![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 22, 19976-19981, May 31, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Oral Biology and the
Received for publication, December 20, 2001, and in revised form, March 18, 2002
The formation of dentin provides one well
accepted paradigm for studying mineralized tissue formation. For
the assembly of dentin, several cellular signaling pathways cooperate
to provide neural crest-derived mesenchymal cells with positional
information. Further, "cross-talk" between signaling pathways from
the mesenchymal derived odontoblast cells and the epithelially derived
ameloblasts during development is responsible for the formation of
functional odontoblasts. These intercellular signals are tightly
regulated, both temporally and spatially. When isolated from the
developing tooth germ, odontoblasts quickly lose their potential to
maintain the odontoblast-specific phenotype. Therefore, generation of
an odontoblast cell line would be a valuable reproducible tool for studying the modulatory effects involved in odontoblast differentiation as well as the molecular events involved in mineralized dentin formation. In this study an immortalized odontoblast cell line, which
has the required biochemical machinery to produce mineralized tissue
in vitro, has been generated. These cells were implanted into animal models to determine their in vivo effects on
dentin formation. After implantation, we observed a multistep,
programmed cascade of gene expression in the exogenous odontoblasts as
the dentin formed de novo. Some of the genes expressed
include the dentin matrix proteins 1, 2, and 3, which are extracellular
matrix molecules responsible for the ultimate formation of mineralized dentin. The biological response was also examined by histology and
radiography and confirmed for mineral deposition by von Kossa staining.
Thus, a transformed odontoblast cell line was created with high
proliferative capacity that might ultimately be used for the
regeneration and repair of dentin in vivo.
Cells destined to form the mineralized tissues are derived from
three distinct lineages. The cranial skeleton develops from neural
crest cells. Most of the axial skeleton like skull, ribs, and sternum
comes from the sclerotomes. Finally, the appendicular bones are derived
from lateral plate mesoderm. Neural crest cells additionally have the
plasticity to differentiate into multiple mesenchymal derivatives such
as bone, cartilage, dentin, and dental pulp (1). Odontoblasts, which
are responsible for the synthesis of dentin (2), arise from neural
crest progenitors that have undergone differentiation in a multistep
lineage pathway.
At its later stages, odontoblast development involves cells called
preodontoblasts, which, after a number of cell divisions, terminally
differentiate into postmitotic tall columnar odontoblast cells
responsible for the synthesis of a mineralized matrix. This event is
highly coordinated and regulated by extracellular matrix molecules,
signaling molecules, growth factors, and their receptors. During the
differentiation process, precise cell-cell, cell-matrix, and
matrix-matrix interactions are responsible for triggering odontoblast
differentiation and synthesis of the key components responsible for
matrix calcification.
Researchers have implicated several regulatory factors and complex
interactions with the epithelially derived ameloblasts in the
regulation of odontoblast differentiation (3). Regulatory events that
occur during dentinogenesis result in the onset of odontoblast-specific
gene expression for dentin matrix protein 2 (DMP2)1 and dentin
sialoprotein (DSP) (4). Various other phosphoproteins synthesized by
the odontoblasts, such as dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) along with
DMP2, may play a structural and/or regulatory role in the calcifying
organic matrix by providing sites for apatite nucleation. The steric
arrangement of phosphate groups in these phosphoproteins may be optimal
for the binding of calcium and presumably for the subsequent
heterogeneous formation of apatite crystals.
The differentiation of odontoblasts along with the expression of the
dentin sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) or DMP3 and DMP1 are necessary for
mineralized dentin formation (5-7). Takagi and Veis (8) first
suggested that defects in the genes for dentin extracellular
noncollagenous proteins (NCPs) were likely candidates for the
dentinogenesis imperfecta Type II, a rare disorder marked by
mineralization defects. Takagi et al. (9) further suggested that dentinogenesis imperfecta patients might show reduced levels of
acidic phosphoproteins such as dentin phosphophoryn (now known as
DMP2). Recently, a nonsense mutation in exon 3 of DSPP gene was
reported to be responsible for one case of dentinogenesis imperfecta
Type II (10). Only two dentin-specific NCPs, the phosphophoryns and DSP
have been identified thus far (4, 6). Although many investigators have
demonstrated the abundance of these proteins in the dentin matrix,
their precise role is not known.
Deciphering the regulatory mechanisms involved in the terminal
differentiation and synthesis of odontoblast-specific matrix molecules
requires a homogenous population of cells. However, primary
odontoblast cells cannot be maintained in cultures for a long time due
to their finite life span (3, 11). Several methodologies have been
employed by investigators to develop cell lines from various
mineralized tissues, the most common being SV-40 large "T" antigen
gene (12-15); others have achieved proliferative potential by
immortalizing primary cells with various oncogenes (16, 17). It has
been demonstrated that cultured primary cells can circumvent senescence
and continue to proliferate when transformed by a number of agents.
Here we report the successful immortalization of rat odontoblasts using
a gene for telomerase, a multicomponent enzyme that regulates
chromosomal length upon cell division. As telomerase is composed of a
template RNA plus an essential catalytic subunit of human telomerase
reverse transcript (hTERT) (18), functional telomerase activity can be
reconstituted by providing the catalytic subunit absent from somatic
cells through ectopic expression of hTERT (19). In this study,
odontoblast cells have been immortalized by reconstitution of
telomerase activity. The result was immortal cell cultures that are
highly proliferative and can grow without senescence. These
immortalized cells demonstrate the presence of fully differentiated
odontoblast-specific markers, namely DMP1, DMP2, and DMP3, and also
have the potential to produce a mineralized dentin matrix both in
vitro and in vivo. The availability of this cell line
will provide a unique opportunity to determine the mechanisms
responsible for differentiation of the neural crest-derived cells into
odontoblast-like cells. These cells could ultimately be manipulated for
tissue engineering of damaged dentin and to identify novel genes that
are odontoblast-specific.
Isolation of Primary Tooth Germs and Cell Culture
Procedures--
First and second molar tooth germs were dissected
aseptically from 3-5-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats, and primary cell
culture was conducted as described before (20). Briefly, the tissues were cut into small particles (about 0.1 cm3) and incubated
with 10 ml of 0.25% trypsin and 1 mM EDTA
(Invitrogen) at 37 °C for 30 min. The released cells were
passed through a 100-µm cell strainer (BD Labware) and pelleted by
centrifugation (3600 rpm for 10 min). The pellet was resuspended and
maintained in the culture medium Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium/F-12 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 15% (v/v) fetal bovine
serum (Cellgro), 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin, 2.5 units/ml
fungizone, and 50 µg/ml ascorbic acid. The medium was changed every 3 or 4 days.
Transduction of Primary Cell Culture--
80% confluent primary
tooth germ cells were transfected with pCI-Neo-hTERT (kind gift from
Weinberg Laboratories, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research,
MIT) and pMx1-SV40T-Neo-195 (kind gift from Dr. S. R. Winn,
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences
University, Portland, OR) by using FuGENE 6 (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) as described by the manufacturer. Forty-eight hours after
transfection, the cells were replated at a low density and were then
selected with 0.7 mg/ml G418 sulfate (Sigma).
Isolating a Single Clone--
A standard sterile disc cloning
(Bel-Art Products) method selectively removed well isolated colonies.
They were replated at low densities to obtain secondary colonies, which
were then expanded into cell lines. Two single clones (T4-4 and T3-2)
from hTERT transfection and one (A4-4) from SV40 large T antigen
transfection were identified by this method, and they exhibited
characteristic odontoblastic morphology. These cells were expanded,
passaged, and assayed for different phenotypic markers.
Reverse Transcription-PCR--
Total RNA was extracted from
A4-4, T3-2, and T4-4 cell lines and rat tooth germs using Trizol
reagent (Invitrogen) and treated with DNaseI (RNase-free, RQ1,
Promega). Three micrograms of total RNA was reverse-transcribed for 90 min at 42 °C with Superscript II (Invitrogen). PCR Supermix
(Invitrogen) was used in all of the PCR reactions. Primers for the PCR
reaction for DMP1, DMP2, DMP3,
alkaline phosphatase, collagen type I, ameloblastin, CBFA1, cytomegalovirus, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were
designed from available sequences at the National Center for
Biotechnology Information gene data bank. The PCR products were
verified by sequencing. For DMP2 Northern blot the primers were
designed from the untranslated region.
Analysis of Gene Expression by Northern Blot--
Northern blots
were performed as described by Sambrook et al. (21).
mRNA was extracted from cultured cells at the 22nd passage using a
FastTrack Kit (Invitrogen). Five-microgram samples of mRNA were
resolved on 0.8% agarose gels containing formaldehyde. The RNA was
transferred to a Hybond nylon membrane (Amersham Biosciences). The membrane was prehybridized with the use of HyperHyb (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) and probed with randomly labeled (Decaprime kit; Ambion) appropriate probes. The probes used were cDNAs for DMP1, DMP2, DMP3, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Immunohistochemistry--
Transfected cell clones at passage 23 were seeded on glass chamber slides (BD Labware) and maintained in
standard medium supplemented with 0.2 mg/ml G418 for 7days. Cells were
fixed with 10% formalin in neutral buffer (Sigma) and incubated
overnight with polyclonal antibodies against DMP1 (22), DMP2 (gift from
Dr. A. Veis), and DMP3 (gift from Dr. W. Butler) and hTERT polyclonal
antibody (sc-7214, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Thereafter, cells were
incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated appropriate
secondary antibody (Sigma) for another 2 h. Microphotographs were
taken using a confocal microscope.
Detection of Telomerase Incorporation--
The pCI-Neo-hTERT
expression vector carries a strong constitutive cytomegalovirus
promoter and the neomycin gene to confer resistance to G418 sulfate for
selection of stable transfectants. The stable transfectants were
confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR with primers specific for
cytomegalovirus promoter and immunostaining with hTERT antibody.
In Vitro Induction of Mineralized Nodule Formation--
The
mineralization microenvironment was created by treating T4-4 cells at
passage 24 (80-90% confluent) with 100 µg/ml ascorbic acid and 10 mM Von Kossa Staining--
The T4-4 cells undergoing mineralization
(40 days in culture) were fixed with 10% formalin in neutral buffer
(Sigma) for 15 min. The slides were washed with distilled water and
then treated with 1% AgNO3 for 1 h, washed again with
distilled water, and treated with 2.5% sodium thiosulfate for 5 min.
The specimens were counterstained and then examined under a light microscope.
X-ray Powder Diffraction--
The samples were dried at room
temperature (24 °C) and placed on aluminum grids. X-ray diffraction
of the samples was carried out with a Siemens D5000 diffractometer with
nickel-filtered CuK Assay for in Vivo Mineralization--
About 5 × 106 of T4-4 cells at passage 25 were mixed with 0.5 × 0.5 cm2 of Collagraft (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN), incubated at
37 °C for 0.5 h, and then transplanted subcutaneously on the
dorsal surface and intramuscularly (quadriceps muscles) in 15-week-old
Sprague-Dawley rats. The procedures were performed in accordance with
specifications of an approved small animal protocol (UIC No. 99-040).
Radiographs were closely examined for signs of mineralized tissue
formation every 10 days. At 12 weeks post-transplantation, the
transplants were removed, fixed with 10% formalin, decalcified with
buffered 10% EDTA (pH 7.4) for a short duration, and then embedded in
paraffin. Sections (5 µm) were deparaffinized and stained for
histological and immunohistological evaluation. Collagraft with
RPC-C2A, a dental pulp cell line (23), was used as a control.
Transformation of Primary Odontoblast Cells--
The
telomerase-containing plasmid was transfected into 3-day-old rat molar
tooth germ cells. Cells were selected for neomycin by G418 in the
medium. Several individual single cell clones were isolated, and
integration of the telomerase gene was detected by PCR and
immunostaining. Two of these transfected clones, T4-4 and T3-2, are
currently being maintained in culture for over 60 passages. Fig
1, A and B, depicts
the primary cells from the rat tooth germ after 1 h and 2 days in
culture, respectively. The immortalized cells during G418 selection are
shown in Fig 1C. Fully differentiated odontoblasts are
characterized by a polarized morphology with the nucleus situated at
the basal third of the cell body and a long odontoblastic process at
the apical end. Fig. 1D depicts a single
telomerase-expressing cell, which has the characteristic odontoblastic
phenotype. Fig. 1, E and F, shows transformed single cells having the same characteristic
odontoblast-like morphology. As the morphology of the transformed cells
resembled the native odontoblasts, telomerase appears to have conferred upon primary cells the ability to express phenotypic characteristics of
differentiated odontoblasts.
Transformed Cells Have Odontoblast-like Phenotype--
To confirm
that the identified cell clones were functioning as differentiated
odontoblasts we used reverse transcription-PCR to measure gene
expression of various NCPs. Fig.
2A shows that the transformed
cell line synthesized various dentin NCPs like dentin matrix protein 1, 2, and 3. The transformed cells also expressed other extracellular
matrix proteins such as collagen type I, alkaline phosphatase, and
CBFA1 (Fig. 2A) as soon as the cells were confluent
(6 days in culture). Northern blot analysis further confirmed the
expression of odontoblast-specific non-collagen genes such
as DMP1, DMP2, and DMP3, indicating
odontoblastic differentiation (Fig. 2B). Immunocytochemical
studies further confirmed that the cell line (T4-4) expressed the major
NCPs in dentin, namely DMP1, DMP2, DMP3, and hTERT (Fig.
3). Thus, the transformed cells appear to
function as differentiated odontoblasts on the molecular level.
Expression of DMPs during Mineralization Activity in Vitro--
To
determine whether the T4-4 cells could make a mineralized dentin
matrix, the cells were cultured in the presence of differentiation medium containing ascorbic acid, Characterization of the Cell Nodules Synthesized by the Transformed
Cells--
When placed under conditions known to foster mineralization
in vitro, the T4-4 cells formed well defined mineralized
nodules, as observed by phase microscopy (Fig.
5, A1) This was confirmed histologically by the von Kossa staining method used for the detection of phosphates (Fig. 5, A2). Transformed cells in culture for
40 days produced calcified nodules, as depicted by black-stained particles in Fig. 5, A2. We further characterized the
deposited mineral by x-ray diffractometry. The analysis identified the
nodules' composition as crystalline hydroxyapatite, due to the
presence of a sharp peak at 2 Transformed Cells Exhibit Mineralization Activity in Vivo--
To
confirm that the in vitro data accurately recapitulate
mineralization events in vivo, we implanted the T4-4 cells
both subcutaneously and intramuscularly in Sprague-Dawley rats.
Collagraft, a three-dimensional scaffold, was used to immobilize the
T4-4 cells. The cell-impregnated scaffold had the potential to
proliferate and synthesize a mineralized matrix when implanted in rats.
After subcutaneous implantation in Sprague-Dawley rats the immobilized cells showed the potential to maintain their differentiated state, proliferate, and synthesize a mineralized matrix within 6 weeks. After
12 weeks of implantation, the cellular scaffolds were harvested and
subjected to histological and immunohistochemical analysis. Morphological examination showed no evidence of inflammation or rejection. Transformed, explanted cells appeared well organized surrounded by a mineralized matrix that was laid down in a polarized manner (Fig. 7A). Protein expression using polyclonal
antibodies directed against DMP1 (Fig. 7D) and the DSP
portion of DMP3 (Fig. 7E) shows that the transformed cells
not only expressed the proteins intracellularly but also in the
mineralized matrix. An antibody directed against telomerase confirmed
the identity of the matrix-producing cells, as the implanted
transformed cells (data not shown). Terminal differentiation of native
odontoblasts is accompanied by the synthesis of NCPs such as DMP1,
DMP2, and DMP3, which have been hypothesized to play a functional role
in mineralization.
Radiographic evaluation further demonstrated that the transformed cells
formed mineralized tissue. The intensity of the matrix synthesized by
the implanted cells increased with time compared with the control group
(Fig. 6). von Kossa (Fig.
7B) and Masson's trichrome
blue (Fig. 7C) stain confirmed the presence of calcium phosphate and collagen in the mineralized matrix. As a control, we
implanted RPC-C2A dental pulp cells, while these cells also secreted
matrix proteins the level of secretion was much lower and there were no
obvious mineralized tissues after von Kossa staining. Further
immunostaining for DMP1 and DMP3 was negative in the transplanted
scaffold and cells (Fig. 7, F and G). In summary, the in vivo results demonstrated that T4-4 transformed cells
could differentiate into odontoblast-like cells and exhibited the gene products and mineralization events characteristic of terminally differentiated, native odontoblasts.
Odontogenic differentiation in culture has not been well
characterized due to two major limitations: the limited life span of
primary cells and the paucity of differentiation markers. Odontoblasts are terminally differentiated cells, thus they cannot be further induced for differentiation. Recent advancements in identification and
cloning of dentin matrix proteins by other laboratories and ours have
helped tremendously in the area of identifying markers for terminally
differentiated odontoblasts (5, 6). The understanding of signaling
mechanisms involved in dentin formation remains in its infancy even
though substantial progress has been made in identifying the
fundamental pathway required for tooth patterning. We anticipate that
the development of an odontoblast cell line will not only be useful for
identifying novel targets and signaling pathways for dentin formation
but will also help in the field of gene therapy for regeneration of dentin.
Various tissue-specific cell lines have been immortalized using
telomerase (24-26). In our studies, we transformed cells from the
developing tooth germ of rats, the primary repository for odontogenic
cells, with a human gene encoding the reverse transcriptase subunit
telomerase. Incorporation of the gene in rat odontoblasts resulted in a
considerable extension of their life span and permitted the cells to
proliferate without limitation. Morphological features of the
transformed odontoblast-like cells were similar to in vivo odontoblasts: both show long cytoplasmic processes attached to one end
of the cell body and a polarized distribution of the nucleus, the rough
endoplasmic reticulum, and the Golgi stack at the other (3). We also
observed that the transformed cells had the necessary biochemical
program for differentiation and were capable of producing a
mineralizing extracellular matrix both in vitro and in
vivo.
In particular, we looked at a transcription factor known to be
essential for tissue-specific gene expression. Researchers have
identified CBFA1 as an essential transcription factor for osteogenesis
and chondrogenesis (27, 28) and showed that the gene product plays an
essential role in osteoblast differentiation. Mutations of CBFA1 gene
result in abnormal skeletal genesis and various dental disorders. The
expression of Cbfa1 in our immortalized cells corroborates
well with a recent report that demonstrates the high level of
expression of this transcription factor in differentiated odontoblasts
(29). Having a cell line such as the telomerase-transformed rat
odontoblasts will be a valuable asset for pinpointing additional transcription factors that control the differentiation of the ectomesenchymal neural crest cells into odontoblasts.
The immortalized cells had the potential to synthesize principal
extracellular matrix components that are necessary for the assembly of
dentin matrix, namely type I collagen, which forms the scaffold for
mineral deposition, and NCPs, which are responsible for nucleating and
regulating the hydroxyapatite crystal size. The dentin matrix proteins
have been proposed to function as regulatory molecules during the
ordered deposition and organization of hydroxyapatite. Specifically
DMP2 and DMP3 or DSPP defines the phenotypic characteristics of dentin.
In situ hybridization studies during development have demonstrated that the extracellular matrix genes DMP1,
DMP2, and DMP3 are synthesized and secreted by
odontoblasts at the mineralization front only after they enter the
secretory stage. Therefore, identification of these terminally
differentiated odontoblast-specific markers would establish the
presence of a true odontoblastic cell line. As T4-4 and T3-2
odontoblast-like cell lines have all the characteristics of an
odontoblastic phenotype, they will likely provide an excellent reproducible in vitro system for studying
odontoblast-specific gene expression.
The biological potential for these cells to form a mineralized tissue
was demonstrated by the in vivo implantation studies. The
implanted cells were completely polarized and functional. We observed a
distinct calcified tissue phenotype coinciding with the expression of
the dentin matrix proteins within the microenvironment of the implanted
site. We confirmed the presence of phosphate in the mineralized tissue
with von Kossa staining. Phosphate is a major component of mineralized
tissue matrix that functions to sequester increased calcium ions and
helps cells maintain homeostasis (30). Recently Gronthos et
al. (31) showed that dental pulp stem cells, when transplanted
into immunocompromised mice, generate a dentin-like mineralized
structure. These results support our evidence that
telomerase-transformed cells function as bona fide differentiated odontoblasts.
The main advantage of developing an odontoblast cell line is that these
cells maybe used to study the signaling mechanisms involved in terminal
differentiation of odontoblasts, isolation and characterization of
odontoblast-specific genes, and tissue engineering of these cells for
the formation of reparative dentin. The molecular mechanisms during
reparative dentin formation have not been systematically investigated.
The transformed cells reported here could be efficiently propagated in
culture with sufficient proliferative capacity to produce enough dentin.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the T4-4
immortalized cells have unique odontogenic potential along with the
capability to form mineralized matrix both in vitro and
in vivo. The ultrastructural morphology of matrix
mineralization and expression of odontoblast-specific differentiation
markers are some of the salient features of the T4-4 odontoblast cell line. This cell line will be a valuable tool for identifying and characterizing the different signaling molecules and transcription factors responsible for the complete differentiation of the
odontoblasts as the process of odontoblast differentiation in
vitro recapitulates the in vivo situation. An
important functional application would be the manipulation of these
cells for tissue engineering of mineralized tissues especially in the
reparative formation and regeneration of dentin.
We thank Verna J. Brown for histological
staining, Isaac D. Johnson for x-ray photography, and Mei Ling Chen for
assisting in confocal laser-scanning microscopy.
*
This work was supported by the Department of Orthodontics at
University of Illinois at Chicago (to C. E.) and NIDCR, National Institutes of Health Grant DE11657 (to A. G.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Oral Biology
(M/C 690), University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612. Tel.: 312-413-0738; Fax: 312-996-6044; E-mail: anneg@uic.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112223200
The abbreviations used are:
DMP, dentin matrix
protein;
DSP, dentin sialoprotein;
DSPP, dentin sialophosphoprotein;
NCP, noncollagenous proteins;
hTERT, human telomerase reverse
transcript.
Odontoblast Cells Immortalized by Telomerase
Produce Mineralized Dentin-like Tissue Both in Vitro and
in Vivo*
, and
Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois,
Chicago, Illinois 60612
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-glycerophosphate along with 10 nM
dexamethasone for 45 days. mRNA was extracted from the T4-4 cell
line at 0, 15, 30, and 45 days for Northern blot analysis to check the
expression of DMPs during the mineralization process.
radiation ( = 1.54 Å), at a scanning rate of
1° (2
)/min.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (153K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Photomicrographs of primary and transformed
cells. Cells were photographed under a light microscope using a
Nikon camera. Primary cells from the rat tooth germs for 1-h culture
after digestion (A), 2 days in culture (B),
during the selection with G418 for about 3 weeks (C and
D), and one single cell clone showing morphology of
odontoblasts having a long process (E and F) are
shown. Please note the long process on a single cell (D).
All pictures are 40× magnification.

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Gene expression analysis in the primary and
transformed cells. Three different cell clones were analyzed for
the expression of various tissue-specific genes by either PCR
(A) or Northern blot (B). A4-4, T3-2, and T4-4
represent the different clones isolated from the transformed primary
cells. Total RNA from rat tooth germ (RTG) was used as a
positive control. PCR was carried out as described under "Materials
and Methods" using gene-specific primers. A negative control for the
PCR reactions was carried out without reverse transcription reaction
(tRNA). Clone A4-4 was transformed by SV40 large T antigen
gene whereas T3-2 and T4-4 were transformed by hTERT gene. Expression
of DMP1, DMP2, and DMP3 in T4-4 was also analyzed by Northern blot
(B). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase
(GAPDH) was included as a positive control for the PCR and
Northern blot.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Immunostaining of DMPs in T4-4 cells.
The expression of various DMPs was analyzed by immunostaining
with specific antibodies using confocal microscopy. The expression of
hTERT in the transformed cell line was also analyzed. A
represents staining with specific primary antibodies. B
represents staining for the nucleus (propidium iodide). C is
a composite of A and B. Bar, 20 µm.
-glycerophosphate, and
dexamethasone. Results from the Northern blot data demonstrated that
these transformed cells are able to induce the expression of dentin
matrix proteins 1, 2, and 3 in the extracellular matrix. Between 0 and
15 days in culture the expression of DMP1 increased but then dropped
after 15 days. In situ data showed a similar time course of
gene expression (data not shown). Between 0 and 45 days in culture,
transformed cells linearly increased their expression of DMP2 and -3 (Fig. 4). Thus, the pattern of expression
of the dentin matrix proteins by transformed odontoblasts mimicked the
expression pattern by native differentiated odontoblasts.

View larger version (40K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Expression of DMPs during
mineralization. T4-4 cells were induced for calcification as
described earlier. mRNAs were isolated after specified time points
during mineralization. Expression of DMP1, DMP2, and DMP3 was analyzed
by Northern blotting (A). A densitometric representation of
the Northern data is shown in B. GAPDH,
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
= 31.8 (Fig. 5B). Thus
the calcification of the extracellular matrix under in vitro
mineralization conditions demonstrates that the entire process is a
dynamic process resulting from the synthesis of specific matrix
molecules and formation of mineralized nodules. Also the formation of
mineralized nodules provides a model for dentin-like tissue formation
in vitro. Thus the transformed cells behaved just like
differentiated cells in vitro.

View larger version (84K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Characterization of the mineralized nodule in
the T4-4 cell line. Cells were induced for mineralization in the
presence of ascorbic acid,
-glycerophosphate, and dexamethasone as
described under "Materials and Methods" for 45 days. A1
represents the photograph of the mineralized nodule under the light
microscope. A2 represents the von Kossa staining for
calcification. B represents characterization of the mineral
by x-ray diffraction. Cells under normal conditions were used as a
"control" whereas dentin and hydroxyapatite (HAP) were
used as positive controls for x-ray diffraction.

View larger version (117K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Autoradiograms to show in vivo
mineralization. Cells were incubated with collagraft
material as described under "Materials and Methods" and implanted
intramuscularly in rats. Autoradiograms were taken at different time
points after the implantation of collagraft with T4-4 cells.
L represents the left side of the animal that has control
cells. R represents the right side of the animal, which has
T4-4 cells. RPC-C2A dental pulp cells were used in the control
implants.

View larger version (83K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Histological and immunohistochemical analysis
of the implants after 12 weeks. The implants with T4-4 cells were
fixed with formalin and sectioned. The sections were stained with
Masson's trichrome (A), von Kossa-stained for calcium
(B), Masson's trichrome-stained for collagen fiber, higher
magnification of A (C). D and
E represent immunostaining for DMP1 and the DSP portion of
DMP3, respectively. The box in A indicates the
region shown in B to E. F and
G represent immunostaining for DMP1 and the DSP portion of
DMP3 in control cells.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Thesleff, I.,
Vaahtokari, A.,
and Partanen, A. M.
(1995)
Int. J. Dev. Biol.
39,
35-50[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Goldberg, M.,
Septier, D.,
Torres-Quintana, M.,
Lecolle, S.,
Hall, R.,
Gafni, G.,
Menachi, S.,
and Embery, G.
(1998)
in
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Chemistry and Biology of Mineralized Tissues
(Goldberg, M.
, Boskey, A.
, and Robinson, C., eds)
, pp. 297-303, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL
3.
Ruch, J. V.,
Lesot, H.,
and Begue-Kim, C.
(1995)
Int. J. Dev. Biol.
39,
51-68[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
George, A.,
Bannon, L.,
Sabsay, B.,
Dillon, J. W.,
Malone, J.,
and Veis, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
32869-32873 5.
George, A.,
Sabsay, B.,
Simonian, P. A.,
and Veis, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
12624-12630 6.
MacDougall, M.,
Simmons, D.,
Luan, X.,
Nydegger, J.,
Feng, J.,
and Gu, T. T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
72,
835-842
7.
Narayanan, K.,
Srinivas, R.,
Ramachandran, A.,
Hao, J.,
Quinn, B.,
and George, A.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
4516-4521 8.
Takagi, Y.,
and Veis, A.
(1981)
in
The Chemistry and Biology of Mineralized Connective Tissues
(Veis, A., ed)
, pp. 233-243, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York
9.
Takagi, Y.,
Veis, A.,
and Sauk, J. J.
(1983)
Clin. Orthop.
176,
282-290
10.
Zhang, X.,
Zhao, J., Li, C.,
Gao, S.,
Qiu, C.,
Liu, P., Wu, G.,
Qiang, B., Lo, W. H.,
and Shen, Y.
(2001)
Nat. Genet.
27,
151-152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Sakamoto, S.,
Baird, S. A.,
and Sakamoto, M.
(1985)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
133,
709-716[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Winn, S. R.,
Randolph, G.,
Uludag, H.,
Wong, S. C.,
Hair, G. A.,
and Hollinger, J. O.
(1999)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
14,
1721-1733[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
D'Errico, J. A.,
Ouyang, H.,
Berry, J. E.,
Macneil, R. L.,
Strayhorn, C.,
Imperiale, M. J.,
Harris, N. L.,
Goldgerg, H.,
and Somerman, M. J.
(1999)
Bone
25,
39-47[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Thonemann, B.,
and Schmalz, G.
(2000)
Arch. Oral Biol.
45,
857-869[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
MacDougall, M.,
Thiemann, F., Ta, H.,
Hsu, P.,
Chen, L. S.,
and Snead, M. L.
(1995)
Connect. Tissue Res.
22,
71-77
16.
Den Besten, P. K.,
Mathews, C. H. E.,
Gao, C.,
and Li, W.
(1998)
Connect. Tissue Res.
38,
3-8[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Kato, Y.,
Windle, J.,
Koop, B.,
Mundy, G. R.,
and Bonewald, L.
(1997)
J. Bone Miner. Res.
12,
2014-2023[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Meyerson, M.,
Counter, C. M., Ng,
Eaton, E.,
Ellisen, L. W.,
Steiner, P.,
Caddle, S. D.,
Ziaugra, L.,
Beijersbergen, R. L.,
Davidoff, M. J.,
Liu, Q.,
Bacchetti, S.,
Haber, D. A.,
and Weinberg, R. A.
(1997)
Cell
90,
785-795[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Counter, C. M.,
Hahn, W. C.,
Wei, W.,
Caddle, S. D.,
Beijersbergen, R. L.,
Lansdorp, P. M.,
Sedivy, J. M.,
and Weinberg, R. A.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14723-14728 20.
Kasugai, S.,
Shibata, S.,
Suzuki, S.,
Susami, T.,
and Ogura, H.
(1993)
Arch. Oral Biol.
38,
769-777[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Sambrook, J.,
Fritch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY
22.
Srinivasan, R.,
Chen, B.,
Gorski, J. P.,
and George, A.
(1999)
Connect. Tissue Res.
40,
251-258[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Kasugai, S.,
Adachi, M.,
and Ogura, H.
(1988)
Arch. Oral. Biol.
33,
887-891[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
O'Hare, M. J.,
Bond, J.,
Clarke, C.,
Takeuchi, Y.,
Atherton, A. J.,
Berry, C.,
Moody, J.,
Silver, A. R.,
Davies, D. C.,
Alsop, A. E.,
Neville, A. M.,
and Jat, P. S.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
646-651 25.
Hahn, W. C.,
and Meyerson, M.
(2001)
Ann. Med.
33,
123-129[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Migliaccio, M.,
Amacker, M.,
Just, T.,
Reichenbach, P.,
Valmori, D.,
Cerottini, J. C.,
Romero, P.,
and Nabholz, M.
(2000)
J. Immunol.
165,
4978-4984 27.
Ducy, P.,
Zhang, R.,
Geoffroy, V.,
Ridall, A. L.,
and Karsenty, G.
(1997)
Cell
89,
677-680[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Otto, F.,
Thornell, A. P.,
Crompton, T.,
Denzel, A.,
Gilmour, K. C.,
Rosewell, I. R.,
Stamp, G. W.,
Beddington, R. S.,
Mundlos, S.,
Olsen, B. R.,
Selby, P. B.,
and Owen, M. J.
(1997)
Cell
89,
765-771[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
D'Souza, R. N.,
Aberg, T.,
Gaikwad, J.,
Cavender, A.,
Owen, M.,
Karsenty, G.,
and Thesleff, I.
(1999)
Development
126,
2911-2920[Abstract]
30.
Beck, G. R., Jr.,
Zerler, B.,
and Moran, E.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
8352-8357 31.
Gronthos, S.,
Mankani, M.,
Brahim, J.,
Robey, P. G.,
and Shi, S.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
13625-13630
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Ravindran, K. Narayanan, A. S. Eapen, J. Hao, A. Ramachandran, S. Blond, and A. George Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone Protein GRP-78 Mediates Endocytosis of Dentin Matrix Protein 1 J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2008; 283(44): 29658 - 29670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hao, K. Narayanan, T. Muni, A. Ramachandran, and A. George Dentin Matrix Protein 4, a Novel Secretory Calcium-binding Protein That Modulates Odontoblast Differentiation J. Biol. Chem., May 25, 2007; 282(21): 15357 - 15365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Narayanan, S. Gajjeraman, A. Ramachandran, J. Hao, and A. George Dentin Matrix Protein 1 Regulates Dentin Sialophosphoprotein Gene Transcription during Early Odontoblast Differentiation J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2006; 281(28): 19064 - 19071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Narayanan, A. Ramachandran, M. C. Peterson, J. Hao, A.-B. Kolsto, A. D. Friedman, and A. George The CCAAT Enhancer-binding Protein (C/EBP){beta} and Nrf1 Interact to Regulate Dentin Sialophosphoprotein (DSPP) Gene Expression during Odontoblast Differentiation J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 2004; 279(44): 45423 - 45432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Goldberg and A. J. Smith CELLS AND EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES OF DENTIN AND PULP: A BIOLOGICAL BASIS FOR REPAIR AND TISSUE ENGINEERING Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 13 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |