![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 21, 18253-18256, May 24, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Departments of
Received for publication, March 22, 2002, and in revised form, March 27, 2002
Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) is a
heterodimeric hemoprotein that catalyzes the conversion of GTP to cGMP.
Upon binding NO to its heme cofactor, purified sGC was activated
300-fold. sGC was only activated 67-fold by nitroglycerin (GTN)
and Cys; and in the absence of Cys, GTN did not activate sGC.
Electronic absorption spectroscopy studies showed that upon NO binding,
the Soret of ferrous sGC shifted from 431 to 399 nm. The data also revealed that activation of sGC by GTN/Cys was not via the expected ferrous heme-NO species as indicated by the absence of the 399 nm heme
Soret. Furthermore, EPR studies of the reaction of GTN/Cys with sGC
confirmed that no ferrous heme-NO species was formed but that there was
heme oxidation. Potassium ferricyanide is known to oxidize
ferrous sGC to the ferric oxidation state. Spectroscopic and activity
data for the reactions of sGC with GTN alone or with K3Fe(CN)6 were indistinguishable. These
data suggest the following: 1) GTN/Cys do not activate sGC via
GTN biotransformation to NO in vitro, and 2) in the absence
of added thiol, GTN oxidizes sGC.
Soluble guanylate cyclase
(sGC)1 is a hemoprotein that
catalyzes the conversion of guanosine 5'-triphosphate (GTP) to the
second messenger, cyclic guanosine 3':5'-monophosphate (cGMP) (1, 2).
The NO is a key signaling molecule in the cardiovascular system involved in
smooth muscle relaxation. In endothelial cells, NO (produced from
L-arginine by nitric-oxide synthase) diffuses into smooth
muscle cells where it stimulates sGC, which ultimately leads to
vasodilation. It has been accepted by many that nitrovasodilators, including the organic nitrates like nitroglycerin (GTN), cause vasodilation by their biotransformation to NO. Although many pathways invoking a variety of enzymes and different intermediates have been
proposed to be involved in the biotransformation of GTN to NO, none
have conclusively described the mechanism of action of GTN (10, 11).
Even the evidence for NO production from GTN is confounded by assays
not sufficiently specific for NO (12-14). Clearly the mechanism of
action of the nitrovasodilators is not fully understood.
The problem of nitrate tolerance provides an additional impetus for the
ongoing study of GTN. Tolerance, first documented in 1867 (15), is a
clinical condition associated with a serious impairment of
nitrovasodilator function as a result of its continuous administration.
Mechanisms proposed to account for the development of nitrate tolerance
include the depletion of essential thiols (16), decreased
biotransformation of GTN to NO (17), desensitization of sGC (1),
enhanced phosphodiesterase activity (18), and production of vascular
superoxide (19). Despite extensive research conducted on nitrate
tolerance, debate about its origin persists (20, 21). Certainly
understanding the mechanism by which GTN leads to smooth muscle
relaxation will help to elucidate the cause of nitrate tolerance.
Herein we have examined the reactivity of GTN with purified sGC to
understand the activation of sGC by GTN and gain valuable insights into
the potential role of sGC in the mechanism of nitrate tolerance.
Materials--
Unless otherwise indicated, all
reagents were purchased from Sigma.
2-(N,N-Diethylamino)-diazenenolate-2-oxide (DEA/NO) was purchased from Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI. GTN was synthesized according to the method of Dunstan (22). GMPCPP was
a gift from Jonathan Winger, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Heterodimeric sGC (rat sGC Activity Assay--
End point assays were performed in
triplicate in a final volume of 100 µl as described previously (24)
except that the GTP-regenerating system (phosphocreatine and creatine
kinase) and the phosphodiesterase inhibitor (isobutyl-3-methylxanthine)
were omitted. The assay mixture was comprised of 50 mM
HEPES, pH 7.4, 1.5 mM GTP, 5.0 mM
MgCl2, 2.0 mM Cys (where indicated), and other
components as described. Assays were incubated with either DEA/NO, GTN,
or potassium ferricyanide (K3Fe(CN)6) for 1 min, then initiated with 0.2-0.4 µg of sGC, and quenched after 2 min
with 400 µl of 125 mM Na2CO3 and
500 µl of 125 mM
Zn(CH3CO2)2. GTN was added in
Me2SO up to a final maximal concentration of 4%
(v/v) Me2SO, which was shown not to affect the enzyme
activity. DEA/NO stocks were prepared in 10 mM NaOH. After
centrifugation of the assay mixtures and appropriate dilution, cGMP was
measured as directed using the cGMP enzyme immunoassay kit,
format B (BioMol).
Electronic Absorption Spectroscopy--
All electronic
absorbance spectra were collected using a Cary 3E spectrophotometer at
10 °C in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. Anaerobic samples were
prepared on a gas train with 10 cycles of N2 and vacuum.
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance--
X-band EPR spectra were
recorded at 13 K on a Bruker ESP-300E spectrometer with a Bruker ST9234
cavity resonator. All spectra were measured using 2.0 milliwatts of
microwave power and a modulation amplitude of 9.5 G. Each spectrum is
the signal average of 16 scans with the buffer spectrum subtracted. The
sample volumes may have been small enough that positioning of the
sample in the EPR cavity was important. Therefore, the GTN and GTN/Cys
reactions were normalized to the adventitious ferric iron signal at
g = 4.3 to correct for potential variation in signal. This
normalization is justified because these samples came from the same
enzyme stock solution. The reaction with
K3Fe(CN)6 was not normalized because of
additional free ferric iron introduced by
K3Fe(CN)6. Anaerobic samples were prepared in
an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products, Inc., Grass Lake, MI) at
room temperature and frozen in liquid N2. The reactions
were allowed to proceed at room temperature until complete as
determined by the separate analysis of the change in the heme Soret
maximum (~5 min for the reactions with
K3Fe(CN)6 and GTN and 10 min for the reaction
of GTN/Cys).
sGC Activity--
At 37 °C and pH 7.4, DEA/NO is known to have
a half-life of ~2 min releasing 1.5 eq of NO (25). Purified sGC was
activated 313-fold by DEA/NO with a maximal specific activity of
13,763 ± 649 nmol/min/mg (Table I).
The inclusion of 2.0 mM Cys in this assay did not affect
the -fold activation (321-fold) or the maximal response of
DEA/NO (14,081 ± 900 nmol/min/mg). sGC was activated 67-fold by
GTN in the presence of 2.0 mM Cys with a maximal specific activity of 2927 ± 495 nmol/min/mg. The activity of sGC after treatment with GTN (up to 1.0 mM) and in the absence of Cys
remained at approximately the basal activity (Table I). As has been
previously shown (26), K3Fe(CN)6 oxidized sGC
to the ferric oxidation state with activity not significantly different
from the basal activity of the ferrous enzyme. Oxidation of sGC by
K3Fe(CN)6 followed by removal of excess
K3Fe(CN)6 and subsequent treatment with Cys resulted in basal level activity (data not shown). The added Cys eventually reduced the ferric heme to ferrous but again yielded the
expected basal level activity (data not shown).
Electronic Absorption Spectroscopy--
sGC was isolated in the
ferrous oxidation state with a heme Soret at 431 nm (Fig.
1C). A comparison of the
electronic absorption spectra of sGC-NO and sGC + GTN/Cys is shown
(Fig. 1A). Upon addition of DEA/NO, the enzyme rapidly binds
NO giving a heme Soret at 399 nm (4). In contrast, the reaction of
GTN/Cys with sGC caused a heme Soret shift of the ferrous enzyme from
431 to 393 nm. Even under anaerobic conditions, we observed no shift in
the heme Soret to 399 nm upon addition of GTN/Cys to sGC. Cysteine
alone had no effect on the spectrum of ferrous sGC (data not shown).
When Cys was included with the reaction of DEA/NO and sGC, a decrease in the 399 nm heme Soret was observed over time, due to a decrease in
the half-life of sGC-NO in the presence of thiol, in agreement with
previously reported results (24).
The electronic absorption spectra of the reactions of GTN and
K3Fe(CN)6 with sGC are shown in Fig.
1B. Similar to the reaction with
K3Fe(CN)6, GTN reacted with sGC shifting the
heme Soret of the ferrous enzyme from 431 to 392 nm, indicative of
ferric sGC.
GMPCPP (a non-hydrolyzable analogue of GTP) is a competitive inhibitor
of sGC.2 The electronic
absorption spectrum of sGC-NO was unaffected by the presence of GTP (or
GMPCPP) and MgCl2 (data not shown). In contrast, in the
presence of 1.0 mM GMPCPP and 5.0 mM
MgCl2, the change in the ferrous heme Soret induced by
GTN/Cys was slightly altered from that in their absence, shifting the
heme Soret from 431 to 395 nm (Fig. 1C). Similar results
were seen using GTP (data not shown).
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance--
sGC (10 µM) was
treated anaerobically with 1.0 mM GTN and 2.0 mM Cys (Fig. 2A),
1.0 mM GTN (Fig. 2B), or 810 µM
K3Fe(CN)6 (Fig. 2C), and the 13 K
EPR spectra of these reactions are shown. In each of the experiments,
there are distinct rhombic signals indicative of ferric heme and
consistent with earlier results with g = 6.36, 5.16, and 2.0 and
line widths of 3.3, 4.1, and 3.3 mT (26). The signals in each
spectrum at g = 4.3 are due to adventitious free ferric iron. In
Fig. 2C, the large signal associated with
K3Fe(CN)6 is clearly visible at g = 2.5. For the reaction of GTN/Cys (Fig. 2A), where 67-fold
activation was measured, the only signals observed are for ferric sGC.
Interestingly there are no three-line signals, previously shown to be
characteristic of five-coordinate ferrous nitrosyl complexes (g = 2.076, 2.029, and 2.005 and line widths of 5.5, 5.7, and 5.8 mT) and
indicative of activated sGC (27). The intensity of the high spin ferric heme signal for the reaction of GTN/Cys with sGC was less than that of
GTN or K3Fe(CN)6 with sGC. This observation is
consistent with less enzyme being in the ferric oxidation state for the
GTN/Cys-treated samples. Support for this interpretation comes from our
optical data that show a more pronounced long wavelength shoulder for the GTN/Cys-treated samples (Fig. 1, A and C,
dashed lines) as compared with GTN- or
K3Fe(CN)6-treated samples (Fig.
1B).
Oxidation of sGC by GTN--
The results presented herein clearly
support the conclusion that the reaction of GTN alone with sGC leads to
the 1-electron oxidation of ferrous sGC as depicted in Scheme
1. Potassium ferricyanide is known to
oxidize sGC to the ferric oxidation state (26), and our results with
GTN and sGC are essentially the same as what was observed with
K3Fe(CN)6. First, the electronic absorption spectra of the reactions of sGC with K3Fe(CN)6
and with GTN are nearly identical. Slight differences in the signal
intensities of the heme Soret maxima can be attributed to the
subtraction of the relatively large background
K3Fe(CN)6 signal in that reaction. Second, the
EPR spectra of the reactions of sGC with GTN or
K3Fe(CN)6 gave signals that were the same as
those previously reported for ferric sGC. The slight differences in the
ferric heme signal at g = 2.0 are still under investigation.
Finally, as expected for a sGC oxidant, GTN alone did not activate the
enzyme.
Although these results support a 1-electron oxidation of the ferrous
heme of sGC by GTN, the expected GTN radical anion (GTN Activation of sGC by GTN/Cys--
GTN alone did not activate sGC
above basal levels as expected based on previous results with ferric
sGC (26). However, in the presence of Cys, GTN activated sGC ~67-fold
over the basal activity. DEA/NO, which activates sGC via NO, stimulated
the enzyme greater than 300-fold in agreement with previous studies
(4). The attenuated maximal response for GTN/Cys appears to be a result of sGC activation through a species other than sGC-NO. The
spectroscopic evidence presented herein clearly supports this
hypothesis. Upon addition of sGC to GTN/Cys under conditions where the
enzyme has been shown to be activated, a 399 nm heme Soret was not
observed in the electronic absorption spectrum. sGC is an excellent
trap for NO, binding at a nearly diffusion-controlled rate (28, 29). If
GTN/Cys stimulate sGC via NO, then trapping NO at the ferrous heme of
sGC should have been spectroscopically observable by a shift of the
heme Soret to 399 nm (the Soret maximum for sGC-NO). More convincingly
the EPR spectra show no ferrous nitrosyl species, which is well
characterized for sGC. If sGC is activated by GTN/Cys through a sGC-NO
mechanism, then a three-line signal with g values of 2.076, 2.029, and
2.005 and line widths of 5.5, 5.7, and 5.8 mT would be present in the
EPR spectrum (27). Close scrutiny of the electronic absorption spectra
shows a Soret generated on reaction of GTN/Cys at 393 nm (or 395 nm
when GMPCPP is bound) that could be interpreted as the result of a
mixture of ferric sGC and sGC-NO species. However, the EPR spectra
clearly show no evidence for formation of sGC-NO in the reaction of
GTN/Cys with sGC. The possibility exists that the ferrous nitrosyl
species in the EPR is not observed because the enzyme does not have
substrate bound since it has been shown that the presence of GTP or
cGMP affects the observed rate constants for NO dissociation from
sGC-NO (30) and the wavelength of the heme Soret of sGC-CO with YC-1 (31). However, reactions of GTN/Cys with 5.0 µM sGC
carried out with substrate (1.5 mM GTP and 5.0 mM MgCl2) or a non-hydrolyzable substrate
analogue (1.5 mM GMPCPP and 5.0 mM
MgCl2) gave the same EPR spectra as those without substrate
or analogue (data not shown).
Since activation of sGC by GTN/Cys does not proceed by way of sGC-NO,
then clearly an alternate mechanism of sGC stimulation must be
possible. Although not directly related to what we have observed here,
CO has been shown to activate the enzyme 4.8-fold over basal activity
(32), showing that it is possible to activate sGC in
heme-dependent but NO-independent fashion. Previous work also supports a NO-independent pathway. Using rat aortic homogenate as
a source of sGC, it was shown that the rate of NO release from GTN/Cys
under physiologically relevant conditions is not fast enough to account
for the observed activation of sGC by GTN/Cys (33). An important
observation is the lack of sGC activation by GTN in the absence of Cys.
Addition of Cys to ferric sGC (where excess
K3Fe(CN)6 has been removed) did not activate
sGC (data not shown). Thus, oxidation of sGC with the subsequent
addition of a thiol was not sufficient for sGC activation. To account
for the activation of sGC by GTN/Cys, there must be an activated sGC species present that cannot be sGC-NO or the same sGC species as
generated upon its oxidation by K3Fe(CN)6 or
GTN alone. One possibility is that GTN/Cys-induced activation of sGC is
through a ferrous sGC species not detected by conventional EPR at low temperatures. The active species could be either an EPR-silent, low
spin Fe(II) heme or a high spin, S = 2, Fe(II) heme adduct. Experiments using parallel mode excitation at X-band and high frequency-high field EPR methods will help distinguish between these
possibilities. A second possibility involves the reaction (or
interaction) of GTN/Cys or GTN
The mechanism of activation by GTN/Cys remains unclear, but some
important details presented herein have given insight to the species
responsible for activation. Direct activation of sGC by an organic
nitrate seems unlikely because of the necessity for specific thiols
(34). Cys (or possibly other thiols) are required for activation of the
enzyme, so any proposed mechanism must account for their role. The two
reasonable alternatives discussed include: 1) an EPR-silent, low spin
Fe(II) heme or a high spin, S = 2, Fe(II) heme adduct generated by
reaction of GTN/Cys with the sGC heme, and 2) a modified ferric sGC
species derived from the reaction (or interaction) with GTN/Cys or
GTN
Although the mechanism of sGC activation by GTN/Cys has not
been determined, the oxidation of sGC by GTN provides an attractive explanation for a potential role of sGC in the development of nitrate
tolerance. Nearly 30 years ago, tolerance to GTN was observed to be
associated with a decrease in the concentration of tissue thiols. Thus,
it was put forth that the oxidation of free thiols to disulfides was
responsible for the development of nitrate tolerance (16). Consistent
with this, it has also been shown that addition of dithiothreitol could
reverse tolerance and prevent the development of tolerance when added
concurrently with GTN (34). Interestingly no correlation between the
concentration of free thiol and the state of tolerance was found (35).
This observation contradicts a theory of tolerance involving the
oxidation of free thiol but is not contradictory to a hypothesis
involving the oxidation of ferrous sGC. To show that oxidized sGC is
responsible for nitrate tolerance, a means to observe the oxidized
species in tolerant tissue would be necessary. Nitrate tolerance is
clearly a complex phenomenon with many factors ultimately contributing
to the clinical end point (21). The results reported here are
consistent with the direct effect of organic nitrates on sGC playing a
role in the tolerance that develops from sustained nitrate therapy.
We acknowledge members of the Marletta
laboratory for discussion and critical evaluation of the manuscript and
Robert Hilliard for technical assistance.
*
This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical
Institute (to M. A. M.) and National Institutes of Health Grant
GM54065 (to J. L. M.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 5, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.C200170200
2
J. A. Winger and M. A. Marletta,
unpublished results.
The abbreviations used are:
sGC, soluble
guanylate cyclase;
GTN, glycerol trinitrate (nitroglycerin);
DEA/NO, 2-(N,N-diethylamino)-diazenenolate-2-oxide;
GMPCPP, guanylyl
ACCELERATED PUBLICATION
Effects of Nitroglycerin on Soluble Guanylate Cyclase
IMPLICATIONS FOR NITRATE TOLERANCE*
,
¶
Chemistry and
¶ Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California,
Berkeley, California 94720-1460 and the § Department of
Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1
1 form of the enzyme, originally isolated from lung tissue,
is a heterodimer comprising a 79-kDa
-subunit and a 70.5-kDa
-subunit (3, 4). The N-terminal region of the
-subunit contains
the heme binding region where the heme axial ligand has been identified
as His-105 (5-7). The bound heme is a ferrous protoporphyrin IX, and
sGC is activated 200-400-fold upon binding nitric oxide (NO) to this
heme cofactor (4, 8, 9).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1
1) was expressed using the
baculovirus/Sf9 expression system and purified according to
previously described methods (23) except that dithiothreitol was
excluded from the final gel filtration column.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Activity of sGC

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The sGC (300 nM) electronic absorption spectra
were collected at 10 °C in 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. A, reaction of 100 µM DEA/NO with sGC
(solid line) gives a
max of 399 nm, while
reaction of 1.0 mM GTN and 2.0 mM Cys with sGC
(dotted line) gives a
max of 393 nm.
B, reaction of 100 µM
K3Fe(CN)6 (solid line) or 1.0 mM GTN (dotted line) with sGC gives a
max of 392 nm. C, upon reaction with 1.0 mM GTN and 2.0 mM Cys in the presence of 1.0 µM GMPCPP the heme Soret of ferrous sGC with a
max of 431 nm (solid line) is shifted to 395 nm (dotted line).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The 13 K EPR spectra of 10 µM sGC treated
anaerobically with 1.0 mM GTN and
2.0 mM Cys (A),
1.0 mM GTN (B),
or 810 µM
K3Fe(CN)6 (C) are
shown. In each of the experiments, there are distinct rhombic
signals indicative of ferric heme. All spectra were measured using 2.0 milliwatts of microwave power and a modulation amplitude of 9.5 G. Each
spectrum is the signal average of 16 scans with the buffer spectrum
subtracted. The signal at g = 4.3 is from adventitious free ferric
iron. In C the broad signal at g = 2.5 is due to
K3Fe(CN)6.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Scheme 1.
Reaction of GTN with sGC. The
top reaction summarizes the results observed with
K3Fe(CN)6 oxidation of the enzyme. The
middle reaction shows that GTN treatment of sGC
leads to complete oxidation to the ferric oxidation state. The expected
co-product, GTN radical anion, was not observed. The bottom
reaction summarizes the observations of sGC treatment with
GTN/Cys. Although the resultant activity was 67-fold over the basal
activity, no nitrosyl species was detected. Spectroscopic results show
that most sGC has been oxidized to the ferric oxidation state
(A). Since ferric sGC has basal level activity, this must
react further to yield B whose properties are unknown
especially with respect to the heme (noted here as X).
Alternatively GTN/Cys or GTN 



![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Chemistry, University of California, 211 Lewis Hall, Berkeley, CA
94720-1460. Tel.: 510-643-9325; Fax: 510-643-9388; E-mail:
marletta@uclink.berkeley.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
,
-methylenediphosphonate;
YC-1, 3-(5'-hydroxymethyl-2'-furyl)-1-benzylindazole;
mT, milliteslas.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Waldman, S. A.,
Rapoport, R. M.,
Ginsburg, R.,
and Murad, F.
(1986)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
35,
3525-3531[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Denninger, J. W.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1411,
334-350[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Kamisaki, Y.,
Saheki, S.,
Nakane, M.,
Palmieri, J. A.,
Kuno, T.,
Chang, B. Y.,
Waldman, S. A.,
and Murad, F.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
7236-7241 4.
Stone, J. R.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
5636-5640[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Wedel, B.,
Humbert, P.,
Harteneck, C.,
Foerster, J.,
Malkewitz, J.,
Bohme, E.,
Schultz, G.,
and Koesling, D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2592-2596 6.
Zhao, Y.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
15959-15964[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Zhao, Y.,
Schelvis, J. P.,
Babcock, G. T.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
4502-4509[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Gerzer, R.,
Bohme, E.,
Hofmann, F.,
and Schultz, G.
(1981)
FEBS Lett.
132,
71-74[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Ignarro, L. J.,
Wood, K. S.,
and Wolin, M. S.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
2870-2873 10.
Thatcher, R. G. J.,
and Weldon, H.
(1998)
Chem. Soc. Rev.
27,
331-337[CrossRef]
11.
Feelisch, M.
(1998)
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol.
358,
113-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Schmidt, K.,
Klatt, P.,
and Mayer, B.
(1994)
Biochem. J.
301,
645-647[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Artz, J. D.,
and Thatcher, G. R.
(1998)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
11,
1393-1397[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Kelm, M.,
Dahmann, R.,
Wink, D.,
and Feelisch, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
9922-9932 15.
Marsh, N.,
and Marsh, A.
(2000)
Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol.
27,
313-319[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Needleman, P.,
Lang, S.,
and Johnson, E. M., Jr.
(1972)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
181,
489-497 17.
Chung, S. J.,
and Fung, H. L.
(1993)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
45,
157-163[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Bohyn, M.,
Berkenboom, G.,
and Fontaine, J.
(1991)
Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther.
5,
457-461[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Munzel, T.,
Sayegh, H.,
Freeman, B. A.,
Tarpey, M. M.,
and Harrison, D. G.
(1995)
J. Clin. Investig.
95,
187-194[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Abrams, J.,
Elkayam, U.,
Thadani, U.,
and Fung, H. L.
(1998)
Am. J. Cardiol.
81,
3A-14A[CrossRef]
21.
Parker, J. D.,
and Parker, J. O.
(1998)
N. Engl. J. Med.
338,
520-531 22.
Dunstan, I., Griffiths, J. V., and Harvey, S. A. (1965)
J. Chem. Soc. 1319
23.
Zhao, Y.,
Brandish, P. E.,
DiValentin, M.,
Schelvis, J. P.,
Babcock, G. T.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
10848-10854[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Brandish, P. E.,
Buechler, W.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
16898-16907[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Keefer, L. K.,
Nims, R. W.,
Davies, K. M.,
and Wink, D. A.
(1996)
in
Nitric Oxide, Part A: Sources and Detection of NO; NO Synthase
(Packer, L., ed), Vol. 268
, pp. 281-293, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
26.
Stone, J. R.,
Sands, R. H.,
Dunham, W. R.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
3258-3262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Stone, J. R.,
Sands, R. H.,
Dunham, W. R.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
207,
572-577[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Stone, J. R.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
1093-1099[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Zhao, Y.,
Brandish, P. E.,
Ballou, D. P.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
14753-14758 30.
Kharitonov, V. G.,
Russwurm, M.,
Magde, D.,
Sharma, V. S.,
and Koesling, D.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
239,
284-286[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Kharitonov, V. G.,
Sharma, V. S.,
Magde, D.,
and Koesling, D.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
10699-10706[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Stone, J. R.,
and Marletta, M. A.
(1998)
Chem. Biol.
5,
255-261[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Artz, J. D.,
Toader, V.,
Zavorin, S. I.,
Bennett, B. M.,
and Thatcher, G. R.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
9256-9264[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Chong, S.,
and Fung, H. L.
(1991)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
42,
1433-1439[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Gruetter, C. A.,
and Lemke, S. M.
(1986)
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
64,
1395-1401[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. W. Huellner, S. Schrepfer, M. Weyand, H. Weiner, I. Wimplinger, T. Eschenhagen, and T. Rau Inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase type 2 attenuates vasodilatory action of nitroglycerin in human veins FASEB J, July 1, 2008; 22(7): 2561 - 2568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Perkins, M. Taniguchi, D. O. Warner, E. N. Chini, and K. A. Jones Reduction in soluble guanylyl cyclase-specific activity following prolonged treatment of porcine pulmonary artery with nitric oxide Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): L84 - L95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Pacher, J. S. Beckman, and L. Liaudet Nitric Oxide and Peroxynitrite in Health and Disease Physiol Rev, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 315 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Esplugues, M. Rocha, C. Nunez, I. Bosca, S. Ibiza, J. R. Herance, A. Ortega, J. M. Serrador, P. D'Ocon, and V. M. Victor Complex I Dysfunction and Tolerance to Nitroglycerin: An Approach Based on Mitochondrial-Targeted Antioxidants Circ. Res., November 10, 2006; 99(10): 1067 - 1075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Munzel, A. Daiber, and A. Mulsch Explaining the Phenomenon of Nitrate Tolerance Circ. Res., September 30, 2005; 97(7): 618 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Munzel, R. Feil, A. Mulsch, S. M. Lohmann, F. Hofmann, and U. Walter Physiology and Pathophysiology of Vascular Signaling Controlled by Cyclic Guanosine 3',5'-Cyclic Monophosphate-Dependent Protein Kinase Circulation, November 4, 2003; 108(18): 2172 - 2183. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Kleschyov, M. Oelze, A. Daiber, Y. Huang, H. Mollnau, E. Schulz, K. Sydow, B. Fichtlscherer, A. Mulsch, and T. Munzel Does Nitric Oxide Mediate the Vasodilator Activity of Nitroglycerin? Circ. Res., October 31, 2003; 93 (9): e104 - e112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gori and J. D. Parker Nitrate Tolerance: A Unifying Hypothesis Circulation, November 5, 2002; 106(19): 2510 - 2513. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |