JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M108326200 on April 1, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 20256-20263, June 7, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/23/20256    most recent
M108326200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Suh, Y.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Suh, Y.-H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Carboxyl-terminal Peptide of beta -Amyloid Precursor Protein Blocks Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate-sensitive Ca2+ Release in Xenopus laevis Oocytes*

Joung-Hun KimDagger §, Jong-Cheol Rah, Scott P. FraserDagger , Keun-A Chang, Mustafa B. A. DjamgozDagger , and Yoo-Hun Suh||

From the Dagger  Neurobiology Group, Department of Biology, Sir Alexander Fleming Bldg., Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom and the  Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine, National Creative Research Initiative Centre for Alzheimer's Dementia, and Neuroscience Research Institute, MRC, Seoul National University, Seoul 110-799, South Korea

Received for publication, August 29, 2001, and in revised form, February 6, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The effects of Alzheimer's disease-related amyloidogenic peptides on inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor-mediated Ca2+ mobilization were examined in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Intracellular Ca2+ was monitored by electrophysiological measurement of the endogenous Ca2+-activated Cl- current. Application of a hyperpolarizing pulse released intracellular Ca2+ in oocytes primed by pre-injection of a non-metabolizable inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate analogue. The carboxyl terminus of the amyloid precursor protein inhibited inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor-mediated intracellular Ca2+ release in a dose-dependent manner. Equimolar beta -amyloid peptides Abeta 1-40 or Abeta 1-42 had no effect, and whereas a truncated carboxyl terminus lacking the Abeta domain was equipotent to the full-length one, a carboxyl terminus fragment lacking the NPTY sequence was less effective than the full-length fragment. The inhibition induced by the carboxyl terminus was not associated with the block of the Ca2+-dependent Cl- channel itself or compromised Ca2+ influx. We conclude that the carboxyl terminus of the amyloid precursor protein inhibits inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-sensitive Ca2+ release and could thus disrupt Ca2+ homeostasis and that the carboxyl terminus is much more effective than the beta -amyloid fragments used. By perturbing the coupling of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate and Ca2+ release, the carboxyl terminus of the amyloid precursor protein can potentially be involved in inducing the neural toxicity characteristic of Alzheimer's disease.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Alzheimer's disease (AD)1 is a progressive and fatal neurodegenerative disease characterized by amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (for a review, see Ref. 1). These plaques are associated with degenerating neuronal processes and consist primarily of fibrillar aggregates of beta -amyloid protein (Abeta ). Although Abeta fragments are the main component of amyloid plaques and have been shown to damage or kill cultured neurones (for a review, see Ref. 2), Abeta may not be the sole neurotoxic component of the amyloid precursor protein (APP). For example, Abeta peptide deposition has been observed without accompanying neurodegeneration (3-5). Another amyloidogenic fragment, the carboxyl terminus (CT) of APP, which is composed of 99-105 amino acid residues containing the complete Abeta sequence, also appears to be toxic to neurones (6, 7). CT has been found not only in presynaptic terminals of rodent entorhinal neurones (8) but also in paired helical filaments (9), in senile plaques (10), in microvessels (11-13), in choroid plexus from human brain in AD, in the white matter of Down's syndrome brains (14), and in both cytosol and media of lymphoblastoid cells obtained from patients with early- or late-onset familial AD (15) and Down's syndrome (16). A transgenic mouse model expressing CT exhibited neuropathology very similar in many respects to that of AD, especially as regards age-dependent neuronal and synaptic degeneration (17) and spatial-learning deficits and electrophysiological alterations that suggested impairment of synaptic plasticity (18). A 31-amino acid carboxyl-terminal fragment of APP (CT31) generated from CT by caspase-9 cleavage was reported to have a pro-apoptotic effect and to mainly contribute to the CT toxicity in neuronal cells. Both CT31 and activated caspase-9 were present in the brains of AD patients but not in control brains (19). These findings together indicate that CTs themselves may also contribute to the neurodegenerative processes in vivo not only as a precursor to make Abeta . Earlier studies showed that Abeta -bearing CTs were released from several different cells and/or were more easily released from the damaged neurons into the media or extracellular fluid (20-22). Recent data has shown the presence of CT in the nuclei (23) and the transcriptively active complex of CT with Fe65 and histone acetyltransferase, Tip60 (24). These findings suggest that CT plays important roles in delayed neurodegeneration via transcriptional regulation. Our previous study also demonstrated that CT fragments without Abeta and the transmembrane domain may also exert toxicity in nerve growth factor-differentiated PC12 cells (25). CT can also contribute to stimulation of inflammatory processes linked to delayed neurodegeneration in AD (26-28).

Abeta and CT peptides have been shown to damage cultured neurons by a mechanism involving disruption of Ca2+ homeostasis (29, 30). However, the potential role of amyloidogenic fragments, including Abeta , in IP3 production and/or intracellular Ca2+ mobilization has not been clear.

