Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112051200 on March 12, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 21, 18272-18280, May 24, 2002
Transcriptional Control of Monolignol Biosynthesis in
Pinus taeda
FACTORS AFFECTING MONOLIGNOL RATIOS AND CARBON ALLOCATION IN
PHENYLPROPANOID METABOLISM*
Aldwin M.
Anterola,
Jae-Heung
Jeon,
Laurence B.
Davin, and
Norman G.
Lewis
From the Institute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State
University, Pullman, Washington 99164-6340
Received for publication, December 18, 2001, and in revised form, March 5, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Transcriptional profiling of
the phenylpropanoid pathway in Pinus taeda cell suspension
cultures was carried out using quantitative real time PCR analyses of
all known genes involved in the biosynthesis of the two monolignols,
p-coumaryl and coniferyl alcohols (lignin/lignan precursors). When the cells were transferred to a medium containing 8%
sucrose and 20 mM potassium iodide, the
monolignol/phenylpropanoid pathway was induced, and transcript levels
for phenylalanine ammonia lyase, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase,
p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase, 4-coumarate:CoA ligase,
caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase, cinnamoyl-CoA reductase, and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase were coordinately up-regulated. Provision of increasing levels of exogenously supplied Phe to saturating levels (40 mM) to the induction medium resulted
in further up-regulation of their transcript levels in the P. taeda cell cultures; this in turn was accompanied by considerable
increases in both p-coumaryl and coniferyl alcohol
formation and excretion. By contrast, transcript levels for both
cinnamate 4-hydroxylase and p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase were
only slightly up-regulated. These data, when considered together with
metabolic profiling results and genetic manipulation of various plant
species, reveal that carbon allocation to the pathway and its
differential distribution into the two monolignols is controlled by
Phe supply and differential modulation of cinnamate 4-hydroxylase
and p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase activities, respectively. The
coordinated up-regulation of phenylalanine ammonia lyase,
4-coumarate:CoA ligase, caffeoyl-CoA
O-methyltransferase, cinnamoyl-CoA reductase and cinnamyl
alcohol dehydrogenase in the presence of increasing concentrations of
Phe also indicates that these steps are not truly rate-limiting,
because they are modulated according to metabolic demand. Finally, the
transcript profile of a putative acid/ester
O-methyltransferase, proposed as an alternative catalyst
for O-methylation leading to coniferyl alcohol, was not
up-regulated under any of the conditions employed, suggesting that it
is not, in fact, involved in monolignol biosynthesis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The phenylpropanoid pathway in vascular plants, which ultimately
leads to important natural products such as the lignins, lignans, and
flavonoids (1), has attracted considerable attention in recent years.
One rationale for this interest is that the lignins are, next to
cellulose, nature's second most abundant products, and it is
considered that genetically altering lignin amounts and/or composition
may be beneficial in both pulp and paper processing (2) and in
achieving more readily digestible animal feed (3). Another rationale is
in establishing the factors fundamentally controlling lignin assembly
and structure and identifying what effects occur when this process is
perturbed through genetic manipulation (4). Thus, various strategies,
using transgenic plants, have focused upon either of the following: (i)
quantitatively reducing lignin contents and/or altering the monomeric
compositions of same to render them more readily removable and/or
animal feedstock-degradable (5-7), or (ii) examining the effects of
disturbing/perturbing lignin assembly on plant cell wall integrity
(e.g. for water/nutrient conduction and vasculature
strength) and related metabolism (4). However, this worldwide effort,
directed toward either up- or down-regulation of each of the monolignol
(lignin precursors) forming steps, has often resulted in phenotypes
that cannot solely be explained simply on the basis of a direct effect
on lignin formation itself (4).
The "normal" xylem lignin of the gymnosperm loblolly pine
(Pinus taeda) is derived from the two monolignols,
p-coumaryl and coniferyl alcohols, these being in ratios of
~1:8, respectively (Fig. 1) (8). (Angiosperm lignins, on the other
hand, have a third monolignol, sinapyl alcohol, with an additional
methoxyl group (9).) In addition to this normal lignified xylem,
the main stem and branches of gymnosperms contain certain cell types that produce a p-coumaryl alcohol-enriched lignin leading to
so-called reaction (compression) wood (10). Such specialized tissues
are involved in buttressing stem and branches to ensure that the
desired alignments/orientations relative to the gravitational vector
are attained (11).
At present, there is a very incomplete understanding of how both
monolignol formation and lignin biosynthesis in developing vascular
plants are regulated, particularly as to how metabolic flux (carbon
allocation) in the pathway and lignin compositions are controlled (12,
13). Furthermore, this lack of detailed knowledge of pathway regulation
has led to reports by other investigators (14-18) that each and every
enzymatic step in the monolignol pathway to the lignins has either a
"key" or regulatory role. One reason for this incomplete
understanding is that distinct phenylpropanoid metabolic processes are
present (operative) in different cell types (including different
subcellular locations) in various tissue types, e.g. leading
to production of pathway-related secondary metabolites, such as
lignans, flavonoids, and the phenolics of suberized tissues (1).
Another reason is that none of the aforementioned studies were able to
examine modulation of the pathway in toto and hence were
constrained to extrapolations and reasonings in the absence of, for
example, metabolic flux data and transcriptional profiles of the entire pathway.
We therefore chose to develop a cell suspension culture system, using
P. taeda, that could be induced to differentially form both
monolignols and a so-called "extracellular lignin" without interference from such competing and/or related pathways (19). (This
system permits the quantitative study of how differential monolignol
biosynthesis occurs; such studies cannot readily be done with
developing intact plants because of the different cell types involved
in distinct metabolic processes, for example.) Thus, when the cell
suspension cultures were transferred to a solution containing 8%
sucrose, the walls underwent partial secondary thickening, and a
"lignin-like" material accumulated in the extracellular medium
(20). On the other hand, when H2O2 scavengers,
such as potassium iodide (KI), are added to the induction medium, the peroxidase-mediated catalysis leading to the extracellular lignin formation is arrested, and instead only the monolignols (lignin/lignan precursors) are excreted into the culture medium without further conversion (20). This system therefore permits the study of monolignol
pathway regulation without additional complications.
The biosynthesis of p-coumaryl and coniferyl alcohols (Fig.
1) is initiated with deamination of Phe by phenylalanine ammonia lyase
(PAL)1 to form cinnamic acid,
which is then hydroxylated by a P450 enzyme, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase
(C4H), to form p-coumaric acid (21). The subsequent
conversions to afford p-coumaryl alcohol involve sequential
CoA transesterification catalyzed by a 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL) and
two distinct reductive steps catalyzed by a cinnamoyl-CoA reductase
(CCR) and a cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD), respectively (22).
The formation of coniferyl alcohol, on the other hand, requires
additional hydroxylation and O-methylation steps that introduce a methoxyl group at the 3-position of the aromatic ring. The
gene encoding the enzyme for this hydroxylation step
(p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase, C3H) has recently
been identified and characterized in Arabidopsis (23).
Significantly, its down-regulation in Arabidopsis apparently
gave a phenotype whose somewhat reduced lignin content was derived
mainly from p-coumaryl alcohol (24), in agreement with a
role of C3H in coniferyl and sinapyl alcohol formation. Interestingly,
the recombinant Arabidopsis C3H expressed in yeast appears
to favor p-coumarate derivatives, such as
p-coumaroyl shikimate and p-coumaroyl quinate,
over either the free acid or its CoA derivatives (23), the significance
of which still remains to be fully understood.
Depending upon the substrate, the O-methylation reactions
can occur either at the level of the CoA esters or the phenylpropenoic acids/aldehydes/alcohols, i.e. methylation of caffeoyl-CoA
by caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase (CCOMT) leads to
formation of feruloyl-CoA (25), whereas methylation of
5-hydroxyphenylpropanoid derivatives by caffeate
O-methyltransferase (COMT) appears to be exclusively
involved in sinapyl alcohol formation in angiosperms (26). In any
event, the feruloyl-CoA undergoes successive reduction reactions
catalyzed by CCR and CAD, respectively, to form coniferyl alcohol
(27).
In a previous study, metabolic flux analyses using loblolly pine cell
suspension cultures had suggested, based on intracellular accumulation
of metabolites, that Phe availability, C4H, and C3H activities may be
rate-limiting factors that control carbon allocation to the pathway
(28). In this contribution, we now report how control of the
phenylpropanoid pathway from Phe onward to the monolignols is
effectuated. This was achieved through quantitatively determining
transcript levels for all known and previously unknown genes in the
pathway (by quantitative real time PCR) and integrating these data with
our present understanding of rate-limiting steps (28). These data
provide new insight into the identification of steps controlling carbon
allocation versus others whose down-regulation results in
either metabolic build-up and/or shunting into non-lignin products.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
P. taeda Cell Cultures--
Cell cultures of P. taeda
were maintained in Lawrence and Brown medium containing 11 µM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, as reported previously
(19), with various aliquots (2.5 ml of packed cell volume) being next
individually transferred to 8% (w/v) sucrose solutions (25 ml)
containing 20 mM KI and with zero or saturating levels (40 mM) of exogenously provided Phe (28). Cells, with or
without Phe, were harvested after 0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, and
24 h of incubation and stored at
80 °C prior to RNA
isolation. Aliquots (1 ml) of each cell culture medium were collected
at the same time intervals and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography to determine levels of excreted p-coumaryl
and coniferyl alcohols.
Cloning of P. taeda PAL, C3H, 4CL, AEOMT, CCOMT, and
CAD--
P. taeda cells (750 mg fresh weight) were ground
in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle, and RNA was extracted
using the RNAgents® Total RNA Isolation System (Promega), according to the manufacturer's protocol. The yield of RNA was estimated by
measuring the absorbance at 260 nm (29). Using 10 µg of total RNA as
the initial template, the 3' end of P. taeda C3H
was isolated by 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (3'-RACE)
using a kit from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. The 5' end of the gene
was isolated by RNA ligase mediated (RLM-RACE), using the reagents and
enzymes in the FirstChoiceTM RLM-RACE kit (Ambion),
following the manufacturer's instructions.
First strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using
200 units of Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) in a
20-µl reaction mixture containing 2 µM oligo(dT) anchor
primers (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), 1 mM PCR-grade
dNTPs (Invitrogen), 10 µM dithiothreitol, 5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 75 mM KCl, and 3 mM MgCl2. After incubation at 42 °C for 50 min and at 65 °C for 15 min, the resulting cDNA (1 µl of the
20-µl reverse transcription reaction) was used as a template to
amplify P. taeda genes encoding PAL, C3H, 4CL,
hydroxycinnamic acid/hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA ester O-methyltransferase (AEOMT), CCOMT, and CAD using
gene-specific primers (Tables I and II) designed from sequences
submitted to the GenBankTM or, in the case of
C3H, from the newly determined sequence of the 5' and 3' ends.
PCR amplification was performed in an Amplitron II Thermocycler using
the following conditions: hot start at 95 °C for 2 min, 30 cycles of
denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min, followed by a 7-min extension
step at 72 °C and an indefinite hold at 4 °C. PCR mixtures consisted of 50 ng of template, 500 nM of each primer, 1 mM dNTPs, 2.6 units of Expand High Fidelity PCR System
Enzyme Mix, 2 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mM KCl,
0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µM EDTA, 0.05%
(w/v) Tween® 20, 0.05% (w/v) Nonidet® P-40, and 5% (w/v) glycerol. PCR fragments were cloned into the pCR2.1 vector and transformed into Escherichia coli TOP10 cells (Invitrogen)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Plasmids were isolated
from E. coli cells using Wizard® Plus SV Minipreps DNA
Purification System (Promega), and the inserted DNA was sequenced.
Nucleotide sequences were determined using an automated DNA sequencer
(Applied Biosystems 377, PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The plasmids were isolated and used as positive controls and/or standards during the
optimization of real time PCR conditions for each gene.
Cloning of P. taeda C4H and CCR--
By using cDNA as
template, a specific region of the P450 genes bordered by the consensus
sequence FXPERF and the heme-binding domain was amplified
using degenerate primers (Table II), with the PCR conditions described
above. The amplified region was then cloned into the pCR2.1 vector and
sequenced as for the other genes examined in this study. Based on the
nucleotide sequence of the C4H fragment, a specific forward
primer (Table II) was designed and used together with a common reverse
anchor primer (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) to amplify the 3' end of
the gene by 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE). The PCR
product was then cloned and sequenced as before. To isolate the 5' end
of C4H, 5'-RACE was performed using a kit from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals, following the manufacturer's instructions. The
coding region of C4H was amplified from cDNA template
using forward and reverse primers that have BamHI and EcoRI sites, respectively (Table II). The PCR product was
next purified from 1% agarose gel using a Qiaquick® gel extraction kit (Qiagen), as recommended by the manufacturer, and digested with
BamHI and EcoRI (New England Biolabs) at 37 °C
for 1 h. The resulting DNA fragment with flanking overhangs was
ligated into a similarly digested pYEDP60 plasmid using T4 DNA ligase
(New England Biolabs), following the manufacturer's protocol. The
recombinant plasmid was transformed into TOP10 E. coli cells
for in vivo re-amplification and recovered by plasmid
isolation. The plasmid was transformed into Saccharomyces
cerevisiae strain WHT1, using a modified lithium acetate protocol
(30), for a subsequent heterologous protein expression and functional
assay.2
A pair of degenerate primers (Table II) was used to amplify a fragment
of the CCR gene from P. taeda cDNA, using the
same PCR conditions as for C4H. The 5' and 3' regions were
isolated by RLM- and 3'-RACE, respectively, as described above for
C4H and C3H. The coding region was amplified by
PCR, cloned into the pTrcHis2 vector (Invitrogen), and transformed into
E. coli TOP10 cells, according to the manufacturer's
instructions, and expressed in functional form (data not shown).
Quantitative Real Time PCR--
For each time point of
harvesting the P. taeda cell suspension cultures, grown with
and without exogenously provided Phe (40 mM), an aliquot
(50 mg fresh weight) was ground in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and
pestle, and RNA was isolated using RNeasy® Plant RNA Isolation kit
(Qiagen). The concentration of isolated RNA was estimated by measuring
its absorbance at 260 nm (29). An aliquot (2 ml) of the RNA extract was
treated with DNase-I (Invitrogen) prior to cDNA synthesis using
Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and random hexamers,
according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA isolation and cDNA
synthesis were carried out in quadruplicate.
For quantification of each phenylpropanoid pathway mRNA, a 40-fold
dilution of cDNA mixture (5 µl) was used as template in a
quantitative real time PCR assay (25 µl) performed on the Mx4000 (Stratagene). In addition to the template, the PCR mixture contained 2× Platinum enzyme mix (12.5 µl, Invitrogen), 160 nM
rhodamine X (ROX), and optimized concentrations of gene-specific
primers and probes (Table I). Primers and probes used for
C3H, 4CL, AEOMT, CCOMT,
CCR, and CAD were designed using Primer
ExpressTM Software (Applied Biosystems), whereas molecular
beacons (for PAL and C4H) were designed following
recommended guidelines (31). The predicted secondary structure(s) and
melting temperatures of the beacons were determined using the mfold
program (bioinfo.math.rpi.edu/mfold/dna). The melting temperatures of
the primers chosen for each beacon were determined using the Oligo
Analyzer 2.0 (Integrated DNA Technologies). Primers were purchased from
Invitrogen; TaqMan® probes were synthesized by Applied Biosystems,
and molecular beacons were from Integrated DNA Technologies.
Quantitative real time PCR employed the Mx4000 (Stratagene) equipped
with four filters for 6-carboxyfluorescein, VIC (Applied Biosystems
proprietary dye), rhodamine X (ROX), and Cy5 (Amersham Biosciences
proprietary dye), respectively, with the thermocycler set at a ramp
rate of 2.0 °C/s. Fluorescence intensities were normalized against
the reference dye, ROX, and were plotted against the number of cycles
using an adaptive base-line algorithm provided by the manufacturer. The
last three fluorescence readings were collected either at 60 (for
TaqMan® probes) or at 55 °C (for molecular beacons) in each cycle,
and the mean was taken as the fluorescence data for that cycle.
Cycling parameters for the TaqMan® assays were 50 °C for 2 min,
95 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s and 60 °C for 1 min. When molecular beacons were used, the reaction mixture was also preincubated at 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 2 min, but the 40 cycles that followed consisted of three steps at
95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min.
Quantification of the cDNA levels of each gene was performed for
each of the 4 replicates of cDNA prepared.
PAGE-purified single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides (Integrated DNA
Technologies) were used to generate a standard curve for C3H, 4CL, AEOMT, CCOMT,
CCR, and CAD, whereas plasmids harboring the
coding sequence of the target gene were used for PAL and
C4H. The concentrations of these DNA standards were
calculated based on their absorbance at 260 nm (29). At least two no
template controls were included for every quantitative real time PCR
assay performed.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
Cloning of P. taeda Phenylpropanoid Pathway Genes--
At the
onset of this investigation, only three loblolly pine genes encoding
known enzymes in the phenylpropanoid pathway to the monolignols (Fig.
1) remained to be cloned, i.e.
C4H, C3H, and CCR. The others,
PAL (32), 4CL (33), CCOMT (34),
CAD (35), and a proposed COMT, also known as
AEOMT (36) (discussed below), had been reported previously.
These studies had claimed that PAL (32), 4CL (37), and CAD (35) were
regulatory enzymes in loblolly pine on the basis of their relative
positions in the phenylpropanoid pathway (PAL is the entry point, 4CL
and CCOMT are putative branch points, and CAD is the last step) and
correlation of their expression with lignification. However, these data
in actual fact provided no clarification into which steps, if any, were
rate-limiting/regulatory.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Monolignol biosynthetic pathway in loblolly
pine. a, phenylalanine ammonia lyase;
b, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase; c,
p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase; d, caffeoyl-CoA
O-methyltransferase; e, 4-coumarate:CoA
ligase; f, cinnamoyl-CoA reductase; g,
cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase. (Note: X is OH or
quinate/shikimate, with the latter two requiring the corresponding
transferase.)
|
|
To isolate genes encoding PAL, 4CL, CCOMT, CAD, and the putative COMT
(AEOMT), cells were first preincubated in a sucrose/KI medium for
6 h prior to total RNA isolation. This time frame was selected
because the various phenylpropanoid pathway metabolites from Phe to the
monolignols are detectable only after 6 h of incubation in the
sucrose/KI medium (28), thereby indicating that their respective
mRNAs are expressed during that period. Thus, using cDNA as
template and gene-specific primers for each gene (Table I), the coding regions of PAL,
4CL, CCOMT, CAD, and AEOMT
were amplified by PCR and individually cloned into the pCR 2.1 vector (see "Experimental Procedures"). The isolated plasmids were
then used as positive controls and/or standards in quantitative real time PCR assays.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Primers and probes used for cloning and quantitative real time PCR
analysis of phenylpropanoid pathway genes
The abbreviations used are as follows: A, adenine; C, cytosine; G,
guanine; T, thymine. 6-FAM, 6-carboxyfluorescein; DAB,
4-(4'-dimethylaminophenylazo)benzoic acid; TAMRA, tetramethylrhodamine.
|
|
The genes encoding C4H, C3H, and CCR were also obtained as follows.
First, the use of degenerate primers (Table
II) originally designed to isolate
differentially induced P450 genes in petunia (38) led to the facile
isolation of P. taeda C4H (GenBankTM
accession number AF096998). Second, the gene sequences for C3H
from Sesamum indicum (GenBankTM accession
number AY065995) and Arabidopsis thaliana
(GenBankTM accession number 5915859), together with
analysis of the P. taeda EST data base for likely C3H
fragments, enabled design of specific primers (see Table II) to
obtain the full-length C3H gene
(GenBankTM accession number AY064170) by RACE. Third,
CCR consensus sequences were utilized for design of
degenerate primers (see Table II) to amplify CCR from
P. taeda (GenBankTM accession number AY064169).
Only single copies of each gene again appear to be present based on an
exhaustive search of homologous sequences in the EST data
base/GenBankTM.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Primers used for cloning of C4H, C3H, and CCR
The abbreviations used are as follows: A, adenine; C, cytosine; G,
guanine; T, thymine; I, deoxyinosine; R, A or G; Y, C or T; K, T or G;
V, A or C, or G; M, A or C.
|
|
The predicted amino acid sequence of P. taeda C4H is ~80%
identical to five C4H sequences reported in the GenBankTM,
namely those from Catharanthus roseus, Helianthus
tuberosus, Populus kitakamiensis, Zinnia
elegans, and Vigna radiata. It is also at least 77%
identical to nine other putative C4H sequences, namely those from
Populus tremuloides, Glycyrrhiza echinata,
Glycine max, A. thaliana, Pisum
sativum, Petroselinum crispum, Cicer
arietinum, Medicago sativa, and Capsicum
chinense. Only two putative C4H sequences, those from
Mesembryanthemum crystallinum and Phaseolus vulgaris, are below 70% identity (67 and 62% respectively) to the predicted amino acid sequence of the putative P. taeda
C4H. In the case of P. taeda C3H, the encoded protein is 72, 68, and 68% identical to those in A. thaliana,
Sorghum bicolor, and Sesamum indicum, respectively.
Finally, comparison of the deduced P. taeda CCR protein
sequence gave 67-68% identity to those from Eucalyptus
gunnii, Nicotiana tabacum, and A. thaliana.
The first CCR gene cloned was from E. gunnii,
which was functionally expressed in E. coli (39). The second
was from N. tabacum, for which in vivo proof of
function has been provided via generating antisense plants and
examining their phenotypes (e.g. reduced lignin content)
(40). Only two other CCR genes thus far, cloned from
A. thaliana, have been functionally expressed in E. coli (41).
Quantitative Real Time PCR Analysis--
Under basal conditions
(maintenance on a 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid containing
medium), the phenylpropanoid pathway to the monolignols in the
P. taeda cells is essentially not induced (19). On the other
hand, transfer of the cells to a solution containing 8% sucrose (and
20 mM KI, as H2O2 scavenger)
results in pathway induction within 2 h, as evidenced by
intracellular accumulation of cinnamic and p-coumaric acids
over a 2-24-h duration (Fig.
2A, solid lines).
Moreover, in essentially the same time frame, the monolignols,
p-coumaryl and coniferyl alcohols, are also both formed and
ultimately excreted into the liquid medium (Fig. 2B,
solid lines) (28). The addition of 40 mM Phe to
the P. taeda cell "bathing" medium, however, results in
further metabolic change as evidenced by the accompanying large
increases in intracellular cinnamic and p-coumaric acid
levels (Fig. 2A, broken lines) and in the
enhanced excretion of p-coumaryl and coniferyl alcohols, with ratios of the monolignols changing from ~1:8 to ~1:1 over 24 h (Fig. 2B, broken lines).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Accumulation of cinnamic ( ) and
p-coumaric ( ) acids in P. taeda
cells incubated in 8% sucrose, 20 mM KI,
with either 0 (solid lines) or 40 mM
(broken lines) exogenously provided Phe
(A) and p-coumaryl ( ) and
coniferyl ( ) alcohol accumulation in the cell bathing medium
(B).
|
|
As noted earlier (28), this differential build up of intracellular
cinnamic and p-coumaric acids in the P. taeda
cells had suggested that C4H and C3H may be rate-limiting steps
(i.e. in terms of controlling differential carbon allocation
to the different monolignol-forming pathways). Hence, to examine
whether such metabolic profiles might be accompanied by corresponding
transcriptional changes for each of the genes in the pathway, the
P. taeda cells were harvested at various time points (0, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h) with transcription levels for each
gene being determined for each time point.
Thus, by using a plant RNA isolation kit (Qiagen), RNA was first
extracted from an aliquot (50 mg fresh weight) of each harvest of
P. taeda cells, over the various time intervals described
above, with and without exogenously provided 40 mM Phe.
Typically, the yield of each RNA sample ranged from 0.3 to 0.5 µg/mg
cells (fresh weight), as determined by the absorbance at 260 nm (29).
Each RNA sample was then treated with DNase-I and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using random hexamers; the resulting cDNAs were
individually diluted 40-fold and used as templates for subsequent
quantitative real time PCR analyses of all of the phenylpropanoid
pathway enzymes using the Mx4000 (Stratagene).
To quantify transcript levels of each gene encoding the phenylpropanoid
pathway enzymes and the putative COMT (AEOMT), TaqMan® probes (42)
and primers were individually designed using the Primer
ExpressTM Software (Applied Biosystems). Among the
TaqMan® probe and primer sets so obtained, only those for PAL
and C4H did not amplify the intended regions,
despite optimization of primer/probe concentrations, amounts of
MgCl2, and annealing temperatures. This problem was subsequently overcome by using molecular beacons (31) for PAL and C4H. The primers and probes used for each gene are
listed in Table I.
The initial amounts of cDNA template for each gene were determined
for every sample using a standard curve generated by a concurrent
quantitative real time PCR assay in separate tubes of 10-fold serial
dilutions of cDNA standards for each gene (data not shown). The
standards used for PAL and C4H were plasmids
harboring the corresponding coding sequences, whereas for the other
genes, synthetic single-stranded DNAs were employed. RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis were each performed four times, with each replicate being subjected to quantitative real time PCR analysis. The data generated are therefore the means of four independent experimental samples, and the results obtained are described below (see Fig. 3).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Transcript levels of PAL
(A), C4H (B), C3H
(C), 4CL (D), CCOMT
(E), CCR (F), CAD
(G), and AEOMT (H) in P. taeda cells incubated with 0 ( ) and 40 ( )
mM Phe. See text for details.
|
|
In the absence of exogenously provided Phe, PAL transcript
levels gradually increased from ~100 copies at 0 h to ~800
copies at 9 h, and then decreased slightly after 20 h to
~700 copies at 24 h (Fig. 3A). During this time
frame, not only was PAL activity induced (data not shown), but the two
monolignols were also excreted into the medium (Fig. 2B,
solid lines). Further addition of Phe (40 mM)
then markedly increased maximum mRNA levels more than 15-fold,
i.e. from ~100 copies at 0 h to as much as ~14,000
copies at 16 h followed by a decrease to ~10,000 copies at
20 h (Fig. 3A). Concomitantly, the monolignol amounts
excreted in the medium were also significantly increased (Fig.
2B, broken lines). The mechanism, however, by
which Phe addition induces these significant changes in PAL
transcript levels is not known, although at least three possibilities
can be contemplated as follows: (i) Phe or some downstream product,
including that involved in ammonium ion (nitrogen) recycling (43),
induces transcription of PAL (44); (ii) Phe prevents
degradation of PAL mRNA; and (iii) a combination of
both. Therefore Phe may act as a signal (received either inside or
outside the cell), triggering a signal transduction pathway, which
ultimately results in increased transcription and/or decreased degradation of the PAL message. The latter may, in turn, be
effectuated through either activation of a positive regulator or
deactivation of a repressor (45).
This induction of PAL transcription in response to increased
Phe supply indicates that PAL itself is not a rate-limiting step, because the levels of transcription and enzymatic activity are modulated in response to metabolic demand. These data thus strongly suggest that pathway up-regulation leading to increased carbon allocation occurs upstream of Phe formation. Indeed this presumably also explains why overexpression of PAL activity does not apparently lead to any increase in lignin content in transformed tobacco plants
(46).
C4H transcript levels of P. taeda cell suspension
cultures were also induced in the 8% sucrose, 20 mM KI
solution (see Fig. 3B), i.e. from ~170 copies
at 0 h to ~450 copies at 9 h, with this subsequently
decreasing gradually to ~70 copies by 24 h. Addition of 40 mM Phe, however, while not affecting overall transcript levels (~500 copies by 12 h), resulted in a sustained higher
level of transcription over the 24-h time frame examined. This small increase in transcription presumably provides the experimental basis
for the corresponding observed increases in p-coumaric acid accumulation (Fig. 2A).
By comparison, C3H message induction profiles remained
essentially unchanged (Fig. 3C) under both treatments (0 and
40 mM Phe), although transfer to the 8% sucrose, 20 mM KI solution resulted in a corresponding increase in the
C3H message from basal levels of ~4,000 to ~20,000
copies within 12 h, which then decreased gradually to ~13,000
copies by 20 h. The C3H transcript profile at 40 mM Phe, however, was essentially the same, reaching a
maximum level of ~16,000 copies at 9 h and then declining to
~8,000 copies by 24 h.
The differential effects on expression of the PAL,
C4H and C3H genes, and the increased
intracellular accumulation of cinnamic and p-coumaric acids
thus provide both a genetic basis for and experimental support to
rate-limiting roles for the 4-hydroxylation and 3-hydroxylation steps
in controlling the metabolic flux to, and the ratios of, the
monolignols so formed (i.e. in terms of differential carbon
allocation to each monolignol). Hence, it is concluded that (i) limited
expression of the C4H gene enables control to be exercised
over metabolic flux into the pathway, even when other genes such as
PAL are significantly up-regulated, and (ii) given that, at
best, only a very limited up-regulation of C3H can occur,
this differential modulation helps facilitate the corresponding shift
in monolignol ratios toward preferentially increasing
p-coumaryl alcohol levels over that of coniferyl alcohol. It
will be of interest to determine in the future the effect on p-coumaryl alcohol formation (i.e. in terms of
amounts formed) when C3H is down-regulated in P. taeda.
This form of metabolic control, which involves modulated transcription
of C4H as a major determinant of phenylpropanoid pathway flux, is consistent with a previous report (47) describing the phenotypes of an Arabidopsis mutant lacking the
transcription factor, AtMYB4. This transcription factor is thought to
function as a repressor of C4H gene expression, which is
de-repressed by both UV light and wounding, resulting in the formation
of more sinapate esters. As for the current study, their data also
suggested that C4H is truly rate-limiting, i.e.
C4H gene expression is most likely the mechanism by which
4-hydroxylation is modulated. Interestingly, it was also found in the
Arabidopsis study that AtMYB4 acts as a strong negative
regulator of C4H but not of the other genes studied, which
included PAL, 4CL, COMT,
CCOMT, and CAD. It can thus be tentatively
proposed that repression of C4H by an AtMYB4 ortholog in
P. taeda may be unaffected by increases in Phe levels, and
hence the levels of C4H mRNA are only slightly altered
(up-regulated). Additionally, as with C4H, the 3-hydroxylation step may
also become rate-limiting due to a similarly repressed transcriptional
activation of the corresponding gene.
The analyses of the transcriptional profiles of the remaining
phenylpropanoid enzymatic steps (4CL, CCOMT, CCR, and CAD) were also
instructive, with these providing additional proof for the transcriptional regulation of the pathway as proposed above. Thus, when
the P. taeda cells were transferred to the 8% sucrose, 20 mM KI solution, there was a gradual increase in 4CL
transcript levels reaching a maximum value of ~12,000 (from
~400 copies at t = 0 h); this then gradually
declined to ~5,000 copies by 24 h (Fig. 3D). In the
added presence of 40 mM Phe, however, the 4CL
message increased much more substantially from ~400 copies at
0 h to ~50,000 copies at 12 h and then declined
progressively to ~16,000 copies at 24 h.
This increase in induction levels of the 4CL transcripts,
effected by Phe availability, together with the essentially unaltered expression of C3H, is consistent with (i) observations of
preferential increase in metabolic flux toward p-coumaryl
alcohol rather than coniferyl alcohol and (ii) that 4CL, like PAL, is
truly not rate-limiting. Furthermore, the effects of increased Phe
availability on enhancing both PAL and 4CL
transcript levels may also be consistent with known similarities
between PAL and 4CL promoter regions,
i.e. in terms of their cis-regulatory elements,
which include P, A, and L boxes
(48). The presence of similar regulatory elements in both of the
promoter regions thus strengthens further the hypothesis that
transcriptional control is being exercised in a similar manner, enabling a coordinated pattern of induction. Thus, these data establish
that 4CL is not a rate-limiting step and/or regulatory enzyme as
claimed previously (37), although extensive down-regulation of
4CL in Arabidopsis, aspen, and tobacco led to
decreases in lignin contents (49-51), e.g. in tobacco, a
severe reduction (to ~1%) of residual 4CL activity relative to wild
type resulted in an ~50% decrease in lignin deposition. However,
this only occurred when the 4CL levels were severely repressed.
Additionally, both the CCOMT expression and CCR
transcript profiles displayed coordinated induction, following the same
general trends as for PAL and 4CL, upon transfer
to the 8% sucrose, 20 mM KI solution, and with added Phe
(Fig. 3, E and F). In the absence of additional
Phe, CCOMT transcript levels increased from ~3,000 to
maximum values of ~24,000 copies within ~9 h and then gradually declined to ~12,000 copies. In the presence of 40 mM Phe,
however, induction levels increased by about 2-fold, with transcript
levels rising steadily from ~4000 at 0 h to ~53,000 copies at
12 h, which then decreased to ~40,000 copies at 24 h.
CCR mRNA expression behaved in a relatively similar
manner (Fig. 3F). Furthermore, the stimulatory effect of Phe
on the transcription of CCOMT and CCR presumably
helps explain our previous observations that neither of the substrates
(i.e. the CoA esters) accumulated in the cells, and hence on
this basis were not rate-limiting steps (28). As for PAL and
4CL, the transcription of CCOMT and
CCR thus seems to be manipulated in order to accommodate the
presence of an ample supply of pathway precursor, conceivably so as not
to restrict carbon flow.
With CAD there were only small increases noted in expression
levels when cells were either provided exogenous Phe or were not (Fig.
3G); these mRNA increases were also accompanied by
corresponding increases in CAD activity (data not shown). At 0 mM Phe, the CAD induction message was increased
~2-fold from ~3,000 copies at 0 h to ~7,000 copies at 9 h, leveling off to ~6,000 copies at 24 h (i.e. these
being coordinated with those of PAL, 4CL,
CCR, and CCOMT). At 40 mM Phe, a
small enhancement was also observed, i.e. from ~5,000
copies at 0 h to ~10,000 copies at 9 h, without any further
significant changes observed until the end of the 24-h incubation
period. However, as for the other non-rate-limiting steps, metabolite
analyses revealed that there was essentially no build up of aldehydic
intermediates under either condition.
Furthermore, previous work (28) had established that when
p-coumaryl and coniferyl aldehydes were added to the
P. taeda bathing medium, even at very high
(non-physiological) concentrations (at least 300,000-fold the maximum
cellular levels), both substrates were still efficiently and rapidly
converted into the corresponding alcohols. Taken together, these data
suggest that under either condition sufficient CAD activity is present
in the cells to accommodate even significant increases in metabolic
flux. Indeed, all of the transgenic and mutant plant data for proposed
down-regulation of CAD did not result in any decrease in the
carbon allocated to the pathway (5). Therefore, this step does not
serve as a true regulatory step in monolignol carbon allocation, in
contrast to previous reports (18, 52).
It can also be speculated that the lack of any significant increase in
the transcript levels of CAD may be due to other
transcription factors acting on the CAD promoter, which
might be distinct from those affecting C3H and
C4H, as well as from those up-regulating the genes encoding
non-regulatory steps. Indeed, when the AtMYB4 ortholog from antirrhinum
was overexpressed in tobacco (53), CAD mRNA was
significantly down-regulated, whereas the latter was not affected when
endogenous AtMYB4 was overexpressed in Arabidopsis (47),
i.e. an indication of different modes of transcriptional regulation for CAD in different species.
Finally, the putative COMT (AEOMT) transcripts
could also be detected, albeit in very low copy numbers relative to the
other phenylpropanoid pathway genes, i.e. having less than
~100 copies per ng of RNA (Fig. 3H). There was, however,
essentially no induction of AEOMT mRNA expression with
the 8% sucrose, 20 mM KI medium, even in the presence of
exogenously provided Phe (Fig. 3H). The incongruously very
low copies of this putative COMT (AEOMT),
together with the lack of coordinated expression with the other
phenylpropanoid genes during induction of the pathway, suggests
strongly some other metabolic role rather than in monolignol/lignin
biosynthesis. Moreover, the AEOMT gene has a very low
sequence identity (34-41%) to all known lignin-related COMTs
(36), which generally share at least 70-85% identity with each
other. Indeed, because many O-methyltransferases are known
to have a wide range of substrate specificity, the reports of
recombinant AEOMT being able to catalyze the conversion of caffeic acid
and caffeoyl-CoA to ferulic acid and feruloyl-CoA, respectively, may
have no physiological relevance. Accordingly, until proven otherwise,
the physiological function of AEOMT has to be viewed as being unknown
at this point.
Concluding Remarks--
In summary, carbon allocation to the
phenylpropanoid pathway, and to the two monolignols, is regulated in
P. taeda in terms of Phe supply and by differential
metabolic flux to each monolignol, and this is controlled by modulation
of transcription levels of C4H and C3H, respectively. In contrast, gene
expression of the other steps is able to adjust to metabolic demand via
up-regulation of their corresponding transcript levels, thereby
ultimately enabling increased flux for that particular step.
Interestingly, in this way monolignol ratios are manipulated between
~1:8 and ~1:1 for p-coumaryl and coniferyl alcohols,
respectively; this in turn is consistent with the changes noted for the
monolignol contents of its lignin of normal and "reaction" wood,
respectively. These data thus appear to provide an explanation as to
how such changes in metabolism are effectuated; however, the underlying
physiological reasons for increasing the p-coumaryl alcohol
content of lignin in reaction wood need to be more fully understood.
Future work will also focus upon how this overall transcriptional
regulation is effectuated and how the different pathways
(e.g. N recycling, phenylpropanoid and shikimic acid pathway
metabolism) are coordinately regulated and interconnected.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Denis Pompon, Philippe Urban,
and Danièle Werck-Reichhart for the plasmid pYEDP60 and yeast
strain WHT1, Dr. Jacqueline Grima-Pettenati for the plasmid containing
eucalyptus CCR cDNA, Dr. Ulrich Matern for a sample of feruloyl CoA,
and Steven C. Halls for the mass spectroscopic analyses.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by United States Department
of Energy Grant DE-FG03-97ER20259, the National Aeronautics and Space
Administration Grant NAG21198, the Lewis B. and Dorothy Cullman and G. Thomas Hargrove Center for Land Plant Adaptation Studies, and the
United States Departments of Energy and Agriculture, National Science
Foundation Plant Biotechnology Research and Training Center.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF096998, AY065995, AY064170, and AY064169.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 509-335-2682;
Fax: 509-335-8206; E-mail: lewisn@wsu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 12, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112051200
2
A. M. Anterola, J.-H. Jeon, L. B. Davin, and N. G. Lewis, manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PAL, Phe ammonia
lyase;
AEOMT, hydroxycinnamic acid/hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA ester
O-methyltransferase;
C3H, p-coumarate
3-hydroxylase;
C4H, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase;
CAD, cinnamyl alcohol
dehydrogenase;
CCOMT, caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase;
CCR, cinnamoyl-CoA reductase;
4CL, 4-coumarate:CoA ligase;
COMT, caffeate
O-methyltransferase;
RACE, 3'-rapid amplification of
cDNA ends;
RLM, RNA ligase-mediated;
ROX, rhodamine X.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Croteau, R.,
Kutchan, T. M.,
and Lewis, N. G.
(2000)
in
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants
(Buchanan, B.
, Jones, R.
, and Gruissem, W., eds)
, pp. 1250-1318, American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD
|
| 2.
|
Roberts, J. C.
(1996)
The Chemistry of Paper
, pp. 161-175, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK
|
| 3.
|
Jung, H. G.,
and Vogel, K. P.
(1986)
J. Anim. Sci.
62,
1703-1712[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
| Anterola, A. M., and Lewis, N. G. (2002)
Phytochemistry,
|
| 5.
|
Baucher, M.,
Monties, B.,
Van Montagu, M.,
and Boerjan, W.
(1998)
Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.
17,
125-197[CrossRef]
|
| 6.
|
Guo, D.,
Chen, F.,
Wheeler, J.,
Winder, J.,
Selman, S.,
Peterson, M.,
and Dixon, R. A.
(2001)
Transgenic Res.
10,
457-464[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Baucher, M.,
Bernard-Vailhé, M. A.,
Chabbert, B.,
Besle, J.-M.,
Opsomer, C.,
Van Montagu, M.,
and Botterman, J.
(1999)
Plant Mol. Biol.
39,
437-447[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
De Stevens, G.,
and Nord, F. F.
(1953)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
39,
80-84[Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Lewis, N. G.,
and Yamamoto, E.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.
41,
455-496[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Westing, A. H.
(1965)
Bot. Rev.
31,
381-480
|
| 11.
|
Scurfield, G.
(1973)
Science
179,
647-655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
van Rensburg, H.,
Anterola, A. M.,
Levine, L. H.,
Davin, L. B.,
and Lewis, N. G.
(2000)
ACS Symp. Ser.
742,
118-144
|
| 13.
|
Lewis, N. G.,
Davin, L. B.,
and Sarkanen, S.
(1999)
in
Comprehensive Natural Products Chemistry
(Barton, D. H. R.
, Nakanishi, K.
, and Meth-Cohn, O., eds), Vol. 3
, pp. 617-745, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam
|
| 14.
|
Zucker, M.
(1965)
Plant Physiol.
40,
779-784[Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Douglas, C. J.
(1996)
Trends Plant Sci.
1,
171-178[CrossRef]
|
| 16.
|
Gowri, G.,
Bugos, R. C.,
Campbell, W. H.,
Maxwell, C. A.,
and Dixon, R. A.
(1991)
Plant Physiol.
97,
7-14[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Goffner, D.,
Campbell, M. M.,
Campargue, C.,
Clastre, M.,
Borderies, G.,
Boudet, A.,
and Boudet, A. M.
(1994)
Plant Physiol.
106,
625-632[Abstract]
|
| 18.
|
Grima-Pettenati, J.,
Campargue, C.,
Boudet, A.,
and Boudet, A. M.
(1994)
Phytochemistry
37,
941-947[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Eberhardt, T. L.,
Bernards, M. A., He, L.,
Davin, L. B.,
Wooten, J. B.,
and Lewis, N. G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
21008-21096
|
| 20.
|
Nose, M.,
Bernards, M. A.,
Furlan, M.,
Zajicek, J.,
Eberhardt, T. L.,
and Lewis, N. G.
(1995)
Phytochemistry
39,
71-79[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Russell, D. W.,
and Conn, E. E.
(1967)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
122,
256-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Gross, G. G.,
Stöckigt, J.,
Mansell, R. L.,
and Zenk, M. H.
(1973)
FEBS Lett.
31,
283-286
|
| 23.
|
Schoch, G.,
Goepfert, S.,
Morant, M.,
Hehn, A.,
Meyer, D.,
Ullmann, P.,
and Werck-Reichhart, D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
36566-36574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Franke, R.,
Hemm, M. R.,
Denault, J. W.,
Ruegger, M. O.,
Humphreys, J. M.,
and Chapple, C.
(2002)
Plant J.
30,
47-59[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Ye, Z.-H.,
Kneusel, R. E.,
Matern, U.,
and Varner, J. E.
(1994)
Plant Cell
6,
1427-1439[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Atanassova, R.,
Favet, N.,
Martz, F.,
Chabbert, B.,
Tollier, M.-T.,
Monties, B.,
Fritig, B.,
and Legrand, M.
(1995)
Plant J.
8,
465-477[CrossRef]
|
| 27.
|
Gross, G. G.,
and Kreiten, W.
(1975)
FEBS Lett.
54,
259-262[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Anterola, A. M.,
van Rensburg, H.,
van Heerden, P. S.,
Davin, L. B.,
and Lewis, N. G.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
261,
652-657[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Warshaw, M. M.,
and Cantor, C. R.
(1970)
Biopolymers
9,
1079-1103[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Gietz, D., St.,
Jean, A.,
Woods, R. A.,
and Schiestl, R. H.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
1425[Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Tyagi, S.,
and Kramer, F. R.
(1996)
Nat. Biotechnol.
14,
303-308[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Whetten, R. W.,
and Sederoff, R. R.
(1992)
Plant Physiol.
98,
380-386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Voo, K. S.,
Whetten, R. W.,
O'Malley, D. M.,
and Sederoff, R. R.
(1995)
Plant Physiol.
108,
85-97[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Li, L.,
Osakabe, Y.,
Joshi, C. P.,
and Chiang, V. L.
(1999)
Plant Mol. Biol.
40,
555-565[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
O'Malley, D. M.,
Porter, S.,
and Sederoff, R. R.
(1992)
Plant Physiol.
98,
1364-1371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Li, L.,
Popko, J. L.,
Zhang, X.-H.,
Osakabe, K.,
Tsai, C.-J.,
Joshi, C. P.,
and Chiang, V. L.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5461-5466[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Zhang, X.-H.,
and Chiang, V. L.
(1997)
Plant Physiol.
113,
65-74[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
Holton, T. A.,
and Lester, D. R.
(1996)
Methods Enzymol.
272,
275-283[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Lacombe, E.,
Hawkins, S.,
van Doorsselaere, J.,
Piquemal, J.,
Goffner, D.,
Poeydomenge, O.,
Boudet, A.-M.,
and Grima-Pettenati, J.
(1997)
Plant J.
11,
429-441[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Chabannes, M.,
Barakate, A.,
Lapierre, C.,
Marita, J. M.,
Ralph, J.,
Pean, M.,
Danoun, S.,
Halpin, C.,
Grima-Pettenati, J.,
and Boudet, A. M.
(2001)
Plant J.
28,
257-270[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Lauvergeat, V.,
Lacomme, C.,
Lacombe, E.,
Lasserre, E.,
Roby, D.,
and Grima-Pettenati, J.
(2001)
Phytochemistry
57,
1187-1195[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Holland, P. M.,
Abramson, R. D.,
Watson, R.,
and Gelfand, D. H.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
7276-7280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
van Heerden, P. S.,
Towers, G. H. N.,
and Lewis, N. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12350-12355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Coruzzi, G. M.,
and Zhou, L.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.
4,
247-253[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Møller, S. G.,
and Chua, N.-H.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
293,
219-234[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Sewalt, V. J. H., Ni, W.,
Blount, J. W.,
Jung, H. G.,
Masoud, S. A.,
Howles, P. A.,
Lamb, C.,
and Dixon, R. A.
(1997)
Plant Physiol.
115,
41-50[Abstract]
|
| 47.
|
Jin, H.,
Cominelli, E.,
Bailey, P.,
Parr, A.,
Mehrtens, F.,
Jones, J.,
Tonelli, C.,
Weisshaar, B.,
and Martin, C.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
6150-6161[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Whitbred, J. M.,
and Schuler, M. A.
(2000)
Plant Physiol.
124,
47-58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Lee, D.,
Meyer, K.,
Chapple, C.,
and Douglas, C. J.
(1997)
Plant Cell
9,
1985-1998[Abstract]
|
| 50.
|
Hu, W.-J.,
Harding, S. A.,
Lung, J.,
Popko, J. L.,
Ralph, J.,
Stokke, D. D.,
Tsai, C.-J.,
and Chiang, V. L.
(1999)
Nat. Biotechnol.
17,
808-812[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Kajita, S.,
Katayama, Y.,
and Omori, S.
(1996)
Plant Cell Physiol.
37,
957-965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Kutsuki, H.,
Shimida, M.,
and Higuchi, T.
(1982)
Phytochemistry
21,
19-23[CrossRef]
|
| 53.
|
Tamagnone, L.,
Merida, A.,
Parr, A.,
Mackay, S.,
Culianez-Macia, F. A.,
Roberts, K.,
and Martin, C.
(1998)
Plant Cell
10,
135-154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Patten, M. Jourdes, E. E. Brown, M.-P. Laborie, L. B. Davin, and N. G. Lewis
Reaction tissue formation and stem tensile modulus properties in wild-type and p-coumarate-3-hydroxylase downregulated lines of alfalfa, Medicago sativa (Fabaceae)
Am. J. Botany,
June 1, 2007;
94(6):
912 - 925.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Friedmann, S. G. Ralph, D. Aeschliman, J. Zhuang, K. Ritland, B. E. Ellis, J. Bohlmann, and C. J. Douglas
Microarray gene expression profiling of developmental transitions in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) apical shoots
J. Exp. Bot.,
February 1, 2007;
58(3):
593 - 614.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Ono, M. Nakai, Y. Fukui, N. Tomimori, M. Fukuchi-Mizutani, M. Saito, H. Satake, T. Tanaka, M. Katsuta, T. Umezawa, et al.
Formation of two methylenedioxy bridges by a Sesamum CYP81Q protein yielding a furofuran lignan, (+)-sesamin
PNAS,
June 27, 2006;
103(26):
10116 - 10121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|