed antigen for the S/C antibody. The line above 17 residues of the CRD shows the synthesized peptide antigen used for the R3p antibody. The underline between TMS 3 and 4 indicates the bacterially expressed antigen for the IH antibody. Asterisks (*) above the sequence indicate the Asn-linked glycosylation sites. Arrows (v v v v) above the sequence indicate two protein kinase A sites, both in the cytoplasmic loops. Putative transmembrane segments (TMS1-11) are bold in italics and labeled above the sequence. The GenBankTM accession number is AF422153.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   The domain structure of suREJ3, suREJ1, polycystin-1 and -2. The key defines each domain. TMS are numbered above suREJ3. suREJ3, polycystin-1, and PKDREJ are homologous to polycystin-2 in the region with the last 6 TMS.

The SUEL domain was originally described as a galactose-binding sea urchin egg lectin (26). SUEL domains are also found in fish eggs (31, 32), and latrophilins, members of the secretin family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs, Ref. 33). The SUEL domain of suREJ3 is 44-48% similar to the SUEL domain from the mammalian latrophilins. The suREJ3 CRD is a C-type lectin domain containing the six diagnostic Cys residues (27). Its specificity for carbohydrate binding is unknown. suREJ3 contains a region of 55 amino acids that have distant homology to 16 repeat sequences present in polycystin-1, called PKD repeats. A multiple sequence alignment with the 16 repeats from human polycystin-1 and suREJ3 shows 16-26% similarity; the human PKD repeats are 20-30% similar to each other. A random jumble analysis shows that the relationship is statistically significant. suREJ3, polycystin-1, and hPKDREJ all possess a REJ module of ~1000 amino acids of unknown function. suREJ3 contains a PLAT domain between TMS 1 and 2, which is also present in polycystin-1 and hPKDREJ. The PLAT domain is homologous to the NH2-terminal beta -barrel domain of lipoxygenases (34), enzymes that peroxidize lipids (35). Of the lipoxygenases, the suREJ3 domain is most closely related to the NH2-terminal domain of mammalian 5-lipoxygenase (48% similar).

suREJ3 Is Cleaved at the GPS Domain-- Prior to the first TMS is the GPS domain. This domain is present in several members of the secretin family of GPCRs, including latrophilins (33). Three members, latrophilin-1, hFlamingo-1, and CD97 are known to be proteolytically processed, with cleavage between the Leu and Thr residues of latrophilin-1 (Fig. 3, Refs. 36-39). If suREJ3 was cleaved at the GPS domain, the unglycosylated NH2 portion of 1,455 amino acids would be ~160 kDa and the COOH portion would be ~140 kDa. Sperm membrane proteins were solubilized in Nonidet P-40, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membrane. Immunoblots were then performed. An antibody to the S/C in the NH2-terminal region reacted with a single component at ~250 kDa, whereas the IH antibody to the internal loop between TMS 3 and 4 reacted with a single band at ~150 kDa (Fig. 4A). Digestion of the preparation with PNGase-F resulted in electrophoretic mobility shifts of the S/C-reacting band to ~180 kDa and the IH-reacting band to ~140 kDa (Fig. 4B). The most likely explanation for these results is that, like the GPCRs, suREJ3 is cleaved into approximately equal halves at the GPS domain, the NH2-terminal portion being heavily glycosylated. Association of the two halves of suREJ3 with each other was confirmed by immunoprecipitation of both proteins from Zwittergent 3-10 extracts of sperm using the IH antibody (Fig. 5). Like suREJ1, the NH2 terminus of suREJ3 can be partially removed from the membrane by incubating sperm in pH 9.2 FSW (23), whereas the COOH terminus is exclusively associated with the membrane fraction (Fig. 7). This indicates that the interaction between the NH2 and COOH termini is not because of disulfide bonds, but rather because the interaction is noncovalent.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Alignments of GPS domains. Dashes are included for alignment. Black boxes denote identity and gray boxes similarity. The arrow above the alignment indicates the GPS cleavage site. The GenBankTM accession numbers are as follows: suREJ3 (AF422153), human polycystin-1 (P98161), hPKDREJ (XP_010050), latrophilin-1 (T14324), human Flamingo-1 (AAG00080), and human CD97 (AAB36682).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Immunoblots with suREJ3 antibodies. A, immunoblot of Nonidet P-40 solubilized total sperm protein identifying the NH2 terminus (S/C) and COOH terminus (IH) of suREJ3. The relative molecular masses are shown on the right. B, immunoblots with S/C and IH antibodies after PNGase-F digestion of WGA eluate of Nonidet P-40 solubilized sperm protein (+, with enzyme; -, no enzyme). Five micrograms of protein were loaded per lane.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Both halves of suREJ3 remain associated in detergent extracts of sperm heads. IH antibody (+) was used for immunoprecipitation with 2 mg of Zwittergent 3-10 solubilized protein from isolated sperm heads. The washed Pansorbin containing the attached antibody/antigen complex was boiled in Laemmli sample buffer. The supernatant was separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membrane. The blots were probed with either the S/C or IH antibodies. Control immunoprecipitates with no IH antibody (-) did not bind either half of suREJ3.

suREJ3 Localizes to the Plasma Membrane Covering the Sperm Acrosomal Vesicle-- Immunofluorescence on whole sperm using Fab fragments of rabbit anti-R3p and rabbit anti-IH IgG show that both halves of suREJ3 co-localize exclusively to the acrosomal vesicle region of sperm (Fig. 6). Reaction with IH antibody occurred only after treatment of the fixed sperm with 0.2% Nonidet P-40, supporting the putative intracellular location of the IH antigen. The exclusive localization to sperm heads was supported by Western blots showing that suREJ3 antigens are present in sperm heads, but not sperm flagella (Fig. 7).


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Immunolocalization of the NH2- and COOH-terminal halves of suREJ3. Phase contrast images are shown on the left (A, C, and E), and immunofluorescent images on the right (B, D, and F). B, anti-R3p Fab; D, anti-IH IgG; and F, no primary antibody. White arrows indicate the same sperm. Both halves of suREJ3 localize exclusively over the acrosomal vesicle. The suREJ3 antigen is present as a collar around the acrosome. In thumb-squashed preparations, it sometimes appears as two dots of fluorescence, one on each side of the acrosomal vesicle, as in B.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Immunoblots of isolated sperm heads and flagella membrane fractions. Sperm heads and flagella were separated and resuspended in pH 9.2 FSW. The high pH causes the plasma membrane to bud off the cell component as tightly sealed vesicles (23). After removing the cellular debris by two 30-min centrifugations at 6,000 × g, the resulting supernatant was centrifuged at 200,000 × g for 1 h. The pellet-containing sperm membrane vesicles and the supernatant were separated on gels and transferred to PVDF membrane. Probing the blots with anti-S/C antibody showed that the NH2-terminal half of suREJ3 was in both the head supernatant (Hs) and head vesicle fraction (Hv). The flagellar fraction did not react with this antibody (Fs, Fv). The IH antibody to the COOH-terminal half of suREJ3 reacted only with the sperm head vesicle preparation (Hv). Five micrograms of protein were loaded per lane.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The extracellular portion of suREJ3 contains three domains: SUEL, CRD, and the PKD repeat, all of which indicate a role in extracellular matrix interactions. The SUEL domain and CRD suggest a lectin-like interaction with carbohydrates, presumably from the multicomponent egg extracellular matrix known as egg jelly (3). We do not know the identity of possible ligands binding these three domains. The SUEL domain was first identified as an alpha -D-galactose-specific lectin in eggs of the sea urchin A. crassispina (26). SUEL is a 105-amino acid protein that forms a homodimer that localizes to the egg cortex after fertilization. SUEL binding is calcium-independent and does not require reduction. The mammalian orphan GPCRs, known as latrophilins, also contain SUEL domains. Latrophilin-1 binds alpha -latrotoxin (black widow spider toxin) in a calcium-independent manner, resulting in massive exocytotic release of neurotransmitter (40). Comparison of rat and bovine latrophilins shows that the SUEL domain is the most conserved part of the protein, suggesting that it is important in latrophilin signaling (41). Although G-protein subunits have been found in sea urchin spermatozoa, there is no evidence that they are involved in triggering the AR (42).

The single CRD of suREJ3 has the diagnostic structure of a calcium-dependent lectin (27). suREJ1 has two NH2-terminal-located CRDs, which are only 50% identical to each other over an alignment of 120 residues (21). The single CRD of suREJ3 is 52% identical to CRD-1 of suREJ1 and 47% identical to the suREJ1 CRD-2. The sequences of these CRDs do not disclose their sugar binding specificity. suREJ3 has only one PKD repeat, whereas human polycystin-1 has 16. PKD repeats are not found in Lov-1, the Caenorhabditis elegans homolog of polycystin-1 (13, 14). The most likely explanation is that duplication of PKD repeats occurred in the evolution of the vertebrates on the way to mammals. NMR studies show the PKD repeat has a beta -sandwich fold, similar to the immunoglobulin fold, but it is evolutionarily unrelated to IgG molecules (28). The PKD repeats from polycystin-1 mediate both cis- (on the same cell) and trans- (cell-to-cell) calcium-dependent, homotypic interactions (43). The aforementioned data suggest that the single PKD repeat of suREJ3 could act in homotypic clustering of the protein in the acrosomal region.

The REJ module was originally described as a domain of 707 amino acids found in suREJ1 and human polycystin-1 (2). The addition of other polycystin-1 homologs to the data base showed that the REJ module was ~1,000 amino acids (7). This domain also occurs in the mammalian testis-specific PKDREJ. The GPS cleavage site is within this domain in suREJ3. The REJ module is not found in the secretin family of GPCRs, which have the GPS domain; therefore, possession of the REJ module is independent of possession of a GPS site. Because the GPS site is known to be extracellular, and PLAT is exclusively intracellular, the positions of these two domains support the topology presented herein for the TMS of suREJ3. Also, the IH antibody to the putative intracellular sequence between TMS 3 and 4 binds only to the acrosomal regions in sperm that have been detergent permeabilized.

Among the secretin family of GPCRs, latrophilins are unique in their relationship to suREJ3, because they contain both the SUEL and GPS domains. This report demonstrates that suREJ3 is cleaved and that the deglycosylated halves correspond to their predicted sizes based on cleavage at the GPS domain. Although we do not experimentally show the exact point of cleavage of suREJ3, based on work with other GPS-containing proteins, we believe that suREJ3 is cleaved at the consensus Leu-Thr site (Fig. 2). This is the first evidence that a polycystin-1-like protein is cleaved. The presence of this domain in suREJ1 may also explain the previous observation that 70% of suREJ1 can be removed from sperm by treatment with pH 9.2 seawater for 5 h (2). Whether mammalian polycystin-1 and hPKDREJ are also cleaved at the GPS domain remains to be demonstrated. The two halves of suREJ3, although associated in detergent extracts of sperm membranes (Fig. 5), are not as tenaciously associated as are the two halves of latrophilin-1. Unlike latrophilin-1, the two halves of suREJ3 dissociate in SDS-mercaptoethanol sample buffer without the addition of 8 M urea (39). Also, like suREJ1, the NH2-terminal half of suREJ3 can be partially removed from sperm by treatment with pH 9.2 seawater, showing that it is a peripheral component of the cell membrane. The relationship between suREJ3 and latrophilins and the location of suREJ3 over the acrosomal vesicle suggests that suREJ3 may regulate AR exocytosis. alpha -Latrotoxin does not induce the AR of sea urchin sperm (data not shown). This is not surprising, because black widow spider toxins show phylogenetic specificity (44). Also, recent work suggests that alpha -latrotoxin does not activate latrophilin-1 to cause exocytosis, but instead functions by tethering to latrophilin-1 and inserting itself into the membrane to form pores (45).

In addition to the location of suREJ1 and suREJ3 on the cell membrane covering the acrosomal vesicle, the exocytosis regulatory proteins, soluble NSF attachment protein (SNAP)-25, vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP), and syntaxin are all exclusive to the acrosomal region of sea urchin sperm (46, 47). Antibodies to suREJ1 induce the exocytotic AR of sea urchin sperm (2). However, neither the S/C and R3p antibodies made to the extracellular NH2-terminal half, nor the IH antibody made to the intracellular COOH-terminal half of suREJ3 induce the AR. suREJ1 is known to bind to the fucose sulfate polymer of egg jelly (2, 3). Two different isotypes of this polymer exist that differ in the placement of sulfate groups. Both are linear polymers of alpha -L-1,3-linked fucose with a molecular mass of approximately one million (4). We do not know if the fucose sulfate polymer, or other ligands in egg jelly, bind to suREJ3. The AR always requires the fucose sulfate polymer; however, oligosaccharide chains of egg jelly glycoproteins greatly enhance the fucose sulfate polymer-induced AR, suggesting that other sperm receptor proteins are involved in the inductive mechanism (48).2 Many scenarios are possible for the involvement of both suREJ1 and suREJ3 in the AR. They may represent redundant signaling pathways, or the two sea urchin sperm receptors could interact in the same pathway.

From the similarities of the proteins shown in Fig. 2, and the fact that polycystin-1 and -2 (11), polycystin-2L (10), and polycystin-2 from syncytiotrophoblast (12) form nonselective cation channels, it is valid to speculate that suREJ3 may form an ion channel or be a component of the regulatory apparatus of a channel. Both polycystin-2 and transient receptor potential channels (TRPCs) are excellent candidates for components of such a channel in the sperm AR. TRPCs were first described in Drosophila photoreception as store-operated cation channels (49). TRPC-1, a mammalian TRP homolog, associates with polycystin-2 through the COOH-terminal coiled-coil domain and also TMS regions (50). Mouse TRPC-2 has been shown to mediate the sustained increase in calcium associated with the sperm AR (51).

Unlike polycystin-1 and -2 (50, 52), sea urchin suREJ3, mammalian PKDREJ (15) and C. elegans Lov-1 (13) do not have a predicted coiled-coil domain in their COOH-terminal ends. Thus, these three proteins, which are all involved in male reproduction, might interact with proteins through other domains. Although clearly related to each other in their COOH-terminal halves, there is much less relationship among them in their NH2-terminal halves. Until the discovery of the sea urchin REJ proteins, the proteins associated with gamete recognition in sea urchins have been unrelated to known mammalian proteins. The smaller genomic size of the sea urchin (800 megabases) and the characteristic of fewer duplicated genes than found in mammals may make the sea urchin a more tractable model for discovering the pathways of signal transduction leading to the deuterostome sperm AR. Further study of suREJ3 may help clarify the function of polycystin-1 and its role in the genesis of polycystic kidney disease in humans, as well as contribute to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of sperm-egg interactions in both sea urchins and mammals.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank W. J. Swanson and J. R. Schulz for many important discussions.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HD12986.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF422153.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 858-534-2146; Fax: 858-534-7313; E-mail: kmengeri@ucsd.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 5, 2001,DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109673200

2 N. Hirohashi and V. D. Vacquier, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AR, acrosome reaction; CRD, carbohydrate recognition domain; FSW, filtered seawater; REJ, receptor for egg jelly; GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptor; GPS, G-protein-coupled receptor cleavage site; hPKDREJ, human PKDREJ; PLAT, polycystin/lipoxygenase/alpha-toxin; PKD, polycystic kidney disease; PNGase-F, protein-N-glycosidase-F; S/C, SUEL/CRD; SUEL, sea urchin egg lectin; suREJ, sea urchin receptor for egg jelly; TMS, transmembrane segment; TRPC, transient receptor potential channel; WGA, wheat germ agglutinin; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Darszon, A., Labarca, P., Nishigaki, T., and Espinosa, F. (1999) Physiol. Rev. 79, 481-510
2. Moy, G. W., Mendoza, L. M., Schulz, J. R., Swanson, W. J., Glabe, C. G., and Vacquier, V. D. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 133, 809-817
3. Vacquier, V. D., and Moy, G. W. (1997) Dev. Biol. 192, 125-135
4. Alves, A. P., Mulloy, B., Moy, G. W., Vacquier, V. D., and Mourão, P. A. (1998) Glycobiology 8, 939-946
5. Consortium, T. E. P. K. D. (1994) Cell 77, 881-894
6. Mochizuki, T., Wu, G., Hayashi, S., Xenophontos, S. L., Veldhuisen, B., Saris, J. J., Reynolds, D. M., Cai, Y., Gabow, P. A., Pierides, A., Kimberling, W. J., Breuning, M. H., Deltas, C. C., Peters, D. J. M., and Somlo, S. (1996) Science 272, 1339-1342
7. Sandford, R., Sgotto, B., Aparicio, S., Brenner, S., Vaudin, M., Wilson, R. K., Chissoe, S., Pepin, K., Bateman, A., Chothia, C., Hughes, J., and Harris, P. (1997) Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 1483-1489
8. Harris, P. C. (1999) Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 1861-1866
9. Calvet, J. P., and Grantham, J. J. (2001) Semin. Nephrol. 21, 107-123
10. Chen, X.-Z., Vassilev, P. M., Basora, N., Peng, J.-B., Nomura, H., Segal, Y., Brown, E. M., Reeders, S. T., Hediger, M. A., and Zhou, J. (1999) Nature 401, 383-386
11. Hanaoka, K., Qian, F., Boletta, A., Bhunia, A. K., Piontek, K., Tsiokas, L., Sukhatme, V. P., Guggino, W. B., and Germino, G. G. (2000) Nature 408, 990-994
12. González-Perret, S., Kim, K., Ibarra, C., Damiano, A. E., Zotta, E., Batelli, M., Harris, P. C., Reisin, I. L., Arnaout, M. A., and Cantiello, H. F. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 1182-1187
13. Barr, M. M., and Sternberg, P. W. (1999) Nature 401, 386-389
14. Barr, M. M., DeModena, J., Braun, D., Nguyen, C. Q., Hall, D. H., and Sternberg, P. W. (2001) Curr. Biol. 11, 1341-1346
15. Hughes, J., Ward, C. J., Aspinwall, R., Butler, R., and Harris, P. C. (1999) Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 543-549
16. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410
17. Nielsen, H., Engelbrecht, J., Brunak, S., and von Heijne, G. (1997) Protein Eng. 10, 1-6
18. Higgins, D. G., Thompson, J. D., and Gibson, T. J. (1996) Methods Enzymol. 266, 383-402
19. Nicholas, K. B., Nicholas, H. B., Jr., and Deerfield, D. W., II (1997) EMBNEW News 4, 14
20. Kyte, J., and Doolittle, R. F. (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 157, 105-132
21. Lee, C., Levin, A., and Branton, D. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 166, 308-312
22. Gassmann, M., Thömmes, P., Weiser, T., and Hübscher, U. (1990) FASEB J. 4, 2528-2532
23. Vacquier, V. D. (1986) Methods Cell Biol. 27, 15-40
24. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685
25. Morrissey, J. H. (1981) Anal. Biochem. 117, 307-310
26. Ozeki, Y., Matsui, T., Masami, S., and Titani, K. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 2391-2394
27. Drickamer, K. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 9557-9560
28. Bycroft, M., Bateman, A., Clarke, J., Hamill, S. J., Sandford, R., Thomas, R. L., and Chothia, C. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 297-308
29. Ponting, C. P., Hofmann, K., and Bork, P. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, R585-588
30. Bateman, A., and Sandford, R. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, R588-590
31. Tateno, H., Saneyoshi, A., Ogawa, T., Muramoto, K., Kamiya, H., and Saneyoshi, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 19190-19197
32. Hosono, M., Ishikawa, K., Mineki, R., Murayama, K., Numata, C., Ogawa, Y., Takayanagi, Y., and Nitta, K. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1472, 668-675
33. Bockaert, J., and Pin, J. P. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1723-1729
34. Gillmor, S. A., Villaseñor, A., Fletterick, R., Sigal, E., and Browner, M. F. (1997) Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 1003-1009
35. Kuhn, H., and Thiele, B. J. (1999) FEBS Lett. 449, 7-11
36. Usui, T., Shima, Y., Shimada, Y., Hirano, S., Burgess, R. W., Schwarz, T. L., Takeichi, M., and Uemura, T. (1999) Cell 98, 585-595
37. Gray, J. X., Haino, M., Roth, M. J., Maguire, J. E., Jensen, P. N., Yarme, A., Stetler-Stevenson, M. A., Siebenlist, U., and Kelly, K. (1996) J. Immunol. 157, 5438-5447
38. Sugita, S., Ichtchenko, K., Khvotchev, M., and Südhof, T. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32715-32724
39. Krasnoperov, V. G., Bittner, M. A., Beavis, R., Kuang, Y., Salnikow, K. V., Chepurny, O. G., Little, A. R., Plotnikov, A. N., Wu, D., Holz, R. W., and Petrenko, A. G. (1997) Neuron 18, 925-937
40. Davletov, B. A., Shamotienko, O. G., Lelianova, V. G., Grishin, E. V., and Ushkaryov, Y. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 23239-23245
41. Matsushita, H., Lelianova, V. G., and Ushkaryov, Y. A. (1999) FEBS Lett. 443, 348-352
42. Cuellar-Mata, P., Martinez-Cadena, G., Castellano, L. E., Aldana-Veloz, G., Novoa-Martinez, G., Vargas, I., Darszon, A., and Garcia-Soto, J. (1995) Dev. Growth Differ. 37, 173-181
43. Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya, O., Bukanov, N. O., Donohue, L. C., Dackowski, W. R., Klinger, K. W., and Landes, G. M. (2000) Hum. Mol. Genet. 9, 1641-1649
44. Schiavo, G., Matteoli, M., and Montecucco, C. (2000) Physiol. Rev. 80, 717-766
45. Hlubek, M. D., Stuenkel, E. L., Krasnoperov, V. G., Petrenko, A. G., and Holz, R. W. (2000) Mol. Pharmacol. 57, 519-528
46. Schulz, J. R., Wessel, G. M., and Vacquier, V. D. (1997) Dev. Biol. 191, 80-87
47. Schulz, J. R., Sasaki, J. D., and Vacquier, V. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 24355-24359
48. Keller, S. H., and Vacquier, V. D. (1994) Dev. Growth Differ. 36, 551-556
49. Montell, C. (1997) Mol. Pharmacol. 52, 755-763
50. Tsiokas, L., Arnould, T., Zhu, C., Kim, E., Walz, G., and Sukhatme, V. P. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3934-3939
51. Jungnickel, M. K., Marrero, H., Birnbaumer, L., Lémos, J. R., and Florman, H. M. (2001) Nat. Cell. Biol. 3, 499-502
52. Qian, F., Germino, F. J., Yiqiang, C., Zhang, X., Somlo, S., and Germino, G. G. (1997) Nat. Genet. 16, 179-183


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
Y. Harada, Y. Takagaki, M. Sunagawa, T. Saito, L. Yamada, H. Taniguchi, E. Shoguchi, and H. Sawada
Mechanism of Self-Sterility in a Hermaphroditic Chordate
Science, April 25, 2008; 320(5875): 548 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Wei, K. Hackmann, H. Xu, G. Germino, and F. Qian
Characterization of cis-Autoproteolysis of Polycystin-1, the Product of Human Polycystic Kidney Disease 1 Gene
J. Biol. Chem., July 27, 2007; 282(30): 21729 - 21737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. Darszon, J. J Acevedo, B. E Galindo, E. O Hernandez-Gonzalez, T. Nishigaki, C. L Trevino, C. Wood, and C. Beltran
Sperm channel diversity and functional multiplicity.
Reproduction, June 1, 2006; 131(6): 977 - 988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. O. Hernandez-Gonzalez, J. Sosnik, J. Edwards, J. J. Acevedo, I. Mendoza-Lujambio, I. Lopez-Gonzalez, I. Demarco, E. Wertheimer, A. Darszon, and P. E. Visconti
Sodium and Epithelial Sodium Channels Participate in the Regulation of the Capacitation-associated Hyperpolarization in Mouse Sperm
J. Biol. Chem., March 3, 2006; 281(9): 5623 - 5633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. A. Mah, W. J. Swanson, and V. D. Vacquier
Positive Selection in the Carbohydrate Recognition Domains of Sea Urchin Sperm Receptor for Egg Jelly (suREJ) Proteins
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2005; 22(3): 533 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H.-H. Lin, G.-W. Chang, J. Q. Davies, M. Stacey, J. Harris, and S. Gordon
Autocatalytic Cleavage of the EMR2 Receptor Occurs at a Conserved G Protein-coupled Receptor Proteolytic Site Motif
J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31823 - 31832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
H. F. Cantiello
Regulation of calcium signaling by polycystin-2
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): F1012 - F1029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. T Neill and V. D Vacquier
Ligands and receptors mediating signal transduction in sea urchin spermatozoa
Reproduction, February 1, 2004; 127(2): 141 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Schultz, F. K. Hamra, and D. L. Garbers
A multitude of genes expressed solely in meiotic or postmeiotic spermatogenic cells offers a myriad of contraceptive targets
PNAS, October 14, 2003; 100(21): 12201 - 12206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GlycobiologyHome page
O. Berteau and B. Mulloy
Sulfated fucans, fresh perspectives: structures, functions, and biological properties of sulfated fucans and an overview of enzymes active toward this class of polysaccharide
Glycobiology, June 1, 2003; 13(6): 29R - 40R.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. C. Hogan, M. D. Griffin, S. Rossetti, V. E. Torres, C. J. Ward, and P. C. Harris
PKHDL1, a homolog of the autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease gene, encodes a receptor with inducible T lymphocyte expression
Hum. Mol. Genet., March 15, 2003; 12(6): 685 - 698.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. Qian, A. Boletta, A. K. Bhunia, H. Xu, L. Liu, A. K. Ahrabi, T. J. Watnick, F. Zhou, and G. G. Germino
Cleavage of polycystin-1 requires the receptor for egg jelly domain and is disrupted by human autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease 1-associated mutations
PNAS, December 24, 2002; 99(26): 16981 - 16986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. J. Mengerink and V. D. Vacquier
An ATP-binding Cassette Transporter Is a Major Glycoprotein of Sea Urchin Sperm Membranes
J. Biol. Chem., October 18, 2002; 277(43): 40729 - 40734.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. Igarashi and S. Somlo
Genetics and Pathogenesis of Polycystic Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2002; 13(9): 2384 - 2398.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Abe, T. Fukuzawa, and S. Hirose
Cleavage of Ig-Hepta at a "SEA" Module and at a Conserved G Protein-coupled Receptor Proteolytic Site
J. Biol. Chem., June 21, 2002; 277(26): 23391 - 23398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Hirohashi and V. D. Vacquier
Egg Sialoglycans Increase Intracellular pH and Potentiate the Acrosome Reaction of Sea Urchin Sperm
J. Biol. Chem., March 1, 2002; 277(10): 8041 - 8047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/2/943    most recent
M109673200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited