Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108326200 on April 1, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 20256-20263, June 7, 2002
Carboxyl-terminal Peptide of
-Amyloid Precursor Protein Blocks
Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate-sensitive Ca2+ Release in
Xenopus laevis Oocytes*
Joung-Hun
Kim
§,
Jong-Cheol
Rah¶,
Scott P.
Fraser
,
Keun-A
Chang¶,
Mustafa B. A.
Djamgoz
, and
Yoo-Hun
Suh¶
From the
Neurobiology Group, Department of Biology,
Sir Alexander Fleming Bldg., Imperial College of Science, Technology
and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom and the ¶ Department
of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, National Creative Research
Initiative Centre for Alzheimer's Dementia, and Neuroscience
Research Institute, MRC, Seoul National University, Seoul
110-799, South Korea
Received for publication, August 29, 2001, and in revised form, February 6, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The effects of Alzheimer's disease-related
amyloidogenic peptides on inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
receptor-mediated Ca2+ mobilization were examined in
Xenopus laevis oocytes. Intracellular Ca2+ was
monitored by electrophysiological measurement of the endogenous Ca2+-activated Cl
current. Application of a
hyperpolarizing pulse released intracellular Ca2+ in
oocytes primed by pre-injection of a non-metabolizable inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate analogue. The carboxyl terminus of the amyloid precursor protein inhibited inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate
receptor-mediated intracellular Ca2+ release in a
dose-dependent manner. Equimolar
-amyloid peptides A
1-40 or A
1-42 had no effect, and
whereas a truncated carboxyl terminus lacking the A
domain was
equipotent to the full-length one, a carboxyl terminus fragment lacking
the NPTY sequence was less effective than the full-length fragment. The inhibition induced by the carboxyl terminus was not associated with the
block of the Ca2+-dependent Cl
channel itself or compromised Ca2+ influx. We conclude that
the carboxyl terminus of the amyloid precursor protein inhibits
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-sensitive Ca2+ release and
could thus disrupt Ca2+ homeostasis and that the carboxyl
terminus is much more effective than the
-amyloid fragments used. By
perturbing the coupling of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and
Ca2+ release, the carboxyl terminus of the amyloid
precursor protein can potentially be involved in inducing the neural
toxicity characteristic of Alzheimer's disease.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Alzheimer's disease
(AD)1 is a progressive and
fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by amyloid plaques and
neurofibrillary tangles (for a review, see Ref. 1). These plaques are
associated with degenerating neuronal processes and consist primarily
of fibrillar aggregates of
-amyloid protein (A
). Although A
fragments are the main component of amyloid plaques and have been shown to damage or kill cultured neurones (for a review, see Ref. 2), A
may not be the sole neurotoxic component of the amyloid precursor protein (APP). For example, A
peptide deposition has been observed without accompanying neurodegeneration (3-5). Another amyloidogenic fragment, the carboxyl terminus (CT) of APP, which is composed of
99-105 amino acid residues containing the complete A
sequence, also
appears to be toxic to neurones (6, 7). CT has been found not only in
presynaptic terminals of rodent entorhinal neurones (8) but also in
paired helical filaments (9), in senile plaques (10), in microvessels
(11-13), in choroid plexus from human brain in AD, in the white matter
of Down's syndrome brains (14), and in both cytosol and media of
lymphoblastoid cells obtained from patients with early- or late-onset
familial AD (15) and Down's syndrome (16). A transgenic mouse model
expressing CT exhibited neuropathology very similar in many respects to
that of AD, especially as regards age-dependent neuronal
and synaptic degeneration (17) and spatial-learning deficits and
electrophysiological alterations that suggested impairment of synaptic
plasticity (18). A 31-amino acid carboxyl-terminal fragment of APP
(CT31) generated from CT by caspase-9 cleavage was reported to have a
pro-apoptotic effect and to mainly contribute to the CT toxicity in
neuronal cells. Both CT31 and activated caspase-9 were present in the
brains of AD patients but not in control brains (19). These findings together indicate that CTs themselves may also contribute to the neurodegenerative processes in vivo not only as a precursor
to make A
. Earlier studies showed that A
-bearing CTs were
released from several different cells and/or were more easily released from the damaged neurons into the media or extracellular fluid (20-22). Recent data has shown the presence of CT in the nuclei (23)
and the transcriptively active complex of CT with Fe65 and histone
acetyltransferase, Tip60 (24). These findings suggest that CT plays
important roles in delayed neurodegeneration via transcriptional
regulation. Our previous study also demonstrated that CT fragments
without A
and the transmembrane domain may also exert toxicity in
nerve growth factor-differentiated PC12 cells (25). CT can also
contribute to stimulation of inflammatory processes linked to delayed
neurodegeneration in AD (26-28).
A
and CT peptides have been shown to damage cultured neurons by a
mechanism involving disruption of Ca2+ homeostasis (29,
30). However, the potential role of amyloidogenic fragments, including
A
, in IP3 production and/or intracellular Ca2+ mobilization has not been clear.
Elucidating the possible effects of A
or CT peptides on
IP3 signaling has been hampered by the intracellular
location of IP3 receptors. Furthermore, limitations
concerning specific inhibitors or activators of the IP3
receptors, not affecting ryanodine receptors, have also made it
difficult to investigate A
effects on the IP3 pathway
(31). To circumvent these difficulties, we have used Xenopus
laevis oocytes as a model system. The large size of
Xenopus oocytes facilitated precise intracellular
application of IP3 and APP fragments. Moreover, the
Ca2+ response of Xenopus oocytes was not
complicated by ryanodine receptors, which are absent in the oocytes
(32). Another advantage of this model system is that injection of
IP3 into Xenopus oocytes elevates the cytosolic
Ca2+ level and activates
Ca2+-dependent Cl
currents (33),
which can be used as a real-time indicator of cytosolic
Ca2+ concentration (34, 35). In addition, Yao and Parker
(36) showed that application of a hyperpolarizing pulse to
Xenopus oocytes pre-injected with an enzyme-resistant
IP3 analogue,
D-3-deoxy-3-fluoro-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (3-F-IP3), induced a current that
represented Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive
stores. We have adopted this protocol to study the effect of
amyloidogenic peptides on the IP3 pathway.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Preparation of Recombinant CT105 and A
--
Recombinant CT105
was prepared on the basis of human APP770 cDNA as described
previously (37). Briefly, the expression plasmid pCS-CT105 was
constructed by ligating the 704-bp BglII-ClaI
fragment excised from pSP65-APP770 into ptrpSF9, digested with
BglII and SmaI, treated with calf intestinal
alkaline phosphatase, and transformed into Escherichia coli
XL1-Blue. CT105 peptide (Mr 14,242) was purified
by a combination of urea solubilization and ion exchange chromatography
and then subjected to dialysis against 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH
7.4) followed by lyophilization. To rule out the effect of possible
co-purified contaminating factors, groups incubated with polymixin B
sulfate were compared with non-treated ones. We confirmed that these
are not significantly different. A
1-42 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. (Dorset, UK). A
1-40,
A
1-42, and CT were dissolved in distilled water to make
100 µM stock solutions and incubated at 37 °C for 6 days.
Construction of Truncated CT Peptides--
To determine which
region is the active domain responsible for the effect on
IP3 signaling of CT, we have generated truncated carboxyl-terminal fragments of APP. Because A
, the transmembrane portion, and the NPTY sequence in the cytoplasmic tail are believed to
be important in mediating toxic effects of CT peptide, constructs without these domains were generated using the PCR-amplified strategy and the GST fusion protein strategy as described earlier (25). Briefly,
they were cloned from pSP65-APP770 by PCR using oligonucleotides complementary to corresponding position (28). For the construction of
plasmids encoding GST fusion proteins,
BamHI/XhoI fragment of the PCR-generated
fragments was cloned into the BamHI/XhoI site of
pGEX 4T-1. We have prepared the following constructs: GST-CT 46 (649-695) without A
and transmembrane (TM) domain (CTdA
/TM) and
GST-CT 86 (597-683) without NPTY domain (CTdNPTY). These final PCR
constructs were confirmed by automated DNA sequencing. These recombinant GST-CTs of APP were purified with a combination of urea
solubilization and ion exchange chromatography.
Oocyte Preparation and Solutions--
X. laevis
oocytes were prepared and defolliculated as described previously (38).
Defolliculated oocytes were stored in incubation medium at 19 °C for
several days. Composition of the incubation medium was (in millimolar):
NaCl, 88.0; KCl, 1.0; CaCl2, 0.41; NaHCO3, 2.5;
MgSO4, 0.82; and Ca(NO3)2, 0.33, penicillin and streptomycin, 10 µg/ml each; gentamicin sulfate,
0.1 mg/ml; pH 7.5. Unless otherwise noted, oocytes were continually
perfused with Ringer's solution at room temperature (18-20 °C)
during recording. In the case of thapsigargin pretreatment, oocytes
were incubated in Ca2+-free medium containing 1 µM thapsigargin overnight at 19 °C.
Composition of the normal Ringer's solution was (millimolar): NaCl,
120; KCl, 2; CaCl2, 1.8; HEPES, 5; pH 7.3. Ca2+-free medium was made by omitting CaCl2 and
adding 5 mM MgCl2 together with 1 mM EGTA (36). Most chemicals were purchased from
Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd. (Dorset, UK). 3-F-IP3, purchased from CN Biosciences UK (Nottingham, UK), was dissolved in distilled water at 35 µM. 3-F-IP3 is about equipotent
to IP3 in liberating intracellular Ca2+ but
cannot be converted to inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate by the action
of 3-kinases and thus stimulates IP3 receptors continuously (39). Thapsigargin (Alomone Labs Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel) was dissolved
in dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO). The final
concentration of Me2SO in the Ca2+-free medium
was 0.1%. The dissolved chemical and peptides were kept at
20 °C
until use.
Microinjection--
Pulled injection pipette3-00-2s (03-G/XL,
Drummond, Broomal, PA; tip diameters, 10-15 µm) were back-filled
with the 3-F-IP3 solutions and attached to an oocyte
injector (Drummond). 46 nl of solution was injected into each oocyte.
Injected oocytes were kept for about 30 min in an incubator at
19 °C, except for experiments on transient current responses. The
latter were induced directly by 3-F-IP3 injections, under
voltage clamp, using a pneumatic pico-pump (WPI, Sarasota, FL). A
holding potential of
40 mV was used in these experiments.
In the main body of experiments, A
1-40,
A
1-42, full-length CT or the truncated fragments were
injected into oocytes which had been "primed" previously for 30 min
with 3-F-IP3 (at 150 nM intracellular
concentration). Injection of the peptides was achieved either with the
oocyte injector (Drummond) or with the pico-pump, dependent on the
experimental set up. For experiments using the pico-pump, the volume of
the injected peptide solution was calibrated before the start of the
experiments. For a pre-set pressure (20 p.s.i.), the duration was
adjusted to give the same ejected volume of liquid (46 nl), measured
under a dissection microscope. The duration was determined separately
for each injection pipette. The concentrations of peptides and
3-F-IP3 injected into oocytes are given in the text as the
final, intracellular ones. These were as follows: 0.22, 0.44, 0.88, 1.3, 1.8, 2.2, and 3.0 µM for CT; 0.44, 0.88, 2.2, and
3.0 µM for A
1-40 and
A
1-42; and 1.2 mM for the various truncated fragments.
