![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 20415-20422, June 7, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine and Department
of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York,
New York 10016
Received for publication, March 8, 2002
RNase E is an important regulatory enzyme that
governs the principal pathway for mRNA degradation in
Escherichia coli. This endonuclease controls its own
synthesis via a feedback mechanism in which the longevity of
rne (RNase E) mRNA is modulated by a cis-acting sensory
element that responds to changes in cellular RNase E activity. Previous
research has shown that this element is an RNA stem-loop (hp2) within
the 5'-untranslated region of the rne transcript. Here we
report studies involving mutational analysis and phylogenetic
comparison that have identified the features of rne hp2
important for its function. These comprise an internal loop flanked on
one side by a 2-bp stem and a hairpin loop and on the other side by a
longer stem whose sequence is inconsequential. A search of bacterial
genome sequences suggests that regulation by an hp2-like element may be
a unique evolutionary adaptation of the rne transcript that
is not shared by other mRNAs.
Messenger RNA degradation is an important mechanism for
controlling gene expression in all organisms. The rate of mRNA
decay directly affects the steady-state concentration of mRNA,
thereby influencing rates of protein synthesis. mRNA lifetimes can
differ markedly within a single cell. In Escherichia coli,
for example, mRNA half-lives can be as short as a fraction of a
minute or as long as an hour, with a typical half-life being 2-4 min
(1). The stability of a given message need not be fixed and may
vary in response to growth conditions (2-5).
In E. coli, mRNA decay generally involves the sequential
action of endonucleases and 3'-exonucleases (1). For most E. coli mRNAs, degradation begins with internal cleavage by RNase
E (6-11). This endonuclease, 1061 amino acids in length, possesses
broad cleavage-site specificity, cutting RNA in a variety of
single-stranded regions that are AU-rich (12, 13). The rate at which
RNase E cleaves mRNA is strongly influenced by RNA features that
are distinct from its sites of cleavage. These features include
structural elements within the 5'-untranslated region
(UTR),1 5'-terminal
phosphorylation, and bound ribosomes (14-16).
In E. coli, RNase E is an essential protein whose
underproduction or overproduction can impair cell growth (17, 18).
Synthesis of this important endonuclease is tightly controlled by an
autoregulatory mechanism that modulates the longevity of the transcript
of the RNase E gene (rne) in response to changes in cellular
RNase E activity (19). Feedback regulation of RNase E synthesis is
mediated in cis by the 361-nucleotide (nt) rne 5'-UTR, which
can confer a comparably high degree of sensitivity to cellular RNase E
levels onto heterologous mRNAs to which it is fused (19, 20). Thus, expression of a reporter gene comprising the rne 5'-UTR and
the initial portion of the rne coding region joined in-frame
to lacZ can differ by more than 30-fold in cells containing
low versus high RNase E activity, and this sensitivity to
RNase E is virtually abolished when all of the 5'-UTR upstream of the
ribosome binding site is deleted (19, 20). The rne 5'-UTR
contains six structural domains (Fig. 1),
two of which, the stem-loop structures hp2 and hp3, are important for
feedback regulation (20). Of these two stem-loops, hp2 is the more
potent sensor of cellular RNase E activity. When fused directly
upstream of the rne ribosome binding site, hp2 alone is
sufficient to direct efficient feedback regulation by RNase E (20).
To better understand the mechanism of RNase E autoregulation, we have
used mutational analysis and phylogenetic comparison to examine the
features of rne hp2 that are important for its ability to
mediate feedback control. These studies indicate that an 8-nt internal
loop near the top of hp2 plays a central role in this regulatory process.
Strains and Plasmids--
The isogenic E. coli
strains CH1827 (MC1061, rne+
zce-726::Tn10) and CH1828
(MC1061, ams-1 zce-726::Tn10) are
derivatives of MC1061 (araD39
Plasmid pEZ Construction and Screening of rne hp2 Internal Loop
Libraries--
To identify the important nucleotides in the 8-nt
internal loop of rne hp2, two combinatorial libraries were
created in which the sequence of the top four (hp2IL-top) or
bottom four (hp2IL-bot) nucleotides of this
internal loop were randomized. Oligonucleotide primer Hp2comp
(5'-CGTGGGGGTGTACA-3', 32 pmol) was annealed to an
equimolar amount of either of two complementary primers that encoded
the entire hp2-ss2 region: Hp2IL-toplib
(5'-CATTTTGGGCCCGACCGATCATCCACGCNGCAATGGCNNNAGACGTATTGATCTTTCAGGCCCAGTTAGCTGTACACCCCCACG-3') or Hp2IL-botlib
(5'-CATTTTGGGCCCGACCGATCATCCACGNAGCAATGGCGTANNNCGTATTGATCTTTCAGGCCCAGTTAGCTGTACACCCCCACG-3'). The annealed oligonucleotides were extended for 1 h at
37 °C with T4 DNA polymerase (10 units) and all four dNTPs (250 µM each) in T4 DNA polymerase buffer (New England
BioLabs). The extended products (86 bp) were purified using a High Pure
purification kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), digested with
ApaI and BsrGI, repurified, and ligated between
the ApaI and BsrGI sites of pEZ8NcoI. Each
library was transformed into competent E. coli WM1/F' cells containing plasmid pRNE101, and the cells were plated on LB-agar supplemented with X-gal (60 µg/ml), ampicillin (100 µg/ml), and kanamycin (100 µg/ml). The high level of RNase E activity present in
these cells allowed reporter mRNAs sensitive to RNase E
overproduction to be identified by their pale color when compared with
otherwise identical cells containing pEZ8 (white colonies) or
pEZ8 Measurement of Repression Ratios--
Computer Search for rne hp2-like Elements--
The computer
program RNAbob (available at
www.genetics.wustl.edu/eddy/software/#rnabob) was used to search for
elements resembling rne hp2 in the genomes of E. coli, Yersinia pestis, and Haemophilus influenzae (genomic sequence files downloaded from
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/Bacteria). The search parameters specified an
8-nt internal loop consisting of the sequence CD Evolutionary Conservation of rne hp2 Function--
Autoregulation
of RNase E synthesis is mediated by rne hp2, an RNA
stem-loop that functions post-transcriptionally as a sensor of cellular
RNase E activity (20). Elucidating the essential features of this 57-nt
5'-UTR element would be useful not only for understanding the mechanism
of RNase E feedback regulation but also for efforts to identify other
genes whose expression might be similarly regulated by this important ribonuclease.
Despite extensive sequence divergence, the 5'-UTR of the
Haemophilus influenzae and E. coli rne
transcripts share significant secondary-structure homology (20). We
first wished to address whether hp2 of Haemophilus rne
mRNA could substitute functionally for the corresponding E. coli stem-loop in mediating RNase E feedback regulation in
E. coli. These studies were performed in the context of an
rne-lacZ reporter (ez
To facilitate the construction of hp2 substitution mutants, we first
introduced two additional G-C base pairs at the base of hp2 to create a
unique ApaI restriction site (GGGCCC) in the reporter gene
(Fig. 2). These additional base pairs did not significantly affect the
sensitivity of the reporter mRNA to feedback regulation by RNase E,
as determined by comparing
We then replaced hp2 of ez8 with the corresponding stem-loop
of the H. influenzae rne transcript (ez8hp2Hinf;
Fig. 2). Despite numerous differences in sequence and secondary
structure between the Haemophilus and E. coli
stem-loops, this hp2 replacement had almost no effect on feedback
regulation (R = 9.8 ± 2.3). This finding suggests
that the features of hp2 that are critical for feedback regulation in
E. coli are conserved in the Haemophilus stem-loop.
To determine which of the conserved features of rne hp2 are
most important for feedback regulation, this stem-loop was divided conceptually into three subdomains. One was an 8-nt internal loop near
the top of hp2, a region of the stem-loop whose sequence is especially
well conserved between Haemophilus and E. coli
(Fig. 2). The other two subdomains were the hairpin loop and 2-bp stem above this internal loop and the long imperfect stem below it. Each of
these subdomains was examined by mutational analysis.
Sequence Requirements Within the Internal Loop of rne hp2--
To
identify which nucleotides in the 8-nt internal loop of E. coli
rne hp2 (CA
The libraries were each transformed into E. coli cells
containing a high concentration of RNase E due to the presence of a multicopy rne plasmid (pRNE101). The high level of RNase E
activity in these cells allowed reporter mRNAs susceptible to
feedback repression to be identified on the basis of the pale color of bacterial colonies grown on LB-agar plates containing the chromogenic
A total of 1202 colonies were screened from the hp2IL-bot
library (CA
In contrast to the hp2IL-bot library, the
hp2IL-top library (CA
Additional information about the key features of the internal loop was
gleaned from close inspection of the repression ratios for each
functional sequence variant within the hp2IL-top library and
from the creation of additional site-directed mutants. For example, the
potential for Watson-Crick base pairing between positions N2 and N3 appears to partially impair the
ability of hp2 to mediate feedback regulation. In the double mutant
hp2IL-2U,3A (CA
In none of the functional sequence variants was cytosine observed at
N2. Although cytosine at this position would be capable of
pairing with a wild-type guanine base at N3, it would not
be able to form a Watson-Crick base pair with adenine at
N3, a nucleotide substitution that is itself well-tolerated
(hp2IL-3A in Fig. 4). To determine the effect of cytosine at
N2 in either of these sequence contexts, we constructed two
additional variants: hp2IL-2C (CA
Position N5 shows considerable sequence flexibility, with
adenine (wild-type), cytosine, or uracil present at this position in
functional transcripts. The reporter transcript with cytosine at
position N5 was fully sensitive to feedback repression by
RNase E (R = 10.7 ± 0.6 for hp2IL-5C;
Fig. 4). The presence of uracil at this position only partially
impaired feedback regulation when this substitution was accompanied by
guanine at position N2, which by itself does not affect
feedback regulation (R = 6.8 ± 0.7 for hp2IL-2G,5U versus 14.7 ± 1.2 for
hp2IL-2G; Fig. 4). The same uracil substitution had a more
deleterious effect in the context of the naturally occurring adenine at
position N2 (R = 4.1 ± 0.2 for
hp2IL-5U; Fig. 5). Introducing guanine at position
N5 severely impaired feedback regulation (R = 1.9 ± 0.2 for hp2IL-5G; Fig. 5), as expected from
the absence of this substitution among the functional reporters in the
hp2IL-top library (Fig. 4). Other nucleotide substitutions
that did not appear among the functional hp2 variants in the
hp2IL-top and hp2IL-bot libraries
(IL-4G, IL-6U, IL-7U,
IL-7A) were likewise found to be deleterious for feedback
regulation (Fig. 5).
The Hairpin Loop at the Top of rne hp2--
Other features of
rne hp2 that may contribute to feedback regulation include
the hairpin loop (AAUG) and 2-bp stem at the top. The importance of the
hairpin loop was evaluated by mutational analysis (Fig.
6). Mutating all four nucleotides of this
loop (hp2mut4: AAUG The Lower Stem of rne hp2--
The internal loop and hairpin loop
of E. coli rne hp2 sit atop a tall, imperfectly base-paired
stem. To determine whether the sequence of this lower portion of hp2
contributes to feedback regulation, we replaced all of hp2 below the
internal loop (a total of 41 nucleotides, including 14 Watson-Crick and
wobble (G-U) base pairs and three small internal loops) with 13 base pairs differing in sequence from wild-type at all but the three bottom-most positions and the position immediately beneath the internal
loop (hp2bot-syn; Fig. 7). The
resulting reporter transcript remained fully sensitive to feedback
regulation (R = 12.1 ± 0.3). The ez8
reporter also retained its sensitivity to feedback regulation when the
G-C base pair directly below the internal loop was mutated to a C-G
pair (hp2CG; R = 9.1 ± 1.0). These
findings indicate that neither the sequence of the stem below the
internal loop of rne hp2 nor the base-pairing imperfections
within this lower stem are important for efficient feedback regulation
in E. coli.
Phylogenetic Analysis of rne hp2--
The mutational studies
described above identify features of rne hp2 that are
important for RNase E autoregulation in E. coli. Natural
sequence variation among bacterial species provides an independent
source of information as to the key features of this stem-loop. We
compared the sequences of rne hp2 from nine species (Fig.
8). These phylogenetic data indicate that
the sequence and secondary structure of the upper portion of hp2,
comprising the internal loop, the hairpin loop, and the 2-bp stem
between them, is conserved in evolution and therefore likely to have an
important function.
Especially well conserved in sequence is the 8-nt internal loop, which
has the consensus sequence CD
Except for the highly conserved G-C base pair immediately beneath the
internal loop, the lower portion of hp2 shows the greatest variability
in sequence and secondary structure, ranging in size from 32 nt
(including 12 base pairs) to 41 nt (including 17 base pairs) and
bearing diverse internal loops at disparate locations. This high degree
of variability is in agreement with our finding that the sequence and
secondary structure of the lower stem of hp2 can be changed
significantly without impairing feedback regulation.
An important step in elucidating post-transcriptional gene
regulation is to identify the features of mRNAs that determine their lifetimes in vivo. Previous studies have shown that
RNase E tightly autoregulates its synthesis in E. coli via a
mechanism in which rne hp2, a sensory element within the
5'-UTR, modulates rne mRNA longevity in response to
changes in cellular RNase E activity (19, 20). We have now identified
evolutionarily conserved features in the upper portion of
rne hp2 that are crucial for its ability to mediate
efficient feedback regulation of RNase E synthesis. These include an
8-nt internal loop and the 2-bp stem and hairpin loop above it.
The core recognition element within rne hp2 is an internal
loop comprising two nucleotides on one strand and six nucleotides on
the other. Point mutations within this internal loop can abolish hp2
function in E. coli. At five of the eight positions
(N1 = C; N4 = U; N6 = A;
N7 = G; N8 = A), no sequence variation is
tolerated, whereas at three other positions (N2 = A, G, or
U; N3 = A or G; N5 = A, C, or U) some sequence
variation is permitted (Fig.
9A). Consistent with these
findings is the limited sequence variation that occurs naturally for
this rne internal loop in several related bacterial species,
where the sequence is strictly conserved at six of the eight positions
and observed to vary only at positions N2 (A, G, or U) and
N3 (A or G) (Fig. 9B).
Critical Features of a Conserved RNA Stem-loop Important for
Feedback Regulation of RNase E Synthesis*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Sequence and secondary structure of the
E. coli rne 5'-UTR. The
secondary structure of this 5'-UTR was determined previously (3).
Brackets delineate the boundaries of its component
structural domains (hp1, ss1, hp2,
ss2, hp3, ss3). Numbering
indicates distance from the 5' terminus. The Shine-Dalgarno element and
translation initiation codon are underlined.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
(ara,
leu)7697,
leuX74 galU
galK
hsr
hsm+ strA) (22). CH1828 carries a
chromosomal rne missense mutation (ams-1) that
reduces cellular RNase E activity at 37 °C (19). Plasmid pRNE101 is
a pACYC177 derivative bearing the wild-type E. coli rne
gene; the presence of this multicopy plasmid in CH1827 causes RNase E
to be overproduced at ~2.8 times its normal cellular concentration
(19).
