Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111359200 on April 4, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 20618-20624, June 7, 2002
Herstatin, an Autoinhibitor of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor
Receptor 2 Tyrosine Kinase, Modulates Epidermal Growth Factor
Signaling Pathways Resulting in Growth Arrest*
Quincey A.
Justman and
Gail M.
Clinton
From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon
Health & Sciences University, Portland, Oregon 97201
Received for publication, November 28, 2001, and in revised form, March 19, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Herstatin is an autoinhibitor of the ErbB family
consisting of subdomains I and II of the human epidermal growth factor
receptor 2 (ErbB-2) extracellular domain and a novel C-terminal domain encoded by an intron. Herstatin binds to human epidermal growth factor
receptor 2 and to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), blocking
receptor oligomerization and tyrosine phosphorylation. In this study,
we characterized several early steps in EGFR activation and
investigated downstream signaling events induced by epidermal growth
factor (EGF) and by transforming growth factor
(TGF-
) in NIH3T3
cell lines expressing EGFR with and without herstatin. Herstatin
expression decreased EGF-induced EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation and
delayed receptor down-regulation despite receptor occupancy by ligand
with normal binding affinity. Akt stimulation by EGF and TGF-
, but
not by fibroblast growth factor 2, was almost completely blocked in the
presence of herstatin. Surprisingly, EGF and TGF-
induced full
activation of MAPK in duration and intensity and stimulated association
of the EGFR with Shc and Grb2. Although MAPK was fully stimulated,
herstatin expression prevented TGF-
-induced DNA synthesis and
EGF-induced proliferation. The herstatin-mediated uncoupling of MAPK
from Akt activation was also observed in Chinese hamster ovary cells
co-transfected with EGFR and herstatin. These findings show that
herstatin expression alters EGF and TGF-
signaling profiles,
culminating in inhibition of proliferation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The ErbB family of receptor tyrosine kinases includes the
prototypical EGFR,1 human
epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2, HER-3, and HER-4. The ErbB
receptors consist of an extracellular ligand binding domain (ECD), a
single transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain
(1-3). Several growth factors containing EGF-like domains bind with
high affinity to each ErbB receptor except HER-2, which appears to
function solely as a transactivating co-receptor (4-6). Growth factor
binding induces homomer and heteromer interactions between ErbB family
members, which are required for kinase activation and receptor
autophosphorylation in trans (2, 7, 8). The tyrosine
phosphorylation sites on ErbB receptors provide docking sites for
signaling proteins that execute such diverse cellular responses as
survival, proliferation, migration, differentiation, and apoptosis (9,
10). Given this wide range of action, regulation of ErbB signaling is
critical, and misregulation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of
many cancers (4-10).
The ErbB receptors transduce signals through the mitogen-activated
protein kinase (MAPK) cascade and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase
(PI3K)/Akt signaling pathway. Generally, EGF-like growth factors
concomitantly activate these two pathways (11-13), whereas several
EGFR inhibitors suppress both signaling cascades (12, 14, 15). Although
the MAPK and the PI3K/Akt pathways are commonly coupled, recent
evidence indicates that Akt is more important in initiating
proliferation and survival signals (11, 16). Targeted inactivation of
Akt inhibits cell growth (17, 18), inducing arrest in G1
independent of MAPK activation by EGF (12). In addition, EGF induction
of Akt activity protects against Fas-induced apoptosis by a
MAPK-independent mechanism (19). Because activation of Akt protects
against drug-induced death of human breast cancer cells (12, 18, 19),
inhibitors that target the Akt pathway should be effective in enhancing
tumor cell death.
Interactions between ECDs are critical in ErbB receptor oligomerization
and activation (20-22). Receptor interactions in vivo may
also require a membrane anchor (21, 22), which increases the affinity
between dimer partners ~10,000-fold (23). Because HER-2 is the
preferred heteromeric partner of ErbB receptors (24, 25), it has been
hypothesized that dominant negative mutants containing the HER-2 ECD
(21, 26) or subdomains from its ECD (27) could disrupt all combinations
of ErbB receptor interactions. Indeed, a mutant missing most of the
cytoplasmic domain of p185neu blocks formation of HER-2
homodimers (28), HER-2/EGFR heteromers (15, 27, 28), and HER-2
association with HER-3 (29). This p185neu dominant negative
mutant also suppresses EGF-mediated activation of both MAPK and
PI3K/Akt (15, 28).
ErbB splice variants that encode truncated ECDs have been
suggested to modulate ErbB signaling (30) either by sequestering growth
factors (31) or by altering receptor interactions (29, 32). One of
these, herstatin, is a secreted alternative product of the
HER-2 gene containing ECD subdomains I and II followed by an
intron-encoded 79-amino acid sequence (32). Herstatin has been shown to
bind to EGFR and HER-2 and to block homomeric and heteromeric receptor
interactions (29, 32). In contrast to dominant negative mutants,
herstatin does not require a membrane anchor to achieve complex
formation and trans inhibition, suggesting that its novel
C-terminal domain may confer high affinity binding to the receptors.
Indeed, the intron-encoded domain, expressed as a recombinant peptide,
binds to HER-2 and the EGFR (29, 32). Although herstatin inhibits the
initial steps of receptor activation, its impact on ligand binding and
intracellular signaling events has not been examined. In light of the
novel structure and receptor binding properties of herstatin,
determination of its effects on signaling is required to understand its
mechanism of action and impact on the biology of the ErbB receptors.
In this study, we demonstrate that herstatin selectively modulates
signaling cascades triggered by EGF and TGF-
. These results suggest
that this naturally occurring, alternative HER-2 product provides a novel mechanism for generating signaling diversity by EGFs.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Generation of Stable Herstatin EGFR3T3
Clones--
EGFR3T3 cells were derived from NIH3T3 cells by
transfection with human EGFR in mammalian expression vector
pCDNA3.1 (Invitrogen). Stably transfected clones were selected in
DMEM + 10% FBS supplemented with 0.4 mg/ml G418. A clonal line
expressing high levels of EGFR was transfected with human herstatin in
pCDNA3.1/Hygro (Invitrogen) using Superfect reagent (Qiagen) as per
the manufacturer's instructions. Control 3T3 cell lines were generated
by transfection with herstatin alone or with the corresponding empty
vector. Stable cell lines were selected with 0.1 mg/ml hygromycin B and
maintained in DMEM + 10% FBS containing 0.4 mg/ml G418 and 0.1 mg/ml
hygromycin B. Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were grown in DMEM
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum.
Antibodies--
Herstatin polyclonal antibody was generated as
described previously (32) and used at a dilution of 1:10,000. All
antibodies were diluted into TBST (Tris-buffered saline plus 0.005%
(v/v) Tween 20). Herstatin monoclonal antibody was a generous gift from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY) and was used at a 1:1000 dilution. Antibodies to MAPK and Akt were obtained from Cell Signaling and used at a 1:1000 dilution. Phospho-specific polyclonal antibodies to MAPK (phosphorylated at T202 and Y204) and
Akt (phosphorylated at S473) were also obtained from Cell
Signaling and used at a 1:1000 dilution. Rabbit polyclonal anti-EGFR
antibody was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. and used at a
1:1000 dilution. Monoclonal anti-Shc antibody was obtained from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. and used at a 1:1000 dilution. Rabbit
polyclonal anti-Grb2 antibody was obtained from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc. and used at a 1:1000 dilution. Rabbit polyclonal
anti-p185HER-2/neu antibody was characterized previously
(33) and used at a 1:10,000 dilution. Anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal
antibody was obtained from Sigma and used at a 1:10,000 dilution.
Transient Transfections--
Cells were grown to ~80%
confluence in 6-well plates and then the plasmid DNAs indicated in the
figure legends were introduced using LipofectAMINE reagent (Invitrogen)
as per the manufacturer's instructions. Transfection efficiencies
between samples were compared by co-transfection with fluorescent green
protein expression plasmid (Invitrogen) and inspection by fluorescence
microscopy. Proteins were analyzed at 40 h after DNA introduction.
Receptor Internalization Assays--
Cells were grown to 70%
confluence, serum-starved for 20 h in 0.5% FBS, washed twice in
ice-cold PBS, and incubated with EGF (Upstate Biotechnology) at 100 ng/ml in cold DMEM for 2 h at 4 °C. Cells were then rinsed
twice with PBS, placed in pre-warmed DMEM, and returned to 37 °C to
allow receptor internalization. At various time points, cells were
placed on ice and washed twice with ice-cold PBS, and then cell surface
proteins were labeled with freshly dissolved EZ-link
Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin (Pierce) at 0.5 mg/ml in PBS for 30 min at room
temperature. To quench the biotinylation reaction, cells were placed on
ice and washed twice with cold PBS containing 0.2 mg/ml bovine serum
albumin and twice with PBS. EGFR from lysed cells was
immunoprecipitated (see below). Samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE in a
6% polyacrylamide gel, electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membrane,
and overlaid with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase at 1 µg/ml in
TBST (Pierce). Biotinylated proteins were visualized by exposing blots
to x-ray film (X-Omat; Eastman Kodak Co.) after treatment with
Supersignal West Pico reagent (Pierce).
Immunoprecipitations--
Cells were washed in PBS and then
lysed on ice in MTG (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 100 mM
NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 1 (v/v) Nonidet P-40, and 2 mM
sodium orthovanadate) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor
mixtures I and II (Sigma; used as per the manufacturer's recommendations). Cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation, and protein concentrations were quantified by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). EGFR from 150 µg of cell lysate was precipitated by overnight incubation with 1 µg of anti-EGFR at 4 °C. Signaling complexes from 500 µg of cell extract were precipitated by overnight incubation with 2 µg of anti-Grb2 at 4 °C. Immune complexes were bound to 25 µl of protein G-Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences) by co-incubation for
40 min at 4 °C, centrifuged, and washed three times with 1 ml of
ice-cold MTG (EGFR) or PBS (Grb2). Immune complexes were boiled in
SDS-PAGE sample buffer for 5 min and analyzed as a Western blot.
Western Blot Analysis--
Western blotting was conducted as
described previously (29). Briefly, cells were lysed, and protein
concentrations were quantified as described for immunoprecipitations.
Lysates were boiled in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and loaded onto
polyacrylamide gels at 30 µg/lane. After electrophoresis, proteins
were transferred onto nitrocellulose, stained with Ponceau S, incubated
with antibody as described above, and visualized by exposure to x-ray
film (X-Omat; Kodak) after treatment with SuperSignal West Pico reagent
or SuperSignal West Dura reagent (Pierce). Blots were stripped with the
Re-Blot Western blot recycling kit (Chemicon International, Inc.) as
per the manufacturer's instructions.
[3H]Thymidine Incorporation Assay--
Cells were
grown to 70% confluence, starved for 24 h in DMEM with 0.5% FBS,
and then treated with various concentrations of TGF-
for 18 h
at 37 °C. Ligand was removed, and cells were incubated in the
presence of [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/ml in DMEM) for 4 h at 37 °C. Cells were washed with cold PBS, incubated in 10%
trichloroacetic acid at room temperature for 10 min, and washed
twice with 5% trichloroacetic acid. DNA was precipitated with 100%
ethanol and then solubilized by incubation in 0.2 N NaOH
for 10 min at room temperature. Samples were neutralized with 0.4 N HCl and counted in a scintillation counter.
EGF Proliferation Assay--
Cells were plated in quadruplicate,
grown to confluence, serum-starved for 18 h in DMEM containing
0.5% FBS, and transferred to growth medium (DMEM containing 0.5% FBS
and 10 nM EGF). Three days later, growth medium was
removed, and live cells were quantified with
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (Sigma) as
described previously (34).
125I-EGF Binding--
The 125I-EGF
binding analysis was conducted as described previously (35). Briefly,
cells were grown to 70% confluence, serum-starved for 24 h, and
incubated at 4 °C for 2 h with 175 pM
125I-EGF (NEN) and different amounts of unlabeled
EGF (total EGF concentrations ranged from 175 pM to 10 nM) in binding buffer (DMEM plus 50 mM Hepes,
pH 7.4, and 5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin). Cells were washed and then
extracted in 0.1 N NaOH plus 0.1% (w/v) SDS, and bound
125I-EGF was quantified by gamma counting.
 |
RESULTS |
Herstatin Reduces EGF-stimulated Tyrosine Phosphorylation and
Down-regulation of the EGFR--
Previous studies have shown that
transient coexpression of herstatin with the EGFR in CHO cells results
in diminished dimerization and tyrosine phosphorylation of the receptor
in response to EGF (29). To further characterize the effects of
herstatin on EGFR and to investigate its impact on EGF-induced
intracellular signaling, stable cell lines that express different
levels of herstatin were derived from NIH3T3 cells expressing human
EGFR (termed EGFR3T3 cells). Efforts to stably express herstatin in
several tumor cell lines that overexpress EGFR as well as HER-2 were
thwarted, presumably because of an inhibitory effect on cell survival.
EGFR3T3 cells were transfected with control or herstatin expression
plasmid, and clonal populations were isolated by selection with
hygromycin B. Varied levels of herstatin were expressed in
herstatin-transfected cell lines but not in the control-transfected
cells (Fig. 1A).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Herstatin expression, EGFR tyrosine
phosphorylation, and receptor down-regulation in parental and
herstatin-transfected EGFR3T3 cells. A, 30 µg of lysate
from parental and herstatin-expressing EGFR3T3 cells was separated by
7.5% SDS-PAGE and subjected to Western blot analysis for herstatin as
described under "Experimental Procedures." B, herstatin-
and mock-transfected EGFR3T3 cells were serum-starved for 20 h and
then incubated with 10 nM EGF for 20 min at 37 °C. Cell
extracts were resolved by 6% SDS-PAGE and analyzed as a Western blot
using anti-phosphotyrosine antibody. The blot was stripped as described
under "Experimental Procedures" and reprobed with anti-EGFR.
Results are representative of three independent experiments.
C, herstatin (clone 1)- and mock-transfected EGFR3T3 cells
were serum-starved as described above, incubated with 16 nM
EGF at 4 °C for 2 h, and incubated at 37 °C for the
durations indicated. Cell surface proteins were biotinylated as
described under "Experimental Procedures." EGFR was
immunoprecipitated from 150 µg of lysate, and immune complexes were
separated by 6% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and then
overlaid with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase. Films were scanned
by imaging densitometry (BioRad, model GS700) to quantitate
streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase signal. Similar results were
observed in two independent experiments.
|
|
To investigate the effects of herstatin on ligand-induced activation of
the receptor, herstatin- and control-transfected EGFR3T3 cells were
serum-starved for 20 h and treated with saturating concentrations
(10 nM) of EGF for 20 min, and phosphotyrosine levels of
the EGFR were assessed. Although clone 1 produced the greatest amount
of herstatin, each of the three herstatin-expressing clones exhibited a
similar reduction in tyrosine phosphorylation of the EGFR (Fig.
1B; see also Figs. 4B and 6A),
suggesting that maximal inhibition was achieved. The EGFR expression
levels were comparable between parental cells and the three different
clones, showing that expression of herstatin did not down-regulate the EGFR (Fig. 1B).
Because receptor tyrosine phosphorylation is required for endocytosis
(36), we hypothesized that reduced EGFR autophosphorylation levels in
the presence of herstatin alter EGF-mediated receptor down-regulation
from the cell surface. Parental and herstatin-expressing EGFR3T3 cells
were saturated with EGF at 4 °C and then returned to 37 °C, a
temperature permissive for internalization. After various incubation
times, cell surface proteins were biotinylated, and EGFR was
immunoprecipitated and visualized by streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase overlay. In the parental cell line, cell surface EGFR was
reduced by 80% at 10 min and was undetectable by 20 min after the
removal of the temperature block (Fig. 1C), in agreement
with other studies (37, 38). In herstatin-expressing cells, however, cell surface EGFR was reduced only about 35% at 10 min, and about one-third of the EGFR remained at the cell surface after 20 min of
incubation at 37 °C. Delayed down-regulation is consistent with
previous findings showing that EGFR degradation, a process contingent
upon endosomal location of the receptor, is blocked in CHO cells that
transiently express herstatin (29).
Herstatin Inhibits EGF-stimulated Akt Phosphorylation, but MAPK Is
Fully Activated--
Signal transduction through the ErbB family
includes both the MAPK and the PI3K/Akt signaling pathways, which are
generally stimulated simultaneously by growth factors (11-13). To
examine the role of herstatin in EGF signaling downstream from the
receptor, we treated EGFR3T3 parental and herstatin-expressing cells
with saturating amounts of EGF (16 nM) and observed the
kinetics of MAPK and Akt phosphorylation over a 1-h time course. In the
parental cell line, the highest level of phospho-Akt was detected at 20 min after EGF addition (Fig.
2A). In the
herstatin-expressing cells, however, little phospho-Akt was observed in
EGF-treated cells, with maximal levels reaching only 2% of the
parental controls. Phosphorylation of Akt was almost completely
abolished in the presence of herstatin; interestingly, there was no
reduction of phospho-MAPK levels. In parental and herstatin-expressing
cells, the time course and extent of MAPK activation were identical; maximal activation was achieved by 5 min and declined at 20 min after
the addition of EGF (Fig. 2A). To determine whether
induction of MAPK in herstatin-expressing cells was due to ectopic
overexpression of EGFR (39-41), we investigated EGF signaling through
endogenous receptors in 3T3 cells that express herstatin. As in the
EGFR3T3 cells, we observed preferential EGF activation of MAPK and
abrogation of Akt phosphorylation in the presence of herstatin (Fig.
2B). These data demonstrate that the signaling profile
caused by herstatin expression is not affected by ectopic
overexpression of EGFR.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
EGF-induced signaling in parental and
herstatin-expressing EGFR3T3 cells. A, herstatin (clone 1)-
and mock-transfected EGFR3T3 cells were serum-starved and incubated
with 16 nM EGF at 37 °C for the durations indicated.
Cell lysates were separated by 7.5% and 10% SDS-PAGE and then
subjected to Western blot analysis using antibodies specific for
phospho-Akt (phospho-Ser473) and phospho-p42/p44 MAPK
(phospho-T202 and Y204). Exposed films were
scanned by imaging densitometry to quantitate phospho-Akt signal. Blots
were stripped and probed with Akt antibody. Results are representative
of six independent experiments. B, herstatin- and
mock-transfected 3T3 cells were serum-starved and incubated with 10 nM EGF at 37 °C for the durations indicated. Cell
lysates were separated by 7.5% and 10% SDS-PAGE and then subjected to
Western blot analysis as described above.
|
|
EGF Induces the Formation of a Signaling Complex Containing EGFR,
phospho-Shc, and Grb2 in Herstatin-expressing Cells--
After EGF
treatment, the adaptor protein Shc binds the autophosphorylation domain
of EGFR, is tyrosine-phosphorylated, and recruits the Grb2-Sos
complex from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane (42). To investigate
whether EGF stimulation of MAPK in the presence of herstatin was
induced by EGFR through Shc and Grb2, we immunoprecipitated Grb2 and
examined the immune complex by Western blotting. In both parental and
herstatin-expressing cells, EGF-dependent association of
EGFR and Shc with Grb2 was detected (Fig.
3). Furthermore, Shc was
tyrosine-phosphorylated to a similar extent (Fig. 3), providing
evidence for an active signaling complex. Because HER-2 is the
preferred heterodimer partner of EGFR (4-6), endogenous HER-2 may be
present in the EGFR-Shc-Grb2 signaling complex, contributing to EGF
stimulation of the MAPK signaling cascade. However, HER-2 could not be
detected in the signaling complex immunoprecipitated from 500 µg of
either parental or herstatin-expressing cells (data not shown), even though the high titer antibody used (33) detects p185HER-2 in 20 µg
of 3T3 cell extract. These data suggest that Shc and Grb2 transduce the
herstatin-mediated EGF signal from EGFR to components of the MAPK
cascade, with no evidence of HER-2 involvement.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
EGF induces EGFR-Shc-Grb2 complex formation
in herstatin-expressing EGFR3T3 cells. Herstatin (clone 1)- and
mock-transfected EGFR3T3 cells were serum-starved and incubated with 10 nM EGF at 37 °C for 20 min. Proteins complexed to
anti-Grb2 were immunoprecipitated from 500 µg of cell lysate,
separated by 8% and 12% SDS-PAGE, and then subjected to Western blot
analysis using the antibodies indicated. The anti-phosphotyrosine blot
was stripped and reprobed with anti-Shc antibody. Results are
representative of two independent experiments.
|
|
Characterization of the Effects of EGF Concentration on
Intracellular Signaling in the Presence and Absence of
Herstatin--
Previous studies have shown that at very low EGF
concentrations, MAPK activation occurs in the absence of Akt activation
and EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation (43). We therefore examined whether signaling in EGFR3T3 cells exhibits a similar sensitivity to EGF concentration. Maximal stimulation of MAPK occurred independently of
Akt activation in EGFR3T3 cells treated with 0.01 nM EGF
(Fig. 4A), suggesting that
ectopic overexpression of EGFR did not eliminate sensitivity to very
low concentrations of EGF. At 0.1 nM EGF, a subsaturating
concentration, maximal stimulation of Akt was observed in parental
cells, but stimulation of Akt was inhibited in the herstatin-expressing
cells. Therefore, preferential inhibition of the Akt pathway by
herstatin could reflect a quantitative reduction in effective EGF
concentration by competitive inhibition. However, after treatment with
either 1 or 100 nM EGF (>100 times KD), EGFR phosphotyrosine levels were diminished ~10-fold, and Akt activation was reduced to the same extent (Fig. 4B). These
data suggest that herstatin has a qualitative impact on intracellular signaling that is independent of EGF concentration.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effects of EGF concentration on signaling in
parental and herstatin-expressing EGFR3T3 cells. A,
herstatin (clone 1)- and mock-transfected EGFR3T3 cells were
serum-starved, treated with 0, 0.01, and 10 nM EGF at
37 °C for 20 min, and analyzed by Western blot as described in the
Fig. 2 legend. Staining with Ponceau S confirms equal loading.
B, herstatin (clone 1)- and mock-transfected EGFR3T3 cells
were treated with l or 100 nM EGF as described in
A. Exposed films were scanned by imaging densitometry to
quantitate phosphotyrosine signal. Results are representative of two
independent experiments.
|
|
Herstatin Expression Does Not Alter the Binding Affinity of EGF for
EGR3T3 Cells--
Previous studies demonstrated that herstatin binds
to the extracellular domain of the HER-2 receptor (32) and forms a
stable complex with EGFR (29). Inhibition of EGFR by herstatin could be
caused by interference with EGF binding. To examine this possibility, we characterized the binding affinity of EGF to parental and
herstatin-expressing clones of EGFR3T3 cells. The cells were incubated
with subsaturating amounts (175 pM) of
125I-EGF, and its displacement by unlabeled EGF was
measured (Fig. 5). The displacement curve
exhibited by the parental cells was indistinguishable from that of cell
lines that expressed either high (clone 1) or low (clones 2 and 3)
levels of herstatin (see Fig. 1A). Moreover, Scatchard
analysis of the binding data, as described in the legend to Fig.
6, revealed the same apparent dissociation constant of ~500 pM in the absence and
presence of different levels of herstatin. These studies show that
herstatin expression does not prevent EGF binding or alter the EGF
binding affinity, suggesting that herstatin is not a competitive
inhibitor of EGF-mediated EGFR activation. Herstatin therefore
modulates signaling of receptors that are complexed with EGF.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Displacement of 125I-EGF by
unlabeled EGF in parental and herstatin-expressing EGFR3T3 cells.
Herstatin and mock-transfected EGFR3T3 cells were plated at 5 × 104 cells/well in 24-well plates and serum-starved. Cells
were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with 175 pM
125I-EGF and unlabeled EGF at total concentrations ranging
from 175 pM to 10 nM. Displacement of bound
125I-EGF by unlabeled EGF was plotted as the maximum
percentage bound 125I-EGF. The dissociation
constants (KD) of EGF for herstatin- and
mock-transfected EGFR3T3 clones were estimated by Scatchard analysis:
bound/free versus bound was plotted using KaleidaGraph
software (Synergy Analysis, 1997); the slopes of regression lines as
calculated by the program provided the estimate of
1/KD. All regression line
R2 values exceeded 0.99.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Herstatin effects on signaling
induced by EGF, TGF- , and FGF-2. A,
herstatin (clone 1)- and mock-transfected EGFR3T3 cells were
serum-starved and treated with l or 100 nM TGF- at
37 °C for 20 min and analyzed as described in Fig. 4B.
Results are representative of two independent experiments.
B, herstatin (clone 1)- and mock-transfected EGFR3T3 cells
were serum-starved and treated with 100 nM FGF-2 at
37 °C for 20 min, and cell lysate was subjected to Western blot
analysis using antibodies against phosphotyrosine and phospho-Akt. The
blot was stripped and incubated with Akt antibody. C, CHO
cells were grown to 80% confluence and transfected with 1.5 µg of
EGFR and 0.5 or 1.5 µg of herstatin expression plasmids. 20 h
after transfection, cells were serum-starved, treated with 10 nM EGF for 20 min at 37 °C, and analyzed for phospho-Akt
and phospho-p42/p44 MAPK by Western blot. Equal loading was confirmed
by Ponceau S staining.
|
|
Herstatin Inhibits TGF-
-induced Receptor Phosphorylation and Akt
Phosphorylation, Whereas MAPK Activation Is Unaffected--
TGF-
is
an EGFR ligand that has increased mitogenic and transforming potency
compared with EGF (44). Although these ligands compete for receptor
binding, they exhibit subtly different binding properties to the EGFR
(45) and show distinct co-receptor-dependent signal
potentiation (37). Despite these differences, parental and
herstatin-expressing EGFR3T3 cells treated with TGF-
displayed signaling profiles similar to those observed in response to EGF stimulation. Depression of EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation occurred in
the herstatin-expressing cells, particularly at high (100 nM) concentrations of TGF-
(Fig. 6A).
Moreover, phospho-Akt levels were markedly decreased, whereas MAPK
activation was unaffected at both low (1 nM) and high (100 nM) concentrations of TGF-
(Fig. 6A).
Herstatin Expression Does Not Alter FGF-2 Stimulation
of Akt--
The strong suppression of EGF- and TGF-
-induced Akt
phosphorylation in the EGFR3T3 cells that stably express herstatin
could be an indirect effect of herstatin expression or chronic ErbB receptor inhibition. To examine the integrity of the PI3K/Akt pathway,
we monitored phospho-Akt levels after treatment with FGF-2, a growth
factor that activates a heterologous receptor tyrosine kinase. Parental
and herstatin-expressing EGFR3T3 cells were serum-starved, exactly as
done before EGF treatment, and then cells were incubated with
saturating amounts of FGF-2 (10 nM) for 20 min. FGF-2
treatment stimulated the tyrosine phosphorylation of an 119-kDa
protein, the approximate size of the FGF receptor (Fig. 6B).
Furthermore, FGF-2 increased phospho-Akt levels to an equivalent extent
in the presence and absence of herstatin (Fig. 6B). These
data demonstrate the functional integrity of the PI3K/Akt pathway and
suggest that the reduction of phospho-Akt levels caused by herstatin
expression is specific to EGF- and TGF-
-induced signaling.
Herstatin Uncouples MAPK from Akt Activation in Transiently
Transfected CHO Cells--
To evaluate whether the uncoupling of
phospho-Akt from MAPK activation by herstatin was a feature confined to
the 3T3 cell background, we examined the EGF signaling profile in CHO
cells, which do not express endogenous EGFR (25). The cells were
transiently transfected with EGFR and different levels of herstatin
expression plasmids and then treated with EGF. Fig. 6C
illustrates that EGF induction of MAPK phosphorylation were unaffected
by expression of different amounts of herstatin. In contrast, Akt
activation was inhibited in proportion to herstatin expression levels.
Herstatin Depresses Mitogenic Stimulation by EGF and
TGF-
--
To test whether herstatin affected the
proliferative functions of the EGFR growth factors, TGF-
-induced
mitogenesis was assessed by measuring DNA synthesis. Cells were first
forced into quiescence by serum starvation for 40 h and then
treated with different concentrations of TGF-
. The ligand was
removed, and cells were incubated with [3H]thymidine to
quantify DNA synthesis. In the presence of herstatin, we observed a
striking decrease in TGF-
-induced [3H]thymidine
incorporation that was not overcome at high ligand concentrations (Fig.
7A). The impact of herstatin
on EGF-mediated cell proliferation was examined by quantitation of live
cells by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide assay (34). Equal numbers of EGFR3T3 control and
herstatin-transfected cells were plated, serum-starved, and then
treated for 72 h with vehicle or EGF. Herstatin expression
resulted in a significant reduction in viable cells in the absence of
EGF (p = 0.007; Fig. 7B), which may reflect
diminished survival under conditions of serum deprivation. Whereas EGF
treatment significantly increased the control EGFR3T3 cells
(p = 0.006; Fig. 7B), cells expressing herstatin displayed no significant proliferation in response to EGF
treatment. These results demonstrate that herstatin interrupts TGF-
-
and EGF-mediated mitogenic signal transduction, resulting in inhibition
of proliferation.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
TGF- -induced DNA
synthesis and EGF-induced proliferation of parental and
herstatin-expressing EGFR3T3 cells. A, herstatin (clone 1)-
and mock-transfected EGFR3T3 cells were plated at 5 × 104 in triplicate, serum-starved, and treated with TGF-
at the concentrations indicated. At 18 h, cells were incubated
with [3H]thymidine as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Levels of [3H]thymidine incorporation are
expressed as a percentage of the untreated control. Error
bars indicate sample mean ± S.D. Results are representative
of three independent experiments. B, herstatin (clone 1)-
and mock-transfected EGFR3T3 clones were grown to 90% confluence,
serum-starved, and treated with 10 nM EGF. At 72 h,
live cells were quantified by
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay as
described under "Experimental Procedures." Error bars
indicate sample mean ± S.D. Results are representative of two
independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Investigating the mechanisms employed by ErbB inhibitors and their
impact on signaling is critical to understanding the biology of these
receptors and to developing anti-receptor tyrosine kinase therapeutics.
Whereas several inhibitors of the EGFR have been investigated,
herstatin is distinguished by its novel structure, consisting of
subdomains I and II of the HER-2 ECD and an intron encoded-C-terminal
domain (32). Furthermore, herstatin is the only naturally occurring
inhibitor of the EGFR in mammalian cells that exerts its action on the
initial events in receptor activation: dimerization and
autophosphorylation (29, 32). In this study, we show that herstatin
selectively modulates the intracellular signaling pathways stimulated
by EGFR ligands. EGF binds to its receptor with normal affinity in the
presence of herstatin, yet receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and
down-regulation are suppressed. Whereas herstatin allows full ligand
stimulation of the MAPK pathway and its upstream effector, Shc, Akt
phosphorylation is selectively blocked, resulting in suppression of
cell growth.
Herstatin is a secreted protein that binds to and inhibits the EGFR
(29). Although the binding site has not been mapped, previous
observations suggest that herstatin associates with the ECD of ErbB
receptors (32). We therefore examined whether herstatin may interfere
with binding of EGF. Our results demonstrate that neither the binding
affinity nor the overall number of EGF binding sites was significantly
altered in cells that expressed either low or very high levels of
herstatin. Therefore, herstatin appears to inhibit EGFR that is
occupied by growth factor. Two other classes of EGFR inhibitors compete
with ligand binding, including the Drosophila ligand Argos
(46, 47) and the EGFR monoclonal antibody C225 (48). Because herstatin
inhibits ligand-occupied receptor, it may be effective even when growth
factors are overproduced by tumors (49).
In this study, we demonstrate that herstatin uncouples intracellular
signaling pathways triggered by EGF and TGF-
. Whereas EGFR tyrosine
phosphorylation and Akt activation are inhibited, Shc and MAPK are
fully activated. This is in contrast to the intracellular signaling
effects of several other inhibitors of EGFR including the quinazoline
inhibitors (12), the p185neu dominant negative mutant (15),
and the C225 monoclonal antibody inhibitor (14), which suppress
EGF-induced phosphorylation of both MAPK and Akt. Similar to herstatin,
these inhibitors reduce EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation and cause
prolonged retention of the EGFR at the cell surface.
In agreement with previous studies (43), we also observed uncoupling of
MAPK and Akt signaling cascades at very low concentrations of EGF (0.01 nM), suggesting that either limiting amounts of ligand or
the presence of herstatin preferentially stimulated the MAPK cascade.
The signaling effects of herstatin can not be explained by a reduction
in the effective concentration of growth factor; the EGF binding
affinity was unaffected by herstatin, and selective suppression of Akt
signaling was observed at both subsaturating (0.1 nM) and
very high ligand concentrations (100 nM).
Because phosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues on activated
receptors is responsible for the recruitment and activation of distinct
intracellular signaling molecules (51), inhibition of some, but not
all, EGFR phosphorylation sites by herstatin may cause preferential
recruitment of effector molecules (52). Evaluation of this possibility
will require phosphopeptide mapping of the EGFR from the
herstatin-expressing cells. However, even in the absence of EGFR
tyrosine phosphorylation, either by kinase-impaired EGFR (39-41) or
EGFR missing its tyrosine phosphorylation sites (53), MAPK is
activated, whereas Akt is not stimulated by EGF (16, 54). In these
cases (53, 55), as well as with herstatin, EGFR appears to be involved
in activation of the MAPK cascade, as shown by its presence in a
signaling complex containing tyrosine phosphorylated Shc and Grb2. An
endogenous receptor tyrosine kinase or a cytoplasmic kinase such as
src (56) may also participate in MAPK activation by EGF.
Endogenous HER-2, the preferred EGFR heteromeric partner, is unlikely
to be responsible for MAPK activation because herstatin effectively
disrupts HER-2 homomeric and heteromeric interactions (29). Although we
were unable to detect HER-2 in the EGF-induced signaling complex, other
endogenous tyrosine kinases may be involved in MAPK activation in
herstatin-expressing cells.
A major question in signaling through receptor tyrosine kinases
concerns the mechanism by which growth factors can stimulate diverse
cellular responses (52, 57, 58). For the ErbB receptors, one level of
diversity is achieved through generation of different ErbB dimer pairs
that have been found to differentially stimulate intracellular
signaling pathways (10, 51, 52, 57). Alternatively, signaling by the
same dimer pair may be altered in response to activation by different
growth factors (8, 22, 52). Additionally, EGF ligands have been shown
to promote diverse cellular responses, depending on the cell type (59).
The results presented here point to a novel mechanism of generating
diversity by which a single ligand, EGF, can achieve altered signal
output within a given cell context. Our studies suggest that herstatin,
a HER-2 receptor variant expressed in fetal kidney and liver cells, can selectively alter EGF signal output, resulting in growth arrest.
The Ras/MAPK pathway was previously suggested to be the major mitogenic
signaling pathway initiated by the EGFR (60). In the presence of
herstatin, full stimulation of MAPK by TGF-
was insufficient to
drive entry into S phase, as suggested by the suppression of DNA
synthesis. Moreover, EGF stimulation of MAPK was insufficient to
stimulate cell proliferation in the presence of herstatin. Because Akt
activation was strongly inhibited, components of the PI3K signaling
pathway that are required for growth factor-induced proliferation may
not be activated in the presence of herstatin. This finding is in
agreement with recent observations that interruption of the MAPK
pathway by EGFR blockade with quinazoline inhibitors is not the cause
of G1 arrest, but rather interruption of PI3K function is
required (12).
Signaling through the EGF receptor is often enhanced in
human cancers through overexpression of the receptor and autocrine stimulation by ligands produced by the tumor (49). Enhanced EGFR
signaling in several carcinomas is directly coupled to inappropriate phospho-Akt survival signals, rendering many cancers resistant to
apoptotic signals, including those activated by radiation and chemotherapies (12, 19). EGF stimulation of Akt kinase activity has
been proposed as a major mechanism behind enhanced survival conferred
by inappropriate EGF signaling. The activation of Akt appears to be
both required and sufficient for the antiapoptotic function of EGF
(19). Results presented here point to the effectiveness of herstatin in
blockage of Akt activation and inhibition of proliferation stimulated
by EGF. Previous studies also demonstrate the effectiveness of
herstatin in blocking proliferation stimulated by HER-2 overexpression, which often occurs in the same tumor cells that have enhanced EGFR
signaling. The results presented here further support the potential
utility of herstatin in the development of therapeutics against cancers
with ErbB receptor involvement.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank L. S. Shamieh for helpful
discussions and critical reading of the manuscript, M. E. Sommer
for generating the EGFR3T3/herstatin cell lines, and M. C. Denton
for constructing the herstatin and EGFR expression plasmids.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported by grants from the National Cancer
Institute.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, 3181 SW Sam
Jackson Park Rd., Portland, OR 97201. Tel.: 503-494-2543; Fax:
503-494-8393; E-mail: clinton@ohsu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 4, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111359200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
EGFR, epidermal
growth factor receptor;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
TGF-
, transforming growth factor
;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor;
ECD, extracellular ligand
binding domain;
PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase;
DMEM, Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
CHO, Chinese hamster
ovary;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
FGF, fibroblast growth
factor.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hanks, S. K.,
Quinn, A. M.,
and Hunter, T.
(1988)
Science
241,
42-52[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Schlessinger, J.,
Ullrich, A.,
Honegger, A. M.,
and Moolenaar, W. H.
(1988)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
53,
515-519[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Yarden, Y.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
57,
443-478[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Dougall, W. C.,
Qian, X.,
Peterson, N. C.,
Miller, M. J.,
Samanta, A.,
and Greene, M. I.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
2109-2123[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Hynes, N. E.,
and Stern, D. F.
(1994)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1198,
165-184[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Tzahar, E.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1377,
M25-M37[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Heldin, C. H.,
and Ostman, A.
(1996)
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev.
7,
3-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Riese, D. J., II,
and Stern, D. F.
(1998)
Bioessays
20,
41-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Burden, S.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1997)
Neuron
18,
847-855[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Olayioye, M. A.,
Neve, R. M.,
Lane, H. A.,
and Hynes, N. E.
(2000)
EMBO J.
19,
3159-3167[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Blume-Jensen, P.,
and Hunter, T.
(2001)
Nature
411,
355-365[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Busse, D.,
Doughty, R. S.,
Ramsey, T. T.,
Russell, W. E.,
Price, J. O.,
Flanagan, W. M.,
Shawver, L. K.,
and Arteaga, C. L.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
6987-6995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Rommel, C.,
Clarke, B. A.,
Zimmermann, S.,
Nunez, L.,
Rossman, R.,
Reid, K.,
Moelling, K.,
Yancopoulos, G. D.,
and Glass, D. J.
(1999)
Science
286,
1738-1741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Liu, B.,
Fang, M., Lu, Y.,
Mendelsohn, J.,
and Fan, Z.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
1913-1922[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Qian, X.,
O'Rourke, D. M.,
Fei, Z.,
Zhang, H. T.,
Kao, C. C.,
and Greene, M. I.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
574-583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Walker, F.,
Kato, A.,
Gonez, L. J.,
Hibbs, M. L.,
Pouliot, N.,
Levitzki, A.,
and Burgess, A. W.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
7192-7204[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Jones, S. M.,
and Kazlauskas, A.
(2001)
Nat. Cell. Biol.
3,
165-172[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Zhou, B. P.,
Liao, Y.,
Xia, W.,
Spohn, B.,
Lee, M. H.,
and Hung, M. C.
(2001)
Nat. Cell. Biol.
3,
245-252[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Gibson, S., Tu, S.,
Oyer, R.,
Anderson, S. M.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17612-17618[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Lemmon, M. A., Bu, Z.,
Ladbury, J. E.,
Zhou, M.,
Pinchasi, D.,
Lax, I.,
Engelman, D. M.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
281-294[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
O'Rourke, D. M.,
Qian, X.,
Zhang, H. T.,
Davis, J. G.,
Nute, E.,
Meinkoth, J.,
and Greene, M. I.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3250-3255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Tzahar, E.,
Pinkas-Kramarski, R.,
Moyer, J. D.,
Klapper, L. N.,
Alroy, I.,
Levkowitz, G.,
Shelly, M.,
Henis, S.,
Eisenstein, M.,
Ratzkin, B. J.,
Sela, M.,
Andrews, G. C.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
4938-4950[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Tanner, K. G.,
and Kyte, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35985-35990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Graus-Porta, D.,
Beerli, R. R.,
Daly, J. M.,
and Hynes, N. E.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1647-1655[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Tzahar, E.,
Waterman, H.,
Chen, X.,
Levkowitz, G.,
Karunagaran, D.,
Lavi, S.,
Ratzkin, B. J.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5276-5287[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Qian, X.,
O'Rourke, D. M.,
Zhao, H.,
and Greene, M. I.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
2149-2157[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Kumagai, T.,
Davis, J. G.,
Horie, T.,
O'Rourke, D. M.,
and Greene, M. I.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
5526-5531[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
O'Rourke, D. M.,
Nute, E. J.,
Davis, J. G., Wu, C.,
Lee, A.,
Murali, R.,
Zhang, H. T.,
Qian, X.,
Kao, C. C.,
and Greene, M. I.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1197-1207[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Azios, N. G.,
Romero, F. J.,
Denton, M. C.,
Doherty, J. K.,
and Clinton, G. M.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
5199-5209L[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]. J.
|
| 30.
|
Maihle, N. J.,
Baron, A. T.,
Barrette, B. A.,
Boardman, C. H.,
Christensen, T. A.,
Cora, E. M.,
Faupel-Badger, J. M.,
Greenwood, T.,
Juneja, S. C.,
Lafky, J. M.,
Lee, H.,
Reiter, J. L.,
and Podratz, K. C.
(2002)
Cancer Treatment Res.
107,
247-258[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Lee, H.,
Akita, R. W.,
Sliwkowski, M. X.,
and Maihle, N. J.
(2001)
Cancer Res.
61,
4467-4473[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Doherty, J. K.,
Bond, C.,
Jardim, A.,
Adelman, J. P.,
and Clinton, G. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
10869-10874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Christianson, T. A.,
Doherty, J. K.,
Lin, Y. J.,
Ramsey, E. E.,
Holmes, R.,
Keenan, E. J.,
and Clinton, G. M.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
5123-5129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Hansen, M. B.,
Nielsen, S. E.,
and Berg, K.
(1989)
J. Immunol. Methods
119,
203-210[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Sliwkowski, M. X.,
Schaefer, G.,
Akita, R. W.,
Lofgren, J. A.,
Fitzpatrick, V. D.,
Nuijens, A.,
Fendly, B. M.,
Cerione, R. A.,
Vandlen, R. L.,
and Carraway, K. L., III.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
14661-14665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Cadena, D. L.,
Chan, C. L.,
and Gill, G. N.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
260-265[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Lenferink, A. E.,
Pinkas-Kramarski, R.,
van de Poll, M. L.,
van Vugt, M. J.,
Klapper, L. N.,
Tzahar, E.,
Waterman, H.,
Sela, M.,
van Zoelen, E. J.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3385-3397[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Vieira, A. V.,
Lamaze, C.,
and Schmid, S. L.
(1996)
Science
274,
2086-2089[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Campos-Gonzalez, R.,
and Glenney, J. R., Jr.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
14535-14538[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Hack, N.,
Sue, A. Q. A.,
Mills, G. B.,
and Skorecki, K. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
26441-26446[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Selva, E.,
Raden, D. L.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
2250-2254[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Ravichandran, K. S.
(2001)
Oncogene
20,
6322-6330[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Wennstrom, S.,
and Downward, J.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
4279-4288[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Salomon, D. S.,
Brandt, R.,
Ciardiello, F.,
and Normanno, N.
(1995)
Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.
19,
183-232[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Winkler, M. E.,
O'Connor, L.,
Winget, M.,
and Fendly, B.
(1989)
Biochemistry
28,
6373-6378[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Vinos, J.,
and Freeman, M.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
3560-3562[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Zhao, D.,
and Bownes, M.
(1999)
Dev. Genet.
25,
375-386[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Mendelsohn, J.
(1997)
Clin. Cancer Res.
3,
2703-2707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Klapper, L. N.,
Kirschbaum, M. H.,
Sela, M.,
and Yarden, Y.
(2000)
Adv. Cancer Res.
77,
25-79[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
| Deleted in proof
|
| 51.
|
Alroy, I.,
and Yarden, Y.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
410,
83-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Sweeney, C.,
and Carraway, K. L., III.
(2000)
Oncogene
19,
5568-5573[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Gotoh, N.,
Tojo, A.,
Muroya, K.,
Hashimoto, Y.,
Hattori, S.,
Nakamura, S.,
Takenawa, T.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Shibuya, M.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
167-171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Deb, T. B., Su, L.,
Wong, L.,
Bonvini, E.,
Wells, A.,
David, M.,
and Johnson, G. R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
15554-15560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Walker, F.,
Hibbs, M. L.,
Zhang, H. H.,
Gonez, L. J.,
and Burgess, A. W.
(1998)
Growth Factors
16,
53-67[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Olayioye, M. A.,
Badache, A.,
Daly, J. M.,
and Hynes, N. E.
(2001)
Exp. Cell Res.
267,
81-87[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Carraway, K. L., III,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1994)
Cell
78,
5-8[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Hunter, T.
(2000)
Cell
100,
113-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Yarden, Y.,
and Sliwkowski, M. X.
(2001)
Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
127-137[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Malumbres, M.,
and Pellicer, A.
(1998)
Front. Biosci.
3,
887-912
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles: