Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200114200 on March 6, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 17994-18001, May 17, 2002
Molecular Dissection of the Functional Domains of a Unique,
Tartrate-resistant, Surface Membrane Acid Phosphatase in the Primitive
Human Pathogen Leishmania donovani*
Alison M.
Shakarian
§,
Manju B.
Joshi¶
,
Elodie
Ghedin**
, and
Dennis M.
Dwyer¶§§
From the ¶ Cell Biology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic
Diseases, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
20892-0425, the
Department of Biology and Biomedical
Sciences, Salve Regina University, Newport, Rhode Island 02840, and the
** Institute for Genomic Research,
Rockville, Maryland 20850
Received for publication, January 4, 2002, and in revised form, February 21, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The primitive trypanosomatid pathogen of humans,
Leishmania donovani, constitutively expresses a unique
externally oriented, tartrate-resistant, acid phosphatase on its
surface membrane. This is of interest because these organisms are
obligate intracellular protozoan parasites that reside and multiply
within the hydrolytic milieu of mammalian macrophage phago-lysosomes.
Here we report the identification of the gene encoding this novel
L. donovani enzyme. In addition, we characterized its
structure, demonstrated its constitutive expression in both parasite
developmental forms, and determined the cell surface membrane
localization of its translated protein product. Further, we used a
variety of green fluorescent protein chimeric constructs as reporters
in a homologous leishmanial expression system to dissect the functional
domains of this unique, tartrate-resistant, surface membrane enzyme.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Leishmania donovani is an important protozoan pathogen
of humans that causes severe and most often fatal visceral disease in
the tropics and subtropics worldwide (1). This organism has a digenetic
life cycle that consists of two major developmental forms: 1)
extracellular flagellated promastigotes that reside and multiply in the
alimentary tract of their sandfly vectors and 2) obligate intracellular
nonflagellated amastigotes that reside and multiply within the
phago-lysosomal system of infected human macrophages.
Acid phosphatases (AcPs)1 are
phosphomonoesterases that hydrolyze substrates under low pH conditions
and are generally considered to be typical marker enzymes of lysosomes
(2, 3). Previously, it was shown that L. donovani
promastigotes (4, 5) and tissue-derived amastigotes possess a unique,
externally oriented, surface membrane, tartrate-resistant acid
phosphatase.2 The presence of
this enzyme on the parasite cell surface is an interesting observation
considering that amastigotes of all pathogenic leishmanial species
reside and multiply within host cell phago-lysosomes. Moreover, to
date, no other tartrate-resistant surface membrane AcP from any source
has been reported in the literature.
The tartrate-resistant surface membrane AcP of L. donovani
(MAcP) has a broad substrate specificity hydrolyzing glycerol
phosphates and mono- and di-phosphorylated sugars (5), inositol
phosphates, and phosphorylated proteins (6). Although the biochemical
properties of this enzyme have been partially characterized, its
biological function(s), as with virtually all acid phosphatases (3),
remain to be elucidated. Understanding and investigating the role(s) that this AcP plays in parasite growth and survival would be
facilitated by the characterization of the gene(s) that encodes this
unique enzyme. To date, however, no such leishmanial genes have been reported. Thus, in the current study we identified the gene encoding this novel L. donovani enzyme and characterized its
structure, expression, and localization in both developmental forms of
the parasite. Further, a variety of green fluorescent protein (GFP) chimeric constructs was used as reporters in a homologous leishmanial expression system to dissect the functional domains of this unique, tartrate-resistant, surface membrane enzyme.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents--
All chemicals used, unless otherwise noted, were
of analytical grade and were purchased from Sigma. Similarly,
enzymes and DNA molecular mass standards were purchased from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals. Protein molecular mass standards were purchased from Amersham Biosciences.
Parasite Cultures--
L. donovani promastigotes
([1S, clone 2D]from the 1S strain World Health
Organization designation: (MHOM/SD/62/1S-CL2D) were grown
at 26 °C in chemically defined 199(+) medium as described by
McCarthy-Burke et al. (7). Axenic amastigotes forms of this L. donovani clone were grown at 37 °C as described by
Joshi et al. (8). All of the cultures were harvested at log
phase (2-3 × 107 cells ml
1) by
centrifugation as described (9). The cell pellets were resuspended in
the appropriate buffers for isolation of nucleic acids, for preparation
of surface membrane fractions, or for transfection experiments.
Tissue-derived amastigotes of this L. donovani strain were
isolated from spleens of infected hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus; LVG strain, Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Wilmington, MA) as described previously (10).
Preparation of Parasite Surface Membrane-enriched
Fractions--
Cell lysates of both promastigotes and axenic
amastigotes were prepared from washed cell pellets by the addition of
lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 2 mM EDTA, 25 µg ml
1 leupeptin, pH 8.0) to a final concentration of
5 × 108 cells ml
1 and disruption in a
prechilled, tightly fitting Dounce homogenizer (5). The lysates were
centrifuged at 8000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C to
obtain parasite surface membrane-enriched fractions (8K pellets). The
supernatant was removed, and the 8K pellets were washed twice
with buffer (10 mM HEPES, 145 mM NaCl, pH, 7.4)
by centrifugation as above. The washed 8K pellets were solubilized (at
~5 × 108 cell equivalents ml
1) in the
same buffer containing 1.0% Triton X-100 (Surfact-Amps® X-100;
Pierce), 1.0% octyl-
-D-glucopyranoside (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) by stirring at 4 °C for ~12 h (11). The samples were centrifuged at 48,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, and
the supernatants, which contained the detergent-solubilized parasite
surface membrane components, were assayed for enzyme activity or used
in immunoprecipitations and Western blot analyses. The protein
concentrations were determined using the bicinchoninic acid (microBCA;
Pierce) method (12).
Isolation of Nucleic Acids--
Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was
isolated from promastigotes using the GNome DNA isolation kit from Bio
101 (La Jolla, CA). Total RNA was isolated from promastigotes, axenic
amastigotes, and tissue-derived amastigotes using the RNeasy method
(Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA) as described previously (13).
Probe Labeling--
A probe common to the 5'-ends of the
L. donovani AcP gene family (13) was generated by PCR
amplification with Taq polymerase and
digoxygenin-dUTP according to the manufacturer's instructions (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The conditions for amplification were
95 °C for 1 min, 42 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min (40 cycles), and 72 °C for 6 min. This 300-bp probe was generated with
oligo primers forward 1, 5'-CAGAACGACCGACATGC, and reverse 2, 5'-GACATACTTGAACCAGG using the previously described pAcP396
(13) as a template. The resulting digoxygenin-labeled fragment
(DIG-300) was used in hybridization studies.
In addition, an oligo unique to MAcP, forward 111, 5'-CGCGAAATGCATGAAGGGCGCAATCGCGTCTTCGATATGG, was labeled with
digoxygenin-dUTP by tailing with terminal transferase according to the
Genius Labeling kit 6 manufacturer's instructions (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals). The resulting MAcP specific oligo probe
(DIG-111) was used in hybridization studies.
Southern Hybridization--
gDNA was digested in independent
reactions with several restriction endonucleases, and the restriction
fragments were separated by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. These
gels were prepared for blotting as described previously (13). DNA was
transferred under vacuum and UV cross-linked to nylon membranes
(Hybond-N; Amersham Biosciences). The membranes were processed for
hybridization with the DIG-300 or DIG-111 probes according to the
Genius system user's guide (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and the
hybridized fragments were visualized using the Genius detection system
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and fluorography.
Cosmid Library Screening--
A cosmid library of L. donovani gDNA (kindly provided by Dr. B. Ullman, Oregon Health
Sciences University, Portland, OR) was screened by hybridization using
the DIG-300 probe. DNA isolated from positive cosmid clones (Magic
Miniprep; Promega, Madison, WI) was analyzed by restriction
endonuclease digestion and Southern hybridization analyses. Cosmids
containing an ~3.0-kb PstI AcP insert (Cos AcP-101, -102, and -103) were subjected to nucleotide sequence analysis.
Nucleotide Sequencing and Analysis--
DNA was sequenced using
the fluorescent dideoxy chain terminator cycle sequencing method (14)
at the Johns Hopkins University DNA Analysis Facility (Baltimore, MD)
as described previously (9). Sequence data from both strands were
analyzed using the Genetic Computer Group software package (15) running
on a National Institutes of Health Unix system and
SequencerTM 3.0 software (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, MI).
Signal sequence and protease cleavage sites were predicted using
Analyze-Signalase 2.0.3 (16).
RT-PCR--
Reverse transcription was carried out with total RNA
from L. donovani promastigotes, axenic amastigotes, and
tissue-derived amastigotes using Superscript II (Invitrogen Co.,
Carlsbad, CA) and oligo(dT) to generate cDNA according to the
manufacturer's instructions. PCR amplification reactions contained the
following oligo primer pair: primer pair 1, forward B,
5'-GCACCAGCTGCGTCCTCT, and reverse B, 5'-ATCACGCCAACTGCAGA. PCR
amplification reactions contained primer pair 1, 2 µl of the cDNA
generated above, dNTPs (Promega) Taq polymerase, and the
appropriate buffer in a final volume of 50 µl. The conditions for
amplification were 95 °C for 1 min, 42 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for
1 min (40 cycles), and 72 °C for 6 min. PCR products were analyzed
by 3.0% NuSieve® agarose (FMC® Bioproducts, Rockland, ME)
gel electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining. Gel-purified PCR
products (SephaglasTM Bandprep kit; Amersham Biosciences)
were subjected to nucleotide sequence analysis.
Antibodies--
Two individual peptides unique to the
MAcP-deduced protein were synthesized using 9-fluoromethyloxycarbonyl
chemistry: peptide 1, Lys-Phe-Pro-Phe-Phe-Arg-Phe-Pro-Tyr-Arg-Arg-Arg-Asp-Cys-Ala-Leu-His (kindly provided by the Laboratory of Molecular Structure NIAID, National Institutes of Health), and peptide 2, Arg-Phe-Pro-Tyr-Arg-Arg-Arg-Asp-Cys-Ala-Leu (Genosys Biotechnologies
Inc., The Woodlands, TX). These peptides were conjugated to
maleimide-activated keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Imject-activated
immunogen conjugation kit; Pierce). Anti-peptide antibodies (anti-MAcP
peptide Ab) were produced in a New Zealand White rabbit (No.
1407) by Spring Valley Laboratories, Inc. (Woodbine, MD) by
subscapular immunization with a mixture containing 1.25 mg of each of
the conjugated peptides (2.5 mg total) as described previously (9). The
resulting anti-MAcP peptide Ab was used in both Western blot analyses
and immunoprecipitation activity assays. In addition, a rabbit
monospecific (No. 172) Ab to the L. donovani SAcP (17) and
the appropriate control sera were used as positive controls in these
assays. An anti-GFP mouse monoclonal antibody
(CLONTECH Laboratories Inc., Palo Alto, CA) was
also used in Western blots and in indirect immunofluorescence assays to
detect GFP chimeric proteins. A rabbit anti-Bip antibody was a kind
gift from Dr. James Bangs (University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI).
Further, a goat anti-rabbit rhodamine-conjugated antibody (Jackson
Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) and a goat anti-mouse
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated antibody (Sigma) were used as
secondary antibodies for fluorescence microscopy.
Western Blots--
Solubilized promastigote and axenic
amastigote surface membrane extracts (10 µg of total protein/lane),
cell lysates of promastigotes and tissue-derived amastigotes (15 µg
of total protein/lane), or culture supernatants (15 µl/lane) from
transfectants were subjected to SDS-PAGE (10% precast
Tris-Glycine Novex® gels, Invitrogen), and the proteins were
transblotted (9) onto nylon (polyvinylidene difluoride) membranes
(Immobilon-P; Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). The membranes were probed
with the anti-MAcP peptide Ab, preimmune serum from this rabbit
(i.e. normal rabbit serum (NRS)), the L. donovani
SAcP control antiserum, or anti-GFP Ab using the LumiGLOTM
Western blot kit reagents (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories,
Gaithersburg, MD). Immunodetection was carried out using the
chemiluminescent horseradish peroxidase system in the
LumiGLOTM kit according to the manufacturer's instructions
(Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories).
Immunoprecipitation of L. donovani MAcP
Activity--
Solubilized surface membrane extracts from L. donovani promastigotes and axenic amastigotes were reacted with
anti-MAcP peptide Ab or NRS in a protein A-Sepharose 4B/CL (Amersham
Biosciences) bead-based assay as described previously (9).
Immunoprecipitates were subsequently assayed for AcP activity in the
presence or absence of 5 mM sodium tartrate (L(+)-tartaric
acid; ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc., Costa Mesa, CA), as described
previously (18). All of the samples were assayed in triplicate, and
these assays were repeated on multiple samples. One unit of enzyme
activity (19) reflects the hydrolysis of 1 nmol of
p-nitrophenyl phosphate (U.S. Biochemical Corp., Cleveland,
OH) to p-nitrophenol min
1 mg
1 of
detergent-solubilized parasite surface membrane protein at 42 °C.
The percentage of activity immunoprecipitated was determined using the
following formula: (activity bound/[activity bound + activity
unbound]) × 100. The results obtained from immunoprecipitations were normalized by subtracting the values obtained with NRS from those
obtained with the anti-MAcP peptide Ab.
Nomenclature--
The designations used in this report for
proteins, genes, and plasmids follows the nomenclature for
Trypanosoma and Leishmania as suggested by
Clayton et al. (20)
GFP Constructs--
pKSNEO was used as the
leishmanial vector (21) to express GFP-MAcP chimeras for studies of the
functional domains of the MAcP. In a multi-step process, the potential
signal peptide (SP) of MAcP, GFP, and the putative transmembrane anchor
domain (TM) of MAcP were PCR-amplified and subcloned to generate
pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP::TM.
First, PCR amplification of the TM domain of MAcP was
performed using Cos AcP-101 as template with the primer pair, forward MAcPTM 5'-TGGTGGAGCGCTCCCGCCTTATATAAATTGATAGCTACGTGT
(Eco47 restriction endonuclease site in bold type) and
reverse MAcPTM 5'-TGGTGGACGCGTTGGACTAGTCCCTTAATACACGCGAAATGCATG (MluI and SpeI restriction endonuclease sites in
bold type). The resulting PCR product was cloned into the
pCR2.1vector (TA Cloning System; Invitrogen) to generate the
plasmid pCR2.1 MAcPTM.
Second, the GFP gene was amplified from plasmid
pEGFP-1 (CLONTECH) using primers forward
GFP 5'-TGGTGGAGCGCTCCCACGCGTCCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCG (Eco47 and MluI restriction endonuclease sites in
bold type) and reverse GFP 5'-CCAAGCGCTCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATG
(Eco47 restriction endonuclease site in bold type). The
resulting PCR product was cloned into the pCR2.1 vector
(Invitrogen), resulting in the plasmid construct pCR2.1
EGFP.
Third, the MAcP signal peptide plus its peptidase cleavage site
(Arg24) was PCR-amplified from Cos AcP-101
template with primers forward MAcPSP
5'-CATGACGTCACTAGTATGGCCTCGAAGCTCATC (SpeI
restriction endonuclease site in bold type) and reverse MAcPSP
5'-TGGTGGACGCGTCCATGCGCACGACAAGGC (MluI
restriction endonuclease site in bold type). The resulting PCR
product was cloned into the pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen) to produce pCR2.1 MAcPSP.
The first chimera that contained GFP and the putative TM
domain of MAcP was constructed by subcloning the gel-purified
Eco47-digested GFP fragment from pCR2.1 EGFP into
the Eco47-linearized pCR2.1 MAcPTM construct,
which resulted in the plasmid construct pCR2.1 GFP::TM. The orientation of the GFP fragment
was verified using gel electrophoresis analysis with the appropriate
restriction endonucleases.
The second chimera containing the MAcP SP, GFP, and the putative MAcP
TM domain was produced by subcloning the gel-purified MluI
fragment of pCR2.1 GFP::TM into the
MluI-linearized pCR2.1 MAcPSP, which resulted in
the plasmid construct pCR2.1
MAcPSP::GFP::TM. The
orientation of the GFP::TM fragment was
verified using gel electrophoresis analysis with the appropriate
restriction endonucleases.
pCR2.1
MAcPSP::GFP::TM was
digested with SpeI, and the gel-purified fragment was
subcloned into the SpeI-linearized leishmanial expression
vector pKS NEO, resulting in the plasmid construct pKS
NEO MAcPSP::GFP::TM.
Orientation of the subcloned fragment was verified using gel
electrophoresis analysis with the appropriate restriction
endonucleases. The final construct pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP::TM was
verified by sequence analysis as described above and was subsequently transfected into L. donovani promastigotes for functional
domain analysis studies. Other MAcP-GFP chimeric expression plasmids including pKS NEO MAcPSP::GFP and
pKS NEO GFP were constructed using the same multi-step
PCR-based cloning strategy above as appropriate.
Transfection of GFP Chimeric Constructs into Leishmania--
For
transfection experiments, harvested promastigote cells were resuspended
in electroporation buffer to 108 cells ml
1 as
described previously (22). 500 µl of cell suspension was added to a
2-mm gap electroporation cuvette (BTX Inc., San Diego, CA). Immediately
prior to electroporation, 20 µl of purified plasmid DNA (1 mg
ml
1 in sterile 10 mm Tris, 2 mm EDTA (Quality Biological,
Inc., Gaithersburg, MD), pH 8.0) was added to the cell suspension. The
cells were electroporated using a BTX Inc. ECM-600
electroporation system. Electroporation conditions were a single pulse
at 475 V, 800 microfarads, and 13 ohms. The electroporated cells were
incubated on ice for 10 min and transferred into 5 ml of culture medium
as described above and incubated at 26 °C for 24 h. The
transfected cells were subsequently harvested by centrifugation as
above and resuspended in culture medium containing 15 µg
ml
1 G418 (Geneticin, Invitrogen). Transfected cells were
selected for growth in increasing concentrations of G418 over a period of several weeks and maintained at 200 µg ml
1 drug. The
drug-resistant cells were used in subsequent experiments.
Microscopy--
Transfected promastigotes were washed three
times in phosphate-buffered saline by centrifugation as described
above. Fluorescence images of such live cells were acquired using a
Zeiss Axioplan microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Thornwood, NY), which was
equipped with epifluorescence, a cooled CCD camera (Photometrics,
Tucson, AZ), and the appropriate fluorescein isothiocyanate
excitation/barrier filters. Transfected parasites were also examined in
indirect immunofluorescence assays using anti-Bip and anti-GFP
antibodies essentially as described by Debrabant et al.
(22). Such cells were examined by confocal microscopy using a Zeiss LSM
410 system with fluorescein isothiocyanate and rhodamine
excitation/barrier filters. The fluorescent images obtained in these
channels were collected separately. All of the captured images were
processed using Adobe Photoshop 5.5 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA).
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of the MAcP ORF--
Previously we identified and
characterized the genes that encode the 110- and 130-kDa
isoforms of the L. donovani histidine secretory AcPs
(SAcP-1 and SAcP-2) (13). In the current study, results of Southern analysis of L. donovani gDNA digested
with PstI revealed three restriction fragments (5.2, 3.9, and 3.0 kb) that hybridized with an L. donovani AcP gene
probe (DIG-300) (Fig. 1). The two larger
PstI fragments, of 3.9 and 5.2 kb, contained the
SAcP-1 and SAcP-2 genes described above (13). The
third PstI fragment, of 3.0 kb, was subcloned, sequenced,
and found to contain a partial ORF, very similar but not identical in
sequence to either SAcP-1 or SAcP-2. To obtain a
full-length ORF corresponding to the 3.0-kb PstI fragment,
an L. donovani gDNA cosmid library was screened with the
DIG-300 probe, which is common to all three PstI restriction
fragments. Seventeen positive clones were identified and analyzed by
restriction endonuclease digestion with PstI followed by
Southern hybridization with the DIG-300 probe. Three of the 17 cosmid
clones (Cos AcP-101, -102, and -103) contained a 3.0-kb PstI
restriction fragment. Sequence analysis revealed that these cosmids
contained a full-length (948 bp) ORF corresponding to the 3.0-kb
PstI genomic fragment.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Southern analysis of PstI
digested L. donovani gDNA. L. donovani gDNA was digested with PstI restriction
endonuclease and subjected to Southern hybridization with the DIG-300
probe. Molecular mass standards in bp are shown on the
left.
|
|
Comparison of the L. donovani AcP-deduced Proteins--
Sequence
analysis showed that the 948-bp ORF encoded a deduced protein with a
calculated molecular mass of 35,192 Da and a predicted isoelectric
point of 8.23. Analysis of the deduced aa sequence showed that it
contained five potential N-linked glycosylation sites
(Asn44, Asn96, Asn135,
Asn219, and Asn245) (Fig.
2A) and one predicted
myristoylation site (Gly37). In addition, the deduced
protein possessed five putative phosphorylation sites by several
different mechanisms (i.e. casein kinase II: Ser83,Ser154, and Ser248 and
protein kinase C: Thr107 and Thr247). Moreover,
the most abundant residues of this deduced protein were alanine and
leucine, which constitute 23% of its aa content.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Sequence and structure of the L. donovani acid phosphatases. A, deduced aa
sequence of the L. donovani MAcP. The open box
indicates a putative 23-aa signal peptide
(Met1-Ala23). The underlined
letters (Val27-Arg39) denote one of the
two conserved signature sequences (catalytic sites) of the histidine
AcP family. The five potential N-linked glycosylation sites
are designated by asterisks. The letters in bold
type are aa unique to the MAcP
(Pro275-Tyr315). The bold and
italicized letters (Lys294-His310)
represent the aa sequence used to generate the anti-MAcP peptide Ab.
B, maps of the L. donovani acid phosphatases.
Diagrammatic comparison of the deduced aa sequences from the L. donovani secretory acid phosphatases (Ld
SAcP-1 and Ld SAcP-2) and the surface
membrane acid phosphatase (Ld MAcP). The length
of each deduced protein is denoted by the superscript
numbers. The black boxes indicate Region I, the 23-aa
putative signal peptide (Met1-Ala23). The
light gray boxes denote Region II, containing the active
sites of these enzymes. The conserved signature sequences that
constitute the catalytic sites among the histidine acid phosphatases
are designated by open boxes 1 and 2. The
medium gray boxes in SAcP-1 and SAcP-2 represent regions
rich in serine/threonine repeats that is absent from the MAcP. The
C-terminal ends of SAcP-1 and SAcP-2 are identical and are designated
by open boxes. Region III of the MAcP contains a putative
transmembrane anchor domain designated by TM followed by a
short putative C-terminal cytoplasmic tail (dark gray
box).
|
|
The deduced protein can be divided into three structural domains.
Region I consists of a 23-aa putative signal peptide
(Met1-Ala23) based on the Von Heijne algorithm
(23) (Fig. 2). The sequence of this putative signal peptide including
its peptidase cleavage site is identical to those present at the N
termini of the SAcP-1- and SAcP-2-deduced proteins (13). Therefore,
cleavage at this site would result in Arg 24 as the
N-terminal aa of the mature protein. In addition, the two SAcP-deduced
proteins of L. donovani (SAcP-1 and SAcP-2) and the 948-bp
ORF-deduced protein above are identical in aa sequence for 251 residues
beyond the signal peptide (Region II) (Fig. 2B). The
presence of a conserved histidine AcP signature sequence
(i.e. a catalytic site consensus sequence) within Region II
(Val27-Arg39) (Fig. 2) indicates that the
948-bp ORF-deduced protein is a member of this highly conserved family
of enzymes. However, the second histidine AcP signature sequence
(Ala285-Thr296) present in SAcP-1 and SAcP-2
is absent in the 948-bp ORF-deduced protein. The third region consists
of the C terminus of this deduced protein. Based on the Kyte-Doolittle
algorithm (24), Region III of 948-bp ORF-deduced protein contains a
stretch of 29 hydrophobic aa residues
(Leu274-Tyr302) that could function as a
transmembrane anchor domain (Fig. 2). This is followed by a short 13-aa
putative cytoplasmic tail (Arg303-Tyr315).
Cumulatively, these observations suggested that the 948-bp ORF
represented a membrane-anchored member of the histidine acid phosphatase family; thus, this gene was designated as the L. donovani MAcP.
Characterization of the MAcP Gene Locus--
Comparison of both
nucleotide and deduced aa sequences revealed that the AcPs from
L. donovani belong to a highly conserved multi-gene family.
To determine whether MAcP constituted a distinct single gene
or a multi-gene locus, we designed a specific oligo probe, DIG-111
(Fig. 3A), that would only
recognize MAcP and not SAcP-1 or
SAcP-2. This oligo probe was used in Southern hybridization analysis of L. donovani gDNA. The results of these analyses
with both single (AatII, NcoI, and
NotI) and double restriction endonuclease (AatII
and NcoI; AatII and NotI; and
NcoI and NotI) digestions demonstrated that
within an ~6-kb region of L. donovani gDNA, only single
restriction fragments were observed to hybridize with the DIG-111 probe
(Fig. 3B). One would expect that multiple restriction fragments would have hybridized with this probe, if the MAcP
locus had been present in more than one copy. Thus, the hybridization results indicated that the 6 kb surrounding and including the MAcP locus were present only once within the L. donovani genome. These results were confirmed by Southern
hybridization of the three cosmids clones, Cos AcP-101, -102, and -103, each of which was shown to contain a single MAcP ORF (data
not shown).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Southern hybridization of the MAcP
gene locus. A, restriction map of the
MAcP locus and position of the DIG-111 oligo probe. The
relevant restriction sites are noted. A, AatII;
Nc, NcoI; Nt, NotI. The
hatched box indicates the 948-bp MAcP ORF. The
solid black line shows the position of the DIG-111 oligo
probe. B, Southern blot of L. donovani gDNA
hybridized with the DIG-111 oligo probe. L. donovani gDNA
was digested with AatII (lane 1), NcoI
(lane 2), NotI (lane 3),
AatII and NcoI (lane 4),
AatII and NotI (lane 5), and
NcoI and NotI (lane 6). The molecular
mass standards are shown in bp on the left.
|
|
Identification of the MAcP Transcript--
Transcription of
MAcP was assayed in a two-step process involving RT and PCR
amplification (Fig. 4). First, cDNA
of promastigote, axenic amastigote, and tissue-derived amastigote
mature mRNA was generated with oligo(dT) and reverse transcriptase.
Second, an aliquot of each of these cDNAs was used as template in
PCR with gene-specific primers (Fig. 4A), and the expected
250-bp amplified product should contain an internal sequence specific
to the MAcP.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
RT-PCR of MAcP
mRNA. A, schematic showing the position of RT-PCR
primers. The box indicates the 948-bp MAcP ORF
encoding Regions I (black box), II (gray box),
and III (white box). The arrows represent the
MAcP-specific primer pair (primer pair 1) and the 250-bp
predicted product (dashes). B, portion of
ethidium bromide-stained gel showing the products of RT-PCR. L. donovani total RNA from promastigotes (Pro), axenic
amastigotes (Ax Am), and in vivo (tissue-derived)
amastigotes (Tis Am) was subjected to RT using oligo(dT).
Aliquots of the resulting cDNAs were subjected to PCR with primer
pair 1. The resulting 250-bp amplified products designated by the
arrow were gel-purified and subjected to nucleotide sequence
analysis.
|
|
The results of these experiments showed that only a single amplified
product of 250 bp was obtained using aliquots of promastigote cDNA
as template (Fig. 4B, Pro lane). Similarly, a
250-bp amplification product was obtained with aliquots of cDNA
from both axenic amastigotes (Fig. 4B, Ax Am
lane) and tissue-derived amastigotes (Fig. 4B, Tis Am lane). These RT-PCR results were confirmed using
several different RNA-cDNA preparations. In control reactions, in
which cDNAs were not generated prior to PCR, no amplified products
were obtained (data not shown). Moreover, in control reactions in which forward or reverse primers were omitted from the reaction mix, no
amplified products were obtained (data not shown). The specificity of
the RT-PCR-amplified products was verified by sequencing the gel-purified PCR-amplified reaction products. Sequence analysis revealed that the primer pair specifically amplified a single product,
which corresponded to the specific MAcP gene sequence. Together, these data demonstrated that MAcP is actively
transcribed by L. donovani promastigotes, axenic
amastigotes, and tissue-derived amastigotes. Thus, the MAcP
appears to be constitutively transcribed throughout the parasite
developmental life cycle.
Localization of MAcP by Western Analysis--
SDS-PAGE and Western
blot analysis were used to determine the cellular localization of the
protein product encoded by the MAcP. L. donovani isolated surface membrane fractions from
promastigotes and axenic amastigotes as well as whole cell lysates of
tissue-derived amastigotes were probed in Western blots using the
anti-MAcP peptide Ab. The results of these assays showed that the
anti-MAcP peptide Ab reacted with a single ~53-kDa protein in the
isolated promastigote surface membranes (Fig.
5, lane 1). These results are
consistent with those reported previously concerning the apparent
molecular mass of a partially purified tartrate-resistant AcP from the
surface membranes of L. donovani promastigotes
(25). The MAcP peptide Ab also recognized a single ~64-kDa protein in
surface membranes of axenic amastigotes (Fig. 5, lane 2) and
an ~60-kDa protein in lysates of tissue-derived amastigotes (Fig. 5,
lane 3). The ~4-kDa difference in apparent molecular mass
between the MAcP protein present in isolated axenic amastigote surface
membranes and in lysates of tissue-derived amastigotes might reflect
differences in their post-translational modifications (e.g.
type and/or amount of glycosylation, phosphorylation, etc.) because of
the diverse environments in which these organisms were grown
(i.e. in vitro cell culture versus
hamster spleen macrophages in vivo). Alternatively, this
difference could result from proteolytic degradation/hydrolysis of the
MAcP protein during the isolation and processing of tissue-derived amastigotes.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Western blot analysis with the anti-MAcP
peptide Ab. The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE, blotted onto a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and probed with the anti-MAcP
peptide Ab or NRS. Lane 1, promastigote surface membranes;
lane 2, axenic amastigote surface membranes; lane
3, tissue-derived amastigote lysates. Molecular mass standards are
shown in kDa on the left.
|
|
In parallel Western blots (data not shown) these proteins were also
recognized by a rabbit polyclonal anti-L. donovani secretory AcP Ab (No. 172). These data are consistent with all three of the L. donovani AcP-deduced proteins (SAcP-1, SAcP-2, and
MAcP) having a common N terminus and verifies that the MAcP protein is
a member of a family of conserved AcPs in L. donovani. In
contrast, the anti-MAcP peptide Ab did not react with the promastigote
110- and 130-kDa SAcP-1 and SAcP-2 secretory proteins, further
demonstrating the specificity of this antibody for the unique
C-terminal domain of the MAcP protein. NRS controls showed no
reactivity with any leishmanial protein (data not shown).
Taken together, these Western blot results demonstrated that the MAcP
protein is produced by tissue-derived amastigotes and that it is
expressed in the surface membranes of both in vitro grown
promastigotes and axenic amastigotes. Further, these results showed
that the MAcP protein expressed by promastigotes and amastigotes differed in apparent molecular mass. The latter may reflect their developmental differences in post-translational processing of this
surface membrane enzyme.
Immunoprecipitation of MAcP Activity--
Surface membranes
isolated from L. donovani promastigotes and axenic
amastigotes were detergent-solubilized and assayed for total acid
phosphatase activity using p-nitrophenyl phosphate as
substrate in the presence or absence of 5 mM sodium
tartrate. The results of these assays demonstrated that both parasite
developmental forms possessed comparable levels of MAcP specific
activity (Table I). Further, these assays
showed that all of the measurable MAcP activity present in these
solubilized surface membranes was resistant to inhibition by sodium
tartrate. Aliquots of such solubilized surface membranes were reacted
with the anti-MAcP peptide Ab (antibody raised against a portion of the
unique C-terminal peptide sequence of MAcP (i.e. aa residues
Lys294-His310)) or NRS in a protein
A-Sepharose 4B/CL bead-based assay (9, 18). Immunoprecipitates from
these were assayed for AcP activity in the presence or absence of 5 mM sodium tartrate. The results from these assays (Table I)
showed that the anti-MAcP peptide Ab immunoprecipitated ~20% of the
total AcP activity present in the detergent-solubilized surface
membranes of each parasite developmental form. Further, these results
showed that all of the activity immunoprecipitated by the anti-MAcP
peptide Ab was tartrate-resistant. The relatively low amount of enzyme
activity immunoprecipitated in these assays might be due to insertion
of the C-terminal hydrophobic domain of MAcP into detergent micelles,
thus making this epitope only partially available for interaction and
recognition by the anti-MAcP peptide Ab.
The results of these immunoprecipitation assays in conjunction with our
Western blot results demonstrated that the anti-MAcP peptide Ab
specifically reacted with a single tartrate-resistant parasite surface
membrane AcP present in both parasite developmental forms. Such
expression is in agreement with our RT-PCR results, which indicated
that the MAcP gene is actively transcribed by both L. donovani promastigotes and axenic amastigotes.
Episomal Expression of GFP Chimeras in L. donovani
Promastigotes--
Chimeric proteins containing specific domains of
the MAcP fused with GFP as a reporter were episomally expressed in
L. donovani promastigotes using the pKS NEO
leishmanial expression vector. These chimeric constructs were used to
demonstrate that the N-terminal region of the MAcP functions as a
signal peptide and that its C-terminal region functions as a membrane
anchor. All chimeric constructs and control plasmids were transfected
into L. donovani promastigotes, which were subsequently
grown in increasing concentrations of G418 (to a final concentration of
200 µg ml
1). These transfectants were subsequently
analyzed in Western blots and by epifluorescence microscopy.
The first plasmid construct, pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP::TM, encoded
a protein (Fig. 6A, map
1) containing the putative N-terminal signal peptide domain
(Met1-Arg23) of MAcP including its peptidase
cleavage site (Arg24), the full-length GFP, and the
C-terminal domain of the MAcP (Pro275-Tyr315).
Thus, this expressed GFP chimeric protein contained the putative MAcP
signal peptide at its N-terminal end and both the MAcP putative transmembrane (TM) anchor domain and cytoplasmic tail at its C terminus. This construct was used to determine whether the C-terminal MAcP sequence would function to target and anchor the GFP in the cell
surface membrane of transfected parasites.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Episomal expression of GFP chimeras in
L. donovani promastigotes. A, maps of
GFP chimeric proteins. Map 1,
MAcPSP::GFP::TM showing the putative MAcP SP
(black box), full-length GFP (light gray area),
the putative MAcP TM domain (white box), and C-terminal
cytoplasmic tail (dark gray region). Map
2, the MAcPSP::GFP chimeric protein as in map
1 but lacking the MAcPTM and cytoplasmic tail. Map 3,
full-length GFP lacking any MAcP protein domains. B, Western
blots of surface membranes isolated from promastigotes transfected with
the control pKS NEO plasmid (lanes 1 and
1') or the pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP::TM plasmid
(lanes 2 and 2') probed with anti-GFP antibody
( -GFP) and anti-MAcP peptide antibody
( -TM). C, fluorescence image showing the cell
surface localization of the MAcPSP::GFP::TM
chimeric protein in promastigotes transfected with the pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP::TM plasmid.
The arrows with the letter F denotes the
flagellum of these parasites. D, indirect immunofluorescence
images of promastigotes transfected with pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP plasmid and probed with anti-GFP
( -GFP) and anti-Bip ( -Bip) antibodies
(panels 1 and 2, respectively). Panel
3 is a merge of the green and red channels
showing the colocalization of GFP and Bip in these cells. E,
Western blots of cell lysates (Lys) and cell-free culture
supernatants (Sup) from promastigotes transfected with the
control pKS NEO plasmid (lanes 1 and
1') or the pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP plasmid (lanes 2 and
2') and probed with the anti-GFP antibody
( -GFP).
|
|
The second plasmid construct, pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP (Fig. 6A, map
2), contained the N-terminal putative signal peptide sequence of
the MAcP as above and the full-length GFP reporter (i.e. it lacked the entire C-terminal domain of the MAcP). This construct was
used to determine whether the N-terminal MAcP sequence functioned as a
signal peptide that would target the nascent protein into the
endoplasmic reticulum.
The third plasmid construct (Fig. 6A, map 3),
pKS NEO GFP, contained no sequences from the MAcP
gene. This construct was used as a GFP reporter control for these
transfection studies.
Surface membranes were isolated from both pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP::TM and
pKS NEO control transfectants. These were subjected to
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analyses with the anti-GFP Ab and anti-MAcP
peptide Ab. In such blots, the anti-GFP Ab and anti-MAcP peptide Ab
each reacted very strongly with a single ~32-kDa protein that was
only present in the surface membranes of pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP::TM transfectants (Fig. 6B, lanes 2 and
2', respectively) and not in those from pKS NEO
control transfectants (Fig. 6B, lanes 1 and
1', respectively). The apparent molecular mass of
this ~32-kDa chimeric protein reflects the sum of its GFP and MAcP
C-terminal domain (42 amino acid residues) components (i.e.
~28 and ~4.2 kDa, respectively). In addition, the anti-MAcP peptide
Ab also reacted with the single ~53-kDa endogenous MAcP protein
present in the surface membranes of both the pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP::TM and pKS NEO control transfectants (data not shown). Further,
preimmune rabbit serum, normal mouse serum, and ascites controls showed no reactivity in these Western blots. The results of these assays demonstrated that the pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP::TM episomal
plasmid was readily translated and expressed as a ~32-kDa
MAcPSP::GFP::TM chimeric protein in these parasites.
L. donovani promastigotes transfected with the above
expression plasmids were also examined by epifluorescence microscopy. Such observations revealed that promastigotes transfected with pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP::TM
demonstrated bright GFP cell surface fluorescence (Fig. 6C).
In contrast, pKS NEO control transfectants showed no surface
fluorescence. These results indicated that the
MAcPSP::GFP::TM chimeric protein was in fact
targeted to and expressed on the cell surface membrane of these
parasites. Further, in conjunction with our Western blot data, these
results demonstrated that the MAcP transmembrane domain was present on
the GFP chimeric protein and that it functioned to anchor this protein
in the parasite cell surface.
In contrast to the above information, promastigotes transfected with
pKS NEO MAcPSP::GFP showed only diffuse
intracellular fluorescence, reflecting the processing of GFP in the
endoplasmic reticulum of these cells. The latter was confirmed by its
colocalization (Fig. 6D, panel 3,
Merge) with Bip (a resident endoplasmic reticulum protein)
in indirect immunofluorescence assays using both anti-GFP (Fig.
6D, panel 1) and anti-Bip (Fig. 6D,
panel 2) antibodies. Cell lysates and cell-free culture
supernatants from promastigotes transfected with the pKS NEO
MAcPSP::GFP plasmid or control pKS NEO plasmid were also subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot
analyses. Such blots were probed with the anti-GFP antibody and matched control reagents. The results of these assays showed that the lysates
of pKS NEO MAcPSP::GFP but not
pKS NEO transfectants contained a single ~28-kDa protein
that reacted with the anti-GFP Ab (Fig. 6E, lanes
2 and 1, respectively). Further, these results also showed that pKS NEO MAcPSP::GFP but not
pKS NEO transfectants secreted/released a single, soluble,
~28-kDa GFP into their culture supernatants (Fig. 6E,
lanes 2' and 1', respectively). The ~28-kDa protein expressed by these transfectants presumably reflects the apparent molecular mass of the mature GFP alone (i.e.
lacking the MAcP signal peptide domain). Cumulatively, these results
demonstrated that the N-terminal end of the MAcP
(Met1-Ala23) functions as a signal peptide to
translocate the nascent GFP into the endoplasmic reticulum. Further, in
the absence of a C-terminal membrane anchor, the mature soluble
~28-kDa GFP is released from these cells into their culture
supernatants, presumably via default into the secretory pathway.
Promastigotes transfected with the pKS NEO GFP plasmid
(i.e. devoid of any MAcP sequences) were also examined in
Western blots and by epifluorescence microscopy. Lysates of such cells
showed that they contained a single ~28-kDa protein that reacted with the anti-GFP Ab in Western blots; however, no GFP was detected in the
cell-free supernatants from these parasites (data not shown). Examination of these cells by epifluorescence microscopy revealed that
GFP was diffusely distributed throughout their cytoplasm. These
observations are in agreement with our conclusions above concerning the
functions of the N- and C-terminal domains of the MAcP.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the current report we identified a new member (MAcP)
of the AcP multi-gene family in L. donovani by Southern
hybridization of a gDNA cosmid library. The MAcP gene is
present in single copy and encodes a distinct but highly conserved
deduced protein of 315 aa. Sequence analysis of gene-specific RT-PCR
using RNA isolated from both developmental forms of this parasite
demonstrated that L. donovani promastigotes, axenic
amastigotes, and tissue-derived amastigotes actively transcribed
MAcP mRNA. In Western blots, the MAcP peptide Ab reacted
with a single polypeptide in promastigote surface membranes, axenic
amastigote surface membranes, and whole cell lysates of tissue-derived
amastigotes. Further, this Ab immunoprecipitated the tartrate-resistant
MAcP activity present in surface membranes of both L. donovani promastigotes and axenic amastigotes. Cumulatively, the
results of these studies demonstrated that MAcP is
constitutively transcribed and translated by both promastigotes and
amastigotes into an active tartrate-resistant AcP protein, which is
expressed in the surface membranes of both of these parasite
developmental forms.
Previously, we identified the genes encoding the two major secretory
isoforms (SAcP-1 and SAcP-2) of the histidine AcPs in L. donovani (13). In the current study we used GFP chimeras to show
that the MAcP-deduced protein possesses a functional 23-aa signal
peptide sequence at its N terminus. Further, we showed that this signal
peptide is identical to those of SAcP-1 and SAcP-2. In addition, the N
termini of these three leishmanial AcPs (SAcP-1, SAcP-2, and MAcP) all
contained 251 conserved aa residues. Moreover, within this region,
these proteins contain a signature sequence (Val27-Arg39) that is characteristic of a
catalytic domain present in all histidine AcPs (13, 26). Downstream of
this catalytic domain, however, these three leishmanial AcPs have
diverged evolutionarily presumably by gene duplication and
polymorphisms. As such, SAcP-1 and SAcP-2 contain regions rich in
serine and threonine repeat units (13) that are absent in MAcP.
The MAcP-deduced protein possesses a unique 41-aa C-terminal domain
that is absent from SAcP-1 and SAcP-2. Further, based on the
Kyte-Doolittle algorithm (24), the MAcP contains a sequence of 29 hydrophobic aa residues (Leu274-Tyr302). In the
current study GFP chimeras were used to show that this C-terminal
domain functions to anchor the MAcP protein into the surface membrane
of these parasites.
Recently, the mechanism by which tartrate inhibits the enzymatic
activity of the tartrate-sensitive histidine AcPs was delineated by
LaCount et al. (27). In that report, the authors showed that in addition to the conserved sequence motif
Arg-His-Gly-Xaa-Arg-Xaa-Pro, aa residues corresponding to
Ala79, His257, and Asp258 of the
human prostatic AcP are involved in the binding of tartrate to the
active site of these enzymes. In that regard, several genes for
tartrate-sensitive leishmanial AcPs have been identified. These include
the two L. donovani secretory AcPs, SAcP-1 and SAcP-2 (13);
the two released AcPs, SAP1 and SAP2 (28); and one membrane-bound AcP,
MBAP (29) of Leishmania mexicana. The deduced proteins of
all of these leishmanial AcPs contain residues, which correspond to
those involved in tartrate binding (27). Thus, conservation of these
residues accounts for these leishmanial AcP enzymatic activities being
inhibited by tartrate. In the current report, we identified a
constitutively expressed gene (MAcP) that encodes a unique
tartrate-resistant surface membrane AcP of L. donovani. Sequence analysis of this MAcP demonstrated that it lacked
the critical residues corresponding to His257 and
Asp258 of the human prostatic AcP. Thus, the absence of
these residues in this leishmanial MAcP is consistent with the tartrate
resistance of this parasite surface membrane enzyme.
Acid phosphatases are generally considered to be typical marker enzymes
of lysosomes. In fact, a family of tartrate-resistant acid phosphatases
(TRAPs) has been identified and shown to be conserved membrane
components of mammalian lysosomes (2, 3). All TRAPs contain five
conserved signature sequences (3); however, none of these signature
sequences were present in the L. donovani MAcP, indicating
that this parasite enzyme is not a TRAP per se. Thus, the
cumulative results of this study have identified and characterized, for
the first time, the gene encoding the unique tartrate-resistant surface
membrane histidine acid phosphatase of L. donovani. To date,
no other tartrate-resistant surface membrane acid phosphatase has been
reported in the literature. Molecular dissection of the functional
domains of this novel parasite enzyme demonstrated that both the
N-terminal signal peptide and the C-terminal anchor domains were
required to target the MAcP to the surface membrane of this pathogen.
Because L. donovani amastigotes reside and multiply within
the phago-lysosomal system of mammalian macrophages, the MAcP may
afford this parasite a survival advantage in such hostile hydrolytic
environments. The availability of the MAcP gene therefore
should facilitate studies concerning the biological role of this enzyme
in parasite survival.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Duane Bartley of the Johns Hopkins
University DNA Analysis Facility for assistance with nucleotide
sequencing, Nancy K. Dwyer (NIDDK, National Institutes of Health) for
confocal microscope imaging, Dr. Buddy Ullman for providing the
L. donovani cosmid library, Dr. Greg
Matlashewski (Institute of Parasitology, McGill University) for
providing the pKS NEO leishmanial expression vector, Dr.
James Bangs (University of Wisconsin, Madison) for the anti-Bip antibody, and Dr. John Colligan (Laboratory of Molecular Structure NIAID, National Institutes of Health) for making a synthetic peptide used in this study. We thank Stephanie Ellis for technical assistance during the course of these studies and Cathleen McCarthy-Burke for
dedicated efforts in the initial phases of this project.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF149839.
§
Supported by a Postdoctoral Intramural Research Training Award
Fellowship and a Staff Research Fellowship from the NIAID, National
Institutes of Health.
Supported by a Postdoctoral Intramural Research Training Award
Fellowship from the NIAID, National Institutes of Health.

Visiting Fellow supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the
Fogarty International Center and NIAID, National Institutes of Health.
§§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: LPD, NIAID, NIH,
Bldg. 4, Rm. 126, 4 Center Dr., MSC-0425, Bethesda, MD 20892-0425. Tel.: 301-496-5969; Fax: 301-402-0079; E-mail:
ddwyer@niaid.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 6, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200114200
2
D. M. Dwyer, unpublished observation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AcP, acid phosphatase(s);
aa, amino acid(s);
Ab, antibody(ies);
DIG, digoxigenin;
gDNA, genomic DNA;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
NRS, normal rabbit
serum;
oligo, oligodeoxyribonucleotide(s);
ORF, open reading frame;
RT, reverse transcription;
SAcP, secretory AcP of L. donovani;
SP, signal peptide;
TM, transmembrane.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
UNDP/World Bank/World Health Organization.
(1999)
Tropical Disease Research: Progress 1997-1998: Fourteenth Programme Report of the UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases
, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
|
| 2.
|
Lamp, E. C.,
and Drexler, H. G.
(2000)
Leuk. Lymphoma
39,
477-484[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Oddie, G. W.,
Schenk, N. Z.,
Angel, N. Z.,
Walsh, N.,
Guddat, L. W., De,
Jersey, J.,
Cassady, A. I.,
Hamilton, S. E.,
and Hume, D. A.
(2000)
Bone
27,
575-584[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Gottlieb, M.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(1981)
Science
212,
939-941[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Gottlieb, M.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(1981)
Exp. Parasitol.
52,
117-128[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Das, S.,
Saha, A. K.,
Glew, R. H.,
Dowling, J. N.,
Kajiyoshi, M.,
and Gottlieb, M.
(1986)
Mol. Biochem. Parastiol
20,
143-153
|
| 7.
|
McCarthy-Burke, C.,
Bates, P. A.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(1991)
Exp. Parasitol.
73,
385-387[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Joshi, M.,
Dwyer, D. M.,
and Nakhasi, H. L.
(1993)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
58,
345-354[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Shakarian, A. M.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(1998)
Gene (Amst.)
208,
315-322[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Dwyer, D. M.,
Langreth, S. G.,
and Dwyer, N. K.
(1974)
Z. Parasitenk.
43,
227-249[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Gbenle, G. O.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
285,
41-46[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Smith, P. K.,
Krohn, R. I.,
Hermanson, G. T.,
Mallia, A. K.,
Gartner, F. H.,
Provenzano, M. D.,
Fujimoto, E. K.,
Goeke, N. M.,
Olson, B. J.,
and Klenk, D. C.
(1985)
Anal. Biochem.
150,
76-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Shakarian, A. M.,
Ellis, S. L.,
Mallinson, D. J.,
Olafson, R. W.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(1997)
Gene (Amst.)
196,
127-137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
McCombie, W. R.,
Heiner, C.,
Kelly, J. M.,
Fitzgerald, M. G.,
and Gocayne, J. D.
(1992)
DNA Seq.
2,
289-296[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Devereaux, J.,
Haeberli, P.,
and Smithies, O.
(1984)
Nucleic Acids Res.
12,
387-395[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
| Mantei, N. (1992) electronic file available on internet via anonymous
ftp from ftp://bio.indiana.edu.molbiol
|
| 17.
|
Bates, P. A.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(1987)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
26,
289-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Ellis, S. L.,
Shakarian, A. M.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(1998)
Exp. Parasitol.
89,
161-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Gottlieb, M.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(1982)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
76-81[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Clayton, C.,
Adams, M.,
Almeida, R.,
Baltz, T.,
Barret, M.,
Bastien, P.,
Belli, S.,
Beverley, S.,
Biteau, N.,
Blackwell, J.,
Blaineau, C.,
Boshart, M.,
Bringaud, F.,
Cross, G.,
Cruz, A.,
Degrave, W.,
Donelson, J., El-,
Sayed, N., Fu, G.,
Ersfeld, K.,
Gibson, W.,
Gull, K.,
Ivens, A.,
Kelly, J.,
Lawson, D.,
Lebowitz, J.,
Majiwa, P.,
Matthews, K.,
Melville, S.,
Merlin, G.,
Michels, P.,
Myler, P.,
Norrish, A.,
Opperdoes, F.,
Papadopoulou, B.,
Parsons, M.,
Seebeck, T.,
Smith, D.,
Stuart, K.,
Turner, M.,
Ullu, E.,
and Vanhamme, L.
(1998)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
97,
221-224[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Zang, W. W.,
Charest, H.,
Ghedin, E.,
and Matlashewski, G.
(1996)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
78,
79-90[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Debrabant, A.,
Ghedin, E.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
16366-16372[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Von Heijne, G.
(1985)
J. Mol. Biol.
184,
99-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Kyte, J.,
and Doolittle, R. F.
(1982)
J. Mol. Biol.
157,
105-132[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Remaley, A. T.,
Das, S.,
Cambell, P. I., La,
Rocca, G. M.,
Pope, M. T.,
and Glew, R. H.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
880-886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Schneider, G.,
Lindqvist, Y.,
and Vihko, P.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
2609-2615[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
LaCount, M. W.,
Handy, G.,
and Lebioda, L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
30406-30409[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Wiese, M.,
Ilg, T.,
Lottspeich, F.,
and Overath, P.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
1067-1074[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Wiese, M.,
Berger, O.,
Stierfhof, Y.-D.,
Wolfram, M.,
Fuchs, M.,
and Overath, P.
(1996)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
82,
153-165[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Joshi and D. M. Dwyer
Molecular and Functional Analyses of a Novel Class I Secretory Nuclease from the Human Pathogen, Leishmania donovani
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 30, 2007;
282(13):
10079 - 10095.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
| <