Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M110649200 on January 30, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 21, 18753-18762, May 24, 2002
Macrophages Inhibit Salmonella Typhimurium
Replication through MEK/ERK Kinase and Phagocyte NADPH Oxidase
Activities*
Carrie M.
Rosenberger
and
B. Brett
Finlay§
From the Departments of Microbiology and Immunology and
Biotechnology Laboratory, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
Received for publication, November 6, 2001, and in revised form, January 29, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Host responses during the later stages of
Salmonella-macrophage interactions are critical to
controlling infection but have not been well characterized. After
24 h of infection, nearly half of interferon-
-primed murine RAW
264.7 macrophage-like cells infected by Salmonella enterica
serovar Typhimurium contained filamentous bacteria. Bacterial
filamentation indicates a defect in completing replication and has been
previously observed in bacteria responding to a variety of stresses. To
understand whether macrophage gene expression was responsible for this
effect on Salmonella Typhimurium replication, we
used gene arrays to profile interferon-
-primed RAW 264.7 cell gene
expression following infection. We observed an increase in MEK1 kinase
mRNA at 8 h, an increase in MEK protein at 24 h, and
measured phosphorylation of MEK's downstream target kinase, ERK1/2,
throughout the 24-h infection period. Treatment of cells with MEK
kinase inhibitors significantly reduced numbers of filamentous bacteria
observed within macrophages after 24 h and increased the number of
intracellular colony-forming units. Phagocyte NADPH oxidase
inhibitors and antioxidants also significantly reduced bacterial
filamentation. Either MEK kinase or phagocyte oxidase inhibitors could
be added 4-8 h after infection and still significantly decrease
bacterial filamentation. Oxidase activity appears to mediate bacterial
filamentation in parallel to MEK kinase signaling, while inducible
nitric-oxide synthase inhibitors had no significant effect on
bacterial morphology. In summary, Salmonella Typhimurium
infection of interferon-
-primed macrophages triggers a MEK kinase
cascade at later infection times, and both MEK kinase and phagocyte
NADPH oxidase activity impair bacterial replication. These two
signaling pathways mediate a host bacteriostatic pathway and may play
an important role in innate host defense against intracellular pathogens.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Macrophages serve a central role in host defense against
pathogenic microbes by nature of their ability to rapidly recognize bacterial components, phagocytose pathogens, and activate an arsenal of
antimicrobial effectors to contain and eliminate the microbe. A
macrophage's repertoire of antimicrobial effectors includes the
phagocyte NADPH oxidase
(phox),1 inducible
nitric-oxide synthase (iNOS), cationic antimicrobial peptides, and an
endosomal system designed to restrict nutrients and traffic
phagocytosed microbes to degradative lysosomes. Phox is a multisubunit
complex that can be assembled on intracellular membranes, such as the
phagosomal membrane and the plasma membrane. Phox activity produces
superoxide that can lead to the generation of other toxic reactive
oxygen intermediates (ROI), such as hydrogen peroxide, and combine with
nitric oxide to generate peroxynitrite, all of which can directly cause
oxidative damage to bacteria (1). Macrophages activate many signaling
pathways following recognition of bacterial components, although the
relative contribution of each pathway to the induction of antibacterial
effectors is not fully understood. For example, macrophages activate
MEK/ERK kinase signaling in response to bacterial infection (2). MEK is
a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase that is activated by
phosphorylation following Salmonella enterica serovar
Typhimurium infection of macrophages in a Raf-dependent or
-independent manner (3). Upon activation, MEK phosphorylates the
downstream kinase ERK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase), which
then dimerizes and translocates to the nucleus where it activates
transcription factors such as Elk-1 to modify gene expression (4).
MEK/ERK signaling is involved in the activation of oxidative and
nitrosative bursts, endosomal trafficking, and increased macrophage
differentiation and therefore is a strong candidate for being
involved in the augmentation of macrophage defenses against
intracellular pathogens (5).
In the murine model of human typhoid fever, Salmonella
Typhimurium resides intracellularly within macrophages (6) in a specialized vacuole, and macrophages appear to be a preferred site for
bacterial replication (7). As this intramacrophage niche helps to
shield Salmonella from killing by components of the innate
and humoral immune defenses, the responses of infected macrophages are
thought to serve a central role in determining disease outcome (7). The
interplay between host resistance factors and bacterial virulence
factors are critical to determining the outcome of infection. On the
host side, macrophages serve to limit the course of infection by
destroying intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium or
restricting bacterial replication by modifying its intracellular
environment. Macrophages limit the availability of cations and
nutrients required by Salmonella within its intracellular vacuole (8). Both phox and iNOS are required for effective host
resistance against Salmonella Typhimurium in the murine
typhoid model (9-11). Cytokines secreted during infection, including
interferon (IFN)-
(12), are essential for host defense against
Salmonella infection. IFN-
-primed macrophages may be
important in mediating bacterial clearance in immune mice (7), and
IFN-
stimulation up-regulates the expression of many of these
antimicrobial effectors and impairs replication of
Salmonella Typhimurium within macrophages (12). On the
bacterial side, while Salmonella Typhimurium initiate a
pro-inflammatory response by macrophages, some bacteria are able to
secure an intracellular niche within a distinct endosomal compartment
where replication occurs 4-8 h after infection. Bacterial virulence
protein mutants that cannot replicate within macrophages are strongly
attenuated for systemic disease within the murine typhoid model,
reinforcing the importance of Salmonella-macrophage interactions (13, 14).
Distinct antibacterial activities have been observed in macrophages at
different times during infection (10). The responses of macrophages to
intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium at later times
post-infection are likely critical in mediating the outcome of
infection but have not been well characterized, with most of the work
centered upon the first few hours of infection. We demonstrate here
that IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells are capable of
restricting the bacterial replication that is permitted by naïve RAW 264.7 cells. To identify host factors mediating this control of bacterial replication, we have used gene arrays to examine
the transcriptional responses of IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells to
intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium at 8 h
post-infection. We identified up-regulated MEK1 kinase mRNA levels,
which were confirmed at the levels of RNA, protein, and kinase
activity. MEK activity correlated with inhibition of bacterial
replication and induction of bacterial filamentation, an indicator of
bacterial stress. MEK kinase and phox activities can impact each other, and we observed that phox inhibitors mimicked the effect of MEK inhibitors in reducing bacterial filamentation. MEK kinase or oxidase
inhibitors added later during infection could significantly decrease
bacterial filamentation, suggesting that MEK and phox activities at
later times are primarily responsible for mediating bacterial
filamentation. While phox activity can positively regulate as well as
be regulated itself by MEK kinase activity, our results suggest that
MEK and phox activities function in parallel to mediate bacterial
filamentation. In summary, we provide evidence that Salmonella Typhimurium infection of IFN-
-primed
macrophages triggers a MEK kinase cascade and ROI production at later
infection times and that both MEK kinase and phox activities impair
bacterial replication, which is reflected by filamentation.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Growth Conditions of Bacterial and Macrophage Cells--
The
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain SL1344 was
obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA)
and grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth. The plasmid pAT113-GFP (kindly
provided by Dr. J. L. Gaillard, Paris, France) was introduced into
SL1344 by electroporation (kindly provided by Dr. L. Knodler, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada). The
Salmonella Typhimurium strain cs401 (14028S
StrR) was kindly provided by Dr. S. Miller (University of
Washington, Seattle, WA). For macrophage infections, 10 ml of LB in a
125-ml flask was inoculated from a frozen glycerol stock and cultured overnight with shaking at 37 °C to stationary phase. The murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 (TIB-72; ATCC) was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Invitrogen,
Burlington, Ontario, Canada) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated
fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen) without antibiotics at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Cultures were used between passage numbers 6 and
20. For the bacterial colony-forming unit (cfu) enumeration experiments described in Fig. 1, RAW 264.7 cells were either unprimed or cultured with 20 units/ml (2 ng/ml) IFN-
(R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN)
for 20-24 h prior to infection. For all subsequent experiments, cells
were primed with IFN-
prior to infection.
Infection Conditions--
For immunofluorescence and cfu
experiments, IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells (1 × 105
cells/well) were seeded in 24-well plates. Bacteria were diluted in
culture medium to give a nominal multiplicity of infection of ~100,
bacteria were centrifuged onto the monolayer at 1000 rpm for 10 min to
synchronize infection, and the infection was allowed to proceed for 20 min in a 37 °C, 5% CO2 incubator. Cells were washed
three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove
extracellular bacteria and then incubated in DMEM + 10% FBS containing
100 µg/ml gentamicin (Sigma, Oakville, Ontario, Canada) to kill any
remaining extracellular bacteria and prevent re-infection. After 2 h, the gentamicin concentration was lowered to 10 µg/ml and
maintained throughout the assay. Intracellular survival/replication of
Salmonella Typhimurium SL1344 was determined using the
gentamicin resistance assay, as described previously (15). Briefly,
cells were washed twice with PBS to remove gentamicin, lysed with 1%
Triton X-100/0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate in PBS at various times
post-infection, and numbers of intracellular bacteria enumerated from
cfu counts on LB agar plates. Under these infection conditions,
macrophages contained an average of 1 bacterium per cell after 2 h
as assessed by standard plate counts, which permitted analysis of
macrophages at 24 h post-infection.
Immunofluorescence--
IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were seeded on 12-mm diameter glass
coverslips in 24-well plates. Following infection with
Salmonella Typhimurium for 24 h, fixation was performed with 2.5% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 37 °C. Fixed cells were washed three times with PBS and blocked in PBS containing 10% normal
goat serum for 10 min. Extracellular bacteria were labeled by
sequentially overlaying coverslips with a rabbit polyclonal primary
antibody to Salmonella Typhimurium lipopolysaccharide (LPS;
Difco, Detroit, MI) at 1:200 and an Alexa 568-conjugated mouse
anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at 1:400
in PBS + 10% normal goat serum for 20 min. Coverslips were mounted
onto 1-mm glass sides using Mowiol (Aldrich). To quantify cells
containing filamentous bacteria, only intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium were counted (not labeled by the
extracellularly applied LPS-specific antibody). Bacteria were scored as
"filamentous" when they were >3× longer than a typical bacterium
(approximately >5 µm). Three populations were scored: the number of
infected cells containing predominantly filamentous bacteria, the
number of infected cells where >50% of intracellular bacteria were of normal size, and the number of infected cells containing bacteria that
were all of normal size. Significance was determined by calculating p values using an unpaired two-tailed t test. The
level of terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end
labeling (TUNEL)-positive (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Laval,
Quebec, Canada) apoptotic cells was less than 10% for all conditions.
RNA Isolation and Northern Blotting--
At various times
post-infection, IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells were washed once with
PBS and scraped to detach the cells from the dish. RNA was then
isolated using Trizol according to the manufacturer's directions
(Invitrogen). RNA was extracted twice with phenol:chloroform:isoamyl
alcohol (25:24:1) and once with chloroform. The RNA was then
precipitated with 2.5 volumes of 100% ethanol and 0.10 volume
sodium acetate, pH 5.2, resuspended in RNase-free water containing
RNase inhibitor (Ambion, Austin, TX), and stored at
70 °C. RNA
quality was assessed by gel electrophoresis and staining with ethidium
bromide. Northern blots were prepared as described previously, using
5-10 µg of total RNA per lane (16). To prepare templates for probe
synthesis, cDNA was prepared from total RNA purified from RAW 264.7 cells using oligo(dT) and SuperScriptII reverse transcriptase
(Invitrogen). The following primer pairs were designed to amplify
portions of the indicated macrophage genes: MEK1,
5'-GTTGCTTTCAGGCCTCTCC-3', 5'-AGTGATGGGCTCTGCTTAGG-3'; GAPDH,
5'-AGAACATCATCCCTGCATCC-3', 5'-CTGGGATGGAAATTGTGAGG-3'. Antisense
cDNA probes were prepared by PCR using 50 ng of the appropriate PCR
product template, the reverse 3'-oligonucleotide, and modified
nucleotides to facilitate repeated stripping of blots (Strip-EZ PCR,
Ambion). These single-stranded PCR products were column-purified
(Qiagen, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) and labeled with biotin using
psoralen-biotin (Ambion) and cross-linking with 365 nm ultraviolet
light. Overnight hybridization at 42 °C was with labeled probe in
UltraHyb (Ambion). The BrightStar non-isotopic detection kit (Ambion)
was used for probe detection according to the manufacturer's
protocols. Northern blots were quantified by densitometry using an
AlphaImager system (Alpha Innotech Co., San Leandro, CA).
cDNA Array Hybridization--
AtlasTM Mouse
cDNA Expression Arrays I (7741-1; CLONTECH,
Palo Alto, CA) consist of a matched set of positively charged membranes containing duplicate spots of 588 murine partial cDNAs.
32P-Radiolabeled first strand cDNA probes were prepared
from 5 µg of total RNA from each cell population using Moloney murine
leukemia virus transcriptase and pooled primers specific for the 588 genes. Hybridization conditions and data analysis have been described previously (16).
Preparation of Protein Extracts and Western
Blots--
IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells (5 × 105/well) were seeded in six-well tissue culture plates and
incubated overnight. At various times post-infection, cells were
collected into 100 µl of boiling 5× SDS-PAGE loading buffer. Total
protein lysates were resolved on a 12% acrylamide SDS-PAGE gel,
electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membrane, and blocked with 5%
skim milk in Tris-buffered saline-0.1% (v/v) Tween 20. Antibodies were
used at the following concentrations: rabbit anti-MEK1, 1:1000 (New
England Biolabs, Beverly, MA); rabbit anti-phosphorylated MEK1, 1:1000
(New England Biolabs; kindly provided by Dr. B. Ellis, University of
British Columbia); rabbit anti-ERK, 1:2000 (New England Biolabs,
Beverly, MA); monoclonal phosphospecific anti-p44/p42 (ERK1/2), 1:2000
(New England Biolabs); and monoclonal anti-actin 1:15,000 (ICN,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada). Blots were incubated with primary antibodies
overnight at 4 °C, followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature and
detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences,
Baie d'Urfé, Quebec, Canada). Western blots were quantified by
densitometry using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Chemical Inhibitors of MEK Kinase, NADPH Oxidase, and
iNOS--
IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with
inhibitors for 30 min prior to infection at the following
concentrations: 50 µM PD98059 (Calbiochem), 50 µM U0126 (Promega, Madison, WI), 4 µM
diphenyleneiodonium (DPI; Sigma), 250 µM acetovanillone
(apocynin; Aldrich), 1 mM ascorbic acid (Sigma), 30 mM N-acetylcysteine (Sigma), 2 mM
NG-L-monomethylarginine
(L-NMMA, Molecular Probes), or 2 mM
NG-D-monomethylarginine
(D-NMMA, Molecular Probes). Fresh inhibitors were added
immediately after infection, at 2 h, and 6-8 h post-infection to
ensure potency. Control cells were treated with equivalent volumes of
dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) per ml of media. To
remove inhibitors from pretreated cells, monolayers were washed three times with PBS at 8 h post-infection and then cultured for 16 h in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 10 µg/ml gentamicin.
Quantification of Intracellular ROIs and Extracellular
Nitrite--
Intracellular ROIs were quantified by a luminol-enhanced
chemiluminescence assay as described previously (17, 18). Briefly, 1 × 106 IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells were seeded
per well in six-well tissue culture plates and primed with IFN-
for
24 h. Cells were pretreated with inhibitors or Me2SO
in media and infected as described above. After 6 or 24 h of
infection, cells were washed once with PBS, scraped into 200 µl of
substrate warmed to 37 °C (PBS containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS,
5 × 10
5 M luminol
(5-amino-2,3-dihydro-1,4-phthalazinedione, Sigma) as an indicator of
ROIs, and 50 units/ml superoxide dismutase (Sigma) and 2000 units/ml
catalase (Sigma) to remove extracellular ROIs). Duplicate samples of
100 µl each were transferred to a clear-bottomed white 96-well plate,
and chemiluminescence (light) units were quantified for 20 min using a
TECAN spectrophotometer/luminometer (Männedorf, Switzerland), and
the light units detected per minute over this time period were
calculated. Nitrite concentration in extracellular medium of
infected cells after 24 h was measured using a Griess reagent kit
(Molecular Probes) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
 |
RESULTS |
IFN-
Priming of RAW 264.7 Cells Restricts Salmonella Typhimurium
Growth--
IFN-
is essential for clearance of
Salmonella Typhimurium within the murine typhoid model, and
we have shown previously that IFN-
has pleiotropic effects on
macrophage transcriptional responses at early times to
Salmonella Typhimurium infection (16). To establish a model
for investigating macrophage responses that are effective in
restricting Salmonella Typhimurium replication, we assessed
the effect of IFN-
on the ability of RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells
to control intracellular numbers of Salmonella Typhimurium. As shown in Fig. 1A, the
number of intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium increased
6-fold over a 22.5-h period in RAW 264.7 cells. These cells permit
Salmonella Typhimurium replication after 4-8 h, although avoidance of macrophage-mediated killing could partially contribute to
the increase. In contrast, intracellular bacterial numbers did not
increase in RAW 264.7 cells primed with IFN-
over this same period
(Fig. 1A). We hypothesized that IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells provide a more relevant model for studying macrophage responses that are effective in limiting Salmonella Typhimurium
infection, as host factors should be maximally expressed in
IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells that restrict intracellular bacterial
numbers. This choice of model was strengthened by the observation that both primary murine macrophages and IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells restrict the intracellular load of Salmonella Typhimurium
(19).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Priming of RAW 264.7 cells with IFN-
inhibits Salmonella Typhimurium replication. A,
naive or IFN- -primed RAW 264.7 cells were infected with
Salmonella Typhimurium, and the number of intracellular
bacteria per well after infection for 1.5 h (white
bars) and 24 h (filled bars) was determined by
gentamicin resistance assay and cfu counts. The mean ± S.D. for
three experiments is shown, with two samples plated in duplicate per
condition for each experiment. * denotes p < 0.001. B, many intramacrophage Salmonella
Typhimurium are filamentous after 24 h. IFN- -primed RAW 264.7 cells were infected with Salmonella Typhimurium expressing
GFP and visualized by fluorescence microscopy after 8 and 24 h.
After 8 h, bacteria were of typical size, and no bacteria adopted
a filamentous morphology (GFP panel) within infected cells (phase
contrast panel). After 24 h, 47 ± 12% of infected cells
(phase contrast panel) contained one or more bacteria with a
filamentous morphology (GFP panel), indicating impaired bacterial
replication.
|
|
Macrophages Induce Bacterial Filamentation at 24 h
Post-infection--
IFN-
priming of macrophages restricts
intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium replication, but the
precise mechanisms for this control are unclear (20). To better
understand the interactions between macrophages and
Salmonella Typhimurium, IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells were
infected with Salmonella Typhimurium expressing green
fluorescent protein (GFP) and examined by fluorescence microscopy. While intracellular bacteria exhibited normal morphology after 8 h
of infection, 47 ± 12% of infected cells contained filamentous bacteria that were >3× the length of a typical bacterium after 24 h (Fig. 1B). Filamentous bacteria were observed
using another Salmonella Typhimurium strain (14028s),
indicating that filamentation is shared by more than one strain of
Salmonella Typhimurium (data not shown). Filamentous
bacteria had partial or absent septa, suggesting a defect in completion
of cell division, an indicator of bacterial stress (21, 22).
Salmonella Induces MEK1 Kinase mRNA and Activity--
To
examine whether macrophage gene expression was responsible for this
effect on bacterial replication at later infection times, we used gene
array analysis to profile the transcriptional responses of
IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells to intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium after infection for 4, 8, and 24 h. Hybridization of
cDNA arrays indicated that MEK1 kinase mRNA levels were
elevated in IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells at 8 h post-infection
but not at 4 h post-infection (data not shown). This observed
modest increase in MEK1 mRNA after 8 h of
Salmonella Typhimurium infection was confirmed by Northern
blot analysis. As seen in Fig.
2A, MEK1 mRNA was
transiently up-regulated at 8 h and 18 h post-infection, was
not observed prior to 8 h, and reduced to the level in uninfected cells at 24 h (n = 3). The increase in MEK1
mRNA 8 h after infection ranged from 1.2- to 2.5-fold relative
to uninfected cells in each of eight experiments (Fig. 2B).
We observed similar kinetics in the increase in MEK1 mRNA abundance
in cells stimulated with 1 µg/ml Salmonella Typhimurium
lipopolysaccharide for 8 or 24 h (LPS; data not shown). This
increase in MEK1 mRNA after infection for 8 h was abrogated
when cells were treated with the MEK kinase inhibitor U0126 prior to
infection, suggesting that transcriptional up-regulation of MEK1 is
mediated by prior kinase activity (Fig. 2A and
quantification in Fig. 2B).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Salmonella Typhimurium infection
increases MEK1 mRNA and protein in
IFN- -primed RAW 264.7 cells.
A, Northern blot analysis of MEK1. RNA was isolated from
Salmonella Typhimurium-infected or mock-infected
IFN- -primed RAW 264.7 cells at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 18, or 24 h
following infection. The label 8 h + U0126 denotes RNA
isolated from cells that were pretreated with the MEK kinase inhibitor
U0126 and infected for 8 h. Northern blots were hybridized with a
MEK1-specific probe and then stripped and re-probed using a
GAPDH-specific probe. A representative experiment is shown
(n = 3). B, quantification of Northern blot
analysis. Northern blot hybridization signals for MEK1 at 8, 18, and
24 h in uninfected (white bars) or infected cells
(gray bars) or at 8 h in infected cells pretreated with
U0126 (black bar) were quantified by densitometry and
normalized to the hybridization signals for GAPDH and to the level in
uninfected cells at each time point. mRNA levels for GAPDH in
uninfected cells at 8, 18, and 24 h were equivalent. The mean ± S.D. for the following number of independent experiments is shown:
8 h, n = 8; 8 h + U0126,
n = 3; 18 h, n = 3; 24 h, n = 8. * denotes p < 0.01. C, Western blot analysis of MEK1. Protein lysates
were prepared from Salmonella Typhimurium-infected (+) or
mock-treated ( ) IFN- -primed RAW 264.7 cells at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, or
24 h following infection and separated by SDS-PAGE
electrophoresis. Western blots were probed with antibodies specific for
total MEK1, phosphorylated MEK1, and total ERK1/2, to confirm equal
loading of samples. A representative experiment is shown
(n = 3).
|
|
While activation of MEK/ERK kinase cascades have previously been shown
to occur within 1 h of Salmonella Typhimurium infection or LPS stimulation (2), MEK kinase activity at much later times of
infection or its transcriptional regulation following infection has not
previously been reported. The observed elevation of MEK1 mRNA level
in Salmonella Typhimurium-infected IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells relative to uninfected cells was followed by increased MEK1
protein abundance at 24 h, as determined by Western blot analysis
(Fig. 2C). A modest increase in MEK1 protein of 1.5 ± 0.2-fold was detected at 24 h post-infection when normalized to actin protein and relative to uninfected cells (n = 4).
This is of a comparable magnitude to the induction of MEK mRNA at
8 h post-infection. At the times when increases in MEK mRNA
and protein abundance were measured, MEK protein was phosphorylated, an
essential step in activation of MEK kinase. MEK phosphorylation was
maximal at 1 h but remained sustained at a modest level in
infected cells throughout 24 h, as seen in longer exposures of
Western blots (Fig. 2C and data not shown). MEK activity
could be detected throughout the infection period, as measured by
Western blot analysis of phosphorylation of its downstream targets, the
ERK1/2 kinases. As seen in Fig. 3,
A-C, phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was maximal within 1 h
following stimulation, but phosphorylation remained elevated throughout
the 24-h period examined when compared with uninfected cells
(quantification of ERK2 phosphorylation in Fig. 3D). MEK1
abundance and activity were similar in IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells
infected by Salmonella Typhimurium or stimulated with 1 µg/ml purified Salmonella Typhimurium LPS over 24 h.
Therefore, up-regulated MEK1 mRNA, protein, and activity in
IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells during a 24-h infection by
Salmonella Typhimurium can be triggered, at least in part,
by bacterial LPS.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Salmonella Typhimurium infection
increases MEK1 protein and activity. A-C, Western
blots. Protein lysates were prepared from IFN- -primed RAW 264.7 cells that were mock-treated (A), infected with
Salmonella Typhimurium (B), or stimulated with 1 µg/ml Salmonella Typhimurium LPS (C) at various
times between 0.5 and 24 h and separated by SDS-PAGE
electrophoresis. Western blots were sequentially probed with antibodies
specific for phosphorylated ERK1/2, to measure MEK1 activity, and total
ERK1/2, to confirm equal loading of samples. These data are
representative of four independent experiments. D,
quantification of Western blot. The quantity of phosphorylated ERK2 was
quantified by densitometry for uninfected (white bars),
Salmonella Typhimurium-infected (black bars), and
purified Salmonella Typhimurium LPS-stimulated cells
(gray bars) and normalized to the level of total ERK2
protein. The mean and S.E. is shown (n = 4). The values
obtained from each independent experiments were normalized to the
quantity of phospho-ERK2/total ERK2 in infected cells at 1 h to
facilitate comparison between experiments. * denotes
p 0.01.
|
|
Increased MEK1 Activity Correlates with Bacterial
Filamentation--
Since both MEK kinase activity and bacterial
filamentation were observed at 24 h post-infection, and MEK/ERK
kinases are strong candidates for augmenting macrophage defenses
against intracellular pathogens, we investigated whether there was a
connection between induction of MEK kinase signaling and bacterial
filamentation. IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells were pretreated with the
MEK inhibitor PD98059 or Me2SO as a control and infected
with Salmonella Typhimurium expressing GFP. Remarkably, MEK
inhibition by PD98059 caused a 76 ± 10% reduction in the number
of cells containing predominantly filamentous bacteria (representative
immunofluorescence shown in Fig.
4A and quantification in Fig.
4B). Similar results were obtained using U0126, another MEK
inhibitor but with a different mode of action (Fig. 4B and
data not shown) (23). Both inhibitors were functional in greatly
reducing MEK activity under our experimental conditions, as determined
by Western blot analysis of ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Fig. 6 and data not
shown). This suggests that MEK-dependent control of
intracellular bacterial proliferation is mediated through impairment of
bacterial cell division, resulting in filamentation.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
MEK1 and NADPH oxidase activity correlates
with bacterial filamentation. A, IFN- -primed RAW
264.7 cells were seeded on glass coverslips, pretreated with either
chemical inhibitors or Me2SO (DMSO) (control),
and infected with Salmonella Typhimurium expressing GFP.
After 24 h, the monolayers were fixed and the coverslips incubated
with anti-Salmonella LPS antibody and a red
fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody to label extracellular
bacteria. All bacteria shown were intracellular. The effect of various
inhibitors on bacterial filamentation was assessed relative to infected
cells mock-treated with Me2SO. Decreased bacterial
filamentation was observed in cells treated with PD98059 to inhibit MEK
kinase activity. Decreased bacterial filamentation was also observed in
cells treated with DPI to inhibit ROIs. No significant inhibition of
bacterial filamentation was observed in cells treated with
L-NMMA to inhibit iNOS. Similar results for each inhibitor
were observed in 3 independent experiments. B,
quantification of decrease in bacterial filamentation by MEK kinase
inhibitors. Cells were pretreated with each inhibitor, and infected
cells containing intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium that
were not labeled by the extracellularly applied LPS-specific antibody
were counted. The mean percentage of cells containing predominantly
filamentous bacteria ± S.D. is shown relative to the percentage
of Me2SO-treated cells, which was set to 100% (36 ± 8% of infected Me2SO-treated cells contained predominantly
filamentous bacteria). Pretreatment with the MEK kinase inhibitors
PD98059 or U0126 or the oxidase inhibitors and antioxidants DPI,
acetovanillone, or N-acetyl-L-cysteine
significantly decreased the number of cells containing predominantly
filamentous bacteria relative to Me2SO-treated cells
(* denotes p < 0.01). No significant
inhibition of bacterial filamentation was observed in cells treated
with L-NMMA to inhibit iNOS relative to cells treated with
Me2SO or the inactive enantiomer D-NMMA
(p = 0.05 and p = 0.85, respectively).
For each experiment, 100-250 infected cells were counted per
condition. The number of independent experiments for each condition
were as follows: Me2SO, n = 10; PD98059,
n = 9; U0126, n = 4; DPI,
n = 5; N-acetylcysteine, n = 3; acetovanillone, n = 3; L-NMMA,
n = 4; D-NMMA, n = 3.
|
|
MEK1 Activity Controls Intracellular Bacterial Numbers--
To
confirm the morphological impairment of bacterial replication revealed
by fluorescence microscopy using an independent assay, we counted the
number of cfus isolated from infected cells treated with
Me2SO or MEK inhibitor PD98059 after 24 h. When MEK activity was inhibited in IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells, we observed a
significant (3-fold) increase in the number of intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium that could form colonies on solid
media (Fig. 5). Similar results were
obtained using the MEK inhibitor U0126 (data not shown), further
supporting our observation that control of intracellular bacterial
numbers results from increased MEK activity. Neither MEK inhibitor
altered internalization of bacteria, as the number of intracellular cfu
at 3 h post-infection was comparable between inhibitor-treated and
untreated cells (Fig. 5). Both MEK inhibitors were active, reducing
ERK1/2 phosphorylation to the basal levels observed by Western blotting
in uninfected cells (Fig. 7 and data not shown).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
MEK1 activity controls Salmonella
Typhimurium replication. IFN- -primed RAW 264.7 cells were
pretreated with PD98059 (MEK inhibitor, filled bars) or
Me2SO (control, white bars) and then infected
with Salmonella Typhimurium. Extracellular bacteria were
removed after 30 min by washing, and the remaining bacteria were killed
using gentamicin. At 3 and 24 h following infection, monolayers
were lysed with detergent and intracellular bacteria enumerated by
plating dilutions on solid medium. The mean ± S.D. is
shown. These data are representative of five independent experiments
with three wells plated in triplicate per experiment; *
denotes p < 0.001.
|
|
Phagocyte NADPH Oxidase Also Mediates Bacterial
Filamentation--
We proceeded to investigate a mechanism to explain
the effect of MEK kinase activity on impairing bacterial replication.
The antibacterial effectors phox and iNOS were strong candidates for mediating bacterial stress and inducing filamentation. Both reactive oxygen and nitrogen species can inhibit Salmonella
Typhimurium survival in macrophages in vivo (9, 10). ROIs
produced by phox can positively regulate MEK kinase activity, and phox
and iNOS can be activated by MEK/ERK signaling (24-29). The iNOS
inhibitors L-NMMA and
NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
hydrochloride (L-NAME) had no significant effect on
bacterial morphology when compared with inactive D-NMMA or
Me2SO, respectively (Fig. 4 and data not shown). In
addition, L-NMMA did not have a synergistic effect when
applied with various antioxidants, although L-NMMA was
functional in decreasing iNOS activity and the corresponding
concentration of extracellular nitrate by the Griess assay (data not
shown). By contrast, numerous NADPH oxidase inhibitors and antioxidants
had a similar effect to the MEK inhibitors in reducing bacterial
filamentation in IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells (representative
immunofluorescence shown in Fig. 4A and quantification in
Fig. 4B). The inhibitor DPI, which lowers ROI levels and
increases intracellular levels of the antioxidant glutathione, reduced
the number of cells containing predominantly filamentous bacteria by
97 ± 5%. Since DPI also inhibits iNOS activity, we used a
variety of other chemical inhibitors of oxidative burst to confirm the
involvement of oxidase activity in mediating bacterial filamentation.
The antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine and the phox
flavoprotein inhibitor acetovanillone reduced the number of these
filamentous bacteria-containing cells by 86 ± 12% and 53 ± 13%, respectively.
MEK Kinase and Phox Activities at Later Times Mediate Bacterial
Filamentation--
As seen in Fig. 3, phosphorylation of ERK1/2 is
maximal within 1 h of infection but remains elevated for 24 h. To determine whether this sustained activity plays a role in
mediating bacterial filamentation, distinct from the early maximal
kinase activation, the MEK inhibitor U0126 was added to infected
IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 h post-infection
and compared with cells treated with inhibitors prior to infection.
Interestingly, U0126 significantly reduced the number of cells
containing predominantly filamentous bacteria relative to
Me2SO when added up to 8 h after infection rather than
pre-infection (Fig. 6A).
Similar results were observed when the antioxidant DPI was added
post-infection. As shown in Fig. 6B, DPI added up to 4 h post-infection was as potent in decreasing bacterial filamentation as
cells pretreated with inhibitors. Inhibition of bacterial filamentation
was also observed in cells treated with the MEK inhibitor PD98059 or
antioxidant N-acetylcysteine 6 h post-infection (data
not shown). Furthermore, cells treated with U0126 or DPI for the first
8 h of the infection and then removed by washing exhibited a
similar degree of bacterial filamentation to cells not treated with
either inhibitor (Fig. 6, A and B). Taken
together, these data suggest that later MEK kinase and phox activities
are primarily responsible for mediating bacterial filamentation and can
be dissociated from the rapid MEK and phox activities following
Salmonella Typhimurium infection, which are maximal at
1 h.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
MEK kinase and phox activities at later times
mediate bacterial filamentation. A, the MEK inhibitor
U0126 was added to infected IFN- -primed RAW 264.7 cells 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 h post-infection and compared with cells treated with
inhibitors prior to infection (0 h) or treated with Me2SO
(DMSO). Some cells were treated with U0126 for the first
8 h of infection and then washed to remove the inhibitor for the
remaining 16 h of infection (8 h chase). B, cells were
treated as in A, except that the antioxidant DPI was used.
For both A and B, the percentage of cells
containing predominantly filamentous bacteria after infection for
24 h was counted. The mean ± S.D. are representative of
three independent experiments, with >100 cells counted per condition
per experiment; * denotes p 0.01.
|
|
MEK Kinase and Phox Activities Appear to Function in Parallel to
Mediate Bacterial Filamentation--
Phox activity produces ROIs that
can enhance MEK kinase activity (25, 26). To assess whether the oxidase
induces bacterial filamentation by increasing MEK kinase activity, we
treated IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells with DPI prior to and during
Salmonella Typhimurium infection and measured ERK
phosphorylation relative to untreated cells. Antioxidant treatment did
not reduce MEK kinase activity, as detected by phosphorylation of the
downstream ERK kinases at 8 h (data not shown) or 24 h (Fig.
7 and data not shown). In addition, DPI
did not attenuate the increase in total MEK kinase protein after
24 h of infection relative to uninfected cells (data not shown).
In contrast, the MEK kinase inhibitors PD98059 and U0126 substantially
reduced ERK phosphorylation (Fig. 7 and data not shown). These data
suggest that phox activity does not augment MEK kinase activity either
prior or subsequent to the induction of bacterial filamentation within
RAW 264.7 cells.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
NADPH oxidase does not mediate filamentation
by modulating ERK phosphorylation. A, Western blot.
Protein lysates were prepared from IFN- -primed RAW 264.7 cells
pretreated with Me2SO (DMSO) or various
inhibitors that were either Salmonella Typhimurium-infected
or mock-treated for 24 h and then separated by SDS-PAGE
electrophoresis. Western blots were probed with antibodies specific for
phosphorylated ERK1/2 as an indicator of MEK1 activity and total ERK1/2
to confirm equal loading of samples. B, quantification of
Western blots. The level of phosphorylated ERK2 was quantified by
densitometry and normalized to the level of total ERK2. The mean ± S.D. are representative of four independent experiments;
* denotes p < 0.01.
|
|
To assess whether MEK kinase activity mediates bacterial filamentation
by positively regulating oxidase activity (24, 29), we measured the
effect of various inhibitors on intracellular ROIs in infected cells. A
luminol-based chemiluminescence assay detected elevated levels of
intracellular ROIs within IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells after 6 h
of infection by Salmonella Typhimurium, relative to
uninfected cells. DPI, N-acetyl-L-cysteine, and
acetovanillone were effective in significantly decreasing the products
of phox activity (Fig. 8A and
data not shown). However, treatment with the MEK kinase inhibitors
U0126 or PD98059 did not significantly reduce intracellular ROIs (Fig.
8A and data not shown). Elevated ROIs were measured within
infected cells at 24 h, when bacterial filamentation is observed,
which were similarly reduced by antioxidants and unchanged by
inhibition of MEK kinase activity (Fig. 8B). These data
suggest that MEK kinase activity does not alter oxidase activity and
intracellular ROIs either prior to or during the presence of
filamentous bacteria.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
MEK kinase does not mediate filamentation by
increasing intracellular ROIs. A, intracellular ROIs
6 h post-infection. IFN- -primed RAW 264.7 cells (1 × 106 cells/well in a six-well tissue culture plate) were
pretreated with inhibitors or Me2SO (DMSO) and
harvested 6 h post-infection. Intracellular ROIs were detected
using a luminol chemiluminescence assay. Chemiluminescence (light)
units were quantified every min for 20 min and the mean light units
detected per minute over this time period ± S.D. is shown.
Infection caused a significant increase in intracellular ROIs compared
with uninfected cells, which was not significantly altered by treatment
with the MEK inhibitor U0126. The oxidase inhibitor DPI significantly
reduced intracellular ROIs within infected cells when compared with
Me2SO-treated infected cells. The mean ± S.D. is
shown and represents duplicate samples from at least three independent
experiments; * denotes p < 0.01. B, intracellular ROIs 24 h post-infection. Cells were
harvested 24 h after infection and ROIs detected as described in
A.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In the murine model of human typhoid fever, Salmonella
Typhimurium establish a niche within macrophages where they can
replicate and cause a systemic disease. Disease is mediated by a
dynamic interplay between host responses to bacterial components and
bacterial virulence mechanisms that are triggered upon entry into the
host environment. We previously used gene arrays to profile the
responses of the RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line to
Salmonella Typhimurium at 4 h post-infection and
demonstrated that most of the macrophages early transcriptional
responses to Salmonella Typhimurium could be triggered by
purified Salmonella Typhimurium LPS and altered by priming
with IFN-
(16). IFN-
priming of macrophages restricts intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium replication but the
precise mechanisms for this control, including a role for MEK/ERK
signaling, are unclear (20). We therefore examined macrophage signaling upon infection with Salmonella Typhimurium to probe the
host's efforts to limit intracellular bacterial replication and
survival. To this end, we used gene array analysis to examine the
transcriptional responses of IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 macrophages to
intracellular Salmonella Typhimurium at later times (8 h)
post-infection. At this time point, bacteria have initiated virulence
factor expression specific to the intracellular environment and are
beginning to replicate within naive RAW 264.7 cells (30). We observed
that MEK1 kinase mRNA levels were transiently elevated in
IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 macrophage cells at 8 h post-infection,
which was confirmed by Northern blot analysis and followed by elevated
MEK1 protein levels at 24 h post-infection. Our observation that
inhibition of MEK activity abrogated the increase in MEK mRNA
levels 8 h after infection supports a connection between early
kinase activity and subsequent transcriptional up-regulation. However,
the delayed inhibitor addition experiments shown in Fig. 6 suggest that
it is rather the later sustained kinase activity that mediates
bacterial filamentation. This prolonged activation of MEK kinase
activity observed throughout the 24-h infection period by
phosphorylation of ERK1/2 may result from continued shedding of LPS by
intracellular bacteria (31). Alternatively, a feedback mechanism of
enhancement of MEK activity has been observed previously, both directly
by MEK1 activity and indirectly by ROI signaling, that can be modulated by MEK activity (25). While the rapid activation of MEK kinase following LPS stimulation is down-regulated by specific phosphatases, increased transcription of MEK kinase at later infection time points
could contribute to the prolonged levels of MEK activity.
The importance of MEK kinase signaling in effective host response to
bacteria is highlighted by the evolution of a MEK-specific phosphatase
that is required by Yersinia to colonize host cells. In
macrophages, signals transmitted through MEK/ERK kinases are known to
induce cell proliferation, differentiation, and the expression of
proinflammatory genes such as TNF-
(5). MEK can exert its pleiotropic effects on cells by two general mechanisms. First, MEK/ERK
signaling has a large number of downstream targets, including multiple
transcription factors, phox, and iNOS, while a functional proteomics
study recently identified an additional 20 previously unrecognized
MEK/ERK effectors (32). Second, the kinetics of MEK activity impacts
the functional effect on the cell. For example, M-CSF causes maximal
induction of ERK activity in macrophages after 5 min, leading to cell
proliferation. In contrast, LPS stimulation induces maximal ERK
activity after 15 min, arresting proliferation and promoting macrophage
activation (33, 34). In addition to the previously reported early
activation of MEK/ERK cascades, in this study we have shown that
Salmonella also induce MEK kinase activation at later time
points of infection. We have demonstrated that MEK inhibitors can be
added 8 h after infection and still inhibit bacterial
filamentation. In addition, chemical inhibition of MEK kinase signaling
for only the first 8 h of infection results in the same extent of
bacterial filamentation after 24 h as cells with functional MEK
kinase activity throughout the entire infection. Together, this
suggests that the sustained MEK activity at later time points plays a
more important role in stressing intracellular bacterial replication
than the early induction of MEK activity that peaks at 1 h.
Interestingly, inhibition of MEK signaling has the opposite effect in
epithelial cells infected by influenza virus (35). In this infection
model, intact MEK signaling is necessary for viral replication as it
controls nuclear export of viral ribonucleoproteins and the MEK
inhibitor U0126 impaired viral production. MEK inhibitors added at
4 h after infection still substantially inhibited replication,
providing another example of the dissociation of early ERK activation
from later signaling events. MEK signaling appears to be playing a
distinct role in macrophages infected by Salmonella
Typhimurium. Our results emphasize the importance of studying host
responses to Salmonella Typhimurium infection at times
following the initial interactions between bacteria and macrophage,
since distinct host responses can occur at different times during the infection.
Bacteria respond to stresses such as oxidative stress (8), nutrient
stress (36), DNA damage (22), and some antibiotics (21, 37) by
arresting DNA replication and/or cell division. Filamentous
uropathogenic Escherichia coli have been observed during
infection of bladder epithelial cells (38). Filamentation or arrest of
bacterial septation has been observed in Salmonella Typhimurium infection of other cell lines. Mouse and rat fibroblast cell lines, which do not permit replication of Salmonella
Typhimurium, interfere with bacterial cell division and result in
filamentation (39). Recently, Martinez-Lorenzo et al.
(40) observed non-septate Salmonella Typhimurium in a
variety of human cancerous skin-related cell lines and primary
melanocytes that also do not permit bacterial replication. These
bacteria were exocytosed, non-invasive, and it was suggested that
filamentation may facilitate antigen presentation, but neither the host
nor bacterial cell signaling responsible for this effect on the
bacteria was described (40). We also observed in macrophages that
filamentous bacteria were non-invasive (data not shown). Furthermore,
we observed that a reduction in the number of filamentous bacteria
following treatment with MEK kinase inhibitors correlated with an
increased intracellular load of viable bacteria. Therefore, MEK kinase
and phox activity contribute to the macrophage's ability to contain
intracellular bacterial numbers by interrupting Salmonella
Typhimurium replication, which impairs the infectious cycle. This is
one of the first examples of a candidate gene identified by array
hybridization for which a functional consequence for host response to
infection has been characterized. Bacteria within the
Salmonella-containing vacuole are subject to numerous
stresses, including oxidative and nitrosative chemistry and limitation
of necessary cations and nutrients (8). The relative contribution of
other host stressors found within the Salmonella-containing
vacuole on bacterial replication remains to be determined.
In our model, infection of IFN-
-primed macrophages by
Salmonella Typhimurium triggers both MEK kinase signaling
and NADPH oxidase activity that can each limit bacterial replication.
This effect is manifested at later time points and is distinct from the
rapid MEK activation and oxidative burst triggered in macrophages by
LPS and phagocytosis. Assembly of the NADPH oxidase enzyme complex can
be regulated by MEK kinase activity, since the inhibitor PD98059
attenuates superoxide production within neutrophils (18). Conversely,
ROIs can induce MEK kinase activity (25). Our results suggest that MEK
kinase and NADPH oxidase likely function in parallel to mediate
bacterial filamentation, as inhibition of neither MEK or oxidase
activity attenuated activity of the other (Fig.
9). To further test for an interaction
between MEK and phox in mediating bacterial filamentation, we measured
filamentation in cells treated with suboptimal concentrations of both
U0126 and DPI to determine whether there was synergy between MEK and
phox activities. In preliminary experiments, two different suboptimal
concentrations of U0126 and DPI resulted in a higher percentage of
IFN-
-primed RAW 264.7 cells containing predominantly filamentous
bacteria than when cells were treated with both inhibitors
simultaneously. Further investigation is required to characterize how
MEK-dependent signaling and phox-dependent ROIs
impair bacterial replication and induce filamentous morphology. In
addition to their direct antibacterial properties, ROIs can also act as
signaling molecules and are potent stimulators of many signal
transduction cascades in macrophages (41, 42). Phox is required for
effective host resistance against Salmonella Typhimurium in
the murine typhoid model (10). Early in infection, virulent
Salmonella Typhimurium actively secretes one or more
virulence proteins that block assembly of a functional multi-subunit
phox enzyme on the membrane of the Salmonella-containing
vacuole to avoid direct oxidative damage (43). However, we show that at
later infection times, phox activity correlates with bacterial
filamentation, an indicator of cell stress. Therefore, while
Salmonella Typhimurium alters its gene expression upon
entering a macrophage to protect itself from direct oxidative damage,
the macrophage continues to produce ROIs that may exert antibacterial
effects later in infection by an indirect mechanism, perhaps by
altering the cellular redox state and subsequent cell signaling. A
recent study by Ehrt et al. (44) provides evidence to
support this concept. Using gene array expression profiling of
macrophages from normal and phox-deficient mice, they observed that 484 differentially expressed genes following Mycobacterium
tuberculosis infection and/or IFN-
stimulation were
phox-dependent. This suggests that ROIs may play a dual
role during innate immune responses by exerting direct antimicrobial effects on intracellular bacteria as well as impacting the fate of
intracellular bacteria by altering macrophage cell signaling.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Working model for signaling in RAW 264.7 cells mediating filamentation of Salmonella
Typhimurium. RAW 264.7 cells infected by
Salmonella Typhimurium or stimulated by purified LPS
activate both MEK kinase activity, resulting in phosphorylation of the
ERK1/2 kinases, and phox activity, resulting in increased intracellular
ROIs. MEK kinase and phox appear to function in parallel to inhibit
bacterial replication and induce bacterial filamentation, an indicator
of bacterial stress.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Ferric Fang, Dr. Michael
Gold, Dr. Leigh Knodler, Dr. Bruce Vallance, and members of the
Finlay laboratory for insightful discussions and critical readings of
the manuscript and Fern Ness for creating the artwork for Fig. 9.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by operating grants from the
Canadian Bacterial Diseases Network and the Canadian Institutes for
Health Research (CIHR).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by studentships from the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Research Council, CIHR, and the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research.
§
Recipient of a CIHR Distinguished Investigator Award and is a
Howard Hughes International Research Scholar. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Biotechnology Laboratory, University of
British Columbia, Rm. 237 Wesbrook Bldg., 6174 University
Blvd., Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada. Tel.:
604-822-2210; Fax: 604-822-9830; E-mail:
bfinlay@interchange.ubc.ca.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, January 30, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M110649200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
phox, phagocyte
NADPH oxidase;
cfu, colony-forming unit;
D-NMMA, NG-D-monomethyl arginine;
DPI, diphenyleneiodonium;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
IFN-
, interferon-
;
iNOS, inducible
nitric-oxide synthase;
L-NMMA, NG-L-monomethylarginine;
LPS, lipopolysaccharide;
ROI, reactive oxygen intermediate;
MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase
kinase;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
FBS, fetal bovine
serum;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Vazquez-Torres, A.,
and Fang, F. C.
(2001)
Trends Microbiol.
9,
29-33[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Procyk, K. J.,
Kovarik, P.,
von Gabain, A.,
and Baccarini, M.
(1999)
Infect. Immun.
67,
1011-1017[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Jesenberger, V.,
Procyk, K. J.,
Ruth, J.,
Schreiber, M.,
Theussl, H. C.,
Wagner, E. F.,
and Baccarini, M.
(2001)
J. Exp. Med.
193,
353-364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Cobb, M. H.,
and Goldsmith, E. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14843-14846[Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Rao, K. M.
(2001)
J. Leukoc. Biol.
69,
3-10[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Richter-Dahlfors, A.,
Buchan, A. M.,
and Finlay, B. B.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
569-580[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Wijburg, O. L.,
Simmons, C. P.,
van Rooijen, N.,
and Strugnell, R. A.
(2000)
Eur. J. Immunol.
30,
944-953[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Kingsley, R. A.,
and Baumler, A. J.
(2000)
in
Bacterial Invasion into Eukaryotic Cells
(Oelschlaeger, T. A.
, and Hacker, J., eds), Vol. 33
, pp. 321-342, Plenum, New York
|
| 9.
|
Vazquez-Torres, A.,
Jones-Carson, J.,
Mastroeni, P.,
Ischiropoulos, H.,
and Fang, F. C.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
192,
227-236[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Mastroeni, P.,
Vazquez-Torres, A.,
Fang, F. C., Xu, Y.,
Khan, S.,
Hormaeche, C. E.,
and Dougan, G.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
192,
237-248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Shiloh, M. U.,
MacMicking, J. D.,
Nicholson, S.,
Brause, J. E.,
Potter, S.,
Marino, M.,
Fang, F.,
Dinauer, M.,
and Nathan, C.
(1999)
Immunity
10,
29-38[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Gulig, P. A.,
Doyle, T. J.,
Clare-Salzler, M. J.,
Maiese, R. L.,
and Matsui, H.
(1997)
Infect. Immun.
65,
5191-5197[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Fields, P. I.,
Swanson, R. V.,
Haidaris, C. G.,
and Heffron, F.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
5189-5193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Shea, J. E.,
Beuzon, C. R.,
Gleeson, C.,
Mundy, R.,
and Holden, D. W.
(1999)
Infect. Immun.
67,
213-219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Steele-Mortimer, O.,
Meresse, S.,
Gorvel, J. P.,
Toh, B. H.,
and Finlay, B. B.
(1999)
Cell Microbiol.
1,
33-49[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Rosenberger, C. M.,
Scott, M. G.,
Gold, M. R.,
Hancock, R. E.,
and Finlay, B. B.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
164,
5894-5904[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Dahlgren, C.,
and Karlsson, A.
(1999)
J. Immunol. Methods
232,
3-14[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Karlsson, A.,
Nixon, J. B.,
and McPhail, L. C.
(2000)
J. Leukoc. Biol.
67,
396-404[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Buchmeier, N. A.,
and Heffron, F.
(1989)
Infect. Immun.
57,
1-7[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Shtrichman, R.,
and Samuel, C. E.
(2001)
Curr. Opin. Microbiol.
4,
251-259[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Weiss, D. S.,
Chen, J. C.,
Ghigo, J. M.,
Boyd, D.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1999)
J. Bacteriol.
181,
508-520[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Hill, T. M.,
Sharma, B.,
Valjavec-Gratian, M.,
and Smith, J.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
1931-1939[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Ahn, N. G.,
Nahreini, T. S.,
Tolwinski, N. S.,
and Resing, K. A.
(2001)
Methods Enzymol.
332,
417-431[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Dewas, C.,
Fay, M.,
Gougerot-Pocidalo, M. A.,
and El-Benna, J.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
165,
5238-5244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Fialkow, L.,
Chan, C. K.,
Rotin, D.,
Grinstein, S.,
and Downey, G. P.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
31234-31242[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Torres, M.,
and Forman, H. J.
(1999)
Arch Biochem. Biophys
366,
231-239[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Ajizian, S. J.,
English, B. K.,
and Meals, E. A.
(1999)
J. Infect. Dis.
179,
939-944[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Chan, E. D.,
and Riches, D. W.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
280,
C441-C450
|
| 29.
|
Downey, G. P.,
Butler, J. R.,
Tapper, H.,
Fialkow, L.,
Saltiel, A. R.,
Rubin, B. B.,
and Grinstein, S.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
434-443[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Hensel, M.
(2000)
Mol. Microbiol.
36,
1015-1023[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Garcia-del Portillo, F. |