Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111901200 on March 18, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19720-19726, May 31, 2002
Clustered Charged Amino Acids of Human Adenosine
Deaminase Comprise a Functional Epitope for Binding the Adenosine
Deaminase Complexing Protein CD26/Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV*
Eva
Richard
§,
S. Munir
Alam
,
Francisco X.
Arredondo-Vega
,
Dhavalkumar D.
Patel
¶, and
Michael S.
Hershfield
**
From the Departments of
Medicine, ¶ Immunology,
and
Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center,
Durham, North Carolina 27710
Received for publication, December 13, 2001, and in revised form, January 29, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Human adenosine deaminase (ADA) occurs as a
41-kDa soluble monomer in all cells. On epithelia and lymphoid cells of
humans, but not mice, ADA also occurs bound to the membrane
glycoprotein CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV. This "ecto-ADA" has been
postulated to regulate extracellular Ado levels, and also the
function of CD26 as a co-stimulator of activated T cells. The
CD26-binding site of human ADA has been localized by homolog scanning
to the peripheral
2-helix (amino acids 126-143). Among the 5 non-conserved residues within this segment, Arg-142 in human and
Gln-142 in mouse ADA largely determined the capacity for stable binding
to CD26 (Richard, E., Arredondo-Vega, F. X., Santisteban,
I., Kelly, S. J., Patel, D. D., and Hershfield, M. S. (2000) J. Exp. Med. 192, 1223-1235). We have now
mutagenized conserved
2-helix residues in human and mouse ADA and
used surface plasmon resonance to evaluate binding kinetics to
immobilized rabbit CD26. In addition to Arg-142, we found that Glu-139
and Asp-143 of human ADA are also important for CD26 binding. Mutating
these residues to alanine increased dissociation rates 6-11-fold and
the apparent dissociation constant KD for wild type
human ADA from 17 to 112-160 nM, changing binding free
energy by 1.1-1.3 kcal/mol. This cluster of 3 charged residues appears
to be a "functional epitope" that accounts for about half of the
difference between human and mouse ADA in free energy of binding to CD26.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Adenosine deaminase
(ADA)1 catalyzes the
hydrolytic deamination of adenosine (Ado) and 2'-deoxyadenosine (dAdo).
The mouse enzyme structure consists of an 8-stranded
-barrel
surrounded by 8
-helixes, with the deep active site pocket and an
essential Zn2+ ion located at the carboxyl-terminal end of
the
-barrel (1). In humans, ADA occurs as a soluble 41-kDa monomer
in all tissues. An "ecto" form of ADA also occurs in some tissues
of humans and cattle, but not mice, which consists of up to two ADA
monomers bound to a homodimeric "ADA complexing protein" with
subunit of 110 kDa (2-5). The latter has been identified as
CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPPIV), or simply CD26, a multifunctional
membrane glycoprotein expressed on epithelia of liver, gut, kidney, and exocrine glands as well as on thymocytes and activated T lymphocytes (6, 7). CD26 has 6 NH2-terminal cytoplasmic and 22 transmembrane amino acids; the 738-residue extracellular portion has a
proximal glycosylated segment, a cysteine-rich domain, and a
COOH-terminal region that contains the DPPIV active site. Several
mostly hydrophobic amino acids located in the cysteine-rich domain of
human CD26 have been implicated in ADA binding (8, 9). No structural information is available for CD26 from any source.
The DPPIV ectopeptidase of CD26 cleaves substrates with Pro or Ala at
the penultimate position. Studies of rat strains and knockout mice
lacking DPPIV suggest that it functions in the hydrolysis/absorption of
prolyl dipeptides and in regulating the biologic activity of some
hormones and chemokines (10-12). CD26 has been shown to act as a
"co-stimulator" of antigen receptor-mediated activation of thymocytes and T lymphocytes (13-15). There is conflicting evidence about whether DPPIV activity influences the co-stimulatory function of
CD26 (16, 17). The possible role of "ecto-ADA" bound to CD26 in the
development and maintenance of immune function has also been a subject
of interest.
In humans, the highest levels of ADA occur in lymphoid cells, and
inherited ADA deficiency causes profound lymphocyte depletion, resulting in the fatal disorder severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)
(18, 19). This condition has usually been attributed to toxic
intracellular effects of Ado and dAdo. It has also been postulated that
in the absence of ADA, elevated extracellular Ado might impair
lymphocyte differentiation and function by causing aberrant signal
transduction via G-protein-coupled Ado receptors (reviewed in Ref. 19).
It has been suggested that ADA bound to CD26 controls levels of
extracellular Ado and thus modulates Ado receptor signaling, presumed
to be involved in T cell activation (7, 15, 20, 21). Alternatively, it
has been suggested that ADA binding to CD26, unrelated to ADA catalytic
activity, may be necessary for the co-stimulatory function of CD26 (21, 22).
Speculation that defective ADA-CD26 binding contributes to the
pathogenesis of ADA-deficient SCID in humans prompted us to characterize the CD26-binding site of human ADA and to examine the
effects of patient-derived ADA mutations on CD26 binding (23). For
these studies, we exploited the observation that mouse ADA, although
83% identical in sequence to the human enzyme, is unable to form a
stable complex with CD26 (5, 24, 25). By using a panel of recombinant
human-mouse ADA hybrids, we localized the CD26-binding site of human
ADA to the carboxyl-terminal end of an 18-amino acid segment, residues
126-143 (23). In mouse ADA this segment forms the peripheral
2-helix, located on the face opposite to the entrance to the active
site pocket (1). Arg-142 in human ADA and Gln-142 in mouse ADA largely
determined the capacity to bind CD26. ADA from a healthy adult whose
only expressed ADA allele carries the R142Q mutation (26) showed
markedly reduced binding to CD26 (23). These findings suggested that,
as in the mouse, ADA binding to CD26 is not essential for normal immune function.
Our previous "homolog scanning" strategy focused on the 5 of 18 residues in the
2-helix at which the human and mouse ADA sequences
have diverged. The methods used (gel filtration, nondenaturing PAGE,
and immunoassay of cell-associated ADA) could detect only stable
ADA-CD26 complexes. In the present study we have used alanine scanning
mutagenesis (27) to evaluate the role in binding of conserved amino
acids found in both human and mouse ADA, and we have used the more
sensitive surface plasmon resonance (SPR) technique to evaluate kinetic
and equilibrium binding constants.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Protein Reagents--
CD26/DPPIV was purified from rabbit
kidneys, and DPPIV activity was assayed, as described (23). The two
purified preparations used had DPPIV-specific activity of 7,667 or
7,883 µmol/min/mg and were essentially free of contaminating ADA
activity. Purified recombinant human CD4 protein was obtained from
Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tarrytown, NY). The 1C5 mouse mAb to
purified human T lymphoblast ADA was prepared in this
laboratory2; its binding
specificity has been reported (23). Goat antibody to human ADA was a
gift of Dr. Dan Wiginton, University of Cincinnati.
Construction and Expression of ADA Mutants--
Wild type human
and mouse ADA cDNAs and several mutant ADA cDNAs involving
amino acids 126-143 (Fig. 1) were available from a previous study
(23). Alanine substitutions were introduced into the wild type human
ADA cDNA by PCR mutagenesis essentially as described (28, 29). All
final ADA cDNA PCR products were cloned into pBluescript II KS and
fully sequenced using the ABI 377 PRISM DNA Sequencing Instrument
(Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
[35S]Methionine-labeled ADA was generated in
vitro from ADA cDNAs in pBluescript, using the TNT Coupled
Wheat Germ Extract System (Promega, Madison, WI). Translation products
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography, and they were also
electrophoresed on cellulose acetate and stained for ADA activity
in situ as described previously (28).
ADA cDNAs were ligated into the NcoI site of pZ plasmid
(derived from pZC11 from which wild type human ADA cDNA had been
excised (30)). pZ/ADA plasmids were used to transform Escherichia
coli SØ3834, which has a deletion of the bacterial ADA gene (30). The conditions used for expression are as reported previously (23, 29),
except that lysates of pZ/ADA cDNA-transformed E. coli
SØ3834 from 100-ml cultures were dialyzed at 4 °C against 2 mM KCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM
KH2PO4, 8 mM
Na2HPO4, pH 7.4 (PBS). ADA activity in these
extracts was assayed, and ADA protein was analyzed by Western blotting
using goat anti-human ADA antiserum and also the 1C5 mouse mAb to human
ADA, as described previously (23).
The concentration of ADA proteins in E. coli SØ3834 lysates
is based on assay of ADA activity and a specific activity of 436.1 µmol/min/mg determined for human ADA from human T lymphoblasts, which
was purified to homogeneity by ion exchange and adenosine-Sepharose affinity chromatography.2 Our previous studies indicate
that recombinant human and mouse ADA have the same catalytic activity
per molecule (23).
Analysis of ADA-CD26 Binding--
Binding of
[35S]Met-labeled ADA in vitro translation
products to rabbit CD26/DPPIV (2 nmol/min DPPIV activity) during a 2-h incubation at 37 °C was analyzed by non-denaturing PAGE as reported previously (23). Binding of recombinant ADA in lysates of E. coli SØ3834 to the CD26-expressing, ADA-deficient,
HTLV-1-transformed AlNe human T lymphoblastoid cell line (LCL) was
assessed by flow cytometry with the 1C5 mAb to human ADA as reported
previously (23).
SPR analysis of ADA binding to purified rabbit kidney CD26/DPPIV was
performed with a BIAcore 3000 instrument (BIAcore, Uppsala, Sweden).
For these studies, rabbit kidney CD26 and recombinant human CD4
glycoprotein (a nonspecific control) were coupled to the CM-dextran
surface of separate flow cells of the same Research Grade CM5 Sensor
Chip, using amine coupling reagents provided by the manufacturer. PBS
was used as running buffer at a flow rate of 15 µl/min. Immediately
prior to immobilization, rabbit CD26/DPPIV (140 µg/ml in PBS) was
diluted 2-fold with 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 3.7, and CD4
(1 mg/ml) was diluted with 3 volumes of 10 mM sodium
acetate, pH 4.0. Then 20 µl of the CD26 and 30 µl of CD4 solutions
were injected at a flow rate of 5 µl/min to immobilize ~4000-6000
response units (RU) of these proteins, after which residual coupling
sites were blocked with ethanolamine. A third flow cell of the CM5 Chip
underwent activation and blocking, but without protein, and served as a
blank surface for subtracting bulk, nonspecific signal.