114-337 is a pSC101 derivative bearing an
rne-lacZ fusion that comprises the rne promoter,
all of the 361-nt rne 5'-UTR except nucleotides 114-337,
and the first 181 rne codons fused in-frame to the tenth
codon of lacZ (20). To construct plasmid pEZ8, a unique
ApaI restriction site was created in pEZ
114-337 by
inserting two guanidylate residues between nucleotides 53 and 54 and
two cytidylate residues between nucleotides 106 and 107 of the
rne 5'-UTR, resulting in two additional G-C base pairs at
the base of rne hp2. Plasmid pEZ8hp2Hinf was constructed by inserting a DNA fragment encoding hp2 of Haemophilus influenzae rne mRNA
(GGGCCCTGTTGGTGAAAACTCAATGCAGCAATTGGCATAAGACATTGATAATCAACATTAGCTGTACA) between the ApaI and BsrGI restriction sites of
pEZ8. In plasmid pEZ8
hp2, the segment between the ApaI
and BsrGI sites of pEZ8, including hp2 and ss2, was replaced
with a short linker
(GGGCCCGCGGCCCAGTTAGCTGTACA), whereas in
pEZ8NcoI, the same pEZ8 segment was replaced with a different linker
(GGGCCCGTGCCATGGTGCTGTACA). Plasmids
pEZ8hp2mut4, pEZ8hp2mut2T, pEZ8hp2mut3T, and pEZ8hp2mut2B are
derivatives of pEZ8 that each encode mutations in the hairpin loop at
the top of rne hp2 (AAUG
GGAA,
AGAG, AUUCG, and GAUA,
respectively). Plasmids pEZ8hp2IL-5U, pEZ8hp2IL-5G, pEZ8hp2IL-2C, and
pEZ8hp2IL-2C,3A are derivatives of pEZ8 that each encode mutations in
the 8-nt internal loop near the top of rne hp2 (CA
GUAAGA
CA
GUUAGA, CA
GUGAGA,
CC
GUAAGA, and CC
AUAAGA,
respectively). Plasmid pEZ8hp2+2bp is a pEZ8 derivative encoding a
mutant reporter mRNA in which two base pairs have been inserted
into the 2-bp stem near the top of rne hp2 (GCAATGGC
GCGCAATGGCGC). Plasmid pEZ8hp2bot-syn was
constructed from pEZ8 by replacing the segment between the ApaI and BsrGI sites with the sequence
GGGCCCGCATGCAGCAATGGCGTAAGACATGCGGGCCCAGTTAGCTGTACA. Plasmid pEZ8hp2CG is a pEZ8 derivative that encodes a G-C
C-G base pair substitution just beneath the 8-nt internal loop of hp2.
hp2 (blue colonies). Reporter plasmids sensitive to RNase E
overproduction were purified and transformed into E. coli
strains CH1828 and CH1827 + pRNE101 for quantitative measurements of
-galactosidase activity.
-Galactosidase assays
were performed as previously described (21). For each
rne-lacZ reporter, a repression ratio was calculated by
dividing the
-galactosidase activity in CH1828 host cells (low RNase
E activity) by the
-galactosidase activity in CH1827 + pRNE101 host
cells (high RNase E activity). The reported repression ratios are each
the average of three or more measurements. Error estimates correspond
to the standard deviation of these measurements.
RUHAGA (where D = A, G, or U; R = A or G; H = A, C, or U), flanked below by a
3-bp stem and above by a 2-bp stem and a 4- to 6-nt hairpin loop
whose sequence was not constrained. Strict search criteria allowed only
canonical base pairs in the 3- and 2-bp stems, as observed in nature.
Only elements present on the coding strand of each gene were considered.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
114-337; Fig.
2) in which all of the E. coli
rne 5'-UTR, except hp3, and the first 181 codons of the rne coding region were fused in-frame to lacZ.
Expression of ez
114-337 in E. coli
is very sensitive to the cellular level of RNase E activity, which
modulates the longevity of the reporter transcript (19, 20). Previous
experiments have shown that, in the absence of hp3, feedback regulation
of rne-lacZ expression is almost entirely dependent on the
presence of hp2, thereby allowing the effects of hp2 mutations to be
fully manifested (20).

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Feedback regulation of rne-lacZ
chimeras. A, sequence and secondary structure of
the 5'-UTR of ez8 mRNA. This 5'-UTR differs from that of
E. coli rne mRNA in that hp3 and the first
nine nucleotides of ss3 have been deleted, a single nucleotide (C) has
been inserted near the 5' boundary of the remaining ss3 segment to
create a BsrGI site, and two G-C base pairs have been added
near the bottom of hp2 to create an ApaI site. The
Shine-Dalgarno element and translation initiation codon are
underlined. B, effect of hp2 substitutions on
feedback regulation. Plasmids encoding
ez
114-337, ez8,
ez8
hp2, or ez8hp2Hinf mRNA were
introduced into an isogenic pair of lacZ
E. coli strains: CH1827 (rne+)
containing the multicopy rne+ plasmid pRNE101
(high RNase E activity) and CH1828 (ams-1; low RNase E
activity). Cellular
-galactosidase activity was measured in extracts
prepared from log-phase bacterial cultures, and repression ratios were
calculated by dividing the
-galactosidase activity in CH1828 cells
by the
-galactosidase activity in CH1827 cells containing pRNE101.
The reported values are each the average of three or more measurements.
Errors correspond to the standard deviation of these measurements. Each
of the four hp2 variants compared in these experiments is shown, with
gray rectangles enclosing the regions that differ from
wild-type rne hp2 of E. coli.
-galactosidase production from this new
reporter (ez8) in isogenic lacZ
E. coli host strains with low (CH1828) or high (CH1827 + pRNE101) levels of cellular RNase E activity. The observed repression
ratio (R, the ratio of
-galactosidase activity in the
CH1828 host versus the CH1827 + pRNE101 host), which is a
direct measure of the degree to which expression of the
rne-lacZ fusion can be inhibited by RNase E, was
approximately the same for ez8 (R = 10.4 ± 2.0) and the original ez
114-337
reporter (R = 11.1 ± 2.1). As expected, when hp2 was instead replaced with an unrelated stem-loop
(UUGGGCCCGCGGCCCAG), sensitivity to cellular RNase E activity was
nearly abolished (R = 2.4 ± 0.2 for
ez8
hp2).
GUAAGA) are most important for feedback regulation, we created two combinatorial libraries in which the sequence of each
half of the internal loop was randomized in the context of the
ez8 reporter (hp2IL-top:
CN2
N3N4N5AGA and
hp2IL-bot:
N1A
GUAN6N7N8). We
chose to divide the internal loop into halves, as the maximum complexity of each library would equal 256 (44), a
relatively manageable number of sequence combinations. In contrast,
simultaneously randomizing all eight positions in a single library
would greatly increase the potential complexity of the library to
65,536 (48), making it much less likely that all sequence
combinations would be represented.
-galactosidase substrate X-gal. The color of these transformants was
compared with that of colonies with an rne-lacZ reporter
either containing (ez8) or lacking (ez8
hp2) a
functional hp2 sequence. Reporter plasmids were purified from colonies
that were as pale as those containing the parent plasmid (pEZ8) and
retransformed into isogenic E. coli strains containing low
or high RNase E activity. For each plasmid, a repression ratio was
calculated by comparing levels of
-galactosidase activity in the two
host strains.
GUAAGA
N1A
GUAN6N7N8). Nearly
all of these colonies were as blue as colonies expressing a reporter
deficient for feedback regulation (ez8
hp2). This finding
seemed to imply that the sequence requirements for the bottom half of
the internal loop were strict. Indeed, only two colonies in this
combinatorial library contained reporters with repression ratios
similar to that of a reporter (ez8) that has a wild-type
internal loop sequence (R = 12.7 ± 1.9 for
hp2IL-bot#7 and 15.2 ± 3.4 for hp2IL-bot#8
versus 10.4 ± 2.0 for ez8; Fig.
3). DNA sequencing revealed that the
internal loops of these two reporters were identical in sequence to
that of wild-type E. coli hp2. These results indicate that
only the wild-type sequence of nucleotides is tolerated at positions
N1 (C), N6 (A), N7 (G), and
N8 (A) of the internal loop.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Analysis of a combinatorial library of
rne-lacZ reporters bearing a randomized sequence in
the lower half of the hp2 internal loop. Members of the
hp2IL-bot library that appeared to be sensitive to feedback
regulation on the basis of colony color were introduced into the
isogenic E. coli strains CH1828 (low RNase E activity) and
CH1827 + pRNE101 (high RNase E activity). Cellular
-galactosidase
activity and repression ratios were measured as in Fig. 2. Among the
1202 library members that were screened, only two (#7 and
#8) were found to be sensitive to feedback regulation, and
both of these had an internal loop that was identical in sequence to
that of wild-type E. coli rne hp2. To the
right is a diagram of the upper portion of hp2; the
nucleotides in the internal loop that were randomized in the
hp2IL-bot library (N1,
N6, N7, and
N8) are enclosed in boxes.
GUAAGA
CN2
N3N4N5AGA) gave
rise to colonies with a wide range of color intensities on X-gal
plates. Among a total of 3580 colonies, several contained reporter
genes that were functional for feedback regulation (defined as having a
repression ratio greater than 6.0), with repression ratios ranging from
7 to 15. This variation in the repression ratios suggested more relaxed sequence requirements in the upper half of the internal loop. Sequencing of eleven library members that were functional for feedback
regulation confirmed this prediction (Fig.
4). Although the nucleotide at position
N4 (U) was invariant, sequence variation was observed at
positions N2 (A, G, or U), N3 (A or G), and
N5 (A, C, or U). Although the wild-type E. coli
sequence was not isolated in this screen, the repeated isolation of
four variants (hp2IL-2G, hp2IL-2U,
hp2IL-3A, and hp2IL-5C) suggested that we had
identified most internal loop sequences in the library that were
competent for feedback regulation.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Analysis of a combinatorial library of
rne-lacZ reporters bearing a randomized sequence in
the upper half of the hp2 internal loop. Members of the
hp2IL-top library that appeared to be sensitive to feedback
regulation on the basis of colony color were introduced into the
isogenic E. coli strains CH1828 (low RNase E activity) and
CH1827 + pRNE101 (high RNase E activity). Cellular
-galactosidase
activity and repression ratios were measured as in Fig. 2. Nucleotides
that deviated from the sequence of wild-type E. coli
rne hp2 are underlined. To the right
is a diagram of the upper portion of hp2; the nucleotides in the
internal loop that were randomized in the hp2IL-top library
(N2, N3, N4,
and N5) are enclosed in boxes. Four hp2
variants (IL-2G, IL-2U, IL-3A, and
IL-5C) were isolated from the library on two independent
occasions.
