![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19823-19830, May 31, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and
§¶
From the Departments of
Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine, § Pharmacology, and ¶ Medicine, Center
for Thrombosis and Hemostasis, The University of North Carolina at
Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
27599-7035
Received for publication, January 22, 2002, and in revised form, February 19, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We used site-directed mutagenesis to investigate
the role of Glu69, Asp70,
Asp71, Asp72, Tyr-sulfate73, and
Asp75 in the second acidic region (AR2) of the serpin
heparin cofactor II (HCII) during formation of the thrombin·HCII
complex with and without glycosaminoglycans. E69Q/D70N/D71N recombinant
(r)HCII, D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII, and E69Q/D70N/D71N/D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII were prepared to localize acidic residues important for thrombin inhibition. Interestingly, D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII had significantly enhanced thrombin inhibition without glycosaminoglycan (4-fold greater)
and with heparin (6-fold greater), showing maximal activity at 2 µg/ml heparin compared with wild-type recombinant HCII (wt-rHCII) with maximal activity at 20 µg/ml heparin. The other rHCII mutants had lesser-enhanced activities, but they all eluted from
heparin-Sepharose at significantly higher ionic strengths compared with
wt-rHCII. Neutralizing and reversing the charge of Asp72,
Tyr-sulfate73, and Asp75 were done to
characterize their individual contribution to HCII activity. Only Y73K
rHCII and D75K rHCII have significantly increased heparin cofactor
activity compared with wt-rHCII; however, all of the individual
rHCII mutants required substantially less glycosaminoglycan at maximal
inhibition than did wt-rHCII. Inhibition of either The serine protease thrombin is a critical component in
coagulation, inflammation, and wound healing (1-9). Thrombin activity must be carefully regulated to maintain an appropriate balance within
the vasculature. One mechanism of thrombin regulation is by serine
protease inhibitors
(serpins)1 such as
antithrombin (ATIII) and heparin cofactor II (HCII) (10-14). Heparin
cofactor II and ATIII belong to a sub-class of serpins whose activity
is greatly enhanced upon binding to glycosaminoglycans like heparin and
heparan sulfate (HCII and ATIII) and dermatan sulfate (HCII) (15-18).
These glycosaminoglycans are found in vivo on cell surfaces
and in extracellular matrix to support these inhibition reactions
(19-23).
Heparin cofactor II has several features for thrombin inhibition and
specificity that render it novel among heparin-binding serpins
(24-26). Heparin cofactor II has an atypical Leu444
reactive center residue, whereas the more typical Arg is found in
thrombin inhibitors like ATIII or protein C inhibitor (10, 12, 13). The
inhibition of thrombin by HCII is enhanced by both heparin and dermatan
sulfate, and the glycosaminoglycan binding site is primarily contained
within the D-helix region of HCII (15, 27-34).
Although HCII is ~30% identical in sequence to antithrombin and
other serpins, it has a unique N-terminal extension of ~80 residues
that contains a tandem repeat of negatively charged acidic residues (9 Asp, 5 Glu, and 2 Tyr-sulfate) (25, 26). Interestingly, the acidic
domain of HCII is homologous to the C terminus of the leech
anticoagulant protein hirudin, which is a potent thrombin inhibitor.
Within the acidic domain of HCII, the two regions are designated acidic
region 1 (AR1) from residues 49-62
(49DWIPEGEEDDDYLD62) and acidic region 2 (AR2)
from residues 63-75 (63LEKIFSEDDDYID75). There
is substantial evidence that the acidic domain of HCII is involved in
facilitating thrombin inhibition, especially in the presence of
glycosaminoglycans (27, 29, 30). Ragg et al. (29, 30)
initially examined the role of the acidic domain in HCII by either
deleting or neutralizing various acidic amino acids and found that AR1
and AR2 have separate functions for thrombin inhibition. Van Deerlin
and Tollefsen (27) demonstrated that, by deleting portions of the
acidic domain (AR1 and AR2), HCII was a less effective inhibitor of
thrombin; interestingly, these mutants also had substantially enhanced
binding to heparin compared with wild-type (wt) recombinant (r)-HCII.
These studies suggested that the acidic domain of HCII both is involved
in and is imperative for effective thrombin inhibition. The two current
models to describe the mechanism for glycosaminoglycan-accelerated
inhibition of thrombin by HCII are the "double-bridge" and the
"allosteric" mechanisms (31, 35). In both models it is assumed that
the acidic domain position is altered following glycosaminoglycan binding to the D-helix region of HCII, thereby allowing the
N-terminal acidic domain to bind thrombin anion-binding exosite-1
(exosite-1) (27, 28, 31, 33, 34, 35, 37).
This paper investigates the role of six AR2 acidic residues in HCII
during thrombin inhibition in the absence and presence of
glycosaminoglycans and with thrombin derivatives with and without a
functional exosite-1. The results indicate that Asp72,
Tyr-sulfate73, and Asp75 promote intramolecular
interactions of the acidic domain with HCII in the absence of
glycosaminoglycans, and altering the charge of these acidic residues
substantially changes glycosaminoglycan-dependent activities of HCII.
Materials--
Human plasma Mutagenesis of Recombinant Proteins--
The QuikChange
site-di- rected mutagenesis kit from Stratagene was used to
introduce the following mutations E69Q/D70N/D71N, D72N/Y73F/D75N,
E69Q/D70N/D71N/D72N/Y73F/D75N (QNNNFN), D72N, D72K, Y73F, Y73K, D75N,
and D75K in the double-stranded plasmid HCII-pVL1392, following the
protocol as described by the supplier using these primers:
5'-GGACCTGGAGAAGATATTCAGTCAAAACAACGACTACATCGACATCGTCGAC-3' (forward,
E69Q/D70N/D71N),
5'-TCGACGATGTCGATGTAGTCGTTGTTTTGACTGAATATCTTCTCCAGGTCC-3' (reverse,
E69Q/D70N/D71N),
5'-GATATTCAGTGAAGACGACAACTTCATCAACATCGTCGACAGTCTGTCAGTTTCC-3' (forward,
D72N/Y73F/D75N),
5'-GGAAACTGACAGACTGTCGACGATGTTGATGAAGTTGTCGTCTTCATCGAATATC-3' (reverse,
D72N/Y73F/D75N),
5'-GAAGATATTCAGTCAAAACAACAACTTCATCAACATCGTCGACAGTCTGTCAGTTTCC-3' (forward, QNNNFN),
5'-GGAAACTGACAGACTGTCGACGATGTTGATGAAGTTGTTGTTTTGACTGAATATCTTC-3' (reverse, QNNNFN),
5'-CCTGGAGAAGATATTCAGTGAAGACGACAACTACATCGACATCGTCGACAGTCG-3' (forward,
D72N), 5'-CAGACTGTCGACGATGTCGATGTAGTTGTCGTCTTCACTGAATATCTTCTCCAGG-3' (reverse, D72N),
5'-CCTGGAGAAGATATTCAGTGAAGACGACAAATACATCGACATCGTCGACAGTCTG-3' (forward,
D72K), 5'-CAGACTGTCGACGATGTCGATGTATTTGTCGTCTTCACTGAATATCTTCTCCAGG-3' (reverse, D72K),
5'-CCTGGAGAAGATATTCAGTGAAGACGACGACTTCATCGACATCGTCGACAGTCTG-3' (forward,
Y73F), 5'-CAGACTGTCGACGATGTCGATGAAGTCGTCGTCTTCACTGAATATCTTCTCCAGG-3' (reverse, Y73F),
5'-CCTGGAGAAGATATTCAGTGAAGACGACGACAAAATCGACATCGTCGACAGTCTG-3' (forward,
Y73K), 5'-CAGACTGTCGACGATGTCGATTTTGTCGTCGTCTTCACTGAATATCTTCTCCAGG-3' (reverse, Y73K),
5'-CCTGGAGAAGATATTCAGTGAAGACGACGACTACATCAACATCGTCGACAGTCTG-3' (forward,
D75N), 5'-CAGACTGTCGACGATGTTGATGTAGTCGTCGTCTTCACTGAATATCTTCTCCAGG-3' (reverse, D75N),
5'-CCTGGAGAAGATATTCAGTGAAGACGACGACTACATCAAAATCGTCGACAGTCTG-3' (forward,
D75K),
5'-CAGACTGTCGACGATTTTGATGTAGTCGTCGTCTTCACTGAATATCTTCTCCAGG-3' (reverse, D75K). PCR was performed to generate double-stranded HCII cDNA, including the mutations in the expression vector. After amplification, parental DNA was removed by digestion with
DpnI endonuclease and the nicked vector DNA containing the
desired mutation was transformed into Epicurian Coli XL1-Blue
supercompetent cells (Stratagene). Full-length sequencing of each clone
by Sequenase kit (version 2.0, Amersham Biosciences, Inc., Cleveland,
OH) confirmed the incorporation of each of these mutations into the
HCII-pVL1392 construct.
Protein Expression and Purification--
Each mutant rHCII and
wt rHCII was cotransfected with linearized BaculoGold (BD
PharMingen) Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis
virus (AcNPV) into Spodoptera frugiperda
(Sf9, Invitrogen) insect cells using established protocols
in our laboratory (41). We expressed rHCII in HighFive insect cells
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) maintained at 25 °C in Excel 405 medium
(JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, KS) as previously detailed. Three days
post-baculovirus transfection, the media was collected and centrifuged
to remove cell debris. The protein was purified essentially as
described previously (41). Protein was then dialyzed against 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% PEG8000
and 0.02% NaN3. Protein was aliquoted and stored at
Protease Inhibition--
Protease inhibition rates were
determined as described previously (32, 42, 43). All assays were
performed at room temperature in 96-well microtiter plates previously
coated with 2 mg/ml BSA. In the absence of glycosaminoglycan, 40-100
nM rHCII (wt and rHCII mutants) was incubated with 1 nM
In the presence of 10 µg/ml glycosaminoglycan, either hirugen or a
control peptide corresponding to the reverse sequence of the HCII
acidic domain (residues 47-61) at 20 µM and rHCII (10 nM) was incubated with 0.5 nM thrombin in the
presence of 1 mg/ml Polybrene and 2 mg/ml BSA in HNPN, pH 7.4. In the
presence of either heparin (5 or 20 µg/ml) or dermatan sulfate (20 or
200 µg/ml), 0.5 nM
Association time courses ranged from 1 to 240 min for Heparin-Sepharose Affinity Chromatography--
We determined the
relative heparin affinities by using 1-3 µg of rHCII protein diluted
in 20 mM Hepes, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% PEG, 0.05%
NaN3, pH 7.4. We ran each protein on a 1-ml Hi-Trap
heparin-Sepharose column equilibrated in 20 mM HEPES, 0.1%
PEG, 50 mM NaCl, 0.05% NaN3, pH 7.4, using an
fast-protein liquid chromatography system (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.).
After the sample was loaded onto the column, protein was eluted with a
40-ml gradient of 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, from 50 to 1500 mM NaCl, and 0.5-ml fractions were collected. For each
fraction, 100 µl was aliquoted onto a 96-well microtiter plate and an
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was performed. The peak elution ionic
strength was determined by plotting 405-nm color development and NaCl
concentration against the fraction number. All samples were run at
least in triplicate using two or more protein preparations.
Human Plasma Assays--
The assay used to evaluate rHCII in
plasma was designed based on previously published methods (32, 44, 45).
We performed this assay using normal hemostasis reference plasma (REF),
human antithrombin-deficient plasma (DEF), or a 50:50 mixture of both types of plasma (REF/DEF) (American Diagnostica) at room temperature in
96-well microtiter plates previously coated with 2 mg/ml BSA (32). We
incubated 10 nM wt rHCII or mutant rHCII with either 1 µg/ml heparin or 5 µg/ml dermatan sulfate, in the presence of each
type of plasma (diluted 1:100). Thrombin inhibition was started when 1 nM thrombin was added to each well. After 15 s, 150 µM tosGly-Pro-Arg-NA was added, and the residual thrombin
activity was measured by color development at 405 nm on a kinetic
microplate reader.
Statistical Analysis--
The statistical significance of the
data was evaluated using Tukey's Student t test;
p values Inhibition of Glycosaminoglycan-accelerated
Because the AR2 rHCII derivatives required substantially less
glycosaminoglycan to reach maximal thrombin inhibition, we next addressed whether this implied a more accessible
glycosaminoglycan-binding site. We used NaCl gradient elution from
heparin-Sepharose to determine whether the AR2 rHCII mutations have
altered apparent affinity for immobilized heparin (Table II). We found
that the AR2 rHCII derivatives (except D75N) required more NaCl to
elute from heparin-Sepharose compared with wt-rHCII, ranging from
525-550 mM NaCl for wt-rHCII and D75N rHCII to 650-925
mM NaCl for the remainder of the AR2 rHCII derivatives.
Collectively, the activity data and the heparin-Sepharose elution
results suggest that altering the charge of AR2 allows heparin to bind
with higher affinity to the D-helix region of HCII.
Physiological-based Thrombin Inhibition Studies by the ARII rHCII
Derivatives--
Our results presented so far show that some AR2 rHCII
mutants are more active than wt-rHCII. We next assessed the potential of three AR2 rHCII derivatives (E69Q/D70N/D71N rHCII, D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII, and D75K rHCII) to inhibit Although HCII is ~30% identical to ATIII and other serpins, it
contains an N-terminal extension of ~80 residues that is found in no
other serpin (10, 14, 25, 26). The N terminus contains a tandem repeat
of two acidic stretches that have the following sequences:
Asp49-Trp50-Ile-Pro-Glu-Gly-Glu55-Glu-Asp-Asp-Asp-Tyr60-Leu-Asp62
and
Leu63-Glu-Lys65-Ile-Phe-Ser-Glu-Asp70-Asp-Asp-Tyr-Ile-Asp75.
Metabolic labeling of HepG2 cells demonstrated that the Tyr residues in
each acidic repeat are sulfated (46). These acidic repeat elements are
homologous to a thrombin-binding region of hirudin, the extremely
potent thrombin inhibitor from leech salivary glands. HCII deletion
mutants lacking either the first ( We initially hypothesized that the AR2 rHCII mutants would have
significant changes related both to glycosaminoglycan binding by HCII
and to glycosaminoglycan-mediated inhibitory activity of HCII with
thrombin. This hypothesis is due to the unique role postulated for AR2
to be an intramolecular mimic of a glycosaminoglycan (27, 29, 30). The
majority of the AR2 rHCII mutations did affect both heparin- and
dermatan sulfate-accelerated thrombin inhibition. Interestingly, the
glycosaminoglycan-dependent inhibition curves for most of the
AR2 rHCII mutants were "left-shifted" when compared with wt-rHCII.
The optimal glycosaminoglycan concentration, which is the concentration
corresponding to the maximum inhibition rate, is expected to be a
function of the affinity of HCII for glycosaminoglycan because
To complement the above results, the optimum glycosaminoglycan
concentration was inversely related to apparent heparin affinity for
each AR2 rHCII mutant as found using heparin-Sepharose elution profiles. Because the intermolecular interactions between
glycosaminoglycans and HCII are thought to be primarily ionic, the
concentration of NaCl required to elute the proteins from
heparin-Sepharose is a measure of their relative affinity. We found
that some of the AR2 rHCII mutants required from 1.4- to 1.7-fold
higher NaCl concentrations to elute from heparin-Sepharose when
compared with wt-rHCII. What is remarkable about these AR2 rHCII
mutants is that the majority of the negatively charged acidic domain is
present while still requiring increased NaCl concentrations to elute
from heparin-Sepharose. These elution differences are somewhat
analogous to N-terminal deletions when the negative charges were
removed from the intact HCII molecule, where The mechanism of glycosaminoglycan-accelerated thrombin inhibition by
HCII is unique among thrombin-inhibiting serpins (15, 16, 47). HCII
appears to employ an allosteric mechanism whereby binding of
glycosaminoglycans to the D-helix region is thought to
alter the acidic domain, which then serves as a "tethered-ligand" for exosite-1 of thrombin (27, 28, 31-37). The acidic domain/exosite-1 interaction is a critical component of the inhibition mechanism in the
presence of glycosaminoglycans, whereas ternary complex formation
bridging HCII, glycosaminoglycan, and thrombin appears to play a more
minor role in the inhibition mechanism. The proposed interaction
between the acidic domain and exosite-1 is well supported by a variety
of data. A synthetic peptide corresponding to residues 54-75 of HCII
inhibited thrombin cleavage of fibrinogen but not thrombin chromogenic
substrate activity (48). Because proteolysis of fibrinogen requires
binding between exosite-1 and fibrinogen, this suggested that the HCII
acidic peptide interacts with exosite-1. Deletion of HCII residues
1-52 by recombinant DNA technology did not affect thrombin inhibition
in either the absence or presence of glycosaminoglycans (27). By
contrast, deletion of residues 1-67 (first acidic region) greatly
decreased HCII inhibition of thrombin in the presence of
glycosaminoglycans but only slightly reduced it in the absence of
glycosaminoglycan, suggesting that the first acidic domain interacted
with thrombin (27). Interestingly, deletion of the entire acidic domain
(residues 1-74) caused no further decreases in activity, suggesting
that only the first acidic domain interacts directly with thrombin. Our
laboratory (28, 32, 34) and others (27, 33) showed that
glycosaminoglycan-accelerated HCII inhibition of
The report by Baglin et al. (49) of the determination of the
structures of native HCII and S195A thrombin-complexed HCII revealed
some of the expected features based on the above discussion; however,
the location of the acidic domain in HCII was unequivocal. The resolved
native structure of HCII was a dimer formed by anti-parallel Collectively, these data allow us to provide an updated proposal of the
mechanism of thrombin inhibition by HCII (Fig.
