![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 17944-17949, May 17, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Institute for Molecular Bioscience, Centre for Microscopy
and Microanalysis, and School of Biomedical Sciences, University of
Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia and the § Queensland
Cancer Fund Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, Department of
Pathology, University of Queensland Medical School, Herston Road,
Brisbane 4006, Australia
Received for publication, November 13, 2001, and in revised form, February 26, 2002
Specific point mutations in caveolin-3, a
predominantly muscle-specific member of the caveolin family, have been
implicated in limb-girdle muscular dystrophy and in rippling muscle
disease. We examined the effect of these mutations on caveolin-3
localization and function. Using two independent assay systems, Raf
activation in fibroblasts and neurite extension in PC12 cells, we show
that one of the caveolin-3 point mutants, caveolin-3-C71W, specifically inhibits signaling by activated H-Ras but not by K-Ras. To gain insights into the effect of the mutant protein on H-Ras signaling, we
examined the localization of the mutant proteins in fibroblastic cells
and in differentiating myotubes. Unlike the previously characterized caveolin-3-DGV mutant, the inhibitory caveolin-3-C71W mutant reached the plasma membrane and colocalized with wild type caveolins. In BHK
cells, caveolin-3-C71W associated with caveolae and in differentiating
muscle cells with the developing T-tubule system. In contrast, the
caveolin-3-P104L mutant accumulated in the Golgi complex and had no
effect on H-Ras-mediated Raf activation. Inhibition by caveolin-3-C71W
was rescued by cholesterol addition, suggesting that the mutant protein
perturbs cholesterol-rich raft domains. Thus, we have demonstrated that
a naturally occurring caveolin-3 mutation can inhibit signaling
involving cholesterol-sensitive raft domains.
Caveolae are an abundant feature of the sarcolemma of muscle
cells. Caveolin-3 (Cav3)1 is
one of the major membrane proteins of skeletal and cardiac muscle
caveolae (1, 2). By analogy to the closely related caveolin family
member, caveolin-1 (Cav1) (3), Cav3 is thought to play a vital and
direct role in the formation of the characteristic flask-shaped pits
typical of caveolae. In addition to this structural role, caveolins
have been implicated in signal transduction and in lipid transport (4).
The role of caveolae and Cav3 in muscle has become clinically relevant
with the finding that mutations in the gene for Cav3 are associated
with several muscle pathologies including a rare form of limb-girdle
muscular dystrophy type 1C and hereditary rippling muscle disease
(5-10). To date, one microdeletion and five point mutations (R26Q,
A45T or A45V, G55S, C71W, and P104L; note that this nomenclature
assumes a single Met at the N terminus) have been described. While four
of these mutant proteins cause a decrease in Cav3 expression, in other
cases surface expression of the protein appears normal (5, 6). Defining
the function of Cav3, identifying its interacting partners, and
characterizing the effect of the myopathy-associated mutations on
muscle function is therefore of vital importance. Moreover, the
specific point mutants of Cav3 that are associated with the skeletal
muscle defects may provide powerful new tools in studies of the role of
caveolins in both muscle and nonmuscle cells.
Cav3 expression is up-regulated as myoblasts fuse to form myotubes (1,
2, 11). In mature muscle, the sarcolemma is highly organized into
regularly spaced Cav3-positive caveolar domains separated by
noncaveolar domains (12). Cav3 shows partial colocalization with
elements of the dystrophin complex (12) and is proposed to associate
with the dystrophin complex at the cell surface (13, 14). In fact,
interactions between Cav3 and dystroglycan through a WW-like domain in
Cav3 have been suggested to mediate a direct interaction between these
two proteins (15). While Cav3 is predominantly associated with the
sarcolemma of mature muscle, in differentiating muscle cells Cav3
associates with the developing T-tubule system (11, 16). The functional significance of the association with this extensive plasma membrane subdomain is as yet unknown, but both caveolae and the developing T-tubule system show similar morphology and are sensitive to
cholesterol-disrupting agents (11, 17, 18). Recent reports of T-tubule
defects in Cav3-deficient mice suggest that Cav3 may be involved in the organization of the T-tubules but is not essential for their formation (19).
Caveolins have been shown to interact in vitro with a number
of signaling molecules including trimeric G protein subunits, Src
kinases, and Raf through direct interactions of these proteins with a
conserved region of caveolin termed the caveolin scaffolding domain
(20). More recent studies have shown that this domain of caveolin can
interact with, and apparently insert into, lipid bilayers (21, 22)
raising questions regarding the specificity of these protein-protein
interactions in vivo. An additional hypothesis for the role
of caveolins has emerged with the finding that Cav1 is a lipid-binding
protein. Cav1 binds both cholesterol (23) and fatty acids (24), and its
expression is regulated by cholesterol at the transcriptional level
(25-27). Cav1 expression also increases cholesterol transport (28).
Consistent with these findings, we have shown that exogenous expression
of a Cav3 truncation mutant, Cav3-DGV, in fibroblastic cells disrupts
lipid transport and causes inhibition of specific signaling pathways
(29). Rather than a direct interaction with signaling proteins, these
studies suggest that the mutant protein affects lipid homeostasis and
so causes disruption of cholesterol-rich surface domains, termed lipid
rafts, with which specific signaling pathways are associated (4). The
muscle cell surface has been shown to be arranged into highly organized
arrays of caveolae raft domains (12). In view of the finding that
artificial Cav3 truncation mutants can inhibit signal transduction
through raft domains (29), we speculated that naturally occurring Cav3
mutants may also affect signaling through sarcolemmal raft domains and
that these mutants may provide excellent tools to dissect caveolin
function. In the present study, we have characterized the mutant Cav3
proteins functionally using two different assays to monitor raft- and
non-raft-mediated Ras-dependent signaling events. We show
that one Cav3 point mutant reaches the cell surface and specifically
inhibits H-Ras-dependent signaling pathways with the
inhibition being rescued by cholesterol addition. These findings give
new insights into the effect of specific point mutations on caveolin
function, the role of caveolins in regulating
raft-dependent signaling events, and the potential effect
of caveolin dysfunction in muscle.
Cell Culture--
BHK cells and C2C12
cells were maintained as described previously (17, 29). PC12 cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented
with 5% (v/v) horse serum, 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, and 2 mM L-glutamine.
Antibodies and cDNAs--
Affinity-purified rabbit
antibodies against p23 (30) were kindly provided by Professor Jean
Gruenberg (University of Geneva, Switzerland). A rabbit polyclonal
antibody against the hemagglutinin (HA) tag was a generous gift from
Professor David James (University of Queensland, Australia). A rabbit
polyclonal antibody to the conserved region of Cav3 ( Transfections--
BHK cells were transiently transfected using
LipofectAMINE or LipofectAMINE Plus reagent (Invitrogen) according to
the manufacturer's instructions. C2C12 cells
were transiently transfected using LipofectAMINE 2000 reagent
(Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly,
myoblasts were transfected at confluence in differentiation medium
(Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 1% (v/v) Serum Supreme
(BioWhittaker) and 2 mM L-glutamine) using 4 µg of total DNA/14 µl of LipofectAMINE 2000 in a total volume of
2.4 ml of medium (Invitrogen). Cells were incubated overnight with the
DNA mixture before it was replaced by fresh differentiation medium, which was subsequently replaced every 2 days prior to fixation, which
routinely occurred 4-6 days postremoval of the transfection reagent
(at which point the myoblasts had morphologically fused to form
multinucleated myotubes). PC12 cells were transiently transfected using
LipofectAMINE according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were
left with the DNA transfection mix for 5 h prior to addition of
medium containing 20% (v/v) calf serum. This medium was
replaced the following day by standard PC12 maintenance medium, and the
cells were incubated a further 24 h prior to fixation. In BHK
cells, the HA-tagged wild type (WT) and mutant Cav3 proteins were
expressed at comparable levels. Note that no correlation was found
between expression level of the HA-tagged proteins and ability of the
mutants to inhibit H-Ras function.
Raf-1 Kinase Assays--
Membrane fractions (P100) from
transfected BHK cells were normalized for Raf protein content via
Western blot analysis and assayed for Raf activity using a two-stage
coupled MEK/ERK assay with phosphorylation of myelin basic protein as
readout exactly as described previously (33). Cholesterol
supplementation was carried out for 1 h using a mix of 16 µg/ml
cholesterol with 0.4% cyclodextrin in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium exactly as described previously (34).
Sucrose Gradients and Western Blots--
Sucrose gradients of
transfected BHK cells and subsequent Western blot analysis were
performed exactly as described previously (31, 35, 36).
Light and Electron Microscopy--
For immunofluorescence
studies, cells were routinely fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and
immunolabeled according to Pol et al. (37). Electron
microscopic localization of Cav3 mutants in plasma membrane sheets was
performed exactly as described previously (31).
A Caveolin-3 Point Mutant Specifically Inhibits H-Ras-mediated
Signaling--
We used a model fibroblast transfection system to
examine the possible effect of Cav3 myopathy mutants on H- or
K-Ras-mediated Raf activation. Ras recruits Raf from the cytosol to the
plasma membrane where Raf activation proceeds through a complex pathway involving interactions with lipids, displacement of 14-3-3, and phosphorylation (38). By co-expression of the mutants with activated Ras (H- or K-Ras) and with Raf, we examined the effect of the Cav3
mutants on two aspects of Ras function: association of Raf with
membranes (Raf recruitment) and activation of Raf (Raf specific activity). It was found that, as has been published previously (29),
neither Ras expression nor recruitment of Raf to the membrane by
constitutively activated H-Ras (H-RasG12V) or K-Ras (K-RasG12V) was
affected by co-expression of the mutant proteins (data not shown).
Moreover, Raf activation by K-Ras was also unaffected by co-expression
of the WT or mutant Cav3 proteins (Fig.
1). In striking contrast, one of the
mutants, Cav3-C71W, showed a strong inhibition of H-Ras-mediated Raf
activation. The level of inhibition was comparable to that seen with
the previously documented Cav3-DGV N-terminal truncation mutant (which
lacks amino acids 1-54) (29) (Fig. 1). Cav3-WT and the
Cav3-G55S and Cav3-P104L mutants had no significant effect on
H-Ras-mediated Raf activation. Since the caveolin scaffolding domain
(amino acids 55-73), in which three dystrophy-associated mutations
occur, has been implicated in the direct binding of signaling
molecules, we also examined whether a caveolin truncation mutant that
lacks this region would inhibit H-Ras-mediated Raf activation as
effectively as the Cav3-DGV mutant. In fact, the Cav3-LLS mutant, which
lacks the entire N-terminal domain of Cav3 (amino acids 1-73), was a
specific and potent inhibitor of H-Ras-mediated Raf activation showing
that the scaffolding domain was not required for the inhibitory
effect.
To validate the use of the Ras/Raf transfection assay for studies of
the caveolin mutants, we examined whether the Cav3-C71W mutant would
inhibit signaling in a completely different Ras assay system. For this
we took advantage of the well characterized role of Ras in regulating
neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells (39). Introduction of activated H-Ras
(Fig. 2) or K-Ras (not shown) into
undifferentiated PC12 cells caused extensive neurite outgrowth,
although the extent of neurite outgrowth induced by K-Ras was not as
marked as that induced by H-Ras. Activated H-Ras was then transfected
into PC12 cells together with Cav3-WT, Cav3-DGV, or the Cav3 point
mutants. As shown in Fig. 2, Cav3-DGV and Cav3-C71W caused a dramatic
inhibition of H-Ras-mediated neurite extension. The same mutant
proteins had no effect on K-Ras-mediated neurite outgrowth (results not shown). Thus, we have identified a point mutation in Cav3 that inhibits
H-Ras signaling in two independent assays.
Localization of Heterologously Expressed Caveolin-3 Mutants in
Fibroblasts and Differentiating Muscle Cells--
We have postulated
that Cav3-DGV specifically inhibits H-Ras signaling through an effect
on cellular cholesterol. Cav3-DGV accumulates intracellularly and does
not reach the cell surface. We therefore examined the localization of
the inhibitory and noninhibitory Cav3 point mutants in fibroblasts and
in differentiating muscle cells. Cav3-WT localizes to surface caveolae
and the Golgi complex of nonmuscle cells (32) and to surface caveolae
and T-tubules of differentiating muscle cells (11). We therefore
examined whether the Cav3 point mutants showed aberrant localization by expression of the HA epitope-tagged forms of the protein in BHK cells.
By immunofluorescence microscopy, the labeling patterns for Cav3-G55S
and Cav3-C71W were indistinguishable from Cav3-WT-HA. In contrast,
Cav3-P104L was predominantly (although not exclusively) in the Golgi
complex, consistent with previous studies (40). We then examined the
localization of the mutant proteins in C2C12 cells, a model muscle cell line. As in the nonmuscle cells, the labeling patterns for Cav3-G55S and -C71W were largely
indistinguishable from Cav3-WT, labeling the cell surface and putative
T-tubules. The Cav3-P104L mutant, in contrast, gave a striking
perinuclear labeling, which colocalized with the cis Golgi marker
protein, p23, in all the transfected cells (Fig.
3).
In view of the inhibitory effect of the Cav3-C71W mutant, we examined
the localization of this protein in more detail. By confocal microscopy
the Cav3-C71W mutant colocalized with Cav3-WT-YFP in co-transfected
C2C12 cells (Fig. 3). In BHK cells, Cav3-C71W localized to caveolae as shown by immunoelectron microscopy on plasma
membrane sheets (Fig. 3).
Therefore Cav3-C71W behaves in a manner similar to the Cav3-DGV mutant
in terms of its effect on H-Ras signaling but does not localize to the
same compartment; in fact the Cav3-C71W mutant traffics in a manner
similar to the wild type protein. The results also show for the first
time that the Cav3-P104L mutant is strongly retained in the Golgi
complex of muscle cells, consistent with results in fibroblasts (40).
The results also show that accumulation of a caveolin mutant
intracellularly is not sufficient to inhibit H-Ras signaling,
emphasizing the specificity of the inhibition mediated by the Cav3-DGV mutant.
Inhibition by the Caveolin-3-C71W Mutant Is Reversed by Cholesterol
Addition and Accompanied by Changes in Density of Raft
Domains--
In view of the different location of the
inhibitory mutants Cav3-DGV and Cav3-C71W, we examined whether the
Cav3-C71W mutant was inhibiting H-Ras signaling through an effect on
cholesterol as demonstrated previously for the Cav3-DGV mutant. A
cyclodextrin/cholesterol mixture was used to supplement the cholesterol
content of the plasma membrane of cells expressing Cav3-C71W or
Cav3-DGV. Strikingly a 1-h incubation with cyclodextrin/cholesterol
completely restored Raf activity in cells expressing Raf, H-Ras, and
Cav3-C71W (Fig. 4), a similar effect to
that seen in cells expressing the Cav3-DGV mutant. This suggests that
the Cav3-C71W mutant perturbs cholesterol-dependent surface
signaling events. We therefore investigated whether Cav3-C71W caused
gross changes in free cholesterol distribution. No significant changes
were observed by filipin staining (results not shown). We also examined
whether Cav3-C71W showed different detergent insolubility
characteristics or oligomerization properties as compared with
expressed wild type Cav3. In both cases the properties of the Cav3-C71W
mutant were indistinguishable from the wild type protein (results not
shown).
