Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109708200 on February 27, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 18191-18197, May 17, 2002
Glucocorticoids Inhibit Cell Cycle Progression in Differentiating
Osteoblasts via Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3
*
Elisheva
Smith
,
Gerhard A.
Coetzee§, and
Baruch
Frenkel
¶
From the Departments of ¶ Orthopedic Surgery,
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and
§ Urology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, and the
Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California Keck School
of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033
Received for publication, October 9, 2001, and in revised form, February 27, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Differentiating osteoblasts in culture undergo a
commitment stage, during which cobblestone-like cells grow to high
density past confluency. In contrast to earlier proliferative stages, the cell cycle during this commitment stage is inhibited by
glucocorticoids (GC). Chronic GC treatment also impedes mineral
deposition if steroid administration commences early enough during
commitment. This study defines a role for glycogen synthase kinase-3
(GSK3
) and its target, c-Myc, in the GC-sensitive osteoblast
persistent cell cycle. c-Myc levels decreased as cells reached
confluence, but then increased during growth to high density. GC
administration at this stage resulted in down-regulation of c-Myc. This
was accompanied by GC-mediated attenuation of GSK3
Ser9 inhibitory phosphorylation and increased GSK3
kinase activity. Down-regulation of c-Myc was attributable to enhanced
Thr58 phosphorylation, leading to accelerated degradation.
In contrast, GC did not inhibit the c-Myc synthesis rate or the level
of
-catenin, a transcriptional coactivator of c-myc. The
attenuated cell cycle and the reduced c-Myc level were returned
to control levels by specific inhibition of GSK3
using
lithium chloride. These results suggest that tonal GSK3
repression
at the cobblestone stage of osteoblast differentiation permits
osteoblast growth to high density. GC interfere with this
growth-permissive axis by GSK3
activation, resulting in c-Myc
down-regulation and impediment of the G1/S cell cycle transition.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Osteoporosis is a major adverse effect of glucocorticoid
(GC)1 treatment for the
amelioration of symptoms of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (1).
The most important single mechanism contributing to bone loss in
GC-treated patients is inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation (for
review, see Refs. 2 and 3). We recently identified a commitment stage
during osteoblast differentiation in culture (the "cobblestone"
stage) in which GC exert their inhibitory effect (4). During this
stage, proliferation persists, but is regulated uniquely compared with
control of the cell cycle prior to confluence. At this commitment stage
(but not earlier), GC inhibit cell cycle progression (4).
Cell growth to high density often reflects loss of cell cycle control.
However, controlled growth to high density occurs during cell
differentiation not only in cultured osteoblasts (4), but also in
cultured adipocytes (5, 6), as well as during the early definition of
skeletal elements in vivo (50). Differentiating nontransformed osteoblasts that grow to high density do exhibit growth
inhibitory signals, e.g. increased levels of the
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1,
decreased cyclin E, and reduced free E2F DNA-binding activity (4). To
explain the persistent growth, we postulated that the Wnt signaling
pathway, which links cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions to the cell
cycle (7-10), may account for the post-confluent osteoblast persistent
cell cycle and may be involved in the inhibition of this cell cycle by
GC.
Wingless/Wnt-mediated cell-cell signaling molecules play a major role
in organogenesis and are conserved among vertebrates, flies, and
primitive multicellular organisms (11-13). Components of the
Wingless/Wnt signaling pathway participate in cell-cell adhesion, body
patterning, cell growth, and tumorigenesis (11, 12). Forced activation
of the Wnt signaling pathway by overexpression of either Wnt1 (18) or
its target,
-catenin (19), results in cell growth to high density.
The
-catenin pool relevant to Wnt signaling resides in the cytoplasm
and is distinct from a membrane-associated pool that plays a role in
cell-cell adherence. In response to Wnt signaling, cytoplasmic
-catenin increases and enters the nucleus, where it cooperates with
lymphoid enhancer factor/T-cell factor in the transcriptional
activation of cell cycle stimulatory genes such as c-myc (9)
and cyclin D1 (10). A major regulator of
-catenin is glycogen
synthase kinase-3
(GSK3
).
-Catenin and GSK3
are found in a
cytoplasmic complex called the
-catenin destruction complex, which
also contains axin and adenomatous polyposis coli (25). The
association of
-catenin with GSK3
results in rapid degradation of
-catenin, probably mediated by phosphorylation. Activation of the
Wnt pathway results in decreased GSK3
intrinsic activity and, more
importantly, disruption of the
-catenin destruction complex, leading
to increased stability and accumulation of
-catenin.
GSK3
also plays a role in regulating growth signals elicited by
molecules such as insulin, insulin-like growth factor I (14), epidermal
growth factor (15), fibroblast growth factor-1,2
and the fibronectin-activated integrin-linked kinase (17). These
signals inhibit the intrinsic activity of GSK3
, but do not usually
lead to disruption of the
-catenin destruction complex.
In this study, we examined the involvement of the
GSK3
/
-catenin/c-myc axis in GC inhibition of
the persistent cell cycle in post-confluent differentiating
osteoblasts. We found that GC-treated differentiating osteoblasts
displayed increased GSK3
activity and decreased levels of c-Myc;
however, c-Myc down-regulation by GSK3
was not mediated via
-catenin, but rather by direct phosphorylation and enhanced
degradation of c-Myc itself.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
The MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells used in this
study were derived from a subclone recently isolated based on its
robust mineralization potential (4). This subclone was expanded to
~109 cells, at which time frozen stocks were prepared and
defined as passage 1. Cells were maintained up to passage 12 in
-minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum
and penicillin/streptomycin. All experiments were performed under differentiation conditions, i.e. in the presence of 50 µM ascorbic acid and 10 mM
-glycerophosphate. SAOS-2 human osteosarcoma cells, stably
transfected with either the wild-type or a dimerization-defective GC
receptor, were a kind gift from Dr. M. J. Garabedian (New York University) (20). These cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 400 µg/ml Geneticin.
Cell Fractionation--
Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were
prepared essentially according to Verona et al. (21). Cell
pellets were resuspended in 2 packed cell volumes of hypotonic buffer
containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8),
1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 mM NaF, and 0.1 mM
Na3VO4. Cells were left to swell on ice for 10 min and then vortexed for 10 s and spun at 500 × g for 5 min. The supernatant (containing the cytoplasmic lysate) was supplemented with 0.33 volume of 80% glycerol and clarified by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 30 min.
The nuclear pellet was washed twice with hypotonic buffer and lysed in
2 nuclear pellet volumes of lysis buffer containing 100 mM
HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.5 M KCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, 28% glycerol, and protease and phosphatase inhibitors as described above. The nuclear extracts were centrifuged at
20,000 × g for 1 h to remove cell debris.
Western Analysis--
Between 60 and 100 µg of protein from
the nuclear extract, cytoplasmic lysate, or whole cell pellets were
subjected to SDS-PAGE. Separated proteins were transferred to a
0.2-µm nitrocellulose membrane using a Mini Trans-Blot Transfer Cell
(Bio-Rad), and immunodetection was performed using ECL (Amersham
Biosciences) according to the manufacturers' recommendations, followed
by exposure of the membrane to x-ray film. Results were quantitated by
photodensitometry using an AlphaImager 2000 system (Alpha Innotech
Corp.) and are expressed as means ± S.D. Differences were
considered significant when p was
0.05 as determined by a
paired t test.
GSK3
Immunoprecipitation and Kinase Assays--
These were
performed essentially as described by Diehl et al. (22).
Cells were lysed in 1% Triton X-100 buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.27 M sucrose, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.4 mM NaF, and 0.4 mM NaVO4. GSK3
was immunoprecipitated from 200 µg of total protein extract using 1 µg of mouse monoclonal anti-GSK3
antibodies and protein
A/G-agarose beads. The immunoprecipitate was resuspended in 24 µl of
kinase buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 14 µM ATP, 83 µM phosphoglycogen synthase
peptide II, 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP (6000 Ci/mmol), and
protease and phosphatase inhibitors as described above. After 30 min at
30 °C, 8 µl of 4× loading buffer (final concentrations: 4% SDS,
12% glycerol, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2%
-mercaptoethanol, and 0.01% Serva blue G) were added. The
mixture was boiled for 5 min and loaded onto a Tricine-16.5% acrylamide gel (23), followed by autoradiography and quantitation as
described above.
Flow Cytometry--
Cell cycle analysis was performed according
to Darzynkiewicz et al. (24). Briefly, cells were lightly
trypsinized, resuspended in Hanks' buffer, fixed in cold 70% ethanol,
washed with Hanks' buffer, and suspended in 1 ml of Hanks' buffer
containing 20 µg/ml propidium iodide and 5 Kunitz units of DNase-free
RNase A. The percentage of cells in G1, S, and
G2/M was determined using an EPICS® Profile Analyzer.
Reagents--
Tissue culture reagents were purchased from
Invitrogen. Antibodies against GSK3
(G22320) and
-catenin
(C19220) were purchased from Transduction Laboratories.
Anti-phospho-Ser9 GSK3
(catalog no. 9336) and
anti-phospho-Thr58 c-Myc (catalog no. 9401) antibodies were
from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Anti-c-Myc antibodies
(SC-764) and protein A/G-agarose beads were from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Phosphoglycogen synthase peptide II was
from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). MG132 was from
Calbiochem. Protein concentration was determined using a micro BCA
protein assay kit (Pierce).
 |
RESULTS |
GC Activate GSK3
by Attenuating Its Ser9 Inhibitory
Phosphorylation--
We have recently shown that GC inhibit persistent
cell cycle progression at a commitment stage during osteoblast
differentiation characterized by a cobblestone appearance (4).
We postulated that components of the Wnt signaling pathway might play a
role during this commitment stage in mediating cell cycle persistence and its inhibition by GC. One of these components is GSK3
, a cell
cycle guardian that is inactivated by a variety of growth stimuli. We
evaluated GSK3
in non-treated and GC-treated MC3T3-E1 cells at and
immediately after the cobblestone stage. As determined by
Western analysis, DEX treatment of cells that had just become confluent
resulted in a small but consistent increase in the total cellular
levels of GSK3
(Fig. 1A).
Because nuclear localization of GSK3
has recently been proposed to
play a cell cycle-related role (22), we also performed Western analysis
on nuclear extracts and found that the increase in GSK3
levels was
even more pronounced in the nuclear fraction of DEX-treated cells (Fig.
1A). Notably, this effect was attenuated in cultures that
had already grown to high density (Fig. 1A, Day
9). Accordingly, we thereafter confined our work specifically to
cells that just initiate growth to high density.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
GC activate GSK3 in
differentiating osteoblasts. A: MC3T3-E1 cells were
maintained under the differentiation protocol and treated with 1 µM DEX either at the cobblestone stage (days 5-7) or
thereafter (days 7-9). Whole cell Triton X-100 extracts
(WCE) and nuclear extracts (Nuc) were prepared
and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-GSK3 antibody.
B: upper left panel, the Triton X-100 extracts
from the day 7 cultures in A were subjected to GSK3
kinase activity assay. GSK3 was immunoprecipitated and incubated
with [ -32P]ATP and phosphoglycogen synthase peptide II
(32P-GS-II), followed by electrophoresis and
autoradiography. Middle left panel, SDS whole cell extracts
were prepared from non-treated and DEX-treated cultures on day 7 and
subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-phospho-Ser9
GSK3 antibody ([pSer9]GSK3 ).
Lower left panel, Western analysis of total GSK3 was
performed on the same membrane used in the middle panel.
Right panel, shown is a graph representing the DEX/control
ratios (mean ± S.D., n = 3) for
Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3 (pGSK), total
GSK3 (GSK), and the relative GSK3 Ser9
phosphorylation level (pGSK/GSK). The latter value was
calculated for each experiment by dividing the
Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3 ratio by the total GSK3
ratio. C: nuclear and cytoplasmic (Cyt) extracts
of cells harvested on day 7 were subjected to Western blot analysis
using anti- -catenin antibody. D: differentiating MC3T3-E1
cells were treated with 1 µM DEX on day 5 and harvested
20 h later for Western analysis of c-Myc in SDS whole cell
extracts.
|
|
GSK3
activity is subject to functionally critical post-translational
modifications. We therefore measured GSK3
activity by
immunoprecipitation and kinase assays using a glycogen synthase-derived peptide as substrate. As exemplified in Fig. 1B (upper
left panel), DEX significantly increased GSK3
activity, and
this increase amounted to 1.77 ± 0.1-fold in three independent experiments.
An important post-translational modification of GSK3
is the
phosphorylation of Ser9, which results in GSK3
inhibition, such as seen following growth factor stimulation (14,
15).2 We therefore evaluated the effect of GC on GSK3
Ser9 phosphorylation. Indeed, as shown in Fig.
1B, DEX decreased the level of
Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3
(middle left panel)
while increasing total GSK3
(lower left panel). In three
independent experiments, DEX induced an average 2.4-fold decrease in
the level of Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3
(Fig.
1B, right panel, pGSK). When corrected for the total levels of GSK3
, DEX reduced by 3-fold the relative level of GSK3
Ser9 phosphorylation (Fig. 1B,
right panel, pGSK/GSK). These results suggest
that GC attenuate the inhibitory phosphorylation of GSK3
mediated by
growth stimulatory signals. Higher activity of GSK3
, a cell cycle
inhibitor, might contribute to the antimitogenic effect of GC in
post-confluent MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts (4).
GC Down-regulate c-Myc in MC3T3-E1 Cells in a
-Catenin-independent Fashion--
An important downstream target of
the Wnt signaling pathway is
-catenin, which participates in the
transcriptional activation of cell cycle stimulatory genes such as
c-myc (9) and cyclin D1 (10). GSK3
-mediated
phosphorylation promotes the degradation of
-catenin. We therefore
examined whether
-catenin is down-regulated in GC-treated
MC3T3-E1 cells. However, as shown in Fig. 1C, DEX did
not decrease either the nuclear or the cytoplasmic
-catenin level,
suggesting that
-catenin is resistant to GC-mediated activation of
GSK3
in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. This is consistent with the notion
that some GSK3
exists in pools that are physically and functionally
distinct from those found complexed with adenomatous polyposis coli,
axin, and
-catenin (for review, see Ref. 25).
GSK3
can down-regulate cell cycle regulatory factors such as c-Myc
and cyclin D1 in both
-catenin-dependent and
-independent manners. The
-catenin-independent pathway entails
direct phosphorylation of c-Myc at Thr58, followed by
ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation (26, 27). Indeed, despite
the persistence of
-catenin in GC-treated MC3T3-E1 cells, Western
blot analysis of c-Myc revealed reduced levels in DEX-treated compared
with non-treated cultures (Fig. 1D). In three independent
experiments, c-Myc levels were significantly decreased by 2.3 ± 0.2-fold.
Osteoblast Growth to High Density Is Associated with c-Myc
Up-regulation--
c-Myc has been previously found to express in
osteoblasts and chondrocytes in vivo (28, 29). We therefore
analyzed c-Myc by Western blot analysis during MC3T3-E1 osteoblast
differentiation in vitro. Expectedly, as cells reached
confluence (Fig. 2A, Day 5), c-Myc levels decreased (Fig. 2B, Day 5 versus Day 3). The same was observed in NIH3T3 cells
under similar culture conditions (data not shown). However, 2 days
after the cobblestone stage (Fig. 2A, Day
7) c-Myc was up-regulated back to levels observed in pre-confluent
cultures (Fig. 2B, Day 7). This was not
seen with the NIH3T3 cells (data not shown). In contrast to c-Myc, cyclin A, which is down-regulated by GC in post-confluent persistently cycling osteoblasts (4), was expressed at steady levels during pre-confluence and confluence and until at least 2 days after confluence (Fig. 2C). Taken together, this expression
pattern and the effect of DEX (Fig. 1D) suggest a role for
c-Myc in driving the post-confluent osteoblast persistent cell
cycle.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Up-regulation of c-Myc in post-confluent
differentiating osteoblasts. A, shown is the morphology
of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts during the GC-sensitive commitment
(cobblestone) stage. Left panel, cells on day 3, just prior
to confluence; middle panel, cells with a cobblestone
appearance (day 5); right panel, cell growth to high density
(day 7). Magnification ×100. B and C, cells were
harvested at the three developmental stages represented in
A, and Western blot analysis was performed using either
anti-c-Myc (B) or anti-cyclin A (C)
antibody.
|
|
GC Promote Thr58 Phosphorylation and Enhanced
Degradation of c-Myc--
Based on the activation of GSK3
(Fig.
1B), without an accompanying decrease in
-catenin (Fig.
1C), the decreased c-Myc level in GC-treated MC3T3-E1 cells
(Fig. 1D) is attributable to protein instability. We
therefore studied c-Myc synthesis and degradation in GC-treated
cultures. Initially, we evaluated c-Myc synthesis rates by blocking
degradation using the proteasomal inhibitor MG132; this was immediately
followed by concomitant MG132 withdrawal and administration of
cycloheximide to block protein synthesis during the measurement of the
c-Myc degradation rate. As shown in Fig.
3, which represents one of three
experiments with similar results, DEX did not inhibit c-Myc synthesis.
However, c-Myc degradation was significantly accelerated in DEX-treated
cells (Fig. 3, A and B). Half-life values can
only be approximated in these experiments because proteasomal recovery
following MG132 withdrawal is not instantaneous. Assuming complete
recovery at 1.5 h post-MG132 withdrawal, c-Myc was degraded in the
DEX-treated cells over the following hour with an apparent half-life
value 3.2 ± 0.7 times greater than that measured in the
non-treated cells (p = 0.02; n = 3).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
GC accelerate c-Myc degradation.
A, post-confluent MC3T3-E1 cells were treated on day
6 with either 1 µM DEX or vehicle (control
(CONT)). At 16 h of DEX treatment, 50 µM
MG132 in 0.1% Me2SO (final concentrations) was
administered, and cells were collected for c-Myc Western blot analysis
after 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 h. At the 4-h time point, MG132 was washed,
and cells were refed with fresh medium containing 50 µM
cycloheximide. Cultures were again harvested at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and
3 h following MG132 withdrawal for Western analysis of c-Myc.
B, shown is a graph illustrating the degradation of c-Myc in
treated ( ) versus non-treated ( ) cells. Values were
derived by densitometry of the autoradiogram shown in A
(right panels). Similar results were obtained in three
independent experiments. C, Western analysis was carried out
on 4-h MG132-treated cells using antibody that recognize either all
forms or just the Thr58-phosphorylated form of c-Myc
([pThr58]c-MYC).
|
|
GSK3
has been shown to target c-Myc for proteasomal degradation by
phosphorylation at Thr58 (26, 27). We therefore tested the
c-Myc Thr58 phosphorylation status in DEX-treated
versus non-treated cells. Samples from 4-h MG132-treated
cultures (as in Fig. 3A) were subjected to Western analysis
using anti-phospho-Thr58 c-Myc antibody. As shown in Fig.
3C, DEX increased the c-Myc Thr58
phosphorylation level. Corrected for total c-Myc, the relative DEX-mediated increases in c-Myc Thr58 phosphorylation were
1.7- and 2.6-fold in two independent experiments. These results are
consistent with the insensitivity of
-catenin to GC (Fig.
1C) and strongly suggest that increased c-Myc
phosphorylation by GSK3
in GC-treated osteoblasts leads to
accelerated degradation and reduced c-Myc steady-state levels.
GC Effects on GSK3
and c-Myc Precede Alterations in the Cell
Cycle Profile--
The increased GSK3
activity in GC-treated cells
(Fig. 1B) may be a result, not a cause, of cell cycle
attenuation (30). We therefore tested GSK3
activity following short
periods of GC treatment (before an effect on the cell cycle is
mounted). Triton X-100 extracts of 2- and 5-h treated cultures were
subjected to GSK3
immunoprecipitation and kinase assays. These short
treatment periods did not alter the distribution of cells among the
phases of the cell cycle (data not shown). As shown in Fig.
4 (upper panel), DEX activated
GSK3
within as little as 2 h of treatment, with somewhat
lesser activation observed at 5 h.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
DEX-mediated GSK3
activation precedes cell cycle attenuation. MC3T3-E1 cells
were treated on day 6 with either 1 µM DEX or vehicle and
harvested after either 2 or 5 h for preparation of Triton X-100
whole cell extracts. The same extracts were subjected to either GSK3
kinase assays (upper panel), as described for Fig.
1B, or Western blot analysis using the indicated antibodies
(lower three panels).
[pSer9]GSK3 ,
anti-phospho-Ser9 GSK3 antibody.
|
|
Next, Triton X-100 extracts as described above were subjected to
Western blot analysis using either anti-GSK3
or
anti-phospho-Ser9 GSK3
antibody. As shown in Fig. 4, 2-h
DEX treatment significantly reduced Ser9-phosphorylated
GSK3
, and this reduction amounted to 47 ± 5% in three
independent experiments. Corrected for total GSK3
, the change in the
relative Ser9 phosphorylation level (calculated, as in Fig.
1B, as the ratio between phospho-GSK3
(DEX)/phospho-GSK3
(control) and GSK3
(DEX)/GSK3
(control))
was significantly reduced within the 2-h treatment period by 46 ± 20% (n = 3). The GC effect on the relative Ser9 phosphorylation of GSK3
was similar at the 5-h time
point, amounting to a significant 50 ± 18% reduction
(n = 3). Because Ser9 phosphorylation is a
major (albeit not the only (31)) determinant influencing GSK3
activity, our data suggest that the fast decrease in GSK3
Ser9 phosphorylation following 2 h of treatment may be
the initial event leading to GSK3
activation, c-Myc down-regulation,
and cell cycle attenuation. Consistent with this, a reduction in c-Myc levels was apparent at the 5-h (although not at the 2-h) treatment time
point (Fig. 4, lower panel).
GC Attenuate GSK3
Ser9 Phosphorylation That Follows
Serum Stimulation--
c-Myc plays a critical role in the response of
the cell cycle machinery to growth signals. To examine the c-Myc
immediate response to serum stimulation, MC3T3-E1 cells were incubated
in serum-free medium for 48 h and then refed with medium
containing 10% serum. DEX was administered 2 h prior to and again
during serum stimulation. Following serum stimulation, c-Myc
immediately began to accumulate in the non-treated cells (Fig.
5). In three independent experiments,
c-Myc levels significantly increased by 2.5 ± 1.1-fold within 20 min of serum stimulation. In contrast, c-Myc accumulation was blunted
in the DEX-treated cells, where an insignificant 27 ± 25%
increase was measured following serum stimulation. The antimitogenic
effect of DEX in serum-stimulated cells was confirmed by flow cytometry
analysis at 12 h following serum stimulation with or without DEX
(Fig. 5B).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
GC attenuate serum-induced
GSK3 Ser9 phosphorylation.
A, post-confluent differentiating cells were deprived of
serum for 48 h and then refed with serum-containing medium. DEX
treatment (1 µM) was initiated 2 h prior to serum
stimulation. SDS cell extracts were prepared at 0, 10, and 20 min of
serum stimulation, and Western blot analysis was performed using the
indicated antibodies. [pSer9]GSK3 ,
anti-phospho-Ser9 GSK3 antibody. B, parallel
DEX-treated and non-treated cultures were harvested 12 h following
serum stimulation, fixed, and stained with propidium iodide for flow
cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in the S + G2 + M phases of the cell cycle is depicted (mean ± S.D.,
n = 3).
|
|
Following serum stimulation, Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3
consistently accumulated in the non-treated cultures (Fig. 5); the
accumulation rate in the DEX-treated cultures was reduced by an average
of 27% as compared with the control cultures, but this difference did
not reach statistical significance (p = 0.15;
n = 3). However, when corrected for the respective
total GSK3
values, the increase in relative GSK3
Ser9
phosphorylation was significantly attenuated in the DEX-treated cultures to levels 63% lower than the respective control values (p = 0.03; n = 3). Thus, GC attenuate
the Ser9 inhibitory phosphorylation of GSK3
in
serum-stimulated MC3T3-E1 cells, potentially blunting the c-Myc accumulation.
Lithium Protects the MC3T3-E1 Cell Cycle from GC--
If GSK3
plays a role in the antimitogenic effect of GC, then inhibition of
GSK3
may ameliorate the inhibitory effect of GC on cell cycle
progression. We therefore tested the antimitogenic effect of DEX on the
post-confluent osteoblast cell cycle in the presence of lithium, a
specific GSK3
inhibitor (32). As shown in Fig.
6A, exposure to lithium
accelerated cell cycle progression in both DEX-treated and non-treated
post-confluent osteoblast cultures. However, the lithium effect on the
DEX-treated cells was more pronounced, bringing, within 9 h, the
cells in S + G2 + M to virtually the same percentage as
measured in the DEX-free cultures. Fig. 6B shows
representative cell cycle profiles from this 9-h time point. As shown,
a 9-h treatment was clearly sufficient for DEX to induce a
G1/S block; and more importantly, lithium completely
equalized the cell cycle profile in non-treated and DEX-treated cells.
This could be explained by lithium counteracting the DEX-mediated c-Myc
down-regulation within as early as 4 h (Fig. 6B,
inset). Interestingly, the GC inhibition of cyclin A (4) was
not rescued by lithium at this time point (Fig. 6B, inset). By 18 h of treatment, DEX further inhibited
cell cycle progression (Fig. 6A). Again, lithium almost
entirely counteracted the decrease in the percentage of cells in S + G2 + M (Fig. 6A). It should be noted that the
distribution of cells between S and G2/M in the DEX-treated
cultures was different from that observed in the absence of DEX (data
not shown), possibly reflecting effects of DEX and lithium on other
cell cycle transitions (33). As opposed to lithium, potassium did not
reverse the inhibitory effect of DEX on the G1/S transition
(Fig. 6A). In conclusion, our results indicate that GSK3
is a critical regulator of the post-confluent cell cycle and that
GSK3
activation contributes to the antimitogenic effect of GC in
differentiating osteoblasts.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Inhibition of GSK3
by lithium rescues the GC-inhibited cell cycle.
Post-confluent MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with either 0.1 µM DEX or vehicle, together with 40 mM LiCl
(a specific GSK3 inhibitor) or KCl as a control. Cells were
collected after either 9 h (only the lithium group) or 18 h
(lithium and potassium treatments). Cells were ethanol-fixed and
stained with propidium iodide, and the cell cycle profile was analyzed
by flow cytometry. A, percentage of cells in S + G2 + M is presented for each experimental group.
Bars represent mean ± S.D. of three plates, except for
the KCl-treated groups, for which the bars represent the
mean of duplicate measurements, which differed by <5%. B,
representative cell cycle profiles are shown for the 9-h DEX-treated
and non-treated cells in the absence and presence of lithium. The
percentages of cells in G1, S, and G2/M are
depicted underneath each histogram. The inset shows the
results of Western analysis of c-Myc and cyclin A (cycA) in
18-h DEX-treated cells to which lithium was administered 4 h prior
to collection (D+L). The results of Western analysis of
c-Myc and cyclin A in DEX-treated cells in the absence of lithium
(D) and in non-treated cells (control (C)) are
shown for comparison.
|
|
GC Inhibition of GSK3
Ser9 Phosphorylation Requires
Receptor Dimerization--
As a first step toward elucidating
mechanisms by which GC activate GSK3
, we investigated whether GC
receptor dimerization is required for this activation. Receptor
dimerization is a prerequisite for DNA binding and classical
transcriptional activation, but is not required for DNA
binding-independent action such as AP-1 trans-repression
(34). We employed SAOS-2 human osteosarcoma cell lines (originally GC
receptor-negative) that had been stably transfected with either the
wild-type or a dimerization-defective (R479D/D481R) rat GC receptor
(35). Each of these cell lines was treated with DEX, and GSK3
Ser9 phosphorylation status was evaluated by Western blot
analysis. Similar to MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts (Fig. 1B), DEX
significantly inhibited GSK3
Ser9 phosphorylation in
SAOS-2 cells expressing the wild-type GC receptor (Fig.
7). In contrast, DEX did not inhibit
GSK3
Ser9 phosphorylation in SAOS-2 cells expressing the
dimerization-defective GC receptor (Fig. 7). These results indicate
that DEX-mediated GSK3
activation requires receptor dimerization,
suggesting that it occurs via classical transcriptional activation of
genes yet to be identified.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
GC-mediated attenuation of
GSK3 Ser9 phosphorylation is
dependent on receptor dimerization. SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells
expressing either the wild-type (wt) or a dimerization
mutant form (dim) of the rat GC receptor (GR)
were treated for 48 h with 1 µM DEX and subjected to
Western analysis using antibody against either
Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3
([pSer9]GSK3 ) or total GSK3 , as
indicated. A, autoradiograms from a representative
experiment; B, graph representing the DEX/control ratios
(mean ± S.D., n = 3) for
Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3 (pGSK), total
GSK3 (GSK), and the relative GSK3 Ser9
phosphorylation level (pGSK/GSK). The latter value was
calculated for each experiment by dividing the
Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3 ratio by the total GSK3
ratio.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Cell proliferation and differentiation are traditionally perceived
as reciprocal processes, cell cycle withdrawal being a prerequisite for
terminal differentiation. However, stages that precede expression of an
ultimate cellular phenotype may occur as cells are cycling, such as
during the differentiation of lymphocytes (36), adipocytes (5, 6), and
osteoblasts (4). Our earlier work with osteoblasts suggests that
the differentiation-related cell cycle, occurring in cultures that have
reached confluence, is regulated in a unique manner, rendering it
susceptible to inhibition by GC (4).
This study suggests that c-Myc plays a crucial role in the persistent
proliferation of post-confluent osteoblasts in culture. c-Myc
steady-state levels decrease as osteoblasts reach confluence, similar
to what is observed in non-osteoblastic cells. However, soon
thereafter, during osteoblast differentiation, c-Myc rises back to
levels observed prior to confluence, and the cells grow to high
density. GC decrease the c-Myc serum response and steady-state levels
and attenuate the persistent cell cycle in the post-confluent differentiating cells.
The increase in c-Myc levels in post-confluent differentiating
osteoblasts may explain the persistent cell cycle despite high levels
of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor
p27Kip1 (4, 37) and even when p27Kip1 is
forcibly elevated further using viral transduction (4). The role of
c-Myc in osteoblast differentiation may be to delay exit from the cell
cycle, thus allowing differentiation steps, which require cell
division. Alternatively, c-Myc may play a role in regulating
differentiation-related genes, with the post-confluent cell cycle being
a nonessential accompanying event. It is difficult to identify a
differentiation stage in vivo, which may be analogous to the
post-confluent cell cycle observed in vitro. However, in favor of a physiological role for c-Myc in mineralizing tissues, this
proto-oncogenic transcription factor has been shown to express in
osteoblasts and in hypertrophic chondrocytes in vivo (28, 29). These observations and the inhibitory effects of GC on c-Myc and
on the osteoblast phenotype suggest a role for c-Myc and possibly the
persistent cell cycle in osteoblast differentiation.
The increase in c-Myc levels in post-confluent differentiating
osteoblasts may also shed light on mechanisms of osteosarcoma development. It is intriguing to speculate that physiological up-regulation of c-Myc at a specific stage of osteoblast
differentiation provides a window of opportunity for the action of
osteoblast-transforming agents such as Fos (38, 39). In this context,
the c-Myc up-regulation is consistent with E2F4-p130 being the
predominant and functionally critical E2F-pocket complex in
post-confluent differentiating osteoblasts (4) because both c-Myc (40)
and E2F4 (41) cooperate with Ras in cellular transformation.
How do GC exert their inhibitory effects on c-Myc and on the osteoblast
persistent cell cycle? In search for upstream effectors, it is
important to remember that the osteoblast cell cycle becomes sensitive
to GC only at confluence. It therefore seemed logical that the GC
inhibition may involve the Wnt signaling pathway, which bridges
cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions with the cell cycle machinery.
Interestingly, what we observed in GC-treated cultures is increased
intrinsic activity of GSK3
, but not decreased nuclear
-catenin
levels, suggesting that GC primarily affect GSK3
in the growth
factor pathway. However, we feel it is premature to rule out an effect
of GC on GSK3
in the Wnt pathway. In fact, GC decreased reporter
activity in cells transiently transfected with a lymphoid enhancer
factor/T-cell factor-controlled luciferase construct (data not shown).
Thus, we believe that GC affect GSK3
in both the Wnt and growth
factor pathways. Importantly, inhibition of GSK3
by lithium
neutralizes the inhibitory effects of GC, indicating a causal
relationship between GSK3
activation and cell cycle attenuation.
The lack of a GC-mediated decrease in nuclear
-catenin is consistent
with the unaffected c-Myc synthesis rate, which is regulated by
-catenin (9, 42, 43). However, GSK3
may work directly on c-Myc,
phosphorylating and accelerating its degradation (26, 27). This
mechanism clearly contributes to the antimitogenic effect of GC in
differentiating osteoblasts, as indicated by the increased
Thr58 phosphorylation and the accelerated degradation of
c-Myc in response to GC treatment. The preferential effect of GC on
GSK3
in the growth factor pathway versus the Wnt pathway
may be explained by selective requirements for substrate priming (44,
45).
GSK3
is a cell cycle guardian that is inactivated in response to
growth factors, typically by Ser9 phosphorylation. Our
results show that GC attenuate this inactivating phosphorylation. GC
decreased GSK3
Ser9 phosphorylation in cultures 2 h
(Fig. 4) as well as 48 h (Fig. 1B) after being
fed fresh medium with or without DEX. The GC effect on GSK3
Ser9 phosphorylation was also apparent during the immediate
response to serum stimulation (Fig. 5). Thus, GC activate GSK3
by
prevention of the serum-induced Ser9 inhibitory
phosphorylation, which is sustained for as long as 48 h.
A limitation of our study is that it employs cell lines, either
transformed (SAOS-2) or nontransformed (MC3T3-E1), that may be
regulated differently than osteoblasts in vivo. Preliminary results with primary murine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells
indicated that, as in the MC3T3-E1 cultures, DEX inhibited both
condensation and calcium deposition (data not shown). Also, GSK3
Ser9 phosphorylation was decreased in the DEX-treated
cultures, but this effect did not reach statistical significance. It is
possible that a DEX effect on the bone marrow-derived osteoblasts was
diluted by different responses of non-osteoblasts and/or osteoblasts at DEX-insensitive stages of differentiation. Thus, the role of GSK3
in
osteoblast differentiation and in GC-induced osteoporosis remains to be
confirmed in primary cultures and in vivo.
Among the cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, and
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors that were analyzed, the
most significant effect of GC in MC3T3-E1 differentiating osteoblasts
is down-regulation of cyclin A and its dissociation from E2F4-p130
complexes (4). It is possible that GC down-regulate c-Myc and cyclin A
via independent mechanisms and that both of these effects contribute to
attenuation of the cell cycle. However, this study demonstrated rapid
inhibitory effects of DEX on c-Myc, which occurred prior to any
significant effect on cyclin A (data not shown). Furthermore, rescue of
the GC-inhibited cell cycle by lithium was accompanied by restoration of c-Myc (but not cyclin A) levels (Fig. 6B). These results
suggest a more crucial role for c-Myc in GC inhibition of the
osteoblast persistent cell cycle. However, <2 h of treatment was
insufficient for DEX to mount any effect on c-Myc or GSK3
(data not
shown). This and the requirement for GC receptor dimerization for the Ser9 dephosphorylation of GSK3
(Fig. 7) suggest that
GC-mediated GSK3
activation occurs via transcriptional stimulation
of an intermediary gene(s).
Are our results with lithium relevant to bone and mineral metabolism in
lithium-treated psychiatric patients? Limited work in this
controversial field indicates lithium-induced
hyperparathyroidism, but no hypercalcemia or bone loss in these
patients (46); one study reported increased levels of alkaline
phosphatase (47), a serum marker of bone formation. Preserved bone mass
in the face of hyperparathyroidism has been attributed to enhancement
of renal calcium reabsorption (46, 48). Based on our in
vitro studies, it is interesting to speculate that enhanced
osteoblast function may also contribute to bone preservation in
lithium-treated patients with hyperparathyroidism.
Maintenance of bone mass throughout life requires that bone formation
equals bone resorption. GC impair this balance primarily by inhibiting
osteoblastic bone formation. The present study demonstrates that GC
activate GSK3
in osteoblasts. This may interfere with important
differentiation cues generated by cell-cell contacts; cell-matrix
interactions; or growth factors signaling through GSK3
, in
particular insulin-like growth factor I, known to play a role in
osteoblast growth and differentiation (49). Our current findings
suggest that impediment of osteoblast function by GSK3
activation
may be mediated by the down-regulation of c-Myc, potentially via
inhibition of a differentiation-related cell cycle. Thus, GC activation
of osteoblast GSK3
may play an important role in the pathogenesis of
and potentially future therapies for GC-induced osteoporosis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to M. J. Garabedian (New
York University), J. R. Woodgett, and A. Ali (Ontario Cancer
Institute) for suggestions and reagents; Abel Valdovinos (University of
Southern California) for technical assistance; and M. J. Roberts
(University of Southern California) for preparation of primary
mesenchymal stem cell cultures from murine bone marrow.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work were supported by Grants RO1-AR47052 and
T32-CA09659 from the National Institutes of Health and by grants from
the Arthritis Foundation and the Zumberge Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. for Genetic
Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, 2250 Alcazar St., CSC/IGM240, Los Angeles, CA 90033. Tel.:
323-442-1322; Fax: 323-442-2764; E-mail: frenkel@hsc.usc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109708200
2
M. Hashimoto, Y. Sagara, D. Langford, I. P. Everall, M. Mallory, A. Everson, M. Digicaylioglu, and E. Masliah,
submitted for publication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GC, glucocorticoid(s);
GSK3
, glycogen synthase kinase-3
;
DEX, dexamethasone;
Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lukert, B.,
and Kream, B.
(1996)
in
Principles of Bone Biology
(Bilezikian, J. P.
, Raisz, L. G.
, and Rodan, G. A., eds)
, pp. 533-548, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA
|
| 2.
|
Manolagas, S. C.,
and Weinstein, R. S.
(1999)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
14,
1061-1066[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Canalis, E.
(1996)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
81,
3441-3447[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Smith, E.,
Redman, R. A.,
Logg, C. R.,
Coetzee, G. A.,
Kasahara, N.,
and Frenkel, B.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
19992-20001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Yeh, W. C.,
Bierer, B. E.,
and McKnight, S. L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
11086-11090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Richon, V. M.,
Lyle, R. E.,
and McGehee, R. E., Jr.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10117-10124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Papkoff, J.,
Rubinfeld, B.,
Schryver, B.,
and Polakis, P.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
2128-2134[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Behrens, J.,
von Kries, J. P.,
Kuhl, M.,
Bruhn, L.,
Wedlich, D.,
Grosschedl, R.,
and Birchmeier, W.
(1996)
Nature
382,
638-642[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
He, T. C.,
Sparks, A. B.,
Rago, C.,
Hermeking, H.,
Zawel, L.,
da Costa, L. T.,
Morin, P. J.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Kinzler, K. W.
(1998)
Science
281,
1509-1512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Shtutman, M.,
Zhurinsky, J.,
Simcha, I.,
Albanese, C.,
D'Amico, M.,
Pestell, R.,
and Ben-Ze'ev, A.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
5522-5527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Miller, J. R.,
and Moon, R. T.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
2527-2539[Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Cadigan, K. M.,
and Nusse, R.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
3286-3305[Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Hobmayer, B.,
Rentzsch, F.,
Kuhn, K.,
Happel, C. M.,
von Laue, C. C.,
Snyder, P.,
Rothbacher, U.,
and Holstein, T. W.
(2000)
Nature
407,
186-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Cross, D. A.,
Alessi, D. R.,
Vandenheede, J. R.,
McDowell, H. E.,
Hundal, H. S.,
and Cohen, P.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
303,
21-26[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Saito, Y.,
Vandenheede, J. R.,
and Cohen, P.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
303,
27-31[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 17.
|
Troussard, A. A.,
Tan, C.,
Yoganathan, T. N.,
and Dedhar, S.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
7420-7427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Young, C. S.,
Kitamura, M.,
Hardy, S.,
and Kitajewski, J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2474-2485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Orford, K.,
Orford, C. C.,
and Byers, S. W.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
855-868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Rogatsky, I.,
Trowbridge, J. M.,
and Garabedian, M. J.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
3181-3193[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Verona, R.,
Moberg, K.,
Estes, S.,
Starz, M.,
Vernon, J. P.,
and Lees, J. A.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
7268-7282[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Diehl, J. A.,
Cheng, M.,
Roussel, M. F.,
and Sherr, C. J.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
3499-3511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Schagger, H.,
and von Jagow, G.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
166,
368-379[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Darzynkiewicz, Z., Li, X.,
and Gong, J.
(1994)
in
Flow Cytometry
(Darzynkiewicz, Z.
, Robinson, J. P.
, and Crissman, H. A., eds), 2nd Ed., Vol. 41
, pp. 15-38, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA
|
| 25.
|
Cohen, P.,
and Frame, S.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
769-776[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Sears, R.,
Nuckolls, F.,
Haura, E.,
Taya, Y.,
Tamai, K.,
and Nevins, J. R.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
2501-2514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Pulverer, B. J.,
Fisher, C.,
Vousden, K.,
Littlewood, T.,
Evan, G.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
59-70[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Liang, J. D.,
Hock, J. M.,
Sandusky, G. E.,
Santerre, R. F.,
and Onyia, J. E.
(1999)
Calcif. Tissue Int.
65,
369-373[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Aizawa, T.,
Kokubun, S.,
Kawamata, T.,
Tanaka, Y.,
and Roach, H. I.
(1999)
J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br.
81,
921-925[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Hughes, K.,
Nikolakaki, E.,
Plyte, S. E.,
Totty, N. F.,
and Woodgett, J. R.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
803-808[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Kim, L.,
Liu, J.,
and Kimmel, A. R.
(1999)
Cell
99,
399-408[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Klein, P. S.,
and Melton, D. A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
8455-8459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Madiehe, A. M.,
Mampuru, L. J.,
and Tyobeka, E. M.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
209,
768-774[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Heck, S.,
Kullmann, M.,
Gast, A.,
Ponta, H.,
Rahmsdorf, H. J.,
Herrlich, P.,
and Cato, A. C.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4087-4095[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Rogatsky, I.,
Hittelman, A. B.,
Pearce, D.,
and Garabedian, M. J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
5036-5049[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Gold, M. R.,
and Matsuuchi, L.
(1995)
Int. Rev. Cytol.
157,
181-276[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Vlach, J.,
Hennecke, S.,
Alevizopoulos, K.,
Conti, D.,
and Amati, B.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
6595-6604[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Miller, A. D.,
Curran, T.,
and Verma, I. M.
(1984)
Cell
36,
51-60[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Grigoriadis, A. E.,
Schellander, K.,
Wang, Z. Q.,
and Wagner, E. F.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
685-701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Land, H.,
Parada, L. F.,
and Weinberg, R. A.
(1983)
Nature
304,
596-602[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Beijersbergen, R. L.,
Kerkhoven, R. M.,
Zhu, L.,
Carlee, L.,
Voorhoeve, P. M.,
and Bernards, R.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
2680-2690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Aberle, H.,
Bauer, A.,
Stappert, J.,
Kispert, A.,
and Kemler, R.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
3797-3804[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Yost, C.,
Torres, M.,
Miller, J. R.,
Huang, E.,
Kimelman, D.,
and Moon, R. T.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1443-1454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Frame, S.,
Cohen, P.,
and Biondi, R. M.
(2001)
Mol. Cell
7,
1321-1327[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Dajani, R.,
Fraser, E.,
Roe, S. M.,
Young, N.,
Good, V.,
Dale, T. C.,
and Pearl, L. H.
(2001)
Cell
105,
721-732[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Mak, T. W.,
Shek, C. C.,
Chow, C. C.,
Wing, Y. K.,
and Lee, S.
(1998)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
83,
3857-3859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Broulik, P. D.,
Stepan, J. J.,
Soucek, K.,
and Pacovsky, V.
(1984)
Clin. Chim. Acta
140,
151-155[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Haden, S. T.,
Stoll, A. L.,
McCormick, S.,
Scott, J.,
and Fuleihan, G. E.-H.
(1997)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
82,
2844-2848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Linkhart, T. A.,
Mohan, S.,
and Baylink, D. J.
(1996)
Bone (N. Y.)
19 (suppl.),
1S-12S
|
| 50.
|
Hall, B. K.,
and Miyake, T.
(2000)
Bioessays
22,
138-147[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.