JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108478200 on March 19, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19304-19314, May 31, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/22/19304    most recent
M108478200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Cho, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Mlo, a Modulator of Plant Defense and Cell Death, Is a Novel Calmodulin-binding Protein

ISOLATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF A RICE Mlo HOMOLOGUE*

Min Chul KimDagger , Sang Hyoung LeeDagger , Jong Kyong KimDagger , Hyun Jin ChunDagger , Man Soo ChoiDagger , Woo Sik ChungDagger , Byeong Cheol MoonDagger , Chang Ho KangDagger , Chan Young ParkDagger , Jae Hyuk YooDagger , Yun Hwan KangDagger , Seong Cheol KooDagger , Yoon Duck KooDagger , Jae Cheol JungDagger , Sun Tae KimDagger , Paul Schulze-Lefert§, Sang Yeol LeeDagger , and Moo Je ChoDagger

From the Dagger  Division of Applied Life Science, Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Gyeongsang National University, Chinju 660-701, Korea and § Max-Planck-Institut für Züchtungsforschung, Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, D-50829 Köln, Germany

Received for publication, September 4, 2001, and in revised form, March 19, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transient influx of Ca2+ constitutes an early event in the signaling cascades that trigger plant defense responses. However, the downstream components of defense-associated Ca2+ signaling are largely unknown. Because Ca2+ signals are mediated by Ca2+-binding proteins, including calmodulin (CaM), identification and characterization of CaM-binding proteins elicited by pathogens should provide insights into the mechanism by which Ca2+ regulates defense responses. In this study, we isolated a gene encoding rice Mlo (Oryza sativa Mlo; OsMlo) using a protein-protein interaction-based screening of a cDNA expression library constructed from pathogen-elicited rice suspension cells. OsMlo has a molecular mass of 62 kDa and shares 65% sequence identity and scaffold topology with barley Mlo, a heptahelical transmembrane protein known to function as a negative regulator of broad spectrum disease resistance and leaf cell death. By using gel overlay assays, we showed that OsMlo produced in Escherichia coli binds to soybean CaM isoform-1 (SCaM-1) in a Ca2+-dependent manner. We located a 20-amino acid CaM-binding domain (CaMBD) in the OsMlo C-terminal cytoplasmic tail that is necessary and sufficient for Ca2+-dependent CaM complex formation. Specific binding of the conserved CaMBD to CaM was corroborated by site-directed mutagenesis, a gel mobility shift assay, and a competition assay with a Ca2+/CaM-dependent enzyme. Expression of OsMlo was strongly induced by a fungal pathogen and by plant defense signaling molecules. We propose that binding of Ca2+-loaded CaM to the C-terminal tail may be a common feature of Mlo proteins.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Both plant and animal cells elevate their cytosolic free calcium level ([Ca2+]cyt)1 in response to a variety of external stimuli, including pathogen attack (1-5). A rapid increase in [Ca2+]cyt has been reported in a number of plant-pathogen interactions (6-9). Ratio imaging of cowpea epidermal cells after challenge with the fungus Uromyces phaseoli demonstrated an increased [Ca2+]cyt level in an incompatible interaction at the time when the pathogen was penetrating the host cell wall (6). A rapid and sustained rise in [Ca2+]cyt was observed in whole leaves of Arabidopsis during race-specific resistance in response to the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae (7). Treatment of suspension-cultured plant cells with non-race-specific fungal elicitors leads to Ca2+ fluxes in the micromolar range (8, 9). Because treatment of plant cells with Ca2+ chelators or Ca2+ channel blockers compromises the oxidative burst that is thought to drive defense responses at sites of attempted pathogen invasion, pathogen-triggered Ca2+ fluxes are likely to play an important role in signaling during plant defense (8, 9). However, little is known of how Ca2+ signals impinge on plant defense pathways at the molecular level.

In plants, Ca2+ either directly activates a group of enzymes called calcium-dependent protein kinases (10-12) or acts indirectly through Ca2+-modulator proteins such as CaM (13, 14). CaM is a ubiquitous Ca2+-binding protein in eukaryotes and the primary intracellular Ca2+ sensor or adaptor. It transduces Ca2+ signals by modulating the activity of numerous and diverse CaMBPs, thereby generating physiological responses to various stimuli (15). In plant cells, multiple CaM genes exist that code for numerous CaM isoforms in wheat (16), potato (17), Arabidopsis (18), and soybean (19). Expression of CaM isoform genes is differentially induced in response to physical and chemical stimuli, including pathogen invasion (20). CaM isoforms have been found to regulate differentially many Ca2+/CaM-dependent enzymes in vitro (21). Soybean CaM isoform-1 (SCaM-1) activates NAD kinase and calcineurin, whereas soybean CaM isoform-4 (SCaM-4) serves as a competitive antagonist of these activations (22). The opposite is true for mammalian nitric-oxide synthase (23, 24). Furthermore, specific CaM isoform(s) mediate SA-independent plant defense signal transduction in vivo (20), although the exact defense signaling cascades mediated by the CaM isoforms remain to be elucidated. There is considerable interest in identifying and characterizing CaM-binding proteins because at least some are expected to have a direct role in mediating the outcome of plant-pathogen encounters.

Barley Mlo is the founder of a plant-restricted and sequence-diversified class of seven-transmembrane proteins located in the plasma membrane (25). Homozygous mutations in barley Mlo confer broad spectrum resistance to the powdery mildew fungus and exhibit a developmentally controlled phenotype of spontaneous leaf cell death, indicating that the wild-type gene has a negative regulatory function in plant defense and leaf cell death (26, 27). Although the subcellular location, topology, and sequence diversification of Mlo family members within a plant species are reminiscent of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) in animals and fungi, direct experimental evidence for Mlo receptor function is lacking (25-28).

Here we report the isolation from rice of a gene encoding an Mlo homologue (OsMlo) that shares 65% sequence identity with the barley gene, HvMlo. OsMlo expression was found to be responsive to pathogen and plant defense signaling molecules. We identified a 20-amino acid sequence in the C-terminal tail of OsMlo that is required for Ca2+-dependent complex formation with CaM. The conservation of the novel CaMBD among Mlo family members in diverse plant species suggests that activity modulation via CaM could be a common feature of Mlo proteins.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Screening of the Rice cDNA Expression Library-- A rice cDNA expression library was constructed in a lambda ZAPII vector (Stratagene) from rice (Oryza sativa L. Milyang 117) suspension cells treated with a fungal elicitor as described previously (29). SCaM-1 was conjugated to a maleimide-activated HRP using the EZ-Link maleimide-activated HRP conjugation kit (Pierce) as described in a previous report (30). We screened the rice cDNA expression library as described by Sambrook et al. (31), using the HRP-conjugated SCaM-1 (SCaM-1:HRP) as a probe. Approximately 4 × 104 plaque-forming units were plated per 15-cm LB plate using Escherichia coli XL1-blue MRF (Stratagene) as the host strain. The plates were incubated at 42 °C until the plaques appeared. The plates were then overlaid with nitrocellulose filters that had previously been soaked in 10 mM IPTG. The incubation was continued at 37 °C for 6-8 h, and the plates were cooled to 4 °C. The filters were removed and rinsed twice in a large volume of TBS-T (TBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20). The filters were blocked by incubation in 7% (w/v) non-fat dry milk/TBS-T overnight, and the blocked filters were washed three times with TBS-T for 5 min and equilibrated in overlay buffer (50 mM imidazole HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl) for 1 h. The membranes were blocked a second time by incubating the filters in overlay buffer containing 9% (v/v) gelatin (Sigma), 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20, and 1 mM CaCl2 for 3.5 h. SCaM-1:HRP was added to the gelatin-containing buffer at a final concentration of 0.2 µg/ml, and the filters were incubated for 1 h. Final washing was done in three steps, with each step consisting of five repeats of a 5-min wash: first, in TBS-T/50 mM imidazole HCl (pH 7.5) and 1 mM CaCl2; second, in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5% Tween 20, 50 mM imidazole HCl, 0.5 M KCl, and 1 mM CaCl2; and third, in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1% Tween 20, and 1 mM MgCl2. Bound CaM:HRP was visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection kit (Amersham Biosciences). A total of 5 × 105 recombinants were screened, and 50 positive clones were isolated after three rounds of screening. cDNA inserts were recovered by in vivo excision with helper phage (ExAssist, Stratagene). To confirm the binding of positive clones to CaM, we expressed positive clones as beta -galactosidase fusion proteins in E. coli and examined the clones for CaM binding by a CaM:HRP overlay assay as described above. In brief, we transformed positive clones into XL1-Blue (Stratagene) and induced the expression of beta -galactosidase fusion proteins with IPTG treatment. Twenty micrograms of IPTG-induced E. coli crude protein were separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto an Immobilon-MP membrane (PVDF, Millipore). The membrane was rinsed in TBS-T, blocked by incubation in 7% (w/v) non-fat dry milk/TBS-T overnight, and processed as described above. For determination of Ca2+-independent binding of CaM, 5 mM EGTA was substituted for the 1 mM CaCl2 in all overlay buffers. The cDNA sequences of the resulting positive clones were determined from both strands of cDNA by dideoxynucleotide chain termination using an automatic DNA sequencer (ABI 373A, Applied Biosystems Inc.), and BLAST searches were performed at the National Center for Biotechnology Information web site.

5'-Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends-- One of the positive clones contained a partial coding region that was homologous to the barley Mlo gene. To obtain the truncated 5' region of OsMlo cDNA, we performed 5'-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) with a Marathon cDNA amplification kit (CLONTECH) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The truncated 5' region of OsMlo cDNA was amplified from cDNA synthesized from mRNA of rice suspension cells treated with a fungal elicitor by using an OsMlo gene-specific oligonucleotide (5'-GCCCTAAACCCATGGTGATGA-CGC-3') and an adaptor primer from CLONTECH. The amplified product was subcloned into the SmaI site of pBluescript II SK(-) (Stratagene) and verified by sequencing. To obtain a full-length clone, the 5'-RACE product was subcloned into the 5' region of the partial OsMlo cDNA clone.

Construction of C-terminal Deletion Mutants of OsMlo cDNA and Site-directed Mutagenesis-- For mapping the CaM binding domain, several C-terminal deletion constructs were prepared in a pGEX-2T vector. First, a BamHI site was introduced in front of the ATG codon of a full-length cDNA clone (named OsMlo.B) using PCR. The OsMlo.B clone was digested by KpnI, PstI, or SphI and blunted by T4 DNA polymerase. The fragments were then cut with BamHI, and the resulting fragments were subcloned into a pGEX-2T vector digested with BamHI and SmaI. The glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion constructs were named according to the fragment they contained as follows: D0 for BamHI/KpnI (amino acids 1-554), D1 for BamHI/PstI (amino acids 1-488), and D3 for BamHI/SphI (amino acids 1-151). The OsMlo.B clone was also cut with BamHI and then partially digested with EcoRV. The larger and smaller BamHI/EcoRV fragments were both subcloned into the BamHI and SmaI sites of the pGEX-2T vector and called D2 (amino acids 1-299) and D4 (amino acids 1-100), respectively. The putative CaMBD (amino acids 440-476) of OsMlo was amplified using a 5' primer containing BamHI (5'-CGGGATCCGAGCAAACGATGAAGGCGC-3') and a 3' primer containing SmaI (5'-TATCCCGGGCGTCGCGAAGTCGACGC-3'), and the amplified fragment was also subcloned into a pGEX-2T vector (GST::OsMlo.CaMBD, denoted by C). To identify the critical residue(s) in the interaction between CaM and OsMlo, we introduced several point mutations into the GST::OsMlo.CaMBD clone. Substitutions of single amino acids were performed using the QuickChangeTM Site-directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene). The forward (F) and reverse (R) primer sequences used are as follows: for L446R, F, 5'-GATGAAGGCGCGGATGAACTGGAGG-3' and R, 5'-CCTCCAGTTCATCCGCGCCTTCATC-3'; for W449R, F, 5'-GCTGATGAACCGGAGGAAGAAGGC-3' and R, 5'-GCCTTCTTCCTCCGGTTCATCAGCG-3'; for N448K, F, 5'-GAAGGCGCTGATGAAATGGAGGAAGAAGG-3' and R, 5'-CCTTCTTCCTCCATTTCATCAGCGCCTTC-3'; for E455K, F, 5'GGAGGAAGAAGGCGATGAAGAAGAAGAAGGTCCGG-3' and R, 5'-CCGGACCTTCTTCTTCTTCATCGCCTTCTTCCTCC-3'.

Expression of Recombinant Proteins in E. coli and the CaM Binding Assay-- All the clones were introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS and expressed. Expression of the GST fusion proteins was induced by application of 1 mM IPTG for 5 h at 25 °C. The cells were harvested, resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2 mM PMSF, 1 mM DTT, 100 µg/ml lysozyme), and incubated on ice for 20 min. The mixture was sonicated for 1 min at 50% pulse and then centrifuged at 6,000 × g for 10 min to remove the cell debris. The supernatant (containing the E. coli crude protein) was used for Western blotting and a CaM:HRP gel overlay assay. Twenty micrograms of E. coli crude protein were separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes (PVDF, Millipore); expressed GST fusion proteins were detected by a polyclonal GST-specific antiserum. To examine the CaM binding ability of recombinant proteins, a duplicate blot was probed with an SCaM-1:HRP conjugate in the presence of 1 mM CaCl2 or 5 mM EGTA. The CaM:HRP overlay assay was carried out as described above. The bound CaM was visualized using an ECL detection system (Amersham Biosciences).

CaM Mobility Shift Assay with a Synthetic Peptide-- A peptide (443MKALMNWRKKAMEKKKVRDA462) corresponding to a stretch of 20 amino acids in the CaMBD of OsMlo was synthesized at a peptide synthesis facility (Genosys Biotechnologies, Inc.). The CaM binding ability of the synthetic peptide was detected by a relative mobility shift of CaM in the presence of the peptide (32). SCaM-1 (303 pmol) was incubated with increasing concentrations of the peptide (molar ratio: 0.0, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0) in a binding buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2), plus 0.1 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA) at room temperature for 1 h. One-half volume of 50% glycerol plus the tracer bromphenol blue was added, and the mixtures were electrophoresed in 15% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels containing 0.375 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), and either 0.1 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA. The gels were run at a constant voltage of 100 V in an electrode buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 192 mM glycine, and either 0.1 mM CaCl2 or 2 mM EGTA) and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue.

Phosphodiesterase Competition Assay-- Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (PDE) assays were performed using commercially available bovine heart CaM-deficient PDE (Sigma). The initial 500-µl reaction volume contained buffer (100 mM imidazole HCl (pH 7.5), 2.56 mM cAMP, 5.13 mM MgSO4, 1.28 mM CaCl2) with concentrations of SCaM-1 (5-200 nM) in the presence (100 nM) or absence of peptide. The reaction was started with the addition of PDE (0.5 milliunit/µl). The basal level of enzyme activity was determined in the absence of SCaM-1, and the stimulated activity was determined in the presence of SCaM-1 and CaCl2. After incubation at 30 °C for 30 min, the reaction was stopped by placing the reaction tubes into a boiling water bath for 5 min and on ice for 2 min. Following a brief centrifugation, 50 µl of alkaline phosphatase (10 units) was added and incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 500 µl of 10% trichloroacetic acid. After vortexing, the precipitates were spun down, and the supernatant (400 µl) was transferred to a new tube. After adding 1 ml of phosphate reagent (19), the supernatant was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min and assayed for Pi at OD660. The dissociation constant (Kd) of SCaM-1 for the peptide was calculated from the concentration of SCaM-1 (nM) required to obtain half-maximal (50%) PDE activity either in the presence (100 nM) or absence of peptide. The following equation was used to calculate dissociation constants (32): Kd = ([Pt] + K - [CaM])K/([CaM] - K), where [Pt] is the total concentration of peptide added, and [CaM] and K are the concentrations of CaM required to obtain half-maximal activation of PDE in the presence or absence of peptides, respectively.

Northern Blot Analysis-- Fungal spores were isolated from rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe grisea) and inoculated into rice suspension-cultured cells (5 × 105 spores/ml) as described by Kim et al. (29). All of the chemicals used in the procedure were introduced into the rice cell suspension culture, and total RNA was isolated by the guanidinium isothiocyanate method with subsequent ultracentrifugation (31). RNA was separated on 1.2% agarose-formaldehyde gels and blotted onto a nylon membranes (GeneScreen Plus, PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The membranes were incubated with 32P-labeled full-length OsMlo cDNA at 65 °C overnight and washed under high stringency conditions according to the method of Church and Gilbert (33).

Genomic Southern Blot Analysis-- Rice genomic DNA was extracted as described (34). Ten micrograms of DNA were digested with EcoRI, HindIII, or XbaI, fractionated on a 0.8% agarose gel, and transferred onto a nylon membrane (GeneScreen Plus, PerkinElmer Life Sciences). The membrane was probed with 32P-labeled full-length OsMlo cDNA. Hybridization and washing conditions were as described above for Northern blot analysis.

Preparation of the Polyclonal Antibody-- A multiple antigenic peptide (OsMloAg, 103KGLKGKKDHRRRLLW117 in OsMlo) was synthesized at the Peptide Synthesis Facility (Peptron, Daejun, South Korea). The polyclonal antibody against the OsMloAg peptide was raised in a New Zealand White rabbit, and the polyclonal antiserum was purified by antigen affinity chromatography on an OsMloAg peptide-Sepharose column as described (35). The column was prepared by conjugating the OsMloAg peptide to CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B according to the procedure recommended by the manufacturer (Amersham Biosciences).

Preparation of Rice Membrane Fractions-- A microsomal membrane fraction was prepared from 10-day-old rice leaves according to the procedure described by Chung et al. (35). Rice leaves were ground on ice in prechilled homogenization buffer of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 20% (w/w) sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, 4 mM DTT, 2 mM PMSF, and complete protease inhibitor mixture (1 tablet per 10 ml of lysis buffer) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The cell homogenate was filtered through two layers of Miracloth (Calbiochem) and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min to remove intact organelles and cell walls. The supernatant was divided into a cytosolic protein fraction (supernatant) and a microsomal fraction (pellet) by further centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 1 h. The resulting microsomal pellets were resuspended in homogenization buffer (1 ml per 10 g of starting material) using glass homogenizers. Microsomes were applied to a continuous sucrose gradient from 15 to 45% (w/w) in centrifugation buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM PMSF) and centrifuged at 110,000 × g for 18 h. Fractions (0.8 ml) were collected from the top, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C until used.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cloning of Rice OsMlo-- To identify molecular components of the Ca2+/CaM-mediated signaling pathways associated with plant defense responses, we screened a rice cDNA expression library constructed from a fungal elicitor-treated rice suspension cell culture using HRP-conjugated SCaM-1 as a probe (29). So far, seven highly conserved CaMs (GenBankTM accession numbers X65016 (36), AF441190, AF042839, AF441191, AF042840, L18913, and Z12827) and a divergent CaM isoform containing an unusual 12-amino acid insertion, between the second and third calcium-binding motifs (AB060552), have been identified from rice. SCaM-1 is nearly identical to the conserved type of rice CaMs, showing only a single amino acid difference compared with OsCaM (Ser11 right-arrow Ala (37)) and two amino acid differences compared with the other conserved rice CaMs (GenBankTM accession numbers AF441190 and AF042839: Ser11 right-arrow Ala and Arg75 right-arrow Lys; GenBankTM accession numbers AF441191, AF042840, L18913, and Z12827: Glu8 right-arrow Asp and Ser11 right-arrow Ala). High conservation of amino acid sequences between conserved rice CaMs and SCaM-1 may suggest that they can share their target/binding proteins, leading us to expect a similar result in the protein-protein interaction-based screening in planta. Fifty positive clones were obtained from about 5 × 105 recombinant phages. DNA sequencing of the clones and comparisons to known sequences in GenBankTM revealed that they included known plant CaMBPs such as kinesin-like proteins (37), CaM-binding heat-shock proteins (38), multidrug resistance associated proteins (39), and two different CaMBPs of unknown function (40, 41). They also included several novel CaMBPs with high homology to known proteins (e.g. OsMlo, in this report) and other proteins with no significant homology to any other reported proteins in GenBankTM data base (data not shown).

One of the clones had high homology to barley Mlo (27). The nucleotide sequence of the 1,302-bp cDNA clone contained a partial coding region (encoding 403 amino acids) and a full 3'-untranslated region. The 5'-truncated region of the cDNA was recovered by RACE-PCR and sequenced. The 1,662 nucleotide full-length cDNA contained an open reading frame encoding a 62-kDa protein consisting of 554 amino acid residues that was designated OsMlo (Fig. 1). The deduced amino acid sequence of OsMlo shared 65% identity with barley Mlo and revealed seven putative transmembrane (TM) domains predicted by hydrophobicity analysis (data not shown). At present, 32 plant genes encoding homologues of Mlo protein have been identified in both dicot and monocot plant species such as Arabidopsis (15 genes), rice (3 genes), barley (2 genes), wheat (3 genes), and maize (9 genes). Interestingly, Mlo sequence-related genes were found only in the plant kingdom, suggesting that Mlo is involved in plant-specific cellular processes. In an effort to determine the evolutionary relationships among Mlo family members, a phylogenetic tree was generated using the amino acid sequences of 32 Mlo proteins (Fig. 2A). The phylogenetic analysis showed that plant Mlo families are divided into five groups, and monocot Mlo proteins, with the exception of maize Mlo proteins, are clustered in a separate group. However, the biological meaning of these groups is not yet clear.


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequence of the OsMlo cDNA. The putative seven transmembrane domains, predicted by the transmembrane prediction program, TMPRED (ExPASy Web server; www.expasy.ch/tools/), are underlined. The arrow indicates the sequence corresponding to the antisense primer used for RACE cloning. The putative CaM binding domain is shaded.


View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Analysis of the CaM-binding domain sequences of OsMlo. A, phylogenetic analysis of plant Mlo families. The amino acid sequences of 32 Mlo proteins were obtained from GenBankTM data base searches. The sequences were aligned and compared to construct a phylogenetic tree by the Clustal method using the MecAlign program (DNAstar Inc.). The GenBankTM accession numbers used in building the phylogenetic tree are as follows: TaMlo (AF384144), TaMlo1 (AF361933), TaMlo2 (AF361932), HvMlo (Z83834), HvMlo1 (Z95496), OsMlo (in this report, AF388195), OsMlo1 (Z95353), OsMlo2 (AP000615), ZmMlo1-ZmMlo9 (AY029312-AY029320, respectively), AtMlo1 (Z95352), and AtMlo2-AtMlo15 (AF369563-AF369576, respectively). Ta, Triticum aestivum; Hv, Hordeum vulgare; Os, O. sativa; Zm, Zea mays; At, Arabidopsis thaliana. B, alignment of the putative CaMBD sequence of OsMlo (Met443 to Ala462) with the corresponding regions of Mlo families. The names of Mlo families listed in A and their putative CaMBD sequences are aligned in the same order. The hydrophobic amino acids corresponding to a Ca2+-dependent CaM-binding motif (1-8-14 motif) and the highly conserved Trp residues are indicated with gray boxes and a black box, respectively. C, helical wheel projection of the putative CaM-binding region of OsMlo. Hydrophobic and basic amino acid residues are marked with * and +, respectively. The dashed line indicates that such a helix is amphipathic, with one side being hydrophilic and the other side hydrophobic. D, a topology of OsMlo. The plasma membrane is represented by a gray bar. Open circles represent the amino acids of OsMlo, and the 20 amino acids corresponding to the putative CaMBD of OsMlo are denoted by closed circles.

Mapping of the CaMBD within OsMlo-- Comparative analysis of the CaM-binding regions of the many reported CaMBPs has provided multiple sequence motifs required for CaM complex formation (42). Based on the structural characteristics of known CaMBDs, a putative CaMBD was located in OsMlo in the last cytosolic region between Met443 and Ala462 (Fig. 2, B and D). Within this 20-amino acid stretch, hydrophobic amino acids are present at positions 1 (Leu446), 8 (Ala453), and 14 (Val459), and several basic residues (five lysines and one arginine) are interspersed between the hydrophobic residues (Fig. 2B). These characteristics of the putative OsMlo CaMBD match a consensus Ca2+-dependent CaM-binding motif designated "1-8-14" (42). Furthermore, a Trp residue (amino acid 449) that is known to play a critical role in the CaM binding of many CaM target proteins (43-45) was also found within this region (Fig. 2B). A sequence comparison of the OsMlo CaMBD with the corresponding region of plant Mlo homologues showed that the positions of critical hydrophobic amino acids, especially the first hydrophobic residue in the 1-8-14 motif and the Trp residue, are strictly conserved among all of the Mlo families (Fig. 2B). Most of the characterized CaM-binding proteins possess a basic amphiphilic alpha -helical region (13, 46). A helical wheel projection of the peptide sequences of the OsMlo CaMBD (20 amino acids, Met443 to Ala462) shows a typical CaMBD feature, segregation of basic and hydrophobic residues on opposite sides of the helix (Fig. 2C (48, 49)).

To confirm the location of the putative CaMBD of OsMlo, we made a series of GST fusion constructs containing the full-length cDNA, four serial C-terminal deletion mutants, and a construct harboring the presumptive binding site. The recombinant proteins were produced in E. coli, separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membranes for Western blotting and subsequent CaM:HRP overlay assays. Expression of the GST fusion proteins was verified by probing the blot with an anti-GST antibody (data not shown). Three recombinant proteins (designated D0, D1, and C) that contained the putative CaMBD interacted with the SCaM-1:HRP conjugate, whereas GST only (G) and the GST fusion proteins lacking the predicted CaM-binding region (designated D2, D3, and D4) did not bind to CaM. CaM bound to OsMlo in the presence but not in the absence of Ca2+ (Fig. 3B). These results demonstrate that CaM binds to the predicted OsMlo CaMBD in the C-terminal region between Met443 and Ala462 in a Ca2+-dependent manner.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Identification of the CaM binding domain of OsMlo. A, schematic representation of OsMlo and its C-terminal deletion constructs. The seven transmembrane domains (I-VII) are indicated with white boxes, and the putative CaMBD is shown with a black box. The amino acid positions of each deletion construct are indicated. D0---D4 and C represent GST fusion constructs containing the indicated fragments of OsMlo. CaM binding ability is indicated as + (CaM binding) or - (no CaM binding). B, CaM binding analysis. GST (G) and GST fusion proteins of a series of C-terminal deletion mutants (D0-D4), and the CaMBD (C) of OsMlo were expressed in E. coli. Twenty micrograms of the crude extracts were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF membrane. For the CaM:HRP overlay assay, blots were probed with SCaM-1:HRP in the presence (1 mM CaCl2, left panel) or absence (5 mM EGTA, right panel) of Ca2+.

Binding of a Synthetic Peptide to CaM-- To analyze further whether CaM binds to the 20-amino acid stretch from Met443 to Ala462 of OsMlo, a peptide corresponding to this region was synthesized and used for a gel shift assay in which the larger peptide-bound form of CaM should migrate with a lower mobility than free CaM under non-denaturing conditions (32). As shown in Fig. 4A, the intensity of a higher molecular mass band representing the peptide-CaM complex increased with increasing concentration of the synthetic peptide in the presence of Ca2+, whereas the higher molecular weight complex was undetectable when EGTA was substituted for Ca2+. At a molar ratio of 1:1 (peptide:CaM), about 50% of the CaM was shifted, and all of the CaM formed a complex with the peptide at molar ratios of 2:1 and 3:1 (peptide:CaM). This result shows that the 20-mer peptide from Met443 to Ala462 of the predicted OsMlo CaMBD is sufficient for Ca2+-dependent CaM binding and provides evidence for a complex stoichiometry.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Analysis of CaM binding to a synthetic OsMlo peptide. A, gel mobility shift assay. The amino acid sequences of the peptide, corresponding to amino acids 443-462 in OsMlo, are shown on the top. SCaM-1 (303 pmol) was incubated with increasing amounts of the peptide (peptide:CaM molar ratios are indicated) in the presence of 0.1 mM CaCl2 (upper panel) or 2 mM EGTA (lower panel). Samples were separated by nondenaturing PAGE and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Arrows indicate the position of the free CaM and the peptide-CaM complex. B, peptide inhibition of SCaM-1-stimulated PDE activity. PDE activity was measured with varying concentrations of SCaM-1 in the presence of a fixed amount (100 nM) of the peptide. Data points represent means of the results from three independent assay (n = 3).

We further analyzed the binding of the synthetic peptide to CaM by a competition assay with PDE, a Ca2+/CaM-dependent enzyme. To determine Kd values of the peptide for the activation of PDE by CaM, the CaM dose-dependent activation of PDE was monitored either in the presence (100 nM) or absence of the peptide (Fig. 4B). The activation curves shifted to the right in the presence of the peptide, indicating that competition occurred between PDE and the peptide for binding to CaM. The concentrations of SCaM-1 needed to achieve half-maximal activation of PDE activity in the absence and presence of the 20-mer peptide were 10.1 and 45.8 nM, respectively, a 4.5-fold difference. The Kd value of the peptide for the activation of PDE by SCaM-1 was determined to be 18.2 nM.

Critical Residues of the CaM-binding Motif-- We made amino acid substitutions at several residues of the CaMBD that were expected to play a critical role in the interaction between CaM and OsMlo, and we analyzed the variants for CaM binding in a CaM overlay assay (Fig. 5). The hydrophobic residue Leu446 at the first position of the 1-8-14 motif and Trp449, which is strictly conserved in all known Mlo proteins, were separately replaced by Arg (denoted by L446R and W449R, respectively). Two additional amino acids, Asn448 and Glu455, were replaced by another basic amino acid, Lys (denoted by N448K and E455K, respectively). Each of the mutations were introduced into the GST::OsMlo CaMBD fusion construct (Fig. 3A, denoted by C), expressed in E. coli, and examined for CaM binding. Expression levels of the mutant proteins in E. coli were similar to that of the wild-type CaMBD of OsMlo, suggesting that these mutations did not affect protein stability (Fig. 5B). However, as shown in Fig. 5C, the single amino acid substitutions L446R and W449R completely abolished Ca2+-dependent CaM-binding of OsMlo. In contrast, the N448K and E455K substitutions did not affect complex formation with CaM. These results reflect sequence-specific complex formation and demonstrate the crucial roles of the conserved CaMBD residues Leu446 and Trp449 for binding.


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Characterization of the CaM binding domain of OsMlo. A, characteristics of the CaMBD sequence. Hydrophobic amino acid residues corresponding to the Ca2+-dependent CaM binding motif (1-8-14 motif) are marked with *, and the basic amino acid residues within this motif are indicated with +. OsMlo.CaMBD WT, L446R, W449R, N448K, and E455K represent the wild-type CaMBD of OsMlo and CaMBD mutants containing single amino acid substitutions. B, Western blotting of GST-fused CaMBD mutants. Wild-type (WT) and CaMBD mutants of OsMlo were fused to the C terminus of GST and expressed in E. coli. Expression of these recombinant proteins was analyzed by Western blotting with an anti-GST antibody (Ab.). C, CaM-binding analysis of wild-type and CaMBD mutants in the presence of Ca2+ (1 mM CaCl2). D, CaM binding ability of the recombinant proteins in the absence of Ca2+ (5 mM EGTA).

Induction of OsMlo Gene Expression by Pathogen and Plant Defense Signaling Molecules-- To investigate the potential responsiveness of OsMlo gene expression to pathogen invasion, rice suspension cells were inoculated with fungal spores isolated from the rice blast fungus (M. grisea). The low transcript level of OsMlo increased rapidly and transiently in response to fungal spore inoculation (Fig. 6A, 1st panel). The OsMlo transcript level peaked at 1 h and then declined to basal levels by 12 h. The rapid induction of OsMlo gene expression in response to pathogen invasion suggests a direct role of OsMlo in plant defenses. We also examined the effect of several potential inducers of plant defense-related genes on OsMlo expression (Fig. 6A). The oligosaccharide elicitor glycol chitin (49) effectively induced OsMlo gene expression. Application of exogenous SA, H2O2, or an H2O2-generating system (glucose and glucose oxidase) also increased the transcript accumulation. Furthermore, two unrelated signaling molecules, jasmonic acid and ethephon, induced OsMlo gene expression, whereas Ca2+/ionomycin treatment had no effect. Thus, OsMlo expression appears to be inducible by multiple defense/stress response pathways.


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Analysis of OsMlo gene expression. A, induction of OsMlo gene expression in response to a fungal pathogen and various defense signaling molecules. Rice suspension cells were treated with fungal spores isolated from rice blast fungus, M. grisea (5 × 105 spores/ml), glycol chitin (0.05%, oligosaccharide elicitor), SA (2 mM), H2O2 (2 mM), glucose/glucose oxidase (2.5 mM, 2.5 units/ml, H2O2-generating system), calcium/ionomycin (1 mM/5 µM, Ca2+ ionophore), ethephon (5 mM, 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid), or jasmonic acid (100 µM) for the indicated times. Twenty micrograms of total RNA from each culture were used for Northern blot analysis. B, effects of various inhibitors on the induction of OsMlo transcription in response to glycol chitin. Inhibitors were added 1 h prior to treatment of rice suspension cells with glycol chitin (GC), and samples were taken 3 h after the glycol chitin treatment. Ethidium bromide-stained rRNAs are shown as a control for gel loading. Mock denotes treatment with an equal volume of distilled H2O instead of glycol chitin, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added as a control because most of the inhibitors examined were dissolved in Me2SO. CHX, cycloheximide, translation inhibitor (1 µM); DPI, diphenyleneiodonium chloride, NADPH oxidase inhibitor (5 µM); DHC, 2,5-dihydroxycinnamic acid methyl ester, peroxidase-mediated H2O2 trapping chemical (50 µM); DMTU, N,N'-dimethylthiourea, H2O2 trapping chemical (400 µM); BAPTA, 1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid, extracellular Ca2+ chelator (5 mM); lanthanum chloride, Ca2+-channel blocker (10 µM); K-252a, protein kinase inhibitor (1 µM); staurosporine, protein kinase inhibitor (2 µM); calyculin A, protein phosphatase 1A and 2A inhibitor (1 µM); cantharidin, protein phosphatase 2A inhibitor (5 µM); and cyclosporin A, protein phosphatase 2B inhibitor (0.2 µM). The mRNA levels of OsMlo were examined by Northern blot analysis. C, quantitative analysis of OsMlo transcript levels. The relative transcript levels of OsMlo were calculated from the autoradiogram using scanning densitometry. Results are expressed relative to glycol chitin/Me2SO treatment as 100%. The orders of the lanes in the RNA gel (Fig. 6B) and of the relative induction (Fig. 6C) are same.

To gain further insight into potential mechanisms mediating OsMlo gene induction upon challenge by a pathogen, we carried out pharmacological studies. As shown in Fig. 6B, cycloheximide, a protein synthesis inhibitor, did not block OsMlo transcript accumulation, indicating that transcriptional activation of OsMlo does not require protein synthesis. Likewise, diphenyleneiodonium, an inhibitor of neutrophil-like NADPH oxidase that is known to block the oxidative burst in plant defense (50, 51), did not affect OsMlo gene induction. In contrast, 2,5-dihydroxycinnamic acid methyl ester and N,N'-dimethylthiourea, H2O2-trapping chemicals, inhibited the elicitor-mediated induction of OsMlo expression up to 56 and 24% of the control expression level, respectively. These results suggest that H2O2 generated by cell wall peroxidases (52) or germine-like oxalate oxidases (53) is more effective for OsMlo induction than the NADPH oxidase system (54). In addition, inhibition of an external Ca2+ influx by the application of an extracellular Ca2+ chelator, BAPTA, or a Ca2+ channel blocker, lanthanium chloride, greatly reduced OsMlo transcript accumulation induced by the oligosaccharide elicitor (67 and 60% reduction, respectively). Rice suspension cells were also pretreated with inhibitors of protein kinase and protein phosphatases to address whether protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation are involved in the induction of OsMlo expression. As shown in Fig. 6, B and C, pretreatment with K-252a and staurosporine, inhibitors of protein kinases, equally diminished the effect of glycol chitin on OsMlo induction (43%). However, the activation of OsMlo by glycol chitin showed a different sensitivity to specific protein phosphatase inhibitors. OsMlo induction was inhibited about 40% by calyculin A, a protein phosphatase 1A and 2A inhibitor, and about 20% by cyclosporin A, a protein phosphatase 2B inhibitor. In contrast, cantharidin, a protein phosphatase 2A inhibitor, had no effect.

Taken together, these pharmacological studies suggest that both an influx of Ca2+ ions and an oxidative burst play significant roles in the induction of OsMlo transcription and that protein kinases and phosphatases participate in this process.

Genomic Southern Blot Analysis-- To examine the OsMlo copy number in the rice genome, Southern blot analysis was carried out with rice genomic DNA digested with EcoRI, HindIII, or XbaI. The hybridization was performed with the full-length OsMlo cDNA as a probe. Under high stringency conditions, only one strong band was observed from each restriction (Fig. 7), indicating that the transcript accumulation profile detected by the OsMlo cDNA probe is indeed gene-specific. However, two weakly hybridizing bands were observed in the HindIII digest, indicating the existence of potentially related gene(s). This result suggests that OsMlo may belong to a small gene family.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Genomic Southern blot analysis. Ten micrograms of DNA were digested with EcoRI (E), HindIII (H), or XbaI (X), fractionated on a 0.8% agarose gel, and transferred onto a nylon membrane. The membrane was probed with the full-length, 32P-labeled OsMlo cDNA. Size markers are shown on the left in kb.

OsMlo Is Located at the Plasma Membrane-- A polyclonal OsMlo antibody was generated using a multiply antigenic peptide, corresponding to OsMlo amino acids Lys103 to Trp117, and purified through immunoaffinity chromatography to remove any minor cross-reactivities (see "Experimental Procedures"). To test the specificity of the affinity-purified antibody, we carried out Western blot analysis with several truncated GST::OsMlo recombinant proteins expressed in E. coli (Fig. 3A, D0-D4 and C). We observed anti-OsMlo immunoreacting bands only in the presence of recombinant proteins containing the region corresponding to the multiply antigenic peptide (D0, D1, D2, and D3). These results indicate that the anti-OsMlo antibody is specific for the peptide.

To determine the subcellular localization of OsMlo, we fractionated cytosolic and microsomal membrane proteins by centrifugation at 100,000 × g, and we tested for the presence of OsMlo by immunoblotting with the affinity-purified anti-OsMlo antibody. As shown in Fig. 8A, a specific signal was detected only in the microsomal fraction; this signal corresponded to a mass of ~65 kDa. To define further the endomembrane location of OsMlo, microsomal membranes were fractionated on sucrose gradients and characterized by Western blot analysis. The fractionation of endomembranes was confirmed by Western blotting with anti-H+-ATPase and anti-BIP antibodies. H+-ATPase is commonly used as a marker for plasma membrane proteins and is abundant in fractions with a sucrose content between 34 and 45% (55). In contrast, BIP, an ER marker, is usually found in lighter (less sucrose content) fractions (56). Co-fractionation of OsMlo with H+-ATPase (Fig. 8B) indicates that OsMlo is a plasma membrane protein.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Subcellular localization of OsMlo. A, immunoblot analysis of protein extracts derived from cytosolic (C) and microsomal (M) fractions separated by centrifugation at 100,000 × g. Protein extracts of each fraction (50 µg) were separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE, transferred onto a membrane, and probed with an affinity-purified anti-OsMlo antibody (1:2000). B, sucrose gradient membrane fractionation showing cofractionation of OsMlo with the plasma membrane (PM) marker. Microsomal proteins were further fractionated over continuous sucrose gradients of 15-45% (w/w), and 0.8-ml fractions were collected from the top of the gradients. Samples (10 µl) from each fraction were separated by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes. The blots were probed with an anti-OsMlo antibody, an anti-H+-ATPase antibody (1:5000, plasma membrane marker (52)), or an anti-BIP antibody (1:3000, ER marker (53)). The immune complexes were visualized using the ECL system (Amersham Biosciences).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plant cells generate Ca2+ signals with different amplitudes, frequencies, and durations in response to a variety of external stimuli and use these signals to control many cellular processes, including plant defense responses (1-5). CaM plays a vital role in transducing the Ca2+ signals by modulating the activity of numerous target proteins (13, 14). To understand the role(s) of CaM in plant defense responses, we isolated potential CaM-binding proteins by screening a cDNA expression library prepared from fungal elicitor-treated rice suspension cells using HRP-conjugated CaM as a probe. In this study, we isolated and characterized a novel CaM-binding protein encoded by OsMlo, which is highly homologous to barley Mlo, a plant defense and cell death modulator (25, 27).

Most of the 50 or more CaMBDs isolated thus far are stretches of 16-35 amino acid residues that, in the alpha -helical wheel representation, show a segregation of basic and polar residues on one side and hydrophobic amino acids on the other side (46, 47, 57, 58). Recently the Ca2+-dependent CaM-binding motifs have been classified into two major groups, the 1-8-14 and 1-5-10 motifs, in which the numbers indicate positions of conserved hydrophobic residues (42). Based on the conserved structural features of CaMBDs, the CaM-binding motif of OsMlo was predicted to be located in the C-terminal last cytosolic region between Met443 and Ala462 in a 20-amino acid stretch showing the 1-8-14 motif (Fig. 2B). The location of the CaMBD of OsMlo was identified by cDNA expression-deletion mapping (Fig. 3, A and B) and was confirmed by CaM mobility shift and PDE enzyme competition assays with a synthetic peptide corresponding to the 20-amino acid stretch from Met443 to Ala462 (Fig. 4). We further verified that the predicted CaM-binding motif is correct by showing that the substitution of a single amino acid, Leu446 right-arrow Arg (corresponding to the first conserved hydrophobic residue in the 1-8-14 motif) or Trp449 right-arrow Arg (which has been known to play a key role in interactions between Ca2+-loaded CaM and CaMBPs (43-45)) resulted in the loss of the Ca2+-dependent CaM-binding ability of OsMlo (Fig. 5).

Thirty two Mlo sequence-related genes have been found in monocot and dicot plant species, showing a striking sequence conservation in each of the seven TM regions, in cytoplasmic loops 1-3, and in the first 30 residues of the C terminus adjacent to TM 7 (25). Interestingly, the CaMBD of OsMlo is located within the conserved stretch of the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail, proximal to TM 7. Sequences adjacent to the CaMBD on the C-terminal side are hypervariable between Mlo family members. A sequence comparison of the putative OsMlo CaMBD with the corresponding regions in Mlo proteins of the other plant species listed in Fig. 2B shows conservation of hydrophobic residues located at positions 1, 8, and 14 and an average net charge of +4 to +7. Another striking feature of the putative CaMBDs of plant Mlo proteins is that the Trp residue is strictly conserved. A critical role for Trp residues in recognizing CaM has been demonstrated in several CaMBPs isolated from animals and plants (43, 59-63). Alteration of this Trp to other amino acid residues abolishes either the binding of CaM to target proteins or the CaM-dependent activation of target proteins (43, 59-61). We used site-specific mutagenesis to show the critical roles of the highly conserved Leu446 and Trp449 residues of OsMlo in the interaction with CaM (Fig. 5). Thus, it seems likely that all Mlo proteins are potential CaM-binding proteins.

Devoto et al. (25) suggested that plant Mlo proteins are reminiscent of the most abundant class of metazoan membrane resident receptors, the GPCRs. Interestingly, recent evidence suggests that CaM participates in GPCR-mediated signaling by direct binding to the receptors (64-66). CaM interacts with the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGluR5, one of the GPCR members) in a Ca2+-dependent manner in vitro (64). The opioid and D2-dopamine receptors, members of another subclass of GPCRs, also contain a CaMBD in their third intracellular loop, and CaM binding inhibits receptor-mediated signal transduction (65, 66). Although the conservation of the CaMBDs in the C-terminal tails of Mlo family members provides evidence for their functional significance in vivo, further experiments must be performed to determine whether and how CaM binding regulates Mlo activity.

A great deal of genetic and cytological analysis of barley mlo mutant plants suggests that the wild-type Mlo protein has a regulatory function in cell death protection and plant defense (26-28). However, it is not yet understood at the molecular level how Mlo modulates plant defense processes. To examine a possible link between OsMlo and plant defense responses, we monitored OsMlo gene expression following pathogen challenge. The observed responsiveness to pathogens and the up-regulation of OsMlo transcription following treatment with the plant defense signaling compounds SA and H2O2 support a putative involvement of the rice gene in plant defense modulation (Fig. 6A). The increase in transcript abundance following treatment with ethephon and jasmonic acid (Fig. 6A) may be indirect evidence for an additional role of OsMlo in mechanical wounding and senescence (67, 68). Inhibition of cellular processes that are involved in defense signaling, such as the generation of reactive oxygen species (54), influx of extracellular Ca2+ (6-9), and protein phosphorylation (69), greatly reduced elicitor-induced OsMlo gene expression. Interestingly, inhibition of extracellular Ca2+ influx efficiently reduced oligosaccharide elicitor-induced OsMlo gene expression, whereas application of Ca2+/ionomycin did not induce OsMlo gene expression. Plants respond to pathogen attack as well as elicitor treatment by activating various early responses such as ion fluxes across the plasma membrane (influx of Ca2+ and H+ and efflux of Cl- and K+), generation of reactive oxygen species, and protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, sequentially followed by defense gene activation and phytoalexin accumulation (6, 70-72). The critical role of elicitor-mediated Ca2+ influx in the activation of downstream plant defense signaling has been shown by pharmacological studies in various plants. The Ca2+ chelator BAPTA and the Ca2+ channel inhibitor La3+ efficiently inhibit elicitor-stimulated reactions, such as Ca2+ influx and phytoalexin accumulation in parsley (6), soybean (73), carrot (74), and tobacco (75). But in the absence of elicitor, the effects of Ca2+ influx on the activation of plant defense responses were slightly different depending on the plant cells. In soybean (73) and carrot cells (74), the treatment of Ca2+ ionophore alone stimulated phytoalexin accumulation, but this did not happen in tobacco cells (75). These results suggest that in some systems, these Ca2+ fluxes are apparently sufficient, whereas in others additional elements seem to be required for the induction of downstream effects. From these results we propose that extracellular Ca2+ influx is a necessary element for the induction of OsMlo gene expression in response to pathogen but is not sufficient to induce OsMlo gene expression by itself in rice suspension cultured cells. Our results provide biological cues for understanding the role of OsMlo in plant defense responses. Further characterization of the mode of CaM action in Mlo function(s) should help to elucidate the role of Ca2+-CaM in plant defense and stress responses.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

We thank Dr. K. Y. Kang for supplying the rice blast fungus, M. grisea, and helpful discussion.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by KOSEF Grant 2000-2-20900-001-1, National Research Laboratory Program (2000) from the Ministry of Science and Technology, G7 Grant 99-G-08-02-06, Kyongnam High Tech Foundation Grant 00-1-10, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Project 298049-4, and Korea/Germany International Cooperation Research Grant from KOSEF (2002).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF388195.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Program), Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Center, Gyeongsang National University, Chinju 660-701, Korea. Tel.: 82-55-751-5957; Fax: 82-55-759-9363; E-mail: mjcho@nongae.gsnu.ac.kr.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108478200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: [Ca2+]cyt, cytosolic free calcium; SCaM, soybean calmodulin; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; IPTG, isopropyl-1-thio-beta -D-galactopyranoside; DTT, dithiothreitol; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; SA, salicylic acid; H2O2, hydrogen peroxide; PDE, 3',5'-cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase; BIP, a homologue of the ER-resident immunoglobulin heavy chain-binding protein; RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends; CaM, calmodulin; CaMBPs, CaM-binding proteins; CaMBD, CaM-binding domain; GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptor; PVDF, polyvinylidene difluoride; TM, transmembrane; BAPTA, 1,2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Knight, M. R., Campbell, A. K., Smith, S. M., and Trewavas, A. J. (1991) Nature 352, 524-526[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Bush, D. S. (1995) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46, 95-122[CrossRef]
3. Price, A. H., Taylor, A., Ripley, S. J., Griffiths, A., Trewavas, A. J., and Knight, M. R. (1994) Plant Cell 6, 1301-1310[Abstract]
4. McAinsh, M. R., and Hetherington, A. M. (1998) Trends Plant Sci. 3, 32-36[CrossRef]
5. Trewavas, A. J., and Malho, R. C. (1998) Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1, 428-433[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Jabs, T., Tschöpe, M., Colling, C., Hahlbrock, K., and Scheel, D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 4800-4805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Xu, H., and Heath, M. C. (1998) Plant Cell 10, 585-597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Blume, B., Nürnberger, T., Nass, N., and Scheel, D. (2000) Plant Cell 12, 1425-1440[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Grant, M., Brown, I., Adams, S., Knight, M., Anislie, A., and Mansfield, J. (2000) Plant J. 23, 441-450[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Roberts, D. M., and Harmon, A. C. (1992) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 43, 375-414[CrossRef]
11. Sanders, D., Brownlee, C., and Harper, J. F. (1999) Plant Cell 11, 691-706[Free Full Text]
12. Harmon, A. C., Gribskov, M., and Harper, J. F. (2000) Trends Plant Sci. 5, 154-159[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Snedden, W. A., and Fromm, H. (1998) Trends Plant Sci. 8, 299-304[CrossRef]
14. Zielinski, R. E. (1998) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49, 697-725[CrossRef]
15. James, P., Vorherr, T., and Carafoli, E. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 38-42[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Yang, T., Segal, G., Abbo, S., Feldman, M., and Fromm, H. (1996) Mol. Gen. Genet. 252, 684-694[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Takezawa, D., Liu, Z. H., Poovaiah, B. W., and An, G. (1995) Plant Mol. Biol. 27, 693-703[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Gawienowski, M. C., Szymanski, D., Perera, I. Y., and Zielinski, R. E. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 22, 215-225[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Lee, S. H., Kim, J. C., Lee, M. S., Heo, W. D., Seo, H. Y., Yoon, H. W., Hong, J. C., Bahk, J. D., Lee, S. Y., Hwang, I., and Cho, M. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21806-21812[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Heo, W. D., Lee, S. H., Kim, M. C., Kim, J. C., Chung, W. S., Chun, H. J., Lee, K. J., Park, C. Y., Choi, J. Y., and Cho, M. J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 766-771[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Lee, S. H., Johnson, J. D., Walsh, M., van Lierop, J. E., Sutherland, C., Xu, A., Snedden, W. A., Kosk-Kosicka, D., Fromm, H., Narayana, N., and Cho, M. J. (2000) Biochem. J. 350, 299-306
22. Lee, S. H., Seo, H. Y., Kim, J. C., Heo, W. D., Chung, W. S., Lee, K. J., Kim, M. C., Cheong, Y. H., Choi, J. Y., Lim, C. O., and Cho, M. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9252-9259[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Cho, M. J., Vaghy, P. L., Kondo, R., Lee, S. H., Davis, J. P., Rehl, R., Heo, W. D., and Johnson, J. D. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 15593-15597[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Kondo, R., Tikunova, S. B., Cho, M. J., and Johnson, J. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36213-36218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Devoto, A., Piffanelli, P., Nilsson, I., Wallin, E., Panstruga, R., von Heijne, G., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34993-35004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Wolter, M., Hollricher, K., Salamini, F., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (1993) Mol. Gen. Genet. 239, 122-128[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Büschges, R., Hollricher, K., Panstruga, R., Simons, G., Wolter, M., Frijters, A., van Daelen, R., van der Lee, T., Diergaarde, P., Groenendijk, J., Töpsch, S., Vos, P., Salamini, F., and Schulze-Lefert, P. (1997) Cell 88, 695-705[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]