Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200954200 on March 11, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 17765-17774, May 17, 2002
Regulation of ALF Gene Expression in Somatic and Male Germ Line
Tissues Involves Partial and Site-specific Patterns of Methylation*
Wensheng
Xie,
SangYoon
Han,
Mohammed
Khan, and
Jeff
DeJong
From the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of
Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas 75080
Received for publication, January 29, 2002, and in revised form, March 7, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
ALF (TFIIA
/
-like factor) is a germ
cell-specific counterpart of the large (
/
) subunit of general
transcription factor TFIIA. Here we isolated homologous GC-rich
promoters from the mouse and human ALF genes and used promoter deletion
analysis to identify sequences active in COS-7 and 293 cells.
Further, bisulfite sequence analysis of the mouse ALF promoter
showed that all 21 CpG dinucleotides between
179 and +207 were
partially methylated in five somatic tissues, brain, heart, liver,
lung, and muscle, and in epididymal spermatozoa from adult mice. In contrast, DNA from prepubertal mouse testis and from purified spermatocytes were unmethylated except at C+19G and
C+170G. We also found that ALF expression correlates
with a strong promoter-proximal DNase I-hypersensitive site present in
nuclei from testis but not from liver. Finally we show that in
vitro methylation of the ALF promoter inhibits activity and that
5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine treatment reactivates the endogenous ALF gene in
a panel of seven different mouse and human somatic cell lines. Overall
the results show that silencing in somatic cells is
methylation-dependent and reversible and that a unique
CpG-specific methylation pattern at the ALF promoter precedes
expression in pachytene spermatocytes. This pattern is transient as
remethylation of the ALF promoter in haploid germ cell DNA has occurred
by the time spermatozoa are present in the epididymis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The ALF1 gene
(TFIIA
/
-like factor;
TFIIA
) encodes a 478-amino acid protein related to the large
(
/
) subunit of general transcription factor TFIIA (1, 2).
ALF, together with the small (
) subunit of TFIIA, can stabilize
TATA-binding protein (TBP)-TATA box interactions and can restore RNA
polymerase II-dependent activity to TFIIA-depleted HeLa
cell extracts. In contrast to the ubiquitously expressed TFIIA
/
gene, ALF is only expressed in germ cells (3).
The genes for several other RNA polymerase II-associated factors are
also selectively transcribed in reproductive tissues. For instance, the
Drosophila TAFII80-related cannonball
gene is expressed only in testis (4), the mouse TRF2/TLF gene is
preferentially expressed in testis (5, 6), and the mouse
TAFII105 gene is preferentially expressed in testis and
ovary (7). These factors, as well as ALF, may be present in germ
cell-specific preinitiation or coactivator complexes necessary for
gametogenic or developmental patterns of gene expression (8). In fact, mutations in the cannonball and TRF2/TLF genes cause defects
in spermatogenesis (4-6), inactivation of the TAFII105
gene impairs oogenesis in mice (7), and Drosophila
TAFII60 mutants show defects in both male and female germ
cell development (9).
Expression of the RNA polymerase II machinery in testis is tightly
controlled during mouse development. In particular, genes for
testis-specific factors such as ALF and TRF2/TLF and for
non-tissue-specific factors such as TBP, TFIIA
/
, TFIIA
, and
TFIIB genes are turned on or up-regulated, respectively, in prepubertal
mice at postnatal day 14 (3, 10, 11). The timing of expression
corresponds with the appearance of primary spermatocytes in the
pachytene stage of meiotic prophase (12). Interestingly meiotic gene
expression often involves initiation at promoters that are distinct
from those utilized in somatic tissues. For instance, the human
TRF2/TLF gene initiates from a testis-specific promoter that is
separate from its weak somatic cell promoter (13). Likewise the mouse TBP gene initiates from five unique testis-specific promoters in
addition to its normal somatic cell promoter (14). In contrast, the
tissue-specific ALF gene is only transcribed from a germ cell-specific promoter. At present, the mechanisms that control the tissue-specific expression and collective up-regulation of general transcription factor
genes in meiotic prophase are not known.
Previous studies have shown some germ cell-specific genes to be
regulated by methylation at CpG dinucleotides, an epigenetic modification catalyzed by a family of CpG-specific DNA
methyltransferases (15-17). For example, the promoters of the germ
cell-specific cyclin A1, Ldh-C, MAGE,
Pdha-2, Pgk-2, tH2B, and
Tnp1 genes contain CpG sites that are methylated in somatic
tissues and unmethylated in testis (18-24). The methylated promoter
would presumably be packaged into an inactive chromatin configuration
through the action of methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins and associated
histone deacetylases (16, 25), whereas the unmethylated promoter
present in germ cells would be accessible to the transcription
machinery. However, while a role for methylation in controlling
X-linked and imprinted genes has been established (26, 27), the
correlation between methylation and tissue-specific or developmentally
regulated gene expression is not absolute (28-30). Still these studies
raise the possibility that the differential expression of genes
encoding the RNA polymerase II machinery in somatic and germ line
tissues might involve DNA methylation.
Here we examine mechanisms that control expression of the germ
cell-specific transcription factor ALF. We isolated homologous GC-rich
promoters of the mouse and human ALF genes, characterized core promoter
elements required for expression in vivo, and found that the
endogenous ALF promoter is accessible to DNase I in testis but not
liver. Together with an analysis of CpG-specific methylation patterns,
the results suggest that methylation and chromatin inaccessibility are
associated with silencing in somatic cells and show that this effect
can be reversed by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (azaC). The data also reveal
unique CpG- and cell-specific patterns of methylation at the ALF
promoter and demonstrate that changes in those patterns occur during
germ cell differentiation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Mouse and Human ALF Genes--
The mouse ALF gene was isolated
in a PCR-based screen of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)
library (Incyte Genomics) using mALF-10
(5'-GCTGGCATGGCCTTCATCAACCTGGTG-3') and mALF-11 (5'-CCCGCACGCCCTCGATGACATCTTCAA-3'). One clone (26090) was full-length, and a 7.0-kb BglII fragment that contained Exons 1-3
(GenBankTM accession no. AF452125) was isolated and
subcloned into pRSET (Invitrogen). A human BAC 96012D that contains the
human ALF gene was purchased from Research Genetics
(GenBankTM accession no. AC073082).
