Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201537200 on March 20, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19929-19937, May 31, 2002
Biosynthesis of Surfactant Protein C (SP-C)
SORTING OF SP-C PROPROTEIN INVOLVES HOMOMERIC ASSOCIATION VIA A
SIGNAL ANCHOR DOMAIN*
Wen-Jing
Wang,
Scott J.
Russo,
Surafel
Mulugeta, and
Michael F.
Beers
From the Lung Epithelial Cell Biology Laboratories,
Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine,
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Received for publication, February 14, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Rat surfactant protein C
(SP-C) is synthesized as a 194-amino acid propeptide
(SP-C-(1-194)) that is directed to the distal secretory pathway
and proteolytically processed as an integral membrane protein to yield
its mature form. We had shown previously that trafficking of proSP-C is
mediated both by a signal anchor domain contained within the mature
SP-C sequence and by a targeting domain in the
NH2-flanking propeptide. Based on evidence from other
integral membrane proteins, we hypothesized that proSP-C targeting is
effected by oligomerization of proSP-C monomers. To evaluate this
in vitro, cDNA constructs encoding for either wild type
proSP-C (pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194)) or heterologous fusion proteins
containing green fluorescent protein (EGFP) linked to SP-C-(1-194)
(EGFP/SP-C-(1-194)), to mutant proSP-C lacking the NH2
targeting domain (EGFP/SP-C-(24-194)), or to mature SP-C alone (EGFP/SP-C-(24-58)) were produced. In transfected A549 cells, fluorescence microscopy revealed that pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194) and EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) were each expressed in CD63 (+), EEA1 (
)
cytoplasmic vesicles. Expression of EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) or
EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) resulted in translocation but retention in early
compartments. When co-transfected with pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194), both
EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) and EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) were directed to CD63 (+)
vesicles that also contained SP-C-(1-194). In contrast, trafficking of
a folding mutant that forms juxtanuclear aggregates,
EGFP/SP-CC122/186G, was not corrected by cotransfection
with pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194). Chemical cross-linking studies of
transfected cell lysates with bismaleimidohexane produced
multimeric forms of both EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) and
EGFP/SP-C-(24-58). These results indicate that sorting involves oligomeric association of proSP-C monomers mediated by the mature SP-C
domain. Heteromeric assembly allows wild type proSP-C to facilitate
trafficking of SP-C mutants with intact transmembrane domains but
lacking targeting signals. We speculate that heterotypic oligomerization of wild type with SP-C folding mutants produces a dominant negative thus contributing to the pathology of chronic lung
disease associated with patients heterozygous for mutant SP-C alleles.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Surfactant protein C
(SP-C),1 isolated from
bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of a variety of mammalian species
represents one of the most hydrophobic secretory proteins characterized
(1-3). The alveolar form of SP-C (mature SP-C) is a 35-amino acid
peptide (Mr 3,500) that contains an extremely
high content of branched aliphatic side-chains as well as covalently
attached palmitic acid at two adjacent cysteine residues in its
NH2 terminus (2). Mature SP-C partitions with surfactant
phospholipid in organic extracts of BAL, and both purified natural or
recombinant forms impart properties of rapid surface absorption and low
surface tension to reconstituted synthetic lipids (4). In a lipid
environment, the secondary structure of mature SP-C is predominantly
-helical (5) and exhibits an extended lipophilic surface with
positive charges located near the NH2 terminus. The
valyl-rich monomeric
-helical state transforms into insoluble
-sheet aggregates upon incubation in aqueous solvents (6). A dimeric
form of SP-C has been recovered from BAL of several species, although
the functional significance of this variant is unknown (7).
Synthesized exclusively by the alveolar type 2 cell as a 21-kDa
proprotein precursor (proSP-C21), the mature SP-C domain is positioned asymmetrically within the primary translation product flanked by propeptides of 23 amino acids at the NH2
terminus and 136 residues at the COOH terminus (1-3, 8). Production of SP-C from this larger precursor is a multistep process requiring four
discrete proteolytic cleavages, all occurring in subcellular compartments located distal to the medial-Golgi (9-14). Thus, translocation of synthesized proSP-C21 to the ER and
targeting of proprotein from the Golgi to distal vesicular organelles
(i.e. multivesicular bodies and lamellar bodies) are crucial
for biogenesis and secretion of the mature alveolar form.
Several important structural domains that influence proSP-C trafficking
have been defined (9, 15). By deletion analyses, the mature SP-C domain
(Phe24-Leu58) acting as a functional
signal-anchor sequence was shown to mediate ER translocation (9).
In vitro, the primary translation product has been shown to
be a bitopic, transmembrane protein, anchored by the mature SP-C region
in a type II (NH2, cytosol/COOH, lumen) orientation (15,
16). ProSP-C remains in an integral membrane form during trafficking
from the ER to the lamellar body, while undergoing proteolytic cleavage
of the extramembrane propeptide regions (9, 13). Using both in
vitro and in vivo models, the intracellular targeting
motif has been localized to the cytosolic (NH2-terminal)
portion of proSP-C (9, 15). Fusion proteins containing EGFP and proSP-C
mutants lacking conserved amino acid residues in the NH2
domain (Glu11-Thr19) are retained in
calnexin-positive (ER) compartments (9, 10). Intratracheal injection of
mice with adenovirus constructs encoding hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged SP-C
proteins has confirmed that the NH2 domain
(Phe1-Glu23), in conjunction with the mature
SP-C domain, is sufficient for secretion of SP-C (15).
Although not a functional targeting domain, the COOH-flanking
propeptide (His59-Ile194) is also important to
SP-C biosynthesis (11, 17). In contrast to NH2 propeptide
(ER retention) mutants, expression either of truncated forms or of
site-directed mutants lacking one or both conserved cysteine in this
COOH-flanking domain results in formation of unprocessed, ubiquitinated
forms that aggregate and are instead directed to a newly defined
subcellular compartment, the aggresome (18). The importance of
disulfide-mediated folding of proSP-C has recently been underscored
in vivo by the observation of chronic lung disease in a
full-term infant with a mutation in the SP-C gene (19). The mutation
c.460 + 1 G
A identified on one allele in both the patient and
mother produced alternate splicing of the SP-C mRNA and exclusion
of exon 4. Despite preservation of the mature protein sequence and
NH2 targeting motif, the resultant foreshortened mutant
deleted one of two conserved cysteine residues in the COOH-flanking
propeptide. The absence of detectable mature SP-C in this patient
suggested that expression of the abnormal protein could have dominant
negative effects on the function or metabolism of wild type SP-C
produced from the normal allele.
Evidence is accruing that many disease-causing mutations and
modifications that alter protein folding result in defective targeting
of both the mutant protein and co-expressed native forms (20-22).
Accumulation of mutant protein in the ER is a major component of the
pathogenesis of several neurological diseases (23-25). Plasma membrane
transport of the Trembler-J (TrJ) mutant of peripheral myelin protein
22 (PMP22) in Schwann cells is blocked in an intermediate compartment
and affects the transport of wild type protein (23, 24). In
co-transfection studies, direct interaction (heteromeric association)
between the two isoforms was demonstrated using co-immunoprecipitation and resulted in reduced plasma membrane expression of wild type PMP22
imparting a molecular mechanism to the neuropathy observed in the TrJ
mouse and in human Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. In Pelizaeus-Merzbacher
leukodystrophy, disease severity is linked to relative expression
levels of isoforms of one or both intrinsic membrane proteins of myelin
encoded by the Plp gene (PLP and DM20). In contrast to ER
retention noted during expression of mutant DM20 and PLP together,
co-expression of a transport-competent DM20 reduces accumulation of
mutant PLP in the ER of oligodendrocytes through formation of a
heterodimer (25). Together these models suggest that, for some
hydrophobic membrane associated proteins, homodimerization is an
essential component for normal biosynthesis and that wild type/mutant
heterodimers formation can occur in disease.
Recently, targeting and secretion of HA-tagged mature SP-C lacking the
NH2 targeting motif did not occur in SP-C
/
mice but
was facilitated by co-expression with endogenous wild type proSP-C
present in control mice (15). This finding, coupled with the recently
described exon 4 mutation, and accumulating evidence for oligomeric
sorting of secreted integral membrane proteins, led us to hypothesize
that sorting and trafficking of SP-C from proximal compartments
involves homomeric association of proSP-C. The present study
investigates the association of proSP-C monomers in vitro
using both functional characterization by intracellular targeting as
well as chemical cross-linking techniques in lung epithelial cells. We
demonstrate that, via the mature SP-C (signal anchor) domain, proSP-C
is capable both of homodimer formation during normal trafficking and of
heterotypic interactions with SP-C mutants that alter trafficking
patterns of both mutant and wild type isoforms.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials
pEGFP-C1 plasmid was purchased form
CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). The pcDNA3 eukaryotic
expression plasmid was obtained from Invitrogen (San Diego, CA).
Polyclonal anti-green fluorescent protein antiserum was purchased form
Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Texas Red-conjugated monoclonal and
polyclonal antibodies were obtained from Jackson Immunoresearch
Laboratories, Inc. (West Grove, PA). Anti-CD63 was purchased from
Immunotech, Inc. (Marseille, France). Anti-calnexin polyclonal antibody
was purchased from StressGen (Victoria, British Columbia, Canada).
Anti-ubiquitin monoclonal antibody was purchased from Chemicon
(Temecula, CA). Monoclonal anti-HA (clone 12CA5 recognizing a peptide
epitope from the hemagglutinin protein of human influenza virus) was
obtained from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Bismaleimidohexane
(BMH) was purchased from Pierce. Except where noted, other reagents
were of electrophoretic grade and were purchased from Bio-Rad or Sigma.
ProSP-C Antiserum--
The monospecific polyclonal antisera
(NPROSP-C) directed against the NH2 propeptide-flanking
domain of rat proSP-C was previously produced in rabbits using a
synthetic peptide immunogen (14). Anti-NPROSP-C (epitope = Met10-Glu23) recognizes proSP-C21
and all major intermediates but does not recognize mature SP-C or COOH
propeptide fragments.
SP-C cDNA Expression Constructs
The cDNA constructs utilized in this study are schematically
illustrated in Fig. 1. All procedures involving oligonucleotide and
cDNA manipulations were performed essentially as described in Ref.
26.
pcDNA3-SP-C-(1-194)--
The vector for the expression of
untagged wild type proSP-C in eukaryotic cells (Fig. 1E) was
previously produced by subcloning of a full-length rat SP-C-(1-194)
cDNA (816 bp) (8) insert into the pcDNA3 expression vector at
the EcoRI site of the polylinker as described (11).
EGFP/SP-C Fusion Proteins--
Chimeric fusion proteins
consisting of EGFP and wild type rat SP-C (EGFP/SP-C-(1-194); Fig.
1A) or mutant SP-C cDNA containing either a truncation
removal of the NH2-terminal-flanking
(EGFP-C1/SP-C-(24-194); Fig. 1B) or mature SP-C
alone (EGFP-C1/SP-C-(24-58); Fig. 1C) were
generated by single-step PCR. pcDNA3-SP-C-(1-194) was used as a
template. Production of the double cysteine mutant,
EGFP/SP-CC122/186G (Fig.
1D) was done with a single PCR
performed using EGFP/SP-CC122G as previously described in
Ref. 18.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Constructs utilized for analysis of proSP-C
trafficking. A-D, EGFP/SP-C fusion constructs.
A, EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) fusion construct containing
full-length rat SP-C; B, deletional construct consisting of
truncation of NH2 terminus; C, mature SP-C alone
produced by truncation of both NH2- and COOH-flanking
propeptides; D, double cysteine folding mutant containing
Gly for Cys at residues 122 and 186 in the COOH-flanking propeptide;
E, pcDNA3-SP-C-(1-194), which is a full-length rat SP-C
cDNA as described (11); F, the HA sequence attached to
the amino terminus of pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194). All SP-C inserts were
generated by PCR with pcDNA3-SP-C-(1-194) as template and
subcloned into either the EGFPC1 or pcDNA3 vectors as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Amino acid nomenclature
is based on published rat SP-C sequence (8). CC represents
putative palmitoylation sites at residues 28 and 29.
|
|
HA-tagged Wild Type ProSP-C--
using pcDNA-SP-C-(1-194)
as a template, the HA tag (YPYDVPDYA) was added to the NH2
terminus of rat SP-C-(1-194) using PCR. The 5' (forward) primer was an
82-mer and contained a KpnI site (bold), a Kozak sequence,
and the HA coding sequence (underlined): TAC AAG GGT ACC ATG
GAC TAC CCA TAC GAT
GTT CCA GAT TAC GCT GCT GAC ATG GGT AGC AAA GAG GTA CTG ATG GAG AGC. The 3'
(reverse) primer was a 21-mer that contained an XhoI site
(bold): TCT AGA TGC ATG CTC GAG CG. Following
amplification, the purified fusion insert was subcloned back into the
pcDNA expression vector using digestion with KpnI and
XhoI.
Cell Lines and Transfection
A549 Cell Line--
The lung epithelial cell line A549 utilized
in transfection studies was originally obtained through the American
Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and has been used in prior
studies (9-11, 18). A549 cells were grown at 37 °C in 5%
CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented
with 10% fetal calf serum, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin.
Cell Transfection--
A549 cells, grown to 50% confluence on
glass coverslips in 35-mm plastic dishes, were transiently transfected
with single cDNA constructs (10 µg/dish) or co-transfected with
two different constructs (5 µg/construct/dish) by CaPO4
precipitation as previously described (9, 10, 18). The medium was
replaced at 24 h, and transfected cells were maintained for up to
48 h.
Analytical Methods
Immunohistochemistry--
A549 cells grown on glass coverslips
and transfected with EGFP chimeric constructs were prepared for
indirect immunofluorescence microscopy as previously described (18).
Following washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
(Ca2+- and Mg2+-free), plated cells were fixed
by immersion of coverslips in 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature
for 30 min, and then permeabilized by incubation for 30 min with 0.3%
Triton X-100 in blocking buffer (5% bovine serum albumin and 10%
normal goat serum in PBS). Immunostaining was performed by incubation
with the primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature at the
indicated dilutions. Coverslips were washed, incubated for 1 h at
room temperature with a 1:200 dilution of secondary goat anti-mouse IgG
monoclonal or secondary goat anti-rabbit IgG polyclonal antibodies,
each conjugated to Texas Red. Cells were washed in PBS, air-dried at
room temperature, and mounted on slides with Mowiol.
Fluorescence images were viewed on an Olympus I-70 inverted
fluorescence microscope with filter packages High Q fluorescein isothiocyanate for EGFP (excitation at 480 nm, emission at 535/550 nm),
and High Q TR for Texas Red (excitation at 560/555 nm, emission at
645/675 nm) obtained from Chroma Technology (Brattleboro, VT). Fluorescent and phase images were captured using a Hamamatsu 12-bit coupled-charge device camera. Image processing and overlay analysis were performed using IMAGE 1 software (Universal Imaging, West Chester, PA).
Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting--
Cell
pellets collected by scraping and centrifugation at 300 × g were solubilized with 40 µl of 50 mM Tris,
190 mM NaCl, 6 mM EDTA, 2% Triton X-100, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, pH 7.4. Following
centrifugation at 8,000 × g for 30 s to remove nuclei, proteins were separated by electrophoresis on a 12%
polyacrylamide gel (27) and transferred to nitrocellulose (14).
Western blotting was done using successive incubations with primary
polyclonal GFP antisera (1:5000) for 1 h and goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:10,000) for
1 h at room temperature. Bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence using a commercially available kit (Amersham Biosciences). Fluorescence images were produced either by exposure to
film or by direct acquisition using the Kodak 440 Image System. The
intensity of each band was analyzed by either densitometric scanning of
exposed film (Quantity 1 (PDI, Huntington Station, NY)) or by
quantitation with Kodak1D software.
Chemical Cross-linking--
Chemical cross-linking of
expressed proSP-C forms was performed as described by Millar et
al. (28) for mitochondrial Mas70p. Transiently transfected A549
cells expressing either EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) or EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) were
recovered from 35-mm2 dishes 48 h after introduction
of plasmid cDNA by scraping and centrifugation. The resulting cell
pellets were resuspended in 10 µl of 0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, containing either BMH (10 mM), vehicle alone (Me2SO), or reaction buffer
alone. After incubation for 60 min at 4 °C, the reaction was stopped by addition of 100 mM dithiothreitol and the samples
processed for analysis by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting as described above.
Statistical Analysis--
Mean data from multiple groups were
compared with analysis of variance. All testing was performed with
Excel Data Analysis software. Significance was accepted at
p < 0.05.
 |
RESULTS |
Expression of Wild Type and Mutant EGFP/SP-C Fusion
Proteins--
Expression EGFP/SP-C fusion proteins was readily
detected in transiently transfected A549 cells 24-48 h after
introduction of plasmids. EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) was restricted to
cytoplasmic vesicles of A549 cells consistent with successful
translocation and export to distal compartments (Fig.
2, A, D, and
G). EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) containing vesicles also stained
positively with anti-NPROSP-C antiserum (Fig. 2, B and
C), indicating that marker molecule and protein did not
dissociate during trafficking. EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) containing vesicles
also stained for CD63 (Fig. 2, E and F), a marker
antigen associated with lamellar bodies and multivesicular bodies of
type 2 cells (29, 30) but not with EEA1 (Fig. 2, H and
I), an early endosome marker (31).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) chimeric protein is
directed to CD63-positive, NPROSP-C-positive, EEA-1-negative
cytoplasmic vesicles. A549 cells grown on glass coverslips
at 80% confluence were transfected with 10 µg of
EGFP-C1/SP-C-(1-194) using CaPO4 as described
under "Experimental Procedures." At 48 h after transfection,
cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with primary polyclonal
NPROSP-C antiserum (A-C), primary monoclonal CD63 antiserum
(D-F), or primary monoclonal EEA-1 antiserum
(G-I) and IgG-specific secondary Texas Red-labeled
antisera. Images acquired by video fluorescence microscopy using a High
Q FITC filter for EGFP and a Texas Red filter are representative of
four separate experiments and >50 cells for each construct. NPROSP-C
staining was observed with Texas Red channel (B) and
colocalized (yellow) with EGFP staining (A) on
double-label color image assembled with green for EGFP and
red for NPROSP-C (C). The majority of
EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) (D) also colocalized with CD63 staining
(yellow) (E) on color overlay (F).
EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) green fluorescence (G) and
EEA-1 staining (red) (H) failed to colocalize
(I). N, nucleus.
|
|
In contrast to wild type proSP-C (Fig.
3A), EGFP-tagged SP-C mutants
showed several distinct patterns of expression. EGFP/SP-C-(24-194), a
construct lacking the NH2-propeptide region, was expressed
in a reticular pattern (Fig. 3B). This compartment also
stained for the resident ER protein calnexin but not for ubiquitin
(data not shown). EGFP/SP-CC122/186G, a mutant containing
the NH2 targeting motif but lacking two conserved cysteine
residues in the COOH propeptide region, was restricted to a perinuclear
compartment (Fig. 3D) that was calnexin-negative, EEA-1-negative, but ubiquitin-positive (data not shown).
EGFP/SP-C-(24-58), a fusion protein that contains only the mature SP-C
sequence, translocated but formed perinuclear aggregates (Fig.
3C) that were ubiquitin-negative.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Subcellular distribution of EGFP/SP-C
mutants. A549 cells were transiently transfected
EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) (A), a mature SP-C fusion protein,
EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) (B), the NH2-terminal
truncated EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) (C), or the cysteine folding
mutant EGFP/SP-CC122/186G (D) using
CaPO4. Images for EGFP expression were acquired 48 h
after transfection by fluorescence microscopy with a High Q FITC filter
package. In contrast to EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) (A),
EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) (B) and EGFP/SP-C-(24-194)
(C) were translocated but retained in proximal compartments,
whereas the cysteine folding mutant EGFP/SP-CC122/186G
formed perinuclear aggregates (D). N,
nucleus.
|
|
Wild Type ProSP-C Facilitates Trafficking of Mutant
EGFP/SP-C Fusion Protein--
Functional evaluation of the
interaction of proSP-C forms in the sorting process was studied by
co-transfection studies. We hypothesized that if trafficking of proSP-C
required oligomerization, then trafficking of mutant proSP-C forms
lacking NH2 propeptide domains normally retained in the ER
could be facilitated by heterotypic interaction with wild type proSP-C
containing complete targeting motifs. In Fig.
4, the construct pcDNA3-SP-C-(1-194)
was used to express an untagged form of wild type proSP-C for
co-expression with EGFP/SP-C-(24-194). At an equal molar ratio, both
the truncated NH2 mutant (detected by EGFP fluorescence;
Fig. 4B) and the wild type form (detected immunostaining for
proSP-C; Fig. 4C) co-localized within cytosolic vesicles
(Fig. 4D). The co-transfection of EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) and
wild type SP-C now resulted in delivery of mutant proSP-C to
CD63-positive compartments (Fig.
5D). In control experiments, co-transfection with an irrelevant plasmid encoding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (pCAT) resulted in continued retention of
EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) in the ER (Fig. 4A). Therefore, these
data indicate that co-expression of wild type proSP-C can alter spatial
expression of mutant SP-C forms lacking targeting motifs by
facilitating transfer from proximal to distal compartments.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Wild type proSP-C facilitates transport of
EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) to NPROSP-C-positive cytoplasmic vesicles. The
EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) plasmid (5 µg) was co transfected at an equimolar
ratio with either an empty plasmid (pCAT; panel A) or with
pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194) (panels B-D) into A549 cells by
CaPO4. 48 h after transfection, cells were fixed,
permeabilized, and stained with anti-NPROSP-C using
TR-conjugated secondary antibody. Fluorescence images acquired
using High Q FITC filter for EGFP (panels A and
B) and a High Q TR filter package for NPROSP-C (panel
C) revealed that EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) (B) colocalized
with wild type proSP-C (C) in cytosolic vesicles
(yellow) (D). N, nucleus.
|
|

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) is directed to
CD63-positive vesicles following co-expression with wild type
proSP-C. The fusion protein of EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) (5 µg) was
transfected into A549 cells alone (panel A) or at an
equimolar ratio with pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194) (panels B-D)
by CaPO4. 48 h after transfection, cotransfected cells
were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with anti-CD63 using
TR-conjugated secondary antibody. Fluorescence images acquired using
High Q FITC filter for EGFP (panels A and B) and
a High Q Texas Red filter package for CD63 staining (panel
C) revealed that, although EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) alone was retained
in ER compartments (A), cotransfection with wild type
proSP-C resulted in colocalization (yellow) of
EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) within CD63-positive compartments (D).
N, nucleus.
|
|
Co-transfection with Wild Type SP-C Promotes Processing of Mutant
SP-C-EGFP/SP-C-(24--
194)
The molecular forms of
EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) produced in A549 cells were assessed by Western
blotting. Using anti-GFP antibody, A549 cells transfected with
EGFPC1 alone showed expression of a major product matching
the predicted size of 27 kDa (Fig.
6A, lane
1), which was not detected in cell lysates of
mock-transfected cells (data not shown). When EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) was
introduced, lysates contained three anti-GFP-positive bands. A form of
48 kDa, corresponding to the predicted size of the primary translation product of the fusion protein, as well as two smaller intermediates (doublet), were identified (Fig. 6A, lane
2). A band with Mr 27,000 (indicating
liberation of free EGFP) was not found, showing that EGFP/SP-C-(1-194)
was partially processed in this cell-type by two-step cleavage of the
COOH terminus. In contrast, EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) was expressed
predominantly as a single foreshortened primary translation product
with Mr 45,000 (Fig. 6A,
lane 3). However, if co-transfected with
pcDNA3-SP-C-(1-194), processing of the EGFP fusion protein is
significantly increased (Fig. 6A, lane 4) as compared with co-transfection with an equal amount of
irrelevant plasmid, pCAT (Fig. 6A, lane
5).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Cotransfection with pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194)
induces COOH-terminal processing of the SP-C mutant
EGFP/SP-C-(24-194). A, Western blot analysis for
detection of EGFP proteins. A549 cells (1 × 106)
transfected with EGFPC1 (10 µg) (lane 1),
EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) (10 µg) (lane 2),
EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) (10 µg) (lane 3),
pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194) (5 µg) + EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) (5 µg)
(lane 4), pCAT (5 µg) + EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) (5 µg)
(lane 5) using CaPO4 were harvested
48 h after transfection by scraping and centrifugation for 10 min
at 300 × g. Nuclear-free lysates were prepared from
cell pellets as described under "Experimental Procedures." Fifty
percent of each nuclear-free lysate was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE,
transferred to nitrocellulose and immunoblotted with primary
polyclonal anti-GFP and bands visualized using ECL. EGFP/SP-C-(1-194)
was expressed as a primary translation product with
Mr of 48,000 with a lower molecular weight
doublet (Mr = 33,000-40,000) consistent with
COOH propeptide processing (lane 2).
EGFP-C1 was expressed as a major product with
Mr 27,000 (lane 1).
EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) alone (lane 3) or
co-transfected with pCAT (lane 5) was expressed
predominantly as a foreshortened product of Mr
46,000 with minimal processing intermediates. Co-transfection with
pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194) resulted in an increase in EGFP/SP-C-(24-194)
processing (lane 4). B, for each
condition, the intensity of the primary translation product band was
compared with that of the processing intermediates by densitometric
scanning. The ratio of the processed intermediate doublet/proprotein
for each condition was determined from three separate experiments and
expressed as mean ± S.E. EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) generated ~50%
processed intermediates (**, p < 0.05 versus other conditions by analysis of variance).
Co-transfection with pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194) quantitatively enhanced
processing EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) compared with single transfection or
pCAT co-transfection (*, p < 0.05).
|
|
Quantitative densitometry confirmed that the presence of wild type
proSP-C could significantly enhance processing of EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) (Fig. 6B). When expressed as the ratio of the intensity of
processing intermediates to primary translation product, cells
transfected with EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) contained ~50% processed forms.
In contrast, EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) remained almost 90% in the
unprocessed state. Co-expression of wild type SP-C induced a 3-fold
increase in the relative amount of processed proSP-C compared with
either single transfection or in co-transfections containing the
irrelevant plasmid pCAT.
Mature SP-C Can Be Directed to Cytosolic Compartments by Wild Type
ProSP-C--
The in vitro or in vivo expression
of mature SP-C in lung epithelial cells lacking endogenous SP-C
results in retention of transfected protein in proximal
compartments. To test whether the interaction of wild type proSP-C with
mature SP-C could alter the sorting process, chimeric
EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) and wild type proSP-C (pcDNA3-SP-C-(1-194))
were expressed together into A549 cells. Using an equimolar ratio, the
presence of wild type proSP-C was sufficient to direct
EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) to cytosolic vesicles. Using immunofluorescence
labeling with an epitope-specific proSP-C antibody that does not
recognize the mature SP-C domain, these vesicles were found to contain
both proteins (Fig. 7, C and
D). In contrast co-transfection with irrelevant pCAT plasmid
did not affect spatial expression of the EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) fusion
(Fig. 7A).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Co-expression of wild type
pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194) facilitates transport of EGFP-tagged mature
SP-C to proSP-C-positive cytoplasmic vesicles. The fusion protein
of EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) (5 µg) was co transfected at an equimolar ratio
with either an empty plasmid (pCAT; panel A) or with
pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194) (panels B-D) into A549 cells by
CaPO4. 48 h after transfection, cells were fixed,
permeabilized, and stained with anti-NPROSP-C and TR-conjugated
secondary antibody. Fluorescence images were acquired using High Q FITC
filter for EGFP (panels A and B) and a High Q TR
filter package for NPROSP-C (panel C). Although
EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) was retained in proximal compartments
(A), overlay images (panel D) indicated that
co-expression with wild type proSP-C resulted in direction of
EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) to vesicles (B) that stained for wild
type proSP-C (yellow) (C). N,
nucleus.
|
|
These data indicate that co-trafficking is mediated by the close
interaction of signal anchor domains (mature SP-C segment) and provide
direct in vitro evidence extending recent in vivo data in mice suggesting that endogenous proSP-C can direct sorting of
exogenous mature SP-C.
Cross-linking Studies--
To examine the possibility that
proSP-C-(1-194) oligomerizes during trafficking, we took advantage of
prior structural data indicating that cysteine residues located at
residues 28 and 29 of the proprotein were positioned adjacent to the
transmembrane segment of the signal anchor (mature SP-C) domain (16,
32, 33). In the event that dimers form, these cysteine residues, located on the cytosolic side of the membrane, would be expected to be
in close proximity (Fig. 8A)
and therefore available for chemical cross-linking by thiol-specific
homobifunctional reagents such as BMH. Following transfection with
EGFP/SP-C-(1-194), treatment of cell lysates with BMH resulted in
formation of several cross-linked forms identified by SDS-PAGE and
Western blotting with anti-GFP antiserum. BMH-treated lysates
demonstrated bands of 96 kDa (consistent with a homodimer of the fusion
protein) as well as two other higher molecular weight bands
representing oligomers (Fig. 8B). The appearance of all
larger bands was dependent on BMH and was not observed in lysates
treated with solvent (Me2SO) or incubated with buffer alone.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Chemical cross-linking of EGFP/SP-C fusion
proteins in A549 cell membranes. A549 cells expressing either
EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) (B) or EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) (C)
were subjected to chemical cross-linking with BMH as schematically
illustrated in panel A and detailed under "Experimental
Procedures." Following resuspension of transfected cells in 0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, containing 10 mM BMH (BMH), vehicle (DMSO), or no
additive (Buffer), mixtures were incubated for 60 min at
4 °C and the reaction terminated by addition of 100 mM
dithiothreitol. The samples were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE and Western
blotting with anti-EGFP antibody as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Treatment of cells expressing EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) with
Me2SO alone resulted in identification of an EGFP/monomer
at Mr 48,000 as well as lower molecular weight
processed forms. Addition of BMH produced cross-linked products
migrating as dimers and higher molecular weight oligomeric forms. In an
analogous fashion, analysis of cells expressing EGFP/SP-C-(24-58)
(C) and treated with Me2SO identified an
EGFP/SP-C monomer at Mr 30,000 without evidence
of processing. Inclusion of BMH produced a major cross-linked product
at Mr 60,000 with minor oligomeric forms. A
nonspecific band (*) at ~ 55 kDa was observed in all
lanes.
|
|
We next tested the hypothesis that homodimer formation was mediated by
interactions between signal anchor domains of adjacent proSP-C
molecules. To evaluate this possibility, we performed additional
cross-linking studies on cell lysates from A549 cells transfected with
the construct EGFP/SP-C-(24-58). Treatment with BMH resulted in
production of a non-reducible band at Mr 60,000 consistent with the predicted size of a cross-linked, non-reducible fusion protein homodimer (Fig. 8C). These results indicate
that the propeptide-flanking domains are not required for oligomerization.
COOH Cysteine Mutants Act as Dominant Negatives--
Because the
transport of membrane-associated proteins such as PMP22 can be affected
by interaction with mutant isoforms of these proteins (23, 24), we
performed experiments to determine whether the expression of some SP-C
mutants could alter trafficking of wild type SP-C. We have shown that
mutation or deletion of one or both conserved cysteine residues at COOH
terminus of proSP-C results in misfolding with mistargeting of
unprocessed mutant protein, leading to formation of stable aggregates
within aggresomes (18). To test if co-transfection could change the
targeting of proSP-C aggregation mutants, wild type
pcDNA3-SP-C-(1-194) was co-transfected into A549 cells together
with the double cysteine mutant EGFP/SP-CC122/186G. As
shown in Fig. 9, in contrast to the
NH2-deleted mutants retained in the ER, co-transfection of
wild type proSP-C did not change the steady state intracellular
distribution of proSP-C folding mutants. EGFP/SP-CC122/186G
remained aggregated in a proximal compartment despite introduction of
equimolar amounts of pcDNA3SP-C-(1-194) (Fig. 9, A and
B). To examine whether these proSP-C folding mutants acted
as dominant negatives, we examined the distribution of HA-tagged wild
type proSP-C during co-transfection studies with GFP-tagged forms. Control experiments (Fig. 9, C and D) using
co-transfection of both HA- and GFP-tagged wild type proSP-C
demonstrated that the HA tagged form co-localized with
EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) in cytoplasmic vesicles. In contrast, the COOH
folding mutant EGFP/SP-CC122G inhibited the delivery of HA
tagged SP-C-(1-194) to cytosolic vesicles with both forms
co-localizing within perinuclear aggregates (Fig. 9, E and
F).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
SP-C COOH folding mutants alter trafficking
induce retention of wild type proSP-C. A and
B, A549 cells were co-transfected with 5 µg of
EGFP/SP-CC122/186G and 5 µg of either pCAT (A)
or pcDNA3-SP-C-(1-194) (B) plasmids using
CaPO4. EGFP expression localized 48 h after
transfection by fluorescence microscopy with a High Q FITC filter
demonstrates aggregation of EGFP fusion product despite the presence of
wild type proSP-C. C and D, the fusion protein
EGFP/SP-C-(1-194) (5 µg) was co-transfected at an equimolar ratio
with HA/SP-C-(1-194). Fluorescence images of cells fixed 48 h
after transfection were acquired using High Q FITC filter for EGFP
(C) and a High Q TR filter for -HA staining
(D) and demonstrate that EGFP- and HA tagged SP-C-(1-194)
co-localize. E and F, the COOH SP-C folding
mutant EGFP/SP-CC122G (5 µg) was co-transfected into A549
cells at an equimolar ratio with HA/SP-C-(1-194) by CaPO4.
Cotransfected cells were fixed 48 h after transfection,
permeabilized, and stained with primary anti-HA and secondary
TR-conjugated antibody. Fluorescence images for EGFP (E) and
HA staining (F) revealed colocalization of the tagged
constructs in perinuclear aggregates. N, nucleus.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The surfactant protein C proprotein is a bitopic integral membrane
protein that is trafficked to the multivesicular body and lamellar body
of type 2 cells, where the mature protein is subsequently secreted with
SP-B and surfactant lipids into the alveolar space via regulated
exocytosis (1-3, 34). The biosynthetic pathway of SP-C comprises a
number of discrete processing steps that are dependent upon sorting and
delivery of the SP-C proprotein from proximal compartments to distal
organellar sites. In previous studies, we defined two regions in the
proSP-C sequence required for trafficking: the mature SP-C domain
(Phe24 to Leu58), which functions as a
signal/anchor sequence active in epithelial and non-epithelial cells,
and the region Met10 to Thr19, contained within
the NH2-flanking propeptide, which is required for
targeting to late vesicular compartments (9, 10). Using both functional
and biochemical approaches, the present study extends these concepts by
demonstrating that, in addition to membrane integration, biosynthetic
processing of proSP-C also involves protein-protein interaction in the
form of homotypic oligomerization. This event provides a mechanism
whereby: 1) mutant SP-C proteins lacking targeting motifs can be
targeted to distal compartments via heterotypic interactions with wild
type SP-C; 2) misfolded SP-C mutants, diverted to ubiquitin-mediated
degradative pathways, can interact with wild type SP-C, thereby
functioning as dominant negatives. These additions to the molecular
model for SP-C biosynthesis explain recent in vivo
observations in which endogenous proSP-C in wild type mice (but not
present in SP-C null littermates), facilitated the secretion of
adenovirus-transfected HA-tagged mature SP-C (15) and in which humans
with familial interstitial lung disease and heterozygous for a
misfolded mutant proSP-C allele exhibited altered trafficking of wild
type protein (19).
The role of oligomerization in SP-C biosynthesis is supported by four
lines of evidence. 1) Co-transfection of wild type protein facilitates
transfer of mutant forms lacking the NH2 targeting domain
(EGFP/SP-C-(24-194)) from proximal compartments to cytosolic vesicles
(Figs. 4 and 5). 2) Double-labeling immunofluorescence co-localizes the
mutant and wild type forms in the same intracellular compartments (Fig.
4). 3) Facilitated transfer of EGFP-(24-194) by co-transfected wild
type proSP-C promotes intracellular processing similar to that of
transfected wild type proSP-C (Fig. 6). 4) Chemical cross-linking with
BMH demonstrates that SP-C-(1-194) is capable of forming homodimers
(Fig. 8B), indicating close spatial interaction between
monomers (Fig. 8A).
Intermolecular interaction via homodimerization has been shown to play
a critical role during sorting of both luminal proteins and integral
membrane proteins. Chromogranins A and B, found in the matrix of dense
secretory granules of the adrenal medulla, each homotypically
oligomerize shortly after synthesis in the endoplasmic reticulum. From
a variety of structural analyses, maintenance of a folded conformation
via a disulfide-bonded loop in the NH2 terminus as well as
other structure-dependent motifs in the COOH termini of
these soluble, luminal molecules are prerequisites for their sorting in
the trans-Golgi-network to secretory granules (35-38). Importantly,
these studies have also shown that heterotypic interactions between
transfected mutant forms and endogenous granins can facilitate normal
anterograde trafficking of mutant proteins (39). Likewise, many
integral membrane proteins also require oligomerization for sorting.
Through the use of chimeric proteins, the integral mitochondrial
membrane protein, Mas70p, has also been shown to undergo
oligomer-dependent sorting facilitated by its signal anchor
domain (28, 40).
In contrast to either of these proteins, SP-C and its proprotein
precursor represent a hybrid molecule in that, within the biosynthetic
pathway, the proprotein is transferred/transported as an integral
membrane protein and then deposited into the lamellar body lumen and
secreted in tight association with phospholipids and SP-B into the
alveolar space (1-3, 34). Deletion analysis in this study indicates
that the mature SP-C domain, which contains a transmembrane
-helix
(spanning positions 34-58), is a promoting structure for formation of
oligomers. The trafficking pattern of tagged mature SP-C
(EGFP/SP-C-(24-58)) can be redirected from retention in proximal
compartments to CD63-positive acidic vesicles by wild type proSP-C
(pcDNA3/SP-C-(1-194)) as detected by colocalization of EGFP
fluorescence and wild type proSP-C using an epitope specific proSP-C
antibody, which recognizes the NH2-flanking propeptide present only in the unlabeled wild type proSP-C (Fig. 7). The use of
the minimal construct containing only mature SP-C indicates that this
is the most likely region mediating homodimeric association. Interestingly, similar commensurate signal anchoring and
oligomerization properties have been attributed to Mas70P (28, 40).
Direct interactions between SP-C proteins were demonstrated via
chemical cross-linking, complementing the functional evidence shown by
co-transfection. The data in Fig. 8 indicate that oligomeric interactions are mediated by non-covalent interaction of the
transmembrane domains. BMH is a well characterized homobifunctional
molecule capable of cross linking Cys-SH residues of adjacent molecules that are within 16.1 Å (see Fig. 8A) (28). This technique
has been used previously to study molecular determinants of
oligomerization in Mas 70P. Because of the instability of the SP-C
tertiary structure in aqueous environments, in situ chemical
cross-linking offers advantages over other techniques for the detection
of protein-protein interactions. The
-helical form of SP-C seems to
be thermodynamically most stable in a micellar environment, whereas
upon removal from lipid, it transforms into insoluble
-sheet
aggregates as a result of a high kinetic barrier for unfolding in
aqueous solvents (5). In fact, if left in aqueous solutions, it can go
on to form insoluble amyloid fibrils (6, 41). Therefore, any conditions
that compromise the integrity of the
-helical structure of the
transmembrane domain (e.g. extraction into aqueous detergent
solutions, denaturation, and/or immunoprecipitation) would likely
affect the direct detection of interaction of mutant and wild type
forms of SP-C through the disruption of tertiary and quaternary
structure. ProSP-C is a type II integral membrane protein (15, 16),
and, in the event that homo-oligomers form via the signal anchor,
cysteine residues on the cytosolic portion of adjacent proSP-C
molecules would be located within 5 amino acids of the membrane
-helix and in close proximity for available linkage via BMH (Fig.
8A). Under reducing conditions, SDS-PAGE identifies
monomeric EGFP/SPC-(1-194) , which forms higher oligomers upon
BMH-mediated cross-linking (Fig. 8B). Mature SP-C alone can
also form homodimers when EGFP/SP-C-(24-58) was cross-linked with BMH
(Fig. 8C). In both cases, oligomers captured with BMH
treatment produced integer values for higher molecular mass forms of 96 kDa and higher (for
EGFP/SP-C-(1-194)-BMH-EGFP/SP-C-(1-194)) and 60 kDa (for
EGFP/SP-C-(24-58)-BMH-EGFP/SP-C-(24-58)), indicating that
heterotypic oligomerization with another protein is unlikely.
Recent in vivo observations lend further support for the
notion of oligomerization in a molecular model for sorting and
trafficking of proSP-C (depicted in Fig.
10). Adenovirus-mediated expression of
HA-tagged mature human SP-C (hSP-C-(24-57)) resulted in secretion of
the HA peptide by wild type mice but not by SP-C null (
/
) mice
(15). The current model proposes that SP-C mutants lacking targeting
signals (EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) and EGFP/SP-C-(24-58)), are translocated
to the ER, anchor into the membrane, and adopt a functional
conformation. However, absence of the NH2 terminus prevents
transport out of the ER, resulting in retention (Fig. 10A).
Cotransfection of wild type SP-C or expression of these mutants in wild
type mice leads to facilitation of transport via the NH2 targeting motif contained within the wild type protein to cytosolic compartments for processing and secretion (Fig. 10B). Thus,
both in vivo and in vitro, if folded properly,
motif-deficient, HA-or EGFP-tagged SP-C constructs can literally be
dragged through the biosynthetic pathway by wild type SP-C containing
the missing targeting sequences.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Model of oligomeric association for sorting
of SP-C: schematic presentation of possible fates of synthesized
proSP-C. A, single transfection of
NH2-terminal truncated EGFP/SP-C-(24-194). Mutants lacking
this domain are translocated but retained in proximal compartment
without further processing to cytoplasmic vesicles. B,
co-transfection of EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) with wild type SP-C
(pcDNA3-SP-C-(1-194)) results in heteromeric association and
redirection of mutant EGFP/SP-C-(24-194) to CD63 (+),
NPROSP-C-positive vesicles. C and D, in contrast,
COOH folding mutants are retrotranslocated from the ER and directed
preferentially to degradative pathways forming aggregates. Through
heteromeric association and retrotranslocation prior to sorting in the
Golgi (D), folding mutants can aggregate wild type SP-C
producing dominant negatives. Not shown is the fate of wild type
proSP-C, which, after homomeric dimerization, is sorted and targeted to
the regulated secretory pathway.
|
|
This model also provides a mechanism for the creation of dominant
negatives by misfolded SP-C mutants. We have previously demonstrated
that proSP-C mutants lacking conserved cysteine residues on the proSP-C
COOH-flanking domain are misfolded, mistargeting, ubiquitinated, and
then directed to proteasome-dependent pathways (11, 18)
(Fig. 10C). Importantly, the steady state expression of this
type of mutant (EGFP/SP-CC122/186G) could not be reversed
by cotransfection with wild type proSP-C (Fig. 8), and HA-tagged wild
type protein was redirected to proximal compartments (Fig. 9). An
analogous human mutation has been reported recently (19). In this case,
both mother and a full-term infant were heterozygous for a single base
mutation (G to A base substitution) in the first codon of intron 4 (460 = 1 G
A), resulting in abnormal splicing and a skip of
exon 4 leading to production of a foreshortened proSP-C isoform missing
a conserved cysteine residue at position 120/121 in the COOH-flanking
region. The index patient was heterozygous, proprotein was made, but
little or no SP-C3.7 was detected. Furthermore, there was
evidence of alveolar inflammation and fibrosis. The functional
consequence of this mutation, i.e. absence of mature SP-C,
is consistent with formation of proprotein heterodimers and impairment
of trafficking and thus processing of the wild type isoform. Mutation
of this same conserved residue in the analogous region of the rat
isoform (Cys122) obliterates disulfide-mediated folding,
promotes aggresome formation, and facilitates co-aggregation of
wild type and mutant protein forms (11, 18) (Fig. 9).
Our model for oligomeric sorting of SP-C can also account for these
observations. Expression of folding mutant molecules subsequently tagged for degradative pathways by ubiquitination can function as
dominant negatives in which the recognition of misfolding in the ER and
retrotranslocation of mutant protein to the cytosol precedes and
preempts a sorting signal from wild type protein normally active at the
trans-Golgi network (Fig. 10D). Oligomeric association thus
diverts both mutant and wild type forms prior to entry into sorting
compartments, thereby functioning as a dominant negative. This pattern
observed in SP-C biosynthesis is similar to what has been described in
some chronic degenerative neurological diseases. The abnormal
trafficking of the PMP22 gene product to the plasma membrane has been
linked to a set of dominantly inherited peripheral neuropathies
including the Trembler J mouse and Charcot-Marie-Tooth I disease (23,
24). Wild type PMP22 protein, a homodimer, has been shown to be
affected by the presence of mutant PMP22 protein in which the
neuropathy appears to result both from decreased trafficking of wild
type PMP22 and from a toxic gain of function via the accumulation of
wild type and TrJ-PMP22 in the intermediate compartment.
In summary, protein-protein interactions have been shown to be required
for normal protein sorting and have been associated with various
pathophysiological conditions, including chronic degenerative disease
in the central nervous system and other organs. Although somewhat
unique in that it is both an integral membrane protein and a secreted
peptide, surfactant protein C appears to represent another in a growing
class of proteins that require homomeric association for sorting and
trafficking. Further characterization of these events will allow for a
more detailed understanding of the molecular basis for the increasingly
recognized syndrome of chronic lung disease associated with
heterozygous expression of mutant forms of proSP-C in humans (19), for
the developmental lung toxicity recently described in transgenic mice
overexpressing mature SP-C alone (42), and for the apparent lack of
pathology found in homozygous SP-C null mice (43). Additional studies aimed at understanding SP-C biosynthesis in the context of the emerging
concept of conformational disease are in progress.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Seth Thomas Scanlon for assistance
with image processing. We thank Drs. Susan Guttentag and Michael Koval
for editorial assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants HL-19737 and P50-HL56401 (both to M. F. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Pulmonary and Critical
Care Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 807 BRB
II/III Bldg., 421 Curie Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104-6160. Fax:
215-573-4469; E-mail: mfbeers@mail.med.upenn.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 20, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201537200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SP-C, pulmonary surfactant protein C (3.7 kDa);
BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage;
BMH, bismaleimidohexane;
EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein;
ER, endoplasmic reticulum;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
GFP, green
fluorescent protein;
HA, hemagglutinin antigen;
PBS, phosphate-buffered
saline;
TR, Texas red.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Weaver, T. E.,
and Conkright, J. J.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Physiol.
63,
555-578[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Solarin, K. O.,
Wang, W. J.,
and Beers, M. F.
(2001)
Pediatr. Pathol. Mol. Med.
20,
471-500[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Beers, M. F
(1998)
in
Lung Surfactant: Cellular and Molecular Processing
(Rooney, S. A., ed)
, pp. 93-124, R. G. Landes, Austin, TX
|
| 4.
|
Mathialagan, N.,
and Possmayer, F.
(1990)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1045,
121-127[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Johansson, J.,
Szyperski, T.,
Curstedt, T.,
and Wuthrich, K.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
6015-6023[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Johansson, J.
(2001)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
29,
601-606[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Creuwels, L. A. J. M.,
Demel, R. A.,
vanGolde, L. M. G.,
and Haagsman, H. P.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1254,
326-332[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Fisher, J. H.,
Shannon, J. M.,
Hofmann, T.,
and Mason, R. J.
(1989)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
995,
225-230[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Johnson, A. L.,
Braidotti, P.,
Pietra, G. G.,
Russo, S. J.,
Kabore, A.,
Wang, W. J.,
and Beers, M. F.
(2001)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
24,
253-263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Russo, S. J.,
Wang, W-J.,
Lomax, C.,
and Beers, M. F.
(1999)
Am. J. Physiol.
277,
L1034-L1044[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Beers, M. F.,
Lomax, C. A.,
and Russo, S. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15287-15293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Solarin, K. O.,
Ballard, P. L.,
Guttentag, S. H.,
Lomax, C. A.,
and Beers, M. F.
(1997)
Pediatr. Res.
42,
356-364[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Vorbroker, D. K.,
Voorhout, W. F.,
Weaver, T. E.,
and Whitsett, J. A.
(1995)
Am. J. Physiol.
269,
L727-L733[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Beers, M. F.,
Kim, C. Y.,
Dodia, C.,
and Fisher, A. B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20318-20328[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Conkright, J. J.,
Bridges, J. P., Na, C. L.,
Voorhout, W. F.,
Trapnell, B.,
Glasser, S. W.,
and Weaver, T. E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
14658-14664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Keller, A.,
Eistetter, H. R.,
Voss, T.,
and Schafer, K. P.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
277,
493-499[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Keller, A.,
Steinhilber, W.,
Schafer, K. P.,
and Voss, T.
(1992)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
6,
601-608[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Kabore, A. F.,
Wang, W. J.,
Russo, S. J.,
and Beers, M. F.
(2001)
J. Cell Sci.
114,
293-302[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Nogee, L. M.,
Dunbar, A. E.,
Wert, S. E.,
Askin, F.,
Hamvas, A.,
and Whitsett, J. A.
(2001)
New Engl. J. Med.
344,
573-579[Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Carrell, R. W.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(2002)
New Engl. J. Med.
346,
45-53[Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Aridor, M.,
and Hannan, L. A.
(2000)
Traffic
1,
836-851[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Kim, P. S.,
and Arvan, P.
(1998)
Endocr. Rev.
19,
173-202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Notterpek, L.,
Ryan, M. C.,
Tobler, A. R.,
and Shooter, E. M.
(1999)
Neurobiol. Dis.
6,
450-460[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Tobler, A. R.,
Notterpek, L.,
Naef, R.,
Taylor, V.,
Suter, U.,
and Shooter, E. M.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
2027-2036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Gow, A.,
and Lazzarini, R. A.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
13,
422-428[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Ausbel, F. M.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Smith, J. A.,
and Struhl, K.
(1995)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 27.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Millar, D. G.,
and Shore, G. C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12229-12232[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Voorhout, W. F.,
Veenendaal, T.,
Haagsman, H. P.,
Weaver, T. E.,
Whitsett, J. A.,
Van Golde, L. M.,
and Geuze, H. J.
(1992)
Am. J. Physiol.
263,
L479-L486[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Voorhout, W. F.,
Weaver, T. E.,
Haagsman, H. P.,
Geuze, H. J.,
and Van Golde, L. M.
(1993)
Microsc. Res. Tech.
26,
366-373[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Mu, F. T.,
Callaghan, J. M.,
Steelemortimer, R. O.,
Stenmark, H.,
Parton, R. G.,
Campbell, P. L.,
McCluskey, J.,
Yeo, J. P.,
Tock, E. P. C.,
and Toh, B. H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13503-13511[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Johansson, J.,
and Curstedt, T.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
244,
675-693[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Vandenbussche, G.,
Clercx, A.,
Curstedt, T.,
Johansson, J.,
and Jornvall, H.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
203,
201-209[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Gobran, L. I.,
and Rooney, S. A.
(2001)
Am. J. Physiol.
281,
L1413-L1419
|
| 35.
|
Yoo, S. H.,
and Lewis, M. S.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
8816-8822[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Chanat, E.,
Weiss, U.,
Huttner, W. B.,
and Tooze, S. A.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
2159-2168[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Cowley, D. J.,
Moore, Y. R.,
Darling, D. S.,
Joyce, P. B.,
and Gorr, S. U.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
7743-7748[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Glombik, M. M.,
Kromer, A.,
Salm, T.,
Huttner, W. B.,
and Gerdes, H. H.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
1059-1070[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Kromer, A.,
Glombik, M. M.,
Huttner, W. B.,
and Gerdes, H. H.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
140,
1331-1346[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Millar, D. G.,
and Shore, G. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
25823-25829[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Gustafsson, M.,
Thyberg, J.,
Naslund, J.,
Eliasson, E.,
and Johansson, J.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
464,
138-142[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Conkright, J. J., Na, C. L.,
and Weaver, T. E.
(2002)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
26,
85-90[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Glasser, S. W.,
Burhans, M. S.,
Korfhagen, T. R., Na, C. L.,
Sly, P. D.,
Ross, G. F.,
Ikegami, W.,
and Whitsett, J. A.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
6366-6371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.