Interaction kinetics were determined at 25 °C by injecting 45 µl
of lysates of E. coli SØ3834-expressing wild type or mutant ADA proteins at a flow rate of 15 µl/min. The dissociation phase was
examined for 5 min. At the end of each cycle, bound ADA was removed,
and the chip was regenerated by injecting 5 µl of 10 mM
glycine HCl, pH 3, at 100 µl/min. (CD26 was sensitive to the pH of
the regeneration buffer. Buffers with pH >3 did not remove bound ADA,
and pH <3 destabilized the CD26 surface. Under the conditions used,
CD26 immobilized on the flow cell was stable for 24-28 cycles.)
ADA-containing lysates were diluted 2-, 4-, and 8-fold with PBS
containing BSA (1 mg/ml), and 4 concentrations of each ADA protein were
examined for each binding analysis. Typically, 150-600 RU of ADA
protein were bound to the immobilized CD26/DPPIV. Specific signal due
to ADA binding was derived by subtracting the RU obtained with the CD4
or no-protein blank flow cells from the response obtained with the CD26
flow cell. Due to the number of ADA mutants, experiments were performed
with several CM5 chips. Results were confirmed by testing several
different preparations of individual recombinant ADA proteins; in all
experiments wild type human ADA was also run as a reference. The
kinetic parameters of the binding reactions were determined using
BIAevaluation 3.1 software, using the 1:1 interaction model.
For determining the equilibrium dissociation
(Keq) constant for wild type human ADA, CD26 was
immobilized at 1200 RU. ADA at concentrations of 0.35, 0.14, 0.07, 0.035, and 0.0175 µM was injected at 45 µl/min.
Keq was calculated from the slope of a Scatchard
plot of the data corrected for nonspecific binding.
 |
RESULTS |
Mutagenesis and Expression of ADA in E. coli SØ3834--
We
showed previously that replacing the entire
2-helix (residues
126-143) of human ADA with the corresponding murine segment abolished
stable binding of human ADA to purified rabbit kidney CD26, as assessed
by gel filtration fast protein liquid chromatography (23). No
human-to-mouse replacements outside this segment diminished CD26
binding. Among the single human-to-mouse substitutions at the 5 non-conserved positions within the
2-helix, replacing Arg-142 of
human ADA with mouse Gln caused the largest reduction in stable binding
to rabbit CD26 (23). We have now evaluated the effects of these
mutations, as well as mutations of conserved residues within the
2-helix, on CD26 binding using SPR.
The human ADA mutants studied include alanine substitutions for
Gln-135, Gln-138, Glu-139, Gly-140, Glu-141, Arg-142, and Asp-143 (Fig.
1). In the mouse ADA structure, residues
at all of these positions (except Gly-140) have surface-exposed side chains (1). We also substituted Lys and Glu for Arg-142 to evaluate the
importance of charge. When expressed in E. coli SØ3834 under standardized conditions, all of these mutants had substantial ADA
activity, ranging from 35 to 96% that obtained with wild type human
cDNA (Table I). Western blots of
equal amounts of ADA activity indicated that the ADA mutants all have
essentially the same activity per molecule as wild type human ADA (Fig.
2). Thus, none of these mutations appears
to cause a major conformational change.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Western blot of recombinant human
ADA mutants with mAb 1C5 to human ADA. All lanes in both
A and B were loaded with the same amount of ADA
activity (42 nmol/min). A, lane 1, wild type
human ADA; lane 2, E128D; lane
3, A131D; lane 4, G134N;
lane 5, Q135A; lane 6,
Q138A; lane 7, E139A; lane
8, G140A; lane 9, E141A;
lane 10, R142Q; and lane
11, D143A. B, lane 1, wild
type human ADA; lane 2, R142A; lane
3, R142K; lane 4, R142E;
lane 5, R142Q/D143A; lane
6, E128D/R142Q; lane 7,
E128D/R142Q/D143A; lane 8,
E128D/A131D/R142Q/D143A; and lane 9,
H1-125/M126-143/H144-363.
|
|
In preliminary studies, we explored the ability to express and purify
human ADA as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase and as a histidine-tagged derivative. In neither case could
catalytically active wild type ADA protein be obtained in good yield.
Because the SPR method has been used for studying complex mixtures
(31-33), we performed our binding studies with crude lysates of
ADA-expressing E. coli SØ3834 cells. Appropriate controls
reported in our earlier studies (23, 29) and described below establish
the validity of the results obtained.
Binding of Recombinant ADAs to Rabbit CD26--
We used a Biacore
3000 instrument to assess the kinetics of ADA/CD26 binding by SPR
measurements. In these studies, we monitored simultaneously the binding
of ADA in lysates of E. coli SØ3834 to immobilized rabbit
CD26, human CD4 glycoprotein (nonspecific control), and to a control
flow cell with no immobilized protein (Fig.
3A). None of the
ADA-containing lysates studied showed significant binding to CD4 or to
the no-protein control flow cell, and lysate prepared from
untransformed E. coli SØ3834 did not show binding to CD26
(not shown), indicating that interaction of ADA with CD26 was
specific.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
BIAcore analysis of the interaction of wild
type (Wt) human and mouse ADA with immobilized rabbit
CD26. A, human ADA (1.3 µM) was
pumped over flow cells of a single CM5 chip on which the following had
been immobilized: 1, rabbit CD26 (circles and
dashed line); 2, human CD4 glycoprotein
(triangles); 3, no-protein control (no
symbol); 4, specific signal for binding of wild type
human ADA to CD26, derived by subtracting the RU obtained with the CD4
flow cell from response obtained with the CD26 flow cell.
B, kinetic analysis of binding of human ADA to CD26
(concentrations of ADA are indicated). Data shown are from one of four
experiments. C, Scatchard analysis of equilibrium
binding data for binding of human ADA to rabbit CD26 (see
"Experimental Procedures" for details). The data were obtained in a
separate experiment from that shown in B. D,
kinetic analysis of binding of mouse ADA to CD26 (concentrations of ADA
injected are indicated). Data shown are from one of three experiments.
RU, response units; C, concentration,
µM; Keq, equilibrium binding
constant.
|
|
A sensorgram obtained with wild type human ADA over the range 0.15-1.3
µM (Fig. 3B) demonstrates high affinity
binding to rabbit CD26, characterized by a rapid association rate
(kon) of 2.2 ± 0.2 × 104
M
1 s
1, and a slower
dissociation rate (koff) of 3.8 ± 0.4 × 10
4 s
1. The apparent equilibrium
dissociation constant (KD, based on
koff/kon) was 17 ± 3 nM (mean ± S.D. of 3 separate experiments) (Table
II). Very similar rates were obtained in
experiments performed with two different preparations of purified
rabbit CD26 and with human ADA from several different E. coli SØ3834 lysates. The dissociation constant determined under
equilibrium conditions (Keq) was 20 nM (Fig. 3C). These values for
Keq and apparent KD
determined by SPR are similar to previous estimates of 6-11
nM determined for the binding of 125I-labeled
human and bovine ADA to glutaraldehyde-fixed membranes prepared from
rabbit kidney cortex (5), and 12 nM for the binding of
125I-labeled bovine ADA to human CD26-expressing
transformed murine hybridoma cells (34).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Kinetics and affinities for binding of ADA to CD26
Hum or H, human; M, mouse. Data are mean ± S.D. from three or
more experiments.
|
|
By comparison with human ADA, wild type mouse ADA showed low affinity
binding to rabbit CD26, characterized by almost 5-fold slower
association and 50-fold faster dissociation rates, resulting in an
apparent KD of 5397 nM (Fig.
3D and Table II). The difference in free energy of binding
(
G) for wild type human and mouse ADA was 3.4 kcal/mol
(Fig. 4). Replacing amino acids 126-143
of human ADA with the murine
2-helix segment (construct H1-125/M126-143/H144-363 in Tables I and II) caused a large increase in koff (1.3 × 10
2
s-1), resulting in an apparent KD of
320 nM, almost 20-fold higher than for wild type human ADA
but 10-fold lower than for mouse ADA (Table II). The 
G
(relative to wild type human ADA) associated with this substitution was
1.8 kcal/mol (Fig. 4) or about half of the total difference in binding
energy for wild type mouse and human ADAs.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Contributions of residues to net binding
energy. The difference in free energy of binding to rabbit CD26
between wild type human ADA and the indicated human ADA mutants or wild
type mouse ADA ( G) are shown as solid bars.
The  G between wild type mouse ADA and the indicated
mouse ADA mutants is shown as open bars. Hum
(M126-143) is a derivative of human ADA in which amino acids
126-143 have been replaced with this segment from mouse ADA (referred
to as H1-125/M126-143/H144-363 in Tables I and II). Mus
(H126-143) is a derivative of mouse ADA in which amino acids
126-143 have been replaced with this segment from human ADA (referred
to as M1-125/H126-143/M144-352 in Tables I and II). All
 G values are derived from G values shown
in Table II. Positive  G values indicate that a
mutation decreased affinity for CD26, whereas negative
 G values indicate that affinity was increased.
|
|
The effects of point mutations within the 126-143 segment on binding
to rabbit CD26 are illustrated in Fig. 5
and summarized in Table II. The naturally occurring human-to-mouse
replacement R142Q had a minor effect on kon but
increased koff by 6-fold (Fig. 5, A
and E), resulting in an apparent KD of
113 nM. The R142A, R142K, and R142E mutations also showed
markedly reduced binding to CD26, due mainly to 9-16-fold increased
dissociation rates, resulting in apparent KD values
of 160, 176, and 192 nM, respectively (Table II). The

G values associated with these mutations were 1.3-1.4
kcal/mol (Fig. 4).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
BIAcore sensorgrams showing the interactions
of selected human ADA mutants with immobilized rabbit CD26.
A-D, kinetic analysis of binding (performed as
described in legend for Fig. 3B) with the following mutants:
A, R142Q; B, D143A; C, E139A; and
D, Q135A. E, comparison of representative
kinetic traces for wild type human ADA (1.3 µM), wild
type mouse ADA (1.5 µM), and the indicated human ADA
mutants: Q135A (1.6 µM), E139A (1.1 µM),
R142Q (0.8 µM), and D143A (1.1 µM). Data
shown are from one of two experiments with Q135A and three experiments
each for E139A, R142Q, and D143A. All analyses were performed with the
same biosensor chip, except for wild type mouse ADA.
|
|
Consistent with our earlier results (23), 3 of the other 4 human-to-mouse replacements within the 126-143 segment (E128D, A131D,
G134N) showed small effects (1.4-2.5-fold on KD; 
G
0.5 kcal/mol) on CD26 binding (Table II and Fig.
4). However, D143A had an apparent KD of 112 nM when measured by SPR, due mainly to an increase in
koff (Fig. 5, B and E).
Thus, R142Q and D143A reduced the affinity of human ADA for rabbit CD26
by the same magnitude (about 7-fold). The reason a larger effect was
not observed with D143A in our previous studies (23), which analyzed
binding by fast protein liquid chromatography, is unclear. However, the
effect observed with D143A using SPR was reproducible and consistent
with an inability to detect stable binding of the D143A protein to
rabbit CD26 by non-denaturing PAGE (data not presented). In other
experiments, only those human-to-mouse constructs that altered Arg-142
and Asp-143 diminished CD26 binding significantly. Those that altered
both residues (R142Q/D143A, E128D/R142Q/D143A, and
E128D/A131D/R142Q/D143A), like the construct that contained the entire
mouse 126-143 segment, markedly increased koff
to 1.2-1.6 × 10
2 s
1, resulting in
apparent KD values of 260-360 nM and

Gs of 1.7-1.8 kcal/mol (Fig. 4).
Effects Due to Alanine Mutagenesis of Conserved Amino
Acids--
The on-rate for the E139A mutant was similar to that of
wild type human ADA, but the complex with CD26 dissociated about
11-fold faster (Fig. 5, C and E), resulting in an
apparent KD of 160 nM (Table II). The

G of 1.3 kcal/mol due to E139A was similar to

G values of 1.3 and 1.1 kcal/mol for R142A and D143A, respectively (Fig. 4). The other Ala substitutions (Q135A, Q138A, G140A, and E141A) had small effects on CD26 binding (1.7-2.2-fold on
apparent KD; 
G
0.5 kcal/mol)
(Table II, Fig. 4, and Fig. 5, D and E). In other
studies not shown, the 35S-labeled in vitro
translation products of the Q135A, Q138A, G140A, and E141A mutants
showed normal binding to rabbit CD26 as assessed by nondenaturing PAGE.
The E139A, R142A, and D143A, as well as the R142K and R142E translation
products all showed no detectable binding by this method, as we
previously found with the R142Q mutant (23).
Introducing the Q142R mouse-to-human mutation in mouse ADA slightly
increased affinity for CD26 (apparent KD values of
3460 versus 5397 nM for wild type mouse ADA).
Making the double mutant Q142R/A143D or introducing the entire human
126-143 segment into mouse ADA decreased koff
by 5-fold, resulting in about a 10-fold decrease in apparent
KD to 661 and 591 nM, respectively (Table II). The 
G values for these substitutions,
relative to wild type mouse ADA, were
1.2 and
1.3 kcal/mol (Fig.
4).
Binding of Recombinant ADAs to Human T Cell-associated
CD26--
To examine binding to human CD26, we used the AlNe T LCL
derived from an immunodeficient patient homozygous for a splice site mutation in ADA intron 10, which results in a highly unstable mutant
ADA protein (35). AlNe cells express high levels of CD26, and in the
absence of exogenous ADA they do not bind anti-ADA mAb 1C5, as
determined by flow cytometry (Fig. 6,
A and B) (23). mAb 1C5 recognizes an epitope near
the COOH terminus of human ADA, which is absent in mouse ADA, and it
reacts approximately as well with all of the ADA mutants studied as
with the wild type human ADA (Fig. 2). Exogenous ADA activity bound to
AlNe cells has been found to partition between monomeric 41-kDa ADA and
a larger species that co-elutes with DPPIV activity (23).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Flow cytometric analysis of binding of
mAb 1C5 to AlNe human T LCL induced by exogenous ADA. A
and B, the AlNe cells in A had been incubated
with lysate of untransformed E. coli SØ3834, and those in
B with lysate of SØ3834 expressing wild type
(wt) human ADA (400 nmol/min per ml of medium). Subsequent
binding of mAb 1C5 is depicted by filled histograms. Also
shown in B is the binding of control IgG (open
histogram). C and D, binding of 1C5 mAb
induced by wild type human ADA or the indicated human ADA mutants. In
these experiments AlNe cells were incubated with 0.3-400 nmol/min of
ADA activity per ml of medium. After washing, cell surface-associated
ADA was determined by reactivity with mAb 1C5 using flow cytometry.
Results are from one of two experiments.
|
|
Incubating AlNe cells with 0.3-400 nmol/min (0.01-19.5
µM) of recombinant Q135A, Q138A, G140A, and E141A human
ADA mutants induced 1C5 mAb binding in a manner similar to that induced
by wild type human ADA, indicating essentially normal binding to CD26
(Fig. 6C). 1C5 binding was detected at all concentrations of
these proteins tested. Induction of 1C5 binding was reduced with the
E139A and D143A mutants and could not be detected at lower
concentrations of these proteins (Fig. 6C). At the highest concentration tested, 400 nmol/min (19.5 µM), wild type
ADA induced 20-fold more 1C5 binding than did E139A and 3.5-fold more
than D143A. Very similar results were found in a second experiment (not
shown). The effect of D143A (Fig. 6D) was similar to that obtained previously with the R142Q mutant (23). We also compared the
binding of R142A, R142K, and R142E mutants to AlNe cells. 1C5 binding
was not detected with these mutants at 0.3-42 nmol/min of ADA
activity. Wild type human ADA induced 65-fold more 1C5 binding than
R142A, 40-fold more than R142K, and 100-fold more than R142E mutant at
400 nmol/min ADA activity (Fig. 6D).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Protein-protein interfaces generally occupy a large area on the
surfaces of the interacting partners and have large patches of
hydrophobic residues (36-38). However, studies involving alanine scanning mutagenesis have indicated that a subset of residues within
interfaces makes a disproportionate contribution to binding energy
(39-41). "Functional epitopes" defined in this manner correspond well to conserved amino acids found by computer analysis to occur in
spatially similar environments in the crystal structures of complexes
involving members of protein "interface families" (42). Functional
epitopes often involve charged or polar amino acids that cluster into
"hot spots" near the center of the binding site, where they are
protected from interaction with bulk solvent by an "O-ring"
consisting of surrounding hydrophobic residues (41, 42).
The binding of human ADA to CD26 may fit this pattern. Thus, using
human-mouse hybrids (homolog scanning) in our previous study (23) and
alanine mutagenesis in the present work, we have shown that the ability
of human ADA to form a stable complex with CD26 is due largely to 3 charged amino acids, Glu-139, Arg-142, and Asp-143. These same 3 residues are conserved in bovine ADA (23), which also binds CD26 (for
reference, Fig. 7 shows the positions of
Glu-139, Gln-142, and Ala-143 at the carboxyl-terminal end of the
2-helix of mouse ADA). SPR analysis of binding after mutating
residues 139, 142, and 143 of human ADA to alanine shows that their
side chains each contribute 1.1-1.3 kcal/mol to binding of CD26. The
E139A and R142A mutations had equivalent effects on binding to both
rabbit CD26 and to human T LCL-associated CD26; the D143A mutation had
a somewhat weaker effect.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Location of the Glu-139, Gln-142, and Ala-143
residues in the mouse ADA crystal structure. The RasMol model uses
coordinates reported by Wilson et al. (1). Residues Glu-139,
Gln-142, and Ala-143 are identified; the rest of the 2-helix
(residues 126-138 and 140, 141) is shown as a gold
space-filling structure. For orientation, the carboxyl-terminal helix
(residues 337-351) is shown in light blue. The bound
inhibitor (green) and zinc ion (yellow) are shown
as space-filling structures at the active site (based on Fig. 3, see
Ref. 23).
|
|
The naturally occurring R142Q mutation, as well as the site-directed
Ala, Glu, and Lys mutations of Arg-142 all reduced the affinity of
human ADA to CD26, associated with 7-11-fold increased apparent
KD values and with 
G values of
1.1-1.4 kcal/mol. Thus, despite similar conformational restrictions
and configurational entropy of the side chains of Glu, Gln, Lys, and
Arg (43), these results indicate that the positively charged
guanidinium group of Arg-142 is critical for ADA binding to CD26. The
magnitude of the 
G values for the mutants studied
suggests that Arg-142 may be involved in a critical hydrogen bond
(44).
The number of human ADA residues that contact CD26 (the "structural
epitope") is probably much larger than the functional epitope we have
defined. Nevertheless, the sum of the 
G values for the
E139A, R142A, and D143A mutants, 3.7 kcal/mol, is essentially identical
to the 3.4 kcal/mol difference binding energy between human and mouse
ADA. Replacing only the 18-residue
2-helix of human ADA with that of
mouse ADA, which changes 5 residues but does not alter Glu-139, was
associated with a 
G of 1.8 kcal/mol, the same as for
the R142Q/D143A double mutant of human ADA. Thus, almost half of the
difference in binding energy between human and mouse ADA may be due to
other differences in their structures. Some residues of mouse ADA
outside the
2-helix may have an inhibitory effect on the interaction
with rabbit CD26. Consistent with this, introducing the human
2-helix into mouse ADA or making the Q142R/A143D mouse-to-human
double mutant changed the binding free energy of mouse ADA only by
about
1.3 kcal/mol.
Four residues located within an extracellular cysteine-rich domain of
human CD26 (Leu-294, Leu-340, Val-341, Ala-342, and Arg-343) have been
shown to be required for the binding of cell surface-associated human
CD26 to bovine ADA (8, 9). These results, and the observation that CD26
dissociated from an ADA-Sepharose affinity column at very low ionic
strength (45), led to the prediction (9) that nonconserved hydrophobic
residues of human ADA might be involved in binding to CD26 (possibly
Leu-346, Ala-350, and Gly-352 near the COOH terminus, which are,
respectively, Arg, Glu, and Gln in mouse ADA). However, replacing all
residues of human ADA beyond 247 with the COOH terminus of mouse ADA
did not alter binding to CD26 (23).
It is possible that Glu-139, Arg-142, and Asp-143 of human ADA interact
with charged residues of CD26. However, mutations that disrupt
electrostatic interactions between proteins generally alter
kon but not koff (46),
whereas the Ala mutations of these residues in ADA all had much larger
effects on koff. Also, in studies not presented
we observed <2-fold effects on the association rate when binding of
wild type human ADA to CD26 was studied at 20-300 mM NaCl.
Increasing ionic strength would be expected to cause a large decrease
in association rate if binding were driven by electrostatic attraction
(47, 48).
In summary, Glu-139, Arg-142, and Asp-143 clustered at the end of a
peripheral helical segment of human ADA comprise a functional epitope
for binding CD26. Rather than an electrostatic interaction, these
charged amino acids may interact with a largely hydrophobic region of
CD26, as has been observed in the complex of lysozyme with
anti-lysozyme mAb HyHEL-63 (49). A full definition of the ADA-CD26-binding site must await determination of the structures of
these proteins in their free and liganded states. However, it is
conceivable that the largely nonpolar residues of human CD26 shown to
be necessary for binding ADA may be part of a hydrophobic O-ring that
serves to shield the polar binding residues of ADA from solvent
(41).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Aron Boney and Casey Paleos for
their excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Grants RO1 DK20902 (to
M. S. H.) and R01 AI47604 (to D. D. P.) from the National
Institutes of Health, by a grant from Enzon, Inc. (to M. S. H.), and
by a Scientist Development grant from the American Heart Association (to S. M. A.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by Fellowship 98/9329 from Fondo de Investigación
Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Sanidad y
Consumo, Spain.
**
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed:
Box 3049, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. Tel.:
919-684-4184; Fax: 919-684-4168; E-mail:
msh@biochem.duke.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 18, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111901200
2
M. S. Hershfield, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ADA, adenosine
deaminase;
DPPIV, dipeptidyl peptidase IV;
SCID, severe combined
immunodeficiency;
LCL, lymphoblastoid cell line;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
SPR, surface plasmon resonance;
RU, response units;
mAb, monoclonal antibody.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Wilson, D. K.,
Rudolph, F. B.,
and Quiocho, F. A.
(1991)
Science
252,
1278-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Nishihara, H.,
Ishikawa, S.,
Shinkai, K.,
and Akedo, H.
(1973)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
302,
429-442[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Daddona, P. E.,
and Kelley, W. N.
(1978)
J. Biol. Chem.
253,
4617-4623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Andy, R. J.,
and Kornfeld, R.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
7922-7925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Schrader, W. P.,
West, C. A.,
Miczek, A. D.,
and Norton, E. K.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
19312-19318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Morrison, M. E.,
Vijayasaradhi, S.,
Engelstein, D.,
Albino, A. P.,
and Houghton, A. N.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
177,
1135-1143[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Kameoka, J.,
Tanaka, T.,
Nojima, Y.,
Schlossman, S.,
and Morimoto, C.
(1993)
Science
261,
466-469[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Dong, R. P.,
Tachibana, K.,
Hegen, M.,
Munakata, Y.,
Cho, D.,
Schlossman, S. F.,
and Morimoto, C.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
6070-6076[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Abbott, C. A.,
McCaughan, G. W.,
Levy, M. T.,
Church, W. B.,
and Gorell, M. D.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
266,
798-810[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Tiruppathi, C.,
Miyamoto, Y.,
Ganapathy, V.,
Roesel, R. A.,
Whitford, G. M.,
and Leibach, F. H.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
1476-1483[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Tiruppathi, C.,
Miyamoto, Y.,
Ganapathy, V.,
and Leibach, F. H.
(1993)
Am. J. Physiol.
265,
G81-G89[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Marguet, D.,
Baggio, L.,
Kobayashi, T.,
Bernard, A. M.,
Pierres, M.,
Nielsen, P. F.,
Ribel, U.,
Watanabe, T.,
Drucker, D. J.,
and Wagtmann, N.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
6874-6879[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Vivier, I.,
Marguet, D.,
Naquet, P.,
Bonicel, J.,
Black, D., Li, C. X.,
Bernard, A.,
Gorvel, J. P.,
and Pierres, M.
(1991)
J. Immunol.
147,
447-454[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Bristol, L. A.,
Sakaguchi, K.,
Appella, E.,
Doyle, D.,
and Takacs, L.
(1992)
J. Immunol.
149,
367-372[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Morimoto, C.,
and Schlossman, S. F.
(1998)
Immunol. Rev.
161,
55-70[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Tanaka, T.,
Kameoka, J.,
Yaron, A.,
Schlossman, S. F.,
and Morimoto, C.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
4586-4590[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Steeg, C.,
Hartwig, U.,
and Fleischer, B.
(1995)
Cell. Immunol.
164,
311-315[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Giblett, E. R.,
Anderson, J. E.,
Cohen, F.,
Pollara, B.,
and Meuwissen, H. J.
(1972)
Lancet
2,
1067-1069[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Hershfield, M. S.,
and Mitchell, B. S.
(2001)
in
The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease
(Scriver, C. R.
, Beaudet, A. L.
, Sly, W. S.
, and Valle, D., eds), 8th Ed.
, pp. 2585-2625, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York
|
| 20.
|
Dong, R. P.,
Kameoka, J.,
Hegen, M.,
Tanaka, T., Xu, Y.,
Schlossman, S. F.,
and Morimoto, C.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
1349-1355[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Franco, R.,
Valenzuela, A.,
Lluis, C.,
and Blanco, J.
(1998)
Immunol. Rev.
161,
27-42[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Martin, M.,
Huguet, J.,
Centelles, J. J.,
and Franco, R.
(1995)
J. Immunol.
155,
4630-4643[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Richard, E.,
Arredondo-Vega, F. X.,
Santisteban, I.,
Kelly, S. J.,
Patel, D. D.,
and Hershfield, M. S.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
192,
1223-1235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Trotta, P. P.,
Ahland, M. P.,
Brown, G. F.,
and Balis, M. E.
(1978)
Mol. Pharmacol.
14,
199-209[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Dinjens, W. N.,
ten Kate, J.,
Wijnen, J. T.,
van der Linden, E. P.,
Beek, C. J.,
Lenders, M. H.,
Khan, P. M.,
and Bosman, F. T.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
19215-19220[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Santisteban, I.,
Arredondo-Vega, F. X.,
Kelly, S.,
Loubser, M.,
Meydan, N.,
Roifman, C.,
Howell, P. L.,
Bowen, T.,
Weinberg, K. I.,
Schroeder, M. L.,
and Hershfield, M. S.
(1995)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
4,
2081-2087[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Cunningham, B. C.,
and Wells, J. A.
(1989)
Science
244,
1081-1085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Arredondo-Vega, F. X.,
Kurtzberg, J.,
Chaffee, S.,
Santisteban, I.,
Reisner, E.,
Povey, M. S.,
and Hershfield, M. S.
(1990)
J. Clin. Invest.
86,
444-452[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Arredondo-Vega, F. X.,
Santisteban, I.,
Daniels, S.,
Toutain, S.,
and Hershfield, M. S.
(1998)
Am. J. Hum. Genet.
63,
1049-1059[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Chang, Z. Y.,
Nygaard, P.,
Chinault, A. C.,
and Kellems, R. E.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
2273-2280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Brigham-Burke, M.,
Edwards, J. R.,
and O'Shannessy, D. J.
(1992)
Anal. Biochem.
205,
125-131[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Lackmann, M.,
Harpur, A. G.,
Oates, A. C.,
Mann, R. J.,
Gabriel, A.,
Meutermans, W.,
Alewood, P. F.,
Kerr, I. M.,
Stark, G. R.,
and Wilks, A. F.
(1998)
Growth Factors
16,
39-51[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Rich, R. L.,
and Myszka, D. G.
(2000)
J. Mol. Recognit.
13,
388-407[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Blanco, J.,
Marie, I.,
Callebaut, C.,
Jacotot, E.,
Krust, B.,
and Hovanessian, A. G.
(1996)
Exp. Cell Res.
225,
102-111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Santisteban, I.,
Arredondo-Vega, F. X.,
Kelly, S.,
Mary, A.,
Fischer, A.,
Hummell, D. S.,
Lawton, A.,
Sorensen, R. U.,
Stiehm, E. R.,
Uribe, L.,
Weinberg, K.,
and Hershfield, M. S.
(1993)
J. Clin. Invest.
92,
2291-2302[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Young, L.,
Jernigan, R. L.,
and Covell, D. G.
(1994)
Protein Sci.
3,
717-729[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Jones, S.,
and Thornton, J. M.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
13-20[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Tsai, C. J.,
Lin, S. L.,
Wolfson, H. J.,
and Nussinov, R.
(1997)
Protein Sci.
6,
53-64[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Wells, J. A.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
202,
390-411[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Clackson, T.,
and Wells, J. A.
(1995)
Science
267,
383-386[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Bogan, A. A.,
and Thorn, K. S.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
280,
1-9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Hu, Z., Ma, B.,
Wolfson, H.,
and Nussinov, R.
(2000)
Proteins
39,
331-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Lee, K. H.,
Xie, D.,
Freire, E.,
and Amzel, L. M.
(1994)
Proteins
20,
68-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Fersht, A. R.,
Shi, J. P.,
Knill-Jones, J.,
Lowe, D. M.,
Wilkinson, A. J.,
Blow, D. M.,
Brick, P.,
Carter, P.,
Waye, M. M.,
and Winter, G.
(1985)
Nature
314,
235-238[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
de Meester, I.,
Vanhoof, G.,
Lambeir, A. M.,
and Scharpe, S.
(1996)
J. Immunol. Meth.
189,
99-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Selzer, T.,
Albeck, S.,
and Schreiber, G.
(2000)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
7,
537-541[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Schreiber, G.,
and Fersht, A. R.
(1996)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
3,
427-431[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Stahelin, R. V.,
and Cho, W.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
4672-4678[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Li, Y., Li, H.,
Smith-Gill, S. J.,
and Mariuzza, R. A.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
6296-6309[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. A. Weihofen, J. Liu, W. Reutter, W. Saenger, and H. Fan
Crystal Structure of CD26/Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV in Complex with Adenosine Deaminase Reveals a Highly Amphiphilic Interface
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 8, 2004;
279(41):
43330 - 43335.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Gonzalez-Gronow, M. S. Hershfield, F. X. Arredondo-Vega, and S. V. Pizzo
Cell Surface Adenosine Deaminase Binds and Stimulates Plasminogen Activation on 1-LN Human Prostate Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 14, 2004;
279(20):
20993 - 20998.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Aertgeerts, S. Ye, L. Shi, S. G. Prasad, D. Witmer, E. Chi, B.-C. Sang, R. A. Wijnands, D. R. Webb, and R. V. Swanson
N-linked glycosylation of dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD26): Effects on enzyme activity, homodimer formation, and adenosine deaminase binding
Protein Sci.,
January 1, 2004;
13(1):
145 - 154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
| This Article |
 |
 |
Abstract
|
 |
Full Text (PDF)
|
 |
All Versions of this Article:
277/22/19720
most recent
M111901200v1
|
 |
Alert me when this article is cited
|
 |
| |