Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201032200 on March 20, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19839-19846, May 31, 2002
Telomeric Localization of the Vertebrate-type Hexamer Repeat,
(TTAGGG)n, in the Wedgeshell Clam Donax trunculus
and Other Marine Invertebrate Genomes*
Miroslav
Plohl
§,
Eva
Prats
,
Andrés
Martínez-Lage¶,
Ana
González-Tizón¶,
Josefina
Méndez¶, and
Luis
Cornudella
From the
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology,
Institut de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, E-08034
Barcelona, Spain and the ¶ Department of Molecular and Cellular
Biology, Universidade da Coruña, E-15071 A
Coruña, Spain
Received for publication, January 31, 2002, and in revised form, March 18, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The hexamer repeat sequence (TTAGGG)n,
found at the ends of all vertebrate chromosomes, was previously
identified as the main building element of one member of a
HindIII satellite DNA family characterized in the genome of
the bivalve mollusc Donax trunculus. It was also found in
22 perfect tandem repeats in a cloned junction region juxtaposed to the
proper satellite sequence, from which the DNA tract encompassing the
clustered tandem copies was excised and subcloned. Here, the
chromosomal distribution of (TTAGGG)n sequences in the
Donax was studied by the sensitivity to Bal31
exonuclease digestion, fluorescence in situ hybridization
(FISH) on metaphase chromosomes and rotating-field gel
electrophoresis. To verify the occurrence of the hexamer repeat in the genomes of taxonomically related molluscs and other marine invertebrates, genomic DNA from the mussel Mytilus
galloprovincialis and the echinoderm Holothuria
tubulosa was also analyzed. The kinetics of Bal31
hydrolysis of high molecular mass DNA from the three marine
invertebrates revealed a marked decrease over time of the hybridization
with the cloned (TTAGGG)22 sequence, concomitantly with a
progressive shortening of the positively reacting DNA fragments. This
revealed a marked susceptibility to exonuclease consistent with
terminal positioning on the respective chromosomal DNAs. In full
agreement, FISH results with the (TTAGGG)22 probe showed that the repeat appears located in telomeric regions in all chromosomes of both bivalve molluscs. The presence of (TTAGGG)n repeat tracts in marine invertebrate telomeres points to its wider
distribution among eukaryotic organisms and suggests an ancestry older
than originally presumed from its vertebrate distinctiveness.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The ends of eukaryotic chromosomes are capped with
functional nucleoprotein structures known as telomeres, which are
required to complete the telomerase-dependent replication
of the tips of the linear DNA molecules and to preserve the stability
and integrity of chromosome arms, as well as for chromosome positioning
and segregation (1). Telomeres are structurally complex and contain several DNA components. Essentially, short double-stranded DNA repeats
organized in tandem arrays at the tip regions and more complex
satellite DNA sequences attached to the tandem repeats, which
constitute the internal telomere-associated DNA and form the
subtelomeric regions (2). The former contain G-rich strands that are
enzymatically elongated by the reverse transcriptase telomerase as
single-stranded tails that extend beyond the complementary C-rich
strand toward the chromosomal 3' termini (3).
The structural organization and function of telomeres are fairly
conserved among widely divergent organisms from protozoa to vertebrates
and higher plants (4). In contrast, telomeric DNA sequences appear to
be variable between species and confined within large taxonomic groups,
therefore telomeric repeats are considered group-specific (5). In this
regard, vertebrates display a repeat motif, namely (TTAGGG)n,
which is conserved in all species so far examined from mammals to fish
(6, 7). Studies on telomeric DNA in invertebrates are less abundant and mainly restricted to insects (8, 9), some other arthropods (10), and a
few flat and roundworms (11-14). Invertebrate telomeric repeats differ
from those found in vertebrates in several respects. They exhibit a
certain degree of heterogeneity in DNA sequence and repeat lengths (1).
In addition, most insects display the pentanucleotide
(T2AG2)n as the telomeric repeat
element (10). Moreover, synthetic oligonucleotides mimicking the
pentanucleotide motif do not recognize sequences from vertebrate
genomic DNA, nor do (TTAGGG)n oligomers hybridize with insect
DNA (8). To date, studies on telomeric DNA in marine and freshwater invertebrates are rather scarce and fragmentary. For instance, (T2AG2)n-containing telomeres have been
reported in a freshwater crustacean (10) but found absent in a
holothuroid, whose genomic DNA yielded fuzzy hybridization signals with
a (TTAGGG)n probe (8). A similar probe has been preliminarily
reported to hybridize to some extent with genomic DNA from an echinoid (15), two marine annelids (16), a neogastropod (17), and the bay
scallop (18). Some fluorescent in situ hybridizations to
chromosomes of the pacific oyster (19) and the freshwater snail
Biwamelania habei (20) have also been described.
We recently characterized a family of HindIII satellite DNAs
in the genome of the bivalve mollusc Donax trunculus (21). Restriction endonuclease digestions of sperm DNA from the truncated wedgeshell with HindIII allowed detection of a DNA fragment
the size of a satellite pentamer, which resisted endonuclease cleavage even under extensive digestion conditions. Cloning of the DNA in the
corresponding band yielded a set of recombinants showing positive
albeit weak reactivity toward one of the characterized HindIII satellites. The 836-bp cloned insert appeared to be
of a heterogeneous nature, since it consisted of a satellite DNA sequence tract, preceded upstream by a segment 130 bp long made up of
tandemly arrayed perfect copies of the hexanucleotide (TTAGGG). The
5'-end of the cloned insert consisted of a segment without any sequence
elements resembling those of the characterized satellite structures.
Studies of telomeric repeats and their modes of association with
repetitive DNA sequences might provide insight into the structural organization and function of telomeric and subtelomeric regions. In
this paper we report the molecular cloning of the clustered tandem
copies of the hexanucleotide (TTAGGG) previously detected in the sperm
DNA of D. trunculus. This cloned DNA segment was used as a
probe to study the chromosomal localization of (TTAGGG)n sequences in the truncated wedgeshell clam by following the time course
of digestion of DNA with the exonuclease Bal31. We also examined genomic DNA from the Mediterranean mussel Mytilus
galloprovincialis and the sea cucumber Holothuria
tubulosa. The results indicate that both molluscs as well as the
echinoderm species contain clusters of the (TTAGGG) repeat and that the
tandem arrays are preferentially located at their chromosome ends. In
addition, FISH1 on metaphase
chromosomes of both molluscs together with RFGE analyses supported the
localization suggested by the exonuclease experiments. This work
demonstrates the presence and location of the vertebrate-type hexamer
repeat in telomeres of marine molluscs and echinoderms.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Organisms and Isolation of Genomic DNA--
Adult specimens of
the truncated wedgeshell (D. trunculus), the blue mussel
(M. galloprovincialis), and the sea cucumber (H. tubulosa) were either obtained from commercial suppliers or
collected on the Mediterranean or northwestern coast (Ria de Ribadeo
and Balcobo beach) of Spain during the breeding season. Specimens of
live H. tubulosa were moved to the laboratory and kept in
cold seawater until use. Sperm fluid was obtained as described
previously (22). Briefly, mollusc shells were carefully opened with a
scalpel, and the gills were removed to expose gonadal tissue. Sperm
fluid was collected through a small incision with the aid of a Pasteur pipette. Male gonads from the echinoderm species were excised immediately before use, squeezed, and the resulting sperm fluid filtered through flannelette as detailed elsewhere (21). High molecular
mass DNA was isolated and purified from fresh sperm suspensions by
standard phenol extraction with some modifications (23).
Bal31 Exonuclease Digestion and DNA Restriction--
To test for
the chromosomal positioning of (TTAGGG) repeat tracts, purified sperm
DNA samples were subjected to Bal31 exonucleolytic trimming
with time. High molecular mass DNA (20 µg) in 20 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 600 mM NaCl, 12.5 mM
CaCl2, 12.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM Na2EDTA was supplemented with
-DNA
HindIII fragments (0.5 µg) to monitor the extent of the
digestion and treated with Bal31 nuclease (2 units) at
30 °C in a final volume of 150 µl. Aliquots of 3.3 µg of DNA
(one-sixth of the bulk reaction) were taken at various times: time 0 (prior to enzyme addition), 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 min, respectively.
Reactions were halted by addition of Na2EDTA to 50 mM, inactivated at 75 °C for 10 min, and chilled on ice. Digested DNAs were then recovered by ethanol precipitation and finally
dissolved in distilled water. A sixth part of the DNA digests (0.55 µg) was used to monitor
-HindIII fragment trimming, whereas the remainder (2.75 µg) was further digested with
AluI.
Southern Transfers and Hybridization Conditions--
All
enzymatic digests were electrophoresed on 0.8% agarose gels and the
resolved DNA fragments subsequently transferred to positively charged
nylon membranes by alkaline blotting in 0.4 N NaOH after
partial depurination (24). DNA probes were labeled with
fluorescein-12-dUTP by random priming with the Klenow fragment of DNA
polymerase I using the Ready-To-Go labeling beads (Amersham Biosciences). Hybridizations were carried out overnight at
42 °C in 50% formamide containing 0.25 M
Na2HPO4 (pH 7.2), 7% SDS, 1 mM
EDTA, and 50 µg/ml tRNA, followed by stringent washes in 0.1 × SSC (saline-sodium citrate), 1% SDS at 65 °C, except for the cloned
histone H4 probe from H. tubulosa, which was hybridized at
35 °C, and the membrane washed at 57 °C. Stringency washes were
followed by blocking with 0.2% casein, 0.5% SDS in phosphate-buffered saline and the filters finally reacted with an alkaline
phosphatase-conjugated anti-fluorescein antibody (Tropix).
Hybridization signals were visualized by chemiluminescence using the
dioxetane CDP-Star (disodium 2-chloro-5-(4-methoxyspiro{1,2-dioxetane-3,2'-(5'-chloro)
tricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decan}-4-yl)-1-phenyl phosphate)
(Roche Diagnostics) and recorded on x-ray film.
Dot-blot Quantitations--
The relative genomic abundance of
the (TTAGGG) hexamer sequence was determined by dot-hybridization of
graded amounts of both D. trunculus sperm DNA and the
recombinant plasmid containing the 148-bp fragment encompassing
the (TTAGGG)22 tandem repeat. DNA samples were spot-blotted
onto nylon and the membrane subsequently probed with the repetitive
insert released from the recombinant clone and 32P-labeled
by random priming (25). After exposure to film the intensities of the
radioactive signals were quantified using a computer-assisted laser
densitometer loaded with the ImageQuant program (Molecular Dynamics).
Mean values were derived from two independent experiments.
Rotating-field Gel Electrophoretic Analysis--
The genomic
organization of (TTAGGG) tandem arrays was examined by RFGE. Aliquots
of purified sperm suspensions from D. trunculus were
embedded in 0.5% agarose plugs at a DNA concentration of 0.5 µg/µl
as previously described (22). Agarose plugs containing high molecular
mass DNA larger than 400 kb were incubated with selected restriction
endonucleases and the resulting large genomic fragments resolved on
1.2% agarose gels in 0.5 × TBE (Tris-borate-EDTA) at 11 °C.
Electrophoresis was run at 100 V for 1 h, followed by successive
pulses of 10 s for 15 h and 20 s for 20 h at 200 V with 120° reorientation angles. Gels were then visualized by ethidium bromide staining and the DNA fragments transferred to a nylon membrane.
Subsequent hybridizations to the cloned (TTAGGG)22 probe were carried out as described above.
Chromosome Preparation and Fluorescence in Situ
Hybridization--
Truncated wedgeshell and mussel specimens were
continuously fed with Isochrisis galbana microalgae for 10 days in the laboratory. Before use, following treatment with 0.005%
colchicine for 6-8 h, gills were dissected and metaphase spreads
prepared as described previously (26). FISH was carried out with the
(TTAGGG)22 cloned probe labeled with digoxigenin by a
standard PCR procedure and denatured at 75 °C for 15 min. The
hybridization was performed in a PTC-100 microscope slide thermal
cycler (MJ Research), with a solution of 50% formamide, 10% dextran
sulfate in 2 × SSC, containing sonicated salmon sperm DNA (0.3 mg/ml) and the denatured digoxigenin-labeled hexamer repeat (3.3 µg/ml). Post-hybridization washes were performed in 2 × SSC at
42 °C and then sequentially with 20% formamide in 0.2 × SSC,
0.1 × SSC, and 2 × SSC for 10 min each.
For detection, slides were washed in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH
7.5), 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20 buffer and blocked in
the same buffer containing 0.5% casein, but lacking detergent, at
37 °C for 30 min. The slides were then incubated with
anti-digoxigenin mouse serum at a dilution of 1:200 in blocking buffer
at 37 °C for 30 min, rinsed in the same buffer, and subsequently
subjected to two consecutive rounds of incubation in the same
conditions, first with rabbit anti-mouse serum conjugated to
fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) at a dilution of 1:1000, and finally
with FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit serum at the same dilution, to
amplify the fluorescence signals. The slides were then washed once in
blocking buffer, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series, and air
dried. Metaphase preparations were counterstained with an antifade
solution containing propidium iodide (50 µg/ml), examined under a
microphot AFX Nikon fluorescence microscope, and photographed on
Kodachrome color slide film (400 ASA).
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation and Cloning of a (TTAGGG)22 Tandem Repeat in
D. trunculus--
During characterization of a family of four
HindIII satellite DNAs in the truncated wedgeshell, a DNA
fragment of similar length to a satellite pentamer was released upon
digestion of sperm DNA. This fragment resisted endonuclease
fragmentation even under extensive digestion conditions. It hybridized
positively in Southern blots of electrophoretically resolved
restriction fragments from HindIII digests probed with the
monomer clone DTHS1 (GenBankTM/EBI accession number
X94534) of the characterized type-1 HindIII Donax
satellite. The DNA in the corresponding band was recovered, cloned, and
sequenced (GenBankTM/EBI accession number X94546)
(21). The cloned insert was 836 bp long and ended in a 66-bp tract that
corresponded to the 3'-terminal half of the DTHS1 monomer unit. The
latter sequence was preceded upstream by a 130-bp segment comprising 22 tandemly arrayed copies of the hexanucleotide
C3TA2, which appeared to be the reversed
complement of the vertebrate-type (TTAGGG) telomeric repeat, as well as
that of the main subrepeat element found in the DTHS1 satellite DNA.
The hexamer repeats were all perfect copies except for the
3'-penultimate repeat in which one C was lacking. A second internal
deletion of a single T was observed 5' contiguous to position 670 of
the insert sequence. The clustered repeats were flanked on both sides
by endonuclease recognition sequences for MseI and
DdeI, with cleavage sites 3' to positions 622 and 770, respectively (Fig. 1). These two
restriction enzyme sites allowed to release from the original clone a
DNA fragment encompassing the entire set of highly conserved tandem
repeats. The excised 148-bp DNA fragment was blunt-ended and subcloned into the EcoRV site of the pBluescript +SK
vector. In turn, the cloned insert was released with polylinker enzymes
contiguous to the cloning site and used as a probe throughout the
experimental work presented here.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Isolation and subcloning of the
(TTAGGG)22 tandem sequence from D. trunculus
sperm DNA. Schematic restriction map of the 836-bp genomic
clone (DTP9-6), isolated upon complete digestion of genomic
DNA with HindIII (21), is shown. The 836-bp DNA insert was
cut into two fragments of 433 and 403 bp in length through the single
KpnI cleavage site, 3' to position 433. The shortest
restriction fragment was recovered and double digested with
MseI and DdeI to yield a 148-bp-long DNA fragment
(DTP9-6/T) encompassing 22 tandem copies of the (GGGTTA)
hexamer sequence shown hatched. The latter fragment was
purified, blunt-end-ligated to EcoRV-linearized
pBluescriptII+SK vector, and subcloned in competent
Escherichia coli Xl1-blue cells. H,
EI, EV, K, M, and
D denote HindIII, EcoRI,
EcoRV, KpnI, MseI, and DdeI
recognition sites, respectively. The DTP9-6 cloned sequence is
available from the GenBankTM/EBI databases under
accession number X94546.
|
|
DNA Sensitivity to Exonuclease Bal31 and Terminal Location of
(TTAGGG) Repeat Sequences in D. trunculus--
The genomic
localization of (TTAGGG)n sequences was examined by following
the time course of Bal31 degradation of sperm DNA from the
wedgeshell clam. High molecular mass genomic DNA extracted from fresh
sperm suspensions was subjected to Bal31 digestion with
time. Phage
-DNA HindIII fragments were added to the DNA
samples to monitor the extent of exonucleolytic trimming. DNA aliquots
were taken at intervals, and a fraction of each aliquot was
subsequently digested to completion with AluI. DNA samples, prior and after AluI digestion, were then electrophoresed in
parallel on a 0.8% agarose gel (Fig.
2A) and Southern blotted to a
nylon membrane. The half of the membrane containing the undigested
Bal31-trimmed DNA was cut out and hybridized with
fluorescein-labeled
-DNA HindIII fragments (Fig.
2B). It can be clearly observed the progressive shortening
of the
-HindIII fragment lengths. All fragment
sizes gradually decreased with the course of Bal31 digestion
as a consequence of the continuous exonuclease trimming of the
-DNA fragment termini. Obviously, this pattern was more
apparent in the smaller fragments, which tended to fade away at late
time intervals.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Time course of exonuclease digestion of
genomic DNA from D. trunculus. High molecular
mass sperm DNA (20 µg) was mixed with -DNA HindIII
restriction fragments (0.5 µg) in a final volume of 150 µl. An
aliquot (25 µl) was removed prior to enzyme addition, and the
remainder was digested with Bal31 (2 units) at different
time intervals. Aliquots (25 µl each) of the bulk reaction were taken
at the indicated intervals, brought to 50 mM
Na2EDTA, heat-inactivated for 10 min, and the DNA was
ethanol-precipitated in the cold and dissolved in distilled water.
A, electrophoretic patterns of Bal31-trimmed DNAs
(one-sixth of each digest), resolved on 0.8% agarose gels containing
ethidium bromide. The remainder of the trimmed DNA was digested to
completion with AluI prior to electrophoresis on the same
gel. B, autoradiogram of the left half of the gel
in A after Southern transfer and hybridization to
fluorescein-labeled -DNA HindIII fragments. Note the
gradual shortening of the -HindIII fragments with the
time course of Bal31 digestion. C, autoradiograph
of the right half of the gel in A
(Bal31 + AluI digests) processed as in
B but probed with a recombinant plasmid carrying the
H. tubulosa histone H4 gene (27). Note that the histone gene
appears resistant to exonucleolytic trimming. D, x-ray film
of the membrane in C after rehybridization with the cloned
(TTAGGG)22 sequence labeled with fluorescein. Note the
sensitivity to Bal31 of digested DNA reacting positively
with the (TTAGGG)22 probe, indicating a terminal
positioning of the repetitive arrays. A 142-bp DNA ladder was used as
size marker (lanes M).
|
|
The second half of the nylon membrane, containing the
Bal31-AluI-digested DNA fragments, was initially
hybridized to the insert of the recombinant pUC19 clone carrying a
1.5-kb HincII fragment containing the entire sequence of the
H. tubulosa histone H4 gene (GenBankTM/EBI accession number Z46226) (27),
labeled with fluorescein (Fig. 2C). As expected from the
internal location of this histone gene in the genome, the DNA bands
reacting with the histone H4 probe remained unaltered during the time
course of Bal31 digestion except for a slight fall in signal
intensity at longer times. The results of the hybridizations with the
-HindIII DNA and histone H4 probes indicate the
integrity of the extracted genomic DNA, ruling out any nicking or inner
degradation of the DNA, while corroborating the exonucleolytic
specificity of Bal31. Subsequently, the H4 probe was
stripped off the membrane, which was rehybridized to the
fluorescein-labeled (TTAGGG)22 cloned sequence (Fig.
2D). In contrast to the electrophoretic patterns of the bulk
DNA fragments shown in Fig. 2A, where the effects of the
digestions with Bal31 alone or in pairwise combination with
AluI were hardly detected by the ethidium bromide staining,
the double digestion of sperm DNA generated an uneven and dauby pattern
of hybridization with the repeat probe. AluI digestion of
genomic DNA at time 0 of the serial digestions with Bal31
produced a broad, intense hybridizing band of low mobility. A
fast-moving band, comparable with the former but broader and less
intense, was also seen near the migration front (lane 0' in
Fig. 2D). Integration of the areas under the signal peaks in
densitometer tracings of the autoradiogram yielded a DNA distribution
in both peaks amounting, respectively, to approximately 45 and 35% of
the total DNA hybridizing to the probe in the lane. Likewise, the
estimated size of the DNA fragments under the peaks, as deduced from
the scans, ranged from 10,000 to 20,000 bp and 500 to 1000 bp,
respectively (data not shown). The signal intensity of the hybridizing
DNA bands generated by AluI digestion gradually decreased
during the Bal31 exonucleolytic trimming, shifting toward lower length distributions with a concomitant reduction of the hybridization signals at the longest times. However, the sensitivity of
the upper DNA signal to Bal31 was slightly higher than that of the lower signal. The intensity of the former decreased drastically within 30 min of digestion, thereafter fading faster than the lower
signal, traces of which still persisted at longer digestion intervals.
The high level of hybridization of genomic DNA to the cloned
(TTAGGG)22 sequence reveals the presence of arrays of this
vertebrate-type hexameric repeat within Donax DNA.
Furthermore, the preferential susceptibility of the DNA sequences
positively reacting with the repeat probe to Bal31
exonucleolytic trimming favors a terminal positioning of the bulk of
the repeat arrays and therefore allows to qualify them as true
telomeric DNA located at the chromosome ends in this mollusc.
Detection of Identical Hexameric Repeat Sequences in the Mussel and
Sea Cucumber Genomes--
To verify the occurrence of similar
hexameric sequences in the genomes of taxonomically related molluscs
and other marine invertebrates, sperm DNA samples from the blue mussel
M. galloprovincialis and the echinoderm H. tubulosa were subjected to Bal31 digestion in the above
conditions (Fig. 3). As expected, the
histone H4 repeat taken as internal gene marker in the Donax
genomic DNA showed comparable behavior in both the mussel and the sea
cucumber sperm DNAs when subjected to serial digestions with
Bal31 and to completion with AluI. The
corresponding DNA restriction fragments reacting positively with the
histone H4 probe remained insensitive to exonucleolytic trimming.
However, the hybridization patterns of the histone H4 gene were not
strictly identical in the three invertebrate species examined. The
minor dissimilarities observed can be attributed to varying
susceptibilities of the respective DNAs to AluI together
with differing structural arrangements of histone H4 genes in these
organisms (27). Both sperm DNAs reacted similarly to Donax
DNA (see Fig. 2D), yielding broad patterns upon digestion
with AluI and hybridization to the labeled
(TTAGGG)22 probe. The size distribution of both blurred
patterns gradually decreased with the digestion, displaying a clear
tendency to fade with time. This indicates a marked sensitivity of the
hybridizing DNA to exonuclease trimming. These data support tracing the
Bal31-sensitive DNA to chromosomal termini in both the
mussel and sea cucumber DNAs and unambiguously confirm the presence of
a substantial proportion of (TTAGGG) repeats at the telomeres of these
marine invertebrate DNAs.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Kinetics of exonuclease digestion of genomic
DNA from M. galloprovincialis and H. tubulosa. To compare sperm DNAs from the blue mussel
and the sea cucumber with genomic DNA from the wedgeshell clam, the
former were subjected to the same serial digestions with
Bal31 and AluI enzymes as in Fig. 2. Both blots
in panels to the left were probed with the plasmid containing the sea
cucumber histone H4 gene (27) labeled with fluorescein. The
rightmost panels show the same filters rehybridized with the
fluorescein-labeled (TTAGGG)22 sequence after removal of
the histone probe. Note that the size of the DNA band reacting with the
H4 probe is unaltered, whereas the
Bal31-AluI-digested DNA hybridizing with the
cloned hexamer repeat becomes trimmed with time, indicating a terminal
location.
|
|
No positively hybridizing DNA bands resistant to Bal31 were
seen in the DNAs analyzed except those of the mussel. The hybridization pattern of Mytilus DNA digested with AluI
displayed a few discrete bands, albeit faint, in the range 500-1000 bp
that were unaffected by the Bal31 digestion. The
insensitivity to trimming of these DNA bands containing (TTAGGG)
sequences suggests an internal positioning within genomic DNA, namely,
at interstitial chromosome regions (2). The presence of these internal
hexameric sequences implies that they are represented within genomic
DNA in the mussel, constituting discrete DNA elements that produce well
defined bands upon digestion. The intensity of the hybridizing bands
suggests the repetitiveness of these internal sequences. Concurrently,
the failure to detect similar DNA bands in the hybridization patterns
from D. trunculus and H. tubulosa does not
preclude their existence provided that they are either organized in DNA
tracts variable in length and/or so poorly represented in the genomes
that they remain undetectable.
Genomic Content of (TTAGGG) Repeats in the
Wedgeshell--
To derive the content of (TTAGGG) repeated
sequences at the ends of Donax chromosomes, the relative
genomic abundance of the hexameric DNA sequence was determined from
dot-blots of increasing amounts of the recombinant clone carrying the
(TTAGGG)22 insert, together with graded amounts of total
sperm DNA from the mollusc. Subsequently, the nylon membrane was
hybridized to a 32P-labeled (TTAGGG)22 insert
released from the same clone and the hybridization signals quantified
using a laser densitometer (Fig. 4). The
genomic abundance computed for the hexameric tandem repeat comprised
0.05% of the total sperm DNA. Since the size of the haploid DNA
complement (C-value) of the wedgeshell clam has been estimated as
1.4 × 109 bp (28), the former value roughly amounts
to 4700 copies of the (TTAGGG)22 sequence per haploid
genome, equivalent to approximately 100,000 hexamer copies.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Relative abundance of the (TTAGGG) hexamer
repeat in the D. trunculus genome. Graded amounts
of sperm DNA (top) and the recombinant clone DTP9-6/T (21)
carrying the (TTAGGG)22 repeated motif (bottom)
were dot-blotted onto a nylon membrane and hybridized to the
32P-labeled (TTAGGG)22 insert excised from the
latter clone. After exposure to film, the radioactive signals were
quantified using a computer-assisted laser densitometer with the
ImageQuant software. Mean values were derived from two independent
experiments.
|
|
The genomic length of the putative telomeric arrays of (TTAGGG) repeats
can be approximated assuming their preferential localization at the
ends of the mollusc chromosomes and using the repeat copy number found,
together with the chromosome number of the haploid cells from
Donax (n = 19) (29). Since the frequency
found for the (TTAGGG) repeat amounts to 100,000 copies and taking into account the haploid chromosomal complement, the computation yields a
value of 5200 repeats per chromosome or 2600 per chromosomal terminus,
equivalent to a repeat tract length of 15.6 kb of DNA. This value is
consistent with the size range of the upper DNA band generated by
AluI at zero time of the Bal31 digestion
(lane 0' in Fig. 2D), as well as with those from
the four-cutter endonuclease digestions shown in Fig. 6, and falls
within the range of lengths reported for telomeric repeats in mammalian
cells (3).
Cytogenetic Localization of (TTAGGG) Tandem Repeats--
To map
the positioning of clusters of the hexameric repeat, fluorescent
in situ hybridizations were performed on both
Donax and Mytilus metaphase chromosomes.
Hybridizations with the (TTAGGG)22 cloned probe produced
sharp and intense signals on all chromosomes of Donax (Fig.
5A) and Mytilus
(Fig. 5B). In both invertebrates, the fluorescence signals
were essentially confined to the ends of all chromosomes, whereas no
signals were detected in non-telomeric regions of Donax. In
contrast, a few weak signals could be detected at internal locations of
some mussel chromosomes. These hybridization signals would imply the
presence of DNA sequences homologous to the (TTAGGG)22
probe at internal loci of some chromosomes of the mussel. The existence
of such internal repeated DNA tracts is consistent with the
insensitivity to Bal31 of the discrete bands observed in the
hybridization patterns of Mytilus DNA digested with
AluI as shown in Fig. 3.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Chromosome localization of (TTAGGG) repeat
arrays in D. trunculus and M. galloprovincialis. Metaphase chromosome squashes
prepared from dissected gills of the truncated wedgeshell
(A) and the common mussel (B) were hybridized to the
digoxigenin-labeled (TTAGGG)22 cloned sequence. Detection
was performed by immunofluorescence with mouse anti-digoxigenin
antibody and a combination of FITC-conjugated to rabbit anti-mouse and
to goat anti-rabbit sera. Metaphase preparations were counterstained
with antifade-containing propidium iodide. The yellow
fluorescent signals at the ends of all chromosomes on both mollusc
species, outlined against the orange chromosomal background,
correspond to clustered (TTAGGG) repeats.
|
|
The results of the cytogenetic analyses fully agree with those of the
DNA sensitivity to the exonuclease Bal31, therefore lending
further support to a preferential telomeric localization of
vertebrate-type (TTAGGG)n repeats in metaphase chromosomes of
the marine invertebrate species examined.
Long Range Organization of the (TTAGGG) Repeated Sequences--
To
examine further the genomic organization of the (TTAGGG) tandem
repeats, RFGE resolution of large genomic fragments generated upon
digestion of agarose-embedded high molecular mass DNA from D. trunculus sperm cells with various endonucleases, followed by
Southern transfer and hybridization to the cloned tandem copies of the
(TTAGGG) sequence, was undertaken. All blots yielded patterns of single
smeary bands intensely hybridizing to the fluorescein-labeled probe,
with no distinguishable internal discrete DNA fragments (Fig.
6). Four-cutter endonucleases generated
bands in the 9.5-15-kb size range as deduced from densitometer
tracings of the autoradiograms. Restriction enzymes with six nucleotide
recognition sites produced comparable banding patterns, but with larger
bands, ranging from 20 kb (lanes XbaI and
HindIII) to over 100 kb (lane EcoRV).
BglII digestion yielded a bimodal length distribution of DNA
fragments, the lower distribution averaging 20 kb, whereas the larger
centered at about 90 kb.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Genomic distribution of (TTAGGG) repeat
tracts in D. trunculus. High molecular mass DNA
from purified sperm suspensions of the truncated wedgeshell embedded in
agarose plugs was digested with a selection of four-cutter
(AfaI, HaeIII, HinfI, and
Sau3AI) and six-cutter (BglII, EcoRV,
HindIII, and XbaI) endonucleases and the
resulting DNA digests subjected to RFGE analysis. Size-fractionated DNA
fragments were blotted over a nylon membrane, probed with a
fluorescein-labeled (TTAGGG)22 cloned sequence, and the
hybridization monitored by chemiluminescence. -DNA
HindIII restriction fragments and a ladder of -phage
concatemers were used as size markers. A plug containing undigested
sperm DNA was loaded on the rightmost lane (Dt).
Note that the undigested DNA is longer than 400 kb and that the bulk of
it is retained in the application slot.
|
|
The tendency of all assayed endonucleases to produce single albeit
broad sets of genomic DNA fragments strongly hybridizing to the
(TTAGGG)22 cloned probe under stringent conditions
indicates that the hexameric repeat sequence occurs in fairly long
arrays in the Donax genome and also points to a
heterogeneity of telomere restriction fragment lengths (30). This
assumption is further supported by the absence of discrete DNA
fragments in the restriction enzyme digestion patterns, which suggests
that hexameric sequence tracts uniform in length are not present in the
Donax genome or, at least, so poorly represented that they
elude detection. The distribution in length of the DNA fragments
generated upon digestion with four-cutter enzymes is consistent with
the value for the repeat length derived from the genomic content of the
(TTAGGG) repeats. The higher sizes resulting from six-cutter
endonucleases can be ascribed to the lower frequency of restriction
enzyme sites for these enzymes in genomic DNA. Moreover, the wider size
range observed may represent heterogeneous tracts of DNA consisting of
hexameric repeats of comparable repetition length linked to flanking
DNA sequences of variable lengths. The latter would extend to
respective cleavage sites dissimilarly positioned in the
telomere-associated DNA sequences at the different chromosome ends, as
previously proposed for the dipteran insect Chironomus
pallidivittatus (31).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Here, we identified (TTAGGG)n sequence tracts in the
genome of the truncated wedgeshell D. trunculus by Southern hybridization with a (TTAGGG)22 probe, subcloned from an
836-bp DNA fragment isolated during the previous characterization of a
HindIII satellite DNA family in the sperm DNA of the mollusc (21). The clustered tandem copies of the hexamer repeat were traced to
terminal telomeric regions in all Donax chromosomes by
exonuclease Bal31 sensitivity assays, and the location was corroborated by FISH analysis. Occurrence of identical (TTAGGG) sequence arrays was also confirmed in the genomes of the blue mussel
M. galloprovincialis and the sea cucumber H. tubulosa.
The high levels of hybridization to the cloned (TTAGGG)22
probe can be considered a clear indication of the existence of arrays of the vertebrate-type hexamer repeat within the genomes of the marine
invertebrates surveyed. In addition, the observed sensitivity to
Bal31 exonuclease trimming of the DNA sequences positively reacting with the repeat probe hint at a terminal localization of the
bulk of the repeat arrays and, consequently, support their consideration as canonical telomeric DNA located at or close to the
chromosome ends in the aforementioned invertebrate species. The latter
suggestion is further sustained by the results of the FISH analyses
performed, which fully agree with those of the susceptibility to the
exonuclease Bal31. This notwithstanding, the discrete bands containing (TTAGGG) repeat tracts seen in the hybridization patterns of
Mytilus DNA digested with AluI, unaffected by
Bal31, imply that they constitute repetitive DNA stretches
of comparable lengths, interstitially located in the chromosomes of the
blue mussel. In this concern, it is worth mentioning that telomeric
repeats have been found at internal sites on the chromosomes of many
organisms (2, 6).
Although telomeric DNA in most organisms consists of arrays of short
repeats, there is no universal telomere motif in eukaryotes, but rather
repeat sequences vary between groups of species (1). Thus, the (TTAGGG)
motif has been considered to be typical of vertebrates even though it
has been also observed in certain molds, fungi, and a protozoan.
Despite this sequence multiplicity and interspecies differences,
telomere function is rather conserved throughout the eukaryotes (5).
The evidence provided here as regards the telomeric localization of
tandemly arrayed (TTAGGG) repeats in D. trunculus
and M. galloprovincialis as well as in the echinoderm
H. tubulosa suggests a number of evolutionary
considerations. Thus, the detection of the genuine vertebrate telomere
motif in invertebrates argues for its wider representation among very
divergent species and, consequently, an ancestry older than initially
presumed from its vertebrate distinctiveness may be surmised, aside
from an equivalent function in nonvertebrate telomeres.
Moreover, the maintenance of telomeric repeats requires a functional
telomerase (3). If the very early eukaryotic origin postulated for this
reverse transcriptase (32) is taken into account, it may be inferred
that emergence of novel telomere repeat sequences ought to occur rarely
in evolution as argued in the case of the (TTAGG)n telomere
sequences in insects (10). Consequentially, new and non-related
appearances over evolutionary time of the vertebrate-type (TTAGGG)
element in very distant organisms should be posited as improbable.
Despite the heterogeneity of telomeric DNA sequences encountered
throughout the eukaryotes, all bear a relative similarity and retain
equivalent functional and structural features. Although the (TTAGGG)
hexamer cannot be unambiguously identified as a true consensus element,
it is the only telomeric repeat widely represented among very divergent organisms from protozoa to mammals and invertebrates as those reported
here (1). In addition, the reverse transcriptase function of telomerase
favors the likelihood of the existence of an ancestral telomeric motif.
The enzymatic activity of telomerase is analogous to that of the major
non-long terminal repeat retrotransposon L1 of mammals, and both share
substantial sequence similarities, which underscore their evolutionary
relatedness and lend support to the assumption that eukaryotic cells
could have recruited the retrotransposon to acquire telomerase activity
at the dawn of eukaryotes (33). This potential situation could explain
the similarities mentioned among eukaryotic telomere DNAs, whereas more
complex and distinct telomeric ends, such as those found in most fungi
(1), or the transposons at the Drosophila chromosome termini
that elongate by transposition of telomere-specific retrotransposable elements (34), could have appeared more recently in evolution.
Telomere repeat sequences in vertebrate organisms appear to be of
variable length, from short telomeres averaging 10 kb in humans (35) to
20-150 kb (TTAGGG)n sequences in mice (36). The 15.6-kb
average length reported here for the tandemly repeat arrays in D. trunculus, estimated from Southern analysis of its genomic DNA
digested with four-cutter endonucleases and confirmed by dot-blot
quantitation of its relative genomic abundance and the RFGE analysis of
digested high molecular mass DNA, is consistent with the range of the
mentioned lengths. However, these measurements should be considered
average approximations, since they do not take into account the
heterogeneity of telomere restriction fragments (37) and fail to
discern the internal subtelomeric repetitive DNA sequences adjacent to
the terminal telomere repeats, which often appear interspersed with the
latter giving rise to satellite DNAs containing degenerate variant
telomeric repeats (5, 6, 38). In this regard, one member of the
HindIII satellite DNA family characterized in the D. trunculus genome (monomer clone DTHS1) displays the (TTAGGG)
hexamer as a prominent subrepeat structure, whereas the remainder
contain short sequence motifs directly related to the hexameric
subrepeat (21). In addition, the 836-bp fragment from which the
(TTAGGG)22 probe used here was subcloned ended with a DNA
stretch encompassing the 3'-terminal half of the DTHS1 monomer unit.
The failure to detect Bal31-resistant DNA bands in the
hybridization patterns from D. trunculus (Fig. 2) and
H. tubulosa (Fig. 3) suggests that the tandemly arrayed
(TTAGGG) repeats in these invertebrates are preferentially located at
the ends of their chromosomes. Any internal (TTAGGG) tracts might be
either variable in length, poorly represented in the genomes, or
interspersed with satellite sequences in a degenerate manner, such as
the subrepeat structures in the Donax HindIII
satellite DNA family, so that they elude detection. In contrast, the
resistance to Bal31 trimming of the few bands seen in the
hybridization pattern of Mytilus DNA digested with
AluI, reacting positively with the (TTAGGG)22
probe (Fig. 3), suggests an internal positioning of the corresponding
DNA fragments in the blue mussel genome, constituting short arrayed
telomeric sequences of comparable length incorporated in a dispersed
manner into internal genomic locations likely containing repetitive DNA sequences.
The long range organization of the (TTAGGG) repeated sequences revealed
by the RFGE analysis of digested genomic DNA from the wedgeshell clam
points to the lack of internal hexamer repeat tracts uniform in size,
thereby supporting further the inference that the vertebrate-type
(TTAGGG)n repeat arrays characterized in the D. trunculus genome are primarily located at the termini of all
chromosomes. Likewise, the failure to detect these hexameric repeats in
interstitial chromosomal loci suggests that the repeated sequence does
not appear dispersed within the genome in this marine invertebrate to a
significant extent, contrasting with many other eukaryotic genomes
(39). To ascertain the arrangement of telomere-associated repetitive
DNA and the interspersion pattern with telomeric sequences in the
Donax genome and its potential involvement in telomere maintenance, more experimental data are required. To address these questions we are extending restriction analyses and cloning of DNA
fragments encompassing the boundaries between flanking subtelomeric repetitive DNA and the terminal (TTAGGG)n telomere sequences described here in the truncated wedgeshell genome.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
We thank Robin Rycroft for his careful reading
of the entire manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by grants (to L. C.)
from the Spanish Dirección General de Enseñanza
Superior (PB97-1136) and the catalan Direcció General de
Recerca (SGR01-354) within the framework of the Centre de
Referència en Biotecnologia de la Generalitat de Catalunya.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipient of an EMBO short term fellowship. Permanent address:
Dept. of Molecular Genetics, Ruder Boskovic Inst., P. O. Box 180 Bijenicka 54, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia.
To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Molecular & Cell Biology, Inst. de Biologia Molecular de Barcelona, CSIC, Jordi Girona 18-26, E-08034 Barcelona, Spain. Tel.:
34-93-4006138; Fax: 34-93-2045904; E-mail:
lcmbmc@cid.csic.es.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201032200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
FISH, fluorescence
in situ hybridization;
RFGE, rotating-field gel
electrophoresis;
FITC, fluorescein
isothiocyanate.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Zakian, V. A.
(1995)
Science
270,
1601-1607[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Biessman, H.,
and Mason, J. M.
(1994)
Chromosoma (Berl.)
103,
154-161
|
| 3.
|
Collins, K.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
12,
378-383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Blackburn, E. H.
(1994)
Cell
77,
621-623[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Blackburn, E. H.
(2001)
Cell
106,
661-673[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Garrido-Ramos, M. A.,
de la Herrán, R.,
Rui Zrejón, C.,
and Rui Zrejón, M.
(1998)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
83,
3-9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Meyne, J.,
Ratliff, R. L.,
and Moyzis, R. K.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
7049-7053[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Okazaki, S.,
Tsuchida, K.,
Maekawa, H.,
Ishikawa, H.,
and Fujiwara, H.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
1424-1432[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Saiga, H.,
and Edstrom, J. E.
(1985)
EMBO J.
4,
799-804[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Sahara, K.,
Marec, F.,
and Traut, W.
(1999)
Chromosome Res.
7,
449-460[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Chiurillo, M. A.,
Cano, I.,
da Silveira, J. F.,
and Ramírez, J. L.
(1999)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
100,
173-183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Joffee, B. I.,
Solovei, I. V.,
and Macgregor, H. C.
(1998)
Chromosoma
107,
173-183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Muller, F.,
Wicky, C.,
Spicher, A.,
and Tobler, H.
(1991)
Cell
67,
815-822[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Teschke, C.,
Solleder, G.,
and Moritz, K. B.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
2677-2684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lejnine, S.,
Makarov, V. L.,
and Langmore, J. P.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
2393-2397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Jha, A. N.,
Dominguez, I.,
Balajee, A. S.,
Hutchinson, T. H.,
Dixon, D. R.,
and Natarajan, A. T.
(1995)
Chromosome Res.
3,
507-508[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Vitturi, R.,
Colomba, M. S.,
Gianguzza, P.,
and Pirrone, A. M.
(2000)
Genetica
108,
253-257[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Estabrooks, S. L.
(1999)
J. Shellfish Res.
18,
401-404
|
| 19.
|
Guo, X.,
and Allen, S. K.
(1997)
J. Shellfish Res.
16,
87-89
|
| 20.
|
Nomoto, Y.,
Hirai, M.,
and Ueshima, R.
(2001)
Zool. Sci.
18,
417-422[CrossRef]
|
| 21.
|
Plohl, M.,
and Cornudella, L.
(1997)
J. Mol. Evol.
44,
189-198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Drabent, B.,
Kim, J. S.,
Albig, W.,
Prats, E.,
Cornudella, L.,
and Doenecke, D.
(1999)
J. Mol. Evol.
49,
645-655[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Sainz, J.,
and Cornudella, L.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
885-890[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Reed, K. C.,
and Mann, D. A.
(1985)
Nucleic Acids Res.
13,
7207-7221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Feinberg, A. P.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1983)
Anal. Biochem.
132,
6-13[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
González-Tizón, A.,
Martínez-Lage, A.,
Rego, I.,
Ausio, J.,
and Méndez, J.
(2000)
Genome
43,
1-8[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Drabent, B.,
Louroutziatis, A.,
Prats, E.,
Cornudella, L.,
and Doenecke, D.
(1995)
DNA Sequence
6,
41-45[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Hinegardner, R.
(1974)
Comp. Biochem. Physiol.
47A,
447-460
|
| 29.
|
Cornet, M.,
and Soulard, C.
(1990)
Genetica
82,
93-97[CrossRef]
|
| 30.
|
Martens, U. M.,
Brass, V.,
Engelhardt, M.,
Glaser, S.,
Waller, C. F.,
Lange, W.,
Schmoor, C.,
Poon, S. S. S.,
and Lansdorp, P. M.
(2000)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
28,
245-250[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Zhang, Y. J.,
Kamnert, I.,
López, C. C.,
Cohn, M.,
and Edström, J. E.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
8028-8036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Malik, H. S.,
Burke, W. D.,
and Eickbush, T. H.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Evol.
16,
793-805[Abstract]
|
| 33.
|
Kazazian, H. H., Jr.
(2000)
Science
289,
1152-1153[Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Biessman, H.,
Zurovcova, M.,
Yao, J. G.,
Lozovskaya, E.,
and Walter, M. F.
(2000)
Chromosoma
109,
372-380[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Moyzis, R. K.,
Buckingham, J. M.,
Cram, L. S.,
Dani, M.,
Deaven, L. L.,
Jones, M. D.,
Meyne, J.,
Ratliff, R. L.,
and Wu, J.-R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
6622-6626
|
| 36.
|
Kipling, D.,
and Cooke, H. J.
(1990)
Nature
347,
400-402[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Zijlmans, J. M.,
Martens, U. M.,
Poon, S. S. S.,
Raap, A. K.,
Tanke, H. J.,
Ward, R. K.,
and Lansdorp, P. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
7423-7428[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Vermeesch, J. R., De,
Meurichy, W.,
Van den Berghe, H.,
Marynen, P.,
and Petit, P.
(1996)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
72,
310-315[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Meyne, J.,
Baker, R. J.,
Hobart, H. H.,
Hsu, T. C.,
Ryder, O. A.,
Ward, O. G.,
Wiley, J. E.,
Wurster-Hill, D. H.,
Yates, T. L.,
and Moyzis, R. K.
(1990)
Chromosoma
99,
3-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. W. Elmore, M. W. Norris, S. Sircar, A. T. Bright, P. A. McChesney, R. N. Winn, and S. E. Holt
Upregulation of Telomerase Function During Tissue Regeneration
Experimental Biology and Medicine,
August 1, 2008;
233(8):
958 - 967.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Huang, X. Hu, J. Hu, L. Zhang, S. Wang, W. Lu, and Z. Bao
MAPPING OF RIBOSOMAL DNA AND (TTAGGG)n TELOMERIC SEQUENCE BY FISH IN THE BIVALVE PATINOPECTEN YESSOENSIS (JAY, 1857)
J. Mollus. Stud.,
November 6, 2007;
(2007)
eym036v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|