Cell Lines--
Human testicular embryonal carcinoma NTERA-2
cl.D1 and mouse spermatogonia GC-1 spg cell lines were purchased from
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). The human embryonal kidney 293 cell line was a gift from Dr. Santosh D'Mello. The human lung cancer
cell line HCC38 was a gift from Dr. John Minna at Southwestern Medical
Center. The human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y and mouse neuroblastoma NIE/115
cell lines were gifts from Dr. Gail Breen. All cells except HCC38 were
grown at 37 °C in 5-10% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and penicillin (100 units/ml). HCC38 was grown in RPMI
1640 medium with 5% fetal bovine serum.
RNase Protection Assays--
To make hybrid genomic DNA-cDNA
RNase protection assay (RPA) constructs, the mouse ALF promoter and
Exon 1 was amplified from BAC 26090 with either mALFrp-1
(5'-CCGGAATTCAAGCGAGCCTGGCGGCTCTC-3') and mALF-6
(5'-CACCAGGTTGATGAAGGCCATGCCAG-3') to give a 93-bp product called PCR I
or with mALFrp-2 (5'-CCGGAATTCTCGCGGTTGCGCAGCAACG-3') and mALF-6 to
generate a 126-bp product called PCR II. Exons 1 and 2 were amplified
from the mouse ALF cDNA using ALFrp-3
(5'-ATACGAGCTCCTTTCAACACCTGCTCCTCGAT-3') and mALF-10
(5'-GCTGGCATGGCCTTCATCAACCTGGTG-3') to generate a 129-bp product called
PCR III. PCR products were digested with HaeIII and ligated
to make short (PCR I-PCR III) and long (PCR II-PCR III) fragments.
These were digested with EcoRI and SacI and
subcloned into pGEM T-Easy (Promega). A mouse angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene construct was prepared as described
previously (31). RPA was performed using total RNA from the testis of
40-day-old mice hybridized with 1 × 104 cpm/µg
[
-32P]UTP-labeled sense or antisense RNA using the
RPAIII kit (Ambion).
Transfection and Luciferase Activity Assays--
The
mouse and human ALF promoters were amplified by PCR from the human and
mouse BAC clones. For the human gene, reactions contained hALFpa-2
(5'-GACAGCACCTCCAGCACCTG-3') together with one of eight primers:
hALFpa-0 (5'-AGCCTGGGCACCATTGAGCA-3'), hALFpa-3 (5'-GTGATCATGCCACTGCACTGCA-3'), hALFpa-4 (5'-GATGCTGCTGTACCACGCTG-3'), hALFpa-5 (5'-CTAGACCCAACCTAACCATCCG-3'), hALFpa-7
(5'-CGACCGCCTCTCCGCCTTGACC-3'), hALFpa-8
(5'-CCGCTCCATCTATTAACGTTCTC-3'), hALFpa-9
(5'-CGTTCTCCGTGGTTGCGCACCT-3'), or hALFpa-6
(5'-CGTTCAAAACGTGCCCAGTG-3'). For the mouse gene, reactions contained
mALFpa-1 (5'-GCCAGCCGCTCTGTGCCTAACC-3') together with one of four
primers: mALFpa-2 (5'-ACTTCTGCCTGAGGACTGGGGA-3'), mALFpa-3
(5'-CCTACGGAGAACAGAGGACAGC-3'), mALFpa-4
(5'-GAGGTTGCCCCATCGACCTGAC-3'), or mALF-pa-5
(5'-AGCAACGAGGACCCACGGTTCA-3'). Each 3'-primer contains an
XhoI site, while all but one 5'-primer contains a
KpnI site (hALFpa-0 contains a SacI site). The
amplified fragments were inserted upstream of the firefly luciferase
reporter gene in the pGL3 Enhancer plasmid (Promega).
Mutagenesis was carried out using mALFpa-7m
(5'-GAGGACCCACGGTGTGCTCGCGAGCCTGG-3') in which the TTCAAAA sequence was
replaced with TGTGCTC. PCR with mALFpa-7m and mALFpa-1 was performed
with pmALF216 as the template. The amplified fragment was used as a primer with mALFpa-4 in a second PCR that was cloned into the pGL3
Enhancer plasmid.
COS-7 and 293 cells in a 24-well plate were grown to 50-80%
confluence and transfected with 0.2 µg of DNA using the FuGENE 6 reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Transfections also contained 2.5 ng of pCMV Sport-
-gal DNA (ATCC) to monitor efficiency. Two days
later whole cell extracts from triplicate transfections were assayed
using the Luciferase Assay System (Promega) and a Turner TD-20e
luminometer. Results are expressed as luciferase
activity/
-galactosidase activity.
DNase I Hypersensitivity Site Analysis--
Mouse liver and
testis nuclei were prepared as described previously (32) with several
modifications. Tissues were homogenized in 10 mM HEPES, pH
7.6, 15 mM KCl, 0.15 mM spermine, 0.5 mM spermidine, 1 mM EDTA, 2.4 M
sucrose, 1% low fat powdered milk, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The homogenate was transferred to an
SW27 rotor tube that contained a cushion of 10 ml of homogenization
buffer without milk. Nuclei were pelleted by centrifugation at
75,000 × g for 60 min at 4 °C and resuspended in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride at a concentration of 10 A260 units/ml. Aliquots of 200 µl were added
to 100 µl of the same buffer supplemented with 15 mM
MgCl2 and 4 mM CaCl2, and 0.5-5
units of DNase I (Promega) were added for 10 min at 37 °C. Reactions
were stopped by addition of EDTA to 40 mM and SDS to
1% (v/v), and DNA was purified after overnight incubation at 55 °C
with 400 µg/ml proteinase K. PvuII-digested DNA was
analyzed by Southern analysis using a random-primed PCR fragment
prepared with mALFpa-3 and mALFpa-9
(5'-AGATGTTATTCCTGTTTTTACC-3').
Sodium Bisulfite Sequence Analysis--
Genomic DNA was isolated
from liver, brain, heart, lung, muscle, and adult and prepubertal
testis of male CD-1 mice. Sodium bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA
(33) was performed as follows. Approximately 2 µg of genomic DNA was
denatured in 0.3 M NaOH for 15 min at 37 °C. Freshly
prepared sodium bisulfite and hydroquinone (Sigma) were added to a
final concentration of 3.1 M and 0.5 mM, respectively, in a final volume of 1 ml. After 8-10 h of incubation at
50 °C, DNA was purified using miniprep columns (Promega) and dissolved in 50 µl of H2O. NaOH was added to 0.3 M for 5 min at room temperature and neutralized with 6 M ammonium acetate, and DNA was precipitated.
PCR amplifications were performed with Elongase (Invitrogen) using
bisulfite-treated DNA. Primer methy-4 (5'-TGTTTTGAAATTTGGGTGATTTTA-3') and methy-3 (5'-AAATAAAATTACCCCATCAACCTAA-3') were designed to amplify
the bottom strand of DNA between
179 and +207 of the mouse ALF
promoter. Primers for the mouse TBP gene were methytbp-1 (5'-CTCTACTTAAAAACCTTAATAAAAA-3') and methytbp-2
(5'-TTAGTTTGATTTTTAGGTTTTTGG-3'). Each primer also contained an
EcoRI site to facilitate cloning. Cycling conditions were 2 min at 94 °C, 5 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 50 °C, 1.5 min at 70 °C, 25 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 50 °C,
1.5 min at 70 °C, and finishing at 70 °C for 6 min. PCR products
were purified by the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen) and sequenced
with the Radiolabeled Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (United States
Biochemical Corp.). Liver PCR products were digested with
EcoRI and subcloned into pBlueScript II (Stratagene).
In Vitro Methylation Analysis--
Human or mouse ALF
promoter-reporter constructs (20 µg) were treated with 20 units of
SssI methylase (New England BioLabs) for 3 h with 160 µM S-adenosylmethionine (New England BioLabs). Methylation status was verified by digestion with HpaII or
MspI. Methylated constructs were transfected into COS-7 or
293 cells and assayed for luciferase activity.
5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine Treatment and RT-PCR--
Cells were
seeded in 60-mm plates and grown to 80% confluence before the addition
of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (Sigma) at a final concentration of 3 µM (34). After 48 h with or without azaC, cells were
washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and harvested. RNA was
extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription reactions were performed using the Advantage RT-for-PCR kit
(CLONTECH) using an oligo(dT)18 primer.
PCR amplification to detect the presence of first strand cDNA for
human ALF mRNA used 2a2-17 (5'-GGTGCTGTCATGGCCTGCCTCAACCCGG-3') and
2a2-8 (5'-ATGCTAGCTGAACCACTG-3'). Reactions to detect first strand
cDNA for mouse ALF mRNA used mALF-3
(5'-GTTTTACGCCGGAAGACCTGA-3') and mALF-5 (5'-GTCCTCGTTGTCGCTGCTA-3').
Detection of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was performed
with primers provided in the kit.
Other Techniques--
Unit gravity sedimentation of spermatocyte
populations was performed as described previously to obtain
populations of pachytene, round, and elongating/elongated spermatocytes
that were 70-90% pure (35). Mature spermatozoa were isolated from
mouse epididymis.
Mobility shift assays were performed as described previously
using proteins expressed and purified from Escherichia
coli by Ni2+ affinity chromatography (1). The probes
were mALF (5'-GAGGACCCACGGTTCAAAAGCGAGCCTGGC-3'), AdML
(5'-AAGGGGGGCTATAAAAGGGGGTGGG-3'), and AdML mutant
(5'-AAGGGGGGCTAGAGAAGGGGGTGGG-3').
Genomic DNA blotting was performed with liver or testis DNA digested
with PstI, PstI and HpaII, or
PstI and MspI. Probe A is a 318-bp fragment
produced by PstI-XbaI digestion of pmALF866. Probe B is a 147-bp PCR product made with mALFrp-1
(5'-CTCGCGGTTGCGCAGCAACG-3') and mALFrp-6
(5'-TGGTCCAACTACTTCCGGTACGGTC-3'). Probe Mito is a 524-bp
EcoRI fragment produced from a pBluescript clone that contains an 856-bp PCR product made with two mitochondrial DNA-specific primers, mMito-1 (5'-GGAATTCCGAGCTTGGTGATAGCTGGT-3') and mMito-2 (5'-GGAATTCTATTCTCCGAGGTCGC-3').
 |
RESULTS |
The Mouse and Human ALF Promoters Are GC-rich--
The human ALF
gene, located on chromosome 2, is downstream of the stoned B-like
factor (SBLF) gene and upstream of the luteinizing hormone receptor
gene (Fig. 1A) (3). We
isolated the mouse ALF gene using a PCR-based screen of a mouse BAC
library and mapped the promoter (GenBankTM accession no.
AF452125) by RPA. In RPA experiments, total adult mouse testis RNA was
annealed to 32P-labeled antisense strand RNAs transcribed
from the mALFrp1-3 and mALFrp2-3 constructs. Digestion with
RNaseA/RNaseT1 produced seven fragments, indicating that transcription
initiates from one of seven sites within a 44-nucleotide window (Fig.
1B, lanes 5 and 7). The major site of
initiation (site 3) is designated as position +1 (Fig. 1C),
and the initiating ATG is located 27 nucleotides downstream. The mouse
ACE gene was used as a control for RPA (Fig.
1B, lane 9) (31).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Organization and mapping of the mouse and
human ALF gene promoters. A, the genomic organization
of the human ALF, SBLF, and partial luteinizing hormone receptor
(LHR) genes are depicted along with splicing patterns that
generate SBLF, ALF, and the chimeric SALF (SBLF-ALF) mRNAs.
B, RNase protection assays were performed with RNA probes
(lanes 11-16) from the mALFrp1-3, mALFrp2-3, and mACErp1-2
constructs. Seven protected fragments were observed in reactions with
antisense probes (lanes 5 and 7), but not with
sense probes (lanes 6 and 8). Control RPA
reactions (mACE) are shown in lanes 9 and 10. An
mALF promoter sequencing reaction is shown in lanes 1-4.
C, alignment of the human and mouse ALF proximal promoters.
Open triangles beneath the mouse sequence show seven
initiation sites between 19 to +25 (labeled 1-7).
Dark arrows show the lengths of selected deletion
constructs. Identical residues, including CpG dinucleotides, are
shaded. A GC box and TTCAAA sequences are boxed,
and Exon 1 is indicated by brackets. Sequences are numbered
at left. D, distribution of CpG dinucleotides in
human ALF, mouse ALF, and mouse TBP promoters. S and
T refer to somatic and testis exons, and the dark
bars show regions analyzed for methylation in this study. Other
features are MER5, ALU elements, and simple
(GA, CT, or T) repeats. nt,
nucleotides.
|
|
An alignment of promoter-proximal sequences from the mouse and human
ALF genes is shown in Fig. 1C. The sequences are 42% identical between
200 and
101 (numbering refers to the mouse promoter), 68% identical between
100 and
1, and 79% identical in
Exon 1. Sequences outside these regions were only weakly similar. Both
promoters are GC-rich (for mouse: 51% between
200 and
101, 71%
between
100 and
1, 57% in Exon 1, and 58% between +48 and +148)
and contain many CpG sites in their promoter regions (Fig. 1D). A GC box (GGGCGG in mouse and GGGCGT in human) at
90
is predicted to bind the Sp1 transcription factor. In addition, a conserved TATA-like element (TTCAAA) is located 35 nucleotides upstream
of initiation site 3, and a similar element is present in the TRF2/TLF
gene (GenBankTM accession no. NM004865) (13). Computer
analysis also revealed putative binding sites for cAMP-response
element-binding protein, AP1, upstream stimulatory factor, CCTC-binding
factor, and other factors. These sites were not analyzed further as
they were not conserved.
The ALF Promoter Is Active in COS-7 and 293 Cells--
To test
whether human ALF promoter constructs were active in somatic cells, we
fused a series of truncated promoters to a luciferase reporter
(phALF2693, phALF1029, phALF489, phALF219, phALF168, phALF130, phALF84,
and phALF53) (Fig. 2A) and
transfected them into COS-7 and 293 cells. Although the endogenous ALF
gene is silent in somatic tissues, these deletion constructs were
expressed to varying levels (Fig. 2B). The highest activity
(~50% of the level seen with pGL3 Control, a vector that contains
the SV40 promoter and enhancer) was observed with phALF219 in 293 cells, while the shortest construct, phALF53, was the least active.
Mouse ALF promoter constructs (pmALF866, pmALF507, pmALF216, and
pmALF57) (Fig. 2A) were also active in COS-7 and 293 cells
(Fig. 2B). The highest activity (~95% of the level seen
with the pGL3 Control) was seen with pmALF216 in 293 cells, while
the shortest construct, pmALF57, was the least active. The
background level of luciferase activity was determined using the
promoter-less pGL3 Enhancer vector.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The mouse and human ALF promoters are active
in 293 and COS-7 somatic cell lines. A, diagram of ALF
promoter-luciferase constructs. B, luciferase reporter
activity was determined for human constructs (phALF53, phALF84,
phALF130, phALF168, phALF219, phALF489, phALF1029, and phALF2693)
or for mouse constructs (pmALF57, pmALF216, pmALF507,
pmALF866, and pmALF216mut) in COS-7 cells or 293 cells. The pGL3
Control and pGL3 Enhancer plasmids are positive and negative controls,
respectively. pmALF216mut is identical to pmALF216 except that the
TATA-like TTCAAA sequence has been altered (see text). C,
bandshift assay reactions were performed with TBP and either ALF
(lanes 1-4) or TFIIA (lanes 5-8) using the mALF
TTCAAA element. Complex formation is abolished by the addition of mALF
TTCAAA (10 pmol, lanes 2 and 6) or AdML TATA
competitors (10 pmol, lanes 3 and 7) but not by a
mutant (mut.) AdML TATA competitor (10 pmol, lanes
4 and 8).
|
|
We next evaluated properties of the conserved TATA-like TTCAAA element.
Bandshift reactions were performed using the AdML TATA or mouse ALF
TTCAAA boxes in the presence of TBP and either TFIIA or ALF (Fig.
2C). TBP-dependent complexes were formed on the
mALF TTCAAA element (lanes 1 and 5), and they
were competed by unlabeled mALF TTCAAA or AdML TATA
oligonucleotides (lanes 2, 3,
6, and 7) but not by an AdML mutant (lanes
4 and 8). To test the functional importance of the
TTCAAA element, we changed it from TTCAAAA to TGTGCTC (pmALF216mut) so
that it was no longer recognized by TBP (data not shown). Surprisingly
transfection analysis showed the pmALF216mut construct was as active as
wild type pmALF216 (Fig. 2B). Taken together the results of
these assays suggest ALF is controlled by a short, GC-rich, and
TATA-less promoter (see "Discussion").
DNase I Hypersensitivity at the ALF Promoter--
We wished to
know whether the ALF promoter was accessible in testis where it is
expressed and inaccessible in a somatic tissue where it is silent. To
address this question, we digested nuclear chromatin from testis and
liver with DNase I. Following digestion, the restriction enzyme
PvuII was used to generate a 2.5-kb fragment that spanned
Exon 1 of the ALF promoter (Fig. 3). In
the presence of DNase I, a fragment of 0.65 kb was produced in
chromatin from both liver and testis (lanes 2, 3,
5, and 6). This band reflects a constitutive
hypersensitive site located ~100 nucleotides downstream of Exon 1. In
addition, a small and somewhat broad band of ~0.45 kb was observed
only in testis (lanes 5 and 6). This
tissue-specific hypersensitive site maps within the GC-rich ALF
promoter. The results show that ALF expression is associated with an
accessible chromatin configuration, presumably to facilitate binding of
the RNA polymerase II machinery.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
DNase I-hypersensitive site analysis.
Nuclei from mouse liver and testis were digested with either no DNase I
(lanes 1 and 4), 0.5 units of DNase I
(lanes 2 and 5), or 5 units of DNase I
(lanes 3 and 6) followed by digestion with
PvuII. ALF promoter fragments were visualized by Southern
blot analysis with a probe located at the 5'-end of the 2.5-kb
PvuII fragment. The diagram below shows the
positions of hypersensitive sites (designated HS-1 and
HS-2).
|
|
Differential Methylation of ALF in Liver and Testis--
The
observation that ALF promoter constructs were active in somatic cells
whereas the endogenous gene is silent suggests regulation by an
epigenetic mechanism. In particular, the presence of multiple CpG
dinucleotides in the ALF promoter points to a possible role for
cytosine methylation. To test this possibility, genomic DNA from mouse
liver or testis was digested with the methylation-sensitive HpaII and methylation-insensitive MspI
restriction enzymes. We focused the analysis on four sites (CCGG)
located in a 2.1-kb PstI fragment spanning the promoter,
Exon 1, and part of Intron 1 (Fig.
4A). Digestion of liver DNA
with PstI/HpaII and hybridization with probe A
revealed a strong 0.7-kb band and a weaker undigested band of 2.1 kb
(Fig. 4B, lane 3). Digestion of liver DNA with PstI/HpaII and hybridization with probe B showed
a weak 0.55-kb band and two partial digestion products of 2.1 and 1.4 kb (lane 10). Based on the intensities of the partially
digested fragments, we estimate that ~5% of genomic DNAs are
methylated at the HpaII site located just upstream of the
transcription start site, while the three downstream sites are
methylated to near completion. In contrast, results with testis genomic
DNA revealed complete digestion to either the 0.7-kb band (lane
6) or the 0.55-kb band (lane 13), indicating that these
sites are not methylated in this tissue.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Digestion of mouse liver and testis genomic
DNA with HpaII and MspI reveals
tissue-specific methylation of the ALF promoter. A,
schematic of the mouse ALF promoter and the locations of
PstI (P), HpaII (H), and
MspI (M) sites. B, genomic DNA blots
using PstI-, PstI-MspI-, and
PstI-HpaII-digested DNA from liver and testis
were hybridized with probe A (lanes 1-6) and probe B
(lanes 7-13). PstI-HpaII reactions
show incomplete digestion of liver DNA (lanes 3 and
10) and complete digestion with testis DNA (lanes
5 and 13). Arrows show the positions of
partially digested products. C, a mitochondrial DNA probe
shows the unmethylated mitochondrial genome is completely digested with
HpaII or MspI (lanes 2, 3,
5, and 6).
|
|
To show that the results in Fig. 4B were not due to
incomplete digestion, DNA from both tissues was hybridized with a
mitochondrial DNA probe (probe mito). This genome is unmethylated and
should be fully digested with either HpaII or
MspI. The results show the expected mitochondrial DNA
digestion products of 1.7 and 0.65 kb (Fig. 4C, lanes
2, 3, 5, and 6), indicating that
digestion was complete.
Bisulfite Sequence Analysis of ALF and TBP Promoter DNA--
To
assess whether other promoter-proximal CpGs were methylated we used a
sodium bisulfite sequencing assay (33). Bisulfite treatment converts
cytosine to uracil but does not affect methylated cytosines. Thus,
sequencing reactions will show an adenosine (A) band at the position of
an unmethylated cytosine, and a guanosine (G) band at the position of a
methylated cytosine. The region tested was the bottom strand of the
mouse ALF promoter between
179 and +207. In reactions with liver DNA,
we observed 22 bands in the "G" lane; 21 of
these corresponded to the position of a CpG dinucleotide in the region
tested, while one at the end was due to incorporation of a G residue
opposite a cytosine in the PCR primer (Fig.
5A). Interestingly bands in
the G lane comigrated with those in the "A"
lane, indicating that some but not all DNAs were methylated.
Additional experiments were performed with DNA from brain, heart, lung,
and muscle, and a representative PhosphorImager trace is shown in
Fig. 6A. While other studies
have shown some genes to be methylated differently among somatic
tissues (29), ALF was always methylated. In contrast, DNA from adult
mouse testis was essentially unmethylated except at C+19G
and C+170G (Figs. 5A and 6A).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Methylation of the mouse ALF and TBP genes in
liver and testis. A, bisulfite sequence analysis of the
ALF promoter ( 179 to +207, see Fig. 1D) in liver and
testis. Bands in the G lane indicate sites of methylation in
the original genomic DNA. B, bisulfite sequence analysis of
the TBP promoter (+220 to +471, see Fig. 1D) in liver and
testis. The TBP gene is numbered with the major somatic initiation site
as +1. The maps to the left side show the locations of the
testis-specific exon (shaded box) and CpGs
(triangles).
|
|

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Partial and site-specific methylation in
somatic and germ line tissues. A, the top
line shows a representative PhosphorImager intensity trace of the
G lane of bisulfite sequencing reactions from brain (Br),
heart (He), liver (Li), lung (Lu), and
muscle (Mu) tissues. CpG sites are numbered above
the trace. Aligned beneath are PhosphorImager traces from
bisulfite sequencing experiments using whole testis (adult),
prepubertal whole testis (8 days old (8 d.o.)),
pachytene, round, elongating/elongated spermatocytes, and epididymal
spermatozoa. DNA from prepubertal testis and isolated spermatocytes is
demethylated at all sites other than C+19G and
C+170G. DNA from epididymal spermatozoa is remethylated in
a pattern similar to that seen in somatic tissues. The diagram to the
left shows the progression of spermatogenesis, and the
status of ALF expression in each tissue is shown to the
right. B, bisulfite-treated liver DNAs
(clones 1-13) were subcloned into pBluescript and
sequenced. Black triangles show the position of methylated
CpGs. The percentage of methylation at each site ranged from 0 to 77%
(%modified). Exon 1 and the C+19G and
C+170G dinucleotides are indicated. n.d., no
data.
|
|
We also examined methylation of the TBP gene. The region
tested begins 220 nucleotides downstream of the ubiquitously expressed "somatic cell" promoter and ends 471 nucleotides downstream (Fig. 1D) (14). This region is transcribed in all tissues but also contains a promoter active only in testis. No G bands were seen in
reactions with either liver or testis DNA, indicating that none of the
26 CpGs in this region are methylated (Fig. 5B). Thus, unlike ALF, the mouse TBP gene is unmethylated and transcribed in both
tissues. This result shows that methylation may play a role at some but
not all general transcription factor genes up-regulated in meiotic prophase.
Partial Methylation of the ALF Promoter on Individual
DNAs--
The observation that the ALF promoter was partially
methylated implies that the patterns present on any individual DNA
would vary. To show the extent of this variation, individual PCR
products from bisulfite-treated liver DNA were cloned and sequenced. Of 13 isolates, 12 different patterns were observed (Fig. 6B).
Methylation at any given CpG ranged from 0 to 77% (0/13 at positions
C
83, C
66, and C
9 to 10/13 at
position C+170), and the number of methylated CpGs per
clone ranged from 0 to 71% (0/21 for clones 5 and 13 and 15/21 for
clone 10). These data are consistent with the degree of methylation
estimated by genomic Southern and bisulfite sequencing analyses. For
instance, 1 of 13 subclones (7.7%) was methylated at the proximal CCGG
site (C
99), and ~5% of liver genomic DNA was
undigestable by HpaII at this site (Fig. 4B). The
results imply that there might not be a particular CpG critical for silencing.
C+19G- and C+170G-specific Methylation in
Male Germ Cells--
We have previously shown that mouse ALF mRNA
is present in germ cells beginning at the pachytene stage of meiosis
and continuing through the appearance of elongating/elongated haploid
spermatids (3). We therefore wanted to determine how ALF was methylated during germ cell development. To test this point, germ cells were separated at unit gravity over a 1-4% gradient of bovine serum albumin to obtain populations of pachytene spermatocytes, round spermatids, and elongating/elongated spermatids. Bisulfite sequencing showed that DNA from these cells was unmethylated except at two positions, C+19G and C+170G (Fig.
6A). These results are similar to those using DNA from whole
testis (Figs. 5A and 6A) but display a lower
"background," presumably because somatic or premeiotic cells of the
testis are absent. Bisulfite sequencing of DNA from prepubertal testis
(8 days old) also showed a hypomethylated,
C+19G- and C+170G-specific pattern (Fig.
6A). This was a bit surprising since at this stage germ
cells have not yet entered the first cycle of meiosis, and ALF is not
yet expressed. Thus, the results show that the ALF promoter is
hypomethylated prior to its expression (see "Discussion"). In
contrast, DNA from mature epididymal spermatozoa was methylated in a
manner indistinguishable from that observed in somatic tissues (Fig.
6A).
The results of these experiments reveal dynamic cell-specific changes
in ALF promoter methylation during germ cell differentiation. These
changes involve formation of a characteristic C+19G- and
C+170G-specific methylation profile early in germ cell
development (at least by day 8 postpartum), a continuation of this
pattern throughout spermatogenesis, during which time expression of the mouse ALF gene occurs, and reversal to a partially methylated state in
mature spermatozoa.
In Vitro Methylation Represses ALF Promoter Activity--
The
results of the experiments in Figs. 4, 5, and 6 show that a methylated
ALF promoter was present in tissues where the gene is not expressed. To
obtain more direct evidence that this modification affects expression,
the phALF130 and phALF489 deletion constructs were modified in
vitro with the SssI methylase (Fig.
7A) and tested for activity.
To show that the constructs were methylated, they were digested with
either HpaII or MspI. As shown in Fig.
7A, methylation prevented digestion of pGL3 Control and
phALF489 by HpaII (lanes 5 and 11),
whereas unmethylated constructs were digested by both HpaII
and MspI (lanes 2, 3, 8,
and 9). When these constructs were introduced into COS-7
cells, expression from the methylated pGL3 Control vector was 2.5-fold
lower than its unmethylated counterpart, while the methylated phALF489
construct was reduced 68-fold (Fig. 7B). Similarly
methylation of phALF489 and phALF130 also diminished activity when
introduced into 293 cells (~100-fold). We conclude that methylation
of the ALF promoter exerts a strong negative effect on expression in
these cells and suggest that methylation might inactivate the
endogenous ALF promoter in somatic cells.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of in vitro
methylation and azaC treatment on ALF gene activity.
A, pGL3 Control and phALF489 were methylated in
vitro with SssI methylase. The extent of methylation
was assessed by comparing digestion patterns of unmethylated
(lanes 1-3 and 7-9) and methylated (lanes
4-6 and 10-12) constructs with HpaII
(lanes 2, 5, 8, and 11) or
MspI (lanes 3, 6, 9, and
12). B, methylated pGL3 Control, phALF130, and
phALF489 constructs were transfected into COS-7 or 293 cells and
assayed for activity. The results are shown as the ratio of the
activity between the unmethylated and methylated constructs.
C, human somatic cell lines (HCC38, 293, NTERA-2, SY5Y, and
HeLa) treated with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine showed an ALF-specific RT-PCR
product in all cell lines except SY5Y (lanes 6-8 and
10). D, mouse somatic cell lines NIH/3T3,
NIE/115, and GC-1 also showed an ALF-specific RT-PCR product after azaC
treatment (lanes 2, 4, 6, and
8). Amplification of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase (G3PDH) was used to normalize template
concentrations.
|
|
5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine Activates ALF Expression in Somatic Cell
Lines--
If methylation of the endogenous ALF gene promoter causes
the gene to be inactive in somatic cells, treatment with azaC should reverse inhibition. AzaC is incorporated into DNA as a non-methylatable cytosine analog and interferes with DNA methyltransferase function (34,
36), and it is presumed that these effects are responsible for its
ability to activate gene expression. Five human cell lines, HCC38, 293, NTERA-2, SY5Y, and HeLa, were tested by RT-PCR for the presence of ALF
mRNA before and after azaC treatment. The 5'-end primer was located
in Exon 1 to avoid detection of the chimeric SALF transcript (data not
shown). Prior to treatment, no expression was observed in any of these
cells (Fig. 7C, lanes 1-5). However, following
48 h of treatment, an ALF-specific RT-PCR product was detected in
four of five lines (HCC38, 293, NTERA-2, and HeLa) (lanes
6-8 and 10), indicating the gene was now active.
Since our methylation analyses used DNA from mouse tissues, we also
tested whether azaC treatment would reactivate ALF expression in mouse
cell lines. Prior to azaC treatment the mouse NIH/3T3, NIE/115, and
GC-1 cell lines did not contain ALF mRNA (Fig. 7D, lanes 1, 3, and 5). Following
treatment, however, ALF-specific RT-PCR products were present
(lanes 2, 4, and 6). The results of
these experiments show that the endogenous ALF gene is silenced by a
mechanism that depends on DNA methylation and that this effect can be
reversed by treatment with azaC.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Characteristics of the ALF Promoter--
ALF is a germ
cell-specific counterpart of the large (
/
) subunit of general
transcription factor TFIIA. The studies here explore mechanisms of
differential gene expression in somatic and germ line tissues using the
ALF gene as a model. The results show that ALF promoters from two
species, mouse and human, display homology in a GC-rich region that
extends ~100 base pairs upstream of the start site and that
constructs that lack this region (pmALF57 and phALF53) are relatively
inactive (Fig. 2B). Furthermore a mutation in a conserved
TATA-like TTCAAA element (pmALF216mut) had no effect on promoter
activity (Fig. 2B) even though this sequence was stably
bound by TFIIA·TBP or ALF·TBP complexes in vitro
(Fig. 2C). The experiments demonstrate that the homologous GC-rich sequences required for ALF promoter activity in COS-7 and 293 cells coincide with the short region of homology between mouse and
human and that transcription factors available in somatic cell lines
such as COS-7 or 293 are sufficient for expression even though the
endogenous gene is silent.
The GC-rich ALF promoter resembles those found in housekeeping genes as
these tend to be TATA-independent and initiate at multiple sites (37).
In addition, testis-specific genes including cyclin A1,
Ldh-C, MAGE, Pgk-2, and
tH2B also contain promoters that are GC-rich (Refs. 18-23
and 38; for review, see Ref. 39). In fact, some genes that use
TATA-dependent promoters in somatic cells switch to GC-rich
promoters in testis (39), and very short promoter-proximal sequences
are often sufficient to specify testis-specific expression in
transgenic mice (e.g. Pdha-2 (
187 bp),
ACE (
91 bp), Ldh-C (
100 bp),
proenkephalin (
116 bp), and Prm1 (
113 bp))
(40-44). These studies suggest that a class of GC-rich, TATA-less promoters are uniquely active only in germ cells.
ALF Promoter Methylation and Silencing in Somatic
Cells--
Although there is still debate whether methylation controls
developmental and tissue-specific patterns of gene expression, our
results on the ALF promoter favor the idea that methylation is involved
in somatic cell silencing. This is strongly supported by the
inactivation of the ALF promoter by in vitro methylation (Fig. 7B) and the ability to activate expression of the
endogenous gene with azaC (Fig. 7, C and D). In
addition, HpaII sites (CCGG) located in the promoter and
Intron 1 are methylated in liver but not testis (Fig. 4B),
and all 21 promoter-proximal CpGs tested are partially methylated in
brain, heart, liver, lung, and muscle (Figs. 5A and
6A), whereas only two of these sites are methylated in testis.
The process by which particular CpGs are selected for methylation and
how this affects expression are interesting issues. Since DNA
methyltransferases are not sequence-specific (15), one possibility is
that variations might be affected by heterogeneous nucleosomal
positioning on chromosomes from different cells or even within the same
cell. In support of this idea, mutations in the Arabidopsis
DDM and human ATRX genes, both of which encode SWI/SNF-like chromatin-remodeling factors, alter patterns of genomic methylation (45, 46). In an earlier study it was shown that a
Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat-containing plasmid
methylated at levels as low as 7% reduced expression by 67-90% (47).
Likewise the partially methylated ALF promoter may recruit
methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins and associated histone deacetylases
that form an inaccessible nucleosomal configuration that spreads over
the entire promoter (16, 48). Although the exact mechanism remains to
be elucidated, DNase I hypersensitivity analysis does show the ALF
promoter to be less accessible in liver nuclei than it is in testis
(Fig. 3).
Two additional observations relate to the effects of methylation.
First, azaC did not activate ALF expression in human neuroblastoma SY5Y
cells, perhaps because they lack a factor(s) required for expression or
because they are insensitive to azaC treatment. Second, a region of the
TBP gene downstream of the ubiquitously expressed somatic cell promoter
(Fig. 1D) (14) was not methylated at any of the 26 CpG sites
examined (Fig. 5B). Since this region contains a
testis-specific promoter that is off in somatic cells (Fig.
1D), this result suggests that a regulatory role for
methylation may be restricted to genes like ALF that are germ
cell-specific, and genes like TBP that are up-regulated in meiotic
prophase but also ubiquitously expressed may utilize distinct mechanisms.
ALF Promoter Methylation and Expression during Male Germ Cell
Differentiation--
The patterns of ALF methylation in male germ
cells highlights several interesting characteristics (Fig.
6A). First, there is the surprising ability to distinguish
C+19G and C+170G from other CpG sites. As the
distance between these sites (151 nucleotides) is the approximate
length of one nucleosomal unit, we speculate that a specific chromatin
configuration could be involved. Second, the C+19G- and
C+170G-specific pattern of methylation is transient since
DNA from epididymal spermatozoa is remethylated at all CpGs.
Reprogramming has also been documented at the Pgk-2 gene
(49) and, together with our data, suggest a de novo
methylation system that acts late in germ cell development. Remarkably
remethylation generates a heterogeneous pattern similar to that seen in
somatic tissues, implying that each haploid paternal genome will be
methylated in a relatively distinct pattern. Finally, germ
cell-specific genes such as ApoA1, Pgk-2, and
Pdha-2 are selectively demethylated sometime between birth
and postnatal day 10 (38, 48-50), and this may also occur at the ALF promoter.
Hypomethylation suggests an association with gene activation (for
reviews, see Refs. 17 and 39). Interestingly ALF is hypomethylated in
prepubertal testis at postnatal day 8, preceding the time of expression
by at least 6 days (Fig. 6A). This may indicate that
demethylation results in a chromatin configuration that allows
transcription to occur once the appropriate trans-acting factors are
available (51). In fact, a DNase I-hypersensitive site indicative of an
open chromatin configuration was observed in testis (Fig. 3), and a
similar site appears at the demethylated Pgk-2 promoter just before it
is expressed (52). It is also possible that demethylation is a
consequence of transcription factor binding as several reports have
shown that NF-
B, Sp1, EBNA-1, and VP16 can prevent methylation and
facilitate demethylation (53-57). In either case, the delay in
expression until the pachytene stage of meiosis reveals additional
constraints that prevent the transcription apparatus from functioning earlier.
Conclusion--
The results of this study reveal dynamic changes
in methylation status at the ALF promoter during the course of male
germ cell differentiation in which a CpG-specific hypomethylated state precedes gene activation and is reversed prior to fertilization. In
addition, the data show that methylation-associated silencing of the
ALF gene in somatic cells is reversible by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Overall the work sets the stage for using ALF as a model to study relationships between DNA methylation, chromatin packaging, and preinitiation complex assembly in male germ cells.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Gail Breen, Santosh D'Mello,
and John Minna for cell lines. We thank Ashok Upadhyaya for recombinant
proteins for bandshift experiments and Dr. Boning Gao for advice on
bisulfite sequencing. We thank JingHong Mu and Ashok Upadhyaya for
helpful comments on the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the American Cancer
Society and The Welch Foundation (to J. D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF452125.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular and
Cell Biology, University of Texas at Dallas, 2601 N. Floyd Rd.,
Richardson, TX 75080. Tel.: 972-883-6882; Fax: 972-883-2409; E-mail:
dejong@utdallas.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200954200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ALF, TFIIA
/
-like factor;
mALF, mouse ALF;
hALF, human ALF;
TF, transcription factor;
TBP, TATA-binding
protein;
TLF, TBP-like factor;
TAF, TBP-associated factor;
MAGE, melanoma antigen;
azaC, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine;
BAC, bacterial
artificial chromosome;
RPA, RNase protection assay;
ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme;
RT, reverse transcription;
SBLF, stoned
B-like factor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Upadhyaya, A. B.,
Lee, S. H.,
and DeJong, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
18040-18048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Ozer, J.,
Moore, P. A.,
and Lieberman, P. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
122-128[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Han, S.,
Zhou, L.,
Upadhyaya, A.,
Lee, S. H.,
Parker, K. L.,
and DeJong, J.
(2001)
Biol. Reprod.
64,
507-517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Hiller, M. A.,
Lin, T.-Y.,
Wood, C.,
and Fuller, M. T.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
1021-1030[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Martianov, I.,
Fimia, G.-M.,
Dierich, A.,
Parvinen, M.,
Sassone-Corsi, P.,
and Davidson, I.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
7,
509-515[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Zhang, D.,
Penttila, T.-L.,
Morris, P. L.,
Teichmann, M.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(2001)
Science
292,
1153-1155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Freiman, R. N.,
Albright, S. R.,
Zheng, S.,
Sha, W. C.,
Hammer, R. E.,
and Tjian, R.
(2001)
Nature
293,
2084-2087
|
| 8.
|
Veenstra, G. J. C.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(2001)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
26,
665-671[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Aoyagi, N.,
and Wassarman, D. A.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
6808-6819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Persengiev, S. P.,
Robert, S.,
and Kilpatrick, D. L.
(1996)
Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
742-747[Abstract]
|
| 11.
|
Schmidt, E. E.,
and Schibler, U.
(1995)
Development
121,
2373-2383[Abstract]
|
| 12.
|
McCarrey, J. R.
(1993)
in
Cell and Molecular Biology of the Testis
(Desjardins, C.
, and Ewing, L. L., eds)
, pp. 58-89, Oxford University Press, New York
|
| 13.
|
Teichmann, M.,
Wang, Z.,
Martinez, E.,
Tjernberg, A.,
Zhang, D.,
Vollmer, F.,
Chait, B. T.,
and Roeder, R. G.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
13720-23725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Schmidt, E. E.,
Ohbayashi, T.,
Makino, Y.,
Tamura, T,
and Schibler, U.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5326-5334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Bestor, T. H.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
2395-2402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Bird, A. P.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(1999)
Cell
99,
451-454[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Trasler, J. M.
(1998)
Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.
9,
467-474[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Ariel, M.,
McCarrey, J.,
and Cedar, H.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
2317-2321[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Bonny, C.,
and Goldberg, E.
(1995)
Dev. Genet.
16,
210-217[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Choi, Y.-C.,
and Chae, C.-B.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
20504-20511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
De Smet, C.,
Lurquin, C.,
Lethe, B.,
Martelange, V.,
and Boon, T.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
7327-7335[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Iannello, R. C.,
Gould, J. A.,
Young, J. C.,
Giudice, A.,
Medcalf, R.,
and Kola, I.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
19603-19608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Muller, C.,
Readhead, C.,
Diederichs, S.,
Idos, G.,
Yang, R.,
Tidow, N.,
Serve, H.,
Berdel, W. E.,
and Koeffler, H. P.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
3316-3329[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Trasler, J. M.,
Hake, L. E.,
Johnson, P. A.,
Alcivar, A. A.,
Millette, C. F.,
and Hecht, N. B.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
1828-1834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Ballestar, E.,
and Wolffe, A. P.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
1-6[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Li, E.,
Beard, C.,
and Jaenisch, R.
(1993)
Nature
366,
362-365[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Panning, B.,
and Jaenisch, R.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1991-2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Bird, A. P.
(1986)
Nature
321,
209-213[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Walsh, C. P.,
and Bestor, T. H.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
26-34[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Choi, Y.-C.,
Aizawa, A.,
and Hecht, N. B.
(1997)
Mamm. Genome
8,
317-323[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Howard, T. E.,
Shai, S.-Y.,
Langford, K. G.,
Martin, B. M.,
and Bernstein, K. E.
(1990)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
10,
4294-4302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Sierra, F.,
Tian, J. M.,
and Schibler, U.
(1993)
in
Gene Transcription, a Practical Approach
(Hames, B. D.
, and Higgins, S. J., eds)
, pp. 129-131, Oxford University Press, New York
|
| 33.
|
Frommer, M.,
McDonald, L. E.,
Millar, D. S.,
Collis, C. M.,
Watt, F.,
Grigg, G. W.,
Molloy, P. L.,
and Paul, C. L.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
1827-1831[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Jones, P. A.,
and Taylor, S. M.
(1980)
Cell
20,
85-93[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Meistrich, M. L.
(1977)
Methods Cell Bio.
15,
15-54[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Juttermann, R., Li, E.,
and Jaenisch, R.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11797-11801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Smale, S. T.
(1994)
in
Transcription: Mechanisms and Regulation
(Conaway, R. C.
, and Conaway, J. W., eds)
, pp. 63-79, Raven Press, New York
|
| 38.
|
Monk, M.,
Boubelik, M.,
and Lehnert, S.
(1987)
Development
99,
371-382[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Kleene, K. C.
(2001)
Mech. Dev.
106,
3-23[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Howard, T.,
Balogh, R.,
Overbeek, P.,
and Bernstein, K. E.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
18-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Iannello, R. C.,
Young, J.,
Sumarsono, S.,
Tymms, M. J.,
Dahl, H.-H. M.,
Gould, J.,
Hedger, M.,
and Kola, I.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
612-619[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Li, S.,
Zhou, W.,
Doglio, L.,
and Goldberg, E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31191-31194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Liu, F.,
Tokeson, J.,
Persengiev, S. P.,
Ebert, K.,
and Kilpatrick, D. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5056-5062[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Zambrowicz, B. P.,
Harendza, C. J.,
Zimmerman, J. W.,
Brinster, R. L.,
and Palmiter, R. D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5071-5075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Gibbons, R. J.,
McDowell, T. L.,
Raman, S.,
O'Rourke, D. M.,
Garrick, D.,
Ayyub, H.,
and Higgs, D. R.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
24,
368-371[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Singer, T.,
Yordan, C.,
and Martienssen, R. A.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
591-602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Hsieh, C.-L.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
5487-5494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Jones, P. A.,
and Takai, D.
(2001)
Science
293,
1068-1070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Ariel, M.,
Cedar, H.,
and McCarrey, J.
(1994)
Nat. Genet.
7,
59-63[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Kafri, T.,
Ariel, M.,
Brandeis, M.,
Shemer, R.,
Urven, L.,
McCarrey, J.,
Cedar, H.,
and Razin, A.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
705-714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
McCarrey, J. R.
(1998)
Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.
9,
459-466[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Kumari, M.,
Stroud, J. C.,
Anji, A.,
and McCarrey, J. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14390-14397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Brandeis, M.,
Frank, D.,
Keshet, I.,
Siegfried, Z.,
Mendelsohn, M.,
Nemes, A.,
Temper, V.,
Razin, A.,
and Cedar, H.
(1994)
Nature
371,
435-438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Hsieh, C.-L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
46-56[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Kirillov, A.,
Kistler, B.,
Mostoslavsky, R.,
Cedar, H.,
Wirth, T.,
and Bergman, Y.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
13,
435-441[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Macleod, D.,
Charlton, J.,
Mullins, J.,
and Bird, A. P.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2282-2292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 57.
|
Matsuo, K.,
Silke, J.,
Georgiev, O.,
Marti, P.,
Giovannini, N.,
and Rungger, D.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1446-1453[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike