![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 21, 19122-19130, May 24, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, January 30, 2002, and in revised form, March 4, 2002
Forced expression of K10, a keratin normally
expressed in postmitotic, terminally differentiating epidermal
keratinocytes, inhibits the progression of the cell cycle in cultured
cells (Paramio, J. M., Casanova, M. Ll., Segrelles, C., Mittnacht,
S., Lane, E. B., and Jorcano, J. L. (1999) Mol. Cell.
Biol. 19, 3086-3094). This process requires a functional
retinoblastoma (pRb) gene product and is mediated by K10-induced
inhibition of Akt and PKC Keratins are the main components of the intermediate filament
cytoskeleton in epithelial cells. They are a large family of proteins
that includes ~30 different polypeptides expressed in a cell type-
and differentiation-specific manner. Their functions have long been
presumed to be predominantly structural. This role was clarified when
human epithelial fragility syndromes became attributable to mutations
within epidermal keratin genes (for reviews see Refs. 1-4). However,
this shared function does not provide a clear explanation of the great
diversity of these proteins, which suggests that they may have
additional specific functions.
Changes in keratin expression pattern are particularly important in the
epidermis. Keratins K5 and K14 are expressed in the mitotically active
basal cells. As these cells enter the terminal differentiation program,
becoming postmitotic and suprabasal, keratins K5 and K14 are
substituted by keratins K1 and K10 (5). Under the influence of
hyperproliferative stimuli, for example during wound healing and in
certain disorders including cancer, epidermal expression of K1 and K10
is drastically reduced. Keratins K6 and K16, normally absent from
interfollicular epidermis, are, however, induced (6). As a whole, these
changes suggest that each keratin pair provides specific functional
requirements to epidermal keratinocytes. This is also highlighted by
recent findings in which K16 was expressed ectopically (7) to rescue
the epidermal fragility promoted by inactivation of the keratin K14
gene (8). These rescued animals show neither epidermal fragility nor
neonatal mortality, but they exhibit strong phenotypic alterations such as alopecia, chronic epidermal ulcers, and alterations in other stratified epithelia (7). This demonstrates that these two proteins are
not functionally equivalent.
In search of specific keratin functions, we have shown that the forced
expression of particular keratin polypeptides may influence proliferation in cultured cells. It has been specifically demonstrated that the ectopic expression of keratin K10 inhibits cell proliferation (9). The modulation of cell growth exerted by keratin K10 is linked to
the retinoblastoma (pRb) protein and the molecular machinery controlling cell cycle progression during G1, in particular
cyclin D1 expression (9). This activity appears to involve the
sequestration of Akt/PKB and atypical PKC Transgenic mice were generated in which human keratin K10 (hK10) gene
expression was targeted to the basal layer of the epidermis via the use
of the bovine keratin K5 (bK5) promoter (11). These animals display
severe alterations in their epidermis, including decreased
proliferation, which results in epidermal hypoplasia. Impaired
activation of both Akt and PKC Transgene Construction and Generation of Transgenic
Mice--
The plasmid bK5hK10 was generated by placing the 5.2 kb of
the bovine K5 regulatory sequences (SalI-NruI fragment) (11) 5'-upstream of the human keratin K10 gene in plasmid HK10MC (12). This
was performed using a SalI-HindIII digestion
protocol. The plasmid pbK5Z, expressing the bacterial lacZ
( Histological Analysis--
Dorsal skin samples and tumors were
fixed in either formalin or ethanol and embedded in paraffin prior to
sectioning. 4-µm sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Mice
were injected with BrdUrd in phosphate-buffered saline (100 µg/g body weight) 1 h prior to sacrifice. To analyze the
epidermal-labeling index, paraffin sections were stained using an
anti-BrdUrd monoclonal antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals)
following the manufacturer's instructions. Keratin K10 staining was
performed in ethanol-fixed tissue sections using LH2 or K8.60
monoclonal antibodies (15, 17)(reacting with both human and mouse K10).
Filaggrin, loricrin, keratin K6, and keratin K5 expression was
monitored as described (15, 17). For ultrastructural analysis, skin
samples were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline
and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide prior to dehydration and
embedding in Epon 812 resin. Ultrathin sections were stained with
uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The expression of total and
phosphorylated Akt was visualized by immunofluorescence using fresh
cryosections of whole mouse skin essentially as previously described
(10).
Chemical Carcinogenesis--
TG.AC mice (18) were bred with
bK5Z+bK5hK10 transgenic mice (13) to obtain single- and
double-transgenic mice. Sixteen bK5Z+bK5hK10/TG.AC transgenic mice and
16 TG.AC littermates were used in chemical carcinogenesis experiments.
The backs of 7-week-old animals were shaved and treated with TPA
(Sigma; 10 nmol in 200 µl of acetone) three times a week for eight
weeks. At this time, the TPA treatment was arrested. The number and
size of tumors arising on each mouse were recorded at regular intervals
during 50 weeks. The histopathological analysis of the tumors was
routinely performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded histology sections.
Western Blot and Kinase Assays--
Whole skin extracts from
newborn mice or primary keratinocytes were obtained in buffer A (1%
Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 137 mM NaCl, 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 µg/ml aprotinin and leupeptin, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 mM NaF, 1 mM
disodium pyrophosphate, and 1 mM Na3VO4) or in
Laemmli buffer for K10 detection. The Akt and PKC Epidermal Abnormalities in bK5hK10 Transgenic Mice--
To study
keratin K10 functions in vivo, we have generated transgenic
mice that ectopically express K10 in the basal layer of the epidermis
using the bovine keratin K5 promoter (11). Five transgenic lines
bearing the bK5hK10 construct and eight bearing a co-injection of the
bK5Z (carrying the
Although no overt phenotype in the epidermis of newborn animals was
detected (irrespective of genotype, i.e. number of transgene copies), homozygous adult mice displayed severe histological epidermal abnormalities first detectable between days 12 and 21. The thickness of
the epithelium was markedly reduced. In fact, the two-three layers of
epidermal cells observed in non-transgenic littermates (Fig.
2A) were reduced to a single
cell layer with flattened and elongated cells (Fig. 2A'). In
addition, the stratum corneum was expanded, rendering a hyperkeratotic
phenotype (Fig. 2, A and A').
These phenotypic changes suggested possible alterations in the
proliferation and/or differentiation program of the epidermal cells.
The expression of several differentiation markers in the epidermis of
homozygous mice were therefore studied and compared with those of
non-transgenic littermates. A similar pattern of expression was found
for keratin 5 (Fig. 2, B and B'), loricrin (Fig.
2, D and D'), keratin K1 and Filaggrin
(not shown). However, the expression of keratin K6, which is normally
confined to the outer root sheath of the hair follicle (see Fig.
6E), was also observed in patches in some interfollicular
regions of the transgenic mice. Interestingly, these K6-positive
patches also showed a more normal epidermal morphology and thickness
(Fig. 2E').
To study the phenotype more closely, electron microscopic analyses were
performed. In agreement with the histological studies, electron
microscopy showed control animals to have a two-three-cell-deep epidermis with the nuclei of the basal layer regularly distributed (Fig. 2A). However, in transgenic mice, only a single cell
layer was observed (Fig. 3A').
In addition, multiple abnormalities were observed in the epidermal
cells of the transgenic mice. Abnormally flattened nuclei lying
parallel to the basal membrane (Fig. 3B) as well as
degenerative mitochondria (Fig. 3B) were frequently observed. Clear cytoplasmic areas depleted of organelles and suggestive of nuclear degeneration were observed around the nuclei (Fig. 3,
A' and C and data not shown). No differences were
seen between control and transgenic cells in the number and structure
of desmosomes and hemidesmosomes (arrows in Fig. 3,
B and C, respectively). Finally, the keratin
filaments appeared more densely packed in transgenic than in control
cells (Fig. 3C), resembling the intermediate filament
bundles observed in suprabasal cells expressing keratins K1 and K10
(19). However, no keratin aggregates were observed in these basal cells
(Fig. 3, B and C). This absence of keratin aggregates is of particular importance since they have been associated with keratin overexpression in cultured cells (20-22). In addition, aggregates have also been linked to skin disorders caused by mutant keratins, including mutations in keratin K10 that give rise to epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (23, 24). In agreement with the absence of
keratin aggregates, no blisters or any sign of epidermal fragility were
observed in the bK5hK10 transgenic mice.
Decreased Epidermal Proliferation in bK5hK10 Transgenic
Mice--
Because K10 expression in cultured cells inhibits
progression of the cell cycle (9, 10), epidermal cell proliferation in
bK5hK10 transgenic mice was analyzed. In newborn skin, significant inhibition of BrdUrd incorporation was seen. This was greater in
homozygous than in heterozygous transgenic mice, which showed decreased
BrdUrd incorporation compared with non-transgenic littermates (Fig.
4, A, A',
A", and B). A similar decrease in proliferation was
also observed in the skin of adult transgenic mice, although the level
of BrdUrd incorporation was reduced with respect to that of newborns
due to the lesser proliferation of adult skin (Fig. 4C). It
is important to remark that this decreased proliferation was observed
even in the absence of overt phenotypic changes, as in the case of low
K10-expressing heterozygous mice irrespective of their age and in
homozygous newborn epidermis (epidermal hypoplasia and hyperkeratosis
appeared at days 21-30, see above).
To extend these in vivo data, the proliferative
potential of primary keratinocytes derived from heterozygous,
homozygous, or non-transgenic newborn mice was studied. Two different
parameters were considered: the capacity of these cells to incorporate
BrdUrd and colony-forming efficiency (9, 10, 15-17). Both types of experiments clearly demonstrated the diminished proliferative potential
of primary keratinocytes derived from homozygous transgenic mice
compared with their heterozygous counterparts. In turn, the latter
showed less proliferative potential than non-transgenic littermates
(Fig. 5, A and
B).
Because K10-induced cell cycle arrest in cultured cells is associated
with reduced cyclin D1 expression and, concomitantly, decreased pRb
phosphorylation (9, 10), these features were analyzed by Western
blotting. A marked decrease in phosphorylated pRb and cyclin D1
expression was observed alongside a parallel increase in
non-phosphorylated pRb in the homozygous samples. The levels observed
in heterozygous animals were intermediate between homozygous and
non-transgenic mice (Fig. 5C). The mechanism underlying the
inhibition of the cell cycle promoted by keratin K10 appears to be
mediated in human keratinocytes by alterations in the PI3K signal
transduction pathway. In fact, K10 sequesters Akt and PKC Impaired Akt/PKB and PKC K10 Expression in the Basal Layer of Epidermis Results in Impaired
Skin Tumorigenesis--
The expression of K10 is rapidly
down-regulated in epidermis under hyperproliferative stimuli including
epidermal tumors (25). This, together with results demonstrating that
K10 expression inhibits cell proliferation in vivo (Fig. 3)
and in vitro (Fig. 4; see also Refs. 10, 11), suggests that
K10 expression may affect skin tumorigenesis. This hypothesis is
reinforced by two recent observations. The partial reduction in tumor
development observed in transgenic mice bearing K10 under the control
of the bovine keratin K6
To confirm this, bK5hK10 transgenic mice were crossed with the
sensitive TG.AC strain (18), and skin carcinogenesis experiments performed. It is worth mentioning that these experiments had to be
performed in the heterozygous mice due to the early lethality observed
in homozygotes. As mentioned above, these heterozygotes displayed no
overt epidermal alterations but showed a partial inhibition of
keratinocyte proliferation and Akt and PKC The shared functional role of keratins in providing
physical resilience to epithelial cells is well established (1-4).
Nonetheless, the careful tissue- and differentiation-specific
expression patterns displayed by these proteins have not been yet
explained in terms of specific functions. This highly regulated,
accurate expression suggests additional, precise roles for the members
of this complex family of proteins. Using cultured cells, the present
authors have recently demonstrated that the expression of keratin K10 inhibits cell cycle progression through its ability to bind and inhibit
the activation of Akt and PKC Keratins As Putative Modulators of Cell Signaling--
The
possibility that keratins play roles in cell signaling has long been a
matter of controversy. Initially based on indirect evidence, for
example the interaction of keratins with molecules implicated in signal
transduction such as PKC Functional Divergence of Keratins in Epidermis--
Changes in
keratin expression in epidermis, either under normal or pathological
conditions such as tumors (25), have suggested that epidermal keratins
are not functionally redundant. This was confirmed by rescuing the K14
gene ablation (8) by ectopic expression of K16 in transgenic mice (7).
Rescued animals do not display the epithelial fragility of
K14-deficient mice (8) but show phenotypic alterations such as
alopecia, chronic epidermal ulcers, and alterations in other stratified
epithelia (7). This demonstrates that K14 and K16 are not functionally
equivalent. In this regard, we have reported that the overexpression of
keratin K14 in human keratinocytes does not affect cell proliferation, while K16 accelerates and K10 inhibits S phase entry in these cells
(9). However, these data seem to be at variance with those of Wawersik
and Coulombe (31), who showed alteration in keratinocyte
differentiation and migration but not increased proliferation through
K16 expression. This apparent controversy can be explained by the
activation of specific signaling pathways and the different experimental approaches employed. In this respect, the changes in cell
cycle progression due to K16 expression have only been detected under
inhibitory conditions, for example with specific inhibitors (10) or
reduced amounts of serum (9), conditions not studied in the
K16-expressing primary keratinocytes. We have shown that K16 expression
rescues the inhibition of cell proliferation caused by wortmannin or
LY294002, two well known inhibitors of PI3K but not PD98059, an
inhibitor of MEK (10). This suggests that K16 might
activate PI3K-dependent signaling pathways. This activation
could be due to K16-induced phosphorylation of the epidermal growth
factor receptor (20), which is an activator of Akt in keratinocytes
(40-42). The activation of Akt could be responsible for the observed
alterations in cell differentiation (43-47) and migration (48-51)
reported in primary keratinocytes derived from K16 transgenic mice.
Keratin K10 As a Component of a Skin Tumor Suppressor
Network--
The present data showing impaired tumor development in
mice expressing K10 ectopically in the basal layer of epidermis are important in several respects. They suggest that under certain circumstances, K10 might act as a tumor suppressor, and they emphasize the relevance of PI3K signaling in skin tumor development. With respect
to the latter, the importance of Akt signaling in mouse skin tumors has
already been suggested. In fact, in transgenic mice, the expression of
an insulin-like growth factor, whose signaling proceeds through PI3K
and Akt (52), increases susceptibility to chemical skin carcinogenesis
protocols (53). In addition, the epidermal growth factor
receptor function, as a survival factor in keratinocyte
oncogenic transformation, is associated with the activation of Akt
(41). More recently, we have observed that Akt
activation is one of the most relevant events during
mouse skin tumorigenesis (28). It was found that Akt activity increases during the promotion and progression stages of this process, preceding the increase in cyclin D1 expression. In addition, Akt overexpression increases the tumorigenic potential of mouse keratinocytes (28). The
action of Akt might be related, in this context, to the phosphorylation and inactivation of GSK3
One of the characteristics of tumor suppressors is their
loss in tumors, usually by mutational inactivation and loss of
heterozygosity. However, in some cases, the inactivation of their
expression takes place through methylation of the promoter and thus
transcriptional silencing. A clear example of this is the
ink4a locus (reviewed in Refs. 57, 58). The expression of
keratin K10 gene is drastically reduced in mouse skin tumors (25),
although the mechanism underlying this silencing is presently unknown.
However, the expression of K10 appears to be modulated by well known
tumor suppressors. In particular pRb, through cooperation with its
relative p107, induces the expression of K10 in human keratinocytes
(15). More recently, we have observed defective expression of K10 gene
in ink4a We are greatly indebted to J. Martínez for excellent animal care, I. de los Santos for
assistance in histology preparations, S. Moreno for help in
photography, and C. Murga for help with the kinase assays. Special
thanks to J. S. Gutkind and C. J. Conti for helpful comments.
*
This work was partially funded by Grant PB94-1230 from the
Spanish DGICYT (Dirección General de Investigación
Científica y Tecnológica).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
34-91-3466598; Fax: 34-91-3466484; E-mail:
jesusm.paramio@ciemat.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 11, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201001200
The abbreviations used are:
PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase;
TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate;
MEK, mitogen-activated
protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase.
The Expression of Keratin K10 in the Basal Layer of the Epidermis
Inhibits Cell Proliferation and Prevents Skin Tumorigenesis*
§,
§¶,
,
, and
Project on Cell and Molecular Biology and
Gene Therapy, CIEMAT Av. Complutense 22, E-28040 Madrid, Spain and the
Department of Animal Pathology, Veterinary School, University of
Santiago de Compostela, Lugo E-27002, Spain
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, two signaling intermediates belonging to
the phosphoinositide (PI) 3-kinase signal transduction pathway
(Paramio, J. M., Segrelles, C., Ruiz, S., and Jorcano, J. L. (2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 7449-7459). Extending earlier
in vitro studies to the in vivo situation, this work analyzes the alterations found in transgenic mice that ectopically express K10 in the proliferative basal cells of the epidermis. Increased expression of K10 led to a hypoplasic and hyperkeratotic epidermis due to a dramatic decrease in skin keratinocyte proliferation in association with the inhibition of Akt and PKC
activities. The
inhibition of cell proliferation and Akt and PKC
activities was also
observed although to a minor extent in low hK10-expressing mice. These
animals displayed no overt epidermal phenotype nor overexpression of
K10. In these non-phenotypic mice, ectopic K10 expression also resulted
in decreased skin tumorigenesis. Collectively, these data demonstrate
that keratin K10 in vivo functions include the control of
epithelial proliferation in skin epidermis.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
to the keratin
cytoskeleton, mediated by keratin K10 through its amino terminus (10).
Therefore, the presence of K10 leads to impaired phosphoinositide
3-kinase (PI3K)1 signaling.
Most of this information has been obtained in cultured cells; this
paper reports work to confirm these results in vivo.
kinase activities in the skin of
these animals was also observed. Finally, chemical skin carcinogenesis
protocols demonstrated that ectopic K10 expression inhibits the
formation of tumors in vivo.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase) gene under the bovine keratin K5 promoter,
has been described previously (11). The constructs were released from
the backbone, purified, and used for microinjection. Transgenic mice
were generated by injection of bK5hK10 or co-injection of both bK5Z
(13) and bK5hK10 constructs into a (C57 BL/10 x BALB/c)
F2 or a (C57BL/10 x DBA/2) F2 genetic
background (13). The presence of the transgene was analyzed by Southern
blots of tail DNA and quantified using phosphorimaging equipment
(Bio-Rad). Primary keratinocyte cultures were established isolating
keratinocytes from newborn mice and cultured in Eagle's minimal medium
containing 8% chelex-treated serum and 0.03 mM
Ca2+ as described (14). Colony-forming efficiency and
bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd)-labeling experiments were performed
essentially as described (9, 10, 15-17).
kinase activity
assays were performed upon immunoprecipitation of the endogenous kinase
proteins as previously reported (10). Western blot analysis using
antibodies against K10, pRb, Akt, phosphorylated Akt and PKC
were
performed according to conventional techniques as previously described
(9, 10, 15-17).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase gene) and bK5hK10 constructs (13)
were analyzed. The ectopic expression of hK10 in the basal layer of the
epidermis of newborn and adult mice was confirmed by
immunohistochemistry (Figs.
1A' and 2C'). This
expression was absent in non-transgenic littermates (Figs.
1A and 2C). All animals appeared healthy at
birth, but by day 21 those (four founders) with high copy numbers of
the bK5hK10 transgene (>10 copies) showed a clear phenotype
characterized by small size, decreased weight, delayed growth, and
paralysis of the rear extremities. This finally led to death between
days 34 and 79. In agreement with the reported copy number dependence of the transgene expression (13), animals (nine founders) with lower
transgene copy numbers showed no obvious phenotypic alterations or
reduction in life span. However, when the bK5hK10 transgene was brought
to homozygosity in these non-phenotypic animals, all the phenotypic
characteristics were again observed. Western blots demonstrated a
stronger expression of hK10 in homozygous than in heterozygous
transgenic mice (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Expression of human keratin K10 in the
epidermis of transgenic mice. Skin sections from newborn
non-transgenic (A) and transgenic (A')
littermates were stained using antibody LH2 for endogenous and
transgenic keratin K10 (15). Note that in the transgenic skin there is
a clear positive staining of the basal layer of the epidermis, which is
absent in non-transgenic skin (the dashed line in
A and A' denotes dermal-epidermal junction).
B, Western blot analysis of whole skin extracts
demonstrating the expression of human K10 in the transgenic mice and
that such expression is stronger in homozygous mice than in
heterozygous littermates. K5 was used to normalize the loading.
Bar in A = 50 µm.

View larger version (104K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Epidermal abnormalities in homozygous
bK5hK10 transgenic mice. A and A',
hematoxylin-eosin-stained skin sections from 21-day-old non-transgenic
(A) and homozygous transgenic mice (A'),
demonstrating that K10 expression in basal cells leads to epidermal
hypoplasia and hyperkeratosis. Insets in A and
A' shows higher magnifications of the interfollicular
epidermis. B and B', peroxidase staining
showing that in non-transgenic (B) and homozygous transgenic
mice (B') K5 expression is confined to basal cells.
C and C', immunohistochemical detection of
keratin K10 in non-transgenic (C) and homozygous transgenic
mice (C'). D and D', peroxidase
staining showing that in non-transgenic (D) and homozygous
transgenic mice (D') loricrin is similarly expressed in most
differentiated cells. E and E', immunodetection
of K6 in non-transgenic (E) and homozygous transgenic mice
(E'). Note that K6 in non-transgenic mice is confined to the
hair follicles, whereas in homozygous mice it is also present in
interfollicular areas in association with regions showing no
hypoplasia. Bars = 100 µm. sc in
A' denotes the thickened hyperkeratotic stratum corneum in
transgenic mice.

View larger version (156K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Ultrastructural analysis of epidermal
abnormalities. Electron microscopy analysis of non-transgenic
(A) and homozygous (A') transgenic mouse skin
demonstrated the presence of a single cell layer in the transgenic
epidermis. Flattened elongated nuclei lying parallel to the basal
membrane were also observed (B). Higher magnification of a
transgenic keratinocyte (C) revealed the presence of
degenerative mitochondria (m in B), abundant
densely packed keratin filaments (kfb in C), and
a clear perinuclear area devoid of cytoplasmic organelles (h
in C). Also of note is the presence of normal desmosomes
(arrowheads in B) and hemidesmosomes
(arrows in C) in transgenic keratinocytes.
bm in B and C denotes the basal
membrane. Bar in A = 10 µm, in
B and C = 1 µm.

View larger version (90K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Decreased epidermal proliferation in
bK5hK10 transgenic epidermis. A, A', and
A", examples of newborn skin sections immunostained against
BrdUrd, showing strongly decreased labeling of basal keratinocytes in
homozygous transgenic skin (A") compared with heterozygous
(A') or control (A) littermates. B,
summary of the in vivo BrdUrd labeling experiments demonstrating the
decreased proliferation in transgenic epidermis. Note also that the
effect is much more evident in homozygous than in heterozygous skin.
C, similar BrdUrd labeling experiments to those in
B but using skins from 15-day-old mice. Note that, although
the labeling index is lower than that of newborn samples, the
antiproliferative effect of K10 is evident.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Impaired proliferation in primary
keratinocytes. A, summary of five independent BrdUrd
labeling experiments using cultured primary keratinocytes derived from
non-transgenic, heterozygous, and homozygous transgenic mice, showing
decreased proliferation induced by K10 expression in vitro
(p = 0.0012 and 0.016). B, reduced colony
formation efficiency displayed by transgenic compared with
non-transgenic primary keratinocytes. C, reduced pRb
phosphorylation and cyclin D1 expression in primary keratinocytes
derived from bK5hK10 transgenic mice. Total protein extracts were
analyzed by Western blotting against total pRb (slowly migrating bands
represent differently phosphorylated pRb species), hypophosphorylated
pRb, and cyclin D1 as previously described (9). D, impaired
Akt activation in primary keratinocytes derived from bK5hK10 transgenic
mice. The same blots shown in C were reblotted using antibodies against
Akt and Ser-473 phosphorylated Akt (active form). Data in A
and B come from three to five independent experiments (in
A at least 500 total cells were counted per experiment) and
are shown as mean ± S.D.
to the
intermediate filament cytoskeleton and thus impairs translocation and
subsequent activation (10). It was therefore investigated whether
similar inhibition takes place in primary keratinocytes derived from
bK5hK10 transgenic mouse epidermis. Whereas the levels of total Akt
were similar in samples from the three different genotypes, those of
phosphorylated, active Akt were severely reduced in heterozygous mice
and barely detectable in homozygotes.
Activities in the Epidermis of bK5hK10
Transgenic Mice--
The reduced Akt activation in primary
keratinocytes derived from bK5hK10 transgenic mice invited studies to
determine whether a similar inhibition takes place in the epidermis
in vivo. In agreement with previous results (10),
immunofluorescence studies revealed that Akt is strongly expressed
throughout all epidermal layers in the epidermis of non-transgenic and
homozygous mice (Fig. 6, A and
A'). However, when an antibody that reacts with phosphorylated Akt was used, only the basal layer of the epidermis stained in non-transgenic animals (Fig. 6B; see also Ref.
10). This staining, indicative of activated Akt, was clearly reduced in
the homozygous epidermis, suggesting a decreased Akt activation in
these animals (Fig. 6B'). Confirming these data, Western
blot analyses using whole skin extracts demonstrated that, although the
levels of Akt were similar for all three genotypes, the amounts of
phosphorylated Akt in homozygous were lower than in non-transgenic mice
(Fig. 6D). Finally, the activities of endogenous Akt and PKC
kinase were analyzed in total extracts from non-transgenic, heterozygous and homozygous mouse epidermis. Both activities were clearly diminished in the transgenic epidermis, particularly so in the
homozygous extracts (Fig. 6E). These results demonstrate that the presence of K10 in skin in vivo impairs the
activation of Akt and PKC
, as in cultured human keratinocytes
(10).

View larger version (103K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Decreased Akt and PKC
activities in bK5hK10 transgenic mouse epidermis.
Immunofluorescence analysis of the Akt expression in non-transgenic
(A) and homozygous transgenic (A') newborn mouse
epidermis, showing similar staining throughout the entire epidermis in
both cases. B and B', the same field as in
A and A', showing that the expression of
phosphorylated (active) Akt is constrained to the basal layer in
non-transgenic mice (B) and that staining is severely
reduced in homozygous transgenic epidermis (B').
C and C', 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole
counterstaining of the sections. D, Western blot of whole
skin extracts from the quoted genotypes demonstrating the decrease in
phosphorylated Akt content in homozygous mice epidermis. E,
kinase assays of the immunoprecipitated endogenous Akt (upper
panel) and PKC
(middle panel) demonstrating the
inhibition of both kinase activities in homozygous, and to a lesser
extent in heterozygous, transgenic bK5hK10 epidermis. The lower
panel shows the Western blot of the immunoprecipitated PKC
,
demonstrating that this enzyme is expressed to a similar level in all
the genotypes. Bar in C = 10 µm.
Dashed lines in A and A' denote the
dermal-epidermal junction.
regulatory region (26), a keratin not
expressed in interfollicular epidermis but strongly induced by
hyperproliferative stimuli (27). Further, we have recently reported
that Akt-dependent signaling, the process that
results inhibited by K10 (10), plays a major role in mouse skin
carcinogenesis (28) and that the simple overexpression of Akt increases
the tumorigenic potential of mouse keratinocytes (28).
activation. A clear delay
in tumor onset was found in the transgenic animals with respect to
their non-transgenic littermates (Fig.
7A). In addition, the number
of papillomas per mouse was strikingly decreased in the transgenic
group (Fig. 7B), and an average 5-fold fall was found in the
size of the tumors (Fig. 7, C and C'). Finally, the number of carcinomas was drastically reduced in the transgenic animals (Fig. 7D), indicating that malignant conversion was
also dramatically impaired (malignant conversion rate of 0.001 compared with 0.024; p = 0.01). Collectively, these data
demonstrate that K10 expression leads to a severe decrease in
tumorigenesis and provide clear evidence for a role for K10 in
preventing tumor development in vivo.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Kinetics of tumor development in double
(TG.AC/bK5hK10) or single (TG.AC) transgenic mice. Sixteen animals
corresponding to each genotype were used in chemical carcinogenesis
experiments. TPA was applied topically for 8 weeks, and the number of
tumors arising in each mouse was recorded at regular intervals.
A, kinetics of tumor appearance in TG.AC single or
TG.AC/nK5hK10 double transgenic animals with a significant delay in the
development of tumors in the presence of K10. B, the number of
papillomas per mouse is also significantly reduced in TG.AC/nK5hK10
double transgenic animals. C and C', distribution
of total papillomas according to size and weeks after starting TPA
treatment in TG.AC (C) and TG.AC/nK5hK10 double transgenic
animals (C'). D, the number of mice bearing
malignant squamous cell carcinomas demonstrates that the rate of
malignant conversion is also severely impaired by hK10
expression.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(9, 10). In this work, these findings
were extended to the in vivo situation using transgenic mice. Similar approaches have been used previously to study the possible functions of keratins (7, 12, 20, 22, 29, 30), and in most
cases the observed phenotype is due to the overexpression of the
transgene (20, 22, 29, 30). In agreement, severe epidermal
abnormalities were found in bK5hK10 transgenic mice in close
association with K10 overexpression (Figs. 2 and 3). Nonetheless, a
clear biochemical phenotype was also seen; this affected keratinocyte
proliferation (Figs. 4-6) in mice that displayed no overt histological
phenotype or K10 overexpression. A similar correlation between the
level of expression of a keratin in transgenic mice and the
corresponding phenotype has been reported for K16 (20, 22, 31). In this
case, however, a clear skin phenotype characterized by a
hyperkeratotic, scaly, and hyperproliferative interfollicular epidermis
was also demonstrated in the absence of K16 overexpression in
vivo (20).
(32) or 14-3-3 proteins (33, 34),
this possibility has now been reinforced by direct experimental data.
In fact, the evidence that K8 and K18 can modulate tumor necrosis
factor-dependent signaling (35-37) and the transitory
epidermal hyperproliferation associated with increased epidermal growth
factor receptor phosphorylation found upon ectopic expression of K16 in
basal epidermal keratinocytes (20), clearly implies that keratins are
putative modulators of cell signaling processes. In this regard, we
have previously shown that keratin K10 can inhibit cell cycle
progression in a pRb-dependent manner (9) through the
interaction and inhibition of Akt and PKC
(10). The present data
clearly confirm this. We show that the ectopic expression of K10
reduces keratinocyte proliferation and pRb phosphorylation and impairs
activation of Akt and PKC
both in primary keratinocytes and in
epidermis in vivo (Figs. 4 and 5). This implicates that, in
agreement with others (38, 39), pRb lies somehow downstream from the
PI3K signaling pathway. Interestingly, we have recently reported that the PTEN tumor suppressor, which acts in opposition to PI3K, may also
prevent cell cycle progression in a pRb-dependent manner in
keratinocytes (16). This is in clear parallel with K10 (9, 10).
, precluding the phosphorylation and degradation of cyclin D1 (54, 55). On the other hand, the expression of
cyclin D1 has been proved essential for the development of mouse skin
tumors (56). In the present work it is shown that the expression of K10
in bK5hK10 transgenic mice, even in the absence of histological
abnormalities, reduces the activity of Akt (Fig. 6) and consequently
the expression of cyclin D1 (Fig. 5; see also Refs. 9, 10). This
mechanism is similar to that described for PTEN in keratinocytes (16)
and suggests that K10 acts as a tumor suppressor under certain circumstances.
2,3/p21-double-deficient mouse
epidermis (17). Although our data showing impaired tumor development in
low K10-expressing mice (Fig. 7) and the delayed tumor formation in
K6
hK10 transgenic mice (26) strongly support the notion that K10 may
function as a tumor suppressor, further studies are required. In
particular, the use of the recently developed K10
/
mouse (59) in
skin carcinogenesis experiments will help to determine this and will clarify the roles of K10 as a modulator of cell proliferation in epidermis.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Fuchs, E. V.
(1997)
Mol. Biol. Cell
69,
899-902
2.
Fuchs, E. V.,
and Weber, K.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
63,
345-382[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Irvine, A. D.,
and McLean, W. H. I.
(1999)
Br. J. Dermatol.
140,
815-828[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
McLean, W. H. I.,
and Lane, E. B.
(1995)
Curr. Op. Cell Biol.
7,
118-125[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Fuchs, E. V.,
and Green, H.
(1980)
Cell
19,
1033-1042[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Weiss, R. A. R.,
Eichner, R.,
and Sun, T. T.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
98,
1397-1406 7.
Paladini, R. D.,
and Coulombe, P. A.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
146,
1185-1201 8.
Lloyd, C., Yu, Q. C.,
Cheng, J.,
Turksen, K.,
Degenstein, L.,
Hutton, E.,
and Fuchs, E.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
1329-1344 9.
Paramio, J. M.,
Casanova, M. Ll.,
Segrelles, C.,
Mittnacht, S.,
Lane, E. B.,
and Jorcano, J. L.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3086-3094 10.
Paramio, J. M.,
Segrelles, C.,
Ruiz, S.,
and Jorcano, J. L.
(2001)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
21,
7449-7459 11.
Ramirez, A.,
Bravo, A.,
Jorcano, J. L.,
and Vidal, M.
(1994)
Differentiation
58,
53-64[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Blessing, M.,
Rüther, U.,
and Franke, W. W.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
743-755 13.
Ramírez, A.,
Milot, E.,
Ponsa, I.,
Marcos-Gutierrez, C.,
Page, A.,
Santos, M.,
Jorcano, J.,
and Vidal, M.
(2001)
Genetics
158,
341-350 14.
Hennings, H.,
Michael, D.,
Cheng, C.,
Steinert, P.,
Holbrook, K.,
and Yuspa, S. H.
(1980)
Cell
19,
245-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Paramio, J. M.,
Laín, S.,
Segrelles, C.,
Lane, E. B.,
and Jorcano, J. L.
(1998)
Oncogene
17,
949-957[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Paramio, J. M.,
Navarro, M.,
Segrelles, C.,
Gómez-Casero, E.,
and Jorcano, J. L.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
7462-7468[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Paramio, J. M.,
Segrelles, C.,
Ruiz, S.,
Martín-Caballero, J.,
Page, A.,
Martínez, J.,
Serrano, M.,
and Jorcano, J. L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
44203-44211 18.
Leder, A.,
Kuo, A.,
Cardiff, R. D.,
Sinn, E.,
and Leder, P.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
9178-9182 19.
Eichner, R.,
Sun, T. T.,
and Aebi, U.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
102,
1767-1777 20.
Paladini, R. D.,
and Coulombe, P. A.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
1035-1051 21.
Paramio, J. M.,
and Jorcano, J. L.
(1994)
Exp. Cell Res.
215,
319-331[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Takahashi, K.,
Folmer, J.,
and Coulombe, P. A.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol
127,
505-520 23.
Cheng, J.,
Syder, A. J., Yu, Q. C.,
Letai, A.,
Paller, A. S.,
and Fuchs, E.
(1992)
Cell
70,
811-819[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Fuchs, E.,
Esteves, R. A.,
and Coulombe, P. A.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6906-6910 25.
Roop, D. R.,
Krieg, T. M.,
Mehrel, T.,
Cheng, C. K.,
and Yuspa, S. H.
(1988)
Cancer Res.
48,
3245-3252 26.
Santos, M.,
Ballestín, C.,
García-Martín, R.,
and Jorcano, J. L.
(1997)
Mol. Carcinog.
20,
3-9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Ramirez, A.,
Vidal, M.,
Bravo, A.,
Larcher, F.,
and Jorcano, J. L.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
4783-4787 28.
Segrelles, C.,
Ruiz, S.,
Perez, P.,
Murga, C.,
Santos, M.,
Budunova, I. V.,
Martínez, J.,
Larcher, F.,
Slaga, T. J.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
Jorcano, J. L.,
and Paramio, J. M.
(2002)
Oncogene
21,
53-64[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve].
29.
Albers, K. M.,
Davis, F. E.,
Perrone, T. N.,
Lee, E. Y.,
Liu, Y.,
and Vore, M.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
157-169 30.
Casanova, M. Ll.,
Bravo, A.,
Ramírez, A.,
Morreale de Escobar, G.,
Were, F.,
Merlino, G.,
Vidal, M.,
and Jorcano, J. L.
(1999)
J. Clin. Invest.
103,
1587-1595[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Wawersik, M.,
and Coulombe, P. A.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
3315-3327 32.
Omary, M. B.,
Baxter, G. T.,
Chou, C. F.,
Riopel, C. L.,
Lin, W. Y.,
and Strulovici, B.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
583-593 33.
Ku, N. O.,
Liao, J.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1892-1906[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Liao, J.,
and Omary, M. B.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
133,
345-357 35.
Caulin, C.,
Ware, C. F.,
Magin, T. M.,
and Oshima, R. G.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
149,
17-22 36.
Inada, H.,
Izawa, I.,
Nishizawa, M.,
Fujita, E.,
Kiyono, T.,
Takahashi, T.,
Momoi, T.,
and Inagaki, M.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
155,
415-426 37.
Gilbert, S.,
Loranger, A.,
Daigle, N.,
and Marceau, N.
(2001)
J. Cell Biol.
154,
763-773 38.
Brennan, P.,
Babbage, J. W.,
Burgering, B. M. T.,
Groner, B.,
Reif, K.,
and Cantrell, D. A.
(1997)
Immunity
7,
679-689[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Klippel, A.,
Escobedo, M. A.,
Wachowicz, M. S.,
Apell, G.,
Brown, T. W.,
Giedlin, M. A.,
Kavanaugh, W. M.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
5699-5711 40.
Okano, J.,
Gaslightwala, I.,
Birnbaum, M. J.,
Rustgi, A. K.,
and Nakagawa, H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
30934-30942 41.
Sibilia, M.,
Fleischmann, A.,
Behrens, A.,
Stingl, L.,
Carroll, J.,
Watt, F. M.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Wagner, E. F.
(2000)
Cell
102,
211-220[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
Wan, Y. S.,
Wang, Z. Q.,
Shao, Y.,
Voorhees, J. J.,
and Fisher, G. F.
(2001)
Int. J. Oncol.
18,
461-466[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Bang, O. S.,
Park, E. K.,
Yang, S. I.,
Lee, S. R.,
Franke, T. F.,
and Kang, S. S.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
81-88[Abstract]
44.
Fukumoto, S.,
Hsieh, C. M.,
Maemura, K.,
Layne, M. D.,
Yet, S. F.,
Lee, K. H.,
Matsui, T.,
Rosenzweig, A.,
Taylor, W. G.,
Rubin, J. S.,
Perrella, M. A.,
and Lee, M. E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
17479-17483 45.
Jiang, B. H.,
Aoki, M.,
Zheng, J. Z., Li, J.,
and Vogt, P. K.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
2077-2081 46.
Rommel, C.,
Clarke, B. A.,
Zimmermann, S.,
Nunez, L.,
Rossman, R.,
Reid, K.,
Moelling, K.,
Yancopoulos, G. D.,
and Glass, D. J.
(1999)
Science
286,
1738-1741 47.
Vandromme, M.,
Rochat, A.,
Meier, R.,
Carnac, G.,
Besser, D.,
Hemmings, B. A.,
Fernandez, A.,
and Lamb, N. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
8173-8179 48.
Bakin, A. V.,
Tomlinson, A. K.,
Bhowmick, N. A.,
Moses, H. L.,
and Arteaga, C. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
36803-36810 49.
Sasaki, T.,
Irie-Sasaki, J.,
Jones, R. G.,
Oliveira-dos-Santos, A. J.,
Stanford, W. L.,
Bolon, B.,
Wakeham, A.,
Itie, A.,
Bouchard, D.,
Kozieradzki, I.,
Joza, N.,
Mak, T. W.,
Ohashi, P. S.,
Suzuki, A.,
and Penninger, J. M.
(2000)
Science
287,
1040-1046 50.
Tamura, M., Gu, J.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Aota, S.,
Parsons, R.,
and Yamada, K. M.
(1998)
Science
280,
1614-1617 51.
Tamura, M., Gu, J.,
Takino, T.,
and Yamada, K. M.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
442-449 52.
Kulik, G.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6711-6718 53.
DiGiovanni, J.,
Bol, D. K.,
Wilker, E.,
Beltran, L.,
Carbajal, S.,
Moats, S.,
Ramirez, A.,
Jorcano, J. L.,
and Kiguchi, K.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
1561-1570 54.
Alt, J. R.,
Cleveland, J. L.,
Hannink, M.,
and Diehl, J. A.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
3102-3114 55.
Diehl, J. A.,
Cheng, M.,
Roussel, M. F.,
and Sherr, C. J.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
3499-3511 56.
Robles, A. I.,
Rodriguez-Puebla, M. L.,
Glick, A. B.,
Trempus, C.,
Hansen, L.,
Sicinski, P.,
Tennant, R. W.,
Weinberg, R. A.,
Yuspa, S. H.,
and Conti, C. J.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
2469-2474 57.
Roussel, M. F.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
5311-5317[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
58.
Sharpless, N. E.,
and DePinho, R. A.
(1999)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
9,
22-30[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
59.
Reichelt, J.,
Bussow, H.,
Grund, C.,
and Magin, T. M.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
1557-1568
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Yao, C. L. Alexander, J. A. Quinn, W.-C. Chan, H. Wu, and D. A. Greenhalgh Fos cooperation with PTEN loss elicits keratoacanthoma not carcinoma, owing to p53/p21WAF-induced differentiation triggered by GSK3{beta} inactivation and reduced AKT activity J. Cell Sci., May 15, 2008; 121(10): 1758 - 1769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Segrelles, J. Lu, B. Hammann, M. Santos, M. Moral, J. L. Cascallana, M. F. Lara, O. Rho, S. Carbajal, J. Traag, et al. Deregulated Activity of Akt in Epithelial Basal Cells Induces Spontaneous Tumors and Heightened Sensitivity to Skin Carcinogenesis Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 67(22): 10879 - 10888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kim and P. A. Coulombe Intermediate filament scaffolds fulfill mechanical, organizational, and signaling functions in the cytoplasm Genes & Dev., July 1, 2007; 21(13): 1581 - 1597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Paramio, M. Santos, and J. L. Jorcano The ends of a conundrum? J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2007; 120(7): 1145 - 1147. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chen, X. Cheng, M. Merched-Sauvage, C. Caulin, D. R. Roop, and P. J. Koch Reply to: The ends of a conundrum? J. Cell Sci., April 1, 2007; 120(7): 1147 - 1148. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |