Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112419200 on March 11, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 21, 18257-18265, May 24, 2002
Error Prone Translesion Synthesis Past
-Hydroxypropano
Deoxyguanosine, the Primary Acrolein-derived Adduct in Mammalian
Cells*
Manorama
Kanuri
,
Irina G.
Minko
,
Lubomir V.
Nechev§,
Thomas
M.
Harris§,
Constance M.
Harris§, and
R. Stephen
Lloyd
¶
From the
Sealy Center for Molecular Science,
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555 and the
§ Department of Chemistry and Center in Molecular
Toxicology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235
Received for publication, December 27, 2001, and in revised form, March 8, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
8-Hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrimido[1,2-a]purin- 10(3H)-one,3-(2'-deoxyriboside)
(1,N2-
-hydroxypropano deoxyguanosine,
-HOPdG) is a major DNA adduct that forms as a result of exposure to
acrolein, an environmental pollutant and a product of endogenous lipid
peroxidation.
-HOPdG has been shown previously not to be a miscoding
lesion when replicated in Escherichia coli. In contrast to
those prokaryotic studies, in vivo replication and
mutagenesis assays in COS-7 cells using single stranded DNA containing
a specific
-HOPdG adduct, revealed that the
-HOPdG adduct was
significantly mutagenic. Analyses revealed both transversion and
transition types of mutations at an overall mutagenic frequency of
7.4 × 10
2/translesion synthesis. In
vitro
-HOPdG strongly blocks DNA synthesis by two major
polymerases, pol
and pol
. Replicative blockage of pol
by
-HOPdG could be diminished by the addition of proliferating cell
nuclear antigen, leading to highly mutagenic translesion bypass across
this adduct. The differential functioning and processing capacities of
the mammalian polymerases may be responsible for the higher mutation
frequencies observed in this study when compared with the accurate and
efficient nonmutagenic bypass observed in the bacterial system.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Xenobiotics from the environment can cause damage to DNA that may
lead to mutations following replication past these lesions. DNA damage
can arise from both endogenous metabolic end-products of cellular
respiration, as well as from hazardous industrial chemicals. Numerous
compounds have been investigated for their ability to form DNA adducts
and their mutagenic potential during replication in prokaryotic and
eukaryotic systems (1-4). One such compound that has recently become
the target for evaluation is acrolein (CH2=CHCHO), an
,
-unsaturated aldehyde that is released into the environment (140 tons/year) via a number of sources
(5-7).1 Acrolein is also
formed endogenously during metabolic oxidation of polyamines, lipid
peroxidation, and cyclophosphamide metabolism (8
10).
Acrolein has been shown to be mutagenic in Salmonella
typhimurium (11) as well as in DNA repair-deficient xeroderma
pigmentosum human cells (12). It also has been demonstrated to
have tumor initiating activity (13). Molecular analysis of mutations
induced by acrolein in human fibroblasts and xeroderma pigmentosum
cells has been performed using a supF shuttle vector. These
studies revealed that in both types of cells, the majority of the
mutations were single and tandem base substitutions that predominantly
occurred in G:C base pairs (14).
Being a bifunctional electrophile, acrolein reacts with DNA bases
in vitro to form several exocyclic DNA adducts (15), among which
8-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrimido[1,2-a]purin-10(3H)-one (1,N2-
-hydroxypropanodeoxyguanosine)
(
-HOPdG)2 (Fig. 1), was
identified as a major product of reaction
with deoxyguanosine (16). This adduct is formed by conjugate addition of the acrolein to N2 of dG followed by ring closure of the
resulting N2-(3-oxopropyl)dG at N-1 to form the
cyclic adduct. The acyclic and cyclic adducts are in dynamic
equilibrium. At physiological pH, the acyclic species cannot be
detected spectrophotometrically. However, it can be trapped as the
N2-(3-hydroxypropyl) adduct by treatment with
NaBH4. Using 32P-postlabeling combined with
high performance liquid chromatography, evidence has been obtained for
the presence of the
-HOPdG adduct in liver cells of humans and
rodents (17, 18) and also in the lymphocyte DNA of cancer patients
under treatment with cyclophosphamide (19).
The discovery of a variety of guanine-derived exocyclic adducts in
healthy mammalian tissues and cells of cancer patients (17-20) has
generated interest in evaluating its mutagenicity by site-specific
approaches. 1,N2-Propanoguanine (PdG) and
pyrimido[1,2-a]purin-10(3H)-one guanine (Fig.
1) share structural similarities with the
-HOPdG, and have been
utilized as model compounds for biological studies (21-25). Experiments designed to replicate past DNA containing a PdG adduct reported a major block to DNA synthesis. However, the relative mutagenicity of this lesion when replicated in Escherichia
coli has varied greatly, with Burcham and Marnett (23) reporting a
2% mutagenesis of G to T and A, while Moriya et al. (22)
found 100% G to T transversions. Furthermore, Moriya et al.
(22) reported that PdG was mutagenic in COS-7 cells, with 7.5% G to T
transversions, and 1% G to A transitions. It is probable that these
mutagenic variations could be accounted for by differences in the
vectors used, with one study (22) employing single stranded DNA while the other (23) used double stranded DNA.
Recent progress in the synthesis of oligodeoxynucleotides containing
-HOPdG (26, 27) has greatly facilitated structural studies (28) and
made it possible to investigate the biological fate of this adduct
using site-specific approaches (29, 30). An oligodeoxynucleotide
containing a single
-HOPdG adduct was incorporated into heteroduplex
DNA (29) and its cellular processing as well as mutagenic potential
were examined in E. coli using wild type and
repair-deficient strains. Analyses of progeny plasmids revealed that
-HOPdG was not mutagenic in vivo and that accurate translesion synthesis, nucleotide excision repair, and recombination repair protect E. coli from the genotoxicity of the adduct.
Inactivation of polB, dinB, and umuD,C
genes did not affect significantly the efficiency or fidelity of
translesion synthesis suggesting that "SOS" polymerases were
not essential for replication across
-HOPdG. Another study (30)
using the same adduct in single stranded as well as double stranded
shuttle vectors, also showed that
-HOPdG was not a strong block to
DNA replication and was not a miscoding lesion in E. coli. In
vitro, the Klenow exo
fragment of E. coli
polymerase I exhibited a limited, mostly error-prone DNA synthesis
across
-HOPdG (29, 30). Therefore, it has been concluded that DNA
polymerase III, the major replicative DNA polymerase in E. coli, catalyzes error-free translesion synthesis across
-HOPdG
(29).
NMR spectroscopy of a DNA duplex containing the
-HOPdG adduct (28)
established that there is a fundamental difference between
-HOPdG
and PdG within duplex DNA, in that the former predominantly exists as
an open ring form (Fig. 1), enabling the modified base to participate
in a standard Watson-Crick base pairing. The chemical conversion of the
-HOPdG to N2-(3-oxopropyl)dG during
replication has been proposed to account for the lack of mutagenicity
of the
-HOPdG adduct as observed in biological studies (29, 30).
In the present study, accuracy of translesion DNA synthesis across the
-HOPdG adduct has been evaluated in vivo in both
mammalian (COS-7) and bacterial (repair deficient E. coli
AB2480 (uvrA
recA
))
cells using a site-specifically modified single stranded pMS2 shuttle
vector (31). To further explore the mechanism of replication bypass and
to identify the polymerases involved in both error free and error-prone
synthesis, in vitro replication assays were carried out with
two major mammalian DNA polymerases, pol
and pol
(32).
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
T4 DNA ligase, T4 polynucleotide kinase, and
EcoRV were obtained from New England BioLabs (Beverly, MA).
S1 nuclease and proteinase K were purchased from Invitrogen (Rockville,
MD). Calf thymus DNA polymerase
and proliferating cell nuclear
antigen (PCNA) were generous gifts from Dr. K. M. Downey
(University of Miami, Miami, FL) and were isolated according to the
published procedures (33, 34). DNA polymerase
from HeLa cells was
kindly provided by Dr. S. Linn (University of California, Berkeley, CA)
and was purified as described (35). [
32P]Ribo-ATP was
purchased from PerkinElmer Life Science (Boston, MA). Bio-Spin columns
were purchased from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA). Centricon 100 concentrators
were obtained from Amicon Inc. (Beverly, MA). Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium, fetal bovine serum, Opti-MEM (reduced serum medium),
L-glutamine, antibiotic-antimycotic, and Lipofectin reagent
for tissue culture were obtained from Invitrogen (Rockville, MD).
Trypsin-EDTA and HEPES buffer were purchased from Cellgro Mediatech,
VA. Phosphate-buffered saline was from Sigma.
Oligodeoxynucleotides--
-HOPdG (Fig. 1) was inserted into
a 12-mer oligonucleotide sequence (5'-GCTAGC(
-HOPdG)AGTCC-3') and
purity determined by a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, by
previously described procedures (27). Nondamaged 12-mer with a dG in
place of
-HOPdG was purchased from Midland Certified Reagent Co.
(Midland, TX). All other oligodeoxynucleotides were synthesized by the
Molecular Biology Core Laboratory of the NIEHS Toxicology Center at the
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, and purified by
electrophoresis through a 15% denaturing PAGE (in the presence of 7 M urea).
Bacterial Strains and Vectors--
Single stranded (ss) pMS2 DNA
was a generous gift from Dr. M. Moriya (State University of New York,
Stony Brook, NY). COS-7 cells were purchased from American Type Culture
Collection (Rockville, MD). E. coli DH10B cells that were
used for transformation of DNA isolated from COS-7 cells after
transfection with modified and control DNA, and helper phage M13KO7
were purchased from Invitrogen (Rockville, MD). Repair-deficient
E. coli AB2480 (uvrA
recA
) was used for propagating the pMS2
shuttle vector during isolation of ss DNA by helper phage rescue using
M13 KO7 (1011 pfu/ml). Purity of ss pMS2 was assayed by
electrophoresis through a 1.4% agarose gel and compared with standard
ss pMS2 DNA as supplied by Dr. M. Moriya.
Construction of Circular ss pMS2 DNA Modified with
-HOPdG--
ss pMS2 (29 pmol, 50 µg) was annealed to a 58-mer
scaffold (145 pmol/2.34 µg) in the presence of a buffer (NEB#3)
containing 100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and
100 µg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA), in 200 µl of reaction mixture, and incubated at 9 °C overnight. The hairpin loop in the ss
pMS2 DNA that contains a single EcoRV restriction site (Fig.
2), was digested with 40 units of
EcoRV in the presence of NEB#3 and BSA in a 600-µl
reaction mixture, by incubation at 37 °C for 3 h. Non-annealed
58-mer scaffold and the excised hairpin loop were removed from the
reaction by centrifugation in a Centricon-100 tube. The 58-mer scaffold
was complementary to the two termini of the digested vector (after
removal of the hairpin loop), and the central sequence was
complementary to the 12-mer oligonucleotide bearing the
-HOPdG
adduct, except there was complete substitution of uracil for thymine
(Fig. 2). The gap created by annealing of ss pMS2 DNA to the scaffold
was filled by ligation with a 10-fold excess of the
-HOPdG
containing oligonucleotide, or the unmodified 12-mer as control. The
12-mer oligodeoxynucleotides were phosphorylated at the 5' end with
ribo-ATP and ligated in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM
dithiothreitol, 10 mM ATP, 25 µg/ml BSA, using T4
polynucleotide kinase (5 units/pmol) and T4 ligase (325 units/pmol), in
the reaction mixture of 200 µl, at 4 °C for 48 h. The
two ligated samples were designated ss pMS2(dG) and ss
pMS2(
-HOPdG).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Schematic representation of construction of
modified ss pMS2 DNA. Single stranded shuttle vector pMS2 was
sequentially annealed to a 58-mer scaffolding DNA stabilizing the
EcoRV site hairpin, restricted with EcoRV,
hybridized to a 12-mer control or -HOPdG containing single-stranded
oligodeoxynucleotide, and ligated to recircularize the ss DNA.
|
|
Ligation products were visualized by ethidium bromide staining,
following electrophoresis through a 1.4% agarose gel and compared with
standard circular and linearized ss pMS2 DNA. Modified samples were
purified to remove non-ligated 12-mer in Centricon-100 tubes after
dilution to 600 µl. After repeating this step three times, DNA was
recovered by ethanol precipitation and the DNA concentration determined
by measuring absorbance at 260 nm. To avoid the 58-mer scaffold being
used as a primer for (
)-strand replication, ligated DNAs were
incubated with uracil-DNA glycosylase for 1 h to remove uracil
bases and generate abasic sites.
Transfection of ss pMS2(dG) and ss pMS2(
-HOPdG) into COS-7
Cells--
Modified DNAs were allowed to replicate in COS-7 cells and
DNA was isolated for transforming E. coli DH10B cells to
assess mutations which might have arisen during replication in COS-7 cells. For transfection of ligated DNAs, COS-7 cells (5 × 105 cells per 6-cm Petri dish) were first maintained in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf
serum, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml),
incubated for 24 h at 5% CO2. Individually, 30 µg
of Lipofectin and 200 ng of ligation mixture were dissolved in 1.5 ml
of Opti-MEM, combined, and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. A
total of 3 ml of this solution was added to each 6-cm Petri plate
containing the attached COS-7 cells and incubated for 18 h at
37 °C. Transfection medium was replaced with 5 ml of fresh
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and cultured for 48 h. Cells
were then washed twice with 5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline, and
progeny phagemid DNA was recovered by the method described by Hirt
(36).
Site-specific Mutagenesis Assay--
DNA extracted from COS-7
cells was successively treated with S1 nuclease (0.2 units/60 µl
reaction mixture) and EcoRV (20 units/60 µl reaction
mixture) to remove any input ssDNA and progeny associated with the
original ss pMS2 vector and then replicated in E. coli
DH10B. A total of 50 µl of electrocompetent DH10B cells was
transformed with 5 µg of DNA by electroporation in chilled 2-mm gap
cuvettes using ECM 600 (BTX, San Diego), at 25 µF, 2.5 kV, R5
(resistance timing) 129 ohms. 2 × Yeast-tryptone (YT) (0.95 ml)
was immediately added and incubated with shaking at 37 °C for 1 h to fully express the ampicillin-resistant gene. Aliquots of the
transformation mixture were plated out onto 1 × YT agar plates
containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin. After incubation overnight at
37 °C, the number of transformants per plate was counted to determine replication efficiency. In addition, 5 µg of
undamaged and damaged, modified ss pMS2 DNA were added to 40 µl of
competent cells of E. coli AB2480
(uvrA
recA
) by
electroporation under similar conditions as described above and allowed
to replicate on LB-ampicillin plates overnight, for comparison of
mutagenicity in mammalian and bacterial cells.
A total of 480 colonies from each plate of transformed cells were
individually picked with sterile toothpicks and grown in 2 × YT
containing ampicillin in 96-well plates overnight. The cultures from
each 96-well plate were transferred using 48-pin replicators, onto
Whatman 541 filter papers placed on ampicillin containing 1 × YT
agar plates, in four replicates (one for each probe:
5'-GATGCTAGCNAGTCCATC-3', where N refers to
A, T, G, or C), and incubated overnight at 37 °C to form well defined colonies. Alternately, colony lifts were performed on four
replicate plates of transformants to determine the actual mutation
frequency of the entire population. Filter papers were removed from the
agar plates, cell lysis achieved by soaking in 0.5 N NaOH
for 5 min followed by neutralization in 0.5 M Tris-HCl (pH
7.4) and washed in 1 × SSC (0.15 M NaCl, 0.15 M sodium
citrate/C6H5O7Na3, pH
7.0). DNA was cross-linked onto the paper in a UV Stratalinker for 1.5 min.
Hybridization was carried out with [
-32P]ATP-labeled
probes, designed to determine the nature of the base at the site of the adducted guanine in progeny plasmid DNA. Hybridization temperature was
calculated using the formula where the oligonucleotide melting temperature equals (4(G+C) + 2(A+T))
14 °C. Filters were incubated in prehybridization solution containing 25 ml of 20 × SSPE (3 M NaCl, 2 mM Na2HPO4, 2 mM EDTA), 20 ml of formamide, 5 ml of Denhardt's solution
(1% Ficoll, 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone, 1% BSA), 1 ml of 10 mg/ml fish
milt DNA and 1 ml of 10% SDS, for 20 min to restrict
nonspecific binding of the probe. Four filters were separated and
probed with 100 pmol each of four 18-mer oligodeoxynucleotides containing one of the four canonical bases at the adducted site within
the centrally located sequence of the damaged and non-damaged 12-mer
oligonucleotide. After overnight hybridization with probes in
hybridization solution, filters were washed with 2 × SSPE at 2 °C above hybridization temperature to remove nonspecifically bound
probes. Dried filters were exposed to X-Omat AR film overnight and
autoradiographs were developed to identify mutation frequency and types
of mutations. Representative colonies were subjected to dideoxy
sequencing (37) to confirm the sequence of the mutated DNAs. A
20-mer primer (5'-CCATCTTGTTCAATCATGCG-3') was used for sequencing progeny plasmid DNA.
Construction of Linear Template for in Vitro Replication
Assays--
The
-HOPdG 12-mer oligodeoxynucleotide utilized in the
construction of the pMS2 vector, as well as its nondamaged analog, were
used to construct 135-mer linear templates. Nondamaged or
-HOPdG
containing 12-mer oligodeoxynucleotide, the 62-mer 5'-flanking DNA, and
the 61-mer 3'-flanking DNA (500 pmol of each) were annealed to an
equimolar amount of the 42-mer scaffold DNA. Prior to annealing, the
12- and 61-mer oligodeoxynucleotides were 5'-phosphorylated using
ribo-ATP (non-labeled) and T4 polynucleotide kinase. To visualize the
ligation products, 1/100 of the 12-mer oligodeoxynucleotides were
phosphorylated with [
-32P]ribo-ATP. Ligations were
performed with 400 units of the T4 DNA ligase in the reaction volume of
100 µl at 13 °C for 20 h. Ligation products were separated by
electrophoresis on a 10% denaturing PAGE. The 135-mer bands were
excised, DNAs were eluted with buffer consisting of 500 mM
ammonium acetate, 10 mM magnesium acetate, and 1 mM EDTA and precipitated with ethanol. The sequence
of resulting oligodeoxynucleotides were identical:
5'-GGGACCTGAACACGTACGGAATTCGATATCCTCGAGCCAGATCTGCGCCAGCTGGCCACCCTGCTAGCGAGTCCGCGCCAAGCTTGGGCTGCAGCAGGTCGACTCTAGAGGATCCCGGGCGAGCTCGAATTCGCC-3', where the underlined G is either
-HOPdG or non-adducted.
In Vitro Replication of
-HOPdG Containing Linear
Template--
21-Mer oligodeoxynucleotides were used as primers for
in vitro polymerase reactions, using the following
sequences: 5'-CCTGCTGCAGCCCAAGCTTGG-3', which is complementary
to the template DNA from positions
9 to
29 relative to the
site of lesion (
9 primer), 5'-AGCCCAAGCTTGGCGCGGACT-3', (
1 primer),
and 5'-TGGCGCGGACTCGCTAGCAGG-3', which is complementary to the
template DNA from positions +9 to
11 overlapping the lesion site (+9
primer). Primer oligodeoxynucleotides were phosphorylated with T4
polynucleotide kinase using [
-32P]ribo-ATP. The
-32P-labeled primers were mixed with the
oligodeoxynucleotide substrates at a molar ratio of 1:2 in the presence
of 50 mM KCl, heated at 90 °C for 2 min, and cooled to
room temperature overnight. DNA samples were purified using P-6
Bio-Spin columns supplied with 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH
7.4). To confirm the completion of primer annealing, aliquots were
tested on a 5% native PAGE, which was also used for verification
of DNA concentrations.
Assays with polymerase
and polymerase
were carried out as
described (33, 38). The polymerase
reaction mixture contained 2 nM primer annealed to a template in 40 mM
HEPES-KOH (pH 6.8), 10% glycerol, 200 µg/ml BSA, 6 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 70 ng of calf
thymus PCNA where indicated, polymerase
, and dNTPs (each of the
four dNTPs or individually) at the concentrations as given in the
figure legends. Reactions were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in a
final volume of 5 µl. The pol
reaction mixture contained 2 nM primer/template DNA, 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH
7.5), 100 mM potassium glutamate, 20% glycerol, 200 µg/ml BSA, 15 mM MgCl2, 10 mM
DDT, 0.03% Triton X-100, 100 µM each of the dNTPs, and
2.5 milliunits of polymerase
(where 1 unit of polymerase is defined
as the amount that catalyzes the incorporation of 1 nmol of dTTP into
an acid-insoluble form per h using dA3000 and oligo(dT)12-18). Reactions were incubated for 20 min at 37 °C in a final volume of 12.5 µl. Incubation of the
primer/template DNA substrates under the same reaction conditions
without polymerase was used as a negative control reaction. Reactions
were terminated by the addition of 2 × of stop solution
consisting of 95% (v/v) formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.02%
(w/v) xylene cyanol, and 0.02% (w/v) bromphenol blue. Reaction
products were resolved on a 15% denaturing PAGE and visualized by
autoradiography. Quantitative analyses was performed using a
PhosphorImager screen and Image-Quant 5.0 software (Molecular Dynamics,
Sunnyvale, CA).
 |
RESULTS |
Mutagenicity of
-HOPdG Modified Single Stranded Vectors in
Simian Kidney Cells--
Single stranded pMS2 DNA which was purified
as described under "Experimental Procedures," was annealed with a
partially complementary scaffold DNA and digested with EcoRV
(Fig. 2, step 1). The EcoRV restriction site
spontaneously forms within a hairpin in the ss pMS2 and completion of
linearization was tested by differential electrophoretic mobility
through a 1.4% agarose gel. Into the resulting gap (Fig. 2, step
2), control unmodified and
-HOPdG modified 12-mer
oligodeoxynucleotides were ligated (Fig. 2, step 3).
Efficiencies of ligation were assessed by electrophoretic analyses of
the conversion of linear to circular DNA molecules. The scaffolding DNA
was severely damaged by digestion with uracil DNA glycosylase (Fig. 2,
step 4). COS-7 cells were transfected with 200 ng of
modified ss pMS2(dG) and ss pMS2(
-HOPdG), and following a 72-h
replication, progeny plasmid DNA was isolated. Following treatment of
this DNA with S1 nuclease and EcoRV to remove any
contaminating non-ligated ss pMS2 vector, E. coli DH10B cells were transformed and selected for ampicillin resistance.
Table I shows the results of
transformation of ss pMS2(dG) and ss pMS2 (
-HOPdG). The modified
construct containing the acrolein adduct yielded slightly more
transformants than control ss pMS2(dG). To assess the mutagenic
potential of the adduct, 480 colonies were picked and grown in 96-well
plates for analysis using a differential hybridization strategy to
reveal the kind of mutations that may have occurred at the site of the
adducted guanine. Of the 480 colonies that were randomly picked, 417 hybridized with one of the probes, while 63 colonies did not
hybridize with any of the four probes. Of those transformants that did
not hybridize with any sequence-specific probe, none of those
hybridized to sequences immediately upstream of the
oligodeoxynucleotide ligation site, suggesting that this deletion was
not caused by the adduct. Furthermore, approximately the same number of
nonhybridized colonies was observed with the control ss pMS2(dG).
Although most colonies (~93%) revealed no targeted mutations (Fig.
3), 2.6% (11/417) of the transformants had targeted G-C transversions as evidenced by hybridization with the
probe containing C at the site of the adducted base (Fig. 4). Sequencing of plasmid DNA prepared
from these colonies confirmed the presence of G opposite the site.
Furthermore, 1% of the transformants (4/417) hybridized with the probe
containing A at the site of the adduct indicating G-A transition, and
3.8% of the transformants (16/417) hybridized with the probe
containing T at the site of the adduct (Fig. 4). A total of 7.4% of
the transformants was found to have point mutations. None of the
transformants carried the sequence of the 58-mer scaffold. Differential
hybridization of control, nonadducted ss pMS2(dG) revealed no mutations
(Figs. 4 and 5). Transfection and
transformation in COS-7 cells and E. coli DH10B cells, as
well as differential hybridization with the four probes were repeated
three times.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Transformation efficiency and base pair substitutions in COS-7 cells
and E. coli (AB 2480) transformed with ss pMS2 (dG) and ss pMS2
( -HOPdG)
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Percentage mutations observed following
replication of DNAs containing a site-specific
-HOPdG adduct in COS-7 cells and
E. coli (AB2480). Percentage of mutations formed
in COS-7 cells as assayed in E. coli by: panel
A, individual colonies picked and grown in 96-well plates or
panel B, colonies lifted out on Whatman 541 filter
paper. Panel C, percentage of mutations observed
following replication of modified DNA in E. coli
(AB2480).
|
|

View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Differential hybridization of colonies grown
in 96-well plates. Panel A, non-damaged control plates
(no mutations detected). Panel B, -HOPdG plates.
Base substitutions detected at the site of the adducted guanine in
progeny plasmid DNA of COS-7 cells. G, A, C, and T denote the base
present at the site of the adducted guanine.
|
|

View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Differential hybridization of colony lifts.
Panel A, non-damaged control (no mutations detected).
Panel B, base pair substitutions at the site of the
adducted guanine in progeny plasmid DNA derived from COS-7 cells.
Panel C, base pair substitutions at the site of the
adducted guanine in E. coli (AB 2480). G,
C, A, and T denote the base present at
the site of the adducted guanine.
|
|
To increase the total number of E. coli transformants that
could readily be assayed, direct lifts were also performed on
transformants, and probed with site-specific A, T, G, or C probes.
Since all of the transformed colonies were lifted for mutational
analysis by the differential hybridization strategy, sequencing for
these DNAs was not possible, but mutation frequencies were confirmed with Fig. 5 showing the pattern of differential hybridization. In
excellent agreement with the previous data, the transformants contained
1.7% G-C transversions, 1.2% G-A transitions, and 3.5% G-T
transversions. Thus, a total of 6.4% mutations were observed by the
direct lift method while 7.4% mutations were obtained using randomly
chosen samples (Fig. 3). Sequencing data confirmed base substitution at the adducted site for all the mutant colonies tested.
Replication and Mutagenicity of
-HOPdG in E. coli AB
2480--
Since the
-HOPdG lesion had been previously shown to be
very weakly mutagenic in E. coli (29, 30), it was considered to be important to test these vector constructs in E. coli
mutagenesis assays. For direct comparison of results in the bacterial
system, modified ss pMS2(dG) and ss pMS2(
-HOPdG) were introduced
into repair-deficient AB2480 cells (uvrA
recA
) by electroporation. The percentage of
mutations obtained in E. coli cells was <1% (Fig. 3). This
essentially error-free replication past the
-HOPdG adduct in
E. coli suggests that the fidelity of the bacterial
polymerases is substantially different from the mammalian polymerases,
that appear to have bypassed the lesion efficiently, but
misincorporated and extended a substantial number of bases opposite the lesion.
In Vitro Lesion Bypass with Polymerases
and
--
The
data within this and other reports (29, 30) indicate that in E. coli,
-HOPdG is not a strong block for DNA synthesis, nor a
miscoding lesion. In vitro, Klenow exo
fragment of E. coli pol I is capable of limited, error-prone DNA synthesis across
-HOPdG (29). The "SOS" polymerases do not
seem to be essential for replication across this lesion, as evidenced
by the observation that inactivation of polB,
dinB, and umuD,C genes did not affect
significantly the efficiency or fidelity of translesion synthesis (29).
It has been concluded therefore that DNA polymerase III, the major
replicative DNA polymerase in E. coli, catalyzes error-free
translesion synthesis across
-HOPdG. Our in vivo
replication studies using the pMS2 vector and COS-7 cells suggest that
in the eukaryotic system the
-HOPdG lesion also does not pose a
significant block for DNA replication machinery; however, it was
pro-mutagenic in this system. Taking these data into consideration, it
was assumed that at least one of the major eukaryotic DNA polymerases,
pol
or pol
(32), may be capable of translesion synthesis,
presumably error-prone, across
-HOPdG. To test this assumption,
in vitro replication studies were performed using both calf
thymus pol
and human pol
.
To determine whether calf thymus pol
was able to replicate across a
-HOPdG adduct, primer extension experiments were carried out in
which running start (
9 primer annealed to template DNA) and standing
start (
1 primer annealed to template DNA) conditions were simulated
(Fig. 6). To control for the integrity of
the template preparations, a +9 primer was also utilized in this study.
Under the conditions used, all three primers were efficiently extended by pol
when they were primed with nondamaged DNA template (Fig. 6,
lane 3, 6, and 9). Due to the
distributive mechanism of pol
replication (39), extension of each
primer led to the formation of a multitude of products that were
shorter than full-length product. On the
-HOPdG-adducted template,
9 primer was efficiently extended to the position one nucleotide
before the lesion (Fig. 6, lane 12), but no bands were
detectable that would reflect nucleotide incorporation opposite the
adducted site or beyond it. Accordingly, no extension was observed when
-HOPdG-modified template was primed with
1 primer (Fig. 6,
lane 15). Thus,
-HOPdG presents a major replication block
to pol
.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Primer extension reactions catalyzed by calf
thymus DNA polymerase on the
-HOPdG-adducted template.
Nondamaged (ND) or -HOPdG-adducted 135-mer DNA templates
were annealed to one of three primers. The DNA substrates (2 nM) were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C in the presence
of all four dNTPs (100 µM) without ( ) or with (+) 50 milliunits of polymerase and in the presence of 70 ng of calf
thymus PCNA where indicated. The positions of the 21-nucleotide primers
and the 97-, 89-, and 79-nucleotide full-length products are indicated.
G* indicates the position of the modified G on the
template.
|
|
It has been shown earlier that PCNA, the known pol
processivity factor (32, 34), facilitates pol
translesion bypass through a number of DNA lesions, including abasic sites,
8-oxo-deoxyguanosine, aminofluorene deoxyguanosine (40), thymine dimers
(41), and 1,N6-ethenodeoxyadenosine (42). In our
experiments, addition of PCNA to reactions resulted in formation of
full-length products (~64% of the primers) when non-damaged DNA
template was examined (Fig. 6, lanes 4, 7, and
10). On the
-HOPdG-modified template, full-length
products were also formed, but only at ~7% under running start
conditions (Fig. 6, lane 13) and ~5% under standing start conditions (Fig. 6, lane 16). In addition, an accumulation
of products was observed that could reflect nucleotide incorporation opposite the lesion (13% of the product under running start and 12%
under standing start conditions). Thus, replicative blockage of pol
caused by
-HOPdG was diminished in the presence of PCNA. Confirming
the integrity and purity of the
-HOPdG-adducted DNA template,
extensions of the +9 primer, without or with PCNA (Fig. 7, lanes 18 and
19), were as efficient as that observed on non-damaged substrate.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Single-nucleotide incorporation by calf
thymus DNA polymerase on the
-HOPdG-adducted template.
Nondamaged (dG) or -HOPdG-adducted 135-mer DNA templates
were annealed to the 1 primer. The DNA substrates (2 nM)
were incubated for 10 min at 37 °C with 50 (A) or 10 (B) milliunits of polymerase in the presence of 100 (A) or 5 (B) µM of each of the four
dNTPs (A, dATP; C, dCTP;
G, dGTP; T, dTTP) and 70 ng of calf
thymus PCNA where indicated. The positions of the 21-nucleotide primer
and 22-nucleotide products are indicated.
|
|
The specificity of nucleotide incorporation by pol
opposite the
-HOPdG was also examined. Single nucleotide incorporation experiments were carried out under the same conditions as the primer
extension experiments. In agreement with primer extension experiments,
no incorporation opposite
-HOPdG was detected when reactions were
incubated without PCNA (Fig. 7, lanes 11-14). On the
non-damaged template, 69% of primers were extended with a C (Fig. 7,
lane 3) and about 1% with a T (Fig. 7, lane 5).
In the presence of PCNA, an A (Fig. 7, lane 15), a G (Fig.
7, lane 17), and a T (Fig. 7, lane 18) were
inserted opposite
-HOPdG, forming 3, 2, and 3% of the products,
respectively. Surprisingly, no detectable nucleotide incorporation was
found when the correct nucleotide was added to the reaction (Fig. 7,
lane 16). On nondamaged substrate, pol
displayed an
unexpectedly high propensity for misincorporation in the presence of
PCNA (Fig. 7, lanes 6-9). In this case, correct nucleotide
C was preferentially incorporated opposite a G (80% of the extension),
but the primers were also readily extended by a T and an A (45 and 16%
of the products, respectively). Reduction of the fidelity of DNA
synthesis by pol
in the presence of PCNA has been reported
previously (43, 44). Particularly, interaction of PCNA with polymerase
led to a decrease in Km of dNTPs, and consequently
to an increase of nucleotide incorporation efficiency. This is true
both for correct and incorrect nucleotide incorporation. Under
conditions of single nucleotide incorporation experiments in which
there is no competition between correct versus incorrect
dNTP, this increased efficiency of incorporation is reflected in
effective misincorporation. After the conditions of the reactions in
the presence of PCNA were adjusted so that misincorporation by pol
opposite G was effectively eliminated (5 µM dNTP and 10 milliunits of the enzyme) (Fig. 7, lanes 24-27), no
nucleotide incorporation was observed opposite
-HOPdG (Fig. 7,
lanes 33-36). Thus in vitro, pol
has limited
ability to replicate through the
-HOPdG. This replication is highly
mutagenic and occurs only at high concentrations of dNTPs and in the
presence of PCNA.
Primer extension experiments were also performed with human pol
using the same set of primers as described in pol
experiments. Under the conditions used, ~97% of the primers were extended by pol
replicating through unmodified G (Fig.
8, lanes 2 and 6). Using the
-HOPdG-modified DNA template, primer extension by pol
was strongly blocked one nucleotide before the lesion and DNA synthesis
was completely aborted after extremely weak incorporation opposite the
lesion (less than 2% of the products) both under running start and
standing start conditions (Fig. 8, lanes 4 and 8). In the presence of human PCNA, replication by pol
through the
-HOPdG was as inefficient as in the absence of PCNA
(data not shown). Therefore, these data indicate that major eukaryotic polymerases, pol
and pol
, are unlikely to be involved in
translesion bypass across the
-HOPdG in vivo, and that
neither of them contributes to error-free replication across this
lesion.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Primer extension reactions catalyzed by human
DNA polymerase on the
-HOPdG-adducted template.
Nondamaged (ND) or -HOPdG-adducted 135-mer DNA templates
were annealed to one of three primers. The DNA substrates (2 nM) were incubated for 20 min at 37 °C in the presence
of all four dNTPs (100 µM of each) without ( ) or with
(+) 2.5 milliunits of polymerase . The positions of the
21-nucleotide primers and the 97-, 89-, and the 79-nucleotide
full-length products are indicated. G* indicates the
position of the modified G on the template.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The results of transformation of mammalian cells with control ss
pMS2(G) and modified ss pMS2(
-HOPdG) reported in this paper indicate
that at least a subset of mammalian polymerases are capable of
efficiently bypassing the adduct, but with extensive misincorporation opposite the lesion. Use of the single stranded shuttle vector in this
study allowed for a sensitive evaluation of in vivo
translesional synthesis and also eliminated the possibility of repair
and preferential replication of the unadducted complementary strand
that could conceivably occur when double stranded vectors are used. It
is evident that in a subset of vector progeny (7.4%), all nucleotides are being incorporated opposite the lesion with a subsequent extension. This work represents the first report of error-prone replication for
-HOPdG adducts.
Comparison of these data with that reported by Moriya et al.
(22) for the mutagenic bypass of PdG, also using the same pMS2 vector
in COS-7 cells, reveals significant similarities. Both of these studies
report that neither the
-HOPdG nor PdG were severe blocks to
in vivo DNA replication, suggesting that one or a
combination of DNA polymerases can efficiently bypass this lesion.
Furthermore, the PdG adduct yielded ~7.5% G to T and ~1% G to C,
while in this study,
-HOPdG conferred 3.8% G to T, 2.6% G to C,
and 1% G to A. Considering that there is differential statistical
power to these reported values based on the total number of colonies
screened, these mutagenic spectra are remarkably similar. In agreement
with the E. coli study of Burcham and Marnett (23) for PdG
and both studies on
-HOPdG in E. coli (29, 30), we also
find very low mutagenic frequencies in E. coli, indicating different functioning and processing abilities of the mammalian polymerases, when compared with bacterial polymerases. A reasonable hypothesis is that the
-HOPdG base is presented to the bacterial polymerase as the acyclic N2-(3-oxopropyl)dG,
while in the mammalian system it remains in the cyclic
-HOPdG form,
at least to some extent.
To identify the polymerase associated with in vivo DNA
synthesis past
-HOPdG and to understand how the adduct gives rise to
mutations, in vitro replication studies were performed using two major replicative mammalian DNA polymerases, pol
and pol
.
Surprisingly, DNA synthesis by both pol
and pol
was almost completely terminated by the
-HOPdG one nucleotide prior to the lesion, but in the presence of PCNA, pol
could perform highly error-prone replication across the adduct.
Although the present study was not aimed at uncovering the basis of
replicative blockage and mutagenicity caused by
-HOPdG, some
assumptions concerning this matter can be made. Weak nucleotide incorporation opposite the lesion by pol
was observed and, in the
case of pol
, incorporation was achieved by addition of PCNA. Based
on this, formation of the competent ternary complex containing
-HOPdG within the polymerase active site is evident. The current model for error-free DNA synthesis past is
-HOPdG based on a recently established (28) structure of the adducted DNA duplex, in
which
-HOPdG was paired with C, as well as on the observation that
in E. coli, the replication across
-HOPdG is very
accurate. Within the duplex, all base pairs including
-HOPdG:C
displayed a Watson-Crick alignment, and the adduct predominantly
existed as an open form with the N2-propyl chain
pointed away from the minor groove (28). In contrast,
-HOPdG
predominantly exists as a ring-closed form in solution (28) and may
have the same conformation in the single-stranded DNA region within a
polymerase active site. Such a ring-closed form would be structurally
similar to that of the PdG lesion. It has been proposed therefore that
at the replicative fork, an incoming dCTP would trigger a structural
rearrangement of the adduct from the ring-closed form to the
ring-open form, promoting the formation of the correct Watson-Crick
hydrogen bonds, stabilizing the structure, and facilitating a
consequent extension of DNA synthesis (28). The data presented here
demonstrate that pol
can incorporate A, G, and T opposite
-HOPdG, but that incorporation of the correct nucleotide, C, was not
detected. This observation that incorrect nucleotides are
preferentially incorporated opposite the adduct is similar to the
error-prone nucleotide insertion by E. coli pol I Klenow
fragment (exo
) opposite the same adduct (29, 30), where
insertions of A and G were much more efficient than insertion of C. Thus these data may suggest that the active sites of such polymerases
either restrict the ability of the exocyclic ring to open and thus
force infrequent mutagenic bypass of the ring-closed form of the lesion or possess unfavorable geometric interactions between dCTP and the
adducted base, whether ring-opened or closed. It is not clear whether
nucleotides are incorporated opposite the adduct that remains in the
ring-closed conformation or whether interactions between an incoming
nucleotide and the adduct promotes the ring opening. Also, it cannot be
excluded that nucleotides are preferentially incorporated opposite the
ring-open form, which may be present as a minor subpopulation in the
single stranded DNA. Independent of how non-canonical base pairs are
formed, the resulting structure does not facilitate the subsequent
steps of extension efficiently.
Both polymerases investigated in the present study possess a 3' to 5'
exonucleolytic activity. Therefore, it is likely that upon encountering
the lesion, the polymerase is stalled performing nonproductive cycling
of polymerization/nucleotide removal. Interestingly, the impact of a
polymerase exonucleolytic activity to bypass
-HOPdG was observed in
the case of E. coli Klenow pol I fragment: the exonucleolytically proficient protein was completely blocked by
-HOPdG,3 whereas the
protein lacking an exonucleolytic activity exhibited a capacity for a
limited error-prone DNA synthesis past the lesion (29, 30). Thus, none
of the three polymerases tested so far utilizes the above mentioned
mechanism for error-free replication across
-HOPdG. Since the adduct
at the replicative fork is presumed to exist in ring-closed form, it is
suggested that for some polymerases the mechanism of
-HOPdG
translesional synthesis would resemble the mechanism of synthesis past
the model PdG adduct.
In vivo replication studies revealed that DNA synthesis past
-HOPdG was not significantly inhibited in a mammalian system and
that the correct nucleotide was incorporated in ~93% of the translesional events. In contrast,
-HOPdG was a severe block for
in vitro replication by both pol
and pol
. In
addition, incorporation of correct nucleotide opposite the lesion was
not detected. The data indicate therefore, that in mammalian cells the
major replicative polymerases are unlikely to be responsible for
replication across
-HOPdG. We hypothesize that a polymerase switching mechanism occurs at replication forks that are blocked by
encountering a
-HOPdG lesion. The identity of this polymerase is
currently unknown but reasonable candidates are the recently identified lesion bypass polymerases (45). The role of such a
polymerase would be to carry out short bypass synthesis, and then be
subsequently displaced by the major replicative enzyme complex. It is
not evident whether one polymerase is solely responsible for the bypass
and mutagenic spectrum in COS-7 cells or whether multiple polymerases
are involved, in which one polymerase carries out error-free bypass and
another is primarily error-prone.
The present study clearly indicates that the
-HOPdG adduct can
contribute to the mutagenicity of acrolein in a mammalian system, being
responsible for at least some of the acrolein-induced base
substitutions. Moreover, the potential for
-HOPdG to form secondary
DNA adducts such as DNA-DNA (46) and DNA-polypeptide cross-links4 may extend
further the spectrum of mutagenicity of this adduct.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We acknowledge Dr. Masaaki Moriya, Department
of Pharmacological Sciences, State University of New York at Stony
Brook, for the generous gift of ss pMS2, Dr. Kathleen M. Downey,
Department of Medicine, University of Miami, for the generous gift of
pol
, and Dr. Hitomi Asahara and Dr. Stuart Linn, Department of
Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, for the generous gift of pol
. We also acknowledge the Molecular Biology
Core Laboratory, NIEHS Toxicology Center, University of Texas Medical
Branch, Galveston, TX, for oligodeoxynucleotide synthesis.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants ES05355 (to T. M. H.), ES06676 (to R. S. L.), and ES00267.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
Holds a Mary Gibbs Jones Distinguished Chair in Environmental
Toxicology from the Houston Endowment. To whom the correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 409-772-2179; Fax: 409-772-1790; E-mail: rslloyd@utmb.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112419200
3
M. Kanuri, I. G. Minko, L. V. Nechev, T. M. Harris, C. M. Harris, and R. S. Lloyd,
unpublished data.
4
A. J. Kurtz and I. G. Minko,
unpublished data.
1
www.scorecard.org.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
-HOPdG, 8-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropyrimido[1,2-a]purin-10(3H)-one,3-(2'-deoxyriboside);
PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen;
BSA, bovine serum
albumin;
ss, single stranded.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Marnett, L. J.
(2000)
Carcinogenesis
21,
361-370[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Chary, P.,
Latham, G. J.,
Robberson, D. L.,
Kim, S. J.,
Han, S.,
Harris, C. M.,
Harris, T. M.,
and Lloyd, R. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4990-5000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Carmical, J. R.,
Zhang, M.,
Nechev, L.,
Harris, C. M.,
Harris, T. M.,
and Lloyd, R. S.
(2000)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
13,
18-25[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
McNees, A. G.,
O'Donnell, M.,
Horton, P. H.,
Kim, H. Y.,
Kim, S. J.,
Harris, C. M.,
Harris, T. M.,
and Lloyd, R. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
33211-33219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Marnett, L. J.
(1994)
DNA Adducts Identification and Biological Significance
, pp. 151-163, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
|
| 6.
|
Perkins, E. G.
(1992)
Lipid Oxidation in Food, ACS Symp. Ser.
, pp. 310-320, American Chemical Society, Washington, D. C.
|
| 7.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 8.
|
Lee, Y.,
and Sayre, L. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19490-19494[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Burcham, P. C.
(1998)
Mutagenesis
13,
287-305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Brock, N.,
Stekar, J.,
Pohl, J.,
Niemeyer, U.,
and Scheffler, G.
(1979)
Arzneim.-Forsch.
29,
659-661
|
| 11.
|
Marnett, L. J.,
Hurd, H. K.,
Hollstein, M. C.,
Levin, D. E.,
Esterbauer, H.,
and Ames, B. N.
(1985)
Mutat. Res.
148,
25-34[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Curren, R. D.,
Yang, L. L.,
Conklin, P. M.,
Grafstrom, R. C.,
and Harris, C. C.
(1988)
Mutat. Res.
209,
17-22[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Cohen, S. M.,
Garland, E. M., St.,
John, M.,
Okamura, T.,
and Smith, R. A.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
3577-3581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Kawanishi, M.,
Matsuda, T.,
Nakayama, A.,
Takebe, H.,
Matsui, S.,
and Yagi, T.
(1998)
Mutat. Res.
417,
65-73[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Singer, B.,
and Bartsch, H.
(1999)
Exocyclic DNA Adducts in Mutagenesis and Carcinogenesis, IARC Scientific Publications No. 150
, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
|
| 16.
|
Chung, F.-L.,
Young, R.,
and Hecht, S. S.
(1984)
Cancer Res.
44,
990-995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Nath, R. G.,
and Chung, F.-L.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
7491-7495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Penn, A.,
Nath, R. G.,
Pan, J.,
Chen, L. C.,
Widmer, K.,
Henk, W.,
and Chung, F.-L.
(2001)
Environ. Health. Perspect.
109,
219-224[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
McDiarmid, M. A.,
Iype, P. T.,
Kolodner, K.,
Jacobson-Kram, D.,
and Strickland, P. T.
(1991)
Mutat. Res.
148,
93-99
|
| 20.
|
Chaudhary, A. K.,
Nokubo, M.,
Reddy, G. R.,
Yeola, S. N.,
Morrow, J. D.,
Blair, I. A.,
and Marnett, L. J.
(1994)
Science
265,
1580-1582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Benamira, M.,
Singh, U.,
and Marnett, L. J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
22392-22400[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Moriya, M.,
Zhang, W.,
Johnson, F.,
and Grollman, A. P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11899-11903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Burcham, P. C.,
and Marnett, L. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
28844-28850[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Johnson, K. A.,
Fink, S. P.,
and Marnett, L. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11434-11438[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Fink, S. P.,
Reddy, G. R.,
and Marnett, L. J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
8652-8657[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Khullar, S.,
Varaprasad, C. V.,
and Johnson, F.
(1999)
J. Med. Chem.
42,
947-950[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Nechev, L. V.,
Harris, C. M.,
and Harris, T. M.
(2000)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
13,
421-429[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
de los Santos, C.,
Zaliznyak, Y.,
and Johnson, F.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
9077-9082[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Yang, I.-Y.,
Hossain, M.,
Miller, H.,
Khullar, S.,
Johnson, F.,
Grollman, A.,
and Moriya, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
9071-9076[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
VanderVeen, L. A.,
Hashim, M. F.,
Nechev, L. V.,
Harris, T. M.,
Harris, C. M.,
and Marnett, L. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
9066-9070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Moriya, M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
1122-1126[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Stucki, M.,
Stagljar, I.,
Jonsson, O.,
and Hubscher, U.
(2001)
Prog. Nucleic Acids. Res. Mol. Biol.
65,
261-298[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Lee, M. Y.,
Tan, C.-K.,
Downey, K. M.,
and So, A. G.
(1984)
Biochemistry
23,
1906-1913[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Tan, C. K.,
Castillo, C., So, A. G.,
and Downey, K. M.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
12310-12316[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Syvaöja, J.,
Suomensaari, S.,
Nishida, C.,
Goldsmith, J. S.,
Chui, G. S.,
Jain, S.,
and Linn, S.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
6664-6668[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Hirt, B.
(1967)
J. Mol. Biol.
26,
365-369 |