![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 17804-17810, May 17, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, January 4, 2002, and in revised form, February 22, 2002
ADAMs (a
disintegrin and metalloproteases)
are members of the metzincin superfamily of metalloproteases.
Among integrins binding to disintegrin domains of ADAMs are
ADAMs1
(a disintegrin and
metalloproteases) or MDC
(metalloprotease/disintegrin/cysteine-rich)
proteins are a family of transmembrane glycoproteins of more than 30 members (see www.people.virginia.edu/~jag6n/Table_of_the_ADAMs.html and www.gene.ucl.ac.uk/nomenclature/genefamily/metallo. html). ADAMs have a prodomain, a metalloprotease domain, a disintegrin domain,
a cysteine-rich region, an EGF-like domain, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic tail (1-3). Several ADAMs are involved in
crucial biological processes such as fertilization (ADAM1, 2, and 3)
(4-6) and muscle cell differentiation (meltrin- The ADAM disintegrin domains are homologous to snake venom disintegrins
and are potential integrin ligands. Snake venom disintegrins bind to
the platelet integrin At least three ADAMs have been shown to participate in fertilization
(ADAM1, 2, and 3) (Refs. 5 and 22, and for review, see Ref. 23). The
ADAMs on the sperm surface are processed and lack the pro- and
metalloprotease domains; thus the disintegrin domains of ADAMs may be
the most important in sperm-egg binding. Recent reports showed that
several amino acid residues within the putative integrin-binding loop
of the ADAM disintegrin domain are critical for sperm-egg interaction
(24-26). The identity of the integrin(s) to which the disintegrin
domains bind has not been fully established. As antibodies to integrin
In the present study, we analyzed how integrins
Production of Recombinant Disintegrin Domains as Glutathione
S-Transferase (GST) Fusion Proteins--
Complementary DNA fragments
encoding the disintegrin domain of ADAMs were amplified by polymerase
chain reaction and cloned in a pGEX-2T vector (Amersham Biosciences) as
described previously (16). The disintegrin domains were derived from
mouse ADAM1 (Arg246-Gln334), mouse ADAM2
(Lys388-Pro479), mouse ADAM3
(Gly394-Glu486), human ADAM9
(Ser413-Tyr503), mouse ADAM10
(Gly457-Thr554), human ADAM15
(Met420-Glu510), mouse ADAM15
(Met421-Glu511), and mouse ADAM17
(Ser474-Thr565). GST fusion proteins were
produced and purified as described previously (16). Absorbance at 280 nm was measured to determine the concentration of purified proteins,
and the amount of proteins was calculated as described previously (16).
In some experiments, because GST binds to the egg plasma membrane (24),
disintegrin domains used for bead coating (see below) were released
from the GST by incubating with thrombin (1 unit/mg of protein) for
6 h at room temperature, and the free GST was removed by
glutathione-agarose affinity chromatography.
Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) Cell Adhesion Assays--
CHO cells
expressing Gamete Preparation for in Vitro Binding
Assays--
Three-week-old B6129PF1/J female mice (Jackson Laboratory)
were superovulated using standard hormonal treatment. Oocytes were collected 12-13 h after administration of human chorionic
gonadotrophin, and cumulus cells were removed by incubation with
hyaluronidase in Flushing and Holding medium (Specialty Media) for 5 min at 37 °C. The zona pellucida were softened in Flushing and
Holding medium containing 10 µg/ml
Sperms were collected from 3-6-month-old B6129F1 male mice (Taconic
Farms) by placing the cauda of the epididymis and the vas deferens in 1 ml of fertilization medium under mineral oil. Each tissue was slit open
with the edge of an injection needle. Sperms were allowed to swim out
for 20 min at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Tissues
were removed from the medium, and spermatozoa were capacitated for 2-3
h under the same conditions. The sperm concentration was estimated with
a hemocytometer.
Binding of Disintegrin-coated Beads to Eggs--
Fluorescent
beads (0.2-µm yellow-green sulfate microspheres, Molecular Probes,
Inc.) were coated overnight at 4 °C with purified GST-free
disintegrin domains (0.3 mg/ml), washed with PBS, quenched for 1 h
at 4 °C in fertilization medium containing 3% BSA, and resuspended
by sonication with a water bath sonicator just before use. Zona
pellucida-free eggs were incubated in 25-µl drops of 0.1% (v/v)
coated beads in 3% BSA in fertilization medium under mineral oil for
1 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Eggs were then washed three times with fertilization medium, fixed in 0.5% glutaraldehyde, and analyzed by confocal microscopy (Bio-Rad, MRC
1024). To confirm that beads were coated with equal amounts of
recombinant protein, aliquots of coated beads were boiled in Laemmli
SDS sample buffer and subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis followed by staining with Coomassie Blue.
Sperm-Egg Binding Assay--
Zona pellucida-free eggs were
preincubated with GST fusion proteins in 100-µl drops of
fertilization medium under mineral oil for 30 min at 37 °C in a 5%
CO2 atmosphere. The concentration of GST elution buffer
(100 mM Tris, 5 mM reduced glutathione) was
adjusted to 10% (v/v) final concentration. Sperm was then added into
the drops (2.5 × 105 sperm/ml final concentration)
and incubated for 1 h. Eggs were washed by removing medium from
the drop and adding fresh Flushing and Holding medium three times.
Finally eggs were fixed by adding glutaraldehyde to the drops to a
final concentration of 0.5%. The number of spermatozoa bound to each
egg was counted immediately under a microscope. Aliquots of the GST
fusion proteins used were subjected to SDS-PAGE under reducing
conditions, transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane, and stained with
Ponceau S to confirm the amount and the quality of recombinant proteins
at the end of the incubation. Control in vitro fertilization
was routinely performed at ~50 × 106 sperm/ml to
ascertain the quality of gametes and to verify that more than 90% of
the eggs could be fertilized.
Integrins
Fig. 1b shows that mutating the RGD motif to SGA completely
blocked the binding of
The
Since Interaction of Oocytes with Disintegrin Domains of
ADAMs--
Several residues in the putative integrin-binding region of
ADAM1, 2, and 3 have been identified as critical for sperm-egg binding
(24-26), but it has not been established which receptor(s) may be
involved. Since ADAM1, 2, and 3 disintegrins bind avidly to
We tested whether fluorescent beads coated with disintegrin domains of
ADAM2, 15, and 17 bind to zona pellucida-free eggs. As GST alone binds
to such eggs (24), the GST portion of the recombinant fusion proteins
was cleaved off, and the recombinant GST-free disintegrin domains were
purified prior to coating of the beads. Fig.
3 shows that the beads coated with the
ADAM15 disintegrin domain bound efficiently to the oocytes, the binding being largely concentrated to the microvillar region of the egg (Fig.
3b, inset). ADAM2 disintegrin domain-coated beads
also bound to the egg microvillar region (Fig. 3a) but to a
lesser extent than ADAM15-coated beads. Beads coated with the ADAM17
disintegrin domain (Fig. 3c) and BSA-coated beads (not
shown) did not bind to eggs.
We next tested whether recombinant disintegrin domains, used as GST
fusion proteins, would inhibit the binding of sperm to oocytes. The
disintegrin domains from ADAM2 and ADAM15 inhibited the binding of
sperm to mouse eggs in a dose-dependent manner, whereas
that from ADAM17 did not affect sperm-egg binding (Fig. 4). The ADAM15 disintegrin domain was a
more potent inhibitor than the ADAM2 disintegrin domain, blocking
sperm-egg binding completely at 3 µM. Consistent with
previous reports, the ADAM2 disintegrin domain at 3 µM
inhibited sperm-egg binding to about 50%. Altogether, these results
indicate that the binding specificity of sperm for the oocyte is
similar to that of ADAM disintegrin for integrin
We have shown here that the conserved
RX6DLPEF motif flanking the RGD motif in the
ADAM15 disintegrin domain, but not the RGD motif itself, is important
for binding of ADAM15 to The RGD motif is not important for The three-dimensional structures of the snake venom disintegrins
echistatin (Protein Data Bank code 2ECH) and kistrin (1KST) are
available. The "disintegrin loops" of echistatin and kistrin are
protruding loops (approximately 15 Å long and 4 Å wide) with the RGD
motif at the tip of the loops. The three-dimensional structure of the
ADAM disintegrin is not available. We generated a molecular model of
the "disintegrin loop region" of the ADAM15 disintegrin domain
based on the echistatin structure (2ECH) using the SWISS-MODEL protein
modeling server (Fig. 5) assuming that
the ADAM disintegrin and snake venom disintegrins are similar in
structure. In this model oppositely charged residues
(Arg481 and Glu491, Arg484 and
Asp488) and hydrophobic residues (Pro482 and
Pro490) are close to each other, stabilizing the loop. This
model predicts that the Arg481 and the DLPEF motif in the
As many ADAMs that have the RX6DLPEF motif are
present on sperm (5) and ADAMs have been implicated in sperm-egg
binding during fertilization, we tested whether
We have shown here that the disintegrin domains of ADAM2 and 15, which
effectively bind to integrin It has been proposed that The biological significance of the interaction between ADAMs
and *
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants GM49899 (to Y. T.) and AR45446 (to E. E.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 6, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200086200
The abbreviations used are:
ADAM, a disintegrin
and metalloprotease;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
BSA, bovine
serum albumin.
Functional Classification of ADAMs Based on a Conserved Motif for
Binding to Integrin
9
1
IMPLICATIONS FOR SPERM-EGG BINDING AND OTHER CELL
INTERACTIONS*
,
,
,
,
Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps
Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, § The
Burnham Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, and the ¶ Lung
Biology Center, Center for Occupational and Environmental Health,
Cardiovascular Research Institute, and Department of Medicine,
University of California, San Francisco, California 94143
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
9
1 and
v
3, and they bind in an RGD-independent
and an RGD-dependent manner, respectively. Human ADAM15 is
the only ADAM with the RGD motif in the disintegrin domain. Thus, both
integrin
9
1 and
v
3 recognize the ADAM15 disintegrin
domain. We determined how these integrins recognize the ADAM15
disintegrin domain by mutational analysis. We found that the
Arg481 and the Asp-Leu-Pro-Glu-Phe residues (residues
488-492) were critical for
9
1 binding,
but the RGD motif (residues 484-486) was not. In contrast, the RGD
motif was critical for
v
3 binding, but
the other residues flanking the RGD motif were not. As the RX6DLPEF
9
1
recognition motif (residues 481-492) is conserved among ADAMs, except
for ADAM10 and 17, we hypothesized that
9
1 may recognize disintegrin domains in
all ADAMs except ADAM10 and 17. Indeed we found that
9
1 bound avidly to the disintegrin domains of ADAM1, 2, 3, and 9 but not to the disintegrin domains of
ADAM10 and 17. As several ADAMs have been implicated in sperm-oocyte interaction, we tested whether the functional classification of ADAMs,
based on specificity for integrin
9
1,
applies to sperm-egg binding. We found that the ADAM2 and 15 disintegrin domains bound to oocytes, but the ADAM17 disintegrin domain
did not. Furthermore, the ADAM2 and 15 disintegrin domains effectively
blocked binding of sperm to oocytes, but the ADAM17 disintegrin domain
did not. These results suggest that oocytes and
9
1 have similar binding specificities for
ADAMs and that
9
1, or a receptor with
similar specificity, may be involved in sperm-egg interaction during
fertilization. As
9
1 is a receptor for
many ADAM disintegrins and
9
1 and ADAMs
are widely expressed,
9
1-ADAM interaction
may be of a broad biological importance.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, ADAM12) (7, 8).
Most, but not all, ADAMs have a catalytically active metalloprotease
domain, which processes several biologically important cell surface
proteins including tumor necrosis factor-
(tumor necrosis
factor converting enzyme (TACE), ADAM17) (for reviews, see Refs. 9 and
10), Alzheimer protein precursor (ADAM10 and 17) (11, 12), Delta
(ADAM10) (9, 13, 14), and heparin-binding EGF (ADAM9) (15).
IIb
3 in an
RGD-dependent manner. Of all known ADAMs, ADAM15 is the
only one that has the RGD motif in the disintegrin domain. Indeed, as
we have reported, the ADAM15 disintegrin domain binds to integrin
v
3 in an RGD-dependent manner
(16). However, ADAM15 binds also to
9
1 in
an RGD-independent manner (17) and to integrin
5
1 (18). Several laboratories, including
ours, have reported that the non-RGD ADAM disintegrin domains interact
with several integrins such as ADAM2 and 9 with
6
1 (5, 19),
ADAM12 with
9
1(17), ADAM23 with
v
3 (20), and ADAM28 with
4
1 (21).
6 were shown to block sperm-egg binding, it has been
proposed that integrin
6
1 on the egg
binds to ADAM2 and 3 on the sperm (26). However, oocytes from
6-null mice can be fertilized in vitro (27),
and anti-integrin
6 subunit monoclonal antibody does not
always block sperm binding (28). Thus, it is still unclear whether
6
1 is the main or only integrin involved
in sperm-egg interaction, and the specificity, occurrence, and
significance of integrin-ADAM binding in other cells and tissues are
not known (for review, see Ref. 23).
v
3 and
9
1
recognize the ADAM15 disintegrin domain by mutating amino acid residues
in the putative integrin-binding site of the disintegrin domain (Fig.
1a). We found that
v
3 and
9
1 recognize distinct motifs in the
disintegrin domain, the RGD (residues 484-486) and the
RX6DLPEF (residues 481-492) motifs,
respectively. The RX6DLPEF
9
1 recognition motif is conserved among
ADAMs, except for ADAM10 and 17, and we provide evidence that
9
1 recognizes several, perhaps all, ADAM
disintegrins with this motif. We also found that oocytes and
9
1 have similar binding specificities for
ADAM disintegrin domains and propose that
9
1, or a receptor with similar
specificity, may be involved in sperm-oocyte interaction during
fertilization. Considering that
9
1 and
ADAMs are widely expressed,
9
1-ADAM
interactions may have a broad significance in many biological and
pathological processes such as fertilization, development, and tissue remodeling.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
v
3, human
6, or
human
9 (designated
3-,
6-, or
9-CHO cells, respectively) have
been described elsewhere (17). Adhesion assays were performed as
described previously (16). Briefly, wells of 96-well Immulon-2
microtiter plates (Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA) were coated
with substrates in 100 µl of PBS (10 mM phosphate buffer,
0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4) overnight at 4 °C. Remaining
protein-binding sites were blocked by incubating with 1% bovine serum
albumin (BSA) (Calbiochem) for 1 h at room temperature. After
washing with PBS, CHO cells (105 cells/well) in 100 µl of
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 1% BSA were
added to the wells and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. After
unbound cells were removed by rinsing the wells with Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium, bound cells were quantified by
measuring endogenous phosphatase activity (29).
-chymotrypsin (Sigma) and then
removed by passing the eggs through a narrow pipette as described
previously (5). Zona pellucida-free eggs were allowed to recover in
fertilization medium composed of Human Tubal Fluid medium (Irvine
Scientific) supplemented with 5 mg/ml BSA fraction V (Sigma) for 1-2 h
at 37 °C under mineral oil in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
v
3 and
9
1 Bind to Distinct Motifs in the
Disintegrin Domain of ADAM15--
Human ADAM15 is the only ADAM with
the RGD motif within the putative integrin-binding sites of disintegrin
domains (Fig. 1a). We have
reported that
v
3 and
9
1 recognize the ADAM15 disintegrin domain in an RGD-dependent and an RGD-independent manner,
respectively (17). To identify how different integrins recognize the
ADAM15 disintegrin domain, we introduced mutations around the RGD
motif. The mutant ADAM15 disintegrin domains were synthesized in
bacteria as GST fusion proteins. The ability of the mutant disintegrin domains to bind to
v
3 and
9
1 was determined in cell adhesion assays
with CHO cells expressing recombinant
v
3
or
9
1 (designated
3-CHO
cells and
9-CHO cells, respectively). CHO cells
transfected with expression vector (designated mock-CHO cells) were
used as controls. CHO cells express endogenous
v
1,
v
5, and
5
1 (30), but these integrins do not bind
to ADAM15 (16).

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effect of point mutations on binding of cells
expressing
9
1
(b-d) or
v
3
(b, e, and f) to the
disintegrin domain of human ADAM15. a shows the
position of the RGD motif in the putative integrin-binding region in
the disintegrin domain of human ADAM15. Mutant disintegrin-GST fusion
protein was generated in bacteria, and the disintegrin domain was
cleaved and purified as described under "Materials and Methods."
Adhesion of
9- and
3-CHO cells was tested
as a function of the coating concentration of the disintegrin domain.
TM, transmembrane.
v
3 but had no
detectable effect on the binding of
9
1 to
the ADAM15 disintegrin domain, consistent with the previous report
(17). We found that the R481A, C487A, D488A, L489A, E491, and F492A
mutations negatively affected adhesion of
9-CHO cells to
the ADAM15 disintegrin domain (Fig. 1, c and d).
In contrast, the same mutations flanking the RGD motif did not
significantly affect adhesion of
3-CHO cells to the
ADAM15 disintegrin domain (Fig. 1, e and f).
Mutating the Asp488 and Glu491 simultaneously
did not further affect the adhesion of
9- or
3-CHO cells to the ADAM15 disintegrin domain (Fig. 1,
d and f). Altogether these results show that the
v
3-ADAM15 interaction requires the RGD
motif but not the surrounding residues. Thus,
v
3 and
9
1
recognize ADAM15 in distinct manners. Interestingly the
residues critical for
9
1 binding in the
disintegrin domain, including Asp488, have also been
identified as critical for sperm-egg binding in ADAM2 and 3 (24-26). The sperm-egg binding studies were performed without
reference to any specific integrin, but the results are compatible with
9
1 being the oocyte receptor.
9
1 binding motif in ADAM15 is
conserved in many ADAMs. The alignment of the sequences of the putative
integrin-binding regions of several ADAM disintegrin domains is shown
in Fig. 2a. The
Arg481, Asp488, Leu489,
Pro490, Glu491, and Phe492 residues
that are critical for
9
1 binding in
ADAM15 (designated the RX6DLPEF motif) are
conserved among the disintegrin domains of all mammalian ADAMs except
for ADAM10, which has the sequence RX5AREGI, and
ADAM17, which has the sequence QX7KGVSY, in this region. We thus hypothesized that
9
1 is a
common receptor for many, if not all, ADAM disintegrin domains with
this motif. To address this hypothesis, we tested the disintegrin
domains of several ADAMs for interaction with
9
1 in cell attachment assays (Fig. 2,
b and c). We found that
9-CHO
cells adhered to the disintegrin domains from ADAM1, 2, 3, and 9 as
well as 15 used as a positive control.
9-CHO cells do
not spread very well on these disintegrins. The
9-CHO
cells did not significantly adhere to the disintegrin domains from
ADAM10 or 17. Control mock-transfected CHO cells did not significantly
adhere to any of the ADAMs tested. We further found that adhesion of
9-CHO cells to the ADAMs was completely blocked by
anti-
9 monoclonal antibody Y9A2 (data not shown), showing that the adhesion was
9-specific. These results
indicate that
9
1 may be a common receptor
for ADAM disintegrin domains with the
RX6DLPEF-like motif.

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Interaction between
9
1
and ADAMs disintegrin domains. a, alignment of the
putative integrin-binding sites of different ADAM disintegrin domains.
Amino acid residues that are critical for
9
1 interaction are boxed.
h, m, and rADAMs represent human,
mouse, and rat ADAMs, respectively. ADAMs that have been identified in
nonmammalian species (ADAM13, 14, and 16) are not shown. It should be
noted that the critical residues are not conserved in ADAM10 and
ADAM17. b and c, adhesion of
9-CHO
cells to GST-ADAM disintegrin domains. GST-ADAM1, -ADAM2, -ADAM3,
-ADAM9, and -ADAM15 disintegrin domains support adhesion of
9-CHO cells, but those of -ADAM10 and -ADAM17 do
not.
6
1 has been implicated in ADAM2 and
ADAM3 binding (26), we tested whether
6
1
expressed in CHO cells bound to the ADAM2 and 3 disintegrin domains. We
found that
6
1 did not mediate adhesion of
6-CHO cells to ADAM2 and 3 under the conditions in which
9-CHO cells adhered to these ligands (data not shown).
9
1, we wanted to test whether the binding
of sperm to the oocyte may have a specificity similar to disintegrin
binding to
9
1. To address this
hypothesis, we first studied whether the recombinant ADAM disintegrin
domains interact with oocytes. Although ADAM15 and 17 have not been
shown to be present on sperm, they were used to test specificity.

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Binding of disintegrin domains to the egg
microvillar region. Fluorescent microspheres were coated with 0.3 mg/ml GST-free recombinant disintegrin domains of mouse ADAM2
(a), ADAM15 (b), and ADAM17 (c) and
incubated with zona pellucida-free eggs. Bead binding was analyzed by
confocal microscopy after washing. Left panel, phase
contrast image. Right panel, projection of fluorescence
images in a single plane. Pictures show results from one representative
experiment of three. ADAM15- and to a lesser extent ADAM2-coated beads
bound to the microvillar region (b, inset) of all
eggs, while ADAM17-coated beads did not bind significantly. Scale
bar, 100 µm.
9
1.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
The disintegrin domain of ADAM15 inhibits the
binding of sperm to the egg plasma membrane. The disintegrin
domains produced as GST fusion proteins were tested for their ability
to interfere with the in vitro binding of capacitated sperm
to zona pellucida-free eggs. Data represent means ± S.E.
(n = 18-21) from one representative experiment of
three.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
9
1. The ADAM
disintegrin domains with this motif, e.g. those of ADAM1, 2, 3, 9, 12, and 15, bind avidly to
9
1, but
those lacking this motif, ADAM10 and 17, do not. The
RX6DLPEF motif is conserved among all ADAM
disintegrin domains except ADAM10 and 17 (Fig. 2a),
suggesting that
9
1 is a receptor for all
ADAMs with this recognition motif and that binding of ADAM disintegrin
domains to
9
1 through this motif may have
critical biological functions. ADAM10 and 17 represent a subfamily
within the ADAM family with several distinct structural (and
functional) features. The disintegrin domains of ADAM10 and 17 contain
only 13 of the 15 cysteine residues characteristic of a typical type
III snake venom disintegrin domain, indicating that the disintegrin
function of ADAM10 and 17 may be different from those of ADAMs with the
conserved RX6DLPEF motif as well as from that of
snake venom disintegrins and may not bind to any integrin at all.
9
1
binding to ADAM15. Thus,
9
1 recognizes
ADAM15 in a manner distinct from that of
v
3. Human ADAM15 is the only ADAM with
the RGD motif in the disintegrin domain, and the RGD motif is not
conserved among ADAM disintegrin domains (even mouse ADAM15 does not
have this motif), suggesting that RGD-dependent interaction
of ADAM15 with integrins may have only limited importance. This is in
stark contrast to many snake venom disintegrins in which the RGD motif
is highly conserved. Snake venom disintegrins bind to
IIb
3 or
v
3
integrins and block thrombosis and hemostasis (for reviews, see Refs. 2 and 31).
9
1 binding motif are located on the
opposite side of the loop and that Arg481 and
Glu491 are close to each other in space, although they are
distant from each other in the primary structure. The RGD motif is
present at the tip of the loop. It is likely that the entire loop
sequence may be required for synthetic peptides of the ADAM
disintegrins to be properly folded and effectively bind to
9
1.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
A model of the integrin-binding site of
ADAM15 disintegrin domain based on the echistatin structure
(2ECH). This model was generated using the SWISS-MODEL protein
modeling server (36-38). The alignment used for generating the model
is shown. The amino acid residues that are critical for
9
1 binding are shown in
bold.
9
1 has been shown to mediate cell
adhesion and migration but not cell spreading in vitro. The
association of an adhesion receptor, such as
9
1, with a metalloprotease, such as an
ADAM, would be expected to facilitate cell migration in vivo
in that the protease may digest and modify extracellular matrices and other tissue barriers in the immediate area of adhesion. The
association between
9
1 and ADAM would
further be expected to occur between molecules on the same cell,
i.e. in cis, as cell-cell interaction is not normally a
feature of cell migration. In contrast, it has been proposed that
shedding of growth factors occurs with the growth factor and ADAM
expressed on different cells, i.e. in trans. ADAM9 is
responsible for processing of heparin-binding EGF (15) and binds with
high affinity to integrin
9
1 (the present
report). It will be interesting to know whether integrin
9
1 is involved in the processing of
heparin-binding EGF. Our identification of mutations that obliterate
the binding of
9
1 to ADAMs can now be
used to test the role of
9
1-ADAM binding
on cell migration as well as on processing of heparin-binding EGF and
other potential ADAM substrates. As the prominent sheddases ADAM10 and
17 do not bind to
9
1, it is unlikely that
9
1 is involved in the processing of the
proteins they target, including tumor necrosis factor-
and the
Alzheimer precursor protein. Few ADAMs other than ADAM10 and 17 have
been tested for capacity to process these proteins. It is possible that
the specificities of the ADAM domains other than the metalloprotease
domains and the cell type-specific expression of ADAM ligands, such as
integrin
9
1, will determine which
proteins will be digested and when. The digestion may then occur either in cis or in trans depending on the situation. The metalloprotease domains themselves may be rather nonspecific. The relative
nonspecificity of metalloproteases agrees with the lack of success in
developing specific metalloprotease inhibitors despite a large effort
in this area by the pharmaceutical companies.
9
1-ADAM interaction may be involved in
sperm-egg binding. Two recent studies demonstrate that the presence of
acidic residues surrounding the cysteine in the disintegrin loop of
ADAM2 (X(C/D)ECD) is essential for the
binding of ADAM2 to the egg plasma membrane (24, 25). The underlined
residues correspond to the RGD sequence in ADAM15. ADAM3, which also
plays a role in sperm-egg binding, has the same characteristics in the
sequence of its disintegrin loop (KSDCD). It has also been
reported that synthetic peptides of the ADAM2 and 3 disintegrin domain
putative integrin-binding site block sperm-egg interaction (5, 22, 24,
26). It is intriguing that the RX6DLPEF
9
1 recognition motif is overlapping with
these peptide sequences. All studies to date show that the Asp residue is essential. This residue is not conserved in ADAM10 and 17.
9
1, bound to
murine oocytes and blocked sperm-egg binding, but the ADAM17
disintegrin domain, which does not bind to
9
1, did not. Although ADAM15 has not been
shown to be present on sperm, it shares the specificity with the sperm
ADAM2; in fact, in our experiments, ADAM15 was more effective in egg
binding and inhibition of sperm-egg binding that ADAM2, although these
differences may be primarily technical. These binding studies suggest
that the receptor for sperm on the oocytes is similar in specificity to
9
1. These results are well explained if
eggs express integrin
9
1 on their
surface. Although we confirmed the expression of
9
1 in many mouse tissues (32-34), our
efforts to identify
9 on oocytes, using immunostaining
in mouse ovary with anti-
9 cytoplasmic peptide antibody
1057 or in guinea pig ovary with either antibody 1057 or monoclonal
antibody Y9A2, were not successful. The lack of detection of
9 in the ovary suggests that either
9 is
not present or it is not accessible to antibodies. Another integrin(s)
or other receptor with specificity similar to
9
1 may exist in eggs.
6
1 is the
oocyte receptor for sperm (5). Recent findings that sperm-egg
interaction is normal in
6-null mice (27) and that the
antibody to
6, GoH3, does not always affect sperm-egg
interaction (28, 35) have raised questions about the role of
6
1 in sperm-egg binding and fusion. We
thus tested the ability of
6
1 to bind to
the ADAM disintegrin domains. We did not detect adhesion of
6-expressing CHO cells to the ADAM disintegrins under
the conditions in which
9-CHO cells adhere to the same
ligands. However, it cannot be ruled out that
6
1 may interact with the ADAM disintegrin
domains under certain conditions in oocytes. Since we used CHO cells
expressing human
9 or
6/hamster
1 hybrid in this study, it also cannot be ruled out that
human and hamster
1 provide different ligand specificities.
9
1 integrin is not known.
9
1 is present in many developing and
mature tissues including airway epithelia, the basal layer of squamous
epithelia, smooth muscle, skeletal muscle, hepatocytes, neutrophils,
and monocytes (32-34). Considering the wide distribution of both ADAMs
and
9
1,
ADAM-
9
1 interactions may play a role in
many physiological and pathological situations including muscle development and regeneration; vascular, cartilage, and other tissue remodeling; and perhaps fertilization. It remains a challenge to
determine what this role may be.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell
Biology, The Scripps Research Inst., VB-6, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd.,
La Jolla, CA 92037. Tel.: 858-784-7636; Fax: 858-784-7645; E-mail:
takada@scripps.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Weskamp, G.,
and Blobel, C. P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2748-2751 2.
Wolfsberg, T. G.,
Straight, P. D.,
Gerena, R. L.,
Huovila, A. P.,
Primakoff, P.,
Myles, D. G.,
and White, J. M.
(1995)
Dev. Biol.
169,
378-383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Black, R. A.,
and White, J. M.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
654-659[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 4.
Wolfsberg, T.,
and White, J.
(1996)
Dev. Biol.
180,
389-401[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 5.
Almeida, E. A.,
Huovila, A. P.,
Sutherland, A. E.,
Stephens, L. E.,
Calarco, P. G.,
Shaw, L. M.,
Mercurio, A. M.,
Sonnenberg, A.,
Primakoff, P.,
Myles, D. G.,
and White, J. M.
(1995)
Cell
81,
1095-1104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 6.
Evans, J. P.,
Schultz, R. M.,
and Kopf, G. S.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
3267-3278[Abstract] 7.
Yagami-Hiromasa, T.,
Sato, T.,
Kurisaki, T.,
Kamijo, K.,
Nabeshima, Y.,
and Fujisawa-Sehara, A.
(1995)
Nature
377,
652-656[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 8.
Gilpin, B. J.,
Loechel, F.,
Mattei, M. G.,
Engvall, E.,
Albrechtsen, R.,
and Wewer, U. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
157-166 9.
Blobel, C. P.
(1997)
Cell
90,
589-592[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
Werb, Z.,
and Yan, Y.
(1998)
Science
282,
1279-1280 11.
Buxbaum, J. D.,
Liu, K. N.,
Luo, Y.,
Slack, J. L.,
Stocking, K. L.,
Peschon, J. J.,
Johnson, R. S.,
Castner, B. J.,
Cerretti, D. P.,
and Black, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27765-27767 12.
Lammich, S.,
Kojro, E.,
Postina, R.,
Gilbert, S.,
Pfeiffer, R.,
Jasionowski, M.,
Haass, C.,
and Fahrenholz, F.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3922-3927 13.
Pan, D.,
and Rubin, G. M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
271-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 14.
Qi, H.,
Rand, M. D., Wu, X.,
Sestan, N.,
Wang, W.,
Rakic, P., Xu, T.,
and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.
(1999)
Science
283,
91-94 15.
Izumi, Y.,
Hirata, M.,
Hasuwa, H.,
Iwamoto, R.,
Umata, T.,
Miyado, K.,
Tamai, Y.,
Kurisaki, T.,
Sehara-Fujisawa, A.,
Ohno, S.,
and Mekada, E.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
7260-7272[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 16.
Zhang, X. P.,
Kamata, T.,
Yokoyama, K.,
Puzon-McLaughlin, W.,
and Takada, Y.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7345-7350 17.
Eto, K.,
Puzon-McLaughlin, W.,
Sheppard, D.,
Sehara-Fujisawa, A.,
Zhang, X. P.,
and Takada, Y.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
34922-34930 18.
Nath, D.,
Slocombe, P. M.,
Stephens, P. E.,
Warn, A.,
Hutchinson, G. R.,
Yamada, K. M.,
Docherty, A. J.,
and Murphy, G.
(1999)
J. Cell Sci.
112,
579-587[Abstract] 19.
Nath, D.,
Slocombe, P. M.,
Webster, A.,
Stephens, P. E.,
Docherty, A. J.,
and Murphy, G.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
2319-2328[Abstract] 20.
Cal, S.,
Freije, J. M.,
Lopez, J. M.,
Takada, Y.,
and Lopez-Otin, C.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
1457-1469 21.
Bridges, L. C.,
Tani, P. H.,
Hanson, K. R.,
Roberts, C. M.,
Judkins, M. B.,
and Bowditch, R. D.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
3784-3792 22.
Yuan, R.,
Primakoff, P.,
and Myles, D. G.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
105-112 23.
Evans, J. P.
(2001)
Bioessays
23,
628-639[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 24.
Bigler, D.,
Takahashi, Y.,
Chen, M. S.,
Almeida, E. A.,
Osbourne, L.,
and White, J. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
11576-11584 25.
Zhu, X.,
Bansal, N. P.,
and Evans, J. P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7677-7683 26.
Takahashi, Y.,
Bigler, D.,
Ito, Y.,
and White, J. M.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
809-820 27.
Miller, B. J.,
Georges-Labouesse, E.,
Primakoff, P.,
and Myles, D. G.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
1289-1296 28.
Evans, J. P.,
Kopf, G. S.,
and Schultz, R. M.
(1997)
Dev. Biol.
187,
79-93[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Prater, C. A.,
Plotkin, J.,
Jaye, D.,
and Frazier, W. A.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
112,
1031-1040 30.
Takagi, J.,
Kamata, T.,
Meredith, J.,
Puzon-McLaughlin, W.,
and Takada, Y.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
19794-19800 31.
McLane, M. A.,
Marcinkiewicz, C.,
Vijay-Kumar, S.,
Wierzbicka-Patynowski, I.,
and Niewiarowski, S.
(1998)
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
219,
109-119[Abstract] 32.
Palmer, E. L.,
Ruegg, C.,
Ferrando, R.,
Pytela, R.,
and Sheppard, D.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1289-1297 33.
Wang, A.,
Patrone, L.,
McDonald, J. A.,
and Sheppard, D.
(1995)
Dev. Dyn.
204,
421-431[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 34.
Taooka, Y.,
Chen, J.,
Yednock, T.,
and Sheppard, D.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
413-420 35.
Evans, J. P.
(1999)
Front. Biosci.
4,
D114-D131[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 36.
Guex, N.,
and Peitsch, M. C.
(1997)
Electrophoresis
18,
2714-2723[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 37.
Peitsch, M. C.
(1995)
Bio/Technology
13,
658-660[CrossRef] 38.
Peitsch, M. C.
(1996)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
24,
274-279[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Saegusa, N. Akakura, C.-Y. Wu, C. Hoogland, Z. Ma, K. S. Lam, F.-T. Liu, Y. K. Takada, and Y. Takada Pro-inflammatory Secretory Phospholipase A2 Type IIA Binds to Integrins {alpha}v{beta}3 and {alpha}4{beta}1 and Induces Proliferation of Monocytic Cells in an Integrin-dependent Manner J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2008; 283(38): 26107 - 26115. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Pasten-Hidalgo, R. Hernandez-Rivas, A. L. Roa-Espitia, M. Sanchez-Gutierrez, F. Martinez-Perez, A. O. Monrroy, E. O Hernandez-Gonzalez, and A. Mujica Presence, processing, and localization of mouse ADAM15 during sperm maturation and the role of its disintegrin domain during sperm-egg binding Reproduction, July 1, 2008; 136(1): 41 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. W. deHart, T. Jin, D. E. McCloskey, A. E. Pegg, and D. Sheppard The {alpha}9{beta}1 integrin enhances cell migration by polyamine-mediated modulation of an inward-rectifier potassium channel PNAS, May 20, 2008; 105(20): 7188 - 7193. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shimoda, G. Hashimoto, S. Mochizuki, E. Ikeda, N. Nagai, S. Ishida, and Y. Okada Binding of ADAM28 to P-selectin Glycoprotein Ligand-1 Enhances P-selectin-mediated Leukocyte Adhesion to Endothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., August 31, 2007; 282(35): 25864 - 25874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stefanidakis and E. Koivunen Cell-surface association between matrix metalloproteinases and integrins: role of the complexes in leukocyte migration and cancer progression Blood, September 1, 2006; 108(5): 1441 - 1450. [Abstract] |