![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 18069-18076, May 17, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, February 19, 2002
Neuropilin-1 (Npn-1) is a receptor for both
semaphorin 3A (Sema3A) and vascular endothelial growth factor 165 (VEGF165). To understand the role Npn-1 plays as a
receptor for these structurally and functionally unrelated ligands, we
set out to identify structural features of Npn-1 that confer binding to
Sema3A or VEGF165. We constructed Npn-1 variants containing
deletions within the "a" and "b" domains of Npn-1. More than 16 variants were expressed in COS-1 cells and tested for alkaline
phosphatase-Sema3A as well as alkaline phosphatase-VEGF165
binding. Our results indicate that each of the two Npn-1 CUB domains
and the amino-terminal coagulation factor V/VIII domain (CF V/VIII) are
essential for Sema3A binding, but only the amino-terminal Npn-1 CF
V/VIII domain is required for binding to VEGF165. Guided by
the structure of the bovine spermadhesin CUB domain, point mutants
targeting defined surfaces of the Npn-1 a1 CUB domain were generated
and tested for Sema3A and VEGF165 binding. One Npn-1
variant, Npn-12ABC, exhibits complete loss of Sema3A
binding while retaining normal VEGF165 binding. Moreover,
co-immunoprecipitation experiments show that Npn-12ABC can
form a signaling complex with the VEGF165 signaling
receptor KDR/VEGFR-2. These results establish the identity of contact
sites between Npn-1 and its semaphorin ligands, and they provide a
foundation for understanding how Npn-1 functions as a receptor for
distinct classes of ligands in vivo.
A complex but ordered series of axon guidance decisions during
development is critical for the establishment of nervous system structure and function (1). The vertebrate vascular network is
similarly complex, with interconnecting conduits that extend throughout
the body that are often in close anatomical proximity to nerve pathways
(2). Recent evidence suggests that at least some of the same
ligand-receptor systems coordinate development of both the nervous
system and the cardiovascular system. For example, Eph receptors and
their ligands, the ephrins, were first characterized as mediators of
repulsive guidance events crucial for correct navigation of neuronal
growth cones and migrating neural crest cells (3, 4). Their unexpected
role in blood vessel formation was revealed when mutant mice that
lacked either ephrin B2 or its cognate receptor EphB4 were shown to die
during embryogenesis due to cardiovascular dysfunction (5, 6). Consistent with this observation, ephrin B2 and
EphB4 were shown to have a reciprocal expression patterns in
arterial and venous endothelial cells (6).
Another example of a cell surface receptor whose function is required
for development of both the cardiovascular and nervous systems is
neuropilin-1 (Npn-1).1 Npn-1
was first identified by a monoclonal antibody (called A5) isolated in a
screen for cell surface proteins capable of mediating axon guidance
decisions during neural development (7, 8). Since its original
characterization, molecular, cellular, genetic, and biochemical
analyses have shown that Npn-1 is a multifunctional 130-kDa
transmembrane protein capable of binding to distinct ligands belonging
to completely unrelated protein families: the semaphorins and VEGFs
(9-11). Npn-1 can also serve as a heterophilic cell adhesion molecule
in vitro (12, 13).
The semaphorins are a large family of proteins that function in axon
guidance and cell migration. Class 3 semaphorins, which include the
protein semaphorin 3A (Sema3A), are well characterized members of the
semaphorin family. In vitro studies have demonstrated that
Npn-1 is the ligand binding component of the Sema3A holoreceptor complex (9, 10). Npn-1 is expressed in specific classes of developing
neurons and is required for repulsive axon guidance mediated by Sema3A
(7-10, 13, 14). Recently, members of the plexin family of large
multidomain transmembrane proteins have been shown to physically
associate with Npn-1 and together form the functional Sema3A receptor
(15, 16). The Npn-1-plexin A1 complex exhibits an enhanced
binding affinity for Sema3A as compared with Npn-1 alone (15), and a
mouse with a targeted deletion of one plexin, PlexA3,
exhibits defects in class 3 semaphorin-mediated axon repulsion
(17).
VEGF family members are critical regulators of vasculogenesis,
angiogenesis, and vascular remodeling. The biological effects of VEGFs
are mediated by the receptor tyrosine kinases Flt-1 (VEGFR-1), Flk-1/KDR (VEGFR-2), and VEGFR-3 (18, 19). Interestingly, select
isoforms of the VEGF family, including VEGF165, also bind with high affinity to Npn-1 (11). Expression of Npn-1 in endothelial cells enhances both affinity labeling of VEGF165 to VEGFR-2
and VEGF165-induced endothelial cell chemotaxis (11, 20).
Thus, Npn-1 acts as a VEGF165 co-receptor that augments the
ability of VEGF165 to activate VEGFR-2. Npn-1 has also been
shown to form a complex with VEGFR-2 (21). Therefore, Npn-1 serves as a
ligand-binding subunit in receptor complexes for structurally distinct
ligands, the secreted semaphorins and VEGF165. Consistent
with that idea, npn-1 mutant mice exhibit defects in
projections of spinal and cranial nerves, and they die during
midgestation due to severe cardiovascular dysfunction (22, 23). Defects
observed in these mice could result from a loss of semaphorin-Npn-1
and/or VEGF-Npn-1 signaling.
To dissect the molecular mechanisms that contribute to vascular and
neuronal functions of Npn-1, we and others have sought to identify
structural features of Npn-1 that confer binding to its ligands. Npn-1
has a large extracellular domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a
very short cytoplasmic domain (24). The Npn-1 extracellular domain
contains two domains with homology to complement components C1r and C1s
(CUB domains, also called "a1" and "a2") at the amino terminus,
followed by two coagulation factor V/VIII domains (CF V/VIII, also
called "b1" and "b2"), and one C-terminal MAM
(meprin, A5, µ-phosphatase) domain (also called "c"). The secreted class 3 semaphorins contain three
domains: a long amino-terminal semaphorin domain (sema), which is the
signature domain of this family, an immunoglobulin (Ig) domain, and a
positively charged carboxyl-terminal basic domain (25). Previous work
has shown that the sema domain of Sema3A can bind to Npn-1 and that it
is necessary for Sema3A repulsive activity on neurons. The Sema3A
Ig-basic region alone cannot elicit biological activity, although it
can bind to Npn-1 with a much lower affinity than the intact Sema3A
protein (26, 27).
Each of the Npn-1 extracellular domains is required for biological
activity mediated by Sema3A (28-30), but only the CUB domains are
required for binding to the sema domain of Sema3A. (31). Moreover, a
Npn-1 variant lacking both a1 and a2 CUB domains is incapable of
binding to Sema3A but does bind to VEGF165. In contrast, deletion of both Npn-1 b domains abolishes binding of both Sema3A and
VEGF165 (31). These results suggest that the Npn-1 binding determinants for Sema3A and VEGF165 may be distinct. Here
we report the identification of amino acid residues within the Npn-1
CUB domains that are required for Sema3A binding but not
VEGF165 binding. We find that amino acid substitutions
within two adjacent hydrophilic loops of the amino-terminal Npn-1 CUB
domain dramatically reduce binding to class 3 semaphorins without
affecting VEGF165 binding. In addition to providing insight
into the nature of the interactions between Npn-1 and its distinct
ligands, these results establish a foundation for understanding how
Npn-1 functions as a receptor for distinct classes of ligands in
vivo and may also provide a basis for rational drug design.
Neuropilin-1 Constructs--
Npn-1 deletion constructs for
ligand-binding assays were created by inverse PCR using the ExSite kit
(Stratagene). Full-length rat Npn-1 in the expression vector pMT21
served as a template for PCRs using oligonucleotide pairs that flanked
the region of interest, including a1, a2, b1, and b2. The
oligonucleotides contained a SalI restriction site at their
5'-ends. Following amplification, inverse PCR products were digested
with SalI and circularized by ligation yielding Npn-1
deletion constructs:
Npn-1 mutation constructs including Npn-12I,
Npn-12AB, Npn-12C, Npn-13D, and
Npn-12ABC were created by three PCR steps. Full-length
Npn-1 in the expression vector pMT21 served as a template for the first
two PCRs using two pairs of primers. The 5' primer from the first pair
(nucleotides 6-18) includes a native EcoRI site. The
3' primer from the first pair and the 5' primer from the second pair
overlap and include the introduced mutations. The 3' primer from the
second pair of primers (nucleotides 2515-2539) contains a native
EcoRV restriction site. The mixture of these first two
purified PCR products then served as a template for the third PCR,
using the 5' primer from the first pair and the 3' primer from the
second pair. Following amplification, the third PCR product was
double-digested with EcoRI/EcoRV and subsequently
used to replace the corresponding region of wild type Npn-1 in pMT21.
This yielded the following Npn-1 mutation constructs:
Npn-12I, Npn-12AB, Npn-12C, and
Npn-13D. Mutant Npn-12ABC was created by using
Npn-12AB as a template for the first two PCRs, and the same
primers were used for generating Npn-12C. All PCR products
and cloning sites were sequenced, and the expression of correctly sized
Npn-1 mutants was confirmed by immunoblotting.
Ligand Preparation--
AP-tagged ligands were produced in HEK
293T cells. DNA was introduced into cells by LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen). Conditioned medium was harvested 48 h
posttransfection. Ligand concentration was determined as described
(37), assuming a specific activity of 2000 units/mg. AP-VEGF cDNA
was obtained from Dr. Michael Klagsbrun (Harvard Medical School).
VEGF165 used for VEGFR-2 phosphorylation experiments was
obtained from Sigma.
Binding Assays--
AP-ligand binding assays were performed as
described (31). Briefly, Npn-1 constructs were expressed in COS-1 cells
following transfection using LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen). Forty-eight
hours posttransfection, cells were incubated with various AP-tagged ligands or with anti-Npn-1 (anti-b2/c domains) (10) for cell surface
expression. Bound AP activity values were normalized for protein
concentration and Npn-1 cell surface expression levels. The normalized
AP values for Npn-1 variants were then reported as percentage binding
relative to wild-type Npn-1.
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblotting--
HEK 293T cells were
co-transfected with an expression vector encoding Myc-Plex A1 (4 µg;
a gift from Dr. Stephen M. Strittmatter, Yale University) and an
expression vector encoding various Npn-1 variants (4 µg) using
LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen). After 2 days, cells were lysed with
ice-cold immunoprecipitation buffer (IP buffer; 50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1% Nonidet P-40, 2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM polyvinylidene difluoride, 0.3 µM
aprotinin, and 10 µM leupeptin). Insoluble proteins were
removed by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 10 min at
4 °C. The concentration of total soluble proteins was determined by
the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad). Immunoprecipitations were
performed using 0.5 mg of protein in a volume of 0.5 ml to which 2 µl
of anti-Myc (9E10) ascites was added. Immunocomplexes were
recovered using an excess of protein G-Sepharose (Gammanbind; Amersham
Biosciences). Following several washes in IP buffer, proteins were
eluted in Laemmli sample buffer and then heated at 100 °C for 5 min.
Proteins were electrophoresed through standard SDS-polyacrylamide gels
and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Membranes were
then blocked with TBS containing 0.5% nonfat dried milk and 0.1%
Tween 20 and probed with anti-Npn-1 (10) polyclonal rabbit IgG (0.5 µg/ml). Then blots were probed with peroxidase-conjugated donkey
anti-rabbit Ig (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (1:5000), and bound
secondary antibody was detected with a chemiluminescent peroxidase
substrate (Super Signal; Pierce). The same blot was stripped with
stripping buffer (62.5 mM Tris base, 2% SDS, and 0.7%
HEK 293T cells were transfected with expression vector for VEGFR-2 (4 µg; a gift from Dr. Cam Patterson, University of North Carolina),
together with an expression vector for various Npn-1 constructs (4 µg) by the LipofectAMINE method (Invitrogen). After 48 h, the
cells were rinsed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, serum-starved (2-3 h, 37 °C), and then treated with 1 nM VEGF for 5 min at 37 °C. Cells were lysed with IP
buffer containing sodium orthovanadate (1 mM), and the
samples were immunoprecipitated with anti-Npn-1 (1 µg/ml). Samples
were then washed with IP buffer, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and transferred
onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked
with TBS containing 3% BSA, 1% normal donkey serum, and 0.1% Tween
20. The membranes were then probed with primary antibody 4G10
anti-phosphotyrosine (0.5 µg/ml; Upstate Biotechnology Inc., Lake
Placid, NY) and peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-mouse (Amersham
Biosciences) secondary antibody. Membranes were stripped and
reprocessed for VEGFR-2 normalization using the polyclonal Ab R2.2
(21).
Cell Surface Binding Analysis and Immunocytochemistry--
COS-1
cells were transfected with 1 µg of pMT21, pMT21-Npn-1, or
pMT21-Npn-12ABC using LipofectAMINE. After 48 h, cells
were subjected either to cell surface binding analysis (37) or to cell
surface Npn-1 immunocytochemistry. Immunocytochemistry was performed
without fixation by incubating cells with blocking solution (5% goat
serum in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium) for 20 min at 4 °C,
followed by anti-Npn-1 (1:250 dilution in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium containing 2% goat serum) for 30 min at room temperature.
Afterward, the cells were washed three times with PBS and fixed with
4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. The cells were
washed with PBS an additional three times and incubated with secondary
Oregon Green 488 goat anti-rabbit (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR) at a dilution of 1:1000. Cells were then visualized under fluorescent microscopy.
Iodination of VEGF165--
The iodination of
VEGF165 was performed as previously reported (21). Briefly,
5 µg of carrier-free human recombinant VEGF165 was
suspended in 90 µl of Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline. To the
reaction tube, 1 mCi of Na125I was added, followed by 40 µl of chloramine T (1 µg/µl in 0.5 M sodium phosphate
buffer, pH 7.5) and incubated for 1 min. 50 µl of sodium
metabisulfite (2 µg/µl in sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5) was
added to stop the reaction. 500 µl of column elution buffer (0.5%
BSA, 0.01% Tween 20 in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline) was
added to the reaction and transferred to preequilibrated PD-10 column
for separation from unreacted iodine. The specific activity was
corrected for column recovery and varied from 5,500 to 7,500 Ci/mmol.
Saturation Analysis and Nonlinear Curve Fitting--
The
saturation analysis was performed as previously reported (21). Briefly,
COS-1 cells transiently expressing either the Npn-1 or the
Npn-12ABC mutant receptor were plated at 2 × 105 cells/well in a 12-well plate 24 h prior to
experimentation. The following morning, the cells were rinsed with 1 ml
of binding buffer (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 0.2% BSA, 25 mM HEPES) and were preequilibrated in the same buffer for
1 h at 4 °C. Increasing concentrations (30-5000
pM) of [125I]VEGF165 were added
in binding buffer containing a protease inhibitor mixture (final
concentration as follows: leupeptin, 10 µg/ml; antipain, 10 µg/ml;
aprotinin, 50 µg/ml; benzamine, 100 µg/ml; soybean trypsin
inhibitor, 100 µg/ml; bestatin, 10 µg/ml; pepstatin 10 µg/ml;
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.3 mM) and 1 µg/ml
heparin in the presence or absence of 30 nM unlabeled
VEGF165 to estimate nonspecific binding. The nonspecific
binding was linear over the indicated tracer concentration range (data
not shown). The binding reaction was allowed to reach equilibrium (4 h
at 4 °C), and the unbound ligand was removed by washing three times
(1 ml) with ice-cold BSA-free binding buffer. The cells were lysed with
250 µl of RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaI,
0.5% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% BSA, 0.1% SDS) and
counted using a Modeling/Solvent Exposure--
The bovine spermadhesin CUB
domain was displayed, and side chain was changed to the corresponding
residues in Npn-1 using the program O (39). Fractional solvent
accessibilities were calculated using the program X-PLOR (40).
Binding Domains of Npn-1 for VEGF165 and Sema3A Are
Distinct--
We set out to identify structural features of Npn-1 that
confer binding to VEGF165 and Sema3A, two structurally
unrelated ligands with distinct functions. Using a PCR-based
mutagenesis approach, we constructed a battery of Npn-1 variants
harboring different deletions within the CUB and CF-V/VIII domains.
Npn-1 variants lacking individual CUB (a1 or a2) or CF-V/VIII (b1 or b2) domains were generated (Fig.
1A) and expressed in COS-1
cells. Expression of these variants was confirmed by anti-Npn-1 Western blots and cell surface immunostaining in the absence of detergent. Each
variant was tested for its ability to bind to Sema3A and VEGF165 ligands fused at their N termini to alkaline
phosphatase (AP-Sema3A and AP-VEGF165). Both of these AP
fusion proteins bind with high affinity to Npn-1 (10, 20). Fig. 1
depicts four of the Npn-1 deletion variants and their AP-Sema3A and
AP-VEGF165 binding properties. Deletion of either the a1 or
a2 CUB domains abolished AP-Sema3A binding but had relatively little
effect on VEGF165 binding (Fig. 1, C and
D). In contrast, deletion of the b1 CF-V/VIII domain
abolished binding to both ligands (Fig. 1, C and
D). Deletion of the b2 CF-V/VIII domain did not abolish binding to either ligand (Fig. 1, C and D),
although reduced binding of AP-VEGF165 to the b2 deletion
variant was consistently observed. These results suggest that each of
the CUB domains is essential for Sema3A but not VEGF165
binding, and the b1 CF-V/VIII region is required for binding to both
ligands.
Mutations in Two a1 CUB Domain Loop Regions Completely Abolish
AP-Sema-Fc Binding without Affecting AP-VEGF165
Binding--
To further refine our characterization of distinct ligand
binding sites on Npn-1, candidate Sema3A-binding residues were sought by generating a three-dimensional model of the Npn-1 a1 CUB domain. Using the crystal structure of the bovine spermadhesin CUB domain (32)
and an alignment of the Npn-1 a1 and spermadhesin CUB domain amino acid
sequences, we identified four loop regions in the Npn-1 a1 CUB domain
that are likely to be solvent-exposed (Fig.
2, labeled red (2I),
pink (2AB), light green (2C), and
dark green (3D)). Three of these (2AB, 2C, and
3D) reside on one side of the predicted a1 CUB domain, whereas the
fourth (2I) lies on the opposite side. Solvent-exposed regions were
sought because they are likely to mediate interactions with ligands,
and mutations at such sites are less likely to disrupt global
structure. Residues of the four regions selected for mutation (2A, 2B,
2C, and 2I) were not only solvent-exposed but were also different,
based on their sequence alignment, from the corresponding neuropilin-2
amino acids. New variants harboring substitutions of either two or
three amino acids in each of these four regions (Npn-12I,
Npn-12AB, Npn-12C, and Npn-13D)
were generated. Charged residues were substituted with oppositely charged residues in these variants, as shown in Fig. 2B.
These four Npn-1 variants were subsequently tested for their ability to
bind Npn-1 ligands.
Npn-12I, Npn-12AB, Npn-12C, and
Npn-13D were each expressed in transfected COS-1 cells
(Fig. 3A). Whole cell binding
assays were performed using these variants and wild type Npn-1 (Fig.
3B). AP-Sema-Fc, a fusion protein in which the Sema3A Ig and
basic domains were replaced by the immunoglobulin Fc domain (31), was
used in these assays instead of an AP-Sema3A protein. This was done to
eliminate any binding contribution of the Sema3A Ig region to the Npn-1 b1 CF-V/VIII domain, an interaction that in the absence of the Sema3A
sema domain does not result in signaling.
Interestingly, the three variants having substitutions residing on the
same face of the predicted a1 CUB domain (Npn-12AB,
Npn-12C, and Npn-13D) each exhibited
dramatically reduced levels of AP-Sema-Fc binding, whereas
Npn-12I, which has substitutions located on the opposite
side of the a1 CUB domain, did not exhibit altered AP-Sema-Fc binding
(Fig. 3B). Therefore, we postulated that the natural
residues on adjacent loop regions might coordinately interact with the
sema domain of Sema3A. To test this idea, an additional Npn-1 variant,
Npn-12ABC, was generated by combining the 2AB and 2C
substitutions. Npn-12ABC contains a five-amino acid
substitution in one surface loop and a two-amino acid substitution in
the adjacent loop on the same face of the a1 CUB domain (Fig.
2B). Although Npn-12ABC was expressed in COS
cells at levels similar to wild-type Npn-1 (Fig. 3A), its
binding to AP-Sema-Fc was undetectable in the solution AP activity
assay (Fig. 3B). Cell surface binding of AP-Sema3A, AP-VEGF165, and AP-SemaFc to
Npn-12ABC-expressing COS-1 cells was also visualized by
alkaline phosphatase histochemical staining (Fig. 3C). There
was a complete absence of AP-Sema3A and AP-SemaFc staining in
Npn-12ABC-expressing COS cells (Fig. 3C,
f and i), although Npn-12ABC is
expressed on the plasma membrane as determined by immunostaining with
anti-Npn-1 in living cells (Fig. 3C, c). The
binding of AP-VEGF165 to Npn-12ABC-expressing
cells appeared normal (Fig. 3C, i). To confirm
that Npn-12ABC exhibits normal, high affinity
VEGF165 binding, we performed a saturation binding analysis
of VEGF165 for wild-type Npn-1 and Npn-12ABC.
For these experiments, wild-type Npn-1 and Npn-12ABC were
transiently expressed in COS-1 cells, and whole cell saturation analyses using [125I]VEGF165 were performed 2 days later. The calculated Kd for
Npn-12ABC is 1.48 nM, which is approximately
equivalent to that of wild type Npn-1 (Kd = 0.93 nM) (Fig. 3D). The lower
Bmax value obtained for VEGF165
binding to Npn-12ABC is the result of lower expression
levels of Npn-12ABC in these binding experiments (data not
shown). Therefore, the 2ABC mutations define a1 CUB domain loop regions
that are required for Sema3A but not VEGF165 binding to
Npn-1.
Mutation 2ABC Abolishes Npn-1 Binding to Other Class 3 Semaphorins--
In addition to Sema3A, other class 3 semaphorins,
including Sema3F and Sema3C, can bind to Npn-1 (27). Therefore, whole cell binding experiments were performed using AP-Sema3A, AP-Sema3C, and
AP-Sema3F to determine whether the Npn-1 2ABC region is required for
binding to these class 3 semaphorins. In these assays,
Npn-12ABC exhibited markedly reduced binding to each of the
class 3 semaphorins tested (Fig. 4).
Sema3A, Sema3C, and Sema3F binding to Npn-1 was affected to a similar
extent by the 2ABC mutation. The small amount of residual binding of
these semaphorin ligands to Npn-12ABC may result from an
interaction between the carboxyl-terminal immunoglobulin and/or basic
regions of class 3 semaphorins and the b1 CF-V/VIII domain of Npn-1.
Thus, the sema domains of the different class 3 semaphorins bind to the
same surface region of Npn-1.
Npn-12ABC Exhibits Normal Binding to Plexin A1 and
VEGFR-2--
In addition to its ability to bind structurally distinct
ligands, Npn-1 directly interacts with multiple transmembrane
signal-transducing receptor subunits. Members of the plexin family of
transmembrane proteins are signal-transducing subunits of holoreceptors
for class 3 semaphorins, whereas VEGFR-2 is a signaling receptor for VEGF165 (19, 26). Both plexin A1 and VEGFR-2 form complexes with Npn-1 in a ligand-independent manner. The regions of interaction between Npn-1 and plexin A1 as well as Npn-1 and VEGFR-2 are not yet
established. It is interesting to note that plexins have sema domains
distantly related to the sema domains of the semaphorin ligands, and it
is possible that the Npn-1 CUB domains interact with the sema domains
of both the secreted semaphorins and plexins. Therefore, we next sought
to establish whether the 2ABC surface of the Npn-1 a1 CUB domain
contributes to the association between Npn-1 and either plexin A1 or
VEGFR-2.
We performed a coimmunoprecipitation assay to compare the abilities of
wild-type Npn-1 and Npn-12ABC to associate with plexin A1.
Wild-type Npn-1 and the Npn-12ABC variant were co-expressed
with Myc-tagged plexin A1 in HEK293T cells, and complexes were
immunoprecipitated using anti-Myc. Anti-Npn-1 immunoblots of the
anti-Myc immune complexes demonstrated that comparable amounts of Npn-1
and Npn-12ABC co-precipitated with Myc-plexin A1 (Fig.
5A). Reprobing the same blot
with anti-Myc showed equal amounts of plexin A1 in the complexes (Fig.
5B). Moreover, levels of expression of Npn-1 and
Npn-12ABC were similar (Fig. 5C). Therefore, in
contrast to its role in binding to the sema domain of class 3 semaphorins, the 2ABC surface region of Npn-1 is not required for its
association with plexin A1.
Npn-1 and VEGFR-2 form a complex in transfected COS-1 cells as well
as in cultured endothelial cells, and this complex is responsible for
the different relative potencies of VEGF isoforms in VEGFR-2
autophosphorylation assays (21). To determine whether the 2ABC surface
of the Npn-1 a1 CUB domain contributes to the formation of the
Npn-1·VEGFR-2 complex or VEGF165-mediated VEGFR-2 phosphorylation, additional co-transfection experiments were performed. Wild-type Npn-1 and Npn-12ABC were co-expressed with
VEGFR-2 in HEK293T cells. Cells were treated with VEGF165
(1 nM) for 5 min and then lysed. Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-Npn-1, and immune complexes were blotted
with anti-phosphotyrosine (Fig.
6A). VEGF165
treatment resulted in similar levels of tyrosine-phosphorylated VEGFR-2 detected in Npn-1 immune complexes obtained from Npn-1 and
Npn-12ABC-expressing cells (Fig. 6A). The
tyrosine-phosphorylated bands were shown to be VEGFR-2 by reprobing the
blot with anti-VEGFR-2 (Fig. 6B). Importantly, levels of
expression of Npn-1 and Npn-12ABC were similar in the
matched lysates (Fig. 6C). Therefore, the 2ABC mutation
affected neither VEGF165 ligand binding nor Npn-1/VEGFR-2 association. Furthermore, the ability of VEGF165 to induce
VEGFR-2 autophosphorylation within the VEGFR-2·Npn-1 complex was
unaltered by the 2ABC mutation.
Guided by the structure of the bovine spermadhesin CUB domain
(32), we have identified seven amino acids located on two adjacent
hydrophilic loops of the amino-terminal Npn-1 CUB domain that are
critical for binding to the sema domain of class 3 semaphorins. This
surface region does not contribute to the binding of a structurally unrelated Npn-1 ligand, VEGF165, nor is it required for
association between Npn-1 and two of its signaling partners, plexin A1
and VEGFR-2. The identification of Npn-1 residues that comprise binding sites for distinct ligands should facilitate elucidation of the in vivo functions of Npn-1 as a receptor for distinct
ligands and, possibly, the design of useful modulators or inhibitors of semaphorin/Npn-1 signaling.
The finding that Npn-12ABC associates normally with plexin
A1 is interesting, because, like the semaphorin ligands, plexins
contain sema domains that can bind to Npn-1 (15, 16, 33). While it is
not known whether plexin sema domains interact with Npn-1 CUB domains,
our results indicate that the 2ABC surface of the Npn-1 a1 CUB domain
is not an obligatory site of contact between plexin A1 and Npn-1.
Indeed, previous findings have indicated that multiple Npn-1 domains
contribute to the Npn-1-plexin A1 association (15). Since multiple
Npn-1 extracellular domains also appear to contribute to Npn-1
homomultimerization and heteromultimerization with neuropilin-2 (29,
31), and since the Npn-1 CUB domains are dispensable for Npn-1
multimerization, it is likely that Npn-12ABC retains the
capacity to form homo- and heteromultimers. Moreover, examination of
the CUB domain dimer of major seminal plasma glycoproteins I and II
(1SPP.pdb) reveals that the 2ABC region is not part of the dimer
interface (32).
Npn-1 appears to be a remarkably versatile protein, because it serves
as a binding subunit of receptor complexes for members of structurally
distinct ligand families, the semaphorins and the VEGFs. The in
vivo function of Npn-1 as the obligate ligand binding subunit of
the Sema3A holoreceptor is well established (22, 26, 27). However, the
role of Npn-1 as a necessary co-receptor for VEGF165
signaling during development of the cardiovascular system is less
clear. Expression of Npn-1 in vascular endothelial cells enhances both
the affinity labeling of VEGF165 to VEGFR-2 and
VEGF165-induced cell chemotaxis (11, 20). Other recent studies have shown that Npn-1 does not augment VEGF165's
ability to bind to VEGFR-2 but rather increases its ability to promote autophosphorylation of VEGFR-2 (21). It is also possible that Sema3C-Npn-1 signaling is required for proper cardiac neural crest cell
migration into the proximal cardiac outflow tract during development
(34). Therefore, the cardiovascular defects in npn-1 null
mice may be the result of a deficiency in semaphorin-Npn-1 signaling,
VEGF-Npn-1 signaling or, perhaps most likely, both. Another striking
feature of the npn-1 null mouse is the severe impairment of
vascularization of the developing nervous system (22). Thus, Npn-1 may
transmit semaphorin and/or VEGF family member signals within vascular
endothelial cells to promote neovasularization of the developing
nervous system.
VEGF and semaphorins may also have antagonistic effects on both neurons
and vascular endothelial cells. VEGF165 and Sema3A compete
with each other in an endothelial motility assay, for sensory neuron
growth cone collapse, and also in their ability to bind to Npn-1 (20).
VEGF165 can also antagonize Sema3A-induced apoptosis of
neurons (35). Finally, VEGF165 promotes growth of DRG
sensory neuron axons, whereas Sema3A induces DRG axon repulsion and
growth cone collapse (36). Thus, the precise roles of semaphorin-Npn-1 signaling, VEGF-Npn-1 signaling, and antagonistic interactions between
Npn-1 ligands may be difficult to glean from simple comparisons between
npn-1 null mice and mice harboring null mutations in genes encoding Npn-1 ligands. Our identification of Npn-1 variants that are
defective in semaphorin-Npn-1 but not VEGF165-Npn-1
binding and signaling and our current analysis of the phenotype of mice harboring the 2ABC mutation introduced into the npn-1 locus
should help to establish the in vivo roles of Npn-1 as a
multifunctional and versatile receptor. The identification of subtle
mutations in the Npn-1 b1 CF-V/VIII region, which serves as the binding site for VEGF165, should provide a reciprocal tool for
establishing the in vivo roles of VEGF-Npn-1 interactions.
We thank Andrea Huber-Broesamle and Dori
Reimert for comments on the manuscript, Dori Reimert for excellent
technical assistance, and members of the Ginty and Kolodkin
laboratories for helpful discussions. We thank M. Klagsbrun for the
AP-VEGF construct, S. Strittmatter for the Myc-plexin A1 construct, and
C. Patterson for the VEGFR-2 expression construct.
*
This work was supported by National Institute of Mental
Health Grant R01MH59199 (to D. D. G. and A. L. K.), the Howard
Hughes Medical Institute (to D. J. L. and D. D. G.), the McKnight
Endowment Fund for Neuroscience (to A. L. K.), and National
Institutes of Health National Research Service Award 5F32NS11016-02
(to C. G.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
**
To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Neuroscience, The
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe St.,
Baltimore, MD 21205. E-mail: dginty@jhmi.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201681200
The abbreviations used are:
Npn-1, neuropilin-1;
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor;
Sema3A, semaphorin 3A;
IP
buffer, immunoprecipitation buffer;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
AP, alkaline phosphatase.
Characterization of Neuropilin-1 Structural Features That
Confer Binding to Semaphorin 3A and Vascular Endothelial
Growth Factor 165*
§,
,
,
§**, and

Department of Neuroscience,
§ Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and
Department of
Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University
School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205 and ¶ Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Mason, Ohio 45040
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
a1+7 (T30-145E),
a2 (146C-274K),
b1(275C-370P), and
b2 (371C-587V). All cloning sites were
sequenced, and the expression of correctly sized Npn-1 deletion mutants
was confirmed by immunoblotting.
-mercaptoethanol) for 1 h at room temperature and reprobed with
anti-Myc primary antibody (1:2000 dilution) and peroxidase-conjugated
sheep anti-mouse (Amersham Biosciences) secondary antibody. Control
lysates from matched samples were prepared without immunoprecipitation
and processed identically as the immunoprecipitated samples described
above using anti-Npn-1.
-counter. The maximum number of binding sites
(Bmax) and the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) values were obtained using the Prism software
package, which performs a statistical assessment of goodness of fit to a one-binding site versus a two-binding site model. This
methodology is preferred over the Scatchard analysis, since it does not
require a transformation and linearization of the data, which is known to distort the experimental errors associated with radioligand-binding data (38). In all cases described herein, the optimal fit of the data
was to a one-binding site model (data not shown). The data points in
all curves were determined in triplicate. The lower Bmax value observed for the mutant receptor (as
compared with the wild type receptor; see Table I) can be attributed to
the lower expression level of mature protein for the mutant receptor in
the COS-1 transient expression system (data not shown).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The Neuropilin-1 a (CUB) and b (CF V/VIII)
domains differentially confer Sema3A and VEGF165
binding. A, schematic representation of neuropilin-1
(Npn-1) and Npn-1 deletion mutants. B, Western blot analysis
of expression of wild type and various neuropilin-1 deletion mutants in
transfected COS-1 cells. Immunoblot with anti-Npn-1 demonstrates
comparable expression levels of all variants. C,
quantitation of AP-Sema3A binding to full-length Npn-1 and Npn-1
deletion mutants. Full-length Npn-1 and deletion mutants were expressed
in COS-1 cells. The bound AP activity values were obtained using
whole-cell AP-Sema3A (4 nM) and AP-VEGF165 (4 nM) binding assays. The bound AP activities were normalized
for protein concentration and cell surface expression of Npn-1
proteins. The normalized AP values of different deletion mutants were
then compared with full-length Npn-1, here presented as percentage of
binding compared with wild-type Npn-1. D, quantitation of
AP-VEGF165 binding to full-length Npn-1 and Npn-1 deletion
mutants. Shown are the means ± S.E. from three separate binding
experiments.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Sites of Npn-1 mutations on a
ribbon diagram of the bovine spermadhesin
CUB domain. A, side chains of bovine spermadhesin were
changed to the corresponding Npn-1 residues and displayed on a
ribbon diagram of the bovine spermadhesin CUB
domain. The ribbon diagram was generated with
program SETOR (41). B, a structure-guided alignment of the
bovine spermadhesin and Npn-1 a1 CUB domain. Positions of the
spermadhesin
-strands are indicted, and buried residues (FSA
0.1) are indicated by filled ovals, exposed
residues (FSA
0.4) are indicated by open
ovals, and partially buried residues (FSA = 0.1-0.4)
are indicted by half-filled ovals.

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Point mutations on the predicted surface
loops of the Npn-1 a1 CUB domain differentially affect Sema3A and
VEGF165 binding. A, Western blot analysis
of COS-1 cell expression of wild-type and various Npn-1 side chain
mutants. Immunoblot with anti-Npn-1 shows comparable expression levels
of all variants. B, quantitation of the sema domain of
Sema3A (AP-SemaFc) (7 nM) binding to wild-type Npn-1 and
Npn-1 variants harboring various a1 CUB domain side chain mutations.
C, cell surface expression and ligand binding of Npn-1 and
Npn-12ABC. COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with
expression vectors encoding either Npn-1 (b, e,
h, and k), Npn-12ABC (c,
f, i, and l), or vector alone
(a, d, g, and j). Binding
of full-length Sema3A (AP-Sema3A) (d-f), the sema domain of
Sema3A (AP-SemaFc) (g-i), and VEGF165 (AP-VEGF)
(j-l) was visualized by alkaline phosphatase
histochemistry. Note that there is no binding of the full-length or
sema domain of Sema3A to Npn-12ABC despite expression of
the protein on the cell surface (c). In contrast,
VEGF165 does bind Npn-12ABC (l).
a-c, immunostaining of cell surface wild type and
Npn-12ABC in living (nonpermeabilized) cells with
anti-Npn-1 polyclonal antibodies. D,
[125I]VEGF165 binding parameters for wild
type Npn-1 and Npn-12ABC variant. Dissociation constant
(Kd) and the predicted maximum number of binding
sites (Bmax) values were determined using
saturation binding and nonlinear curve fitting analyses. Shown are
means ± S.E. for three separate experiments. The lower
Bmax value observed for Npn-12ABC is
due to the lower expression levels of Npn-12ABC in the
COS-1 transient expression system (data not shown).

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Npn-12ABC does not bind other
class 3 semaphorins. Quantitation of binding with AP-Sema3A (5 nM), AP-Sema3C (5 nM), and AP-Sema3F (5 nM) to wild-type and Npn-12ABC. Shown are the
means ± S.E. from three separate binding experiments.

View larger version (74K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Npn-12ABC forms a
normal complex with its co-receptor plexin A1. HEK293T cells were
transfected with Npn-1, Npn-12ABC, or vector together with
Myc-tagged plexin A1. Cell lysates were subjected to
immunoprecipitation using anti-Myc and blotted with anti-Npn-1
(A). The same blot was stripped and reblotted with anti-Myc
(B). Lysates from the same set of samples used for
immunoprecipitation were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with
anti-Npn-1 (C). This experiment was done three times with
similar results.

View larger version (78K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Association of Npn-12ABC with
VEGFR-2 is normal, as is its ability to mediate
VEGF165-dependent phosphorylation of
VEGFR-2. HEK293T cells were transfected with expression vectors
encoding either Npn-1, Npn-12ABC, or vector together with
vectors encoding VEGFR-2. Cells were treated with VEGF165
(1 nM) or vehicle for 5 min and then lysed. Cell lysates
were subjected to immunoprecipitation using anti-Npn-1 and blotted with
anti-phosphotyrosine (4G10) (A) or anti-VEGFR-2
(B). Lysates from the same set of samples used for
immunoprecipitation were resolved by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with
anti-Npn-1 (C). Note that VEGF165 induced
similar levels of VEGFR-2 phosphorylation in VEGFR-2/Npn-1-expressing
cells and VEGFR-2/Npn-12ABC-expressing cells. This
experiment was done three times with similar results.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES

To whom correspondence may be addressed: Dept. of Neuroscience,
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe St.,
Baltimore, MD 21205. E-mail: kolodkin@jhmi.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Tessier-Lavigne, M.,
and Goodman, C. S.
(1996)
Science
274,
1123-1133 2.
Shima, D. T.,
and Mailhos, C.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
10,
536-542[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 3.
Holder, N.,
and Klein, R.
(1999)
Development
126,
2033-2044[Abstract] 4.
Wilkinson, D. G.
(2000)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
196,
177-244[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 5.
Gerety, S. S.,
Wang, H. U.,
Chen, Z. F.,
and Anderson, D. J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell
4,
403-414[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 6.
Wang, H. U.,
Chen, Z. F.,
and Anderson, D. J.
(1998)
Cell
93,
741-753[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 7.
Takagi, S.,
Tsuji, T.,
Amagai, T.,
Takamatsu, T.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(1987)
Dev. Biol.
122,
90-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 8.
Takagi, S.,
Hirata, T.,
Agata, K.,
Mochii, M.,
Eguchi, G.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(1991)
Neuron
7,
295-307[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 9.
He, Z.,
and Tessier-Lavigne, M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
739-751[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 10.
Kolodkin, A. L.,
Levengood, D. V.,
Rowe, E. G.,
Tai, U.-T.,
Giger, R. J.,
and Ginty, D. D.
(1997)
Cell
90,
753-762[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 11.
Soker, S.,
Takashima, S.,
Miao, H.-Q.,
Neufeld, G.,
and Klagsbrun, M.
(1998)
Cell
92,
735-745[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 12.
Shimizu, M.,
Murakami, Y.,
Suto, F.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
148,
1283-1293 13.
Takagi, S.,
Kasuya, Y.,
Shimizu, M.,
Matsuura, T.,
Tsuboi, M.,
Kawakami, A.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(1995)
Dev. Biol.
170,
207-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 14.
Kawakami, A.,
Kitsukawa, T.,
Takagi, S.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(1996)
J. Neurobiol.
29,
1-17[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 15.
Takahashi, T.,
Fournier, A.,
Nakamura, F.,
Wang, L.-H.,
Murakami, Y.,
Kalb, R. G.,
Fujisawa, H.,
and Strittmatter, S. M.
(1999)
Cell
99,
59-69[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 16.
Tamagnone, L.,
Artigiani, S.,
Chen, H., He, Z.,
Ming, G.-L.,
Song, H.-J.,
Chedotal, A.,
Winberg, M. L.,
Goodman, C. S.,
Poo, M.-M.,
Tessier-Lavigne, M.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1999)
Cell
99,
71-80[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 17.
Cheng, H. J.,
Bagri, A.,
Yaron, A.,
Stein, E.,
Pleasure, S. J.,
and Tessier-Lavigne, M.
(2001)
Neuron
32,
249-263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 18.
Ferrara, N.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
280,
C1358-C1366 19.
Neufeld, G.,
Cohen, T.,
Gengrinovitch, S.,
and Poltorak, Z.
(1999)
FASEB J.
13,
9-22 20.
Miao, H.-Q.,
Soker, S.,
Feiner, L.,
Alonso, J. L.,
Raper, J. A.,
and Klagsbrun, M.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
233-241 21.
Whitaker, G. B.,
Limberg, B. J.,
and Rosenbaum, J. S.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
25520-25531 22.
Kawasaki, T.,
Kitsukawa, T.,
Bekku, Y.,
Matsuda, Y.,
Sanbo, M.,
Yagi, T.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(1999)
Development
126,
4895-4902[Abstract] 23.
Kitsukawa, T.,
Shimizu, M.,
Sanbo, M.,
Hirata, T.,
Taniguchi, M.,
Bekku, Y.,
Yagi, T.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(1997)
Neuron
19,
995-1005[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 24.
Fujisawa, H.,
Kitsukawa, T.,
Kawakami, A.,
Takagi, S.,
Shimizu, M.,
and Hirata, T.
(1997)
Cell Tissue Res.
290,
465-470[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 25.
Semaphorin Nomenclature Committee.
(1999)
Cell
97,
551-552[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 26.
Nakamura, F.,
Kalb, R. G.,
and Strittmatter, S. M.
(2000)
J. Neurobiol.
44,
219-229[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 27.
Raper, J. A.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
10,
88-94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 28.
Chen, H., He, Z.,
Bagri, A.,
and Tessier-Lavigne, M.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
1283-1290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 29.
Nakamura, F.,
Tanaka, M.,
Takahashi, T.,
Kalb, R. G.,
and Strittmatter, S. M.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
1093-1100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 30.
Renzi, M. J.,
Feiner, L.,
Koppel, A. M.,
and Raper, J. A.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
7870-7880 31.
Giger, R. J.,
Urquhart, E. R.,
Gillespie, S. K. H.,
Levengood, D. V.,
Ginty, D. D.,
and Kolodkin, A. L.
(1998)
Neuron
21,
1079-1092[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 32.
Romero, A.,
Romao, M. J.,
Varela, P. F.,
Kolln, I.,
Dias, J. M.,
Carvalho, A. L.,
Sanz, L.,
Topfer-Petersen, E.,
and Calvete, J. J.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
783-788[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 33.
Takahashi, T.,
and Strittmatter, S. M.
(2001)
Neuron
29,
429-439[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 34.
Feiner, L.,
Webber, A. L.,
Brown, C. B., Lu, M. M.,
Jia, L.,
Feinstein, P.,
Mombaerts, P.,
Epstein, J. A.,
and Raper, J. A.
(2001)
Development
128,
3061-3070 35.
Bagnard, D.,
Vaillant, C.,
Khuth, S. T.,
Dufay, N.,
Lohrum, M.,
Puschel, A. W.,
Belin, M. F.,
Bolz, J.,
and Thomasset, N.
(2001)
J. Neurosci.
21,
3332-3341 36.
Sondell, M.,
Sundler, F.,
and Kanje, M.
(2000)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
12,
4243-4254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 37.
Flanagan, J. G.,
and Leder, P.
(1990)
Cell
63,
185-194[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] 38.
Motulsky, H. J.,
and Ransnas, L. A.
(1987)
FASEB J.
1,
365-374[Abstract] 39.
Jones, T. A.,
Zou, J. Y.,
Cowan, S. W.,
and Kjeldgaard.
(1991)
Acta Crystallogr. A
47,
110-119 40.
Brunger, A. T.
(1992)
X-PLOR, Version 3.1., a system for x-ray crystallography and NMR
, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
41.
Evans, S. V.
(1993)
J. Mol. Graph.
11,
127-138
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Uekita, M. Tanaka, M. Takigahira, Y. Miyazawa, Y. Nakanishi, Y. Kanai, K. Yanagihara, and R. Sakai CUB-Domain-Containing Protein 1 Regulates Peritoneal Dissemination of Gastric Scirrhous Carcinoma Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2008; 172(6): 1729 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Narazaki, M. Segarra, and G. Tosato Sulfated polysaccharides identified as inducers of neuropilin-1 internalization and functional inhibition of VEGF165 and semaphorin3A Blood, April 15, 2008; 111(8): 4126 - 4136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Acevedo, S. Barillas, S. M. Weis, J. R. Gothert, and D. A. Cheresh Semaphorin 3A suppresses VEGF-mediated angiogenesis yet acts as a vascular permeability factor Blood, March 1, 2008; 111(5): 2674 - 2680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sulpice, J. Plouet, M. Berge, D. Allanic, G. Tobelem, and T. Merkulova-Rainon Neuropilin-1 and neuropilin-2 act as coreceptors, potentiating proangiogenic activity Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 2036 - 2045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Guttmann-Raviv, N. Shraga-Heled, A. Varshavsky, C. Guimaraes-Sternberg, O. Kessler, and G. Neufeld Semaphorin-3A and Semaphorin-3F Work Together to Repel Endothelial Cells and to Inhibit Their Survival by Induction of Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem., September 7, 2007; 282(36): 26294 - 26305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Geretti, A. Shimizu, P. Kurschat, and M. Klagsbrun Site-directed Mutagenesis in the B-Neuropilin-2 Domain Selectively Enhances Its Affinity to VEGF165, but Not to Semaphorin 3F |