JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112223200 on March 19, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19976-19981, May 31, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/22/19976    most recent
M112223200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hao, J.
Right arrow Articles by George, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hao, J.
Right arrow Articles by George, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Odontoblast Cells Immortalized by Telomerase Produce Mineralized Dentin-like Tissue Both in Vitro and in Vivo*

Jianjun Hao, Karthikeyan Narayanan, Amsaveni Ramachandran, Gen He, Abdullah Almushayt, Carla EvansDagger , and Anne George§

From the Department of Oral Biology and the Dagger  Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60612

Received for publication, December 20, 2001, and in revised form, March 18, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The formation of dentin provides one well accepted paradigm for studying mineralized tissue formation. For the assembly of dentin, several cellular signaling pathways cooperate to provide neural crest-derived mesenchymal cells with positional information. Further, "cross-talk" between signaling pathways from the mesenchymal derived odontoblast cells and the epithelially derived ameloblasts during development is responsible for the formation of functional odontoblasts. These intercellular signals are tightly regulated, both temporally and spatially. When isolated from the developing tooth germ, odontoblasts quickly lose their potential to maintain the odontoblast-specific phenotype. Therefore, generation of an odontoblast cell line would be a valuable reproducible tool for studying the modulatory effects involved in odontoblast differentiation as well as the molecular events involved in mineralized dentin formation. In this study an immortalized odontoblast cell line, which has the required biochemical machinery to produce mineralized tissue in vitro, has been generated. These cells were implanted into animal models to determine their in vivo effects on dentin formation. After implantation, we observed a multistep, programmed cascade of gene expression in the exogenous odontoblasts as the dentin formed de novo. Some of the genes expressed include the dentin matrix proteins 1, 2, and 3, which are extracellular matrix molecules responsible for the ultimate formation of mineralized dentin. The biological response was also examined by histology and radiography and confirmed for mineral deposition by von Kossa staining. Thus, a transformed odontoblast cell line was created with high proliferative capacity that might ultimately be used for the regeneration and repair of dentin in vivo.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cells destined to form the mineralized tissues are derived from three distinct lineages. The cranial skeleton develops from neural crest cells. Most of the axial skeleton like skull, ribs, and sternum comes from the sclerotomes. Finally, the appendicular bones are derived from lateral plate mesoderm. Neural crest cells additionally have the plasticity to differentiate into multiple mesenchymal derivatives such as bone, cartilage, dentin, and dental pulp (1). Odontoblasts, which are responsible for the synthesis of dentin (2), arise from neural crest progenitors that have undergone differentiation in a multistep lineage pathway.

At its later stages, odontoblast development involves cells called preodontoblasts, which, after a number of cell divisions, terminally differentiate into postmitotic tall columnar odontoblast cells responsible for the synthesis of a mineralized matrix. This event is highly coordinated and regulated by extracellular matrix molecules, signaling molecules, growth factors, and their receptors. During the differentiation process, precise cell-cell, cell-matrix, and matrix-matrix interactions are responsible for triggering odontoblast differentiation and synthesis of the key components responsible for matrix calcification.

Researchers have implicated several regulatory factors and complex interactions with the epithelially derived ameloblasts in the regulation of odontoblast differentiation (3). Regulatory events that occur during dentinogenesis result in the onset of odontoblast-specific gene expression for dentin matrix protein 2 (DMP2)1 and dentin sialoprotein (DSP) (4). Various other phosphoproteins synthesized by the odontoblasts, such as dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) along with DMP2, may play a structural and/or regulatory role in the calcifying organic matrix by providing sites for apatite nucleation. The steric arrangement of phosphate groups in these phosphoproteins may be optimal for the binding of calcium and presumably for the subsequent heterogeneous formation of apatite crystals.

The differentiation of odontoblasts along with the expression of the dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) or DMP3 and DMP1 are necessary for mineralized dentin formation (5-7). Takagi and Veis (8) first suggested that defects in the genes for dentin extracellular noncollagenous proteins (NCPs) were likely candidates for the dentinogenesis imperfecta Type II, a rare disorder marked by mineralization defects. Takagi et al. (9) further suggested that dentinogenesis imperfecta patients might show reduced levels of acidic phosphoproteins such as dentin phosphophoryn (now known as DMP2). Recently, a nonsense mutation in exon 3 of DSPP gene was reported to be responsible for one case of dentinogenesis imperfecta Type II (10). Only two dentin-specific NCPs, the phosphophoryns and DSP have been identified thus far (4, 6). Although many investigators have demonstrated the abundance of these proteins in the dentin matrix, their precise role is not known.

Deciphering the regulatory mechanisms involved in the terminal differentiation and synthesis of odontoblast-specific matrix molecules requires a homogenous population of cells. However, primary odontoblast cells cannot be maintained in cultures for a long time due to their finite life span (3, 11). Several methodologies have been employed by investigators to develop cell lines from various mineralized tissues, the most common being SV-40 large "T" antigen gene (12-15); others have achieved proliferative potential by immortalizing primary cells with various oncogenes (16, 17). It has been demonstrated that cultured primary cells can circumvent senescence and continue to proliferate when transformed by a number of agents. Here we report the successful immortalization of rat odontoblasts using a gene for telomerase, a multicomponent enzyme that regulates chromosomal length upon cell division. As telomerase is composed of a template RNA plus an essential catalytic subunit of human telomerase reverse transcript (hTERT) (18), functional telomerase activity can be reconstituted by providing the catalytic subunit absent from somatic cells through ectopic expression of hTERT (19). In this study, odontoblast cells have been immortalized by reconstitution of telomerase activity. The result was immortal cell cultures that are highly proliferative and can grow without senescence. These immortalized cells demonstrate the presence of fully differentiated odontoblast-specific markers, namely DMP1, DMP2, and DMP3, and also have the potential to produce a mineralized dentin matrix both in vitro and in vivo. The availability of this cell line will provide a unique opportunity to determine the mechanisms responsible for differentiation of the neural crest-derived cells into odontoblast-like cells. These cells could ultimately be manipulated for tissue engineering of damaged dentin and to identify novel genes that are odontoblast-specific.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolation of Primary Tooth Germs and Cell Culture Procedures-- First and second molar tooth germs were dissected aseptically from 3-5-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats, and primary cell culture was conducted as described before (20). Briefly, the tissues were cut into small particles (about 0.1 cm3) and incubated with 10 ml of 0.25% trypsin and 1 mM EDTA (Invitrogen) at 37 °C for 30 min. The released cells were passed through a 100-µm cell strainer (BD Labware) and pelleted by centrifugation (3600 rpm for 10 min). The pellet was resuspended and maintained in the culture medium Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/F-12 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 15% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Cellgro), 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 2.5 units/ml fungizone, and 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid. The medium was changed every 3 or 4 days.

Transduction of Primary Cell Culture-- 80% confluent primary tooth germ cells were transfected with pCI-Neo-hTERT (kind gift from Weinberg Laboratories, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, MIT) and pMx1-SV40T-Neo-195 (kind gift from Dr. S. R. Winn, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR) by using FuGENE 6 (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as described by the manufacturer. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells were replated at a low density and were then selected with 0.7 mg/ml G418 sulfate (Sigma).

Isolating a Single Clone-- A standard sterile disc cloning (Bel-Art Products) method selectively removed well isolated colonies. They were replated at low densities to obtain secondary colonies, which were then expanded into cell lines. Two single clones (T4-4 and T3-2) from hTERT transfection and one (A4-4) from SV40 large T antigen transfection were identified by this method, and they exhibited characteristic odontoblastic morphology. These cells were expanded, passaged, and assayed for different phenotypic markers.

Reverse Transcription-PCR-- Total RNA was extracted from A4-4, T3-2, and T4-4 cell lines and rat tooth germs using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) and treated with DNaseI (RNase-free, RQ1, Promega). Three micrograms of total RNA was reverse-transcribed for 90 min at 42 °C with Superscript II (Invitrogen). PCR Supermix (Invitrogen) was used in all of the PCR reactions. Primers for the PCR reaction for DMP1, DMP2, DMP3, alkaline phosphatase, collagen type I, ameloblastin, CBFA1, cytomegalovirus, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were designed from available sequences at the National Center for Biotechnology Information gene data bank. The PCR products were verified by sequencing. For DMP2 Northern blot the primers were designed from the untranslated region.

Analysis of Gene Expression by Northern Blot-- Northern blots were performed as described by Sambrook et al. (21). mRNA was extracted from cultured cells at the 22nd passage using a FastTrack Kit (Invitrogen). Five-microgram samples of mRNA were resolved on 0.8% agarose gels containing formaldehyde. The RNA was transferred to a Hybond nylon membrane (Amersham Biosciences). The membrane was prehybridized with the use of HyperHyb (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) and probed with randomly labeled (Decaprime kit; Ambion) appropriate probes. The probes used were cDNAs for DMP1, DMP2, DMP3, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Immunohistochemistry-- Transfected cell clones at passage 23 were seeded on glass chamber slides (BD Labware) and maintained in standard medium supplemented with 0.2 mg/ml G418 for 7days. Cells were fixed with 10% formalin in neutral buffer (Sigma) and incubated overnight with polyclonal antibodies against DMP1 (22), DMP2 (gift from Dr. A. Veis), and DMP3 (gift from Dr. W. Butler) and hTERT polyclonal antibody (sc-7214, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Thereafter, cells were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated appropriate secondary antibody (Sigma) for another 2 h. Microphotographs were taken using a confocal microscope.

Detection of Telomerase Incorporation-- The pCI-Neo-hTERT expression vector carries a strong constitutive cytomegalovirus promoter and the neomycin gene to confer resistance to G418 sulfate for selection of stable transfectants. The stable transfectants were confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR with primers specific for cytomegalovirus promoter and immunostaining with hTERT antibody.

In Vitro Induction of Mineralized Nodule Formation-- The mineralization microenvironment was created by treating T4-4 cells at passage 24 (80-90% confluent) with 100 µg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM beta -glycerophosphate along with 10 nM dexamethasone for 45 days. mRNA was extracted from the T4-4 cell line at 0, 15, 30, and 45 days for Northern blot analysis to check the expression of DMPs during the mineralization process.

Von Kossa Staining-- The T4-4 cells undergoing mineralization (40 days in culture) were fixed with 10% formalin in neutral buffer (Sigma) for 15 min. The slides were washed with distilled water and then treated with 1% AgNO3 for 1 h, washed again with distilled water, and treated with 2.5% sodium thiosulfate for 5 min. The specimens were counterstained and then examined under a light microscope.

X-ray Powder Diffraction-- The samples were dried at room temperature (24 °C) and placed on aluminum grids. X-ray diffraction of the samples was carried out with a Siemens D5000 diffractometer with nickel-filtered CuKalpha radiation ( = 1.54 Å), at a scanning rate of 1° (2theta )/min.

Assay for in Vivo Mineralization-- About 5 × 106 of T4-4 cells at passage 25 were mixed with 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 of Collagraft (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN), incubated at 37 °C for 0.5 h, and then transplanted subcutaneously on the dorsal surface and intramuscularly (quadriceps muscles) in 15-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats. The procedures were performed in accordance with specifications of an approved small animal protocol (UIC No. 99-040). Radiographs were closely examined for signs of mineralized tissue formation every 10 days. At 12 weeks post-transplantation, the transplants were removed, fixed with 10% formalin, decalcified with buffered 10% EDTA (pH 7.4) for a short duration, and then embedded in paraffin. Sections (5 µm) were deparaffinized and stained for histological and immunohistological evaluation. Collagraft with RPC-C2A, a dental pulp cell line (23), was used as a control.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Transformation of Primary Odontoblast Cells-- The telomerase-containing plasmid was transfected into 3-day-old rat molar tooth germ cells. Cells were selected for neomycin by G418 in the medium. Several individual single cell clones were isolated, and integration of the telomerase gene was detected by PCR and immunostaining. Two of these transfected clones, T4-4 and T3-2, are currently being maintained in culture for over 60 passages. Fig 1, A and B, depicts the primary cells from the rat tooth germ after 1 h and 2 days in culture, respectively. The immortalized cells during G418 selection are shown in Fig 1C. Fully differentiated odontoblasts are characterized by a polarized morphology with the nucleus situated at the basal third of the cell body and a long odontoblastic process at the apical end. Fig. 1D depicts a single telomerase-expressing cell, which has the characteristic odontoblastic phenotype. Fig. 1, E and F, shows transformed single cells having the same characteristic odontoblast-like morphology. As the morphology of the transformed cells resembled the native odontoblasts, telomerase appears to have conferred upon primary cells the ability to express phenotypic characteristics of differentiated odontoblasts.


View larger version (153K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Photomicrographs of primary and transformed cells. Cells were photographed under a light microscope using a Nikon camera. Primary cells from the rat tooth germs for 1-h culture after digestion (A), 2 days in culture (B), during the selection with G418 for about 3 weeks (C and D), and one single cell clone showing morphology of odontoblasts having a long process (E and F) are shown. Please note the long process on a single cell (D). All pictures are 40× magnification.

Transformed Cells Have Odontoblast-like Phenotype-- To confirm that the identified cell clones were functioning as differentiated odontoblasts we used reverse transcription-PCR to measure gene expression of various NCPs. Fig. 2A shows that the transformed cell line synthesized various dentin NCPs like dentin matrix protein 1, 2, and 3. The transformed cells also expressed other extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen type I, alkaline phosphatase, and CBFA1 (Fig. 2A) as soon as the cells were confluent (6 days in culture). Northern blot analysis further confirmed the expression of odontoblast-specific non-collagen genes such as DMP1, DMP2, and DMP3, indicating odontoblastic differentiation (Fig. 2B). Immunocytochemical studies further confirmed that the cell line (T4-4) expressed the major NCPs in dentin, namely DMP1, DMP2, DMP3, and hTERT (Fig. 3). Thus, the transformed cells appear to function as differentiated odontoblasts on the molecular level.


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Gene expression analysis in the primary and transformed cells. Three different cell clones were analyzed for the expression of various tissue-specific genes by either PCR (A) or Northern blot (B). A4-4, T3-2, and T4-4 represent the different clones isolated from the transformed primary cells. Total RNA from rat tooth germ (RTG) was used as a positive control. PCR was carried out as described under "Materials and Methods" using gene-specific primers. A negative control for the PCR reactions was carried out without reverse transcription reaction (tRNA). Clone A4-4 was transformed by SV40 large T antigen gene whereas T3-2 and T4-4 were transformed by hTERT gene. Expression of DMP1, DMP2, and DMP3 in T4-4 was also analyzed by Northern blot (B). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was included as a positive control for the PCR and Northern blot.


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Immunostaining of DMPs in T4-4 cells. The expression of various DMPs was analyzed by immunostaining with specific antibodies using confocal microscopy. The expression of hTERT in the transformed cell line was also analyzed. A represents staining with specific primary antibodies. B represents staining for the nucleus (propidium iodide). C is a composite of A and B. Bar, 20 µm.

Expression of DMPs during Mineralization Activity in Vitro-- To determine whether the T4-4 cells could make a mineralized dentin matrix, the cells were cultured in the presence of differentiation medium containing ascorbic acid, beta -glycerophosphate, and dexamethasone. Results from the Northern blot data demonstrated that these transformed cells are able to induce the expression of dentin matrix proteins 1, 2, and 3 in the extracellular matrix. Between 0 and 15 days in culture the expression of DMP1 increased but then dropped after 15 days. In situ data showed a similar time course of gene expression (data not shown). Between 0 and 45 days in culture, transformed cells linearly increased their expression of DMP2 and -3 (Fig. 4). Thus, the pattern of expression of the dentin matrix proteins by transformed odontoblasts mimicked the expression pattern by native differentiated odontoblasts.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Expression of DMPs during mineralization. T4-4 cells were induced for calcification as described earlier. mRNAs were isolated after specified time points during mineralization. Expression of DMP1, DMP2, and DMP3 was analyzed by Northern blotting (A). A densitometric representation of the Northern data is shown in B. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Characterization of the Cell Nodules Synthesized by the Transformed Cells-- When placed under conditions known to foster mineralization in vitro, the T4-4 cells formed well defined mineralized nodules, as observed by phase microscopy (Fig. 5, A1) This was confirmed histologically by the von Kossa staining method used for the detection of phosphates (Fig. 5, A2). Transformed cells in culture for 40 days produced calcified nodules, as depicted by black-stained particles in Fig. 5, A2. We further characterized the deposited mineral by x-ray diffractometry. The analysis identified the nodules' composition as crystalline hydroxyapatite, due to the presence of a sharp peak at 2theta  = 31.8 (Fig. 5B). Thus the calcification of the extracellular matrix under in vitro mineralization conditions demonstrates that the entire process is a dynamic process resulting from the synthesis of specific matrix molecules and formation of mineralized nodules. Also the formation of mineralized nodules provides a model for dentin-like tissue formation in vitro. Thus the transformed cells behaved just like differentiated cells in vitro.


View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Characterization of the mineralized nodule in the T4-4 cell line. Cells were induced for mineralization in the presence of ascorbic acid, beta -glycerophosphate, and dexamethasone as described under "Materials and Methods" for 45 days. A1 represents the photograph of the mineralized nodule under the light microscope. A2 represents the von Kossa staining for calcification. B represents characterization of the mineral by x-ray diffraction. Cells under normal conditions were used as a "control" whereas dentin and hydroxyapatite (HAP) were used as positive controls for x-ray diffraction.

Transformed Cells Exhibit Mineralization Activity in Vivo-- To confirm that the in vitro data accurately recapitulate mineralization events in vivo, we implanted the T4-4 cells both subcutaneously and intramuscularly in Sprague-Dawley rats. Collagraft, a three-dimensional scaffold, was used to immobilize the T4-4 cells. The cell-impregnated scaffold had the potential to proliferate and synthesize a mineralized matrix when implanted in rats. After subcutaneous implantation in Sprague-Dawley rats the immobilized cells showed the potential to maintain their differentiated state, proliferate, and synthesize a mineralized matrix within 6 weeks. After 12 weeks of implantation, the cellular scaffolds were harvested and subjected to histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Morphological examination showed no evidence of inflammation or rejection. Transformed, explanted cells appeared well organized surrounded by a mineralized matrix that was laid down in a polarized manner (Fig. 7A). Protein expression using polyclonal antibodies directed against DMP1 (Fig. 7D) and the DSP portion of DMP3 (Fig. 7E) shows that the transformed cells not only expressed the proteins intracellularly but also in the mineralized matrix. An antibody directed against telomerase confirmed the identity of the matrix-producing cells, as the implanted transformed cells (data not shown). Terminal differentiation of native odontoblasts is accompanied by the synthesis of NCPs such as DMP1, DMP2, and DMP3, which have been hypothesized to play a functional role in mineralization.

Radiographic evaluation further demonstrated that the transformed cells formed mineralized tissue. The intensity of the matrix synthesized by the implanted cells increased with time compared with the control group (Fig. 6). von Kossa (Fig. 7B) and Masson's trichrome blue (Fig. 7C) stain confirmed the presence of calcium phosphate and collagen in the mineralized matrix. As a control, we implanted RPC-C2A dental pulp cells, while these cells also secreted matrix proteins the level of secretion was much lower and there were no obvious mineralized tissues after von Kossa staining. Further immunostaining for DMP1 and DMP3 was negative in the transplanted scaffold and cells (Fig. 7, F and G). In summary, the in vivo results demonstrated that T4-4 transformed cells could differentiate into odontoblast-like cells and exhibited the gene products and mineralization events characteristic of terminally differentiated, native odontoblasts.


View larger version (117K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Autoradiograms to show in vivo mineralization. Cells were incubated with collagraft material as described under "Materials and Methods" and implanted intramuscularly in rats. Autoradiograms were taken at different time points after the implantation of collagraft with T4-4 cells. L represents the left side of the animal that has control cells. R represents the right side of the animal, which has T4-4 cells. RPC-C2A dental pulp cells were used in the control implants.


View larger version (83K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Histological and immunohistochemical analysis of the implants after 12 weeks. The implants with T4-4 cells were fixed with formalin and sectioned. The sections were stained with Masson's trichrome (A), von Kossa-stained for calcium (B), Masson's trichrome-stained for collagen fiber, higher magnification of A (C). D and E represent immunostaining for DMP1 and the DSP portion of DMP3, respectively. The box in A indicates the region shown in B to E. F and G represent immunostaining for DMP1 and the DSP portion of DMP3 in control cells.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Odontogenic differentiation in culture has not been well characterized due to two major limitations: the limited life span of primary cells and the paucity of differentiation markers. Odontoblasts are terminally differentiated cells, thus they cannot be further induced for differentiation. Recent advancements in identification and cloning of dentin matrix proteins by other laboratories and ours have helped tremendously in the area of identifying markers for terminally differentiated odontoblasts (5, 6). The understanding of signaling mechanisms involved in dentin formation remains in its infancy even though substantial progress has been made in identifying the fundamental pathway required for tooth patterning. We anticipate that the development of an odontoblast cell line will not only be useful for identifying novel targets and signaling pathways for dentin formation but will also help in the field of gene therapy for regeneration of dentin.

Various tissue-specific cell lines have been immortalized using telomerase (24-26). In our studies, we transformed cells from the developing tooth germ of rats, the primary repository for odontogenic cells, with a human gene encoding the reverse transcriptase subunit telomerase. Incorporation of the gene in rat odontoblasts resulted in a considerable extension of their life span and permitted the cells to proliferate without limitation. Morphological features of the transformed odontoblast-like cells were similar to in vivo odontoblasts: both show long cytoplasmic processes attached to one end of the cell body and a polarized distribution of the nucleus, the rough endoplasmic reticulum, and the Golgi stack at the other (3). We also observed that the transformed cells had the necessary biochemical program for differentiation and were capable of producing a mineralizing extracellular matrix both in vitro and in vivo.

In particular, we looked at a transcription factor known to be essential for tissue-specific gene expression. Researchers have identified CBFA1 as an essential transcription factor for osteogenesis and chondrogenesis (27, 28) and showed that the gene product plays an essential role in osteoblast differentiation. Mutations of CBFA1 gene result in abnormal skeletal genesis and various dental disorders. The expression of Cbfa1 in our immortalized cells corroborates well with a recent report that demonstrates the high level of expression of this transcription factor in differentiated odontoblasts (29). Having a cell line such as the telomerase-transformed rat odontoblasts will be a valuable asset for pinpointing additional transcription factors that control the differentiation of the ectomesenchymal neural crest cells into odontoblasts.

The immortalized cells had the potential to synthesize principal extracellular matrix components that are necessary for the assembly of dentin matrix, namely type I collagen, which forms the scaffold for mineral deposition, and NCPs, which are responsible for nucleating and regulating the hydroxyapatite crystal size. The dentin matrix proteins have been proposed to function as regulatory molecules during the ordered deposition and organization of hydroxyapatite. Specifically DMP2 and DMP3 or DSPP defines the phenotypic characteristics of dentin. In situ hybridization studies during development have demonstrated that the extracellular matrix genes DMP1, DMP2, and DMP3 are synthesized and secreted by odontoblasts at the mineralization front only after they enter the secretory stage. Therefore, identification of these terminally differentiated odontoblast-specific markers would establish the presence of a true odontoblastic cell line. As T4-4 and T3-2 odontoblast-like cell lines have all the characteristics of an odontoblastic phenotype, they will likely provide an excellent reproducible in vitro system for studying odontoblast-specific gene expression.

The biological potential for these cells to form a mineralized tissue was demonstrated by the in vivo implantation studies. The implanted cells were completely polarized and functional. We observed a distinct calcified tissue phenotype coinciding with the expression of the dentin matrix proteins within the microenvironment of the implanted site. We confirmed the presence of phosphate in the mineralized tissue with von Kossa staining. Phosphate is a major component of mineralized tissue matrix that functions to sequester increased calcium ions and helps cells maintain homeostasis (30). Recently Gronthos et al. (31) showed that dental pulp stem cells, when transplanted into immunocompromised mice, generate a dentin-like mineralized structure. These results support our evidence that telomerase-transformed cells function as bona fide differentiated odontoblasts.

The main advantage of developing an odontoblast cell line is that these cells maybe used to study the signaling mechanisms involved in terminal differentiation of odontoblasts, isolation and characterization of odontoblast-specific genes, and tissue engineering of these cells for the formation of reparative dentin. The molecular mechanisms during reparative dentin formation have not been systematically investigated. The transformed cells reported here could be efficiently propagated in culture with sufficient proliferative capacity to produce enough dentin.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the T4-4 immortalized cells have unique odontogenic potential along with the capability to form mineralized matrix both in vitro and in vivo. The ultrastructural morphology of matrix mineralization and expression of odontoblast-specific differentiation markers are some of the salient features of the T4-4 odontoblast cell line. This cell line will be a valuable tool for identifying and characterizing the different signaling molecules and transcription factors responsible for the complete differentiation of the odontoblasts as the process of odontoblast differentiation in vitro recapitulates the in vivo situation. An important functional application would be the manipulation of these cells for tissue engineering of mineralized tissues especially in the reparative formation and regeneration of dentin.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Verna J. Brown for histological staining, Isaac D. Johnson for x-ray photography, and Mei Ling Chen for assisting in confocal laser-scanning microscopy.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Department of Orthodontics at University of Illinois at Chicago (to C. E.) and NIDCR, National Institutes of Health Grant DE11657 (to A. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Oral Biology (M/C 690), University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612. Tel.: 312-413-0738; Fax: 312-996-6044; E-mail: anneg@uic.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112223200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: DMP, dentin matrix protein; DSP, dentin sialoprotein; DSPP, dentin sialophosphoprotein; NCP, noncollagenous proteins; hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcript.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Thesleff, I., Vaahtokari, A., and Partanen, A. M. (1995) Int. J. Dev. Biol. 39, 35-50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Goldberg, M., Septier, D., Torres-Quintana, M., Lecolle, S., Hall, R., Gafni, G., Menachi, S., and Embery, G. (1998) in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Chemistry and Biology of Mineralized Tissues (Goldberg, M. , Boskey, A. , and Robinson, C., eds) , pp. 297-303, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL
3. Ruch, J. V., Lesot, H., and Begue-Kim, C. (1995) Int. J. Dev. Biol. 39, 51-68[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. George, A., Bannon, L., Sabsay, B., Dillon, J. W., Malone, J., and Veis, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32869-32873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. George, A., Sabsay, B., Simonian, P. A., and Veis, A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12624-12630[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. MacDougall, M., Simmons, D., Luan, X., Nydegger, J., Feng, J., and Gu, T. T. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 72, 835-842
7. Narayanan, K., Srinivas, R., Ramachandran, A., Hao, J., Quinn, B., and George, A. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 4516-4521[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Takagi, Y., and Veis, A. (1981) in The Chemistry and Biology of Mineralized Connective Tissues (Veis, A., ed) , pp. 233-243, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York
9. Takagi, Y., Veis, A., and Sauk, J. J. (1983) Clin. Orthop. 176, 282-290
10. Zhang, X., Zhao, J., Li, C., Gao, S., Qiu, C., Liu, P., Wu, G., Qiang, B., Lo, W. H., and Shen, Y. (2001) Nat. Genet. 27, 151-152[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Sakamoto, S., Baird, S. A., and Sakamoto, M. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 133, 709-716[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Winn, S. R., Randolph, G., Uludag, H., Wong, S. C., Hair, G. A., and Hollinger, J. O. (1999) J. Bone Miner. Res. 14, 1721-1733[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. D'Errico, J. A., Ouyang, H., Berry, J. E., Macneil, R. L., Strayhorn, C., Imperiale, M. J., Harris, N. L., Goldgerg, H., and Somerman, M. J. (1999) Bone 25, 39-47[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Thonemann, B., and Schmalz, G. (2000) Arch. Oral Biol. 45, 857-869[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. MacDougall, M., Thiemann, F., Ta, H., Hsu, P., Chen, L. S., and Snead, M. L. (1995) Connect. Tissue Res. 22, 71-77
16. Den Besten, P. K., Mathews, C. H. E., Gao, C., and Li, W. (1998) Connect. Tissue Res. 38, 3-8[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Kato, Y., Windle, J., Koop, B., Mundy, G. R., and Bonewald, L. (1997) J. Bone Miner. Res. 12, 2014-2023[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Meyerson, M., Counter, C. M., Ng, Eaton, E., Ellisen, L. W., Steiner, P., Caddle, S. D., Ziaugra, L., Beijersbergen, R. L., Davidoff, M. J., Liu, Q., Bacchetti, S., Haber, D. A., and Weinberg, R. A. (1997) Cell 90, 785-795[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Counter, C. M., Hahn, W. C., Wei, W., Caddle, S. D., Beijersbergen, R. L., Lansdorp, P. M., Sedivy, J. M., and Weinberg, R. A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 14723-14728[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Kasugai, S., Shibata, S., Suzuki, S., Susami, T., and Ogura, H. (1993) Arch. Oral Biol. 38, 769-777[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Sambrook, J., Fritch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY
22. Srinivasan, R., Chen, B., Gorski, J. P., and George, A. (1999) Connect. Tissue Res. 40, 251-258[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Kasugai, S., Adachi, M., and Ogura, H. (1988) Arch. Oral. Biol. 33, 887-891[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. O'Hare, M. J., Bond, J., Clarke, C., Takeuchi, Y., Atherton, A. J., Berry, C., Moody, J., Silver, A. R., Davies, D. C., Alsop, A. E., Neville, A. M., and Jat, P. S. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 646-651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Hahn, W. C., and Meyerson, M. (2001) Ann. Med. 33, 123-129[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Migliaccio, M., Amacker, M., Just, T., Reichenbach, P., Valmori, D., Cerottini, J. C., Romero, P., and Nabholz, M. (2000) J. Immunol. 165, 4978-4984[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Ducy, P., Zhang, R., Geoffroy, V., Ridall, A. L., and Karsenty, G. (1997) Cell 89, 677-680[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Otto, F., Thornell, A. P., Crompton, T., Denzel, A., Gilmour, K. C., Rosewell, I. R., Stamp, G. W., Beddington, R. S., Mundlos, S., Olsen, B. R., Selby, P. B., and Owen, M. J. (1997) Cell 89, 765-771[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. D'Souza, R. N., Aberg, T., Gaikwad, J., Cavender, A., Owen, M., Karsenty, G., and Thesleff, I. (1999) Development 126, 2911-2920[Abstract]
30. Beck, G. R., Jr., Zerler, B., and Moran, E. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 8352-8357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Gronthos, S., Mankani, M., Brahim, J., Robey, P. G., and Shi, S. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 13625-13630[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Ravindran, K. Narayanan, A. S. Eapen, J. Hao, A. Ramachandran, S. Blond, and A. George
Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone Protein GRP-78 Mediates Endocytosis of Dentin Matrix Protein 1
J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2008; 283(44): 29658 - 29670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Hao, K. Narayanan, T. Muni, A. Ramachandran, and A. George
Dentin Matrix Protein 4, a Novel Secretory Calcium-binding Protein That Modulates Odontoblast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2007; 282(21): 15357 - 15365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Narayanan, S. Gajjeraman, A. Ramachandran, J. Hao, and A. George
Dentin Matrix Protein 1 Regulates Dentin Sialophosphoprotein Gene Transcription during Early Odontoblast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2006; 281(28): 19064 - 19071.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Narayanan, A. Ramachandran, M. C. Peterson, J. Hao, A.-B. Kolsto, A. D. Friedman, and A. George
The CCAAT Enhancer-binding Protein (C/EBP){beta} and Nrf1 Interact to Regulate Dentin Sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) Gene Expression during Odontoblast Differentiation
J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 2004; 279(44): 45423 - 45432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.Home page
M. Goldberg and A. J. Smith
CELLS AND EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES OF DENTIN AND PULP: A BIOLOGICAL BASIS FOR REPAIR AND TISSUE ENGINEERING
Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 13 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/22/19976    most recent
M112223200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hao, J.
Right arrow Articles by George, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hao, J.
Right arrow Articles by George, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.