Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111250200 on February 13, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 17978-17986, May 17, 2002
Slow-Tight Binding Inhibition of Xylanase by an Aspartic Protease
Inhibitor
KINETIC PARAMETERS AND CONFORMATIONAL CHANGES THAT DETERMINE THE
AFFINITY AND SELECTIVITY OF THE BIFUNCTIONAL NATURE OF THE
INHIBITOR*
Chandravanu
Dash,
Vinod
Vathipadiekal,
Sudeep P.
George, and
Mala
Rao
From the Division of Biochemical Sciences, National Chemical
Laboratory, Pune, Maharashtra 411 008, India
Received for publication, November 27, 2001, and in revised form, February 7, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The first report of slow-tight inhibition of
xylanase by a bifunctional inhibitor alkalo-thermophilic
Bacillus inhibitor (ATBI), from an extremophilic
Bacillus sp. is described. ATBI inhibits aspartic protease
(Dash, C., and Rao, M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem., 276, 2487-2493) and xylanase (Xyl I) from a Thermomonospora sp. The steady-state kinetics revealed time-dependent
competitive inhibition of Xyl I by ATBI, consistent with two-step
inhibition mechanism. The inhibition followed a rapid
equilibrium step to form a reversible enzyme-inhibitor complex
(EI), which isomerizes to the second enzyme-inhibitor
complex (EI*), which dissociated at a very slow rate. The
rate constants determined for the isomerization of EI to
EI*, and the dissociation of EI* were 13 ± 1 × 10
6 s
1 and 5 ± 0.5 × 10
8 s
1, respectively. The
Ki value for the formation of EI complex was 2.5 ± 0.5 µM, whereas the overall
inhibition constant Ki* was 7 ± 1 nM. The conformational changes induced in Xyl I by ATBI
were monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy and the rate constants
derived were in agreement with the kinetic data. Thus, the
conformational alterations were correlated to the isomerization of
EI to EI*. ATBI binds to the active site of the
enzyme and disturbs the native interaction between the histidine and
lysine, as demonstrated by the abolished isoindole fluorescence of
o-phthalaldehyde (OPTA)-labeled Xyl I. Our results revealed
that the inactivation of Xyl I is due to the disruption of the
hydrogen-bonding network between the essential histidine and other
residues involved in catalysis and a model depicting the probable
interaction between ATBI or OPTA with Xyl I has been proposed.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In recent years, considerable efforts have been expended in the
design and synthesis of glycosidase inhibitors, not only to understand
about the active site structures and mechanisms of these interesting
enzymes but also in generating new therapeutic agents. Specific
inhibitors of glycosidases have proved valuable in a number of
applications ranging from mechanistic studies (1, 2) to possible
therapeutic uses such as control of blood glucose levels (3), viral
infectivity through interference with normal glycosylation of coat
proteins (4), against cancer, bacterial infections, and as insecticides
(5). A number of naturally occurring reversible glycosidase inhibitors
such as nojirimycin, castanospermine, swainsonine, and acarbose have
been reported (1). Another class of inhibitors is the synthetic
analogues of sugars containing reactive groups such as epoxides,
isothiocyanates, and
-halocarbonyls (1, 6). There are reports of
mechanism-based inhibitors such as conduritol epoxides (7), the quinone
methide-generating glycosides (8), and the glycosylmethyl triazenes
(9).
Xylanases (1,4-
-D-xylan xylanohydrolase) are
glycosidases that catalyze the hydrolytic cleavage of
-1,4-linked polymers of D-xylose (10). They
have raised enormous interest in the past decade in view of their
application in clarification of juices and wines, conversion of
renewable biomass into liquid fuels and in development of
environmentally sound pre-bleaching processes in the paper and pulp
industry (11). Although extensive studies have been carried out on the
industrial applications of xylanases, there is a paucity of reports on
their molecular enzymology and clinical implications. Recently,
glycosidases have been studied with a clinical perspective of locating
enzyme-allergens (12). Some of these enzymes, including xylanases and
cellulases have been found to cause occupational and non-occupational
allergies, such as respiratory and irritant contact dermatitis.
Therefore, from the biomedical point of view, inhibitors of this class
of enzymes will have tremendous importance in the near future. In addition, inhibition of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes have
potential applications to prevent the degradation of wood and cloth by
the action of the hydrolytic enzymes present in the gut of termites.
The three-dimensional structures of family 10 xylanases (13, 14) have
revealed the extended substrate binding cleft in which the surface
residues are linked by an extensive hydrogen bonding network. The
clefts form deep grooves consistent with their endo-mode action
and comprise a series of subsites, each one capable of binding a xylose
moiety (15). The active site of xylanase contains two essential
catalytic groups, one playing the role of acid/base and the other
functioning as a nucleophile (16). These two groups have been
identified as carboxyl groups and a covalent intermediate is formed,
which undergoes hydrolysis to afford hemiacetal with net retention of
anomeric stereochemistry (17). The transition states leading to and
from the covalent intermediate have substantial oxacarbonium ion
character, as indicated by kinetic isotope effects and by the effects
of electron-withdrawing substituents on the sugar ring upon reaction
rate (2, 17). Analysis of active site amino acids that play an
important role in substrate binding and in catalysis has been greatly
facilitated by solving the crystal structure of family 10 xylanases
covalently linked to mechanism-based cellobiosyl and sylobiosyl
inhibitors (18). To gain further insight into the details of the
hydrolytic mechanism of glycosidases, specific inhibitors are
necessary, which can act as mechanistic and structural probes. A
diverse array of extremely potent, basic, nitrogen-containing
inhibitors has been developed over the years, and they have been found
to be of great utility in the study of the glycosidase mechanism (1,
19). However, there have been very few reports of naturally occurring
inhibitors of xylanases and to our knowledge no reports of peptidic
inhibitors of this class of enzyme from extremophilic organisms.
In this report, we present slow-tight binding inhibition of the
thermostable xylanase (Xyl
I)1 from a
Thermomonospora sp. by a bifunctional inhibitor ATBI, isolated from an extremophilic Bacillus sp. The steady-state
kinetics revealed a two-step inhibition mechanism, and the
conformational modes observed during the binding of inhibitor to the
enzyme were conveniently monitored by fluorescence analysis. The
mechanism of inactivation of Xyl I by ATBI was delineated by monitoring the isoindole fluorescence of the o-phthalaldehyde
(OPTA)-labeled enzyme and a model for the probable interactions have
been proposed.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Oat spelt xylan, dinitrosalicylic acid, and
o-phthalaldehyde (OPTA) were obtained from Sigma Chemical
Co., St. Louis, MO. Sephadex A-50 and Sephacryl S-200 were obtained
from Amersham Biosciences, Inc., Sweden. All other chemicals used were
of analytical grade.
Microorganisms and Growth
Conditions--
Thermomonospora sp. producing Xyl I is an
alkalothermophilic actinomycete having optimum growth at pH 9 and
50 °C. It was isolated from self-heating compost from the Barabanki
district of Uttar Pradesh, India (20). The ATBI producing extremophilic Bacillus sp. was isolated in this laboratory from the soil
sample of a hot spring at Vajreswari, Maharashtra, India (21). The optimal growth condition of the Bacillus sp. is pH 10 and
50 °C. For the production of the inhibitor, the Bacillus
sp. was grown in a liquid medium containing soya meal (2%) and other
nutrients2 (the pH of the
medium was adjusted by the addition of sterile 10% sodium carbonate).
Purification of ATBI--
The inhibitor was purified from the
extracellular culture filtrate of the Bacillus sp. as
described previously (23). Briefly, about 1000 ml of the extracellular
culture filtrate was treated with 65 g of activated charcoal, and
the supernatant was subjected to membrane filtration using Amicon UM10
(Mr cut-off 10,000) and UM2
(Mr cut-off 2000). The resulting clear filtrate
was concentrated by lyophilization and loaded onto a prepacked Ultopac
Lichrosorb RP-18 (LKB) column. The fractions detected at 210 nm were
eluted on a linear gradient of 0-50% acetonitrile and water
containing 0.01% trifluoroacetate, and the active fractions showing
the inhibitory activity were found to be homogenous.
Purification of Xyl I--
The Thermomonospora sp.
was grown at 50 °C for 96 h for the production of Xyl I. The
enzyme was purified to homogeneity from the extracellular culture
filtrate by fractional ammonium sulfate precipitation (35-55%),
DEAE-Sephadex ion exchange chromatography and Sephacryl S-200 gel
filtration chromatography (24).
Xylanase Assay and Inhibition Kinetics--
The xylanase assay
was carried out in phosphate buffer, 0.05 M, pH 6.0, by
mixing a specified concentration of the enzyme with 0.5 ml of oat-spelt
xylan (10 mg/ml) in a reaction mixture of 1 ml and incubating at
50 °C for 30 min. The reducing sugar released was determined by the
dinitrosalicylic acid method (25). One unit of xylanase activity was
defined as the amount of enzyme that produced 1 µmol xylose
equivalent per min using oat-spelt xylan as the substrate under assay
conditions. Protein concentration was determined according to the
method of Bradford (26) using bovine serum albumin as the standard.
For initial kinetic analysis, the kinetic parameters for the substrate
hydrolysis were determined by measuring the initial rate of enzymatic
activity. The inhibition constant (Ki) was
determined by Dixon method (27) and also by the Lineweaver-Burk's equation. The Km value was also calculated from the
double-reciprocal equation by fitting the data into the computer
software Microcal Origin. For the Lineweaver-Burk's analysis Xyl I (2 µM) was incubated with ATBI at (1 µM) and
(2.5 µM) and assayed at increased concentration of xylan
(1-10 mg/ml) at 50 °C for 30 min. The reciprocals of substrate
hydrolysis (1/v) for each inhibitor concentration were plotted against the reciprocals of the substrate concentrations, and
the Ki was determined by fitting the resulting data. In Dixon's method, xylanolytic activity of Xyl I (2 µM)
was measured in the presence of 5 and 10 mg/ml xylan, at concentrations
of ATBI ranging from 0.5 to 5 µM at 50 °C for 30 min.
The reciprocals of substrate hydrolysis (1/v) were plotted
against the inhibitor concentration and the Ki was
determined by fitting the data using Microcal Origin.
For the progress curve analysis, assays were carried out in a reaction
mixture of 1 ml containing enzyme, substrate, and inhibitor at various
concentrations. The reaction mixture contained Xyl I (50 nM) in sodium-phosphate buffer, 0.05 M, pH 6.0, and varying concentrations of ATBI (0.5-3 µM) and xylan
(10 mg/ml). Reaction was initiated by the addition of Xyl I at
50 °C, and the release of products were monitored at different time
intervals by estimating the reducing sugar at 540 nm. In each slow
binding inhibition experiment, five to six assays were performed with
appropriate blanks. For the kinetic analysis and rate constant
determinations, the assays were carried out in triplicates, and the
average value was considered throughout. Further details of the
experiments are given in the respective figure legends.
Evaluation of Kinetic Parameters--
Initial rate studies for
reversible, competitive inhibition were analyzed according to Equation 1,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where Km is the Michaelis constant,
Vmax is the maximal catalytic rate at saturating
substrate concentration [S], Ki = (k4/k3) is the
dissociation constant for the first reversible enzyme-inhibitor
complex, and I is the inhibitor concentration (28). The
progress curves for the interactions between ATBI and Xyl I were
analyzed using Equation 2 (29, 30),
|
(Eq. 2)
|
where [P] is the product concentration at any time
t, v0 and vs
are the initial and final steady-state rates, respectively, and
k is the apparent first-order rate constant for the
establishment of the final steady-state equilibrium. As a prerequisite
for tight binding inhibitors, corrections have been made for the
reduction in the inhibitor concentration that occurs on formation of
the enzyme-inhibitor (EI) complex. This is because, in the
case of tight binding inhibition, the concentration of EI is
not negligible in comparison to the inhibitor concentration and the
free inhibitor concentration is not equal to the added concentration of
the inhibitor. The corrections of the variation of the steady-state
velocity with the inhibitor concentrations were made according to
Equations 3 and 4 as described by Morrison and Walsh (31),
|
(Eq. 3)
|
|
(Eq. 4)
|
where Ki' = Ki* (1 + S/Km), k7 is the rate
constant for the product formation, and It and
Et stands for total inhibitor and enzyme
concentration, respectively.
The relationship between the rate constant of enzymatic reaction,
k, and the kinetic constants for the association and
dissociation of the enzyme and inhibitor was determined as per Equation 5,
|
(Eq. 5)
|
The progress curves were analyzed by Equations 2 and 5 using
non-linear least-square parameter minimization to determine the
best-fit values with the corrections for the tight binding inhibition.
The overall inhibition constant is determined as given by Equation 6,
|
(Eq. 6)
|
For the time-dependent inhibition, there exists a
time range in the progress curves wherein formation of EI*
is small. Within this time range, it is possible to directly measure
the effect of the inhibitor on v0,
i.e. to measure Ki directly. Values for
Ki were obtained from Dixon analysis at a constant
substrate concentration as described in Equation 7,
|
(Eq. 7)
|
The rate constant k6, for the
dissociation of the second enzyme-inhibitor complex was measured
directly from the time-dependent inhibition. Concentrated
Xyl I and ATBI were incubated in a reaction mixture to reach
equilibrium, followed by large dilutions in assay mixtures containing
near-saturating substrate. Xyl I (2 mM) was preincubated
with equimolar concentrations of ATBI for 120 min in sodium-phosphate
buffer, 0.05 M, pH 6.0. 5 µl of the preincubated sample
was removed, diluted 5000-fold in the same buffer, and assayed at
50 °C using xylan at (150 mg/ml) at different time intervals.
Fluorescence Analysis--
Fluorescence measurements were
performed on a PerkinElmer Life Sciences LS50 luminescence spectrometer
connected to a Julabo F20 water bath. Protein fluorescence was excited
at 295 nm, and the emission was recorded from 300 to 500 nm at
25 °C. The slit widths on both the excitation and emission were set
at 5 nm, and the spectra were obtained at 100 nm/min.
For inhibitor binding studies, Xyl I (2 µM) was dissolved
in sodium phosphate buffer, 0.05 M, pH 6.0. Titration of
the enzyme with ATBI was performed by the addition of different
concentrations of the inhibitor to a fixed concentration of enzyme
solution. For each inhibitor concentration on the titration curve, a
new enzyme solution was used. All the data on the titration curve were
corrected for dilutions, and the graphs were smoothened. The magnitude
of the rapid fluorescence decrease (F0
F) occurring at each ATBI concentration was computer-fitted
to the Equation 8, to determine the calculated value of
Ki and
Fmax (32),
|
(Eq. 8)
|
The first order rate constants for the slow loss of
fluorescence, kobs, at each inhibitor
concentration [I] were computer-fitted to Equation 9 (32),
for the determination of k5 under the assumption that for a tight binding inhibitor, k6 can be
considered negligible at the onset of the slow loss of
fluorescence,
|
(Eq. 9)
|
The time course of the protein fluorescence following the
addition of inhibitor was measured for 10 min with excitation and emission wavelengths fixed at 295 and 340 nm, respectively, with data
acquisition at 0.1-s intervals. Corrections for the inner filter effect
were performed as described by Equation 10 (33),
|
(Eq. 10)
|
where Fc and F stand for the
corrected and measured fluorescence intensities, respectively, and
Aex and Aem are the
absorbances of the solution at the excitation and emission wavelengths,
respectively. Background buffer spectra were subtracted to remove the
contribution from Raman scattering.
Effect of ATBI on the Isoindole Fluorescence of OPTA-labeled Xyl
I--
Fresh OPTA solution was prepared in methanol for each
experiment. The modification was carried out by incubating Xyl I (2 µM) in 1 ml of 0.05 M sodium phosphate
buffer, pH 6, with 50 µM OPTA at 25 °C. Methanol had
no effect on the activity of the enzyme and was always less than 2%
(v/v). The formation of Xyl I-isoindole derivative was followed
spectrofluorometrically by monitoring the increase in fluorescence with
the excitation wavelength fixed at 338 nm. To monitor the effect of
ATBI on the isoindole fluorescence of Xyl I, the enzyme was
preincubated with ATBI (5 µM) for 15 min, and then OPTA
was added and the formation of isoindole derivative was monitored as
described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Kinetic Analysis of the Inhibition of Xyl I--
The aspartic
protease inhibitor (ATBI) was produced extracellularly by an
extremophilic Bacillus sp. and was characterized for its
inhibitory activity toward HIV-1 protease, pepsin, and the protease
from Aspergillus saitoi (23, 34, 35). The bifunctional nature of ATBI was established by its potency toward Xyl I, the xylanase purified from the Thermomonospora sp. Xyl I, a
member of family 10 xylanase is highly thermostable with half-lives of 86, 30, and 15 min at 80, 90, and 100 °C, respectively, and is stable in an expansive pH range of 5-10 with more than 75% residual activity. Initial kinetic assessments revealed that ATBI is a competitive inhibitor of Xyl I with an IC50 value of
6.5 ± 0.5 µM (Fig.
1). In the absence of ATBI, the
steady-state rate of xylanolytic activity of Xyl I reached rapidly
whereas, in its presence a time-dependent decrease in the
rate as a function of the inhibitor concentration was observed.
Examination of the progress curves revealed a time range where the
initial rate of reaction did not deviate from linearity (Fig.
2), and the conversion of EI
to EI* was minimal. For a low concentration of ATBI, this
time range was 8 min, within which classic competitive inhibition
experiments were used to determine the Ki values
(Equation 5). The value of the inhibition rate constant
Ki, associated with the formation of the reversible
enzyme-inhibitor complex (EI) determined from the fits of
data to the reciprocal equation was 2.5 ± 0.5 µM
(Fig. 3), which was corroborated by the
Dixon method (data not shown). The apparent rate constant
k, derived from the progress curves, when plotted
versus the inhibitor concentration, followed a hyperbolic
function (Fig. 4), thus revealing a fast equilibrium that precedes the formation of the final slow dissociating enzyme-inhibitor complex (EI*) and indicating a two-step,
slow-tight inhibition mechanism (Scheme I). Indeed, the data could be
fitted to Equation 5 by non-linear regression analysis, which yielded the best estimate of the overall inhibition constant
Ki* of 7 ± 1 nM.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Inhibition of Xyl I by ATBI. The
xylanolytic activity of the purified Xyl I (2 µM) was
determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of ATBI. The
percent inhibition of the xylanase activity was calculated from the
residual enzymatic activity. The sigmoidal curve indicates the best fit
for the percent inhibition data (average of triplicates) obtained, and
the IC50 value was calculated from the graph.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Time course of inhibition of Xyl I by
ATBI. The reaction mixture contained Xyl I (50 nM) in
sodium-phosphate buffer, 0.05 M, pH 6.0, and varying
concentrations of ATBI and xylan (10 mg/ml). The reaction was initiated
by the addition of Xyl I at 50 °C. The points represent
the hydrolysis of substrate as a function of time, and the
lines indicate the best fits of data obtained from Equations
2 and 5, with the corrections made as per Equations 3 and 4. The
concentrations of ATBI were 0.465 µM ( ), 0.62 µM ( ), 0.95 µM ( ), 1.55 µM ( ), and 3 µM ( ).
|
|

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Initial rate of enzymatic reaction of Xyl I
in the presence of ATBI. Enzymatic activity of Xyl I was estimated
using oat-spelt xylan in sodium-phosphate buffer, 0.05 M,
pH 6.0, and the xylose equivalent was determined at 540 nm. Xyl I (2 µM) was incubated without ( ) or with the inhibitor at
1 µM ( ) and 2.5 µM ( ) and assayed at
increased concentration of xylan (1-10 mg/ml) at 50 °C for 30 min.
The reciprocal of substrate hydrolysis (1/v) for each
inhibitor concentration were plotted against the reciprocal of the
substrate concentration. The straight lines indicated the
best fits for the data obtained by non-linear regression analysis and
analyzed by Lineweaver-Burk's reciprocal equation. Velocities are in
micromoles per minute per milligram.
|
|

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Dependence of Xyl I inhibition on ATBI
concentration. The rate constants k were calculated
from the progress curves recorded following the addition of Xyl I to
the reaction mixture containing xylan and ATBI. The solid
line indicates the best fit of the data obtained.
|
|
In an alternative method, the rate constant k6,
for the conversion of EI* to EI, was determined
by preincubating high concentrations of enzyme and inhibitor for
sufficient time to allow the system to reach equilibrium. Dilution of
the enzyme-inhibitor complex into a relatively large volume of assay
mixture containing saturating substrate concentration causes
dissociation of the enzyme-inhibitor complex and thus regeneration of
enzymatic activity. Under these conditions, v0
and the effective inhibitor concentration can be considered
approximately equal to zero and the rate of activity regeneration will
provide the k6 value. After preincubating Xyl I
with ATBI, the enzyme-inhibitor mixture was diluted 5000-fold into the
assay mixture containing the substrate at 50 Km. By
least-squares minimization of Equation 2 to the data for recovery of
enzymatic activity, the determined k6 value was
5 ± 0.5 × 10
8 s
1 (Fig.
5), which clearly indicated a very slow
dissociation of EI*. The final steady-state rate,
vs, was determined from the control that was
preincubated without the inhibitor. The value of the rate constant
k5, associated with the isomerization of EI to EI*, was 13 ± 1 × 10
6 s
1 as obtained from fits of Equation 5
to the onset of inhibition data using the experimentally determined
values of Ki and k6 (Table
I). The overall inhibition constant
Ki* is a function of
k6/(k5 + k6) and is equal to the product of
Ki and this function. The k6
value indicated a slower rate of dissociation of EI* complex
and the half-life t1/2 for the reactivation of
EI* as determined from k6 values was
38.5 ± 4 × 102 h, suggesting higher binding
affinity of ATBI toward Xyl I,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where, E stands for free enzyme, I is free
inhibitor, EI is a rapidly forming pre-equilibrium complex,
and EI* is the final enzyme-inhibitor complex. E
may undergo inter conversion into another form E*, which
binds to the inhibitor by a fast step, where kcf
and k
cf stand for the rate constants for
forward and backward reaction, respectively, for the conversion of the enzyme.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Dissociation rate constant
(k6) for Xyl I-ATBI complex. Xyl I (2 mM) was preincubated without ( ) or with ( ) equimolar
concentrations of ATBI for 120 min in sodium-phosphate buffer, 0.05 M, pH 6.0, at 50 °C. At the specified times indicated by
the points, 5 µl of the preincubated sample was removed, diluted
5000-fold in the same buffer, and assayed for the xylanolytic activity
using xylan (150 mg/ml). The rate constant associated with the
regeneration of activity (k6) was determined by
estimating the reducing sugar as described in the text.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Inhibition constants of ATBI against Xyl I
Values of rate constants for Xyl I inhibition by ATBI were calculated
from Scheme I at 50 °C in sodium phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 6.0) using oat-spelt xylan as the substrate.
IC50 is from the inhibition profile, Ki was
determined from the steady-state time range for the competitive
inhibition. k6 is calculated from the regeneration
assay, Ki and k5 were determined
from the equations as described in the text.
|
|
Scheme I describes two alternative models for the
time-dependent inhibition. The mechanism in Scheme
Ia, where the binding of the inhibitor to the enzyme is slow
and tight, but occurs in a single step, is eliminated based on the data
of Table I, because the inhibitor have measurable effect on the initial
rates before the onset of slow-tight binding inhibition. Scheme
Ic represents the inhibition model where the inhibitor binds
only to the free enzyme that has slowly adopted the transition-state
configuration can also be eliminated by the observed rates of onset of
inhibition. Our foregoing results for the inactivation of Xyl I were
therefore consistent with the slow-tight binding mechanism as described in Scheme Ib.
Effect of Inhibitor Binding on the Fluorescence of Xyl I--
The
kinetic analysis revealed a two-step inhibition mechanism, where the
EI complex isomerizes to a tightly bound, slow dissociating EI* complex. This isomerization is a consequence of the
conformational changes induced in Xyl I due to the binding of ATBI. The
tryptophanyl fluorescence of Xyl I exhibited an emission maxima
(
max) at ~339 nm, as a result of the radiative decay
of the
-
* transition from the Trp residues (Fig.
6). The binding of ATBI resulted in a
concentration-dependent quenching of the fluorescence with
saturation reaching at or above 6 µM ATBI (Fig. 6,
inset). The absence of blue or red shift in
max negated any drastic gross conformational changes in
the three-dimension structure of the enzyme due to inhibitor binding.
The subtle conformational changes induced during the isomerization of
EI to EI* was monitored by analyzing the tryptophanyl fluorescence of the complexes as a function of time. Binding of ATBI resulted an exponential decay of the fluorescence intensity as indicated by a sharp decrease in the quantum yield of
fluorescence followed by a slower decline to a stable value (Fig.
7). Furthermore, titration of ATBI
against Xyl I revealed that the magnitude of the initial rapid
fluorescence loss (F0
F) increased
in a saturation-type manner (Fig. 8),
which corroborated the two-step slow-tight binding inhibition of Xyl I
by ATBI. From the data in Fig. 8, the magnitude of the rapid
fluorescence decrease at a specific ATBI concentration was found to be
close to the total fluorescence quenching observed Fig. 6, indicating
that the EI and EI* complexes have the same
intrinsic fluorescence. The value of Ki determined
by fitting the data for the magnitude of the rapid fluorescence
decrease (F0
F) was 2.6 ± 0.5 µM, and the k5 value was
determined from the data derived from the slow decrease in fluorescence
was 13.5 ± 1 × 10
6 s
1. These
rate constants are in good agreement with that obtained from the
kinetic analysis, therefore, the initial rapid fluorescence decrease
can be correlated to the formation of the reversible complex
EI, whereas the slow, time-dependent decrease
reflected the accumulation of the tight bound slow dissociating complex EI*.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Steady-state fluorescence emission spectra of
Xyl I as a function of ATBI. Protein fluorescence was excited at
295 nm, and emission was monitored from 300-400 nm at 25 °C.
Titration was performed by the addition of different concentrations of
the inhibitor to a fixed concentration of enzyme. Xyl I was dissolved
in sodium-phosphate buffer, 0.05 M, pH 6.0, and the
concentrations of ATBI used were 0 µM ( ), 0.31 µM ( ), 0.62 µM ( ), 1.24 µM ( ), 1.86 µM ( ), 2.48 µM ( ), 3.1 µM ( ), 3.72 µM ( ), 4.34 µM ( ), 4.96 µM ( ), 5.58 µM (- - - -), 6.2 µM (- - - -), 9.3 µM (- - - -), and
12.4 µM (- - - -). The curve in the
inset represents the best fit of the fluorescence quenching
data of Xyl I at 339 nm ( max) as a function of ATBI
concentration.
|
|

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Time-dependent effect of ATBI on
the fluorescence quenching of Xyl I. ATBI was added to Xyl I (2 µM) at the specified time (indicated by the
arrow), and the fluorescence emission was monitored for
300 s, at a data acquisition time of 0.1 s. The excitation
and emission wavelength were fixed at 295 and 339 nm, respectively. The
data are the average of five scans with the correction for buffer and
dilutions. The concentrations of ATBI used were 0 µM
(A), 0.62 µM (B), and 1.24 µM (C).
|
|

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of ATBI concentration on the
tryptophan fluorescence of Xyl I. A specified concentration of Xyl
I (2 µM) was treated with increasing concentrations of
ATBI (0-12 µM). The fluorescence was measured at
25 °C (excitation, 295 nm; emission, 339 nm). Each measurement was
repeated five times, and the average values of the fluorescence
intensity at 339 nm were recorded. Control experiments with the buffer
and inhibitor were performed under identical conditions. The
fluorescence changes (F F0)
were plotted against the inhibitor concentrations. The resulting
hyperbola indicates the best fit of the data obtained.
|
|
Effect of ATBI on the Isoindole Fluorescence of Xyl I by
OPTA--
In our earlier report, we have investigated the role of
essential histidine and lysine residues in the active site of the Xyl I
and shown that binding of the chemoaffinity label OPTA to these
residues of the active site resulted in the formation of an isoindole
derivative (36). The active site of Xyl I constitutes the
catalytic carboxylic groups and the histidine residue, which play a
crucial role in catalysis. To investigate the binding of ATBI to the
active site and changes in the native intermolecular interactions, we
have monitored the changes in the interaction of the lysine and
histidine due to ATBI binding, and their influence on the isoindole
fluorescence of Xyl I (Fig. 9). The
unbound enzyme did not show fluorescence when excited at 338 nm,
however, incubation of OPTA with Xyl I resulted in an increase in the
fluorescence with a
max at 417 nm due to the formation
of the isoindole derivative. The ATBI-preincubated Xyl I failed to
react with OPTA as revealed by the total loss of isoindole
fluorescence, which not only confirmed the binding of ATBI to the
active site of Xyl I but also further revealed that the binding of ATBI
resulted in the formation of a new set of hydrogen bonding and other
non-ionic interactions. These altered weak interactions cause
disruption of the native hydrogen bonding network of the histidine and
lysine residues, which are essential for the formation of isoindole
derivative.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Isoindole fluorescence of Xyl I on reaction
with OPTA. Xyl I (2 µM) was treated without or with
ATBI (1 µM) and was incubated at 25 °C for 20 min and
then further incubated with a fresh solution of OPTA (50 µM). The isoindole fluorescence of the Xyl I-bound OPTA
was measured with excitation at 330 nm. The lines represent
the isoindole fluorescence of Xyl I ( ), Xyl I + OPTA ( ), and Xyl
I + ATBI (preincubated) and OPTA ( ) and are the average of six scans
with corrections from buffer and respective controls.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Since the discovery of the potent inhibitory effects of
deoxynojirimycin toward glycosidases in the early 1970s, this class of
compound has been the subject of a vast amount of ongoing research interest concerning synthesis and the evaluation of biological properties (13). Although a plethora of synthetic inhibitors has been
reported, there is a lacuna of peptidic inhibitors of glycosidases from
extremophilic microorganisms. It is noteworthy to point out that
several extremophiles are known to produce highly thermostable
xylanases and cellulases, however, these organisms have not been
studied extensively for their potential exploitation toward isolation
of inhibitors of important enzymes. We present here the first report of
a bifunctional peptidic inhibitor ATBI, from an extremophilic
Bacillus sp., exhibiting slow-tight binding inhibition
against xylanase. Previously we have reported the kinetic parameters
involved in the inhibition of HIV-1 protease, pepsin, and the aspartic
protease from the Aspergillus saitoi by ATBI. The inhibitor
showed exceptionally high potency against Xyl I, the thermostable
xylanase from a Thermomonospora sp., and its 1:1 molar ratio
of interaction with the enzyme indicated its "tight binding"
nature. The two-step inhibition mechanism was corroborated by the
equilibrium binding studies of the enzyme and inhibitor and the
correlation of the kinetic data with the conformational changes induced
in the enzyme-inhibitor complexes.
In the presence of competitive inhibitors, a number of enzymatic
reactions do not respond immediately but display a slow onset of
inhibition, which is referred to as slow binding inhibition (37-40).
The establishment of the equilibria between enzyme, inhibitor, and
enzyme-inhibitor complexes, in slow binding inhibition occurs slowly on
the steady-state time scale (41-45). Enzyme-catalyzed reactions, where
the concentrations of the enzyme and inhibitor are comparable and the
equilibria are set up rapidly, are referred to as tight binding
inhibition. Kinetically, the slow binding inhibition can be illustrated
by three mechanisms (Scheme I). When an inhibitor has a low
Ki value and the concentration of I
varies in the region of Ki, both
k3I and k4
values would be low. Thus, a simple second-order interaction between enzyme and inhibitor, and low rates of association and dissociation would lead to slow binding inhibition. Alternatively, a two-step model
depicts the rapid formation of an initial collisional complex EI, which slowly isomerizes to form a tightly bound slow
dissociating complex EI*. Slow binding inhibition can also
arise due to an initial slow interconversion of the enzyme
E, into another form E*, which binds to the
inhibitor by a fast step. Understanding the basis of the isomerization
of EI to EI* could lead to design of inhibitors
that allow titration of the lifetime of the EI*. In case of
slow-tight binding inhibition, the inhibitor will inhibit the enzyme
competitively at the onset of the reaction; however, at increasing
concentration of inhibitor, the rate of substrate hydrolysis will
decrease hyperbolically as a function of time. In tight binding
inhibition, corrections have to be made for the reduction in the
inhibitor concentration that occurs on formation of the EI
complex, because the concentration of EI is not negligible in comparison to the inhibitor concentration and the free inhibitor concentration is not equal to the added concentration of the inhibitor. The kinetic analysis of the xylanase inhibition in this report provides
a unique opportunity for the quantitative determination of these rates
and affinities, which can be extended to other slow-tight binding
inhibition reactions. The formation of an EI complex between
Xyl I and ATBI was too rapid to be measured at steady-state kinetics
and was likely to be near diffusion control. However, the isomerization
of EI to the second tightly bound enzyme-inhibitor complex
EI* was too slow and relatively independent of the stability of the EI or the ability of the inhibitor to stabilize the
EI*. The k6 values revealed very slow
dissociation of the inhibitor from the EI* indicating a
highly stable, non-dissociative nature of the second complex.
Therefore, for slow-tight binding inhibition, the major variable is
k6, the first-order rate constant associated with the conversion of EI* to EI, and the
apparent inhibitor constant Ki* depends on the
ability of the inhibitor to stabilize the EI*. The half-life
as derived from the k6 value indicated a longer
half-life of the EI*, which is an essential parameter for an
inhibitor to have biomedical applications.
The characteristic feature of slow binding inhibition is the induction
of conformational changes in the enzyme-inhibitor complex, resulting in
the clamping down of the enzyme to the inhibitor, thus the formation of
a stable enzyme-inhibitor complex. The two-step inhibition mechanism of
Xyl I by ATBI was reflected in the quenching pattern of the
fluorescence of the enzyme-inhibitor complexes. The rate constants
derived from the fluorescence analysis of the complexes corroborated
the values derived from the kinetic analysis. Therefore, we propose
that the initial rapid fluorescence loss reflected the formation of the
reversible complex EI, whereas the subsequent slower
decrease was correlated to the accumulation of the tightly bound
complex EI*. Any major alteration in the three-dimensional
structure of Xyl I due to the binding of ATBI can be ruled out, because
there was no shift in the tryptophanyl fluorescence of the complexes.
Any disturbance in the environment of tryptophan residues may be
reflected in an alternation in emission wavelength, quantum yield, and
susceptibility to quenching (46). Energy transfer to an acceptor
molecule having an overlapping absorption spectrum can also contribute
to fluorescence quenching (47). However, because the inhibitor has no
absorption in the region of 290-450 nm, the fluorescence quenching due
to the energy transfer between the inhibitor and the tryptophan
residues of Xyl I have been neglected. The other possibility is the
presence of multiple sites, where binding at one induced rapid
fluorescence change and at a second site caused the slow fluorescence
decrease. This was verified by titrating a fixed concentration of Xyl I with increasing concentrations of ATBI. The xylanolytic activity decreased linearly with increasing concentrations of ATBI yielding a
stoichiometry close to 1:1 (also revealed by fluorescence) expected for
the slow-tight binding inhibition, therefore inconsistent with the
presence of multiple high affinity sites. From the physical explanation
for the quenching process, it was apparent that the inhibitor induced
fluorescence quenching followed the formation of both the complexes.
The agreement of the rate constants concomitant with the fluorescence
changes observed during the time-dependent inhibition led
us to correlate the localized conformational changes in the
enzyme-inhibitor complex to the isomerization of the EI to
EI*.
Conformational integrity of the active site of an enzyme is essential
for its catalysis, and investigations on the molecular orientation of
the functional groups of active site as well as their microenvironment
are the areas of growing scientific interest. Chemoaffinity labeling is
a powerful technique to assign the binding sites of
ligand-macromolecule complexes, which combine some of the advantages of
both the photoactivated and electrophilic affinity labeling (48). OPTA
is a bifunctional, fluorescent chemoaffinity label, which until
recently was known to have absolute specificity for amino and thiol
groups (49) for the formation of an isoindole derivative. However,
application of OPTA as a probe to ascertain the conformational
flexibility and polarity of the active site of Xyl I by the formation
of a fluorescent isoindole derivative with the lysine and histidine
residue have been reported in our laboratory (36). OPTA contains two
aldehyde groups; one of which reacts with the primary amine of lysine,
whereas the second group reacts with the secondary amine of the
imidazole ring of histidine, resulting in the formation of the
isoindole derivative. A schematic model depicting the interaction of
the aldehyde groups of OPTA with the secondary amine of His and the
primary amine of Lys residue of the Xyl I has been proposed (Fig.
10A). Our foregoing results revealed that, when Xyl I was preincubated with ATBI, OPTA failed to
form the isoindole derivative as reflected by the loss of fluorescence. The inability of OPTA to form the isoindole derivative with the ATBI-bound Xyl I could be attributed to the interaction of ATBI with
either lysine or histidine or both the residues, thereby changing the
native molecular interactions of these residues. The amino acid
sequence of ATBI (Ala-Gly-Lys-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Pro-Pro-Glu) revealed
the presence of amino acid residues such as Asp, Lys, and Glu with
charged side chains. We propose that the carboxyl group of the Asp
residues of ATBI (Fig. 10B) can form hydrogen bonding with
the amines of His and Lys residues of Xyl I, thereby preventing the
binding of OPTA. This, however, does not exclude the possible role of
steric hindrance exerted by the bound ATBI in preventing the binding of
OPTA to the active site. The catalytic site of xylanases consists of
two carboxyl groups and an essential lytic water molecule and follows a
general acid-base catalytic mechanism (50). Based on the existing
experimental evidences, we further propose that the charged side chains
of the amino acids, the amide nitrogens, and the carbonoyl
oxygen groups of ATBI could form many intermolecular hydrogen bonds and
other weak interactions (van der Waal's, ionic, etc.) with the
residues in or near the active site of Xyl I. We also visualize that
the tight binding nature of ATBI in conjunction with the multiple
non-bonded interactions may be sufficient to interfere in the native
weak interactions between the carboxyl groups, the lytic water
molecule, and the essential histidine residue of the active site,
leading toward the inactivation of Xyl I. However, the crystal
structure of the enzyme-inhibitor complex will aid in understanding the
mechanism of inactivation of Xyl I in depth and will further shed light on the molecular interactions between the enzyme and inhibitor.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Schematic representation of the stereo view
model depicting the probable mechanism of OPTA and ATBI binding to the
active site of the Xyl I. The active site of the Xyl I has been
modeled based on the x-ray crystallographic structure of a
similar thermostable family 10 xylanase from Thermoascus
aurantiacus (22) (PDB ID 1TUX) using the software Quanta/SYBYL,
MSI. The active site of Xyl I includes the essential Glu, His, and Lys
residues. A, the chemoaffinity label OPTA (shown in
purple color) contains two aldehyde groups, one of which
binds to the primary amine of the Lys and the other group reacts with
the secondary amine of the imidazole ring of His of Xyl I resulting in
the release of two water molecule (not shown). These chemical reactions
result in the formation a fluorescent isoindole derivative.
B, preincubation of ATBI with Xyl I resulted in the binding
of the inhibitor in the active site of the enzyme. Based on our
results, we propose that the Asp residues in the ATBI (shown in
purple color) form hydrogen bonds (solid dashed
lines) with the free amine group of the Lys and the secondary
amine of the His of Xyl I. The other charged residues (not shown) can
form many non-bonded interactions with the active site residues of Xyl
I. These interactions in conjunction with the tight binding nature of
ATBI probably prevent the binding of OPTA to the His and Lys residues,
thus an isoindole derivative failed to be formed with the
ATBI-preincubated Xyl I.
|
|
The kinetic analysis demonstrated that the
inhibition of Xyl I by ATBI, followed slow-tight binding inhibition
mechanism and the induced conformational changes, is conveniently
monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy. Based on our observations, we
conclude that, concomitant with the kinetic analysis, fluorescence
spectroscopy plays a very important role in the determination of
kinetic constants of enzyme inhibition, as discussed for the
characterization of the mechanism of inhibition of Xyl I by the
slow-tight binding inhibitor ATBI.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
C. D. and S. P. G. thank the Council of
Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India, for financial
assistance. We thank Dr. C. G. Suresh and Manish Chandra, Division
of Biochemical Sciences, and Dr. K. N. Ganesh and Ramesh Babu,
Division of Organic Synthesis, National Chemical Laboratory for their
help in modeling.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Council of Scientific and
Industrial Research, Government of India.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Tel.: 91-20-589-3034;
Fax: 91-20-588-4032; E-mail: malarao@dalton.ncl.res.in.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 13, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111250200
2
C. Dash, S. U. Phadtare, A. Ahmed, V. V. Deshpande, and M. B. Rao (1998) Indian Patent
3560-DEL-98.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Xyl I, xylanase from
Thermomonospora sp.;
ATBI, alkalo-thermophilic
Bacillus inhibitor;
HIV, human immunodeficiency virus;
OPTA, o-phthalaldehyde;
EI, reversible enzyme-inhibitor
complex;
EI*, isomer of the second enzyme-inhibitor
complex.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Legler, G.
(1990)
Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem.
48,
319-385[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Sinnot, M. L.
(1990)
Chem. Rev.
90,
1171-1202[CrossRef]
|
| 3.
|
Truscheit, E.,
Frommer, W.,
Junge, B.,
Muller, L.,
Schimdt, D. D.,
and Wingender, W.
(1981)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
20,
744-761[CrossRef]
|
| 4.
|
Elbein, A. D.,
Legler, G.,
Trusty, A.,
McDowell, W.,
and Schwarz, R.
(1984)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
235,
579-588[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Leroy, E.,
and Reymond, J.-L.
(1999)
Org. Lett.
1,
775-777[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Withers, S. G.,
and Aerbersold, R.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
361-372[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Leger, G.
(1968)
Hoppe-Seyler Z. Physiol. Chem.
349,
767-774
|
| 8.
|
Halazy, S.,
Berges, V.,
Ehrhard, E.,
and Danzin, C.
(1990)
Bioorg. Chem.
18,
330-334[CrossRef]
|
| 9.
|
Marshall, P. J.,
Sinnott, M. L.,
Smith, P. J.,
and Widdows, D.
(1980)
J. Chem. Soc. (Perkin I)
1980,
366-376
|
| 10.
|
Biely, P.
(1985)
Trends Biotechnol.
3,
286-290[CrossRef]
|
| 11.
|
Kulkarni, N.,
Shendye, A.,
and Rao, M.
(1999)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
23,
411-456[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Tarvainen, K.,
and Keskinen, H.
(1991)
Clin. Exp. Allergy
21,
609-615[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Harris, G. W.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Connerton, I.,
Cummings, N., Lo,
Leggio, L.,
Scott, M.,
Hazlewood, G. P.,
Laurie, J. I.,
Gilbert, H. J.,
and Pickersgill, R. W.
(1994)
Structure
2,
1107-1116[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
White, A.,
Withers, S. G.,
Gilkes, N. R.,
and Rose, N. R.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
12546-12552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Davies, G. J.,
Wilson, K.,
and Henrissat, B.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
321,
557-559
|
| 16.
|
Royers, J. C.,
and Nakas, J. P.
(1989)
Enz. Microbiol. Technol.
11,
405-410
|
| 17.
|
Ly, H. D.,
and Withers, S. G.
(1999)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
316,
695-696
|
| 18.
|
White, A.,
Tull, D.,
Johns, K.,
Withers, S. G.,
and Rose, D. R.
(1996)
Nature Struct. Biol.
3,
149-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Stutz, A. E.
(1999)
Immunosugars as Glycosidase Inhibitors: Nojirimycin and Beyond
, pp. 95-120, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
|
| 20.
|
George, S. P.,
Ahmad, A.,
and Rao, M.
(2001)
Bioresour. Technol.
77,
171-175[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Dey, D.,
Hinge, J.,
Shendye, A.,
and Rao, M.
(1991)
Can. J. Microbiol.
38,
436-442
|
| 22.
|
Natesh, R.,
Bhanumoorthy, P.,
Vithayathil, P. J.,
Sekar, K.,
Ramakumar, S.,
and Viswamitra, M. A.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
288,
999-1012[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Dash, C.,
and Rao, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2487-2493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
George, S. P.,
Ahmad, A.,
and Rao, M.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
282,
48-54[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Miller, G. L.
(1959)
Anal. Chem.
31,
426-428[CrossRef]
|
| 26.
|
Bradford, M. M.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
72,
248-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Dixon, M.
(1953)
Biochem. J.
55,
170-171[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Cleland, W. W.
(1979)
Methods Enzymol.
63,
103-138[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Beith, J. G.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
248,
59-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Morrison, J. F.,
and Stone, S. R.
(1985)
Comments Mol. Cell. Biophys.
2,
347-368 |