GUAAGA
CU
AUAAGA), where Watson-Crick base
pairing is possible between uracil at N2 and adenine at
N3, there is a 35% reduction in the repression ratio
relative to the wild-type sequence (R = 6.9 ± 0.4 for hp2IL-2U,3A versus 10.4 ± 2.0 for ez8; Fig. 4). In contrast, the same substitutions
made individually at N2 or N3 lack the potential for Watson-Crick base pairing and have no detrimental effect
on feedback regulation (R = 10.6 ± 1.3 for
hp2IL-2U and 12.6 ± 0.8 for hp2IL-3A; Fig.
4).
GUAAGA
CC
GUAAGA) and hp2IL-2C,3A
(CA
GUAAGA
CC
AUAAGA). In the context of guanine at
N3, the presence of cytosine at N2 severely
impaired feedback regulation, causing the reporter to be scarcely more sensitive to cellular RNase E activity than a reporter lacking hp2
altogether (R = 3.6 ± 0.2 for hp2IL-2C
versus 2.4 ± 0.2 for ez8
hp2; Fig.
5). Eliminating the potential for
Watson-Crick base pairing between N2 and N3 by
substituting both cytosine at N2 and adenine at
N3 resulted in only a partial restoration of feedback regulation (R = 4.7 ± 0.4 for
hp2IL-2C,3A versus 3.6 ± 0.2 for hp2IL-2C and 12.6 ± 0.8 for hp2IL-3A; Figs.
4 and 5). These findings indicate that cytosine is intrinsically not
well tolerated at position N2, quite apart from its base
pairing potential.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of site-directed mutations in the
internal loop of rne hp2. Derivatives of
ez8 bearing site-directed mutations within the internal loop
of rne hp2 were introduced into the isogenic E. coli strains CH1828 (low RNase E activity) and CH1827 + pRNE101
(high RNase E activity). Cellular
-galactosidase activity and
repression ratios were measured as in Fig. 2. Nucleotides that deviated
from the sequence of wild-type E. coli rne hp2
are underlined. To the right is a diagram of the
upper portion of wild-type hp2; the nucleotides in the internal loop
that were targeted for site-directed mutagenesis are enclosed in
boxes.
GGAA)
significantly impaired but did not abolish feedback regulation
(R = 4.7 ± 0.4 for hp2mut4
versus 2.4 ± 0.2 for ez8
hp2), as did
replacing only the top two nucleotides of the loop with two dissimilar
nucleotides (hp2mut2T: AAUG
AGAG; R = 4.8 ± 0.5). Nonetheless,
there is no sequence feature of the hairpin loop that is absolutely
required. Thus, substituting three dissimilar nucleotides for the top
two nucleotides of the loop (hp2mut3T: AAUG
AUUCG) did not impair feedback regulation
(R = 9.9 ± 1.0), and mutating the bottom two
nucleotides of the loop (hp2mut2B:
AAUG
GAUA) caused
only a mild reduction in the repression ratio (R = 8.4 ± 0.8). These findings indicate that the hairpin loop at the
top of rne hp2 makes a significant contribution to feedback
regulation by RNase E but in a manner that cannot readily be predicted
by merely examining the loop sequence. A significant regulatory defect
was also observed when the 2-bp stem that separates the hairpin loop
from the 8-nt internal loop was doubled in length (R = 4.0 ± 0.5 for hp2+2bp), suggesting that the distance
and orientation of the hairpin loop with respect to the internal loop are also important.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect of mutations in the hairpin loop and
upper stem of rne hp2. Derivatives of
ez8 bearing site-directed mutations within the hairpin loop
and uppermost stem of rne hp2 were introduced into the
isogenic E. coli strains CH1828 (low RNase E activity) and
CH1827 + pRNE101 (high RNase E activity). Cellular
-galactosidase
activity and repression ratios were measured as in Fig. 2. Only the
upper portion of hp2 is shown. Substituted or inserted nucleotides that
deviated from the sequence of wild-type E. coli
rne hp2 are enclosed in gray rectangles.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effect of mutations in the lower stem of
rne hp2. Derivatives of ez8 bearing
site-directed mutations within the lower stem of rne hp2
were introduced into the isogenic E. coli strains CH1828
(low RNase E activity) and CH1827 + pRNE101 (high RNase E activity).
Cellular
-galactosidase activity and repression ratios were measured
as in Fig. 2. Substituted nucleotides that differed from wild-type
E. coli rne hp2 are enclosed in gray
rectangles.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Comparison of rne hp2 from
nine bacterial species. A hp2-like element was identified upstream
of the rne coding region in nine bacterial species. A
sequence and likely secondary structure is shown for each. Sequence
data for Vibrio cholera was previously published (24).
Preliminary sequence data for Actinobacillus
actinomycetemcomitans was obtained from The Institute for Genomic
Research website at www.tigr.org. Preliminary sequence data for
Klebsiella pneumoniae was obtained from the Genome
Sequencing Center, Washington University website at
genome.wustl.edu.
RUAAGA (where D = A, G, or U and
R = A or G, with no potential for Watson-Crick base pairing
between these two nucleotides). Except for the absence of phylogenetic
variation at N5, this consensus sequence agrees perfectly
with the results of mutational analysis. Also well conserved in length
and sequence is the 2-bp stem above this internal loop, consistent with
our finding that feedback regulation is impaired when this short stem
is extended. The hairpin loop at the top of rne hp2 shows
somewhat greater evolutionary variation, ranging in size from four to
five nucleotides with the consensus sequence AN(N)NG (where N is a
nucleotide of unspecified identity). The lack of sequence variation at
the first and last positions of the hairpin loop is unexpected in view
of our finding that these two nucleotides can be mutated without
adversely affecting feedback regulation in E. coli.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Summary of the essential features of
rne hp2. A, diagram of the upper
portion of hp2 summarizing the sequence features of the internal loop
that are necessary for efficient feedback regulation in E. coli, as determined by mutational analysis. N
N, Watson-Crick
base pair. (N), optional fifth nucleotide in the hairpin
loop. B, a similar diagram depicting the consensus sequence
of nine natural variants of rne hp2, as determined by
comparing the stem-loops shown in Fig. 8. These variants all have at
least three consecutive Watson-Crick base pairs below the internal
loop, and all are topped by hairpin loops 4-5 nt in length.
C, model for rne hp2 function in E. coli. An RNA-binding domain of RNase E or an associated protein
binds to the upper portion of rne hp2, thereby facilitating
access of the ribonuclease active site to one or more cleavage sites
elsewhere in the rne transcript.
Above the internal loop of rne hp2, between nucleotides N2 and N3, are a 2-bp stem and a 4-5 nt hairpin loop that also contribute to hp2 recognition. In the rne transcripts of related bacterial species, the sequence of this hairpin loop varies at all but the first and last positions (Fig. 9B). Nonetheless, nucleotide substitutions at these two conserved positions can have little effect on hp2 function in E. coli, whereas substitutions at the nonconserved positions can significantly reduce the efficiency of feedback regulation when they deviate from variations observed naturally in other bacterial species (Figs. 6 and 8; note that the hairpin loop of hp2mut3T is identical to that of rne hp2 in Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, whereas the hairpin loop of hp2mut2T is unlike any known hp2 variant in nature). The length of the short stem between the hairpin loop and internal loop is critical, hp2 function being markedly impaired by increasing the size of this stem from 2 to 4 bp (Fig. 6). On the other hand, the sequence of this 2-bp stem is inconsequential (20) despite its evolutionary conservation. Together, these findings suggest that the shape of the short stem and hairpin loop at the top of hp2 may be more important for recognition than their sequence per se and that the crucial features of this shape have been conserved during evolution despite sequence divergence.
The 8-nt internal loop of hp2 is situated atop a tall, imperfectly paired stem whose sequence, mispairings, and length are poorly conserved in evolution. Our data show that the sequence of this lower stem, including a highly conserved G-C base pair directly beneath the 8-nt internal loop, is unimportant (Fig. 7). Consequently, this portion of hp2 can be replaced with a perfectly base-paired stem having a different sequence without affecting feedback regulation. The lower stem of hp2 may serve simply as a pedestal for the upper portion of hp2, helping to ensure its proper folding and to improve its accessibility to the cellular factor that mediates its function.
Together, our findings suggest a model for rne hp2 recognition in which RNase E or a hypothetical protein cofactor makes intimate, sequence-specific contact with the 8-nt internal loop and backbone contact with the upper stem and hairpin loop (Fig. 9C). In vitro experiments suggest that hp2 itself is not a target for RNase E cleavage.2 Nonetheless, by increasing the local concentration of RNase E, binding to hp2 could help the ribonuclease gain access to one or more cleavage sites elsewhere in the rne transcript, thereby accelerating rne mRNA degradation. The fact that base pairs can be removed from (hp2bot-syn) or added to (ez8) the bottom of hp2 without impairing its function suggests that the precise spatial relationship between the upper portion of this stem-loop and other regions of the rne 5'-UTR is relatively inconsequential.
Besides hp2, the only other domain of the rne 5'-UTR that is known to contribute appreciably to feedback regulation is rne hp3 (Fig. 1); however, this branched stem-loop is not required, and its role is not known (20). Previous experiments have shown that a putative RNase E cleavage site in the single-stranded segment (ss1) that precedes hp2 can be removed without impairing regulation (19, 20). Likewise, the rne coding region appears not to contribute in cis to feedback regulation, because an rne-lacZ reporter in which the fifth rne codon has been fused to lacZ is tightly regulated by RNase E (23).
In comparison to a number of other E. coli genes, expression of the rne gene is unusually sensitive to the cellular level of RNase E activity (19). The identification of the key sequence features of rne hp2 provides a basis for searching the genomes of E. coli and related microorganisms for other genes encoding similar elements that may render those genes particularly sensitive to feedback regulation by RNase E. Using strict search criteria based on the essential features of hp2 to examine the sequences of the E. coli, Yersinia pestis, and H. influenzae genomes (see "Experimental Procedures"), rne was the only gene found to encode a hp2-like stem-loop in all three species. Two other mRNAs in E. coli and one in Y. pestis have the potential to form a similar stem-loop, but in each case this potential is of questionable significance due to its lack of conservation in either of the other two bacterial species that were examined. Using more relaxed criteria, additional candidates for possible hp2 homologs were identified, but again none were conserved in all three species. We conclude that hp2 most likely is a unique evolutionary adaptation of the rne gene that enables its expression to be tightly regulated by cellular RNase E activity.
Examination of the RNase E genes of bacterial organisms that are only distantly related to E. coli suggests that their rne transcripts may lack a recognizable homolog of hp2 upstream of the coding region. Either RNase E synthesis is not autoregulated in those species, or its autoregulation is mediated in cis by an element distinct from hp2.
The precision with which E. coli cells regulate RNase E
synthesis is crucial for properly controlling rates of mRNA decay and for sustaining cell growth (18). Knowing the critical features of
rne hp2 should be of considerable value in elucidating the molecular mechanism by which this regulatory stem-loop senses the
cellular concentration of RNase E and modulates rne gene
expression through changes in rne mRNA longevity.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are grateful to Manisha Narasimhan and Helena Celesnik for help in constructing combinatorial libraries and site-directed mutants.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This research was supported by Grant GM35769 (to J. G. B.) from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Skirball Institute of
Biomolecular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 540 First Ave., New York, NY 10016. Tel.: 212-263-5409; Fax: 212-263-8951; E-mail: belasco@saturn.med.nyu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202313200
2 A. Diwa and J. G. Belasco, unpublished data.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
UTR, untranslated
region;
nt, nucleotide(s);
X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Belasco, J. G. (1993) in Control of Messenger RNA Stability (Belasco, J. G. , and Brawerman, G., eds) , pp. 3-12, Academic Press, San Diego |
| 2. | Nilsson, G., Belasco, J. G., Cohen, S. N., and von Gabain, A. (1984) Nature 312, 75-77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Resnekov, O.,
Rutberg, L.,
and von Gabain, A.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
8355-8359 |
| 4. |
Klug, G.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
1765-1769 |
| 5. | Rauhut, R., and Klug, G. (1999) FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23, 353-370[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Apirion, D.
(1978)
Genetics
90,
659-671 |
| 7. | Ono, M., and Kuwano, M. (1979) J. Mol. Biol. 129, 343-357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Mudd, E. A., Krisch, H. M., and Higgins, C. F. (1990) Mol. Microbiol. 4, 2127-2135[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Babitzke, P.,
and Kushner, S. R.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
1-5 |
| 10. | Melefors, Ö., and von Gabain, A. (1991) Mol. Microbiol. 5, 857-864[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Taraseviciene, L., Miczak, A., and Apirion, D. (1991) Mol. Microbiol. 5, 851-855[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
McDowall, K. J.,
Lin-Chao, S.,
and Cohen, S. N.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10790-10796 |
| 13. |
Lin-Chao, S.,
Wong, T.-T.,
McDowall, K. J.,
and Cohen, S. N.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10797-10803 |
| 14. | Bouvet, P., and Belasco, J. G. (1992) Nature 360, 488-491[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Mackie, G. A. (1998) Nature 395, 720-723[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Arnold, T. E., Yu, J., and Belasco, J. G. (1998) RNA (N. Y.) 4, 319-330[Abstract] |
| 17. |
Claverie-Martin, F.,
Diaz-Torres, M. R.,
Yancey, S. D.,
and Kushner, S. R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
2843-2851 |
| 18. | Jain, C., Deana, A., and Belasco, J. G. (2002) Mol. Microbiol. 43, 1053-1064[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Jain, C.,
and Belasco, J. G.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
84-96 |
| 20. |
Diwa, A.,
Bricker, A. L.,
Jain, C.,
and Belasco, J. G.
(2000)
Genes Dev.
14,
1249-1260 |
| 21. | Jain, C., and Belasco, J. G. (2000) Methods Enzymol. 318, 309-332[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Mudd, E. A., and Higgins, C. F. (1993) Mol. Microbiol. 9, 557-568[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Diwa, A. (2001) Autoregulation of RNase E: Features of rne Messenger RNA and RNase E That Are Important for Feedback RegulationPh.D. thesis , New York University |
| 24. | Heidelberg, J. F., Eisen, J. A., Nelson, W. C., Clayton, R. A., Gwinn, M. L., Dodson, R. J., Haft, D. H., Hickey, E. K., Peterson, J. D., Umayam, L., Gill, S. R., Nelson, K. E., Read, T. D., Tettelin, H., Richardson, D., Ermolaeva, M. D., Vamathevan, J., Bass, S., Qin, H., Dragoi, I., Sellers, P., McDonald, L., Utterback, T., Fleishmann, R. D., Nierman, W. C., and White, O. (2000) Nature 406, 477-483[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Perwez, D. Hami, V. F. Maples, Z. Min, B.-C. Wang, and S. R. Kushner Intragenic suppressors of temperature-sensitive rne mutations lead to the dissociation of RNase E activity on mRNA and tRNA substrates in Escherichia coli Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2008; 36(16): 5306 - 5318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||