Identification of Two Sp1 Phosphorylation Sites for
p42/p44 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases
THEIR IMPLICATION IN VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR GENE
TRANSCRIPTION*
Julie
Milanini-Mongiat,
Jacques
Pouysségur, and
Gilles
Pagès
From the Institute of Signalling, Developmental Biology and Cancer
Research, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice cedex 2, France
Received for publication, February 21, 2002, and in revised form, March 18, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Sp1 regulates activation of many genes implicated
in tumor growth and cell cycle progression. We have previously
demonstrated its implication in the up-regulation of vascular
endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene transcription following growth
factor stimulation of quiescent cells, a situation where p42/p44
mitogen-activate protein kinase (MAPK) activity is dramatically
increased. Here we show that p42/p44 MAPK directly phosphorylates Sp1
on threonines 453 and 739 both in vitro and in
vivo. Mutation of these sites to alanines decreases by half the
MAPK-dependent transcriptional activity of Sp1, in the
context of the VEGF promoter, in SL2 Drosophila cells
devoid of the endogenous Sp1 protein. Moreover, inducible overexpression of the (T453A,T739A) Sp1 double mutant compromises MAPK-driven VEGF mRNA transcription in fibroblasts. These results highlight Sp1 as a key molecular link between elevated activation of
the Ras
p42/p44MAPK signaling pathway and increased VEGF expression, two major steps deregulated in tumor cells.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Normal and pathological angiogenesis depends on the secretion of
growth factors needed for proliferation and survival of endothelial cells. Among these factors the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF),1 which is
overexpressed by a wide variety of human tumors (1), has been shown to
be crucial for tumor neovascularization. Regulation of VEGF expression
is complex, because it is modulated by numerous stimuli at multiple
levels, including gene transcription (2-9), mRNA stabilization
(10-14), and mRNA translation (15, 16). Interestingly, the low
tension of oxygen (hypoxia), which occurs in the core of solid tumors,
induces VEGF expression by modulating all three levels of regulation
cited above (2, 3, 11, 12, 15, 16). Oncogenes, including activated
forms of Ras, Src, and Raf (17, 18),
have also been implicated in increased VEGF expression. We have
recently shown that the p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)
pathway plays a critical role in the transcription of VEGF gene
following Ras transformation and growth factor stimulation. For this
first study we used a cell line derived from CCL39 fibroblasts in which
rapid and exclusive activation of MAPK can be achieved in response to
estradiol (19-21). In these cells, activation of the MAPK pathway is
sufficient to induce VEGF transcription (22). However, the
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway via activation of protein kinase
C
is also highly important in human fibrosarcoma and renal cell
carcinoma for driving VEGF transcription (23, 24). In both cases, the
main transcription factor implicated in the regulation of VEGF
transcription following Ras activation is Sp1 (8, 22,
25).
Sp1 is one of the first eucaryotic transcription factors to be
identified and cloned (26). It plays an important role in the
transcriptional regulation of genes, and its knock out in mice results
in embryonic lethality (27). Originally described as a cellular
transcription factor required for SV40 gene expression, Sp1
was shown to stimulate transcription through binding to GC-rich boxes
present on a wide variety of promoters. Sp1 is a highly glycosylated
and phosphorylated protein (28). Several kinases have been shown to
phosphorylate Sp1, including DNA-dependent protein kinase
(29), casein kinase II (30), protein kinase A (31), and protein kinase
C
(8), but the sites targeted by these kinases in vivo
are still unknown. However, a recent report (32) described
phosphorylation of human Sp1 by cyclin A-CDK 2 on serine 59. The level
of Sp1 phosphorylation is also regulated during cell cycle progression
(33, 34) and differentiation (35), two processes in which the MAPK
cascade is switched on.
MAPK are activated by a wide variety of stimuli and particularly by
growth and differentiation factors. These serine/threonine kinases are
cytoplasmic in quiescent cells, but once activated they translocate to
the nucleus (36). They phosphorylate multiple substrates, including
membrane-associated (37), cytoplasmic (38-41), and nuclear proteins
(42-45). An important role in the control of gene expression has been
attributed to MAPK, because many of their nuclear targets are
transcription factors, such as Elk-1 (46), which is directly activated,
c-Fos, which is stabilized (47), and p53, which is degraded following
phosphorylation by MAPK (48).
Constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway has been observed in many
tumors (49-54). Concomitantly, VEGF is overexpressed in many tumors
and contributes to their neovascularization (55). In a previous study
we have identified a short region of the VEGF promoter, which is
targeted by the p42/p44 MAPK. This region containing two Sp1 sites
actually binds the transcription factor (22). Another study showed that
recombinant active p42 MAPK enhances DNA binding capacity of Sp1
in vitro (56). These observations prompted us to test the
hypothesis that Sp1 is a link between the MAPK pathway and VEGF
expression. First we observed that MAPK stimulation rapidly enhanced
DNA binding of Sp1 and Sp3 to the VEGF promoter. By using in
vitro kinase assays as well as antibodies directed against
phosphopeptides we identified two major sites targeted by p42/p44 MAPK
on Sp1. Both sites are indispensable for Sp1 activity following
activation of the p42/p44 MAPK pathway. Thereafter, we
demonstrated that phosphorylation of Sp1 by p42/p44 MAPK is a
crucial event for the regulation of at least VEGF, one of the key
genes implicated in neovascularization.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Restriction and DNA modifying enzymes were
obtained from New England BioLabs or from Eurogentec (Liège,
Belgium). [
-32P]dCTP and
[
-32P]dATP were from ICN. Synthetic
oligonucleotides were from Eurogentec. Recombinant human proteins Sp1
and AP-2 were purchased from Promega. Recombinant active p42 MAPK/ERK2
was purchased from New England BioLabs. Anti-Myc antibody (9E10)
was from Roche Molecular Biochemicals. Anti-Sp1 (PEP-2) was from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology.
Cell Culture and Transfection--
Raf:ER cells
are a derivative of CCL39 fibroblasts that stably expressed a fusion
protein comprised of the catalytic domain of Raf-1 and the hormone
binding domain of the estrogen receptor (19-21). These cells were
cultivated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Invitrogen) without
phenol red containing 7.5% fetal calf serum, penicillin (50 units/ml),
streptomycin sulfate (50 µg/ml), and G418 (400 µg/ml).
Growth-arrested cells were obtained by total deprivation of serum for
48 h. Cells expressing a tetracycline-inducible vector were
cultivated in the same medium supplemented with blasticidin (7.5 µg/ml, selection of the tetracycline repressor) and zeocin (500 µg/ml, selection of the gene of interest). Induction of the transgene was obtained by stimulating the cells for 24-48 h with 1 µg/ml tetracycline. The Drosophila melanogaster Schneider
(SL2) cells were grown in DES medium (Invitrogen) with
L-glutamine supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal
calf serum.