Electrophysiology--
Conventional two-electrode methodologies
were performed with a voltage-clamp amplifier (GeneClamp 500B, Axon
Instruments, Foster City, CA). Resistances of the voltage-measuring
electrodes filled with 2.5 M KCl were in the range 1-3
M
, whereas current-measuring electrodes had resistances
of 0.4-1 M
. Stimulation and data acquisition were
controlled by pClamp 6.02 software (Axon Instruments) via a Digidata
1200 interface (Axon Instruments). Recorded data were stored on an IBM
computer and analyzed in pClamp 6.02 package. Two types of membrane
currents were recorded: 1) Fast, transient currents induced directly by
3-F-IP3 injection. For recording the transient current
(It) induced directly by 3-F-IP3
itself, the compound was injected into oocytes under voltage clamp
(
40 mV), and the resulting currents were monitored for ~20 min. 2) Late currents induced by membrane hyperpolarization in oocytes pre-injected with 3-F-IP3. The delayed membrane currents
(Tin) were recorded as follows: (i) An oocyte
pre-injected with 3-F-IP3 was incubated for 30 min and
transferred to the recording chamber. (ii) The oocyte was
voltage-clamped at a holding potential of 0 mV to keep the driving
force of Ca2+ influx at a low level. (iii) A
hyperpolarizing pulse was applied from 0 mV to
110 mV for 4.5 s,
and the current response was recorded. The current response recorded
before the peptide injection was used as the control. (iv) A peptide
was injected with the pico-pump or oocyte injector. (v) The same
hyperpolarizing pulse was applied to the oocyte 10 min following
peptide injection. The resulting response was compared with its own
pre-injection control. The percentage residual current was
expressed as [(post-injection amplitude/pre-injection amplitude) × 100].
Data Analysis--
All data have been presented as means ± S.E. of the means (S.E.). The number of measurements given
(n) represents different oocytes; the number of batches,
i.e. toads used (N) for a given experiment, is
also indicated. Data were analyzed using a statistics package, SAS/6.03
(SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Effect of a given peptide on current
amplitude was analyzed by one-way ANOVA, after all the percentage data
were transformed to logarithmic values. A Tukey test was used for
multiple comparisons. Wilcoxon test (non-parametric) was used for
comparison of two groups. Correlation coefficients were determined by
non-parametric Spearman test. Statistical significance was considered
at the following levels: p < 0.05 (
),
p < 0.01 (*), p < 0.001 (**),
p < 0.0001 (***), and p < 0.00001 (****).
 |
RESULTS |
Control Experiments
3-F-IP3-induced Transient Membrane
Currents--
Injection of 3-F-IP3 (1 µM)
into oocytes held at
40 mV caused a biphasic inward current: A fast,
transient component (It), followed by a slow
phase with typical oscillations (Fig.
1A). This response pattern was
similar to those induced by IP3 or 3-F-IP3 in
previous studies on Xenopus oocytes (36, 40, 41). This confirmed that the IP3 system was functioning normally.

View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Left panel, A, membrane
current recorded from an oocyte (voltage-clamped at 40 mV) in
response to injection of 1 µM 3-F-IP3. The
injection of 3-F-IP3 activates a large transient inward
current (It) followed by a long-lasting
secondary inward current with some oscillations. The
arrowhead indicates the injection point of
3-F-IP3. B, hump current
(Tin) evoked by a hyperpolarizing pulse applied
to oocytes previously injected with 3-F-IP3 (150 nM). The oocyte was loaded with 3-F-IP3 about
30 min before applying the voltage pulse ( 40 to 110 mV; 4.5-s
duration). C, similar protocol (as in B) applied
to control, non-injected oocyte. No hump current is generated. Currents
were not leak-subtracted. Right panel, effect of
extracellular Ca2+ on Tin.
D, the control current response of a
3-F-IP3-injected oocyte bathed in normal Ringer's
solution. E, oocyte bathed in Ca2+-free
Ringer's solution. F, recovery on returning to normal
Ringer's solution. The recordings were obtained from the same oocyte.
The scale bar in A applies to part A,
whereas the scale bar in part B refers to all
other parts of the figure.
|
|
Hyperpolarization-induced Membrane Currents in
3-F-IP3-injected Oocytes--
Oocytes injected with
3-F-IP3 (150 nM) were incubated for a further
30 min and then a hyperpolarizing pulse (0 to
110 mV) was applied
under voltage clamp. This generated a slow "hump-like" inward
current (Tin, Parker and Miledi (42)) (Fig.
1B). Water-injected control oocytes showed only leakage
currents without Tin (Fig. 1C). The
reversal potential of Tin was about
22 mV
(n = 3), similar to the value reported previously for
the endogenous Ca2+-dependent Cl
current of Xenopus oocytes (e.g. Ref. 34).
Effect of Enhanced Depletion of Ca2+ Stores on
Tin--
A high level of 3-F-IP3 (1.5 µM) was used to test whether Tin
could be altered by enhanced depletion of Ca2+ stores. The
mean amplitudes of the hump currents induced by 1.5 µM
and 150 nM 3-F-IP3 were indistinguishable:
962 ± 192 nA (n = 14/n = 3)
versus 1153 ± 233 nA (n = 15/n = 3; p > 0.1), respectively. This
was not due to 150 nM 3-F-IP3 saturating the
Ca2+ release pathway. This was confirmed by comparing the
amplitudes of It generated directly by the
IP3 analogue injection: The currents induced by 150 nM and 1.5 µM 3-F-IP3 were
112.6 ± 32.2 and 279.3 ± 61.9 nA, respectively
(n = 7/n = 2 for both;
p < 0.05). These results suggested that the amplitude
of Tin was not affected by possible enhanced
depletion of the Ca2+ stores.
Ca2+ dependence of Tin--
We examined
whether Tin depended on extracellular
Ca2+. Tin was abolished in the
Ca2+-free/EGTA Ringer's solution (Fig. 1, D
versus E). This effect was reversible, with the
current recovered in normal Ringer's solution containing 1.8 mM Ca2+ (Fig. 1F). We also tested
whether Tin could be mediated
exclusively by Ca2+ influx. Thapsigargin (1 µM) was used to deplete Ca2+ stores and set
up capacitative Ca2+ entry (43). No
Tin current could be observed in such oocytes using the standard protocol (data not shown). This confirmed, under our
experimental conditions, Tin was not simply
generated by Ca2+ entering from outside.
These characteristics taken together are consistent with the
Tin current representing a Cl
current activated by Ca2+ released from
IP3-sensitive stores by the triggering action of hyperpolarization-induced Ca2+ influx, as in the study of
Yao and Parker (36).
Inhibitory Effect of CT on Tin
Following a control (pre-injection) recording of
Tin in oocytes primed with 3-F-IP3,
water (as vehicle control) or an amyloidogenic fragment of APP
(A
1-40, A
1-42, or CT) was applied intracellularly. Experiments, in which the oocytes were injected with
distilled water alone, showed that Tin was
stable and that the post-injection amplitudes were not much different
from those of pre-injection controls (residual current = 96.5 ± 4.8%; n = 18/n = 4;
p > 0.05; Figs.
2A and
3A). Application of either
A
1-40 or A
1-42 (0.22-3.0
µM for both) had no significant effect on
Tin (n = 8 for each; Figs.
2B, 2C, and 3A). In contrast,
injection of CT peptide was very effective in suppressing
Tin (Figs. 2D and 3A). The
inhibitory effect of CT peptide on Tin was
dose-dependent (Fig. 4). The
concentration of CT peptide that induced half-maximal inhibition
of Tin was about 0.4 µM.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effects of amyloidogenic fragments on
Tin. Traces in the left panel
show control recordings of Tin before injection.
Corresponding traces on the right show the
current responses after injection in each case. A, water
injection as a vehicle control. B, 3 µM
A 1-40; C, 3 µM
A 1-42; D, 3 µM CT. The same
volume (46 nl) of sterile distilled water or peptide solution was
injected into each oocyte. Other experimental conditions were as in
Fig. 1B.
|
|

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
A, normalized mean amplitudes of
residual Tin after injection of water or 2.2 µM amyloidogenic fragments. Residual currents (%) were
calculated by dividing the peak amplitude of Tin
after injection with that of the respective control
Tin (i.e. (post-injection
Tin × 100)/(pre-injection
Tin)). One way-ANOVA and a Tukey test were
performed for statistical comparisons with the water-injected control
(***, p < 0.0001). The data for each condition
represent the mean of eight oocytes; the value for water control was
obtained from 12 oocytes. Error bars denote S.E.
B, normalized mean amplitudes of residual
Tin after injection of water, GST, 1.22 µM CT, or equimolar truncated CT peptides. Residual
currents were determined as described above. Student's t
test was performed for comparison with GST control (*,
p < 0.01; CTdNPTY (+) indicates p < 0.05).
|
|

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Dose-response curves for the effects of CT
(filled circle),
A 1-40 (filled
square), and
A 1-42 (open
circle) on Tin. Residual currents (%) were
calculated as stated in Fig. 3 legend and under "Experimental
Procedures." One way-ANOVA and then a Tukey test were performed for
statistical comparisons to water-injected control. Each
point is the average of measurements from 8-12 oocytes. The
error bars denote S.E.
|
|
We also investigated if CT would inhibit It
induced directly by 3-F-IP3 injection. 3-F-IP3
(1 µM) typically evoked peak inward currents of 50-350
nA. There was no statistically significant effect on the peak inward
current when 1.3 µM CT (a concentration that consistently
inhibited Tin) was co-injected with
3-F-IP3 (n = 13/n = 3;
p > 0.1). In addition, the reduction of
Tin was not overcome by 10- or 100-fold higher
concentration of 3-F-IP3 (i.e. 1.5 and 15 µM, respectively; data not shown). In addition, we tested
whether IP3 re-injection could evoke the current following the initial block by CT. We could not find any recovery of
Tin in this condition (data not shown).
Comparison of Inhibitory Effect of CT and the Truncated CT Peptides
on Tin--
To explore the active part of the CT domain
responsible for its inhibitory effects on Tin,
we made truncated CT peptides, CTdNPTY and CTdA
/TM. Water, 1.2 µM GST, CT, or each GST-conjugated, truncated CT peptide
was applied intracellularly, after checking Tin
in oocytes primed with 3-F-IP3. CTdNPTY suppressed
Tin less effectively than full-length CT
injection (residual current = 57.2 ± 10.3%,
n = 7; p < 0.05; Fig. 3B),
whereas CTdA
/TM showed no significant difference (residual
current = 19.3 ± 10.3%, n = 7; Fig.
3B) at the same concentration. The control oocytes injected with GST or water showed stable Tin (residual
current of GST = 101.0 ± 15.5%, n = 7;
p > 0.05; residual current of water = 96.5 ± 4.8%, n = 18; p > 0.05; Fig.
3A). These results show that the YENPTY domain in the
cytoplasmic tail seems to have a more crucial role in inhibiting
IP3 signaling rather than the A
or TM domains.
Lack of Effect of CT on Capacitative Ca2+ Entry or
Ca2+-dependent Cl
Channels--
To eliminate the possibility that CT could compromise
capacitative Ca2+ entry, oocytes that had been pre-treated
with thapsigargin overnight (in the absence of extracellular
Ca2+), to set up capacitative Ca2+ entry (44),
were injected with 1.3 µM CT. Current responses to
hyperpolarizing pulses were 646 ± 142 nA before, compared with 590 ± 157 nA following CT injection (p = 0.18, n = 11/n = 3; Fig. 5). In addition, thapsigargin treatment
is known to lengthen the time-to-peak of Tin
(41). We therefore measured the time-to-peak of
Tin before and following 1.3 µM CT
injection (1245 ± 196 ms versus 1134 ± 150 ms,
respectively). The values were not significantly different
(p = 0.19; n = 12). Together, these
results are consistent with CT having no significant effect on
capacitative Ca2+ entry.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Lack of effect of CT on capacitative
Ca2+ entry. Oocytes were incubated in
Ca2+-free medium containing 1 µM thapsigargin
overnight before recording. A hyperpolarizing pulse ( 40 to 110 mV
for 4.5 s) was applied. Currents were recorded before
(A) and following (B) CT peptide injection. The
traces were obtained from different oocytes.
|
|
To elucidate whether the inhibitory effect of CT involved directly the
Ca2+-activated Cl
channels, we compared the
decay time courses of Tin before and after CT
injection in oocytes in which CT reduced, but did not abolish, the peak
Tin current (see later). Current decay could be
fitted with a single exponential of which the time constant (
) did
not change significantly following CT injection (
= 1024 ± 265 versus 964 ± 156 ms, before and after CT,
respectively, n = 16/n = 4;
p > 0.4; Fig. 6).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Decay time courses of
Ca2+-activated Cl channels. These were
not altered by CT injection. Representative traces of
Tin evoked by hyperpolarization from 0 mV to
110 mV in 3-F-IP3-injected oocytes, recorded before
(A) and following (B) CT injection. The
traces are from different oocytes. The straight
lines represent the exponential best fits to the current decays,
with time constants ( ) as indicated.
|
|
In conclusion, the inhibitory effect of CT on Ca2+ release
was most likely due to suppression of IP3-sensitive
Ca2+ release from internal stores, rather than any effect
on capacitative Ca2+ entry or Ca2+-activated
Cl
current.
Relation of Time to Peak of Tin and Inhibitory Effect
of CT--
We explored the relationship between the time-to-peak of
Tin (measured before CT injection) and the
residual peak current recorded after CT injection expressed as a
percentage of the original amplitude. Fig.
7 shows that there was a strong inverse
correlation between the time-to-peak prior to CT injection and the
residual current (correlation coefficient =
0.78;
p < 0.001). This suggested that oocytes with slower
Tin were more sensitive to CT. In other words,
when Ca2+ influx (derived from the membrane
hyperpolarization) needed to trigger Tin was
greater, as indicated by the time-to-peak of
Tin, the suppressing effect of CT was
bigger.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Correlation of residual current amplitudes
(normalized, %; as described in the legend to Fig. 3) and time-to-peak
(log scale). The inhibitory effect of CT on
Tin was enhanced in oocytes displaying longer
time-to-peak before CT peptide injection. A non-parametric Spearson
test showed that there is a strong inverse correlation between the two
data sets (correlation coefficient = 0.78; p < 0.001).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We investigated the effects of amyloidogenic fragments of APP on
the IP3 pathway in X. laevis oocytes using the
Ca2+-activated Cl
(Tin) current as an indicator of
[Ca2+]i. The main conclusion is that CT peptide,
but not the A
fragments, inhibits Ca2+ release from
intracellular Ca2+ stores when activated by an
IP3 analogue and triggered by hyperpolarization-induced Ca2+ influx.
Tin required the presence of extracellular
Ca2+ to be triggered, because it was abolished in
Ca2+-free medium (Fig. 1, E and F).
If Tin were to be mediated exclusively by
Ca2+ entry, however, it should have persisted in oocytes
when capacitative Ca2+ entry was induced by use of
thapsigargin (43). The absence of Tin in
thapsigargin-treated oocytes suggested that the current was not
dependent upon Ca2+ influx alone. It was concluded,
therefore, that entry of Ca2+ induced by membrane
hyperpolarization triggered Tin, as a
consequence of Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive
Ca2+ stores in continuous presence of IP3. This
is consistent with the results of Yao and Parker (36). It should be
noted, however, that under conditions associated with more
"complex" second-messenger associated events (e.g.
5-hydroxytryptamine receptor activation (36)), there is evidence
that Tin can be activated by interaction of
Ca2+ influx and Cl
channels, in a pathway
that bypasses the need for intracellular Ca2+ release.
However, under our experimental conditions, this was clearly not the case.
Enhanced depletion of the Ca2+ store obtained by high (1.5 µM) concentration of 3-F-IP3 did not result
in any significant increase of Tin amplitude.
This ruled out the possibility that Tin was a
simple delayed release of Ca2+ from incompletely depleted
Ca2+ stores. However, it is possible that the
IP3-dependent Ca2+ release could
involve a refilling mechanism occurring after Ca2+ store depletion.
Control experiments, in which oocytes were injected with distilled
water alone, showed that Tin was stable and that
the post-injection amplitude was not much different from the
pre-injection amplitude (Figs. 3A and 4). Intracellular
application of the CT peptide strongly attenuated
Tin, whereas A
1-40 and
A
1-42 had no significant effect under identical
experimental conditions (Figs. 3, B-D, and 4A).
In addition, the reduction of Tin was not
overcome by 10- or 100- fold higher concentration of
3-F-IP3 (i.e. 1.5 and 15 µM,
respectively, data not shown). In addition, we tested whether
IP3 re-injection could evoke the current following the
initial block by CT. We could not find any recovery of
Tin in this condition (data not shown). These
experiments indicate that CT inhibits Tin by
altering the IP3-induced receptor-signaling pathway rather
than simply by blocking IP3 receptor directly.