Elucidating the possible effects of Abeta or CT peptides on IP3 signaling has been hampered by the intracellular location of IP3 receptors. Furthermore, limitations concerning specific inhibitors or activators of the IP3 receptors, not affecting ryanodine receptors, have also made it difficult to investigate Abeta effects on the IP3 pathway (31). To circumvent these difficulties, we have used Xenopus laevis oocytes as a model system. The large size of Xenopus oocytes facilitated precise intracellular application of IP3 and APP fragments. Moreover, the Ca2+ response of Xenopus oocytes was not complicated by ryanodine receptors, which are absent in the oocytes (32). Another advantage of this model system is that injection of IP3 into Xenopus oocytes elevates the cytosolic Ca2+ level and activates Ca2+-dependent Cl- currents (33), which can be used as a real-time indicator of cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (34, 35). In addition, Yao and Parker (36) showed that application of a hyperpolarizing pulse to Xenopus oocytes pre-injected with an enzyme-resistant IP3 analogue, D-3-deoxy-3-fluoro-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (3-F-IP3), induced a current that represented Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive stores. We have adopted this protocol to study the effect of amyloidogenic peptides on the IP3 pathway.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Preparation of Recombinant CT105 and Abeta -- Recombinant CT105 was prepared on the basis of human APP770 cDNA as described previously (37). Briefly, the expression plasmid pCS-CT105 was constructed by ligating the 704-bp BglII-ClaI fragment excised from pSP65-APP770 into ptrpSF9, digested with BglII and SmaI, treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase, and transformed into Escherichia coli XL1-Blue. CT105 peptide (Mr 14,242) was purified by a combination of urea solubilization and ion exchange chromatography and then subjected to dialysis against 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) followed by lyophilization. To rule out the effect of possible co-purified contaminating factors, groups incubated with polymixin B sulfate were compared with non-treated ones. We confirmed that these are not significantly different. Abeta 1-42 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. (Dorset, UK). Abeta 1-40, Abeta 1-42, and CT were dissolved in distilled water to make 100 µM stock solutions and incubated at 37 °C for 6 days.

Construction of Truncated CT Peptides-- To determine which region is the active domain responsible for the effect on IP3 signaling of CT, we have generated truncated carboxyl-terminal fragments of APP. Because Abeta , the transmembrane portion, and the NPTY sequence in the cytoplasmic tail are believed to be important in mediating toxic effects of CT peptide, constructs without these domains were generated using the PCR-amplified strategy and the GST fusion protein strategy as described earlier (25). Briefly, they were cloned from pSP65-APP770 by PCR using oligonucleotides complementary to corresponding position (28). For the construction of plasmids encoding GST fusion proteins, BamHI/XhoI fragment of the PCR-generated fragments was cloned into the BamHI/XhoI site of pGEX 4T-1. We have prepared the following constructs: GST-CT 46 (649-695) without Abeta and transmembrane (TM) domain (CTdAbeta /TM) and GST-CT 86 (597-683) without NPTY domain (CTdNPTY). These final PCR constructs were confirmed by automated DNA sequencing. These recombinant GST-CTs of APP were purified with a combination of urea solubilization and ion exchange chromatography.

Oocyte Preparation and Solutions-- X. laevis oocytes were prepared and defolliculated as described previously (38). Defolliculated oocytes were stored in incubation medium at 19 °C for several days. Composition of the incubation medium was (in millimolar): NaCl, 88.0; KCl, 1.0; CaCl2, 0.41; NaHCO3, 2.5; MgSO4, 0.82; and Ca(NO3)2, 0.33, penicillin and streptomycin, 10 µg/ml each; gentamicin sulfate, 0.1 mg/ml; pH 7.5. Unless otherwise noted, oocytes were continually perfused with Ringer's solution at room temperature (18-20 °C) during recording. In the case of thapsigargin pretreatment, oocytes were incubated in Ca2+-free medium containing 1 µM thapsigargin overnight at 19 °C.

Composition of the normal Ringer's solution was (millimolar): NaCl, 120; KCl, 2; CaCl2, 1.8; HEPES, 5; pH 7.3. Ca2+-free medium was made by omitting CaCl2 and adding 5 mM MgCl2 together with 1 mM EGTA (36). Most chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd. (Dorset, UK). 3-F-IP3, purchased from CN Biosciences UK (Nottingham, UK), was dissolved in distilled water at 35 µM. 3-F-IP3 is about equipotent to IP3 in liberating intracellular Ca2+ but cannot be converted to inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate by the action of 3-kinases and thus stimulates IP3 receptors continuously (39). Thapsigargin (Alomone Labs Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO). The final concentration of Me2SO in the Ca2+-free medium was 0.1%. The dissolved chemical and peptides were kept at -20 °C until use.

Microinjection-- Pulled injection pipette3-00-2s (03-G/XL, Drummond, Broomal, PA; tip diameters, 10-15 µm) were back-filled with the 3-F-IP3 solutions and attached to an oocyte injector (Drummond). 46 nl of solution was injected into each oocyte. Injected oocytes were kept for about 30 min in an incubator at 19 °C, except for experiments on transient current responses. The latter were induced directly by 3-F-IP3 injections, under voltage clamp, using a pneumatic pico-pump (WPI, Sarasota, FL). A holding potential of -40 mV was used in these experiments.

In the main body of experiments, Abeta 1-40, Abeta 1-42, full-length CT or the truncated fragments were injected into oocytes which had been "primed" previously for 30 min with 3-F-IP3 (at 150 nM intracellular concentration). Injection of the peptides was achieved either with the oocyte injector (Drummond) or with the pico-pump, dependent on the experimental set up. For experiments using the pico-pump, the volume of the injected peptide solution was calibrated before the start of the experiments. For a pre-set pressure (20 p.s.i.), the duration was adjusted to give the same ejected volume of liquid (46 nl), measured under a dissection microscope. The duration was determined separately for each injection pipette. The concentrations of peptides and 3-F-IP3 injected into oocytes are given in the text as the final, intracellular ones. These were as follows: 0.22, 0.44, 0.88, 1.3, 1.8, 2.2, and 3.0 µM for CT; 0.44, 0.88, 2.2, and 3.0 µM for Abeta 1-40 and Abeta 1-42; and 1.2 mM for the various truncated fragments.

Electrophysiology-- Conventional two-electrode methodologies were performed with a voltage-clamp amplifier (GeneClamp 500B, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA). Resistances of the voltage-measuring electrodes filled with 2.5 M KCl were in the range 1-3 MOmega , whereas current-measuring electrodes had resistances of 0.4-1 MOmega . Stimulation and data acquisition were controlled by pClamp 6.02 software (Axon Instruments) via a Digidata 1200 interface (Axon Instruments). Recorded data were stored on an IBM computer and analyzed in pClamp 6.02 package. Two types of membrane currents were recorded: 1) Fast, transient currents induced directly by 3-F-IP3 injection. For recording the transient current (It) induced directly by 3-F-IP3 itself, the compound was injected into oocytes under voltage clamp (-40 mV), and the resulting currents were monitored for ~20 min. 2) Late currents induced by membrane hyperpolarization in oocytes pre-injected with 3-F-IP3. The delayed membrane currents (Tin) were recorded as follows: (i) An oocyte pre-injected with 3-F-IP3 was incubated for 30 min and transferred to the recording chamber. (ii) The oocyte was voltage-clamped at a holding potential of 0 mV to keep the driving force of Ca2+ influx at a low level. (iii) A hyperpolarizing pulse was applied from 0 mV to -110 mV for 4.5 s, and the current response was recorded. The current response recorded before the peptide injection was used as the control. (iv) A peptide was injected with the pico-pump or oocyte injector. (v) The same hyperpolarizing pulse was applied to the oocyte 10 min following peptide injection. The resulting response was compared with its own pre-injection control. The percentage residual current was expressed as [(post-injection amplitude/pre-injection amplitude) × 100].

Data Analysis-- All data have been presented as means ± S.E. of the means (S.E.). The number of measurements given (n) represents different oocytes; the number of batches, i.e. toads used (N) for a given experiment, is also indicated. Data were analyzed using a statistics package, SAS/6.03 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Effect of a given peptide on current amplitude was analyzed by one-way ANOVA, after all the percentage data were transformed to logarithmic values. A Tukey test was used for multiple comparisons. Wilcoxon test (non-parametric) was used for comparison of two groups. Correlation coefficients were determined by non-parametric Spearman test. Statistical significance was considered at the following levels: p < 0.05 (dagger ), p < 0.01 (*), p < 0.001 (**), p < 0.0001 (***), and p < 0.00001 (****).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Control Experiments

3-F-IP3-induced Transient Membrane Currents-- Injection of 3-F-IP3 (1 µM) into oocytes held at -40 mV caused a biphasic inward current: A fast, transient component (It), followed by a slow phase with typical oscillations (Fig. 1A). This response pattern was similar to those induced by IP3 or 3-F-IP3 in previous studies on Xenopus oocytes (36, 40, 41). This confirmed that the IP3 system was functioning normally.


View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Left panel, A, membrane current recorded from an oocyte (voltage-clamped at -40 mV) in response to injection of 1 µM 3-F-IP3. The injection of 3-F-IP3 activates a large transient inward current (It) followed by a long-lasting secondary inward current with some oscillations. The arrowhead indicates the injection point of 3-F-IP3. B, hump current (Tin) evoked by a hyperpolarizing pulse applied to oocytes previously injected with 3-F-IP3 (150 nM). The oocyte was loaded with 3-F-IP3 about 30 min before applying the voltage pulse (-40 to -110 mV; 4.5-s duration). C, similar protocol (as in B) applied to control, non-injected oocyte. No hump current is generated. Currents were not leak-subtracted. Right panel, effect of extracellular Ca2+ on Tin. D, the control current response of a 3-F-IP3-injected oocyte bathed in normal Ringer's solution. E, oocyte bathed in Ca2+-free Ringer's solution. F, recovery on returning to normal Ringer's solution. The recordings were obtained from the same oocyte. The scale bar in A applies to part A, whereas the scale bar in part B refers to all other parts of the figure.

Hyperpolarization-induced Membrane Currents in 3-F-IP3-injected Oocytes-- Oocytes injected with 3-F-IP3 (150 nM) were incubated for a further 30 min and then a hyperpolarizing pulse (0 to -110 mV) was applied under voltage clamp. This generated a slow "hump-like" inward current (Tin, Parker and Miledi (42)) (Fig. 1B). Water-injected control oocytes showed only leakage currents without Tin (Fig. 1C). The reversal potential of Tin was about -22 mV (n = 3), similar to the value reported previously for the endogenous Ca2+-dependent Cl- current of Xenopus oocytes (e.g. Ref. 34).

Effect of Enhanced Depletion of Ca2+ Stores on Tin-- A high level of 3-F-IP3 (1.5 µM) was used to test whether Tin could be altered by enhanced depletion of Ca2+ stores. The mean amplitudes of the hump currents induced by 1.5 µM and 150 nM 3-F-IP3 were indistinguishable: 962 ± 192 nA (n = 14/n = 3) versus 1153 ± 233 nA (n = 15/n = 3; p > 0.1), respectively. This was not due to 150 nM 3-F-IP3 saturating the Ca2+ release pathway. This was confirmed by comparing the amplitudes of It generated directly by the IP3 analogue injection: The currents induced by 150 nM and 1.5 µM 3-F-IP3 were 112.6 ± 32.2 and 279.3 ± 61.9 nA, respectively (n = 7/n = 2 for both; p < 0.05). These results suggested that the amplitude of Tin was not affected by possible enhanced depletion of the Ca2+ stores.

Ca2+ dependence of Tin-- We examined whether Tin depended on extracellular Ca2+. Tin was abolished in the Ca2+-free/EGTA Ringer's solution (Fig. 1, D versus E). This effect was reversible, with the current recovered in normal Ringer's solution containing 1.8 mM Ca2+ (Fig. 1F). We also tested whether Tin could be mediated exclusively by Ca2+ influx. Thapsigargin (1 µM) was used to deplete Ca2+ stores and set up capacitative Ca2+ entry (43). No Tin current could be observed in such oocytes using the standard protocol (data not shown). This confirmed, under our experimental conditions, Tin was not simply generated by Ca2+ entering from outside.

These characteristics taken together are consistent with the Tin current representing a Cl- current activated by Ca2+ released from IP3-sensitive stores by the triggering action of hyperpolarization-induced Ca2+ influx, as in the study of Yao and Parker (36).

Inhibitory Effect of CT on Tin

Following a control (pre-injection) recording of Tin in oocytes primed with 3-F-IP3, water (as vehicle control) or an amyloidogenic fragment of APP (Abeta 1-40, Abeta 1-42, or CT) was applied intracellularly. Experiments, in which the oocytes were injected with distilled water alone, showed that Tin was stable and that the post-injection amplitudes were not much different from those of pre-injection controls (residual current = 96.5 ± 4.8%; n = 18/n = 4; p > 0.05; Figs. 2A and 3A). Application of either Abeta 1-40 or Abeta 1-42 (0.22-3.0 µM for both) had no significant effect on Tin (n = 8 for each; Figs. 2B, 2C, and 3A). In contrast, injection of CT peptide was very effective in suppressing Tin (Figs. 2D and 3A). The inhibitory effect of CT peptide on Tin was dose-dependent (Fig. 4). The concentration of CT peptide that induced half-maximal inhibition of Tin was about 0.4 µM.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effects of amyloidogenic fragments on Tin. Traces in the left panel show control recordings of Tin before injection. Corresponding traces on the right show the current responses after injection in each case. A, water injection as a vehicle control. B, 3 µM Abeta 1-40; C, 3 µM Abeta 1-42; D, 3 µM CT. The same volume (46 nl) of sterile distilled water or peptide solution was injected into each oocyte. Other experimental conditions were as in Fig. 1B.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   A, normalized mean amplitudes of residual Tin after injection of water or 2.2 µM amyloidogenic fragments. Residual currents (%) were calculated by dividing the peak amplitude of Tin after injection with that of the respective control Tin (i.e. (post-injection Tin × 100)/(pre-injection Tin)). One way-ANOVA and a Tukey test were performed for statistical comparisons with the water-injected control (***, p < 0.0001). The data for each condition represent the mean of eight oocytes; the value for water control was obtained from 12 oocytes. Error bars denote S.E. B, normalized mean amplitudes of residual Tin after injection of water, GST, 1.22 µM CT, or equimolar truncated CT peptides. Residual currents were determined as described above. Student's t test was performed for comparison with GST control (*, p < 0.01; CTdNPTY (+) indicates p < 0.05).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Dose-response curves for the effects of CT (filled circle), Abeta 1-40 (filled square), and Abeta 1-42 (open circle) on Tin. Residual currents (%) were calculated as stated in Fig. 3 legend and under "Experimental Procedures." One way-ANOVA and then a Tukey test were performed for statistical comparisons to water-injected control. Each point is the average of measurements from 8-12 oocytes. The error bars denote S.E.

We also investigated if CT would inhibit It induced directly by 3-F-IP3 injection. 3-F-IP3 (1 µM) typically evoked peak inward currents of 50-350 nA. There was no statistically significant effect on the peak inward current when 1.3 µM CT (a concentration that consistently inhibited Tin) was co-injected with 3-F-IP3 (n = 13/n = 3; p > 0.1). In addition, the reduction of Tin was not overcome by 10- or 100-fold higher concentration of 3-F-IP3 (i.e. 1.5 and 15 µM, respectively; data not shown). In addition, we tested whether IP3 re-injection could evoke the current following the initial block by CT. We could not find any recovery of Tin in this condition (data not shown).

Comparison of Inhibitory Effect of CT and the Truncated CT Peptides on Tin-- To explore the active part of the CT domain responsible for its inhibitory effects on Tin, we made truncated CT peptides, CTdNPTY and CTdAbeta /TM. Water, 1.2 µM GST, CT, or each GST-conjugated, truncated CT peptide was applied intracellularly, after checking Tin in oocytes primed with 3-F-IP3. CTdNPTY suppressed Tin less effectively than full-length CT injection (residual current = 57.2 ± 10.3%, n = 7; p < 0.05; Fig. 3B), whereas CTdAbeta /TM showed no significant difference (residual current = 19.3 ± 10.3%, n = 7; Fig. 3B) at the same concentration. The control oocytes injected with GST or water showed stable Tin (residual current of GST = 101.0 ± 15.5%, n = 7; p > 0.05; residual current of water = 96.5 ± 4.8%, n = 18; p > 0.05; Fig. 3A). These results show that the YENPTY domain in the cytoplasmic tail seems to have a more crucial role in inhibiting IP3 signaling rather than the Abeta or TM domains.

Lack of Effect of CT on Capacitative Ca2+ Entry or Ca2+-dependent Cl- Channels-- To eliminate the possibility that CT could compromise capacitative Ca2+ entry, oocytes that had been pre-treated with thapsigargin overnight (in the absence of extracellular Ca2+), to set up capacitative Ca2+ entry (44), were injected with 1.3 µM CT. Current responses to hyperpolarizing pulses were 646 ± 142 nA before, compared with 590 ± 157 nA following CT injection (p = 0.18, n = 11/n = 3; Fig. 5). In addition, thapsigargin treatment is known to lengthen the time-to-peak of Tin (41). We therefore measured the time-to-peak of Tin before and following 1.3 µM CT injection (1245 ± 196 ms versus 1134 ± 150 ms, respectively). The values were not significantly different (p = 0.19; n = 12). Together, these results are consistent with CT having no significant effect on capacitative Ca2+ entry.


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Lack of effect of CT on capacitative Ca2+ entry. Oocytes were incubated in Ca2+-free medium containing 1 µM thapsigargin overnight before recording. A hyperpolarizing pulse (-40 to -110 mV for 4.5 s) was applied. Currents were recorded before (A) and following (B) CT peptide injection. The traces were obtained from different oocytes.

To elucidate whether the inhibitory effect of CT involved directly the Ca2+-activated Cl- channels, we compared the decay time courses of Tin before and after CT injection in oocytes in which CT reduced, but did not abolish, the peak Tin current (see later). Current decay could be fitted with a single exponential of which the time constant (tau ) did not change significantly following CT injection (tau  = 1024 ± 265 versus 964 ± 156 ms, before and after CT, respectively, n = 16/n = 4; p > 0.4; Fig. 6).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Decay time courses of Ca2+-activated Cl- channels. These were not altered by CT injection. Representative traces of Tin evoked by hyperpolarization from 0 mV to -110 mV in 3-F-IP3-injected oocytes, recorded before (A) and following (B) CT injection. The traces are from different oocytes. The straight lines represent the exponential best fits to the current decays, with time constants (tau ) as indicated.

In conclusion, the inhibitory effect of CT on Ca2+ release was most likely due to suppression of IP3-sensitive Ca2+ release from internal stores, rather than any effect on capacitative Ca2+ entry or Ca2+-activated Cl- current.

Relation of Time to Peak of Tin and Inhibitory Effect of CT-- We explored the relationship between the time-to-peak of Tin (measured before CT injection) and the residual peak current recorded after CT injection expressed as a percentage of the original amplitude. Fig. 7 shows that there was a strong inverse correlation between the time-to-peak prior to CT injection and the residual current (correlation coefficient = -0.78; p < 0.001). This suggested that oocytes with slower Tin were more sensitive to CT. In other words, when Ca2+ influx (derived from the membrane hyperpolarization) needed to trigger Tin was greater, as indicated by the time-to-peak of Tin, the suppressing effect of CT was bigger.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Correlation of residual current amplitudes (normalized, %; as described in the legend to Fig. 3) and time-to-peak (log scale). The inhibitory effect of CT on Tin was enhanced in oocytes displaying longer time-to-peak before CT peptide injection. A non-parametric Spearson test showed that there is a strong inverse correlation between the two data sets (correlation coefficient = -0.78; p < 0.001).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We investigated the effects of amyloidogenic fragments of APP on the IP3 pathway in X. laevis oocytes using the Ca2+-activated Cl- (Tin) current as an indicator of [Ca2+]i. The main conclusion is that CT peptide, but not the Abeta fragments, inhibits Ca2+ release from intracellular Ca2+ stores when activated by an IP3 analogue and triggered by hyperpolarization-induced Ca2+ influx.

Tin required the presence of extracellular Ca2+ to be triggered, because it was abolished in Ca2+-free medium (Fig. 1, E and F). If Tin were to be mediated exclusively by Ca2+ entry, however, it should have persisted in oocytes when capacitative Ca2+ entry was induced by use of thapsigargin (43). The absence of Tin in thapsigargin-treated oocytes suggested that the current was not dependent upon Ca2+ influx alone. It was concluded, therefore, that entry of Ca2+ induced by membrane hyperpolarization triggered Tin, as a consequence of Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores in continuous presence of IP3. This is consistent with the results of Yao and Parker (36). It should be noted, however, that under conditions associated with more "complex" second-messenger associated events (e.g. 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor activation (36)), there is evidence that Tin can be activated by interaction of Ca2+ influx and Cl- channels, in a pathway that bypasses the need for intracellular Ca2+ release. However, under our experimental conditions, this was clearly not the case.

Enhanced depletion of the Ca2+ store obtained by high (1.5 µM) concentration of 3-F-IP3 did not result in any significant increase of Tin amplitude. This ruled out the possibility that Tin was a simple delayed release of Ca2+ from incompletely depleted Ca2+ stores. However, it is possible that the IP3-dependent Ca2+ release could involve a refilling mechanism occurring after Ca2+ store depletion.

Control experiments, in which oocytes were injected with distilled water alone, showed that Tin was stable and that the post-injection amplitude was not much different from the pre-injection amplitude (Figs. 3A and 4). Intracellular application of the CT peptide strongly attenuated Tin, whereas Abeta 1-40 and Abeta 1-42 had no significant effect under identical experimental conditions (Figs. 3, B-D, and 4A). In addition, the reduction of Tin was not overcome by 10- or 100- fold higher concentration of 3-F-IP3 (i.e. 1.5 and 15 µM, respectively, data not shown). In addition, we tested whether IP3 re-injection could evoke the current following the initial block by CT. We could not find any recovery of Tin in this condition (data not shown). These experiments indicate that CT inhibits Tin by altering the IP3-induced receptor-signaling pathway rather than simply by blocking IP3 receptor directly.

The deletion studies showed that YENPTY sequence, which is known to have a role in intracellular sorting (24), rather than the Abeta or TM domains, may at least in part, be responsible for the attenuation of IP3 induced signal (Fig. 3B).

Interestingly, injection of the CT peptide had no effect on the size of It. At present, the reasons for this are unclear, because both It and Tin are dependent on IP3. However, the two events are distinct in that (i) It is an immediate event following IP3 injection, whereas Tin takes many minutes to develop and (ii) It, unlike Tin, is not dependent upon extracellular Ca2+ (45). Thus, possible differences in the intracellular events controlling these two discrete events may explain their distinct sensitivity to CT.

The inhibitory effect of CT on Tin was concentration-dependent, with the half-maximal effect occurring at about 0.4 µM (Fig. 4). This is in the range of CT concentrations found previously to be toxic to oocytes (46) and to a variety of mammalian cells, including neurones (7).

Several possible mechanisms were tested to elucidate the one or more steps involved in the inhibitory effect of CT on Tin. In particular, the possible effects of CT on 1) capacitative Ca2+ entry, 2) the Ca2+-activated Cl- channel, or 3) the cytoplasmic Ca2+ level, were evaluated.

Compromised Ca2+ entry, preventing Ca2+ release from intracellular stores, was unlikely to be involved, because capacitative Ca2+ entry induced by pre-treatment of thapsigargin did not change significantly after CT injection (Fig. 5) and CT had no effect on the length of the time-to-peak of Tin. This is in agreement with recent work by Yoo et al. (47), who found that neither Abeta 1-42 nor full-length beta APP had any effect on capacitative Ca2+ entry in Chinese hamster ovary cells.

It was possible that CT affected the Ca2+-dependent Cl- channels directly. However, the decay time constant (tau ) of Tin measured before and after CT injection did not change (Fig. 6). Furthermore, oscillatory currents due to the Ca2+-activated Cl- current were observed in oocytes after CT injection, consistent with lack of effect of CT on the Cl- channel (46). Taken together, the possible involvement of the Ca2+-activated Cl- channel was ruled out as a significant component of the inhibitory effect of CT on Tin.

Another explanation for the inhibition of Ca2+ release was that CT lowered cytosolic Ca2+ concentration to low levels by chelating Ca2+. Chelation of Ca2+ would prevent the Cl- current evoked by Ca2+ released from its stores. However, Ca2+ chelation was unlikely to occur, because, in fact, an increase of [Ca2+]i has been observed when CT was applied to Purkinje cells of rat cerebellum (48).

Ca2+ influx, enhanced by CT, could lead to levels of [Ca2+]i high enough to block IP3 receptors, because very high [Ca2+]i has been reported to block IP3 receptors completely (49, 50). If this mechanism occurred under our experimental conditions, however, the capacitative Ca2+ entry induced by 3-F-IP3 or thapsigargin should have increased after CT injection. Such an increase was not observed (Figs. 2D and 5). Therefore, increased Ca2+ influx cannot account for the inhibitory effect of CT on IP3-sensitive Ca2+ release. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that the Ca2+ influx enhanced by CT was large enough to block Ca2+ release through IP3 receptor channels, but the change was too small to be detected by electrophysiological recording. This possibility remains to be investigated further.

We tested whether CT would affect directly Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores. The analysis shown in Fig. 7 revealed a strong, inverse relationship between time-to-peak of Tin measured before CT injection and residual current amplitude after CT injection. The response to IP3 varied greatly from oocyte to oocyte, possibly due to the differences in the number and spatial distribution of IP3 receptors (45, 51). Oocytes, which were highly sensitive to 3-F-IP3, would deplete their Ca2+ stores more in response to a given concentration of 3-F-IP3, compared with relatively insensitive oocytes. CT more potently blocked Tin (Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive stores) in oocytes displaying longer time-to-peak.

Two existing hypothesis can be adopted to explain the relationship between time-to-peak and sensitivity of each oocyte to IP3, as follows: First, there is the steady-state model. It has been suggested that Ca2+ release is controlled by the intraluminal Ca2+level within Ca2+ stores (52). The steady-state model considered that decreasing the Ca2+ content of the stores would slow down further the Ca2+ release until it stopped when the level of luminal Ca2+ fell to a low concentration (53). Consequently, "sensitive" oocytes would have less full Ca2+ stores after injection of 3-F-IP3 and would need more Ca2+ refilling to reach a certain threshold for Ca2+ release, which may result in delayed Tin (i.e. longer time-to-peak), as found (Fig. 7). Second, there is the feedback model. Feedback inhibition of the IP3 receptor by cytosolic Ca2+ would limit further release of Ca2+, and recovery of sensitivity to IP3 would follow the subsequent decline of cytosolic Ca2+ as the latter was re-sequestered (54, 55). Accordingly, oocytes highly sensitive to 3-F-IP3 would have more Ca2+ liberated by injection of 3-F-IP3. Such oocytes could take longer time to sequester Ca2+ to a non-blocking level of [Ca2+]i and this may result in delayed Tin.

Thus, the time-to-peak can be considered as a measure of the IP3 sensitivity of each oocyte. Ca2+ release in highly sensitive oocytes (where a large portion of Ca2+ store was exhausted by the 3-F-IP3) was inhibited more by CT. Such a correlation would arise as a result of CT directly suppressing IP3-sensitive Ca2+ release rather than one or more other auxiliary mechanisms. Hence, the inverse relationship found is consistent with CT inhibition being specific to the Ca2+ release mechanism from IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores. However, CT did not appear to inhibit directly the binding of 3-F-IP3 to IP3 receptors or compete with 3-F-IP3 for IP3 binding sites, because there was no significant effect of CT on It when co-injected with 3-F-IP3, and high concentrations of 3-F-IP3 could not overcome the CT-induced block. CT was most likely to uncouple the triggering action of Ca2+ influx from induction of the IP3-sensitive Ca2+ release. It remains to be determined whether such an uncoupling effect occurs in vivo and whether it could lead to any long-term effect.

In overall conclusion, we have shown that the CT fragment of beta APP, but not the Abeta fragments, suppresses Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores triggered by extracellular Ca2+ entry in the Xenopus oocyte model. Although the effect of CT peptide on Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores must be confirmed in the neuronal system, our results support further the view that the CT peptide plays an important role in pathogenesis of AD (56, 57). The inhibitory effect of CT on IP3-sensitive Ca2+ release could disrupt intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis and thus contribute to the cellular toxicity in AD.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by the National Creative Research Initiative Grant from the Ministry of Science & Technology, the BK21 Human Life Sciences Project, The British Council (Seoul), Korea, the Rotary Club International, and the Royal Society (to S. P. F.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Present address: Center for Neurobiology and Behavior, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, 1051 Riverside Dr., New York, NY 10032.

|| To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 82-2-740-8285; Fax: 82-2-745-7996; E-mail: yhsuh@plaza.snu.ac.kr.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M108326200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AD, Alzheimer's disease; IP3, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate; 3-F-IP3, D-3-deoxy-3-fluoro-myo-inositol 1,4, 5-trisphosphate; Abeta , beta -amyloid protein; APP, amyloid precursor protein; CT, carboxyl-terminal; GST, glutathione S-transferase; TM, transmembrane.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Selkoe, D. J. (1994) Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 489-517[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Yankner, B. A. (1996) Neuron 16, 921-932[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Joachim, C. L., Morris, J. H., and Selkoe, D. J. (1989) Am. J. Pathol. 135, 309-319[Abstract]
4. Gearing, M., Wilson, R. W., Unger, E. R., Shelton, E. R., Chan, H. W., Masters, C. L., Beyreuther, K., and Mirra, S. S. (1993) J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 52, 22-30[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Einstein, G., Buranosky, R., and Crain, B. J. (1994) J. Neurosci. 14, 5077-5088[Abstract]
6. Fukuchi, K. I., Sopher, B., and Martin, G. M. (1993) Nature 361, 122[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Kim, S. H., and Suh, Y.-H. (1996) J. Neurochem. 67, 1172-1182[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Buxbaum, J. D., Thinakaran, G., Koliatsos, V., O'Callahan, J., Slunt, H. H., Price, D. L., and Sisodia, S. S. (1998) J. Neurosci. 18, 9629-9637[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Caputo, C. B., Sobel, I. R., Scott, C. W., Brunner, W. F., Barth, P. T., and Blowers, D. P. (1992) Biochem. Biophys. Research Commun. 185, 1034-1040[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Selkoe, D. J., Podlisny, M. B., Joachim, C. L., Vickers, E. A., Lee, G., Fritz, L. C., and Oltersdorf, T. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 7319-7365
11. Tamaoka, A., Kalaria, R. N., Lieberburg, I., and Selkoe, D. J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 1345-1349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Maruyama, K., Terakado, K., Usami, M., and Yoshikawa, K. (1990) Nature 347, 566-569[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Dyrks, T., Dyrks, E., Hartmann, T., Masters, C., and Beyreuther, K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 18210-18217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Tokuda, T., Tanaka, K., Kametani, F., Ikeda, S., and Yanagisawa, N. (1995) Neurosci. Lett. 186, 149-152[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Matsumoto, A. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 175, 361-365
16. Kametani, F., Tanaka, K., Tokuda, T., and Ikeda, S. (1994) FEBS Lett. 351, 165-167[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Oster-Granite, M. L., McPhie, D. L., Greenan, J., and Neve, R. L. (1996) J. Neurosci. 16, 6732-6741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Nalbantoglu, J., Tirado-Santiago, G., Lahsaini, A., Poirier, J., Goncalves, O., Verge, G., Momoli, F., Welner, S. A., Massicotte, G., Julien, J. P., and Shapiro, M. L. (1997) Nature 387, 500-505[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Lu, D. C., Rabizadeh, S., Chandra, S., Shayya, R. F., Ellerby, L. M., Ye, X., Salvesen, G. S., Koo, E. H., and Bredesen, D. E. (2000) Nat. Med. 4, 397-404
20. Yankner, B. A., Dawes, L. R., Fisher, S., Villa-Komaroff, L., Oster-Granite, M. L., and Neve, R. L. (1989) Science 245, 417-420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Kozlowski, M. R., Spanoyannis, A., Manly, S. P., Fidel, S. A., and Neve, R. L. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 1679-1687[Abstract]
22. Seubert, P., Oltersdorf, T., Lee, M. G., Barbour, R., Blomquist, C., Davis, D. L., Bryant, K., Fritz, L. C., Galasko, D., Thal, L. J., et al.. (1993) Nature 361, 260-263[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. DeGiorgio, L. A., DeGiorgio, N., Milner, T. A., Conti, B., and Volpe, B. T. (2000) Brain Res. 874, 137-146[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Cao, X., and Sudhof, T. C. (2001) Science 293, 115-120[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Lee, J. P., Chang, K. A., Kim, H. S., Kim, S.S., Jeong, S. J., and Suh, Y. H. (2000) J. Neurosci. Res. 60, 565-570[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Rah, J. C., Kim, H. S., Kim, S. S., Bach, J. H., Kim, Y. S., Park, C. H., Seo, J. H., Jeong, S. J., and Suh, Y. H. (2001) FASEB J. 15, 1463-1465[Free Full Text]
27. Bach, J. H., Chae, H. S., Rah, J. C., Lee, M. W., Park, C. H., Choi, S. H., Choi, J. K., Lee, S. H., Kim, Y. S., Kim, K. Y., Lee, W. B., Suh, Y. H., and Kim, S. S. (2001) J. Neurochem. 78, 109-120[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Chong, Y. H., Sung, J. H., Shin, S. A., Chung, J. H., and Suh, Y. H. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 23511-23517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Mattson, M. P., Cheng, B., Davis, D., Bryant, K., Lieberburg, I., and Rydel, R. E. (1992) J. Neurosci. 12, 376-389[Abstract]
30. Kim, H. S., Park, C. H., and Suh, Y. H. (1998) Neuroreport 9, 3875-3879[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Wilcox, R. A., Primrose, W. U., Nahorski, S. R., and Challiss, R. A. (1998) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 19, 467-475[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Parys, J. B., Sernett, S. W., DeLisle, S., Snyder, P. M., Welsh, M. J., and Campbell, K. P. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 18776-18782[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Parekh, A. B., Foguet, M., Lubbert, H., and Stuhmer, W. (1993) J. Physiol. 469, 653-671[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Barish, M. E. (1983) J. Physiol. (Lond.) 342, 309-325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Gomez-Hernandez, J., Stuhmer, W., and Parekh, A. B. (1997) J. Physiol. 502, 569-574[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Yao, Y., and Parker, I. (1993) J. Physiol. 468, 275-296[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Chong, Y. H., Jung, J. M., Choi, W., Park, C. W., Choi, K. S., and Suh, Y. H. (1994) Life Sci. 54, 1259-1268[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Fraser, S. P., Moon, C., and Djamgoz, M. B. A. (1993) in Electrophysiology, a Practical Approach (Wallis, D. I., ed) , pp. 65-86, Oxford University Press, Oxford
39. Kozikowski, A. P., Fauq, A. H., Aksoy, I. A., Seewald, M. J., and Powis, G. (1990) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 7403-7404[CrossRef]
40. Yao, Y., and Parker, I. (1992) J. Physiol. 458, 319-338[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Parekh, A. B. (1995) Pflugers Arch. 430, 954-963[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Parker, I., and Miledi, R. (1987) Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 231, 27-36[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Putney, J. W. (1990) Cell Calcium 11, 611-624[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Petersen, C. C. H., and Berridge, M. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32246-32253[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Miledi, R., and Parker, I. (1989) J. Physiol. 415, 189-210[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Fraser, S. P., Suh, Y. H., Chong, Y. H., and Djamgoz, M. B. (1996) J. Neurochem. 66, 2034-2040[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Yoo, A. S., Cheng, I., Chung, S., Grenfell, T. Z., Lee, H., Pack-Chung, E., Handler, M., Shen, J., Xia, W., Tesco, G., Saunders, A. J., Ding, K., Frosch, M. P., Tanzi, R. E., and Kim, T. W. (2000) Neuron 27, 561-572[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Hartell, N. A., and Suh, Y.-H. (2000) J. Neurochem. 74, 1112-1121[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Bezprozvanny, I., Watras, J., and Ehrlich, B. E. (1991) Nature 351, 751-754[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Thrower, E. C., Lea, E. J., and Dawson, A. P. (1998) Biochem. J. 330, 559-564
51. Mak, D. D., and Forskett, J. K. (1997) J. Gen. Physiol. 109, 571-587[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Missiaen, L., Taylor, C. W., and Berridge, M. J. (1992) J. Physiol. 455, 623-640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Missiaen, L., De, Smedt, H., Droogmans, G., and Casteels, R. (1992) Nature 357, 599-602[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Parker, I., and Ivorra, I. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 260-264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Levy, S., and Payne, R. (1993) J. Gen. Physiol. 101, 67-84[Abstract/Free Full Text]
56. Fraser, S. P., Suh, Y.-H., and Djamgoz, M. B. A. (1997) Trends Neurosci. 20, 67-72[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Suh, Y. H. (1997) J. Neurochem. 68, 1781-1791[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit