![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19633-19638, May 31, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, February 28, 2002, and in revised form, March 25, 2002
Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA
polymerase IV (Dpo4) is a member of the Y family of DNA polymerases
whose crystal structure has recently been solved. As a model for other
evolutionarily conserved Y family members that perform translesion DNA
synthesis and have low fidelity, we describe here the base substitution
and frameshift fidelity of DNA synthesis by Dpo4. Dpo4 generates all 12 base-base mismatches at high rates, 11 of which are similar to those of its human homolog, DNA polymerase Our understanding of spontaneous mutagenesis and lesion bypass
during DNA replication has been expanded in the last several years by
the discovery of a number of novel DNA polymerases in the Y family (1).
These polymerases all lack intrinsic 3' to 5' exonuclease activity, and
several of them can copy DNA templates containing lesions that slow
down or arrest synthesis by polymerases in other families. Among
several subdivisions of the Y family, the DinB subfamily consists of
enzymes sharing significant sequence homology with the product of the
Escherichia coli dinB gene, DNA polymerase IV (2). E. coli Pol IV1 and its
human homolog, DNA polymerase Decades of study indicate that the stability of large genomes depends
on the high fidelity of DNA replication. It is therefore of great
interest to understand the molecular basis of low fidelity synthesis by
Y family polymerases, especially since they are conserved in all three
kingdoms of life. Indeed, the genome of the archaeal aerobic
thermophile Sulfolobus solfataricus P2 also contains a DinB
homolog designated DNA polymerase IV (Dpo4) (15). Recently, high
resolution crystal structures have been described of a ternary complex
consisting of Dpo4, primer-template DNA, and a correct nucleotide bound
at the active site (16). In this structure, the nascent base pair
binding pocket is relatively open and has increased solvent
accessibility in comparison with polymerases in other families. This
predicts that Dpo4 will synthesize DNA with low base substitution
fidelity. In support of this possibility, kinetic analysis revealed
that Dpo4 inserts incorrect nucleotides at rates ranging from 3 × 10 Also of interest is the frameshift fidelity of DinB polymerases.
The mesophilic DinB polymerases, E. coli Pol IV and
mammalian pol To test these ideas and to establish a comprehensive view of Dpo4
fidelity that can be used in future structure-function studies of this
enzyme and other Y family polymerases, here we report the error rates
for all 12 base substitutions and for single base deletions in a
variety of sequence contexts. The results reveal the generally
inaccurate DNA synthesis capacity of Dpo4, and they strongly suggest
that many single base deletions and a subset of base substitutions may
result from the ability of Dpo4 to polymerize despite the presence of
an extra, unpaired template base in the active site.
Materials--
Materials for the forward mutation assay were
from previously described sources (26). S. solfataricus P2
Dpo4 polymerase was prepared as described previously (15).
Forward Mutation Assay--
Reaction mixtures (30 µl)
contained 1 nM gel-purified M13mp2 gapped DNA substrate, 40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0 at 22 °C), 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 7.5 µg of bovine
serum albumin, 2.5% glycerol, and 1 mM dATP, dGTP, dCTP,
and dTTP. Polymerization reactions were initiated by adding 3.3-10
nM Dpo4, incubated at 70 °C for 1 h, and terminated
by adding EDTA to 15 mM. DNA products were analyzed by
agarose gel electrophoresis as described (26). Reaction products were
assayed for the frequency of lacZ mutants as described (26).
DNA from independent lacZ mutant phage was sequenced to
identify the types of sequence changes generated during gap-filling
synthesis. Since an average of 2.6 errors was identified per
lacZ mutant, many of the mutants contained both phenotypically detectable and silent changes. Here the error rates are
described as the number of observed mutations divided by the number of
nucleotides sequenced. The resulting values are similar to those
obtained using the error rate calculation for higher fidelity DNA
polymerases described earlier (26), which uses only the phenotypically
detectable sites, the lacZ mutant frequency, and the value
for expression of the nascent strand in E. coli.
Misinsertion Kinetics--
The 5'-GC substrate was constructed
by annealing the following oligonucleotides: 5'-GGT GCG GGC CTC TTC GCT
ATT ACG CCA-3' (primer) and 5'-CCT TTC GCC AGC TGG CGT AAT
AGC GAA GAG GCC CGC ACC-3' (template). A 5'-AC substrate used the same
primer and a template in which the G (in boldface type) was replaced by
A. Oligonucleotides were annealed by mixing 5'-32P-labeled
primer with template in a 1:2 ratio. Mixtures were incubated at
85 °C and slowly cooled to 25 °C. Reaction mixtures (30 µl) contained the same components used for the gap-filling assay except for
170 nM template, 1.1-6.7 nM Dpo4 and seven
different concentrations of each individual dNTP. Reaction mixtures
were incubated at 70 °C, aliquots were removed at 2-, 4-, 6-, and
8-min time intervals, and the reactions were terminated with adding an
equal volume of 95% formamide in 20 mM EDTA. Reaction
products were fractionated on a 16% (w/v) denaturing polyacrylamide
gel and quantified using a PhosphorImager. Kinetic constants were
derived as previously described (27).
The fidelity of DNA synthesis by Dpo4 was examined using a forward
mutation assay that scores a variety of substitution and frameshift
errors generated during copying of a lacZ template in a
single-stranded gap in M13mp2 DNA. Correct polymerization produces
DNA that yields blue M13 plaques in an E. coli
Fig. 2 compares the average error rates
of Dpo4 with those of other exonuclease-deficient DNA polymerases
obtained using the M13mp2 forward mutation assay. The substitution
error rate for Dpo4 is 6.5 × 10
Low Fidelity DNA Synthesis by a Y Family DNA Polymerase Due
to Misalignment in the Active Site*
,
,
¶
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics and
¶ Laboratory of Structural Biology, NIEHS, National Institutes of
Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 and
§ Section on DNA Replication, Repair, and Mutagenesis,
NICHD, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
. This result is consistent with
the Dpo4 structure, implying lower geometric selection for correct base
pairs. Surprisingly, Dpo4 generates C·dCMP mismatches at an unusually
high average rate and preferentially at cytosine flanked by 5'-template
guanine. Dpo4 also has very low frameshift fidelity and frequently
generates deletions of even noniterated nucleotides, especially
cytosine flanked by a 5'-template guanine. Both unusual features of
error specificity suggest that Dpo4 can incorporate dNTP precursors
when two template nucleotides are present in the active site binding
pocket. These results have implications for mutagenesis resulting from
DNA synthesis by Y family polymerases.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(pol
) can bypass certain lesions
in template DNA, and they replicate undamaged DNA templates with low
fidelity (3-6). These properties are shared by Rad30A members of the Y
family, including eukaryotic DNA polymerase
(7-12), whose
inactivation leads to an increased susceptibility to sunlight-induced
skin cancer in humans (13, 14).
4 to 8 × 10
3 (15).
, both contribute to single base deletion mutagenesis
in vivo (3, 17-19), and these polymerases generate high
levels of frameshift errors in vitro (2, 5). Early studies
(20) of the error specificity of exonuclease-deficient eukaryotic DNA polymerases
(B family) and
(X family) considered three possible mechanisms for how single base deletions might be generated during DNA
synthesis. Deletions in homopolymeric runs could be explained by the
classical strand slippage hypothesis (21). However, deletions of
noniterated nucleotides were also generated that were inconsistent with
misaligned substrate stability imparted by the correct base pairing
possible in repetitive sequences. Thus, two additional hypotheses were
put forth. One suggested that some frameshift errors might be initiated
by nucleotide misinsertion, followed immediately by primer relocation
to create a misaligned deletion intermediate stabilized by one or more
correct terminal base pairs (22, 23). The other idea (20) was that a
noniterated nucleotide might assume a stable conformation in the active
site such that it would not template an incorporation event itself but
would not interfere with its neighbor's ability to do so. Support for this hypothesis was provided by kinetic analysis of insertion by human
pol
with substrates containing abasic sites (24) or
propanodeoxyguanosine adducts (25). Those modified template nucleotides
were suggested to be misaligned at the active site, with the
misalignment stabilized by the incoming dNTP paired with the next
template base. Direct support for misalignment in the active site
binding pocket is the structure of Dpo4 in which a template guanine at
the active site is unpaired, with incoming dCTP paired with the next
template guanine (Fig. 6b in Ref. 16). The fact that the
active site of Dpo4 can accommodate an unpaired template nucleotide
suggests that this polymerase could have low frameshift fidelity, even
for loss of noniterated nucleotides.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-complementation strain. Errors are scored as light blue or
colorless plaques, and error specificity is defined by sequencing DNA
isolated from independent lacZ mutants. Dpo4 copied the
275-nucleotide mutational target sequence and continued to fill the
407-nucleotide gap to apparent completion as determined by agarose gel
electrophoresis (data not shown, but see typical analysis in Ref. 26).
The DNA products yielded a lacZ mutant frequency of 16%, a
value that is similar to results with human pol
(5) and
substantially higher than for polymerases in the A, B, or X families.
Sequence analysis of the 275-nucleotide lacZ target in 182 independent lacZ mutants (50,050 total nucleotides) revealed
476 sequence changes (i.e. 2.6 changes per mutant). Among
these, 326 (70%) were single base substitutions (Fig.
1), and 116 (25%) were single base
deletions (open triangles in Fig. 1). The
remaining changes included nine single base additions (Fig. 1,
slashes), nine tandem double base substitutions, and 16 other examples of one or a few two-base deletions, two-base additions,
combined substitution-additions, combined substitution-deletions, large
deletions, and more complex changes (not shown).

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Single base error spectrum of Dpo4. The
lacZ
-complementation sequence in M13mp2 from template
nucleotide
84 through +197 is shown as three
lines. Base substitutions are shown above the
sequence, and single base deletions (
) and insertions
(slash followed by inserted
base) are shown below the sequence.
3 (326/50,050). This
is comparable with the rate for the homologous human pol
(5) and
4-5-fold lower than for mouse and human pol
. All four Y family
enzymes listed have substantially higher substitution rates than do
polymerases in the A, B, and X families (DNA polymerases
,
,
and
, respectively) (Fig. 2A). Thus, Dpo4 serves as a
good model for the generally low base substitution fidelity of Y family
polymerases in the DinB and Rad30A subfamilies.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Error rates for Dpo4 compared with other
exonuclease-deficient polymerases. A, base substitution
rates. B, error rate for C·dCMP. C, single base
deletion rates. Error rates are as reported from the following
references: human and mouse pol
(29); human pol
(5);
Sso Dpo IV (this study); human pol
(41); human pol
(42); human pol
(43).
Single Base Substitution Error Specificity--
Dpo4 generated all
12 single base-base mismatches (Table I),
and these were widely distributed in many different sequence contexts
throughout the target sequence (Fig. 1). As is the case with other DNA
polymerases, the highest Dpo4 error rate was observed for the T-dGMP
mismatch, 4.7 × 10
3. The lowest error rate was
0.6 × 10
3 for the G·dAMP mismatch, yielding a
range of error rates of only 8-fold. The error rates for Dpo4 are
similar to those for the human DinB homolog, pol
(5), except for
the C-dCMP rate, which was unusually high with Dpo4 (Fig.
2B). Interestingly, C-dCMP is the most common misinsertion
event generated by the homologous Dbh pol from Sso strain P1
(28).
|
Single Base Deletion Rate and Error Specificity--
The single
base deletion error rate for Dpo4 is 2.3 × 10
3.
This is comparable with the deletion error rates of other Y family enzymes and is much higher than for polymerases in other families (Fig.
2C). To consider whether the deletions generated by Dpo4 might be initiated by strand slippage, we used the information in Fig.
1 and Table I to calculate subclasses of deletions in different
sequence contexts. The average rate for deleting any of the 97 noniterated template nucleotides in the target was calculated to be
1.7 × 10
3. This is similar to the rates at which
nucleotides were deleted from repetitive sequence tracts of 2-5
nucleotides (Fig. 3A). A
similar, minimal dependence of error rate on repeat tract length has
previously been observed for human pol
(5) and pol
(29). In
contrast, deletion error rates for polymerases in other families are
lower, and those rates typically increase with increasing repetitive
tract length. As one example, the rate of single base deletions by
exonuclease-deficient human pol
(A family) within iterated tracts
of 4 or 5 nucleotides is 26 times greater than the rate in noniterated
DNA (Fig. 3B). The smaller dependence of single-base
deletion error rate on repetitive sequence length by Dpo4 implies that
most deletions are initiated by a mechanism other than strand
slippage.
|
Active Site Misalignment to Explain Unusual Error
Specificity--
In consideration of what the deletion mechanism might
be, we analyzed the two unusual features of Dpo4 error specificity in greater detail. Surprisingly, 54% of the nonreiterated nucleotides deleted by Dpo4 were cytosine, a preference not seen in previous studies of any other polymerase. Cytosine deletions were not randomly distributed in the target; 19 of the 26 noniterated cytosines that were
deleted were flanked by a 5'-template guanine (Fig. 1). Equally
surprisingly, the third most common base substitution error indicated
formation of a C-dCMP mismatch (Table I, column 4). This mismatch is
rarely produced by polymerases in other families (e.g. see
Ref. 30 and Fig. 2B). Furthermore, the C·dCMP intermediate is generated by Dpo4 at a rate that is 12-fold higher than for pol
and even higher than for pol
(Fig. 2B), despite the fact that pol
has lower base substitution fidelity overall (Fig. 2A). As observed for the noniterated cytosine deletions, 30 of 34 C·dCMP errors generated by Dpo4 were flanked by a 5'-template guanine (Fig. 1, Table I). This strong preference for a flanking template guanine for both errors and the misaligned ternary complex structure previously observed (16) suggest a common mechanism in which
Dpo4 skips the template cytosine and incorporates dCTP when paired with
the flanking guanine (Fig. 4). If dCMP
incorporation is immediately followed by correct synthesis, a deletion
will result from the extended misalignment (pathway F, for
frameshift). However, realignment prior to further
incorporation (pathway B, for base substitution) will
generate a C·C mismatch at the primer terminus whose extension will
result in a C to G substitution.
|
Kinetic Analysis of Misinsertion-- To test this transient misalignment model for formation of C·dCMP mismatches, we determined steady state parameters for insertion of each of the four dNTPs with a cytosine (we used lacZ template position 146; Fig. 1) present as the first template nucleotide in an oligonucleotide substrate. The Km and Vmax values (Table II) were used to calculate the ability of Dpo4 to discriminate between correct incorporation of dGMP and "apparently incorrect" incorporation of dCMP when the template contained either a 5'-flanking guanine or adenine. With the 5'-GC template, discrimination (fins) between insertion of dGMP and dCMP was 0.042 (Table II, line 2). This is similar to the value of 0.027 for stable misincorporation (i.e. insertion plus mismatch extension) of dCMP opposite this same template cytosine during gap-filling synthesis, where five C to G substitutions were observed at position 146 among 182 lacZ mutants (Fig. 1). The active site misalignment model predicts that changing the flanking template base to adenine should decrease dCMP insertion because dCTP opposite template A would be incorrect. This prediction is fulfilled with the 5'-AC template, where discrimination against dCMP insertion was increased by 18-fold (fins = 0.0023, Table II). As an internal control, note that discrimination against insertion of dAMP opposite C was similar using the 5'-GC and 5'-AC templates (0.0084 and 0.012, respectively), as predicted by the model.
|
Sequence Context for Other Base Substitutions--
To see if this
misalignment mechanism could theoretically explain other substitutions,
we analyzed the sequence contexts for all 12 mismatches produced by
Dpo4 (Table I). As mentioned above, 88% (30/34) of all C to G
substitutions occurred at a 5'-GC-3' template sequence. This is a
greater proportion than would be expected by chance, since only 22 of
79 cytosines in the target (28%) are flanked by a 5'-G (Table I, line
12). As a consequence, the average rate of C to G substitutions flanked
by G is 75 × 10
4, which is 19-fold higher than the
rate of 3.3 × 10
4 for all other template cytosines.
The 19-fold difference in rate at 5'-GC sequences compared with
5'-(A/T/C)C sequences (Table I, last line, last column) is similar to
the 18-fold decrease in dCMP misinsertion resulting from replacement of
the flanking G with A (Table II).
A similar analysis of T to G transversions (Table I, line 6) indicates
that T·dCMP mismatches are also preferentially generated in a manner
consistent with active site misalignment. Thus, 79% of these
substitutions were at the 19% of template thymines flanked by a 5'-G,
yielding an error rate that is 15-fold higher than for the same
substitution flanked by the other three bases. This substitution also
involves a template pyrimidine and incoming dCTP. It is notable that
dCMP incorporated opposite a template G is the most catalytically
favored event for Dpo4 among the four possible correct base pairs (15).
Analysis of the reciprocal error involving a template C and incoming
dTMP revealed a 3-fold sequence-dependent bias in error
rate. A 3-fold sequence-dependent bias was also seen with
the A·dCMP mismatch, the third possible error involving incoming
dCTP, as well as with the A·dAMP mismatch.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study provides a comprehensive view of the fidelity of DNA
synthesis by Sso Dpo4, a DinB DNA polymerase in the Y
family. When copying undamaged DNA, Dpo4 is highly inaccurate for
essentially all types of single base substitutions and deletions in a
large number of different sequence contexts. This generally low
fidelity was anticipated by homology to other Y family members that
also have low fidelity (5, 29). In fact, Dpo4 and its human homolog DNA
polymerase
generate most base substitutions at remarkably similar
rates, and these rates are much higher than those generated by
polymerases in the A, B, and X families. Like human pol
and pol
, Dpo4 also generates an unusually high rate of single base deletions, including deletions of noniterated bases whose loss is not
predicted by the classical strand slippage hypothesis.
These common fidelity characteristics are interesting in light of
recently published structures of Y family polymerases. These include
the apoenzyme structures of S. cerevisiae pol
(31) and
the full-length (28) and N-terminal fragment of S. solfataricus P1 Dbh polymerase (32). Most relevant to this study
are the structures of two different ternary complexes of Sso
Dpo4 with primer-template DNA and a nucleotide bound at the active site (16). These structures reveal that Y family members have the same
general right hand shape and thumb, fingers, and palm subdomains found
in polymerases in other families. The structures of the palms suggest
that Y family members have a catalytic mechanism in common with other
polymerases. However, several structural features of Y family
polymerases are distinctive. Dpo4 has a "little finger" subdomain
that is not present in other polymerase families but is present in
Sso Dbh (designated "wrist" in Ref. 28) and in yeast pol
(designated "PAD" in Ref. 31). The Dpo4 little finger fits into
the major groove upstream of the active site and contacts the backbone
of both strands. It is tethered to the thumb via a positively charged
loop that contacts the template strand backbone. The Dpo4 thumb is
smaller than that observed in polymerases in other families and it
contacts the backbone of both strands on the opposite (minor groove)
side of the duplex. The primer-template is B-form, with a minor groove
that is deeper and narrower than in most other polymerase-DNA
structures. Dpo4 does not contact any bases in the minor groove
upstream of the active site, which differs from other polymerases
(e.g. see Fig. 2 in Ref. 33), which may use such contacts to
probe for base pairing correct geometry. The fingers domain of Dpo4
that contacts the incoming nucleotide and the single-stranded template
is unusually small and lacks the
-helix in other polymerases
(34-36) that has a critical role in fidelity (reviewed in Ref. 33).
The side chains surrounding the nascent base pair in Dpo4 are small and hydrophobic, in contrast to the larger side chains present in other
polymerases. Thus, the nascent base pair binding pocket in Dpo4 is
relatively open and has increased solvent accessibility in comparison
with polymerases in other families. These structural features are
consistent with the ability of Dpo4 to incorporate various mismatches
in different sequence contexts at relatively high rates (Fig. 1 and
Table I), regardless of differences in mismatch shape, size,
orientation, or base hydrogen bonding, stacking, or hydration potential.
Pyrimidine·pyrimidine mispairs have been suggested to be sterically
excluded from polymerase active site binding pockets by the increased
bulk resulting from bound water molecules that are not efficiently
displaced during noncomplementary base pairing (37). Consistent with
this is the observation that C·dCMP is usually the least frequent
mismatch generated by DNA polymerases, including pol
and avian
myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (30, 38) and pol
(29)
and pol
(5). Thus, we were surprised to see that the average
C·dCMP error rate for the 79 cytosines monitored in this study was
unusually high (Table I, last line, and Fig. 2B). Five
observations suggest that most of these errors involve correct dCMP
incorporation opposite the template guanine flanking a preceding,
unpaired cytosine, followed by realignment and mismatch extension (Fig.
4, pathway B). The first is the structure of a ternary complex of Dpo4
revealing an unpaired template strand base in the active site binding
pocket and the next template base correctly paired with an incoming
dNTP (Fig. 6b in Ref. 16). The second is the fact that the
error rate for C to G transversions is 19-fold higher when C is flanked
by G rather than the other bases (Table I). The third is the
observation that discrimination against dCMP insertion is 18-fold lower
when cytosine is flanked by G than when flanked by A (Table II). Fourth
is the fact that template cytosine flanked by guanine is the most
frequently deleted nucleotide. This is consistent with pathway F of the
model (Fig. 4), wherein dCMP incorporation is simply followed by
continued correct synthesis without realignment. Finally, the limited
effect of increasing repeat sequence length on the deletion error rate of Dpo4 (Fig. 3) suggests that an unpaired nucleotide can exist in the
substrate (e.g. as seen in the misaligned Dpo4 structure) without being stabilized by the correct base pairing that is possible in repetitive DNA.
How general is the misalignment mechanism for different errors and
different polymerases? The branched pathway in Fig. 4 can account for a
substantial proportion of errors generated by Dpo4. Among base
substitutions (Table I), pathway B can account for almost all errors
involving incoming dCTP opposite C or T, a smaller portion of the third
mismatch involving dCTP opposite A and possibly some mismatches
involving incoming dATP opposite A. Dpo4 crystal structures with the
inferred misaligned intermediates might provide insights into why
template pyrimidines and incoming dCTP seem to be particularly
preferred. Pathway F (Fig. 4) can readily account for deletions of
noniterated nucleotides, and it may also contribute to deleting
iterated nucleotides as well. This mechanism may be common to other Y
family polymerases, since the limited effect of repeat sequence length
on Dpo4 deletion rate (Fig. 3A) is shared by human pol
(5) and pol
(29). Since these human polymerases and Dpo4 were
assayed for fidelity at 37 and 70 °C, respectively, this further
suggests that active site misalignment readily occurs at both
temperatures during replication. This does not exclude the possibility
that reaction temperature may affect the rate of misalignment or the
balance between extension of mispaired versus mismatched
termini (see branch point of Fig. 4). In addition, since mutations
consistent with active site misalignment are observed at much lower
frequencies during replication at 70 °C by the A family
Taq polymerase (39), it is likely that unique structural elements associated with Dpo4 and other Y family polymerases stabilize the misalignment.
Interestingly, the error spectrum in Fig. 1 indicates that certain
5'-GC-3' sequences yield C to G substitutions (e.g.
nucleotide 146), whereas others yield deletions of C (e.g.
nucleotide 9). Thus, additional sequence contexts, such as the identity
of the primer terminal base pair, may determine whether realignment
(Fig. 4, pathway B) or direct primer extension (pathway F) occurs. This balance may differ among polymerases, even those in the same family. Thus, Dpo4, pol
, and pol
share common frameshift error rates (Fig. 2C) and limited response to increasing run length, yet
the latter two enzymes do not share with Dpo4 the preferential
formation of C·dCMP or T·dCMP mismatches in specific sequence
contexts. However, C·dCMP and T·dCMP have the highest relative
misincorporation efficiencies of formation among all mispairs for the
Dbh polymerase of Sso P1. It is speculated that these
mispairs may arise from misalignments in either the 5' or 3' direction
and over more than one base along the template strand (28). Therefore,
enhanced formation of these specific mispairs by strand misalignment
may be a common property of archaeal DinB polymerases. Finally, the ability of Dpo4 and perhaps other Y family members to incorporate a
dNTP while an unpaired template strand nucleotide is located in the
active site binding pocket may be relevant to their ability to bypass
certain lesions and to sometimes generate deletions while doing so (10,
40).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dinh Nguyen for expert technical assistance in the sequence analysis of lacZ mutants and William Beard, Youri Pavlov, and Wei Yang for critical evaluation of the manuscript.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
919-541-2644; Fax: 919-541-7613; E-mail: kunkel@niehs.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202021200
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
Pol IV, E.
coli DNA polymerase IV;
Dpo4, DNA polymerase IV from S. solfataricus strain P2;
Dbh, DNA polymerase IV from S. solfataricus strain P1;
pol
, DNA polymerase
;
pol
, DNA
polymerase
;
pol
, DNA polymerase
;
pol
, DNA polymerase
;
pol
, DNA polymerase
;
exo
, exonuclease-deficient.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Ohmori, H., Friedberg, E. C., Fuchs, R. P., Goodman, M. F., Hanaoka, F., Hinkle, D., Kunkel, T. A., Lawrence, C. W., Livneh, Z., Nohmi, T., Prakash, L., Prakash, S., Todo, T., Walker, G. C., Wang, Z., and Woodgate, R. (2001) Mol. Cell 8, 7-8[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Wagner, J., Gruz, P., Kim, S.-R., Yamada, M., Matsui, K., Fuchs, R. P., and Nohmi, T. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 281-286[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Kim, S. R.,
Maenhaut-Michel, G.,
Yamada, M.,
Yamamoto, Y.,
Matsui, K.,
Sofuni, T.,
Nohmi, T.,
and Ohmori, H.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13792-13797 |
| 4. | Tang, M., Pham, P., Shen, X., Taylor, J. S., O'Donnell, M., Woodgate, R., and Goodman, M. F. (2000) Nature 404, 1014-1018[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Ohashi, E.,
Bebenek, K.,
Matsuda, T.,
Feaver, W. J.,
Gerlach, V. L.,
Friedberg, E. C.,
Ohmori, H.,
and Kunkel, T. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
39678-39684 |
| 6. |
Johnson, R. E.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
3838-3843 |
| 7. |
Johnson, R. E.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(1999)
Science
283,
1001-1004 |
| 8. | Matsuda, T., Bebenek, K., Masutani, C., Hanaoka, F., and Kunkel, T. A. (2000) Nature 404, 1011-1013[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Haracska, L., Yu, S. L., Johnson, R. E., Prakash, L., and Prakash, S. (2000) Nat. Genet. 25, 458-461[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Levine, R. L.,
Miller, H.,
Grollman, A.,
Ohashi, E.,
Ohmori, H.,
Masutani, C.,
Hanaoka, F.,
and Moriya, M.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
18717-18721 |
| 11. |
Kuraoka, I.,
Robins, P.,
Masutani, C.,
Hanaoka, F.,
Gasparutto, D.,
Cadet, J.,
Wood, R. D.,
and Lindahl, T.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
49283-49288 |
| 12. |
Chiapperino, D.,
Kroth, H.,
Kramarczuk, I.,
Sayer, J. M.,
Masutani, C.,
Hanaoka, F.,
Jerina, D. M.,
and Cheh, A. M.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
11765-11771 |
| 13. | Masutani, C., Kusumoto, R., Yamada, A., Dohmae, N., Yokoi, M., Yuasa, M., Araki, M., Iwai, S., Takio, K., and Hanaoka, F. (1999) Nature 399, 700-704[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Johnson, R. E.,
Kondratick, C. M.,
Prakash, S.,
and Prakash, L.
(1999)
Science
285,
263-265 |
| 15. |
Boudsocq, F.,
Iwai, S.,
Hanaoka, F.,
and Woodgate, R.
(2001)
Nucleic Acids Res.
29,
4607-4616 |
| 16. | Ling, H., Boudsocq, F., Woodgate, R., and Yang, W. (2001) Cell 107, 91-102[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Ogi, T., Kato, T., Jr., Kato, T., and Ohmori, H. (1999) Genes Cells 4, 607-618[Abstract] |
| 18. | Foster, P. L. (2000) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 65, 21-29[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | McKenzie, G. J., Lee, P. L., Lombardo, M. J., Hastings, P. J., and Rosenberg, S. M. (2001) Mol. Cell 7, 571-579[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Kunkel, T. A.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
13581-13587 |
| 21. |
Streisinger, G.,
Okada, Y.,
Emrich, J.,
Newton, J.,
Tsugita, A.,
Terzaghi, E.,
and Inouye, M.
(1966)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
31,
77-84 |
| 22. |
Kunkel, T. A.,
and Soni, A.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
14784-14789 |
| 23. |
Bebenek, K.,
and Kunkel, T. A.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4946-4950 |
| 24. |
Efrati, E.,
Tocco, G.,
Eritja, R.,
Wilson, S. H.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2559-2569 |
| 25. |
Hashim, M. F.,
Schnetz-Boutaud, N.,
and Marnett, L. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20205-20212 |
| 26. | Bebenek, K., and Kunkel, T. A. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 262, 217-232[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Lewis, D. A.,
Bebenek, K.,
Beard, W. A.,
Wilson, S. H.,
and Kunkel, T. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
32924-32930 |
| 28. | Silvian, L. F., Toth, E. A., Pham, P., Goodman, M. F., and Ellenberger, T. (2001) Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 984-989[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Matsuda, T., Bebenek, K., Masutani, C., Rogozin, I. B., Hanaoka, F., and Kunkel, T. A. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 312, 335-346[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Mendelman, L. V.,
Boosalis, M. S.,
Petruska, J.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
14415-14423 |
| 31. | Trincao, J., Johnson, R. E., Escalante, C. R., Prakash, S., Prakash, L., and Aggarwal, A. K. (2001) Mol. Cell 8, 417-426[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Zhou, B., Pata, J. D., and Steitz, T. A. (2001) Mol. Cell 8, 427-437[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Bebenek, K., and Kunkel, T. A. (2000) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 65, 81-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Sawaya, M. R.,
Pelletier, H.,
Kumar, A.,
Wilson, S. H.,
and Kraut, J.
(1994)
Science
264,
1930-1935 |
| 35. | Doublié, S., Tabor, S., Long, A. M., Richardson, C. C., and Ellenberger, T. (1998) Nature 391, 251-258[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Kiefer, J. R., Mao, C., Braman, J. C., and Beese, L. S. (1998) Nature 391, 304-307[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Kool, E. T. (1998) Biopolymers 48, 3-17[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Mendelman, L. V.,
Petruska, J.,
and Goodman, M. F.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
2338-2346 |
| 39. |
Eckert, K. A.,
and Kunkel, T. A.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
3739-3744 |
| 40. | Napolitano, R., Janel-Bintz, R., Wagner, J., and Fuchs, R. P. (2000) EMBO J. 19, 6259-6265[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Osheroff, W. P.,
Jung, H. K.,
Beard, W. A.,
Wilson, S. H.,
and Kunkel, T. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3642-3650 |
| 42. | Roberts, J. D., and Kunkel, T. A. (1996) in DNA Replication in Eukaryotic Cells: Concepts, Enzymes and Systems (De Pamphilis, M., ed) , pp. 217-247, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 43. |
Longley, M. J.,
Nguyen, D.,
Kunkel, T. A.,
and Copeland, W. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
38555-38562 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Jia, N. E. Geacintov, and S. Broyde The N-clasp of human DNA polymerase {kappa} promotes blockage or error-free bypass of adenine- or guanine-benzo[a]pyrenyl lesions Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2008; 36(20): 6571 - 6584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Fiala, S. M. Sherrer, J. A. Brown, and Z. Suo Mechanistic consequences of temperature on DNA polymerization catalyzed by a Y-family DNA polymerase Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(6): 1990 - 2001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chen, F.-Y. Dupradeau, D. A. Case, C. J. Turner, and J. Stubbe DNA oligonucleotides with A, T, G or C opposite an abasic site: structure and dynamics Nucleic Acids Res., January 17, 2008; 36(1): 253 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Fiala, C. D. Hypes, and Z. Suo Mechanism of Abasic Lesion Bypass Catalyzed by a Y-family DNA Polymerase J. Biol. Chem., March 16, 2007; 282(11): 8188 - 8198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Fiala and Z. Suo Sloppy Bypass of an Abasic Lesion Catalyzed by a Y-family DNA Polymerase J. Biol. Chem., March 16, 2007; 282(11): 8199 - 8206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Perlow-Poehnelt, I. Likhterov, L. Wang, D. A. Scicchitano, N. E. Geacintov, and S. Broyde Increased Flexibility Enhances Misincorporation: TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON NUCLEOTIDE INCORPORATION OPPOSITE A BULKY CARCINOGEN-DNA ADDUCT BY A Y-FAMILY DNA POLYMERASE J. Biol. Chem., January 12, 2007; 282(2): 1397 - 1408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. DeLucia, S. Chaudhuri, O. Potapova, N. D. F. Grindley, and C. M. Joyce The Properties of Steric Gate Mutants Reveal Different Constraints within the Active Sites of Y-family and A-family DNA Polymerases J. Biol. Chem., September 15, 2006; 281(37): 27286 - 27291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Yakovleva and S. Shuman Nucleotide Misincorporation, 3'-Mismatch Extension, and Responses to Abasic Sites and DNA Adducts by the Polymerase Component of Bacterial DNA Ligase D J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2006; 281(35): 25026 - 25040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kashiwagi, Y. Isogai, K.-I. Nishiguchi, and K. Shiba Frame shuffling: a novel method for in vitro protein evolution Protein Eng. Des. Sel., March 1, 2006; 19(3): 135 - 140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Perlow-Poehnelt, I. Likhterov, D. A. Scicchitano, N. E. Geacintov, and S. Broyde The Spacious Active Site of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase Facilitates Promiscuous Nucleotide Incorporation Opposite a Bulky Carcinogen-DNA Adduct: ELUCIDATING THE STRUCTURE-FUNCTION RELATIONSHIP THROUGH EXPERIMENTAL AND COMPUTATIONAL APPROACHES J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36951 - 36961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Boudsocq, R. J. Kokoska, B. S. Plosky, A. Vaisman, H. Ling, T. A. Kunkel, W. Yang, and R. Woodgate Investigating the Role of the Little Finger Domain of Y-family DNA Polymerases in Low Fidelity Synthesis and Translesion Replication J. Biol. Chem., July 30, 2004; 279(31): 32932 - 32940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Beard, D. D. Shock, and S. H. Wilson Influence of DNA Structure on DNA Polymerase {beta} Active Site Function: EXTENSION OF MUTAGENIC DNA INTERMEDIATES J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31921 - 31929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Schurer, C. Rudolph, H. D. Ulrich, and W. Kramer Yeast MPH1 Gen |