![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 17381-17384, May 17, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,
, andFrom the Joslin Diabetes Center & Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Received for publication, January 17, 2002, and in revised form, March 4, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The nuclear lamins form a two-dimensional
matrix that provides integrity to the cell nucleus and participates in
nuclear activities. Mutations in the region of human LMNA
encoding the carboxyl-terminal tail Lamin A/C are associated with
forms of muscular dystrophy and familial partial lipodystrophy
(FPLD). To help discriminate tissue-specific phenotypes, we
have solved at 1.4-Å resolution the three-dimensional crystal
structure of the lamin A/C globular tail. The domain adopts a novel,
all Interest in the nuclear envelope has intensified with the recent
discovery that human diseases are linked to mutations in genes encoding
components of the nuclear lamina (1-3). Emery-Dreifuss muscular
dystrophy (EDMD)1 was the
first disease found to be caused by a specific defect in the nuclear
envelope (4, 5). The X-linked form of EDMD was mapped to the
Emd gene that encodes the protein now known as emerin (4).
An autosomal dominant form of EDMD was subsequently mapped to the
Lmna gene that encodes the A-type lamins (6). Two additional
myopathies have been mapped to the Lmna locus, limb-girdle
muscular dystrophy with atrio-ventricular conduction disturbances
(LGMD) (7) and dilated cardiomyopathy with conduction system defects
(DCM-CD) (8). EDMD, LGMD, and DCM-CD were originally described as
distinct syndromes, although considerable overlap had been recognized
(9, 10). Clinical variability consistent with all three diagnoses can
even be seen within family members carrying the same mutant
Lmna allele (10), suggesting that the myopathies associated
with Lmna mutations represent a clinical spectrum rather
than distinct disorders.
Dunnigan-type familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD), on the other hand,
represents a distinct clinical disorder that also maps to the
Lmna gene (11, 12). Like the myopathies, FPLD is
tissue-specific, but adipose tissue is affected as opposed to muscle. A
loss of subcutaneous fat in the torso and extremities begins around
puberty. Fat may accumulate instead in the face and neck. Systemic
manifestations of FPLD include hypertriglyceridemia and
hyperinsulinemia associated with a syndrome of severe insulin resistance. Patients with FPLD do not have skeletal muscle or cardiac
findings associated with the hereditary myopathies. Conversely, patients with EDMD, LGMD, or DCM-CD have normal fat distribution and
insulin sensitivity, raising the intriguing question of how specific
mutations in Lmna lead to clinically distinct phenotypes that affect either muscle or fat, but not both.
Lamins A and C are encoded by Lmna (13), whereas lamins B1
and B2 are encoded by distinct genes, Lmnb1 and
Lmnb2. The lamins form the nuclear lamina, a protein
meshwork that lines the inner leaflet of the nuclear membrane thus
maintaining the structural integrity of the nucleus. Lamins also
apparently bind chromatin-associated histones and additional nuclear
proteins such as emerin (14, 15). A central Frameshift and nonsense mutations in Lmna cause muscular
dystrophy. These are severe mutations in terms of encoded protein function. Similarly, Lmna Protein Production and Crystallization--
DNA encoding human
lamin A/C residues 436-552 was subcloned into a pET28a vector
(Novagen) using NdeI and EcoRI sites. Protein was
expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) (Novagen) using LB or synthetic medium containing L-selenomethionine (SeMet)
and isolated from bacterial lysates using cobalt affinity media. The His6 affinity tag was removed with thrombin, and the
protein was further purified by ion exchange chromatography (Mono Q
FPLC). Crystals were obtained at room temperature by the vapor
diffusion method in drops suspended over 0.5 ml of crystallization
buffer (25% polyethylene glycol 4000, 0.2 M
ammonium acetate, 10 mM DTT, 0.1 M Tris-HCl,
(pH 8.5)). The hanging drops contained 1 µl of protein (20 mg/ml in 5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.1 M NaCl, 10 mM DTT) mixed with 1 µl of crystallization buffer.
Data Collection and Structure Refinement--
Crystals were
transferred to a crystallization buffer containing 25% glycerol prior
to cryogenic data (100 K) collection at National Synchrotron Light
Source beamlines X25 and X12C. HKL Suite (19) was used to integrate and
scale the data. The program SOLVE (20) was used to identify the two
selenium atoms, and MLPHARE and DM (21) were used to generate a
preliminary electron density map. The overall figure of merit of the
MAD phases was 0.63; the initial electron density map calculated using
the MAD phases was interpretable. A final model, including lamin
residues 436 through 544, 4 amino-terminal vector-derived residues, and 107 water molecules, was built using the program O (22) and the
refinement package CNS (23).
Domain Architecture and Structural Homology--
Alignments of the
available amino acid sequences for vertebrate and invertebrate lamins
revealed two regions of high homology connected by a variable length
spacer. Algorithms for predicting protein secondary structure indicated
that the homology domains are ordered, while the spacer, which contains
the nuclear localization signal, is predicted to be disordered. The
first homology domain corresponds to the coiled coil rod domain common
to all IF proteins. The second domain located toward the carboxyl
termini of the lamin sequences is not found in cytoplasmic IFs. The
second homology domain contains the known FPLD mutations as well as
several mutations associated with EDMD and LGMD (Fig.
1), so we targeted this domain for
structural analysis.
Recombinant protein corresponding to human lamin A/C residues 436-552
was crystallized (P212121 crystal form; unit
cell: a = 26.4, b = 52.6, c = 67.4 Å), and the structure was solved at 1.4-Å resolution by MAD methods
(Table I). The final model is based on 18,892 reflections using
30-1.4-Å resolution data. The model contains 878 non-hydrogen protein
atoms and 107 solvent molecules per asymmetric unit and has an R-factor
of 21.6% and an Rfree of 23.8%. The temperature
B-factor is 16.0 Å2, and the root mean square
deviations for bond length and bond angle are 0.0056 Å and 1.41°, respectively.
The structure of the globular tail of lamin A/C reveals a compact, well
defined domain composed entirely of
The two sheets of the
Although different classes within the Ig domain family share very low
(<10%) sequence identity, certain residues that contribute to the
domain core have conserved function. Residue c3 (third position in Potential Function of the Ig Domain--
Although biological roles
of the nuclear lamins are understood, including the maintenance of
nuclear integrity, specific molecular functions of the
carboxyl-terminal domain are unknown. Ig domains in general may serve
either as structural scaffolds or they may mediate specific
intermolecular interactions with other proteins, DNA, or phospholipids.
As scaffolds, a series of Ig domains often serve as building blocks,
with one of the domains having intermolecular binding properties and
the others interacting with adjacent domains. For example
immunoglobulins are composed of paired heavy and light chains having
four or two Ig domains each (27). The terminal (variable) Ig domains in
each chain mediate antigen binding, while the remaining four (constant)
domains in each half-antibody are structural. Analogous clusters of Ig
domains comprise the extracellular domains of B and T cell receptors
and major histocompatibility complex proteins, growth factor and
cytokine receptors, and numerous cell adhesion molecules, where they
are often called fibronectin repeats. To predict potential sites of
interaction with the lamin Ig-like domain, we have analyzed the
surfaces of many Ig domains that mediate protein-protein interactions
and found that virtually any surface might be involved.
We have similarly analyzed Ig domains that bind DNA in the selected
group of transcription factors that includes NF-
Phospholipid-binding C2 domains, which regulate catalytic
activity and subcellular localization, for example in the PKC enzymes (28), are structurally related to Ig domains. Acidic residues from the
bc and fg loops at the top of the PKC- Disease Mutations in the Lamin Tail Domain--
Over 50 distinct
mutations and polymorphisms have been identified in the lmna
gene (6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 29-31). Six leading to frameshifts and early
termination are associated with the hereditary myopathies, as are the
22 missense mutations encoding substitutions in the coiled coil domain
(Fig. 1). We thus surmise that null mutations and severe
loss-of-function leads to muscular dystrophy. By contrast, of 15 missense mutations encoding substitutions within the globular Ig domain
(Figs. 1 and 3A), 9 occur in
families with muscular dystrophy (EDMD or LGMD) and 8 are in families
with FPLD (two distinct mutations encode the K486N substitution). Most of the muscular dystrophy mutations in the Ig domain affect core residues that are likely to be necessary for maintenance of proper folding and protein stability. The N456I, N456K, I469T, Y481H, W520S,
T528K, and L530P substitutions are predicted to perturb stable folding
of the domain and potentially diminish protein stability. The remaining
two EDMD mutations substitute arginine residues present at opposite
surfaces of the domain. R453 is in the b strand, with its side chain
ion paired with the carboxylate side chains from Glu443 and
Glu444 in the a strand. Along with Asp446,
Glu447, and Glu448, these five acidic residues
form an electrostatic patch on the surface of the domain.
Arg527 is on the opposite surface of the domain in the f
strand. The guanidinium group of its side chain forms a bipartite salt
bridge with the two carboxylate oxygen atoms from the side chain of
Glu537. The R453W and R527P substitutions would disrupt
these salt bridges on the domain surface and perturb local structure in
addition to having more general effects on global structure.
The three residues that are mutated in patients with FPLD cluster
within a discrete corner of the domain (Fig. 3, A and
B). Gly465 is in the b'c loop and
Lys486 is in the dd' loop. These two short loops run
antiparallel to one another and are fixed at either end by associated
antiparallel Conclusion--
Specific mutations in the tail domain of human
lamin A/C are associated either with muscular dystrophy or
lipodystrophy. The crystal structure of this domain reveals that the
mutations segregate; substitutions encoded by muscular dystrophy
mutations are usually in the protein core and most likely perturb
protein stability, whereas substitutions encoded by lipodystrophy
mutations are localized to a discrete corner of the domain which may
mediate an intermolecular interaction.
immunoglobulin-like fold. FPLD-associated mutations cluster
within a small surface, whereas muscular dystrophy-associated mutations
are distributed throughout the protein core and on its surface. These
findings distinguish myopathy- and lipodystrophy-associated mutations
and provide a structural framework for further testing hypotheses
concerning lamin function.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
helical rod domain in
the lamins has high homology with the intermediate filament (IF)
proteins, including the keratins, vimentin, and desmin. All other IFs
are cytoplasmic, whereas lamins are restricted to the nucleus. The
lamin and other IF protomers dimerize into coiled coils (via their
central rod domains) that further assemble into larger filaments (16).
The intertwining of lamin filaments and their carboxyl-terminal
segments distinguish them from other IFs. The carboxyl-terminal regions
appear by transmission electron microscopy to form globular domains
(16).
/
mice exhibit a muscular
dystrophy-like syndrome associated with retarded growth and early death
(17), whereas adipose tissue, insulin sensitivity, and lipid profiles in Lmna
/
mice are nearly normal (18). Thus null alleles
and severe loss-of-function appear to affect muscle rather than fat. Missense mutations occurring throughout the coiled coil domain are
associated as well with the inherited myopathies and not FPLD (Fig
1A). These are likely to prevent dimerization and higher order assembly of lamin filaments, so that in terms of function these
too are severe. In contrast, specific missense mutations in the
carboxyl-terminal domain of lamin A/C may be associated either with
inherited myopathy or FPLD, but not both. Since the biological
functions of the carboxyl-terminal domain are unknown, understanding
the effects that substitutions have on function has been particularly
difficult to divine. We have solved the three-dimensional structure of
the globular tail domain of lamin A/C to provide a framework for
determining how certain missense mutations cause muscular dystrophy
while others cause lipodystrophy.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Data and refinement statistics
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (76K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of lamin C and
structure-based sequence alignment of its globular tail with other
metazoan lamins. A, helical rod (coiled coil) and
globular tail domains are colored green and red,
respectively. Missense mutations associated with EDMD,
LGMD, and *DCM-CD mutations are labeled above the
schematic; FPLD mutations are labeled below. B, lamin
sequences were aligned using the program NPS@ (32).
strands are
colored green, red, or gray according
the
sheet in which they are found (Fig. 2A). Lamin
sequences shown are from Xenopus laevis (frog),
Danio rerio (fish), Drosophila
melanogaster (fly), and Caenorhabditis elegans (worm).
Substitutions due to disease mutations are displayed above the aligned
sequences in black (FPLD) or red (EDMD,
LGMD).
strands (Fig. 2a). Two large
sheets form
a
sandwich. One sheet has five
strands and the other has four.
A second, smaller
sheet lies perpendicular and adjacent to the
plane of the
sandwich. Listed sequentially,
strands a, b, and e
form one sheet and strands c, d, f, and g form the other. Short loops
connect most of the
strands, lending to the compact appearance of
the domain. This type of
sandwich is referred to as an
immunoglobulin (Ig) domain, a common protein structural unit (24, 25).
We have followed the convention of labeling
strands in Ig domains
according to linear position (Figs. 1 and 2); intervening loops are
named according to flanking strands (e.g. ab, e'f, etc.).
Ig-like domains have a common core of six
strands: a, b, and e in
one
sheet and c, f, and g in the other (Fig. 2b).
Ig-like domains have been further categorized into four groups
according to the presence of ancillary
strands and the connections
between them (Fig. 2b) (25, 26). Because it is different
from the previously defined subtypes, the lamin A/C tail represents the
prototype for a new class of Ig-related domain, which we refer to as
the lamin or L subtype.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Structure of the lamin A/C tail.
a, ribbon (33) diagram reveals an Ig domain fold,
with
strands colored and labeled as in Fig. 1. b,
two-dimensional topology diagrams of hydrogen bonding patterns observed
in Ig domain classes.
strands a, b, c, e, f, and g (colored
gray) are common to all Ig-like domains. Connectivity between the
strands and the presence of accessory strands distinguishes Ig domain
subtypes.
sandwich in lamin A/C are closely associated.
Water is excluded from the densely packed core, which is formed by
residues from
strands a (Val440, Val442,
Val445), b (Val452, Leu454,
Asn456), b' (Gln462, Met464), c
(Trp467, Ile469, Arg471,
Asn473), d (Leu479, Tyr481,
Phe483), d' (Phe487, Leu489), e
(Val495, Ile497, Ala499), e'
(Leu512, Trp514), f (Leu526,
Thr528, Leu530), and g (Val538,
Ala539, Arg541, Leu543) as well as
the dd' (Pro484) and e'f (Gln517,
Trp520) loops. The longest interstrand loop (e'f) wraps
around the domain and fills the cleft where the
sheets meet. It is
anchored by Trp520, whose side chain is completely buried
in the domain core. Two grooves are present on the domain surface,
which we speculate might serve as potential sites for intermolecular
recognition. The larger groove lies between
strands d and e' and
has aromatic residues Tyr481, Phe483,
Phe487, Trp514, and Trp520 at its
base. In our crystal structure, the ee' loop of an adjacent molecule is
inserted into this groove, supporting potential roles for the groove or
the ee' loop in intermolecular interactions. A smaller cleft bordered
by the loop preceding strand a and the fg and bb' loops has residues
Gln462, Trp467, and Val538 at its base.
strand c) is invariably hydrophobic, while residues a3, b1, e5, and f5
are hydrophobic in most cases (26). All of these residues in lamin A/C
are hydrophobic: c3 = Ile469; a3 = Val442; b1 = Phe451; e5 = Ile497; f5 = Leu530.
B, NFAT, p53, and
the SH2 domain-containing STAT proteins. In each of these cases,
residues on elongated ab and ef loops at the base of the Ig domain
contact DNA. These loops are longer than their counterparts in lamin
and, as is typical of DNA-binding proteins, Arg, Lys, and Gln residues
form critical hydrogen bonds with DNA. The short ab loop in lamin forms
a type I
turn, with glutamic acid residues at its second and third
positions. While the e'f loop is longer, containing 11 residues, it
caps the domain base, its length is just sufficient to connect the e'
and f strands, and it lacks residues necessary for binding DNA.
The lamin Ig domain cannot bind DNA by the mechanism common to these
transcription factors.
C2 domain chelate a pair of
calcium ions. Phosphatidylserine binds residues in this vicinity and
buries one of the calcium atoms. The acidic residues in the
corresponding bc and fg loops of the lamin domain are not properly
oriented either for calcium chelation or phosphatidylserine binding.
Therefore, while our structure provides a powerful starting point, the
identification of the relevant physiological partners will be required
before more detailed analyses can be used to map the involved surfaces.

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Stereoimages of disease-associated
substitutions. A, residues that are substituted in EDMD
and LGMD, colored red, either contribute to the domain core
(Asn456, Ile469, Tyr481,
Trp520, Thr528, and Leu530) or sit
on opposite surfaces of the domains (Arg453,
Arg527). Residues that are substituted in patients with
FPLD, colored yellow, map to a distinct corner on the domain
surface. B, expanded view of the b'c and dd' loops and
flanking strands. Oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur atoms are colored
red, blue, and violet, respectively,
and carbon atoms of unsubstituted residues are green. Carbon
atoms of residues substituted in FPLD are colored yellow,
whereas those that are substituted in EDMD or LGMD are colored
red.
strands (the antiparallel sheets are formed by strands
b' and d' at one end and strands c and d at the other end). The MGNW sequence encompassing Gly465 forms a type I
turn.
Substitution of Gly465 would destabilize the turn and an L
amino acid side chain, as occurs in the G465D substitution, would clash
with the dd' backbone in the vicinity of Lys486, which is 4 Å away. Solvent-exposed Lys486, along with the two
preceding prolines, forms a sharp turn. Substitutions with asparagine
or threonine, which cause FPLD, are not expected to disrupt either the
turn or the domain fold. It is possible that Lys486
participates in an intermolecular interaction. The final residue that
is mutated in FPLD, Arg482, is at the carboxyl terminus of
the d strand. The
carbon of Arg482 is about 10 Å away
from the
carbons of Gly465 and Lys486, such
that these three residues circumscribe a small triangle on the domain
surface. The Arg482 side chain similarly extends into
surrounding solvent without interacting with neighboring residues. FPLD
mutations substitute Arg482 with Trp, Gln, Leu, or Gly,
suggesting that here too a basic side chain is required. Thus
substitution of either Arg482 or Lys486 would
likely prevent an intermolecular interaction due to loss of a basic
side chain, rather than perturbing structure. Substitution of
Gly465 would likely perturb the local environment of these
basic residues. In contradistinction, most muscular dystrophy mutations
are predicted to perturb core structure.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank R. Hegele and R. Trembath for helpful discussions and R. Sweet and the staff of beamlines X25 and X12C at the National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National Laboratory, for valuable assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 DK43123.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1IFR) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
Both authors supported by Mary K. Iacocca Fellowships.
§ Supported by National Institutes of Health Fellowship DK09393.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Joslin Diabetes Center, One Joslin Place, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail: Steven. Shoelson@joslin.harvard.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 18, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C200038200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: EDMD, Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy; LGMD, limb-girdle muscular dystrophy; DCM-CD, dilated cardiomyopathy and conduction system defect; FPLD, Dunnigan-type familial partial lipodystrophy; IF, intermediate filament; SeMet, L-selenomethionine; DTT, dithiothreitol; MAD, multiple wavelength anomalous dispersion; PKC, protein kinase C.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Worman, H. J.,
and Courvalin, J. C.
(2000)
J. Membr. Biol.
177,
1-11[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Wilson, K. L.,
Zastrow, M. S.,
and Lee, K. K.
(2001)
Cell
104,
647-650[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Burke, B.,
Mounkes, L. C.,
and Stewart, C.
(2001)
Traffic
2,
675-683[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Bione, S.,
Maestrini, E.,
Rivella, S.,
Mancini, M.,
Regis, S.,
Romeo, G.,
and Toniolo, D.
(1994)
Nat. Genet.
8,
323-327[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Manilal, S.,
Nguyen, T. M.,
Sewry, C. A.,
and Morris, G. E.
(1996)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
5,
801-808 |
| 6. |
Bonne, G., Di,
Barletta, M. R.,
Varnous, S.,
Becane, H. M.,
Hammouda, E. H.,
Merlini, L.,
Muntoni, F.,
Greenberg, C. R.,
Gary, F.,
Urtizberea, J. A.,
Duboc, D.,
Fardeau, M.,
Toniolo, D.,
and Schwartz, K.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
21,
285-288[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Muchir, A.,
Bonne, G.,
van der Kooi, A. J.,
van Meegen, M.,
Baas, F.,
Bolhuis, P. A.,
de Visser, M.,
and Schwartz, K.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
1453-1459 |
| 8. |
Fatkin, D.,
MacRae, C.,
Sasaki, T.,
Wolff, M. R.,
Porcu, M.,
Frenneaux, M.,
Atherton, J.,
Vidaillet, H. J., Jr.,
Spudich, S., De,
Girolami, U.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Seidman, C.,
Muntoni, F.,
Muehle, G.,
Johnson, W.,
and McDonough, B.
(1999)
N. Engl. J. Med.
341,
1715-1724 |
| 9. |
Bonne, G.,
Mercuri, E.,
Muchir, A.,
Urtizberea, A.,
Becane, H. M.,
Recan, D.,
Merlini, L.,
Wehnert, M.,
Boor, R.,
Reuner, U.,
Vorgerd, M.,
Wicklein, E. M.,
Eymard, B.,
Duboc, D.,
Penisson-Besnier, I.,
Cuisset, J. M.,
Ferrer, X.,
Desguerre, I.,
Lacombe, D.,
Bushby, K.,
Pollitt, C.,
Toniolo, D.,
Fardeau, M.,
Schwartz, K.,
and Muntoni, F.
(2000)
Ann. Neurol.
48,
170-180[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Brodsky, G. L.,
Muntoni, F.,
Miocic, S.,
Sinagra, G.,
Sewry, C.,
and Mestroni, L.
(2000)
Circulation
101,
473-476[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Cao, H.,
and Hegele, R. A.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
109-112 |
| 12. |
Shackleton, S.,
Lloyd, D. J.,
Jackson, S. N.,
Evans, R.,
Niermeijer, M. F.,
Singh, B. M.,
Schmidt, H.,
Brabant, G.,
Kumar, S.,
Durrington, P. N.,
Gregory, S.,
O'Rahilly, S.,
and Trembath, R. C.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
24,
153-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Lin, F.,
and Worman, H. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
16321-16326 |
| 14. |
Goldberg, M.,
Harel, A.,
Brandeis, M.,
Rechsteiner, T.,
Richmond, T. J.,
Weiss, A. M.,
and Gruenbaum, Y.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
2852-2857 |
| 15. |
Clements, L.,
Manilal, S.,
Love, D. R.,
and Morris, G. E.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
267,
709-714[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Stuurman, N.,
Heins, S.,
and Aebi, U.
(1998)
J. Struct. Biol.
122,
42-66[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Sullivan, T.,
Escalante-Alcalde, D.,
Bhatt, H.,
Anver, M.,
Bhat, N.,
Nagashima, K.,
Stewart, C. L.,
and Burke, B.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
913-920 |
| 18. |
Cutler, D. A.,
Sullivan, T.,
Marcus-Samuels, B.,
Stewart, C. L.,
and Reitman, M. L.
(2002)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
291,
522-527[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Otwinowski, Z.,
and Minor, W.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
276,
307-326 |
| 20. |
Terwilliger, T. C.,
and Berendzen, J.
(1999)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
55,
849-861[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Collaborative Computational Project 4.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr.
50,
760-776[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Jones, T. A.,
Zou, J. Y.,
Cowan, S. W.,
and Kjeldgaard, M.
(1991)
Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A
47,
110-119[CrossRef] |
| 23. | Brunger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., Delano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J.-S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998) Acta Crystallograph. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Williams, A. F.,
and Barclay, A. N.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
6,
381-405[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Bork, P.,
Holm, L.,
and Sander, C.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
242,
309-320[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Halaby, D. M.,
Poupon, A.,
and Mornon, J.
(1999)
Protein Eng.
12,
563-571 |
| 27. |
Amzel, L. M.,
and Poljak, R. J.
(1979)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
48,
961-997[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Verdaguer, N.,
Corbalan-Garcia, S.,
Ochoa, W. F.,
Fita, I.,
and Gomez- Fernandez, J. C.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
6329-6338[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Speckman, R. A.,
Garg, A., Du, F.,
Bennett, L.,
Veile, R.,
Arioglu, E.,
Taylor, S. I.,
Lovett, M.,
and Bowcock, A. M.
(2000)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
66,
1192-1198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Di Barletta, R.,
Ricci, E.,
Galluzzi, G.,
Tonali, P.,
Mora, M.,
Morandi, L.,
Romorini, A.,
Voit, T.,
Orstavik, K. H.,
Merlini, L.,
Trevisan, C.,
Biancalana, V.,
Housmanowa-Petrusewicz, I.,
Bione, S.,
Ricotti, R.,
Schwartz, K.,
Bonne, G.,
and Toniolo, D.
(2000)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
66,
1407-1412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Brown, C. A.,
Lanning, R. W.,
McKinney, K. Q.,
Salvino, A. R.,
Cherniske, E.,
Crowe, C. A.,
Darras, B. T.,
Gominak, S.,
Greenberg, C. R.,
Grosmann, C.,
Heydemann, P.,
Mendell, J. R.,
Pober, B. R.,
Sasaki, T.,
Shapiro, F.,
Simpson, D. A.,
Suchowersky, O.,
and Spence, J. E.
(2001)
Am. J. Med. Genet.
102,
359-367[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Combet, C.,
Blanchet, C.,
Geourjon, C.,
and Deleage, G.
(2000)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
25,
147-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Carson, M. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 958-961[CrossRef] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. K. Shumaker, L. Solimando, K. Sengupta, T. Shimi, S. A. Adam, A. Grunwald, S. V. Strelkov, U. Aebi, M. C. Cardoso, and R. D. Goldman The highly conserved nuclear lamin Ig-fold binds to PCNA: its role in DNA replication J. Cell Biol., April 16, 2008; 181(2): 269 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Dechat, K. Pfleghaar, K. Sengupta, T. Shimi, D. K. Shumaker, L. Solimando, and R. D. Goldman Nuclear lamins: major factors in the structural organization and function of the nucleus and chromatin Genes & Dev., April 1, 2008; 22(7): 832 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Adam, K. Sengupta, and R. D. Goldman Regulation of Nuclear Lamin Polymerization by Importin {alpha} J. Biol. Chem., March 28, 2008; 283(13): 8462 - 8468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Benedetti, I. Menditto, M. Degano, C. Rodolico, L. Merlini, A. D'Amico, L. Palmucci, A. Berardinelli, E. Pegoraro, C. P. Trevisan, et al. Phenotypic clustering of lamin A/C mutations in neuromuscular patients Neurology, September 18, 2007; 69(12): 1285 - 1292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Spuler, T. Kalbhenn, J. Zabojszcza, F.K.H. van Landeghem, A. Ludtke, K. Wenzel, M. Koehnlein, M. Schuelke, L. Ludemann, and H. H. Schmidt Muscle and nerve pathology in Dunnigan familial partial lipodystrophy Neurology, February 27, 2007; 68(9): 677 - 683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L.R.M. Verstraeten, J. L.V. Broers, M. A.M. van Steensel, S. Zinn-Justin, F. C.S. Ramaekers, P. M. Steijlen, M. Kamps, H. J.H. Kuijpers, D. Merckx, H. J.M. Smeets, et al. Compound heterozygosity for mutations in LMNA causes a progeria syndrome without prelamin A accumulation Hum. Mol. Genet., August 15, 2006; 15(16): 2509 - 2522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. V. Broers, F. C. S. Ramaekers, G. Bonne, R. B. Yaou, and C. J. Hutchison Nuclear lamins: laminopathies and their role in premature ageing. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 967 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Manju, B. Muralikrishna, and V. K Parnaik Expression of disease-causing lamin A mutants impairs the formation of DNA repair foci J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2006; 119(13): 2704 - 2714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Boguslavsky, C. L. Stewart, and H. J. Worman Nuclear lamin A inhibits adipocyte differentiation: implications for Dunnigan-type familial partial lipodystrophy Hum. Mol. Genet., February 15, 2006; 15(4): 653 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Zastrow, D. B. Flaherty, G. M. Benian, and K. L. Wilson Nuclear Titin interacts with A- and B-type lamins in vitro and in vivo J. Cell Sci., January 15, 2006; 119(2): 239 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Young, L. G. Fong, and S. Michaelis Thematic Review Series: Lipid Posttranslational Modifications. Prelamin A, Zmpste24, misshapen cell nuclei, and progeria--new evidence suggesting that protein farnesylation could be important for disease pathogenesis J. Lipid Res., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 2531 - 2558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Bao, W. Zhang, R. Krencik, H. Deng, Y. Wang, J. Girton, J. Johansen, and K. M. Johansen The JIL-1 kinase interacts with lamin Dm0 and regulates nuclear lamina morphology of Drosophila nurse cells J. Cell Sci., November 1, 2005; 118(21): 5079 - 5087. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Shumaker, R. I. Lopez-Soler, S. A. Adam, H. Herrmann, R. D. Moir, T. P. Spann, and R. D. Goldman Functions and dysfunctions of the nuclear lamin Ig-fold domain in nuclear assembly, growth, and Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy PNAS, October 25, 2005; 102(43): 15494 - 15499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Garg, O. Cogulu, F. Ozkinay, H. Onay, and A. K. Agarwal A Novel Homozygous Ala529Val LMNA Mutation in Turkish Patients with Mandibuloacral Dysplasia J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5259 - 5264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Prufert, A. Vogel, and G. Krohne The lamin CxxM motif promotes nuclear membrane growth J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2004; 117(25): 6105 - 6116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Omary, P. A. Coulombe, and W.H. I. McLean Intermediate Filament Proteins and Their Associated Diseases N. Engl. J. Med., November 11, 2004; 351(20): 2087 - 2100. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Vantyghem, P. Pigny, C. A. Maurage, N. Rouaix-Emery, T. Stojkovic, J. M. Cuisset, A. Millaire, O. Lascols, P. Vermersch, J. L. Wemeau, et al. Patients with Familial Partial Lipodystrophy of the Dunnigan Type Due to a LMNA R482W Mutation Show Muscular and Cardiac Abnormalities J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5337 - 5346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Schirmer and L. Gerace The Stability of the Nuclear Lamina Polymer Changes with the Composition of Lamin Subtypes According to Their Individual Binding Strengths J. Biol. Chem., October 8, 2004; 279(41): 42811 - 42817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Muchir and H. J. Worman The Nuclear Envelope and Human Disease Physiology, October 1, 2004; 19(5): 309 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Reynolds, L. Liang, and J. D. Baines Conformational Changes in the Nuclear Lamina Induced by Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Require Genes UL31 and UL34 J. Virol., June 1, 2004; 78(11): 5564 - 5575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Zastrow, S. Vlcek, and K. L. Wilson Proteins that bind A-type lamins: integrating isolated clues J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2004; 117(7): 979 - 987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J J Shen, C A Brown, J R Lupski, and L Potocki Mandibuloacral dysplasia caused by homozygosity for the R527H mutation in lamin A/C J. Med. Genet., November 1, 2003; 40(11): 854 - 857. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Holt, C. Ostlund, C. L. Stewart, N. t. Man, H. J. Worman, and G. E. Morris Effect of pathogenic mis-sense mutations in lamin A on its interaction with emerin in vivo J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2003; 116(14): 3027 - 3035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||