|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201880200 on March 8, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 21, 18928-18937, May 24, 2002
Contributions of the LG Modules and Furin Processing to Laminin-2
Functions*
Sergei P.
Smirnov ,
Erin L.
McDearmon§,
Shaohua
Li ,
James M.
Ervasti§,
Karl
Tryggvason¶, and
Peter D.
Yurchenco
From the Department of Pathology & Laboratory
Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New
Jersey 08854, the § Department Physiology, University of
Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, and the ¶ Department of
Medical Biochemistry & Biophysics, Karolinska Institute,
S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
Received for publication, February 25, 2002, and in revised form, March 7, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The 2-laminin subunit contributes to basement
membrane functions in muscle, nerve, and other tissues, and mutations
in its gene are causes of congenital muscular dystrophy. The 2
G-domain modules, mutated in several of these disorders, are thought to mediate different cellular interactions. To analyze these
contributions, we expressed recombinant laminin-2
( 2 1 1) with LG4-5,
LG1-3, and LG1-5 modular deletions. Wild-type and LG4-5
deleted-laminins were isolated from medium intact and cleaved within
LG3 by a furin-like convertase. Myoblasts adhered predominantly through
LG1-3 while -dystroglycan bound to both LG1-3 and LG4-5.
Recombinant laminin stimulated acetylcholine receptor (AChR)
clustering; however, clustering was induced only by the proteolytic
processed form, even in the absence of LG4-5. Furthermore, clustering
required 6 1 integrin and -dystroglycan
binding activities available on LG1-3, acting in concert with laminin
polymerization. The ability of the modified laminins to mediate
basement membrane assembly was also evaluated in embryoid bodies where
it was found that both LG1-3 and LG4-5, but not processing, were
required. In conclusion, there is a division of labor among LG-modules
in which (i) LG4-5 is required for basement membrane assembly but not
for AChR clustering, and (ii) laminin-induced AChR clustering requires
furin cleavage of LG3 as well as -dystroglycan and
6 1 integrin binding.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The laminin 2-chain, a subunit of laminin-2
( 2 1 1) and laminin-4
( 2 2 1), is expressed in the
basement membranes of skeletal muscle, peripheral nerve, brain, and
placenta (1-3). 2-Laminins, similar in molecular morphology and
functional attributes to 1-laminin, are thought to play important
roles in basement membrane assembly and the maintenance of the
neuromuscular axis (reviewed in Ref. 4). Mutations in the laminin
2-subunit are a cause of a human congenital muscular dystrophy
typically characterized by early onset, severity, and involvement of
peripheral nerve and brain (5, 6). Some of these dystrophies have
mutations within the part of the gene coding for LG modules (7). The
dystrophic phenotype in mouse models of the disease is one of defective
basement membranes in muscle and nerve, muscle necrosis with poor
regeneration, patchy peripheral nerve dysmyelination, and decreased
complexity of infoldings and post-junctional membrane lengths of the
NMJ motor endplate (6, 8-12).
Studies on cultured myotubes have revealed that 1- and 2-laminin
polymerization and G-domain contributions drive laminin assembly on the
cell surface and direct a redistribution of interacting cytoskeletal
components (13). The ability of laminin to induce such cytoskeletal
reorganizations is thought to reflect an important receptor-dependent property of laminin during early steps
in assembly of a basement membrane. It has also been shown that
laminins can induce the clustering of the acetylcholine receptor
(AChR),1 a property shared
with agrin (14). However, while agrin is secreted by terminal neurons
and triggers this differentiation in a MuSK-dependent and
topographically site-specific manner, the activity of laminins is
MuSK-independent and topographically diffuse (8, 14-17). The laminin
activity has been found to depend on binding contributions for
7 1 integrin and dystroglycan and appears
to synergistically enhance the role of agrin (16, 17).
Although the laminin 2 chain is closely related to the
embryonic-type laminin- 1 chain, and although both laminins are
capable of polymerization mediated through short-arm domains (18), it is different in that the 2-chain becomes proteolytically cleaved within G-domain and has a different distribution of dystroglycan- and
heparin-binding sites. Laminin's biologically relevant functions are
thought to derive from coordinated contributions from different domains
of all three subunits (4). To analyze the LG subdomain dependence of
these functions in 2-laminins, we generated recombinant laminins of
the subunit composition
2 1 1 bearing three
deletions of the LG modules. These laminins were proteolytically
processed in LG-3 by a furin-like convertase, and both unprocessed and
processed forms were isolated for study. Using these reagents, we
investigated their effects on cultured myotubes and laminin 1-null
embryoid bodies, the latter a model system with which to evaluate
basement membrane assembly. We report that laminin-2 binds to cell
surfaces, mediates basement membrane assembly, and induces AChR
clustering. While all activities depend on LG1-3, AChR clustering
requires only LG1-3. Furthermore, furin processing is needed for AChR
clustering but not for basement membrane assembly.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Human DNA Constructions
Lm- 1/pCEP4--
A 5.5-kb BamHI DNA fragment
containing the full-length human 1 cDNA (19, 20) was isolated
from a pBR322- 1 plasmid and inserted into the pCEP4 (puromycin)
vector at the BamHI site.
Lm- 1FLAG-pRc/CMV--
The 1-chain cDNA
(21) in pVL941 was modified to contain a nucleotide sequence encoding
the FLAG epitope. Laminin 1 cDNA with a 3'-terminal FLAG
sequence was prepared from the pVL941 plasmid by replacing a
SacI-SnaBI DNA fragment containing the 3' end of
cDNA with a SacI digested PCR product synthesized using primers 5'-CAACTGTCCTACTGGCAC-3' and
5'-CGGGATCCTACTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAGTCGGGCTTTTCAATGGACGG-3'. The second primer contained the 3' end of 1 cDNA and FLAG
sequence preceded the stop codon. PCR was accomplished with Vent
polymerase (New England Biolabs). The 5.5 BamHI DNA fragment
from the plasmid was excised, blunted, and ligated into the expression
vector pRc/CMV (Invitrogen, neo resistance) previously digested with
HindIII and blunted.
Lm- 2 Constructs--
A synthetic DNA fragment coding for the
HA epitope was inserted following a BM40 signal sequence connected
in-frame with the mature 2 cDNA, the last previously joined from
two cDNAs coding for the full protein sequence (2, 22). For this
purpose a primer
5'-CCCGATATCATGAGGGCCTGGATCTTCTTTCTCCTTTGCCTGGCCGGGAGGGCTCTGGCAGCCCCGCTAGCTTACCCTTACGACGTGCCTGACTACGCCCAGCAAAGAGGTTTATTCCCT-3' containing an HA-TAG and BM40 (SPARC) signal peptide and 5'
end of 2 cDNA sequences was used together with a second primer
5'-CTGTCCTCCTACTGCTGGG-3' to synthesize a PCR product with pCIS- 2
plasmid DNA. The DNA fragment obtained was cleaved with
EcoRV and BssHII and inserted into pCIS- 2
vector DNA to replace the original 1837-bp
EcoRV-BssHII DNA sequence.
Lm- 2 Deletion Constructs--
In the first step, two PCR
reactions were carried out with two pairs of primers. One primer (first
pair) corresponded to the 5' end and another primer (second pair)
corresponded to the 3' end of the deletion. At the second step, PCR was
carried out with a mixture of the products from the first reactions.
The following sets of primers were used for the first pair for:
(a) deletion of LG1-5: 5'-CCTCACTGGTCCGCTGCCT-GC-3'
(number 1) with 5'-CCCCTTAATTAATCAGTCACCTCCTGAAGACACAGATACTTTG-3' and
5'-TGAGGGGCGTTCAACCTGTATCATGC-3' with 5'-CAAGTTAACGCGGCCGCTC-3' (number
2); (b) for deletion of LG1-3: number 1 with
5'-GGGCGTAGGAAAGGCTGGGGTGGGAACTGGGTCACCTCCTGAAGACACAGATACTTTG-3' and
5'-CCAGTTCCCACCCCAGCCTTTCCTACGCCC-3' with number 2; (c) for deletion of LG4-5: number 1 with
5'-GCATGATACAGGTTGAACGCCCCTCACTCAGGCTGGATAACTATTTC-3' and
5"-TGAGGGGCGTTCAACCTGTATCATGC-3' with number 2. For all
mutations, primers 1 and 2 were used for the second step PCR. The PCR
products were then cleaved with Bsp120I and PacI
and inserted into pCIS- 2 vector to replace the original
Bsp120I-PacI fragment.
Transfection and Cloning of Mammalian 293 cells
Transfection of human adenovirus-transformed 293 cells (ATCC CRL
1573) was carried out by calcium phosphate precipitation as previously
described (23). Samples from conditioned media and cell lysates were
screened for recombinant protein using anti-laminin-2/4 antibody.
cDNAs coding for the three chains of recombinant laminin-2 (all of
human origin) were transfected into 293 cells in a manner similar to
that used to generate recombinant laminin-1 (24) but with different
expression vectors for the 1 and 1 chains ( 2 in vector pCIS,
1 in pCEP4-Pu {puromycin} and 1 in pRC/CMV {G418}) with
the FLAG tag DNA (protein sequence DYKDDDDK) inserted 3' to, and
in-frame with, 1. The first step was to transfect and select for
stable clones of 293 cells expressing the 1 chain. The second step
was to co-transfect these cells with the 2 and 1 vector
constructs and to select for cells stably expressing all three chains
under puromycin and G418 selection. Laminin 1 and 1 chain
expression was confirmed in immunoblots with laminin-2/4 and E4
specific antibodies, the latter recognizing epitopes of the N-terminal
moiety of the 1 chain. The 2 chain was identified using affinity
purified antibodies to whole laminin-2 and laminin- 2G domain (18,
25). Human 1 chain expression was found to be much greater compared
with mouse- 1 (24), a fraction of the protein appearing in medium.
Cells were maintained in either 1 µg/ml puromycin and/or 500 µg/ml
G418 following transfection with resistant colonies were isolated and expanded.
Purification of Recombinant Laminins
Cells stably expressing recombinant laminin were grown to
confluency in tissue culture flasks (150 cm2) maintained
with G418 and puromycin. Conditioned media was collected and
centrifuged to remove debris, adjusted to 1.5 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 0.1% Tween 20, and incubated
with FLAG-specific monoclonal M2 antibody-agarose beads (Sigma, 1-ml
beads/100 ml medium) at 4 °C overnight. Beads were collected by
centrifugation, washed, and protein was eluted with a 0.1 mg/ml
solution of FLAG peptide (Sigma/2.5 ml). The eluates were purified by
HPLC affinity chromatography using a heparin-5PW (0.8 × 7.5 cm;
Toso-Haas) equilibrated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA. The column was eluted with a shallow NaCl gradient
and fractions from the separated peaks were collected.
Proteins and Antibodies
Laminin-1 (DEAE-unbound fraction) and laminin-2/4 were purified
from mouse EHS tumor and human placenta as described (18). Laminin-1
fragment E1' (short arm complex) was purified from EHS tumor (26) and
AEBSF-E1' (nonpolymerization inhibition control) was prepared by
treatment of E1' with 5 mM aminoethylbenzenesulfonyl fluoride (13). Polyclonal antibodies specific for laminin-1, laminin-2/4, and laminin 2-G domain have been previously described (18, 24). Imunoprecipitation was accomplished by incubating ~5 ml of
conditioned medium with 10 µg/ml primary antibody followed by
precipitation with 50 µl of a 50% suspension of either protein A-Sepharose or anti-FLAG-agarose beads. Mouse monoclonal antibodies specific for HA (clone 12CA5) and the C-terminal region of
-dystroglycan (used at 1:25 dilution) were purchased from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals and Novocastra Laboratories. Hamster monoclonal
IgM specific for the 1 integrin subunit was used at
10-20 µg/ml for blocking experiments, and at 5 µg/ml for indirect
immunofluorescence (Ha2/5, PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Monoclonal
antibodies used to inhibit integrin- 6 (mouse),
integrin- 7 (mouse), integrin- 1 (hamster),
and -dystroglycan (mouse) binding to laminin were, respectively,
GoH3 (BD PharMingen, CA), Ha2/5 (BD PharMingen), O26 (used at 30 µg/ml; gift of Steven Kaufman, Univeristy of Illinois; Ref. 27), and
IIH6 (hybridoma conditioned medium used at a 1:10 dilution, gift of
Kevin Campbell, University of Iowa).
Biochemical Assays and Rotary Shadowing
Dystroglycan Binding Assay--
96-Well polystyrene plates were
incubated overnight at 4 °C with 0.5 µg/well of either purified
laminins or bovine serum albumin (Sigma) diluted in 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA.
Laminin-coated wells were blocked for 2 h at room temperature with
1% bovine serum albumin in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2 followed by a 2-h incubation with varying concentrations of iodinated -dystroglycan diluted in blocking solution. Wells were washed with blocking solution, removed, and bound -dystroglycan radioactivity was measured. Nonspecific binding of labeled -dystroglycan to bovine serum albumin-coated wells was subtracted (28).
Co-polymerization--
This assay, used to detect
laminin-specific self-assembly with small amounts of test laminin,
depends on the ability of the two proteins to co-aggregate in a
concentration-dependent manner with polymerization driven
by the EHS-laminin (18). Briefly, aliquots of EHS-laminin in
polymerization buffer were incubated with a fixed concentration of
recombinant laminin at 37 °C. Samples were centrifuged and the
supernatant and pelleted fractions analyzed by SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions.
SDS-PAGE was carried out in 3.5-12% linear gradient gels (26)
and stained with Coomassie Blue R-250 or transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for immunoblotting. Immunoblotting of proteins was performed as described (26).
Rotary Shadowing--
Laminin (25-50 µg/ml in 0.15 M ammonium bicarbonate, 60% glycerol) was sprayed onto
mica discs, evacuated in a Balzers BAF500K unit, rotary shadowed with
0.9 nm Pt/C at an 8° angle, backed with 8 nm carbon at a 90° angle,
and viewed in an electron microscope as otherwise described (26).
Electron micrograph images are shown contrast-reversed.
Cell Culturing and Analysis
Mouse C2C12 and rat L8E63 myoblasts were cultured in medium
containing 10% fetal calf serum. The former were converted to myotubes
in 5% horse serum, and analyzed 3-5 days post-fusion as described
(13). For quantitation of myoblast adhesion, cells labeled with
[3H]thymidine were incubated (70 m) in tissue culture
wells (3 × 104 cells/well) pre-treated with
nitrocellulose and coated with laminins as described (29) followed by
determination of bound radioactivity. Fused myotubes were incubated at
37 °C with laminins (10 µg/ml) suspended in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium F-12 containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin. Unattached
protein was removed by washing with PBS containing 1 mM
CaCl2. Blocking antibodies and fragments in 100-fold molar
excess, when used, were added to the culture medium prior to addition
of laminin at the following final concentrations: IIH6 (1/10 dilution),
Ha2/5 and GoH3 (10 µg/ml), and E1' (500 µg/ml). Wild type R1 and
laminin- 1 null ES cells (30) were grown on feeder layers of
mitomycin-treated (100 µg/ml, 2 h) SNL STO cells in ES medium
(Invitrogen) supplemented with 15% ES-grade fetal calf serum
(Invitrogen), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 0.1 mM -mercaptoethanol, 1 mM sodium pyruvate,
100 µg of penicillin/ml, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 1000 units/ml
leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF, Invitrogen). To culture EBs,
subconfluent ES cells were dispersed with 0.25% trypsin, 0.53 mM EDTA and plated onto gelatin-coated dishes (3 h) to
allow feeder cells to attach. Nonadherent ES aggregates were dispersed
and cultured on bacteriological Petri dishes in ES medium without LIF.
Microscopy
Following incubation, myotubes were fixed with 3%
paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at room temperature, blocked in PBS
containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 5% normal goat serum, and
incubated with primary antibodies diluted in the same buffer. Following several washes, the cells were incubated with FITC- or Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature, washed, and overlaid with DABCO, mounted, and examined with an Olympus IX-70 inverted fluorescent microscope fitted with a Princeton Instruments 5 mHz Micromax cooled CCD camera. Myotube surface coverage by laminins
was determined from digitalized images with IPLab version 3.0 (Scanalytics) using segmentation parameters adjusted to detect laminin-covered areas from background. The automatically marked areas
were quantitated and the average area and S.E. were determined (n = 6-10 fields). Rat monoclonal anti-laminin 1
(clone A5; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), rabbit anti-mouse
type IV collagen antibody (Rockland Immunochemicals, Gilgertville, PA),
and rat anti-mouse perlecan monoclonal antibody (Chemicon, Temecula,
CA) were used for immunostaining of EBs at 1, 2.5, 2 and 2.5 µg/ml, respectively.
Acetylcholine Receptor Clustering--
C2C12 myotubes were
incubated for 18 h in the presence of either different
concentrations or 10 µg/ml recombinant or other laminins, without or
with blocking reagents. Myotubes were then incubated for 1 h with
5 µg/ml FITC- -bungarotoxin (Molecular Probes) to label clusters of
AChR's, washed 4 times with PBS, 1 mM CaCl2 to
remove unattached protein, and fixed. Myotubes were incubated with
antibody IIH6 (1/10 dilution from conditioned medium), washed, and then
treated with goat anti-mouse Cy3 (1:100). Fluorescent micrographs of
fixed cells were analyzed in IPLab to determine the number of clusters
per field. Only AChR clusters that co-localized with dystroglycan were scored.
EBs were collected by gravity sedimentation, washed, and
fixed with 3% paraformaldehyde in PBS followed by incubation in 7.5% sucrose-PBS (3 h) and 15% sucrose (4 °C, overnight). Frozen
sections were prepared with nonspecific binding sites blocked with 5%
goat serum. FITC- and/or Cy5-conjugated antibodies were used as
secondary reagents and nuclei were counterstained with
4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.
Electron Microscopy--
Electron microscopy of thin sections
was carried as described (31).
 |
RESULTS |
Expression of Recombinant Laminin Subunits in 293 Cells--
We
followed a two-step transfection protocol (24) to express recombinant
heterotrimeric laminin. 293 cells stably expressing laminin 1 and
selected with the antibiotic G418 were transfected with the
1-expression vector and 2-expression vectors coding for wild-type
protein or protein bearing deletions within the LG modules (Fig.
1). Clones expressing protein without
epitope tag were generated in parallel with clones expressing 1
bearing a C-terminal FLAG tag. The latter proved far more successful
for the preparation of heterotrimeric laminins and furthermore,
permitted purification from serum-containing medium. For the 2
deletion mutants and a wild-type control, a hemagglutinin (HA) tag was placed N-terminal to the mature sequence. Wild-type (WT) recombinant protein and all protein bearing LG module deletions ( G1-5,
G1-3, and G4-5) were secreted into the culture medium.
Heterotrimeric laminin expression was initially detected by the ability
of 2 chain and 1 chain-specific antibodies to react with the
respective laminin subunits first immunoprecipitated with FLAG antibody
(data not shown). The 2 chain bands reacted with both antibodies
specific for laminin-2/4 and laminin- 2-G domain and the 1 chain
was identified under nonreducing conditions (necessary for antibody
reactivity) with E4-specific antibody.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Deletions created in the LG modules of
laminin-2. The LG modules that comprise the 2-G domain project
beyond the coiled-coil domain. LG4 is connected to LG3 through a spacer
sequence (hinge region) that is disulfide bonded to the LG5 terminus,
positioning LG5 next to LG1-3. Laminin-2 extracted from several
sources bears proteolytic cleavage in the LG modules with the distal
75-80-kDa fragment noncovalently attached to the N-terminal portion of
the 2 chain. 2-Subunit deletions were G1-5, G1-3, and
G4-5 as shown.
|
|
Heparin Interactions and Identification of Unprocessed and
Processed 2 Chains--
For purification (Fig.
2), recombinant laminins in conditioned
medium were initially bound to anti-FLAG antibody beads and eluted with
FLAG peptide, facilitating subsequent steps by eliminating contaminating serum and secreted proteins. The eluted fraction was
bound through its -subunit to a heparin-5PW column and eluted with a
salt gradient (Fig. 2a). Two wild-type and rLm2- G4-5
protein peaks each were eluted at 0.16 and 0.33 M NaCl,
with relative peak sizes varying among different media collections. The
different fractions were analyzed by reducing SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2,
b-d). The more weakly bound wild-type laminin fraction was
found to consist of laminin-2 similar to that obtained from placenta
and consisting of a ~275-kDa (processed, "p") 2
band (previously designated 2m in Ref. 18) and ~75-kDa fragment
band (known as a C-terminal moiety) with the 1 and 1 chains (Fig.
2b), while the more strongly bound fraction consisted of a
larger 2-subunit ( 2, unprocessed "u") with no
observed additional -chain component. It has previously been shown
in recombinantly expressed mouse laminin 2-LG1-3 fragment that two
closely overlapping furin-type recognition sites exist in the LG3
module with cleavage between Arg-2575 and Gln-2576 generating a blocked
N terminus (32, 33). We therefore predicted that deletion of LG modules
4 and 5 should leave a smaller cleavable C-terminal fragment of ~19
kDa plus carbohydrate. A fragment of ~22 kDa was identified in the
low salt, but not the high salt, fractions of rLm2 G4-5 (Fig.
2c), in good agreement with the fragment generated from
2-LG1-3 by Talts et al. (33) and paralleling the
salt-elution behavior seen with wild type recombinant protein. The main
2 band of this high salt fraction appeared to migrate marginally
slower than that of the low salt fraction (predicted mass difference is
~7%). When the FLAG-containing fractions of rLm2- G1-3 and
rLm2- G1-5 conditioned media were subjected to heparin-affinity
chromatography, each yielded a single low salt-eluting peak detected by
reducing SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2, a and d). When
N-terminal HA-tagged wild-type protein was evaluated (Fig.
2e), both the more slowly and faster migrating 2 bands
were found to possess HA epitope by immunoprecipitation, further
supporting the conclusion that the high salt fraction corresponded to
laminin-2 bearing an unprocessed 2 chain while the low salt fraction
corresponded to laminin-2 bearing the typical-sized G-domain processed
2 domain. Finally, the ~75-kDa species reacted with
2-G-specific antibody (blot not shown). Thus heparin affinity
chromatography resolved the different laminin species and revealed that
high-affinity heparin binding is lost upon LG3 cleavage.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Characterization of rLm2 mutant
proteins. a, high performance liquid
chromatography heparin-affinity elution profiles of engineered laminin
proteins from a heparin-5PW column. b-d, SDS-PAGE
(reducing) analysis of purified rLm2 proteins in Coomassie Blue-stained
polyacrylamide gels. e, anti-HA immunoprecipitate of
secreted WT (N-terminal HA-tagged) and LG deletion laminins detected by
immunoblotting with laminin-2/4 antibody (reduced SDS-PAGE).
|
|
Molecular Shape of Recombinant Laminins--
The different
recombinant fractions were analyzed by electron microscopy following
rotary Pt/C replication of glycerol spreads on mica (Fig.
3). Wild-type processed recombinant
laminin-2 had a typical laminin shape consisting of three short arms
with small terminal and mid-arm globules, and one long arm ending in
the large elliptical structure corresponding to the LG modules
(arrows, upper left panel). The long axis of the LG modules
varied with respect to that of the lower portion of the long arm coiled
coil domain. The most striking difference in the deletion mutants was observed with rLm2 G1-5 (upper middle panel and extreme
right lower two panels) which completely lacked the globular
domain of the long arm. The long arm globules of rLm2- G1-3 and
rLm2- G4-5 were similar in appearance, characterized by a more
spherical shape, on average smaller than the elliptical globule of
wild-type protein. Processed and unprocessed forms of wild-type
laminin-2 could not be distinguished from each other in the electron
micrographs.

View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Rotary shadowing. Contrast-reversed
electron microscopic images of Pt/C replicas of the different purified
recombinant laminin-2 proteins are shown. Note the reduction of size
and ellipticity of G-domain (arrows) for rLm2- G4-5,
rLm2- G1-3, and its complete absence in rLm2- G1-5.
|
|
Furin Processing--
While both unprocessed and processed
2-subunit forms were secreted by WT-transfected 293 cells, only
unprocessed laminin subunit was detected in the cell lysates, either in
Western blots of transiently transfected cells (Fig.
4a) or FLAG-epitope protein from stably
transfected cells (data not shown). When stably transfected cells
expressing rLm2-WT protein were treated with different concentrations of the furin protease-inhibitor d-RVKR-cmk, proteolytic cleavage of the
laminin was prevented (Fig. 4b). When rLm2-WTp was added to
the medium of nontransfected 293 cells, C2C12 myotubes, and rat DRG
Schwann cells, laminin in the conditioned media (collected after 2 days) was partially processed from the 293 and Schwann cell cultures
unless treated with d-RVKR-cmk, but minimally if at all from the C2C12
myotube cultures (Fig. 4c). Thus cultured 293 and Schwann
cells can process extracellular laminin in a
furin-dependent fashion while myotubes do not to any
appreciable degree.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Proteolytic processing. Panel a,
conditioned media and cell lysates from 293 cells transiently
transfected with r- 2-HA-tag cDNA were probed with anti-HA
antibody (mk, mock-transfected control). b,
laminin-2/4 specific antibody immunoblot (reduced) of conditioned media
obtained from 293 cells stably expressing WT rLm2 and maintained for
40 h in the presence of the furin protease-inhibitor d-RVKR-cmk.
c, laminin-2/4 antibody immunoblot of culture media
immunoprecipitated with FLAG-specific antibody and recovered from 40-h
incubations of exogenous purified rLm2-WTu in presence of Schwann cell,
C2C12 myotubes, or 293 cells maintained either without (L)
or with d-RVKR-cmk inhibitor (L+I).
|
|
Cell Adhesion, Dystroglycan Binding, and Polymerization
Activities--
Mouse myoblasts adhered to and spread on both
processed and unprocessed wild-type protein with 50% maximal coat
concentrations of about twice that of laminin-1 (Fig.
5). Cells also adhered to and spread on
both processed and unprocessed recombinant laminin bearing deletions of
LG4-5 with only a small reduction of coat concentration dependence.
However, cells adhered poorly to, and did not spread on, recombinant
laminin bearing deletion of LG1-3. Deletion of all LG modules
abolished cell adhesion over the concentration range studied,
indicating that G-domain is required for myoblast cell adhesion.
Adhesion contributions were detected from
6 1 and 7 1
integrins for the myoblasts. Furthermore, this interaction was largely
dependent upon LG1-3 but not LG4-5 and was independent of LG
processing.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Myoblast adhesion. C2C12 myoblasts were
incubated in wells coated with different concentrations of rLm2-WTp
(closed circles), rLm2-WTu (open circles),
rLm2- G45p (open triangles), rLm2- G45u (closed
triangles), rLm2- G13 (closed squares), and
rLm2- G15 (closed diamonds) and the degree of adhesion was
determined (average ± S.E., n = 3).
b, mouse C2C12 and rat L863 myoblasts were incubated in
wells coated with rLm2-WTp protein in the absence and presence of
blocking antibodies for 6-integrin (GoH3, with mouse
cells), 1-integrin (Ha2/5, both cells), and
7-integrin (O26, rat cells).
|
|
A solid-phase assay was used to evaluate -dystroglycan binding (Fig.
6). Radioiodinated rabbit skeletal muscle
-dystroglycan was incubated at different concentrations in wells
coated with equimolar coatings of different recombinant laminins.
Dystroglycan bound to wild-type rLm2, rLm2 G4-5, and rLm2- G1-3,
but not to rLm2- G1-5, in a concentration-dependent
manner. Binding to all active laminin-2 proteins was salt-sensitive but
heparin-insensitive. The data were fitted by nonlinear regression
analysis with single- and two-class binding algorithms, and the
dystroglycan concentrations at half-maximal binding (indicated in
parentheses) were determined by inspection from the fitted curves.
rLm2- G4-5p (18 nM) and rLm2- G1-3 (15 nM) could be well fit by the single-class algorithm while
rLm2-WTp (average 43 nM), WTu (38 nM), and
G4-5u (62 nM) were better fit by the two-class
algorithm. The levels of binding to wild-type protein at a given
concentration was greater than twice that observed for either
rLm2- G4-5p or rLm2- G1-3 alone, suggesting that at least two
dystroglycan-binding sites are present in the full complement of
2-LG modules. Dystroglycan bound to rLm2-WTu and rLm2- G4-5u,
both unprocessed proteins, as well. The rLm2-WTu binding plot was
similar to that of rLm2-WTp while the rLm2- G4-5u binding was at
least 2-fold higher compared with that of rLm2- G45p, suggesting that
there may be two sites within LG1-3 and that cleavage of G-domain
decreases dystroglycan binding. However, rLm2-WTu was not observed to
achieve higher binding levels compared with rLm2- G45u as would be
expected from the summation of rLm2- G1-3 and rLm2- G4-5u
contributions. Both the apparent inaccessibility of more than three
sites and two-class binding behavior may be due to steric hindrance
occurring at adjacent G-domain-binding sites occurring at high
dystroglycan concentrations. Since dystroglycan binding was not reduced
in the unprocessed state, and since alanine mutagenesis of the
furin-recognition site caused a substantial decrease of dystroglycan
affinity for recombinant 2LG1-3 (32), its seems likely that the
furin-recognition site overlaps with the cleavage site.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Dystroglycan binding. Radioiodinated
-dystroglycan was incubated at the indicated concentrations with
wells coated with different recombinant laminins (rLm2-WTp,
closed circles; rLm2-WTu, open circles;
rLm2- G45p, closed squares; rLm2- G45u, open
triangles; and rLm2- G13, closed triangles; average
of 3 ± S.E.). a-c, direct binding data shown in three
panels corresponding to three different experiments with data
normalized to the maximal binding of WTp. d, effects of
heparin, high salt, and EDTA on -dystroglycan binding to different
recombinant laminins.
|
|
Laminin polymerization is a property of full-sized laminins
including laminins-1, -2, and -4 that is dependent upon interactions among the short arms (18, 26). A laminin co-polymerization assay,
developed to measure the polymerization potential of test laminins in
small amounts, was employed to evaluate the recombinant proteins (18).
Wild-type processed protein was found to co-precipitate with laminin-1
in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig.
7). The fraction of polymeric recombinant
laminin was lower than (lagged behind) that of laminin-1 as observed
previously for placental laminin-2 (18). The co-polymerization of
rLm2 G1-5, which possessed an N-terminal 2 HA epitope
tag was compared with that of wild-type protein lacking an HA tag and
was found to possess similar activity, i.e. neither the HA
tag nor loss of G interfered with polymerization.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Polymerization. rLm2-WTp was incubated
with laminin-1 (0- 0.4 mg/ml, 37 °C), separated into polymer
(P) and supernatant (S) fractions, and analyzed
by SDS-PAGE (g). Quantitation of scans of Coomassie
Blue-stained laminin-1 and FLAG-specific immunoblot are shown in plot
for rLm2-WTp and rLm2- G15 (h).
|
|
Laminin-2 Binding to Myotube Surfaces and Co-localization with
Dystroglycan and Integrin--
Recombinant wild-type and deleted
2-laminins were added to the culture medium of fused C2C12 myotubes
for 2 or 4 h and then evaluated for the distributions of laminin,
-dystroglycan, and 1-integrin on the myotube surfaces
by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig.
8). By 2 h, rLm2-WTp,u and
G4-5p,u had decorated the myotube surfaces in a patchy honeycombed
pattern (Fig. 4, a-d) with maximal coverage achieved by
2-4 h (quantitation not shown). The myotubes were co-stained for
laminin/ -dystroglycan (Fig. 8, a and b) and
laminin/ 1-integrin (c and d). By
2 h incubation, rLm2-WTp and WTu were noted to co-localize with
-dystroglycan (a' and b') and laminin
co-localization with 1-integrin was detected at 4 h
following treatment with rLm2-WTp and WTu (Fig. 4, c' and d'). Dystroglycan and integrin co-localization was also
observed with G45p at 4 h (images not shown); however, coverage
was reduced. The relative amounts of coverage by the different laminins
were determined at 2 h (Fig. 8e). Wild-type protein
covered a much greater area compared with laminin deleted in LG4-5.
Furthermore, coverage was only slightly above background for laminin
deleted in LG1-3 or LG1-5. We evaluated the ability of blocking
antibodies, and heparin to perturb rLm2-WTp and WTu accumulation on
myotube surfaces (Fig. 8f). Inhibition of -dystroglycan
(IIH6) and heparin-heparan sulfate interactions each separately caused
a modest decrease in the surface area coverage with inhibition of all
three activities preventing most binding. We also evaluated G4-5
(Fig. 8g) and found that with the processed form of this
deletion mutant, nearly complete inhibition was achieved following
treatment with IIH6, Ha2/5, or heparin alone under conditions that
produced only modest reductions with wild-type protein. In contrast,
significantly less inhibition was observed following treatment of the
unprocessed deletion mutant.

View larger version (118K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Laminin and receptors on myotubes.
Recombinant Lm2-WTp (a and c), WTu (b
and d), and laminins bearing deletions were incubated (10 µg/ml) with C2C12 myotubes, washed, and detected with antibody for
laminin-2/4 (a-d) and either -dystroglycan (IIH6,
a' and b', after 2 h incubation) or
1 integrin (Ha2/5, c' and d',
after 4 h incubation). Relative laminin surface areas measured
from the immunofluorescence images are shown in panel e
(n = 6). rLm2-WTp, rLm2-WTu, rLm2- G45p, and
rLm2- G45u (2 h) were also treated with 1 integrin
(Ha2/5) and -dystroglycan (IIH6) blocking antibodies, and heparin,
as shown in panel f (n = 10). The inhibitory
effects on laminin surface coverage following incubation with
rLm2- G45p,u, the minimally active recombinant laminin, are also
shown (g, n = 7).
|
|
Contribution of Laminin 2-LG Modules to AChR
Clustering--
When recombinant laminin-2 was incubated with myotubes
for longer periods, a substantial (5-10-fold) increase in AChR
clusters (detected with bungarotoxin) was observed over that detected
in the absence of exogenous laminin (Fig.
9). These clusters co-localized with
-dystroglycan that was concentrated at these sites. Maximal induction was achieved by about 10 µg/ml (Fig. 9h).
Surface laminin co-localized with the bungarotoxin as well but was also
present in areas away from the clusters (Fig. 9a",
inset). Of all the recombinant laminins tested, only
rLm2-WTp and G4-5p induced AChR clustering above background levels
(Fig. 9, b-g and i). Both antibodies IIH6 and
Ha2/5 blocked AChR clustering induced by either of the laminins (Fig.
9, k and n). Since GoH3, an
6-integrin-specific blocking reagent, also inhibited
clustering of these two proteins (l and n),
6 1 was implicated in mediating
clustering. Heparin (1 mg/ml) inhibited clustering induced by
rLm2- G4-5p (n), but not that induced by WTp
(j). This observations seems likely to be related to the
ability of heparin to nearly completely inhibit 2-4 h accumulation of
rLm2- G4-5p, but only to partially inhibit accumulation of WTp. In
comparison, laminin-1-induced AChR clustering was substantially
inhibited with heparin as well as anti- -dystroglycan (m).
Laminin polymerization, a process mediated by the three short arms, was
previously found to be selectively inactivated following treatment with
AEBSF (13). To determine whether polymerization contributes to
laminin-induced AChR clustering, myotubes were incubated overnight with
10 µg/ml recombinant laminin-2 (WTp) either alone or in the presence
of laminin-1 fragment E1' which inhibits polymerization unless treated
with AEBSF (o). rLm2-WTp induced AChR clustering was
inhibited by 1 µM (0.5 mg/ml) E1', but not by
AEBSF-E1'.

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Induction of AChR clustering.
C2C12 myotubes were incubated with recombinant laminins for 18 h.
Panels a-g, fluorescence images shown stained for AChR
(bungarotoxin, green) and -dystroglycan (IIH6,
red). Separate and merged images shown for rLm2-WTp
(a, a', and a") and merged images for the other
laminins. Inset in a" shows co-localization with
laminin (blue). Panels h-o, quantitation of AChR
clustering (n = 20): h, dependence of
AChR receptor clustering on rLm2-WTp protein concentration;
i, comparison of different recombinant laminins, 10 µg/ml; j, effect of heparin (1 mg/ml) on rLm2-WTp;
(k) effect of Ha2/5 and IIH6 on WTp. Hamster and mouse IgM
controls were 6.5 ± 0.7 and 7.8 ± 0.7, respectively);
l, AChR clustering inhibition by GoH3; (m)
comparison of laminin-1 with laminin-2/4; n, inhibition
of rLm2- G45p induction of clustering by antibodies. o,
the laminin short arm complex E1', which inhibits laminin
polymerization unless inactivated with AEBSF (A-E1'), blocked AChR
clustering induction by rLm2-WTp.
|
|
Laminin Mediation of Basement Membrane Assembly--
The greatly
increased coverage of intact laminin on myotubes compared with all
deletion mutants suggested that deletion of LG modules would have an
adverse effect on the efficiency of basement membrane assembly. The
myotubes produce little or no type IV collagen or other basement
membrane components and we find they do not form stable basement
membranes. Therefore, to examine the role of the LG modules in basement
membrane assembly, we evaluated the ability of the recombinant laminins
to mediate basement membrane assembly in embryoid bodies (EBs) derived
from ES cells that are null for the laminin- 1 subunit. These EBs,
when treated with exogenous laminin-1, form basement membranes (34)
that contain type IV collagen, nidogen, and perlecan in addition to the
added laminin. rLm2-WTp, WTu (in the presence of 10 µM
furin inhibitor), G4-5p, G1-3, and G1-5 laminins were
incubated (50 µg/ml) with laminin- 1-null EBs and examined by
immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig.
10). Wild-type laminin-2, regardless of
processing (immunoblots of a cell lysate at the end of the incubation
revealed that essentially all of the 2 chain was still in the
unprocessed state, Fig. 10m), mediated formation of a
subendodermal linear co-staining for laminin, type IV collagen,
nidogen, and perlecan. In contrast, all deletion mutants were unable to
mediate basement membrane formation. The formation of basement membrane
following treatment with rLm2-WTp was confirmed by electron
microscopy.

View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Basement membrane assembly in embryoid
bodies. Laminin 1-null ES cells were cultured for 7 days in
suspension as embryoid bodies with 50 µg/ml rLm2-WTp
(a-f), G45p (g and h), G13
(i and j), or rLm2-WTu with d-RVKR-cmk
(k and l). Immunoblot (Lm-1/4 antibody) of EB
conditioned media from WTu-treated EBs (7 days) without (lane
1) and with (lane 2) d-RVKR-cmk. Cryosections were
prepared and immunostained for laminin- 1 (FITC, a,
g, i, and k), type IV collagen (Cy3,
b, h, j, and l), perlecan
(FITC, d), or nidogen (Cy3, e). Untreated
(n) and rLm2-WTp-treated (o) embryoid bodies were
also fixed with gluteraldehyde and embedded in plastic for electron
microscopy (endodermal/inner cell mass interface shown; paired
arrows indicate no basement membrane in untreated and thick
basement membrane in rLm2-WTp-treated EBs; n = nucleus).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The C-terminal G-domain, composed of five LG modules, appears to
be the principal cell-interactive domain of laminin. The structure
deduced from the 2-LG4-5 crystal is that each LG module is a
-sandwich with the first three modules separated from the last two
by a hinge disulfide-linked to LG5 (35). Although the 2-laminin
subunit has fairly high homology with the 1-subunit, it exhibits
several G-domain differences. First, the 2-subunit becomes
proteolytically processed in LG-3 by a furin-like convertase that
cleaves at the end of the sequence RRKRR in laminin-2 (32). Second,
2-laminin G-domain possesses dystroglycan sites in both LG-3 and
LG4-5, compared with a limitation of binding to LG module-4 in
laminin-1. Each dystroglycan-binding site within 2 LG1-5 is insensitive to heparin treatment (unlike laminin-1), accounting for the
near-complete lack of inhibition of dystroglycan binding reported for
intact laminin-2/4 (28).
Previously we found the short and long arm domains of laminin-1,
through polymerization and cell binding, act in concert to assemble ECM
and alter cytoskeleton (13). To dissect LG-modular functions in a
laminin isoform yet preserve the potential for such cooperativity, we
introduced LG1-5, LG1-3, and LG4-5 deletions into the laminin 2
subunit DNA and expressed the respective heterotrimeric laminins. 293 cells, by virtue of a furin-like convertase, were found to cleave much,
but not all, of the wild-type and LG4-5 deleted laminin within LG3,
providing us with two additional laminin states for study. Through our
analysis we found that myoblast adhesion and spreading are mediated by
LG1-3 through 6 1 and 7 1 integrins (similar to laminin-1), that
-dystroglycan binds separately to LG1-3 and LG4-5 (unlike
laminin-1), and confirmed that polymerization is independent of
G-contributions. In our evaluation of myotubes and embryoid bodies, we
found that: (a) LG1-3 is required for basement membrane and
for clustering of AChR, (b) LG4-5 is required for basement
membrane assembly but not for AChR clustering, (c)
furin-processing of LG-3 is required for AChR clustering, but not for
basement membrane assembly, (d) 6 1 integrin as well as dystroglycan are
required for AChR clustering, and (e) polymerization of
laminin is required for AChR clustering (providing the evidence for a
hypothesis as described in Ref. 36). The laminin contribution to AChR
clustering can be regulated by furin in 2-laminins but is
constitutively active in 1-laminin.
It is conceptually useful to distinguish anchorage,
interactions required to bind and retain otherwise free laminin on a
cell surface, from receptor activities of laminin, required
to mediate cellular responses. Using surface area coverage as an index
of binding to compare contributions on myotube surfaces, we found that
coverage was greatest when laminin possessed all of its LG modules
regardless of processing, and was almost completely absent if all LG
modules were deleted. Deletion of LG4-5 caused a substantial decrease
of myotube surface accumulation yet did not interfere with AChR
clustering. This loss of coverage correlated with the ability of the
laminin to assemble basement membrane in embryoid bodies lacking
endogenous 1-subunit expression. Deletion of LG1-3 caused near
total loss of myotube accumulation and here too the laminin was unable
to assemble basement membrane. For wild-type laminin-2, inhibition of
-dystroglycan, 1-integrin, and heparan sulfate/sulfatide binding each caused a modest decrease of coverage, while inhibition of all three caused a substantial decrease, suggesting that all three types of interactions contribute to and account for most
of the anchorage. In contrast, for laminin lacking LG4-5 (processed
form), surface binding could be abolished by separate inhibition of
dystroglycan, integrin, or heparin class binding. Since
dystroglycan- 2-laminin interactions are insensitive to heparin
treatment, the heparin effect seen with the deleted laminin is not due
to inactivation of dystroglycan binding. Taken together, these data are
consistent with a model in which anchorage of laminin to the cell
surface is mediated by 1-integrin-, -dystroglycan-, and
heparin-type binding to LG1-3, and a combination of -dystroglycan- and heparin-type binding to LG4-5. Since unprocessed rLm2 G4-5 resisted inhibition by single blocking agents, the sum of affinity contributions is likely greater in LG1-3 if processing does not occur,
contributions obscured when LG4-5 are also present in the laminin.
Laminin activity has been proposed to play a synergistic role with
agrin in NMJ formation, affecting AChR clustering through dystroglycan
and 7-integrin (16, 27, 37-39). From this study, we
found that AChR clustering requires both laminin polymerization (a
short-arm activity) as well as LG1-3 module interactions, the latter
minimally dependent upon -dystroglycan and
6 1-integrin binding in the presence of
anchorage partially provided through heparin-type interactions. The
previously identified 7 1-integrin contribution (27) and complete inhibition of clustering achieved with
GoH3 suggests that 6 1 works in concert
with 7 1 to cluster AChR.
To compare the basement membrane requirements to those of AChR
induction, we employed the recently described laminin 1-null embryoid bodies that generate all required basement membrane components except laminin and that when treated with laminin assemble a basement membrane and then differentiate to form epiblast (34, 40, 41). The
necessity of both LG1-3 and LG4-5 for basement membrane assembly
revealed important G-domain contributions emanating from both sides of
the hinge region. However, unlike AChR clustering, several studies
reveal that 1-integrin and dystroglycan are not, at
least separately, essential for basement membrane assembly. First, Schwann cell basement membranes, which contain laminin-2, do not
require 1-integrin (42). Second, basement membrane is detected in dystroglycan-free muscle of genetic chimeric mice (43, 44).
Third, we have found that basement membranes can assemble in
dystroglycan-null and polymerizing laminin-treated 1
integrin-null embryoid
bodies.2 A conclusion
suggested by the above and data described herein is that G-domain
anchorage with high surface accumulation of laminin, rather than
ligation of a particular integrin or dystroglycan, is critical for
basement membrane assembly, while specific integrin and dystroglycan
receptor ligation, rather than high accumulation, is essential for AChR
clustering. This characteristic, along with the presence of an
appropriate integrin-binding site and dystroglycan-binding site in
2-laminin LG1-3 (the latter is missing in 1-laminin LG1-3) can
explain why LG4-5 is superfluous for clustering. A general hypothesis
is that the relative LG-module contributions for different basement
membrane functions differ among laminin isoforms.
All laminins with the exception of 1-laminins become proteolytically
cleaved, often in G-domain (see Ref. 4). These modifications may have
evolved to allow for post-depositional regulation of laminin function
during development and tissue remodeling. Unprocessed laminin-2 can
support cell adhesion/spreading, bind to dystroglycan, accumulate on
myotube surfaces, and form basement membrane, yet strikingly cannot
cluster the AChR. The only binding interaction we found to be
markedly different in unprocessed laminin is increased heparin
binding affinity. However, it is not known if this difference is causal
in preventing AChR clustering activity in the unprocessed state. Furin,
a serine protease, is a membrane-bound enzyme that is found in the
trans-Golgi stacks and plasma membrane and that can cleave a number of
ECM components (45). In an examination of its distribution in muscle,
we have detected furin in relevant locations, i.e. at the
neuromuscular junction, and, to a lesser extent, in embryonic
muscle.3 We have found that
extracellular laminin is processed by Schwann and 293 cells but much
less efficiently by EBs and (particularly) cultured myotubes, revealing
that furin can cleave laminin-2 following its secretion and that this
activity can vary. The existence of laminin processing in G-domain
argues for an important functional dependence of a number of isoforms
on controlled proteolysis through the LG modules and leads to the
attractive possibility that furin regulates laminin-2 activity.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank David Edgar for providing laminin
1-null ES cells, Holly Colognato for initial characterization of
AChR induction, Raj Patel for sample preparation for electron
microscopy, Eva Engvall and Ulla Wewer for laminin 2-cDNAs, and
Ariana Combs for preparing -dystroglycan.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants DK36425 and NS38469 (to P. D. Y.) and ARO1985 (to
J. E.), the Muscular Dystrophy Association (to J. E.),
BioStratum, Inc. (to P. D. Y.), and an American Heart
Association-Northland Affiliate Pre-doctoral Fellowship (to E. L. M).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept.
of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical
School, Piscataway, NJ 08854. Tel./Fax: 732-235-5166 (4825); E-mail:
yurchenc@umdnj.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201880200
2
S. Li, D. Harrison, S. Carbonetto, N. Smyth, D. Edgar, R. Fässler, and P. D. Yurchenco, manuscript
in preparation.
3
S. Smirnov and P. D. Yurchenco, unpublished observations.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AChR, acetylcholine
receptor;
NMJ, neuromuscular junction;
Lm, laminin;
EBs, embryoid
bodies;
AEBSF, aminoethylbenzenesulfonyl fluoride;
d-RVKR-cmk, decanoyl-RVKR-chloromethyl ketone;
HA, hemagglutinin;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Leivo, I.,
and Engvall, E.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
1544-1548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Vuolteenaho, R.,
Nissinen, M.,
Sainio, K.,
Byers, M.,
Eddy, R.,
Hirvonen, H.,
Shows, T. B.,
Sariola, H.,
Engvall, E.,
and Tryggvason, K.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
381-394[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Patton, B. L.,
Miner, J. H.,
Chiu, A. Y.,
and Sanes, J. R.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
1507-1521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Colognato, H.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(2000)
Dev Dyn
218,
213-234[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Sewry, C. A., M, D. A.,
Wilson, L. A.,
Sorokin, L. M.,
Naom, I.,
Bruno, S.,
Ferlini, A.,
Dubowitz, V.,
and Muntoni, F.
(1997)
Neuropediatrics
28,
217-222[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Edwards, J. P.,
Hatton, P. A.,
and Wareham, A. C.
(1998)
Brain Res.
788,
262-268[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Guicheney, P.,
Vignier, N.,
Helbling-Leclerc, A.,
Nissinen, M.,
Zhang, X.,
Cruaud, C.,
Lambert, J. C.,
Richelme, C.,
Topaloglu, H.,
Merlini, L.,
Barois, A.,
Schwartz, K.,
Tome, F. M.,
Tryggvason, K.,
and Fardeau, M.
(1997)
Neuromuscul. Disord.
7,
180-186[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Law, P. K.,
Saito, A.,
and Fleischer, S.
(1983)
Exp. Neurol.
80,
361-382[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Tremblay, J. P.,
Gregoire, L.,
Sasseville, R.,
Guay, G.,
and Belhumeur, C.
(1988)
Synapse
2,
148-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Matsumura, K.,
Yamada, H.,
Saito, F.,
Sunada, Y.,
and Shimizu, T.
(1997)
Neuromuscul. Disord.
7,
7-12[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Kuang, W., Xu, H.,
Vachon, P. H.,
Liu, L.,
Loechel, F.,
Wewer, U. M.,
and Engvall, E.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
102,
844-852[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Kuang, W., Xu, H.,
Vilquin, J. T.,
and Engvall, E.
(1999)
Lab. Invest.
79,
1601-1613[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Colognato, H.,
Winkelmann, D. A.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
619-631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Sugiyama, J. E.,
Glass, D. J.,
Yancopoulos, G. D.,
and Hall, Z. W.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
181-191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
McMahan, U. J.
(1990)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
55,
407-418[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Burkin, D. J.,
Kim, J. E., Gu, M.,
and Kaufman, S. J.
(2000)
J. Cell Sci.
113,
2877-2886[Abstract]
|
| 17.
|
Jacobson, C.,
Cote, P. D.,
Rossi, S. G.,
Rotundo, R. L.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
435-450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Cheng, Y. S.,
Champliaud, M. F.,
Burgeson, R. E.,
Marinkovich, M. P.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31525-31532[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Pikkarainen, T.,
Eddy, R.,
Fukushima, Y.,
Byers, M.,
Shows, T.,
Pihlajaniemi, T.,
Saraste, M.,
and Tryggvason, K.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
10454-10462[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Pikkarainen, T.,
Schulthess, T.,
Engel, J.,
and Tryggvason, K.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
209,
571-582[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Pikkarainen, T.,
Kallunki, T.,
and Tryggvason, K.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
6751-6758[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Ehrig, K.,
Leivo, I.,
Argraves, W. S.,
Ruoslahti, E.,
and Engvall, E.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
3264-3268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Colognato-Pyke, H.,
O'Rear, J. J.,
Yamada, Y.,
Carbonetto, S.,
Cheng, Y. S.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
9398-9406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Yurchenco, P. D.,
Quan, Y.,
Colognato, H.,
Mathus, T.,
Harrison, D.,
Yamada, Y.,
and O'Rear, J. J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10189-10194[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Rambukkana, A.,
Yamada, H.,
Zanazzi, G.,
Mathus, T.,
Salzer, J. L.,
Yurchenco, P. D.,
Campbell, K. P.,
and Fischetti, V. A.
(1998)
Science
282,
2076-2079[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Yurchenco, P. D.,
and Cheng, Y. S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
17286-17299[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Burkin, D. J., Gu, M.,
Hodges, B. L.,
Campanelli, J. T.,
and Kaufman, S. J.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
143,
1067-1075[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Pall, E. A.,
Bolton, K. M.,
and Ervasti, J. M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3817-3821[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Sung, U.,
O'Rear, J. J.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1255-1268[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Smyth, N.,
Vatansever, H. S.,
Murray, P.,
Meyer, M.,
Frie, C.,
Paulsson, M.,
and Edgar, D.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
151-160[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Tsiper, M. V.,
and Yurchenco, P. D.
(2002)
J. Cell Sci.
115,
1005-1015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Talts, J. F.,
and Timpl, R.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
458,
319-323[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Talts, J. F.,
Mann, K.,
Yamada, Y.,
and Timpl, R.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
426,
71-76[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Murray, P.,
and Edgar, D.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
1215-1221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Tisi, D.,
Talts, J. F.,
Timpl, R.,
and Hohenester, E.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
1432-1440[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Cohen, M. W.,
Jacobson, C.,
Yurchenco, P. D.,
Morris, G. E.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
1047-1058[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Montanaro, F.,
Lindenbaum, M.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
1325-1340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Montanaro, F.,
Gee, S. H.,
Jacobson, C.,
Lindenbaum, M. H.,
Froehner, S. C.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
1250-1260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Burkin, D. J.,
Wallace, G. Q.,
Nicol, K. J.,
Kaufman, D. J.,
and Kaufman, S. J.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
152,
1207-1218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Murray, P.,
and Edgar, D.
(2001)
Mech. Dev.
101,
213-215[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Murray, P.,
and Edgar, D.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
931-939[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Feltri, M. L.,
Porta, D. G.,
Previtali, S. C.,
Nodari, A.,
Migliavacca, B.,
Cassetti, A.,
Littlewood-Evans, A.,
Reichardt, L. F.,
Messing, A.,
Quattrini, A.,
Mueller, U.,
and Wrabetz, L.
(2002)
J. Cell Biol.
156,
199-210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Cote, P. D.,
Moukhles, H.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
4672-4679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Cote, P. D.,
Moukhles, H.,
Lindenbaum, M.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
23,
338-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Mallet, W. G.,
and Maxfield, F. R.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
345-359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. K. McKee, S. Capizzi, and P. D. Yurchenco
Scaffold-forming and Adhesive Contributions of Synthetic Laminin-binding Proteins to Basement Membrane Assembly
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 27, 2009;
284(13):
8984 - 8994.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Ido, S. Ito, Y. Taniguchi, M. Hayashi, R. Sato-Nishiuchi, N. Sanzen, Y. Hayashi, S. Futaki, and K. Sekiguchi
Laminin Isoforms Containing the {gamma}3 Chain Are Unable to Bind to Integrins due to the Absence of the Glutamic Acid Residue Conserved in the C-terminal Regions of the {gamma}1 and {gamma}2 Chains
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 2008;
283(42):
28149 - 28157.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Nishimune, G. Valdez, G. Jarad, C. L. Moulson, U. Muller, J. H. Miner, and J. R. Sanes
Laminins promote postsynaptic maturation by an autocrine mechanism at the neuromuscular junction
J. Cell Biol.,
September 22, 2008;
182(6):
1201 - 1215.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Gorfu, I. Virtanen, M. Hukkanen, V.-P. Lehto, P. Rousselle, E. Kenne, L. Lindbom, R. Kramer, K. Tryggvason, and M. Patarroyo
Laminin isoforms of lymph nodes and predominant role of {alpha}5-laminin(s) in adhesion and migration of blood lymphocytes
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
September 1, 2008;
84(3):
701 - 712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. K. McKee, D. Harrison, S. Capizzi, and P. D. Yurchenco
Role of Laminin Terminal Globular Domains in Basement Membrane Assembly
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 20, 2007;
282(29):
21437 - 21447.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Colognato, J. Galvin, Z. Wang, J. Relucio, T. Nguyen, D. Harrison, P. D. Yurchenco, and C. ffrench-Constant
Identification of dystroglycan as a second laminin receptor in oligodendrocytes, with a role in myelination
Development,
May 1, 2007;
134(9):
1723 - 1736.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Harrison, S.-A. Hussain, A. C. Combs, J. M. Ervasti, P. D. Yurchenco, and E. Hohenester
Crystal Structure and Cell Surface Anchorage Sites of Laminin {alpha}1LG4-5
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 13, 2007;
282(15):
11573 - 11581.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hozumi, N. Suzuki, P. K. Nielsen, M. Nomizu, and Y. Yamada
Laminin {alpha}1 Chain LG4 Module Promotes Cell Attachment through Syndecans and Cell Spreading through Integrin {alpha}2beta1
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 27, 2006;
281(43):
32929 - 32940.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Ohtake, H. Tojo, and M. Seiki
Multifunctional roles of MT1-MMP in myofiber formation and morphostatic maintenance of skeletal muscle
J. Cell Sci.,
September 15, 2006;
119(18):
3822 - 3832.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Tremblay and S. Carbonetto
An Extracellular Pathway for Dystroglycan Function in Acetylcholine Receptor Aggregation and Laminin Deposition in Skeletal Myotubes
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 12, 2006;
281(19):
13365 - 13373.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Smirnov, P. Barzaghi, K. K. McKee, M. A. Ruegg, and P. D. Yurchenco
Conjugation of LG Domains of Agrins and Perlecan to Polymerizing Laminin-2 Promotes Acetylcholine Receptor Clustering
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 16, 2005;
280(50):
41449 - 41457.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Li, P. Liquari, K. K. McKee, D. Harrison, R. Patel, S. Lee, and P. D. Yurchenco
Laminin-sulfatide binding initiates basement membrane assembly and enables receptor signaling in Schwann cells and fibroblasts
J. Cell Biol.,
April 11, 2005;
169(1):
179 - 189.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. W. Zhou, S. A. Oak, S. E. Senogles, and H. W. Jarrett
Laminin-{alpha}1 globular domains 3 and 4 induce heterotrimeric G protein binding to {alpha}-syntrophin's PDZ domain and alter intracellular Ca2+ in muscle
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
February 1, 2005;
288(2):
C377 - C388.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. O. Sigle, S. G. Gil, M. Bhattacharya, M. C. Ryan, T.-M. Yang, T. A. Brown, A. Boutaud, Y. Miyashita, J. Olerud, and W. G. Carter
Globular domains 4/5 of the laminin {alpha}3 chain mediate deposition of precursor laminin 5
J. Cell Sci.,
September 1, 2004;
117(19):
4481 - 4494.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Ido, K. Harada, S. Futaki, Y. Hayashi, R. Nishiuchi, Y. Natsuka, S. Li, Y. Wada, A. C. Combs, J. M. Ervasti, et al.
Molecular Dissection of the {alpha}-Dystroglycan- and Integrin-binding Sites within the Globular Domain of Human Laminin-10
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 19, 2004;
279(12):
10946 - 10954.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. E. Frank and W. G. Carter
Laminin 5 deposition regulates keratinocyte polarization and persistent migration
J. Cell Sci.,
March 15, 2004;
117(8):
1351 - 1363.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. T. Martin
Dystroglycan glycosylation and its role in matrix binding in skeletal muscle
Glycobiology,
August 1, 2003;
13(8):
55R - 66R.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Mongiat, S. M. Sweeney, J. D. San Antonio, J. Fu, and R. V. Iozzo
Endorepellin, a Novel Inhibitor of Angiogenesis Derived from the C Terminus of Perlecan
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 31, 2003;
278(6):
4238 - 4249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Hirosaki, Y. Tsubota, Y. Kariya, K. Moriyama, H. Mizushima, and K. Miyazaki
Laminin-6 Is Activated by Proteolytic Processing and Regulates Cellular Adhesion and Migration Differently from Laminin-5
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 13, 2002;
277(51):
49287 - 49295.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. M. Gonzalez, M. Gonzales, G. S. Herron, U. Nagavarapu, S. B. Hopkinson, D. Tsuruta, and J. C. R. Jones
Complex interactions between the laminin alpha 4 subunit and integrins regulate endothelial cell behavior in vitro and angiogenesis in vivo
PNAS,
December 10, 2002;
99(25):
16075 - 16080.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|