JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200524200 on March 1, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 17571-17579, May 17, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/20/17571    most recent
M200524200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Swatton, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Swatton, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, C. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Fast Biphasic Regulation of Type 3 Inositol Trisphosphate Receptors by Cytosolic Calcium*

Jane E. Swatton and Colin W. TaylorDagger

From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1PD, United Kingdom

Received for publication, January 17, 2002, and in revised form, February 21, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In cytosol-like medium (CLM) with a free [Ca2+] of 200 nM, a supramaximal concentration of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) (30 µM) evoked 45Ca2+ release from type 3 IP3 receptors only after a latency of 48 ± 6 ms; this latency could not be reduced by increasing the IP3 concentration. In CLM containing a low free [Ca2+] (~4 nM), 300 µM IP3 evoked 45Ca2+ release after a latency of 66 ± 11 ms; this was reduced to 14 ± 3 ms when the [Ca2+] was 1 mM. Preincubation with CLM containing 100 µM Ca2+ caused a rapid (half-time = 33 ± 9 ms), complete, and fully reversible inhibition that could not be overcome by a high concentration of IP3 (300 µM). Hepatic (type 2) IP3 receptors were not inhibited by Ca2+ once they had bound IP3, but 100 µM Ca2+ rapidly inhibited type 3 IP3 receptors whether it was delivered before addition of IP3 or at any stage during a response to IP3. Ca2+ increases the affinity of IP3 for hepatic receptors by slowing IP3 dissociation, but Ca2+ had no effect on IP3 binding to type 3 receptors. The rate of inhibition of type 3 IP3 receptors by Ca2+ was faster than the rate of IP3 dissociation, and occurred at similar rates whether receptors had bound a high (adenophostin) or low affinity (3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3) agonist. Dissociation of agonist is not therefore required for Ca2+ to inhibit type 3 IP3 receptors. We conclude that type 2 and 3 IP3 receptors are each biphasically regulated by Ca2+, but by different mechanisms. For both, IP3 binding causes a stimulatory Ca2+-binding site to be exposed allowing Ca2+ to bind and open the channel. IP3 binding protects type 2 receptors from Ca2+ inhibition, but type 3 receptors are inhibited by Ca2+ whether or not they have IP3 bound. Increases in cytosolic [Ca2+] will immediately inhibit type 3 receptors, but inhibit type 2 receptors only after IP3 has dissociated.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3)1 receptors belong to a family of intracellular channels that mediate the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores in response to a range of physiological stimuli (1). The three mammalian subtypes of the IP3 receptor (types 1-3), which form both homotetrameric (2) and heterotetrameric (3, 4) complexes, are regulated by both IP3 and Ca2+ (5). This interplay between IP3 and Ca2+ is likely to determine the complex Ca2+ signals evoked by receptors that stimulate IP3 formation.

The similarities between the IP3 receptor subtypes are presently more striking than the differences. Each subtype is predicted to form a similar structure with an N-terminal IP3-binding domain separated by some 1500 residues from a C-terminal region that includes six membrane-spanning domains, the last two of which together with the intervening loop line the pore of the channel (6, 7). Within the functional receptor, however, the IP3-binding domain of one subunit appears to be intimately associated with the pore region of a neighboring subunit (8). The ion permeation properties of the channel are also similar for each receptor subtype (9, 10), consistent with the highly conserved sequences found within the pore-forming region (11). The most important differences between IP3 receptor subtypes, which are certainly differentially expressed (11), are therefore likely to be in their modulation (12-15) and perhaps in their subcellular distribution (16, 17).

Biphasic regulation of IP3 receptors by cytosolic Ca2+ is widespread (5), with many reports confirming that modest increases in Ca2+ stimulate channel opening, while more substantial increases are inhibitory for type 1 (18) and type 2 (19) IP3 receptors, as well as for the IP3 receptors from Xenopus (20) and insects (21, 22). The effects of Ca2+ on type 3 IP3 receptors have aroused more controversy. In bilayer recordings from the type 3 IP3 receptors of RIN-5F cells, even very high concentrations of Ca2+ failed to inhibit channel activity (23). IP3-evoked Ca2+ release from DT40 cells lacking types 1 and 2 IP3 receptors also appeared to be resistant to Ca2+ inhibition (24). But many other studies of both cells expressing predominantly type 3 IP3 receptors (25), including RINm5F cells (26), and of recombinant type 3 IP3 receptors (15, 27) have reported biphasic regulation of IP3 receptor behavior by cytosolic Ca2+. It seems likely, therefore, that biphasic regulation by cytosolic Ca2+ may be an ubiquitous feature of IP3 receptors, although it is far from clear that the underlying mechanisms are the same (28, 29).

The rapid kinetics of IP3 receptor regulation by IP3 and Ca2+ are likely to be significant in determining the contributions of different IP3 receptor subtypes to the complex regenerative Ca2+ signals in intact cells (30, 31). Despite the importance of resolving the behavior of IP3 receptors on a time scale appropriate to understanding rapid Ca2+ release events in intact cells (30), most studies of IP3 receptor gating have been limited to either steady-state measurements (15, 23) or to examining rates of Ca2+ release with very limited temporal resolution.

We previously used rapid superfusion of permeabilized rat hepatocytes loaded with 45Ca2+ to examine the kinetics of IP3-evoked Ca2+ release by type 2 IP3 receptors with a temporal resolution of 9 ms (31, 32). We concluded that IP3 binding determined whether Ca2+ stimulated or inhibited channel opening (31, 32). Here, we apply similar methods to examine IP3-evoked Ca2+ release from permeabilized RINm5F cells, which both we (26) and others (33) have shown to express predominantly type 3 IP3 receptors.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- IP3 was from American Radiolabeled Chemicals (St. Louis, MO). 45Ca2+ (238.5 Ci/mol) was from ICN (Thame, Oxfordshire, UK) and [3H]IP3 (37 Ci/mmol) was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Little Chalfont, UK). Ionomycin, synthetic adenophostin A, and 3-deoxy-3-fluoro IP3 were from Calbiochem (Nottingham, UK). Thapsigargin was from Alomone Labs (Jerusalem, Israel). All other materials were from suppliers listed earlier (26).

Isolation of Cells-- RINm5F rat insulinoma cells (a gift from Dr. Peter Brown, University of Manchester, UK) were cultured at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in RPMI 1640 medium containing 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) and 5% fetal calf serum (Sigma, Poole, UK). Cells were passaged every 3-4 days when confluent. Hepatocytes were isolated from the livers of male Wistar rates (200-300 g) by collagenase digestion (34) and kept for up to 6 h at 4 °C in Eagle's minimal essential medium containing 26 mM NaHCO3 and 2% bovine serum albumin.

Measurement of Unidirectional 45Ca2+ Efflux from Permeabilized RINm5F Cells-- Confluent RINm5F cells (passages 90-100) were scraped from a flask, washed by centrifugation (650 × g, 2 min), and resuspended (1 × 106 cells/ml) in Ca2+-free cytosol-like medium (CLM: 140 mM KCl, 20 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 20 mM Pipes, pH 7.0, at 37 °C). The cells were permeabilized by incubation with saponin (10 µg/ml) for 5 min at 37 °C (26), washed by centrifugation (650 × g, 2 min), and resuspended in CLM containing ~200 nM free Ca2+ (300 µM total Ca2+), carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (10 µM), and 45Ca2+ (10 µCi/ml). After addition of ATP (1.5 mM), creatine phosphate (5 mM), and creatine phosphokinase (5 units/ml), cells were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C during which their intracellular stores reached a steady-state Ca2+ content of 141 ± 14 pmol/106 cells (n = 3). Cells were rapidly removed from the loading medium by 8-fold dilution into CLM (200 nM free Ca2+, 20 °C) and a brief centrifugation (650 × g, 30 s), before resuspension (6 × 106 cells/ml) in CLM (200 nM free Ca2+, 20 °C). The effects of IP3 or its analogues on the 45Ca2+ content of the stores were determined after 2-min incubations at 20 °C (to allow direct comparison with superfusion experiments) and in the presence of thapsigargin (1 µM) to inhibit the endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase. The incubations were terminated by rapid filtration through Whatman GF/C filters using a Brandel receptor binding harvester (26), and the 45Ca2+ content of the stores determined by liquid scintillation counting. Active 45Ca2+ accumulation was defined as the 45Ca2+ that could be released by ionomycin (10 µM).

Measurement of 45Ca2+ Release by Rapid Superfusion-- Permeabilized RINm5F cells loaded with 45Ca2+ (30 µCi/ml) were immobilized on a nitrocellulose and glass fiber filter array held in the chamber of a rapid superfusion apparatus; the apparatus has been described elsewhere (34). Briefly it allows rates of 45Ca2+ release from the immobilized cells to be measured with a temporal resolution of up to 9 ms, as CLM flows (at 2 ml/s) from pressurized cylinders to the cells and then (with the 45Ca2+ released from the cells) into vials arranged around a circular fraction collector. Because the medium bathing the immobilized cells is continuously replaced during superfusion, unidirectional 45Ca2+ efflux can be measured without the addition of thapsigargin used in the conventional 45Ca2+ efflux experiments (see above). Inclusion of an inert marker ([3H]inulin) in the superfusing media allowed the arrival of a stimulus to be precisely related to changes in 45Ca2+ efflux. Under the conditions used for these experiments, the half-time (t1/2) for exchange of the media was 31 ± 1 ms (n = 3). All experiments were performed at 20 °C. The size of the intracellular 45Ca2+ pool was calculated for each experiment by summing all 45Ca2+ released during the stimulation with that released at the end of the experiment by Triton X-100 (0.5%). In some experiments (Fig. 2) very rapid increases in free [Ca2+] were achieved using a pulsing protocol (31): a 50-ms pulse of CLM containing 1.65 mM Ca2+ followed by continuous superfusion with CLM containing 1.1 mM Ca2+ allowed the free [Ca2+] to be increased from ~200 nM to 100 µM within 50 ms.

Permeabilized hepatocytes were prepared and loaded with 45Ca2+ as reported previously (34), and rates of IP3-evoked 45Ca2+ release were then measured using rapid superfusion as described for RINm5F cells. Free [Ca2+] were predicted using the computer program WinMAXC version 2.05 (C. Patton, Stanford University, CA 93950), and then measured using either fura 2 or a Ca2+-sensitive electrode (19, 26).

[3H]IP3 Equilibrium-competition Binding-- Saponin-permeabilized RINm5F cells were washed by centrifugation (650 × g, 2 min), resuspended in TE medium (50 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.3, at 2 °C), and incubated (2.75 × 106 cells in 200 µl) with [3H]IP3 (3 nM) and competing ligands for 5 min at 2 °C. Bound and free ligand were separated by filtration (35), and 3H activity was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Specific [3H]IP3 binding (~500 disintegrations/min) was typically ~70% of total binding. Equilibrium binding data were analyzed to provide dissociation constants (Kd) for competing ligands as reported previously (35).

Analysis-- Because the 45Ca2+ content of the stores declines as a superfusion experiment progresses, we express many of the responses to IP3 as fractional release rates, where the amount of 45Ca2+ released by IP3 is expressed as a fraction of the 45Ca2+ remaining within the IP3-sensitive stores at the beginning of that interval (34). By expressing rates of 45Ca2+ release relative to the amount of 45Ca2+ available for release, this form of analysis effectively isolates the activity of the IP3 receptor from changes in the 45Ca2+ content of the stores. We thereby expect stable fractional release rates unless the IP3 receptor changes its behavior (36).

IP3-evoked Ca2+ release was calculated by subtracting the basal rate of 45Ca2+ release from the 45Ca2+ detected in each fraction during stimulation with IP3. By measuring basal rates of 45Ca2+ release over protracted times (not shown), we established the following empirical relationship between the fraction of the Ca2+ stores released (S), the fractional rate of unstimulated 45Ca2+ release at the beginning of the superfusion (I) and the fractional rate of unstimulated 45Ca2+ release from partially depleted stores (P).
P=I (0.71e<SUP>−8.8<UP>S</UP></SUP>+0.31) (Eq. 1)
This equation was used to separately compute the basal rate of 45Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive and IP3-insensitive Ca2+ stores throughout the experiment. Concentration-effect relationships were fitted to logistic equations using nonlinear curve fitting (KaleidaGraph, Synergy Software, PA) (37).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Delayed Activation of Type 3 IP3 Receptors-- In permeabilized RINm5F cells, IP3 caused a rapid increase in the rate of 45Ca2+ release, with the half-maximal rate occurring with an IP3 concentration of 4.96 ± 0.82 µM (n = 3) and the maximal rate of 45Ca2+ release occurring with 10 µM IP3. During stimulation with 30 µM IP3 in normal CLM, the cells were therefore exposed to a supramaximal concentration of IP3 within about 15 ms, but the first detectable release of 45Ca2+ occurred only after a delay of 48 ± 6 ms (n = 3) (Fig. 1A, i). This long absolute latency, which is similar to that observed previously for hepatic IP3 receptors (32), was not shortened by further increasing the IP3 concentration (Fig. 1A, ii): the latency was 43 ± 9 ms (n = 3) when cells were stimulated with 300 µM IP3 (Table I). In the latter experiments, cells would have been exposed to at least 7 times the maximally effective IP3 concentration (~70 µM) within 10 ms.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Cytosolic Ca2+ shortens the latency for IP3 receptor activation. A, rates of 45Ca2+ efflux are shown for permeabilized cells stimulated with 30 µM (i) or 300 µM (ii) IP3 in normal CLM (free [Ca2+] = 200 nM). The open bar shows the switch to CLM containing IP3 and the dotted line ([3H]inulin) denotes the arrival of IP3 in the effluent. B, rates of 45Ca2+ efflux are shown in response to 300 µM IP3 in either nominally Ca2+-free CLM (open circle ) or CLM containing 1 mM free Ca2+ (). The dotted line ([3H]inulin) denotes the simultaneous delivery of the IP3 and Ca2+. C, cells superfused with Ca2+-free CLM (100 µM EGTA) were briefly (30 ms, open bar) stimulated with 300 µM IP3 before rapidly (solid bar) increasing the free [Ca2+] to 1 mM using EGTA-free CLM. The dashed line ([3H]inulin) shows the arrival of the high-Ca2+ CLM. For A-C, results (mean ± S.E., n = 3) are expressed as percentages of the total 45Ca2+ content of the stores. D and E, the free [Ca2+] of superfusing media are shown after switching from nominally Ca2+-free CLM (1 mM (D) or 100 µM (E) EGTA) to CLM containing either 2 mM Ca2+ with 1 mM EGTA (D), or EGTA-free CLM containing 1 mM Ca2+ (E). The total Ca2+ concentrations were calculated from the measured t1/2 for mixing (31 ± 1 ms) using a monoexponential equation: T = A(1-exp-0.0219t), where T = the total Ca2+ concentration at time t (in ms) from the onset of mixing (when [Ca2+] = 0 mM), and A is the final total [Ca2+] (2 mM in D, 1 mM Ca2+ in E). The [EGTA] remained constant (at 1 mM) in panel D, but in E it decreased from 100 µM to EGTA-free during the mixing. The total [EGTA] (T) at time (t) from the onset of mixing was calculated from: T = B·exp-0.0219t, where B is the initial [EGTA] (100 µM). At each time (D and E), the free [Ca2+] was calculated from the total [Ca2+] and [EGTA] using WinMAXC (see "Experimental Procedures").

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Cytosolic Ca2+ shortens the latency for IP3 receptor activation without affecting the peak rate of 45Ca2+ release
Latencies, defined as the first of 3 successive rises in 45Ca2+ release following detection of [3H]inulin (included with the IP3) in the superfusate, are shown for cells stimulated with 30 or 300 µM IP3. Where indicated, the free [Ca2+] was increased (from 200 nM to 100 µM or from nominally Ca2+-free to 1 mM) by simultaneous delivery of IP3 and CLM containing high-Ca2+. For cells stimulated in CLM containing ~4 or 200 nM free Ca2+, cells were preincubated for at least 10 s with the appropriate CLM before delivery of IP3 in the same medium. Peak rates of 45Ca2+ release evoked by 300 µM IP3 and the time to reach the peak rate are also shown. Mean ± S.E. of three to six independent determinations.

While the latency could not be reduced by increasing the IP3 concentration, it was reduced and ultimately abolished by increasing the free [Ca2+] of the CLM. In nominally Ca2+-free CLM (free [Ca2+] ~4 nM), the latency after stimulation with 300 µM IP3 was 66 ± 11 ms and this was reduced as the free [Ca2+] was increased (Table I), such that when the free [Ca2+] was 1 mM, the latency was only 14 ± 3 ms (Table I, Fig. 1B). It is noteworthy that although increasing the free [Ca2+] shortened both the latency and the time taken for the rate of 45Ca2+ release to reach its peak, it had no significant effect on the peak rate of 45Ca2+ release (Table I).

Although there was an immediate rise in the rate of 45Ca2+ release when IP3 (300 µM) was delivered in the presence of 1 mM free Ca2+, there was a lag of ~40 ms before the response attained its fastest rate (Fig. 1B). We considered whether this slow take-off might simply result from a relatively slow increase in free [Ca2+] as Ca2+-free CLM (1 mM EGTA) was replaced by (t1/2 = 31 ± 1 ms) the high-Ca2+ CLM (2 mM Ca2+, 1 mM EGTA) causing an abrupt increase in free [Ca2+] as the buffering capacity of the EGTA was exceeded. The simulation shown in Fig. 1D confirms that under the conditions used for these experiments, a switch to high-Ca2+ CLM caused the free [Ca2+] surrounding the cells to abruptly increase to several micromolar only after a delay of ~25 ms. By reducing the EGTA concentration in the CLM used initially to 100 µM and then stepping to CLM containing 1 mM Ca2+ without EGTA, the free [Ca2+] surrounding the cells was predicted to increase almost linearly to 1 mM and to exceed 100 µM within 8 ms (Fig. 1E).

We used this Ca2+-delivery protocol to very rapidly expose cells to a high free [Ca2+] during the latent period of the response to a supramaximal concentration of IP3. Cells were first exposed to IP3 (300 µM) in nominally Ca2+-free CLM (100 µM EGTA) for 30 ms and then to high-Ca2+ in EGTA-free CLM (Fig. 1C). During the initial exposure to IP3, there was no stimulated release of 45Ca2+ because this interval lies within the latent period (~66 ms in nominally Ca2+-free CLM). After rapidly increasing the free [Ca2+], there was an immediate increase in the rate of 45Ca2+ release with no detectable latency (Fig. 1C).

Rapid and Reversible Inhibition of IP3-evoked Ca2+ Release by Cytosolic Ca2+-- Stimulation of permeabilized RINm5F cells with a maximal concentration of IP3 (10 µM) caused a rapid increase in the rate of 45Ca2+ release to a peak, followed by a decay over several seconds (Fig. 2A). Preincubation of the cells for 1.2 s with CLM containing a free [Ca2+] of 100 µM completely abolished the subsequent response to IP3 (Fig. 2A). The increase in free [Ca2+] itself only minimally increased the rate of 45Ca2+ release from 0.16 ± 0.01%/100 ms to 0.23 ± 0.01%/100 ms (n = 15) (Fig. 2D), indicating that depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores could not account for the loss of response to IP3, and (see below) that increasing the free [Ca2+] does not itself significantly stimulate 45Ca2+ release in the absence of IP3. The reversibility of the inhibition under conditions where the stores could not re-load with Ca2+ (see below) further confirms that the lack of response to IP3 results from inhibition of IP3 receptors rather than store depletion.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Inhibition of IP3 receptors by cytosolic Ca2+. A, rates of 45Ca2+ release evoked by 10 µM IP3 are shown for cells stimulated in normal CLM (free [Ca2+] = 200 nM, ) or after preincubation for 50 ms (open circle ), 150 ms () or 1.2 s (black-triangle) with CLM containing 100 µM free Ca2+. The double-pulse protocol (see "Experimental Procedures") was used to increase the free [Ca2+] to 100 µM within 50 ms. B, rates of 45Ca2+ release evoked by 10 µM IP3 are shown under control conditions () or after pretreatment with 100 µM free Ca2+ for 1.2 s before stimulation with 10µM (black-square) or 300 µM () IP3. For A and B, dashed line shows the arrival of [3H]inulin (included with IP3) and results (mean ± S.E., n = 3) are expressed as percentages of the total Ca2+ content of the stores. C, effects of varying the duration of the preincubation with 100 µM Ca2+ on the peak rates of 45Ca2+ release evoked by 10 µM IP3. Results are shown as percentages of the peak rate of 45Ca2+ release under control conditions. D, cells were washed with CLM containing 200 nM free Ca2+ before the free Ca2+ was increased to 100 µM (shown by the dashed line). Results are expressed as percentages of the total Ca2+ content of stores.

The inhibition of IP3 receptors by high Ca2+ could not be overcome by increasing the concentration of IP3 (Fig. 2B). The normal peak rate of 45Ca2+ release evoked by 10 µM IP3 was 3.03 ± 0.15%/100 ms (n = 3). After preincubation with high Ca2+ for 1.2 s, the peak rate of Ca2+ release fell to 0.027 ± 0.008%/100 ms (n = 3) after stimulation with 10 µM IP3, and to 0.24 ± 0.07%/100 ms (n = 3) after stimulation with 300 µM IP3. Inhibition of IP3 receptors by Ca2+ has been proposed to be mediated by calmodulin (38, 39), by other Ca2+-binding proteins (40) or by residues within the IP3 receptor (41). We have not established the site through which Ca2+ inhibits type 3 IP3 receptors, although it is unlikely to be calmodulin because neither calmidazolium (20 µM) nor a peptide inhibitor derived from Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (10 µM) (13) prevented complete inhibition of the IP3 receptor by CLM containing 100 µM Ca2+ (not shown).

By varying the duration of the preincubation with high-Ca2+ CLM before stimulating with 10 µM IP3, the half-time for inhibition by cytosolic Ca2+ was established (39 ± 3 ms, n = 3) (Fig. 2C). We were concerned that with such rapid inhibition, the time taken for IP3 to reach its maximally effective concentration was likely to significantly affect our measurement of the kinetics of Ca2+ inhibition. To resolve the issue, the time course of Ca2+ inhibition was investigated by preincubating with high-Ca2+ CLM and then assessing IP3 receptor activity using 300 µM IP3, which allowed the IP3 concentration to exceed 70 µM within 10 ms. The half-time for Ca2+ inhibition determined using this method (33 ± 9 ms) was indistinguishable from that observed using 10 µM IP3 as the test pulse (39 ± 3 ms).

To assess whether inhibition by cytosolic Ca2+ was reversible, cells were pretreated for 1.2 s with CLM containing 100 µM free [Ca2+] to fully inhibit IP3 receptors, and then superfused for various recovery periods in normal CLM (free [Ca2+] = 200 nM) before assessing IP3 receptor activity by addition of 10 µM IP3. The results demonstrate that inhibition by cytosolic Ca2+ reversed rapidly and fully with a half-time of 102 ± 20 ms (n = 3) (Figs. 3, A and B).


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Rapid recovery from Ca2+ inhibition. A, cells pretreated with 100 µM Ca2+ for 1.2 s were allowed to recover for various intervals in CLM containing 200 nM free Ca2+ before stimulation with 10 µM IP3. The control () and fully inhibited (triangle ) responses are shown together with the responses recorded after recovery periods of 100 ms (black-triangle), 400 ms (open circle ), 1 s (black-square), or 8 s (). Dashed line shows arrival of [3H]inulin included with IP3. B, peak rates of 45Ca2+ release (% of control response) are plotted as a function of the recovery period. Results (mean ± S.E., n = 3) are expressed as percentages of the total Ca2+ content of the intracellular stores.

Cytosolic Ca2+ Inhibits Type 3 IP3 Receptors with IP3 Bound-- We first confirmed our earlier observation (31) that hepatic (largely type 2) IP3 receptors are not inhibited by cytosolic Ca2+ when they have IP3 bound (Fig. 4, A and C). Although preincubation with Ca2+ (100 µM) rapidly and completely inhibited hepatic IP3 receptors (31), the same high-Ca2+ CLM delivered after exposure to 10 µM IP3 caused a modest stimulation of Ca2+ release rather than inhibition (Fig. 4, A and C). Similar experiments with the type 3 IP3 receptors of RINm5F cells gave very different results (Fig. 4, B and D). Increasing the cytosolic free [Ca2+] (to 100 µM) during a response to a supramaximal concentration of IP3 (100 µM) first caused a significant increase in the rate of 45Ca2+ release, but then rapidly inhibited the response (Fig. 4, B and D). This occurred whether the high Ca2+ was delivered at the peak of the response to IP3 (250 ms after IP3 addition) or during a later phase of the response (after 1 s) (Fig. 4, D and E). The stimulatory phase of the response to increased Ca2+ clearly reflects an interaction with the IP3 receptor because the same stimulus in the absence of IP3 caused no significant increase in 45Ca2+ release (Fig. 2D). From the monoexponential curve fits to the decaying phases of the Ca2+ inhibition, we established that the half-times for Ca2+ inhibition were ~170 ms regardless of the duration of the prior stimulation with IP3, or the concentration of IP3 used. Addition of high-Ca2+ after stimulation with 10 or 100 µM IP3 for 250 ms, caused the channels to close with half-times of 174 ± 32 and 170 ± 21 ms, respectively (n = 3); and when the duration of exposure to IP3 was increased to 1 s before addition of high-Ca2+, the half-times for channel closure were 172 ± 22 ms (10 µM IP3) and 173 ± 24 ms (100 µM IP3).


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Ca2+ rapidly inhibits type 3, but not type 2, IP3 receptors with IP3 bound. Permeabilized hepatocytes (A and C) or RINm5F cells (B, D, and E) were stimulated with 10 µM IP3 (hepatocytes) or 100 µM IP3 (RINm5F cells) in CLM containing 200 nM free Ca2+ either throughout the experiment (), or for 250 ms (B and D; open circle ), 300 ms (A and C; open circle ), or 1 s (E; open circle ) before increasing the free [Ca2+] to 100 µM. The dashed line shows the arrival of [3H]inulin included with the IP3 in normal CLM and then (at 5 times greater [3H]inulin concentration) in the high-Ca2+ CLM. Open bars denote the presence of IP3 and solid bars the presence of high-Ca2+. Results (mean ± S.E., n = 3-5) are expressed as either percentages of the total Ca2+ content of the stores (A and B) or as fractional release rates (C-E). Note that because the percentage of the Ca2+ stores that are sensitive to IP3 is different in hepatocytes (~20%) and RINm5F cells (~55%), the relationship between peak 45Ca2+ release rate and peak fractional 45Ca2+ release rate is different for the two cell types.

In hepatocytes, cytosolic Ca2+ increases the affinity of the IP3 receptor for IP3 (42, 43). Equilibrium-competition binding experiments using permeabilized RINm5F cells demonstrated that Ca2+ did not increase the affinity of type 3 IP3 receptors for IP3. The equilibrium-dissociation constant (Kd) for IP3 in Ca2+-free medium was 13 ± 3 nM (n = 4) and it was 18 ± 4 nM (n = 5) when the free [Ca2+] was 100 µM. We therefore considered the possibility that if IP3 binding protects IP3 receptors from Ca2+ inhibition, it might be more effective in hepatocytes where increased Ca2+ slows IP3 dissociation, than in RINm5F cells where Ca2+ does not increase the affinity of IP3 for its receptor. We therefore considered two possible explanations for the rapid inhibition of type 3 IP3 receptors by Ca2+ in the continued presence of IP3. First, Ca2+ inhibition of types 2 and 3 IP3 receptors may be fundamentally different, with Ca2+ inhibiting type 3 receptors irrespective of whether they have IP3 bound. Alternatively, IP3 binding may prevent Ca2+ inhibition for both subtypes, but the rate of IP3 dissociation from type 3 receptors may be too rapid to prevent Ca2+ inhibition during simultaneous exposure to IP3 and high Ca2+ (Fig. 4).

We reasoned that if the latter explanation were true, the rate of Ca2+ inhibition could be no faster than the rate of IP3 dissociation, and the rate of Ca2+ inhibition would be slower if the receptor were occupied by an agonist with a slower dissociation rate. To distinguish between the two possibilities, we therefore used two additional agonists that differ massively in their affinities for IP3 receptors: adenophostin A (44, 45) and 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3 (35) typically have about 10-fold higher and 10-fold lower affinity than IP3, respectively. Conventional 45Ca2+ efflux assays, performed under conditions that mimic those used for rapid superfusion, established that in RINm5F cells adenophostin A (EC50 = 2.5 ± 0.2 nM) was 32-fold more potent than IP3, and 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3 (EC50 = 343 ± 21 nM) was 4-fold less potent than IP3 (EC50 = 79 ± 2 nM) (Fig. 5A). To directly measure the rates of dissociation of these agonists from the active conformation of the type 3 IP3 receptor, rates of 45Ca2+ release were measured as cells were stimulated for 300 ms with 10 µM of each agonist and then as the agonist was rapidly washed out (t1/2 = 31 ± 1 ms) (Fig. 5B). The results (Fig. 5, B and C) demonstrate that after rapid removal of IP3, the channels close with t1/2 = 249 ± 37 ms (n = 3), they close more quickly after removal of 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3 (t1/2 = 156 ± 4 ms), and more slowly after removal of adenophostin A (350 ± 36 ms). The 2.2-fold difference in the dissociation rate of adenophostin A and 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3 is much less than the 137-fold difference in their relative potencies in conventional assays of 45Ca2+ release (Fig. 5A), suggesting that the high affinity of adenophostin A cannot be due entirely to its slower dissociation rate (46). Nevertheless, the significantly different dissociation rates of the three agonists allowed us to assess whether agonist dissociation limits the onset of Ca2+ inhibition.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Ca2+ release evoked by high or low affinity agonists of the IP3 receptor. A, the concentration-dependent effects of adenophostin A (), IP3 (open circle ), or 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3 (black-square) on the 45Ca2+ content of permeabilized RINm5F cells were determined during a 2-min incubation at 20 °C in CLM without ATP and containing 200 nM free [Ca2+] and 1 µM thapsigargin. B, cells were superfused for 300 ms with 10 µM adenophostin A (), IP3 (open circle ), or 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3 (black-square) in CLM containing 200 nM free Ca2+ before removal of the agonist. The dashed line shows the presence of [3H]inulin, included with each of the agonists. Results (mean ± S.E., n = 3) are expressed as percentages of the total Ca2+ content of the intracellular stores. C, rates of 45Ca2+ release (from B) are shown for the period beginning 200 ms after the onset of agonist washout, with each rate expressed as a percentage of that at 200 ms. The lines were fitted to monoexponential equations.

In rapid superfusion experiments where permeabilized RINm5F cells were stimulated for 1 s with IP3 (10 µM), adenophostin A (10 µM), or 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3 (50 µM) in CLM containing 200 nM free Ca2+ before increasing the free [Ca2+] to 100 µM, the half-times for Ca2+ inhibition were indistinguishable (Fig. 6, A-C), at 125 ± 7 ms for IP3, 130 ± 19 ms for adenophostin A, and 131 ± 16 ms for 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3 (n = 3). These results are important for two reasons. First, they demonstrate that the different rates of dissociation of these agonists from the IP3 receptor have no effect on the time course of the inhibition by high-Ca2+. Second, the Ca2+ inhibition (t1/2 ~130 ms) is significantly faster than the rate of dissociation of IP3 (t1/2 = 249 ms). Neither result is consistent with a requirement for IP3 to dissociate from its receptor before it becomes susceptible to Ca2+ inhibition.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Ca2+ rapidly inhibits Ca2+ release evoked by high or low affinity agonists of type 3 IP3 receptors. A-C, cells were superfused with IP3 (10 µM, A), adenophostin A (10 µM, B) or 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3 (50 µM, C) in CLM containing 200 nM free Ca2+ throughout () or for 1 s before increasing the free Ca2+ to 100 µM (open circle ). The dashed lines show the arrival of [3H]inulin included with each agonist in 200 nM free Ca2+ and then at 5 times higher concentration with the high-Ca2+ CLM. Open bars denote the presence of agonist and solid bars the presence of high-Ca2+. Results (mean ± S.E., n = 3) are expressed as fractional release rates.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Opening of Type 3 IP3 Receptors after Sequential Binding of IP3 and Ca2+-- Our earlier rapid superfusion analysis of hepatic (type 2) IP3 receptors demonstrated that in normal CLM (free [Ca2+] ~200 nM), IP3 stimulated 45Ca2+ release only after a significant delay that could not be reduced by increasing the IP3 concentration. We concluded that delayed opening of the channel could not, therefore, be a consequence of slow binding of IP3 to the four receptor subunits (32). Similar absolute latencies had been reported in intact cells after flash-photolysis of caged IP3 in Xenopus oocytes (47), endothelial cells (48), and hepatocytes (49). In permeabilized hepatocytes, the latency before channel opening after addition of supramaximal concentrations of IP3 was, however, affected by the free [Ca2+]; it was longer in nominally Ca2+-free CLM and almost abolished when the free [Ca2+] was very high. Because even prolonged incubation with Ca2+ had no greater effect on latency than Ca2+ delivered with IP3, we concluded that Ca2+ exerted its stimulatory effect only after IP3 had bound to the receptor (32). Our model therefore suggested that binding of IP3 caused a Ca2+-binding site to become accessible and the channel opened only after that site had bound Ca2+ (Fig. 7A). To account for the very long delays in channel opening at low concentrations of IP3, the delays in channel opening evoked by maximal IP3 at limiting Ca2+ concentrations, and the steep concentration dependence of the effects of IP3 on channel opening, we suggested that several of the subunits within the tetrameric receptor were required to complete this sequential binding of IP3 and then Ca2+ before the channel opened to release Ca2+ (Fig. 7A).


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Ca regulation of types 2 and 3 IP3 receptors. A, for both subtypes, binding of IP3 causes exposure of a stimulatory Ca2+-binding site (S). Binding of IP3 and Ca2+ to several (perhaps all four) of the subunits is required for channel opening. B, Ca2+ can inhibit type 3 receptors by binding to an inhibitory site (I) whether or not they have IP3 bound, whereas IP3 binding protects type 2 receptors from Ca2+ inhibition. For simplicity, only a single receptor subunit is shown in B and in both panels the Ca2+-binding sites are shown as part of the IP3 receptor (41), although the involvement of accessory binding sites cannot be eliminated.

Our present results with type 3 IP3 receptors are consistent with the model proposed for type 2 receptors. Maximal concentrations of IP3 evoked 45Ca2+ release only after a significant latency that could not be further reduced by even very substantial increases in IP3 concentration. But the latency was increased in very low-Ca2+ CLM and almost abolished in very high-Ca2+ CLM (Table I). Furthermore, a rapid increase in free [Ca2+] during a response to even a supramaximal concentration of IP3 (100 µM, Fig. 4, B, D, and E) or other agonists (Fig. 6) triggered a rapid increase in the rate of 45Ca2+ release before the inhibitory effect of high-Ca2+ curtailed the response. Maximal occupancy of IP3 receptors by IP3 is not, therefore, sufficient to cause maximal channel opening, but it primes the receptor such that increasing the rate of Ca2+ binding to the newly exposed Ca2+-binding site stimulates further channel opening.

Our results suggest that for both types 2 and 3 receptors, IP3 binding causes exposure of a Ca2+-binding site that must then bind Ca2+ for the channel to open (Fig. 7A). In their steady-state single channel analyses of type 3 IP3 receptors, Foskettand co-workers (15), who also recorded biphasic effects of Ca2+ on channel gating for both Xenopus and type 3 IP3 receptors, concluded that IP3 activates the channel by decreasing its sensitivity to Ca2+ inhibition without modulating its sensitivity to Ca2+ stimulation. That interpretation is not consistent with our model, but it will be difficult to resolve the inconsistency until it becomes possible to record from single channels under conditions that allow rapid changes in IP3 and Ca2+ concentration.

Rapid Inhibition of Type 3 IP3 Receptors by Cytosolic Ca2+-- Despite continuing controversy (23, 24), there is substantial evidence that type 3 IP3 receptors, like all other IP3 receptor subtypes, are inhibited by substantial increases in cytosolic [Ca2+] (15, 25-27). Our present results establish that in the absence of IP3, Ca2+ rapidly inhibits type 3 IP3 receptors (t1/2 = 39 ± 3 ms) and the inhibition cannot be overcome by even very high concentrations of IP3; similar results were previously obtained for type 2 IP3 receptors (31). In contrast with type 2 IP3 receptors, however, the inhibition of type 3 receptors is rapidly (t1/2 = 102 ± 20 ms) and completely reversible (Fig. 3).

In hepatocytes, binding of IP3 protects the receptor from inhibition by increases in cytosolic [Ca2+] that would rapidly inhibit the unliganded receptor (31) (Fig. 4, A and C). This lead us to suggest that in addition to causing the stimulatory Ca2+-binding site to become accessible, IP3 binding also causes occlusion of the inhibitory Ca2+-binding site (Fig. 7B). The results with type 3 IP3 receptors are very different: after an initial stimulation of Ca2+ release (see above) an increase in cytosolic [Ca2+] causes rapid inhibition of IP3-evoked Ca2+ release whether delivered early in the response to IP3 or late in the response (Fig. 4, B, D, and E). In the rapid time courses, where high-Ca2+ was delivered either with the IP3 (Fig. 1B) or 30 ms later (Fig. 1C), Ca2+ shortened the latency before channel opening, but it also caused rapid inhibition of the response. In CLM containing 200 nM free [Ca2+] the peak response to 300 µM IP3 occurred after 293 ± 3 ms and then decayed slowly (t1/2 = 1060 ± 180 ms, n = 6), but the response in 1 mM Ca2+ peaked much earlier (121 ± 13 ms) and then decayed much more rapidly (t1/2 ~140 ms, Fig. 1, B and C). This pattern of response (stimulation then inhibition) and its time course are similar to the responses observed when Ca2+ increases were delivered at later stages of the response to IP3 (Fig. 4, B, D, and E). We suggest that in each case the biphasic response to Ca2+ reflects the balance between rapid Ca2+ binding to stimulatory sites and a slower binding of Ca2+ to inhibitory sites. The time course of the inhibition is therefore slower than that recorded when the cells were pretreated with Ca2+ in the absence of IP3 (Fig. 2).

Ca2+ slows IP3 dissociation from hepatic IP3 receptors (42), but it had no effect on the affinity of type 3 IP3 receptors for IP3. We therefore considered the possibility that even if IP3 binding protected both receptor subtypes from Ca2+ inhibition, the effect might be more significant for hepatic IP3 receptors, where Ca2+ would enhance the protection by slowing dissociation of IP3 from the receptor. If IP3 dissociation did limit the rate of Ca2+ binding to its inhibitory site, we would expect a receptor with a rapidly dissociating agonist bound to be more rapidly susceptible to Ca2+ inhibition. Our results (Fig. 6) showing that inhibition occurs with indistinguishable kinetics for receptors occupied by adenophostin, IP3, or 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-IP3 and that Ca2+ inhibition is more rapid than dissociation of even the most rapidly dissociating agonist establish that agonist dissociation is not required to allow inhibition of type 3 IP3 receptors by Ca2+. We conclude that type 3 IP3 receptors are rapidly and reversibly inhibited by increases in cytosolic [Ca2+] whether or not they have IP3 bound. From single channel analyses of Xenopus (20) or type 3 (15) IP3 receptors in the nuclear envelope, Mak et al. (15) proposed that the effect of IP3 was to relieve inhibition by cytosolic Ca2+. While that model is consistent with the ability of IP3 to block Ca2+ inhibition of type 2 receptors, it is difficult to reconcile with our results for type 3 receptors, where rates of inhibition by Ca2+ appear not to be affected by IP3 binding (Fig. 7B).

Conclusions-- Biphasic regulation by cytosolic Ca2+ may be an ubiquitous feature of IP3 receptors, but our superfusion analyses suggest that the means whereby Ca2+ exerts these effects are different for types 2 and 3 IP3 receptors. Both receptors appear to open after sequential binding of first IP3 and then Ca2+ to several (perhaps all four) subunits of the receptor (Fig. 7A). Ca2+ binding to another site (43) inhibits the receptor. Whereas that site appears to close after IP3 binding to type 2 receptors, it remains accessible after binding of IP3 to type 3 receptors. Ca2+ can therefore inhibit type 2 receptors only after IP3 has dissociated, whereas type 3 receptors are more immediately susceptible to Ca2+ inhibition. We suggest that, contrary to an earlier suggestion (23), type 3 IP3 receptors may be more susceptible than type 2 receptors to rapid inhibition by increased cytosolic Ca2+.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Wellcome Trust Grant 039662.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel./Fax: 44-1223-334058; E-mail: cwt1000@cam.ac.uk.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200524200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; CLM, cytosol-like medium; EC50, half-maximally effective concentration; Pipes, piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid).

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Berridge, M. J. (1993) Nature 361, 315-325[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Hirota, J., Michikawa, T., Miyawaki, A., Furuichi, T., Okura, I., and Mikoshiba, K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 19046-19051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Monkawa, T., Miyawaki, A., Sugiyama, T., Yoneshima, H., Yamamoto-Hino, M., Furuichi, T., Saruta, T., Hasagawa, M., and Mikoshiba, K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 14700-14704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Wojcikiewicz, R. J. H., and He, Y. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 213, 334-341[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Taylor, C. W. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1436, 19-33[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Galvan, D. L., Borrego-Diaz, E., Perez, P. J., and Mignery, G. A. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 29483-29492[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Boehning, D., Mak, D.-O. D., Foskett, J. K., and Joseph, S. K. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 13509-13512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Boehning, D., and Joseph, S. K. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 5450-5459[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Ramos-Franco, J., Fill, M., and Mignery, G. A. (1998) Biophys. J. 75, 834-839[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Mak, D.-O., D., McBride, S., Raghiram, V., Yue, Y., Joseph, S. K., and Foskett, J. K. (2000) J. Gen. Physiol. 115, 241-255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Taylor, C. W., Genazzani, A. A., and Morris, S. A. (1999) Cell Calcium 26, 237-251[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Patel, S., Joseph, S. K., and Thomas, A. P. (1999) Cell Calcium 25, 247-264[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Cardy, T. J. A., and Taylor, C. W. (1998) Biochem. J. 334, 447-455[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Yule, D. I. (2001) J. Gen. Physiol. 117, 431-434[Free Full Text]
15. Mak, D.-O., McBride, S., and Foskett, J. K. (2001) J. Gen. Physiol. 117, 435-446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Hirata, K., Nathanson, M. H., Burgstahler, A. D., Okazaki, K., Mattei, E., and Sears, M. L. (1999) Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 40, 2046-2053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. El-Daher, S. S., Patel, Y., Siddiqua, A., Hassock, S., Edmunds, S., Maddison, B., Patel, G., Goulding, D., Lupu, F., Wojcikiewicz, J. H., and Authi, K. S. (2000) Blood 95, 3412-3422[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Bezprozvanny, I., Watras, J., and Ehrlich, B. E. (1991) Nature 351, 751-754[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Marshall, I. C. B., and Taylor, C. W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 13214-13220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Mak, D.-O., D., McBride, S., and Foskett, J. K. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 15821-15825[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Swatton, J. E., Morris, S. A., and Taylor, C. W. (2001) Biochem. J. 359, 435-441[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Baumann, O., and Walz, B. (1989) J. Comp. Physiol. A 165, 627-636
23. Hagar, R. E., Burgstahler, A. D., Nathanson, M. H., and Ehrlich, B. E. (1998) Nature 296, 81-84
24. Miyakawa, T., Maeda, A., Yamazawa, T., Hirose, K., Kurosaki, T., and Iino, M. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1303-1308[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Missiaen, L., Parys, J. B., Sienaert, I., Maes, K., Kunzelmann, K., Takahashi, M., Tanzawa, K., and De Smet, H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8983-8986[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Swatton, J. E., Morris, S. A., Cardy, T. J. A., and Taylor, C. W. (1999) Biochem. J. 344, 55-60[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Boehning, D., and Joseph, S. K. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 21492-21499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Yoneshima, H., Miyawaki, A., Michikawa, T., Furuichi, T., and Mikoshiba, K. (1997) Biochem. J. 322, 591-596[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Cardy, T. J. A., Traynor, D., and Taylor, C. W. (1997) Biochem. J. 328, 785-793[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Berridge, M. J., Lipp, P., and Bootman, M. D. (2000) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1, 11-21[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Adkins, C. E., and Taylor, C. W. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 1115-1118[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Marchant, J. S., and Taylor, C. W. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 510-518[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Wojcikiewicz, R. J. H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11678-11683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Taylor, C. W., and Marchant, J. S. (1999) in Signal Transduction: A Practical Approach (Milligan, G., ed) , pp. 361-384, IRL Press, Oxford
35. Nerou, E. P., Riley, A. M., Potter, B. V. L., and Taylor, C. W. (2001) Biochem. J. 355, 59-69[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Marchant, J. S., and Taylor, C. W. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 11524-11533[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Marchant, J. S., Beecroft, M. D., Riley, A. M., Jenkins, D. J., Marwood, R. D., Taylor, C. W., and Potter, B. V. L. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 12780-12790[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Missiaen, L., Parys, J. B., Weidema, A. F., Sipma, H., Vanlingen, S., De, Smet, P., Callewaert, G., and De Smedt, H. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 13748-13751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Michikawa, T., Hirota, J., Kawano, S., Hiraoka, M., Yamada, M., Furuichi, T., and Mikoshiba, K. (1999) Neuron 23, 799-808[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Danoff, S. K., Supattapone, S., and Snyder, S. H. (1988) Biochem. J. 254, 701-705[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Miyakawa, T., Mizushima, A., Hirose, K., Yamazawa, T., Bezprozvanny, I., Kurosaki, T., and Iino, M. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 1674-1680[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Pietri, F., Hilly, M., and Mauger, J.-P. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 17478-17485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Marshall, I. C. B., and Taylor, C. W. (1994) Biochem. J. 301, 591-598[Medline] [Order article via