![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19673-19678, May 31, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Laboratory for Molecular Oncology, Department of Human
Genetics, University of Leuven and Flanders Interuniversity
Institute for Biotechnology, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Received for publication, December 19, 2001, and in revised form, February 22, 2002
The activation of the pleomorphic adenoma
gene 1 (PLAG1) is the most frequent gain-of-function
mutation found in pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands. To gain
more insight into the regulation of PLAG1 function, we searched for
PLAG1-interacting proteins. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we
identified karyopherin The activation of the pleomorphic adenoma gene 1 (PLAG1)1 is the
most frequent gain-of-function mutation found in pleomorphic adenomas
of the salivary glands. Indeed, >50% of these benign tumors carry
aberrations in chromosome 8q12 in the region were PLAG1 is
localized. These aberrations result in the replacement of the
PLAG1 promoter, which is inactive in the normal adult
salivary gland, with a strong promoter (1-3). As such,
PLAG1 was identified as a candidate oncogene in the
tumorigenesis of pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands.
The PLAG1 protein consists of a C-terminal trans-activation
domain preceded by seven C2H2 zinc fingers,
which are responsible for DNA binding (4). The consensus PLAG1 binding
site comprises a core sequence (GRGGC) and a G-cluster (RGGK),
separated by seven random nucleotides (5). DNA binding is mediated
mainly via three of the seven zinc fingers with fingers 6 and 7 interacting with the core and with finger 3 interacting with the
G-cluster. In transient trans-activation assays, PLAG1
specifically activates transcription from its consensus DNA binding
site, indicating that PLAG1 is a genuine transcription factor.
Potential PLAG1 binding sites were found in the promoter of many genes
and notably in the promoter 3 of the human insulin-like growth factor
II (IGF-II) gene for which we have proved that it is a
bona fide PLAG1 target gene
(5).2
PLAG1 is a member of the highly conserved PLAG subfamily of zinc finger
proteins comprising two other members, PLAGL1 (also called LOT1 or
ZAC1) and PLAGL2 (4, 6-8). Structurally and functionally, PLAG1 and
PLAGL2 are very similar. PLAGL2 is able to bind to the consensus
binding site of PLAG1, and IGF-II is a target of both PLAG1
and PLAGL2.2 PLAG1 and PLAGL2 both are able to transform
NIH-3T3 cells in vitro, indicating they are genuine
proto-oncogenes.2 In contrast, PLAGL1 inhibits tumor cell
growth through the induction of apoptotic cell death and G1
arrest and recognizes a different consensus binding site (9).
To gain more insight into the regulation of PLAG1 function, a mouse
embryonic cDNA library was screened for PLAG1-interacting proteins
in the yeast two-hybrid assay system. We used an embryonic library,
because PLAG1 is expressed mainly during embryonic development. We
opted to screen with the N-terminal tail of PLAG1 for two reasons. First, this region has a high surface probability as predicted by the
Protean program (DNAstar), indicating its availability for interaction
with other proteins. Second, in contrast to the DNA-binding zinc finger
domain and the trans-activating C-terminal domain, no
function had been assigned to the N-terminal part of PLAG1. Proteins
interacting with this region might reveal new aspects of PLAG1 function.
The screen revealed interaction between PLAG1 and karyopherin Plasmid Constructs--
GST-PLAG1-(2-244) and
GST-PLAG1-(84-244) were described previously (5, 10).
GST-PLAGL1-(2-215) and GST-PLAGL2-(2-250) deletion mutants were
constructed by PCR cloning and subsequent ligation into the
EcoRI/XhoI sites (as underlined in the primers) of the pGEX-5X-2 vector and verified by sequencing. To clone
PLAGL1-(2-215), the following PCR primers were used: P2N2,
5'-CCCGAATTCTGGCCACGTTCCCCTGCC-3', and P2C215,
5'-GGGCTCGAGCTAGCTCTCTTTCATCAGCTCC-3'. To clone
PLAGL2-(2-250), the following PCR primers were used: P3N2,
5'-CCCGAATTCTGACCACATTTTTCACCAGCG-3', and P3C250,
5'-GGGCTCGAGCTACTTGATCTTGAGCAGCTCCT-3'. All sequences are 5' to 3', and the direction forward (N) or reverse (C) is indicated. To obtain the PLAG1 bait construct used in the yeast two-hybrid assay, we cloned the PLAG1 fragment of the
GST-PLAG1-(2-244) construct into the BamHI/PstI
sites of pGBT9 (CLONTECH). This plasmid was again
digested with StyI (cutting PLAG1 at 209 bp in the open
reading frame) and PstI, blunt-ended, and religated, generating pGBT9-PLAG1-(2-70). Yeast Two-hybrid Assay--
The Matchmaker Two-hybrid System 2 was purchased from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). All
experiments were performed in the yeast reporter strain CG-1945
(Trp GST Pull-down Assays--
Full-length murine karyopherin Immunofluorescence on Cultured Tumor Cells--
A pleomorphic
adenoma with a translocation involving chromosome 8q12
(t(3;8)(p21;q12)), the reciprocal translocations with breakpoints at chromosome 3p21 and 8q12 was retrieved from the tumor
bank of the Center for Human Genetics (University of Leuven, Leuven,
Belgium). It was a primary tumor originating from the salivary gland of
a previously untreated patient. Primary in situ cultures
were obtained from the original single cell suspension of tumor cells
and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F12 (1:1)
(Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum at 37 °C in a
humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. These cells were
subsequently grown to 40-60% confluency on chamber slides
(Lab-Tek®), and immunofluorescence was performed as
described previously (10). In short, the slides were fixed in cold
acetone followed by methanol (5 min each) and air-dried. Cells were
then permeabilized and blocked in phosphate-buffered saline containing
0.2% Triton X-100 and 0.5% blocking reagent (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) for 30 min at room temperature. Subsequently, the slides
were incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-PLAG1 antibody (PEM190) (10)
followed by washes in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.2% Triton
X-100 (3 × 10 min), incubation with Texas Red-conjugated donkey
anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Amersham Biosciences), and again washes
(three times). Finally, the slides were mounted in Vectashield (Vector
Laboratories, Inc.) supplemented with 0.4 µg/ml
4'-6-diamine-2-phenylinidole-dihydrochloride (DAPI, Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) and analyzed on a Zeiss Axiophot fluorescence microscope
equipped with a cooled digital CCD camera system (Photometrics) using
SmartCaptureTM software.
Cell Lines, Transfection, and Fluorescence--
293T human
embryonic kidney epithelial cells were used to examine the expression
and subcellular localization of
Transient transfections were performed using FuGENE 6 transfection
reagent (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) according to the supplier's
instructions. The cells were grown to 70-80% confluency on coverslips
in 24-well plates. For each transfection 0.75 µl of FuGENE 6 transfection reagent in 25 µl of serum-free Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) was added to 0.5 µg of DNA and incubated
at room temperature for 15 min after which the mixture was applied
directly to the growth medium of the cells. Cells were incubated
further at 37 °C for 18-24 h followed by fixation in 4%
formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline for 10 min at room
temperature and three subsequent wash steps in phosphate-buffered saline. Finally, the slides were mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Inc.) supplemented with 1/1000 DAPI and analyzed under
the fluorescence microscope.
Identification of Karyopherin Karyopherin Identification of Two Putative NLSs in PLAG1--
Karyopherin PLAG1 Putative NLS1 Is Essential for Interaction with Karyopherin
Putative NLS1 of PLAG1 Plays a Role in Its Nuclear
Localization--
Because karyopherin Assay of Other Segments of PLAG1 for Nuclear Import--
The
mutation of the predicted NLS1 in the context of full-length PLAG1
protein fused to Karyopherin The results presented here reveal the presence of two regions in PLAG1
that independently determine nuclear localization. The first one is the
predicted NLS1 in the N-terminal part of PLAG1 that mediates nuclear
import through interaction with karyopherin The contribution of passive diffusion in nuclear localization of PLAG1
has not yet been established. With a molecular mass of 55 kDa,
PLAG1 might be able to pass through nuclear pores by diffusion.
Nevertheless, small proteins are often equipped with NLSs to ensure
fast nuclear accumulation by active transport. The results presented in
this work focus on active transport, because fusion to
The PLAG1 family members PLAGL1 and PLAGL2 did not interact with
karyopherin As a result of alternative splicing of PLAG1, different
isoforms of the protein are predicted starting either at methionine 83 or methionine 100. These truncated PLAG1 products lack the identified
NLS and do not bind to karyopherin The fact that PLAG1 is equipped with an extra NLS absent in the other
PLAG family members and in the PLAG1 isoforms suggests that its nuclear
import might be of particular physiological relevance. Indeed, the
nuclear targeting directed by NLS1 is more efficient in comparison to
the nuclear targeting by the zinc finger domain. A cytoplasmic protein
is driven to the nucleus in 100% of the cells after fusion to NLS1.
Introduction of the DNA-binding domain of PLAG1, in contrast, confers
nuclear localization in only 47% of the cells (see table in
Fig. 5). However, it is not yet clear why PLAG1 needs a highly
efficient mechanism for nuclear import mediated by NLS1, which is in
contrast to the other family members and the isoforms that lack the
identified NLS. It would not be surprising to learn that the extra NLS
of PLAG1 has some yet uncharacterized physiological role. A nuclear
localization signal in chicken heat shock transcription factor 3 (cHSF), for example, targets the protein to the nucleus and in addition
is essential for its stress-induced dimer-to-trimer transition
(25).
In the context of the whole cell, the interaction between PLAG1
and karyopherin *
This work was supported in part by the Geconcerteerde
Onderzoeksactie (GOA, 1997-2001), the Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk
Onderzoek Vlaanderen (FWO), and the Algemene Spaar en L
§
Postdoctoral Fellow of the FWO.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
32-016-34-59-87; Fax: 32-016-34-60-73; E-mail:
wim.vandeven@med.kuleuven.ac.be.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 6, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112112200
2
Hensen, K., Van Valckenborgh, I. C., Kas, K.,
Van de Ven, W. J., and Voz, M. L. (2002) Cancer Res.
62, 1510-1517.
The abbreviations used are:
PLAG1, pleomorphic adenoma gene-like 1 protein;
PLAGL2, pleomorphic
adenoma gene-like 2 protein;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
GFP, green fluorescent protein;
SD
Identification of a Karyopherin
2 Recognition Site in PLAG1,
Which Functions As a Nuclear Localization Signal*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2 as a PLAG1-interacting protein. Physical
interaction between PLAG1 and karyopherin
2 was confirmed by an
in vitro glutathione S-transferase
pull-down assay. Karyopherin
2 escorts proteins into the nucleus via
interaction with a nuclear localization sequence (NLS) composed of
short stretches of basic amino acids. Two putative NLSs were identified
in PLAG1. The predicted NLS1 (KRKR) was essential for physical
interaction with karyopherin
2 in glutathione
S-transferase pull-down assay, and its mutation resulted in
decreased nuclear import of PLAG1. Moreover, NLS1 was able to drive the
nuclear import of the cytoplasmic protein
-galactosidase. In
contrast, predicted NLS2 of PLAG1 (KPRK) was not involved in
karyopherin
2 binding nor in its nuclear import. The residual
nuclear import of PLAG1 after mutation of the NLS1 was assigned to the
zinc finger domain of PLAG1. These observations indicate that the
nuclear import of PLAG1 is governed by its zinc finger domain and by
NLS1, a karyopherin
2 recognition site.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2, a
protein involved in active nuclear import. This interaction provided
the basis for the identification of a karyopherin
2 recognition site
in PLAG1, which functions as a nuclear localization signal.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Galactosidase-PLAG1-GFP fusion constructs for intracellular fluorescence studies were prepared by
cloning PCR fragments amplified from the pCDNA3-PLAG1 expression construct (5) into the SacII/XbaI sites of pHM829 (11). The following primers were used: SacII-Plag1N2,
5'-AGTCCCGCGGGCCACTGTCATTCCTGGTG-3'; SacII-Plag1N41,
5'-AGTCCCGCGGAAGGCCTTTAACAGTGTTGAG-3';
SacII-Plag1N242, 5'-AGTCCCGCGGAAGGTCAAAACAGAACCAGTG-3';
XbaI-Plag1C500,
5'-ACTGTCTAGACTGAAAAGCTTGATGGAAAC-3'; XbaI-Plag1C41,
5'-ACAGTCTAGACTTGTCACACAGTTGGCAAG-3'; and
XbaI-Plag1C241, 5'-ACTGTCTAGACAGAAGCTCTTGATTGTGAC-3'. To clone the
putative NLS1 (SGKRKRGE) into the SacII/XbaI site
of pHM829 vector, the following oligonucleotides were used: oligoNLSup,
5'-GGTCAGGGAAACGTAAGCGTGGTGAAT-3', and oligoNLSlow,
5'-CTAGATTCACCACGCTTACGTTTCCCTGACCGC-3'. Mutations of the NLS motifs
within GST-PLAG1-(N2-C244),
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(2-500)-GFP, and
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(2-42)-GFP constructs were performed as
described in the Stratagene protocol for PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis. To mutate the first candidate NLS motif
22KRKR25 into
22KAAR25, the following primers were
used: mutaNLS1-up,
5'-CCTTCAGGGAAAGCTGCGCGTGGTGAAACC-3', and
mutaNLS1-low,
5'-GGTTTCACCACGCGCAGCTTTCCCTGAAGG-3'. To mutate the second candidate NLS motif 29KPKR32 into
29KPAA32, we used the following primers:
mutaNLS2-up,
5'-GGTGAAACCAAACCAGCAGCTAACTTTCCTTGCCAAC-3', and
mutaNLS2-low, 5'-GTTGGCAAGGAAAGTTAGCTGCTTGGTTTGGTTTCACC-3'. The frame and mutations in all of the newly synthesized
constructs were verified by sequencing.
and Leu
). The "bait" construct
consisted of the N-terminal part of human PLAG1- (N2-C70) cloned into
the yeast vector pGBT9 (CLONTECH). This vector
allows the fusion of the protein of interest to the C-terminal end of
the GAL4 DNA-binding domain and contains TRP1 reporter gene for selection of transformants. The PLAG1 bait construct did not show autonomous transcriptional activation and hence was a good
candidate for the detection of protein interactions in the yeast
two-hybrid transcriptional activation assay. An oligo(dT)
and
randomly primed "prey" cDNA library from 12.5-day-old embryonic mice cloned into the pACT2 vector was kindly provided by Drs. K. Verschueren and D. Huylebroeck (University of Leuven and Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology, Belgium). The pACT2 vector allows the fusion of proteins to the C-terminal end of the major
GAL4 activation domain and contains LEU2 for selection of
transformants. 1 × 109 CG-1945 yeast were transformed
with 66 µg of bait-DNA and 33 µg of prey-library-DNA using a LiAc
high efficiency transformation protocol (12). This yeast strain
contains the HIS3 and lacZ reporter genes under
the control of promoters containing GAL4 binding sites. Transformants
were grown for 10 days at 30 °C on triple selective (lacking Trp,
Leu, and His) synthetic dropout (SD
) agar plates
containing 5 mM 3-aminotriazol (Sigma). Double
transformed His+ yeast colonies were restreaked on new
SD
agar plates and grown for another 24-48 h. For the
qualitative measurement of
-galactosidase activity, colony lift
filter assays were performed according to standard protocols. Plasmid
DNA was isolated from positive (blue) colonies by glass bead lysis,
extraction with phenol/chloroform, and ethanol precipitation and
subsequently used to transform the Escherichia coli strain
HB101 (Leu
) by electroporation. pACT2 plasmids containing
different inserts as analyzed by PCR amplification and BglII
digestion were reassayed by cotransformation into yeast-competent cells
with either the PLAG1-pGBT9 construct, the empty pGBT9 vector, or pGBT9
containing an unrelated cDNA insert (human lamin C) shown to
interact in a two-hybrid assay with an independent protein. Plasmids
that generated colonies on SD
agar plates and were only
positive in the X-gal filter assay with the PLAG1 bait construct
were considered for further analysis.
2
cDNA in the pET15b vector (generously provided by Dr. M. Waterman,
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, College of Medicine,
University of California, Irvine, CA) was used to prepare
in vitro synthesized [35S]methionine-labeled
karyopherin
2 protein. The in vitro translation reaction
was carried out using the TNT T7 Quick-coupled
transcription/translation system (Promega) following the
manufacturer's instructions. Bacterial expression constructs were made
using the pGEX-5X-2 vector, directing the synthesis of GST fused to
different parts of PLAG1. The fusion proteins were purified according
to supplier's instructions and verified by SDS-PAGE. The different
PLAG1 fusion proteins or GST alone as negative control were bound to
glutathione-agarose beads. Equal amounts of these GST fusion proteins
(~20 µg) were incubated with 10 µl of in vitro
synthesized [35S]methionine-labeled full-length
karyopherin
2 protein in 500 µl of NENT500 buffer (500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% Nonidet P-40). This mixture was tumbled for
1 h at 4 °C. Subsequently, the beads were washed four times in
500 µl of NENT500 buffer, resuspended in 30 µl of
SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and incubated at 95 °C for 2 min. Proteins
were size-separated on SDS-PAGE, and interacting karyopherin
2 was
detected by autoradiography.
-galactosidase-PLAG1-GFP fusion
proteins. Cell lines were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium/F12 (1:1) (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
and cultured at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2 As a PLAG1-interacting Protein
via a Yeast Two-hybrid Assay--
The yeast two-hybrid assay was used
to identify proteins interacting with the N-terminal part of
PLAG1-(2-70) (Fig. 1). Approximately 160,000 colonies were screened on triple selective (lacking Trp, Leu,
and His) agar and subsequently on X-gal filters. Thirty colonies were
retained as candidates for specifying PLAG1-interacting proteins. Different prey plasmids were isolated from these yeast colonies. The
plasmids were subsequently reassayed by cotransformation into yeast-competent cells with either the PLAG1 pGBT9 construct, the empty
pGBT9, or pGBT9 containing an unrelated cDNA insert. Three independent prey plasmids generated yeasts that were able to grow on
SD
agar plates and that were only positive in the X-gal
filter assay with the PLAG1 bait construct. All three prey plasmids
contained an insert of ~2 kb, which upon nucleotide sequence analysis
appeared to encode mouse karyopherin
2 (GenBankTM
accession number AAH06720) starting at amino acid 38. This
N-terminal truncated protein lacks a part of the importin
-binding
domain but still contains the armadillo repeats responsible for the
binding to the NLS.

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Overview of human PLAG1 domain
structure. The diagram indicates the location of the
trans-activation domain and the seven zinc fingers
(F). The fingers shown in bold (fingers 3, 6, and
7) are essential for DNA binding. Different isoforms of the protein are
predicted starting either at methionine 83 or methionine 100. The
N-terminal fragment of PLAG1-(2-70) was used as a bait in the yeast
two-hybrid screen. The two NLSs as predicted by Psort are
depicted.
2 Binds to PLAG1 and not to PLAGL1 or PLAGL2 in a
GST Pull-down Assay--
To confirm the physical interaction between
karyopherin
2 and PLAG1, we carried out a GST pull-down assay using
in vitro translated full-length mouse
[35S]karyopherin
2 and PLAG-(2-244) fused to GST. As
shown in Fig. 2, karyopherin
2 bound
strongly to GST-PLAG1-(2-244), while it did not bind to GST used as a
control. Moreover, GST-PLAG1-(84-244), lacking the N-terminal PLAG1
segment used in the two-hybrid screen, failed to interact with
karyopherin
2. Together, these results confirm the interaction
between karyopherin
2 and PLAG1 identified in the two-hybrid assay
and moreover show that this interaction is specific for the N-terminal
region PLAG1-(2-84). As PLAG1 is a member of the highly conserved PLAG
subfamily of zinc finger proteins, which includes PLAGL1 and PLAGL2, we
were interested in whether these proteins could interact with
karyopherin
2. To determine this possibility, we studied the
interaction of karyopherin
2 with PLAGL1 and PLAGL2 in a GST
pull-down experiment. As shown in Fig. 2, GST-PLAGL1-(2-215) and
GST-PLAGL2-(2-250) did not interact with karyopherin
2 in contrast
with the strong interaction between GST-PLAG1-(2-244) and karyopherin
2.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Karyopherin
2 binds
to GST-PLAG1-(N2-C244) in a GST pulldown assay. A,
autoradiograph of 35S-labeled full-length karyopherin
2
recovered after interaction with GST alone, GST-PLAG1-(84-244),
GST-PLAG1-(2-244), GST-PLAGL1-(2-215), and GST-PLAGL2-(2-250). 10%
of the input amount of 35S-labeled karyopherin
2 used in
the GST pull-down assay is shown in the input lane.
B, 5% of the input amount of GST fusion proteins used in
the GST pull-down assay was put on SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie
Blue staining. The upper band of GST-PLAG1 corresponds to
the full-length fusion, and the lower band is the result of
site-specific cleavage of PLAG1 fusion proteins.
2
is implicated in active nuclear import of various proteins via
interaction with a NLS (13), consisting of short stretches of basic
amino acids. The identification of karyopherin
2 as a
PLAG1-interacting protein suggests that the interaction is mediated via
a nuclear localization signal in PLAG1. An analysis of PLAG1 on the
Psort server (psort.nibb.ac.jp/) identified two candidate NLS
consensus signals, KRKR and KPKR, positioned at amino acids 22-25 and
29-32, respectively (Fig. 1).
2--
Previous studies have shown that mutagenesis of the basic
residues within an NLS motif eliminates karyopherin
2 recognition. Therefore, we mutated the candidate NLS motifs in GST-PLAG1-(2-244) by
replacing two basic residues with alanines and analyzed the PLAG1-karyopherin
2 interaction in a GST pull-down assay (Fig. 3). The mutation of putative NLS1 of
PLAG1 eliminated the interaction with karyopherin
2
(mNLS1). In contrast, the mutation of the predicted NLS2 did
not affect the binding of karyopherin
2 to GST-PLAG1
(mNLS2). As expected, the mutation of both predicted NLSs
eliminated the interaction between PLAG1 and karyopherin
2
(mNLS1+2). These data show that NLS1 of PLAG1 is involved in karyopherin
2 interaction, whereas NLS2 is not.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The predicted NLS1 of GST-PLAG1-(N2-C244) is
essential for karyopherin
2 binding.
A, autoradiograph of 35S-labeled full-length
karyopherin
2 recovered after interaction with GST-PLAG1-(2-244)
(WT), GST-PLAG1-(2-244) with mutated NLS1
(mNLS1), GST-PLAG1-(2-244) with mutated NLS2
(mNLS2), and GST-PLAG1-(2-244) with mutated NLS1 and
mutated NLS2 (mNLS1+2). 10% of the input amount of
35S-labeled karyopherin
2 used in the GST pull-down
assay is shown in the input lane. B, 5% of the
input amount of GST fusion proteins used in the GST pull-down assay was
loaded on SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie Blue staining. The
upper band of GST-PLAG1 corresponds to the full-length
fusion, and the lower band is the result of site-specific
cleavage of PLAG1 fusion proteins.
2 is involved in active
nuclear import via physical interaction with its cargo, PLAG1 is likely
to be such a cargo protein and therefore is expected to localize to the
nucleus. We recently showed that exogenous PLAG1 transfected in COS-1
kidney fibroblast cells is localized in the nucleus (5). In addition,
immunofluorescence on cultured pleomorphic adenoma cells of the
salivary gland with PLAG1-specific antibodies shows nuclear
localization of the endogenous PLAG1 protein (Fig.
4). To assess the role of the predicted
NLSs in vivo, we monitored the intracellular localization in
293T cells of various
-galactosidase-PLAG1-GFP fusion proteins by
fluorescence microscopy. Whereas wild-type PLAG1 fusion protein was
found exclusively in the nucleus of all transfected cells (Fig.
5, panel A), the
mutation of putative NLS1 resulted in a heterogenic picture with 56%
of the cells showing only nuclear fluorescence, 28% only cytoplasmic,
and 16% both nuclear and cytoplasmic fluorescence (Fig. 5, panel
B). The mutation of predicted NLS2 had no effect on the nuclear
localization of the fusion protein (Fig. 5, panel C). The
effect of the mutation in NLS1 was even more pronounced when we fused
only the N-terminal segment of PLAG1-(2-41) to
-galactosidase
and GFP. A complete shift from exclusively nuclear localization for the
wild-type fusion (Fig. 5, panel E) to exclusively
cytoplasmic localization for the NLS1 mutant (Fig. 5, panel
F) was observed. Again, the mutation of predicted NLS2 resulted in
a picture indistinguishable from the wild-type fusion (Fig. 5,
panel G). In addition, the fusion of only eight amino acids
including the predicted NLS1 (SGKRKRGE) to the
-galactosidase-GFP converted this exclusively cytoplasmic protein to
an exclusively nuclear one (Fig. 5, panel I). Taken
together, these results show the functional importance of NLS1 for
active nuclear import of PLAG1, whereas we could not demonstrate a role
for NLS2.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Endogenous PLAG1 is localized in the nucleus
of tumor cells. Immunofluorescence of cultured pleomorphic
adenoma cells from the salivary gland with PLAG1-specific antibodies
(PEM190) and Texas Red-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibodies. Nuclei
are stained with DAPI.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The intracellular localization of
various
-galactosidase-PLAG1-GFP fusion
proteins in transiently transfected 293T cells. Fluorescence of
293T cells transfected with
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(full-length,
wild-type)-GFP (A);
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(full-length,
NLS1-mutated)-GFP (B);
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(full-length,
NLS2-mutated)-GFP (C);
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(full-length,
NLS1- and NLS2-mutated)-GFP (D);
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(2-41, wild-type)-GFP (E);
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(2-41, NLS1-mutated)-GFP (F);
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(2-41, NLS2-mutated)-GFP (G);
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(2-41, NLS1- and NLS2-mutated)-GFP
(H);
-galactosidase-(SGKRKRGE)-GFP (I);
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(244-500)-GFP (J); and
-galactosidase-PLAG1-(42-242)-GFP (K). All nuclei
showed blue fluorescence after DAPI staining. The
intracellular localization of the corresponding
-galactosidase-PLAG1-GFP fusion proteins in terms of percentage is
shown in the table. For each different fusion protein around
100 cells was evaluated by fluorescent microscopy and classified as
having either green fluorescence exclusively in the nucleus
(N) or exclusively in the cytoplasm (C) or both
in nucleus and cytoplasm (N + C).
-galactosidase and GFP did not completely inhibit
nuclear import as shown above. Indeed, 72% of the transfected cells
still showed nuclear localization of the fusion proteins (Fig. 5). In
contrast, the same NLS1 mutation in the N-terminal segment of
PLAG1-(2-41) fully inhibited nuclear import. These results indicate
the presence of another motif in PLAG1 that can determine active
nuclear localization independently of NLS1. To pinpoint this motif,
several PLAG1 deletion constructs were assessed for nuclear import. A
-galactosidase-PLAG1-GFP fusion protein containing the C-terminal
activation domain PLAG1-(244-500) failed to enter the nucleus (Fig. 5,
panel J). On the other hand, the fusion of the zinc finger
domain without the N-terminal part PLAG1-(41-242) gave a heterogenic
picture (Fig. 5, panel K) with 47% of the transfected cells
showing exclusive nuclear fluorescence, 33% exclusive cytoplasmic, and
20% both nuclear and cytoplasmic fluorescence (Fig. 5). As such, these
data assign a functional role in nuclear import to this region despite
its apparent lack of an NLS motif and its failure to interact with
karyopherin
2 in the GST pull-down assay (Fig. 2,
GST-PLAG1-(84-244)).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2 or Kpna2 (also called pendulin)
(GenbankTM accession number AAH06720), a member of the
importin family, was identified as a PLAG1-interacting protein in a
yeast two-hybrid screen. Karyopherin
2 is implicated in active
nuclear import of various proteins by interaction with a NLS (13). A
conventional nuclear localization sequence consists of short stretches
of basic amino acids, either a single stretch (i.e.
monopartite NLS) or two stretches separated by a spacer region
(i.e. bipartite). Importin
proteins deliver their
NLS-tagged cargo into the nucleus through interaction with importin
. Importin
docks the karyopherin-cargo complex with the nuclear
pore followed by translocation of the complex through the pore via an
energy-dependent process. In the nucleus the
karyopherin/cargo complex dissociates, after which the karyopherins
recycle to the cytoplasm. Karyopherin
2 consists of an N-terminal
hydrophilic importin
-binding domain (14-16) and a hydrophobic
central region composed of armadillo repeats, which bind to the NLS
motif (17-19).
2. The second is the
zinc finger domain of PLAG1, which is responsible for DNA binding. This
domain can also localize the protein to the nucleus, although no
candidate NLS consensus signals could be identified using Psort.
The mechanism by which this domain targets PLAG1 to the nucleus, either
by direct interaction with one of the several importin
proteins or
indirectly via proteins that bind to the zinc finger domain, is still
unknown. Such redundancy in nuclear targeting is not uncommon for
transcription factors, enzymes, or structural proteins whose nuclear
import is essential. A seemingly superfluous NLS was found in the
42-kDa B-cell-specific activator protein. The N-terminal DNA-binding
domain termed the paired box and a defined NLS in the central domain of
B-cell-specific activator protein are redundant in nuclear targeting of
B-cell-specific activator protein (20). Multiple functional NLSs
were identified in DNA topoisomerases I, II
, and II
(21, 22). The
histone H10 contains multiple sequence elements for
nuclear targeting (23).
-galactosidase and GFP adds an additional 102 kDa (75 and 27 kDa,
respectively) to the molecular mass, thus severely impairing if not
completely preventing passive diffusion.
2 in vitro. In addition, an analysis with
Psort did not reveal candidate NLS consensus signals in PLAGL1 or
PLAGL2. Nevertheless, both are shown to be nuclear proteins (9, 24), in
agreement with their function as transcription factors. It is possible
that their zinc finger domain is responsible for their nuclear import.
2 in a GST pull-down assay. In
these isoforms, the zinc finger domain probably ensures nuclear targeting.
2 is not exclusive. PLAG1 has to compete with other
NLS-containing cargo proteins for karyopherin
2 in order to be
transported into the nucleus. Some import substrates such as small
nuclear ribonuclear proteins, histones, and ribosomal subunits
are imported into the nucleus in high but relatively constant amounts,
whereas other import substrates such as transcription factors are only
required in the nucleus for short periods in small amounts in response
to specific cellular signals. The mechanisms inducing rapid changes in
signal binding affinity such as phosphorylation or intermolecular
masking are essential to ensure dynamic exchanges between nucleus and
cytoplasm. In the case of PLAG1, it seems that the protein uses the
nuclear import machinery to transport all of the highly overexpressed
PLAG1 protein into the nucleus despite the competition with other cargo
proteins. Therefore, it seems that either PLAG1 is not regulated at the
level of nuclear import and is always rapidly transported into the
nucleus to affect its target genes or the mechanism that decreases the
binding affinity and allows competition of other NLS-containing
proteins is not functional in 293T cells.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
lrente
Kas-programma voor Kankeronderzoek.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
, synthetic
dropout;
DAPI, 4'-6-diamine-2-phenylindole-dihydrochloride;
IGF-II, insulin-like growth factor II gene.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Kas, K.,
Roijer, E.,
Voz, M.,
Meyen, E.,
Stenman, G.,
and Van de Ven, W. J.
(1997)
Genomics
43,
349-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Voz, M. L.,
Astrom, A. K.,
Kas, K.,
Mark, J.,
Stenman, G.,
and Van de Ven, W. J.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1409-1416[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Astrom, A. K.,
Voz, M. L.,
Kas, K.,
Roijer, E.,
Wedell, B.,
Mandahl, N.,
Van de Ven, W.,
Mark, J.,
and Stenman, G.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
918-923 4.
Kas, K.,
Voz, M. L.,
Hensen, K.,
Meyen, E.,
and Van de Ven, W. J. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23026-23032 5.
Voz, M. L.,
Agten, N. S.,
Van de Ven, W. J.,
and Kas, K.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
106-113 6.
Spengler, D.,
Villalba, M.,
Hoffmann, A.,
Pantaloni, C.,
Houssami, S.,
Bockaert, J.,
and Journot, L.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
2814-2825[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Abdollahi, A.,
Godwin, A. K.,
Miller, P. D.,
Getts, L. A.,
Schultz, D. C.,
Taguchi, T.,
Testa, J. R.,
and Hamilton, T. C.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
2029-2034 8.
Abdollahi, A.,
Roberts, D.,
Godwin, A. K.,
Schultz, D. C.,
Sonoda, G.,
Testa, J. R.,
and Hamilton, T. C.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
1973-1979[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Varrault, A.,
Ciani, E.,
Apiou, F.,
Bilanges, B.,
Hoffmann, A.,
Pantaloni, C.,
Bockaert, J.,
Spengler, D.,
and Journot, L.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
8835-8840 10.
Debiec-Rychter, M.,
Van Valckenborgh, I.,
Van Den Broeck, C.,
Hagemeijer, A.,
Van De Ven, W. J.,
Kas, K.,
Van Damme, B.,
and Voz, M. L.
(2001)
Lab. Invest.
81,
1289-1297[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Sorg, G.,
and Stamminger, T.
(1999)
Biotechniques
26,
858-862[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Gietz, R. D.,
Schiestl, R. H.,
Willems, A. R.,
and Woods, R. A.
(1995)
Yeast
11,
355-360[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Nakielny, S.,
and Dreyfuss, G.
(1999)
Cell
99,
677-690[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Gorlich, D.,
Henklein, P.,
Laskey, R. A.,
and Hartmann, E.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1810-1817[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Moroianu, J.,
Blobel, G.,
and Radu, A.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
6572-6576 16.
Weis, K.,
Ryder, U.,
and Lamond, A. I.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1818-1825[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Peifer, M.,
Berg, S.,
and Reynolds, A. B.
(1994)
Cell
76,
789-791[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Conti, E., Uy, M.,
Leighton, L.,
Blobel, G.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1998)
Cell
94,
193-204[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Kobe, B.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
388-397[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Kovac, C. R.,
Emelyanov, A.,
Singh, M.,
Ashouian, N.,
and Birshtein, B. K.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
16752-16757 21.
Mirski, S. E.,
Gerlach, J. H.,
and Cole, S. P.
(1999)
Exp. Cell Res.
251,
329-339[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Mo, Y. Y.,
Wang, C.,
and Beck, W. T.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
41107-41113 23.
Schwamborn, K.,
Albig, W.,
and Doenecke, D.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
244,
206-217[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Furukawa, T.,
Adachi, Y.,
Fujisawa, J.,
Kambe, T.,
Yamaguchi-Iwai, Y.,
Sasaki, R.,
Kuwahara, J.,
Ikehara, S.,
Tokunaga, R.,
and Taketani, S.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
4718-4727[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Nakai, A.,
and Ishikawa, T.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
34665-34671
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Heckl and U. Vogel Nuclear Trafficking of a Gadolinium Conjugate in Nude Mice Xenografted with Human LN-229 Glioma J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2006; 319(2): 657 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Heath, A.-L. Williamson, and E. P. Rybicki The Capsid Protein of Beak and Feather Disease Virus Binds to the Viral DNA and Is Responsible for Transporting the Replication-Associated Protein into the Nucleus J. Virol., July 15, 2006; 80(14): 7219 - 7225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Declercq, F. Van Dyck, C. V. Braem, I. C. Van Valckenborgh, M. Voz, M. Wassef, L. Schoonjans, B. Van Damme, L. Fiette, and W. J.M. Van de Ven Salivary Gland Tumors in Transgenic Mice with Targeted PLAG1 Proto-Oncogene Overexpression Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 65(11): 4544 - 4553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Shomron, M. Reznik, and G. Ast Splicing Factor hSlu7 Contains a Unique Functional Domain Required to Retain the Protein within the Nucleus Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2004; 15(8): 3782 - 3795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |