JBC Anatrace, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109708200 on February 27, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 20, 18191-18197, May 17, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/20/18191    most recent
M109708200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E.
Right arrow Articles by Frenkel, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, E.
Right arrow Articles by Frenkel, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Glucocorticoids Inhibit Cell Cycle Progression in Differentiating Osteoblasts via Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3beta *

Elisheva SmithDagger , Gerhard A. Coetzee§, and Baruch FrenkelDagger ||

From the Departments of  Orthopedic Surgery, Dagger  Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and § Urology, Institute for Genetic Medicine, and the Norris Cancer Center, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033

Received for publication, October 9, 2001, and in revised form, February 27, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Differentiating osteoblasts in culture undergo a commitment stage, during which cobblestone-like cells grow to high density past confluency. In contrast to earlier proliferative stages, the cell cycle during this commitment stage is inhibited by glucocorticoids (GC). Chronic GC treatment also impedes mineral deposition if steroid administration commences early enough during commitment. This study defines a role for glycogen synthase kinase-3beta (GSK3beta ) and its target, c-Myc, in the GC-sensitive osteoblast persistent cell cycle. c-Myc levels decreased as cells reached confluence, but then increased during growth to high density. GC administration at this stage resulted in down-regulation of c-Myc. This was accompanied by GC-mediated attenuation of GSK3beta Ser9 inhibitory phosphorylation and increased GSK3beta kinase activity. Down-regulation of c-Myc was attributable to enhanced Thr58 phosphorylation, leading to accelerated degradation. In contrast, GC did not inhibit the c-Myc synthesis rate or the level of beta -catenin, a transcriptional coactivator of c-myc. The attenuated cell cycle and the reduced c-Myc level were returned to control levels by specific inhibition of GSK3beta using lithium chloride. These results suggest that tonal GSK3beta repression at the cobblestone stage of osteoblast differentiation permits osteoblast growth to high density. GC interfere with this growth-permissive axis by GSK3beta activation, resulting in c-Myc down-regulation and impediment of the G1/S cell cycle transition.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Osteoporosis is a major adverse effect of glucocorticoid (GC)1 treatment for the amelioration of symptoms of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (1). The most important single mechanism contributing to bone loss in GC-treated patients is inhibition of osteoblastic bone formation (for review, see Refs. 2 and 3). We recently identified a commitment stage during osteoblast differentiation in culture (the "cobblestone" stage) in which GC exert their inhibitory effect (4). During this stage, proliferation persists, but is regulated uniquely compared with control of the cell cycle prior to confluence. At this commitment stage (but not earlier), GC inhibit cell cycle progression (4).

Cell growth to high density often reflects loss of cell cycle control. However, controlled growth to high density occurs during cell differentiation not only in cultured osteoblasts (4), but also in cultured adipocytes (5, 6), as well as during the early definition of skeletal elements in vivo (50). Differentiating nontransformed osteoblasts that grow to high density do exhibit growth inhibitory signals, e.g. increased levels of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1, decreased cyclin E, and reduced free E2F DNA-binding activity (4). To explain the persistent growth, we postulated that the Wnt signaling pathway, which links cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions to the cell cycle (7-10), may account for the post-confluent osteoblast persistent cell cycle and may be involved in the inhibition of this cell cycle by GC.

Wingless/Wnt-mediated cell-cell signaling molecules play a major role in organogenesis and are conserved among vertebrates, flies, and primitive multicellular organisms (11-13). Components of the Wingless/Wnt signaling pathway participate in cell-cell adhesion, body patterning, cell growth, and tumorigenesis (11, 12). Forced activation of the Wnt signaling pathway by overexpression of either Wnt1 (18) or its target, beta -catenin (19), results in cell growth to high density.

The beta -catenin pool relevant to Wnt signaling resides in the cytoplasm and is distinct from a membrane-associated pool that plays a role in cell-cell adherence. In response to Wnt signaling, cytoplasmic beta -catenin increases and enters the nucleus, where it cooperates with lymphoid enhancer factor/T-cell factor in the transcriptional activation of cell cycle stimulatory genes such as c-myc (9) and cyclin D1 (10). A major regulator of beta -catenin is glycogen synthase kinase-3beta (GSK3beta ). beta -Catenin and GSK3beta are found in a cytoplasmic complex called the beta -catenin destruction complex, which also contains axin and adenomatous polyposis coli (25). The association of beta -catenin with GSK3beta results in rapid degradation of beta -catenin, probably mediated by phosphorylation. Activation of the Wnt pathway results in decreased GSK3beta intrinsic activity and, more importantly, disruption of the beta -catenin destruction complex, leading to increased stability and accumulation of beta -catenin.

GSK3beta also plays a role in regulating growth signals elicited by molecules such as insulin, insulin-like growth factor I (14), epidermal growth factor (15), fibroblast growth factor-1,2 and the fibronectin-activated integrin-linked kinase (17). These signals inhibit the intrinsic activity of GSK3beta , but do not usually lead to disruption of the beta -catenin destruction complex.

In this study, we examined the involvement of the GSK3beta /beta -catenin/c-myc axis in GC inhibition of the persistent cell cycle in post-confluent differentiating osteoblasts. We found that GC-treated differentiating osteoblasts displayed increased GSK3beta activity and decreased levels of c-Myc; however, c-Myc down-regulation by GSK3beta was not mediated via beta -catenin, but rather by direct phosphorylation and enhanced degradation of c-Myc itself.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- The MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells used in this study were derived from a subclone recently isolated based on its robust mineralization potential (4). This subclone was expanded to ~109 cells, at which time frozen stocks were prepared and defined as passage 1. Cells were maintained up to passage 12 in alpha -minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin. All experiments were performed under differentiation conditions, i.e. in the presence of 50 µM ascorbic acid and 10 mM beta -glycerophosphate. SAOS-2 human osteosarcoma cells, stably transfected with either the wild-type or a dimerization-defective GC receptor, were a kind gift from Dr. M. J. Garabedian (New York University) (20). These cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 400 µg/ml Geneticin.

Cell Fractionation-- Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were prepared essentially according to Verona et al. (21). Cell pellets were resuspended in 2 packed cell volumes of hypotonic buffer containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 mM NaF, and 0.1 mM Na3VO4. Cells were left to swell on ice for 10 min and then vortexed for 10 s and spun at 500 × g for 5 min. The supernatant (containing the cytoplasmic lysate) was supplemented with 0.33 volume of 80% glycerol and clarified by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 30 min. The nuclear pellet was washed twice with hypotonic buffer and lysed in 2 nuclear pellet volumes of lysis buffer containing 100 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 0.5 M KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 28% glycerol, and protease and phosphatase inhibitors as described above. The nuclear extracts were centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 1 h to remove cell debris.

Western Analysis-- Between 60 and 100 µg of protein from the nuclear extract, cytoplasmic lysate, or whole cell pellets were subjected to SDS-PAGE. Separated proteins were transferred to a 0.2-µm nitrocellulose membrane using a Mini Trans-Blot Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad), and immunodetection was performed using ECL (Amersham Biosciences) according to the manufacturers' recommendations, followed by exposure of the membrane to x-ray film. Results were quantitated by photodensitometry using an AlphaImager 2000 system (Alpha Innotech Corp.) and are expressed as means ± S.D. Differences were considered significant when p was <= 0.05 as determined by a paired t test.

GSK3beta Immunoprecipitation and Kinase Assays-- These were performed essentially as described by Diehl et al. (22). Cells were lysed in 1% Triton X-100 buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.27 M sucrose, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.4 mM NaF, and 0.4 mM NaVO4. GSK3beta was immunoprecipitated from 200 µg of total protein extract using 1 µg of mouse monoclonal anti-GSK3beta antibodies and protein A/G-agarose beads. The immunoprecipitate was resuspended in 24 µl of kinase buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 14 µM ATP, 83 µM phosphoglycogen synthase peptide II, 10 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP (6000 Ci/mmol), and protease and phosphatase inhibitors as described above. After 30 min at 30 °C, 8 µl of 4× loading buffer (final concentrations: 4% SDS, 12% glycerol, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% beta -mercaptoethanol, and 0.01% Serva blue G) were added. The mixture was boiled for 5 min and loaded onto a Tricine-16.5% acrylamide gel (23), followed by autoradiography and quantitation as described above.

Flow Cytometry-- Cell cycle analysis was performed according to Darzynkiewicz et al. (24). Briefly, cells were lightly trypsinized, resuspended in Hanks' buffer, fixed in cold 70% ethanol, washed with Hanks' buffer, and suspended in 1 ml of Hanks' buffer containing 20 µg/ml propidium iodide and 5 Kunitz units of DNase-free RNase A. The percentage of cells in G1, S, and G2/M was determined using an EPICS® Profile Analyzer.

Reagents-- Tissue culture reagents were purchased from Invitrogen. Antibodies against GSK3beta (G22320) and beta -catenin (C19220) were purchased from Transduction Laboratories. Anti-phospho-Ser9 GSK3beta (catalog no. 9336) and anti-phospho-Thr58 c-Myc (catalog no. 9401) antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Anti-c-Myc antibodies (SC-764) and protein A/G-agarose beads were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Phosphoglycogen synthase peptide II was from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY). MG132 was from Calbiochem. Protein concentration was determined using a micro BCA protein assay kit (Pierce).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

GC Activate GSK3beta by Attenuating Its Ser9 Inhibitory Phosphorylation-- We have recently shown that GC inhibit persistent cell cycle progression at a commitment stage during osteoblast differentiation characterized by a cobblestone appearance (4). We postulated that components of the Wnt signaling pathway might play a role during this commitment stage in mediating cell cycle persistence and its inhibition by GC. One of these components is GSK3beta , a cell cycle guardian that is inactivated by a variety of growth stimuli. We evaluated GSK3beta in non-treated and GC-treated MC3T3-E1 cells at and immediately after the cobblestone stage. As determined by Western analysis, DEX treatment of cells that had just become confluent resulted in a small but consistent increase in the total cellular levels of GSK3beta (Fig. 1A). Because nuclear localization of GSK3beta has recently been proposed to play a cell cycle-related role (22), we also performed Western analysis on nuclear extracts and found that the increase in GSK3beta levels was even more pronounced in the nuclear fraction of DEX-treated cells (Fig. 1A). Notably, this effect was attenuated in cultures that had already grown to high density (Fig. 1A, Day 9). Accordingly, we thereafter confined our work specifically to cells that just initiate growth to high density.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   GC activate GSK3beta in differentiating osteoblasts. A: MC3T3-E1 cells were maintained under the differentiation protocol and treated with 1 µM DEX either at the cobblestone stage (days 5-7) or thereafter (days 7-9). Whole cell Triton X-100 extracts (WCE) and nuclear extracts (Nuc) were prepared and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-GSK3beta antibody. B: upper left panel, the Triton X-100 extracts from the day 7 cultures in A were subjected to GSK3beta kinase activity assay. GSK3beta was immunoprecipitated and incubated with [gamma -32P]ATP and phosphoglycogen synthase peptide II (32P-GS-II), followed by electrophoresis and autoradiography. Middle left panel, SDS whole cell extracts were prepared from non-treated and DEX-treated cultures on day 7 and subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-phospho-Ser9 GSK3beta antibody ([pSer9]GSK3beta ). Lower left panel, Western analysis of total GSK3beta was performed on the same membrane used in the middle panel. Right panel, shown is a graph representing the DEX/control ratios (mean ± S.D., n = 3) for Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3beta (pGSK), total GSK3beta (GSK), and the relative GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation level (pGSK/GSK). The latter value was calculated for each experiment by dividing the Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3beta ratio by the total GSK3beta ratio. C: nuclear and cytoplasmic (Cyt) extracts of cells harvested on day 7 were subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-beta -catenin antibody. D: differentiating MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with 1 µM DEX on day 5 and harvested 20 h later for Western analysis of c-Myc in SDS whole cell extracts.

GSK3beta activity is subject to functionally critical post-translational modifications. We therefore measured GSK3beta activity by immunoprecipitation and kinase assays using a glycogen synthase-derived peptide as substrate. As exemplified in Fig. 1B (upper left panel), DEX significantly increased GSK3beta activity, and this increase amounted to 1.77 ± 0.1-fold in three independent experiments.

An important post-translational modification of GSK3beta is the phosphorylation of Ser9, which results in GSK3beta inhibition, such as seen following growth factor stimulation (14, 15).2 We therefore evaluated the effect of GC on GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation. Indeed, as shown in Fig. 1B, DEX decreased the level of Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3beta (middle left panel) while increasing total GSK3beta (lower left panel). In three independent experiments, DEX induced an average 2.4-fold decrease in the level of Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3beta (Fig. 1B, right panel, pGSK). When corrected for the total levels of GSK3beta , DEX reduced by 3-fold the relative level of GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation (Fig. 1B, right panel, pGSK/GSK). These results suggest that GC attenuate the inhibitory phosphorylation of GSK3beta mediated by growth stimulatory signals. Higher activity of GSK3beta , a cell cycle inhibitor, might contribute to the antimitogenic effect of GC in post-confluent MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts (4).

GC Down-regulate c-Myc in MC3T3-E1 Cells in a beta -Catenin-independent Fashion-- An important downstream target of the Wnt signaling pathway is beta -catenin, which participates in the transcriptional activation of cell cycle stimulatory genes such as c-myc (9) and cyclin D1 (10). GSK3beta -mediated phosphorylation promotes the degradation of beta -catenin. We therefore examined whether beta -catenin is down-regulated in GC-treated MC3T3-E1 cells. However, as shown in Fig. 1C, DEX did not decrease either the nuclear or the cytoplasmic beta -catenin level, suggesting that beta -catenin is resistant to GC-mediated activation of GSK3beta in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. This is consistent with the notion that some GSK3beta exists in pools that are physically and functionally distinct from those found complexed with adenomatous polyposis coli, axin, and beta -catenin (for review, see Ref. 25).

GSK3beta can down-regulate cell cycle regulatory factors such as c-Myc and cyclin D1 in both beta -catenin-dependent and -independent manners. The beta -catenin-independent pathway entails direct phosphorylation of c-Myc at Thr58, followed by ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation (26, 27). Indeed, despite the persistence of beta -catenin in GC-treated MC3T3-E1 cells, Western blot analysis of c-Myc revealed reduced levels in DEX-treated compared with non-treated cultures (Fig. 1D). In three independent experiments, c-Myc levels were significantly decreased by 2.3 ± 0.2-fold.

Osteoblast Growth to High Density Is Associated with c-Myc Up-regulation-- c-Myc has been previously found to express in osteoblasts and chondrocytes in vivo (28, 29). We therefore analyzed c-Myc by Western blot analysis during MC3T3-E1 osteoblast differentiation in vitro. Expectedly, as cells reached confluence (Fig. 2A, Day 5), c-Myc levels decreased (Fig. 2B, Day 5 versus Day 3). The same was observed in NIH3T3 cells under similar culture conditions (data not shown). However, 2 days after the cobblestone stage (Fig. 2A, Day 7) c-Myc was up-regulated back to levels observed in pre-confluent cultures (Fig. 2B, Day 7). This was not seen with the NIH3T3 cells (data not shown). In contrast to c-Myc, cyclin A, which is down-regulated by GC in post-confluent persistently cycling osteoblasts (4), was expressed at steady levels during pre-confluence and confluence and until at least 2 days after confluence (Fig. 2C). Taken together, this expression pattern and the effect of DEX (Fig. 1D) suggest a role for c-Myc in driving the post-confluent osteoblast persistent cell cycle.


View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Up-regulation of c-Myc in post-confluent differentiating osteoblasts. A, shown is the morphology of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts during the GC-sensitive commitment (cobblestone) stage. Left panel, cells on day 3, just prior to confluence; middle panel, cells with a cobblestone appearance (day 5); right panel, cell growth to high density (day 7). Magnification ×100. B and C, cells were harvested at the three developmental stages represented in A, and Western blot analysis was performed using either anti-c-Myc (B) or anti-cyclin A (C) antibody.

GC Promote Thr58 Phosphorylation and Enhanced Degradation of c-Myc-- Based on the activation of GSK3beta (Fig. 1B), without an accompanying decrease in beta -catenin (Fig. 1C), the decreased c-Myc level in GC-treated MC3T3-E1 cells (Fig. 1D) is attributable to protein instability. We therefore studied c-Myc synthesis and degradation in GC-treated cultures. Initially, we evaluated c-Myc synthesis rates by blocking degradation using the proteasomal inhibitor MG132; this was immediately followed by concomitant MG132 withdrawal and administration of cycloheximide to block protein synthesis during the measurement of the c-Myc degradation rate. As shown in Fig. 3, which represents one of three experiments with similar results, DEX did not inhibit c-Myc synthesis. However, c-Myc degradation was significantly accelerated in DEX-treated cells (Fig. 3, A and B). Half-life values can only be approximated in these experiments because proteasomal recovery following MG132 withdrawal is not instantaneous. Assuming complete recovery at 1.5 h post-MG132 withdrawal, c-Myc was degraded in the DEX-treated cells over the following hour with an apparent half-life value 3.2 ± 0.7 times greater than that measured in the non-treated cells (p = 0.02; n = 3).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   GC accelerate c-Myc degradation. A, post-confluent MC3T3-E1 cells were treated on day 6 with either 1 µM DEX or vehicle (control (CONT)). At 16 h of DEX treatment, 50 µM MG132 in 0.1% Me2SO (final concentrations) was administered, and cells were collected for c-Myc Western blot analysis after 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 h. At the 4-h time point, MG132 was washed, and cells were refed with fresh medium containing 50 µM cycloheximide. Cultures were again harvested at 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and 3 h following MG132 withdrawal for Western analysis of c-Myc. B, shown is a graph illustrating the degradation of c-Myc in treated () versus non-treated (open circle ) cells. Values were derived by densitometry of the autoradiogram shown in A (right panels). Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments. C, Western analysis was carried out on 4-h MG132-treated cells using antibody that recognize either all forms or just the Thr58-phosphorylated form of c-Myc ([pThr58]c-MYC).

GSK3beta has been shown to target c-Myc for proteasomal degradation by phosphorylation at Thr58 (26, 27). We therefore tested the c-Myc Thr58 phosphorylation status in DEX-treated versus non-treated cells. Samples from 4-h MG132-treated cultures (as in Fig. 3A) were subjected to Western analysis using anti-phospho-Thr58 c-Myc antibody. As shown in Fig. 3C, DEX increased the c-Myc Thr58 phosphorylation level. Corrected for total c-Myc, the relative DEX-mediated increases in c-Myc Thr58 phosphorylation were 1.7- and 2.6-fold in two independent experiments. These results are consistent with the insensitivity of beta -catenin to GC (Fig. 1C) and strongly suggest that increased c-Myc phosphorylation by GSK3beta in GC-treated osteoblasts leads to accelerated degradation and reduced c-Myc steady-state levels.

GC Effects on GSK3beta and c-Myc Precede Alterations in the Cell Cycle Profile-- The increased GSK3beta activity in GC-treated cells (Fig. 1B) may be a result, not a cause, of cell cycle attenuation (30). We therefore tested GSK3beta activity following short periods of GC treatment (before an effect on the cell cycle is mounted). Triton X-100 extracts of 2- and 5-h treated cultures were subjected to GSK3beta immunoprecipitation and kinase assays. These short treatment periods did not alter the distribution of cells among the phases of the cell cycle (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 4 (upper panel), DEX activated GSK3beta within as little as 2 h of treatment, with somewhat lesser activation observed at 5 h.


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   DEX-mediated GSK3beta activation precedes cell cycle attenuation. MC3T3-E1 cells were treated on day 6 with either 1 µM DEX or vehicle and harvested after either 2 or 5 h for preparation of Triton X-100 whole cell extracts. The same extracts were subjected to either GSK3beta kinase assays (upper panel), as described for Fig. 1B, or Western blot analysis using the indicated antibodies (lower three panels). [pSer9]GSK3beta , anti-phospho-Ser9 GSK3beta antibody.

Next, Triton X-100 extracts as described above were subjected to Western blot analysis using either anti-GSK3beta or anti-phospho-Ser9 GSK3beta antibody. As shown in Fig. 4, 2-h DEX treatment significantly reduced Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3beta , and this reduction amounted to 47 ± 5% in three independent experiments. Corrected for total GSK3beta , the change in the relative Ser9 phosphorylation level (calculated, as in Fig. 1B, as the ratio between phospho-GSK3beta (DEX)/phospho-GSK3beta (control) and GSK3beta (DEX)/GSK3beta (control)) was significantly reduced within the 2-h treatment period by 46 ± 20% (n = 3). The GC effect on the relative Ser9 phosphorylation of GSK3beta was similar at the 5-h time point, amounting to a significant 50 ± 18% reduction (n = 3). Because Ser9 phosphorylation is a major (albeit not the only (31)) determinant influencing GSK3beta activity, our data suggest that the fast decrease in GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation following 2 h of treatment may be the initial event leading to GSK3beta activation, c-Myc down-regulation, and cell cycle attenuation. Consistent with this, a reduction in c-Myc levels was apparent at the 5-h (although not at the 2-h) treatment time point (Fig. 4, lower panel).

GC Attenuate GSK3beta Ser9 Phosphorylation That Follows Serum Stimulation-- c-Myc plays a critical role in the response of the cell cycle machinery to growth signals. To examine the c-Myc immediate response to serum stimulation, MC3T3-E1 cells were incubated in serum-free medium for 48 h and then refed with medium containing 10% serum. DEX was administered 2 h prior to and again during serum stimulation. Following serum stimulation, c-Myc immediately began to accumulate in the non-treated cells (Fig. 5). In three independent experiments, c-Myc levels significantly increased by 2.5 ± 1.1-fold within 20 min of serum stimulation. In contrast, c-Myc accumulation was blunted in the DEX-treated cells, where an insignificant 27 ± 25% increase was measured following serum stimulation. The antimitogenic effect of DEX in serum-stimulated cells was confirmed by flow cytometry analysis at 12 h following serum stimulation with or without DEX (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   GC attenuate serum-induced GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation. A, post-confluent differentiating cells were deprived of serum for 48 h and then refed with serum-containing medium. DEX treatment (1 µM) was initiated 2 h prior to serum stimulation. SDS cell extracts were prepared at 0, 10, and 20 min of serum stimulation, and Western blot analysis was performed using the indicated antibodies. [pSer9]GSK3beta , anti-phospho-Ser9 GSK3beta antibody. B, parallel DEX-treated and non-treated cultures were harvested 12 h following serum stimulation, fixed, and stained with propidium iodide for flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in the S + G2 + M phases of the cell cycle is depicted (mean ± S.D., n = 3).

Following serum stimulation, Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3beta consistently accumulated in the non-treated cultures (Fig. 5); the accumulation rate in the DEX-treated cultures was reduced by an average of 27% as compared with the control cultures, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.15; n = 3). However, when corrected for the respective total GSK3beta values, the increase in relative GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation was significantly attenuated in the DEX-treated cultures to levels 63% lower than the respective control values (p = 0.03; n = 3). Thus, GC attenuate the Ser9 inhibitory phosphorylation of GSK3beta in serum-stimulated MC3T3-E1 cells, potentially blunting the c-Myc accumulation.

Lithium Protects the MC3T3-E1 Cell Cycle from GC-- If GSK3beta plays a role in the antimitogenic effect of GC, then inhibition of GSK3beta may ameliorate the inhibitory effect of GC on cell cycle progression. We therefore tested the antimitogenic effect of DEX on the post-confluent osteoblast cell cycle in the presence of lithium, a specific GSK3beta inhibitor (32). As shown in Fig. 6A, exposure to lithium accelerated cell cycle progression in both DEX-treated and non-treated post-confluent osteoblast cultures. However, the lithium effect on the DEX-treated cells was more pronounced, bringing, within 9 h, the cells in S + G2 + M to virtually the same percentage as measured in the DEX-free cultures. Fig. 6B shows representative cell cycle profiles from this 9-h time point. As shown, a 9-h treatment was clearly sufficient for DEX to induce a G1/S block; and more importantly, lithium completely equalized the cell cycle profile in non-treated and DEX-treated cells. This could be explained by lithium counteracting the DEX-mediated c-Myc down-regulation within as early as 4 h (Fig. 6B, inset). Interestingly, the GC inhibition of cyclin A (4) was not rescued by lithium at this time point (Fig. 6B, inset). By 18 h of treatment, DEX further inhibited cell cycle progression (Fig. 6A). Again, lithium almost entirely counteracted the decrease in the percentage of cells in S + G2 + M (Fig. 6A). It should be noted that the distribution of cells between S and G2/M in the DEX-treated cultures was different from that observed in the absence of DEX (data not shown), possibly reflecting effects of DEX and lithium on other cell cycle transitions (33). As opposed to lithium, potassium did not reverse the inhibitory effect of DEX on the G1/S transition (Fig. 6A). In conclusion, our results indicate that GSK3beta is a critical regulator of the post-confluent cell cycle and that GSK3beta activation contributes to the antimitogenic effect of GC in differentiating osteoblasts.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Inhibition of GSK3beta by lithium rescues the GC-inhibited cell cycle. Post-confluent MC3T3-E1 cells were treated with either 0.1 µM DEX or vehicle, together with 40 mM LiCl (a specific GSK3beta inhibitor) or KCl as a control. Cells were collected after either 9 h (only the lithium group) or 18 h (lithium and potassium treatments). Cells were ethanol-fixed and stained with propidium iodide, and the cell cycle profile was analyzed by flow cytometry. A, percentage of cells in S + G2 + M is presented for each experimental group. Bars represent mean ± S.D. of three plates, except for the KCl-treated groups, for which the bars represent the mean of duplicate measurements, which differed by <5%. B, representative cell cycle profiles are shown for the 9-h DEX-treated and non-treated cells in the absence and presence of lithium. The percentages of cells in G1, S, and G2/M are depicted underneath each histogram. The inset shows the results of Western analysis of c-Myc and cyclin A (cycA) in 18-h DEX-treated cells to which lithium was administered 4 h prior to collection (D+L). The results of Western analysis of c-Myc and cyclin A in DEX-treated cells in the absence of lithium (D) and in non-treated cells (control (C)) are shown for comparison.

GC Inhibition of GSK3beta Ser9 Phosphorylation Requires Receptor Dimerization-- As a first step toward elucidating mechanisms by which GC activate GSK3beta , we investigated whether GC receptor dimerization is required for this activation. Receptor dimerization is a prerequisite for DNA binding and classical transcriptional activation, but is not required for DNA binding-independent action such as AP-1 trans-repression (34). We employed SAOS-2 human osteosarcoma cell lines (originally GC receptor-negative) that had been stably transfected with either the wild-type or a dimerization-defective (R479D/D481R) rat GC receptor (35). Each of these cell lines was treated with DEX, and GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation status was evaluated by Western blot analysis. Similar to MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts (Fig. 1B), DEX significantly inhibited GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation in SAOS-2 cells expressing the wild-type GC receptor (Fig. 7). In contrast, DEX did not inhibit GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation in SAOS-2 cells expressing the dimerization-defective GC receptor (Fig. 7). These results indicate that DEX-mediated GSK3beta activation requires receptor dimerization, suggesting that it occurs via classical transcriptional activation of genes yet to be identified.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   GC-mediated attenuation of GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation is dependent on receptor dimerization. SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells expressing either the wild-type (wt) or a dimerization mutant form (dim) of the rat GC receptor (GR) were treated for 48 h with 1 µM DEX and subjected to Western analysis using antibody against either Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3beta ([pSer9]GSK3beta ) or total GSK3beta , as indicated. A, autoradiograms from a representative experiment; B, graph representing the DEX/control ratios (mean ± S.D., n = 3) for Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3beta (pGSK), total GSK3beta (GSK), and the relative GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation level (pGSK/GSK). The latter value was calculated for each experiment by dividing the Ser9-phosphorylated GSK3beta ratio by the total GSK3beta ratio.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell proliferation and differentiation are traditionally perceived as reciprocal processes, cell cycle withdrawal being a prerequisite for terminal differentiation. However, stages that precede expression of an ultimate cellular phenotype may occur as cells are cycling, such as during the differentiation of lymphocytes (36), adipocytes (5, 6), and osteoblasts (4). Our earlier work with osteoblasts suggests that the differentiation-related cell cycle, occurring in cultures that have reached confluence, is regulated in a unique manner, rendering it susceptible to inhibition by GC (4).

This study suggests that c-Myc plays a crucial role in the persistent proliferation of post-confluent osteoblasts in culture. c-Myc steady-state levels decrease as osteoblasts reach confluence, similar to what is observed in non-osteoblastic cells. However, soon thereafter, during osteoblast differentiation, c-Myc rises back to levels observed prior to confluence, and the cells grow to high density. GC decrease the c-Myc serum response and steady-state levels and attenuate the persistent cell cycle in the post-confluent differentiating cells.

The increase in c-Myc levels in post-confluent differentiating osteoblasts may explain the persistent cell cycle despite high levels of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1 (4, 37) and even when p27Kip1 is forcibly elevated further using viral transduction (4). The role of c-Myc in osteoblast differentiation may be to delay exit from the cell cycle, thus allowing differentiation steps, which require cell division. Alternatively, c-Myc may play a role in regulating differentiation-related genes, with the post-confluent cell cycle being a nonessential accompanying event. It is difficult to identify a differentiation stage in vivo, which may be analogous to the post-confluent cell cycle observed in vitro. However, in favor of a physiological role for c-Myc in mineralizing tissues, this proto-oncogenic transcription factor has been shown to express in osteoblasts and in hypertrophic chondrocytes in vivo (28, 29). These observations and the inhibitory effects of GC on c-Myc and on the osteoblast phenotype suggest a role for c-Myc and possibly the persistent cell cycle in osteoblast differentiation.

The increase in c-Myc levels in post-confluent differentiating osteoblasts may also shed light on mechanisms of osteosarcoma development. It is intriguing to speculate that physiological up-regulation of c-Myc at a specific stage of osteoblast differentiation provides a window of opportunity for the action of osteoblast-transforming agents such as Fos (38, 39). In this context, the c-Myc up-regulation is consistent with E2F4-p130 being the predominant and functionally critical E2F-pocket complex in post-confluent differentiating osteoblasts (4) because both c-Myc (40) and E2F4 (41) cooperate with Ras in cellular transformation.

How do GC exert their inhibitory effects on c-Myc and on the osteoblast persistent cell cycle? In search for upstream effectors, it is important to remember that the osteoblast cell cycle becomes sensitive to GC only at confluence. It therefore seemed logical that the GC inhibition may involve the Wnt signaling pathway, which bridges cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions with the cell cycle machinery. Interestingly, what we observed in GC-treated cultures is increased intrinsic activity of GSK3beta , but not decreased nuclear beta -catenin levels, suggesting that GC primarily affect GSK3beta in the growth factor pathway. However, we feel it is premature to rule out an effect of GC on GSK3beta in the Wnt pathway. In fact, GC decreased reporter activity in cells transiently transfected with a lymphoid enhancer factor/T-cell factor-controlled luciferase construct (data not shown). Thus, we believe that GC affect GSK3beta in both the Wnt and growth factor pathways. Importantly, inhibition of GSK3beta by lithium neutralizes the inhibitory effects of GC, indicating a causal relationship between GSK3beta activation and cell cycle attenuation.

The lack of a GC-mediated decrease in nuclear beta -catenin is consistent with the unaffected c-Myc synthesis rate, which is regulated by beta -catenin (9, 42, 43). However, GSK3beta may work directly on c-Myc, phosphorylating and accelerating its degradation (26, 27). This mechanism clearly contributes to the antimitogenic effect of GC in differentiating osteoblasts, as indicated by the increased Thr58 phosphorylation and the accelerated degradation of c-Myc in response to GC treatment. The preferential effect of GC on GSK3beta in the growth factor pathway versus the Wnt pathway may be explained by selective requirements for substrate priming (44, 45).

GSK3beta is a cell cycle guardian that is inactivated in response to growth factors, typically by Ser9 phosphorylation. Our results show that GC attenuate this inactivating phosphorylation. GC decreased GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation in cultures 2 h (Fig. 4) as well as 48 h (Fig. 1B) after being fed fresh medium with or without DEX. The GC effect on GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation was also apparent during the immediate response to serum stimulation (Fig. 5). Thus, GC activate GSK3beta by prevention of the serum-induced Ser9 inhibitory phosphorylation, which is sustained for as long as 48 h.

A limitation of our study is that it employs cell lines, either transformed (SAOS-2) or nontransformed (MC3T3-E1), that may be regulated differently than osteoblasts in vivo. Preliminary results with primary murine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells indicated that, as in the MC3T3-E1 cultures, DEX inhibited both condensation and calcium deposition (data not shown). Also, GSK3beta Ser9 phosphorylation was decreased in the DEX-treated cultures, but this effect did not reach statistical significance. It is possible that a DEX effect on the bone marrow-derived osteoblasts was diluted by different responses of non-osteoblasts and/or osteoblasts at DEX-insensitive stages of differentiation. Thus, the role of GSK3beta in osteoblast differentiation and in GC-induced osteoporosis remains to be confirmed in primary cultures and in vivo.

Among the cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors that were analyzed, the most significant effect of GC in MC3T3-E1 differentiating osteoblasts is down-regulation of cyclin A and its dissociation from E2F4-p130 complexes (4). It is possible that GC down-regulate c-Myc and cyclin A via independent mechanisms and that both of these effects contribute to attenuation of the cell cycle. However, this study demonstrated rapid inhibitory effects of DEX on c-Myc, which occurred prior to any significant effect on cyclin A (data not shown). Furthermore, rescue of the GC-inhibited cell cycle by lithium was accompanied by restoration of c-Myc (but not cyclin A) levels (Fig. 6B). These results suggest a more crucial role for c-Myc in GC inhibition of the osteoblast persistent cell cycle. However, <2 h of treatment was insufficient for DEX to mount any effect on c-Myc or GSK3beta (data not shown). This and the requirement for GC receptor dimerization for the Ser9 dephosphorylation of GSK3beta (Fig. 7) suggest that GC-mediated GSK3beta activation occurs via transcriptional stimulation of an intermediary gene(s).

Are our results with lithium relevant to bone and mineral metabolism in lithium-treated psychiatric patients? Limited work in this controversial field indicates lithium-induced hyperparathyroidism, but no hypercalcemia or bone loss in these patients (46); one study reported increased levels of alkaline phosphatase (47), a serum marker of bone formation. Preserved bone mass in the face of hyperparathyroidism has been attributed to enhancement of renal calcium reabsorption (46, 48). Based on our in vitro studies, it is interesting to speculate that enhanced osteoblast function may also contribute to bone preservation in lithium-treated patients with hyperparathyroidism.

Maintenance of bone mass throughout life requires that bone formation equals bone resorption. GC impair this balance primarily by inhibiting osteoblastic bone formation. The present study demonstrates that GC activate GSK3beta in osteoblasts. This may interfere with important differentiation cues generated by cell-cell contacts; cell-matrix interactions; or growth factors signaling through GSK3beta , in particular insulin-like growth factor I, known to play a role in osteoblast growth and differentiation (49). Our current findings suggest that impediment of osteoblast function by GSK3beta activation may be mediated by the down-regulation of c-Myc, potentially via inhibition of a differentiation-related cell cycle. Thus, GC activation of osteoblast GSK3beta may play an important role in the pathogenesis of and potentially future therapies for GC-induced osteoporosis.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to M. J. Garabedian (New York University), J. R. Woodgett, and A. Ali (Ontario Cancer Institute) for suggestions and reagents; Abel Valdovinos (University of Southern California) for technical assistance; and M. J. Roberts (University of Southern California) for preparation of primary mesenchymal stem cell cultures from murine bone marrow.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work were supported by Grants RO1-AR47052 and T32-CA09659 from the National Institutes of Health and by grants from the Arthritis Foundation and the Zumberge Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed: Inst. for Genetic Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, 2250 Alcazar St., CSC/IGM240, Los Angeles, CA 90033. Tel.: 323-442-1322; Fax: 323-442-2764; E-mail: frenkel@hsc.usc.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109708200

2 M. Hashimoto, Y. Sagara, D. Langford, I. P. Everall, M. Mallory, A. Everson, M. Digicaylioglu, and E. Masliah, submitted for publication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: GC, glucocorticoid(s); GSK3beta , glycogen synthase kinase-3beta ; DEX, dexamethasone; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Lukert, B., and Kream, B. (1996) in Principles of Bone Biology (Bilezikian, J. P. , Raisz, L. G. , and Rodan, G. A., eds) , pp. 533-548, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA
2. Manolagas, S. C., and Weinstein, R. S. (1999) J. Bone Miner. Res. 14, 1061-1066[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Canalis, E. (1996) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 81, 3441-3447[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Smith, E., Redman, R. A., Logg, C. R., Coetzee, G. A., Kasahara, N., and Frenkel, B. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 19992-20001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Yeh, W. C., Bierer, B. E., and McKnight, S. L. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 11086-11090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Richon, V. M., Lyle, R. E., and McGehee, R. E., Jr. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10117-10124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Papkoff, J., Rubinfeld, B., Schryver, B., and Polakis, P. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2128-2134[Abstract]
8. Behrens, J., von Kries, J. P., Kuhl, M., Bruhn, L., Wedlich, D., Grosschedl, R., and Birchmeier, W. (1996) Nature 382, 638-642[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. He, T. C., Sparks, A. B., Rago, C., Hermeking, H., Zawel, L., da Costa, L. T., Morin, P. J., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. (1998) Science 281, 1509-1512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Shtutman, M., Zhurinsky, J., Simcha, I., Albanese, C., D'Amico, M., Pestell, R., and Ben-Ze'ev, A. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 5522-5527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Miller, J. R., and Moon, R. T. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 2527-2539[Free Full Text]
12. Cadigan, K. M., and Nusse, R. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3286-3305[Free Full Text]
13. Hobmayer, B., Rentzsch, F., Kuhn, K., Happel, C. M., von Laue, C. C., Snyder, P., Rothbacher, U., and Holstein, T. W. (2000) Nature 407, 186-189[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Cross, D. A., Alessi, D. R., Vandenheede, J. R., McDowell, H. E., Hundal, H. S., and Cohen, P. (1994) Biochem. J. 303, 21-26[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Saito, Y., Vandenheede, J. R., and Cohen, P. (1994) Biochem. J. 303, 27-31[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Deleted in proof
17. Troussard, A. A., Tan, C., Yoganathan, T. N., and Dedhar, S. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7420-7427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Young, C. S., Kitamura, M., Hardy, S., and Kitajewski, J. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 2474-2485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Orford, K., Orford, C. C., and Byers, S. W. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 146, 855-868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Rogatsky, I., Trowbridge, J. M., and Garabedian, M. J. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3181-3193[Abstract]
21. Verona, R., Moberg, K., Estes, S., Starz, M., Vernon, J. P., and Lees, J. A. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 7268-7282[Abstract]
22. Diehl, J. A., Cheng, M., Roussel, M. F., and Sherr, C. J. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 3499-3511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Schagger, H., and von Jagow, G. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 166, 368-379[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Darzynkiewicz, Z., Li, X., and Gong, J. (1994) in Flow Cytometry (Darzynkiewicz, Z. , Robinson, J. P. , and Crissman, H. A., eds), 2nd Ed., Vol. 41 , pp. 15-38, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA
25. Cohen, P., and Frame, S. (2001) Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 769-776[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Sears, R., Nuckolls, F., Haura, E., Taya, Y., Tamai, K., and Nevins, J. R. (2000) Genes Dev. 14, 2501-2514[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Pulverer, B. J., Fisher, C., Vousden, K., Littlewood, T., Evan, G., and Woodgett, J. R. (1994) Oncogene 9, 59-70[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Liang, J. D., Hock, J. M., Sandusky, G. E., Santerre, R. F., and Onyia, J. E. (1999) Calcif. Tissue Int. 65, 369-373[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Aizawa, T., Kokubun, S., Kawamata, T., Tanaka, Y., and Roach, H. I. (1999) J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 81, 921-925[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Hughes, K., Nikolakaki, E., Plyte, S. E., Totty, N. F., and Woodgett, J. R. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 803-808[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Kim, L., Liu, J., and Kimmel, A. R. (1999) Cell 99, 399-408[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Klein, P. S., and Melton, D. A. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 8455-8459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Madiehe, A. M., Mampuru, L. J., and Tyobeka, E. M. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 209, 768-774[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Heck, S., Kullmann, M., Gast, A., Ponta, H., Rahmsdorf, H. J., Herrlich, P., and Cato, A. C. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4087-4095[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Rogatsky, I., Hittelman, A. B., Pearce, D., and Garabedian, M. J. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 5036-5049[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Gold, M. R., and Matsuuchi, L. (1995) Int. Rev. Cytol. 157, 181-276[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Vlach, J., Hennecke, S., Alevizopoulos, K., Conti, D., and Amati, B. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 6595-6604[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Miller, A. D., Curran, T., and Verma, I. M. (1984) Cell 36, 51-60[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Grigoriadis, A. E., Schellander, K., Wang, Z. Q., and Wagner, E. F. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 122, 685-701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Land, H., Parada, L. F., and Weinberg, R. A. (1983) Nature 304, 596-602[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Beijersbergen, R. L., Kerkhoven, R. M., Zhu, L., Carlee, L., Voorhoeve, P. M., and Bernards, R. (1994) Genes Dev. 8, 2680-2690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Aberle, H., Bauer, A., Stappert, J., Kispert, A., and Kemler, R. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 3797-3804[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Yost, C., Torres, M., Miller, J. R., Huang, E., Kimelman, D., and Moon, R. T. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 1443-1454[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Frame, S., Cohen, P., and Biondi, R. M. (2001) Mol. Cell 7, 1321-1327[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Dajani, R., Fraser, E., Roe, S. M., Young, N., Good, V., Dale, T. C., and Pearl, L. H. (2001) Cell 105, 721-732[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Mak, T. W., Shek, C. C., Chow, C. C., Wing, Y. K., and Lee, S. (1998) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 3857-3859[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Broulik, P. D., Stepan, J. J., Soucek, K., and Pacovsky, V. (1984) Clin. Chim. Acta 140, 151-155[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Haden, S. T., Stoll, A. L., McCormick, S., Scott, J., and Fuleihan, G. E.-H. (1997) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 2844-2848[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Linkhart, T. A., Mohan, S., and Baylink, D. J. (1996) Bone (N. Y.) 19 (suppl.), 1S-12S
50. Hall, B. K., and Miyake, T. (2000) Bioessays 22, 138-147[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.