Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M109613200 on March 14, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19831-19838, May 31, 2002
Characterization of a Brain-enriched Chaperone, MRJ, That
Inhibits Huntingtin Aggregation and Toxicity Independently*
Jen-Zen
Chuang
§,
Hui
Zhou§¶,
Meicai
Zhu
,
Shi-Hua
Li¶,
Xiao-Jiang
Li¶, and
Ching-Hwa
Sung
**
From the
Department of Ophthalmology and
** Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Weill Medical
College of Cornell University, New York, New York 10012 and the
¶ Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta,
Georgia 30322
Received for publication, October 4, 2001, and in revised form, March 12, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Molecular chaperones are involved in a wide range
of cellular events, such as protein folding and oligomeric protein
complex assembly. DnaK- and DnaJ-like proteins are the two major
classes of molecular chaperones in mammals. Recent studies have shown that DnaJ-like family proteins can inhibit polyglutamine aggregation, a
hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases, including
Huntington's disease (HD). Although most DnaJ-like proteins
studied are ubiquitously expressed, some have restricted expression, so
it is possible that some specific chaperones may affect polyglutamine
aggregation in specific neurons. In this report, we describe the
isolation of a DnaJ-like protein MRJ and the characterization of its
chaperone activity. Tissue distribution studies showed that MRJ is
highly enriched in the central nervous system. In an in
vitro cell model of HD, overexpressed MRJ effectively suppressed
polyglutamine-dependent protein aggregation, caspase
activity, and cellular toxicity. Collectively, these results suggest
that MRJ has a relevant functional role in neurons.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Molecular chaperones (heat-shock proteins) were initially
identified by their appearance under conditions of stress. During stress, these proteins prevent aggregation and assist in the refolding of misfolded proteins. Chaperones also play essential roles in a
variety of cellular functions under normal conditions. These functions
include assisting in the folding of newly translated proteins, guiding
translocation proteins across organelle membranes, assembling and
disassembling oligomeric protein complexes, and facilitating
proteolytic degradation of unstable proteins (1).
In Escherichia coli, different classes of molecular
chaperones (DnaK, DnaJ, GrpE) function in concert: DnaJ and GrpE act as co-factors for the ATPase activity catalyzed by DnaK (2). Mammalian homologues of DnaK (Hsp70)1
and DnaJ have also been isolated, and, in contrast to the prokaryotes, mammals have many homologues of these genes. Although the Hsp70 family
members share a high degree of sequence conservation, members of the
DnaJ-like protein family are structurally diverse, containing different
combinations of 1-3 conserved domains. All DnaJ-like proteins contain
a characteristic J-domain, which is believed to mediate the
interactions with Hsp70 that regulate ATPase activity (2, 3). Regions
in the C terminus of the DnaJ-like protein are much less conserved and
thought to mediate interactions with polypeptide substrates (4). In
contrast to Hsp70, which is ubiquitously expressed, several DnaJ family
proteins exhibit some tissue specificity (5, 6). Thus, DnaJ proteins
may play a role in determining the specificity of functional engagement of Hsp70 in distinct cellular compartments or in different cell types
(4).
A correlation has been observed between the expression
levels of molecular chaperones and the ability of cells to survive stress. For example, heat shock treatment induces the overexpression of
certain chaperones, which is correlated with the increasing protective
effect against light damage in the retina (7) and against glutamate
excitotoxicity in cortical neuron cultures (8, 9). Recently, the role
of chaperones has been investigated in polyglutamine diseases, such as
HD. A hallmark of polyglutamine diseases is the proteolytic production
of an N-terminal fragment of huntingtin, containing the polyglutamine
repeat, that forms aggregates (inclusions) in the nucleus and cytoplasm
of affected neurons (10-16). Although the inclusions have not been
shown to have a causal role in these diseases, their involvement in the pathogenesis of HD has been supported by the correlation between the
number of inclusions in HD patients' cortex and the severity of their
disease (17, 18). Moreover, inclusion formation precedes neurological
dysfunction in the transgenic mice model of HD and is associated with
predisposition to cell death in in vitro cell models of HD
(19, 20).
The involvement of molecular chaperones in the polyglutamine
expansion-induced diseases is best evidenced by the fact that Hsp70 and
DnaJ-like protein Hsp40/HDJ1 were isolated as suppressors for
polyglutamine-mediated neurodegeneration in the fly (21, 22). However,
overexpression of different members of universally expressed DnaJ-like
family proteins have had varied results in the cellular model of HD:
Overexpression of HDJ-2/HSDJ increased polyglutamine-induced
aggregation (23), whereas Hsp40/HDJ-1 overexpression inhibited
polyglutamine-induced aggregation (24, 25).
In this paper, we describe the isolation and functional
characterization of a DnaJ-like family protein, MRJ, which is highly enriched in the central nervous system. In HD cell models,
overexpressed MRJ effectively suppressed the protein aggregation,
caspase activity, and cellular toxicity induced by the mutant
huntingtin, suggesting that MRJ may be a chaperone that acts on
neuronal disease proteins.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Molecular Cloning of Bovine and Human mrj--
Partial
cDNAs of bovine mrj were initially isolated in a yeast
two-hybrid screen in which the second extracellular region of
peripherin/rds was used as bait. To construct the bait plasmid, the
coding sequence for peripherin/rds (Arg-123 to Ser-264) was PCR-amplified from the human retinal cDNA (forward primer,
5'-GGAATTCCATATGCGGGGCTCGCTGGAGAACACC; reverse primer,
5'-GTACCCATGGTTAGGAGTTCATGAGGCTGCTGTA) and inserted into
NdeI/NcoI-digested pASII vector
(CLONTECH, Palo Alto, CA). To obtain the
full-length bovine mrj cDNA, 5'- and 3'-RACE were carried out using a Marathon cDNA amplification kit
(CLONTECH). Briefly, first-strand cDNAs were
synthesized on bovine retinal poly(A)+ RNA using
gene-specific primers (5'-CTGGCCGTCTTCTTCAACTTCCACCC-3' for 5'-RACE;
5'-GGAGCCGAGGCACGGGCTCGTTC-3' for 3'-RACE). The second-strand cDNA
was subsequently synthesized and ligated with an adapter primer.
Finally, 5'-RACE and 3'-RACE products were PCR-amplified using
adapter-ligated cDNAs as template. The forward primer used for the
PCR was a modified adapter primer that contains an extra BamHI site, and the reverse primer is a nested gene-specific
primer (5'-CATGCCATGGTGATCTTCCTGCTGTTCACCAC for 5'-RACE;
5'-CATGCCATGGAAGTCTGTTTCCTTCCTTTGATGC for 3'-RACE). The nested PCR
products were then digested with NcoI and
BamHI and inserted into
NcoI/BamHI-digested pACTII vector (CLONTECH) for sequencing.
To isolate human mrj cDNA, full-length bovine
mrj cDNA was radiolabeled with
[
-32P]dCTP (Ready to Go kit, Amersham Biosciences,
Inc., Piscataway, NJ) and used as a probe to screen a human retinal
cDNA library (a kind gift from Dr. J. Nathans). The cDNA
inserts were PCR-amplified from the positive isolates and cloned for
sequencing. Several clones contained full-length human mrj,
with an encoded sequence identical to the human mrj recorded
in GenBankTM (accession number NP_005485).
Constructs--
To generate a GST-MRJ fusion construct for
antibody production, a BamHI/XhoI cDNA
fragment containing the C-terminal 198 residues of bovine MRJ was
excised from the pACTII vector isolated from the two-hybrid screen and
inserted 3' of the GST open reading frame in pGEX-5X-2 vector. The same
cDNA fragment was also subcloned into a
BamHI/SalI-digested pMAL-cRI* vector (26) to
produce an MBP-MRJ fusion for antibody purification. The coding
sequence of full-length human MRJ and an N-terminal 41-amino
acid-deleted mutant were also subcloned into a PRK5 vector for
eukaryotic expression.
For the ATPase activity assay, a His6 tag was fused to the
C terminus of an ORF containing either the full-length
(MRJ-(1-241)), the J plus G/F domain (MRJ-(1-109)), or the
C-terminal domain (MRJ-(108-241)) of human MRJ in pET28a vector using
standard PCR-cloning methods. All PCR-derived constructs were sequenced
to confirm the absence of spurious mutations.
Northern Blotting--
Total RNA (20 µg) from various bovine
tissues was purified and resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis under
denaturing conditions and blotted as described previously (27). A
-32P-radiolabeled, bovine mrj cDNA
fragment containing the region encoding the entire 3'-UTR region
(nucleotides 811-1374) was hybridized in 5× SSC, 30% formamide, 2%
SDS, 200 µg/ml denatured herring sperm DNA and 5× Denhardt's
solution at 42 °C. Human poly(A)+ RNA tissue blots
(CLONTECH) were similarly probed with radiolabeled cDNA fragment of the human mrj 3'-UTR region
(nucleotides 730-1406). After hybridization, RNA blots were washed
three times with 1× SSC and 0.1% SDS at room temperature before autoradiography.
ATPase Activity Assay--
BL21(DE3) harboring fusion constructs
encoding His6-tagged MRJ fragments were induced with
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactoside for 3 h. The cells
were lysed, and postnuclear supernatant was purified on a nickel column
according to the manufacturer's instructions (Novagen, Madison, WI).
Fusion proteins were dialyzed against ATPase reaction buffer (20 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.4, 50 mM KCl, and 5 mM MgOAc). The protein concentration was determined using a protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and the purity of the protein was examined by SDS-PAGE analysis followed by Coomassie Blue staining.
The ATPase activity assay was performed as described previously (28)
with minor modifications. Briefly, assays were carried out in
duplicate, with two 50-µl reactions per sample. Each reaction contained 1 µM bovine Hsp70 (Hsc70, Sigma Chemical Co.,
St. Louis, MO), 50 µM ATP, 0.6 µM purified
His6-tagged MRJ fragment, and 2 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP (>3000 Ci/mM, PerkinElmer Life
Sciences, Wellesley, MA) in ATPase reaction buffer. Prior to the
reaction, 7 µl of each sample was removed and used to assess the
basal level of radioactive release. At different time intervals during
the 30 °C incubation, 7-µl aliquots were taken out and transferred
to 0.5 ml of suspension containing 50 mM HCl, 5 mM H3PO4, and 7% (w/v) activated
charcoal (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.) to stop the reaction. The
reactions were centrifuged and assayed by liquid scintillation
counting. The cpm values were converted to moles of Pi
release into the supernatant at each time point. Initial titration of
MRJ proteins (0-6 µM) in the Hsp70 ATPase assay showed
that the ATPase stimulation effect of MRJ is
dosage-dependent and that components in the ratio of 1 mol
of Hsp70 to 1-3 mol of full-length MRJ fragments were effective. Note
that the His6-tag has been found to have no adverse effect
on the co-chaperone activity of Hsp40 (29).
Generation and Purification of Anti-MRJ Antibody--
Bovine
GST-MRJ was produced according to the manufacturer's instructions
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) with minor modifications. Briefly, the
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactoside-induced bacterial culture was centrifuged and the cell pellets were resuspended in
breaking buffer (50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, 150 mM
NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1 µg/ml lysozyme, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, and 0.7 µg/ml pepstatin) and sonicated. The
sonicated samples were supplemented with NaCl to a final concentration
of 0.5 M and then centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 15 min. The
resulting pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, sonicated, and recentrifuged. The final pellet was dissolved in 8 M urea, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 5 mM
EDTA, and 50 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0, and subjected to SDS-PAGE.
A gel slice containing GST-MRJ was excised, ground, and used for
immunization (Cocalico, Reamstown, PA). The resulting
antiserum was used in this report. MBP-MRJ fusion proteins, which are
soluble in Triton X-100, were produced and purified according to
manufacturer's instruction (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA). To
affinity-purify the immunized rabbit antiserum, crude serum was first
passed through Sepharose columns conjugated with GST and MBP proteins,
then a column conjugated with MBP-MRJ fusion protein. The antibodies were eluted with 50 mM glycine-HCl, pH 2.8, and neutralized
with 1 M Tris-Cl, pH 9.5.
Cell Culture and Immunocytochemistry--
PRK vectors expressing
HD exon 1 (1-67 amino acids) plus additional 150 glutamines, Hsp70,
and red fluorescence protein have been described in a previous study
(25). Transient transfection of 293 cells was performed with
LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). For co-transfection, same
amounts of huntingtin cDNA and the PRK vectors were used for
expression of huntingtin alone. At 24 or 48 h after transfection,
cells grown in six-well plates were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and
permeabilized by 0.2% Triton-100. Double labeling was carried out
using rabbit anti-MRJ antibody and mouse monoclonal anti-huntingtin
antibody. The latter one was generated against the human huntingtin N
terminus (amino acids 1-256), the same antigen that has been used to
generate rabbit antibody EM48 (30). Hoechst dye (1 µg/ml) was used to
label the nuclei. A Zeiss fluorescence microscope (Axiovert 135) and video system (Dage-MTI Inc., Michigan City, IN) were used to capture images. The captured images were stored and processed using Adobe PhotoShop software.
Cell Viability and Caspase Activity Assays--
Cell viability
was determined by a modified
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTS)
assay (Cell Titer 96, Promega) as described in our previous study (25). Briefly, transfected 293 cells in six-well plates were transferred into
96-well plates at a density of 20,000 cells/well in serum-free medium,
and 20 µl of MTS reagent (2.1 mg/ml) was added to each well. The
cells were then incubated for 45-60 min at 37 °C in a 5%
CO2 incubator. The reaction was stopped by adding 25 µl
of 10% SDS. The plates were read with a microplate reader (SPECTRAmax PLUS, Molecular Devices, Palo Alto, CA) at 490 nm. Each data point was
obtained using a triplet assay.
Fluorometric assays of caspase-3 activity (25, 31) were performed using
kits obtained from Bio-Rad Laboratory (Hercules, CA). Cultured 293 cells were transiently transfected with mutant huntingtin 150Q or
co-transfected with huntingtin and MRJ for 24 or 48 h in six-well
plates. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline, the cells were
lysed in the lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM NaH2PO4/NaHPO4, pH
7.5, 130 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM
sodium pyrophosphate). To measure caspase activity, 200 µl of assay
buffer (40 mM PIPES, pH 7.2, 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM EDTA, 0.2% (w/v)
CHAPS, 20% sucrose) was added to a tube, with a final concentration of
10 ng/µl peptide substrate
(acetyl-Asp-Glu-Val-Asp-7-amido-4-(trifluoromethyl) for
caspase-3. Cell lysates (200 µg of protein) were added to the tube to
start the reaction. When the caspase inhibitor
(Z-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethylketone) was used to measure the
specificity of the assay, it was added to cell lysates at a
concentration of 50 µM for 30 min before the addition of
the specific caspase substrate. Background was obtained with the same
assay buffer without cell lysates. The reaction was incubated at
37 °C for 1 h, followed by the measurement of the caspase
activity with a fluorescence plate reader (Fluostar Galaxy, BMG
Labtechnologies, Durham, NC) set at 390-nm excitation and 460-nm
emission. For staurosporine treatment, transfected cells were grown in
culture medium containing 1% fetal bovine serum and then incubated
with staurosporine (2.5 µM, Sigma Chemical Co.) for
6 h before caspase-3 activity analysis. All values were obtained
from three to five independent experiments and expressed as mean ± S.D. Statistical significance was assessed by using Student's
t test. p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Immunoblotting--
Various tissues dissected from rats were
homogenized and lysed in extraction buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5%
deoxycholate, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl,
2 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors). The supernatant
prepared by centrifugation (40,000 × g for 1 h at
4 °C) was subjected to SDS-PAGE and blotted. Immunoblotting assays
were performed by standard procedures. For signal detection, alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated secondary antibody (Promega) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitro blue tetrazolium substrate were used. For the transfected cells, immunoblotting procedures were
carried out as described previously (25).
 |
RESULTS |
Molecular Cloning of Bovine and Human mrj--
During a two-hybrid
screen for genes whose products interact with a retinal disease protein
peripherin/rds (32, 33), a cDNA containing partial sequences with
significant homology to several DnaJ-like family proteins was isolated.
To obtain a full-length cDNA of this DnaJ-like protein, we produced
5'-RACE and 3'-RACE PCR products from bovine retinal RNA, and fused
them together (see "Experimental Procedures"). The deduced amino
acid sequence of this bovine cDNA (Fig.
1) was 94 and 90% identical to human and
mouse MRJ, respectively (34, 35). Thus, our clones are the bovine
orthologues of MRJ. This was further supported by the isolation of
several full-length human mrj cDNA clones from a human
retinal library probed with the bovine cDNA. Although human MRJ has
242 amino residues, both the bovine and mouse mrj encode an
open reading frame of 241 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 26.9 kDa and a predicted pI of 7.4 (Table
I). Hydropathy analysis revealed no
transmembrane domains.

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Sequence of the bovine mrj
cDNA clone and its amino acid sequence. Nucleotide and
deduced sequence of mrj containing the ORF, 5'-UTR, and
3'-UTR (GenBankTM accession number AF426743). The 729-bp
ORF encodes a putative 242-amino acid protein. Note the Kozak sequence
or ribosome binding sequence is locate upstream of the first ATG in the
5'-UTR. The asterisk represents the stop codon.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
MRJ and its closely related homologues
List of the five most closely related published DnaJ-like family
proteins and their characterizations.
|
|
MRJ belongs to a growing list of DnaJ-like family proteins. It contains
the signature J domain at the N terminus (amino acids 1-74), followed
by a glycine/phenylalanine (G/F)-rich domain (amino acids 75-119), and
unique C-terminal sequences. Sequence comparisons revealed that, among
DnaJ-like family members, MRJ shares high overall identity to MSJ1
(70% identity (6)), HSJ-1b (61% identity (5)), Hsp40/HDJ-1 (41%
identity (36, 37)), HDJ2/HSD-J (40% identity (38, 39)), and MTJ1 (31%
identity (40)). However, the molecular masses and pI values of these
proteins are rather diverse (Table I). On the other hand, the molecular
mass of MRJ is similar to that of several small heat-shock proteins
such as hsp20 (41), hsp25 (42), hsp27 (43), and crystallin (44, 45).
However, there is no significant homology between MRJ and these other
small heat-shock proteins.
Stimulatory Effect of MRJ on ATPase Activity of Hsp70--
One
feature of E. coli DnaJ is its absolute requirement for
interaction with DnaK to stimulate Hsp70 ATPase activity (46, 47).
Although the mouse (34) and human MRJs (35, 48) have been previously
isolated, the ability of MRJ to act as an Hsp70 co-chaperone has not
yet been experimentally confirmed.
To test whether MRJ is a bona fide co-chaperone, recombinant
His6-tagged human MRJ was produced, purified, and subjected
to an Hsp70 ATPase activity assay (Fig.
2). In agreement with a previous report
(28), Hsp70 alone exhibited a weak ATPase activity. Under our
experimental conditions, Hsp70 itself has a turnover rate of 0.025 mol
of ATP hydrolyzed per minute (Fig. 2D). The addition of
full-length MRJ fragment resulted in a significant stimulation of the
Hsp70 ATPase; this stimulation was both dose-dependent (Fig. 2C) and time-dependent (Fig.
2D). In 20 min, MRJ increased the ATP hydrolysis rate
~8-fold relative to Hsp70 protein alone. Previously, it was shown
that the region containing the J plus G/F domain of Hsp40, but not the
J-domain alone, also had a stimulatory effect on Hsp70 ATPase activity
(28). To compare the stimulatory effect of different domains of MRJ,
the N terminus of MRJ-(1-109) containing both the J-domain and G/F
domain and the C terminus of MRJ-(108-241) were subjected to Hsp70
ATPase assays. We showed that MRJ-(1-109) was capable of increasing
Hsp70 ATPase activity by ~5.5-fold. Surprisingly, however, the
C-terminal half of MRJ-(108-241) also displayed the ability to enhance
the Hsp70-catalyzed ATPase activity ~4-fold. Previously, it has been
shown that denatured protein substrates can also stimulate the ATPase
activity catalyzed by Hsp70, however, only when they were added at the
concentration of several hundred-fold molar excess to that of Hsp70
(27). In contrast, MRJ fragments are functionally active at 1- to
3-fold molar excess to Hsp70, indicating it acts as a co-chaperone,
rather than as a substrate.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
ATPase catalyzed by Hsp70 can be stimulated
by MRJ fragments. A, schematic diagram of the
His6-tagged human MRJ fragments MRJ-(1-241), MRJ-(1-109),
and MRJ-(108-241) used in Hsp70 ATPase assay (B)
His6-tagged MRJ fragments were purified by nickel column,
analyzed on SDS-PAGE, and stained by Coomassie Blue. The molecular
weight markers are indicated. C, titration of stimulatory
effect of full-length MRJ on Hsp70-catalyzed ATPase activity. Hsp70 (1 µM) and various concentrations of full-length MRJ
(MRJ-(1-241)) were incubated with ATP in a 20-µl reaction at
30 °C for 30 min. The amount of [32P]Pi
released into the supernatant was determined by liquid scintillation
counting. The cpm data were converted to picomoles after correction for
background release of radioactivity into the supernatant, counting
efficiency, and specific activity of [ -32P]ATP.
D, Hsp70 (1 µM) without (diamond)
or with 3 µM of His6-tagged MRJ-(1-241)
( ), MRJ-(1-109) ( ), or MRJ-(108-241) ( ) were incubated with
[ -32P]ATP for 30 min at 30 °C. At each time point
indicated, duplicate aliquots were removed and assayed. The results
were obtained from three independent experiments.
|
|
Enrichment of MRJ in the Central Nervous System--
A Northern
blot was performed to examine the tissue distribution of
mrj. The initial attempt using the full-length bovine mrj
cDNA as a probe detected two transcripts of ~3 and 1.7 kb in RNAs
isolated from different tissues (data not shown). To rule out the
possibility that multiple transcripts were derived from nonspecific
cross-reactions of other DnaJ-like proteins, a probe containing only
the 3'-UTR region of bovine mrj was then used (see
"Experimental Procedures"). This probe detected a single ~1.7-kb
transcript. The highest levels of the mrj messenger were found in retina and brain, whereas low levels of transcript were seen
in other tissues (Fig. 3A).
The conditions for blotting were very specific, as evidenced by the
fact that the most closely related homologue, MSJ-1, which is
testis-specific and has a transcript size of ~1.2 kb (Table I (6)),
was not detected (data not shown). Similarly, a Northern blot of
mRNAs isolated from various human tissues
(CLONTECH) using a human mrj cDNA
probe also revealed a brain-enriched distribution (Fig. 3B).
Within brain, Northern blotting of mRNAs isolated from different
brain regions showed that mrj was expressed at a higher
level in hippocampus and thalamus and a lower level in amygdala,
substantia nigra, corpus callosum, and caudate nucleus (Fig.
3C).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Tissue expression patterns of MRJ determined
by Northern blotting and immunoblotting assays. A,
total RNAs isolated from the different bovine tissues as indicated were
probed with radiolabeled bovine mrj cDNA fragment
(top panel). Image of ethidium bromide-stained agarose
demonstrates that a similar amount of each RNA was loaded in each
sample (bottom panel). B, human tissue
poly(A)+ RNA blot (CLONTECH) was probed
with radiolabeled human mrj cDNA fragment. C,
Northern blot of poly(A)+ RNAs isolated from different
human brain regions probed with the same fragment used in B.
A single band of ~1.7 kb mrj transcript was seen in both
bovine and human RNAs. D, postnuclear supernatants of
various rat tissues were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE, transferred, and
immunoblotted with the affinity-purified anti-MRJ antibody.
|
|
The tissue expression pattern of MRJ was also examined by
immunoblotting. A single band with an estimated molecular mass of ~28
kDa was recognized by the affinity-purified anti-MRJ antibody in a few
tissues (Fig. 3D). Consistent with the distribution of the
mrj transcript, the highest amount of MRJ was detected in brain and retina among the tissues examined.
Reductions in HD Aggregation and Cellular Toxicity--
The
evidence that MRJ is a co-factor of Hsp70 and is preferentially
expressed in brain prompted us to examine whether MRJ can reduce
polyglutamine protein aggregation associated with neurodegenerative diseases, such as HD. In the HD brain, N-terminal fragments of mutant
huntingtin form inclusions in both the cytoplasm and nucleus (15, 29).
Similar inclusions are also observed in tissue culture cells
transfected with N-terminal huntingtin fragments (19, 20, 49). Using
human embryonic kidney 293 cells transfected with mutant huntingtin N
terminus as a model, we found that cells transfected with huntingtin
alone exhibited puncta or aggregates distributed throughout the
cytoplasm and nucleus (Fig.
4A). At 24 h
post-transfection, 61.8% of these cells displayed aggregates. In
contrast, cells where MRJ was co-expressed had diffusely distributed huntingtin and fewer aggregates; only ~11.2% of them had aggregates (Fig. 4B). To confirm this observation biochemically, we
analyzed huntingtin aggregation by Western blot. At 24 h,
co-expression of MRJ dramatically decreased the high molecular weight
huntingtin aggregates (Fig. 4D, bracket) and
increased the amount of huntingtin monomers (Fig. 4D,
arrow). The reduction in huntingtin aggregation was not due
to a decrease in the expression of transfected proteins, because double
immunostaining showed that transfected cells expressed both MRJ and
mutant huntingtin at relatively high levels. We found that the MRJ
lacking the partial J-domain (first 41 residues) also displayed a
similar ability in inhibiting huntingtin aggregation (data not shown),
consistent with the C-terminal chaperone activity observed in the
ATPase assays.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Inhibition of aggregation of mutant
huntingtin by MRJ. A, low magnification (×100)
of 293 cells transfected with the HD exon1 protein containing 150 glutamines (150Q) alone or 150Q and MRJ combined.
Transfected cells were stained with mouse antibody to huntingtin and
rabbit antibody to MRJ 24 h after transfection. B,
quantitative assessment of transfected cells containing huntingtin
aggregates. Approximately 61.8% of cells transfected with huntingtin
alone contain aggregates (n = 462) whereas only about
11.2% of cells transfected with both huntingtin and MRJ contain
aggregates (n = 583). C, high magnification
of (×400) of 293 cells co-transfected with MRJ and 150Q at 24 or
48 h. Arrows indicate huntingtin inclusions that are
also MRJ immunoreactive. D, immunoblotting analysis of
aggregated huntingtin in 293 cells co-transfected with 150Q alone ( )
or with (+) MRJ after 24 and 48 h. High molecular weight
huntingtin aggregates and monomeric huntingtin are indicated by
bracket and arrow, respectively.
|
|
Consistent with the previous report (25), the amount of huntingtin
aggregation increased over time after transfection. Almost all cells
exhibited huntingtin aggregates at 48 h after transfection (Fig.
4C). This was supported by the increase of high molecular weight aggregates detected in the Western blot assays (Fig.
4D). In contrast to the 24-h time point, the inhibitory
effect of MRJ on huntingtin aggregation was remarkably reduced. As
shown in Fig. 4C (arrows), many MRJ
co-transfected cells also had aggregates, and these aggregates were
immunoreactive for MRJ. Consistently, MRJ showed little or no effect on
the removal of the high molecular weight aggregates in the Western
blots (Fig. 4D).
Mutant huntingtin is toxic to transfected 293 cells (50). To examine
whether MRJ also protects against huntingtin excitotoxicity, we
measured the cell viability of transfected cells using an MTS assay.
Cells transfected with huntingtin alone exhibited about 55% cell
viability relative to the mock-transfected control cells (Fig.
5A). A similar degree of
decreased viability was seen at both 24 and 48 h after
transfection, despite the greater aggregation at the 48-h time point.
Co-expression of MRJ significantly improved the viability of the
huntingtin-transfected cells to 75-82% of the mock transfected
control cells (Fig. 5A). The protective effect of MRJ was
similar to that of Hsp70. However, the aggregation level was different
between the 24- and 48-h transfected cells, indicating that cell
viability may not be critically dependent on the amount of huntingtin
aggregation. Overexpression of controls, either red fluorescence
protein or huntingtin 20Q, had no effect on cell viability (Fig.
5A).

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of huntingtin toxicity by
MRJ. A, cell viability was detected using MTS assay.
Transfection of 150Q alone or with control red fluorescence protein
(150Q+RFP) for either 24 or 48 h resulted in a similar
decrease in cell viability. Co-expression of MRJ (150Q+MRJ)
or Hsp70 (150Q+Hsp70) for 24 or 48 h significantly
increased the viability of cells that were transfected with 150Q. 20Q
or Hsp70 transfection alone did not significantly affect viability. The
viability of cells transfected with empty PRK vector is considered to
be 100%. **, p < 0.01 compared with 20Q transfection
alone. B, MRJ inhibits caspase-3 activity in
huntingtin-transfected cells. Co-expression of MRJ significantly
inhibited the increase of caspase-3 activity mediated by 150Q at 24 as
well as 48 h after transfection. 20Q or Hsp70 transfection alone
did not significantly affect caspase-3 activity. The increase is
compared with that of cells transfected with PRK vector alone.
C, staurosporine treatment of 293 cells (STS, 2.5 µM) for 6 h markedly increased caspase-3 activity.
This increase was reduced by MRJ overexpression (+MRJ) for
either 24 or 48 h. Values are expressed as a percentage of control
(PRK vector transfection alone). **, p < 0.01 compared
with cells without MRJ.
|
|
Our recent studies suggested that chaperones protect against
polyglutamine toxicity via inhibition of caspase activity (25). To
examine whether MRJ also inhibits caspase activation induced by mutant
huntingtin, we measured caspase-3 activity in transfected 293 cells.
Expanded huntingtin (150Q), but not 20Q, increased caspase-3 activity
(Fig. 5B). Like Hsp70, MRJ also significantly reduced the
caspase-3 activity induced by mutant huntingtin. Co-expression of
control red fluorescence protein did not prevent the increase in
caspase-3 activity. The inhibitory effect of MRJ on caspase-3 activity
was not much different between the 24- and 48-h time points. Finally,
MRJ also inhibited the caspase-3 activity augmented by the
apoptotic reagent staurosporine (Fig. 5C). This finding suggests that MRJ is capable of reducing caspase-3 activity mediated by
not only mutant huntingtin but also another insult.
 |
DISCUSSION |
This report describes the isolation and functional
characterization of a neuronal-enriched DnaJ-like protein, MRJ.
In vitro, MRJ is capable of stimulating Hsp70 ATPase
activity. In the cell model of HD, MRJ can inhibit huntingtin
aggregation, caspase activity, and cellular toxicity. Many of these
functions have been assigned to other co-chaperones and/or chaperones
(25, 51-55), arguing that MRJ acts like a functional chaperone. These
abilities of MRJ, taken together with its neuronal-enriched
distribution, suggested that MRJ could be an endogenous molecular
chaperone for neuronal proteins, including the HD disease protein.
The E. coli genome encodes only one DnaK, one DnaJ, and two
or three additional J-domain containing molecules (56). In contrast, at
least 11 Hsp70 (57) and 40 DnaJ-like proteins are identified in the
mammal expressed sequence tag sequences (34), suggesting that chaperone
functions are more specific and highly regulated in mammals. One
possible mechanism to regulate chaperone function is the consideration
of specific DnaJ family members with the protein substrates and/or
specific members of Hsp70. This hypothesis has been supported by the
unique tissue expression patterns of multiple members of the DnaJ-like
family. At both the mRNA and protein levels, we showed a remarkable
enrichment of MRJ in the brain of adult animals. This is consistent
with the in situ studies in the mouse embryo (E12.5), where
high levels of MRJ expression were seen in retina and several regions
of the brain (trigeminal ganglia, diencephalon, and midbrain), whereas
little or no expression of this molecule was detected in other organs
(34). Moreover, the same report showed that the defective placental
development caused by the loss of MRJ expression cannot be compensated
for by the other two DnaJ-like family proteins, suggesting that
different members of DnaJ proteins may have specific and unique
cellular functions.
In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, DnaJ-like proteins are believed to
act as co-chaperones with the Hsp70 protein. The J-domain of DnaJ
proteins is thought to regulate the ATPase activity of Hsp70, whereas
the C-terminal domain binds to misfolded polypeptides and modulates the
folding process (1). Similar to the results described for mammalian
Hsp40 (29), we found that the J plus G/F domain of MRJ is functionally
active in stimulating Hsp70 ATPase activity. For both Hsp40 and MRJ,
this region itself yields more than half of the stimulatory activity of
the full-length protein. Interestingly, our results suggest that the
unique MRJ C terminus also was able to regulate Hsp70 ATPase activity.
The C terminus activity was slightly weaker than that of the J plus G/F
domain. Lower but substantial ATPase stimulatory activity has also been
seen in the C terminus of E. coli DnaJ (58), but it has yet
been described in mammalian DnaJ. In agreement with the in
vitro ATPase assays, the MRJ protein with a partially deleted J-domain also retains some ability to inhibit huntingtin aggregation.
Previously, two MRJ homologues, Hsp40/HDJ-1 and HDJ-2/HSDJ, have been
shown to be able to reduce polyglutamine aggregation in different cell
models (23-25, 59). Although these chaperones share ~40% overall
amino acid identity with MRJ, their C-terminal sequences are rather
diverged. Interestingly, it has been noted that, like MRJ, truncated
HDJ-2/HSDJ lacking the J-domain also can effectively suppress
aggregation caused by the mutant ataxin-3 in vitro (60). It
is thus probable that the J-domain, the specific C terminus, or both
could be involved in the chaperone activity of DnaJ proteins in cells.
These findings indicate that molecular chaperones have a broad
substrate specificity, and thus the physiological roles of these
chaperones are more likely to be determined by their expression level
and tissue localization. At present, the only other known
neuron-enriched DnaJ-like family protein is HSJ1, which was initially
isolated by screening an expression library with an antibody against a
putative structural component of neurofibrillary tangles associated
with Alzheimer's disease (5). Interestingly, HSJ1b and MRJ are
phylogenetically closely related: They share 61% identity overall. The
endogenous substrate for HSJ1 has not yet been identified.
The ability of MRJ to reduce huntingtin aggregation and the
co-localization of MRJ with huntingtin aggregates suggested that huntingtin could be the endogenous substrate of MRJ-mediated chaperone activity. Currently, we do not know how MRJ inhibits the formation of
huntingtin protein aggregates. It is possible that MRJ constantly corrects the misfolding of mutant huntingtin during its protein synthesis and thus improves its solubility. Another possibility is that
MRJ is involved in the rapid degradation of unstable proteins soon
after their synthesis, a function that has been described for several
DnaJ-like proteins in yeast (61, 62). The increase of huntingtin
degradation products was indeed noted in the MRJ transfected cell
lysates (Fig. 4D).
Although the pathological role of huntingtin inclusions is still
controversial (56), the formation of polyglutamine aggregates is
apparently correlated with disease progression in HD animal models (16,
17). Moreover, chaperones appear to be able to prevent
neurodegeneration in polyglutamine disease models of the fly (21, 22).
Nevertheless, the exact molecular mechanism by which chaperones prevent
cell death is poorly understood. The present study showed that
decreases in huntingtin aggregation in MRJ-overexpressing cells were
not always kinetically associated with a decrease in cellular toxicity.
Namely, aggregation was severe at 48 h even in the presence of
MRJ, whereas cell death remained low in the MRJ-transfected cells.
Although there are several possibilities, the simplest explanation is
that the ability of MRJ to inhibit polyglutamine aggregation is
independent of cellular toxicity. Interestingly, the caspase-3 activity
inhibition exhibited by MRJ correlates well with the cell viability.
Our previous study has shown that, although chaperones, Hsp70 and N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor, cannot inhibit huntingtin
aggregation, they are able to inhibit cellular toxicity as well as
caspase activity (25). Furthermore, MRJ is able to inhibit
staurosporine-induced cell death, which is irrelevant to huntingtin
aggregation. It is thus conceivable that the MRJ-mediated cell rescue
occurs through an aggregation-independent pathway.
If the above hypothesis is true, the ability of MRJ to inhibit
huntingtin toxicity suggests that MRJ may also be able to reduce the
cellular toxicity caused by the expansion of the polyglutamine tracts
responsible for other types of neuronal degenerative diseases, or even
other kinds of diseases. These other neuronal polyglutamine diseases
include dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy, spinocerebellar ataxia
type 1 (SCA1), SCA3, and SCA7. One common feature of these polyglutamine diseases is the striking specificity of cell death. For
example, although huntingtin is ubiquitously expressed in neuronal and
non-neuronal cells, neurons in the striatum are primarily affected in
HD patients (63-66). The high expression level of MRJ in neurons
suggests that MRJ could act as a surveillance chaperone for regulating
neuronal protein aggregation and inhibition of polyglutamine toxicity
in vivo. Impairment of these processes could be particularly
related to the neuropathology of the diseases. Further investigation of
the temporal and spatial regulation of MRJ expression in brain, and its
correlation with the vulnerable neurons will be important to reveal the
putative role of chaperones in these diseases and may also provide
novel therapeutic approaches for HD or other neuronal degenerative diseases.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Ramee Lee, Kai Xu, and Fengli Cao
for expert technical assistance during the initial phase of this work.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a career development award, by
the Dolley Green Special Scholar Award (Research To Prevent Blindness), by The Foundation Fighting Blindness, and by National Institutes of
Health Grants EY11307 (to C.-H. S.), AG19206, and NS41449 (to X.-J. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF426743.
§
Both authors contributed equally to this work.
Present address: Center of Molecular Biology, Air Force
General Hospital, Beijing 100036, China.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Margaret M. Dyson Vision Research Institute, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 1300 York Ave., LC313, New York, NY 10021. Tel.:
212-746-2291; Fax: 212-746-6670; E-mail:
chsung@mail.med.cornell.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 14, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M109613200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
Hsp70, heat-shock
protein 70;
HD, Huntington's disease;
RACE, rapid amplification of
cDNA ends;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
ORF, open
reading frame;
UTR, untranslated repeat;
MTS, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic acid;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid;
SCA1, spinocerebellar ataxia type
1.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hartl, F. U.
(1996)
Nature
381,
571-580[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Liberek, K.,
Marszalek, J.,
Ang, D.,
Georgopoulos, C.,
and Zylicz, M.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
2874-2878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Scidmore, M. A.,
Okamura, H. H.,
and Rose, M. D.
(1993)
Mol. Biol. Cell
4,
1145-1159[Abstract]
|
| 4.
|
Cyr, D. M.,
Langer, T.,
and Douglas, M. G.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
176-181[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Cheetham, M. E.,
Brion, J. P.,
and Anderton, B. H.
(1992)
Biochem. J
284,
469-476[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Berruti, G.,
Perego, L.,
Borgonovo, B.,
and Martegani, E.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
239,
430-441[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Barbe, M.,
Tytell, M.,
Gower, D.,
and Welch, W.
(1988)
Science
241,
1817-1820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Rordorf, G.,
Koroshetz, W. J.,
and Bonventre, J. V.
(1991)
Neuron
7,
1043-1051[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Lowenstein, D. H.,
Chan, P. H.,
and Miles, M. F.
(1991)
Neuron
7,
1053-1060[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Igarashi, S.,
Koide, R.,
Shimohata, T.,
Yamada, M.,
Hayashi, Y.,
Takano, H.,
Date, H.,
Oyake, M.,
Sato, T.,
Sato, A.,
Egawa, S.,
Ikeuchi, T.,
Tanaka, H.,
Nakano, R.,
Tanaka, K.,
Hozumi, I.,
Inuzuka, T.,
Takahashi, H.,
and Tsuji, S.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
18,
111-117[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Li, M.,
Miwa, S.,
Kobayashi, Y.,
Merry, D. E.,
Yamamoto, M.,
Tanaka, F.,
Doyu, M.,
Hashizume, Y.,
Fischbeck, K. H.,
and Sobue, G.
(1998)
Ann. Neurol.
44,
249-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Skinner, P. J.,
Koshy, B. T.,
Cummings, C. J.,
Klement, I. A.,
Helin, K.,
Servadio, A.,
Zoghbi, H. Y.,
and Orr, H. T.
(1997)
Nature
389,
971-974[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Paulson, H. L.,
Perez, M. K.,
Trottier, Y.,
Trojanowski, J. Q.,
Subramony, S. H.,
Das, S. S.,
Vig, P.,
Mandel, J. L.,
Fischbeck, K. H.,
and Pittman, R. N.
(1997)
Neuron
19,
333-344[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Holmberg, M.,
Duyckaerts, C.,
Durr, A.,
Cancel, G.,
Gourfinkel-An, I.,
Damier, P.,
Faucheux, B.,
Rottier, Y.,
Hirsch, E. C.,
Agid, Y.,
and Brice, A.
(1998)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
7,
913-918[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
DiFiglia, M.,
Sapp, E.,
Chase, K. O.,
Davies, S. W.,
Bates, G. P.,
Vonsattel, J. P.,
and Aronin, N.
(1997)
Science
277,
1990-1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Davies, S. W.,
Turmaine, M.,
Cozens, B. A.,
DiFiglia, M.,
Sharp, A. H.,
Ross, C. A.,
Scherzinger, E.,
Wanker, E. E.,
Mangiarini, L.,
and Bates, G. P.
(1997)
Cell
90,
537-548[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Yamamoto, A.,
Lucas, J. J.,
and Hen, R.
(2000)
Cell
101,
57-66[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Becher, M. W.,
Kotzuk, J. A.,
Sharp, A. H.,
Davies, S. W.,
Bates, G. P.,
Price, D. L.,
and Ross, C. A.
(1998)
Neurobiol. Dis.
4,
387-397[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Martindale, D.,
Hackam, A.,
Wieczorek, A.,
Ellerby, L.,
Wellington, C.,
McCutcheon, K.,
Singaraja, R.,
Kazemi-Esfarjani, P.,
Devon, R.,
Kim, S. U.,
Bredesen, D. E.,
Tufaro, F.,
and Hayden, M. R.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
18,
150-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Cooper, J. K.,
Schilling, G.,
Peters, M. F.,
Herring, W. J.,
Sharp, A. H.,
Kaminsky, Z.,
Masone, J.,
Khan, F. A.,
Delanoy, M.,
Borchelt, D. R.,
Dawson, V. L.,
Dawson, T. M.,
and Ross, C. A.
(1998)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
7,
7783-7790
|
| 21.
|
Warrick, J. M.,
Chan, H. Y.,
Gray-Board, G. L.,
Chai, Y.,
Paulson, H. L.,
and Bonini, N. M.
(1999)
Nat. Genet.
23,
425-428[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Kazemi-Esfarjani, P.,
and Benzer, S.
(2000)
Science
287,
1837-1840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Wyttenbach, A.,
Carmichael, J.,
Swartz, J.,
Furlong, R. A.,
Narain, Y.,
Rankin, J.,
and Rubinsztein, D. C.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
2898-2903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Jana, N. R.,
Tanaka, M.,
Wang, G.,
and Nukina, N.
(2000)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
9,
2009-2018[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Zhou, H., Li, S. H.,
and Li, X. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
48417-48424[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Chuang, J.-Z.,
Lin, D. C.,
and Lin, S.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
1095-1109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Chuang, J. Z.,
Milner, T. A.,
Zhu, M.,
and Sung, C. -H.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
2919-2928[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Sadis, S.,
and Hightower, L. E.
(1992)
Biochemistry
31,
9406-9412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Minami, Y.,
Hohfeld, J.,
Ohtsuka, K.,
and Hartl, F.-U.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19617-19624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Gutekunst, C. A., Li, S. H., Yi, H.,
Mulroy, J. S.,
Kuemmerle, S.,
Jones, R.,
Rye, D.,
Ferrante, R. J.,
Hersch, S. M.,
and Li, X. J.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
2522-2534[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Li, S. H.,
Cheng, A. L., Li, H.,
and Li, X. J.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
5159-5172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Molday, R. S.,
Hicks, D.,
and Molday, L.
(1986)
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.
28,
50-61
|
| 33.
|
Kajiwara, K.,
Sandberg, M. A.,
Berson, E. L.,
and Dryja, T. P.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
3,
208-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Hunter, P. J.,
Swanson, B. J.,
Haendel, M. A.,
Lyons, G. E.,
and Cross, J. C.
(1999)
Development
126,
1247-1256[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Seki, N.,
Hattori, A.,
Hayashi, A.,
Kozuma, S.,
Miyajima, N.,
and Saito, T.
(1999)
J. Hum. Genet.
44,
185-189[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Ohtsuka, K.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
197,
235-240[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Raabe, T.,
and Manley, J. L.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
6645[Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Oh, S. A.,
Iwahori, A.,
and Kato, S.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1174,
114-116[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Davis, A. R.,
Alevy, Y. G.,
Chellaiah, A.,
Quinn, M. T.,
and Mohanakumar, T.
(1998)
Int. J. Biol. Cell Biol.
30,
1203-1221
|
| 40.
|
Brightman, S. E.,
Blatch, G. L.,
and Zetter, B. R.
(1995)
Gene
153,
249-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Kato, K.,
Gogo, S.,
Inaguma, Y.,
Hasegawa, K.,
Morishita, R.,
and Assano, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
15302-15309[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Gaestel, M.,
Gotthardt, R.,
and Muller, T.
(1993)
Gene
128,
279-283[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Hickey, E.,
Brandon, S. E.,
Potter, R.,
Stein, G.,
Stein, J.,
and Weber, L. A.
(1986)
Nucleic Acids Res.
14,
4127-4145[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Ingolia, T. D.,
and Craig, E. A.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
2360-2364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Klemenz, R.,
Froehli, E.,
Steiger, R. H.,
Schafer, R.,
and Aoyama, A.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
3652-3656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Wall, D.,
Zylicz, M.,
and Georgopoulos, C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
5446-5451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Greene, M. K.,
Maskos, K.,
and Landry, S. J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
6108-6113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Izawa, I.,
Nishizawa, M.,
Ohtakara, K.,
Ohtsuka, K.,
Inada, H.,
and Inagaki, M.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
34521-34527[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Li, S. H.,
and Li, X. J.
(1998)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
7,
777-782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Li, H., Li, S. H.,
Johnston, H.,
Shelbourne, P. F.,
and Li, X. J.
(2000)
Nat. Genet.
25,
385-389[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Mosser, D. D.,
Caron, A. W.,
Bourget, L.,
Meriin, A. B.,
Sherman, M. Y.,
Morimoto, R. I.,
and Massie, B.
(2000)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20,
7146-7159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Pandey, P.,
Saleh, A.,
Nakazawa, A.,
Kumar, S.,
Srinivasula, S. M.,
Kumar, V.,
Weichselbaum, R.,
Nalin, C.,
Alnemri, E. S.,
Kufe, D.,
and Kharbanda, S.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
4310-4322[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Saleh, A.,
Srinivasula, S. M.,
Balkir, L.,
Robbins, P. D.,
and Alnemri, E. S.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
476-483[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Beere, H. M.,
Wolf, B. B.,
Cain, K.,
Mosser, D. D.,
Mahboubi, A.,
Kuwana, T.,
Tailor, P.,
Morimoto, R. I.,
Cohen, G. M.,
and Green, D. R.
(2000)
Nat. Cell Biol.
2,
469-475[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Li, C. Y.,
Lee, J. S., Ko, Y. G.,
Kim, J. I.,
and Seo, J. S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
25665-25671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Genevaux, P.,
Wawrzynow, A.,
Zylicz, M.,
Georgopoulos, C.,
and Kelley, W. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
7906-7912[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Tavaria, M.,
Gabriele, T.,
Kola, I.,
and Anderson, R. L.
(1996)
Cell Stress Chaperones
1,
23-28[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Szabo, A.,
Korszun, R.,
Hartl, F. U.,
and Flabaganm, J.
(1996)
EMBO
15,
408-417[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Cummings, C. J.,
Mancini, M. A.,
Antalffy, B.,
DeFranco, D. B.,
Orr, H. T.,
and Zoghbi, H. Y.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
19,
148-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Chai, Y.,
Koppenhafer, S. L.,
Bonini, N. M.,
and Paulson, H. L.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
10338-10347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 61.
|
Yaglom, J. A.,
Goldberg, A. L.,
Finley, D.,
and Sherman, M. Y.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3679-3684[Abstract]
|
| 62.
|
Lee, D. H.,
Sherman, M. Y.,
and Goldberg, A. L.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4773-4781[Abstract]
|
| 63.
|
Vonsattel, J. P.,
Myers, R. H.,
Stevens, T. J.,
Ferrante, R. J.,
Bird, E. D.,
and Richardson, E. P., Jr.
(1985)
J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.
44,
559-577[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 64.
|
Saudou, F.,
Finkbeiner, S.,
Devys, D.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1998)
Cell
95,
55-66[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Ferrante, R. J.,
Kowall, N. W.,
Beal, M. F.,
Richardson, E. P., Jr.,
Bird, E. D.,
and Martin, J. B.
(1985)
Science
230,
561-563[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 66.
|
Graveland, G. A.,
Williams, R. S.,
and DiFiglia, M.
(1985)
Science
227,
770-773[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by