Polycystin-1 Activation of c-Jun N-terminal Kinase and AP-1 Is
Mediated by Heterotrimeric G Proteins*
Stephen C.
Parnell
§,
Brenda S.
Magenheimer
§,
Robin L.
Maser
,
Christopher A.
Zien
,
Anna-Maria
Frischauf¶, and
James P.
Calvet
From the
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology and the Kidney Institute, University of Kansas Medical
Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160 and ¶ Institut fuer Genetik
und Allgemeine Biologie, Universitaet Salzburg, A-5020
Salzburg, Austria
Received for publication, February 25, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Functional analysis of polycystin-1, the product
of the gene most frequently mutated in autosomal dominant polycystic
kidney disease, has revealed that this protein is involved in the
regulation of diverse signaling pathways such as the activation of the
transcription factor AP-1 and modulation of Wnt signaling. However, the
initial steps involved in the activation of such cascades have remained unclear. We demonstrated previously that the C-terminal cytosolic tail
of polycystin-1 binds and activates heterotrimeric G proteins in
vitro. To test if polycystin-1 can activate cellular signaling cascades via heterotrimeric G protein subunits, polycystin-1 C-terminal tail-mediated c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and AP-1 activities were
assayed in transiently transfected 293T cells in the presence of
dominant-negative, G protein inhibiting constructs, and in the presence
of cotransfected G
subunits. The results showed that
polycystin-1-mediated JNK/AP-1 activation is mediated by G
and
G
subunits. Polycystin-1-mediated AP-1 activity could be
significantly augmented by cotransfected G
i,
G
q, and G
12/13 subunits, suggesting that
polycystin-1 can couple with and activate several heterotrimeric G
protein families.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
(ADPKD)1 is a major inherited
disorder that is characterized by the growth of large, fluid-filled
cysts from the tubules and collecting ducts of affected kidneys, and by
a number of extrarenal manifestations including liver and pancreatic
cysts, heart valve defects, and cerebral, and aortic aneurysms (1-4).
Approximately 85% of all cases of ADPKD are caused by mutations in the
PKD1 gene, with most (if not all) of the remaining cases
being caused by defects in the PKD2 gene. The
PKD1 gene product, polycystin-1, appears to be a large
membrane-associated glycoprotein (5-9) that is thought to play a role
in cell-cell and/or cell-matrix interactions (10). Polycystin-1 is
composed of a large N-terminal extracellular domain of about 3,000 amino acids, a multimembrane spanning domain of about 1,000 amino acids
containing 11 transmembrane segments, and a C-terminal cytosolic domain
of about 200-225 amino acids. Polycystin-2, the protein product of the
PKD2 gene, appears to be a Ca2+-permeable,
nonselective cation channel whose activity may be regulated by a direct
interaction with the C-terminal cytosolic domain of polycystin-1
(11-14).
Sequence analysis of polycystin-1 has suggested that the C-terminal
cytosolic domain of the protein is involved in protein-protein interactions and signal transduction (15). Biochemical analyses support
this hypothesis, as transient transfection of the C-tail of
polycystin-1 modulates Wnt signaling via stabilization of
-catenin (16) and activates the transcription factor AP-1 via c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) and protein kinase C (17). Polycystin signaling has also
been implicated in the regulation of a cell growth phenotype, as ADPKD
renal epithelial cells are susceptible to abnormal proliferation in
response to cAMP (18-20). Furthermore, stable transfection of full-length polycystin-1 in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells suppresses spontaneous cyst formation and inhibits cellular growth rates and
apoptosis (21). Despite these clues, however, the primary cytosolic
events that initiate these signaling cascades have remained unclear.
A number of observations have suggested that heterotrimeric G proteins
play a role in polycystin-1-mediated signaling. Polycystin-1 has been
shown to bind and stabilize RGS7 (regulator of G protein signaling 7)
(22), a member of the newly identified family of RGS proteins that are
capable of regulating G protein-dependent signaling
cascades by accelerating the hydrolysis of GTP bound to G
subunits
of certain heterotrimeric G proteins (23). Furthermore, RGS7 has
been identified as a candidate for a genetic modifier of bpk, a murine
model of PKD that is similar to human autosomal recessive PKD (24). We
have also shown that polycystin-1 binds and activates heterotrimeric
Gi/Go proteins in vitro (25).
However, a direct link between polycystin-1-mediated signaling pathways and heterotrimeric G proteins has not been established.
To determine whether heterotrimeric G proteins mediate polycystin-1
signaling, we tested the effects of expression of the G
sequestering constructs, dominant-negative G
i2 and
-adrenergic receptor kinase C-terminal tail (
ARK-ct), on
polycystin-mediated JNK activation. The evidence demonstrated that
polycystin-1 activates JNK signaling via G
subunits of
heterotrimeric G proteins. We also showed that a dominant-negative
p115RhoGEF construct inhibited AP-1 activation and that
wild-type G
12 and G
13 subunits
effectively augmented polycystin-1 signaling to AP-1. G
i
and G
q family subunits were also found to be capable of
stimulating polycystin-1 signaling to AP-1 but less effectively than
G
12 family subunits. These results, taken together with
our previous in vitro G protein binding and activation
studies (25), indicate that polycystin-1 can couple with and signal via
heterotrimeric G proteins and thus is an atypical heterotrimeric G
protein-coupled receptor.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
DNA Constructs--
The sIg-PKD-MN6 (MN6) construct
(obtained from Dr. G. Walz (17)) contains the C-terminal cytosolic tail
of human polycystin-1 (amino acids 4077-4241) fused to the membrane
targeting cassette, sIg.7 (Fig. 1). The sIg.7 cassette consists of the
CD5 signal peptide, the CH2-CH3 domains of human IgG, and the CD7
transmembrane domain. MN6 terminates in the coiled-coil region of
polycystin-1. The sIg-PKD222 construct (Fig. 1) was made from a mouse
polycystin-1 cDNA (obtained from Dr. G. Germino), which was
subcloned downstream of sIg.7 in pcDNA1.1/Amp (Invitrogen) such
that it encodes the C-terminal 222 amino acids of polycystin-1 (25).
For controls, sIg.7 alone was inserted in pcDM12 (a derivative of
pcDM8; Invitrogen) (sIg-0-12; control for sIg-PKD-MN6) or
pcDNA1.1/Amp (sIg-0-1.1; control for sIg-PKD222). The sIg-PKD1284
polycystin-1 fusion construct (Fig. 1) was made from the 3' portion of
a mouse polycystin-1 cDNA clone (26) encoding amino acid residues
3,010-4,293, which was subcloned downstream of the CD5 signal sequence
and the CH2-CH3 IgG domains in pcDNA1.1/Amp (Invitrogen). As a
control, a stop codon was introduced in place of amino acid 3092 to
create the construct sIg-stop. The HA-JNK1
construct was obtained
from Dr. L. E. Heasley;
ARK-ct and pRK5 were obtained from Dr.
R. J. Lefkowitz; dominant-negative (DN) and wild-type (WT)
G
i2 were obtained from Dr. T. Okamoto; and a vector
encoding a GST-Jun-(1-79) was obtained from Dr. J. Pelling. A
Myc-tagged DN p115RhoGEF (Lsc-RGS, amino acids 1-283 (27)) in
pCMV3-Tag3 (Stratagene) was obtained from Dr. Freichel-Blomquist. An
out-of-frame control plasmid was constructed by cutting and end-filling
at the BamHI site just downstream of the Myc tag. EE-tagged
G
i1, G
i2, G
i3,
G
q, G
12, and G
13 in pcDNA3.1 were obtained from the Guthrie cDNA Resource Center
(www.guthrie.org/AboutGuthrie/Research/cDNA). pFR-Luc,
pFA2-cJun, pAP-1-Luc, pFC-MEKK, and pBlueScript (pBS) were from
Stratagene, and pRL-null was from Promega.
JNK Assays--
Human embryonic kidney 293T cells were
maintained in DMEM (1× MOD) with L-glutamine and 1 g/liter glucose (CellGro) with 500 units/liter penicillin and 0.5 mg/liter streptomycin (Sigma) and 10% fetal calf serum at 37 °C in
5% CO2 (4.5 g/liter glucose and heat-inactivated serum
were used for the endogenous JNK and AP-1 assays). Cells were
transfected using a modified calcium phosphate protocol as described
previously (28). Following the addition of DNA precipitates, cells were
then incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 4 h, after
which the medium was replaced with serum-free growth medium or with
medium containing 0.5% serum. Pertussis toxin (200 ng/ml) was added
either 1 h before or 4 h after transfection. Cells were lysed
16 or 24-26 h following transfection. They were then washed in
phosphate-buffered saline and scraped into 0.5 ml per T25 flask of
Tris/Triton lysis buffer (TLB) (20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 137 mM NaCl, 25 mM
-glycerol phosphate, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 2 mM Na2P2O7, 1% Triton
X-100, 10% glycerol) plus 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 mM
benzamidine, and 0.5 mM dithiothreitol (TLB+). The cells were vortexed 20 s at 4 °C and incubated on ice for 20 min, and the lysates were clarified by centrifugation (14,000 × g) for 10 min. Supernatants were placed at
80 °C until
use. Protein concentration was determined using the Bio-Rad Detergent
Compatible Assay Kit. Protein A/G+-agarose beads (50 µl per reaction;
Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were washed twice in TLB and once in TLB+ and
were suspended in 0.5 ml of TLB+ per 6 reactions plus 0.4 µg per
reaction of anti-HA probe F-7 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for assaying
HA-JNK1
activity. The beads were rotated at 4 °C for ~45 min
and spun down briefly in a microcentrifuge; the supernatant was
decanted, and the beads were resuspended in aliquots of 100 µl/reaction. 200 µg of cellular lysate and TLB+ was added to a final volume of 0.6 ml; the reactions were rotated at 4 °C for 2 h and then washed 3 times in TLB+ and twice in kinase buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 25 mM
-glycerol phosphate,
25 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM
Na3VO4, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol). The
beads were then resuspended in 31 µl of kinase buffer containing 1 mM ATP, 8 µg of GST-Jun-(1-79) substrate, and
[
-32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol; PerkinElmer Life Sciences)
and were incubated in a room temperature water bath for 5 min.
Reactions were terminated by the addition of 20 µl of 2× Laemmli
loading buffer and were placed on dry ice until loading. Reactions were
boiled 5 min and then loaded and electrophoresed, and fusion protein
was detected as described previously (29). 32P
incorporation was quantified using a PhosphorImager SI (Molecular Dynamics). Endogenous JNK was assayed with the PathDetect
Trans-Reporting System (Stratagene) by following the manufacturer's instructions.
AP-1 Assays--
Endogenous AP-1 was assayed with the PathDetect
Cis-Reporting System (Stratagene), which utilizes a 7× AP-1 reporter.
293T cells were plated 24 h prior to transfection at ~7.5 × 105 cells per well in 6-well plates. A total of 7 µg
of DNA was used for calcium phosphate precipitation, with 3 µg of
control or polycystin-1 construct, 1 µg of reporter, 5 ng of RL-null,
100 or 500 ng of G
construct, 1 µg of DN p115RhoGEF (DN
p115), and pBS as the filler. The medium, lacking serum, was changed
3.5-4 h after transfection was begun, and cells were incubated for
24-26 h longer. Cells were lysed in Passive Lysis Buffer (Promega),
and 20 µl of lysate were used for the Dual-Luciferase assay (Promega)
on an EG & G Berthold 9507 luminometer. Expression of the G
constructs was confirmed by Western blotting.
Western Blotting--
All Western blots were performed with
Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore) using antibodies for
ARK-ct
(anti-GRK2), G
i3, G
q, G
12,
G
13, p115RhoGEF (anti-9E10 Myc tag), and JNK
(anti-JNK1) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; for
G
i1/G
i2 from Calbiochem; and for
EE-tagged G
subunits from Babco, according to the manufacturer's specifications. Anti-human IgG Western blots were performed as described previously (25). For combined chemiluminescence and colorimetric development, membranes were incubated in chemiluminescence buffer and developed with CDP-Star (Amersham Biosciences) according to
manufacturer's instructions. Following chemiluminescence, blots were
developed with BCIP/NBT (Sigma).
 |
RESULTS |
Dominant-negative
ARK-ct and G
i2 Constructs
Inhibit JNK Activity Mediated by the C-terminal Cytosolic Tail of Human
and Mouse Polycystin-1--
Transfection of a human C-terminal
cytosolic polycystin-1 construct into 293T cells was shown to activate
c-Jun N-terminal kinase (17). Because JNK is known to be activated by
G
subunits (30, 31), 293T cells were cotransfected with cDNAs
encoding a C-terminal polycystin-1 fusion protein, HA-JNK1
, and a
G
-sequestering construct, the
-adrenergic receptor kinase
C-terminal tail (
ARK-ct) (32). Following transfection with the human
C-tail MN6 construct (see Fig. 1), cells
were lysed; HA-JNK1
was immunoprecipitated with an anti-HA antibody,
and HA-JNK activity was determined by an immune complex kinase assay.
JNK activity in MN6-transfected cells was increased >7-fold over that
of control cells transfected with sIg-0 (Fig.
2A). Cotransfection of
ARK-ct reduced JNK activity ~30% (Fig. 2A), suggesting
that this JNK activation is mediated by G
subunits.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Polycystin-1 fusion constructs. A,
models for full-length polycystin-1 (left), the C-terminal
tail constructs (middle), and the multimembrane spanning
construct (right). B, structures of the cDNAs
encoding the human and mouse polycystin-1 fusion proteins. All of the
constructs have a CD5 signal sequence followed by the CH2-CH3 domains
of human IgG (sIg). The short C-tail constructs also have
the CD7 transmembrane domain. sIg-PKD-MN6, which encodes amino acids
4,077-4,241 of human polycystin-1, and its control construct, sIg-0-12
lacking the C-tail, are cloned in pcDM12; sIg-PKD222, which encodes
amino acids 4,072-4,293 of mouse polycystin-1, and its control
construct, sIg-0-1.1 lacking the C-tail, are cloned in pcDNA1.1.
sIg-PKD222 encodes the C-terminal 222 amino acids of polycystin-1, and
MN6 encodes a shorter C-terminal domain construct that is truncated in
the coiled-coil domain (68). sIg-PKD1284, which encodes amino acids
3,010-4,293 of mouse polycystin-1, and its control construct sIg-stop,
which has a stop codon just to the 3' side of the first putative
transmembrane domain (8) and therefore encodes amino acids 3,010-3,091
of polycystin-1, are cloned in pcDNA1.1. The sIg-PKD1284 construct
encodes the complete multimembrane spanning and intra- and
extracellular loops of polycystin-1 and is expected to adopt a
structure more representative of native polycystin-1.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of human polycystin-1
C-tail-mediated HA-JNK1 activation by
dominant-negative interfering constructs. 293T cells were
cotransfected with sIg-PKD-MN6 or sIg-0, HA-JNK1 , and increasing
amounts (shown in µg transfected DNA) of ARK-ct (A), DN
G i2 (B), or WT G i2
(C). Cells were plated at 4 × 105 cells
per T25 flask, grown for 2 days, and transfected for 16 h. Each
flask was transfected with a total of 7 µg of DNA, which included the
indicated amounts of ARK-ct (A) brought to 3 µg of DNA
with pRK5, or with a total of 10 µg of DNA, which included the
indicated amounts of DN G i2 (B) or WT
G i2 (C) brought to 6 µg of DNA with pRK5,
plus 2 µg of HA-JNK1 , and 2 µg of either sIg-MN6 or sIg-0. Cells
were lysed, and protein concentrations were determined. Equal amounts
of protein were used to assay HA-JNK1 activity, as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Data are expressed as fold stimulation
relative to the value for sIg-0 without inhibitors, which was set at
one. Independent experiments were carried out 3 (n = 3)
or 4 (n = 4) times. Error bars represent
S.D. Significant differences between treated and control samples are
indicated by one asterisk (p < 0.05), as
determined by one-way ANOVA. Western blots demonstrate expression of
the various constructs from one of the experiments; endogenous JNK
(endg JNK).
|
|
Because overexpression of G
subunits can also sequester G
subunits, 293T cells were cotransfected with cDNAs encoding MN6, HA-JNK1
, and a dominant-negative DN G
i2 that remains
in an inactive, 
-bound state upon GTP binding (G
i2
G204A) (33). Cotransfection of increasing amounts of DN
G
i2 decreased JNK activation in a dose-dependent fashion by an average of ~65% (Fig.
2B). A similar experiment was carried out using a wild-type
(WT) G
i2 construct. As seen in Fig 2C,
cotransfection of the WT construct inhibited JNK activation to nearly
the same degree as the DN construct (~60% inhibition). The
observation that both DN and WT G
i2 subunits reduce
polycystin-mediated JNK activation suggests that they inhibit signaling
by sequestering G
subunits.
To investigate the effects of these inhibitors on endogenous JNK
activity, 293T cells were cotransfected with a murine polycystin-1 C-tail construct, sIg-PKD222 (see Fig. 1), one of the inhibitor constructs, a c-Jun activation domain/GAL4 DNA binding domain fusion
protein, and a GAL4 promoter-reporter construct (Fig.
3). Under these conditions, all three
constructs completely inhibited endogenous JNK activation, supporting
the idea that G
subunits mediate polycystin-1-induced JNK
activation from the C-tail constructs. The WT and DN inhibitors
utilized in these studies were ineffective in inhibiting either
endogenous JNK or HA-JNK1
activated by constitutively active MEKK, a
kinase that acts upstream of JNK (34), demonstrating the specificity of
inhibition by
ARK-ct and the DN and WT G
i2 constructs
(data not shown).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Inhibition of mouse polycystin-1
C-tail-mediated endogenous JNK activation by dominant-negative
interfering constructs. 293T cells were cotransfected with
sIg-PKD222 or sIg-0 and the inhibitors ARK-ct, DN
G i2, WT G i2, or pRK5 alone (vector).
Cells were plated at ~7.5 × 105 cells per well of a
6-well plate, grown for 1 day, and transfected for 24-26 h. Each
3-well triplicate sample was transfected with a total of 7 µg of DNA,
which included 2 µg of the inhibitor constructs or pRK5, 2 µg of
sIg-PKD222 or sIg-0, 1 µg of pFR-Luc, 50 ng of pFA2-cJun, 10 ng of
pRL-null, and pBS as the filler. To determine the level of activation
of endogenous JNKs, cells were cotransfected with the c-Jun activation
domain/GAL4 DNA binding domain construct (pFA2-cJun) and the luciferase
reporter gene under the control of a GAL4 promoter (pFR-Luc). Following
transfection, cells were lysed and JNK activation was determined by
assaying firefly luciferase activity, and the values were normalized to
Renilla luciferase activity. Data are expressed as relative
luciferase units (RLUs). Independent experiments were
carried out in triplicate (n = 3). Error
bars represent S.D. In all cases, the inhibitors significantly
decreased JNK activation (p < 0.001), as determined by
one-way ANOVA. The Western blot demonstrates expression of the
polycystin constructs from one of the experiments.
|
|
JNK Signaling via the Complete Multimembrane Spanning Region of
Polycystin-1--
The results shown in Figs. 2 and 3 suggest that the
C-terminal tail of polycystin-1 signals in a constitutive fashion,
because the C-tail constructs do not contain extracellular polycystin-1 sequences. Because many GPCRs utilize intracellular loops to initiate signaling, we wanted to determine whether a larger polycystin-1 construct containing all of the putative intra- and extracellular loops
would behave in a manner similar to that of the human sIg-PKD-MN6 and
the murine sIg-PKD222 constructs. Thus, a cDNA encoding the C-terminal 1,284 amino acids of murine polycystin-1 was fused to the
extracellular portion of the sIg.7 membrane targeting cassette (lacking
the CD7 transmembrane domain). This construct, sIg-PKD1284 (see Fig.
1), encodes the complete, predicted multimembrane spanning and intra-
and extracellular loops of polycystin-1 (8) and might be expected to
function similarly to native polycystin-1.
Consistent with observations using the shorter C-terminal tail
constructs, sIg-PKD1284 also activated HA-JNK1
.
ARK-ct (Fig. 4A) and DN G
i2
(data not shown) were both effective at blocking JNK activity, reducing
this activation ~65 and ~35%, respectively. However, in contrast
to our observations with the shorter polycystin-1 constructs, WT
G
i2 caused a stimulation in JNK activity, which was more
effective at lower amounts of the transfected WT G
i2 (Fig. 4B). The stimulation of JNK at low concentrations of
WT G
i2 suggested that polycystin-1 may be capable of
utilizing G
i2 for signaling and that the reduced JNK
activation at higher concentrations of WT G
i2 may be due
to sequestration of G
by overwhelming amounts of the G
subunits. Endogenous JNK was also completely inhibited by
ARK-ct and
DN G
i2 but showed some stimulation with WT
G
i2 when activated by the sIg-PKD1284 polycystin-1
construct (data not shown). Despite this stimulation of JNK activity by exogenous WT G
i2, we could only partially block
polycystin-induced JNK activation with pertussis toxin. In four
experiments in which inhibition was seen, HA-JNK1
activation by the
mouse and human C-tail constructs was inhibited from 9 to 43%
(mean = 25%). These results suggest that polycystin-induced JNK
signaling is only partially mediated by Gi and may
therefore involve other G protein families.

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of mouse multimembrane spanning
polycystin-1-mediated HA-JNK1 activation by
dominant-negative interfering constructs. 293T cells were
cotransfected with sIg-PKD1284 or sIg-stop, HA-JNK1 , and increasing
amounts (shown in µg of transfected DNA) of ARK-ct (A)
or WT G i2 (B). Cells were plated at ~4 × 105 cells per T25 flask, grown for 2 days, and
transfected for 16 h. Each flask was transfected with a total of
10 µg of DNA, which included the indicated amounts of ARK-ct
(A) brought to 5 µg of DNA with pRK5, or with a total of
11 µg of DNA, which included the indicated amounts of WT
G i2 (B) brought to 6 µg of DNA with pRK5,
plus 2 µg of HA-JNK1 , and 3 µg of either sIg-PKD1284 or
sIg-stop. Cells were lysed and protein concentrations were determined.
Equal amounts of protein were used to assay HA-JNK1 activity, as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Data are expressed as
fold stimulation relative to the value for sIg-stop without inhibitors,
which was set at one. Independent experiments were carried out 3 (n = 3) or 4 (n = 4) times. Error
bars represent S.D. Significant differences between treated and
control samples are indicated by one asterisk
(p < 0.05), two asterisks
(p < 0.01), or three asterisks
(p < 0.005), as determined by one-way ANOVA. Western
blots demonstrate expression of the various constructs from one of the
experiments, endogenous JNK (endg JNK).
|
|
AP-1 Signaling Is Mediated by the G
Subunits of Heterotrimeric G
Proteins--
AP-1 can be activated by a number of signaling pathways,
including the JNK pathway (35-37). Previous work (17) had shown that
the human polycystin-1 C-tail can activate AP-1 in a JNK- and
PKC-dependent fashion. We have seen that the sIg-PKD1284
construct (data not shown), as well as the sIg-PKD222, can activate
AP-1 when assayed using a 7× AP-1 promoter. To identify the G protein families that can be activated by polycystin-1, wild-type
Gi, Gq, and G12 family
subunits
were cotransfected into 293T cells with the sIg-PKD222 construct, and
AP-1 was assayed. At 100 ng of transfected G
construct,
G
12 and G
13 were found to be quite effective at stimulating polycystin-1-induced AP-1 activity (Fig. 5A). G
i1,
G
i2, G
i3, and G
q were much
less effective compared with G
12 and G
13
(Fig. 5A and data not shown). At 500 ng of transfected G
construct, G
i1, G
i2, and
G
i3 were found to be more effective, and
G
q was comparable with G
12 in stimulating AP-1 (Fig. 5B and data not shown). To determine the
contribution of endogenous G
12 family subunits to
polycystin-induced activation of AP-1, we tested the effect of the
dominant-negative inhibitor of G
12 family subunits, DN
p115RhoGEF (DN p115). The DN p115 construct lacks the RhoGEF
domain of p115RhoGEF, but contains the RGS domain, and therefore
can bind to and inhibit G
12 and G
13
subunits (27, 38, 39). Fig. 6 shows two
representative experiments (left and right) in
which AP-1 activity in polycystin-transfected cells was inhibited ~24
and 38% by the DN p115 construct, confirming that polycystin-induced
AP-1 activity is mediated in part by endogenous G12 family
heterotrimeric G proteins.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Stimulation of mouse polycystin-1-induced
AP-1 activity by G family subunits.
Endogenous AP-1 was assayed in 293T cells transfected as described
under "Experimental Procedures," with a total of 7 µg of DNA
which included 3 µg of control or polycystin-1 construct, 1 µg of
AP-1 reporter, 5 ng of RL-null, 100 ng or 500 ng of G construct, and
pBS as the filler. A, 100 ng of G i1,
G i2, G i3, G 12, and
G 13. B, 500 ng of G i1,
G i3, G q, and G 12. Data are
expressed as relative luciferase units (RLUs). Independent
experiments were carried out in triplicate (n = 3).
Error bars represent S.D. Significant differences between
G -stimulated and -unstimulated control samples are indicated by
one asterisk (p < 0.05), three
asterisks (p < 0.005), or four
asterisks (p < 0.001), as determined by one-way
ANOVA. Western blots demonstrate expression of the polycystin-1
(Ig-PKD222) and control (Ig-0) constructs from one of each of the
experiments.
|
|

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Inhibition of mouse polycystin-1-induced AP-1
activity by DN p115. Endogenous AP-1 was assayed in 293T cells
transfected as described under "Experimental Procedures," with a
total of 7 µg of DNA which included 3 µg of control or polycystin-1
construct, 1 µg of DN p115 or control plasmid, 1 µg of AP-1
reporter, 5 ng of RL-null, and pBS as the filler. Data for two
independent experiments, each carried out in triplicate
(n = 3), are expressed as direct firefly luciferase
activity. AP-1 activity was inhibited by DN p115 ~24 and ~38%,
representing 42 and 30% drops in fold increase, respectively.
Error bars represent S.D. Significant differences between DN
p115-inhibited and control samples are indicated by one
asterisk (p < 0.05) or two asterisks
(p < 0.01), as determined by one-way ANOVA. Western
blots demonstrate expression of the polycystin-1 (Ig-PKD222) and
control (Ig-0) constructs.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study has demonstrated that polycystin-1 activates JNK and
AP-1 signaling via G
and G
subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins and that polycystin-1 can couple with Gi,
Gq, and G12 family proteins. Polycystin-1
contains sequence elements found in a number of GPCRs, including a
latrophilin/CL-1-like GPCR proteolytic site (40). This GPCR proteolytic
site domain has been identified in CIRL-l, a member of a recently
identified subfamily of large orphan receptors that contains structural
features typical of cell adhesion proteins and GPCRs (41). We showed
previously that polycystin-1 also contains a polybasic domain in its
C-terminal tail that can activate Gi/Go
proteins in vitro (25). This domain lies in the most highly
conserved region of polycystin-1 and is part of a sequence capable of
forming stable binding interactions with heterotrimeric
Gi/Go proteins in vitro (25).
Polycystin-1 has an unusual structure for a GPCR, as it is thought to
have 11 transmembrane domains rather than 7 and thus would have to be
classified as an atypical GPCR.
GPCRs can signal through a number of pathways that lead to the
activation of JNK and AP-1 (42). Pathways that activate Rac and/or
Cdc42 and JNK via heterotrimeric G proteins have been described, including those activated by G
12 and G
13
subunits (43, 44), 
subunits (30, 31), G
i subunits
(45), and possibly Gq (46). In addition, AP-1 can be
activated by JNK-independent pathways involving Gq and
G12/G13 activation of Rho, the p38 MAPKs, and
BMK1/ERK5 (47, 48). Work by others (17) has shown that the polycystin-1
C-terminal cytosolic domain can activate JNK via the small G proteins
Rac-1 and Cdc42. Here we demonstrate the first evidence that
polycystin-1 mediated signaling to JNK and AP-1 is regulated by
heterotrimeric G protein subunits, possibly through a number of pathways.
To test the hypothesis that polycystin-1 modulates JNK and AP-1
activity via heterotrimeric G proteins, we assessed the ability of
various polycystin-1 C-terminal constructs to activate JNK and AP-1 in
the presence of specific inhibitors of G protein signaling. JNK
activation mediated by C-terminal tail polycystin-1 constructs could be
inhibited in some experiments up to 100% by dominant-negative inhibitors. Because transfection of a WT G
i2 subunit
also inhibited JNK activation, it was thought that overexpression of WT
and DN G
subunits might be inhibiting JNK activation by competing
for G
subunits. Similar observations have been made in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where overexpression of the G
subunit Gpa1 inhibits G
signaling (49), and in COS-7 cells, where transient transfection of G
i subunits interferes with
G
q/11- and G
16-mediated signaling via
competition for G
complexes (50). Consistent with this idea,
cotransfection of
ARK-ct, a specific 
scavenger, inhibited
exogenously expressed HA-JNK1
by about 30% (Fig. 2) and completely
inhibited endogenous JNK (Fig. 3).
The polycystin-1 assays made use of C-tail constructs that apparently
function in a constitutively active fashion, because they lack
extracellular polycystin-1 sequences. Constitutive activity of GPCRs
has been observed previously (51). We also tested a larger fusion
protein construct encoding amino acids 3,010-4,293 of murine
polycystin-1. This construct, sIg-PKD1284, only lacks the N-terminal
extracellular domain of polycystin-1 but contains all of the putative
transmembrane domain segments (8) and all of the extracellular and
intracellular loops, as well as the C-tail. Thus, the product encoded
by this construct would be expected to adopt the native polycystin-1
structure over this region of the protein. As with the experiments
involving the smaller C-tail constructs, sIg-PKD1284 was also capable
of stimulating JNK and AP-1. Furthermore, the sIg-PKD1284-mediated JNK
activation was effectively inhibited by
ARK-ct and by DN
G
i2. However, contrary to our observations utilizing the
smaller C-tail constructs, the sIg-PKD1284-mediated JNK activation
could be stimulated somewhat by WT G
i2 at low
concentrations (Fig. 4B). Despite this stimulation, we could
only partially inhibit polycystin-1 JNK activation with pertussis
toxin. Thus, to identify other G protein families that may be activated
by polycystin-1, we transfected cells with three different
G
i subunits, with G
q and with
G
12 and G
13 subunits. Although all three
G protein families were found to be capable of stimulating polycystin-1
activation of AP-1, G
12 and G
13 were the
most effective. Furthermore, polycystin-1-induced AP-1 activity was
inhibited with a DN p155RhoGEF construct that specifically inhibits G
12 and G
13. Our results
demonstrate that polycystin-1 is able to couple with G12
class heterotrimeric G proteins to stimulate AP-1, and they suggest the
involvement of other G protein families in JNK/AP-1 signaling.
Apparently, the C-tail alone is sufficient for coupling with and
activating G protein signaling.
Polycystin-1 has been shown to regulate Ca2+ flux through
an interaction with polycystin-2 (12, 13). Polycystin-2 has similarity to the
1E-1 subunit of a voltage-activated calcium channel, a class
of calcium channels whose activity is potentially regulated by G
subunits (52, 53). Binding of G
to the
1 subunit of these
channels results in kinetic slowing and steady-state inhibition of the
current. This inhibition may be due to competition (or in some cases
cooperative interactions) between G
and a channel
subunit
that regulates membrane targeting and other biophysical properties of
1 channels (54, 55). Interestingly, antibodies directed against the
channel
subunit block the GTPase activity of G
o in
neuronal membranes, suggesting that the channel
subunit has
GAP activity (56). GAP activity may be important in channel
function as it promotes the reassociation of G
and G
GDP in an
inactive heterotrimeric state, thereby preventing binding of G
to
the
1 channel subunit. Polycystin-2 is also capable of activating
JNK and AP-1 via a pathway dependent on RhoA/Rac-1/Cdc42 (57). The
ability of polycystin-2 to regulate Ca2+ flux may account
for its ability to activate JNK. Calcium mobilization has been
implicated in JNK signaling, as chelation of intracellular and/or
extracellular Ca2+ is capable of inhibiting JNK activation
via the m2 (58) or m3 (59) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Indeed,
a recent paper (60) has demonstrated that polycystin-1 can regulate
Ca2+ and K+ channels in a pertussis
toxin-sensitive, G
-dependent fashion, thus supporting
this idea.
JNK and AP-1 play critical roles in numerous cellular processes,
including cell cycle regulation, cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, and inflammation (61). JNK signaling has been characterized extensively in Drosophila, being involved in developmental
pathways that control planar polarity (62), epidermal adhesion and
integrity (63), and dorsal closure (64). Polycystic kidney disease is characterized by epithelial cell proliferation, a dedifferentiated epithelial phenotype, and abnormal epithelial polarity (4, 15, 65).
Polycystin-1 has also been shown to have a direct role in the
maintenance of the vasculature and of epithelial integrity (66) and in
mediating intercellular adhesion (67). Thus, it is reasonable to
envision that JNK and AP-1 signaling could play key roles in
polycystin-1 function and cystic disease progression. Our evidence
supports the idea that polycystin-1 is a GPCR (Fig. 7). Binding to an unidentified
extracellular ligand (or to itself through homotypic interactions)
could regulate heterotrimeric G protein signaling that would in turn
lead to the control of diverse cellular processes that are misregulated
in PKD, such as cell proliferation, differentiation, polarity, and
fluid secretion.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Model of G protein-coupled polycystin-1
function. Our data demonstrate that polycystin-1-mediated JNK and
AP-1 activation are regulated by the G and G subunits of
heterotrimeric G proteins. G subunits could potentially be
involved in the regulation of polycystin-2 channel activity. The
extracellular event that initiates polycystin-1-mediated G protein
signaling remains unknown.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We gratefully acknowledge the following
individuals for providing cDNAs: Dr. G. Walz (University of
Freiburg; sIg-PKD-MN6), Dr. G. Germino (The Johns Hopkins University;
mouse 3' polycystin-1 cDNA), Dr. L. E. Heasley (University of
Colorado Health Sciences Center, HA-JNK1
), Dr. R. J. Lefkowitz
(Duke University Medical Center;
ARK-ct and pRK5), Dr. T. Okamoto
(Cleveland Clinic Foundation; DN and WT G
i2), Dr. A. Freichel-Blomquist (University of Essen, Germany, Lsc-RGS), and Dr. J. Pelling (University of Kansas Medical Center; GST-Jun-(1-79) vector).
We also acknowledge Dr. S. K. Heath (Imperial Cancer Research
Fund) for constructing the mouse polycystin-1 cDNA clone, which was
used to make sIg-PKD1284.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants DK53763 (to J. P. C.) and DK57301 (to J. P. C. and
R. L. M.), grants from the Polycystic Kidney Disease Foundation (to
J. P. C. and R. L. M.), and a University of Kansas Medical Center
Training Grant in Biomedical Research (to S. C. P.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical
Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160-7421. Tel.:
913-588-7424; Fax: 913-588-7440; E-mail: jcalvet@kumc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 23, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201875200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ADPKD, autosomal
dominant polycystic kidney disease;
ANOVA, analysis of variance;
HA, hemagglutinin;
JNK, c-Jun N-terminal kinase;
ARK-ct,
-adrenergic
receptor kinase C-terminal tail;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
DN, dominant-negative;
WT, wild type;
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor;
GAP, GTPase-activating protein..
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Watson, M. L., and Torres, V. E.
(eds)
(1996)
Polycystic Kidney Disease
, pp. 1-590, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
| 2.
|
Grantham, J. J.
(1997)
Kidney Int.
63 (suppl.),
93-97
|
| 3.
|
Torres, V. E.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens.
7,
159-169[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Calvet, J. P.,
and Grantham, J. J.
(2001)
Semin. Nephrol.
21,
107-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
The European Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium.
(1994)
Cell
77,
881-894[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
The American PKD1 Consortium.
(1995)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
4,
575-582[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
The International Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium.
(1995)
Cell
81,
289-298[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Hughes, J.,
Ward, C. J.,
Peral, B.,
Aspinwall, R.,
Clark, K.,
San Millan, J. L.,
Gamble, V.,
and Harris, P. C.
(1995)
Nat. Genet.
10,
151-160[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Harris, P. C.,
Ward, C. J.,
Peral, B.,
and Hughes, J.
(1995)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
6,
1125-1133[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Wilson, P. D.
(2001)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
12,
834-845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Gonzalez-Perrett, S.,
Kim, K.,
Ibarra, C.,
Damiano, A. E.,
Zotta, E.,
Batelli, M.,
Harris, P. C.,
Reisin, I. L.,
Arnaout, M. A.,
and Cantiello, H. F.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
1182-1187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Hanaoka, K.,
Qian, F.,
Boletta, A.,
Bhunia, A. K.,
Piontek, K.,
Tsiokas, L.,
Sukhatme, V. P.,
Guggino, W. B.,
and Germino, G. G.
(2000)
Nature
408,
990-994[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Vandorpe, D. H.,
Chernova, M. N.,
Jiang, L.,
Sellin, L. K.,
Wilhelm, S.,
Stuart-Tilley, A. K.,
Walz, G.,
and Alper, S. L.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
4093-4101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Vassilev, P. M.,
Guo, L.,
Chen, X. Z.,
Segal, Y.,
Peng, J. B.,
Basora, N.,
Babakhanlou, H.,
Cruger, G.,
Kanazirska, M., Ye, C.,
Brown, E. M.,
Hediger, M. A.,
and Zhou, J.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
282,
341-350[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Calvet, J. P.
(1998)
J. Nephrol.
11,
24-34[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Kim, E.,
Arnould, T.,
Sellin, L. K.,
Benzing, T.,
Fan, M. J.,
Gruning, W.,
Sokol, S. Y.,
Drummond, I.,
and Walz, G.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4947-4953[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Arnould, T.,
Kim, E.,
Tsiokas, L.,
Jochimsen, F.,
Gruning, W.,
Chang, J. D.,
and Walz, G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6013-6018[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Yamaguchi, T.,
Pelling, J. C.,
Ramaswamy, N. T.,
Eppler, J. W.,
Wallace, D. P.,
Nagao, S.,
Rome, L. A.,
Sullivan, L. P.,
and Grantham, J. J.
(2000)
Kidney Int.
57,
1460-1471[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Hanaoka, K.,
and Guggino, W. B.
(2000)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
11,
1179-1187[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Sutters, M.,
Yamaguchi, T.,
Maser, R. L.,
Magenheimer, B. S., St,
John, P. L.,
Abrahamson, D. R.,
Grantham, J. J.,
and Calvet, J. P.
(2001)
Kidney Int.
60,
484-494[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Boletta, A.,
Qian, F.,
Onuchic, L. F.,
Bhunia, A. K.,
Phakdeekitcharoen, B.,
Hanaoka, K.,
Guggino, W.,
Monaco, L.,
and Germino, G. G.
(2000)
Mol. Cell
6,
1267-1273[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Kim, E.,
Arnould, T.,
Sellin, L.,
Benzing, T.,
Comella, N.,
Kocher, O.,
Tsiokas, L.,
Sukhatme, V. P.,
and Walz, G.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6371-6376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Ross, E. M.,
and Wilkie, T. M.
(2000)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
69,
795-827[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Guay-Woodford, L. M.,
Wright, C. J.,
Walz, G.,
and Churchill, G. A.
(2000)
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.
11,
1253-1260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Parnell, S. C.,
Magenheimer, B. S.,
Maser, R. L.,
Rankin, C. A.,
Smine, A.,
Okamoto, T.,
and Calvet, J. P.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
251,
625-631[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Lohning, C.,
Nowicka, U.,
and Frischauf, A. M.
(1997)
Mamm. Genome
8,
307-311[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Rumenapp, U.,
Asmus, M.,
Schablowski, H.,
Woznicki, M.,
Han, L.,
Jakobs, K. H.,
Fahimi-Vahid, M.,
Michalek, C.,
Wieland, T.,
and Schmidt, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2474-2479[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Rogers, J. A.,
Read, R. D., Li, J.,
Peters, K. L.,
and Smithgall, T. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17519-17525[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Parnell, S. C.,
Magenheimer, B. S.,
Maser, R. L.,
and Calvet, J. P.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
259,
539-543[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Coso, O. A.,
Teramoto, H.,
Simonds, W. F.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3963-3966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Yamauchi, J.,
Kaziro, Y.,
and Itoh, H.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1957-1965[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Koch, W. J.,
Hawes, B. E.,
Inglese, J.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6193-6197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Hermouet, S.,
Merendino, J. J.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
and Spiegel, A. M.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
10455-10459[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Ramirez, M. T.,
Sah, V. P.,
Zhao, X. L.,
Hunter, J. J.,
Chien, K. R.,
and Brown, J. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14057-14061[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Wisdom, R.
(1999)
Exp. Cell Res.
253,
180-185[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Jochum, W.,
Passegue, E.,
and Wagner, E. F.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
2401-2412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Mechta-Grigoriou, F.,
Gerald, D.,
and Yaniv, M.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
2378-2389[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Kozasa, T.,
Jiang, X.,
Hart, M. J.,
Sternweis, P. M.,
Singer, W. D.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Bollag, G.,
and Sternweis, P. C.
(1998)
Science
280,
2109-2111[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Mao, J.,
Yuan, H.,
Xie, W.,
and Wu, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12973-12976[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Ponting, C. P.,
Hofmann, K.,
and Bork, P.
(1999)
Curr. Biol.
9,
R585-R588[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Sugita, S.,
Ichtchenko, K.,
Khvotchev, M.,
and Sudhof, T. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32715-32724[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Coso, O. A.,
Chiariello, M.,
Kalinec, G.,
Kyriakis, J. M.,
Woodgett, J.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
5620-5624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Collins, L. R.,
Minden, A.,
Karin, M.,
and Brown, J. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17349-17353[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T. A.,
Faure, M. P.,
Ahn, N. G.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21081-21087[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Yamauchi, J.,
Kawano, T.,
Nagao, M.,
Kaziro, Y.,
and Itoh, H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7633-7640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Levi, N. L.,
Hanoch, T.,
Benard, O.,
Rozenblat, M.,
Harris, D.,
Reiss, N.,
Naor, Z.,
and Seger, R.
(1998)
Mol. Endocrinol.
12,
815-824[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Marinissen, M. J.,
Chiariello, M.,
Pallante, M.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
4289-4301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Marinissen, M. J.,
Chiariello, M.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(2001)
Genes Dev.
15,
535-553[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Dohlman, H. G.,
and Thorner, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3871-3874[Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Slepak, V. Z.,
Katz, A.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
4037-4041[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Morisset, S.,
Rouleau, A.,
Ligneau, X.,
Gbahou, F.,
Tardivel-Lacombe, J.,
Stark, H.,
Schunack, W.,
Ganellin, C. R.,
Schwartz, J. C.,
and Arrang, J. M.
(2000)
Nature
408,
860-864[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
De Waard, M.,
Liu, H.,
Walker, D.,
Scott, V. E.,
Gurnett, C. A.,
and Campbell, K. P.
(1997)
Nature
385,
446-450[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Yassin, M.,
Zong, S.,
and Tanabe, T.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
220,
453-458[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Dolphin, A. C.
(1998)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
506,
3-11[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Meir, A.,
Bell, D. C.,
Stephens, G. J.,
Page, K. M.,
and Dolphin, A. C.
(2000)
Biophys. J.
79,
731-746[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Campbell, V.,
Berrow, N.,
Brickley, K.,
Page, K.,
Wade, R.,
and Dolphin, A. C.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
370,
135-140[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Arnould, T.,
Sellin, L.,
Benzing, T.,
Tsiokas, L.,
Cohen, H. T.,
Kim, E.,
and Walz, G.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
3423-3434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Mitchell, F. M.,
Russell, M.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
309,
381-384
|
| 59.
|
Wylie, P. G.,
Challiss, R. A.,
and Blank, J. L.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
338,
619-628
|
| 60.
|
Delmas, P.,
Nomura, H., Li, X.,
Lakkis, M.,
Luo, Y.,
Segal, Y.,
Fernandez-Fernandez, J. M.,
Harris, P.,
Frischauf, A. M.,
Brown, D. A.,
and Zhou, J.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
11276-11283[Abstract/Free |