JBC Focus on PI3-Kinase with Echelon

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110275200 on February 1, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 17544-17547, May 17, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/20/17544    most recent
M110275200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robben, J.
Right arrow Articles by Volckaert, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robben, J.
Right arrow Articles by Volckaert, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Selection and Identification of Dense Granule Antigen GRA3 by Toxoplasma gondii Whole Genome Phage Display*

Johan RobbenDagger , Kirsten HertveldtDagger §, Eugène Bosmans, and Guido VolckaertDagger ||

From the Dagger  Laboratory of Gene Technology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 21, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium and  DiaMed Eurogen, Transportstraat 4, B-3980 Tessenderlo, Belgium

Received for publication, October 25, 2001, and in revised form, January 24, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Toxoplasma gondii is a ubiquitous, unicellular, eukaryotic parasite with a complex intracellular life cycle capable of invading and chronically infecting a wide variety of vertebrate host species, including man. Although normally opportunistic in healthy adults, it is a lethal pathogen in immunocompromised humans, particularly in AIDS patients. We present the application of a genomic phage display as a tool for the direct identification of antigens with potential value in diagnosis and/or as subunit vaccine components. Using a polycosmid cloning strategy, we constructed a large phagemid display library (>109 independent clones) of mixed short genomic restriction fragments (<=  500 bp) of T. gondii genomic DNA (80 Mbp genome size) fused to gene III of the filamentous phage M13. Biopanning of the library with monoclonal Toxoplasma antibodies resulted in the isolation and identification of an epitope of GRA3, an antigen located in the dense granules of T. gondii tachyzoites. The reactivity of the phage displaying the GRA3 epitope with the monoclonal antibody was confirmed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. These results demonstrate the accessibility of midsized eukaryotic genomes to display technology and the feasibility to screen these whole genome display libraries with antibodies for isolating novel antigenic determinants.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Toxoplasma gondii is an obligate intracellular protozoan parasite with a complex life cycle (1). Humans usually acquire infection by ingesting either infectious oocysts through contact with cats or cat faeces or by eating meat that contains tissue cysts. In healthy adults, infection normally results in a benign self-limiting disease. However, once infected the host harbors the parasite for life. In a chronically infected individual developing immunodeficiency on response to drug treatment or disease, e.g. AIDS, the infection can reactivate and cause severe disease and mortality (2). A primary infection during pregnancy can cause abortion or severe damage to the fetus. In animals, toxoplasmosis is recognized as a major cause of abortion and neonatal losses in sheep, goats, and pigs (3).

A diagnosis of toxoplasmosis is usually based on serological assays, although in recent years molecular biology techniques such as PCR have been applied for the detection of T. gondii DNA in clinical samples (4). Most commercial serological assays detect antibodies by means of natural tachyzoite antigens from infected mice or cell culture systems. However, the use of whole tachyzoite antigens is rather expensive and sometimes results in false positive reactions (5). The use of recombinant antigens may overcome these drawbacks. Until now, only a limited number of recombinant antigens have been studied, e.g. the surface antigens SAG1 (P30) (6) and SAG2 (P22) (7), the dense granule antigens GRA21 (8) and GRA4 (9), and the rhoptry protein ROP2 (10).

Direct procedures by immunization with non-living vaccines are not as yet available for humans. Various attempts to develop an animal vaccine to both the asexual systemic stage and the sexual entero-epithelial stage of the Toxoplasma life cycle have been reported over the last thirty years. Immunizations with whole killed (11) or irradiated (12) parasites had limited success. Effective vaccines have been produced using live attenuated parasites that induce immunity but do not persist as tissue cysts (13). Vaccination with pure native P30 antigen (14) or with selected fractions of parasite lysates (15) has been partially successful. Attempts with recombinant antigens, however, have failed so far (16).

Further immunological characterization of the Toxoplasma parasite deserves undiminished attention. The search for new antigens by cDNA screening as well as EST sequencing (17) is hampered by the complex life cycle and the limited availability of certain parasite developmental stages. In this paper, we present the application of the phage display of peptides encoded by fragmented genomic DNA as a useful tool to directly select and identify antigenic determinants from the genome. To facilitate the construction of essentially large genomic libraries, a novel display vector was constructed to allow highly efficient cloning. The feasibility of this approach was confirmed by the isolation and identification of an epitope from the dense granule antigen GRA3 (18) by the panning of a genomic T. gondii display library against a monoclonal antibody directed toward an uncharacterized 30-kDa T. gondii antigenic protein.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preparation of T. gondii Genomic DNA-- The T. gondii strain Deelen (19) was maintained in permanent in vitro cultures by serial 3-4 day passages of parasites on monolayers of VERO cells in Opti-MEM medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 4% fetal calf serum and 50 µg/ml gentamicin. After lysis of the monolayer, parasites were harvested by centrifugation of the supernatant. Pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of PBS buffer (phosphate, 0.01 M; NaCl, 0.14 M; pH 7.2), and the remaining unlysed host cells were ruptured by repeated forced passage through a 27-gauge needle. The suspension was further purified by continuous density gradient centrifugation on 36% of Percoll® (Amersham Biosciences) at 28.600 × g in a fixed angle 25° rotor. Batches of 109 purified tachyzoite cells in 100 µl of PBS were lysed by the addition of 1 ml of Qiagen lysis buffer G2 (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) supplemented with 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K and 0.3 mg/ml RNase A and heated at 50 °C for 45 min. Genomic DNA was prepared from the lysate with Qiagen genomic tip 100/G according to the supplier's instructions.

Display Vector Construction-- To create a phagemid display vector with cosmid properties, the phage lambda cos site from position -201 to +186 (20) was amplified by PCR with a forward primer extended at the 5'-end with an AatII and a BstXI site and a reverse primer bearing an AatII and a BstEII. The resulting PCR fragment was cloned into the AatII site of the phagemid vector pHEN1 (21). A number of clones containing the insert in different orientations were sequence-verified and tested for transducibility after in vitro packaging of concatamers or so-called polycosmids in phage lambda particles. Therefore, the vector was linearized with BstEII, religated at a high vector concentration (500 ng/µl), and mixed with MaxPlaxTM Packaging Extract (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI). Phage particles were titered by the transduction of Escherichia coli strain TG1 (supE hsdDelta 5 thi Delta (lac-proAB) F'{traD36 proAB+ lacIq lacZDelta M15}). One positive clone was retained, and the phagemid/cosmid vector was termed the phosmid pHOS1. In this vector, multiple cloning sites (BglII, SmaI and BstBI) for gene III fusion were created by the replacement/insertion of a synthetic NcoI/NotI cassette. Shotgun cloning of restriction fragments in the correct reading frame was made possible by the construction of a set of nine phosmids (pHOS21-pHOS29), each with the multiple cloning sites in a different upstream/downstream gene III reading frame (Table I).

Genomic Library Construction-- T. gondii genomic DNA was cut with the four compatible restriction enzymes HinPI (Gdown-arrow CGC), MspI (Cdown-arrow CGG), AciI (Cdown-arrow CGC), and TaqI (Tdown-arrow CGA). Equal portions of genomic DNA were subjected to separate digestions or to consecutive double, triple, or quadruple digestions in all 15 possible combinations. The restriction fragments were pooled and fractionated according to size by preparative electrophoresis through a 10-cm 2.5% agarose column on a model 230A HPEC System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Nine different size fractions ranging from 30 to 540 bp were selected and concentrated with Microcon YM-10 centrifugal devices (Millipore, Bedford, MA) prior to ligation into the display vector. This display vector was prepared by mixing equimolar amounts of the nine plasmids from the pHOS20 series and by digestion with BstBI (TTdown-arrow CGAA) followed by dephosphorylation. The vector and individual genomic DNA size fractions were ligated at a 1:2 molar ratio and a low total DNA concentration (~12.5 ng/µl). The heat-inactivated ligation mixtures were pooled, linearized with BstEII, and religated at a high concentration (~250 ng/µl). Five fractions of 1 µg of concatenated DNA were packaged in phage lambda particles and transduced in a single reaction to E. coli TG1 cells grown in LB supplemented with 0.2% maltose and 10 mM MgCl2. In vivo excision of the vector monomers was realized by co-infection with excess VCSM13 helper phage (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The primary library was obtained by the collection of phage particles produced 3 h after co-infection. The number of independent clones was estimated at >=  109 (see also "Results"). Representative portions of this library were stored at -70 °C and amplified prior to biopanning.

Biopanning-- Toxoplasma-specific monoclonal antibodies were obtained from a mouse immunized with sonicated tachyzoites. Phage amplification, expression, and display of cloned fragments were performed as described previously (21). The library was biopanned against Toxoplasma antibodies essentially as described by Smith and Scott (22). Briefly, in the first selection round 1012 colony-forming unit phagemid particles (~1000 times the estimated library size) were allowed to react overnight at 4 °C with 1 µM biotinylated monoclonal antibodies preincubated with M13mp18 particles. Binding phagemid particles were captured for 10 min on 60-mm streptavidin-coated polystyrene Petri dishes blocked with 10% dialyzed fetal calf serum and 0.02% NaN3 in Tris-buffered saline. After ten washing steps, binding phages were eluted with Tris-glycine, pH 2.2, neutralized, and used for the infection of TG1 cells. Recovered phage particles in general titered to ~107-8 colony-forming units. In further rounds, 1-5 × 1011 amplified phagemid particles were biopanned with monoclonal antibodies at 100 pM.

Selected clones were characterized by automated fluorescent DNA sequencing on an ABI 373 Sequencer using BigDye TerminatorTM chemistry (Applied Biosystems). Binding specificity was confirmed by phage ELISA. Microtiter plates were coated overnight with 500 ng/well specific monoclonal antibody in PBS and blocked for 2 h with 200 µl/well blocking buffer (PBS supplemented with 5% bovine serum albumin and 0.02% NaN3). After three washes with PBS and 0.5% Tween 20, about 2 × 1010 phages in 100 µl blocking solution were allowed to react for 3-4 h. Bound phages were revealed by a 1-h incubation with secondary horse radish peroxidase-conjugated anti-M13 antibodies (Amersham Biosciences) and a 30-min staining with 2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid). The difference between A405 and A495 was taken as the ELISA signal.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Library Construction-- T. gondii genomic DNA was semirandomly fragmented by combinatorial digestion with four restriction enzymes generating protruding 5'-CG ends compatible with the BstBI cloning site of the pHOS vector set. Size fractionation by HPEC of the pooled restriction fragments and A260 monitoring of the eluted DNA showed a statistically expected asymmetrical size distribution with a peak around 100 bp and more than 90% of the total DNA contained within fragments shorter than 500 bp. The 30 to 540 bp fragments were cloned by phage lambda-mediated polycosmid transduction as described under "Experimental Procedures." The packaged polycosmids were titered at 1.4 × 108 transducing units in total from ~5 µg of ligated DNA. According to the size of the phosmid (5 kb), concatamers of 8-10 vector units are expected to be packaged into lambda particles and transduced into E. coli cells. We could indeed show the presence of up to 8-10 vectors by PCR analysis of the cloned inserts in overnight colonies from control-transduced cells not co-infected with M13 helper phage (Fig. 1). Co-infection resulted as expected in in vivo excision and packaging of the phagemid monomers into M13 particles (PCR analysis results not shown). Hence, the total number of independent phagemid clones produced after in vivo excision was estimated at 1.1-1.4 × 109. The total number of phagemid particles in the primary library had a titer of 4 × 1011 colony-forming units. PCR analysis of the whole library and of individual clones confirmed the targeted size distribution of cloned fragments and showed that less than 5% of the clones were without insert.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   PCR analysis of Toxoplasma genomic fragment cloning by polycosmid transduction in the absence of excision helper phage. Clones were subjected to standard PCR with vector primers and reaction products analyzed by 2% agarose electrophoresis. Amplified vector sequence corresponds to 197 ± 2 bp. Multiple bands reflect the presence of up to 10 vectors with different inserts per cell line.

Clonal representation of the library was evaluated by PCR on plasmid DNA prepared from an amplified whole library using a set of 12 primers specific to sequences of the T. gondii P22 and P30 genes. All primer pairs located on a single, potentially cloned restriction fragment produced PCR products of the expected size. Primer pairs not located on potentially cloned restriction fragments yielded PCR products from genomic control DNA but not from library DNA (data not shown). Because the library was analyzed after supplementary reinfection with M13 helper phages and phage rescue, we presume that the possible loss of clones from the library due to the supplementary amplification step had no significant influence on clonal representation.

Biopanning-- The library was biopanned against monoclonal antibody 2F2, directed against a 30-kDa tachyzoite antigen as determined by Western blotting, and originally presumed to correspond to the major surface antigen P30. DNA sequence analysis of 24 individual clones randomly picked from the library obtained after three selection rounds showed that all selected DNA fragments were inserted in the correct gene III reading frame and consequently displayed as a peptide-g3p fusion (Table I). One sequence occurred 16 times out of 24 random clones and encoded a peptide of 42 amino acids (Table II). Sequence similarity search in the public sequence data bases showed that the peptide corresponds to a segment of the GRA3 protein of T. gondii (Fig. 2). The sequence of the cloned DNA fragment is identical to the published cDNA sequence (18) with the exception of a T > G, resulting in a Gly instead of a Cys in position 80 of GRA3. In addition, 28 highly significant matches with tachyzoite and bradyzoite cDNA clones were found in the GenBankTM EST data base division (Release 041400; 10,741 entries for Toxoplasma). ESTs overlapping with GRA3 residue 80 all encode for Gly at this position in strains RH and ME49 in agreement with our sequence. The specificity of monoclonal antibody 2F2 for the GRA3 epitope was confirmed by phage ELISA. Restriction analysis of the GRA3 cDNA showed that the panned fragment corresponded to an AciI fragment, the smallest epitope encoding fragment potentially present in the genomic library.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
pHOS vector set for gene III fusion of restriction fragments

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Clones isolated from the Toxoplasma genome phage display library after three biopanning rounds against monoclonal antibody 2F2


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Sequence alignment of the deduced amino acids of the monoclonal antibody 2F2-binding peptide obtained by genomic biopanning with the Toxoplasma GRA3 protein (Swiss-Prot accession no. Q27914). Discrepant amino acids are in boldface.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have developed an approach to screen for novel antigenic determinants based on the display of genomic DNA fragment-encoded peptides on filamentous phage. The procedure allows the enrichment of relevant peptides from the library by affinity selection with specific antibodies as well as the identification of its corresponding genomic sequence. The whole genome phage display approach extends display procedures previously used for epitope mapping (e.g. Refs. 23 and 24). In the latter cases, a single gene, cDNA, or whole plasmid containing the cloned target gene is fragmented with DNaseI, and the resultant clone library is biopanned against monoclonal antibodies. Jacobsson and Frykberg (25) were the first to use genomic display libraries prepared from sonicated genomic DNA of Staphylococcus aureus to screen for ligand-binding bacterial receptors. Recently, Lin and Lis (26) applied a randomly sheared yeast genomic library expressing protein fragments on the surface of lambda phages for the identification of proteins that interact with the heat shock factor repression region. This genomic phage display for the purpose of tracing antigenic determinants of T. gondii is the first display application on a midsized eukaryotic genome, expanding the display selection range by an order of magnitude and dealing with the occurrence of introns.

Statistical analysis of the size distribution of the exons in known T. gondii genes containing introns indicated that the exons are often rather short (50-200 bp). These data indicate the need to include fragments shorter than 100 bp in the library. In contrast, antibodies recognizing conformational epitopes require the incorporation of larger fragments encoding peptides capable of adopting native-like three-dimensional structures (e.g. domains). Large fragments, on the other hand, may include the gene stop codon and thus be unsuitable for display in N-terminal g3p fusion-based systems. Hence, a fragment size range from 50 to 500 bp was assumed as most appropriate. Taking into account a genome size of 80 Mbp (27) and a one-eighteenth chance of insertion of coding sequences in the correct orientation and reading frames, a representative library of short genomic T. gondii fragments should contain >= 108 independent clones. We preferred to use enzymatic restriction as a DNA fragmentation method to maximize cloning efficiency. The combinatorial use of four different tetranucleotide-recognizing restriction enzymes all generating 5'-CG ends allowed for the generation of short overlapping DNA fragments and the presence of a given amino acid sequence in peptides of different lengths in the display library. This will theoretically increase the chance that an epitope is expressed and recognized by antibodies. A drawback of the use of restriction cleavage for fragmentation as opposed to mechanical shearing is the fixed and reduced resolution of the fragment library. Possible effects of non-random distribution of CG dinucleotide sequences and the inhibitory effects of methylation upon restriction fragmentation cannot be evaluated at present because of insufficient data on the Toxoplasma genome. Experimental analysis of the restriction fragment distribution, however, showed that by far most of the fragments fell within the preferred size range of 50-500 bp.

To accomplish the desired library size, we developed a highly efficient cloning strategy building on the observation that empty vectors and cosmids/phosmids with small inserts can tandemly ligate into so-called polycosmids of appropriate length, packagable into phage lambda particles. As such, phosmid vectors can be transduced very efficiently and subsequently rescued successfully in the form of M13-packaged monomers by M13 helper phage infection. The method is fast, simple, and easily applicable on a large scale, facilitating the construction of extremely large libraries. A related system was described for the efficient construction of phage libraries by lambda-mediated transduction of cos-engineered M13 phage vectors that are autonomously released from their concatamers (28). Our approach with phagemid vectors and helper phage-mediated excision allows us to increase the total number of vectors packaged from about 6-10 units per phage head. SurfZAPTM (29) and lambdaZLG6 (30) are other examples of phage display systems taking advantage of the cloning efficiency of phage lambda. In these systems, however, only a single phagemid is subjected to in vivo excision.

The proof of principle was delivered by biopanning of the constructed T. gondii genomic display library against monoclonal antibodies obtained by the immunization of mice with sonicated tachyzoites. After three selection rounds, almost exclusive enrichment was observed of clones containing an open reading frame correctly fused to gene III. One clone occurred in excess (67%). A sequence similarity search of the encoded peptide in public protein data bases revealed the identity with a segment of the T. gondii GRA3 protein. GRA3 is a 220-amino acid protein with a mature molecular weight of 30 kDa (18) and belongs to a group of antigenic proteins located in the dense granules of tachyzoites. Hence, the identified 30-kDa antigen was not the abundantly expressed p30 surface antigen (SAG1) initially presumed to react with the monoclonal antibody in Western blots of total tachyzoite proteins but a different highly expressed (17) tachyzoite protein. GRA proteins are secreted into the tachyzoite parasitophorous vacuole after invasion of the host cell and are also found in the parasitophorous vacuole membrane and in the bradyzoite cyst wall. Dense granule antigens are recognized by an important fraction of the specific G, M, and A immunoglobulins in the serum of patients suffering from acute toxoplasmosis (31).

The isolation of the GRA3 gene fragment by biopanning confirmed the feasibility of the use of phage display to screen randomized genomic expression libraries with antibodies for novel antigen genes. Because only protein fragments are displayed, the approach is expected to be most appropriate for biopanning against antibodies recognizing linear epitopes, although the discovery of non-linear epitopes may not be impossible. Whether the genomic display approach is also amenable to biopanning with polyclonal antibodies remains to be investigated.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Janick Mathys for useful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Flemish Biotechnology Action Program (Vlaams Actieprogramma Biotechnologie, VLAB).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Recipient of a predoctoral fellowship from the Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen (FWO).

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 32-16-329669; Fax: 32-16-321965; E-mail: guido.volckaert@agr.kuleuven.ac.be.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110275200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GRA, granule antigen; EST, expressed sequence tag; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Black, M. W., and Boothroyd, J. C. (2000) Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 64, 607-623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Wong, S. Y., and Remington, J. S. (1993) AIDS 7, 299-316[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Buxton, D. (1998) Vet. Res. (Paris) 29, 289-310[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Pelloux, H., Dupouy-Camet, J., Derouin, F., Aboulker, J. P., and Raffi, F. (1997) AIDS 11, 1888-1890[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Taylor, D. W., Evans, C. B., Aley, S. B., Barta, J. R., and Danforth, H. D. (1990) J. Protozool. 37, 540-545[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Kim, K., Bulow, R., Kampmeier, J., and Boothroyd, J. C. (1994) Infect. Immun. 62, 203-209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Parmley, S. F., Sgarlato, G. D., Mark, J., Prince, J. B., and Remington, J. S. (1992) J. Clin. Microbiol. 30, 1127-1133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Murray, A., Mercier, C., Decoster, A., Lecordier, L., Capron, A., and Cesbron-Delauw, M. F. (1993) Appl. Parasitol. 34, 235-244[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Mevelec, M. N., Chardes, T., Mercereau-Puijalon, O., Bourguin, I., Achbarou, A., Dubremetz, J. F., and Bout, D. (1992) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 56, 227-238[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Martin, V., Arcavi, M., Santillan, G., Amendoeira, M. R., De, Souza Neves, E., Griemberg, G., Guarnera, E., Garberi, J. C., and Angel, S. O. (1998) Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 5, 627-631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Frenkel, J. K., and Smith, D. D. (1982) J. Parasitol. 68, 744-748[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Seah, S. K., and Hucal, G. (1975) Can. J. Microbiol. 21, 1379-1385[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Buxton, D., and Innes, E. A. (1995) Parasitology 110, S11-S16
14. Bulow, R., and Boothroyd, J. (1991) J. Immunol. 147, 3496-3500[Abstract]
15. Lunden, A., Lovgren, K., Uggla, A., and Araujo, F. G. (1993) Infect. Immun. 61, 2639-2643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Lunden, A., Parmley, S. F., Bengtsson, K. L., and Araujo, F. G. (1997) Parasitol. Res. 83, 6-9[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Ajioka, J. W., Boothroyd, J. C., Brunk, B. P., Hehl, A., Hillier, L., Manger, I. D., Marra, M., Overton, G. C., Roos, D. S., Wan, K. L., Waterston, R., and Sibley, L. D. (1998) Genome Res. 8, 18-28[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Bermudes, D., Dubremetz, J. F., Achbarou, A., and Joiner, K. A. (1994) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 68, 247-257[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. van Loon, A. M., and van der Veen, J. (1980) J. Comp. Pathol. 33, 635-639
20. Hohn, B. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 7456-7460[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Hoogenboom, H. R., Griffiths, A. D., Johnson, K. S., Chiswell, D. J., Hudson, P., and Winter, G. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 4133-4137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Smith, G. P., and Scott, J. K. (1993) Methods Enzymol. 217, 228-257[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Wang, L. F., Du, Plessis, D. H., White, J. R., Hyatt, A. D., and Eaton, B. T. (1995) J. Immunol. Methods 178, 1-12[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Petersen, G., Song, D., Hugle-Dorr, B., Oldenburg, I., and Bautz, E. K. (1995) Mol. Gen. Genet. 249, 425-431[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Jacobsson, K., and Frykberg, L. (1995) BioTechniques 18, 878-885[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Lin, J. T., and Lis, J. T. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 3237-3245[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Sibley, L. D., and Boothroyd, J. C. (1992) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 51, 291-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Alting-Mees, M. A., and Short, J. M. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 137, 93-100[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Hogrefe, H. H., Amberg, J. R., Hay, B. N., Sorge, J. A., and Shopes, B. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 137, 85-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Jespers, L. S., De, Keyser, A., and Stanssens, E. (1996) Gene (Amst.) 173, 179-181[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Kumolosasi, E., Bonhomme, A., Beorchia, A., Lepan, H., Marx, C., Foudrinier, F., Pluot, M., and Pinon, J. M. (1994) Microsc. Res. Tech. 29, 231-239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/20/17544    most recent
M110275200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robben, J.
Right arrow Articles by Volckaert, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robben, J.
Right arrow Articles by Volckaert, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.