![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 20555-20562, June 7, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University,
University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Received for publication, December 14, 2001, and in revised form, March 28, 2002
The bacteriophage T4 59 protein (gp59) plays an
essential role in recombination and replication by mediating the
assembly of the gene 41 helicase (gp41) onto DNA. gp59 is required to
displace the gp32 single-stranded binding protein on the lagging
strand to expose a site for helicase binding. To gain a better
understanding of the mechanism of helicase assembly, the architecture
and stoichiometry of the gp41-gp59 complex were investigated. Both the
N and C termini of gp41 were found to lie close to or in the gp41-gp41
subunit interface and interact with gp59. The site of interaction of
gp41 on gp59 is proximal to Cys-215 of gp59. Binding of gp41 to gp59 stimulates a conformational change in the protein resulting in hexamer
formation of gp59, and gp59 likewise stimulates oligomer formation of
gp41. The gp59 subunits in this complex are arranged in a head to head
orientation, such that Cys-42 of one subunit is in close proximity to
Cys-42 on an adjacent subunit, and Cys-215 on one subunit is close to
Cys-215 on a neighboring subunit. As the helicase is loaded onto DNA, a
conformational change in the gp41-gp59 complex occurs, which may serve
to displace gp32 from the lagging strand and load the hexameric
helicase in its place.
DNA replication is a multistaged reaction that requires the
recruitment of proteins, assembly of replication forks at an origin, and template-directed replication of DNA. The replication machinery in
the T4 bacteriophage is composed of three units, the primosome (a
complex of the primase (gp61) bound to the helicase (gp41)), the
holoenzyme (composed of a DNA polymerase (gp43), a sliding clamp
(gp45), and a clamp loader (gp44/62)), and the single-stranded binding
protein gp32.
An initial event in the replication process is the recruitment and
assembly of the primosome at the DNA replication fork. Formation of the
primosome on the lagging strand most likely begins with assembly of the
helicase. The bacteriophage T4 helicase plays an essential role in DNA
replication and recombination during phage infection of
Escherichia coli. The helicase is needed to unwind duplex
DNA ahead of the holoenzyme to allow nucleotide incorporation during
replication and is required to unwind duplex DNA for pairing of
single-strand DNA with new partners in recombination (1). gp41 forms a
hexameric ring that encircles the lagging strand of the replication
fork and unwinds the duplex in a 5'-3' direction by hydrolyzing ATP
(1). During DNA replication, the gp41 helicase is intimately associated
with the gp61 primase, which synthesizes the RNA primers used in
discontinuous lagging strand synthesis. The formation of this primosome
is needed for efficient unwinding of duplex DNA during replication as
well as productive primer synthesis (2, 3).
Loading of the gp41 replicative helicase at the bacteriophage T4 DNA
replication fork requires the displacement of single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (gp32) coating the lagging strand. The helicase assembly protein, gp59, is required to load the helicase under these
conditions, thus assuming a critical role in bacteriophage T4 DNA
replication as well as recombination (4-6).
The gp59 protein is a 26-kDa, basic (pI = 10.18) protein that
exists as a monomer in solution (7, 8). It has a high affinity for DNA
and can bind duplex DNA,
ssDNA,1 and forked DNA
substrates (7, 9). The protein is composed of almost all gp59 acts via direct contacts with gp41 and has been shown to interact
with the helicase both on and off DNA (8, 11). gp59 also binds to gp32
in both the presence and absence of DNA (8, 12). Morrical et
al. (13) have suggested that the C-terminal, acidic domain
(A-domain) of gp32 mediates the interaction between the two proteins.
More recent studies have demonstrated that the DNA binding core domain
of gp32 also interacts with gp59 (14), and the combination of the two
sites of interaction may be necessary for gp32 displacement.
Furthermore, gp59 contains distinct sites for gp32 and gp41 binding
(11). As such, the gp59-mediated assembly of gp41 onto gp32-coated DNA
most likely involves a ternary complex between the three proteins.
Although gp59 exists as a monomer in solution, it can oligomerize in
the presence of gp32 or DNA. Cross-linking experiments demonstrated
that gp59 could form at least pentamers in the presence of either of
these molecules (14). Furthermore, Raney et al. (15) showed
that the enhancement of the ATP-dependent DNA unwinding activity of gp41 was maximal when gp59 was present in a 1:1 molar ratio
with gp41 (hexamer of gp59 to hexamer of gp41). As such, gp59 is
expected to form higher multimeric states when bound to the helicase.
In E. coli, the DnaB helicase is loaded onto DNA by a
protein analogous to gp59, DnaC. Cryoelectron microscopy studies
indicated that DnaC forms a hexameric ring associated with the
hexameric DnaB ring (16). By analogy, we predict a similar oligomeric state and arrangement of gp59 and gp41.
To gain a better understanding of the mechanism of helicase assembly,
the architecture and stoichiometry of the gp41-gp59 complex was
investigated. We have demonstrated that 1) both the N and C terminus of
gp41 lie in the gp41-gp41 subunit interface and interact with gp59; 2)
the site of interaction of gp41 on gp59 is close to Cys-215 of gp59; 3)
conformational changes in the gp41-gp59 complex occur upon gp41 loading
on DNA; and 4) gp59 forms a hexamer upon binding gp41, and the gp59
subunits are arranged in a head to head orientation. The importance of
these findings is discussed herein.
Cloning and Purification of gp41--
The 41 gene was isolated
from bacteriophage T4 genomic DNA (Sigma) by PCR amplification using
the primers 5'-GCGGAACATATGGTAGAAATTATTCTTTCT and
5'-GCGGAATTCGCTCTTCCGCAAAATTTTAATTC. The product was digested with
NdeI and SapI and ligated into a custom IMPACT
vector placed under the control of a T7 promoter. This vector places a
self-cleaving intein and chitin binding domain at the C terminus of
gp41 and allows purification of the protein on a chitin affinity column followed by cleavage of the intein with dithiothreitol (DTT; Sigma) to
yield the unmodified gp41. E. coli BL21(DE3) cells were
electrotransformed with the plasmid, and transformants were selected
with 50 µg/ml kanamycin on NCZYM (Invitrogen) agar plates. A
single colony was grown in NCZYM medium to an
A600 of 0.5 and induced for 18 h at 20 °C with 0.1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- Labeling of the C Terminus of gp41c and Cross-linking to
gp59--
The gp41c, containing a C-terminal cysteine (Cys-476) was
applied to a Sephadex G-25 column to remove reducing agents. The protein (100 µl of a 6 µM solution) was then mixed with
10 µl of thiol-reactive trifunctional cross-linker (Fig.
1A) dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF; 60 µM
final concentration) for 14 h at 4 °C in the dark. Excess label
was removed by applying the solution to a Sephadex G-25 column. gp41c
and gp59 (in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl,
10% glycerol) were mixed at a final concentration of 1 µM each, in the presence or absence of 3 mM
ATP and/or 5 nM M13mp18 single-stranded DNA. Cross-linking
was initiated by exposure to ultraviolet light as described previously
(17). In the samples where reduction of the cross-linker was desired, DTT was added to a final concentration of 100 mM. The
products of the cross-linking experiment was separated on a 10%
polyacrylamide gel and subjected to a Western blot using
streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (SA-HRP; Invitrogen) as a
probe, as described previously (17). Prestained broad range molecular
weight markers (Bio-Rad) were used to assess molecular weights of
the species observed.
Labeling of the N Terminus of gp41 and Cross-linking to
gp59--
gp41 was dialyzed into 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol. In the presence of 5 mM
ADP, pH 7.0, only the N terminus of gp41 is labeled upon the addition
of an amine-reactive probe. gp41 (100 µl of a 6 µM solution) was mixed with 10 µl of
sulfosuccinimide-2-[6-(biotinamido)-2-(p-azidobenzamido)hexanoamido]ethyl-1,3'-dithiopropionate (Sulfo-SBED; Fig. 1B) dissolved in DMF (10 µM final concentration) for 16 h at 4 °C in the
dark. Excess label was removed with a Sephadex G-25 column. gp41 and
gp59 were mixed to a final concentration of 1 µM each in
the presence or absence of ATP and/or DNA as described above. The
samples that required reduction of cross-linker were reduced with 100 mM DTT. The samples were analyzed by a Western blot using
SA-HRP as a probe.
To verify that only the N terminus of gp41 was labeled, helicase
labeled with Sulfo-SBED was digested with trypsin and applied to a
100-µl streptavidin-agarose (Sigma) column. The column was washed
with 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1 M NaCl to remove
unlabeled peptides. The labeled peptide bound to the column by virtue
of the Sulfo-SBED label was then treated with 1 M
2-mercaptoethanol for 30 min to cleave the disulfide bond in the
cross-linker, thus eluting the peptide. The eluted peptide was dried in
a speed vacuum, and the sample was desalted with a zip-tip
pipette tip containing C-18 resin (Millipore Corp.) according to
the manufacturer's instructions. The peptide was eluted from the
zip-tip C-18 resin using 60% acetonitrile, 40%
H2O, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The isolated peptide (500 µl) was then mixed with 500 µl of Thiol-Thiol Cross-linking between gp41c and gp59--
gp41c was
labeled at the N terminus with biotin succinimide (to allow
visualization by Western blot using SA-HRP) and mixed with gp59 (to a
final concentration of 1 µM) in the presence of 10 µM 1,6-bis-maleimidohexane (BMH; Pierce) with
or without 3 mM ATP and/or 5 nM M13mp18 DNA.
After 7 min, the reaction was quenched with 5 µl of gel loading
buffer containing 60 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 25% glycerol, 2%
SDS, 14.4 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.1% bromphenol blue.
The products were separated with a 10% polyacrylamide gel, and a
Western blot with SA-HRP as a probe was used to detect the biotinylated
protein. In the experiments in which gp41 was cross-linked to gp59 in
the presence of gp32, gp32 (2 µM) and gp59 (1 µM) were preincubated for 10 min (in the presence or
absence of 2 nM M13 DNA) before the addition of 1 µM gp41c (labeled at the N terminus with biotin).
Cross-linking conditions and analyses were performed as described
above. Molecular weight markers (precision unstained broad range and/or
prestained broad range; Bio-Rad) were used to assess the size of the
cross-linked species.
gp59 was cross-linked to investigate higher oligomer formation by
mixing gp59 and gp41 (without a C-terminal cysteine added) to a final
concentration of 5 µM each in a 30-µl reaction volume (with or without 5 mM ATP and/or 20 nM M13 DNA)
containing BMH at a concentration of 50 µM. After 7 min,
the reaction was quenched with gel loading buffer and subjected to
SDS-PAGE. The gel was stained with Gel Code Blue (Pierce).
Mapping the Point of Contact between gp41c and
gp59--
Thiol-thiol cross-linking between gp41c and gp59 could occur
between the C-terminal cysteine on gp41c and one of the two cysteine residues on gp59 (Cys-42 or Cys-215). It was predicted that the site of
cross-link on gp59 is Cys-215. To determine whether cross-linking occurred between the C terminus of gp41 and Cys-215 of gp59, Cys-42 was
selectively modified covalently, and gp41c was mixed with gp59 in the
presence of BMH. Cys-42 of gp59 was blocked by the addition of 100 µl
of a 30 µM solution of gp32 labeled with
N-[6-(7-amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetamido)hexyl]-3'-(2'-pyridyldithio)propionamide (AMCA-HPDP; Pierce) to 50 µl of a 20 µM gp59 solution
for 30 min. It was previously shown that under these conditions,
complete transfer of the fluorophore occurred via a disulfide exchange between Cys-42 of gp59 and the mixed disulfide between Cys-166 of gp32
and the fluorophore (14). gp32 and excess label were removed from
labeled gp59 by subjecting the mixture to a Mono-Q fast protein liquid
chromatography column. Proteins were eluted from the Mono-Q column
using a linear gradient between 0 and 1 M NaCl in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5. The amount of labeled gp59 was determined by quantifying the amount of fluorophore based on its absorbance at 345 nm and determination of gp59 amount by Bradford assay. The
concentration of fluorophore relative to protein was found to be
1.10:1. The site of label was confirmed by digesting labeled protein with trypsin, separating the fragments by HPLC (14), and
identifying the labeled peptide by MALDI mass spectrometry, as
described above.
