Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201405200 on March 13, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 21, 18817-18826, May 24, 2002
Physical Interaction with Human Tumor-derived p53 Mutants
Inhibits p63 Activities*
Sabrina
Strano
§,
Giulia
Fontemaggi
¶,
Antonio
Costanzo
,
Maria Giulia
Rizzo
,
Olimpia
Monti
,
Alessia
Baccarini
,
Giannino
Del Sal**,
Massimo
Levrero
,
Ada
Sacchi
,
Moshe
Oren
, and
Giovanni
Blandino
§§
From the
Molecular Oncogenesis Laboratory, Regina
Elena Cancer Institute, Rome 00158, Italy,
Laboratory of Gene
Expression, Fondazione Andrea Cesalpino, University of Rome "La
Sapienza" Rome 00161, Italy, ** Laboratorio Nazionale CIB,
AREA Science Park, Dipartimento di Biochimica, Biofisica e Chimica
delle Macromolecole Trieste 34012, Italy,

Molecular Cell Biology Department, The
Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
Received for publication, February 11, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The p53 tumor suppressor gene is the most
frequent target for genetic alterations in human cancers, whereas the
recently discovered homologues p73 and p63 are rarely mutated. We and
others have previously reported that human tumor-derived p53 mutants
can engage in a physical association with different isoforms of p73,
inhibiting their transcriptional activity. Here, we report that human
tumor-derived p53 mutants can associate in vitro and
in vivo with p63 through their respective core domains. We
show that the interaction with mutant p53 impairs in vitro
and in vivo sequence-specific DNA binding of p63 and
consequently affects its transcriptional activity. We also report that
in cells carrying endogenous mutant p53, such as T47D cells, p63 is
unable to recruit some of its target gene promoters. Unlike wild-type
p53, the binding to specific p53 mutants markedly counteracts
p63-induced growth inhibition. This effect is, at least partially,
mediated by the core domain of mutant p53. Thus, inactivation of p53
family members may contribute to the biological properties of specific
p53 mutants in promoting tumorigenesis and in conferring selective
survival advantage to cancer cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Approximately half of human tumors bear p53 mutations (1).
The most prevalent type of these mutations consists of missense mutations that are frequently accompanied by loss of the remaining wild-type p53 (wt-p53)1
allele (2, 3). The major site of the p53 mutations is the highly
conserved DNA binding core domain (4-6). Thus, mutant p53 proteins are
unable to specifically bind DNA and to activate specific wt-p53 target
genes. One certain outcome of p53 mutations is the loss of wild type
activities such as growth arrest, apoptosis, and differentiation.
However, at variance with other tumor suppressor genes, cells with p53
mutations maintain expression of full-length protein. This may suggest
that, at least, certain mutant forms of p53 can gain additional
functions through which they contribute actively to cancer progression
(6-9). Such evidence is provided by several in vitro and
in vivo studies (10-17). We and others have reported that
conformational defective p53 mutants can increase resistance of tumor
cells to anticancer treatment and promote genomic instability (18-20).
The molecular mechanisms underlying such effects remain to be elucidated.
The recent identification of two p53-relatives, p63 and p73 holds new
perspectives in studying gain of function of mutant p53 (21-23). p63
and p73 share a significant homology with each other and with p53.
Indeed, they share the same modular organization, comprising an
N-terminal transactivation domain, a central sequence-specific DNA
binding domain, and a C-terminal oligomerization domain. Several p63
and p73 isoforms are present in cells (21, 23-28). They result either
from the use of a cryptic promoter that generates p63 isoforms (
N
p63
, p63
, and p63
) lacking N-terminal transactivation domain or by alternative splicing that generates p63 isoforms (p63
, p63
,
and p63
) with different C-terminal sequences (30, 32). Exogenous
expression of p63 or p73 causes growth arrest, apoptosis, and
differentiation, recapitulating some of the most characterized p53
biological effects (9, 21, 23, 30, 31). These are mainly mediated by
p73 and p63 through the activation of specific p53 target genes such as
Bax, IGF-BP3, p21waf1,
and cyclin G (16, 21, 23, 24, 32-37). The respective deficient mice have provided further insights into the physiological role of p73 and p63. p73-deficient mice exhibit severe defects in the
development of nervous and immune systems (38). p63
/
mice are born
alive but show striking defects in development. Their skin does not
progress from early stages of development, lacking stratification as
well as expression of differentiation markers. The mammary glands, hair
follicles, and teeth are absent in p63-deficient mice (39,
40). In agreement with this phenotype, p63 was recently found mutated
in patients affected by autosomal dominant disorder characterized by
ectrodactyly, ectodermal dyspalsia, and facial clefts (41).
The possibility that p53, p73, and p63 form hetero-oligomers in cells
has been indicated by recent reports (8, 9). It was originally shown
that p73
but not p73
can interact with p53 in two-hybrid
screening (21). It was subsequently reported that human tumor-derived
p53 mutants can engage in a physical association in vitro
and in vivo either with p73 or p63 (33, 34, 42, 43). Recent
findings indicate that the association between mutant p53 and p73 can
be, at least partially, governed by a common polymorphism at codon 72 of p53 that encodes Arg or Pro (34). The biological outcome of these
interactions results in functional inactivation of p73 transcriptional
activity as well as induction of apoptosis (33, 34, 42, 43).
Therefore, we have further investigated the physical association
between human tumor-derived p53 mutants and p63. We found that this
association occurs under physiological conditions as shown by
reciprocal co-precipitation experiments performed either in T47D breast
cancer cells and HaCat immortalized keratinocytes. The core domain of
mutant p53 and the DNA binding domain of p63 mediate this association.
We also report that binding of mutant p53 strongly impairs in
vitro and in vivo the binding of p63 to its target gene
promoters and consequently affects its transcriptional activity.
Indeed, we found that in cells carrying endogenous mutant p53, such as
T47D cells, p63 is unable to recruit some of its target gene promoters.
Similar to wt-p53, overexpression of p63 strongly inhibits colony
formation of SAOS2 cells. The concomitant expression of specific p53
mutants, such as p53His175 and p53His273, but not p53Gly281,
counteracts the p63-mediated growth suppression. Such an effect
requires the binding of p63 to mutant p53 and is not exerted by the
coexpression of wt-p53. Of note, the core domain of mutant p53 can also
exert such an impairment. Thus, protein-protein interactions between
members of the p53 family might impact on growth and drug resistance of
cancer cells.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
The H1299 cell line is derived from a human
large cell lung carcinoma. H1299 cells were maintained in RPMI medium,
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Invitrogen) (19).
The H1299-p53His175#41 cell line was generated as previously reported
(43). SAOS2 osteosarcoma cells (a gift from M. Fanciulli) and HaCat
immortalized keratinocytes were maintained in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% FCS. T47D breast cancer cells
were maintained in RPMI 10% FCS (43).
Plasmids and Transfections--
Overexpression of p63 was
achieved by transfection of pcDNA3-myc-p63
(kindly provided by
F. McKeon) and pcDNA3-HA-p63
. pcDNA3-HA-p63
-(141-321) was obtained by PCR followed by subcloning into pcDNA3-HA vector. Sequences of the oligonucleotides and primers are available on request. Overexpression of mutant p53 was achieved by transfection of
the following plasmids: pcDNA3-p53His175, pcDNA3-p53His273, pcDNA3-p53Trp248, pcDNA3-p53His175-(22-23),
pcDNA3-p53His175-
proline, pcDNA3-p53His175-(1-338), and
pcDNA3-p53His175-(1-355). Overexpression of the core domain of
mutant p53 was achieved by transfection of pEGFP-p53His175-(74-298).
The double mutants of p53His175 and its core were prepared as
previously described (43).
Transient transfections were done in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium plus 10% FCS by the calcium phosphate method in the presence of
BES
(N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid, sodium salt) (Sigma). The precipitates were left for 12 h,
after which the medium was changed again to RPMI plus 10% FCS. The
cells were harvested at 36 or 48 h, respectively (43).
Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot Analysis--
H1299 cells
were transfected in 100-mm plates with 8 µg of DNA and harvested at
36 h after transfection. Cells were lysed in 900 µl of lysis
buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 100 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaF, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, protease, and phosphatase inhibitors), and the extracts were sonicated for 10 s and
centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min to remove cell debris. Protein
concentrations were determined by a colorimetric assay (Bio-Rad). After
preclearing for 1 h at 4 °C with Protein G,
immunoprecipitations were performed by incubating 1.5 mg of whole-cell
extract with 1.5 µg/sample of anti-p63 polyclonal antibody (H-129
that maps at the carboxyl terminus of human p63
) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) or with anti-hemagglutinin
(anti-HA) antibody or with a mixture of anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801 or
with anti-IgG polyclonal antibody (Cappel). Immunocomplexes were
precipitated with protein G-agarose beads (KPL, Guilford, CA). The
immunoprecipitates were washed three times with 1 ml of wash NET-gel
buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.25% gelatin, 0.1% Nonidet P-40). The excess
liquid was aspirated, and 40 µl of 5× sample buffer was added.
Immunoprecipitates as well as 1% of each extract were resolved by
SDS-10% PAGE. Protein gels were transferred to nitrocellulose
membranes (Sartorius). For p53 detection, a mixture of p53 mAbs DO1 and
1801 (1:40 dilution) or anti-p53 FL393 (1 µg/ml) (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) were used respectively; for c-Myc detection, we used
anti-c-Myc (9E10) (Pharmingen) at 2 µg/ml; for maltose-binding
protein (MBP)-p63
detection, we used anti-MBP monoclonal antibody
(CLONTECH) at 2 µg/ml; for p21waf1
detection, we used anti-p21 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology) at 1:20,000 dilution; for p53His175-(74-298)
(GFP-tagged) we used an anti-GFP polyclonal antibody
(Invitrogen) at 1:5000.
T47D and HaCat cells were lysed as previously described. Aliquots of
cell extracts containing 2.5 mg of total proteins were immunoprecipitated with anti-p63 polyclonal antibody, with anti-IgG polyclonal antibody, or with a mixture of anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801. For p53 detection, a mixture of p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801 was used at 1:40
dilution. For reciprocal co-precipitation experiments, T47D and HaCat
cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-p53FL393 and with a mixture of
anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801, respectively. For p63 detection, an
anti-p63 monoclonal antibody (4A4 that was raised against amino acids
1-205 of p63) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used at 1:100 dilution.
Western blot analysis was performed with the aid of the enhanced
chemiluminescence Supersignal West Pico Stable Peroxidase Solution (Pierce).
Recombinant Proteins and in Vivo Binding Assays--
Recombinant
proteins employed in the pull-down assay were produced as previously
described (36, 43). Pull-down assays were performed using 20 µg of
immobilized purified GST fusion proteins or wild type GST that were
incubated with 2 mg of total cellular proteins prepared from H1299
cells transiently transfected with p53His273, p53Trp248, or
p53His175-(74-298), from H-175#41 and T47D cells. The immunoblots were
probed with a mixture of anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801 or with anti-p53
mAb 240 or with anti-MBP antibody. Detection was performed with the aid
of the enhanced chemiluminescence Supersignal West Pico Stable
Peroxidase Solution (Pierce).
Formaldehyde Cross-linking and Chromatin
Immunoprecipitation--
H1299-175#41 cells were treated with
ponasterone A to induce the expression of p53H175 for 24 h. DNA
and proteins were cross-linked by the addition of formaldehyde (1%
final concentration) 20 min before harvesting. Formaldehyde
cross-linking was stopped by the addition of glycine, pH 2.5 (125 mM final concentration), for 5 min at room temperature.
Cells were scraped off of the plates, resuspended in hypotonic buffer,
and passed through a 26-gauge needle. Nuclei were spun down,
resuspended in 300 µl of SDS lysis buffer (1% SDS, 10 mM
EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, and a protease inhibitor
mixture), and sonicated to generate 500-2000-bp fragments. After
centrifugation, the cleared supernatant was diluted 10-fold with
immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 5 MM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40). The cell lysate
was precleared by incubation at 4 °C with 50 µl of Protein A beads
preadsorbed with sonicated single-stranded DNA and bovine serum
albumin. The cleared lysates were incubated overnight with an anti-p63
polyclonal antibody (H-137, whose epitope corresponds to amino acids
15-151 of the DNA binding of
Np63
) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or
with a control antibody. Immune complexes were precipitated with
protein A beads preadsorbed with sonicated single-stranded DNA and
bovine serum albumin. After centrifugation, the beads were washed and the antigen was eluted with 1% SDS, 100 mM sodium
carbonate. DNA-protein cross-links were reversed by heating at 65 °C
for 4-5 h, and DNA was phenol-extracted and ethanol-precipitated.
Levels of Bax, p21waf1, 14-3-3
, and p53AIP1 promoter DNAs
were determined by PCR using oligonucleotides spanning the p53 binding
sites. The following specific oligonucleotides were used: Bax (down,
5'-CTG GGC AAC ATA GAG AGA CCT CAT; up, 5'-CCA GCC AGG ACG TTA TAG ATG
ACT); p21waf1 (down, 5'-CAT TGT TCC CAG CAC TTC CTC TC; up,
5'-AGA AAG CCA ATC AGA GCC ACA G); 14-3-3
(down, 5'-CAT CAG AGTAAG
ACC CTA TCT C; up, 5'-AAT GCT ACA GGG TTT CCA AGG); and p53AIP1 (down,
5'-TGG GTA GGA GGT GAT CTC ACC; up, 5'-GAG CAG CAC AAA TGG ACT GG).
Oligonucleotides specific for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
promoter (down, 5'-AAA AGC GGG GAG AAA GTA GG; up, 5'-TCT CTT TGG GCC
CTC CGA TC) were used as negative control.
For the chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) performed on T47D cells,
the following oligonucleotides were used: 14-3-3
(down, 5'-CTG TAC
TTC AGC CTG CAG ATC AGA G; up, 5'-CCG ACC TAA TAG TTG AGC CAG GAT); Bax
(down, 5'-CTG GGC AAC ATA GAG AGA CCT CAT; up, 5'-CCA GCC AGG ACG TTA
TAG ATG ACT); cyclin G (down, 5'-GAT CTG ATA TCG TGG GGT GAG GT; up,
5'-CCC ACA CCA ACT AAA GAC AGG AAG); and Mdm2 (down, 5'-GCA GGT TGA CTC
AGC TTT TCC TCT; up, 5'-GTG GTT ACA GCC CCA TCA GTA GGT A-3').
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay--
The electrophoretic
mobility shift assay was performed in a 20-µl DNA binding reaction,
which contained 30 µg of whole cell extract, 4 fmol of labeled duplex
oligonucleotide, binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 40% glycerol, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 2 µg/ml bovine
serum albumin, and 0.2% Triton X-100) and 300 µg of salmon sperm.
The reaction was carried out at room temperature for 10 min, and the
protein-DNA complexes were subjected to native electrophoresis on 5%
acrylamide, 0.5× TBE gel. Anti-p73 polyclonal antibodies C-17 and C-20
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-p63 polyclonal antibody H-129
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were added to the labeled oligonucleotide
and incubated on ice for 15 min. The following oligonucleotide was
used: TCA CAA GTT AGA GAC AAG CCT GGG CGT GGG CAT TAT T.
Luciferase Assays--
H1299 cells (3 × 105/60-mm plate) were transfected with reporter plasmid
together with the indicated combinations of plasmids. An equal number
of pCMV-
-gal plasmids was added to each transfection reaction
mixture. 36 h later, cells were rinsed with cold
phosphate-buffered saline, resuspended in cell lysis buffer (Promega
Corp., Madison, WI), and incubated for 10 min at room temperature.
Insoluble material was spun down, and luciferase activity was
quantitated using a commercially available kit (Promega) with the aid
of a TD-20E luminometer (Turner). The values were normalized for
-galactosidase and protein contents.
Indirect Immunofluorescence--
Cells growing on glass
coverslips were fixed with cold methanol and incubated at
20 °C
for 30 min. After rehydration with phosphate-buffered saline for
5 min, the cells were stained for 1 h with a mixture of p53 mAbs
DO1 and 1801. Staining with the secondary antibody and with
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole was performed as described before (19),
followed by visualization under a fluorescence microscope.
Colony Suppression Assays--
SAOS2 cells were plated and
transiently transfected as reported above. 24 h after the
transfection, cells were detached and replated in triplicate at 3 × 104/60-mm dish. Two days later, puromycin (2 µg/ml)
was added to each plate and maintained for 72 h. Two weeks later,
colonies were fixed in methanol and stained with Giemsa solution
followed by washing with water.
 |
RESULTS |
The Association between Human Tumor-derived p53 Mutants and p63
Occurs under Physiological Conditions--
To determine the biological
relevance of the association between mutant p53 and p63, we performed
coprecipitation experiments using T47D breast cancer cells and HaCat
skin-derived immortalized keratinocytes carrying endogenous mutant
p53Phe194 and mutant p53Y179/W282, respectively, as well as endogenous
p63 (34, 44). Following a preclearing, equal portions of cell extract
were taken for immunoprecipitation with control anti-IgG polyclonal
serum (Fig. 1, A-C,
lane 3), with anti-p63 polyclonal antibody (Fig. 1, A-C, lane 2), or with a mixture of
anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801 (Fig. 1A, lane
4). Immunoprecipitates were subjected to immunoblot with a
mixture of anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801. Aliquots of total cell lysate
from control cells (Fig. 1, A and B,
lane 1) were directly applied on the gel. As
shown in Fig. 1, A-C, p53 mutants were detected only in the
immunoprecipitates with p53 or with p63 (lanes 2 and 4) and not in the anti-IgG immunoprecipitates (lane 3). Reciprocal co-precipitation experiments
of T47D and HaCat were performed by immunoprecipitation with
anti-p53FL393 and a mixture of anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801, respectively. Equal aliquots of lysates derived from the above
mentioned cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-IgG serum or with
anti-HA monoclonal antibody. Immunoblot was probed with a monoclonal
anti-p63 antibody. As shown in Fig. 1, B-D,
co-precipitated p63 was detected only in the
p53-immunoprecipitates (lane 2). Of note, p63
, which is quite
abundant in T47D cells as verified by reverse transcription-PCR analysis (data not shown), is involved in the association with mutant
p53 (Fig. 1B)

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The association between mutant p53 and p63
occurs under physiological conditions. A-D, T47D human
breast cancer cells and HaCat skin-derived immortalized keratinocytes
carrying p53Phe194 and p53Y179/W282, respectively, were extracted and
subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) as described under
"Experimental Procedures," followed by immunoblot (IB)
using a mixture of anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801 (A and
B) and anti-p63 monoclonal antibody (C and
D). Lanes 2-4 (A) and
lanes 2 and 3 (B-D)
represent immunoprecipitates corresponding to 2.5 mg of total cell
protein. Positions of protein molecular size markers are indicated on
the left.
|
|
Thus, these results indicate that the association between mutant p53
and p63 occurs under physiological conditions.
The DNA Contact-defective p53 Mutants, p53His273 and p53Trp248,
Engage in a Physical Association with Endogenous p63
--
In an
attempt to verify whether DNA contact-defective p53 mutants, such as
p53His273 and p53Trp248 can also associate with endogenous p63
, we
performed coprecipitation experiments. To this end, H1299 cells were
transiently transfected with a vector encoding p53His273 or p53Trp248
or with an empty vector. Cell lysates derived from these cells were
processed as previously reported (Fig. 1C). As seen in Fig.
2A, coprecipitated mutant p53His273 and p53Trp248 were brought down only in anti-p63
immunoprecipitates (lanes 8 and 9).
The specificity of these interactions was further confirmed by a
pull-down assay in which identical cell lysates were incubated with
GST-p63
or GST alone. Specifically bound mutant p53 was detected
only when cell lysates (1.5 mg/lane) of H1299 overexpressing p53
mutants were incubated with GST-p63
(Fig. 2B,
lanes 6 and 9). Aliquots of
unprocessed lysates (100 µg/lane) were processed and probed for each
of the above reported experiments.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
p63 engages in a
physical interaction with p53His273 and p53Trp248. A,
cell lysates derived from H1299 cells transiently transfected with a
plasmid encoding p53Trp248 (H-248) or p53His273 (H-273) were subjected
to immunoprecipitation as reported in Fig. 1A. B,
cell extracts derived from H-273 and H-248 cells were incubated with
GST-p63 and GST alone. Immunoblots relative to panels
A and B were probed with a mixture of anti-p53
mAbs DO1 and 1801. Positions of protein molecular size markers are
indicated on the left.
|
|
Taken together, these results indicate that other human tumor-derived
p53 mutants distinct from those carried by T47D and HaCat cells can
engage in a physical association with endogenous p63. Furthermore, they
show that the two most frequent p53 mutations in human cancers, such
as p53His273 and p53Trp248, can interact with p63.
The Core Domain of Mutant p53 Is Sufficient for the Association
with p63
--
We and others have previously shown that the core
domain of mutant p53 is sufficient for the association with different
isoforms of p73 (42, 43). To further characterize the association
between mutant p53 and p63, we aimed to identify which p53 domain is
involved in that association.
To this end, we transiently co-transfected H1299 cells with a vector
encoding p53His175 or the indicated double mutants together with a
vector encoding a c-Myc-tagged version of p63
(Fig.
3B). In agreement with
previously reported data, we found that p53His175 and p63
can
associate in reciprocal coprecipitation experiments (Fig.
3A, lane 4, and Fig. 3B,
lane 2). Furthermore, as shown in Fig.
3B (lanes 3-6), p53 double mutants
were present in anti-p63 immunoprecipitates. We checked the efficiency
of the p63 immunoprecipitation by reprobing the blot with anti-c-Myc
monoclonal antibody (Fig. 3B, middle
panel). Protein levels of p53His175, its double mutants, and
c-Myc-tagged p63
reached in each transient co-transfection are shown
in Fig. 3B (lower panels). The
reported results clearly suggest that the core domain of mutant p53
might be sufficient for the association with p63
. To investigate
this issue, we employed an in vivo binding assay. Total cell
lysates of H1299 cells transiently transfected either with
pEGFPp53His175-(74-298) vector or with its related empty vector were
incubated with GST-p63
or with GST alone. Specifically bound mutant
p53 was detected by probing the immunoblot with anti-p53 mAb 240 (Fig.
4A, lane
4). To verify whether the core of mutant p53 can also engage
in a physical interaction with endogenous p63
, H1299 cells were
transiently transfected with the above reported vectors. Cell lysates
derived from these cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-p63 and
anti-IgG polyclonal sera and subjected to immunoblot with anti-p53 mAb
240. As shown in Fig. 4B, p53His175 (74-298) was
brought down only from extracts of cells transfected with
pEGFPp53His175 (74-298) and immunoprecipitated with anti-p63
polyclonal serum (lane 3).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
In vivo association between p63
and mutant p53His175. A, H1299 cells overexpressing
mutant p53His175 and a c-Myc tagged version of p63 were lysed and
subjected to immunoprecipitation with a mixture of anti-p53 MAbs DO1
and 1801. Immunoblot was probed with anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibody
(upper panel). The blot was reprobed with a
mixture of anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801. B, H1299 cells were
transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding p63 /c-Myc in
combination with p53His175, p53His175-(22-23), p53His175 proline,
p53His175-(1-355), or p53His175-(1-338). Cell extracts were subjected
to immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-p63 polyclonal
antibody. Immunoblot (IB) was probed with a mixture of
anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801 (top panel). The blot
was reprobed with anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibody (middle
panel). Aliquots containing 100 mg of total cell protein
were subjected to immunoblot with a mixture of anti-p53
mAbs DO1 and 1801 and with anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibody, respectively
(lower panels). Positions of protein molecular
size markers are indicated on the left.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The core domain of mutant p53 binds in
vitro and in vivo to p63. A, cell extracts
derived from H1299 cells transiently transfected either with a plasmid
encoding a GFP-tagged version of p53His175-(74-298) or with the
relative empty vector were incubated with GST-p63 or with GST alone.
Immunoblot (IB) was probed with anti-p53 mAb 240. B, cell extract employed in A was subjected to
immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-p63 or anti-IgG
polyclonal sera, followed by immunoblotting with anti-p53 mAb 240. C, bacterial purified MBP-p63 was incubated with
GST-p53His175 or GST-p53His175-(74-298) or with GST alone and
transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was probed with
anti-MBP antibody (upper panel). Coomassie
staining of replica gel shows the GST fusion proteins (lower
panel).
|
|
To further investigate whether the association between mutant p53 or
its core domain and p63 occurs directly, we employed an in
vitro binding assay. Bacterially expressed and purified MBP-p63
protein was incubated with GST-p53His175 or with GST-p53His175 (74-298) or with GST alone. The immunoblot was probed with anti-MBP antibody. Specifically bound p63
was detected only when MBP-p63
was incubated with mutant p53 or with its core domain (Fig.
4C, lanes 3 and 4). GST
fusion proteins employed in this experiment are shown in the
lower panel.
Thus, the reported results demonstrate that the core domain of mutant
p53 can engage in vitro and in vivo in a physical
interaction with p63
. The association between human tumor-derived
p53 mutants and p63
might occur directly.
The DNA Binding Domain of p63 Is Involved in the Association with
Mutant p53--
We have previously reported that the region of p73
including the sequence-specific DNA binding and the oligomerization
domains is sufficient for the interaction with mutant p53 (43). In an attempt to identify the minimal domain of p63 involved in that association, we analyzed whether the DNA binding domain of p63
is
sufficient for the association with mutant p53. To this end, we
transiently cotransfected H1299 cells with a vector encoding an
HA-tagged version of full-length p63
or its DNA binding domain together with a plasmid encoding mutant p53His175. As seen in Fig.
5, p53His175 was detected in
immunoprecipitates derived either from cells overexpressing full-length
p63
or the p63 DNA binding domain. Similar data were obtained
employing an in vivo binding assay in which GST-p63
,
GST-p63
-(140-321), and GST alone were incubated with cell lysates
of H1299 cells overexpressing p53His175 (data not shown).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The specific DNA binding domain of p63 is
sufficient for the binding to mutant p53. H1299 cells were
transiently transfected with a plasmid encoding a HA-tagged version of
p63 or p63 -(140-321) together with a plasmid encoding p53His175.
Cells were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP)
with anti-HA monoclonal antibody. Immunoblot was probed with a mixture
of anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801 (upper panel).
Aliquots containing 100 µg of total protein from unprocessed lysates
were subjected to immunoblot (IB) with a mixture of anti-p53
mAbs DO1 and 1801 (middle panel) or with
anti-HA monoclonal antibody (lower panels).
|
|
Thus, the DNA binding domain of p63 is sufficient for the association
with human tumor-derived p53 mutants.
Functional Inactivation of p63 by Mutant p53--
We have
previously reported that the association with mutant p53 interferes
with transcriptional activity of p73
, -
, -
, and -
(43). To
address the functional relevance of mutant p53 binding to p63
, we
performed DNA binding and transactivation assays. To this end, DNA
binding reactions were employed using GST-p63
, radiolabeled
oligonucleotide resembling the p53 binding site of Bax promoter with or
without cell lysates derived from the indicated cell lines (Fig.
6A). As shown in Fig.
6A, the binding of p63
to DNA was specific, because it
was supershifted by the addition of anti-p63 antibody but not by
anti-p73 antibody (Fig. 6A, lanes 7 and 8). Furthermore, a 200-fold molar excess of unlabeled probe specifically inhibited this binding (Fig. 6A,
lane 5) but not a 1000-fold molar excess of an
unrelated probe (Fig. 6A, lane 6).
Mutant p53His175 strongly reduced the binding of p63
to DNA (Fig.
6A, lane 4). Of note, a similar effect
was also seen in the presence of cell extracts derived from H1299 cells
overexpressing the core domain of mutant p53 (Fig. 6A,
lane 12).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Mutant p53 markedly reduces p63
transcriptional activity. A, gel shift assays were
performed by the incubation of GST-p63 with H1299 transiently
transfected with the indicated plasmids (lanes
3-12) and with a 32P-radiolabeled p53
DNA-binding site of human Bax. Specific and nonspecific competitions
are shown in lanes 5 and 6. Supershift
with anti-p63 polyclonal antibody is shown in lane
7. B, H1299 cells were transiently transfected
with the indicated combinations of plasmids encoding p63 (25 ng/60-mm dish), p53His175 (100 ng/dish), or p53His175-(74-298) (100 ng/dish) or vector control together with a Bax luciferase reporter
plasmid (50 ng/dish). The total amount of transfected DNA in each dish
was kept constant by the addition of empty vector wherever necessary.
Cell extracts were prepared 36 h later and subjected to
determination of luciferase activity. Results are represented as
repression of p63 transcriptional activity. Histograms show
the mean of a typical experiment of three performed in triplicate;
bars indicate S.D.
|
|
Transactivation assays were performed by cotransfection of H1299 cells
with p63
together with mutant p53His175 or with mutant p53His175
(74-298) and a luciferase reporter gene driven by the p53-responsive
Bax promoter. In agreement with DNA binding results, mutant p53His175
as well as its core domain markedly reduced the transcriptional
activity of p63
(Fig. 6B).
To determine whether mutant p53 can also interfere with the activation
of endogenous target genes by p63
, we analyzed the levels of
p21waf1 protein in cells overexpressing p63
alone or
together with a plasmid encoding mutant p53His175 as well as its core
domain. As seen in Fig. 7, overexpression
of p63
caused a clear accumulation of p21waf1 protein
(lanes 2 and 6). This is markedly
reduced when mutant p53 or its core domain is concomitantly
overexpressed (lanes 3 and 8).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Overexpression of mutant p53His175 or of its
core domain markedly reduces the amount of p63-inducible
p21waf1 protein. H1299 cells were transiently transfected
with the indicated plasmid combinations. The total amount of
transfected was maintained constant by the addition of a control
vector. Cell extracts (50 µg/lane) were prepared 36 h later,
subjected to SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted with anti-p21waf1
polyclonal serum, with a mixture of anti-p53 mAb DO1/1801, with
anti-c-Myc monoclonal antibody, with anti-GFP serum, or with
anti- -Hsp70 antibody for equal loading.
|
|
Taken together, these results demonstrate that human tumor-derived p53
can interact with p63 not only physically but also functionally.
The Binding of Mutant p53 to p63 Interferes in Vivo with the
Recruitment of Its Target Genes--
To further investigate whether
the physical association with mutant p53 can interfere in
vivo with the binding of p63 to a specific DNA binding site, we
performed chromatic immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and
co-precipitation experiments in the same cell context such as H1299
cells whose mutant p53His175 expression is tightly regulated by
ponasterone A (H1299-p53His175#41) (43). In order to induce mutant p53
expression, the cell line was grown in the presence of ponasterone A
(2.5 µM/ml) for 24 h.
To perform ChIP experiments, cells with or without ponasterone A
addition were treated with formaldehyde to cross-link proteins to DNA.
The cross-linked chromatin derived from equivalent numbers of cells was
immunoprecipitated by using either an anti-p63 or an unrelated
anti-IgG antibody. Following immunoprecipitation, the cross-linking was
reversed, and the amount of endogenous Bax, p21waf1, 14-3-3
,
and p53AIP1 promoters was monitored in each sample by PCR amplification
using internal primers (33, 35, 45-47). We found that Bax,
p21waf1, and 13-3-3
promoters were present in the chromatin
immunoprecipitates with anti-p63 antibody (Fig.
8A, upper
panels). Of note, these promoters were not present in
identical chromatin immunoprecipitates derived from cells
overexpressing p53His175 upon the addition of ponasterone A (Fig.
8A, upper panels). As expected,
anti-IgG immunoprecipitates derived from the above mentioned cells did not contain the above mentioned promoters. As shown in Fig.
8A, p63 does not bind to the p53AIP1 promoter. This may be
related to target specificity or to the lack of p63 modifications that make it able to recruit directly such a p53 target gene. To evaluate whether the binding of p63 to the Bax, p21waf1, and 14-3-3
promoters was specific, we applied the chromatin immunoprecipitation
assay to the GADPH promoter that does not contain the binding site for
p63. Thus, the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase promoter was
present neither in anti-p63 nor anti-IgG immunoprecipitates (Fig.
8A, lower panel).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Mutant p53 interferes in vivo
with the binding of p63 to target gene promoters.
A, cross-linked chromatin from H175#41 with or without
ponasterone A treatment was immunoprecipitated with antibodies
to p63 and IgG and analyzed by PCR with primers specific for the
indicated promoters (see "Experimental Procedures"). Input
corresponds to nonimmunoprecipitated cross-linked chromatin.
B, H1299-inducible cell line was generated as reported under
"Experimental Procedures." Cell extracts were prepared from
H1299-p53His175#41 24h after the addition of 2.5 µM of
ponasterone A (lanes 1-3). Identical cell
extracts were prepared from untreated cells. Aliquots of 1.5 mg of
protein were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-p63 or with
anti-IgG polyclonal sera. C, subcellular localization of
mutant p53His175 is shown. Cells were stained with
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole to visualize nuclei and a mixture of
anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801 to visualize mutant p53.
|
|
To perform co-precipitation experiments, cell extracts derived from
H1299-p53His175#41 with or without ponasterone A stimulation were
immunoprecipitated either with anti-p63 and anti-IgG polyclonal sera
and subjected to immunoblot with a mixture of anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and
1801. As shown in Fig. 8B, mutant p53His175 was only present in immunoprecipitates derived from H1299-p53His175#41 cells upon induction with ponasterone A (lane 6). The
predominant nuclear localization of mutant p53His175 upon ponasterone A
induction is shown in Fig. 8C.
To further verify whether the binding of p63 to its target gene
promoters was impaired in cells carrying endogenous mutant p53, we
performed ChIP experiments in T47D cells. To this end, cross-linked
chromatin derived from T47D cells was immunoprecipitated and processed
as reported in Fig. 8A. We found that the binding of p63 to
Bax, 14-3-3
, and cyclin G promoters (upper
panels) is impaired, whereas the binding to Mdm2 promoter
(lower panel) is still present (Fig.
9) (48).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
The binding in vivo of p63
to some of its target gene promoters is impaired in T47D cells.
Cross-linked chromatin from T47D cells was immunoprecipitated with
antibodies to p63 and IgG and analyzed by PCR with primers specific for
the indicated promoters (see "Experimental Procedures"). Input
corresponds to nonimmunoprecipitated cross-linked chromatin.
|
|
Taken together, the results of the ChIP (Figs. 8A and 9) and
the co-precipitation experiments (Figs. 1 (A and
B) and 8B) clearly indicate that, only upon
binding to mutant p53, endogenous p63 is unable to recruit specific
target genes.
Overexpression of Specific Human Tumor-derived p53 Mutants Markedly
Reduces p63-mediated Growth Suppression--
To further investigate
the biological relevance of the association between mutant p53 and p63,
we investigated whether exogenous expression of mutant p53 interferes
with p63
-mediated growth suppression. To this end, SAOS2 cells were
cotransfected with p63
together with a plasmid encoding p53His175,
or p53His273, or p53His175-(74-298) and as a control with an empty
vector. Overexpression of p63
suppressed colony formation of SAOS2
cells as compared with that of cells transfected with empty vector
(Fig. 10A). Conversely, SAOS2 cells regained colony formation when mutant p53 was overexpressed (Fig. 10A). Interestingly, the core domain of mutant p53
could also promote such an effect (Fig. 10A). In agreement
with the above reported observations, we found that transient
overexpression of p63
strongly inhibited cell growth of SAOS2 cells,
whereas coexpression of p53His175 restored such property to a similar extent as control cells (Fig. 10B). Unlike
mutant p53, wt-p53 is per se able to inhibit colony
formation of SAOS2 cells, but when co-expressed with p63
it does not
interfere with p63-mediated growth suppression (Fig.
10A).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Mutant p53 overexpression rescues
p63-induced growth suppression. A, SAOS2 cells were
grown in 60-mm dishes and transfected with the indicated plasmids
together with a selectable marker plasmid. The ratio between p63
expression plasmid (2 µg/transfection) and the ones encoding for p53
mutants (6 µg/transfection) and its core domain was 1:3. An equal
amount of pBabe-puro (0.5 µg/transfection) was added to each
transfection. Cells were replated and selected with puromycin as
reported under "Experimental Procedures." The data shown represent
the average of number of colonies formed relative to cells transfected
with the marker alone. Error bars indicate S.D.
of a representative experiment out of three performed in triplicate.
B, SAOS2 cells were transiently transfected with the
indicated plasmid combinations. The total amount of transfected DNA was
maintained constant by the addition of an empty control vector. 48 h later, cells were fixed in paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room
temperature. After rehydration with phosphate-buffered saline
for 5 min, cells were visualized and photographed with the aid of
phase-contrast microscopy.
|
|
In an attempt to verify whether each p53 mutant can bind and counteract
p63 activities, we assessed the effects induced by mutant p53Gly281
overexpression on the p63-mediated growth suppression. As shown in Fig.
11A, mutant p53Gly281 does
not counteract p63-mediated suppression of SAOS2 colony formation. The
requirement of the physical association of mutant p53 to p63, in order
to impair the activities of the latest, is clearly indicated by the
finding that mutant p53Gly281 does not interact with p63
(Fig.
11B), whereas, under the same experimental conditions,
p53His175 binds to p63
(Fig. 11C).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Mutant p53Gly281 does not bind to and
counteract p63-mediated growth suppression. A, SAOS2
cells were grown and transfected with the indicated plasmid
combinations as reported in Fig. 9A. The data shown are the
average of number of colonies formed relative to cells transfected with
the marker alone. Error bars indicate S.D. values
of a representative experiment out of three performed in triplicate.
B and C, cell extracts derived from
SAOS2-p53Gly281 (S-281) and SAOS2-p53His175 (S-175) cells were
incubated with GST-p63 and GST alone. Immunoblots relative to
B and C were probed with a mixture of anti-p53
mAbs DO1 and 1801. D, SAOS2 cells were transiently
transfected with the indicated plasmids. Cell extracts (50 µg/lane)
were prepared 36 h later, subjected to SDS-PAGE, and immunoblotted
with anti-c-Myc or with a mixture of anti-p53 mAbs DO1 and 1801.
|
|
To explore whether the counteracting effect of mutant p53 on
p63-mediated growth suppression occurs through the reduction of p63
protein levels, we looked at the protein levels of p63
upon
overexpression of p53His175 or p53Gly281 in SAOS2 cells. We found that
such overexpression does not impact on the protein levels of p63
(Fig. 11D).
Taken together, these results contribute to further define a functional
role for the association between specific human tumor-derived p53
mutants and p63.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Recent reports have clearly indicated the existence of a network
of protein-protein interactions between the members of the p53 family
in cancer cells (33, 34, 42, 43). Here we provide further evidence on
the physical association between human tumor-derived p53 mutants and
p63. In agreement with the data reported by Gaiddon et al.
(42), we show that the interaction between mutant p53 and p63 occurs
under physiological conditions. The simplest way to interpret such
in vivo interaction could be that in tumors bearing mutant
p53 growth inhibition, apoptosis or differentiation induced by p63 is
impaired. In support of this, we show that overexpression of mutant p53
markedly reduces transcriptional activity of p63 as well as
counteracting growth suppression by p63. The tumor suppressor
function of p63 and p73 has been challenged by several observations
(49). To date, both p63 and p73 have been found rarely mutated in human
tumors. Indeed, several studies have reported that overexpression of
p73 or
Np63 is present in neuroblastoma, colorectal cancer, bladder
cancer, nasopharingeal carcinomas, squamous-cell carcinoma of head and
neck, and hepatocellular carcinoma (4, 50-57). Thus, it is possible
that overexpression of p63 and p73 in tumors is tolerated by the
presence of mutant p53. p73 and possibly p63 can be activated in
response to DNA damage. Indeed, it has been reported that p73 can be
stabilized and tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to
cis-platin and
-irradiation, respectively (58-60). These
post-translational modifications of p73 require a competent kinase-active c-Abl (58-60). A more recent work has reported that, in
response to DNA damage, p73 can be acetylated and consequently driven
to specific target genes (61). We have recently shown that the
co-activator YAP depicts specificity in binding and enhancing transcriptional activity of p53 family members (36, 62, 63). YAP binds
to p63 and p73 but not p53 and promotes their ability to activate
proapoptotic genes such as Bax
(36).2 Taken together, these
results indicate that in response to DNA damage or diverse types of
stress, p63 and/or p73 can promote apoptosis, being involved in
alternative pathways to those recruiting p53. The identification of
specific p63 or p73 target genes should highlight the downstream events
of such pathways. Gain of function of mutant p53 could result in
binding and sequestering p63 from pathways, culminating in either
growth arrest or apoptosis upon cancer treatment. As shown by chromatin
immunoprecipitation experiments (Figs. 8 and 9), the binding of
endogenous p63 to the Bax, p21waf1, 14-3-3
, cyclin G, and
p53AIP1 promoters is impaired in cells carrying either exogenous or
endogenous mutant p53. This might represent a molecular basis to the
impaired apoptotic activity of p63 in tumors bearing mutant p53.
We originally reported that the core domain of mutant p53 and a large
region of p73, including the DNA binding and the oligomerization domains, mediate this association in vitro and in
vivo (43). A more recent work has reported that the core domain of
mutant p53 can either bind to p73 or to p63 (42). By deletion studies, we now report that the interaction between mutant p53 and p63 occurs
through the respective DNA binding domains. The identification of the
minimal stretch of residues of p63 and mutant p53 directly involved in
this interaction may allow the design of small peptides aimed to
disassemble the protein-protein complex and to make available p63 for
anti-tumor effects. The core domain of mutant p53 has been regarded as
inactive, since it cannot bind and activate wt-p53 target genes. Taken
together, these observations with the previously reported data define
the core domain of mutant p53 as a protein-protein interaction module
that might contribute to gain of function of mutant p53 by sequestering
and inactivating proteins required for anti-tumor functions. Further
support for the potential role of the core domain in gain of function
activity of mutant p53 might be provided by its ability to markedly
reduce p63 transcriptional activity and to counteract p63-induced
growth inhibition as found in transactivation and colony suppression
assays. These findings do not exclude the possibility that the N
terminus and/or C terminus (or termini) of mutant p53 can play a role
in oncogenic activity of mutant p53 (64-67). Indeed, mutant p53Gly281
that has been reported to exert, in vitro and in
vivo, gain of function activity through its N-terminal
transactivation domain does not associate with and counteract
p63-mediated growth suppression (Fig. 11, A and B). These findings might allow the definition of two classes
of gain of function p53 mutants. The first one may account for mutants (p53His175 and p53His273) whose gain of function activity relies on
protein-protein interactions with p63 and p73, whereas the second one
includes p53 mutants (p53Gly281) that exert such activity independently
from the physical association with the p53 family members. Thus, gain
of function of mutant p53 might result from a combination of specific
protein-protein interactions as well as from the activation or
repression of specific target genes. In this case, a model based on the
sequential role for the domains of mutant p53 can be considered. A
rather speculative hypothesis might suggest that the core domain of
mutant p53 plays the major role in sequestering and inactivating
proteins required for biological activities of oncosuppressor proteins,
such as p63 and p73, whereas both N-and C-terminal regions can mainly
control activation or repression of specific target genes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank F. McKeon, A. Levine, B. Vogelstein,
and G. Cesareni for expression plasmids; D. Lane for DO1 antibody; and
M. Fanciulli for SAOS2 cells. We are grateful to M. Sudol for helpful
suggestions and revision of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by European Community Grant
QLG1-1999-00273, by the Italian Association for Cancer Research, and
by the Ministero della Sanita', Italy.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by European Community Grant QLG1-1999-00273.
¶
Recipient of a fellowship from Fondazione Italiana per
la Ricerca sul Cancro.
§§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Molecular Oncogenesis
Laboratory, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Via delle Messi d'Oro, 156, Rome 00158, Italy. Tel.: 39-06-52662522; Fax: 39-06-4180526; E-mail:
blandino@ifo.it.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 13, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201405200
2
S. Strano and G. Blandino, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
wt-p53, wild type
p53;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hollstein, M.,
Soussi, T.,
Thomas, G.,
von Brevern, M. C.,
and Bartsch, H.
(1997)
Rec. Results Cancer Res.
143,
369-389[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Hainaut, P.,
Soussi, T.,
Shomer, B.,
Hollstein, M.,
Greenblatt, M.,
Hovig, E.,
Harris, C. C.,
and Montesano, R.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
151-157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Levine, A. J.
(1997)
Cell
88,
323-331[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Crook, T.,
Nicholls, J. M.,
Brooks, L.,
O'Nions, J.,
and Allday, M. J.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
3439-3444[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Hussain, S. P.,
and Harris, C. C.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
4023-4037[Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Prives, C.,
and Hall, P. A.
(1999)
J. Pathol.
187,
112-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Blagosklonny, M. V.
(2000)
FASEB J.
14,
1901-1907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Sigal, A.,
and Rotter, V.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
6788-6793[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Strano, S.,
Rossi, M.,
Fontemaggi, G.,
Munarriz, E.,
Soddu, S.,
Sacchi, A.,
and Blandino, G.
(2001)
FEBS Lett.
490,
163-170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Crook, T.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
3935-3940[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Dittmer, D.,
Pati, S.,
Zambetti, G.,
Chu, S.,
Teresky, A. K.,
Moore, M.,
Finlay, C.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
4,
42-46[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Hsiao, M.,
Low, J.,
Dorn, E., Ku, D.,
Pattengale, P.,
Yeargin, J.,
and Haas, M.
(1994)
Am. J. Pathol.
145,
702-714[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Lee, Y. I.,
Lee, S.,
Das, G. C.,
Park, U. S.,
and Park, S. M.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
3717-3726[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Li, R.,
Sutphin, P. D.,
Schwartz, D.,
Matas, D.,
Almog, N.,
Wolkowicz, R.,
Goldfinger, N.,
Pei, H.,
Prokocimer, M.,
and Rotter, V.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
3269-3277[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Murphy, K. L.,
Dennis, A. P.,
and Rosen, J. M.
(2000)
FASEB J.
14,
2291-2302[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Okamoto, K.,
and Prives, C.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
4606-4615[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Shaulsky, G.,
Goldfinger, N.,
and Rotter, V.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
5232-5237[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Aas, T.,
Borresen, A. L.,
Geisler, S.,
Smith-Sorensen, B.,
Johnsen, H.,
Varhaug, J. E.,
Akslen, L. A.,
and Lonning, P. E.
(1996)
Nat. Med.
2,
811-814[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Blandino, G.,
Levine, A. J.,
and Oren, M.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
477-485[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Gualberto, A.,
Aldape, K.,
Kozakiewicz, K.,
and Tlsty, T. D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
5166-5171[Abstract/Free Full Text]. 21
|
| 21.
|
Kaghad, M.,
Bonnet, H.,
Yang, A.,
Creancier, L.,
Biscan, J. C.,
Valent, A.,
Minty, A.,
Chalon, P.,
Lelias, J. M.,
Dumont, X.,
Ferrara, P.,
McKeon, F.,
and Caput, D.
(1997)
Cell
90,
809-819[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Oren, M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
829-832[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Yang, A.,
Kaghad, M.,
Wang, Y.,
Gillett, E.,
Fleming, M. D.,
Dotsch, V.,
Andrews, N. C.,
Caput, D.,
and McKeon, F.
(1998)
Mol. Cell.
2,
305-316[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
De Laurenzi, V.,
Costanzo, A.,
Barcaroli, D.,
Terrinoni, A.,
Falco, M.,
Annicchiarico-Petruellizz, M.,
Levrero, M.,
and Melino, G.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
188,
1763-1768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
De Laurenzi, V. D.,
Catani, M. V.,
Terrinoni, A.,
Corazzari, M.,
Melino, G.,
Costanzo, A.,
Levrero, M.,
and Knight, R. A.
(1999)
Cell Death Differ.
6,
389-390[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Osada, M.,
Ohba, M.,
Kawahara, C.,
Ishioka, C.,
Kanamaru, R.,
Katoh, I.,
Ikawa, Y.,
Nimura, Y.,
Nakagawara, A.,
Obinata, M.,
and Ikawa, S.
(1998)
Nat. Med.
4,
839-843[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Schmale, H.,
and Bamberger, C.
(1997)
Oncogene
15,
1363-1367[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Trink, B.,
Okami, K., Wu, L.,
Sriuranpong, V.,
Jen, J.,
and Sidransky, D.
(1998)
Nat. Med.
4,
747-748[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Levrero, M., De,
Laurenzi, V.,
Costanzo, A.,
Gong, J.,
Wang, J. Y.,
and Melino, G.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
1661-1670[Abstract]
|
| 30.
|
Yang, A.,
and McKeon, F.
(2000)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.
1,
199-207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Jost, C. A.,
Marin, M. C.,
and Kaelin, W. G., Jr.
(1997)
Nature
389,
191-194[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Buckbinder, L.,
Talbott, R.,
Velasco-Miguel, S.,
Takenaka, I.,
Faha, B.,
Seizinger, B. R.,
and Kley, N.
(1995)
Nature
377,
646-649[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Di Como, C. J.,
Gaiddon, C.,
and Prives, C.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1438-1449[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Marin, M. C.,
Jost, C. A.,
Brooks, L. A.,
Irwin, M. S.,
O'Nions, J.,
Tidy, J. A.,
James, N.,
McGregor, J. M.,
Harwood, C. A.,
Yulug, I. G.,
Vousden, K. H.,
Allday, M. J.,
Gusterson, B.,
Ikawa, S.,
Hinds, P. W.,
Crook, T.,
and Kaelin, W. G., Jr.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
25,
47-54[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Miyashita, T.,
and Reed, J. C.
(1995)
Cell
80,
293-299[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Strano, S.,
Munarriz, E.,
Rossi, M.,
Castagnoli, L.,
Shaul, Y.,
Sacchi, A.,
Oren, M.,
Sudol, M.,
Cesareni, G.,
an |