Raf:ER cells (106 cells/10-cm
diameter dish) were transfected by CaPO4 precipitation technique with 15 µg of the different pcDNA4/TO vectors. SL2
cells were transiently transfected as described above (see luciferase assays).
Plasmid Constructs--
All the plasmids coding for the
different subdomains of Sp1 fused to GST were a generous gift of Dr. J. Horowitz excepted the GST-D, which was obtained by PCR
using the following oligonucleotides on the GST-Zn matrix:
forward, 5'-CGGGATCCCGGCACTGCCACTCCTTCAGCC-3'; reverse,
5'-GGAATTCCTAGTTGGCAAGACGGGCAATGC-3' (57). The full-length Sp1
cDNA excised from the pGEX vector was introduced in the pCMVTag vector within EcoRI/BamHI sites. We then excised
a NotI/XhoI fragment of this vector and
introduced it in the pcDNA4/TO vector (Invitrogen). The different
point mutations of the MAPK consensus phosphorylation sites were
obtained using a QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit supplied by
Stratagene. The vector containing the VEGF promoter fused to the
luciferase reporter gene has already been described (22). The
MEKSD/SE-MAPK construct corresponding to a fusion of the
MEKSD/SE cDNA with the
ERK2 cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. Y. Miyata
(58)), was subcloned in the XhoI site of the pCMVTag3B
vector (Stratagene).
Preparation of RNA--
Cells were washed in ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed in the "RNA Insta-Pure"
buffer from Eurogentec. The supernatant was cleared by centrifugation,
ethanol-precipitated, and resuspended in sterile water. Ten micrograms
of RNA was used for Northern analysis and analyzed as previously
described (22, 59).
Luciferase Assays--
SL2 Drosophila cells in
12-well dishes (105/well) were transiently transfected
using the calcium phosphate technique. 3.5 µg of reporter plasmid
(
88/+54 of the VEGF promoter in pGL2 basic vector) was co-transfected
with 0.5 µg of Myc-Sp1-HA (wt or mutants), in the absence
or presence of 1 µg of
MEKSD/SE-MAPK. 1.5 µg of pPAC plasmid coding for the LacZ gene under control of the Drosophila actin promoter was also added as a control
of transfection efficiency. Salmon sperm DNA was added to reach a final
amount of 13 µg. Sixteen hours after transfection, cells were washed
once in DES medium and incubated in DES medium supplemented with 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. Four days after transfection,
cells were washed in PBS, and luciferase assays were performed as
previously described (22)
Preparation of Nuclear Extracts and Gel Mobility Shift
Assays--
Confluent
Raf:ER cell cultures were
serum-deprived overnight prior to stimulation with 1 µM
estradiol for 15 min. Nuclear extracts, electromobility shift assays
(EMSA), and supershift assays were performed, as previously described
(22). The probe used in these experiments was synthesized to span the
region of the human VEGF promoter comprised between the
88 and
66 bp: 5'-TTTCCGGGGCGGGCCGGGGGCGGGGTAT-3'
(random sequences added to the wild type sequence are shown in
italic letters).
Antibodies--
Anti-phosphopeptide sera were generated by
Neosystem (Strasbourg, France) by injecting two rabbits each with the
following phosphopeptides. Phosphopeptide 1 (Phospho
Thr739):
NH2-KRRSEGSTA-(PO3H2)-TPSALI-COOH
coupled to KLH. Phosphopeptide2 (Phospho Thr453):
NH2-KSGPIIIR-(PO3H2)-TPTVGPNG-COOH
(where the boldface "T" represents the threonines targeted by
MAPK), coupled to ovalbumin (GenBankTM accession
numbers: AB039286 and J03133). Sera were affinity-purified by passing
them first over an EAH-Sepharose 4B column (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.)
to which the unphosphorylated peptide was coupled and the flow-through
was collected. The non-retained fraction was then passed over a column
to which the phosphorylated peptide was bound. Specific IgG were then
eluted with 100 mM glycine (pH 2.8) and neutralized in Tris
3 M, pH 11.
Immunofluorescence--
Raf:ER cells were plated
on glass coverslips at a density of 105 cells/35-mm dish.
The cells were rendered quiescent by incubation in serum-free medium
for 24 h and stimulated or not with estradiol 1 µM.
Cells were then fixed with 10% paraformaldehyde at 37 °C, followed
by methanol permeabilization for 15 min at
20 °C. Coverslips were
washed with PBS, and the nonspecific sites were blocked by incubation
with PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 0.2% gelatin.
Coverslips were incubated with the first antibody diluted in
PBS/BSA/gelatin (anti-phospho-Thr453, 1/120; anti-Myc,
1/1000) for 1 h, then washed five time with PBS. Prior to the
incubation with the second antibody (biotin-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit, 1/1000 and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat
anti-mouse, 1/100), 4',6-diamidine dihydrochloride (Roche) was added at
a final concentration of 0.2 µg/ml during the last 15 min of
incubation to enumerate cells. After extensive washes in PBS and in
distilled water, coverslips were mounted in Citifluor and examined
under epifluorescence illumination.
Kinase Assay--
They were performed in kinase buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10 mM
para-nitrophenyl phosphate, 10 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol) with ~5 µg of
the different GST/Sp1 fusion proteins or equimolar amounts of Sp1 (0.6 µg), AP-2 (0.3 µg), BSA (0.4 µg), myelin basic protein (0.12 µg), GST-ATF2 (0.4 µg), GST-Elk1 (0.3 µg), and GST-Jun (0.4 µg)
as substrates and 5 µCi of 50 µM
[
-32P]ATP for 15 min at 30 °C. The reaction was
stopped by addition of Laemmli sample buffer and resolved on
SDS-PAGE.
Western Blotting--
Raf:ER cells or
Raf:ER cells stably transfected with the tetracycline
inducible vectors were serum-deprived for 48 h. After estradiol or
serum stimulation, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and immediately
lysed in Laemmli sample buffer. Eighty micrograms of protein was
resolved by SDS-PAGE on 7.5% gels and transferred onto a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon). The membranes were
incubated with purified anti-phospho-Thr739 antibody
(1/1000) or anti-phospho-MAPK (1/5000) or anti-total Sp1 (PEP2 Santa
Cruz Biotechnology, 1/2000). The protein was labeled with an
anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and
developed using an ECL system (Amersham Biosciences, Inc.).
 |
RESULTS |
Increase Sp1 Binding to the VEGF Promoter following a Short
p42/p44 MAPK Stimulation--
We have previously shown that
long term activation of the p42/p44 MAPK pathway results in increased
VEGF transcription. This effect was found to be directly dependent on
the recruitment of Sp1 and AP-2 transcription factors to a GC-rich
region located on the proximal region of the VEGF promoter (
88/
66)
(22). To determine whether this effect of p42/p44MAPK on the DNA
binding activity of these transcription factors is direct, we performed EMSA experiments with nuclear extracts of cells expressing an estradiol-inducible Raf-1 (
Raf-1:ER) (19, 20). In these cells, p42/p44 MAPK activity is rapidly and exclusively activated by estradiol
(21).
Raf-1:ER cells were serum-deprived for 48 h and then
stimulated by the addition of estradiol. When incubated with nuclear
extracts of untreated
Raf-1:ER cells, a basal DNA binding
activity on a double-stranded probe encompassing the
88/
66-bp region of the human VEGF promoter was detected (Fig.
1A, lane 1). In
nuclear extracts of cells stimulated with estradiol for 15 min (Fig.
1A, lane 3) or 3 h (Fig. 1A,
lane 5), an increase DNA binding activity was observed. Both
basal and the stimulated complexes, in extracts of
estradiol-stimulated cells for 15 min (Fig. 1A, lane
4) or 3 h (Fig. 1A, lane 6), were
almost entirely disrupted in the presence of an excess of unlabeled
double-stranded Sp1 consensus oligonucleotide, demonstrating that these
complexes contain Sp1 or Sp1-related proteins. However, when extracts
of cells stimulated with estradiol for 3 h (Fig. 1A,
lane 6) were used, one part of complex B resists competition
with unlabeled Sp1 consensus oligonucleotide. One part of this complex
can be attributed to the presence of the AP-2 transcription factor,
which is recruited to the VEGF promoter after long term p42/p44 MAPK stimulation as previously described (22). To demonstrate the presence
of Sp1 in the different complexes observed with extracts of
estradiol-stimulated
Raf-1:ER cells for 15 min, we
performed supershift experiments with anti-Sp1 antibody. Our results
clearly demonstrate that Sp1 (present at least in complexes B1 and B2) is recruited to the VEGF promoter following a short term stimulation of
p42/p44 MAPK by estradiol (Fig. 1B). Supershift experiments with anti-Sp3 antibody also show that Sp3 is recruited to the VEGF
promoter following a short term stimulation with estradiol and is
contained within complex B3 and c (data not shown). Band shift as well
as supershift experiments were also performed with nuclear extracts of
estradiol-stimulated cells in the presence of cycloheximide, an
inhibitor of protein synthesis. The same results were also obtained in
such conditions (data not shown). Because this effect occurred rapidly
and in conditions where protein neo-synthesis is blocked, we postulated
that it could be accounted for by direct phosphorylation of the
transcription factors.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Binding analysis of Sp transcription factors
to the VEGF promoter. A, EMSA with nuclear extracts of
quiescent (lanes 1 and 2) or estradiol-stimulated
Raf-1:ER cells for15 min (lanes 3 and 4) or
3 h (lanes 6 and 7), in the absence
(lanes 1, 3, 5) or the presence
(lanes 2, 4, 6) of excess
double-stranded Sp1 consensus oligonucleotides. Formation of specific
complexes is indicated on the left (a,
B1-3, and c) according to the nomenclature
previously described (22). The DNA sequence of the probe has also been
described (22). Competitors were used at a concentration of 100 M excess. B, EMSA with nuclear extracts of
estradiol-stimulated Raf-1:ER for 15 min in the absence (lane
1) or the presence (lane 2) of 0.2 µg of Sp1-specific
antibody. The position of supershifted complexes is indicated by the
arrowhead.
|
|
MAPK Phosphorylates Sp1 on Two Sites in Vitro and in Vivo--
We
have then investigated whether Sp1 could be directly phosphorylated by
p42/p44 MAPK. Thus, we performed in vitro kinase assays
using equivalent molar amounts of affinity-purified Sp1, AP-2, bovine
serum albumin (BSA), GST-ATF2, GST-Jun, GST-Elk1, and myelin basic
protein. GST-ATF2, a specific substrate for the SAPK/c-Jun
NH2-terminal kinase and p38/HOG MAPK (60, 61), GST-Jun, a specific substrate for the SAPK/c-Jun
NH2-terminal kinase (62) and BSA can be considered as
negative controls. GST-Elk1 (63, 64) and myelin basic protein (65),
commonly used substrates for p42/p44 MAPK, are considered as positive
controls. We observed that recombinant active p42 MAPK strongly
phosphorylates Sp1 as well as GST-Elk1 and myelin basic protein,
whereas AP-2, GST-ATF2, GST-Jun remain poor substrates for MAPK under
the same conditions. In these conditions, BSA is not phosphorylated at all (Fig. 2A). The regions of
Sp1 targeted by MAPK were determined by performing in vitro
kinase assays on the functional domains of Sp1, schematized in Fig.
2B, fused to glutathione S-transferase (GST) (57). Two of these domains, but not the others (data not shown), are phosphorylated by p42 MAPK in vitro. These
include the glutamine-rich transactivating domain, BQ, and
the COOH-terminal domain, D, which is implicated in protein-protein interactions and required for synergistic transactivation via several
Sp1 sites (66, 67). Phospho-amino acid analysis of these domains
revealed that the phosphorylation occurs only on threonine residues
(data not shown). To identify the putative MAPK phosphorylation sites
within these domains, we mutated the three threonines contained in MAPK
consensus phosphorylation sites to alanine; two in the BQ
domain (GQT355P and
IRT453P) and one in the D domain
(TAT739P).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Identification of two MAPK phosphorylation
sites on Sp1. A, equimolar amounts of Sp1 (0.6 µg),
AP-2 (0.3 µg), GST-ATF2 (0.4 µg), GST-Jun (0.4 µg), BSA (0.4 µg), GST-Elk1 (0.3 µg), and myelin basic protein (0.12 µg) were
incubated with recombinant active MAPK (p42* MAPK). The
phosphorylated proteins were detected after SDS-PAGE by
autoradiography. The slower migrating bands in the case of GST-Jun,
GST-Elk1, and Sp1 correspond to degradation products. B,
schematic representation of the different domains of Sp1 according to
the nomenclature of Murata et al. (57):
AS/T, AQ, BB,
and BQ are transactivating domains, the C
domain contains a PEST sequence and a basic region implicated in
protein-protein interactions, Zn contains three zinc finger
domains and is responsible for DNA binding, and the D domain
is implicated in synergistic activation of Sp1 and mediates interaction
with other transcription factors. Targeted phosphorylation sites
described above are indicated by arrows. Numbering
corresponds to the full-length human Sp1 sequence in
GenBankTM (accession numbers: AB039286 and J03133).
C, wild type D domain or D domain mutated on threonine 739, wild type BQ domain, BQ domain mutated on
threonine 355 or 453, GST/C (negative control), and myelin basic
protein (positive control) were used as substrates for recombinant
active p42 MAPK. The phosphorylation of each recombinant protein was
analyzed by autoradiography after SDS-PAGE. Coomassie Blue staining is
shown as loading control.
|
|
As shown in Fig. 2C, point mutation of the potential
BQ domain sites revealed that threonine 453 is
phosphorylated by MAPK in vitro, whereas threonine 355 is
not. Similarly, active p42 MAPK efficiently phosphorylates wild type
GST/D protein but not the T739A mutant form, confirming that threonine
739 is also targeted by MAPK in vitro. Therefore, this first
in vitro approach allowed us to identify two sites for
direct MAPK action: 451IRTP454 and
737TATP740. We next developed
anti-phospho-specific antibodies directed against the sequences
targeted by p42/p44 MAPK to further analyze the in vivo
relevance of these phosphorylations. The specificity of the
immunopurified antibodies was analyzed by Western blotting to
GST/BQ and GST/Zn-D proteins phosphorylated, or not, by p42
MAPK in vitro. Fig.
3A shows that each antibody
recognizes only the phosphorylated form of the appropriate specific
amino acid sequence. Using the affinity-purified
anti-phospho-Thr453 antibodies, we were unable to detect
in vivo Sp1 phosphorylation by immunoblotting, however, it
could be visualized by immunofluorescence staining. Indeed, in control
Raf-1:ER quiescent cells, no staining was detectable (Fig.
3B, Control,
). But when p42/p44 MAPK was activated for 15 min with estradiol, we observed an increased nuclear
immunoreactivity (Fig. 3B, Control, +). To verify
that this reactivity toward anti-phospho-Thr453 was
specific for Sp1, we attempted to amplify the signal by developing a
cell line in which overexpression of epitope-tagged Sp1 (Myc-tagged at
the NH2 terminus, and HA-tagged at COOH terminus) could be induced with tetracycline. Under induced conditions (right
panels of Fig. 3B), MAPK activation with estradiol
potently enhanced nuclear immunolabeling with
anti-phospho-Thr453 antibodies. This result demonstrates
that the protein detected by this antibody in vivo is indeed
Sp1. The level of tagged Sp1 after tetracycline induction was monitored
both by anti-myc immunofluorescence staining, and by Western blotting
(see Fig. 3, B and C). Activation of endogenous
MAPK was monitored with anti-phospho-MAPK antibodies (Fig.
3C). The same results were obtained in two independent
clones, and in CCL39 cells stimulated by fetal bovine serum (data not shown). Concerning the D domain, phosphorylation of Thr739
in vivo could be readily detected by Western blotting of
extracts of
Raf:ER cells stimulated with estradiol or serum.
Anti-phospho-Thr739 antibodies detected a protein of 95 kDa
corresponding to Sp1 and only under stimulated conditions. Both the
intensity- and time-dependent phosphorylation of the 95-kDa
protein correlated with the increase in MAPK activity (see Fig.
3D). Furthermore, the myc-tagged Sp1-inducible transgene
product is also labeled by the anti-phospho-Thr739 in
tetracycline-treated cells, as shown in Fig. 3E. These data clearly demonstrate that Sp1 is rapidly phosphorylated on
Thr739 in vivo following p42/p44 MAPK
activation.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
In vivo phosphorylation of Sp1 by
MAPK occurs on threonine 453 and threonine 739. A,
specificity of the immune serum affinity-purified using peptides
containing phospho-threonine 453 or phospho-threonine 739. GST/BQ or
GST/Zn-D were phosphorylated or not by recombinant active p42 MAPK.
Equal amounts of proteins were submitted to immunoblot analysis with
anti-GST purified antibody as a loading control, and with
anti-phospho-Thr453 or
anti-phospho-Thr739-purified sera ( -PT453 and
-PT739). B, phosphorylated Thr453
Sp1 was examined by immunofluorescence analysis on the WT2 cells. This
CCL39-derived clone expresses a Raf-1: ER chimera (21), the
tetracycline repressor, and tagged-Sp1 (WT) under control of the
tetracycline operator. WT2 cells were serum-deprived 48 h. At the
same time, Sp1 overexpression was induced by tetracycline (1 µg/ml).
Cells were then stimulated or not with estradiol for 15 min.
Immunostaining with purified anti-phospho-Thr453 shows a nuclear staining after Raf:ER stimulation with estradiol (Texas
red staining). The overexpression of tagged-Sp1 is detected by anti-myc
staining, which gives an exclusive nuclear staining, only in
tetracycline-treated cells (fluorescein isothiocyanate staining).
Nuclei are visualized by a 4',6-diamidine dihydrochloride staining
(top row of images). C, phosphorylation of
p42/p44 MAPK in response to Raf:ER activation is detected in the WT2
clone, treated or not with tetracycline, by anti-phospho-MAPK
immunoblotting (Sigma) (lower panel). The level of
tagged-Sp1 expression is controlled by anti-HA immunoblotting
(upper panel). D, phosphorylated
Thr739 Sp1 was examined by immunoblotting with purified
anti-phospho-Thr739 on quiescent estradiol (1 µM)- or fetal bovine serum (FBS,
20%)-stimulated Raf-1:ER cells (upper panel). To verify
the co-localization of the bands, anti-total Sp1 hybridization was
performed with the PEP-2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) on the
same membrane. The antibodies directed against phosphorylated p42/p44
MAPK and total MAPK were used, respectively, to control for MAPK
activation and as a loading control (lower panels).
E, WT2 cells were serum-deprived 48 h. At the same
time, Sp1 overexpression was induced by tetracycline (1 µg/ml). Cells
were then stimulated by estradiol (1 µM) for the times
indicated. As in D, phosphorylated Thr739 Sp1
was examined by immunoblotting (upper panel). The level of
endogenous and epitope-tagged Sp1 expression is controlled by anti-Sp1
immunoblotting (PEP-2, Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The level of MAPK
activation is also shown as a control.
|
|
Phosphorylated Forms of Sp1 Bind to the VEGF Promoter--
To
demonstrate that Thr453- and
Thr739-phosphorylated Sp1 was present in the DNA complexes
shown in Fig. 1, we performed supershift experiments with the
Thr453 and Thr739 anti-phospho-Sp1 antibodies.
Antibodies directed against total Sp1 were used as a positive control
(Fig. 4). Indeed, anti-total Sp1 antibody
supershifted part of complex B as shown on Fig. 1B (Fig. 4,
lane 2). In the presence of Thr739
anti-phospho-Sp1 antibody, an evident supershifted complex was observed
(Fig. 4, lane 3) whereas only a weak supershift was obtained in the presence of Thr453 anti-phospho-Sp1 (Fig. 4,
lane 4). Simultaneous addition of both antibodies results in
a reduction in the intensity of complexes a and B (data not shown).
These results clearly demonstrated that Sp1, phosphorylated on both
threonines 453 and 739, is recruited to the VEGF promoter following
activation of the p42/p44 MAPK pathway. However, the fact that
anti-phospho-antibodies are not able to induce supershifts equivalent
to those obtained with anti-total Sp1 could reflect a minor proportion
of Sp1 phosphorylated on these sites after a 15-min estradiol
stimulation or the capacity of both antibodies to efficiently recognize
phosphorylated Sp1 engaged in protein-DNA complexes. Irrelevant
antibodies used as negative controls do not induce supershift as well
as reduction of the intensity of any protein-DNA complexes (data not
shown).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Phosphorylated forms of Sp1 bind to the VEGF
promoter. EMSA with nuclear extracts of estradiol-stimulated
Raf:ER cells for 15 min, in the absence (lane 1) or the
presence of 0.2 µg of the following antibodies; Sp1 antibody
(lane 2), anti-phospho-Thr739 (lane
3), and anti-phospho-Thr453 (lane 4). The
specific complexes (a and B) are indicated on the
left. The positions of supershifted complexes are indicated
by arrowheads.
|
|
Phosphorylation of Sp1 by p42/p44 MAPK Increases
Transcriptional Efficiency of the Minimal VEGF Promoter--
We next
examined the functional role of these MAPK-dependent
phosphorylation sites by comparing wild type and mutated (T453A or/and
T739A) Sp1 forms on transcriptional activation of the VEGF promoter.
For that purpose, we analyzed the activity of the minimal VEGF promoter
containing the Sp1 target sites (22) in SL2 Drosophila cells, which lack endogenous Sp1. Using an Sp1-negative cell line ensured that all the activity was attributable to the transfected constructs. Expression of wild type Sp1 in normally growing cells stimulated VEGF promoter activity by 6- to 8-fold. When a constitutive active form of p42 MAPK was co-expressed (MEKSD/SE-p42MAPK
fusion protein) (58), a condition where total MAPK activity is highly
enhanced, VEGF promoter activity was further increased by ~4-fold.
Interestingly, each single-mutated or double-mutated Sp1 form
transactivated transcription from the VEGF promoter as well as wild
type Sp1. However, in the presence of the MEKSD/SE-p42MAPK
fusion protein, the mutated Sp1 forms are less efficient in promoting
transcriptional activation than the wild type protein and activation
was reduced by more than 50% in the presence of (T453A,T739A) Sp1
(Fig. 5). This type of inhibition is in
the same order of magnitude of that induced by mutation of serine 59, a
site targeted by cyclin A/CDK 2 (32). These results indicate that both
MAPK phosphorylation sites contribute to intrinsic
Sp1 activity. However, direct phosphorylation of Sp1 by p42/p44 MAPK represents only one half of the p42/p44 MAPK-mediated VEGF
transcription. The fact that p42/p44 MAPK could allow the recruitment
of Sp1 partners to the VEGF promoter probably explains why we do not observe a total inhibition in the presence of the mutated forms of
Sp1.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Requirement of phosphorylation on threonines
453 and 739 for maximal p42/p44 MAPK-mediated VEGF minimal promoter
transcription. SL2 Drosophila cells were transfected in
the absence (empty vector (EV)) or presence of wild type
Sp1, (T453A) Sp1, (T739A) Sp1, or (T453A,T739A) Sp1 under control of
the CMV promoter, and a vector coding for -galactosidase under
control of the Drosophila actin promoter
(pPAC). The effect of activation of the MAPK
pathway induced by the MEKSD/SE-MAPK chimera on Sp1
transcriptional activity was examined using the 88/+54 bp human VEGF
promoter coupled to the luciferase reporter gene (22). Luciferase
activity was normalized to -galactosidase activity and total protein
amount and represented in -fold induction, compared with the VEGF
promoter activity in the absence of Sp1. Expression of the wild type
and mutated Sp1 molecules was monitored by anti-HA immunoblotting
(inset).
|
|
Overexpression of Sp1 Double Mutant Inhibits Estradiol-induced VEGF
Transcription in
Raf:ER Cells--
In a second biological assay, we
directly analyzed the expression of specific MAPK-dependent
VEGF gene expression under conditions in which the wild type or the
double Sp1 mutant was induced with tetracycline. Fig.
6A shows the time course of
p42/p44 MAPK-stimulated VEGF expression in cells in which wild type or
(T453A,T739A) Sp1 was induced or not with tetracycline. Ectopic
expression of wild type Sp1 (Fig. 6A, +Tet,
left) increased basal and estradiol-induced VEGF expression
particularly after stimulation for 1 or 2 h. In contrast,
expression of the double-mutated form of Sp1 (T453A,T739A) (Fig.
6A, +Tet, right) reduced by half the
basal and p42/p44 MAPK-dependent VEGF expression (Fig.
6B). Therefore, the mutated Sp1 form behaves as a dominant
negative construct on VEGF transcription in vivo. The less
potent effect of estradiol in inducing VEGF expression in the double
Sp1 mutant compared with wild type Sp1-expressing cells, in the absence
of tetracycline, can be interpreted as the following: 1) this clone is
intrinsically less sensitive to estradiol, 2) the tetracycline
regulated promoter is leaky and allows for basal expression of the
double Sp1 mutant, which exerts a partial dominant negative effect even
in the absence of tetracycline. Another surprising result is the effect
of overexpression of wild type Sp1 (positive effect) or mutant Sp1
(negative effect) on basal VEGF mRNA levels in growth
factor-deprived cells. Such basal VEGF mRNA levels are attributed
to residual promoter activity induced by the remaining p42/p44 MAPK
activity that persists in all cell lines tested even after a long term
serum deprivation. We suppose that basal expression of VEGF is enhanced
because of the presence of increased "basal" p42/p44 MAPK-activated
Sp1 when the wild type form of Sp1 is induced by tetracycline.
Overexpression of the mutated form of Sp1 competed with endogenous
basal p42/p44 MAPK-activated Sp1 for binding to the VEGF
promoter resulting in a reduction of the basal VEGF mRNA level.
Fig. 6C shows by Western blot analysis the level of
induction of ectopic Sp1 after tetracycline induction and estradiol
stimulation for 1 h to verify that no major differences of
expression between wild type or (T453A,T739A) Sp1 exist (top
panel). Overexposure of this blot shows basal expression of the
Sp1 transgenes even in the absence of tetracycline (data not shown).
This observation favors the second interpretation given above, which
explains the differential effect observed with estradiol between wild
type and (T453A,T739A) Sp1-expressing cells in the absence of
tetracycline. A Western blot anti-p44 MAPK is shown as a loading
control (bottom panel). Under these conditions, ectopic
expression of wild type or (T453A,T739A) Sp1 does not modify p42/p44
MAPK activation by estradiol stimulation (Western blot
anti-phosphorylated forms of MAPK, middle panel). All these results highlight the regulatory role of p42/p44 MAPK phosphorylation on Sp1 activity in the context of the VEGF promoter.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
(T453A,T739A) Sp1 has a dominant negative
effect on p42/p44 MAPK-mediated VEGF mRNA expression.
A, Northern blot analysis were performed on 10 µg of total
RNA from serum-deprived cells treated (+) or not ( ) with tetracycline
(1 µg/ml) during 48 h, then stimulated or not with 100 nM estradiol for the times indicated. 18 S ribosomal RNA is
shown as the loading control. This experiment is representative of
three independent experiments. B, quantification by
phosphorimaging of the signals shown in A. The quantity of
VEGF mRNA was normalized to the amount of 18 S rRNA. C,
cells were serum-deprived in the absence ( ) or the presence (+) of
tetracycline for 48 h, then stimulated (+) or not ( )
with estradiol 100 nM for 1 h. Induction of wild
type (WT) and (T453,739A) Sp1 (DM) was monitored
by anti-HA immunoblotting (top panel). Expression of p44
MAPK is shown as a loading control in the bottom panel.
Activation of p42/p44 MAPK was also monitored by an antibody directed
against the phosphorylated form of MAPK (middle
panel).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The work reported here was first designed to identify a molecular
link between the Ras signaling pathway and the transcription of the
VEGF gene. Our previous results identified the proximal GC-rich box
(
88/
66) of the VEGF promoter, where Sp1 and AP-2 bind, as the main
target for growth factors stimulation and oncogenic activation, an
action mediated via the p42/p44 MAPK signaling cascade (22). The
present study reinforces this conclusion and establishes Sp1 activation
by MAPK as one of the molecular links bridging growth factor
action/oncogenic transformation and VEGF expression. Phosphorylation of
Sp1 by p42/p44 MAPK on threonines 453 and 739 is a key element in this
regulatory action. Although Sp1 is a substrate of several protein
kinases in vitro, this is the first time that two MAPK
phosphorylation sites have been identified in vivo. Mutation
of both threonines to alanines decreases but does not abolish Sp1
activity, which is still able to transactivate an artificial
VEGF/Luciferase promoter in SL2 Drosophila cells. Furthermore, our supershift experiments suggest that the proportion of
phosphorylated Sp1 on both sites is relatively low after activation of
the p42/p44 MAPK pathway for 15 min.
However, our results strongly suggest that these phosphorylations
enhance Sp1 binding and Sp1 transcriptional activity. Our experiments
also corroborate the results of Merchant et al. (56) who
have described that phosphorylation of Sp1 by ERK2 in vitro enhances binding of Sp1 to a target sequence. However, we do not know
if the p42/p44 MAPK-dependent phosphorylation of Sp1
directly affects transcriptional activity or if phosphorylation of
threonines 453 and 739 allows the recruitment of one or more Sp1
partners required for efficient transcription. We cannot also rule out the possibility that p42/p44MAPK phosphorylates one or more other factors that interact with Sp1 to activate transcription. It is probably the reason why the increment in transcriptional activation induced by the MEK/MAPK chimera is not entirely blocked when the mutated forms of Sp1 are used in Drosophila cells. Another
result that corroborates this hypothesis is that Gal4/Sp1A fusion
protein, which contains neither threonines 453 or 739, could activate a reporter gene following NGF stimulation, a strong activator of p42/p44
MAPK, in PC12 cells (68). However, overexpression of the double-mutant
forms of Sp1 reduced by half the estradiol-mediated induction of
endogenous VEGF mRNA in
Raf-1:ER cells probably by
preventing efficient phosphorylation of endogenous Sp1 by p42/p44 MAPK.
This result confirms that phosphorylation of Sp1 by p42/p44 MAPK is
necessary for full Sp1 activity.
The phosphorylation site Thr453 is interesting, because the
domain BQ of Sp1 has been shown to interact directly with
both the TATA-box protein accessory factor TAFII110 (69),
and transcription factors (70). Phosphorylation of this site, conserved
in all mammalian Sp1 sequences, could be essential for coupling
TATA-less promoters to the polymerase machinery via Sp1 and TATA
box-binding protein-associated factor interaction. The second
site, Thr739, also conserved in all cloned mammalian Sp1
proteins, belongs to a region essential for synergistic activation of
transcription by Sp1 (67) and is known to interact with different
partners (71, 72). Furthermore, this site is proximal to putative
docking sites for MAPK recognition of substrate proteins. The first
sequence, 679FACP682, is closely related
to the FXFP motif present in specific MAPK substrates
whereas the second sequence,
614KKKQHICHI623, closely related to the
(K/R)(K/R)(K/R)X1-5(L/I)X(L/I) mediates binding to MAPK and JNK. One potential serine, four
threonines, and docking sites for MAPK recognition are also present on
Sp3 (Ser5, Thr47, Thr151,
Thr388, and Thr422, for putative
phosphorylation sites and F613ECP616 and
K549KKQHICHI557 for the docking sites). Indeed,
Sp3 could also represent a p42/p44 MAPK target, and the presence of
both sequences could explain the recruitment of Sp3 to the VEGF
promoter following short p42/p44 MAPK stimulation. Our results prompted
us to investigate if p42/p44 MAPK and Sp1 could co-immunoprecipitate.
As expected, we have reproducibly obtained acceptable
co-immunoprecipitation of p42/p44 MAPK with endogenous Sp1.
One key point of this study is the demonstration that the Raf
MAPK-driven VEGF transcription requires the direct phosphorylation of
Sp1 by p42/p44 MAPK. This finding raises two important questions: 1) Is
Sp1 action mandatory for VEGF expression in response to various
external stimuli such as growth factors and hypoxia? 2) Considering the
wide list of Sp1-dependent promoters, how general is the
p42/p44 MAPK control of transcription via Sp1 phosphorylation?
