![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 18091-18097, May 17, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
§¶,
§,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
¶¶, and
From the
Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska
Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden, the
Department of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain, the ** Mental Health Institute, University
of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, the

Department of Medicine, Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, the
§§ Department of Biomedical Sciences, University
of Modena, 41100 Modena, Italy, and the ¶¶ National
Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland 21224
Received for publication, August 13, 2001, and in revised form, January 22, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antagonistic and reciprocal interactions are
known to exist between adenosine and dopamine receptors in the
striatum. In the present study, double immunofluorescence experiments
with confocal laser microscopy showed a high degree of colocalization
of adenosine A2A receptors (A2AR) and
dopamine D2 receptors (D2R) in cell membranes of SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells stably transfected with human D2R and in cultured striatal cells.
A2AR/D2R heteromeric complexes were
demonstrated in coimmunoprecipitation experiments in membrane preparations from D2R-transfected SH-SY5Y cells and from
mouse fibroblast Ltk Adenosine and dopamine signaling exert opposite effects in the
basal ganglia, a brain region involved in sensory-motor integration. Thus, adenosine agonists induce motor depression and adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine, produce motor activation (1). These
opposite effects result from specific antagonistic interactions between
subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the striatum, the main
input structure of the basal ganglia. In fact, striatal dopamine
receptors and, to some extent, adenosine receptors are segregated in
the two main populations of Cell Cultures--
Maintenance of SH-SY5Y cells (parental and
D2R-transfected cells) as well as the pharmacological
characterization and maintenance of D2R- and
D1R-transfected mouse fibroblast Ltk Immunolabeling Experiments--
Neuroblastoma cells were grown
on glass coverslips coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma) and
exposed to various amounts of CGS21680 (RBI) and/or quinpirole (RBI) in
serum-free medium for 3 h at 37 °C. They were then rinsed with
PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.06 M sucrose for
15 min, and washed with PBS containing 20 mM glycine. Cells
were subsequently treated with PBS, containing 20 mM
glycine, and 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min at room temperature.
Double immunostaining was performed with fluorescein-conjugated anti-A2AR antibodies (VC21-FITC, 40 µg/ml) (10) and
rhodamine-conjugated anti-D2R antibodies (D2-246-316, 30 µg/ml) (11) for 1 h at 37 °C. Antipeptide antisera against
A2AR were raised in New Zealand White rabbits and
characterized as described elsewhere (12). The specific peptide
corresponds to the second extracellular loop of the receptor.
Anti-A2AR antibodies (VC21) were purified by affinity
chromatography using the specific peptide coupled to activated
thiol-Sepharose 4B. The coverslips were rinsed for 40 min in the same
buffer and mounted with medium suitable for immunofluorescence (ICN).
Internalization assays were made as reported elsewhere (12) with some
modifications. Cells were incubated in serum-free medium (4 °C,
2 h) with VC21-FITC and rhodamine-conjugated D2-246-316 in the
absence (control) or presence of 200 nM CGS 21680 and/or 50 µM quinpirole. Cells were washed with the same medium
(without ligands in the control experiments), and internalization of
labeled receptors was induced by incubation at 37 °C for 3 h.
Cells were fixed and processed as described above. Striatal cultures
were exposed to various amounts of CGS21680 and/or quinpirole in the same medium for 6 h at 37 °C. They were then rinsed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde containing 2% picric acid for 1 h, and washed with PBS supplemented with 20 mM glycine.
Double or single immunostaining was performed with
fluorescein-conjugated anti-A2AR antibodies and
rhodamine-conjugated anti-D2R (D2-246-316) antibodies or
fluorescein-conjugated anti-A1R antibodies (PC21-FITC) (13)
for 1 h at 37 °C. Microscopic observations were made in Leica
TCS 4D (Leica Lasertechnik) confocal scanning laser equipment adapted
to an inverted Leitz DMIRBE microscope. Image analysis was performed
with a KS 400 image analyzer (Zeiss). After acquisition of the
superimposed images (yellow color) of the
A2AR/D2R IR, the area of the cell nucleus was
interactively discarded. Densitometric evaluation was performed on this
new image. The median values of the histograms representing the
intensity of A2R/D2R IR in areas with
coaggregates (interactively encircled) and in areas with no or few
aggregates (interactively encircled) were taken as representative
values in their respective areas. A quantitative evaluation of the
degree of unevenness of the A2AR/D2R receptor codistribution was obtained by calculating the Gini's index (14, 15),
which here measures the distribution of the IR intensity, pixel by
pixel, in the sampled area. The Gini's index ranges from 0 (even
distribution, i.e. the IR intensity is equally distributed among pixels) to 1 (maximal concentration, i.e. the IR
intensity is concentrated in one single pixel) (14).
Coimmunoprecipitation Experiments--
SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma
cell membranes were obtained by disrupting the cells with a Polytron
homogenizer (Kinematica, PTA 20TS rotor, setting 4; Brinkmann) for
three 5-s periods in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. Membranes were
separated by centrifugation at 105,000 × g for 45 min
at 4 °C. They were then solubilized in ice-cold lysis buffer (PBS,
pH 7.4, Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) for 1 h on ice and then centrifuged at 80,000 × g for 90 min. The supernatant was immunoprecipitated as previously described (6)
using anti-A2AR antibodies (VC21) or an irrelevant IgG covalently coupled to protein A-Sepharose. Immunoprecipitates were
resolved by SDS-PAGE, and Western blots were performed with anti-A2AR, anti-A1R (PC11), or
anti-D2R antibodies (for details, see Ref. 6).
D2R- and D1R transfected mouse fibroblast
Ltk cAMP Accumulation Experiments--
Neuroblastoma or striatal
cells were incubated with [3H]adenine (24 Ci/mmol;
Amersham Biosciences; 1 µCi/well) for 2 h at 37 °C in
serum-free medium. They were subsequently washed with PBS and incubated
for 10 min at 37 °C in PBS containing 100 µM
phosphodiesterase inhibitor RO-20-1724 (Calbiochem). Various
concentrations of forskolin, CGS 21680, and/or quinpirole were
then added and the cells placed at 37 °C for an additional 10 min.
The incubation solution was then discarded and replaced by ice-cold 0.3 M perchloric acid containing [14C]cAMP (51.3 mCi/mmol; PerkinElmer Life Sciences) as an internal standard.
After sonication and centrifugation (8,000 × g for 5 min), [3H]cAMP present in the supernatant was identified
by sequential chromatography (17). Formation of cAMP was expressed as
the percentage of conversion of total [3H]ATP into
[3H]cAMP. For statistical analysis, one-way ANOVA
(followed by post hoc Scheffe's
multiple comparison test) and Mann-Whitney's U test were used.
Colocalization of A2AR and D2R in
Nontreated SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells: Immunolabeling
Experiments--
A2AR/D2R interactions were
first studied in a previously characterized human neuroblastoma cell
line (SH-SY5Y) stably transfected with human D2R (long
form) (about 1100 fmol/mg of protein) (7). This cell line
constitutively expresses functional A2AR (about 200 fmol/mg
of protein), the activation of which decreases the affinity of the
transfected D2R for dopamine and counteracts
D2R-mediated intracellular
[Ca2+i] response (7). Double
immunofluorescence experiments including image analysis were performed
in nonpermeabilized cells, using fluorescein-conjugated
anti-A2AR antibodies (green color)
and rhodamine-conjugated anti-D2R antibodies
(red color). As seen in Fig.
1A (panels a and
b), there is a clear spatial predominance of D2R
versus A2AR immunoreactivity, which is in agreement with the higher D2R density found in previous
binding experiments (7). Confocal analysis revealed substantial
colocalization of both receptors at the membrane level
(yellow color in Fig. 1A, panel
c), which indicates that in the absence of exogenous agonists the
lateral distance between the two receptor proteins is less than 0.1 µm. A semi-quantitative analysis of the distribution of the
yellow was done by evaluating the intensity of the color (which directly reflects the amount of coexisting receptors) and calculating the Gini's index or GI (a measure of unevenness, which evaluates the proportion of coaggregates in the sampled area). These
calculations were completed on the whole cell body
membrane, as well as on the areas of the cell body membrane containing
coaggregates and on the parts with few or no coaggregates (Fig.
1B). In nontreated cells (Fig. 1A, panel
c), high amounts of coexisting receptors were found both in the
cell body membrane with coaggregates and in the cell body membrane
displaying a more diffuse distribution of
A2AR/D2R IR. The GI value of these cells was
0.10, indicating a rather even distribution of the colocated
A2AR/D2R IR and few coaggregates of the two
receptors (Fig. 1B).
Coaggregation of A2AR and D2R in CGS 21680- or Quinpirole-treated SH-SY5Y Cells: Immunolabeling
Experiments--
Substantial modifications of A2AR and
D2R distribution were obtained when the cells were treated
with the A2AR agonist CGS 21680 or the D2R
agonist quinpirole. Hence, 3 h of treatment with either CGS 21680 (100 nM, Fig. 1A, panel d) or
quinpirole (10 µM, Fig. 1A, panel
e) induced an aggregation of both A2AR and D2R. Similar effects were also observed with shorter
incubation times at higher agonist concentrations (data not shown).
Thus, 3 h of incubation at these concentrations give a maximal
effect. The computer-assisted analysis of the confocal images showed an increase in unevenness of the yellow distribution (GI for the entire
cell body membrane was 0.23 for CGS 21680- and 0.20 for quinpirole-treated cells). Furthermore, the yellow intensity value was
still high for the cell body membrane with
A2AR/D2R coaggregates but very low for the cell
body membrane with diffusely distributed A2AR/D2R IR (Fig. 1B). Altogether,
this analysis indicates the presence on the cell body membrane of an
increased proportion of A2AR/D2R coaggregates.
Cointernalization of A2AR and D2R in CGS
21680- or Quinpirole-treated SH-SY5Y Cells: Immunolabeling
Experiments--
Cotreatment with CGS 21680 (100 nM) and
quinpirole (10 µM) markedly decreased the yellow
intensity values of the cell body membrane associated with coaggregates
and diffusely distributed A2AR/D2R IR as
compared with untreated cells (Fig. 1, A (panel f) and
B). This indicates that cotreatment with CGS 21680 (100 nM) and quinpirole (10 µM) induces
coaggregation followed by cointernalization of A2AR and
D2R. A stronger reduction in D2R IR
(red) was, however, obtained with higher concentrations of
quinpirole (50 µM) and CGS 21680 (200 nM)
(Fig. 1A, panel g). At these concentrations of
the agonists, the Gini's index was high (0.30) reflecting an uneven
distribution of A2AR/D2R IR. In addition, the
values for the yellow intensity in the cell body membrane with
A2AR/D2R coaggregates and the cell body
membrane with diffusely distributed A2AR/D2R IR
were, respectively, low and very low (Fig. 1B). This
suggests that a cotreatment of the cells with high doses of the
agonists potentiates both coaggregation and cointernalization of
A2AR and D2R. Ligand-induced cointernalization
was confirmed in experiments where cells were first labeled with
anti-A2AR and anti-D2R antibodies for 2 h
at 4 °C in the absence (Fig. 2,
panel a) or in the presence of CGS21680 (200 nM)
and/or quinpirole (50 µM) (Fig. 2, panels b-d). Subsequently, the ligand-induced internalization of labeled receptors was allowed to occur by incubating the cells for 3 h at
37 °C. Confocal analysis revealed colocalized
A2AR/D2R aggregates inside the cell after
pretreatment with either CGS 21680 (200 nM) or quinpirole
(50 µM) (Fig. 2, panels b and
c), which became more pronounced after pretreatment with
both compounds (Fig. 2, panel d).
Absence of Quinpirole-induced Aggregation of A2AR in
Parental SH-SY5Y Cells: Immunolabeling Experiments--
The
involvement of D2R in quinpirole-mediated effects was
assessed using parental neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, which express very
low levels of D2R (7). Hence, quinpirole at 100 µM for 3 h did not induce any modification of
A2AR immunolabeling pattern (Fig.
3).
Codesensitization of A2AR and D2R in CGS
21680- and Quinpirole-treated SH-SY5Y Cells: cAMP Accumulation
Experiments--
Under basal conditions 1 µM CGS 21680 significantly increased cAMP accumulation in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma
cells (Fig. 4A). Quinpirole (1 µM) did not modify cAMP levels but significantly counteracted both forskolin (10 µM)-induced and CGS
21680-induced increases in cAMP accumulation (Fig. 4A).
These results confirm the existence of functional and interacting
A2AR and D2R in D2R-transfected neuroblastoma cells (7). After 3 h of incubation with either 200 nM CGS 21680 or 50 µM quinpirole (and
subsequent withdrawal of the agonists, see "Experimental
Procedures"), CGS 21680 was no longer able to significantly increase
cAMP levels (Fig. 4B). This demonstrates the existence of
both homologous and D2R-mediated heterologous
desensitization of A2AR. Instead, the inhibitory effect of
quinpirole on forskolin-induced elevation of cAMP levels was about the
same (40-50% inhibition) under basal conditions and after a 3-h
incubation with the A2AR or the D2R agonist
(Fig. 4, A and B). Thus, as already described,
A2AR clearly desensitized after A2AR agonist
incubation (18, 19) and D2R (long form) showed resistance
to D2R agonist-induced desensitization (20). However, after
3 h of incubation with both quinpirole (50 µM) and
CGS 21680 (200 nM), quinpirole (1 µM)
inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation by only 17.1%/11.4%
(median/interquartile range) (Fig. 4C). This effect, when
compared with the effect of quinpirole on untreated cells, was
significantly different (Mann-Whitney U test:
p < 0.01). Hence, quinpirole was found to inhibit
forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation by 40.7%/5.8%
(median/interquartile range) (Fig. 4C). Therefore,
costimulation of A2AR and D2R accelerates
D2R desensitization, likely by causing increased
D2R internalization (see above).
Coimmunoprecipitation of A2AR and D2R in
Membrane Preparations from SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells and
Ltk Colocalization and Coaggregation of A2AR and
D2R in Cultured Striatal Neurons: Immunolabeling
Experiments--
A2AR/D2R interactions were
also studied in neuronal primary cultures of rat striatum. Cells were
grown for 2 weeks and immunostained for A2AR and
D2R (see above). Immunolabeling of A1R on
nonpermeabilized cells was also performed. Most neurons exhibited
A2AR and D2R IR in the soma and in the
dendrites, however, with predominance of D2R to
A2AR IR in the dendrites (Fig.
7A). As for neuroblastoma cells, confocal analysis revealed a high degree of
A2AR/D2R colocalization in the absence of
exposure to exogenous agonists (Fig. 7A). Treatment (6 h)
with either the A2AR agonist CGS 21680 (100 nM)
or the D2R agonist quinpirole (10 µM) induced
aggregation of both A2AR and D2R (Fig.
7A) and reduction in IR intensity. However, no synergism was
observed when cells were cotreated with CGS 21680 (100 nM) and quinpirole (10 µM) for the same time (Fig.
7A). To assess the specificity of
A2AR/D2R interactions, cells were incubated with 10 µM quinpirole for 6 h and immunostained with
anti-A1R antibodies. No change in the pattern of
distribution of A1R present in the soma and dendrites was
observed (Fig. 7B). In addition and instead of
A2AR/D2R, no aggregates were seen, which
confirms the specificity of A2AR/D2R
interactions. Cointernalization experiments analogous to those
described in Fig. 2 could not be performed in cultured striatal cells,
which did not tolerate the temperature conditions of the experimental
internalization protocol (cells changed morphology and fell off the
coverslip).
Interaction between A2AR and D2R in
Cultured Striatal Neurons: cAMP Accumulation Experiments--
Both
basal and forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation were about 10 times
higher than in neuroblastoma cells (Fig.
8A). This could explain why,
unlike what was observed in neuroblastoma cells, CGS 21680 (1 µM) did not induce any significant increase in cAMP accumulation compared with basal values (Fig. 8A). As for
neuroblastoma cells, quinpirole (1 µM) did not modify
cAMP levels but significantly reduced forskolin (10 µM)-induced cAMP accumulation (Fig. 8B). Finally, CGS 21680 (1 µM) counteracted the effect of
quinpirole on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation (Fig. 8B).
These results provide a functional demonstration of the antagonistic
A2AR/D2R interactions in striatal neurons in
culture.
The main findings of the present work are first that
A2AR and D2R are colocalized and form
heteromers in untreated neuronal cells and that they coaggregate upon
long term exposure to either agonist. The formation of
A2AR/D2R heteromers and aggregates is receptor
subtype-specific because co-expression of
A2AR/D1R (present study) or
A1R/D2R (6) does not lead to formation of
heteromers. Furthermore, A2AR did not form heteromeric
complexes with A1R (present study). This phenomenon may
therefore constitute the molecular basis for the selective
A2AR/D2R interactions observed in
vitro, like A2AR modulation of D2 binding
characteristics (7, 8, 22, 23), counteraction of
D2R-mediated intracellular [Ca2+i] responses
(7), and inhibition of cAMP accumulation (see Ref. 23 and present
paper). The same type of antagonism was observed in vivo
with the A2AR inhibition of D2R-mediated
regulation of GABA release in the globus pallidus and of
D2R-mediated increases in motor activity (1, 5). Besides
acute antagonistic actions, the A2AR/D2R
heteromers may be involved in receptor trafficking, because long term
exposure to either A2AR or D2R agonists induces aggregation and cotreatment with these agonists induces internalization of both receptors. Moreover, prior exposure to A2AR or
D2R agonists can produce a desensitization of the
A2AR in terms of cAMP accumulation associated with
coaggregation. In contrast, co-exposure to A2AR and
D2R agonists, but not to any of the two agonists alone,
causes desensitization of D2R-mediated inhibition of cAMP
accumulation, which is associated with cointernalization. The present
observation that A2AR and D2R functions are
simultaneously altered after long exposure to agonists can aid in
understanding behavioral findings involving cross-tolerance and
cross-sensitization between dopamine agonists and compounds active at
adenosine receptors (such as caffeine) (24, 25). Together with other
recently reported findings, the present results suggest that changes in
A2AR function may be involved in the secondary effects
observed after chronic intermittent treatment with L-DOPA
such as reduced antiparkinsonian activity and dyskinesia (26).
Adenosine is a feedback detector of neuronal activation, in view of the
fact that it allows the neuronal network to return into a resting state
(27). Adenosine is therefore expected to increase in the striatal
extracellular fluid from patients with Parkinson's disease mainly
after chronic intermittent L-DOPA treatment and in
agreement with the evidence of increased striatal glutamate drive (28).
Hence, striatal extracellular levels of adenosine have been found to
increase in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine
model of Parkinson's disease (29). Thus, the wearing off of the
antiparkinsonian action of L-DOPA treatment may in part be
caused by the simultaneous chronic activation of A2AR and
D2R that, according to the present results, may lead to
substantial cointernalization of both receptors. The coadministration
of A2AR antagonists together with L-DOPA or
dopamine D2R agonists may therefore provide a new
therapeutic approach lacking the secondary effects of chronic
L-DOPA treatment (30, 31). Overall, the present and
previous (1, 5) data implicate that the membrane interactions taking
place between A2AR and D2R via heteromeric
complexes represent a crucial mechanism influencing
D2R-mediated transmission. This prompts development of
adenosine and dopamine antagonists/agonists compounds preferentially active on A2AR/D2R heteromers as new drugs for
the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases, such as Parkinson's
disease (30, 31), schizophrenia (32, 33), Huntington's disease (34), and dystonia (35), in which D2R have been implicated.
cells stably transfected with human
D2R (long form) and transiently cotransfected with the
A2AR double-tagged with hemagglutinin. Long term exposure
to A2AR and D2R agonists in
D2R-cotransfected SH-SY5Y cells resulted in coaggregation,
cointernalization and codesensitization of A2AR and
D2R. These results give a molecular basis for
adenosine-dopamine antagonism at the membrane level and
have implications for treatment of Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia, in which D2R are involved.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-aminobutyric acid (GABA)
efferent neurons. Striopallidal neurons express dopamine receptors
predominantly of the D2 subtype
(D2R)1 and the
highest density of adenosine A2A receptors
(A2AR) in the brain (2, 3). In the rat, the
strionigro-strioentopeduncular neurons contain dopamine receptors
predominantly of the D1 subtype (D1R) and
express exclusively adenosine receptors of the A1 subtype (A1R) (2-4). Experimental evidence supports the existence
of antagonistic A2AR/D2R and
A1R/D1R interactions, respectively, in the GABA
striopallidal and strionigro-strioentopeduncular neurons (1, 5). Taken
together, these data suggested proximity between receptors, which could
allow them to form heteromeric complexes (directly or indirectly by
means of adaptor proteins). In fact, A1R and
D1R were found to form heteromeric complexes (6). Although antagonistic A2AR/D2R interactions have been
reported to play an important role in basal ganglia function, it is
still not known whether the formation of heteromeric
A2AR/D2R complexes is also involved. In the
present work, the existence of selective intramembrane interactions
between A2AR and D2R in neuronal cells is
demonstrated, including formation of heteromeric
A2AR/D2R complexes and their potential
involvement in cross-desensitization mechanisms via agonist-induced
coaggregation and cointernalization of A2AR and D2R. These results have clinical implications for
Parkinson's disease and other basal ganglia disorders where dopamine
D2R are the target for therapy (1, 5).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
cells
are described in detail elsewhere (7-9). For primary cultures, striata
were removed from 16-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat embryos (B&K Universal)
in Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS supplemented with 20 units/ml penicillin and 20 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). The
tissue fragments were pooled and mechanically dissociated in SFM
Neurobasal serum-free medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with B27
(Invitrogen), glutamine (2 mM; Invitrogen), penicillin/streptomycin (20 units/ml/20 µg/ml; Invitrogen), and
-mercaptoethanol (25 µM) (Invitrogen). Cells were
collected by centrifugation at 100 × g for 5 min and
resuspended in fresh medium. The resulting single-cell suspension was
seeded on 24-well plates coated with gelatin (Sigma) and
poly-L-lysine (Sigma), and cells were grown at 37 °C in
saturation humidity with 5% CO2.
cells were transiently transfected with
A2AR cDNA double-tagged with hemagglutinin (HA-A2AR-HA) (16) by calcium phosphate precipitation (8, 9). Immunoprecipitation of HA-A2AR-HA was performed with
anti-HA antibodies (Babco) covalently coupled to protein G-Sepharose. Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting were done following standard protocols (6). Immunoblots were developed with ECL Western blot
detection system.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, double immunofluorescence
staining and confocal images of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells
stably transfected with the cDNA encoding for human D2R
(long form). Cells were processed for immunostaining using fluorescein
(green)-conjugated rabbit anti-A2AR antibodies
and rhodamine (red)-conjugated rabbit anti-D2R
antibodies and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Superimposition of
images (panels c-h) reveals the colocalization
of A2AR and D2R in yellow.
Panels a-c show A2AR
immunoreactivity (a), D2R immunoreactivity
(b), and A2AR/D2R colocalization
(c) in nontreated cells (no agonist preincubation).
Panels d-g show the effects of 3 h of
treatment at 37 °C with CGS-21680 (100 nM) alone
(d), quinpirole (10 µM) alone (e),
CGS-21680 (100 nM) and quinpirole (10 µM)
(f), or CGS-21680 (200 nM) and quinpirole (50 µM) (g). Cells were processed for
immunostaining after agonist preincubation. Representative images from
four independent experiments/treatment are shown; scale
bars, 10 µm. B, semiquantitation of images from
panels c-g in A. The area
(light gray) where diffuse IR (no or few
coaggregates) and the area (dark gray) where
several coaggregates could be detected were interactively selected. The
median intensity values (left y axis) for these
two types of areas, obtained in the four experimental conditions
mentioned above (c-g), are given. The Gini's indexes
(right y axis) for the four experimental
conditions (c-g) are given. It should be noticed that the
Gini's index is low (rather even distribution of the IR intensity
among pixels) for nontreated cells (c), whereas the Gini's
index is high (rather uneven distribution of the IR intensity among
pixels) for co-treatment with CGS-21680 (200 nM) plus
quinpirole (50 µM) (g).

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Agonist-induced internalization of
A2AR and D2R in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells
stably transfected with the cDNA encoding for human D2R
(long form). Cells were processed for immunostaining using
fluorescein (green)-conjugated rabbit anti-A2AR
antibodies and rhodamine (red)-conjugated rabbit
anti-D2R antibodies and analyzed by confocal microscopy.
Superimposition of images reveals the colocalization of
A2AR and D2R (yellow). Cells were
first incubated with anti-A2AR and anti-D2R
antibodies for 2 h at 4 °C in the presence (b-d) or
absence (a) of the agonists. The cells were then placed at
37 °C for 3 h allowing ligand-induced internalization of
previously labeled receptors. Panel a shows the
weak diffuse immunoreactivity of nonpretreated control cells (compare
with Fig. 1, panels c). Panels
b-d show the effects of 3 h of treatment at 37 °C
with CGS-21680 (200 nM) alone (b), quinpirole
(50 µM) alone (c), or CGS-21680 (200 nM) and quinpirole (50 µM) (d).
Representative images from four independent experiments/treatment are
shown; scale bars, 10 µm.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Immunostaining of parental SH-SY5Y
neuroblastoma cells. Untransfected SH-SY5Y cells were processed
for immunostaining using fluorescein (green)-conjugated
rabbit anti-A2AR antibodies after exposure to medium in the
absence (a) or presence (b) of 100 µM quinpirole (3 h, 37 °C). Representative images from
three independent experiments are shown; scale
bar, 10 µm.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
cAMP accumulation experiments in SH-SY5Y
neuroblastoma cells stably transfected with D2R (long
form). Results represent means ± S.E. and are expressed as
percentage of conversion of total [3H]ATP to
[3H]cAMP (n = 6-8). A,
effects of 10 µM forskolin (F), 1 µM CGS 21680 (CGS), and 1 µM
quinpirole (Q), alone or in combination, without agonist
preincubation. Quinpirole significantly decreased forskolin- and
CGS-induced cAMP accumulation. **, p < 0.01 compared with control (C); ++, p < 0.01 compared with forskolin; ··, p < 0.01 compared with CGS; one-way ANOVA and post hoc Scheffe's
multiple comparison test. B, effects of 10 µM
forskolin (F), 1 µM CGS 21680 (CGS), and 1 µM quinpirole (Q),
alone or in combination, after preincubation for 3 h with either
200 nM CGS 21680 or 50 µM quinpirole.
Preincubating the cells with either agonist counteracted CGS
21680-induced cAMP accumulation. ** and *,
p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively,
compared with control (C); +, p < 0.05 compared with forskolin; one-way ANOVA and post hoc
Scheffe's multiple comparison test. C, effects of 10 µM forskolin in the absence (F) and presence
of 1 µM quinpirole (F/Q) with and without
preincubation for 3 h with 200 nM CGS 21680 and 50 µM quinpirole. The counteractive effect of quinpirole on
forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation was significantly lower after
simultaneous preincubation with A2AR and D2R
agonists (17.1%/11.4%, in median/interquartile range;
n = 7) than without preincubation (40.7%/5.8%, in
median/interquartile range; n = 7) (p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test).
Fibroblast Cells--
The possible existence of
A2AR/D2R heteromeric complexes was then
analyzed by coimmunoprecipitation performed on membrane preparation of
D2R-transfected SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells.
Immunoprecipitation with anti-A2AR antibodies followed by
Western blotting with anti-D2R antibodies revealed three
bands of 43, 47, and 63 kDa (Fig. 5), corresponding to different glycosylated states of the D2R
(21). The same three bands were also obtained in control lysate
preparations (Fig. 5). On the other hand, immunoprecipitation with
anti-A2AR antibodies followed by Western blotting with
anti-A1R did not reveal any band corresponding to
A1R, indicating the absence of A2AR-A1R co-immunoprecipitation (Fig. 5). A
Western blotting performed with control lysate preparations showed a
band of ~40 kDa, which corresponds to the A1R (Fig. 5).
A2AR/D2R interactions were also examined in
mouse fibroblast Ltk
cells stably transfected with the
human D2R (long form) or human D1R (8, 9).
These two cell lines express a similar density of transfected dopamine
receptors (2.8 pmol/mg protein of D2R in the
D2R-Ltk
cell line and 4.2 pmol/mg protein of
the D1R in the D1R-Ltk
cell line (Refs. 8 and 9)). Both
cell lines were transiently transfected with either dog
A2AR cDNA double-tagged with hemagglutinin (HA-A2AR-HA) or an irrelevant plasmid. Antibodies against
the hemagglutinin tag (anti-HA) were able to precipitate a band of ~65 kDa detected in Western blot with the anti-D2R
antibodies but only from cells that express both D2R and
HA-A2AR-HA (Fig. 6). This
band corresponds to the highly glycosylated state of D2R
(21). As a positive control, we showed that this band could also be
obtained from lysates of D2R-transfected Ltk
cells, thus being independent of the presence of
HA-A2AR-HA. Antibodies against anti-HA failed to
coimmunoprecipitate D1R in cells expressing
D1R/HA-A2AR antibodies, assessing for the
specificity of the A2AR/D2R
coimmunoprecipitation (Fig. 6). These results demonstrate for the first
time that A2AR and D2R assemble into heteromeric complexes in two different cell lines that coexpress both
receptors and that these complexes exist in the absence of exogenous
agonists.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Coimmunoprecipitation of A2AR and
D2R from membrane preparations of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma
cells stably transfected with D2R (long form).
Immunoprecipitation with anti-A2AR antibodies was followed
by Western blotting with antibodies against A2AR
(left), against D2R (middle), or
against A1R (right). For positive control an
aliquot of cell membrane extracts was used.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Coimmunoprecipitation of
HA-A2AR-HA and D2R from membrane preparations
of mouse Ltk
fibroblasts. Ltk
fibroblasts stably transfected with either human dopamine
D2R (long form) or human dopamine D1R were
transiently transfected with either double-tagged
HA-A2AR-HA (HA-A2AR-HA/D2R and
HA-A2AR-HA/D1R cells) or an irrelevant plasmid
(D2R and D1R cells). An aliquot of cell
membrane extracts was used as a positive control. WB,
Western blot; IP, immunoprecipitation.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Double immunofluorescence staining and
confocal images of striatal neurons in culture. Panel
A, cells were exposed for 6 h to either 100 nM CGS-21680, 10 µM quinpirole, or both and
were processed for immunostaining using fluorescein
(green)-conjugated rabbit anti-A2AR antibodies
and rhodamine (red)-conjugated rabbit anti-D2R
antibodies. The cells were analyzed by confocal microscopy.
Superimposition of images reveals the colocalization of
A2AR and D2R in yellow.
Panel B, staining of adenosine A1R
with fluorescein (green)-conjugated anti-A1R
antibodies. Note the lack of effect of 10 µM quinpirole
(6 h). Representative images from four to five independent
experiments/treatment are shown; scale bar, 10 µm.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
cAMP accumulation experiments in striatal
neurons in culture. Results represent means ± S.E. and are
expressed as percentage of conversion of total [3H]ATP to
[3H]cAMP (n = 10-14). A,
effects of 10 and 30 µM forskolin (F10 and
F30, respectively), 1 µM CGS 21680 (CGS), and 1 µM quinpirole (Q).
Forskolin, but not CGS 21680, significantly increased cAMP
accumulation. **, p < 0.01 compared with control
(C); one-way ANOVA. B, effects of 10 µM forskolin (F), 1 µM CGS 21680 (CGS), and 1 µM quinpirole (Q),
alone or in combination. CGS 21680 counteracted the inhibitory effect
of quinpirole on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation. + and ++,
p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively,
compared with forskolin; one-way ANOVA and post
hoc Scheffe's multiple comparison test.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Swedish Medical Research Council Grant 14X-00715, European Commission Grant QLG3-CT-2001-01056, Spanish Commission of Science and Technology National Plan of Biotechnology Grant BIO99-0601-C02-02), an Italian Ministero della Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica ex60% grant, and a grant from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§ These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Present address: Stroke Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4128. Tel.: 301-594-2597; Fax: 301-402-2769; E-mail: hillionj@ninds.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107731200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: D2R, dopamine D2 receptor; A2AR, adenosine A2A receptor; HA, hemagglutinin; ANOVA, analysis of variance; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; IR, immunoreactive; GI, Gini's index; DOPA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Ferré, S.,
Fredholm, B. B.,
Morelli, M.,
Popoli, P.,
and Fuxe, K.
(1997)
Trends Neurosci.
20,
482-487[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Schiffmann, S. N.,
Jacobs, O.,
and Vanderhaeghen, J.-J.
(1991)
J. Neurochem.
57,
1062-1067[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Fink, J. S.,
Weaver, D. R.,
Rivkees, S. A,
Peterfreund, R. A.,
Pollack, A. E.,
Adler, E. M.,
and Reppert, S. M.
(1992)
Mol. Brain Res.
14,
186-195[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Ferré, S.,
O'Connor, W. T.,
Svenningsson, P.,
Bjorklund, L.,
Lindberg, J.,
Tinner, B.,
Stromberg, I.,
Goldstein, M.,
Ogren, S. O.,
Ungerstedt, U.,
Fredholm, B. B.,
and Fuxe, K.
(1996)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
8,
1545-1553[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Fuxe, K.,
Ferré, S.,
Zoli, M.,
and Agnati, L. F.
(1998)
Brain Res. Rev.
26,
258-273[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Ginés, S.,
Hillion, J.,
Torvinen, M., Le,
Crom, S.,
Casado, V.,
Canela, E. I.,
Rondin, S.,
Lew, J. Y.,
Watson, S.,
Zoli, M.,
Agnati, L. F.,
Vernier, P.,
Lluis, C.,
Ferré, S.,
Fuxe, K.,
and Franco, R.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
8606-8611 |
| 7. |
Salim, H.,
Ferré, S.,
Dalal, A.,
Peterfreund, R. A.,
Fuxe, K.,
Vincent, J. D.,
and Lledo, P. M.
(2000)
J. Neurochem.
74,
432-439[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Dasgupta, S.,
Ferré, S.,
Kull, B.,
Hedlund, P. B.,
Finnman, U. B.,
Ahlberg, S.,
Arenas, E.,
Fredholm, B. B.,
and Fuxe, K.
(1996)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
316,
325-331[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Ferré, S.,
Torvinen, M.,
Antoniou, K.,
Irenius, E.,
Civelli, O.,
Arenas, E.,
Fredholm, B. B.,
and Fuxe, K.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4718-4724 |
| 10. |
Sarrio, S.,
Casado, V.,
Escriche, M.,
Ciruela, F.,
Mallol, J.,
Canela, E. I.,
Lluis, C.,
and Franco, R.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
5164-5174 |
| 11. |
Bjelke, B.,
Goldstein, M.,
Tinner, B.,
Andersson, C.,
Sesack, S. R.,
Steinbusch, H. W.,
Lew, J. Y., He, X.,
Watson, S.,
Tengroth, B.,
and Fuxe, K.
(1996)
J. Chem. Neuroanat.
12,
37-50[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Saura, C. A.,
Mallol, J.,
Canela, E. I.,
Lluis, C.,
and Franco, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17610-17617 |
| 13. |
Ciruela, F.,
Casado, V.,
Mallol, J.,
Canela, E. I.,
Lluis, C.,
and Franco, R.
(1995)
J. Neurosci. Res.
42,
818-828[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Duncan, O. D. (1977) in The Measurement of Population (Smith, D. , and Keyfitz, N., eds) , pp. 349-363, Springer Verlag, London |
| 15. |
Agnati, L. F.,
Fuxe, K.,
Zini, I.,
Calza, L.,
Benfenati, F.,
Zoli, M.,
Hokfelt, T.,
and Goldstein, M.
(1982)
Neurosci. Lett.
32,
253-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. |
Olah, M. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
337-344 |
| 17. |
Salomon, Y.,
Londos, C.,
and Rodbell, M.
(1974)
Anal. Biochem.
58,
541-548[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Palmer, T. M.,
Gettys, T. W.,
Jacobson, K. A.,
and Stiles, G. L.
(1994)
Mol. Pharmacol.
45,
1082-1094[Abstract] |
| 19. |
Mundell, S. J.,
and Kelly, E.
(1998)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
125,
1594-1600[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Ng, G. Y.,
Varghese, G.,
Chung, H. T.,
Trogadis, J.,
Seeman, P.,
O'Dowd, B. F.,
and George, S. R.
(1997)
Endocrinology
138,
4199-4206 |
| 21. |
Fishburn, C. S.,
Elazar, Z.,
and Fuchs, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29819-29824 |
| 22. |
Ferré, S.,
von Euler, G.,
Johansson, B.,
Fredholm, B. B.,
and Fuxe, K.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
7238-7241 |
| 23. |
Kull, B.,
Ferré, S.,
Arslan, G.,
Svenningsson, P.,
Fuxe, K.,
Owman, C.,
and Fredholm, B. B.
(1999)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
58,
1035-1045[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Fenu, S.,
Cauli, O.,
and Morelli, M.
(2000)
Behav. Brain. Res.
114,
97-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Garrett, B. E.,
and Holtzman, S. G.
(1994)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
262,
65-75[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Zeng, B. Y.,
Pearce, R. K.,
MacKenzie, G. M.,
and Jenner, P.
(2000)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
12,
1096-1104[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Ferré, S.,
and Fuxe, K.
(2000)
Prog. Brain Res.
125,
353-361[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Chase, T. N.,
and Oh, J. D.
(2000)
Trends Neurosci.
23,
S86-S91[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Nomoto, N.,
Kaseda, S.,
Iwata, S.,
Shimizu, T.,
Fukuda, T.,
and Nakagawa, S.
(2000)
J. Neurol.
247,
V16-V22[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Kanda, T.,
Jackson, M. J.,
Smith, L. A.,
Pearce, R. K.,
Nakamura, J.,
Kase, H.,
Kuwana, Y.,
and Jenner, P.
(1998)
Ann. Neurol.
43,
507-513[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Stromberg, I.,
Popoli, P.,
Muller, C. E.,
Ferré, S.,
and Fuxe, K.
(2000)
Eur. J. Neurosci.
12,
4033-4037[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Ferré, S.
(1997)
Psychopharmacology
133,
107-120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Akhondzadeh, S.,
Shasavand, E.,
Jamilian, H.,
Shabestari, O.,
and Kamalipour, A.
(2000)
J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.
25,
131-137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Popoli, P.,
Pezzola, A.,
Reggio, R.,
Caporali, M. G.,
and Scotti de Carolis, A.
(1994)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
257,
R5-R6[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Richter, A.,
Hamann, M.,
and Bartling, C.
(2000)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
404,
299-302[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Zeng, I. Armando, Y. Luo, G. M. Eisner, R. A. Felder, and P. A. Jose Dysregulation of dopamine-dependent mechanisms as a determinant of hypertension: studies in dopamine receptor knockout mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): H551 - H569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Quiroz, C. Gomes, A. C. Pak, J. A. Ribeiro, S. R. Goldberg, B. T. Hope, and S. Ferre Blockade of Adenosine A2A Receptors Prevents Protein Phosphorylation in the Striatum Induced by Cortical Stimulation. J. Neurosci., October 18, 2006; 26(42): 10808 - 10812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Prinster, C. Hague, and R. A. Hall Heterodimerization of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Specificity and Functional Significance Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2005; 57(3): 289 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Agnati, K. Fuxe, M. Torvinen, S. Genedani, R. Franco, S. Watson, G. G. Nussdorfer, G. Leo, and D. Guidolin New Methods to Evaluate Colocalization of Fluorophores in Immunocytochemical Preparations as Exemplified by a Study on A2A and D2 Receptors in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells J. Histochem. Cytochem., August 1, 2005; 53(8): 941 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Novi, L. Stanasila, F. Giorgi, G. U. Corsini, S. Cotecchia, and R. Maggio Paired Activation of Two Components within Muscarinic M3 Receptor Dimers Is Required for Recruitment of {beta}-Arrestin-1 to the Plasma Membrane J. Biol. Chem., May 20, 2005; 280(20): 19768 - 19776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Torvinen, D. Marcellino, M. Canals, L. F. Agnati, C. Lluis, R. Franco, and K. Fuxe Adenosine A2A Receptor and Dopamine D3 Receptor Interactions: Evidence of Functional A2A/D3 Heteromeric Complexes Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2005; 67(2): 400 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||