4). The historical depiction of HCII is
given Fig. 4A, and this shows the acidic domain docked
to the D-helix region (27, 29, 30, 32, 36). The mutants and
data described by Liaw et al. (33) suggest that the
acidic domain is no longer bound to the D-helix, and its
location is altered and may resemble that shown in Fig. 4B.
Following glycosaminoglycan binding, the acidic domain is fully
extended and interaction with exosite-1 in thrombin is favored (Fig.
4C). The structural data from Baglin et al. (49)
show that the HCII·S195A thrombin complex resembles that
predicted with the acidic domain and exosite-1 in direct contact with
the expected interaction between the reactive center of HCII and active site of thrombin (Fig. 4D). The AR2 rHCII mutants described
here would appear to be in equilibrium between the HCII structures depicted in Fig. 4, A and B (comparing
differences in activity found here to those reported by Liaw et
al. (33)). The enhanced sensitivity of the AR2 rHCII mutants
(especially Asp72, Tyr-sulfate73, and
Asp75) to glycosaminoglycan interactions is connected to
increased thrombin inhibition activity, which is consistent with a more permissive glycosaminoglycan binding site due to altered intramolecular interactions. Thus, AR2 may act as a "molecular rheostat" to help maintain HCII in a relatively inactive form in the absence of glycosaminoglycans, but after glycosaminoglycan binding it allows the
acidic domain to tether and recruit exosite-1 of thrombin that
leads to favorable thrombin inhibition.
-thrombin/hirugen
or
T-thrombin (both with an altered anion-binding exosite-1) by the AR2 rHCII mutants was similar to wt-rHCII.
D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII and D75K rHCII were significantly more active than
wt-rHCII in a plasma-based thrombin inhibition assay with
glycosaminoglycans. These results indicate that improved thrombin
inhibition in the AR2 HCII mutants is mediated by enhanced interactions
between the acidic domain and anion-binding exosite-1 of thrombin and that AR2 may be a "molecular rheostat" to promote
thrombin inhibition in the presence of glycosaminoglycans.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-thrombin and HCII were prepared
and purified in our laboratory as previously described (38, 39). We
prepared human
T-thrombin by limited proteolysis of
-thrombin with trypsin as previously described (28). Monoclonal
antibody 2-4-34 to purified human plasma HCII was made in our
laboratory using standard techniques. Human antithrombin-deficient
plasma (catalog no. 203) and normal hemostasis reference plasma
(catalog no. 258N) were purchased from America Diagnostica (Greenwich,
CT). Heparin was from Diosynth (Oss, The Netherlands). Dermatan sulfate
was from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA) and was nitrous acid-treated to
remove contaminating heparin/heparan sulfate (40). Hi-Trap
Heparin-Sepharose was from Amersham Biosciences, Inc. (Piscataway, NJ),
and Q-Sepharose was from Sigma Chemical Co.
Tosyl-Gly-Pro-Arg-4-nitroanilide acetate (tosGly-Pro-Arg-NA, Chromozym
TH) was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals (Indianapolis, IN), and
succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide (sucAla-Ala-Pro-Phe-NA) was from Sigma. Hirugen and the reverse peptide
to HCII's acidic domain were synthesized and purified by the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Peptide Synthesis and
Protein Core Facility.
80 °C. The production of rHCII was verified by immunoblot analysis
of whole cell lysates using a monoclonal antibody to HCII (mAb 2-4-34).
The concentration of rHCII was determined by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay using purified plasma HCII as the standard as
described previously (32). We obtained ~70 µg of recombinant
protein of each mutant from 100 ml of HighFive cells in a 200-ml shaker
flask infected with the various recombinant viral stocks. Immunoblot
and SDS-PAGE confirmed that each mutant rHCII had the same
electrophoretic mobility as wt rHCII (data not shown).
-thrombin, 1 nM
T-thrombin, or 4 nM chymotrypsin, in the
presence of 1 mg/ml Polybrene and 2 mg/ml BSA in HNPN, pH 7.4 (20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.2% PEG, and
0.02% NaN3). In the presence of glycosaminoglycans, 10 nM rHCII was incubated with 0-2 mg/ml heparin or 0-2
mg/ml dermatan sulfate with 1 nM thrombin in the presence
of 2 mg/ml BSA in HNPN, pH 7.4, in the absence of Polybrene.
T-thrombin was
incubated with 10 nM rHCII in the presence of 2 mg/ml BSA
in HNPN, pH 7.4.
-thrombin,
T-thrombin, and chymotrypsin depending upon the assay
conditions. Residual thrombin activity was measured with 150 µM tosGly-Pro-Arg-NA and 1 mg/ml Polybrene in the absence
of glycosaminoglycan or 2 mg/ml Polybrene in the presence of heparin or
dermatan sulfate. Residual chymotrypsin activity was measured with 150 µM sucAla-Ala-Pro-Phe-NA. Substrate cleavage was measured
by color development at 405 nm on a Vmax Kinetic
Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices). Assays were performed at least
in triplicate on two or more recombinant protein preparations. Second
order inhibition rate constants were calculated as described (32, 42,
43).
0.05 were considered significant.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-Thrombin,
T-Thrombin, and
Chymotrypsin by the AR2 rHCII Derivatives in the Absence of
Glycosaminoglycans--
Wild-type rHCII inhibits
-thrombin at
a rate of ~1 × 104 M
1
min
1 in the absence of glycosaminoglycans, whereas
E69Q/D70N/D71N rHCII, D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII, and QNNNFN rHCII inhibit
-thrombin 1.2-, 4.2-, and 3.2-fold faster than wt-rHCII,
respectively (Table I). The results with
these "shotgun" HCII mutants suggest that neutralizing
Asp72, Asp75, and Tyr-sulfate73 had
the biggest influence on thrombin inhibition. Comparing the effect of
these individual residues in HCII individually for thrombin inhibition
(using neutral and reverse-charge mutations), we found only D75K had a
significantly increased rate of
-thrombin inhibition (2.6-fold) when
compared with wt-rHCII (Table I).
T-Thrombin (
-thrombin with an altered exosite-1) inhibition by wt-rHCII and all
of the AR2 rHCII derivatives was ~2-3 × 103
M
1min
1 (Table I), which further
demonstrates the importance of exosite-1 in thrombin during HCII
inhibition. Chymotrypsin inhibition by HCII requires neither the acidic
domain nor glycosaminoglycan binding, and we found no significant
difference for any of the AR2 rHCII derivatives compared with wt-rHCII
(Table I). These results indicate that altering the charge of AR2 in
HCII creates a better
-thrombin inhibitor in the absence of
glycosaminoglycans, and that Asp72,
Tyr-sulfate73, and Asp75 contribute the most to
this effect.
HCII Inhibition of
-thrombin,
T-thrombin, and
chymotrypsin in the absence of glycosaminoglycans
-thrombin (1 nM),
T-thrombin (1 nM), or
chymotrypsin (4 nM) inhibition by wild-type and mutant
rHCIIs (100 nM rHCII for
-thrombin and
T-thrombin; 40 nM rHCII for chymotrypsin). The
values represent the mean ± S.D. of three to six separate
determinations with at least three different protein preparations. All
assays were performed as described under "Experimental Procedures."
-Thrombin Inhibition and
Heparin-Sepharose Binding by the AR2 rHCII Derivatives--
With
heparin, each of the shotgun rHCII derivatives inhibit
-thrombin 3- to 6-fold faster than wt-rHCII (Fig. 1,
top panel).2
Interestingly, less heparin was required for each rHCII mutant to reach
maximal thrombin inhibition (1-2 µg/ml) compared with wt-rHCII
(~20 µg/ml) (Table II). In the
presence of dermatan sulfate, wt-rHCII inhibits thrombin at a rate of
3.3 × 108
M
1min
1 (Fig. 1, bottom
panel). D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII inhibits thrombin at a rate 3.3 times
faster than that of wt-rHCII whereas E69Q/D70N/D71N rHCII and QNNNFN
rHCII inhibit thrombin similar to wt-rHCII (Fig. 1, lower
panel and Table II). However, the amount of dermatan sulfate
needed for maximal thrombin inhibitory activity is also significantly
decreased for the shotgun AR2 rHCIIs (5-20 µg/ml) as compared
with wt-rHCII (100-200 µg/ml) (Table II). The individual AR2 rHCII
derivatives of Asp72, Tyr-sulfate73, and
Asp75 all required less heparin and dermatan sulfate to
reach maximal thrombin inhibition compared with wt-rHCII (Fig.
2); however, only Y73K rHCII and D75K
rHCII have significantly increased activity in the presence of heparin
whereas none have significantly increased activity in the presence of
dermatan sulfate (Table II and Fig. 2). Because the individual
Asp72, Tyr-sulfate73, and Asp75
rHCII mutants do not have increased glycosaminoglycan-accelerated thrombin inhibitory activity to the same extent, as does D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII, this implies an additive influence of these AR2 residues to
accelerate the HCII-glycosaminoglycan thrombin inhibition reaction.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Inhibition of
-thrombin by wild-type and shotgun AR2 rHCIIs in
the presence of heparin and dermatan sulfate.
-Thrombin was
incubated with wild-type rHCII (
), E69Q/D70N/D71N rHCII (
),
D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII (
), or QNNNFN rHCII (
) in the presence of
increasing amounts of heparin (top panel) or dermatan
sulfate (bottom panel). The data represent an average of at
least three separate protein preparations performed in
triplicate.
HCII inhibition of
-thrombin in the presence of heparin and dermatan
sulfate
-thrombin (0.5 nM) inhibition by wild-type and mutant rHCIIs (5 nM) in the presence of heparin or dermatan sulfate
(DSO4). The maximal inhibition of each curve was used in the
calculation of the average inhibition rate. The values represent the
mean ± S.D. of three to six separate determinations with at least
three different protein preparations. The final column indicates the
peak NaCl concentration at which each variant eluted from Hi-Trap
heparin-Sepharose. All assays were performed as described under
"Experimental Procedures."

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Inhibition of
-thrombin by wild-type and individual AR2 rHCIIs in
the presence of heparin and dermatan sulfate.
-Thrombin was
incubated with rHCII in the presence of increasing amounts of heparin
(top panels) or dermatan sulfate (bottom panels).
For all graphs, wild-type rHCII is indicated by
, in top
and bottom left panels, the neutral AR2 residues are D72N
(
), Y73F (
), and D75N (
); in the top and
bottom right panels, the basic AR2 residues are D72K (
),
Y73K (
), and D75K (
). The data represent an average of at least
three separate protein preparations performed in triplicate.
-Thrombin/Hirugen and
T-Thrombin Inhibition by
the AR2 rHCII Derivatives--
We further studied the role of thrombin
exosite-1 during AR2 rHCII inhibition (with heparin or dermatan
sulfate). Consistent with past studies, hirugen drastically reduced the
rate of
-thrombin inhibition with heparin or dermatan sulfate by
both wt-rHCII and all of the AR2 rHCII derivatives (Fig.
3, shown for dermatan sulfate in the
top panel). Although the inhibition rates for
T-thrombin are much reduced compared with
-thrombin,
E69Q/D70N/D71N rHCII, D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII, and D75K rHCII have
slightly increased rates of
T-thrombin inhibition as
compared with wt-rHCII with heparin or dermatan sulfate (Fig. 3, shown
for dermatan sulfate in the bottom panel). Overall, these
results imply that the process of thrombin recognition by all of the
rHCII's is similar whether using hirugen to sterically hinder access
to thrombin exosite-1 or
T-thrombin where the
-loop
of exosite-1 is absent.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Inhibition of
-thrombin/hirugen and of
T-thrombin by wild-type and AR2 rHCIIs
in the presence dermatan sulfate. Top panel,
inhibition of
-thrombin by AR2 rHCII mutants in the presence of 10 µg/ml dermatan sulfate with hirugen (black bars), buffer
(gray bars), or a control acidic peptide (white
bars). The data represent an average of at least two separate
protein preparations performed in triplicate. Bottom panel,
T-thrombin inhibition by the AR2 rHCII mutants in the
presence of 20 µg/ml dermatan sulfate (black bars) or 200 µg/ml dermatan sulfate (white bars). The data represent an
average of at least two separate protein preparations performed in
triplicate.
-thrombin with a more
physiologically relevant assay setting (Table
III). With heparin or dermatan sulfate, E69Q/D70N/D71N rHCII and D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII both exhibited a 2- to
3-fold greater thrombin inhibitory rate than wt-rHCII in the presence
of all three types of plasma (normal reference, antithrombin-deficient, and a 50:50 mix to mimic a heterozygous antithrombin deficiency), whereas the inhibitory activity of D75K rHCII was slightly less than
the other rHCII mutants (Table III). These results show that the
AR2 rHCII mutants are potent thrombin inhibitors in the presence of
glycosaminoglycans and plasma and imply that they may have potential as
therapeutic anticoagulants.
HCII inhibition of
-thrombin in the presence of glycosaminoglycans
and plasma
-thrombin (1 nM) inhibition by wild-type and mutant rHCIIs (10 nM) added to the various plasmas. The values represent the
mean ± S.D. of three to six separate determinations with at least
three different protein preparations. All assays were performed as
described under "Experimental Procedures."
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
67-rHCII) or both (
74-rHCII)
acidic domains were found to have greatly increased affinity for
heparin as assessed by salt elution from heparin-Sepharose (27). This
observation has led to the hypothesis that the D-helix of
HCII is part of an "internal binding site" for the acidic domain.
Because the nature of heparin-HCII interaction is mostly anionic, the
increased heparin affinity could also be due to the removal of negative
charges concentrated in the acidic domain. The goal of this study was
to study the structure-activity relationships of the second acidic
region (AR2) in HCII using site-directed mutagenesis. Our working
hypothesis was that, by altering the charge of AR2 acidic residues
in HCII, we would increase both progressive antithrombin activity
(inhibition in the absence of added glycosaminoglycans) and heparin-
and dermatan sulfate-cofactor activities (thrombin inhibition in the
presence of added glycosaminoglycans).
-Thrombin inhibition rates of two of the three shotgun AR2 rHCII
mutants in the absence of glycosaminoglycans were significantly increased suggesting that the largest change in activity was influenced by the final three acidic residues (Asp72,
Tyr-sulfate73, and Asp75). There was an
additive effect of these acidic residues, as only D75K (when residues
were individually mutated) had a substantially increased rate compared
with wt-rHCII yet this inhibition rate was still lower when compared
with D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII. The increased inhibition activity appears to
be caused by an enhanced interaction between the HCII acidic domain and
exosite-1 of thrombin, because inhibition rates of both
T-thrombin and
-thrombin in the presence of hirugen
were all reduced to rates similar to wt-rHCII. Finally, the comparable
inhibition rates of wt-rHCII and the AR2 rHCII mutants with
chymotrypsin (which requires neither the HCII acidic domain nor
glycosaminoglycans for inhibition) indicate that the reactive site loop
has not been altered to an "activated" conformation. The results
further implicate a role for the acidic domain due to altered HCII
intramolecular interactions that increased activity to
-thrombin.
-thrombin was used for all experiments and all other variables were
constant. We found that AR2 mutants, like D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII and Y73K
rHCII, had maximum heparin and dermatan sulfate optima clearly reduced
from wt-rHCII, in some cases as much as 10- to 20-fold less
glycosaminoglycan was required for rates that were increased 2-to
6-fold compared with that for wt-rHCII. Additionally, the inhibition
values were still enhanced for the AR2 rHCII mutants compared with
wt-rHCII when tested with a mixture of plasma and buffer with added
glycosaminoglycans. Even with
T-thrombin or
-thrombin/hirugen in the presence of glycosaminoglycans, some AR2
mutants were more active than wt-rHCII (although all of these rates
were drastically reduced compared with
-thrombin), most likely
because the acidic domain binding site on exosite-1 is neither totally
removed in
T-thrombin nor completely blocked by hirugen
in
-thrombin (for instance, with hirugen (20 µM) and
heparin (10 µg/ml) the inhibition rates (k2, M
1 min
1) for D72N/Y73F/D75N
rHCII and D75K rHCII were reduced to 2.0 ± 0.5 × 108 and 1.0 ± 0.3 × 108,
respectively, as compared with 0.4 ± 0.1 × 108
for wt-rHCII). We have shown previously that dermatan sulfate accelerates
T-thrombin inhibition by HCII by 30-fold,
indicating that the acidic domain still interacts with the remaining
portions of exosite-1 in a productive manner. These results imply that for wild-type HCII, Asp72, Tyr-sulfate73, and
Asp75 help maintain critical intramolecular interactions
that attenuate thrombin inhibition activity until glycosaminoglycans
bind, which expels the acidic domain to then contact exosite-1 of thrombin.
1-67 rHCII and
1-74 rHCII eluted from heparin-Sepharose at 1.4- and 2.1-fold
higher NaCl concentrations, respectively, compared with wt-rHCII (27,
32). We found previously that a synthetic peptide corresponding to the
glycosaminoglycan binding site in HCII (from residues 183 to 200) bound
with 2.6-fold greater affinity to heparin-Sepharose when compared with
native HCII, indicating that the glycosaminoglycan-binding site
was either masked or in an altered conformation compared with the
peptide (47). It is intriguing to speculate that both Y73K and D75K
(which had the highest increase in NaCl elution from heparin-Sepharose)
might be directly contributing to glycosaminoglycan binding and be
juxtaposed to the D-helix glycosaminoglycan region of HCII.
Compared with wt-rHCII, the AR2 rHCII mutants are generally more
permissive to glycosaminoglycan binding. These results indicate that
for wild-type HCII, Asp72, Tyr-sulfate73, and
Asp75 support crucial intramolecular interactions that
hinder glycosaminoglycan binding.
T-thrombin (in which exosite-1 has been removed by
limited proteolysis) was reduced by greater than 1000-fold as compared
with
-thrombin, whereas inhibition by antithrombin was relatively
unaffected by the absence of exosite-1. Site-directed mutants of the
basic residues in exosite-1 showed specificity similar to where hirugen
binds exosite-1, and large decreases in activity with
HCII-glycosaminoglycans were seen for some of the mutants (31, 35,
37).
-sheet
interaction between strands 1C of each monomer with the acidic domain
and the N terminus undefined. Recently, Liaw et al. (33)
employed the exact opposite strategy to our study, where they replaced
the basic residues in the D-helix region of HCII with
neutral residues. They found an increase in progressive antithrombin
activity of more than 100-fold compared with wt-rHCII (33). As
expected, thrombin exosite-1 was essential for inhibition by these
rHCII mutants (33). More recently, Brinkmeyer et al. (36)
characterized an rHCII mutant with a re-formable disulfide bond between
P52C and F195C. The oxidized form of this mutant was unable to form
stable HCII·thrombin complexes; however, after reduction with
-mercaptoethanol the reduced HCII mutant was an active thrombin
inhibitor in the presence of glycosaminoglycans.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Schematic model for thrombin inhibition by
HCII. Shown here are the following possible structures for
HCII (Leu444 reactive center residue in green).
A, as historically depicted with acidic domain (AR1 and AR2
shown in yellow) ionically bound to the
glycosaminoglycan-binding site (D-helix shown in
blue); B, interpreting the data from Liaw
et al. (33) implies that the acidic domain is not associated
with the D-helix after neutralization of the
D-helix by mutagenesis; C, following interaction
with glycosaminoglycan, the acidic domain is liberated and is able to
effectively bind to exosite-1 of thrombin; and (D) complexed
to thrombin (active site Ser of thrombin (in gray) and
exosite-1 (in red) and exosite-2 (in light blue))
with the acidic domain bound to exosite-1 (as shown historically by
biochemical/molecular biological approaches and recently confirmed by
crystallization of the HCII·S195A thrombin non-covalent complex
(Baglin et al. (49)). The mechanism of HCII·thrombin
interaction predicts Asp72, Tyr-sulfate73, and
Asp75 of AR2 promote intramolecular interactions during
glycosaminoglycan binding to the D-helix to support a
conformational change that allows for acidic domain recognition of
thrombin exosite-1. Collectively, the data can be used to interpret an
equilibrium between conformations A, B, and C above, which, when in the
presence of glycosaminoglycan, the encounter between the active site of
thrombin and the reactive center of HCII is enhanced and stabilized by
acidic domain and exosite-1 orientation and interaction (drawing is
based on a schematic by D. M. Tollefsen).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Susannah Bauman for advice and support in the early part of this work. We also thank Dr. Dougald Monroe and Dr. Herbert Whinna for scientific assistance and advice throughout this study.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Research Grant HL-32656 from the National Institutes of Health (to F. C. C).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Campus Box 7035, Division of Hematology-Oncology/Medicine, 932 Mary Ellen Jones Bldg.,
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7035. Tel.:
919-966-3311; Fax: 919-966-7639; E-mail: fchurch@email.unc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, February 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200630200
2 We determined the stoichiometry of inhibition values (SI; the number of serpin molecules consumed before an inactivated serpin·protease complex is formed) for the shotgun rHCII mutants compared to wtrHCII in the presence of heparin and dermatan sulfate. SI values for wt-rHCII, E69Q/D70N/D71N rHCII, D72N/Y73F/D75N rHCII, and QNNNFN rHCII ranged from 1.9 to 2.1 (similar to values reported previously (42)). This suggests that the kinetics of inhibition for these rHCII mutants were very similar to wt-rHCII.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: serpin, serine protease inhibitor; HCII, heparin cofactor II; ATIII, antithrombin III; wt, wild-type; r, recombinant; E69Q/D70N/D71N/D72N/Y73F/D75N, QNNNFN; exosite-1, anion-binding exosite-1; BSA, bovine serum albumin; PEG, polyethylene glycol 8000; Gly-Pro-Arg-NA, tosyl-Gly-Pro-Arg-p-nitroanilide; Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-NA, succinyl-Ala-Ala-Pro-Phe-p-nitroanilide; REF, normal hemostasis reference plasma; DEF, human antithrombin III-deficient plasma; DEF/REF, 1:1 mix of DEF and REF.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Davie, E. W., Fuijikawa, K., and Kisiel, W. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 10363-10370[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Church, F. C., and Hoffman, M. R. (1994) Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 4, 140-146[CrossRef] |
| 3. | Mann, K. G. (1999) Thromb. Haemost. 82, 165-174[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Dahlback, B. (2000) Lancet 355, 1627-1632[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Cocks, T. M., and Moffatt, J. D. (2000) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 21, 103-108[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Cirino, G., Bucci, M., Cicala, C., and Napoli, C. (2000) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 21, 170-172[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Esmon, C. T. (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1477, 349-360[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Preissner, K. T., Nawroth, P. P., and Kanse, S. M. (2000) J. Pathol. 190, 360-372[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Hoffman, M., and Monroe, D. M. (2001) Thromb. Haemost. 85, 958-965[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Huber, R., and Carrell, R. W. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 8951-8966[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Potempa, J.,
Korzus, E.,
and Travis, J. T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15957-15960 |
| 12. | Gettins, P. G. W., Patston, P. A., and Olson, S. T. (eds) (1996) Serpius: Structure, Function, and Biology, Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit , R. G. Landes Co., and Chapman and Hall, Austin, TX |
| 13. | Church, F. C., Cunningham, D. D., Ginsburg, D., Hoffman, M., Stone, S. R., and Tollefsen, D. M. (1997) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 425, 358 |
| 14. |
Silverman, G. A.,
Bird, P. I.,
Carrell, R. W.,
Church, F. C.,
Coughlin, P. B.,
Gettins, P. G. W.,
Irving, J. A.,
Lomas, D. A.,
Luke, C. J.,
Moyer, R. W.,
Pemberton, P. A.,
Remold-O'Donnell, E.,
Salvesen, G. S.,
Travis, J.,
and Whisstock, J. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
33293-33296 |
| 15. | Tollefsen, D. M. (1995) Thromb. Haemost. 74, 1209-1214[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Pratt, C. W., and Church, F. C. (1993) Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 4, 479-490[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Pratt, C. W., and Church, F. C. (1991) Semin. Hematol. 28, 3-9[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Tollefsen, D. M., Maimone, M. M., McGuire, E. A., and Peacock, M. E. (1989) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 556, 116-122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
McGuire, E. A.,
and Tollefsen, D. M.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
169-175 |
| 20. | Ruoslahti, E. (1988) Ann. Rev. Cell Biol. 4, 229-255[CrossRef] |
| 21. |
Whinna, H. C.,
Choi, H. U.,
Rosenberg, L. C.,
and Church, F. C.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
3920-3924 |
| 22. |
Shirk, R. A.,
Church, F. C.,
and Wagner, W. D.
(1996)
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.
16,
1138-1146 |
| 23. |
Shirk, R. A.,
Parthasarathy, N.,
SanAntonio, J. D.,
Church, F. C.,
and Wagner, W. D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
18085-18092 |
| 24. | Griffith, M. J., Noyes, C. M., Tyndall, J. A., and Church, F. C. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 6777-6782[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Blinder, M. A., Marasa, J. C., Reynolds, C. H., Deaven, L. L., and Tollefsen, D. M. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 752-759[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Ragg, H.
(1986)
Nucleic Acids Res.
14,
1073-1087 |
| 27. |
van Deerlin, V. M. D.,
and Tollefsen, D. M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
20223-20231 |
| 28. |
Rogers, S. J.,
Pratt, C. W.,
Whinna, H. C.,
and Church, F. C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
3613-3617 |
| 29. |
Ragg, H.,
Ulshofer, T.,
and Gerewitz, J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
5211-5218 |
| 30. |
Ragg, H.,
Ulshofer, T.,
and Gerewitz, J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
22386-22391 |
| 31. |
Myles, T.,
Church, F. C.,
Whinna, H. C.,
Monard, D.,
and Stone, S. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31203-31208 |
| 32. |
Bauman, S. J.,
and Church, F. C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
34556-34565 |
| 33. |
Liaw, P. C. Y.,
Austin, R. C.,
Fredenburgh, J. C.,
Stafford, A. R.,
and Weitz, J. I.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27597-27604 |
| 34. | Holland, C. A., Henry, A. T., Whinna, H. C., and Church, F. C. (2000) FEBS Lett. 484, 87-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Sheehan, J. P.,
Tollefsen, D. M.,
and Sadler, J. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32747-32751 |
| 36. | Brinkmeyer, S., Eckert, E., and Ragg, H. (2001) Abstract of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress, P2082, Paris, France |
| 37. |
Sheehan, J. P., Wu, Q.,
Tollefsen, D. M.,
and Sadler, J. E.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
3639-3645 |
| 38. |
Griffith, M. J.,
Noyes, C. M.,
and Church, F. C.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
2218-2225 |
| 39. | Church, F. C., and Whinna, H. C. (1986) Anal. Biochem. 157, 77-83[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Teien, A. N., Abildgaard, U., and Höök, M. (1976) Thromb. Res. 8, 859-867[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Ciaccia, A. V., Cunningham, E. L., and Church, F. C. (1995) Protein Express. Purif. 6, 806-812[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. |
Ciaccia, A. V.,
Willemze, A. J.,
and Church, F. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
888-893 |
| 43. |
Ciaccia, A. V.,
Monroe, D. M.,
and Church, F. C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
14074-14079 |
| 44. |
Griffith, M. J.,
Carraway, T.,
White, G. C.,
and Dombrose, F. A.
(1983)
Blood
61,
111-118 |
| 45. |
Tollefsen, D. M.,
and Pestka, C. A.
(1985)
Blood
66,
769-774 |
| 46. |
Hortin, G.,
Tollefsen, D. M.,
and Strauss, A. W.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
15827-15830 |
| 47. |
Pratt, C. W.,
Whinna, H. C.,
and Church, F. C.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
8795-8801 |
| 48. |
Hortin, G. L.,
Tollefsen, D. M.,
and Benutto, B. M.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
13979-13982 |
| 49. | Baglin, T. P., Carrell, R. W., Church, F. C., Esmon, C. T., and Huntington, J. A. (2001) Abstract of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis OC61, Paris, France |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Dai, K. Viswanathan, Y. M. Sun, X. Li, L. Y. Liu, B. Togonu-Bickersteth, J. Richardson, C. Macaulay, P. Nash, P. Turner, et al. Identification of Myxomaviral Serpin Reactive Site Loop Sequences That Regulate Innate Immune Responses J. Biol. Chem., March 24, 2006; 281(12): 8041 - 8050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. H. Pomin, M. S. Pereira, A.-P. Valente, D. M. Tollefsen, M. S. G. Pavao, and P. A. S. Mourao Selective cleavage and anticoagulant activity of a sulfated fucan: stereospecific removal of a 2-sulfate ester from the polysaccharide by mild acid hydrolysis, preparation of oligosaccharides, and heparin cofactor II-dependent anticoagulant activity Glycobiology, April 1, 2005; 15(4): 369 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|