An answer to the first question was rapidly obtained by stimulating
Raf:ER cells by fetal bovine serum instead of estradiol. Under this condition, ectopic expression of the double Sp1 mutant (T453A,T739A) only moderately suppressed VEGF transcription. This result indicates, as anticipated, that phosphorylation of Sp1 on
threonines 453 and 739 is not as important when a multiplicity of
signaling pathways are elicited instead of a single one. It is
important to recall that, in different cellular contexts, the VEGF
transcriptional control is more sensitive to phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase than p42/p44 MAPK signaling (24). Further work will address
the specific contribution of phosphorylated Sp1 in response to
platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and
-thrombin alone or in combination with hypoxia.
The second question was addressed by monitoring in parallel to VEGF,
the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21Waf1/Cip1. The promoter of
this gene is notorious for its regulation by Sp1 (73, 74).
Surprisingly, p21Waf1/Cip1 expression upon p42/p44 MAPK
activation (estradiol stimulation) is magnified by the ectopic
expression of (T453A,T739A) Sp1 (data not shown). One of the major
differences between both promoters is the presence of a TATA box on the
p21Waf1/Cip1 promoter (75). Overexpression of an
unphosphorylatable form of Sp1 could favor the interaction of TATA
box-binding protein with the TATA box and thus increase
transcription. Indeed, phosphorylation of NF
B by p38 MAPK is
essential to mediate a positive regulation by transcription factor
IID in the context of cytokine promoters (76). As it was shown
that phosphorylation of transcription factor IID could inhibit
transcription (77), we could envision that an unphosphorylatable
form of Sp1 would bypass this phenomena and thus enhance transcription.
Two alternative mechanisms could be proposed to explain the positive
effects of phosphorylation of Sp1 in the context of VEGF promoter.
Phosphorylation could mediate the release of inhibitory proteins.
Several candidate proteins exist, including p53 and its homologue p73,
which have both been shown to be implicated in the down-regulation of
VEGF transcription (78, 79). Another putative candidate is Sp1
Inhibitor (Sp1-I) a small protein that prevents binding of Sp1 to DNA
(80). The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor (pVHL) could also be
considered because of its implication in tumoral angiogenesis and
because it was shown to inhibit Sp1 activity through a direct
interaction (9). Alternatively, phosphorylation of Sp1 could mediate
the recruitment of co-activators. Two likely partners are AP-2 and
Egr-1, which have been shown to be associated to Sp1 on the VEGF
promoter (25). The transcriptional co-activator p300 could also be
associated to phosphorylated Sp1. Indeed, a complex between Sp1 and
p300 has been identified on the p21WAF1/CIP1 promoter
following nerve growth factor stimulation of PC12 cells, a situation
where p42/p44 MAPK is strongly activated (68).
Another interesting feature of Sp1 phosphorylation is its effect on
stability. It has been previously shown that long term stimulation of
GH4 cells with EGF, a strong stimulator of p42/p44 MAPK, induces Sp1
degradation (81). Thus phosphorylation of Sp1 by p42/p44 MAPK could be
important for stimulating its transcription potential following a short
term stimulation and for mediating its degradation at later times to
avoid a general dysfunction of the system.
Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of protein stability
has already been described for the transcription factor c-Jun or the
MAPK phosphatase 1 or the tumor suppressor p53. c-Jun and MAPK
phosphatase 1 are less sensitive to degradation by the proteasome
machinery following JNK (82) or p42/p44 MAPK (83) phosphorylation,
respectively, whereas p53 becomes sensitive to degradation after
phosphorylation by p42/p44 MAPK (48). We are currently investigating
how phosphorylation of Thr453 or/and Thr739
modifies the stability of Sp1 and next how phosphorylation mediates the
recruitment of specific Sp1 partners depending on the promoter context
and specific physiological situations.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. Jonathan Horowitz for providing
the plasmids coding for the GST/Sp1 fusion proteins; Dr. Robert Tjian
for the plasmid coding for the human Sp1; Dr. Y. Miyata for the active MEK1-MAPK fusion construct; Dr. Benoit Derijard for providing the
plasmids coding for the GST-ATF2 and GST-Jun fusions proteins; Dr.
Robert A. Hipskind for providing the plasmid coding for GST-Elk1; Drs.
Pascal Thérond and Laurent Ruel for providing SL2
Drosophila cells and the pPAC plasmid; Maurice
Hattab, Danièle Roux, Dominique Grall, and Frédéric
Bonino for their excellent technical support; Drs. Edurne Berra,
Clotilde Gimond, Philippe Lenormand, Ellen Van
Obberghen-Schilling, and Francesc Viñals for their
advice; and all the members of the laboratory for their helpful
comments and encouragement.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by grants from the CNRS,
l'Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, le Ministère de la
Recherche, l'Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer, la Ligue
Nationale Contre le Cancer, le Groupement des Entreprises
Françaises et Monégasque dans la Lutte contre le Cancer,
and la Fondation de France.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-492-03-12-31;
Fax: 33-492-03-12-35; E-mail: gpages@unice.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 19, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201753200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
VEGF, vascular
endothelial growth factor;
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
CMV, cytomegalovirus;
MEK, MAPK/ERK kinase;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift
assay;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
SAPK, stress-activated protein
kinase;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase;
WT, wild type;
HA, hemagglutinin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Berse, B.,
Brown, L. F.,
Van de Water, L.,
Dvorak, H. F.,
and Senger, D. R.
(1992)
Mol. Biol. Cell
3,
211-220[Abstract]
|
| 2.
|
Finkenzeller, G.,
Technau, A.,
and Marme, D.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
208,
432-439[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Ikeda, E.,
Achen, M. G.,
Breier, G.,
and Risau, W.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19761-19766[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Levy, A. P.,
Levy, N. S.,
Wegner, S.,
and Goldberg, M. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13333-13340[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Shima, D. T.,
Kuroki, M.,
Deutsch, U., Ng, Y. S.,
Adamis, A. P.,
and D'Amore, P. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3877-3883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Forsythe, J. A.,
Jiang, B.-H.,
Iyer, N. V.,
Agani, F.,
Leung, S. W.,
Koos, R. D.,
and Semenza, G. L.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4604-4613[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Pal, S.,
Claffey, K. P.,
Dvorak, H. F.,
and Mukhopadhyay, D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27509-27512[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Pal, S.,
Claffey, K. P.,
Cohen, H. T.,
and Mukhopadhyay, D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
26277-26280[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Mukhopadhyay, D.,
Knebelmann, B.,
Cohen, H. T.,
Ananth, S.,
and Sukhatme, V. P.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
5629-5639[Abstract]
|
| 10.
|
Stein, I.,
Neeman, M.,
Shweiki, D.,
Itin, A.,
and Keshet, E.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
5363-5368[Abstract]
|
| 11.
|
Levy, A. P.,
Levy, N. S.,
and Goldberg, M. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2746-2753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Levy, A. P.,
Levy, N. S.,
and Goldberg, M. A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
25492-25497[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Levy, N. S.,
Chung, S.,
Furneaux, H.,
and Levy, A. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
6417-6423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Claffey, K. P.,
Shih, S. C.,
Mullen, A.,
Dziennis, S.,
Cusick, J. L.,
Abrams, K. R.,
Lee, S. W.,
and Detmar, M.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
469-481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Stein, I.,
Itin, A.,
Einat, P.,
Skaliter, R.,
Grossman, Z.,
and Keshet, E.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
3112-3119[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Huez, I.,
Créancier, L.,
Audigier, S.,
Gensac, M. C.,
Prats, A. C.,
and Prats, H.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
6178-6190[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Mukhopadhyay, D.,
Tsiokas, L.,
Zhou, X. M.,
Foster, D.,
Brugge, J. S.,
and Sukhatme, V. P.
(1995)
Nature
375,
577-581[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Grugel, S.,
Finkenzeller, G.,
Weindel, K.,
Barleon, B.,
and Marmé, D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25915-25919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Samuels, M. L.,
Weber, J. M.,
and McMahon, M.
(1993)
Mol. Biol. Cell
13,
6241-6252
|
| 20.
|
Samuels, M. L.,
and McMahon, M.
(1994)
Mol. Biol. Cell
14,
7855-7866
|
| 21.
|
Lenormand, P.,
McMahon, M.,
and Pouyssegur, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
15762-15768[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Milanini, J.,
Vinals, F.,
Pouysségur, J.,
and Pagès, G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18165-18172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Pal, S.,
Datta, K.,
Khosravi-Far, R.,
and Mukhopadhyay, D.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
2395-2403[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Rak, J.,
Mitsuhashi, Y.,
Sheehan, C.,
Tamir, A.,
Vioria-Petit, A.,
Filmus, J.,
Mansour, S. J.,
Ahn, N. G.,
and Kerbel, R. S.
(2000)
Cancer Res.
60,
490-498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Gille, J.,
Swerlick, R. A.,
and Caughman, S. W.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
750-759[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Kadonaga, J. T.,
Carner, K. R.,
Masiarz, F. R.,
and Tjian, R.
(1987)
Cell
51,
1079-1090[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Marin, M.,
Karis, A.,
Visser, P.,
Grosveld, F.,
and Philipsen, S.
(1997)
Cell
89,
619-628[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Jackson, S. P.,
and Tjian, R.
(1988)
Cell
55,
125-133[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Jackson, S. P.,
MacDonald, J. J.,
Lees-Miller, S.,
and Tjian, R.
(1990)
Cell
63,
155-165[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Armstrong, S. A.,
Barry, D. A.,
Leggett, R. W.,
and Mueller, C. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13489-13495[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Rohlff, C.,
Ahmad, S.,
Borellini, F.,
Lei, J.,
and Glazer, R. I.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21137-21141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Fojas de Borja, P.,
Collins, N. K., Du, P.,
Azizkhan-Clifford, J.,
and Mudryj, M.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
5737-5747[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Jensen, D. E.,
Black, A. R.,
Swick, A. G.,
and Azizkhan, J. C.
(1997)
J. Cell. Biochem.
67,
24-31[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Black, A. R.,
Jensen, D.,
Lin, S. Y.,
and Azizkhan, J. C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1207-1215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Leggett, R. W.,
Armstrong, S. A.,
Barry, D.,
and Mueller, C. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25879-25884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Gonzalez, F. A.,
Seth, A.,
Raden, D. L.,
Bowman, D. S.,
Fay, F. S.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
1089-1101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Northwood, I. C.,
Gonzalez, F. A.,
Wartmann, M.,
Raden, D. L.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15266-15276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Rossomando, A. J.,
Dent, O.,
Sturgill, T. W.,
and MArshak, D. R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1594-1602[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Brunet, A.,
Pagès, G.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
346,
299-303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Corbalan-Garcia, S.,
Yang, S. S.,
Degenhardt, K. R.,
and Bar-Sagi, D.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5674-5682[Abstract]
|
| 41.
|
Lin, L.,
Wartmann, M.,
Lin, A.,
Knopf, J. L.,
Seth, A.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1993)
Cell
72,
269-278[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Tedford, K.,
Kim, S., Sa, D.,
Stevens, K.,
and Tyers, M.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
228-238[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Gille, H.,
Sharrocks, A. D.,
and Shaw, P. E.
(1992)
Nature
358,
414-424[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Janknecht, R.,
Zinck, R.,
Ernst, W. H.,
and Nordheim, A.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
1273-1278[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Seth, A.,
Gonzalez, F. A.,
Gupta, S.,
Raden, D. L.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
24796-24804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Marais, R.,
Wynne, J.,
and Treisman, R.
(1993)
Cell
73,
381-393[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Okazaki, K.,
and Sagata, N.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
5048-5059[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Song, X.,
Sheppard, H. M.,
Norman, A. W.,
and Liu, X.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
1677-1682[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Marshall, C. J.
(1995)
Cell
80,
179-185[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Mandell, J. W.,
Hussaini, I.,
Zecevic, M.,
Weber, M. J.,
and Vandenberg, S. R.
(1998)
Am. J. Pathol.
153,
1411-1423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Schmidt, C. M.,
McKillop, I. H.,
Cahill, P. A.,
and Sitzmann, J. V.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
236,
54-58[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Salh, B.,
Marotta, A.,
Mattewson, C.,
Ahluwalia, M.,
Flint, J.,
Owen, D.,
and Pelech, S.
(1999)
Anticancer Res.
19,
731-740[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Gioeli, D.,
Mandell, J. W.,
Petroni, G. R.,
Frierson, H. F.,
and Weber, M. J.
(1999)
Cancer Res.
59,
279-284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Hoshino, R.,
Chatani, Y.,
Yamori, T.,
Tsuoro, T.,
Oka, H.,
Yoshida, O.,
Shimada, Y.,
Ari, S.,
Wada, H.,
Fujimoto, J.,
and Kohno, M.
(1999)
Oncogene
18,
813-822[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Risau, W.
(1997)
Nature
386,
671-674[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Merchant, J. L., Du, M.,
and Todisco, A.
(1999)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
254,
454-461[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Murata, Y.,
Kim, H. G.,
Rogers, K. T.,
Udvadia, A. J.,
and Horowitz, J. M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20674-20681[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Miyata, Y.,
Adachi, S.,
Mizuno, H.,
and Nishida, E.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1451,
334-342[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Pagès, G.,
Berra, E.,
Milanini, J.,
Levy, A. P.,
and Pouysségur, J.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
26484-26491 |