Isothermal Titration Calorimetry of gp41 and gp59--
Binding
of gp41 to gp59 was assessed by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC)
on a MicroCal VP-ITC system (according to the protocol published
previously) (18). Proteins of interest were dialyzed into complex
buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM KOAc, 10 mM Mg(OAc)2) for at least 8 h to reach
dialysis equilibrium. Protein solutions were centrifuged to remove
particles before beginning the experiment and quantitated by UV-visible
absorbance. All solutions were degassed prior to use. This degassing
step was determined in control experiments not to affect protein activity.
gp59 (21 µM) was in the syringe and injected in 7-µl
volumes into a 2.2 µM solution of gp41 containing 1 mM ATP Oligomerization of gp41 in the Presence of gp59--
To
determine whether gp59 induced higher oligomer formation of gp41, the
two proteins were cross-linked in the absence or presence of ATP. A
100-µl solution of gp59 (10 µM) was labeled with biotin
by the following procedure. Biotin-maleimide (Sigma) was dissolved in
DMF to make a 100 µM solution, and 10 µl of this solution was added to the gp59 solution for 4 h at 4 °C. gp41 (8 µM) was labeled with rhodamine-maleimide (Molecular
Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR) by following the same procedure. The two
labeled proteins were mixed to a final concentration of 4 µM each in the presence or absence of 1 mM
ATP. A solution of 0.25% (final concentration) 3,3'-dithio-bis(propionic acid N-
hydroxysuccinimide ester (Sigma) was added to each sample for 10 min.
The products were separated by SDS-PAGE, and gp41 cross-link bands were
detected with a Fluor-S multiimager, whereas the gp59 cross-link bands
were detected with a Western blot procedure using SA-HRP as a probe.
gp41 cross-linked in the presence of ATP was used as a control to
assess the size of the cross-linked species.
Mapping the Point of Contact between gp59 Subunits--
The
fluorescently labeled thiol-thiol cross-linker shown in Fig.
1C was synthesized from the trifunctional maleimide
cross-linker tris(2-maleimidoethyl)amine (TMEA; Pierce) and the
fluorescent probe AMCA-HPDP. AMCA-HPDP dissolved in DMF was
reduced with 3 equivalents of tris(2-carboxylethyl)phosphine
hydrochloride (TCEP; Molecular Probes) and mixed with 10 equivalents of
TMEA (dissolved in DMF) for 30 min at 25 °C. The mixture was
separated by HPLC as described previously (14). The product was
collected by monitoring at 345 nm the absorbance maximum for AMCA and
dried in a speed vacuum. MALDI mass spectrometry was used to
confirm the identity of the product.
gp59 (500 µg) was cross-linked with 10 equivalents of the
cross-linker for 7 min in the presence of gp41 (45 µg). The proteins were digested with trypsin as described above, and the peptides were
separated by HPLC. Fractions (0.25 ml) were collected, dried in a speed
vacuum, and redissolved in 10 µl of 60% acetonitrile, 40%
H2O, 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The fractions were then
placed on the stage of a Fluor-S multiimager, and illuminated in
transilluminator mode to identify the fraction that contained the
fluorescently labeled cross-linked peptide. This fraction was analyzed
by MALDI mass spectrometry to determine the mass of the cross-linked peptide.
Labeling of gp41c at the C Terminus and Cross-linking to
gp59--
gp41 contains 4 cysteine residues (amino acids 208, 233, 316, and 319). A DTNB assay determined that one of these cysteines was
solvent-accessible, but labeling at this site with a cross-linker yielded no cross-links to gp59, suggesting that it is not close to the
interface of interaction between the two
proteins.2 To determine
whether the C terminus of gp41c interacted with gp59, cross-linking
between the C terminus of gp41c and gp59 was conducted. A cysteine
residue was added to the C terminus of gp41 (Cys-476, with the modified
protein denoted as gp41c) by cleavage of a gp41-intein fusion protein
with cysteine. The protein was then labeled with the thiol-reactive
trifunctional cross-linker shown in Fig.
1A. The labeled gp41c was
subsequently mixed with gp59 in the presence or absence of DNA and/or
ATP and subjected to ultraviolet light to initiate cross-linking. When
the products of the cross-linking reaction were separated by SDS-PAGE
and subjected to a Western blot using SA-HRP as a probe, cross-link
bands corresponding to gp41c dimers were seen in the absence of gp59,
signifying that the C terminus of gp41c is close to or in the
homodimeric interface (Fig.
2A, lane
2). When gp41c was mixed with gp59 and exposed to light, in
the presence or absence of ATP and/or DNA, high molecular weight
species were seen, consistent with gp41c-gp59 cross-links (Fig.
2A, lanes 3-6). Upon the addition of
DTT, the cross-link was reduced and the biotin label was transferred to
gp59, confirming that a gp41c-gp59 cross-link had occurred (Fig.
2A, lanes 9-12).
Cross-linking between the N Terminus of gp41 and gp59--
In
order to elucidate a second point of contact between gp41 and gp59, the
N terminus of gp41 was labeled as described under "Experimental
Procedures" with the amine-reactive trifunctional cross-linker
Sulfo-SBED (Fig. 1B). The proteins were mixed in the absence
or presence of DNA and/or ATP and then separated by SDS-PAGE followed
by a Western blot using SA-HRP as a probe to identify the biotinylated
cross-links. When gp41 was cross-linked by itself, a band corresponding
to a gp41-gp41 homodimer was observed (Fig. 2B,
lane 2). When gp41 and gp59 were mixed,
cross-links were visualized in both the absence and presence of ATP
and/or DNA (Fig. 2B, lanes 3-6).
Reduction of the cross-linker with DTT caused transfer of the biotin to
gp59, validating that the cross-link occurred between gp41 and gp59
(Fig. 2B, lanes 7 and
8).
Thiol-Thiol Cross-linking between gp41c and gp59--
Morrical
et al. (13) suggested that gp59 has distinct binding sites
for gp41c and gp32. Experiments described previously demonstrated that
Cys-42 of gp59 is in close proximity to gp32 (14). gp59 contains a
second cysteine residue, Cys-215, that lies on the opposite side of the
protein relative to Cys-42. Since it is likely that gp41 interacts on
this side of the protein, away from the gp32 binding site, thiol-thiol
cross-linking was attempted to cross-link the C terminus of gp41c to
gp59. gp41c was N-terminally labeled with biotin to allow easier
detection of cross-links by Western blot using SA-HRP as a probe. When
mixed with the thiol-thiol cross-linker BMH, gp41c cross-linked to form a homodimer linked at the C-terminal cysteine residues (Fig.
3A). In the presence of
gp59, with or without ATP added, bands were seen that
correspond to gp41c-gp59 cross-links (Fig. 3A). Typically, two cross-link bands were observed, one that migrated with the expected
mobility of a gp41c-gp59 cross-link (molecular mass of about 75 kDa)
and a band that migrated with a faster mobility (~65 kDa). The
intensity of the higher mobility band varies from experiment to
experiment, whereas the lower mobility band does not vary. In
experiments using a cleavable thiol-thiol cross-linker, this pattern of
cross-linking between gp41c and gp59 is also seen. Excision of these
bands followed by cleavage of the cross-linker and separation of the
products on a second gel indicate that both bands are composed of
gp41c-gp59 cross-links.2 Most likely, the faster migrating
band is due to an intramolecular cross-link of gp41c as well as an
intermolecular cross-link to gp59, resulting in higher mobility of the
more compact structure than the gp41c-gp59 intermolecular cross-link
alone. When DNA was added, no cross-links between gp41c and gp59 were
visualized, indicating that some conformational change occurs upon
loading of gp41 on DNA (Fig. 3A, lanes
1 and 2).
To confirm that gp41c cross-linked to Cys-215 of gp59, a cross-linking
experiment was conducted in which the Cys-42 of gp59 was blocked by
covalent modification. Previously, we showed that incubation of gp32
labeled with a probe via a mixed disulfide with gp59 resulted in
complete transfer of the probe from gp32 to gp59 by a disulfide
exchange (Fig. 4A) (14). As
described under "Experimental Procedures," a label (AMCA) was
placed selectively on Cys-42 of gp59 using this method. The modified
gp59 protein contained only one free cysteine residue, Cys-215, as
determined by MALDI mass spectrometry. Thiol-thiol cross-linking using
BMH showed that gp41c cross-linked to both the modified (Fig.
4B, lanes 2 and 3) gp59 as
well as the unmodified gp59 (Fig. 4B, lanes 6 and 7), demonstrating that Cys-42 was not
involved in the cross-linking.
The interaction between gp41c and gp59 was also analyzed in the
presence of gp32. Preincubation of gp59 with gp32 prior to the addition
of gp41c led to the same pattern of cross-linking observed above (Fig.
3B), indicating that gp32 bound to gp59 does not affect gp41
binding. As before, cross-links between gp41 and gp59 disappear in the
presence of DNA. Experiments conducted by Morrical et al.
(13) indicated that under similar conditions to those used for the
cross-linking, gp32, gp59, and gp41 (in the absence of DNA) form
a ternary complex. As such, it is expected that gp41 does not displace
gp32 in these experiments but rather binds independently. In a
separate experiment in which gp32 labeled with a biotin handle was
preincubated with gp59, mixed with gp41, and then subjected to
cross-linking (Fig. 3C), cross-links were observed between
gp32 and gp59, indicating that gp41 did not affect gp32-gp59 binding.
These data support a model in which gp32 and gp41 bind to distinct
sites on gp59, such that gp32 interacts at a point on gp59 near to
Cys-42, while gp41 interacts with gp59 on the opposite side, close to
Cys-215 (Fig. 4C).
The Oligomeric State of gp59 in the Presence of gp41--
In the
presence of gp32 or DNA, gp59 forms a multimer composed of at least
five subunits (14). Moreover, kinetic experiments by Raney et
al. (15) indicated that gp41 and gp59 formed a 1:1 complex (six
subunits of gp59 and six subunits of gp41). Thiol-thiol cross-linking
was performed to investigate the oligomeric state of gp59 in the
presence of gp41. gp59 was subjected to cross-linking with BMH in the
presence of gp41 (without a C-terminal cysteine added) in the presence
and absence of DNA and/or ATP. Since a cysteine residue placed at the C
terminus of gp41 is required for gp41-gp59 thiol-thiol cross-linking,
only gp59-gp59 cross-links are observed. Cross-links were seen that
correspond to higher multimeric states of gp59 (Fig.
5A) regardless of the presence of ATP or DNA. The largest observable species migrated as a gp59 pentamer. It is likely that the protein forms oligomers higher than
pentamers, but limitations on the yield of cross-linking and resolution
by gel electrophoresis make observation of this multimeric state
difficult.
The association of gp41 and gp59 was further examined by isothermal
titration calorimetry. ITC can provide accurate measures of
stoichiometry, binding constant, and enthalpy and entropy of binding,
making it an excellent technique for the detection of macromolecular
interactions. The direct interaction of the untagged, unmodified
molecules is monitored. In the ITC experiment, gp59 was titrated into a
gp41 solution in the presence of ATP Oligomerization of gp41 in the Presence of gp59--
gp41 was
labeled with rhodamine and gp59 was labeled with biotin to distinguish
between cross-links involving gp41 and those with gp59. The proteins
were then cross-linked in the absence or presence of ATP to determine
the effect of gp59 on the oligomerization of gp41. In the absence of
ATP and gp59, only a minimal number of gp41 higher order
cross-links are seen (Fig. 5C, lane
4). When ATP is added, the majority of gp41 is cross-linked
to hexamer (Fig. 5C, lane 3). In the
absence of ATP but in the presence of gp59, hexameric cross-links of
gp41 are also observed, although not to the same extent as in the
presence of ATP (Fig. 5C, lane 2).
These higher order bands are not gp59-gp59 cross-links or gp59-gp41
cross-links, since a Western blot using SA-HRP to visualize biotinylated gp59 protein did not show these high molecular weight bands (Fig. 5C, lane 1).
Mapping the Site of gp59-gp59 Interaction--
gp59 contains only
two cysteine residues. Cross-linking of gp59 with a thiol-thiol
cross-linker in the presence of gp32, DNA, or gp41 yields higher
molecular weight species. To form cross-links of trimers or higher,
both cysteine residues must be involved and be close to or in the
gp59-gp59 subunit interface. Two simple models can be generated that
describe gp59-gp59 oligomer formation. The subunits could be oriented
head to head, as shown in Fig. 6A, such that Cys-42
cross-links to Cys-42 and Cys-215 cross-links to Cys-215.
Alternatively, the subunits could be in a head to tail orientation,
such that Cys-215 cross-links to Cys-42 (Fig. 6A).
A fluorescently labeled thiol-thiol cross-linker (TMEA-AMCA) was
utilized to map protein-protein interactions. TMEA-AMCA (Fig. 1C) was synthesized from the trifunctional thiol-reactive
cross-linker TMEA and the fluorescent probe AMCA-HPDP (as described
under "Experimental Procedures"). AMCA-HPDP was reduced with the
phosphine TCEP to yield the fluorescence probe with a free sulfhydryl
group, which was then mixed with TMEA. The mixture was separated by
HPLC, and the product was verified by MALDI mass spectrometry (data not shown).
gp59 was cross-linked with this reagent in the presence of DNA. Some of
the mixture was separated by SDS-PAGE, and the cross-links were
visualized with a Fluor-S multiimager. In transilluminator mode, the
fluorescence of the probe, AMCA, was detected (Fig. 6B) and
demonstrated that higher cross-linked species are present. The
remaining solution (not subjected to SDS-PAGE) was digested with
trypsin, and the resulting peptides were separated by HPLC. Fractions
were collected and placed on the stage of the Fluor-S to determine
which contained fluorophore and thus the cross-linked peptides (Fig.
6C). Fraction 17 contained the most fluorescence and was
analyzed by MALDI mass spectrometry. Masses of 2550.93 (Fig.
7A) and 3668.38 (Fig.
7B) were observed, consistent with tryptic fragments
containing Cys-42 cross-linked to Cys-42 plus the cross-linker ([M + H]+ = 2550.91) and Cys-215 cross-linked to Cys-215 plus
the cross-linker ([M + H]+ = 3668.20). The fragment
containing Cys-215 has two missed cleavages (sequence KSCKY), which is
not unexpected, considering that the labeled cysteine residue is so
close to the tryptic cleavage sites. Thus, the interaction between gp59
subunits appears to be head to head (Fig.
8A).
gp59 is needed to load gp41 onto single-stranded DNA covered with
gp32 protein. gp59 acts via contacts with gp41 as well as gp32 and may
form a ternary complex with these two proteins. Previous data indicated
that oligomer formation of gp59 may be an important step in loading the
hexameric helicase (14). As such, the architecture and stoichiometry of
the gp41-gp59 complex was analyzed and revealed that 1) both the N and
C terminus of gp41 lie in the gp41-gp41 subunit interface and interact
with gp59; 2) the site of interaction of gp41 on gp59 is close to
Cys-215; 3) conformational changes in the gp41-gp59 complex occur upon
gp41 loading on DNA; 4) gp59 forms a hexamer upon binding gp41, and the
gp59 subunits are arranged in a head to head orientation.
The Interaction between gp41 and gp59--
Labeling either the N
terminus of gp41 (Met-1) or the C terminus (Cys-476) with a
trifunctional cross-linker followed by exposure to ultraviolet light to
initiate cross-linking resulted in formation of gp41-gp41 homodimers.
These experiments imply that both the N terminus and C terminus are on
the same face of gp41 and located close to or in the subunit interface.
Cross-linking studies also indicate that both the N and C terminus of
gp41 interact with gp59. Thiol-thiol cross-linking indicated that the C
terminus of gp41 interacts with gp59 close to Cys-215. However, as the
helicase is loaded onto DNA, a conformational change in the gp41-gp59
complex occurs, such that thiol-thiol cross-linking is no longer effective.
The ability of gp59 to interact at the gp41 subunit interface could
have important implications for gp41 assembly. The thermodynamics of
gp41 hexamer formation has not been well characterized. At physiologic
concentrations of gp41 and ATP, the protein may exist in an equilibrium
between oligomeric states. Cross-linking experiments indicated that the
presence of gp59 caused formation of gp41 hexamers even in the absence
of ATP. Binding of gp59 to the gp41 subunit interface could strengthen
the association between gp41 subunits, facilitating formation of the
hexamer, and promote loading of the helicase.
Oligomeric State and Subunit Arrangement of gp59--
Previous
studies showed that gp59 was capable of self-association on DNA or in
the presence of gp32 and could form at least pentameric species (14).
Thiol-thiol cross-linking of gp59 in the presence of gp41 demonstrated
that conformational changes induced by gp41 allow self-association. The
largest observable species migrates as a gp59 pentamer, although higher
multimers could be formed. ITC was employed to accurately assess the
multimeric state of gp59 in the presence of the helicase and showed
that the gp59 bound as a hexamer to the gp41 hexamer. Given the
functional hexameric state of gp41, we speculate that this multimeric
state may also be the active conformer of gp59. As such, the
architecture of the gp59 complex in the presence of gp41 was investigated.
The site of gp59-gp59 interaction was mapped via a novel methodology
involving cross-linking of the protein in the presence of gp41 with a
fluorescently labeled cross-linker, digestion of the protein with
trypsin, isolation of the cross-linked peptides by virtue of the
fluorophore, and identification of the site of cross-linking by MALDI
mass spectrometry. The subunits were found to be oriented in a head to
head orientation, with Cys-42 on one subunit being in close proximity
to Cys-42 in an adjacent subunit and Cys-215 on one subunit being in
close proximity to Cys-215 in a second subunit, as represented in the
model in Fig. 8A.
Cryoelectron microscopy studies on the E. coli DnaB and DnaC
proteins, the bacterial homologs of T4 gp41 and gp59, respectively, show that the two proteins form stacked hexameric rings (16). Formation of rings is a feature conserved in DNA replication because of
the thermodynamic stability of the ring as well as the ability to
circumscribe DNA and form stable protein-DNA complexes. Based on the
analogous E. coli system and the ability of many replication proteins to assemble into rings, gp59 is also predicted to form a ring
with the subunits oriented in a head to head arrangement, as shown in
the speculative model in Fig. 8B.
A Model for Helicase Assembly--
A sequential pathway for
primosome assembly is outlined in Fig. 9.
It is likely that the gp41-gp59 complex forms after gp59 is bound to
gp32-DNA. The Kd value for a gp59 binding to a
gp32-DNA complex was determined to be ~2 nM (19), whereas the Kd for the binding of gp41 to gp59 in the
absence of DNA or gp32 is ~450 nM. Hence, we favor as the
initial step binding of gp59 to gp32-coated DNA.
The predicted binding site for gp41 on gp59 bound to gp32-DNA is close
to Cys-215, based on the site of gp32-gp59 interaction and thiol-thiol
cross-linking between gp41 and gp59 in the absence of DNA. Thiol-thiol
cross-linking between gp41 and gp59 is maintained even when gp32 is
preincubated with gp59, consistent with previous results that indicate
that gp59 has distinct sites for gp32 and gp41. However, this
cross-linking is abolished when DNA is added, although the N and C
terminus of gp41 remain in contact with gp59. It is possible that the
site of thiol-thiol cross-linking in the absence of DNA represents the
initial site of gp41 binding to the gp59-gp32-DNA complex. In the
second step, loading of the helicase on DNA is mediated by
conformational changes in gp59 and the architecture of the gp41-gp59
complex, resulting in the loss of thiol-thiol cross-linking (which is
slow relative to helicase loading), although the proteins remain in
contact. gp59 binds to both the A-domain of gp32 and the core domain,
potentially destabilizing gp32-DNA interactions to facilitate the
removal of gp32 from DNA. The end result is the removal of gp32 in the third step followed by replacement by the helicase.
It is not known if gp59 departs or remains associated with the gp41-DNA
complex. Jones et al. (9) demonstrated by a gel shift assay
that the gp41-gp59-DNA complex is stable. Furthermore, our
cross-linking experiments in which the N and C termini of gp41 were
labeled with a trifunctional cross-linker also showed cross-linking
between gp41 and gp59 in the presence of DNA, suggesting that the
tripartite complex is stable. Once the helicase is assembled, the
primase is likely to be loaded next. Binding of the primase to helicase
is weak in the absence of DNA (2, 20); thus, loading of the helicase
onto DNA by gp59 is requisite for a stable primosome. The primase may
serve to displace gp59 from the helicase and bind in its place.
Evidence for this was observed in cross-linking experiments that showed
an interaction between gp59 and the primase,2 which is
being investigated further. If this mechanism holds true, the assembly
of the primosome would show strong parallels to the successive steps
observed in loading of the gp45 clamp protein by the gp44/62 clamp
loader (21-23), as gp59 assembles the helicase ring, chaperones the
primase, and departs from the replication fork.
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Ann Valentine
for assistance with the isothermal titration calorimetry experiments.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Chemistry, 414 Wartik Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802. Tel.: 814-865-2882; Fax:
814-865-2973; E-mail: sjb1@psu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111951200
2
F. T. Ishmael, S. C. Alley, and
S. J. Benkovic, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
ssDNA, single-stranded DNA;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
gp41c, gp41 with a cysteine
residue added to the C terminus (Cys-476);
DMF, dimethylformamide;
SA-HRP, streptavidin linked to horseradish peroxidase;
Sulfo-SBED, sulfosuccinimide-2-[6-(biotinamido)-2-(p-azidobenzamido)
hexanoamido]ethyl-1,3'-dithiopropionate;
BMH, 1,6
bis-maleimidohexane;
AMCA, N-6-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetamido;
AMCA-HPDP, N-[6-(7-
amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetamido)hexyl]-3'-(2'-pyridyldithio)propionamide;
ITC, isothermal titration calorimetry;
TMEA, tris(2-maleimidoethyl)amine;
TCEP, tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine
hydrochloride;
MALDI, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization;
HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography;
ATP
Assembly of the Bacteriophage T4 Helicase
ARCHITECTURE AND STOICHIOMETRY OF THE gp41-gp59 COMPLEX*
, and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helices
and contains a C-terminal and an N-terminal domain (10). Mueser
et al. (10) have shown that gp59 binds to forked DNA
substrates with higher affinity than ssDNA. Furthermore, it has been
proposed that duplex DNA binds to the N-terminal domain, whereas ssDNA
binds to the C-terminal domain based on models generated from the gp59
crystal structure and its similarity to high mobility group proteins
(10).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-galactopyranoside. The cells
were centrifuged at 4,000 × g for 30 min and
resuspended in chitin column buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA). The
cells were lysed by sonication and centrifuged for 30 min at
20,000 × g, and the supernatant was applied to a 10-ml
chitin column. The column was washed with 1 liter of chitin column
buffer, and gp41 was cleaved from the column by the addition of 100 mM DTT dissolved in chitin column buffer for 24 h. The
protein was eluted from the chitin column and subsequently diluted so
that the NaCl concentration was 200 mM. It was then loaded
at 0.5 ml/min onto a 15-ml P11 column (Whatman) equilibrated with 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 200 mM NaCl, and 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. gp41 does not bind to the column
under these conditions and was collected in the flow-through fraction.
The protein was concentrated to ~10 µM with an Amicon
stirred cell concentrator equipped with a YM30 membrane. For
purification of gp41 with a C-terminal cysteine added (Cys-476, denoted
as gp41c), the protein was cleaved from the chitin column with 100 mM cysteine dissolved in 20 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mM EDTA. The
rest of the purification was as described above. The gp41 and gp41c
proteins were dialyzed into 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, and 10% glycerol and stored at
70 °C.
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (15 mg/ml dissolved in 50% acetonitrile, 50% water, 0.1%
trifluoroacetic acid), and the mixture was spotted and air-dried on a
MALDI target plate. The sample was analyzed by a Voyager MALDI mass
spectrometer (Perseptive) in linear mode to confirm that only the N
terminus was labeled. Positive ions were detected using a delayed
extraction time of 300 ns and 250 laser scans.
S. Data were analyzed by Origin 5.0 (MicroCal).
Heats of dilution were subtracted from all data before fitting. Heats
of dilution were determined in a separate control experiment by
injecting the protein into buffer. Data analysis requires a binding
model, and fitting returns values for the binding constant
K,
H of binding,
S of binding, and the binding stoichiometry N.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Structure of cross-linkers used in this
study. A, the thiol-reactive trifunctional cross-linker
containing a cysteine-reactive 2-thiopyridine mixed disulfide, a
photoactivable arylazide, and the affinity probe biotin. B,
Sulfo-SBED, the amine-reactive trifunctional cross-linker used
in these studies. C, TMEA-AMCA, a fluorescent
homobifunctional thiol-thiol cross-linker.

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Cross-linking between gp41 and gp59.
A, cross-linking between the C terminus of gp41 and gp59. A
cysteine residue was added to the C terminus of gp41 as described under
"Experimental Procedures." This site was labeled with a
photoactivable trifunctional cross-linker (Fig. 1A) and
cross-linked to gp59. The proteins were mixed at a final concentration
of 1 µM each in the presence or absence of 3 mM ATP and/or 5 nM ssDNA (M13mp18). The lanes
on the Western blot (using SA-HRP as a probe) represent gp41 not
exposed to light (lane 1); gp41 exposed to light
(lane 2); gp41 mixed with gp59 (lane
3); gp41 mixed with gp59 and ATP (lane
4); gp41 mixed with gp59 and DNA (lane
5); gp41 mixed with gp59, ATP, and DNA (lane
6). Lanes 7-12 contain the same components as
lanes 1-6, except 100 mM DTT was
added. B, cross-linking between gp59 and gp41 labeled at the
N terminus with Sulfo-SBED. Lane 1, gp41 without
exposure to light; lane 2, gp41 plus exposure to
light; lane 3, gp41 plus gp59; lane
4, gp41 plus gp59 and ATP; lane 5,
gp41 plus gp59 and DNA; lane 6, gp41 plus gp59,
ATP, and DNA. Lanes 7-11, the same as lanes
2-6, except 100 mM DTT was added.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Thiol-thiol cross-linking between gp41 and
gp59. A, gp41 was labeled at the N terminus with a
biotin probe and cross-linked using BMH in the presence of gp59 (the
proteins were mixed to a final concentration of 1 µM
each) and 3 mM ATP and/or 5 nM ssDNA (M13mp18)
as labeled. The protein and cross-links were identified by a Western
blot using SA-HRP as a probe. Contents of the gel are as follows: gp41,
gp59, ATP, and DNA (lane 1); gp41, gp59, and DNA
(lane 2); gp41, gp59, and ATP (lane
3); gp41 and gp59 (lane 4); gp41 alone
in the presence of BMH (lane 5). The bands
corresponding to cross-links are denoted by arrows on the
right side of the gel. B, gp59 was
preincubated with gp32 and then mixed with gp41 and BMH. Each lane of
the gel contains: gp32, gp59, gp41, DNA, and ATP (lane
1); gp32, gp59, gp41, and DNA (lane
2); gp32, gp59, gp41, and ATP (lane
3); gp32, gp59, and gp41 (lane 4).
C, cross-linking between gp32 and gp59 in the presence
(lane 3) and absence (lane
2) of gp41 using BMH. gp32 was labeled with biotin and
cross-linked to gp59 with BMH followed by SDS-PAGE and a Western blot
procedure using SA-HRP to detect gp32-gp59 cross-links.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
The site of interaction between gp41 and
gp59. A, incubation of gp32 labeled with a probe via a
mixed disulfide results in complete transfer of the probe to Cys-42 of
gp59 by a disulfide exchange reaction. B, thiol-thiol
cross-linking of gp41 and gp59 using BMH (final concentration of each
protein was 1 µM in the presence or absence of 3 mM ATP and/or 5 nM ssDNA). Lane
1, gp41 by itself in the presence of BMH. Lanes
2-5, gp41 cross-linked to gp59 with Cys-42 modified.
Lane 2, gp41 and gp59; lane
3, gp41, gp59, and ATP; lane 4, gp41,
gp59, and DNA; lane 5, gp41, gp59, DNA, and ATP.
Lanes 6-9 contain the same components as
lanes 2-5, with the exception that unmodified
gp59 was used. C, model of gp32 and gp41 bound to gp59. gp32
binds close to Cys-42 of gp59, whereas gp41 binds close to
Cys-215.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Oligomeric state of gp59 in the presence of
gp41. A, thiol-thiol cross-linking with BMH in the
presence of gp41 resulted in higher oligomeric species of gp59. gp41
was mixed with gp59 in the presence or absence of DNA and/or ATP as
labeled in the figure. Oligomeric states of gp59 are labeled to the
right of the gel with arrows. B, gp59
(21 µM) was titrated into gp41 (2.2 µM) to
give the binding isoterm shown in the figure. The data were fit to a
one-site model, and the estimated Kd for the process
was 450 ± 120 nM, with a stoichiometry of 0.95 ± 0.06 gp59 hexamers/1 gp41 hexamer. C, the oligomerization
of gp41 was investigated in the presence of gp59. gp59 was labeled with
biotin, and gp41 was labeled with rhodamine to determine complexes
involving each protein by using Western blot with SA-HRP as a probe and
fluorescence, respectively. Lanes 1-5 contain
gp59, gp41, and DSS, visualized by Western blot (lane
1); gp59, gp41, and DSS visualized by fluorescence
(lane 2); gp41, ATP, and DSS (lane
3); gp41 and DSS (lane 4); and gp41
(lane 5).
S (a nonhydrolyzable ATP
analog). Under these conditions, gp41 is present as a hexameric ring
(18). The calorimeter measures the amount of power required to
compensate for each injection and maintain a constant temperature with
respect to a reference cell. As the binding sites are saturated, each
injection peak becomes smaller until the heat reflects only dilution of
the titrant molecule. An independent control experiment with only
buffer in the cell provides a measure of this background. The data in
this experiment were fit to a model describing a single set of
identical binding sites (single site model). Binding of gp41 to gp59 is
an exothermic process, with a dissociation constant of 450 ± 120 nM (Fig. 5B). The stoichiometry of gp59 to gp41
was calculated to be 0.95:1 ± 0.06, indicating that a hexamer of
gp59 bound to the gp41 hexamer.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Mapping the point of contact between gp59
subunits. A, possible orientations of the gp59
multimer. The protein subunits could be oriented head to head with
Cys-42 in close proximity to Cys-42 and Cys-215 close to Cys-215.
Alternatively, the subunits could be arranged "head to tail" in
which Cys-42 and Cys-215 are in close proximity. B, gp59 was
cross-linked with the fluorescent cross-linker shown in Fig.
1C and separated by SDS-PAGE, and the cross-link bands were
visualized with a Fluor-S multiimager. C, cross-linked gp59
was digested with trypsin and subjected to HPLC as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Cross-linked peptides were identified by
detecting the fluorescent fractions with a Fluor-S multiimager.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
MALDI mass spectrometry of cross-linked gp59
peptides. A, MALDI mass spectrometry of this fraction
identified a mass of 2550.93, consistent with a cross-link between
Cys-42 and Cys-42. B, MALDI mass spectrometry identified a
second site of cross-link, between Cys-215 and Cys-215. The
arrows over the peptide sequence with the
cross-linked cysteine residues indicate sites of missed cleavage.

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Model of gp59 oligomer formation.
A, a model is proposed in which the gp59 subunits are
arranged "head to head" with Cys-42 close to Cys-42 and Cys-215
close to Cys-215. B, the two proteins are predicted to form
stacked rings.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
A model for gp41 assembly by gp59. gp59
binds to gp32-coated DNA, inducing gp59 multimer formation. This is
followed by binding of gp41 to the complex. Conformational changes in
gp59 allow gp41 assembly and gp32 removal. Finally, association of gp61
displaces gp59 and binds gp41, completing primosome formation.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Present address: Chiron Corp., 201 Elliot Ave. W., Suite 150, Seattle, WA 98119.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
S, adenosine
5'-O-(thiotriphosphate).
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Benkovic, S. J.,
Valentine, A. M.,
and Salinas, F.
(2001)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
70,
181-208[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Dong, F.,
and von Hippel, P. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19625-19631 3.
Hinton, D. M.,
and Nossal, N. G.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
10873-10878 4.
Cunningham, R. P.,
and Berger, H.
(1977)
Virology
80,
67-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Karam, J. D.
(1994)
Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4
, pp. 38-53, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
6.
Mosig, G.
(1994)
Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4
, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
7.
Lefebvre, S. D.,
and Morrical, S. W.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
272,
312-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Yonesaki, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1284-1289 9.
Jones, C. E.,
Mueser, T. C.,
and Nossal, N. G.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
27145-27154 10.
Mueser, T. C.,
Jones, C. E.,
Nossal, N. G.,
and Hyde, C. C.
(2000)
J. Mol. Biol.
296,
597-612[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Morrical, S. W.,
Hempstead, K.,
and Morrical, M. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
33069-33081 12.
Lefebvre, S. D.,
Wong, M. L.,
and Morrical, S. W.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22830-22838 13.
Morrical, S. W.,
Beernink, H. T. H.,
Dash, A.,
and Hempstead, K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20198-20207 14.
Ishmael, F. T.,
Alley, S. C.,
and Benkovic, S. J.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
25236-25242 15.
Raney, K. D.,
Carver, T. E.,
and Benkovic, S. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14074-14081 16.
San Martin, C.,
Radermacher, M.,
Wolpensinger, B.,
Engel, A.,
Miles, C. S.,
Dixon, N. E.,
and Carazo, J. M.
(1998)
Structure
6,
501-509[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Alley, S. C.,
Ishmael, F. T.,
Jones, A. D.,
and Benkovic, S. J.
(2000)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
122,
6126-6127[CrossRef]
18.
Valentine, A. M.,
Ishmael, F. T.,
Shier, V. K.,
and Benkovic, S. J.
(2001)
Biocehmistry
40,
15074-15085
19.
Xu, H.,
Wang, Y.,
Bleuit, J. S.,
and Morrical, S. W.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
7651-7661[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Barry, J.,
and Alberts, B.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
33049-33062 21.
Sexton, D. J.,
Carver, T. E.,
Berdis, A. J.,
and Benkovic, S. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
28045-28051 22.
Kaboord, B. F.,
and Benkovic, S. J.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
1084-1092[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Sexton, D. J.,
Kaboord, B. F.,
Berdis, A. J.,
Carver, T. E.,
and Benkovic, S. J.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
7749-7756[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. W. Nelson, J. Yang, and S. J. Benkovic Site-directed Mutations of T4 Helicase Loading Protein (gp59) Reveal Multiple Modes of DNA Polymerase Inhibition and the Mechanism of Unlocking by gp41 Helicase J. Biol. Chem., March 31, 2006; 281(13): 8697 - 8706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yang, J. Xi, Z. Zhuang, and S. J. Benkovic The Oligomeric T4 Primase Is the Functional Form during Replication J. Biol. Chem., July 8, 2005; 280(27): 25416 - 25423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. C. Dudas and K. N. Kreuzer Bacteriophage T4 Helicase Loader Protein gp59 Functions as Gatekeeper in Origin-dependent Replication in Vivo J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21561 - 21569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhang, M. M. Spiering, M. A. Trakselis, F. T. Ishmael, J. Xi, S. J. Benkovic, and G. G. Hammes Assembly of the bacteriophage T4 primosome: Single-molecule and ensemble studies PNAS, March 1, 2005; 102(9): 3254 - 3259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. De Felice, L. Esposito, B. Pucci, M. De Falco, M. Rossi, and F. M. Pisani A CDC6-like Factor from the Archaea Sulfolobus solfataricus Promotes Binding of the Mini-chromosome Maintenance Complex to DNA J. Biol. Chem., October 8, 2004; 279(41): 43008 - 43012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Jones, E. M. Green, J. A. Stephens, T. C. Mueser, and N. G. Nossal Mutations of Bacteriophage T4 59 Helicase Loader Defective in Binding Fork DNA and in Interactions with T4 32 Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein J. Biol. Chem., June 11, 2004; 279(24): 25721 - 25728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ma, T. Wang, J. L. Villemain, D. P. Giedroc, and S. W. Morrical Dual Functions of Single-stranded DNA-binding Protein in Helicase Loading at the Bacteriophage T4 DNA Replication Fork J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 19035 - 19045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yang, M. A. Trakselis, R. M. Roccasecca, and S. J. Benkovic The Application of a Minicircle Substrate in the Study of the Coordinated T4 DNA Replication J. Biol. Chem., December 12, 2003; 278(50): 49828 - 49838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||