JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M107731200 on February 28, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 18091-18097, May 17, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/20/18091    most recent
M107731200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hillion, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fuxe, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hillion, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fuxe, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Coaggregation, Cointernalization, and Codesensitization of Adenosine A2A Receptors and Dopamine D2 Receptors*

Joëlle HillionDagger §, Meritxell CanalsDagger §, Maria TorvinenDagger , Vicent Casadó||, Rizaldy ScottDagger , Anton TerasmaaDagger , Anita HanssonDagger , Stanley Watson**, Mark E. OlahDagger Dagger , Josefa Mallol||, Enric I. Canela||, Michele Zoli§§, Luigi F. Agnati§§, Carlos F. IbáñezDagger , Carme Lluis||, Rafael Franco||, Sergi FerréDagger ¶¶, and Kjell FuxeDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden, the || Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain, the ** Mental Health Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, the Dagger Dagger  Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, the §§ Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Modena, 41100 Modena, Italy, and the ¶¶ National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland 21224

Received for publication, August 13, 2001, and in revised form, January 22, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Antagonistic and reciprocal interactions are known to exist between adenosine and dopamine receptors in the striatum. In the present study, double immunofluorescence experiments with confocal laser microscopy showed a high degree of colocalization of adenosine A2A receptors (A2AR) and dopamine D2 receptors (D2R) in cell membranes of SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells stably transfected with human D2R and in cultured striatal cells. A2AR/D2R heteromeric complexes were demonstrated in coimmunoprecipitation experiments in membrane preparations from D2R-transfected SH-SY5Y cells and from mouse fibroblast Ltk- cells stably transfected with human D2R (long form) and transiently cotransfected with the A2AR double-tagged with hemagglutinin. Long term exposure to A2AR and D2R agonists in D2R-cotransfected SH-SY5Y cells resulted in coaggregation, cointernalization and codesensitization of A2AR and D2R. These results give a molecular basis for adenosine-dopamine antagonism at the membrane level and have implications for treatment of Parkinson's disease and schizophrenia, in which D2R are involved.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Adenosine and dopamine signaling exert opposite effects in the basal ganglia, a brain region involved in sensory-motor integration. Thus, adenosine agonists induce motor depression and adenosine antagonists, such as caffeine, produce motor activation (1). These opposite effects result from specific antagonistic interactions between subtypes of adenosine and dopamine receptors in the striatum, the main input structure of the basal ganglia. In fact, striatal dopamine receptors and, to some extent, adenosine receptors are segregated in the two main populations of gamma -aminobutyric acid (GABA) efferent neurons. Striopallidal neurons express dopamine receptors predominantly of the D2 subtype (D2R)1 and the highest density of adenosine A2A receptors (A2AR) in the brain (2, 3). In the rat, the strionigro-strioentopeduncular neurons contain dopamine receptors predominantly of the D1 subtype (D1R) and express exclusively adenosine receptors of the A1 subtype (A1R) (2-4). Experimental evidence supports the existence of antagonistic A2AR/D2R and A1R/D1R interactions, respectively, in the GABA striopallidal and strionigro-strioentopeduncular neurons (1, 5). Taken together, these data suggested proximity between receptors, which could allow them to form heteromeric complexes (directly or indirectly by means of adaptor proteins). In fact, A1R and D1R were found to form heteromeric complexes (6). Although antagonistic A2AR/D2R interactions have been reported to play an important role in basal ganglia function, it is still not known whether the formation of heteromeric A2AR/D2R complexes is also involved. In the present work, the existence of selective intramembrane interactions between A2AR and D2R in neuronal cells is demonstrated, including formation of heteromeric A2AR/D2R complexes and their potential involvement in cross-desensitization mechanisms via agonist-induced coaggregation and cointernalization of A2AR and D2R. These results have clinical implications for Parkinson's disease and other basal ganglia disorders where dopamine D2R are the target for therapy (1, 5).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Cultures-- Maintenance of SH-SY5Y cells (parental and D2R-transfected cells) as well as the pharmacological characterization and maintenance of D2R- and D1R-transfected mouse fibroblast Ltk- cells are described in detail elsewhere (7-9). For primary cultures, striata were removed from 16-day-old Sprague-Dawley rat embryos (B&K Universal) in Ca2+/Mg2+-free PBS supplemented with 20 units/ml penicillin and 20 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). The tissue fragments were pooled and mechanically dissociated in SFM Neurobasal serum-free medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with B27 (Invitrogen), glutamine (2 mM; Invitrogen), penicillin/streptomycin (20 units/ml/20 µg/ml; Invitrogen), and beta -mercaptoethanol (25 µM) (Invitrogen). Cells were collected by centrifugation at 100 × g for 5 min and resuspended in fresh medium. The resulting single-cell suspension was seeded on 24-well plates coated with gelatin (Sigma) and poly-L-lysine (Sigma), and cells were grown at 37 °C in saturation humidity with 5% CO2.

Immunolabeling Experiments-- Neuroblastoma cells were grown on glass coverslips coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma) and exposed to various amounts of CGS21680 (RBI) and/or quinpirole (RBI) in serum-free medium for 3 h at 37 °C. They were then rinsed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.06 M sucrose for 15 min, and washed with PBS containing 20 mM glycine. Cells were subsequently treated with PBS, containing 20 mM glycine, and 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min at room temperature. Double immunostaining was performed with fluorescein-conjugated anti-A2AR antibodies (VC21-FITC, 40 µg/ml) (10) and rhodamine-conjugated anti-D2R antibodies (D2-246-316, 30 µg/ml) (11) for 1 h at 37 °C. Antipeptide antisera against A2AR were raised in New Zealand White rabbits and characterized as described elsewhere (12). The specific peptide corresponds to the second extracellular loop of the receptor. Anti-A2AR antibodies (VC21) were purified by affinity chromatography using the specific peptide coupled to activated thiol-Sepharose 4B. The coverslips were rinsed for 40 min in the same buffer and mounted with medium suitable for immunofluorescence (ICN). Internalization assays were made as reported elsewhere (12) with some modifications. Cells were incubated in serum-free medium (4 °C, 2 h) with VC21-FITC and rhodamine-conjugated D2-246-316 in the absence (control) or presence of 200 nM CGS 21680 and/or 50 µM quinpirole. Cells were washed with the same medium (without ligands in the control experiments), and internalization of labeled receptors was induced by incubation at 37 °C for 3 h. Cells were fixed and processed as described above. Striatal cultures were exposed to various amounts of CGS21680 and/or quinpirole in the same medium for 6 h at 37 °C. They were then rinsed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde containing 2% picric acid for 1 h, and washed with PBS supplemented with 20 mM glycine. Double or single immunostaining was performed with fluorescein-conjugated anti-A2AR antibodies and rhodamine-conjugated anti-D2R (D2-246-316) antibodies or fluorescein-conjugated anti-A1R antibodies (PC21-FITC) (13) for 1 h at 37 °C. Microscopic observations were made in Leica TCS 4D (Leica Lasertechnik) confocal scanning laser equipment adapted to an inverted Leitz DMIRBE microscope. Image analysis was performed with a KS 400 image analyzer (Zeiss). After acquisition of the superimposed images (yellow color) of the A2AR/D2R IR, the area of the cell nucleus was interactively discarded. Densitometric evaluation was performed on this new image. The median values of the histograms representing the intensity of A2R/D2R IR in areas with coaggregates (interactively encircled) and in areas with no or few aggregates (interactively encircled) were taken as representative values in their respective areas. A quantitative evaluation of the degree of unevenness of the A2AR/D2R receptor codistribution was obtained by calculating the Gini's index (14, 15), which here measures the distribution of the IR intensity, pixel by pixel, in the sampled area. The Gini's index ranges from 0 (even distribution, i.e. the IR intensity is equally distributed among pixels) to 1 (maximal concentration, i.e. the IR intensity is concentrated in one single pixel) (14).

Coimmunoprecipitation Experiments-- SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell membranes were obtained by disrupting the cells with a Polytron homogenizer (Kinematica, PTA 20TS rotor, setting 4; Brinkmann) for three 5-s periods in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4. Membranes were separated by centrifugation at 105,000 × g for 45 min at 4 °C. They were then solubilized in ice-cold lysis buffer (PBS, pH 7.4, Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) for 1 h on ice and then centrifuged at 80,000 × g for 90 min. The supernatant was immunoprecipitated as previously described (6) using anti-A2AR antibodies (VC21) or an irrelevant IgG covalently coupled to protein A-Sepharose. Immunoprecipitates were resolved by SDS-PAGE, and Western blots were performed with anti-A2AR, anti-A1R (PC11), or anti-D2R antibodies (for details, see Ref. 6).

D2R- and D1R transfected mouse fibroblast Ltk- cells were transiently transfected with A2AR cDNA double-tagged with hemagglutinin (HA-A2AR-HA) (16) by calcium phosphate precipitation (8, 9). Immunoprecipitation of HA-A2AR-HA was performed with anti-HA antibodies (Babco) covalently coupled to protein G-Sepharose. Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting were done following standard protocols (6). Immunoblots were developed with ECL Western blot detection system.

cAMP Accumulation Experiments-- Neuroblastoma or striatal cells were incubated with [3H]adenine (24 Ci/mmol; Amersham Biosciences; 1 µCi/well) for 2 h at 37 °C in serum-free medium. They were subsequently washed with PBS and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in PBS containing 100 µM phosphodiesterase inhibitor RO-20-1724 (Calbiochem). Various concentrations of forskolin, CGS 21680, and/or quinpirole were then added and the cells placed at 37 °C for an additional 10 min. The incubation solution was then discarded and replaced by ice-cold 0.3 M perchloric acid containing [14C]cAMP (51.3 mCi/mmol; PerkinElmer Life Sciences) as an internal standard. After sonication and centrifugation (8,000 × g for 5 min), [3H]cAMP present in the supernatant was identified by sequential chromatography (17). Formation of cAMP was expressed as the percentage of conversion of total [3H]ATP into [3H]cAMP. For statistical analysis, one-way ANOVA (followed by post hoc Scheffe's multiple comparison test) and Mann-Whitney's U test were used.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Colocalization of A2AR and D2R in Nontreated SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells: Immunolabeling Experiments-- A2AR/D2R interactions were first studied in a previously characterized human neuroblastoma cell line (SH-SY5Y) stably transfected with human D2R (long form) (about 1100 fmol/mg of protein) (7). This cell line constitutively expresses functional A2AR (about 200 fmol/mg of protein), the activation of which decreases the affinity of the transfected D2R for dopamine and counteracts D2R-mediated intracellular [Ca2+i] response (7). Double immunofluorescence experiments including image analysis were performed in nonpermeabilized cells, using fluorescein-conjugated anti-A2AR antibodies (green color) and rhodamine-conjugated anti-D2R antibodies (red color). As seen in Fig. 1A (panels a and b), there is a clear spatial predominance of D2R versus A2AR immunoreactivity, which is in agreement with the higher D2R density found in previous binding experiments (7). Confocal analysis revealed substantial colocalization of both receptors at the membrane level (yellow color in Fig. 1A, panel c), which indicates that in the absence of exogenous agonists the lateral distance between the two receptor proteins is less than 0.1 µm. A semi-quantitative analysis of the distribution of the yellow was done by evaluating the intensity of the color (which directly reflects the amount of coexisting receptors) and calculating the Gini's index or GI (a measure of unevenness, which evaluates the proportion of coaggregates in the sampled area). These calculations were completed on the whole cell body membrane, as well as on the areas of the cell body membrane containing coaggregates and on the parts with few or no coaggregates (Fig. 1B). In nontreated cells (Fig. 1A, panel c), high amounts of coexisting receptors were found both in the cell body membrane with coaggregates and in the cell body membrane displaying a more diffuse distribution of A2AR/D2R IR. The GI value of these cells was 0.10, indicating a rather even distribution of the colocated A2AR/D2R IR and few coaggregates of the two receptors (Fig. 1B).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, double immunofluorescence staining and confocal images of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells stably transfected with the cDNA encoding for human D2R (long form). Cells were processed for immunostaining using fluorescein (green)-conjugated rabbit anti-A2AR antibodies and rhodamine (red)-conjugated rabbit anti-D2R antibodies and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Superimposition of images (panels c-h) reveals the colocalization of A2AR and D2R in yellow. Panels a-c show A2AR immunoreactivity (a), D2R immunoreactivity (b), and A2AR/D2R colocalization (c) in nontreated cells (no agonist preincubation). Panels d-g show the effects of 3 h of treatment at 37 °C with CGS-21680 (100 nM) alone (d), quinpirole (10 µM) alone (e), CGS-21680 (100 nM) and quinpirole (10 µM) (f), or CGS-21680 (200 nM) and quinpirole (50 µM) (g). Cells were processed for immunostaining after agonist preincubation. Representative images from four independent experiments/treatment are shown; scale bars, 10 µm. B, semiquantitation of images from panels c-g in A. The area (light gray) where diffuse IR (no or few coaggregates) and the area (dark gray) where several coaggregates could be detected were interactively selected. The median intensity values (left y axis) for these two types of areas, obtained in the four experimental conditions mentioned above (c-g), are given. The Gini's indexes (right y axis) for the four experimental conditions (c-g) are given. It should be noticed that the Gini's index is low (rather even distribution of the IR intensity among pixels) for nontreated cells (c), whereas the Gini's index is high (rather uneven distribution of the IR intensity among pixels) for co-treatment with CGS-21680 (200 nM) plus quinpirole (50 µM) (g).

Coaggregation of A2AR and D2R in CGS 21680- or Quinpirole-treated SH-SY5Y Cells: Immunolabeling Experiments-- Substantial modifications of A2AR and D2R distribution were obtained when the cells were treated with the A2AR agonist CGS 21680 or the D2R agonist quinpirole. Hence, 3 h of treatment with either CGS 21680 (100 nM, Fig. 1A, panel d) or quinpirole (10 µM, Fig. 1A, panel e) induced an aggregation of both A2AR and D2R. Similar effects were also observed with shorter incubation times at higher agonist concentrations (data not shown). Thus, 3 h of incubation at these concentrations give a maximal effect. The computer-assisted analysis of the confocal images showed an increase in unevenness of the yellow distribution (GI for the entire cell body membrane was 0.23 for CGS 21680- and 0.20 for quinpirole-treated cells). Furthermore, the yellow intensity value was still high for the cell body membrane with A2AR/D2R coaggregates but very low for the cell body membrane with diffusely distributed A2AR/D2R IR (Fig. 1B). Altogether, this analysis indicates the presence on the cell body membrane of an increased proportion of A2AR/D2R coaggregates.

Cointernalization of A2AR and D2R in CGS 21680- or Quinpirole-treated SH-SY5Y Cells: Immunolabeling Experiments-- Cotreatment with CGS 21680 (100 nM) and quinpirole (10 µM) markedly decreased the yellow intensity values of the cell body membrane associated with coaggregates and diffusely distributed A2AR/D2R IR as compared with untreated cells (Fig. 1, A (panel f) and B). This indicates that cotreatment with CGS 21680 (100 nM) and quinpirole (10 µM) induces coaggregation followed by cointernalization of A2AR and D2R. A stronger reduction in D2R IR (red) was, however, obtained with higher concentrations of quinpirole (50 µM) and CGS 21680 (200 nM) (Fig. 1A, panel g). At these concentrations of the agonists, the Gini's index was high (0.30) reflecting an uneven distribution of A2AR/D2R IR. In addition, the values for the yellow intensity in the cell body membrane with A2AR/D2R coaggregates and the cell body membrane with diffusely distributed A2AR/D2R IR were, respectively, low and very low (Fig. 1B). This suggests that a cotreatment of the cells with high doses of the agonists potentiates both coaggregation and cointernalization of A2AR and D2R. Ligand-induced cointernalization was confirmed in experiments where cells were first labeled with anti-A2AR and anti-D2R antibodies for 2 h at 4 °C in the absence (Fig. 2, panel a) or in the presence of CGS21680 (200 nM) and/or quinpirole (50 µM) (Fig. 2, panels b-d). Subsequently, the ligand-induced internalization of labeled receptors was allowed to occur by incubating the cells for 3 h at 37 °C. Confocal analysis revealed colocalized A2AR/D2R aggregates inside the cell after pretreatment with either CGS 21680 (200 nM) or quinpirole (50 µM) (Fig. 2, panels b and c), which became more pronounced after pretreatment with both compounds (Fig. 2, panel d).


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Agonist-induced internalization of A2AR and D2R in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells stably transfected with the cDNA encoding for human D2R (long form). Cells were processed for immunostaining using fluorescein (green)-conjugated rabbit anti-A2AR antibodies and rhodamine (red)-conjugated rabbit anti-D2R antibodies and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Superimposition of images reveals the colocalization of A2AR and D2R (yellow). Cells were first incubated with anti-A2AR and anti-D2R antibodies for 2 h at 4 °C in the presence (b-d) or absence (a) of the agonists. The cells were then placed at 37 °C for 3 h allowing ligand-induced internalization of previously labeled receptors. Panel a shows the weak diffuse immunoreactivity of nonpretreated control cells (compare with Fig. 1, panels c). Panels b-d show the effects of 3 h of treatment at 37 °C with CGS-21680 (200 nM) alone (b), quinpirole (50 µM) alone (c), or CGS-21680 (200 nM) and quinpirole (50 µM) (d). Representative images from four independent experiments/treatment are shown; scale bars, 10 µm.

Absence of Quinpirole-induced Aggregation of A2AR in Parental SH-SY5Y Cells: Immunolabeling Experiments-- The involvement of D2R in quinpirole-mediated effects was assessed using parental neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, which express very low levels of D2R (7). Hence, quinpirole at 100 µM for 3 h did not induce any modification of A2AR immunolabeling pattern (Fig. 3).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Immunostaining of parental SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Untransfected SH-SY5Y cells were processed for immunostaining using fluorescein (green)-conjugated rabbit anti-A2AR antibodies after exposure to medium in the absence (a) or presence (b) of 100 µM quinpirole (3 h, 37 °C). Representative images from three independent experiments are shown; scale bar, 10 µm.

Codesensitization of A2AR and D2R in CGS 21680- and Quinpirole-treated SH-SY5Y Cells: cAMP Accumulation Experiments-- Under basal conditions 1 µM CGS 21680 significantly increased cAMP accumulation in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells (Fig. 4A). Quinpirole (1 µM) did not modify cAMP levels but significantly counteracted both forskolin (10 µM)-induced and CGS 21680-induced increases in cAMP accumulation (Fig. 4A). These results confirm the existence of functional and interacting A2AR and D2R in D2R-transfected neuroblastoma cells (7). After 3 h of incubation with either 200 nM CGS 21680 or 50 µM quinpirole (and subsequent withdrawal of the agonists, see "Experimental Procedures"), CGS 21680 was no longer able to significantly increase cAMP levels (Fig. 4B). This demonstrates the existence of both homologous and D2R-mediated heterologous desensitization of A2AR. Instead, the inhibitory effect of quinpirole on forskolin-induced elevation of cAMP levels was about the same (40-50% inhibition) under basal conditions and after a 3-h incubation with the A2AR or the D2R agonist (Fig. 4, A and B). Thus, as already described, A2AR clearly desensitized after A2AR agonist incubation (18, 19) and D2R (long form) showed resistance to D2R agonist-induced desensitization (20). However, after 3 h of incubation with both quinpirole (50 µM) and CGS 21680 (200 nM), quinpirole (1 µM) inhibited forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation by only 17.1%/11.4% (median/interquartile range) (Fig. 4C). This effect, when compared with the effect of quinpirole on untreated cells, was significantly different (Mann-Whitney U test: p < 0.01). Hence, quinpirole was found to inhibit forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation by 40.7%/5.8% (median/interquartile range) (Fig. 4C). Therefore, costimulation of A2AR and D2R accelerates D2R desensitization, likely by causing increased D2R internalization (see above).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   cAMP accumulation experiments in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells stably transfected with D2R (long form). Results represent means ± S.E. and are expressed as percentage of conversion of total [3H]ATP to [3H]cAMP (n = 6-8). A, effects of 10 µM forskolin (F), 1 µM CGS 21680 (CGS), and 1 µM quinpirole (Q), alone or in combination, without agonist preincubation. Quinpirole significantly decreased forskolin- and CGS-induced cAMP accumulation. **, p < 0.01 compared with control (C); ++, p < 0.01 compared with forskolin; ··, p < 0.01 compared with CGS; one-way ANOVA and post hoc Scheffe's multiple comparison test. B, effects of 10 µM forskolin (F), 1 µM CGS 21680 (CGS), and 1 µM quinpirole (Q), alone or in combination, after preincubation for 3 h with either 200 nM CGS 21680 or 50 µM quinpirole. Preincubating the cells with either agonist counteracted CGS 21680-induced cAMP accumulation. ** and *, p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively, compared with control (C); +, p < 0.05 compared with forskolin; one-way ANOVA and post hoc Scheffe's multiple comparison test. C, effects of 10 µM forskolin in the absence (F) and presence of 1 µM quinpirole (F/Q) with and without preincubation for 3 h with 200 nM CGS 21680 and 50 µM quinpirole. The counteractive effect of quinpirole on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation was significantly lower after simultaneous preincubation with A2AR and D2R agonists (17.1%/11.4%, in median/interquartile range; n = 7) than without preincubation (40.7%/5.8%, in median/interquartile range; n = 7) (p < 0.01; Mann-Whitney U test).

Coimmunoprecipitation of A2AR and D2R in Membrane Preparations from SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells and Ltk- Fibroblast Cells-- The possible existence of A2AR/D2R heteromeric complexes was then analyzed by coimmunoprecipitation performed on membrane preparation of D2R-transfected SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells. Immunoprecipitation with anti-A2AR antibodies followed by Western blotting with anti-D2R antibodies revealed three bands of 43, 47, and 63 kDa (Fig. 5), corresponding to different glycosylated states of the D2R (21). The same three bands were also obtained in control lysate preparations (Fig. 5). On the other hand, immunoprecipitation with anti-A2AR antibodies followed by Western blotting with anti-A1R did not reveal any band corresponding to A1R, indicating the absence of A2AR-A1R co-immunoprecipitation (Fig. 5). A Western blotting performed with control lysate preparations showed a band of ~40 kDa, which corresponds to the A1R (Fig. 5). A2AR/D2R interactions were also examined in mouse fibroblast Ltk- cells stably transfected with the human D2R (long form) or human D1R (8, 9). These two cell lines express a similar density of transfected dopamine receptors (2.8 pmol/mg protein of D2R in the D2R-Ltk- cell line and 4.2 pmol/mg protein of the D1R in the D1R-Ltk- cell line (Refs. 8 and 9)). Both cell lines were transiently transfected with either dog A2AR cDNA double-tagged with hemagglutinin (HA-A2AR-HA) or an irrelevant plasmid. Antibodies against the hemagglutinin tag (anti-HA) were able to precipitate a band of ~65 kDa detected in Western blot with the anti-D2R antibodies but only from cells that express both D2R and HA-A2AR-HA (Fig. 6). This band corresponds to the highly glycosylated state of D2R (21). As a positive control, we showed that this band could also be obtained from lysates of D2R-transfected Ltk- cells, thus being independent of the presence of HA-A2AR-HA. Antibodies against anti-HA failed to coimmunoprecipitate D1R in cells expressing D1R/HA-A2AR antibodies, assessing for the specificity of the A2AR/D2R coimmunoprecipitation (Fig. 6). These results demonstrate for the first time that A2AR and D2R assemble into heteromeric complexes in two different cell lines that coexpress both receptors and that these complexes exist in the absence of exogenous agonists.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Coimmunoprecipitation of A2AR and D2R from membrane preparations of SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells stably transfected with D2R (long form). Immunoprecipitation with anti-A2AR antibodies was followed by Western blotting with antibodies against A2AR (left), against D2R (middle), or against A1R (right). For positive control an aliquot of cell membrane extracts was used.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Coimmunoprecipitation of HA-A2AR-HA and D2R from membrane preparations of mouse Ltk- fibroblasts. Ltk- fibroblasts stably transfected with either human dopamine D2R (long form) or human dopamine D1R were transiently transfected with either double-tagged HA-A2AR-HA (HA-A2AR-HA/D2R and HA-A2AR-HA/D1R cells) or an irrelevant plasmid (D2R and D1R cells). An aliquot of cell membrane extracts was used as a positive control. WB, Western blot; IP, immunoprecipitation.

Colocalization and Coaggregation of A2AR and D2R in Cultured Striatal Neurons: Immunolabeling Experiments-- A2AR/D2R interactions were also studied in neuronal primary cultures of rat striatum. Cells were grown for 2 weeks and immunostained for A2AR and D2R (see above). Immunolabeling of A1R on nonpermeabilized cells was also performed. Most neurons exhibited A2AR and D2R IR in the soma and in the dendrites, however, with predominance of D2R to A2AR IR in the dendrites (Fig. 7A). As for neuroblastoma cells, confocal analysis revealed a high degree of A2AR/D2R colocalization in the absence of exposure to exogenous agonists (Fig. 7A). Treatment (6 h) with either the A2AR agonist CGS 21680 (100 nM) or the D2R agonist quinpirole (10 µM) induced aggregation of both A2AR and D2R (Fig. 7A) and reduction in IR intensity. However, no synergism was observed when cells were cotreated with CGS 21680 (100 nM) and quinpirole (10 µM) for the same time (Fig. 7A). To assess the specificity of A2AR/D2R interactions, cells were incubated with 10 µM quinpirole for 6 h and immunostained with anti-A1R antibodies. No change in the pattern of distribution of A1R present in the soma and dendrites was observed (Fig. 7B). In addition and instead of A2AR/D2R, no aggregates were seen, which confirms the specificity of A2AR/D2R interactions. Cointernalization experiments analogous to those described in Fig. 2 could not be performed in cultured striatal cells, which did not tolerate the temperature conditions of the experimental internalization protocol (cells changed morphology and fell off the coverslip).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Double immunofluorescence staining and confocal images of striatal neurons in culture. Panel A, cells were exposed for 6 h to either 100 nM CGS-21680, 10 µM quinpirole, or both and were processed for immunostaining using fluorescein (green)-conjugated rabbit anti-A2AR antibodies and rhodamine (red)-conjugated rabbit anti-D2R antibodies. The cells were analyzed by confocal microscopy. Superimposition of images reveals the colocalization of A2AR and D2R in yellow. Panel B, staining of adenosine A1R with fluorescein (green)-conjugated anti-A1R antibodies. Note the lack of effect of 10 µM quinpirole (6 h). Representative images from four to five independent experiments/treatment are shown; scale bar, 10 µm.

Interaction between A2AR and D2R in Cultured Striatal Neurons: cAMP Accumulation Experiments-- Both basal and forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation were about 10 times higher than in neuroblastoma cells (Fig. 8A). This could explain why, unlike what was observed in neuroblastoma cells, CGS 21680 (1 µM) did not induce any significant increase in cAMP accumulation compared with basal values (Fig. 8A). As for neuroblastoma cells, quinpirole (1 µM) did not modify cAMP levels but significantly reduced forskolin (10 µM)-induced cAMP accumulation (Fig. 8B). Finally, CGS 21680 (1 µM) counteracted the effect of quinpirole on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation (Fig. 8B). These results provide a functional demonstration of the antagonistic A2AR/D2R interactions in striatal neurons in culture.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   cAMP accumulation experiments in striatal neurons in culture. Results represent means ± S.E. and are expressed as percentage of conversion of total [3H]ATP to [3H]cAMP (n = 10-14). A, effects of 10 and 30 µM forskolin (F10 and F30, respectively), 1 µM CGS 21680 (CGS), and 1 µM quinpirole (Q). Forskolin, but not CGS 21680, significantly increased cAMP accumulation. **, p < 0.01 compared with control (C); one-way ANOVA. B, effects of 10 µM forskolin (F), 1 µM CGS 21680 (CGS), and 1 µM quinpirole (Q), alone or in combination. CGS 21680 counteracted the inhibitory effect of quinpirole on forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation. + and ++, p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively, compared with forskolin; one-way ANOVA and post hoc Scheffe's multiple comparison test.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The main findings of the present work are first that A2AR and D2R are colocalized and form heteromers in untreated neuronal cells and that they coaggregate upon long term exposure to either agonist. The formation of A2AR/D2R heteromers and aggregates is receptor subtype-specific because co-expression of A2AR/D1R (present study) or A1R/D2R (6) does not lead to formation of heteromers. Furthermore, A2AR did not form heteromeric complexes with A1R (present study). This phenomenon may therefore constitute the molecular basis for the selective A2AR/D2R interactions observed in vitro, like A2AR modulation of D2 binding characteristics (7, 8, 22, 23), counteraction of D2R-mediated intracellular [Ca2+i] responses (7), and inhibition of cAMP accumulation (see Ref. 23 and present paper). The same type of antagonism was observed in vivo with the A2AR inhibition of D2R-mediated regulation of GABA release in the globus pallidus and of D2R-mediated increases in motor activity (1, 5). Besides acute antagonistic actions, the A2AR/D2R heteromers may be involved in receptor trafficking, because long term exposure to either A2AR or D2R agonists induces aggregation and cotreatment with these agonists induces internalization of both receptors. Moreover, prior exposure to A2AR or D2R agonists can produce a desensitization of the A2AR in terms of cAMP accumulation associated with coaggregation. In contrast, co-exposure to A2AR and D2R agonists, but not to any of the two agonists alone, causes desensitization of D2R-mediated inhibition of cAMP accumulation, which is associated with cointernalization. The present observation that A2AR and D2R functions are simultaneously altered after long exposure to agonists can aid in understanding behavioral findings involving cross-tolerance and cross-sensitization between dopamine agonists and compounds active at adenosine receptors (such as caffeine) (24, 25). Together with other recently reported findings, the present results suggest that changes in A2AR function may be involved in the secondary effects observed after chronic intermittent treatment with L-DOPA such as reduced antiparkinsonian activity and dyskinesia (26). Adenosine is a feedback detector of neuronal activation, in view of the fact that it allows the neuronal network to return into a resting state (27). Adenosine is therefore expected to increase in the striatal extracellular fluid from patients with Parkinson's disease mainly after chronic intermittent L-DOPA treatment and in agreement with the evidence of increased striatal glutamate drive (28). Hence, striatal extracellular levels of adenosine have been found to increase in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine model of Parkinson's disease (29). Thus, the wearing off of the antiparkinsonian action of L-DOPA treatment may in part be caused by the simultaneous chronic activation of A2AR and D2R that, according to the present results, may lead to substantial cointernalization of both receptors. The coadministration of A2AR antagonists together with L-DOPA or dopamine D2R agonists may therefore provide a new therapeutic approach lacking the secondary effects of chronic L-DOPA treatment (30, 31). Overall, the present and previous (1, 5) data implicate that the membrane interactions taking place between A2AR and D2R via heteromeric complexes represent a crucial mechanism influencing D2R-mediated transmission. This prompts development of adenosine and dopamine antagonists/agonists compounds preferentially active on A2AR/D2R heteromers as new drugs for the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases, such as Parkinson's disease (30, 31), schizophrenia (32, 33), Huntington's disease (34), and dystonia (35), in which D2R have been implicated.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Swedish Medical Research Council Grant 14X-00715, European Commission Grant QLG3-CT-2001-01056, Spanish Commission of Science and Technology National Plan of Biotechnology Grant BIO99-0601-C02-02), an Italian Ministero della Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica ex60% grant, and a grant from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Present address: Stroke Branch, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-4128. Tel.: 301-594-2597; Fax: 301-402-2769; E-mail: hillionj@ninds.nih.gov.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M107731200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: D2R, dopamine D2 receptor; A2AR, adenosine A2A receptor; HA, hemagglutinin; ANOVA, analysis of variance; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; IR, immunoreactive; GI, Gini's index; DOPA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Ferré, S., Fredholm, B. B., Morelli, M., Popoli, P., and Fuxe, K. (1997) Trends Neurosci. 20, 482-487[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Schiffmann, S. N., Jacobs, O., and Vanderhaeghen, J.-J. (1991) J. Neurochem. 57, 1062-1067[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Fink, J. S., Weaver, D. R., Rivkees, S. A, Peterfreund, R. A., Pollack, A. E., Adler, E. M., and Reppert, S. M. (1992) Mol. Brain Res. 14, 186-195[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Ferré, S., O'Connor, W. T., Svenningsson, P., Bjorklund, L., Lindberg, J., Tinner, B., Stromberg, I., Goldstein, M., Ogren, S. O., Ungerstedt, U., Fredholm, B. B., and Fuxe, K. (1996) Eur. J. Neurosci. 8, 1545-1553[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Fuxe, K., Ferré, S., Zoli, M., and Agnati, L. F. (1998) Brain Res. Rev. 26, 258-273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Ginés, S., Hillion, J., Torvinen, M., Le, Crom, S., Casado, V., Canela, E. I., Rondin, S., Lew, J. Y., Watson, S., Zoli, M., Agnati, L. F., Vernier, P., Lluis, C., Ferré, S., Fuxe, K., and Franco, R. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 8606-8611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Salim, H., Ferré, S., Dalal, A., Peterfreund, R. A., Fuxe, K., Vincent, J. D., and Lledo, P. M. (2000) J. Neurochem. 74, 432-439[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Dasgupta, S., Ferré, S., Kull, B., Hedlund, P. B., Finnman, U. B., Ahlberg, S., Arenas, E., Fredholm, B. B., and Fuxe, K. (1996) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 316, 325-331[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Ferré, S., Torvinen, M., Antoniou, K., Irenius, E., Civelli, O., Arenas, E., Fredholm, B. B., and Fuxe, K. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 4718-4724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Sarrio, S., Casado, V., Escriche, M., Ciruela, F., Mallol, J., Canela, E. I., Lluis, C., and Franco, R. (2000) Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 5164-5174[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Bjelke, B., Goldstein, M., Tinner, B., Andersson, C., Sesack, S. R., Steinbusch, H. W., Lew, J. Y., He, X., Watson, S., Tengroth, B., and Fuxe, K. (1996) J. Chem. Neuroanat. 12, 37-50[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Saura, C. A., Mallol, J., Canela, E. I., Lluis, C., and Franco, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 17610-17617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Ciruela, F., Casado, V., Mallol, J., Canela, E. I., Lluis, C., and Franco, R. (1995) J. Neurosci. Res. 42, 818-828[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Duncan, O. D. (1977) in The Measurement of Population (Smith, D. , and Keyfitz, N., eds) , pp. 349-363, Springer Verlag, London
15. Agnati, L. F., Fuxe, K., Zini, I., Calza, L., Benfenati, F., Zoli, M., Hokfelt, T., and Goldstein, M. (1982) Neurosci. Lett. 32, 253-258[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Olah, M. E. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 337-344[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Salomon, Y., Londos, C., and Rodbell, M. (1974) Anal. Biochem. 58, 541-548[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Palmer, T. M., Gettys, T. W., Jacobson, K. A., and Stiles, G. L. (1994) Mol. Pharmacol. 45, 1082-1094[Abstract]
19. Mundell, S. J., and Kelly, E. (1998) Br. J. Pharmacol. 125, 1594-1600[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Ng, G. Y., Varghese, G., Chung, H. T., Trogadis, J., Seeman, P., O'Dowd, B. F., and George, S. R. (1997) Endocrinology 138, 4199-4206[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Fishburn, C. S., Elazar, Z., and Fuchs, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 29819-29824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Ferré, S., von Euler, G., Johansson, B., Fredholm, B. B., and Fuxe, K. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 7238-7241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Kull, B., Ferré, S., Arslan, G., Svenningsson, P., Fuxe, K., Owman, C., and Fredholm, B. B. (1999) Biochem. Pharmacol. 58, 1035-1045[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Fenu, S., Cauli, O., and Morelli, M. (2000) Behav. Brain. Res. 114, 97-105[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Garrett, B. E., and Holtzman, S. G. (1994) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 262, 65-75[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Zeng, B. Y., Pearce, R. K., MacKenzie, G. M., and Jenner, P. (2000) Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 1096-1104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Ferré, S., and Fuxe, K. (2000) Prog. Brain Res. 125, 353-361[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Chase, T. N., and Oh, J. D. (2000) Trends Neurosci. 23, S86-S91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Nomoto, N., Kaseda, S., Iwata, S., Shimizu, T., Fukuda, T., and Nakagawa, S. (2000) J. Neurol. 247, V16-V22[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Kanda, T., Jackson, M. J., Smith, L. A., Pearce, R. K., Nakamura, J., Kase, H., Kuwana, Y., and Jenner, P. (1998) Ann. Neurol. 43, 507-513[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Stromberg, I., Popoli, P., Muller, C. E., Ferré, S., and Fuxe, K. (2000) Eur. J. Neurosci. 12, 4033-4037[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Ferré, S. (1997) Psychopharmacology 133, 107-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Akhondzadeh, S., Shasavand, E., Jamilian, H., Shabestari, O., and Kamalipour, A. (2000) J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 25, 131-137[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Popoli, P., Pezzola, A., Reggio, R., Caporali, M. G., and Scotti de Carolis, A. (1994) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 257, R5-R6[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Richter, A., Hamann, M., and Bartling, C. (2000) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 404, 299-302[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve].(2000)


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Zeng, I. Armando, Y. Luo, G. M. Eisner, R. A. Felder, and P. A. Jose
Dysregulation of dopamine-dependent mechanisms as a determinant of hypertension: studies in dopamine receptor knockout mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): H551 - H569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Quiroz, C. Gomes, A. C. Pak, J. A. Ribeiro, S. R. Goldberg, B. T. Hope, and S. Ferre
Blockade of Adenosine A2A Receptors Prevents Protein Phosphorylation in the Striatum Induced by Cortical Stimulation.
J. Neurosci., October 18, 2006; 26(42): 10808 - 10812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
S. C. Prinster, C. Hague, and R. A. Hall
Heterodimerization of G Protein-Coupled Receptors: Specificity and Functional Significance
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2005; 57(3): 289 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
L. F. Agnati, K. Fuxe, M. Torvinen, S. Genedani, R. Franco, S. Watson, G. G. Nussdorfer, G. Leo, and D. Guidolin
New Methods to Evaluate Colocalization of Fluorophores in Immunocytochemical Preparations as Exemplified by a Study on A2A and D2 Receptors in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells
J. Histochem. Cytochem., August 1, 2005; 53(8): 941 - 953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Novi, L. Stanasila, F. Giorgi, G. U. Corsini, S. Cotecchia, and R. Maggio
Paired Activation of Two Components within Muscarinic M3 Receptor Dimers Is Required for Recruitment of {beta}-Arrestin-1 to the Plasma Membrane
J. Biol. Chem., May 20, 2005; 280(20): 19768 - 19776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
M. Torvinen, D. Marcellino, M. Canals, L. F. Agnati, C. Lluis, R. Franco, and K. Fuxe
Adenosine A2A Receptor and Dopamine D3 Receptor Interactions: Evidence of Functional A2A/D3 Heteromeric Complexes
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2005; 67(2): 400 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]