JBC Advanced Peptides, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201047200 on February 25, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 21, 18390-18396, May 24, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/21/18390    most recent
M201047200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weber, J.
Right arrow Articles by Senior, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weber, J.
Right arrow Articles by Senior, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Quantitative Determination of Binding Affinity of delta -Subunit in Escherichia coli F1-ATPase

EFFECTS OF MUTATION, Mg2+, AND pH ON Kd*

Joachim Weber, Susan Wilke-Mounts, and Alan E. SeniorDagger

From the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14642

Received for publication, January 31, 2002, and in revised form, February 21, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To study the stator function in ATP synthase, a fluorimetric assay has been devised for quantitative determination of binding affinity of delta -subunit to Escherichia coli F1-ATPase. The signal used is that of the natural tryptophan at residue delta 28, which is enhanced by 50% upon binding of delta -subunit to alpha 3beta 3gamma epsilon complex. Kd for delta  binding is 1.4 nM, which is energetically equivalent (50.2 kJ/mol) to that required to resist the rotor strain. Only one site for delta  binding was detected. The delta W28L mutation increased Kd to 4.6 nM, equivalent to a loss of 2.9 kJ/mol binding energy. While this was insufficient to cause detectable functional impairment, it did facilitate preparation of delta -depleted F1. The alpha G29D mutation reduced Kd to 26 nM, equivalent to a loss of 7.2 kJ/mol binding energy. This mutation did cause serious functional impairment, referable to interruption of binding of delta  to F1. Results with the two mutants illuminate how finely balanced is the stator resistance function. delta ' fragment, consisting of residues delta 1-134, bound with the same Kd as intact delta , showing that, at least in absence of Fo subunits, the C-terminal domain of delta  contributes zero binding energy. Mg2+ ions had a strong effect on increasing delta  binding affinity, supporting the possibility of bridging metal ion involvement in stator function. High pH environment greatly reduced delta  binding affinity, suggesting the involvement of protonatable side-chains in the binding site.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ATP synthesis by oxidative or photophosphorylation is catalyzed by the enzyme ATP synthase. In Escherichia coli the subunit composition is alpha 3beta 3gamma delta epsilon ab2cn. F1 or F1-ATPase is the name given to the alpha 3beta 3gamma delta epsilon subcomplex, which may be released from the membrane and purified in soluble form showing ATP hydrolysis activity. Fo is the subcomplex that remains behind in the membrane after F1 release. Consisting of ab2cn, it is responsible both for anchoring F1 and for providing the pathway for protons to move through the membrane (1-3). ATP synthase is extraordinary because it acts as a rotary motor (4) with ATP hydrolysis on the three catalytic sites of F1 located at alpha /beta interfaces, providing the energy to drive rotation of the gamma -, epsilon -, and c-subunits (5-8). These three subunits are firmly linked together and comprise the "rotor" of the motor (9-11). ATP-driven rotation of the rotor, specifically of the c-subunit oligomeric ring, brings about proton efflux, and mechanisms for this proton transport have been suggested (11-13). It is widely assumed, although not yet demonstrated, that influx of protons through Fo down the transmembrane proton gradient reverses the rotor, and that the rotational movement of gamma  within F1 brings about ATP synthesis in the three catalytic sites. The mechanism by which ATP-driven rotation of subunits occurs, and the mechanism of rotation-driven ATP synthesis, are not yet understood and have most recently been discussed in Refs. 14-16.

It was apparent that a stator was required to counteract the rotor, and the stator is believed to be formed from the a-, b2-, and delta -subunits (9, 10, 17, 18). The stator is the least well understood part of ATP synthase in terms of structure. For a-subunit, no high resolution structure analysis is yet available, although topological models have been derived (11, 19, 20). It appears to be largely or entirely membrane-buried. The b-subunit dimer has been characterized biochemically and divided into functional domains (17, 18, 21), but no high resolution structure is yet available. Via its N-terminal region, b-subunit interacts with a-subunit within the membrane (22-24), whereas the C-terminal region of b is shown to interact with delta  (21, 25, 26). Thus the b-subunit is pictured as being an elongated, helical molecule, positioned at one side of F1. NMR analysis has provided a high resolution structure for residues 1-105 of the delta -subunit (27), but the structure of the remaining residues to the C terminus (residue 177)1 is not yet known. Electron microscopic analysis has shown that delta  is located at the top of F1 (31), sitting presumably upon the "crown" formed by the N-terminal beta -barrel domains of the alpha 3beta 3 hexagon (32).

Our understanding of the nature of the interaction between delta  and F1 remains rudimentary, however. Cross-linking studies showed proximity of the alpha - and/or beta -subunits to delta , both in E. coli (33, 34) and chloroplast enzyme (35). Other studies in E. coli enzyme implicated the alpha -subunit N-terminal region as being involved. Removal of the N-terminal 15 or 19 residues from alpha  by proteolytic digestion prevented binding of delta  to alpha 3beta 3gamma complex (36). Cross-linking of an inserted Cys at residue alpha 2 to a natural Cys in delta  was obtained in high yield (37). The mutation alpha G29D rendered F1 deficient of delta -subunit and resulted in functional disruption, including partial loss of oxidative phosphorylation in cells, loss of F1 binding to Fo in vitro, and loss ATP-driven proton pumping in vitro (38). However, while the designation of the N-terminal region of alpha  as a "membrane-binding region" turned out to be well founded (38) (even though this region is actually the part of the enzyme most distant from the membrane) unfortunately none of the available x-ray structures show the extreme N-terminal residues of alpha  or any of delta . Therefore no detailed model of the alpha /delta interface can be assigned as yet. Questions that have not yet been answered are: 1) does delta -subunit interact functionally with parts of beta  as well as alpha , 2) are all three alpha -subunits (or alpha /beta pairs) involved in binding one delta  or is just one alpha  (or alpha /beta ) sufficient, 3) what are the region(s) and residues of delta  that bind to alpha  and/or beta , and 4) what are the residues of the N-terminal of alpha  that are functionally directly involved in delta -binding?

Understanding the manner in which the stator functions in ATP synthase is clearly important to understanding the overall process of ATP synthesis, and elucidating the nature of the delta -F1 interface in functional and structural terms is one facet of this problem. Our goal in this paper was to develop a quantitative binding assay to determine the binding affinity of delta  under true equilibrium conditions and then to quantify the binding affinity accurately in wild-type and in the alpha G29D mutant. During the project we found that the mutation delta W28L also impairs binding, suggesting that this region of delta  is likely at or close to the delta -F1 interface. The C-terminal region of delta  was found not to contribute any binding energy at the delta -F1 interface. An important role for Mg2+ (or other divalent) ions is shown, and pH was found to profoundly influence delta  binding.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Purification of F1, Purification of delta -Subunit, and Preparation of delta -depleted F1-- E. coli F1 was purified as in Ref. 39. delta -subunit was purified as in Ref. 40 with minor modifications as follows. Plasmid pJC1 was transformed into strain AH3 (30) for expression, the gel filtration was on Sephacryl S100HR, and the peak from ion exchange or gel filtration was concentrated by ultrafiltration using Amicon YM10 membranes. delta ' fragment was purified using the same procedure, except pJC1 was transformed into strain DK8 (41). For purification of delta W28L subunit, the mutation was constructed by directed mutagenesis using the oligonucleotide described previously (42) in an M13mp19 template containing an EcoRI-SmaI fragment from pJC1(40). After mutagenesis the EcoRI-SmaI fragment was moved back to pJC1 creating the new plasmid pSWM101, which was transformed into strain AH3 and used for expression of delta W28L subunit. delta -depleted F1 was prepared as in Ref. 43, except that the gel filtration column consisted of Sephacryl S300HR (1.5 cm × 100 cm). The column buffer was 50 mM glycine/NaOH, pH 9.4, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM ATP, and 10% glycerol at 20 °C, and immediately after recovery the fractions were adjusted to pH 8.0 with 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.0.

E. coli Strains-- Wild-type F1 was purified from strain SWM1 (44). Trp-free F1 was purified from strain pB0W1/DK8, created by transferring a Pme1-EagI fragment from plasmid p0W1(42) into plasmid pRLL2 (45) and transforming the resultant pB0W1 into strain DK8. delta W28L F1 was purified from strain pSWM92/DK8. pSWM92 was constructed by moving a PpuM1-SphI fragment from p0W1 into pBWU13.4 (46). beta W107 F1 was purified from strain pSWM86/DK8. pSWM86 was constructed by moving a Pme1-EagI fragment from pDP34N (47) into pRLL2. The following mutations were constructed by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis as in Ref. 45 using the respective oligonucleotides. 1) alpha L55W, GAAATGATCTCGTGGCCGGGTAACC, inserts a Trp (TGG) codon and also a new BssS1 site. The template was M13mp18 with an SphI-SalI fragment from p0W1, and after mutagenesis the mutation was moved into pB0W1 on an SphI-Csp45-1 fragment creating new plasmid pSWM89. 2) beta F17W, GTTGACGTCGAATGGCCACAGGATGCCG, inserts a Trp codon and an Msc1/BalI site. The template was M13mp18 containing the beta W107F mutation in a HindII-KpnI fragment from p0W1, and the mutations were moved back into pRLL2 on a Pme1-EagI fragment to create new plasmid pSWM87. 3) beta Y26W, GGATGCCGTACCACGCGTGTGGGATGCTCTTGAG, inserts a Trp codon and both BstXI and Mlu1 sites. The template and procedure were as for beta F17W, and the final plasmid was pSWM88. 4) alpha G29D, CTCACAACGAAGACACTATTGTTTCTG, adds a Bbs1 site. The template was the same as for alpha L55W mutagenesis above, and the alpha G29D mutation was moved into plasmid pSWM86 (above) on a SphI-Csp45-1 fragment to create new plasmid pSWM93. Each of the plasmids pSWM87,88,89, and 93 were transformed into strain DK8 for purification of F1.

Fluorescence Binding Assays-- Tryptophan fluorescence was measured in a spectrofluorometer type SPEX Fluorolog 2 at 23 °C. lambda exc was 295 nm. The buffer was 50 mM HEPES/NaOH, 5 mM MgSO4, pH 7.0, unless noted otherwise. Binding of delta  to delta -depleted F1 was measured by adding increasing concentrations of isolated delta -subunit to 10 or 50 nM enzyme and monitoring the fluorescence at 325 nm. Background signals, including enzyme fluorescence and fluorescence of free delta , determined in parallel control experiments, were subtracted. The binding-induced increase in delta  fluorescence was plotted versus the total delta  concentration, and from the resulting curves Kd values were determined by nonlinear regression. Kd for binding of delta W28L mutant subunit was estimated from competition experiments in which delta -depleted F1 was preincubated with a given concentration of delta W28L subunit, and then wild-type delta  was added. From the change in Kdapp for wild-type delta  due to the presence of delta W28L mutant, Kd for the mutant was calculated.

Assay of ATP-driven Proton Pumping in Reconstituted Membrane Vesicles and Routine Procedures-- Acridine orange fluorescence quenching was followed as an indicator of ATP-driven proton pumping (48). Membrane vesicles were stripped of F1 by KSCN-extraction (48). For reconstitution of F1Fo, stripped membranes (500 µg of protein) were preincubated for 15 min at 30 °C in a total volume of 500 µl with F1 (100 µg) or delta -depleted F1 (100 µg) plus appropriate amounts of delta -subunit or delta ' fragment (10 µg, unless otherwise indicated). 400 µl of this mixture were added to 1.6 ml of assay buffer (100 mM HEPES/NaOH, 5 mM MgCl2, 300 mM KCl, pH 7.5). Acridine orange (4 µM) fluorescence was continuously recorded in a spectrofluorometer type SLM AMINCO AB2 (lambda exc 430 nm, lambda em 565 nm). Proton gradient formation was initiated by addition of 1 mM ATP and terminated by addition of 10 µM CCCP. Assays of ATPase activity, protein concentration by Bradford assay, and SDS-gel electrophoresis on 10-20% gradient gels were as described (49).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Strategy for Design of Assay to Determine Kd of Binding of delta -Subunit to delta -depleted E. coli F1

As discussed in the Introduction, current evidence favors the view that delta -subunit binds to F1 at the "top" of the molecule, distant from the membrane. Our initial approach was to insert single Trp residues into the N-terminal beta -barrel domains of alpha - or beta -subunits, with the hope that upon binding of delta , one or more of these would show perturbation of the Trp fluorescence signal. Conserved aromatic or leucine residues were targeted. The following mutations were made: alpha L55W, beta F17W, and beta Y26W. Each was expressed in the Trp-free background (42) previously used in this laboratory to characterize nucleotide-binding properties of the enzyme (e.g. Ref. 49). The Trp-free background contains the mutations delta W28L/alpha W513F/gamma W108Y/gamma W206Y/beta W107F and it was previously shown that Trp-free F1 is functionally similar to wild-type (42). In addition the naturally occurring Trp at beta 107 was expressed alone in otherwise Trp-free background (we refer to this as the "beta W107" enzyme). After purification, all mutant enzymes showed normal subunit composition on SDS-gels. Properties of the mutant enzymes used in this work are shown in Table I. It may be seen that none of the enzymes containing single Trp residues or the Trp-free enzyme caused any major functional perturbation of ATP synthesis in cells as the growth yields were close to normal. Also, the specific activities of the purified F1 were close to normal (the increased activity for Trp-free F1 confirmed previous data (42)). Yields of the alpha L55W, beta F17W, beta Y26W, and Trp-free enzyme were 0.04, 0.085, 0.19, and 0.11 mg/g cells, respectively, which was significantly lower than wild-type (0.8 mg/g cells). However, the beta W107 enzyme could be purified in good yield (0.41 mg/g cells).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Properties of mutant strains and purified F1
ND, not determined.

Preparation of delta -depleted F1

To prepare delta -depleted F1 we used essentially the procedure of Smith et al. (43), in which F1 is passed through a gel filtration column at pH 9.4, which causes the delta -subunit to dissociate from the alpha 3beta 3gamma epsilon complex. We found that complete delta -depletion was not achieved with wild-type F1. However, complete depletion (as judged by Coomassie Blue-stained SDS gels) was achieved with the Trp-free enzyme, the mutants alpha L55W, beta F17W, beta Y26W, and the beta W107 enzyme. The result of a delta -depletion experiment using beta W107 enzyme is shown in Fig. 1 lanes 1 and 2, and was typical for this group. Confirming the earlier report (43) we found that delta -depletion by this procedure did not change the ATPase activity of F1. A common property of all the enzymes that could be efficiently depleted of delta  by this procedure was that they contain the mutation delta W28L in the delta -subunit. We therefore constructed an enzyme that was wild-type except for the delta W28L mutation and found that it too could be readily depleted of delta -subunit. Thus residue delta Trp-28 appeared to contribute to enhanced affinity of binding of delta -subunit to F1, and use of the mutant delta W28L was valuable for delta -depletion.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   SDS-gel electrophoresis of delta -depleted F1, purified delta -subunit and delta ' fragment. Coomassie Blue-stained 10-20% gradient SDS gels are shown. Lane 1, beta W107 F1 (10 µg); lane 2, delta -depleted beta W107 F1 (10 µg); lane 3, purified delta ' fragment (2 µg); lane 4, purified delta W28L mutant delta -subunit (2 µg); lane 5, purified wild-type delta  (2 µg).

Expression and Purification of delta -Subunit

We used essentially the method reported by Dunn and Chandler (40) in which delta -subunit expression from plasmid pJC1 is induced by isopropyl thiogalactoside. Plasmid JC1 was transformed into strains DK8 (Delta uncB-uncC) or AH3(Delta uncFH). Growth conditions and purification of delta  were essentially as described (40). In the original procedure a proteolytic fragment named delta ', consisting of residues 1-134 of delta -subunit (27) was formed and had to be separated from intact delta . Here we found that using the DK8 background, only delta ' was present, and it could be purified to homogeneity readily (Fig. 1, lane 3). In contrast, in the AH3 background, mostly intact delta  and little delta ' was present, and the intact delta  could be readily purified (Fig. 1, lane 5) in high yield (5.0 mg/liter cells). We also introduced the delta W28L mutation, allowing purification of this mutant delta -subunit (Fig. 1, lane 4).

Confirmation of Functional Integrity of delta -depleted F1 and Purified delta

The in vitro ATP-driven proton-pumping assay described by Perlin et al. (48) was used to demonstrate functional integrity of delta -depleted F1 and purified delta . The assay uses acridine orange fluorescence quenching as a measure of proton accumulation in membrane vesicles. Fig. 2A shows typical experimental results. F1 containing the delta W28L mutation was depleted of delta , thus yielding wild-type delta -depleted F1. Addition of this preparation to KSCN-stripped membranes gave no ATP-driven proton pumping (Fig. 2A, trace 1). When wild-type F1 that was delta -replete (containing either Trp or Leu at delta 28) was added the results were as in Fig. 2A, trace 2, i.e. there was excellent reconstitution of ATP-driven proton pumping. When delta -depleted F1 was preincubated with excess purified delta  (containing either Trp or Leu at delta 28) the results were as in trace 3, i.e. there was again excellent reconstitution of function. When purified delta ' was substituted for delta , however, no reconstitution of function occurred. Using this method we found that all of the mutant F1 preparations containing single Trp and Trp-free F1 gave 50-85% quenching of acridine fluorescence quenching upon rebinding to stripped membranes either before delta -depletion or after delta -depletion followed by incubation with wild-type or delta W28L delta -subunit. Therefore all of these mutant enzymes were functionally competent. The experiment also showed that the procedure used for delta -depletion did not cause functional impairment and that our purified delta  preparations were fully active.


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   ATP-driven proton-pumping in reconstituted F1Fo. A, membrane vesicles were stripped of F1 by KSCN treatment, then reconstituted with wild-type delta -depleted F1 (trace 1), intact wild-type F1 (trace 2), or wild-type delta -depleted F1 incubated with wild-type delta -subunit (trace 3). The traces show acridine orange fluorescence upon addition of ATP. A quench of fluorescence indicates proton uptake into the reconstituted vesicles. For details, see "Experimental Procedures." B, wild-type delta -depleted F1 was incubated with increasing concentration of purified wild-type delta -subunit and reconstituted with stripped membranes. The percent quench of acridine orange fluorescence after addition of ATP is plotted against the molar ratio of delta /F1.

We investigated whether this procedure could be used to determine stoichiometry and/or affinity of binding of delta  to delta -depleted F1. Fig. 2B shows a typical titration experiment in which increasing amounts of wild-type delta -subunit were mixed with wild-type delta -depleted F1 and stripped membranes. The curve shows that saturation was reached at a stoichiometry of less than 1 mol of delta  per mol of added delta -depleted F1. This result ensues because the Fo binds F1-delta complex preferentially, and the assay requires that F1 is present in excess over Fo. Thus this assay cannot be used to determine accurately the affinity of binding of delta  to F1.

Flurorescence Properties of F1 and delta -Subunit

The environment of the introduced Trp in the mutant enzymes varied from unpolar (beta F17W) to moderately polar (beta Y26W; lambda max values given in Table I). Each of the enzymes, alpha L55W, beta F17W, beta Y26W, and beta W107, was delta -depleted and then mixed with purified delta W28L delta -subunit (which lacks Trp and therefore has no intrinsic Trp fluorescence of its own as seen in Fig. 3, trace 1). In no case was any change in fluorescence spectrum seen (data not shown). Therefore none of these single Trp residues was responsive to addition of delta -subunit, and it appeared binding of delta  caused no changes of the environment of these residues within the N-terminal beta -barrel domains of the alpha - and beta -subunits, indicating conformational rigidity of the F1 crown.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Fluorescence spectra of purified delta -subunit and of delta -subunit bound to delta -depleted F1. Corrected spectra are shown. Trace 1, purified delta W28L subunit; trace 2, purified wild-type delta -subunit; trace 3, purified wild-type delta -subunit mixed with delta -depleted beta W107 F1 (ratio 1 mol/mol). Note that the contribution of the beta W107 F1 fluorescence alone (in absence of delta ) has been subtracted from trace 3.

However, when the same experiment was repeated using wild-type delta  instead of delta W28L, in every case an enhancement of the total fluorescence was seen. Fig. 3 shows typical spectra obtained using the beta W107 enzyme, and the same results were seen with alpha L55W, beta F17W, and beta Y26W enzymes. Fig. 3, trace 2 shows the intrinsic fluorescence of purified wild-type delta , which has a maximum at 326 nm, showing that the single Trp in wild-type delta  resides in a relatively unpolar environment. Trace 3 is the spectrum obtained upon mixing delta -depleted beta W107 F1 with wild-type delta  after subtraction of the contribution of delta -depleted beta W107 F1 alone. The experiment shows that upon binding of delta  to delta -depleted F1, a strong enhancement (+50%) of the fluorescence of residue delta Trp-28 occurs accompanied by a blue-shift of 4 nm. The same enhancement of residue delta Trp-28 fluorescence was seen using delta -depleted Trp-free and wild-type F1 (data not shown). The results show that the environment of residue delta Trp-28 becomes more unpolar upon binding to F1 and, importantly, show that the fluorescence change of this residue provides a sensitive equilibrium binding assay for delta  binding to F1.

Determination of Affinity of Binding of Purified delta -Subunit or delta ' to delta -depleted F1 by Fluorescence Assay

We chose to use the beta W107 enzyme for most assays for the following reasons. As noted above, the beta W107 enzyme was obtained in good yield. Also, because its intrinsic fluorescence was 60% lower than that of wild-type enzyme, this meant that the correction factor upon subtraction of the intrinsic F1 fluorescence (see above) was lower. It might seem that Trp-free F1 would provide even greater advantage; however, this was counterbalanced by the low yield of this enzyme. However, we wish to emphasize here that binding measurements were made with the beta W107, beta Y26W, Trp-free, and wild-type enzymes, and all showed essentially identical affinity (Kd) for binding of wild-type delta -subunit as determined in titration experiments.

Fig. 4A shows typical titration curves obtained when beta W107 (trace 1) or wild-type (trace 2) delta -depleted F1 was titrated with wild-type delta . In these experiments the concentration of delta -depleted F1 was 50 nM at pH 7.0 with 5 mM Mg2+ present. The titration curves were fitted by a model assuming n binding sites. The curves appear "stoichiometric," i.e. there is a close-to-linear approach to saturation plateau, which is reached at a ratio of 1 delta  per F1 (mol/mol), and in all cases the calculated value of n was 1.0 or very close to 1.0. Fig. 4B shows titration curves using 10 nM delta -depleted beta W107 F1 (trace 1) or Trp-free delta -depleted F1 (trace 2) with wild-type delta . These more rounded curves yielded Kd values similar to those calculated from Fig. 4A data. Lower protein concentrations could not be used due to loss of sensitivity. Fig. 4B, trace 3 shows a control experiment in which delta -depleted beta W107 F1 was titrated with purified delta W28L subunit, yielding no enhancement of fluorescence.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Titration of delta -depleted F1 with purified delta -subunit. delta -subunit was mixed with delta -depleted F1, and the resultant fluorescence enhancement at 325 nm (after subtraction of the contribution of delta  alone and of delta -depleted F1 alone) was plotted against the concentration of delta -subunit. Concentration of delta -depleted F1 was 50 nM (A) or 10 nM (B). A, trace 1, delta -depleted beta W107 F1 titrated with wild-type delta ; trace 2, wild-type delta -depleted F1 titrated with wild-type delta ; trace 3, delta -depleted beta W107 F1 titrated with delta ' fragment. B, trace 1, delta -depleted beta W107 F1 titrated with wild-type delta ; trace 2, Trp-free delta -depleted F1 titrated with wild-type delta ; trace 3, delta -depleted beta W107 F1 titrated with delta W28L subunit.

Calculated Kd values for binding of wild-type delta  to wild-type, beta W107, Trp-free, and beta Y26W delta -depleted F1 are shown in Table II, lines 1-4. We note that in no case was there any indication of additional binding sites, and from the results we can state that if such binding sites occur their Kd values are >1 µM.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Kd values for binding of wild-type delta -subunit, delta ' fragment, or delta W28L mutant to delta -depleted F1.

The affinity for binding of delta ' fragment was measured by the same technique (see Fig. 4A, trace 3), and Kd was found to be 1.4 nM for binding to beta W107 F1 (Table II, line 5). This experiment showed that under the assay conditions in Fig. 4, none of the binding energy between delta  and F1 is contributed by the C-terminal part of delta .

Conditions That Affect the Strength of delta  Binding to F1

The purification procedure for E. coli F1 involves preparation of membrane vesicles enriched in F1Fo followed by release of the F1 in presence of EDTA to chelate Mg2+ ions. Additionally, F1 may be depleted of delta -subunit by gel filtration at high pH values (see "Experimental Procedures"). Thus it was anticipated that both pH and Mg2+ concentration would affect the strength of delta -binding. Table III shows values of Kd for binding of wild-type delta  to delta -depleted F1 under a range of pH values in presence or absence of 5 mM Mg2+ ions. It may be noted that Mg2+ ions had a large effect at all pH values. In the presence of Mg2+, binding affinity (Kd) was found to lie in a narrow range between pH 6.0 and 9.0 but increased at pH 9.4 to 16.6 nM. pH 9.4 is the condition for preparation of delta -depleted F1. In the absence of Mg2+, all Kd values were increased, and the influence of higher pH on Kd values became very marked indeed. Addition of ADP (1 mM) in presence of 5 mM Mg2+ ions at pH 7.0 had no effect on the binding curve or calculated Kd values.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Influence of Mg2+ concentration and pH on Kd of delta -binding
Values shown are Kd in nM, for binding of purified wild-type delta -subunit to delta -depleted beta W107 F1. All values shown are means of duplicate assays. It was confirmed from measurements of ATPase activity that varied pH caused no instability of beta W107 delta -depleted F1. Buffers were 50 mM MES/NaOH, pH 6.0, 50 mM HEPES/NaOH, pH 7.0, 50 mM Tris/H2SO4, pH 8.0, 50 mM glycine/NaOH, pH 9.0 and 9.4.

Mutations That Impair delta -Binding

The alpha G29D Mutation-- Originally identified by random mutagenesis (38), the alpha G29D mutation is the only mutation yet known to cause functional defects specifically derived from disruption of delta -binding to F1. These defects include impairment of binding of F1 to Fo, ATP-driven proton pumping, and oxidative phosphorylation (38). In contrast, for example, the alpha Q2C mutation did not cause functional defects, although cross-linking of the introduced alpha Cys-2 to natural Cys in delta  could be readily achieved (37), showing proximity of the introduced Cys to delta . Thus the region around alpha Gly-29, and perhaps residue alpha Gly-29 itself, is likely involved in delta -binding. We therefore wished to define the effects of the mutation in quantitative terms. For this purpose the alpha G29D mutation was combined with the beta W107 mutation in an otherwise Trp-free background. As expected the growth yield of strain alpha G29D/beta W107 was significantly lower than wild-type or of beta W107 alone (Table I). Purified alpha G29D/beta W107 F1 retained ATPase activity (Table I); however, in the ATP-driven proton-pumping assay conducted as in Fig. 2, alpha G29D/beta W107 F1 gave only 12% quench of acridine orange fluorescence in presence or absence of excess added wild-type delta . delta -depleted alpha G29D/beta W107 F1 was prepared and titrated with wild-type delta  (Fig. 5), yielding a Kd value of 25.5 nM as compared with a value of 1.4 nM for wild-type or beta W107 alone (see above). Thus a diminution of strength of binding of delta  to F1 of around 20-fold is caused by alpha G29D, and this is sufficient to cause defects in F1Fo function easily detectable in vitro and in vivo. It may also be noted that titrations of the alpha G29D/beta W107 mutant enzyme with wild-type delta -subunit consistently gave greater fluorescence enhancement than that seen with wild-type, Trp-free, or beta W107 enzymes, by 1.4-fold, as if the alpha G29D mutation itself were directly affecting the environment of the delta Trp-28 residue.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of the alpha G29D mutation on delta -binding to F1. Titrations were carried out as in Fig. 4, using delta -depleted alpha G29D/beta W107 F1 and wild-type delta -subunit. A, 50 nM F1. B, 10 nM F1.

delta W28L Mutation-- We had a strong indication that the delta W28L mutation weakened binding of delta  to F1 from the fact that it facilitated preparation of delta -depleted F1. To assay the Kd of binding of the mutant delta  we used a competition assay in which titrations of wild-type delta  to delta -depleted beta W107 F1 were carried out in the presence of different fixed concentrations of added delta W28L. The results of three experiments (not shown) gave a Kd of 4.6 nM (Table II). Thus the delta W28L mutation weakens binding by 3- to 4-fold. This apparently is sufficient to allow more efficient delta -depletion of F1 but not sufficient to cause significant functional impairment in the cell or in ATP-driven proton pumping assays in vitro.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We report here a novel assay for quantitative determination of binding affinity (Kd) for binding of delta -subunit to the alpha 3beta 3gamma epsilon complex of E. coli F1-ATPase. The assay is a true equilibrium method that depends on enhancement of the fluorescence of the natural Trp at residue delta 28 in the delta -subunit upon binding to F1. No chemical modification was required, although removal of some of the intrinsic Trp residues in F1 helped to reduce the signal/noise ratio. Because purified E. coli delta -subunit occurs as a monomer (40) the assay was not complicated by formation of dimers or aggregates of delta  (cf. Ref. 50). Using the assay we determined the Kd for binding of wild-type delta  and of a fragment of delta ', which lacks the C-terminal 43 residues, and also the affinity of binding of two mutants that impair binding, namely alpha G29D and delta W28L. Further we demonstrate large effects of Mg2+ ions and pH on the binding affinity.

We found that the Kd of binding of delta -subunit to F1 was around 1.4 nM (Table II). A similar value was found for the chloroplast delta -subunit binding to chloroplast F1 (50) using an assay involving fluorescence correlation spectroscopy of chemically modified delta . A Kd value of 1.4 nM suggests a standard free energy of binding of 50.2 kJ/mol, which, as pointed out in Ref. 50 is consistent with the strain demands placed upon the stator by the torque energy generated by the rotor during ATP hydrolysis under conditions of ATP, ADP, and Pi concentrations within the cell, equivalent to ~50 kJ/mol (50, 51). We found that the delta ' fragment, lacking the C terminus of delta , bound with the same affinity as intact delta , suggesting that the C-terminal residues contribute little binding energy. Previous proteolytic cleavage of delta  had suggested that the C-terminal region was not responsible for F1-binding (29). It is thought that the C-terminal region of delta  binds to the C-terminal region of the b-subunit (21, 24-26). A fragment of the b-subunit containing the C-terminal region, named "bsol," was found to form a b2delta complex with purified delta -subunit, but the binding affinity between b2 and delta  was surprisingly weak with Kd = 5-10 µM (40). This would also imply that the C-terminal region of delta  through its association with b-subunit confers little binding energy to stator resistance. However, mutations and truncations at the C-terminal region of delta  bring about large functional deficiencies (30, 52). One explanation could be that there is a cooperative effect between binding of delta  to F1 and to b-subunit, which tightens the overall binding of delta . The availability of the assay described here should allow this to be examined in future work. Additional effects on stator resistance could also derive from interactions between b-subunit and alpha /beta pairs as seen in Refs. 24 and 53.

In this context, experiments on OSCP,2 the mitochondrial homolog of E. coli delta -subunit, are relevant. Cross-linking and proteolysis studies indicate that, like E. coli delta , OSCP binds to the N-terminal region of alpha  and also to beta  at the top of F1 (54, 55). Numerous functional studies indicate a similar role for the two proteins in binding F1 to Fo. However, reported Kd values for binding of OSCP to mitochondrial F1 are in the 50-80-nM range (56, 57), which is much higher than we saw here for delta -binding in E. coli enzyme and explains why OSCP does not co-purify with F1 in contrast to delta . When OSCP binding to mitochondrial F1Fo was measured, the apparent Kd value was 1.7-5 nM, showing that there was an extra effect (58, 59). In mitochondrial F1Fo there are several supernumerary subunits, not seen in the E. coli enzyme, which could contribute to the higher binding affinity, but the alternative explanation, of cooperativity of binding of OSCP in F1Fo, is also possible.

Reduction of the binding affinity in the delta W28L mutant to Kd = 4.6 nM (Table II) reduces the standard free energy of binding by 2.9 kJ/mol. This was not enough to have a detectable effect on function as measured by growth yield assay in whole cells or by ATP-driven proton pumping assays in vitro. However it did facilitate removal of the delta -subunit by gel filtration at high pH, which we were able to exploit to prepare delta -depleted F1. The alpha G29D mutation had a much larger effect, with the Kd value being 25.5 nM (Table II), yielding a reduction in binding energy of 7.2 kJ/mol. This mutation has quite strong debilitating effects on rotation-based energy transmission between F1 and Fo. This result exemplifies how energetically finely balanced the stator stalk is, in that it is able to tolerate only very small changes in binding affinity between delta  and F1.

The results with alpha G29D enzyme confirm that this residue is located at or very close to the delta -binding site. X-ray structures (15, 32) show this residue close to the surface of the N-terminal beta -barrel domain. Whether the effect of the mutation is due to an electrostatic effect of insertion of a carboxyl or due to a poorer fit of binding surfaces after inserting the larger side-chain remains conjectural. The development of the assay system described here should now accelerate understanding of the structure of the delta /alpha interface by facilitating mutagenesis studies, and also of delta /beta interfaces if they are of functional significance. As noted in the Introduction the details of delta -binding at the top of F1 remain intriguing. delta  binds in just one copy, potentially to three alpha -subunits or alpha /beta pairs. Possibly it needs only to bind to one alpha  with high affinity to achieve the proper structure. Possibly the three N termini of alpha  form a tripodal binding site, like the legs of a lunar module, with all three N termini combining to form one binding site for delta .

The effect of the delta W28L mutation on binding affinity, and especially the pronounced fluorescence enhancement response of residue delta Trp-28 upon binding of delta , indicate a location of this residue close to F1. The NMR structure of delta  (27) shows that residue delta 28 lies in helix 2 (residues 24-39) at the protein surface, but with the side-chain pointing into the protein matrix, consistent with the relatively unpolar environment reported by the Trp spectrum. One model would be that helix 2 of delta  binds directly to F1, and that the substitution delta W28L causes small conformational changes of the helix surface contours. This, however, does not agree well with the finding that residue Arg-94 of OSCP (equivalent to delta Arg-85) is crucial for binding (57). delta Arg-85 is located in a turn after helix 5, which consists of residues 71-83. The structure suggests also a second model, that the surface formed by residues from helix 1 (residues 5-20) and helix 5 might bind to F1. Side-chains from helix 1 make contact with delta Trp-28, thus mutation of the latter might affect the binding surface through helix 1. Both binding models, but particularly the second, would decrease accessibility of delta Trp-28 from the medium upon binding, as suggested by the blue-shift of fluorescence upon binding (Fig. 3). Future mutagenesis of delta -subunit coupled with the quantitative assay should define a binding model.

Release of F1 from E. coli membranes in soluble form is achieved in the presence of EDTA to chelate Mg2+ ions, and reconstitution of F1Fo in vitro requires the presence of Mg2+ ions. The data in Table III show a large effect of Mg2+ ions on the affinity of binding of delta  to delta -depleted F1 and provide an explanation for the above effects. At all pH values tested, Kd was higher in the presence than in the absence of Mg2+. This phenomenon was first recognized by Abrams and colleagues (60) who showed using Streptococcus faecalis F1 that delta -subunit was lost on gel electrophoresis in the absence of Mg2+ but remained bound to F1 in presence of 2 mM Mg2+. They concluded that Mg2+ (or another divalent cation) was naturally present in the enzyme to act as an anchor between delta  and F1. The data reported here confirm and extend the earlier work by showing a substantial effect of Mg2+ on delta  binding. Speculatively, one can propose that Mg2+ ions bridging alpha  and delta  are involved in binding delta  to F1 (60). Studies on E. coli F1 determined that, as purified, it contained 2 Mg2+/F1 (mol/mol) with no other metal present (61). Intriguingly, isolated alpha -subunit was found to bind 1 Mg2+ (mol/mol). Furthermore, it was shown later that purified E. coli F1 preparations commonly contain only 0.65 mol delta /mol F1 due to loss of delta  during purification (62). This would imply that the true content of alpha -delta bridging Mg2+ ions might be 3 mol/mol F1, i.e. one per alpha . It is an interesting speculation. The data in Table III also affirm the large effect of raising pH values on weakening of delta -binding, an effect that was recognized empirically in the past and used to deplete F1 of delta -subunit (43). It is clear that protonatable residues on alpha  or delta , with pKa values in the range of 8-9, are involved with or at least strongly influence delta -binding.

Summarizing, we report an assay for quantitative determination of binding of delta -subunit to F1-ATPase. We show that mutations in alpha - or in delta -subunits affect the Kd, and that the stator is finely balanced in terms of its resistance to strain since relatively small changes in Kd of delta  binding significantly impair function. We show that the C-terminal residues of delta  contribute no binding energy at all. Mg2+ is a critical component of delta -binding, suggesting possible alpha -delta bridging metal site(s) in the enzyme, and high pH greatly decreased Kd, implicating protonatable side-chains in the binding site. The availability of a simple but quantitative assay for delta -binding now opens up the possibility of defining structure/function of the ATP synthase stator in detail.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Prof. S. D. Dunn, University of Western Ontario, for a gift of plasmid pJC1 and helpful discussion.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM25349 (to A. E. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Box 712, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642. Tel.: 585-275-2777; Fax: 585-271-2683; E-mail: alan_senior@urmc.rochester.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 25, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201047200

1 E. coli residue numbers are used throughout the article. Based on amino acid sequence analysis, Mabuchi et al. (28) determined that the N-terminal Met was present in delta -subunit, whereas Mendel-Hartvig and Capaldi (29) reported that it was removed. In this work, to be consistent with our earlier studies (30), delta -subunit residues are numbered assuming that the N-terminal Met is residue 1.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviation used is: OSCP, oligomycin sensitivity conferral protein.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Weber, J., and Senior, A. E. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1319, 19-58[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Deckers-Hebestreit, G., and Altendorf, K. (1