![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 20535-20540, June 7, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Cardiovascular Branch, NHLBI, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1622
Received for publication, February 15, 2002, and in revised form, March 28, 2002
The Cdc25 family of dual specific phosphatases
are critical components of cell cycle progression and checkpoint
control. Certain stresses such as ultraviolet light stimulate the rapid
and selective destruction of Cdc25A protein through a Chk1 protein
kinase-dependent pathway. We demonstrate that in contrast
to cellular stresses previously examined, hydrogen peroxide exposure
affects Cdc25C but not Cdc25A levels. Pharmacological inhibition of
Chk1 activity or a mutant of Cdc25C that lacks the Chk1 phosphorylation
site still undergoes degradation in response to oxidants. We also
demonstrate that in vitro hydrogen peroxide stimulates an
intramolecular disulfide bond between the active site cysteine at
position 377 and another invariant cysteine at position 330. The
in vivo stability of Cdc25C is substantially reduced by the
mutation of either of these two cysteine residues. In contrast, a
double (C2) mutant of both cysteine 330 and cysteine 377 results in a
protein that is more stable than wild type Cdc25C and is resistant to
oxidative stress-induced degradation. In addition, the C2 mutant, which
is unable to form an intramolecular disulfide bond, has reduced binding
to 14-3-3 in vitro and in vivo. These results
suggest that oxidative stress may induce cell cycle arrest in part
through the degradation of Cdc25C.
Three different human Cdc25 family members exist with Cdc25A
regulating the G1/S transition and Cdc25B and Cdc25C
involved in G2/M progression. Evidence suggests that two
critical amino acids, threonine 14 and tyrosine 15, located within the
cyclin-dependent kinases represent the major target for the
Cdc25 family of protein phosphatases. Dephosphorylation of these two
critical amino acid residues is essential for proper cell cycle
progression and the subsequent association of
cyclin-dependent kinases with their associated cyclins
(1).
Given their crucial role in cell cycle progression and checkpoint
control, the regulation of the activity of the various Cdc25 family
members has been the subject of numerous investigations. For the case
of Cdc25C, enzymatic activity has been demonstrated to be low during
interphase, in part because the phosphatase is phosphorylated on serine
216. Various intracellular kinases including Chk1 appear to be capable
of phosphorylating Cdc25C on this residue (2-6). One of the important
functional consequences of phosphorylation of Ser-216 is to create a
consensus binding site for 14-3-3 protein binding (4). A variety of
evidence suggests that in human cells, the binding of 14-3-3 increases
the cytoplasmic localization of the protein (7-9). In addition to
14-3-3 binding, Cdc25C is also actively transported from the nucleus
through a leptomycin B-sensitive pathway that requires an N-terminal
nuclear export sequence (9).
Evidence suggests the existence of an additional mechanism besides the
phosphorylation and subcellular localization for regulation of Cdc25
activity. Three recent reports (10-12) have described the targeted
degradation of Cdc25A in response to UV light, ionizing radiation, or
stalled replication. For the case of UV light and stalled replication,
both studies demonstrated that inhibiting Chk1 kinase by agents such as
caffeine abolished stress-induced Cdc25A proteasomal-mediated
degradation. Interestingly, targeted degradation under these conditions
was specific for the Cdc25A gene product, because levels of Cdc25B and
Cdc25C were not affected by these stresses.
All members of the Cdc25 family and indeed all protein tyrosine
phosphatases possess a cysteine residue in their active site. This
cysteine is extremely reactive with pKa generally below a pH of 5.0. This low pKa stands in contrast
to most other cysteine residues in proteins that have a
pKa greater than 8.0. As such, at a physiological
pH, the active site of most tyrosine phosphatases is rapidly ionized to
a thiolate anion. Further oxidation can convert this thiolate anion to
a sulfenic acid intermediate that is enzymatically inactive
(13). Indeed, initial studies with purified Cdc25 phosphatases
demonstrated that enzymatic activity absolutely required the presence
of a millimolar concentration of reducing agents such as
DTT1 (14). Given the reactive
nature of the active site cysteine and the fact that the sulfenic form
of the cysteine is enzymatically inactive, the potential exists in that
members of the Cdc25 family may be in fact partially regulated by the
intracellular redox state. This notion is further supported by the
published structure of two Cdc25 family members demonstrating that the
active site cysteine could readily form an intramolecular disulfide
bond with another conserved cysteine in the molecule (15, 16). No
information is presently available regarding the physiological role, if
any, for this disulfide bond formation.
One potential benefit of having two reactive cysteines within the Cdc25
structure would be that an additional cysteine would facilitate the
formation of a disulfide bond that could potentially rescue the active
site cysteine from irreversible oxidation. Although it is generally
believed that cysteine sulfenic acid intermediates are readily
reversible by thiol reduction, the formation of higher oxidation states
such as sulfinic acid intermediates are thought to represent permanent
irreversible modifications. Because the active site cysteine is by its
very nature highly reactive and hence subject to oxidation, the ability
to form an intramolecular disulfide could represent a safety valve
mechanism to prevent irreversible cysteine oxidation.
In this report, we have examined the effects of oxidative stress on the
Cdc25 family of phosphatases. In contrast to other stresses examined to
date (10-12), oxidative stress does not affect Cdc25A levels. However,
we do observe that hydrogen peroxide results in the rapid degradation
of Cdc25C. We show that this degradation appears to be independent of
Chk1 activity but requires the presence of two cysteine residues
previously shown to be involved in disulfide bond formation.
Interestingly, our data also suggest that these cysteine residues are
important for the binding of Cdc25C to 14-3-3 and hence the subcellular
localization of the protein. These results suggest how alterations in
the intracellular redox state may potentially function in the
G2/M checkpoint as well as in normal cell cycle progression.
Cell Culture and Transfection--
HeLa cells were cultured in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with
10% fetal bovine serum. Cell transfection was routinely performed in a
6-cm dish using 5 µg of DNA and 15 µl of LipofectAMINE 2000 reagent
according to manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). For oxidative
challenge, we noted that the most reproducible results were obtained
under serum-free conditions. This may be a result of the presence of
high levels of catalase and other peroxidases in serum. As such,
transfected HeLa cells were first washed several times with serum-free
medium and then exposed to the indicated concentration of
H2O2. Except where noted, cells were routinely
treated with 1 mM H2O2 for three
hours prior to harvest. At the end of the treatment time, cells were
washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and subsequently
harvested in radioimmune precipitation buffer (PBS, 1% Tween 20, 1%
sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with protease inhibitors (CompleteTM Mixture, Roche Molecular Biochemicals). Lysates
were subsequently run on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and analyzed using
anti-Cdc25A (F6) or anti-Cdc25C (H6) mouse monoclonal antibodies
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Pharmacological inhibition of Chk1 was
achieved by pretreatment with 10 mM caffeine for one hour
prior to hydrogen peroxide exposure (10). For analysis of endogenous
Cdc25C, HeLa cells were grown to 80% confluence in 15-cm dishes.
Following exposure to hydrogen peroxide (1 mM for 3 h), protein lysate was immunoprecipitated with 5 µl of a mouse
monoclonal anti-Cdc25C (H6) antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and
processed for Western blot analysis as above.
Plasmids and Mutants Preparation--
Full-length human Cdc25A
cDNA was amplified from a commercially available IMAGE:3633880
clone (Incyte Genomics) (GenBankTM accession number
BE513548) and subsequently subcloned into a mammalian expression vector
(pcDNA3.1/HisA, Invitrogen). The Myc-tagged human Cdc25C
cDNA was kindly provided by Dr. H. Piwnica-Worms. This cDNA was
subcloned as described above into pcDNA3.1. Various mutants of
Cdc25C were prepared by a two-step PCR method (17). Single cysteine to
serine substitutions were created at positions 330 and 377, and a
double (C2) mutant containing both cysteine substitutions was also
constructed. A similar strategy was employed to create a serine to
alanine position 216 mutant. All constructs were verified by direct DNA
sequencing of the entire gene.
For bacterial expression of the C-terminal portion (amino acids
200-473) of wild type and C330S Cdc25C, constructs were subcloned into
the pET15b bacterial expression vector (Novagen). Protein was purified
from bacterial lysates using a Ni-affinity column. GST fusion proteins
were constructed by amplification of full-length wild type and C2
mutant genes and subcloned into the bacterial expression vector
pGEX-6P-3 (Amersham Biosciences).
Pulse-chase Analysis--
One day after transfection, HeLa cells
were incubated in cysteine and methionine-free Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium (labeling medium) for 1 h. Cells were then
exposed to fresh labeling medium supplemented with 0.1 mCi/ml
[35S]methionine (Amersham Biosciences) for 3 h.
Following the labeling period, cells were washed twice and subsequently
incubated in chase medium (10 mg/liter L-methionine, 10 mg/liter L-cysteine in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with cycloheximide at 10 µg/ml) for the indicated time.
Following the chase period, cells were lysed in 500 µl of radioimmune
precipitation buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors followed by
overnight immunoprecipitation using 5 µl of anti-Cdc25C (H6) mouse
monoclonal antibody per sample. Samples were run on a 12% PAGE-SDS gel
and subsequently fixed for 30 min (50% MeOH, 10% glacial acetic acid)
and then exposed to x-ray film overnight. Bands were analyzed by Scion
Image software (Scion Corporation). Results are representative of two
independent experiments.
Immunohistochemistry--
HeLa cells were seeded at a density of
7.5 × 104 cells/well in Lab-Tek II Chamber Slide
(Nunc) prior to transfection. One day after transfection, cells were
treated by leptomycin B (10 ng/ml for 3 h). Cells were washed four
times with PBS and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 30 min at
room temperature. Fixed cells were subsequently washed four times with
PBS and permeabilized for 1 h in PBS containing 5% goat serum and
0.1% Triton X-100. Cells were then exposed for 1 h to a 1:200
dilution of mouse monoclonal anti-Cdc25C (H6) antibody in the above
permeabilization buffer. Cells were again washed four times with PBS
and subsequently exposed for 1 h to a 1:200 dilution of AlexaFluor
secondary goat anti-mouse antibody (Molecular Probes). Subcellular
distribution of Cdc25C was analyzed using a Zeiss confocal microscope
(LSM-510).
In Vitro Binding of 14-3-3--
GST-Cdc25C fusion wild type and
C2 mutant proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli as
full-length proteins and purified by standard methods using
glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences). HeLa cell protein lysate
was prepared in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, proteasomal inhibitor
Complete mixture). HeLa cell protein lysate (100 µg) was then
incubated with Sepharose-bound GST-Cdc25C wild type or C2 mutant
protein either in the presence or absence of 10 mM DTT.
After 30 min at room temperature, Sepharose beads were washed four
times in lysis buffer, and bound proteins were eluted using 10 mM reduced glutathione in PBS, pH 8.0. Eluted proteins were
analyzed by Western blot for the amount of associated 14-3-3 protein
using an antibody that recognizes all 14-3-3 family members
(anti-14-3-3 mouse monoclonal antibody, clone H-8, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
Previous studies have demonstrated the targeted destruction of
Cdc25A in response to ultraviolet light or other checkpoint-inducing stresses (10-12). In addition, a number of reports have demonstrated that exposure to exogenous reactive oxygen species induces cell cycle
arrest (18-20). To understand whether cell cycle arrest under oxidative stress conditions triggered degradation of Cdc25A, we analyzed levels of the phosphatase following exposure to hydrogen peroxide. As seen in Fig. 1, the levels
of Cdc25A were not noticeably affected by the treatment of cells with 1 mM hydrogen peroxide. In contrast to the lack of effect
seen with Cdc25A, the levels of Cdc25C rapidly decreased following
exposure to exogenous hydrogen peroxide (Fig.
2A). This decrease in protein
level was evident as soon as 30 min following oxidant challenge. Lower
concentrations of hydrogen peroxide were also effective in reducing
Cdc25C levels. As noted in Fig. 2B, hydrogen peroxide
concentrations as low as 250 µM resulted in noticeable
decreases in Cdc25C levels. Given that under these conditions Cdc25A
and Cdc25C were expressed off the same heterologous promoter, the most
likely explanation for these results is that hydrogen peroxide results
in a change in protein stability. To further confirm this finding, we
measured protein stability of wild type Cdc25C in the presence or
absence of hydrogen peroxide. Pulse-chase analysis demonstrated that
protein half-life was significantly reduced in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (Fig. 2C). Similar results were also observed with
endogenous protein. As seen in Fig. 2D, the levels of
endogenous Cdc25C fell significantly following brief oxidative
stress.
Previous studies with ultraviolet light-induced Cdc25A destruction
demonstrated a role for Chk1-mediated phosphorylation. In particular,
the treatment of cells with caffeine, an agent that inhibits Chk1
activity, blocked UV-mediated Cdc25A degradation. To test whether
similar mechanisms existed for oxidant-induced Cdc25C-mediated
degradation, we treated cells with caffeine prior to hydrogen peroxide
treatment. As evident in Fig.
3A, caffeine treatment had no
effect on hydrogen peroxide-mediated destruction of Cdc25C. To further
pursue this notion, we made use of the fact that serine 216 is a site
of Chk1 phosphorylation on Cdc25C. Therefore, we next analyzed the
effects of hydrogen peroxide on a Cdc25C site-directed mutant that
replaced serine 216 with an alanine residue. Although for unclear
reasons the S216A mutant ran with an appreciably faster electrophoretic
mobility than wild type (WT) protein, the mutant retained sensitivity
to hydrogen peroxide-induced degradation (Fig. 3B).
Redox Regulation of Cdc25C*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effects of hydrogen peroxide on Cdc25A
levels. Cells were exposed to 1 mM hydrogen peroxide
for the indicated time prior to harvest. Levels of Cdc25A were
determined by Western blot analysis. Levels of
-tubulin were
measured to confirm equal protein loading.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effects of hydrogen peroxide on Cdc25C
levels. A, cells were exposed to 1 mM
hydrogen peroxide and harvested at the indicated times. Levels of
Cdc25C were determined by Western blot along with
-tubulin.
B, cells were exposed to the indicated concentration of
hydrogen peroxide and harvested 3 h after exposure. C,
half-life of Cdc25C protein measured in pulse-chase experiments in the
presence (open squares) and absence of 1 mM
hydrogen peroxide (closed squares). D, levels of
endogenous Cdc25C immunoprecipitated from either control cells or cells
treated with 1 mM hydrogen peroxide for 3 h.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Role of Chk1 in oxidative stress-induced
Cdc25C degradation. A, to inhibit Chk1 activity, cells
were treated where indicated with 10 mM caffeine prior to
exposure to hydrogen peroxide. B, cells expressing either
wild type or the S216A mutant form of Cdc25C lacking the Chk1
phosphorylation site were examined. The S216A protein ran with a
consistently faster mobility but had equivalent sensitivity to hydrogen
peroxide-mediated degradation.
A structural analysis of Cdc25 family members has demonstrated that the
active site cysteine is able to form an intramolecular disulfide bond
with another invariant cysteine residue (15, 16). For the case of
Cdc25C, the active site cysteine is at position 377 and the other
invariant cysteine is at position 330. To assess whether in
vitro hydrogen peroxide treatment was sufficient to induce
disulfide bond formation, we measured the electrophoretic mobility of
bacterially expressed WT Cdc25C protein in a non-reducing gel. As seen
in Fig. 4A, consistent with
disulfide bond formation, wild type Cdc25C that was exposed in
vitro to as little as 10 µM hydrogen peroxide had a
noticeable shift in electrophoretic mobility. The addition of the
reducing agent DTT reversed these changes in mobility. A similar
analysis with a cysteine to serine mutation at position 330 resulted in
a protein that is incapable of disulfide bond formation. An analysis of
this protein demonstrated that, as expected, there was no detectable
mobility shift in a non-reducing gel in response to in vitro
hydrogen peroxide exposure (Fig. 4B).
|
We next sought to further assess the role of cysteine 330 and cysteine
377 in the hydrogen peroxide-mediated degradation of Cdc25C. To attempt
these studies, we created full-length single (position 330 or 377) and
double (positions 330 and 377) cysteine mutants. As seen in Fig.
5A, the levels of these
expressed proteins varied dramatically in transfected cells. Whereas
the levels of wild type and the C2 mutant were similar, the levels of
the 330 and especially the 377 mutant were significantly reduced.
Because for all these mutants, expression was derived from an identical heterologous promoter, the differences in protein levels presumably reflect inherent differences in stability. To confirm this observation, we directly measured protein half-life with pulse-chase analysis. As it
is evident in Fig. 5B, both single cysteine mutants were significantly less stable than the wild type protein. In contrast, the
double mutant appeared slightly more stable than the wild type Cdc25C
under these conditions.
|
We next assessed the effects of the single or double cysteine mutants
on protein stability following hydrogen peroxide treatment. As seen in
Fig. 6, as expected, the exposure of
cells to hydrogen peroxide led to a dramatic fall in the level of wild
type Cdc25C. Qualitatively, similar results were seen with the 330 mutant, although the initial levels were substantially less. Levels of the 377 were so low under basal conditions that it was difficult to
assess the effects of hydrogen peroxide. Finally, in contrast to either
wild type protein or the single cysteine mutants, the levels of the C2
mutant did not change significantly following hydrogen peroxide
challenge.
|
To further pursue the physiological relevance of the intramolecular
disulfide bond in Cdc25C, we were intrigued by the observation that in
our experimental conditions both the S216A mutant and the C2 mutant had
significantly faster electrophoretic mobility on standard SDS-PAGE
analysis. Given that the S216A mutant cannot bind 14-3-3 protein, we
wondered whether the C2 mutant might also have altered 14-3-3 binding.
Perhaps even more physiologically relevant, given that the wild type
protein can apparently adopt an open configuration when reduced and a
closed disulfide bond-containing configuration when oxidized, we
wondered whether such conformational shifts could regulate 14-3-3 interactions. To begin testing this hypothesis, we measured the
in vitro interaction of wild type Cdc25C and the C2 mutant
with 14-3-3 under both non-reducing and reducing conditions. As seen in
Fig. 7, under non-reducing conditions, wild type Cdc25C was able to interact with 14-3-3. Interestingly, if
Cdc25C was exposed to DTT to produce a fully reduced form, no
interaction with 14-3-3 was detected. This observation suggests that in
the open enzymatically active state, the interaction of Cdc25C with
14-3-3 proteins is significantly reduced. To further validate this
conjecture, we measured the interaction of the C2 mutant with 14-3-3 proteins. This mutant is unable to form an intramolecular disulfide
bond and hence should always be locked in the open configuration. As
seen in Fig. 7, in the presence or absence of DTT, there is no apparent
interaction of the C2 mutant with 14-3-3.
|
These results suggest that in vitro, the reduced or open
configuration of Cdc25C has a significantly attenuated capacity to interact with 14-3-3. Previous evidence in Xenopus and human
cells suggest that the binding of 14-3-3 represents an important
regulatory mechanism for Cdc25C and that it is responsible in part for
maintaining the protein in the cytosol (7-8, 18, 19). Another
mechanism for localization is the leptomycin B-sensitive export of the
protein from the nucleus. Both mechanisms contribute to the regulation of Cdc25C subcellular distribution (9). To understand whether the
results demonstrated in Fig. 7 play a role in vivo, we
reasoned that because the C2 mutant would have reduced or absent the
binding to 14-3-3, the localization of this mutant should be
significantly more dependent on the remaining intact leptomycin
B-sensitive nuclear export pathway. As demonstrated in Fig.
8, A and B, under normal conditions in unsynchronized cells, both wild type and C2 mutant
forms of Cdc25C had a predominantly cytosolic localization. The
treatment with leptomycin B, which in time renders localization solely
dependent on 14-3-3 binding, results in a shift in wild type protein
distribution to include both a nuclear and cytoplasmic localization. In
contrast, under these leptomycin treatment conditions, the C2 mutant
was predominantly nuclear (see Fig. 8, C and D). These results are consistent with the C2 mutant being more dependent than wild type Cdc25C on leptomycin B-dependent export. In
addition, it has been recently demonstrated that leptomycin
B-dependent nuclear export can also be inhibited by oxidant
challenge such as hydrogen peroxide treatment (20). Similarly, we found
that hydrogen peroxide treatment resulted in increased C2 nuclear
accumulation when compared with wild type protein (data not shown).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Checkpoint control in response to environmental stresses represents a fundamental mechanism to protect genomic integrity. The family of Cdc25 phosphatases represents an essential component in checkpoint control as well as in normal cell cycle progression. Our data suggest that a rise in intracellular hydrogen peroxide is sufficient to induce the degradation of Cdc25C protein, and that this oxidant-mediated degradation requires the presence of two reactive cysteine residues within the protein. In the absence of these two critical cysteine residues, the protein is not subject to oxidant-mediated degradation. In addition, our data suggest that the presence of an intramolecular disulfide within the protein may also be important for the interaction of Cdc25C with 14-3-3 protein, because the C2 mutant is unable to bind 14-3-3 in vitro and under certain conditions has altered subcellular localization in vivo. Therefore, these data suggest that wild type Cdc25C may potentially regulate its interaction with 14-3-3 in a disulfide-dependent manner.
An analysis of single cysteine mutants reveals that these constructs
have decreased protein stability. Generally, it is believed that
oxidation of a cysteine beyond the sulfenic form is unstable. One
practical role for an intramolecular disulfide bond therefore would be
to protect the active site cysteine from an irreversible oxidation. In
particular, if the active site cysteine is oxidized to a sulfenic ion,
subsequent disulfide bond formation with cysteine 330 could rescue the
protein and prevent the formation of a terminal sulfinic species. Under
these conditions (see Fig. 9), mutants that lack either cysteine 330 or 377 would in turn lack this protective mechanism. Interestingly, it has recently been observed that some low
molecular tyrosine phosphatases can also form intramolecular disulfide
bonds following direct hydrogen peroxide treatment or after growth
factor induced hydrogen peroxide generation (21). In these cases,
oxidation leads to disulfide bond formation and enzymatic inactivation,
suggesting that redox regulation through disulfide bond formation may
be a common mechanism for regulating the activity of both protein
tyrosine phosphatases and dual-specific phosphatases.
|
Numerous studies have demonstrated that oxidative stress induces cell cycle arrest often but not always at the G2/M checkpoint (22-24). The observation that the binding of 14-3-3 to Cdc25C at least in vitro is dependent on whether or not Cdc25C is reduced or oxidized, raising the possibility that redox regulation of the phosphatase activity may be important for normal cell cycle regulation. Several previous lines of evidence have indirectly raised this possibility. For instance, earlier reports have demonstrated that the disulfide reductase thioredoxin is able to rescue mouse embryos arrested in mitosis at the two-cell stage (25). The exogenous addition of thioredoxin under these conditions increases cyclin-dependent kinases activity, consistent with thioredoxin potentially regulating Cdc25C activity. In addition, in plants there appears to be a glutathione-dependent checkpoint, although the precise mediator of this checkpoint remains unknown (26). Finally, an analysis of antioxidants as a function of cell cycle in mammalian cells revealed that the levels of glutathione rise dramatically in M-phase to levels ~3-fold higher then in S-phase (27). The basis for this increase in cellular-reducing equivalents is again unknown. To date, there is no evidence to suggest that such a rise in glutathione levels is essential for G2/M progression. Nonetheless, it is tempting to speculate that such a rise might be important to maintain Cdc25C in the reduced and hence active form.
Finally, a number of questions remain unanswered. Presently, it is
unclear why the effects of oxidants are specific for the Cdc25C
isoform. This is particularly unclear, because all other members of the
Cdc25 phosphatase family have a similar cysteine configuration and have
been shown to be able to undergo disulfide bond formation (15, 16).
These differences in sensitivity may relate to whether the protein
in vivo exists predominantly in an open or closed
configuration. In general, only the open fully reduced protein would be
predicted to undergo a significant amount of oxidant-mediated
degradation. In addition, differences in the reactivity of the active
site cysteine or the other invariant cysteine in Cdc25A
versus Cdc25C may play a role in this observed specificity
to oxidant challenge. Similarly, although the levels of Cdc25C declines
dramatically following hydrogen peroxide treatment, to date the
treatment of cells with either proteasomal inhibitors or with
inhibitors of lysosomal degradation do not appear to rescue the
protein.2 Thus, the
mechanism by which Cdc25C is degraded remains unclear. Nonetheless,
these results do strengthen the conclusion that the destruction of
Cdc25C by oxidants differs significantly from either the UV or ionizing
radiation-induced degradation of Cdc25A, which is
proteasomal-dependent (10, 12). Future studies addressing these and other related issues should hopefully provide significant insight into how oxidative stress regulates cell cycle arrest and what
role the intracellular redox state plays in normal cell cycle progression.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank H. Piwnira-Worms for the Cdc25C cDNA and Ilsa I. Rovira for help with the preparation of this paper.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cardiovascular Branch,
NHLBI, NIH, Bldg. 10/6N-240, 10 Center Dr., Bethesda, MD 20892-1622. Tel.: 301-402-4081; Fax: 301-402-9311; E-mail:
finkelt@nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 29, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201589200
2 P. A. Savitsky and T. Finkel, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: DTT, dithiothreitol; C2, double mutant of both cysteine 330 and cysteine 377; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; GST, glutathione S-transferase; WT, wild type.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Obaya, A. J., and Sedivy, J. M. (2002) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59, 126-142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Walworth, N. C., Davey, S., and Beach, D. (1993) Nature 363, 368-371[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Walworth, N., and Bernards, R. (1996) Science 271, 353-356[Abstract] |
| 4. |
Peng, C. Y.,
Graves, P. R.,
Thoma, R. S., Wu, Z.,
Shaw, A. S.,
and Piwnica-Worms, H.
(1997)
Science
277,
1501-1505 |
| 5. |
Furnari, B.,
Rhind, N.,
and Russell, P.
(1997)
Science
277,
1495-1497 |
| 6. |
Sanchez, Y.,
Wong, C.,
Thoma, R. S.,
Richman, R., Wu, Z.,
Piwnica-Worms, H.,
and Elledge, S. J.
(1997)
Science
277,
1497-1501 |
| 7. |
Dalal, S. N.,
Schweitzer, C. M.,
Gan, J.,
and DeCaprio, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
4465-4479 |
| 8. |
Graves, P. R., Yu, L.,
Schwartz, J. K.,
Sausville, E. A.,
O'Conner, P. M.,
and Piwnica-Worms, H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
5600-5605 |
| 9. | Graves, P. R., Lovly, C. M., Uy, G. L., and Piwnica-Worms, H. (2000) Oncogene 20, 1839-1851 |
| 10. |
Mailand, N.,
Flack, J.,
Lukas, C.,
Syljuasen, R. G.,
Welcker, M.,
Bartek, J.,
and Lukas, J.
(2000)
Science
288,
1425-1428 |
| 11. | Molinari, M., Mercurio, C., Dominguez, J., Goubin, F., and Draetta, G. F. (2000) EMBO J. 1, 71-79[CrossRef] |
| 12. | Flack, J., Mailand, N., Syljuasen, R. G., Bartek, J., and Lukas, J. (2001) Nature 410, 842-847[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. | Clairborne, A., Yeh, J. I., Mallet, T. C., Luba, J., Crane, E. J., Charrier, V., and Parsonage, D. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 15407-15416[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. | Dunphy, W. G., and Kumagai, A. (1991) Cell 67, 189-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Fauman, E. B., Cogswell, J. P., Lovejoy, B., Rocque, W. J., Holmes, W., Montana, V. G., Piwnica-Worms, H., Rind, M. J., and Saper, M. A. (1998) Cell 93, 617-625[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Reynolds, R. A., Yem, A. W., Wolfe, C. L., Deibel, M. R., Chidester, C. G., and Watenpaugh, K. D. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 293, 559-568[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K., and Pease, L. R. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 77, 51-59[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Kugamai, A.,
and Dunphy, W. G.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1067-1072 |
| 19. | Yang, J., Wonkler, K., Yoshida, M., and Kornbluth, S. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 2174-2183[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
Saydam, N.,
Georgiev, O.,
Nakano, M. Y.,
Greber, U. F.,
and Schaffner, W.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
25487-25495 |
| 21. |
Chiarugi, P.,
Fiaschi, T.,
Taddei, M. L.,
Talini, D.,
Giannoni, E.,
Raugei, G.,
and Ramponi, G.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
33478-33487 |
| 22. |
Flattery-O'Brien, J. A.,
and Dawes, I. W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8564-8571 |
| 23. | Arrington, E. D., Caldwell, M. C., Kumaravel, T. S., Lohani, A., Joshi, A., Evans, M. K., Chen, H. T., Nussenzweig, A., Holbrook, N. J., and Gorospe, M. (2000) Free Radical Biol. Med. 29, 1166-1176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
D'Agnillo, F.,
and Alayash, A. I.
(2001)
Blood
98,
3315-3323 |
| 25. | Natsuyama, S., Noda, Y., Yamashita, M., Nagahama, Y., and Mori, T. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1176, 90-94[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | den Boer, B. G. W., and Murray, J. A. H. (2000) Trends Cell Biol. 10, 245-250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Li, N., and Oberley, T. D. (1998) J. Cell. Physiol. 177, 148-160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Filomeni, G. Rotilio, and M. R. Ciriolo Molecular Transduction Mechanisms of the Redox Network Underlying the Antiproliferative Effects of Allyl Compounds from Garlic J. Nutr., November 1, 2008; 138(11): 2053 - 2057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gupta and S. W. Ragsdale Dual Roles of an Essential Cysteine Residue in Activity of a Redox-regulated Bacterial Transcriptional Activator J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2008; 283(42): 28721 - 28728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Tomko Jr. and J. S. Lazo Multimodal Control of Cdc25A by Nitrosative Stress Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 68(18): 7457 - 7465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhou, J. D. Ferraris, N. I. Dmitrieva, Y. Liu, and M. B. Burg MKP-1 inhibits high NaCl-induced activation of p38 but does not inhibit the activation of TonEBP/OREBP: Opposite roles of p38{alpha} and p38{delta} PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5620 - 5625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Michalek, K. J. Nelson, B. C. Holbrook, J. S. Yi, D. Stridiron, L. W. Daniel, J. S. Fetrow, S. B. King, L. B. Poole, and J. M. Grayson The Requirement of Reversible Cysteine Sulfenic Acid Formation for T Cell Activation and Function J. Immunol., November 15, 2007; 179(10): 6456 - 6467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Zaccagnini, F. Martelli, A. Magenta, C. Cencioni, P. Fasanaro, C. Nicoletti, P. Biglioli, P. G. Pelicci, and M. C. Capogrossi p66ShcA and Oxidative Stress Modulate Myogenic Differentiation and Skeletal Muscle Regeneration after Hind Limb Ischemia J. Biol. Chem., October 26, 2007; 282(43): 31453 - 31459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Menon, E. H. Sarsour, A. L. Kalen, S. Venkataraman, M. J. Hitchler, F. E. Domann, L. W. Oberley, and P. C. Goswami Superoxide Signaling Mediates N-acetyl-L-cysteine-Induced G1 Arrest: Regulatory Role of Cyclin D1 and Manganese Superoxide Dismutase Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 67(13): 6392 - 6399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Sanders, D. Sizov, P. R. Seavers, M. Ortiz-Lombardia, and A. A. Antson Transcription activator structure reveals redox control of a replication initiation reaction Nucleic Acids Res., May 11, 2007; 35(10): 3504 - 3515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Dehennaut, T. Lefebvre, C. Sellier, Y. Leroy, B. Gross, S. Walker, R. Cacan, J.-C. Michalski, J.-P. Vilain, and J.-F. Bodart O-Linked N-Acetylglucosaminyltransferase Inhibition Prevents G2/M Transition in Xenopus laevis Oocytes J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2007; 282(17): 12527 - 12536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-S. Kwon, J.-H. Jeong, and J.-H. Roe Inactivation of Homocitrate Synthase Causes Lysine Auxotrophy in Copper/Zinc-containing Superoxide Dismutase-deficient Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe J. Biol. Chem., January 20, 2006; 281(3): 1345 - 1351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brisson, T. Nguyen, P. Wipf, B. Joo, B. W. Day, J. S. Skoko, E. M. Schreiber, C. Foster, P. Bansal, and J. S. Lazo Redox Regulation of Cdc25B by Cell-Active Quinolinediones Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2005; 68(6): 1810 - 1820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Dames, J. M. Mulet, K. Rathgeb-Szabo, M. N. Hall, and S. Grzesiek The Solution Structure of the FATC Domain of the Protein Kinase Target of Rapamycin Suggests a Role for Redox-dependent Structural and Cellular Stability J. Biol. Chem., May 27, 2005; 280(21): 20558 - 20564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Barrett, S. M. Black, H. Todor, R. K. Schmidt-Ullrich, K. S. Dawson, and R. B. Mikkelsen Inhibition of Protein-tyrosine Phosphatases by Mild Oxidative Stresses Is Dependent on S-Nitrosylation J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 14453 - 14461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Groen, S. Lemeer, T. van der Wijk, J. Overvoorde, A. J. R. Heck, A. Ostman, D. Barford, M. Slijper, and J. den Hertog Differential Oxidation of Protein-tyrosine Phosphatases J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 10298 - 10304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Pop, R. J. Kolarik, and S. W. Ragsdale Regulation of Anaerobic Dehalorespiration by the Transcriptional Activator CprK J. Biol. Chem., November 26, 2004; 279(48): 49910 - 49918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. van der Wijk, J. Overvoorde, and J. den Hertog H2O2-induced Intermolecular Disulfide Bond Formation between Receptor Protein-tyrosine Phosphatases J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44355 - 44361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mori, M. Shibanuma, and K. Nose Invasive Potential Induced under Long-Term Oxidative Stress in Mammary Epithelial Cells Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 64(20): 7464 - 7472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Stocker and J. F. Keaney Jr. Role of Oxidative Modifications in Atherosclerosis Physiol Rev, October 1, 2004; 84(4 |