Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111981200 on March 7, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 17696-17705, May 17, 2002
Alternative Splice Variants of Doublecortin-like Kinase Are
Differentially Expressed and Have Different Kinase Activities*
Harold A.
Burgess and
Orly
Reiner
From the Department of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of
Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Received for publication, December 16, 2001, and in revised form, February 21, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Alternative splicing of mRNA
transcripts expands the range of protein products from a single gene
locus. Several splice variants of DCLK
(doublecortin-like kinase) have previously been reported. Here, we
report the genomic organization underlying the splice variants of
DCLK and examine the expression profile of two splice variants affecting the kinase domain of DCLK and CPG16 (candidate plasticity gene 16), one containing an Arg-rich domain and the other
affecting the C terminus of the protein. These splice alternatives were
differentially expressed in embryonic and adult brain. Both splice
variants disrupted DCLK PEST domains; however, all splice variants
remained sensitive to proteolysis by calpain. The adult-specific C-terminal splice variant of DCLK had reduced autophosphorylation activity, but similar kinase activity for myelin basic protein relative
to the embryonic splice variant. The splice variant adding an Arg-rich
domain gained an autophosphorylation site at Ser-382. Although this
protein isoform was expressed mainly in the adult brain, the
phosphorylated form was strongly enriched in embryonic brain and adult
olfactory bulb, suggesting a possible role in migrating neurons.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The majority of neuronal cells in the central nervous system are
generated during embryogenesis and persist throughout life without
further rounds of division and differentiation. Individual neurons
accomplish an array of distinct tasks during their life span, including
cellular migration, axon extension and pathfinding, synaptogenesis, and
participation in mature nervous system function. It has been suggested
that to deal with these diverse demands on cellular function, the
repertoire of neuronal gene products is enhanced by alternative
splicing and RNA editing. Following the description of differential RNA
processing of the calcitonin gene (1), alternative splice forms of many
gene products have been detected in the central nervous system (2,
3).
Doublecortin-like kinase
(DCLK)1 is a serine-threonine
kinase expressed in the central nervous system. The N-terminal domain of DCLK is very similar to the doublecortin protein and mediates microtubule localization (4-6). The C-terminal kinase domain of DCLK
resembles members of the family of
calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases, but lacks a
canonical calmodulin-binding site (7). The human gene was named DCAMKL1
(doublecortin- and
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein
kinase-like protein-1) (8); however, biochemical evidence does not
indicate that calcium/calmodulin modulates kinase activity (7).
The DCLK locus gives rise to several transcripts through
differential splicing and use of alternative promoters (see Fig. 1).
The DCL product includes the doublecortin domain, but lacks the kinase
domain. DCLKR+ is a full-length transcript embracing
both doublecortin and kinase domains and includes an additional 16 amino acids enriched in arginine residues (the Arg-rich domain),
between the doublecortin and kinase domains (9). Two splice variants
affecting the final coding exon of DCLK have been described
(9-11). A second promoter following the doublecortin domain gives rise
to two distinct transcripts: CPG16, which represents the
kinase domain with six unique amino acids at the N terminus (7, 9-11);
and a second transcript encoding a small protein referred to CARP
(Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein
kinase-related peptide) (11) or Ania-4 (12), the N terminus of which is
identical to CPG16 over 38 amino acids, whereas the C terminus consists
of 17 unique amino acids.
DCLK
is susceptible to cleavage by the calcium-dependent
protease calpain (13). This event releases an active kinase domain from
the DCLK microtubule anchorage domain and may therefore represent a
mechanism for regulating the localization of the kinase domain in
response to neuronal calcium transients. Although no consensus sequence
for calpain substrates has been identified, many proteins cleaved by
calpain contain hydrophilic motifs enriched in proline, glutamic acid,
serine, and threonine (PEST domains) (14, 15). Splice forms of DCLK
disrupt the PEST domains, potentially altering its susceptibility to
proteolysis. Differential splicing potentially modulates kinase
activity. The C-terminal tail of calmodulin kinase I has been shown to
fold across the active site of the kinase (16), and the homologous
segment modulates kinase activity in several serine-threonine kinases
(17, 18). We therefore sought to determine whether kinase activity was
altered in splice variants of DCLK.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Exon Structure Determination--
To determine the exon
structure of DCLK underlying different splice variants, we used the
BLAT search tool (19)2 to
align human and mouse cDNAs representing DCLK,
DCL, CPG16, and CARP against the human
genome sequence. Where non-human cDNAs were used, the alignment was
manually curated to determine exact intron/exon boundaries. A
list of shared and unique exons was compiled and is schematically
represented in Fig. 1. We used the same process to determine the exon
structure of DCX.
Isolation of the Mouse Intron between Exons 9 and
10--
Intron/exon boundaries are highly conserved in human and mouse
(20). We therefore designed primers for amplifying the mouse intron
following exon 9 based on mouse cDNA sequence corresponding to
human exons 9 and 10. Primer sequences were 5'-TCTCTCTGTTATTGTGGCAGGA (in exon 10) and 5'-GTTTGCAGCTCAATGGATGA (in exon 9). PCR was performed
under standard conditions for 30 cycles with 50 ng of mouse genomic DNA
for template. A band of 2.4 kb was isolated and end-sequenced using the
exon 9 primer.
RT-PCRs--
RT-PCR was carried out in all cases using the
Access RT-PCR kit (Promega, Madison, WI) with 65 pmol of each primer
and 100 ng of total mRNA isolated from adult mouse heart, testes,
and brain and embryonic day 13, 15, and 17 mouse brain isolated using TriReagent (Sigma, Rehovot, Israel) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The primer pairs used in each reaction are shown in Fig. 3.
The sequences of the primers used are as follows: 40310, 5'-CCCTGGGTTAATGATGATGG; 40311, 5'-GGGGAGTAGTCCTCCGATTC; 47745, 5'-GGCTCCTCGACTTCACTTTC; 47746, 5'-CAGCAAAATTTCCGTCTCCT; 48044, 5'-AGGCTCTGGCTCTTGGCTAT; 48045, 5'-CTTCCCGGAGAAGCAAGTC; 48046, 5'-CTTCTCCCAAGCTCATCACC; and 49139, 5'-TTCAAAGAATACCGCCGAGT. The RT-PCR
conditions were 48 °C for 45 min; 94 °C for 2 min; and then 10 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, touchdown at 68 °C to
58 °C for 45 s, and 68 °C for 30 s; and then 25 cycles
of 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 45 s, and 68 °C for
30 s. In all cases, control reactions containing no RNA and no
reverse transcriptase were included. Reaction products were
separated on 2% agarose gels.
Antibodies and Western Blotting--
Antisera raised against the
DCLK C and N termini have been characterized previously (4, 9). For
anti-DCLK Arg domain antibodies, a peptide (CLGRRHSLQRGWR) was
purchased coupled to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Genemed Synthesis, San
Francisco, CA) and used for production of polyclonal antibodies
(Antibody Unit, Weizmann Institute of Science). The antibodies were
tested by Western blotting on extracts of 293-T cells transfected with
FLAG-DCLKR+
or FLAG-DCLKR+
-D527A
constructs (4). For anti-DCLK phospho-Ser-382 antibodies, a peptide
(CLGRRHSLQRGWR with a phosphorylated serine residue) was purchased and
used for immunization the same way. Sera that tested positive for
reactivity to DCLK on transfected cell extract were affinity-purified
to extract a phospho-specific component. The phosphopeptide and an
unphosphorylated sample of the same peptide were each dissolved in
Me2SO. 10 mg of peptide was added to 2 ml of Affi-Gel 10 beads (Bio-Rad). Following 4 h of coupling, the beads were
quenched with 0.1 M ethanolamine (pH 8.0) for 1 h and
then washed with Me2SO, 0.1 M glycine (pH 2.5),
and 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). Sera was first incubated with
the unphosphorylated peptide-bead conjugate, with rolling at 4 °C
overnight. The flow-through was collected, applied to the
phosphorylated peptide-bead conjugate, and incubated at 4 °C
overnight. The beads were applied to a column and washed with 20 ml of
10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), then with 10 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 0.5 M NaCl, and then with 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.9). Antibodies were eluted with 0.1 M glycine (pH 2.5) and neutralized with 0.1 M
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0). The specificity of the antisera for the
phosphorylated form of the protein was tested by reacting against
recombinant GST-DCLKR+
and
GST-DCLKR+
-D527A and by observing increased
immunoreactivity during autophosphorylation by
GST-DCLKR+
as described below. Anti-DCLK
phospho-Ser-382 antibodies were used at a dilution of 1:100 in 3%
bovine serum albumin with overnight incubation at 4 °C. Cell culture
and transfections were carried out as previously described (13).
Protein extracts from cells and tissues were made in modified
radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5%
deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 0.3 M NaCl,
and 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)) supplemented with protease inhibitors (10 µg/ml aprotinin, 5 µM pepstatin, 10 µg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10 µg/ml leupeptin).
Protein concentration was assessed with the Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad).
Western blotting was carried out using the Laemmli system on 10 or 12%
polyacrylamide gels. Before loading, proteins were denatured by boiling
for 3 min in sample buffer. Blocking and antibody dilution were
carried out in 2.5% skim milk in phosphate-buffered saline and 0.05%
Tween. Other antibodies used are as follows: anti-tubulin monoclonal antibody (clone DM1A) used at 1:5000 (Sigma), peroxidase-conjugated affinity pure goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) at 1:10,000 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA), and
peroxidase-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG at 1:10,000 (Amersham
Biosciences). Anti-GST antibody (1:5000) was a gift from Professor
Kimchi (Weizmann Institute of Science). Blots were developed using
SuperSignal chemiluminescence (Pierce).
Plasmid Construction and Recombinant Protein
Production--
Splice forms of DCLK were constructed as follows. For
GST-DCLK
, first a C-terminal EcoRI-SalI
fragment from FLAG-DCLKR+
was subcloned into FLAG-DCL,
which lacks the Arg-rich domain, to create FLAG-DCLK
. The open
reading frame of DCLK
was then subcloned into pGEX-2TK, creating
GST-DCLK
. For GST-DCLKR+
and GST-DCLK
, a partial
DCLK cDNA containing the DCLK
C terminus was cloned
during screening of a cDNA library (9). The C terminus was
amplified using primers 5'-CAAGAAGCATTTCAACACAGG and
5'-TTTCTCGAGGATCCTGGTTGCGTCTTA and subcloned into pCPG16-RFP (4)
using XmnI and XhoI sites. Note that the
introduction of an XhoI site at the 3'-end of the DCLK
open reading frame alters the last amino acid from Met to Ile. A C-terminal NdeI-XhoI fragment of
pCPG16
-RFP was then subcloned into GST-DCLKR+
(13)
and GST-DCLK
, each cut with NdeI and EcoRI,
and an adaptor was made from oligonucleotides 5-AATTCTTAC and
5'-TCGAGTAAG. For FLAG-DCLKR+
-S382A, point mutations
were introduced into the FLAG-DCLKR+
plasmid using the
QuikChange kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) with primers
5'-CCCCTCTGCAAGGCATGCCTTCTCCCAAG and 5'-CTTGGGAGAAGGCATGCCTTGCAGAGGGG. Production of recombinant GST-DCLK fusion proteins was performed for
all proteins as previously described for GST-DCLKR+
(13).
Calpain Cleavage Assay--
For the calpain cleavage assays,
~200 ng of GST-DCLK was incubated at 30 °C with 1 milliunit of
calpain in 20 µl containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 1 mM CaCl2 for 0, 1, and 10 min, and the reaction
was then stopped by adding sample buffer and 2 mM EDTA. Reactions were subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with an
antibody against the DCLK N terminus.
Kinase Assays--
For in vitro kinase assay ~200
ng of each GST-DCLK splice variant (previously quantitated by Western
blotting to ensure that identical amounts were used) was incubated at
30 °C in kinase reaction buffer containing 20 mM
magnesium acetate, 20 µM ATP, 100 mM NaCl,
100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2.5 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP, 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (Sigma), and
1 µg of myelin basic protein (Sigma). At the indicated time points,
reactions were stopped with sample buffer and 2 mM EDTA.
Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose.
The extent of myelin basic protein phosphorylation and
autophosphorylation was quantified by PhosphorImager analysis before
the blot was subjected to immunoblotting with an antibody against the
DCLK N terminus as a loading control.
Mass Spectrometry--
Recombinant GST-DCLK was allowed to
autophosphorylate in vitro and then subjected to SDS-PAGE
and staining with Coomassie Blue. Tryptic digestion, alkaline
phosphatase treatment, metal column chromatography, and mass
spectrometry were carried out by the Mass Spectrometry Unit of the
Weizmann Institute of Science.
 |
RESULTS |
Genomic Organization Underlying Alternative Splice Forms of
DCLK--
We first sought to clarify the genomic structure underlying
the set of DCLK gene products. We aligned the various
protein products of the DCLK gene against the human genome
(Fig. 1). Our analysis concurs with the
intron/exon organization reported by Matsumoto et al. (21)
and Vreugdenhil et al. (22); however, adding the first exon
of both CPG16 and CARP (exon 6) and the third exon of CARP (exon 8) to generate a full
representation of DCLK exons means that our exon numbering
system is not identical to theirs. As the N terminus of DCLK is ~80%
identical to DCX, we also used BLAT to determine the intron/exon
organization of the DCX gene. The intron/exon structures of
the doublecortin domains of the two genes are extremely similar. The
first exon of both genes is noncoding. Exons 2-4 of DCX and
DCLK are homologous, encoding coordinate sets of amino
acids. Exon 5 of the two genes is very similar, with the
DCLK exon extending for an additional two codons and the
DCX gene having an alternative splice donor site allowing
for the inclusion of an additional five amino acids (GNDQD) after
serine 310. DCLK exon 6 specifies six N-terminal amino acids
unique to CPG16 and CARP. DCLK exon 7 and DCX exon 6 encode homologous amino acids. Interestingly,
DCLK exon 8, used only in CARP, is also
homologous to DCX exon 7.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Exons of the human DCLK gene
homolog DCAMKL1. Exons were determined by
alignment of DCLK, DCL, CPG16, and CARP cDNAs against human genomic
sequence. For comparison, the exon organization of human doublecortin
is also illustrated. Exons colored black encode the same
segments of DCX and DCAMKL1 proteins as the corresponding vertically
aligned exon (e.g. DCX exon 6 is very similar to
DCAMKL1 exon 7). Exons marked with an a
indicate alternative splice sites. DCX exon 5a adds the five
amino acids GDELG following Glu-374; DCAMKL1 exon 9a in
mouse adds the Arg-rich insert discussed under "Results";
and for the DCL transcript, a cryptic 5'-donor site
within DCAMKL1 exon 13a is spliced to a 3'-splice acceptor
in exon 20a, within the untranslated region of other transcripts
depicted. Gene products arising from differential splicing and/or
promoter use are indicated along with the designation used in this
study.
|
|
In the course of cloning mouse DCLK transcripts, we
encountered several splice variants (9). Exon 19 is differentially incorporated, giving rise to the DCLK
and
DCLK
transcripts (Fig. 1). As exon 19 is 74 bases long,
its inclusion in DCLK
transcripts causes exon 20 to be
translated in an alternative reading frame with a premature stop codon
(Fig. 2A). Despite the early
stop codon, DCLK
is only 11 amino acids shorter than DCLK
due to the inclusion of exon 19. A second splice variant, DCLKR+,
incorporated an additional 48 nucleotides following exon 9, encoding
for an Arg-rich domain. We searched for a homologous coding region
between exons 9 and 10 in the human genome sequence, but found only
partial homology to this sequence in the intron immediately after exon
9. We therefore amplified mouse genomic DNA using primers from exons
flanking exon 9. Sequencing revealed that the nucleotides encoding the
Arg-rich domain follow immediately from exon 9 in mouse. This splice
variant therefore arises from alternative 5'-splice site utilization in
mouse, but does not exist in human, although, interestingly,
nucleotides encoding the first five amino acids of this domain are
identical in human. The alternative splice sites in mouse both
match five of the nine nucleotides in the splice donor consensus
sequence (2).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Differential splicing alters the protein
coding sequence of DCLK transcripts.
A, inclusion of exon 19 in DCLK causes a shift in the
reading frame of exon 20. Exons 18-20 are indicated along with the
human-mouse nucleotide identity. The splice organization of DCLK and
DCLK is illustrated along with cognate amino acids. B,
use of an alternative 5'-splice donor site after exon 9 generates the
16-amino acid insert constituting the Arg-rich domain in
DCLKR+. Human and mouse sequences at the end of and
following exon 9 are aligned; nucleotides contributing to the coding
region are underlined; and the corresponding protein
sequences are shown. Although experimental evidence supports the use of
the distal 5'-splice donor site in mouse transcripts, there is no
evidence for a corresponding splice variant in human. Moreover, the
human putative protein sequence (in italics) is not similar
to the mouse protein sequence in the Arg-rich domain.
|
|
Alternative Splice Forms of DCLK Are Differentially
Expressed--
To determine whether all the described splice products
could be detected in mouse tissue, we undertook a series of RT-PCR and
Western blot experiments using antisera raised against peptides from
different splice forms of DCLK. RT-PCR experiments demonstrated that
splice forms of both CPG16 and DCLK exist that
contain the Arg-rich domain. From total mRNA, experiments performed
with primers designed to co-amplify splice forms with and without the
Arg-rich domain indicated that although the splice form lacking the
Arg-rich domain was more readily amplified and therefore probably more abundant, the Arg-rich domain was detected in both embryonic and adult
mouse brain (Fig. 3A). Primers
designed to specifically amplify the Arg-rich domain from
DCLK but not CPG16 detected DCLKR+ at
all ages, most strongly during embryogenesis, consistent with down-regulation of DCLK in adult brain (Fig. 3B).
In contrast, CPG16-specific primers revealed expression of
both CPG16 and CPG16R+ in adult brain only (Fig.
3C). Expression of a second product of the CPG16
promoter (CARP) was also confined to adult brain (Fig.
3D). Experiments designed to differentially amplify
transcripts encoding the alternative C termini of DCLK
demonstrated a switch in utilization from the
-splice form during
embryogenesis to the
-splice form in the adult (Fig.
3E).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
RT-PCR shows differential expression of
alternative splice forms in embryonic and adult brain.
DCLK gene products are schematized on the right,
together with the positions of the primers used. The sizes of the
expected PCR products N1 to N8 are indicated and aligned below the
corresponding primers. A, RT-PCR with primers 47745 and
47746 detected the Arg-rich domain (R) splice variant
(product N1) in embryonic and adult brain. Note that product N1
was potentially amplified from either DCLK or
CPG16 (see schematic on right). B, RT-PCR with
primers 48045 and 48046 demonstrated the inclusion of the Arg-rich
domain specifically in DCLK (as opposed to
CPG16) transcripts. C, RT-PCR with
primers 48044 and 47746 detected a splice variant of CPG16
including the Arg-rich domain in adult brain (product N4).
D, RT-PCR with primers 48044 and 49139 detected CARP
expression exclusively in adult brain (product N6), similar to
CPG16 (product N5 in C). E, RT-PCR
with primers 40310 and 40311 demonstrated predominance of -splice
forms skipping exon 19 in embryonic brain (product N7) and -splice
forms including it in adult brain (product N8). MQ, MilliQ
water; E13, E15, and E17, embryonic
days 13, 15, and 17, respectively; Ad.-RT, no reverse
transcriptase; C-ter, C terminus.
|
|
To confirm these results, we raised antibodies against a peptide
representing part of the amino acid sequence of the Arg-rich domain
(Fig. 4A). Immunoblot analysis
using an antibody against the N terminus of DCLK, which should
recognize all splice forms of DCLK, revealed expression in both adult
and developing brain. The anti-DCLK Arg domain antisera reacted with a
band of the same size mainly in adult brain (Fig. 4B).
Expression of DCLKR+ mRNA has been reported in adult
hippocampus (22). As previously reported (9),
-specific antisera
revealed strong expression only in embryonic brain lysate, consistent
with the switch from
- to
-splice form utilization seen by
RT-PCR.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Western blotting demonstrates differential
expression of / - and
Arg-rich domain splice variants of DCLK in embryonic and adult
brain. A, antisera against a peptide from within the
arginine-rich insert in DCLK were tested for specificity in Western
blotting (WB) of lysates from 293-T cells transfected with
FLAG-DCLK or FLAG-DCLK-D527A (kinase mutant). No reaction was
seen in mock-transfected cells, whereas a single band of the expected
~85 kDa was seen in both transfected cell lysates. B, the
distribution of different splice forms of DCLK in embryonic and adult
brain was compared by Western blotting against protein extracts of
brain tissue. The antibody against the DCLK N terminus recognizes an
epitope present in all DCLK splice forms and indicates that DCLK was
found at all ages examined (first panel). The splice form
with the Arg-rich insert was found almost exclusively in adult brain
(third panel). As previously reported, the splice form of
DCLK affecting the last coding exon, which is recognized by our
antisera against the C terminus, was expressed mostly in embryonic and
neonatal brain (second panel). Blots were reprobed with
anti-tubulin antibody as a loading control (fourth panel).
E13, E15, and E17, embryonic days 13, 15, and 17, respectively.
|
|
Splice Variants Have Altered Kinase Activity, but Not Calpain
Susceptibility--
Both the Arg-rich domain and
/
-splice
variants alter PEST domains within DCLK (Fig.
5A). The
-splice form lacks
a C-terminal PEST domain altogether, whereas the Arg-rich domain
disrupts a strong PEST domain preceding the kinase domain, producing
two weak adjacent PEST domains. As PEST domains have been considered to
be calpain-targeting signals, we tested whether all splice forms of
DCLK remained sensitive to cleavage by calpain in vitro. Recombinant forms of all splice forms of DCLK were cleaved by calpain
within 10 min of incubation, indicating that splicing does not render
DCLK immune to proteolytic attack (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Differential splicing of DCLK
transcripts disrupt both PEST domains, but does not abolish
sensitivity to proteolysis by calpain. A, the four
splice variants of DCLK are illustrated with PEST domains marked as
black boxes. Only the -form contains a C-terminal PEST
domain. Differential utilization of the Arg-rich domain (white
boxes) between the DCX and kinase domains disrupts the PEST domain
in this region and effectively breaks it in two. Scores of significant
PEST domains are marked. Higher numbers represent putatively stronger
domains, whereas only scores above 5.0 are considered to be true PEST
domains. B, recombinant GST-DCLK fusion proteins
representing all four splice variants were completely cleaved by
calpain within 10 min of incubation. WB, Western
blotting.
|
|
We next tested whether splice forms of DCLK demonstrated different
kinase activity in vitro, as assessed by the rate of
autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of an exogenous substrate,
myelin basic protein. Whereas all splice forms showed similar kinase
activity for myelin basic protein (Fig.
6A), the rate of
autophosphorylation of DCLK
was only 50% of that of DCLK
or
DCLKR+
(Fig. 6B). We therefore sought to
determine sites of autophosphorylation of DCLK and subjected
recombinant DCLKR+
autophosphorylated in
vitro to analysis by mass spectrometry.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
DCLK has reduced
autophosphorylation activity, but not reduced kinase activity for
myelin basic protein. Recombinant GST-DCLK ( ),
GST-DCLKR+ ( ), GST-DCLK ( ), and
GST-DCLKR+ ( ) were assayed for activity for myelin
basic protein (A) and autophosphorylation (B)
using [ -32P]ATP. Prior experiments determined that,
under the conditions used, the reaction remained linear at these time
points. Reactions were stopped at different time points and subjected
to SDS-PAGE. Immunoblotting with an antibody against the DCLK N
terminus was carried out to ensure equal loading of kinase. The extent
of 32P incorporation was measured by exposure of the
membrane to PhosphorImager analysis and quantitation.
|
|
DCLK Autophosphorylates at Ser-382--
Mass spectrometry of
tryptic fragments of DCLK revealed a major peptide peak with a
molecular mass exactly representing a phosphorylated form of Ser-382,
which lies in the Arg-rich domain (Fig.
7A). This peptide was
eliminated by treatment of DCLK with alkaline phosphatase (Fig.
7B). Furthermore, it was retained on metal columns designed
to enrich for phosphopeptides (Fig. 7, C and D),
but not following treatment with alkaline phosphatase (Fig. 7,
E and F). These results strongly indicate that
one site of autophosphorylation of DCLK is in its Arg-rich domain, at
Ser-382.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Mass spectrometry reveals autophosphorylation
by DCLK in the Arg-rich domain at serine 382. A,
recombinant DCLKR+ was allowed to autophosphorylate
in vitro before tryptic digestion and analysis by mass
spectrometry. The molecular mass (876.42 Da) of a prominent peak
(indicated by the arrow) corresponds closely to the expected
molecular mass of a tryptic fragment (RHSLQR) with a phosphorylated
serine residue. B, when the mixture of tryptic peptides was
previously subjected to treatment with alkaline phosphatase
(AP), the peak at 876.42 Da was eliminated. Instead, a peak
was observed at 796.48 Da, corresponding to the expected molecular mass
of the same but now unphosphorylated peptide (arrow).
C-F, metal affinity columns selectively retained a
phosphorylated peptide at 876.4 Da. After in vitro
autophosphorylation, the protein was subjected to tryptic digestion,
purification on metal affinity columns, and analysis by mass
spectrometry. The peptide at 876.4 Da (marked by an arrow in
each panel), potentially representing phospho-RHSLQR, was retained on
both ferric (C) and nickel (D) metal affinity
columns, suggesting that it bears a negative charge. Such peptides are
often phosphopeptides. Retention of the 876.4-Da band on metal affinity
columns was eliminated by pretreatment of the peptide mixture with
alkaline phosphatase (compare the peak exactly under the tip of the
arrow before alkaline phosphatase treatment in E
and after treatment in F). This demonstrates that the
negative charge on the 876.4-Da peptide is indeed derived from a
phosphate moiety.
|
|
We raised antisera against a synthetic peptide phosphorylated at
Ser-382 and affinity-purified a phospho-specific component. The
affinity-purified antisera reacted strongly with recombinant DCLKR+
purified from bacteria, which appeared to
autophosphorylate during expression. The specificity for phosphorylated
Ser-382 was indicated by the presence of only faint cross-reactivity
with a kinase mutant form of the DCLKR+
-D527A protein
(Fig. 8A). Similar results
were obtained with recombinant DCLKR+
(data not
shown).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
DCLK is phosphorylated at serine 382 in mouse
brain lysate. A, antisera that specifically recognize
Ser-382-phosphorylated DCLK were prepared by immunization with a
synthetic phosphopeptide. These antisera react with recombinant DCLK
in vitro only when the protein is competent to
autophosphorylate; the kinase mutant form of DCLK with a D527A mutation
(4) is not recognized by these antisera. The antisera against the DCLK
C terminus, which are insensitive to the phosphorylation state,
revealed similar amounts of DCLK in each lane. B, in protein
extract from transfected 293-T cells (40 µg/lane), the anti-DCLK
phospho-Ser-382 antibody (lower panel) recognized only
FLAG-DCLKR+ (containing the phosphorylated epitope), but
not FLAG-DCLKR+ -S382A (in which the phosphorylated
serine is replaced by alanine) or FLAG-DCLK (the splice form lacking
this autophosphorylation site altogether). As a transfection control,
the antibody against the DCLK N terminus demonstrated expression of all
three proteins (upper panel). C,
autophosphorylation of GST-DCLKR+ in vitro
enhanced immunoreactivity with the anti-DCLK phospho-Ser-382 antisera
(upper panel). Anti-GST antibodies were used as a loading
control (lower panel). Quantitation of the signal by
scanning densitometry, normalized to anti-GST immunoreactivity,
demonstrated a 3.7-fold increase in signal after autophosphorylation.
D, the anti-DCLK phospho-Ser-382 antibody was used to study
whether Ser-382-phosphorylated DCLK exists in brain lysate. The
antibody against the DCLK N terminus showed expression of DCLK in
embryonic and adult brain and minor expression in olfactory bulbs
(first panel). Although the splice form of DCLK that
includes this residue was most expressed in adult brain (second
panel), the phosphorylated form was detected most strongly in
embryonic brain extract and in adult olfactory bulb (third
panel). The blot was also probed with anti-tubulin antibody as a
loading control (fourth panel). WB, Western
blotting; E16 and E18, embryonic days 16 and 18, respectively.
|
|
To further test the specificity of the antisera, 293-T cells were
transfected with FLAG-DCLKR+
, FLAG-DCLK
, or a
FLAG-DCLKR+
-S382A construct carrying a point mutation
changing serine 382 to alanine, eliminating the putative
autophosphorylation site. Western blotting of protein extracts from
transfected cells with antisera against the DCLK N terminus
demonstrated expression of all three constructs (Fig. 8B,
upper panel). The affinity-purified antisera recognized the
FLAG-DCLKR+
protein, but showed no immunoreactivity with
the FLAG-DCLK
protein (which lacks the phosphorylation site) or
FLAG-DCLKR+
-S382A (in which the epitope carries a point
mutation) (Fig. 8B, lower panel).
Either autophosphorylation at Ser-382 is saturated during
expression, or Ser-382 is only poorly phosphorylated in
vitro, as immunoreactivity during in vitro
autophosphorylation increased by 3.7-fold (quantitation of immunoblot
in Fig. 8C). The affinity-purified antisera were used to
study the extent of endogenous autophosphorylation in mouse tissue.
Protein extract was made in buffer with inhibitors of serine-threonine
phosphatases and subjected to immunoblotting (Fig. 8D).
Again, we noted the pronounced expression of the DCLKR+
protein in adult brain. Surprisingly, phosphorylation at Ser-382 was
most easily detected in embryonic brain and olfactory bulb, suggesting
that although expression of DCLKR+ is very low, it is more
likely to be phosphorylated at Ser-382.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Regulated Expression of DCLK Splice Forms--
Here, we have
reported the differential expression of alternative splice products of
the DCLK gene. Splice forms of DCLK vary in
autophosphorylation activity, but not in activity for an in vitro substrate, myelin basic protein. We have demonstrated that the
-splice variant of the DCLK C terminus has only 50% of the autophosphorylation activity of the
-splice variant. A second splice
variant incorporating an Arg-rich domain before the kinase domain is
autophosphorylated at Ser-382, as assessed by mass spectrometry and
anti-DCLK phospho-Ser-382 antibodies.
It has been predicted that one-third to one-half of human mRNAs are
subject to alternative splicing (23, 24). Only ~20% of alternatively
spliced genes have variations in the coding region (24). In 40% of the
cases, variant protein sequences are generated by splice alternatives
utilizing exons in different reading frames. The use of an exon in two
reading frames may result from the use of alternative 5'- or 3'-splice
sites; from the retention of an intron; or, as in the case of
DCLK, from the differential inclusion of an exon encoding an
odd number of nucleotides (25).
Alternative 5'-splice site selection of DCLK exon 9 accounts
for a splice variant of mouse DCLK in which an Arg-rich
domain precedes the kinase domain. A second splice variant of
DCLK arises from differential incorporation of exon 19. The
first 67 nucleotides of DCAMKL1 exon 20, which are utilized
in two reading frames, are identical in mouse and human, compared with
a 90% nucleotide identity in other exons, including the region of exon
20 that is not translated in two frames. This may reflect constraints on mutation due to the necessity of preserving function in two amino
acid sequences. However, as exon 19 is also almost identical in mouse
and human (73 of 74 nucleotides), mutation may be constrained by other
factors, including sequence motifs regulating alternative splicing. A
high degree of human-mouse nucleotide sequence similarity in
alternatively spliced exons has previously been reported for the
myotonic dystrophy protein kinase gene (26).
Splice variants encompassing the Arg-rich domain were enriched in adult
mouse brain. This probably reflects the adult-specific expression of
CPG16 and CPG16 R+. As the DCLKR+ protein (but
not mRNA) was also enriched in adult brain, there may be
differences in mRNA stability in embryonic and adult tissues. We
demonstrated that the Arg-rich domain of DCLK is specific to mouse. The
RT-PCR results, although not strictly quantitative, suggest that the
DCLKR+ splice form is either a minor transcript or
expressed in a small subset of neurons.
In addition, we observed a switch from mRNA transcripts encoding
the
-splice variant in embryonic tissue to the
-splice variant in
adult tissue. Western blot analysis confirmed that DCLK
expression
is lost following embryogenesis and showed that total DCLK expression
(presumably reflecting DCLK
expression) is somewhat reduced in adult
tissue. The main splice forms of DCLK are therefore DCLK
during
embryogenesis and DCLK
in adult brain. As CPG16 expression is
confined to adult brain, this indicates that the main splice form of
CPG16 is CPG16
, a conclusion supported by additional RT-PCR
experiments (data not shown). Previous in situ hybridization
experiments have demonstrated expression of both
- and
-splice
forms in adult hippocampus; however, it is unclear whether the
transcripts detected represent CPG16 or DCLK (22).
RNA splicing involves the recruitment of spliceosomal proteins and
small nuclear ribonucleoproteins to pre-mRNA at 5'- and 3'-splice
sites. Splice alternatives arise from competition between spliceosomes
forming at potential splice sites, and control of splice decisions may
therefore be achieved by regulation of spliceosome formation.
Spliceosome formation is regulated by several mechanisms, including phosphorylation of the SR splicing factor
ASF/SF2 (27) and the ratio of spliceosome heterogeneous nuclear
ribonucleoprotein A1 to ASF/SF2 proteins (28). A large number of
neuron-specific splicing events have been described (2), making it
likely that neuronal cells contain factors that orchestrate RNA
processing in a neuron-specific manner (29-31).
Splicing decisions are also controlled by the combinatorial action of
multiple RNA elements residing in both exons and introns (3, 32, 33).
Intronic polypyrimidine tracts at the 3'-splice site of exons
constitute negative splicing control elements. In the large
conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK) channel and NMDAR1, these
act to exclude the incorporation of exons in response to calcium
signaling through Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase IV (33). The polypyrimidine tract-binding protein
represses utilization of the neuron-specific N1 exon in c-src
by binding CUCUCU motifs in the flanking introns (34). The
polypyrimidine tract within the 3'-splice acceptor of DCLK
exon 19 contains such a motif, potentially contributing to repression
of this exon during embryogenesis.
Regulated splice sites often display a poor match to splice consensus
sequences, facilitating regulation of the site (2). The alternative
5'-splice sites following exon 9 are equally poor matches to the splice
consensus sequence, potentially making it prone to differential splicing.
DCLK Splice Variants Are Susceptible to Cleavage by
Calpain--
Control of susceptibility to cleavage by calpain by
alternative splicing has been previously demonstrated for I
B
(35) and prointerleukin-1a (36). As PEST domains are disrupted by splice
alternatives of DCLK, we examined the significance of the DCLK PEST
domains for calpain-mediated proteolysis.
It has been suggested that by sequestering calcium, negatively charged
residues clustered in PEST domains could raise its local concentration
sufficiently to activate calpain (14). Evidence supports the original
contention that PEST domains target proteins for rapid degradation (for
example, see Ref. 37). The strongest evidence for PEST domains
conferring susceptibility to calpain comes from a study in which the
PEST domain of I
B
was shown to be necessary for binding to and
cleavage by calpain (38). This domain also acted as a transferable
calpain susceptibility module. Other results do not support a function
for PEST domains as calpain susceptibility motifs (39, 40). Moreover,
some calpain substrates lack strong PEST signatures (40-42), whereas some PEST domain-containing proteins are either not susceptible or
resistant to calpain (15, 40).
Despite significant variations in the strength of PEST motifs in splice
forms of DCLK, all splice forms of DCLK were cleaved by calpain
in vitro. Our results therefore lend support to a body of
evidence arguing that PEST motifs are not required for proteolytic cleavage of substrates by calpain. Possibly calmodulin-binding motifs
interact with the calmodulin-like domain of calpain and act as
targeting signals (15, 39, 43). Calmodulin often alters the cleavage
pattern of calpain substrates (44, 45); however, the calmodulin-binding
domain itself is not required for calpain proteolysis in several
proteins (15).
Research into the role of PEST domains in targeting calpain may be
confounded by two problems. The algorithm that scores PEST domains may
not be optimal for recognizing biologically significant motifs.
Its performance may be compromised by the requirement for positive
residues bracketing (but not within) the PEST domain (15).
Additionally, as the PEST domain is not the site of proteolysis by
calpain, but rather was proposed to target calpain to protein substrates (14), the use of in vitro assays to determine
cleavage susceptibility may be inappropriate.
DCLK Splice Variants Affect Kinase Activity--
In characterizing
autophosphorylation sites of DCLK, we found a strong mass spectrometry
signal for a peptide with mass compatible with phosphorylation at
Ser-382. The residues immediately surrounding Ser-382 are RRHSLQR. Arg
or Lys residues are commonly found closely preceding target
phosphorylated residues in substrates of serine-threonine kinases.
Ser-382 lies in the differentially spliced Arg-rich domain. Modulation
of kinase activity by Arg-rich domains has been previously described
(46, 47). Using anti-DCLK phospho-Ser-382 antisera, we detected
phosphorylation of this residue in mouse tissue. An unexpected finding
was that phosphorylated Ser-382 was more strongly detected in embryonic
brain and adult olfactory bulb than in adult brain despite higher
expression of the Arg-rich domain in adult brain. This may be due to
greater autophosphorylation activity of DCLK
, which is the main
embryonic splice form of DCLK. Alternatively, this residue may be
phosphorylated by another kinase in embryonic brain.
Autophosphorylation has been previously linked to regulation of
serine-threonine kinase activity. Autophosphorylation by the closely
related kinase Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase II leads to calcium-independent activity and is
necessary for the establishment of long term potentiation (48).
We note with interest that a feature common to embryonic brain and
adult olfactory bulb is ongoing neuronal migration. In the developing
cortex, DCLK is most strongly expressed in cortical plate neurons (4),
whereas some reports show expression in migrating neurons (5, 49). We
plan to use the anti-DCLK phospho-Ser-382 antibodies to study the
distribution of phosphorylated DCLK within the brain and to study the
pattern of phosphorylation of this residue in response to stimulation
protocols in cultured neurons.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Orit Leitner and Alon
Levy (Antibody Unit, Weizmann Institute of Science) for help in
producing phospho-specific antibodies. We also gratefully acknowledge
the expert assistance of Dr. Alla Shainskaya and Tevie
Mehlman (Mass Spectrometry Unit, Weizmann Institute of Science).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Human Frontier
Science Program Grant RG283199, the Minerva Foundation (Germany), and
the Volkswagon-Stiftung.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Incumbent of the Aser Rothstein Career Development Chair in
Genetic Diseases. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Inst. of Science, Herzl 2, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Tel.: 972-8-9342319; Fax: 972-8-9344108; E-mail:
Orly.Reiner@weizmann.ac.il.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 7, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111981200
2
Available at genome.ucsc.edu/.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
DCLK, doublecortin-like kinase;
DCAMKL1, doublecortin- and
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase-like
protein-1;
DCL, doublecortin-like protein;
CPG16, candidate plasticity
gene 16;
CARP, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent
protein kinase-related peptide;
DCX, doublecortin;
RT-PCR, reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Amara, S. G.,
Jonas, V.,
Rosenfeld, M. G.,
Ong, E. S.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1982)
Nature
298,
240-244[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Stamm, S.,
Zhang, M. Q.,
Marr, T. G.,
and Helfman, D. M.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
1515-1526[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Lopez, A. J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
32,
279-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Burgess, H. A.,
and Reiner, O.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Neurosci.
16,
529-541[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Lin, P. T.,
Gleeson, J. G.,
Corbo, J. C.,
Flanagan, L.,
and Walsh, C. A.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
9152-9161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Gonczy, P.,
Bellanger, J. M.,
Kirkham, M.,
Pozniakowski, A.,
Baumer, K.,
Phillips, J. B.,
and Hyman, A. A.
(2001)
Dev. Cell
1,
363-375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Silverman, M. A.,
Benard, O.,
Jaaro, H.,
Rattner, A.,
Citri, Y.,
and Seger, R.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2631-2636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Sossey-Alaoui, K.,
and Srivastava, A. K.
(1999)
Genomics
56,
121-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Burgess, H. A.,
Martinez, S.,
and Reiner, O.
(1999)
J. Neurosci. Res.
58,
567-575[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Omori, Y.,
Suzuki, M.,
Ozaki, K.,
Harada, Y.,
Nakamura, Y.,
Takahashi, E.,
and Fujiwara, T.
(1998)
J. Hum. Genet.
43,
169-177[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Vreugdenhil, E.,
Datson, N.,
Engels, B.,
de Jong, J.,
van Koningsbruggen, S.,
Schaaf, M.,
and de Kloet, E. R.
(1999)
J. Neurobiol.
39,
41-50[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Berke, J. D.,
Paletzki, R. F.,
Aronson, G. J.,
Hyman, S. E.,
and Gerfen, C. R.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
5301-5310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Burgess, H. A.,
and Reiner, O.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
36397-36403[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Rogers, S.,
Wells, R.,
and Rechsteiner, M.
(1986)
Science
234,
364-368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Wang, K. K.,
Villalobo, A.,
and Roufogalis, B. D.
(1989)
Biochem. J.
262,
693-706[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Goldberg, J.,
Nairn, A. C.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1996)
Cell
84,
875-887[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Francis, S. H.,
Smith, J. A.,
Colbran, J. L.,
Grimes, K.,
Walsh, K. A.,
Kumar, S.,
and Corbin, J. D.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20748-20755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Cegielska, A.,
Gietzen, K. F.,
Rivers, A.,
and Virshup, D. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1357-1364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Lander, E. S.,
Linton, L. M.,
Birren, B.,
Nusbaum, C.,
Zody, M. C.,
Baldwin, J.,
Devon, K.,
Dewar, K.,
Doyle, M.,
FitzHugh, W.,
Funke, R.,
Gage, D.,
Harris, K.,
Heaford, A.,
Howland, J.,
Kann, L.,
Lehoczky, J.,
LeVine, R.,
McEwan, P.,
McKernan, K.,
Meldrim, J.,
Mesirov, J. P.,
Miranda, C.,
Morris, W.,
Naylor, J.,
Raymond, C.,
Rosetti, M.,
Santos, R.,
Sheridan, A.,
Sougnez, C.,
Stange-Thomann, N.,
Stojanovic, N.,
Subramanian, A.,
Wyman, D.,
Rogers, J.,
Sulston, J.,
Ainscough, R.,
Beck, S.,
Bentley, D.,
Burton, J.,
Clee, C.,
Carter, N.,
Coulson, A.,
Deadman, R.,
Deloukas, P.,
Dunham, A.,
Dunham, I.,
Durbin, R.,
French, L.,
Grafham, D.,
Gregory, S.,
Hubbard, T.,
Humphray, S.,
Hunt, A.,
Jones, M.,
Lloyd, C.,
McMurray, A.,
Matthews, L.,
Mercer, S.,
Milne, S.,
Mullikin, J. C.,
Mungall, A.,
Plumb, R.,
Ross, M.,
Shownkeen, R.,
Sims, S.,
Waterston, R. H.,
Wilson, R. K.,
Hillier, L. W.,
McPherson, J. D.,
Marra, M. A.,
Mardis, E. R.,
Fulton, L. A.,
Chinwalla, A. T.,
Pepin, K. H.,
Gish, W. R.,
Chissoe, S. L.,
Wendl, M. C.,
Delehaunty, K. D.,
Miner, T. L.,
Delehaunty, A.,
Kramer, J. B.,
Cook, L. L.,
Fulton, R. S.,
Johnson, D. L.,
Minx, P. J.,
Clifton, S. W.,
Hawkins, T.,
Branscomb, E.,
Predki, P.,
Richardson, P.,
Wenning, S.,
Slezak, T.,
Doggett, N.,
Cheng, J. F.,
Olsen, A.,
Lucas, S.,
Elkin, C.,
Uberbacher, E.,
Frazier, M.,
et al..
(2001)
Nature
409,
860-921[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Batzoglou, S.,
Pachter, L.,
Mesirov, J. P.,
Berger, B.,
and Lander, E. S.
(2000)
Genome Res.
10,
950-958[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Matsumoto, N.,
Pilz, D. T.,
and Ledbetter, D. H.
(1999)
Genomics
56,
179-183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Vreugdenhil, E.,
Engels, B.,
Middelburg, R.,
van Koningsbruggen, S.,
Knol, J.,
Veldhuisen, B.,
and de Kloet, E. R.
(2001)
Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.
94,
67-74[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Kan, Z.,
Rouchka, E. C.,
Gish, W. R.,
and States, D. J.
(2001)
Genome Res.
11,
889-900[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Mironov, A. A.,
Fickett, J. W.,
and Gelfand, M. S.
(1999)
Genome Res.
9,
1288-1293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Lazaridis, K. N.,
Tietz, P., Wu, T.,
Kip, S.,
Dawson, P. A.,
and LaRusso, N. F.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
11092-11097[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Groenen, P. J.,
Wansink, D. G.,
Coerwinkel, M.,
van den Broek, W.,
Jansen, G.,
and Wieringa, B.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
605-616[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Petersen-Mahrt, S. K.,
Estmer, C.,
Ohrmalm, C.,
Matthews, D. A.,
Russell, W. C.,
and Akusjarvi, G.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1014-1024[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Caceres, J. F.,
Stamm, S.,
Helfman, D. M.,
and Krainer, A. R.
(1994)
Science
265,
1706-1709[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Jensen, K. B.,
Dredge, B. K.,
Stefani, G.,
Zhong, R.,
Buckanovich, R. J.,
Okano, H. J.,
Yang, Y. Y.,
and Darnell, R. B.
(2000)
Neuron
25,
359-371[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Wakamatsu, Y.,
and Weston, J. A.
(1997)
Development
124,
3449-3460[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Polydorides, A. D.,
Okano, H. J.,
Yang, Y. Y.,
Stefani, G.,
and Darnell, R. B.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
6350-6355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Wei, N.,
Lin, C. Q.,
Modafferi, E. F.,
Gomes, W. A.,
and Black, D. L.
(1997)
RNA
3,
1275-1288[Abstract]
|
| 33.
|
Xie, J.,
and Black, D. L.
(2001)
Nature
410,
936-939[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Chou, M. Y.,
Underwood, J. G.,
Nikolic, J.,
Luu, M. H.,
and Black, D. L.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
5,
949-957[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Hirano, F.,
Chung, M.,
Tanaka, H.,
Maruyama, N.,
Makino, I.,
Moore, D. D.,
and Scheidereit, C.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2596-2607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Sultana, T.,
Svechnikov, K.,
Weber, G.,
and Soder, O.
(2000)
Endocrinology
141,
4413-4418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Decatur, A. L.,
and Portnoy, D. A.
(2000)
Science
290,
992-995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Shumway, S. D.,
Maki, M.,
and Miyamoto, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
30874-30881[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Molinari, M.,
Anagli, J.,
and Carafoli, E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
2032-2035[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Carillo, S.,
Pariat, M.,
Steff, A.,
Jariel-Encontre, I.,
Poulat, F.,
Berta, P.,
and Piechaczyk, M.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
313,
245-251[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Xie, H. Q.,
and Johnson, G. V.
(1998)
J. Neurosci. Res.
53,
153-164[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Kobayashi, Y.,
Yamamoto, K.,
Saido, T.,
Kawasaki, H.,
Oppenheim, J. J.,
and Matsushima, K.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5548-5552[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Molinari, M.,
Maki, M.,
and Carafoli, E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14576-14581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Wang, K. K.,
Roufogalis, B. D.,
and Villalobo, A.
(1989)
Biochem. Cell Biol.
67,
703-711[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Wang, K. K.,
Roufogalis, B. D.,
and Villalobo, A.
(1988)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
267,
317-327[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Tokumitsu, H.,
Takahashi, N.,
Eto, K.,
Yano, S.,
Soderling, T. R.,
and Muramatsu, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
15803-15810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Poteet-Smith, C. E.,
Shabb, J. B.,
Francis, S. H.,
and Corbin, J. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
379-388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Silva, A. J.,
Stevens, C. F.,
Tonegawa, S.,
and Wang, Y.
(1992)
Science
257,
201-206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Mizuguchi, M.,
Qin, J.,
Yamada, M.,
Ikeda, K.,
and Takashima, S.
(1999)
Am. J. Pathol.
155,
1713-1721[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg