Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M200903200 on March 20, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 21, 18728-18735, May 24, 2002
Dimerization and Release of Molecular Chaperone Inhibition
Facilitate Activation of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-2
Kinase in Response to Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress*
Kun
Ma,
Krishna M.
Vattem, and
Ronald C.
Wek
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana
University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
Received for publication, January 28, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor-2
(eIF2) by pancreatic eIF2 kinase (PEK), induces a program of
translational expression in response to accumulation of malfolded
protein in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This study addresses the
mechanisms activating PEK, also designated PERK or EIF2AK3. We describe
the characterization of two regions in the ER luminal portion of the transmembrane PEK that carry out distinct functions in the regulation of this eIF2 kinase. The first region mediates oligomerization between
PEK polypeptides, and deletion of this portion of PEK blocked induction
of eIF2 kinase activity. The second characterized region of PEK
facilitates interaction with ER chaperones. In the absence of stress,
PEK associates with ER chaperones GRP78 (BiP) and GRP94, and this
binding is released in response to ER stress. ER luminal sequences
flanking the transmembrane domain are required for GRP78 interaction,
and deletion of this portion of PEK led to its activation even in the
absence of ER stress. These results suggest that this ER chaperone
serves as a repressor of PEK activity, and release of ER chaperones
from PEK when misfolded proteins accumulate in the ER induces gene
expression required to enhance the protein folding capacity of the
ER.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
A well characterized mechanism regulating translation initiation
in response to different cellular stresses involves phosphorylation of
the
subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor-2
(eIF2)1 (1, 2). In mammalian
cells, four eIF2 kinases have been identified, and each directly senses
distinct stress signals and modulates downstream response pathways by
translational control. These eIF2 kinases include PKR, important for an
antiviral defense pathway mediated by interferon (3-5); HRI, which
couples protein synthesis to the availability of heme in erythroid
cells (6, 7); GCN2, which is activated by nutritional stresses; and the subject of this report (1, 8-11), pancreatic eIF2 kinase, PEK (also
known as Perk, encoded by the EIF2AK3 gene),
important for remedying protein misfolding in the endoplasmic reticulum
(11-15).
In mammalian cells, a block in glycosylation or disulfide linkages in
the ER or release of calcium from this organelle leads to impaired
assembly of proteins slated for the secretory pathway and induced
phosphorylation of eIF2 by PEK (16-18). The eIF2, combined with
initiator methionyl-tRNA and GTP, associates with the 40 S ribosomal
subunit and participates in the recognition of the start codon during
initiation of translation (19). During the joining of the small and
large ribosomal subunit, GTP complexed with eIF2 is hydrolyzed to GDP.
Phosphorylation of eIF2 by PEK reduces the exchange of eIF2-GDP to the
GTP-bound form that is catalyzed by the guanine nucleotide exchange
factor, eIF2B. The resulting reduction in eIF2-GTP levels impedes
translation initiation in the cell, allowing the cell sufficient time
to correct the folding problem incurred by the ER stress prior to
synthesizing additional proteins.
Accompanying this reduction in translation during ER stress is the
unfolded protein response (UPR) (17, 18, 20). The UPR involves the
expression of a large number of secretory pathway genes, including
those involved in protein folding, such as ER chaperones GRP78/BiP and
GRP94, disulfide bond formation, protein glycosylation, retrograde
protein degradation, translocation, and vesicle trafficking (21).
Another ER transmembrane protein kinase, IRE1, induces the
transcription of UPR genes (20, 22-25). Phosphorylation of eIF2 by PEK
is proposed to work in concert with IRE1 to enhance the coordinate
expression of proteins linked with the UPR by a mechanism involving
preferential translation of certain of mRNAs (18, 26). In addition
to sharing a common topological arrangement in the ER membrane, a
portion of the ER luminal sequences of PEK shares homology with IRE1,
suggesting that there is a common mechanism activating the cytoplasmic
protein kinase activities in response to the ER stress (13, 14, 27). Loss of PEK (Perk) function in mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to ER
stress leads to inappropriately elevated protein synthesis that further
exacerbates protein misfolding in this organelle, triggering apoptosis
(15). Loss of PEK (EIF2AK3 gene) in humans leads to a
rare autosomal recessive disorder, Wolcott-Rallison syndrome, that is
characterized by neonatal insulin-dependent diabetes
accompanied by a characteristic destruction of the pancreatic beta
cells (28). However, Wolcott-Rallison syndrome patients do not display
autoantibodies diagnostic of type I diabetes. At later ages, there is
an occurrence of epiphyseal dysplasia, osteoporosis, and growth
retardation. Frequently, afflicted patients also suffer from
multisystemic pathologies including hepatic and renal complications, cardiovascular disease, and mental retardation (29, 30). PEK
/
mice
display similar pancreatic defects and succumb to complications related
to severe hyperglycemia within several weeks of birth (11).
PEK and each of the other eIF2 kinases are proposed to share common
features in their mechanisms of activation in response to stress.
Direct binding with ligands whose concentrations are impacted by stress
or with proteins whose levels or properties are altered by stress can
trigger an activated eIF2 kinase conformation. For example, dsRNA
produced during different viral infections binds cooperatively with two
dsRNA binding domains (dsRBDs) in PKR, leading to enhanced eIF2 kinase
activity (3-5). In the case of HRI, association with chaperones HSP90
and HSC70 is thought to be important for modulating HRI activity in
response to heme deprivation or heat shock (6, 31, 32). Binding with ER chaperone GRP78 or its yeast homologue KAR2 is proposed to regulate the
ER transmembrane protein kinase IRE1 and possibly PEK (33, 34). With
the accumulation of misfolded protein during ER stress, the chaperone
may be titrated from the regulatory sequences shared between IRE1 and
PEK, facilitating autophosphorylation and eIF2 kinase activity.
Accompanying this activated conformation is autophosphorylation involving threonine residues in the so-called activation loop of the
kinase domain. PEK was reported to be autophosphorylated in
vitro at 10 different sites, including threonine 980 located in
the activation loop, and hyperphosphorylation as judged by retarded
migration of PEK in SDS-PAGE is thought to participate in kinase
activation in response to cellular ER stress (13, 14, 35).
In this report, we find that PEK dimerization is required for
hyperphosphorylation and induced eIF2 kinase activity during ER stress,
and this oligomerization is mediated by ER luminal sequences extending
beyond the IRE1 homology domain. PEK association with ER chaperones
GRP78 and GRP94 is released upon ER stress, and deletion of sequences
in PEK that facilitate GRP78 binding leads to activation as judged by
hyperphosphorylation, independent of ER stress. Together, these results
support the model whereby different ER chaperones bind and repress PEK,
and release of this interaction in response to protein misfolding in
the ER facilitates PEK dimerization, autophosphorylation, and induced
eIF2 phosphorylation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
PEK Mutants and Plasmid Constructions--
cDNAs encoding
wild-type or mutant versions of PEK illustrated in Fig.
1 were inserted downstream of the
cytomegalovirus promoter in plasmid pcDNA3 (Invitrogen). These
plasmids include pKM10 (wild-type PEK), pKM24 (PEK-K621M), pKM68 (PEK
C-A), pKM39 (PEK-
1), pKM42 (PEK-
2), pKM43 (PEK-
3), pKM47
(PEK-
4), pKM66 (PEK-
4-K621M), pKM56 (PEK-
1-3), pKM67
(PEK-
1-3-K621M), pKM57 (PEK-
1-4), pKM29 (PEK-
C), and pKM65
(PEK-
C C-A). PEK-K621M, which contains Lys for Met-621 and PEK C-A
containing Ala substitutions for Cys at residues 215, 220, 335, and
452), were made by using the QuikChange mutagenesis kit
(Stratagene). Deletions in PEK were constructed by standard PCR methods
(36). To facilitate immunoprecipitation, the c-Myc epitope was inserted
at the carboxyl terminus of full-length PEK, PEK-
1-3, PEK-
1-4,
and PEK-
C.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Diagram of PEK proteins used to delineate
mechanisms important for induced eIF2 phosphorylation in response to ER
stress. Human PEK, 1115 residues in length, is represented by a
box. PEK contains an amino-terminal signal sequence proposed
to facilitate translocation into the ER, sequences homologous to IRE1
(13, 14, 27), and an ER transmembrane region (TM). The
carboxyl-terminal portion of PEK, located in the cytoplasm, contains
the protein kinase domain. In this catalytic region, there is a
223-residue insert region dividing subdomains IV and V, a feature
conserved among eIF2 kinases. Below the PEK box are mutant
versions of PEK used in this study. Residue substitutions in PEK are
indicated by the wild-type amino acid, position of residue, and the
mutant residue. Portions of PEK that were deleted in-frame are
indicated by brackets with numbers 1,
2, 3, or 4 or C for
carboxyl terminus, and the amino acid residues removed are listed to
the left of the mutant diagrams.
|
|
Cell Culture, Transfection, and ER Stress Treatment--
Human
embryonic kidney (HEK) 293T cells that express SV40 T antigen were
cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (BioWhittaker), supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 50 units/ml penicillin,
50 µg/ml streptomycin, 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) in
humidified air with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Cells grown in
100-mm dishes were transfected with plasmid DNA encoding wild-type or
mutant versions of PEK or vector alone by using LipofectAMINE
(Invitrogen). After culturing the transfected cells for 48 h, cells were treated with 1 µM thapsigargin for 1 h
or 5 mM homocysteine for 3 h. Cells then were washed
twice with 10 ml of ice-cold phosphate-buffered solution. Cell lysates were prepared in 500 µl of lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100 in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 100 mM NaF, 17.5 mM
-glycerolphosphate, 10%
glycerol) supplemented with protease inhibitors (100 µM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.15 µM aprotinin, 1 µM leupeptin, and 1 µM pepstatin) and
clarified by centrifugation.
Immunoblots, Immunoprecipitations, and Kinase Assays--
Rabbit
polyclonal antibody was raised against recombinant protein containing
the carboxyl terminus of human PEK, and the antibody was further
prepared by affinity purification. Polyclonal antibody against c-Myc,
GRP78, GRP94, and HSP70 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Equal amounts of lysates prepared from HEK 293T
cells transfected with the pcDNA3 plasmid expressing PEK were
separated by electrophoresis in an SDS-polyacrylamide gel and
transferred onto nitrocellulose filters. Filters were blocked in a
TBS-T solution containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.2% Tween 20 supplemented with 4% nonfat
milk. Filters were then incubated in TBS-T-containing
PEK-specific antibody and 4% nonfat milk, washed three times in TBS-T,
and incubated with TBS-T-containing goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody
conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Bio-Rad). Filters were washed
three times in TBS-T solution, and the PEK-antibody complex was
detected by enhanced chemiluminescence. Immunoblots measuring eIF2
phosphorylation were carried out with antibody that specifically
recognizes phosphorylated eIF2 at Ser-51 (Research Genetics) (37).
Total eIF2
in lysates was detected by immunoblot using monoclonal
antibody generously provided by Dr. Scot Kimball (Pennsylvania
State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA) that recognizes
either phosphorylated or nonphosphorylated forms of this initiation
factor. The eIF2
-antibody complex was visualized using horseradish
peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibody and
chemiluminescent substrate. To establish linearity in the assay,
proteins were serially diluted in the SDS-PAGE, and multiple
autoradiographic exposures were performed. Immunoblot analyses
measuring phosphorylated PEK were performed using rabbit polyclonal
antiserum that specifically recognizes PEK phosphorylated at
Thr-980.
In experiments incorporating immunoprecipitations, equal amounts of
protein lysates prepared from 293T-derived cells were precleared with
protein G-agarose (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) for 3 h at
4 °C with gentle rocking. Agarose was collected by centrifugation
for 20 s at 12,000 × g, and the supernatants were incubated with goat polyclonal antibody against GRP78 or with mouse
monoclonal antibody against the c-Myc tag for 1 h at 4 °C with
gentle rocking. Antibody complexes were collected by using protein
G-agarose incubated for 3 h at 4 °C, followed by centrifugation for 20 s at 12,000 × g. Agarose pellets were
washed twice with lysis buffer, twice with high salt buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton
X-100), and twice with low salt buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 0.1% Triton X-100). Immunoprecipitated proteins were heated at
95 °C for 3 min in the presence of SDS sample buffer and clarified
by centrifugation. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and PEK, GRP78,
GRP94, or HSP70 was visualized by immunoblot analysis using specific
antibodies. Proteins associated with antibodies were visualized using
horseradish peroxidase-labeled secondary antibody and chemiluminescent
substrate. Linearity of the immunoblot analyses was confirmed by using
serial dilutions of protein sample and by performing multiple
autoradiographic exposures of different length times. PEK
immunoprecipitation kinase assays were carried out as described using
recombinant eIF2
substrate and [
-32P]ATP in a
final ATP concentration of 50 µM (38, 39).
In the study measuring PEK binding with GRP78, we used antibody
specific to this ER chaperone in the immunoprecipitation, followed by
PEK or GRP78 immunoblot analysis of proteins in the immune complex.
GRP78 binding was calculated as the level of PEK in the complex
normalized for the level of immunoprecipitated GRP78. Values were
presented relative to wild-type PEK co-precipitated with GRP78.
In the dimerization study that defined the dimerization region of PEK,
the relative density was determined for each PEK band in the immunoblot
analysis. Oligomerization was calculated as the ratio of the nontagged
PEK protein to the c-Myc-tagged version of PEK-
C in each
immunoprecipitation sample. Values were normalized for wild-type PEK
co-immunoprecipitated with PEK-
C. It is noted that the PEK antibody
was prepared against recombinant protein containing residues 588-1115.
Although it can recognize PEK-
C, which includes residues 1061-1115,
immunoblots using this PEK antibody presumably underrepresent PEK-
C
levels compared with PEK containing the entire carboxyl terminus.
Additionally, we carried out immunoblots using antibody specific to the
c-Myc tag of PEK-
C and found that the relative levels of the
truncated kinase between the preparations were identical to that
measured with the PEK antibody (data not shown). It is noted that HEK
293T cells expressing PEK-
4 consistently expressed less of the
co-transfected c-Myc-PEK-
C. Similar results were obtained with three
independent experiments.
Glycerol Gradient Centrifugation--
Proteins in cell lysates
were separated on a 12-ml exponential 20-40% glycerol gradient in
cell lysis buffer described above. The gradient was subjected to
ultracentrifugation using a Beckman SW41 rotor, at 39,000 rpm for
42 h at 4 °C. One-ml fractions were collected from the
gradients. Equal volumes from each fraction were separated by SDS-PAGE,
and PEK levels were measured by immunoblot analysis using PEK-specific
antibody and densitometry. Size standards used in the glycerol
gradients included albumin, aldolase, catalase, ferritin, and
thyroglobulin (Amersham Biosciences).
 |
RESULTS |
Different ER Stress Conditions Induce PEK Oligomerization--
To
address the multimeric state of PEK during nonstressed and ER-stressed
conditions, lysates from HEK 293T cells were characterized by glycerol
gradient centrifugation, and fractions were assayed for the presence of
PEK by immunoblot. ER stress was induced by adding thapsigargin to the
cells, resulting in the release of calcium from this organelle. In
nonstressed conditions, PEK sedimented with a molecular weight of
appropriately 210,000, which increased to 320,000 in response to ER
stress (Fig. 2). The higher molecular weight form observed in response to ER stress was confirmed using HEK
293T cells that overexpressed PEK by transfection of a pcDNA3 derivative encoding PEK downstream of the cytomegalovirus promoter. Migration of PEK in either condition was significantly higher than its
monomeric size of 125,000, indicating that PEK oligomerized or
interacted with other proteins. Furthermore, immunoblot analysis of PEK
in the higher molecular weight form indicated that it sedimented more
slowly in the SDS-PAGE as compared with nonstressed conditions (Fig. 2,
B and C). The slower mobility in the denaturing
gel electrophoresis is the result of hyperphosphorylation of PEK in
response to ER stress, and this migration difference is absent
following phosphatase treatment or when kinase-defective mutants of PEK
are similarly analyzed (13, 14).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
PEK oligomerizes in response to ER
stress. HEK 293T cells incubated in the presence or absence of the
ER stressing agent, thapsigargin, for 1 h, and cellular lysates
were separated using a 20-40% glycerol gradient. PEK levels were
measured in gradient fractions by immunoblot using antibody specific to
this eIF2 kinase. Autoradiograms generated by the immunoblot analyses
are illustrated below histograms that present the
relative levels of PEK in each gradient fraction as judged by
densitometry. A, HEK 293T cells were prepared in the absence
of ER stress; B and C, cells were subjected to
thapsigargin treatment. C, experiment carried out using HEK
293T cells that were transfected with plasmid pcDNA3 encoding
wild-type PEK under the transcriptional expression of the
cytomegalovirus promoter as described under "Materials and
Methods." Marker molecular weights are ×1,000.
|
|
It has been suggested that oligomerization involving the luminal
portion of the ER transmembrane protein kinase IRE1, and possibly PEK,
is important for their activation in response to ER stress (27, 33, 40,
41). The higher molecular weight measured for PEK during this cellular
stress would be consistent with dimerization between PEK molecules. To
address this premise, we expressed a c-Myc-tagged version of PEK that
was substantially deleted for its cytoplasmic portion (Fig. 1). If PEK
oligomerization is required for PEK phosphorylation in trans
and enhanced eIF2 kinase activity, we reasoned that the PEK-
C would
function as a dominant-negative. By binding with the luminal sequences
of the endogenous full-length PEK, PEK-
C would block appropriate autophosphorylation required to facilitate an activated conformation of
the full-length kinase. Indeed, expression of the truncated PEK-
C in
HEK 293T cells blocked hyperphosphorylation of PEK in response to
thapsigargin treatment as judged by the retarded migration of PEK in
the SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3A).
Moreover, expression of PEK-
C significantly diminished the induction
of eIF2
phosphorylation in response to thapsigargin exposure. Levels
of total eIF2 were unchanged between cell lysates.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Dominant-negative mutant
PEK- C complexes with full-length PEK and
inhibits phosphorylation of eIF2. Plasmids expressing PEK- C or
vector alone were introduced into HEK 293T cells. Following
transfection, the cultured cells were incubated in the presence or
absence of thapsigargin (Tg, panel A)
or homocysteine (Hcy, panel B) as
indicated, collected, and analyzed by immunoblot using antibodies
specific to PEK, phosphorylated eIF2 , or total eIF2 .
Panel C, HEK 293T cells were transfected with
plasmids expressing both wild-type (WT) PEK and c-Myc-tagged
PEK- C or with wild type PEK alone as indicated. PEK- C was
immunoprecipitated from cell lysates using c-Myc antibody. Proteins in
the immune complexes were subjected to SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot
analysis using antibodies that specifically recognize PEK. In the
lower portion of panel C,
wild-type PEK in the cell lysates was measured by immunoblot, showing
similar levels of the eIF2 kinase in the transfected HEK 293T cell
preparations.
|
|
To determine whether PEK-
C functioned as a dominant-negative in
response to other ER stress agents, we carried out an analogous experiment using homocysteine, a known inducer of the UPR (42, 43).
Consistent with our earlier observation, PEK hyperphosphorylation was
induced in response to homocysteine treatment of the HEK 293T cells,
and expression of PEK-
C blocked both autophosphorylation and eIF2
phosphorylation in response to this ER stress agent (Fig.
3B). We conclude that PEK-
C can function as a
dominant-negative in response to different ER stress conditions. To
ascertain whether PEK-
C directly interacts with full-length PEK, the
two forms of the eIF2 kinase were co-expressed in HEK 293T cells, and
the c-Myc-tagged PEK-
C was immunoprecipitated using c-Myc-specific antibody. Proteins in the immune complexes were separated by SDS-PAGE, and PEK was visualized by immunoblot. Wild-type PEK
co-immunoprecipitated with PEK-
C, whereas no full-length kinase
immunoprecipitated with the c-Myc antibody in the absence of PEK-
C
expression (Fig. 3C). Together, our results are consistent
with the idea that in response to ER stress PEK dimerizes through ER
luminal sequences.
ER Luminal Sequences Extending beyond the IRE1 Homology Region
Mediate PEK Dimerization and Activation--
The observation that
PEK-
C complexes with the full-length version of the eIF2 kinase
provided a tool to address the portions of the kinase that mediate
oligomerization. At least four cysteine residues are present in the
luminal portion of PEK from humans, mice, Drosophila
melanogaster, and Caenorhabditis elegans (14). Notably,
two cysteine residues at positions 215 and 220 in the human eIF2 kinase
are invariant between these PEK homologues and IRE1. We substituted
alanine for each of the four cysteine residues in the luminal portion
of PEK-
C and analyzed the ability of this form of the truncated PEK
(PEK-
C C-A) to complex with wild-type PEK. Following the
experimental strategy described earlier, full-length eIF2 kinase was
found to co-immunoprecipitate with the c-Myc-tagged version of PEK-
C
C-A (Fig. 4A). No wild-type
PEK was observed to immunoprecipitate using lysates devoid of the
truncated kinase. We conclude that cysteine residues in the ER luminal
portion of PEK and potential disulfide linkages mediated by these
residues are not required for dimerization between PEK molecules.
Consistent with the ability of the PEK-
C C-A to oligomerize,
expression of this mutant in HEK 293T cells blocked both the
hyperphosphorylation of PEK in response to ER stress and the subsequent
induction of eIF2
phosphorylation (Fig. 4B). Furthermore,
the full-length PEK containing the four cysteine substitutions was
activated, as judged by hyperphosphorylation, in response to
thapsigargin treatment (Fig. 4C). We conclude that the ER
luminal cysteine residues and possible inter- or intramolecular
disulfide bonds are dispensable for PEK dimerization and the mechanism
of activation of this eIF2 kinase.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Cysteine residues in the ER luminal region
are dispensable for dimerization and activation of PEK.
A, wild-type PEK was co-expressed in HEK 293T cells with a
c-Myc-tagged version of PEK- C containing alanine substituted for
each of four cysteine residues in the ER luminal portion of the eIF2
kinase (PEK- C C-A) or with vector alone. Following preparation of
cellular lysates, PEK- C C-A was immunoprecipitated using c-Myc
antibody. Wild type (WT) or the indicated truncated PEK in
the immune complexes was visualized by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot
analysis using PEK-specific antibodies. In the lower
portion of A, wild-type PEK in the cell lysates
was measured by immunoblot, showing similar levels of the kinase in HEK
293T preparations. B, expression plasmids for PEK- C,
PEK- C C-A, or vector alone were transfected into HEK 293T cells and
incubated in the presence or absence of thapsigargin as indicated. PEK,
phosphorylated eIF2 , or total eIF2 was visualized by immunoblot
using antibodies that specifically recognize these proteins.
C, wild-type (WT) PEK or PEK C-A with alanine
substituted at each of the four cysteine residues was expressed into
HEK 293T cells. Following incubation in the presence or absence of
thapsigargin, cell lysates were prepared and subjected to SDS-PAGE,
followed by immunoblot analysis. PEK was visualized using antibodies
specific to this eIF2 kinase, and hyperphosphorylation was assessed by
the molecular weight shift.
|
|
To demarcate the portions of PEK required for dimerization, we next
deleted four different regions in the ER luminal portion of PEK and
analyzed the ability of these mutant proteins to complex with PEK-
C
(Fig. 1). As described earlier for the co-immunoprecipitation experiments using the full-length version of PEK, the different deleted
forms of PEK were distinguishable based on their molecular weight
differences as viewed in the SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot analysis
using PEK-specific antibody (Fig. 5).
Deletion of either regions 1, 2, or 3 reduced co-immunoprecipitation
with c-Myc-tagged PEK-
C to between 10 and 22% of that measured for
full-length PEK. By comparison, PEK deleted for region 4 retained the
ability to dimerize (Fig. 5). By combining deletions 1, 2, and 3 into a
single c-Myc-tagged PEK mutant, we found a near abolishment of
dimerization, as measured by co-immunoprecipitation with full-length PEK (Fig. 5B). A similar inability to dimerize was obtained
when PEK deleted for all four regions was analyzed for
co-immunoprecipitation with wild-type PEK. We conclude that sequences
extending beyond the IRE1 homology region in the ER luminal portion of
PEK are important for dimerization.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Sequences extending beyond the IRE1 homology
region facilitate PEK dimerization. PEK mutants deleted for
different portions of the ER luminal domain were co-expressed in HEK
293T cells with either PEK- C or wild-type (WT) PEK as
indicated. PEK- C, PEK- 1-4, or PEK- 1-3 tagged with c-Myc as
highlighted was immunoprecipitated using equal amounts of cell lysates
and antibody specific to the c-Myc epitope. Wild-type or truncated PEK
in the immune complexes were separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by
immunoblot analysis using PEK-specific antibodies (B).
A, a histogram representing the oligomerization
between the Myc-tagged PEK- C and the co-expressed versions of PEK
that were not tagged. Histograms represent the ratio of
nontagged PEK to c-Myc-tagged PEK- C in each immune complex (see
"Materials and Methods"). Ratios were normalized for wild-type PEK.
It is noted that HEK 293T cells expressing PEK- 4 consistently
expressed less of the co-transfected c-Myc-PEK- C. C,
nontagged PEK in the HEK 293T lysates was measured by immunoblot using
PEK-specific antibody, showing similar levels of these nontagged kinase
versions in the cell preparations.
|
|
Dimerization is proposed to be an important step leading to
hyperphosphorylation of PEK and induced eIF2 phosphorylation in response to ER stress. We characterized the levels of
autophosphorylation of PEK-
1-3 as judged by the molecular weight
shift following SDS-PAGE and immunoblot (Fig.
6). While wild-type PEK was
hyperphosphorylated in response to ER stress, minimal phosphorylation
of PEK-
1-3 was detected in the thapsigargin-exposed cells, with a
molecular weight identical to that observed for the repressed
conditions, or in PEK-
1-3 protein containing a kinase-inactivating
Met substitution for Lys-621 (Fig. 6A). We next examined the
impact of
1-3 on the eIF2 kinase activity of PEK. The levels of
phosphorylation of the
subunit of eIF2 in ER-stressed HEK 293T
cells overexpressing wild-type PEK were significantly elevated compared
with those transfected with a PEK-
1-3 cDNA or vector alone
(Fig. 6B). Levels of overexpressed wild-type PEK and
PEK-
1-3 were similar as judged by immunoblot of whole cell lysates.
To further compare eIF2 kinase activities between wild-type PEK and
PEK-
1-3, the protein kinases were immunoprecipitated using antibody
specific to PEK and assayed for phosphorylation of recombinant eIF2
substrate. Consistent with the earlier in vivo analysis,
eIF2 kinase activity of the immunoprecipitated PEK-
1-3 was
significantly reduced compared with wild-type PEK (Fig. 6C).
We conclude that ER luminal sequences in PEK that mediate dimerization
are required for full induction of eIF2 kinase activity.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Deletion of PEK dimerization sequences
reduces eIF2 kinase activity. HEK 293T cells were transfected with
pcDNA3-derived plasmids encoding wild-type PEK, PEK- 1-3, the
kinase-inactivated PEK- 1 3-K621M, or vector alone and subjected to
ER stress using thapsigargin. A, cellular lysates were
prepared from the HEK 293T-derived cells in the presence or absence of
ER stress, and PEK was visualized by immunoblot. B,
phosphorylated eIF2 and total eIF2 in the transfected HEK 293T
cells subjected to ER stress were visualized by immunoblot analysis
using antibody specific to the phosphorylated form of the protein or
using antibody that recognizes both phosphorylated and
nonphosphorylated eIF2 . Relative levels of phosphorylated eIF2
are represented in the histogram. PEK levels in the samples
were analyzed by immunoblot. C, PEK in the HEK 293T lysates
was immunoprecipitated using PEK-specific antibody and immune complexes
containing equal amounts of transfected wild-type or PEK- 1-3 were
incubated in the presence of [ -32P]ATP and recombinant
eIF2 . Following separation of proteins in the kinase reaction
mixture by SDS-PAGE, radiolabeled eIF2 was visualized by
autoradiography. Relative levels of in vitro phosphorylated
eIF2 as determined by liquid scintillation counting are represented
as a histogram. PEK levels in the immune complexes were
measured by immunoblot analysis.
|
|
Regulation of PEK Involves Association of Chaperones with ER
Luminal Portion of the eIF2 Kinase--
ER chaperone GRP78 is proposed
to control the kinase activity of IRE1, and possibly PEK, through
direct protein-protein interaction (33, 34). To address whether PEK
associates in a regulated fashion with chaperones, we
immunoprecipitated the ER chaperones GRP78 and GRP94 or the cytoplasmic
chaperone HSP70 from lysates prepared from HEK 293T cells cultured in
the presence or absence of ER stress. Proteins in the immune complexes
were separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot analysis using
antibodies specific for each chaperone or for PEK (Fig.
7). PEK co-immunoprecipitated with GRP78
and GRP94, and this association was significantly reduced in response
to ER stress. By comparison, no association was detected between PEK
and the cytoplasmic chaperone HSP70. These results combined with our
earlier glycerol gradient analysis are consistent with the idea that
PEK associates with ER chaperones such as GRP78 or GRP94 during
nonstressed conditions.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
PEK complexes with ER-resident chaperones
GRP78 and GRP94 but not cytoplasmic chaperone HSP70. HEK 293T
cells were grown in the presence or absence of thapsigargin, and
following lysate preparations, antibodies specific to GRP78, GRP94, or
HSP70 were used to immunoprecipitate the indicated chaperone. In the
bottom panel, proteins from each immune complex
were separated by SDS-PAGE, and antibodies against GRP78, GRP94, or
HSP70 that were used in the immunoprecipitation were used to visualize
this chaperone by immunoblot. Top panel, in
parallel, the presence of PEK was measured in each of the immune
complexes using PEK-specific antibody and immunoblot analysis.
|
|
The association of PEK with ER chaperones indicates that
sequences in the luminal portion of PEK facilitate this protein-protein interaction. To address which region of PEK is required for interaction with the chaperones, we expressed the PEK mutants deleted for different
ER luminal segments in HEK 293T cells and characterized their
association with GRP78 as judged by co-immunoprecipitation using
antibody specific to GRP78. We found that deletion of regions 1-3,
required for dimerization between PEK molecules, were dispensable for
interaction with GRP78 (Fig. 8). By
contrast, PEK deleted for region 4, which had no impact on PEK
dimerization, significantly reduced GRP78 to levels found for the PEK
mutant devoid of regions 1-4. As a control, we found similar amounts
of GRP78 in the immune complexes as judged by immunoblot (Fig.
8B). Furthermore, similar amounts of wild-type and mutant
versions of PEK were expressed in the HEK 293T cells in whole cell
lysates (Fig. 8C), confirming that although PEK-
4 and
PEK-
1-4 were available for interaction with GRP78, there was no
complex formed between this ER chaperone and the eIF2 kinase. We
conclude that the major domain for PEK interaction with GRP78 chaperone
resides in the ER luminal sequences immediately flanking the
transmembrane region of PEK. This GRP78 binding region is distinct from
the portion of the ER luminal sequences that mediates PEK
dimerization.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Identification of the luminal portion of PEK
that associates with GRP78. GRP78 was immunoprecipitated in
lysates prepared from HEK 293T cells expressing wild type PEK,
PEK- 4, PEK- 1-3, or PEK- 1-4. Proteins in the immune complexes
were separated by SDS-PAGE, and the presence of PEK (A) or
GRP78 (B) was visualized by immunoblot analysis using
antibodies specific to these proteins. As a control, PEK levels were
measured in whole cell lysates (C). Levels of PEK bound to
GRP78 are illustrated in the histogram in the top
panel. GRP78 binding was calculated as the level of PEK in
the complex normalized for the level of immunoprecipitated GRP78.
Values were presented relative to wild-type (WT) PEK
co-precipitated with GRP78.
|
|
PEK Mutant That Is Blocked for GRP78 Association Is Constitutively
Hyperphosphorylated--
GRP78 is proposed to function as a repressor
of PEK, binding with the eIF2 kinase and maintaining it in an inactive
conformation. With the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the lumen
of the ER during stress, GRP78 would be titrated from PEK, allowing PEK to hyperphosphorylate and assume an activated kinase state. Deletion of
region 4 significantly reduced binding between GRP78 and PEK. In the
immunoblot in Fig. 8C, PEK-
4 migrated more slowly than the wild-type PEK, suggesting a higher degree of autophosphorylation. To further explore the model, we measured PEK hyperphosphorylation by
migration in SDS-PAGE using cells containing the different versions of
PEK in response to the presence or absence of ER stress. In response to
thapsigargin treatment, expressed wild-type PEK shifted to a higher
molecular weight form (Fig. 9,
bottom panel). To independently confirm that
wild-type PEK is phosphorylated in response to the ER stress, we
carried out a second immunoblot analysis using antibodies specific to
PEK phosphorylated at Thr-980. Phosphorylated wild-type PEK was readily
visible in the thapsigargin-exposed cells, whereas minimal
phosphorylation was detected in the absence of this ER stress (Fig. 9,
top panel). By comparison, PEK-
1-3 that is
severely impaired for dimerization and eIF2 kinase activity showed
little change in migration as judged by the immunoblot analysis in
response to ER stress and exhibited no phosphorylation as measured
using the antibody specific to phosphorylated PEK. These results are
consistent with the model that dimerization is a prerequisite for
hyperphosphorylation of PEK in response to ER stress. In the example of
PEK-
4, protein migration in the immunoblot analysis suggests that
this PEK mutant is constitutively hyperphosphorylated independently of
ER stress (Fig. 8C and 9). Supporting this premise is the
observation that expression of a version of PEK-
4 containing the
kinase-defective K621M substitution migrated faster compared with the
kinase-active counterpart (Fig. 9, bottom panel).
Finally, immunoblot measurements using antibody specific to
phosphorylated PEK demonstrated that PEK-
4 is phosphorylated independently of ER stress (Fig. 9, top panel).
As expected, no PEK phosphorylation is detected in the PEK-
4 version
containing the K621M substitution. Together, these results are
consistent with the idea that mutations contributing to the release of
GRP78 binding to PEK lead to constitutive hyperphosphorylation and
activation of PEK.

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Deletions in PEK that block GRP78 interaction
lead to constitutive hyperphosphorylation of PEK. HEK 293T cells
expressing wild-type PEK, PEK- 1-3, PEK- 4, kinase-inactive
PEK- 4-K621M, or vector alone, were treated in the presence of
absence of thapsigargin. Cellular lysates were prepared from the HEK
293T-derived cells and phosphorylated PEK (top
panel) or total PEK (bottom panel)
were visualized by immunoblot.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We describe the characterization of two regions in the ER luminal
portion of PEK that carry out distinct functions in the regulation of
this eIF2 kinase in response to ER stress. The first described region
mediates PEK oligomerization. Using c-Myc-tagged versions of PEK in
immunoprecipitation assays, it was found that sequences including, but
not limited to, the IRE1 homology region are required for interaction
between PEK molecules (Fig. 5). Deletion of this oligomerization region
blocked induction of eIF2 kinase activity in response to ER stress,
emphasizing the importance of this protein-protein interaction in the
mechanism of PEK activation (Fig. 6).
The second characterized region of PEK facilitates interaction with ER
chaperones. During nonstressed conditions, PEK was observed to
associate with ER chaperones GRP78 and GRP94 (Fig. 7). Minimum
chaperone interaction was detected during ER stress conditions. Because
ER stress and the accompanying phosphorylation of eIF2 significantly
reduce translation, it could be suggested that diminished PEK
association with ER chaperones occurs simply because there is less
synthesis of the eIF2 kinase and therefore reduced chaperone-mediated
folding of PEK. Arguing against this idea is our observation that the
observed chaperone interaction with PEK is restricted to ER-based
chaperones, with no detectable association with cytoplasmic HSP70 (Fig.
7). More definitively, we observed that ER luminal sequences flanking
the transmembrane domain are required for GRP78 interaction, and
deletion of this portion in PEK-
4 abolished binding with this ER
chaperone and led to phosphorylation of this eIF2 kinase even in the
absence of ER stress (Figs. 8 and 9). These results suggest that GRP78 serves as a repressor of PEK activity, and its release in response to
ER stress facilitates phosphorylation of eIF2 kinase accompanying its
activation. PEK autophosphorylation also requires the ability to
homo-oligomerize, suggesting that this phosphorylation takes place
between PEK molecules during ER stress conditions (Fig. 9). Analysis of
PEK by glycerol gradient centrifugation supports the model that there
is a dynamic change in the molecular weight of the PEK complex when the
ER organelle is subjected to stress (Fig. 2).
Mechanisms Regulating Protein Kinases Involved in the ER Stress
Response--
In mammalian cells, PEK and IRE1 function in concert to
recognize ER stress and implement a stress response. It is curious that
while the UPR is also conserved in yeast, only IRE1 is present in its
stress pathway. As predicted by the sequence homology in their ER
luminal regions, recognition of ER stress by IRE1 and PEK appears to
share certain common features. Shamu and Walter (40) reported that
overexpression of truncated IRE1, removed for both the
carboxyl-terminal kinase domain and the endoribonuclease region
important for processing of HAC1 mRNA, in yeast cells
also expressing wild-type IRE1 blocked the UPR. Similar to the PEK oligomerization described in Fig. 5, hetero-oligomerization was found
between the truncated and full-length IRE1 proteins, although visualization of the yeast IRE1 protein complex required cross-linking treatment (40). Liu et al. (27) reported that a chimeric
yeast IRE1 substituted for its ER luminal region with sequences from C. elegans PEK could function to induce the UPR in yeast
cells, suggesting common features in the control of IRE1 and PEK.
Oligomerization also appears to be important for IRE1 function in
mammalian cells. IRE1 was found to shift to a higher molecular weight
form, interpreted to be a homodimer, upon treatment of rat pancreatic
cells AR42J with the reducing agent, dithiothreitol (33). Furthermore,
PEK also shifted to a complex of greater than 600,000 molecular weight,
suggestive of upwards of six PEK polypeptides, in response to
dithiothreitol exposure. In a similar analysis using HEK 293T cells
treated with thapsigargin, we observed a shift in PEK size to
~320,000, suggestive of a complex between two PEK molecules (Fig. 2).
This may represent a functional difference between these two cell
types. In both studies, the higher molecular weight form of PEK
appeared to be phosphorylated as judged by the slower mobility in
SDS-PAGE.
Regulation of IRE1 activity also appears to involve interaction between
this protein kinase and GRP78. Overexpression of GRP78 (BiP) in Chinese
hamster ovary cells prevented the UPR as measured by endogenous GRP78
expression and facilitated continued translation of cellular mRNAs
in response to calcium ionophore (A23187) or tunicamycin treatment
(44). It was uncertain whether such GRP78 expression was the result of
increased GRP78 repression of PEK or IRE1 or rather the result of
facilitated protein folding accompanying increased amounts of this ER
chaperone. Our characterization of the GRP78 binding region in PEK
would support the repressor model. Direct GRP78 interaction with mouse
IRE1 and PEK was also reported and was suggested to be involved in
inhibition of the kinase activities during the nonstressed state (33).
The observation that PEK-
4, reduced for interaction with GRP78, is
phosphorylated independently of ER stress suggests that ER chaperone
binding with PEK is the predominant mechanism of repressing PEK in
nonstressed conditions in the HEK 293T cells. We observed that in
addition to GRP78, GRP94 can complex with PEK, and this association is significantly reduced in response to thapsigargin treatment. Thus, different ER chaperones may participate in the regulation of
PEK.
Molecular Chaperones in the Regulation of eIF2
Kinases--
Molecular chaperones are also important for regulation of
members of the eIF2 kinase family. Matts and colleagues (6, 31, 32, 45)
have championed the role of cytoplasmic chaperones in the stress
recognition and activation of HRI. HSP90 and HSC70 associate with HRI
and are thought to function as molecular chaperones. Upon converting
HRI to a conformation capable of binding to heme, maintaining the eIF2
kinase in an inactive state, HSP90 is released from the so-called
transformed HRI. However, HSC70 retains its association with
transformed HRI, maintaining the eIF2 kinase in an inactive state (32,
45). In this role, HSC70 would function analogously to GRP78 as a
repressor of eIF2 kinase activity. In addition to activation by heme
deficiency, the activity of HRI is induced by heat shock or oxidative
stress in hemin-supplemented lysates (6, 46). Misfolded protein that
accumulates in the cytoplasm of cells subjected to heat or oxidative
stress would sequester HSC70 from HRI, facilitating kinase activation
and eIF2 phosphorylation. The structural basis for HSC70 inhibition of HRI activity is not currently understood. In the example of PEK, accumulation of unfolded protein in the ER lumen in response to an
excessive secretory pathway load or upon exposure of ER stressing agents would titrate ER chaperones from PEK, allowing for activation of
the eIF2 kinase. The cytoplasmic chaperone HSP90 is also thought to
facilitate maturation and serve as an inhibitor of PKR and yeast GCN2
(47, 48).
Role of Oligomerization and Autophosphorylation in Activation of
PEK and eIF2 Kinases--
Oligomerization and autophosphorylation are
two conserved features in the mechanisms activating eIF2 kinases. In
the well studied example of PKR, two dsRBDs are required for
dimerization between PKR polypeptides (4, 5, 49-51). Such
oligomerization is facilitated by the cooperative binding of dsRNA
between the dsRBDs, although protein-protein contacts may also
participate. Additionally, we have proposed that association of PKR to
ribosomes enhances the localized concentration of PKR required to
facilitate dimerization (37, 52). Binding of dsRNA to the dsRBDs also contributes to an activated conformational change in PKR involving the
release of a proposed inhibitory interaction between a region flanking
dsRBD-2 and the kinase catalytic domain (39, 53). In the case of PEK,
the inactive state is maintained by GRP78 association with region 4. Such GRP78 binding is suggested to preclude oligomerization between PEK
polypeptides involving regions 1-3. GRP78 binding with region 4 may
sterically hinder association between PEK polypeptides or maintain
regions 1-3 in a conformation not conducive to homodimerization.
Release of ER chaperones from PEK in response to ER stress would allow
for PEK oligomerization involving the ER luminal sequences. PEK
association with the ER membrane would ensure that this eIF2 kinase is
present in a localized fashion in the cell, analogous to the ribosome
association of PKR. However, the division of the ER transmembrane PEK
into cytoplasmic and ER luminal portions would preclude an
amino-terminal regulatory domain interaction with the kinase domain as
proposed for PKR. Instead, oligomerization between PEK luminal
sequences would bring cytoplasmic domains in close proximity.
Following oligomerization, autophosphorylation in trans is
important for promoting activation of eIF2 kinases. In the example of
PKR, phosphorylation occurs between polypeptides at multiple serine and
threonine residues. Notably, Thr-446 and Thr-451 in the activation loop
of the catalytic domain of PKR are a prerequisite for induced eIF2
kinase activity (37, 54). Mass spectrometric analysis of PEK
phosphorylated in vitro has identified 10 serine, threonine,
and tyrosine residues in the kinase domain (35), including the
activation loop residue Thr-980 that was specifically recognized by our
phospho-PEK antibody (Fig. 9). Given the importance of the analogous
residue in PKR (Thr-446), Thr-980 and the adjacent Thr-985, a residue
not yet identified as being phosphorylated, are important candidates
for regulation of PEK activation. PEK phosphorylation of eIF2 would
contribute to an increased UPR and a dampened general translation,
enhancing the protein folding capacity of the ER as required to remedy
the cellular stress condition.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Jana Narasimhan, Kirk Staschke, and
Sheree Wek for helpful discussions and the Biochemistry Biotechnology
Facility at Indiana University for technical support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported in part by American Heart
Association fellowships 0010131Z (to K. M.) and 00205572 (to
K. M. V.), National Institutes of Health Grants R01GM49164 and
R01GM643540, and American Cancer Society Grant RPG MBC-87806 (to
R. C. W.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 317-274-0549;
Fax: 317-274-4686; E-mail: rwek@iupui.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200903200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
eIF2, eukaryotic
initiation factor-2;
UPR, unfolded protein response;
dsRNA, double-stranded RNA;
dsRBD, dsRNA binding domain;
HEK, human
embryonic kidney;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
PEK, pancreatic eIF2
kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Wek, R. C.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
491-496[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Clemens, M. J.
(1996)
in
Translational Control
(Hershey, J. W. B.
, Mathews, M. B.
, and Sonenberg, N., eds)
, pp. 139-172, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 3.
|
Proud, C. G.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
241-246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Kaufman, R. J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
11693-11695[Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Williams, B. R.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
6112-6120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Chen, J.-J.
(2000)
in
Translational Control of Gene Expression
(Sonenberg, N.
, Hershey, J. W. B.
, and Mathews, M. B., eds)
, pp. 529-546, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 7.
|
Han, A. P., Yu, C., Lu, L.,
Fujiwara, Y.,
Browne, C.,
Chin, G.,
Fleming, M.,
Leboulch, P.,
Orkin, S. H.,
and Chen, J. J.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
6909-6918[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Hinnebusch, A. G.
(2000)
in
Translational Control of Gene Expression
(Sonenberg, N.
, Hershey, J. W. B.
, and Mathews, M. B., eds)
, pp. 185-244, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 9.
|
Berlanga, J. J.,
Santoyo, J.,
and De Haro, C.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
265,
754-762[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Sood, R.,
Porter, A. C.,
Olsen, D. A.,
Cavener, D. R.,
and Wek, R. C.
(2000)
Genetics
154,
787-801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Harding, H. P.,
Novoa, I.,
Zhang, Y.,
Zeng, H.,
Wek, R.,
Schapira, M.,
and Ron, D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
6,
1099-1108[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Shi, Y.,
Vattem, K. M.,
Sood, R., An, J.,
Liang, J.,
Stramm, L.,
and Wek, R. C.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
7499-7509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Harding, H. P.,
Zhang, Y.,
and Ron, D.
(1999)
Nature
397,
271-274[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Sood, R.,
Porter, A. C., Ma, K.,
Quilliam, L. A.,
and Wek, R. C.
(2000)
Biochem. J.
345,
281-293
|
| 15.
|
Harding, H. P.,
Zhang, Y.,
Bertolotti, A.,
Zeng, H.,
and Ron, D.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
5,
897-904[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Brostrom, C. O.,
and Brostrom, M. A.
(1998)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol.
58,
79-125[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Kaufman, R. J.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1211-1233[Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Ron, D.,
and Harding, H. P.
(2000)
in
Translational Control of Gene Expression
(Sonenberg, N.
, Hershey, J. W. B.
, and Mathews, M. B., eds)
, pp. 547-560, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 19.
|
Hershey, J. W. B.,
and Merrick, W. C.
(2000)
in
Translational Control of Gene Expression
(Sonenberg, N.
, Hershey, J. W. B.
, and Mathews, W. B., eds)
, pp. 33-88, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 20.
|
Patil, C.,
and Walter, P.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
13,
349-355[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Travers, K. J.,
Patil, C. K.,
Wodicka, L.,
Lockhart, D. J.,
Weissman, J. S.,
and Walter, P.
(2000)
Cell
101,
249-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Cox, J. S.,
Shamu, C. E.,
and Walter, P.
(1993)
Cell
73,
1197-1206[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Mori, K., Ma, W.,
Gething, M. J.,
and Sambrook, J.
(1993)
Cell
74,
743-756[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Tirasophon, W.,
Welihinda, A. A.,
and Kaufman, R. J.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1812-1824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Wang, X. Z.,
Harding, H. P.,
Zhang, Y.,
Jolicoeur, E. M.,
Kuroda, M.,
and Ron, D.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5708-5717[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Shen, X.,
Ellis, R. E.,
Lee, K.,
Liu, C. Y.,
Yang, K.,
Solomon, A.,
Yoshida, H.,
Morimoto, R.,
Kurnit, D. M.,
Mori, K.,
and Kaufman, R. J.
(2001)
Cell
107,
893-903[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Liu, C. Y.,
Schroder, M.,
and Kaufman, R. J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
24881-24885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Delepine, M.,
Nicolino, M.,
Barrett, T.,
Golamaully, M.,
Lathrop, G. M.,
and Julier, C.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
25,
406-409[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Thornton, C. M.,
Carson, D. J.,
and Stewart, F. J.
(1997)
Pediatr. Pathol. Lab. Med.
17,
487-496[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Castelnau, P., Le,
Merrer, M.,
Diatloff-Zito, C.,
Marquis, E.,
Tete, M. J.,
and Robert, J. J.
(2000)
Eur. J. Pediatr.
159,
631-633[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Uma, S.,
Hartson, S. D.,
Chen, J. J.,
and Matts, R. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
11648-11656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Uma, S.,
Thulasiraman, V.,
and Matts, R. L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
5861-5871[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Bertolotti, A.,
Zhang, Y.,
Hendershot, L. M.,
Harding, H. P.,
and Ron, D.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
326-332[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Okamura, K.,
Kimata, Y.,
Higashio, H.,
Tsuru, A.,
and Kohno, K.
(2000)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
279,
445-450[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Ma, Y., Lu, Y.,
Zeng, H.,
Ron, D., Mo, W.,
and Neubert, T. A.
(2001)
Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.
15,
1693-1700[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Kramer, M. F.,
and Coen, D. M.
(1999)
in
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
(Ausubel, F. M.
, Brent, R.
, Kingston, R. E.
, Moore, D. D.
, Seidman, J. G.
, Smith, J. A.
, Struhl, K.
, Albright, L. M.
, Coen, D. M.
, and Varki, A., eds), Vol. 3
, pp. 15.1.1-15.1.15, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 37.
|
Vattem, K. M.,
Staschke, K. A.,
and Wek, R. C.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
3674-3684[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Zhu, S.,
Sobolev, A. Y.,
and Wek, R. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24989-24994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Vattem, K. M.,
Staschke, K. A.,
Zhu, S.,
and Wek, R. C.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
1143-1153[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Shamu, C. E.,
and Walter, P.
(1996) |