We next examined whether expression of the Cav3-C71W mutant affected
raft domains. We used a modified flotation method in which
carbonate-treated membranes are separated on a linear sucrose gradient
to separate raft and non-raft domains (31). Cav3-WT, Cav3-C71W, or
Cav3-DGV were transfected with GFP-tH, a raft marker comprising the
H-Ras minimal membrane-targeting domain attached to the C terminus of
GFP. Both Cav3-C71W and Cav3-DGV, but not Cav3-WT, caused a significant
shift of the raft marker GFP-tH to denser fractions (Fig.
5) consistent with the postulated effect of these proteins on plasma membrane raft domains. Interestingly, however, it was noted that the extent of the shift was different for
the two mutants with the Cav3-C71W mutant causing a more modest shift
of a portion of the GFP-tH from its normal position on the density gradient. It is assumed that the increase in density of the
GFP-tH-containing rafts is due to a decrease in cholesterol in raft
domains, consistent with rescue of H-Ras inhibition by cholesterol
addition. Note that there was no difference in the density of fractions
containing Cav3-WT and Cav3-C71W on the gradients (Fig. 5), further
supporting the localization data (Fig. 3). The flotation of endogenous
Cav1 was also unaffected by co-expression of Cav3-C71W (data not
shown), highlighting the significance of the reproducible shift
observed for GFP-tH and suggesting that caveolae domains are not
significantly affected by mutant expression.
Amino Acid Substitution at Position 71 or Reduced Plasma Membrane
Localization of Caveolin-3-C71W Ablates the Inhibitory Effects of the
Mutant Protein--
Finally we explored the relevant features of the
Cav3-C71W mutant that make it inhibitory to H-Ras function. We first
generated a new HA-tagged Cav3 mutant, Cav3-C71A, in which the amino
acid at position 71 was changed from a cysteine to an alanine. This mutant was used to determine whether the impact of the mutation in
Cav3-C71W is due to the loss of the cysteine residue, which is
conserved within Cav3 from different species, or to the presence of the
substituted bulky hydrophobic tryptophan. Cav3-C71A localized in BHK
cells in a manner indistinguishable from that observed for the Cav3-WT
or Cav3-C71W mutant (data not shown). Unlike the Cav3-C71W mutant,
however, the Cav3-C71A mutant was unable to inhibit H-Ras-mediated Raf
activation (Fig. 1) and did not inhibit activated H-Ras-mediated
neurite outgrowth in the PC12 assay (Fig. 2). This would argue that it
is the acquisition of the tryptophan at position 71 that alters
Cav3 function.
In addition we investigated whether plasma membrane localization was
essential for the inhibition of H-Ras signaling by Cav3-C71W. The N
terminus of Cav3 has been shown to be required for caveolar localization of Cav3 (32). Consistent with this, we have found that the
introduction of point mutants in conserved amino acids in this region,
such as the arginine at position 26 (a naturally occurring dystrophy
mutant) and the highly conserved proline at position 28, resulted in
the intracellular retention of the resultant mutants in the
C2C12 system (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 3, introducing a proline to histidine change in Cav3-C71W at
position 28 caused the mutant protein (Cav3-P28H/C71W) to accumulate
intracellularly in BHK and C2C12 cells. The
mutant protein was unable to inhibit H-Ras-mediated Raf activation
(Fig. 1). The lack of inhibitory effect of the double mutant was
confirmed using the PC12 neurite outgrowth assay (Fig. 2).
We have shown, therefore, that a single point mutation in Cav3, a
cysteine to tryptophan substitution at amino acid position 71, can cause perturbation of cholesterol-dependent raft
signaling domains using two independent Ras assays. The Ras assays
provide powerful model systems to study raft-dependent and
-independent signaling pathways as shown in this and previous studies
(29, 31). Ras has been implicated in regulation of muscle genes during differentiation and in response to nerve activity, but the involvement of distinct Ras isoforms in muscle is unknown. Genetic ablation of
H-Ras (and N-Ras) expression in mice had no discernible
phenotype (41) in contrast to the embryonically lethal effects of K-Ras ablation (42), suggesting that H-Ras is not essential for muscle differentiation in vivo. While we have used Ras as an assay,
it is likely that other signaling events utilizing raft domains may be
affected in muscle cells expressing the Cav3-C71W protein in vivo. A possibly analogous situation was reported recently in neurons from mice with Niemann-Pick type C in which it was shown that
the cholesterol imbalance associated with the disease caused defects in
specific raft-dependent signaling pathways (43). Interestingly it has been reported that in Cav3 knockout mice the
dystrophin complex no longer floats on a sucrose density gradient (19)
implying that Cav3, via an ability to profoundly influence raft domain
formation, may also impact on the performance of raft resident
structural proteins.
We speculate that the Cav3-C71W-induced disruption of cholesterol-rich
domains in muscle may underlie the mild dystrophic phenotype caused by
the mutant protein. However, it is important to note that a recent
study suggested that a number of the described Cav3 point mutations
also occurred in nondystrophic individuals and may therefore represent
polymorphisms (44). In the case of Cav3-C71W, of 100 apparently healthy
individuals screened, one subject was found to carry that mutation. In
view of the striking effects of the mutant protein described here, it
is possible that the effects of Cav3-C71W may be balanced by
compensatory mechanisms in some, but not all, genetic backgrounds. In
support of this, it has recently been reported that the Cav3-P104L
mutation, originally documented in patients with limb-girdle muscular
dystrophy, is also found in patients with a separate muscle disorder
known as hereditary rippling muscle disease (10), further verifying
that both genetic and environmental backgrounds influence phenotypic outcome.
The effects of the Cav3-C71W mutant show similarities to those
previously described for the Cav3-DGV mutant in the specificity for
H-Ras-mediated signaling events, rescue by addition of cholesterol, and
the effect on the density of raft-containing membranes (Ref. 29 and
this study). However, unlike the Cav3-DGV mutant, Cav3-C71W reaches
cell surface caveolae, and based on comparison with a double mutant
impaired in transport to the surface, this surface localization may be
required for its inhibitory effects. Caveolins have been implicated in
cholesterol transport to the plasma membrane and may therefore be
important in regulating the availability of plasma membrane cholesterol
for raft domains. We have speculated that Cav3-DGV perturbs the
distribution of free cholesterol in the cell, causing intracellular
accumulation in late endosomes, and therefore reduces the availability
of cholesterol required for functional surface raft domains (37). As
the Cav3-C71W mutant has a similar effect and yet reaches the cell
surface and has no apparent gross effects on free cholesterol
distribution, the mechanisms involved are presumably distinct. It is
possible that the C71W mutation increases the affinity of Cav3 for
cholesterol and prevents release of cholesterol from caveolae to
noncaveolar lipid rafts, but further work is required to test this
hypothesis. Our results suggest that the addition of tryptophan rather
than the loss of cysteine may be important. Interestingly the
corresponding amino acid is highly conserved in mammalian Cav1 and is a
phenylalanine. Thus, the tryptophan substitution might make Cav3 more
like Cav1 in this region.
The identification of a single amino acid residue that changes the
properties of the Cav3 protein so dramatically provides a valuable tool
for studies of caveolins, cholesterol, and raft domains. Moreover, we
have revealed a potential mechanism by which mutations in Cav3 can
induce defects in specific signaling pathways that could lead to long
term pathological changes.
We are grateful to Rob Luetterforst for
excellent technical assistance.
*
This research was supported by grants from the National
Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (to R. G. P. and J. F. H.). The Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics is a Special Research Centre of the Australian Research Council.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Also supported by the Royal Children's Hospital Foundation, Queensland.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 7, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110879200
The abbreviations used are:
Cav, caveolin;
HA, hemagglutinin;
WT, wild type;
MEK, mitogen-activated protein
kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase;
ERK, extracellular
signal-regulated kinase;
YFP, yellow fluorescent protein;
GFP, green
fluorescent protein;
MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic
acid.
Inhibition of Lipid Raft-dependent Signaling by a
Dystrophy-associated Mutant of Caveolin-3*
,
§,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Con-Cav)
has been characterized previously (32). A polyclonal antibody to Cav1
was from Transduction Laboratories (catalog no. C13630). Other reagents
have been described previously (31). HA-tagged Cav3 point mutants were
generated by PCR using mouse HA-tagged Cav3 as template. Cav3-DGV has
been described previously (32). Cav3-LLS comprises residues 74-150 of
Cav3. All constructs were confirmed by sequencing.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A caveolin-3 point mutant specifically
inhibits H-Ras-dependent Raf activation. BHK cells
were transfected with the indicated combinations of activated H- or
K-Ras (G12V), Raf, and Cav3 mutant constructs. The cells were then
fractionated, and 20 µg of each membrane (P100) fraction were
immunoblotted for Ras and Raf-1. P100 fractions from H-Ras
(A) and K-Ras transfection series (B) were then
normalized for Raf content and assayed for Raf specific activity using
a coupled MEK/ERK assay. The results show relative Raf specific
activity ± S.E. from three to five independent experiments for
each bar. Each assay set was normalized against the Raf
activity of cells transfected with Ras and Raf alone (=1). C
shows the relative expression levels of two of the HA-tagged Cav3
constructs compared with that of endogenous Cav1 in BHK cells. Extracts
from BHK cells transfected with Cav3-C71W or Cav3-P104L were processed
for Western blot analysis and probed with antibodies to the HA tag
(upper panel A) to detect transfected proteins
(T) with an antibody (
Con-Cav) to the conserved region of
Cav3 (middle panel B) or with a polyclonal antibody
(
Cav1) to Cav1 (bottom panel C). The
Con-Cav and
Cav1 antibodies recognize both endogenous Cav1 (E) and
ectopically expressed Cav3 (T) with varying affinities.
Densitometric analysis of blots obtained with the
Con-Cav antibody
showed that, after correction for transfection efficiency, Cav3-P104L
levels were approximately 6-fold and Cav3-C71W levels were
approximately 3-fold greater than those of endogenous Cav1.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Specific inhibition of H-Ras-stimulated
neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells by caveolin-3 mutants. PC12 cells
were transfected with the indicated constructs. After 48 h the
cells were fixed and examined by fluorescent microscopy. A,
cells transfected with the control vector (GFP-tH) have no
neurites, whereas cells transfected with GFP-H-RasG12V show extensive
neurite outgrowth. In cells coexpressing H-RasG12V and Cav3-C71W or
Cav3-DGV neurite outgrowth is severely inhibited. Negligible effects on
neurite outgrowths are seen when H-RasG12V is co-expressed with Cav3-WT
or Cav3-P28H/C71W. B, cells co-transfected with
GFP-H-RasG12V and the indicated HA-tagged Cav3 mutants were labeled
with antibodies to HA and imaged for both constructs as shown.
Unlike Cav3-C71W, Cav3-C71A had no impact on H-RasG12V-induced
neurite outgrowth. Bars, 25 µm. The experiments shown
are representative of three independent experiments.

View larger version (120K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Localization of caveolin-3 mutants in BHK
cells and C2C12 cells. HA-tagged caveolin
mutants were transfected into BHK cells (A-E) or
C2C12 myotubes (F-J) as indicated:
Cav3-WT (A and F), Cav3-G55S (B and
G), Cav3-C71W (C and H), Cav3-P104L
(D and I), Cav3-P28H/C71W (E and
J). In both cell types note the similar staining patterns
with Cav3-WT and both Cav3-C71W and Cav3-G55S, which contrasts with the
perinuclear labeling of the Cav3-P104L mutant. K and
L show colocalization between Cav3-P104L (L) and
the Golgi marker p23 (K). M and N
indicate labeling for the inhibitory mutant Cav3-C71W (M)
and Cav3-WT-YFP (N). O shows electron microscopic
localization of Cav3-C71W on plasma membrane sheets using anti-HA
antibodies followed by 10-nm protein A-gold. Bars:
A-N, 10 µm; O, 100 nm.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of H-Ras signaling by caveolin-3
mutants is reversed by cholesterol addition. BHK cells were
transfected with Raf-1 and activated H-Ras (G12V) in combination with
the caveolin constructs indicated. They were then treated with a
cyclodextrin/cholesterol (CD/Chol) mixture for
1 h or left untreated as indicated. The cells were then
fractionated, and 20 µg of each membrane (P100) fraction were
immunoblotted for Ras and Raf-1. P100 fractions were then normalized
for Raf content and assayed for Raf specific activity using a coupled
MEK/ERK assay as described in Fig. 1. The results show relative Raf
specific activity ± S.E. from three to five independent
experiments for each bar. Expression of ectopically
expressed caveolin constructs was verified by Western blotting (not
shown).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Caveolin-3 mutants increase
density of raft-containing membranes. BHK cells were transfected
with GFP-tH alone or in combination with Cav3-WT, Cav3-C71W, or
Cav3-DGV as indicated. Whole cell lysates prepared in 45% sucrose, 250 mM Na2CO3 were centrifuged under a
sucrose gradient. Each fraction, numbered from the top of the gradient,
was then collected, diluted into MES-buffered saline, pelleted, and
immunoblotted. A, expression of Cav3-C71W and Cav3-DGV
alters the distribution of GFP-tH, whereas expression of Cav3-WT does
not. The lower two profiles show blotting for HA-tagged
Cav3-WT or Cav3-C71W in the same gradients. Cav3 shows an identical
distribution to Cav3-C71W in the sucrose gradient. B, the
top three immunoblots of A were then quantified
by phosphorimaging. These experiments show that Cav3-DGV and Cav3-C71W
expression cause a significant increase in the density of
GFP-tH-containing microdomains. Similar results were obtained in three
independent experiments.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
61-7-3365-6468; Fax: 61-7-3365-4422; E-mail:
R.Parton@imb.uq.edu.au.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Way, M.,
and Parton, R. G.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
376,
108-112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 2.
Tang, Z.,
Scherer, P. E.,
Okamoto, T.,
Song, K.,
Chu, C.,
Kohtz, D. S.,
Nishimoto, I.,
Lodish, H. F.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2255-2261 3.
Fra, A. M.,
Williamson, E.,
Simons, K.,
and Parton, R. G.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
8655-8659 4.
Kurzchalia, T. V.,
and Parton, R. G.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
11,
424-431[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 5.
McNally, E. M.,
de Sa Moreira, E.,
Duggan, D. J.,
Bonnemann, C. G.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
Lidov, H. G.,
Vainzof, M.,
Passos-Bueno, M. R.,
Hoffman, E. P.,
Zatz, M.,
and Kunkel, L. M.
(1998)
Hum. Mol. Genet
7,
871-877 6.
Minetti, C.,
Sotgia, F.,
Bruno, C.,
Scartezzini, P.,
Broda, P.,
Bado, M.,
Masetti, E.,
Mazzocco, M.,
Egeo, A.,
Donati, M. A.,
Volonte, D.,
Galbiati, F.,
Cordone, G.,
Bricarelli, F. D.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
and Zara, F.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
18,
365-368[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 7.
Carbone, I.,
Bruno, C.,
Sotgia, F.,
Bado, M.,
Broda, P.,
Masetti, E.,
Panella, A.,
Zara, F.,
Bricarelli, F. D.,
Cordone, G.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
and Minetti, C.
(2000)
Neurology
54,
1373-1376 8.
Herrmann, R.,
Straub, V.,
Blank, M.,
Kutzick, C.,
Franke, N.,
Jacob, E. N.,
Lenard, H. G.,
Kroger, S.,
and Voit, T.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
2335-2340 9.
Sunada, Y.,
Ohi, H.,
Hase, A.,
Hosono, T.,
Arata, S.,
Higuchi, S.,
Matsumura, K.,
and Shimizu, T.
(2001)
Hum. Mol. Genet
10,
173-178 10.
Betz, R. C.,
Schoser, B. G.,
Kasper, D.,
Ricker, K.,
Ramirez, A.,
Stein, V.,
Torbergsen, T.,
Lee, Y. A.,
Nothen, M. M.,
Wienker, T. F.,
Malin, J. P.,
Propping, P.,
Reis, A.,
Mortier, W.,
Jentsch, T. J.,
Vorgerd, M.,
and Kubisch, C.
(2001)
Nat. Genet.
28,
218-219[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Parton, R. G.,
Way, M.,
Zorzi, N.,
and Stang, E.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
137-154 12.
Rahkila, P.,
Takala, T. E.,
Parton, R. G.,
and Metsikko, K.
(2001)
Exp. Cell Res.
267,
61-72[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 13.
Song, K. S.,
Scherer, P. E.,
Tang, Z.,
Okamoto, T., Li, S.,
Chafel, M.,
Chu, C.,
Kohtz, D. S.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15160-15165 14.
Crosbie, R. H.,
Yamada, H.,
Venzke, D. P.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
and Campbell, K. P.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
427,
279-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 15.
Sotgia, F.,
Lee, J. K.,
Das, K.,
Bedford, M.,
Petrucci, T. C.,
Macioce, P.,
Sargiacomo, M.,
Bricarelli, F. D.,
Minetti, C.,
Sudol, M.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
38048-38058 16.
Ralston, E.,
and Ploug, T.
(1999)
Exp. Cell Res.
246,
510-515[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 17.
Carozzi, A. J.,
Ikonen, E.,
Lindsay, M. R.,
and Parton, R. G.
(2000)
Traffic
1,
326-341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 18.
Ishikawa, H.
(1968)
J. Cell Biol.
38,
51-66 19.
Galbiati, F.,
Engelman, J. A.,
Volonte, D.,
Zhang, X. L.,
Minetti, C., Li, M.,
Hou, H., Jr.,
Kneitz, B.,
Edelmann, W.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
21425-21433 20.
Razani, B.,
Schlegel, A.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
2103-2109[Abstract] 21.
Schlegel, A.,
Schwab, R. B.,
Scherer, P. E.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22660-22667 22.
Arbuzova, A.,
Wang, L.,
Wang, J.,
Hangyas-Mihalyne, G.,
Murray, D.,
Honig, B.,
and McLaughlin, S.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
10330-10339[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 23.
Murata, M.,
Peranen, J.,
Schreiner, R.,
Wieland, F.,
Kurzchalia, T. V.,
and Simons, K.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
10339-10343 24.
Trigatti, B. L.,
Anderson, R. G.,
and Gerber, G. E.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
255,
34-39[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 25.
Hailstones, D.,
Sleer, L. S.,
Parton, R. G.,
and Stanley, K. K.
(1998)
J. Lipid Res.
39,
369-379 26.
Bist, A.,
Fielding, P. E.,
and Fielding, C. J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10693-10698 27.
Fielding, C. J.,
Bist, A.,
and Fielding, P. E.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3753-3758 28.
Smart, E. J.,
Ying, Y.,
Donzell, W. C.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29427-29435 29.
Roy, S.,
Luetterforst, R.,
Harding, A.,
Apolloni, A.,
Etheridge, M.,
Stang, E.,
Rolls, B.,
Hancock, J. F.,
and Parton, R. G.
(1999)
Nat. Cell Biol.
1,
98-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Rojo, M.,
Pepperkok, R.,
Emery, G.,
Kellner, R.,
Stang, E.,
Parton, R. G.,
and Gruenberg, J.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
1119-1135 31.
Prior, I. A.,
Harding, A.,
Yan, J.,
Sluimer, J.,
Parton, R. G.,
and Hancock, J. F.
(2001)
Nat. Cell Biol.
3,
368-375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 32.
Luetterforst, R.,
Stang, E.,
Zorzi, N.,
Carozzi, A.,
Way, M.,
and Parton, R. G.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
1443-1459 33.
Roy, S.,
Lane, A.,
Yan, J.,
McPherson, R.,
and Hancock, J. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20139-20145 34.
Furuchi, T.,
and Anderson, R. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21099-21104 35.
Parton, R. G.,
and Hancock, J. F.
(2001)
Methods Enzymol.
333,
172-183[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 36.
Pol, A.,
Calvo, M., Lu, A.,
and Enrich, C.
(1999)
Hepatology
29,
1848-1857[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 37.
Pol, A.,
Luetterforst, R.,
Lindsay, M.,
Heino, S.,
Ikonen, E.,
and Parton, R. G.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
1057-1070 38.
Kolch, W.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
351,
289-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 39.
Cowley, S.,
Paterson, H.,
Kemp, P.,
and Marshall, C. J.
(1994)
Cell
77,
841-852[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 40.
Galbiati, F.,
Volonte, D.,
Minetti, C.,
Chu, J. B.,
and Lisanti, M. P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
25632-25641 41.
Esteban, L. M.,
Vicario-Abejon, C.,
Fernandez-Salguero, P.,
Fernandez- Medarde, A.,
Swaminathan, N.,
Yienger, K.,
Lopez, E.,
Malumbres, M.,
McKay, R.,
Ward, J. M.,
Pellicer, A.,
and Santos, E.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
1444-1452 42.
Johnson, L.,
Greenbaum, D.,
Cichowski, K.,
Mercer, K.,
Murphy, E.,
Schmitt, E.,
Bronson, R. T.,
Umanoff, H.,
Edelmann, W.,
Kucherlapati, R.,
and Jacks, T.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2468-2481 43.
Henderson, L. P.,
Lin, L.,
Prasad, A.,
Paul, C. A.,
Chang, T. Y.,
and Maue, R. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
20179-20187 44.
de Paula, F.,
Vainzof, M.,
Bernardino, A. L.,
McNally, E.,
Kunkel, L. M.,
and Zatz, M.
(2001)
Am. J. Med. Genet.
99,
303-307[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kirkham, S. J. Nixon, M. T. Howes, L. Abi-Rached, D. E. Wakeham, M. Hanzal-Bayer, C. Ferguson, M. M. Hill, M. Fernandez-Rojo, D. A. Brown, et al. Evolutionary analysis and molecular dissection of caveola biogenesis J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2008; 121(12): 2075 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Palygin, J. M. Pettus, and E. F. Shibata Regulation of caveolar cardiac sodium current by a single Gs{alpha} histidine residue Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): H1693 - H1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Hernandez-Deviez, M. T. Howes, S. H. Laval, K. Bushby, J. F. Hancock, and R. G. Parton Caveolin Regulates Endocytosis of the Muscle Repair Protein, Dysferlin J. Biol. Chem., March 7, 2008; 283(10): 6476 - 6488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Couchoux, B. Allard, C. Legrand, V. Jacquemond, and C. Berthier Loss of caveolin-3 induced by the dystrophy-associated P104L mutation impairs L-type calcium channel function in mouse skeletal muscle cells J. Physiol., May 1, 2007; 580(3): 745 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Wang and R. J. Deschenes Plasma Membrane Localization of Ras Requires Class C Vps Proteins and Functional Mitochondria in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2006; 26(8): 3243 - 3255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ren, P. Vajjhala, J. S. Lee, B. Winsor, and A. L. Munn The BAR Domain Proteins: Molding Membranes in Fission, Fusion, and Phagy Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2006; 70(1): 37 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Parton, M. Hanzal-Bayer, and J. F. Hancock Biogenesis of caveolae: a structural model for caveolin-induced domain formation. J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2006; 119(Pt 5): 787 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rubin, T. C. Murphy, J. Rahnert, H. Song, M. S. Nanes, E. M. Greenfield, H. Jo, and X. Fan Mechanical Inhibition of RANKL Expression Is Regulated by H-Ras-GTPase J. Biol. Chem., January 20, 2006; 281(3): 1412 - 1418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Hernandez-Deviez, S. Martin, S. H. Laval, H. P. Lo, S. T. Cooper, K. N. North, K. Bushby, and R. G. Parton Aberrant dysferlin trafficking in cells lacking caveolin or expressing dystrophy mutants of caveolin-3 Hum. Mol. Genet., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 129 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Nixon, J. Wegner, C. Ferguson, P.-F. Mery, J. F. Hancock, P. D. Currie, B. Key, M. Westerfield, and R. G. Parton Zebrafish as a model for caveolin-associated muscle disease; caveolin-3 is required for myofibril organization and muscle cell patterning Hum. Mol. Genet., July 1, 2005; 14(13): 1727 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Jayanthi, D. J. Samuvel, and S. Ramamoorthy Regulated Internalization and Phosphorylation of the Native Norepinephrine Transporter in Response to Phorbol Esters: EVIDENCE FOR LOCALIZATION IN LIPID RAFTS AND LIPID RAFT-MEDIATED INTERNALIZATION J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 19315 - 19326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Hnasko and M. P. Lisanti The Biology of Caveolae: Lessons from Caveolin Knockout Mice and Implications for Human Disease Mol. Interv., December 1, 2003; 3(8): 445 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Smythe, J. C. Eby, M.-H. Disatnik, and T. A. Rando A caveolin-3 mutant that causes limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 1C disrupts Src localization and activity and induces apoptosis in skeletal myotubes J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2003; 116(23): 4739 - 4749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Wyse, I. A. Prior, H. Qian, I. C. Morrow, S. Nixon, C. Muncke, T. V. Kurzchalia, W. G. Thomas, R. G. Parton, and J. F. Hancock Caveolin Interacts with the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor during Exocytic Transport but Not at the Plasma Membrane J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23738 - 23746. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||