The deletion studies showed that YENPTY sequence, which is known to
have a role in intracellular sorting (24), rather than the A
or TM
domains, may at least in part, be responsible for the attenuation of
IP3 induced signal (Fig. 3B).
Interestingly, injection of the CT peptide had no effect on the size of
It. At present, the reasons for this are
unclear, because both It and
Tin are dependent on IP3. However,
the two events are distinct in that (i) It is an
immediate event following IP3 injection, whereas
Tin takes many minutes to develop and (ii) It, unlike Tin, is not
dependent upon extracellular Ca2+ (45). Thus, possible
differences in the intracellular events controlling these two discrete
events may explain their distinct sensitivity to CT.
The inhibitory effect of CT on Tin was
concentration-dependent, with the half-maximal effect
occurring at about 0.4 µM (Fig. 4). This is in the range
of CT concentrations found previously to be toxic to oocytes (46) and
to a variety of mammalian cells, including neurones (7).
Several possible mechanisms were tested to elucidate the one or more
steps involved in the inhibitory effect of CT on
Tin. In particular, the possible effects of CT
on 1) capacitative Ca2+ entry, 2) the
Ca2+-activated Cl
channel, or 3) the
cytoplasmic Ca2+ level, were evaluated.
Compromised Ca2+ entry, preventing Ca2+ release
from intracellular stores, was unlikely to be involved, because
capacitative Ca2+ entry induced by pre-treatment of
thapsigargin did not change significantly after CT injection (Fig. 5)
and CT had no effect on the length of the time-to-peak of
Tin. This is in agreement with recent work by
Yoo et al. (47), who found that neither A
1-42 nor full-length
APP had any effect on
capacitative Ca2+ entry in Chinese hamster ovary cells.
It was possible that CT affected the
Ca2+-dependent Cl
channels
directly. However, the decay time constant (
) of
Tin measured before and after CT injection did
not change (Fig. 6). Furthermore, oscillatory currents due to the
Ca2+-activated Cl
current were observed in
oocytes after CT injection, consistent with lack of effect of CT on the
Cl
channel (46). Taken together, the possible involvement
of the Ca2+-activated Cl
channel was ruled
out as a significant component of the inhibitory effect of CT on
Tin.
Another explanation for the inhibition of Ca2+ release was
that CT lowered cytosolic Ca2+ concentration to low levels
by chelating Ca2+. Chelation of Ca2+ would
prevent the Cl
current evoked by Ca2+
released from its stores. However, Ca2+ chelation was
unlikely to occur, because, in fact, an increase of
[Ca2+]i has been observed when CT was applied to
Purkinje cells of rat cerebellum (48).
Ca2+ influx, enhanced by CT, could lead to levels of
[Ca2+]i high enough to block
IP3 receptors, because very high
[Ca2+]i has been reported to block
IP3 receptors completely (49, 50). If this mechanism
occurred under our experimental conditions, however, the capacitative
Ca2+ entry induced by 3-F-IP3 or thapsigargin
should have increased after CT injection. Such an increase was not
observed (Figs. 2D and 5). Therefore, increased
Ca2+ influx cannot account for the inhibitory effect of CT
on IP3-sensitive Ca2+ release. However, we
cannot rule out the possibility that the Ca2+ influx
enhanced by CT was large enough to block Ca2+ release
through IP3 receptor channels, but the change was too small
to be detected by electrophysiological recording. This possibility remains to be investigated further.
We tested whether CT would affect directly Ca2+ release
from IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores. The analysis
shown in Fig. 7 revealed a strong, inverse relationship between
time-to-peak of Tin measured before CT injection and residual current amplitude after CT injection. The response to
IP3 varied greatly from oocyte to oocyte, possibly due to
the differences in the number and spatial distribution of
IP3 receptors (45, 51). Oocytes, which were highly
sensitive to 3-F-IP3, would deplete their Ca2+
stores more in response to a given concentration of
3-F-IP3, compared with relatively insensitive oocytes. CT
more potently blocked Tin (Ca2+
release from IP3-sensitive stores) in oocytes displaying
longer time-to-peak.
Two existing hypothesis can be adopted to explain the relationship
between time-to-peak and sensitivity of each oocyte to IP3,
as follows: First, there is the steady-state model. It has been
suggested that Ca2+ release is controlled by the
intraluminal Ca2+level within Ca2+ stores (52).
The steady-state model considered that decreasing the Ca2+
content of the stores would slow down further the Ca2+
release until it stopped when the level of luminal Ca2+
fell to a low concentration (53). Consequently, "sensitive" oocytes
would have less full Ca2+ stores after injection of
3-F-IP3 and would need more Ca2+ refilling to
reach a certain threshold for Ca2+ release, which may
result in delayed Tin (i.e. longer
time-to-peak), as found (Fig. 7). Second, there is the feedback model.
Feedback inhibition of the IP3 receptor by cytosolic
Ca2+ would limit further release of Ca2+, and
recovery of sensitivity to IP3 would follow the subsequent decline of cytosolic Ca2+ as the latter was re-sequestered
(54, 55). Accordingly, oocytes highly sensitive to 3-F-IP3
would have more Ca2+ liberated by injection of
3-F-IP3. Such oocytes could take longer time to sequester
Ca2+ to a non-blocking level of
[Ca2+]i and this may result in delayed
Tin.
Thus, the time-to-peak can be considered as a measure of the
IP3 sensitivity of each oocyte. Ca2+ release in
highly sensitive oocytes (where a large portion of Ca2+
store was exhausted by the 3-F-IP3) was inhibited more by
CT. Such a correlation would arise as a result of CT directly
suppressing IP3-sensitive Ca2+ release rather
than one or more other auxiliary mechanisms. Hence, the inverse
relationship found is consistent with CT inhibition being specific to
the Ca2+ release mechanism from IP3-sensitive
Ca2+ stores. However, CT did not appear to inhibit directly
the binding of 3-F-IP3 to IP3 receptors or
compete with 3-F-IP3 for IP3 binding sites,
because there was no significant effect of CT on
It when co-injected with 3-F-IP3,
and high concentrations of 3-F-IP3 could not overcome the
CT-induced block. CT was most likely to uncouple the triggering action
of Ca2+ influx from induction of the
IP3-sensitive Ca2+ release. It remains to be
determined whether such an uncoupling effect occurs in vivo
and whether it could lead to any long-term effect.
In overall conclusion, we have shown that the CT fragment of
APP,
but not the A
fragments, suppresses Ca2+ release from
IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores triggered by
extracellular Ca2+ entry in the Xenopus oocyte
model. Although the effect of CT peptide on Ca2+ release
from IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores must be
confirmed in the neuronal system, our results support further the view
that the CT peptide plays an important role in pathogenesis of AD (56,
57). The inhibitory effect of CT on IP3-sensitive
Ca2+ release could disrupt intracellular Ca2+
homeostasis and thus contribute to the cellular toxicity in AD.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the National Creative
Research Initiative Grant from the Ministry of Science & Technology, the BK21 Human Life Sciences Project, The British
Council (Seoul), Korea, the Rotary Club International, and the Royal
Society (to S. P. F.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, College of
Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Dr., New
York, NY 10032.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
82-2-740-8285; Fax: 82-2-745-7996; E-mail:
yhsuh@plaza.snu.ac.kr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108326200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AD, Alzheimer's disease;
IP3, inositol
1,4,5-trisphosphate;
3-F-IP3, D-3-deoxy-3-fluoro-myo-inositol
1,4, 5-trisphosphate;
A
,
-amyloid protein;
APP, amyloid
precursor protein;
CT, carboxyl-terminal;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
TM, transmembrane.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Selkoe, D. J.
(1994)
Ann. Rev. Neurosci.
17,
489-517[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Yankner, B. A.
(1996)
Neuron
16,
921-932[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Joachim, C. L.,
Morris, J. H.,
and Selkoe, D. J.
(1989)
Am. J. Pathol.
135,
309-319[Abstract]
|
| 4.
|
Gearing, M.,
Wilson, R. W.,
Unger, E. R.,
Shelton, E. R.,
Chan, H. W.,
Masters, C. L.,
Beyreuther, K.,
and Mirra, S. S.
(1993)
J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol.
52,
22-30[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Einstein, G.,
Buranosky, R.,
and Crain, B. J.
(1994)
J. Neurosci.
14,
5077-5088[Abstract]
|
| 6.
|
Fukuchi, K. I.,
Sopher, B.,
and Martin, G. M.
(1993)
Nature
361,
122[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Kim, S. H.,
and Suh, Y.-H.
(1996)
J. Neurochem.
67,
1172-1182[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Buxbaum, J. D.,
Thinakaran, G.,
Koliatsos, V.,
O'Callahan, J.,
Slunt, H. H.,
Price, D. L.,
and Sisodia, S. S.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
9629-9637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Caputo, C. B.,
Sobel, I. R.,
Scott, C. W.,
Brunner, W. F.,
Barth, P. T.,
and Blowers, D. P.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Research Commun.
185,
1034-1040[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Selkoe, D. J.,
Podlisny, M. B.,
Joachim, C. L.,
Vickers, E. A.,
Lee, G.,
Fritz, L. C.,
and Oltersdorf, T.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
7319-7365
|
| 11.
|
Tamaoka, A.,
Kalaria, R. N.,
Lieberburg, I.,
and Selkoe, D. J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
1345-1349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Maruyama, K.,
Terakado, K.,
Usami, M.,
and Yoshikawa, K.
(1990)
Nature
347,
566-569[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Dyrks, T.,
Dyrks, E.,
Hartmann, T.,
Masters, C.,
and Beyreuther, K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
18210-18217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Tokuda, T.,
Tanaka, K.,
Kametani, F.,
Ikeda, S.,
and Yanagisawa, N.
(1995)
Neurosci. Lett.
186,
149-152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Matsumoto, A.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
175,
361-365
|
| 16.
|
Kametani, F.,
Tanaka, K.,
Tokuda, T.,
and Ikeda, S.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
351,
165-167[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Oster-Granite, M. L.,
McPhie, D. L.,
Greenan, J.,
and Neve, R. L.
(1996)
J. Neurosci.
16,
6732-6741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Nalbantoglu, J.,
Tirado-Santiago, G.,
Lahsaini, A.,
Poirier, J.,
Goncalves, O.,
Verge, G.,
Momoli, F.,
Welner, S. A.,
Massicotte, G.,
Julien, J. P.,
and Shapiro, M. L.
(1997)
Nature
387,
500-505[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Lu, D. C.,
Rabizadeh, S.,
Chandra, S.,
Shayya, R. F.,
Ellerby, L. M., Ye, X.,
Salvesen, G. S.,
Koo, E. H.,
and Bredesen, D. E.
(2000)
Nat. Med.
4,
397-404
|
| 20.
|
Yankner, B. A.,
Dawes, L. R.,
Fisher, S.,
Villa-Komaroff, L.,
Oster-Granite, M. L.,
and Neve, R. L.
(1989)
Science
245,
417-420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Kozlowski, M. R.,
Spanoyannis, A.,
Manly, S. P.,
Fidel, S. A.,
and Neve, R. L.
(1992)
J. Neurosci.
12,
1679-1687[Abstract]
|
| 22.
|
Seubert, P.,
Oltersdorf, T.,
Lee, M. G.,
Barbour, R.,
Blomquist, C.,
Davis, D. L.,
Bryant, K.,
Fritz, L. C.,
Galasko, D.,
Thal, L. J.,
et al..
(1993)
Nature
361,
260-263[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
DeGiorgio, L. A.,
DeGiorgio, N.,
Milner, T. A.,
Conti, B.,
and Volpe, B. T.
(2000)
Brain Res.
874,
137-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Cao, X.,
and Sudhof, T. C.
(2001)
Science
293,
115-120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Lee, J. P.,
Chang, K. A.,
Kim, H. S.,
Kim, S.S.,
Jeong, S. J.,
and Suh, Y. H.
(2000)
J. Neurosci. Res.
60,
565-570[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Rah, J. C.,
Kim, H. S.,
Kim, S. S.,
Bach, J. H.,
Kim, Y. S.,
Park, C. H.,
Seo, J. H.,
Jeong, S. J.,
and Suh, Y. H.
(2001)
FASEB J.
15,
1463-1465[Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Bach, J. H.,
Chae, H. S.,
Rah, J. C.,
Lee, M. W.,
Park, C. H.,
Choi, S. H.,
Choi, J. K.,
Lee, S. H.,
Kim, Y. S.,
Kim, K. Y.,
Lee, W. B.,
Suh, Y. H.,
and Kim, S. S.
(2001)
J. Neurochem.
78,
109-120[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Chong, Y. H.,
Sung, J. H.,
Shin, S. A.,
Chung, J. H.,
and Suh, Y. H.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
23511-23517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Mattson, M. P.,
Cheng, B.,
Davis, D.,
Bryant, K.,
Lieberburg, I.,
and Rydel, R. E.
(1992)
J. Neurosci.
12,
376-389[Abstract]
|
| 30.
|
Kim, H. S.,
Park, C. H.,
and Suh, Y. H.
(1998)
Neuroreport
9,
3875-3879[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Wilcox, R. A.,
Primrose, W. U.,
Nahorski, S. R.,
and Challiss, R. A.
(1998)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
19,
467-475[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Parys, J. B.,
Sernett, S. W.,
DeLisle, S.,
Snyder, P. M.,
Welsh, M. J.,
and Campbell, K. P.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
18776-18782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Parekh, A. B.,
Foguet, M.,
Lubbert, H.,
and Stuhmer, W.
(1993)
J. Physiol.
469,
653-671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Barish, M. E.
(1983)
J. Physiol. (Lond.)
342,
309-325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Gomez-Hernandez, J.,
Stuhmer, W.,
and Parekh, A. B.
(1997)
J. Physiol.
502,
569-574[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Yao, Y.,
and Parker, I.
(1993)
J. Physiol.
468,
275-296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Chong, Y. H.,
Jung, J. M.,
Choi, W.,
Park, C. W.,
Choi, K. S.,
and Suh, Y. H.
(1994)
Life Sci.
54,
1259-1268[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Fraser, S. P.,
Moon, C.,
and Djamgoz, M. B. A.
(1993)
in
Electrophysiology, a Practical Approach
(Wallis, D. I., ed)
, pp. 65-86, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
| 39.
|
Kozikowski, A. P.,
Fauq, A. H.,
Aksoy, I. A.,
Seewald, M. J.,
and Powis, G.
(1990)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
112,
7403-7404[CrossRef]
|
| 40.
|
Yao, Y.,
and Parker, I.
(1992)
J. Physiol.
458,
319-338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Parekh, A. B.
(1995)
Pflugers Arch.
430,
954-963[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Parker, I.,
and Miledi, R.
(1987)
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B
231,
27-36[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Putney, J. W.
(1990)
Cell Calcium
11,
611-624[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Petersen, C. C. H.,
and Berridge, M. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32246-32253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Miledi, R.,
and Parker, I.
(1989)
J. Physiol.
415,
189-210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Fraser, S. P.,
Suh, Y. H.,
Chong, Y. H.,
and Djamgoz, M. B.
(1996)
J. Neurochem.
66,
2034-2040[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Yoo, A. S.,
Cheng, I.,
Chung, S.,
Grenfell, T. Z.,
Lee, H.,
Pack-Chung, E.,
Handler, M.,
Shen, J.,
Xia, W.,
Tesco, G.,
Saunders, A. J.,
Ding, K.,
Frosch, M. P.,
Tanzi, R. E.,
and Kim, T. W.
(2000)
Neuron
27,
561-572[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Hartell, N. A.,
and Suh, Y.-H.
(2000)
J. Neurochem.
74,
1112-1121[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Bezprozvanny, I.,
Watras, J.,
and Ehrlich, B. E.
(1991)
Nature
351,
751-754[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Thrower, E. C.,
Lea, E. J.,
and Dawson, A. P.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
330,
559-564
|
| 51.
|
Mak, D. D.,
and Forskett, J. K.
(1997)
J. Gen. Physiol.
109,
571-587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Missiaen, L.,
Taylor, C. W.,
and Berridge, M. J.
(1992)
J. Physiol.
455,
623-640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Missiaen, L., De,
Smedt, H.,
Droogmans, G.,
and Casteels, R.
(1992)
Nature
357,
599-602[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Parker, I.,
and Ivorra, I.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
260-264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Levy, S.,
and Payne, R.
(1993)
J. Gen. Physiol.
101,
67-84[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Fraser, S. P.,
Suh, Y.-H.,
and Djamgoz, M. B. A.
(1997)
Trends Neurosci.
20,
67-72[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Suh, Y. H.
(1997)
J. Neurochem.
68,
1781-1791[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit 