Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201763200 on March 21, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 20640-20650, June 7, 2002
Endothelial Chemokines Destabilize L-selectin-mediated
Lymphocyte Rolling without Inducing Selectin Shedding*,
Valentin
Grabovsky
,
Oren
Dwir
, and
Ronen
Alon§
From the Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science,
Rehovot 76100, Israel
Received for publication, February 21, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Chemokines presented on specialized endothelial
surfaces rapidly up-regulate leukocyte integrin avidity and firm arrest
through Gi-protein signaling. Here we describe a
novel, G-protein-independent, down-regulatory activity of apical
endothelial chemokines in destabilizing L-selectin-mediated leukocyte
rolling. Unexpectedly, this anti-adhesive chemokine suppression of
rolling does not involve L-selectin shedding. Destabilization of
rolling is induced only by immobilized chemokines juxtaposed to
L-selectin ligands and is an energy-dependent process. Chemokines are found to interfere with a subsecond stabilization of
selectin tethers necessary for persistent rolling. This is a first
indication that endothelial chemokines can attenuate in situ L-selectin adhesion to endothelial ligands at subsecond
contacts. This negative feedback mechanism may underlie the
jerky nature of rolling mediated by L-selectin in vivo.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Selectins mediate the reversible capture (tethering) of
circulating leukocytes to vascular endothelium at numerous types of inflamed or lymphoid target tissues (1). Leukocyte tethers are
short-lived and must be rapidly propagated into rolling adhesions, to
allow the recruited leukocyte to survey the endothelial lining for
additional stimulatory molecules, predominantly chemokines (2).
Chemokines elicit rapid signals through binding to specific G-protein-coupled receptors
(GPCR)1 on tethered
leukocytes, which trigger the avidity of leukocyte integrins to
endothelial ligands, and thereby stabilize secondary leukocyte
adhesion, arrest, and subsequent extravasation (3). Whether chemokine
signals transduced to a rolling leukocyte can also modulate the
adhesive properties of its selectin or selectin ligands has not been
demonstrated. Soluble chemoattractants have been shown, on the other
hand, to trigger L-selectin shedding by cell surface endoproteolysis,
implicating blood-borne chemokines as potential down-regulators of
selectin-mediated rolling (4, 5). Selectin rolling is a highly dynamic
process that depends on subsecond coupling of tethers successively
formed and broken at the cell front and trailing edge under disruptive
shear forces (6, 7). L-selectin rolling adhesions can be mediated by single tethers preferentially formed at microvillar surface projections where L-selectin is preferentially localized (8, 9). Notably, L-selectin-mediated leukocyte rolling in vivo is extremely
fast and jerky in nature (10), even at endothelial sites expressing high levels of L-selectin ligands such as the peripheral lymph node
high endothelial venules (HEV) (10, 11). Stabilization of
L-selectin-mediated rolling, characterized by smooth rather than jerky
motion, is critically dependent on the number of bonds simultaneously
formed at each microvillar contact site (12). We therefore speculated
that the jerky nature of L-selectin-mediated rolling in various
in vivo settings might be caused by reduced L-selectin
adhesiveness on leukocytes interacting with endothelium-displayed L-selectin ligands. In the present in vitro study, we found
that several key chemokines, shown to be displayed on endothelial
surfaces in vivo, are capable of strongly destabilizing the
rolling activity of L-selectin in different types of leukocytes.
Notably, this suppression of rolling was mediated by immobilized rather
than soluble chemokines. Leukocyte capture to ligand, although normal, allowed the rapid encounter of immobilized chemokines co-displayed with
L-selectin ligands, thereby eliciting the in situ reduction of L-selectin tether avidity to ligand. Surprisingly, destabilization of rolling was not the result of proteolytic L-selectin shedding. Furthermore, chemokine-mediated suppression of selectin rolling, although dependent on metabolic energy, did not involve intracellular signaling through the chemokine receptor. This is a first demonstration that endothelial chemokines may regulate selectin-mediated leukocyte rolling through a nonproteolytic Gi-protein-independent
process, prior to and independent of their triggering of integrin adhesiveness.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Antibodies and Reagents
The anti-L-selectin mAb, DREG-200 (13), was provided by Dr.
T. K. Kishimoto (Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Ridgefield, CT). The anti-very late antigen 4 (VLA-4) mAb, HP1/2 (14), was a gift
from Dr. Roy Lobb (Biogen Inc., Cambridge, MA). The anti-glycoprotein cell adhesion molecule 1 (GlyCAM-1), purified from mouse serum by
immunoaffinity chromatography (15), was a gift from Dr. S. D. Rosen (University of California, San Francisco, CA). P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 (PSGL-1) was affinity-purified from human neutrophil lysates, was a generous gift from Dr. R. P. McEver (University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK),
and was stored frozen in 1%
n-octyl-
-D-glucopyranoside/PBS. Peripheral
node addressin (PNAd) purified from human tonsil lysates by MECA-79 mAb
affinity chromatography (16), a generous gift from Drs. E. L. Berg
(Protein Design Laboratories, Mountain View, CA) and J. J. Campbell (Children's Hospital, Boston, MA), was stored in 1% octyl
glucoside/PBS solution at 4 °C. Chemokines were obtained from R&D
Systems (Minneapolis, MN), except for BCA-1, a gift from Dr. P. Loetscher (University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland). Chemokines were
functionally inactivated by brief heat inactivation for 5 min at
100 °C as described previously (17). Biotin-labeled stromal
cell-derived factor-1
(SDF-1
) derivatives (modified either at the
COOH or NH2 terminus of the chemokine) were a kind gift
from Dr. F. Baleux (Institute Pasteur, Paris, France) and Dr. N. Fujii
(Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan). Both derivatives exhibited similar
chemotactic activity toward T cells in Transwell chemotaxis assays.
Biotin-labeled PSGL-1-derived sialyl Lewisx
(sLex)-decorated glycopeptide and a nonfucosylated control
peptide, both corresponding to the 19-residue NH2 terminus
of human PSGL-1, and each containing a single biotin group at its COOH
terminus (18), were a gift from Dr. R. T. Camphausen (Genetics
Institute, Cambridge, MA). Neutralite avidin (19) was a gift from Dr.
E. A. Bayer, (Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel).
Bovine serum albumin (fraction V), Ca2+- and
Mg2+-free Hanks' balanced salt solution, Ficoll-Hypaque
1077, and phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) were obtained from
Sigma-Aldrich. Human serum albumin (HSA, fraction V), pertussis toxin
(PTX), and tyrphostin AG490 were obtained from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). The protease inhibitors Ro31-9790 (20) and KD-IX-73-4 (21) were
obtained from Dr. P. Altevogt (German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany) and T. K. Kishimoto, respectively.
Cells
Human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL; obtained from healthy
donors) were isolated from citrate-anticoagulated whole blood by
dextran sedimentation and density separation over Ficoll-Hypaque. The
mononuclear cells thus obtained were washed and further purified on
nylon wool and plastic adherence as described (22). The resulting purified PBL consisted of more than 90% CD3+ T lymphocytes
and were cultured in lipopolysaccharide-free RPMI, 10% FCS for 15-18
h before use. Peripheral blood neutrophils were isolated from
anticoagulated blood after dextran sedimentation and density separation
over Ficoll-Hypaque (23). Murine B lymphocytes were derived from fresh
splenocytes by positive immunoselection with mAb B220 followed by
magnetic cell sorting purification, as described (24). The
murine pre-B 300.19 cell line, stably expressing either native human
L-selectin or tail-truncated L-selectin, was a generous gift from Dr.
G. S. Kansas (Northwestern University, Chicago, IL) (25). Clones
were maintained in RPMI 1640, supplemented with antibiotics, 10% FCS,
2 mM glutamine, and 0.1 µM 2-mercaptoethanol. The human umbilical vein endothelial cell-derived line, ECV-304 (LS12),
stably transfected with
-1,3-fucosyltransferase and
N-acetylglucosamine 6-O-sulfotransferase and
expressing functional sulfated L-selectin ligands (26) was a kind gift
from Dr. R. Kannagi (Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan). Cells were
maintained in RPMI 1640, 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, and antibiotics.
Immunofluorescence Flow Cytometry
Indirect immunofluorescence was performed on washed cells that
were suspended in PBS supplemented with 5% FCS and 5 mM
EDTA. Cells were incubated at 4 °C either with 10 µg/ml L-selectin
mAb DREG-200 or with pre-immune mouse IgG. Cells were washed, stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ig, resuspended in PBS supplemented with 0.05% sodium azide, and
immediately analyzed in a FACScan flow cytometer (BD
PharMingen, Erembodegem, Belgium). To assess protein kinase
C-induced L-selectin shedding, PBL or neutrophils were suspended in
cell binding medium (see below) in the presence of protease inhibitors
or with control carrier solution for 15 min at 25 °C as described
previously (20, 21). Leukocytes were then treated with PMA (100 ng/ml,
2-10 min, 25 °C) and immediately incubated at 4 °C with 10 µg/ml DREG-200, followed by staining with secondary mAb, as described above.
Preparation of Ligand-coated Substrates
Aliquots of GlyCAM-1, PNAd, or PSGL-1 were diluted in coating
medium (PBS, supplemented with 20 mM bicarbonate, pH 8.5)
and adsorbed onto polystyrene plates as described previously (27). Washed substrates were adsorbed with 0.1-4 µg/ml amount of either intact or heat-inactivated chemokines for 3 h at 4 °C. The
anti-L-selectin mAb DREG-200 was mixed with either intact or
heat-inactivated chemokines in the presence of 2 µg/ml HSA and coated
onto polystyrene plates overnight at 4 °C. Neutralite avidin was
diluted in PBS, 40 mM bicarbonate, pH 9.0, and adsorbed
onto a polystyrene plate overnight at 4 °C, followed by HSA blocking
at 4 °C. An equimolar mixture of biotin-labeled PSGL-1-derived
selectin-binding peptide (2 × 10
2 nM)
and either biotin-labeled SDF-1
or an inactive biotin-labeled control PSGL-1 peptide was diluted in cell binding medium (see below)
and adsorbed for 4 h at 4 °C on the avidin-coated plate. Substrates coated with avidin complexed with inactive biotin-labeled glycopeptides lacked any adhesive activity to all L-selectin-expressing leukocytes tested.
Laminar Flow Assays
Cell Tethering and Rolling Measurements--
The polystyrene
plate, on which purified ligand was adsorbed, was assembled in a
parallel plate laminar flow chamber as described previously (28).
Various leukocyte populations were washed in H/H medium (Hanks'
balanced salt solution, 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, supplemented
with 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) containing 5 mM EDTA,
resuspended in cell binding medium (H/H medium supplemented with 2 mM CaCl2) at 2 × 106
cells/ml, and perfused at room temperature through the flow chamber at
a rate generating wall shear stress of 0.1 dyn/cm2, as
described (27). Once reaching the upstream side of the test adhesive
substrate, the flow rate was elevated to generate a shear stress of
0.75, 1, or 1.75 dyn/cm2, and all cellular interactions
were visualized at two different fields of view (each one 0.17 mm2 in area) using a 10× objective of an inverted phase
contrast microscope (Diaphot 300, Nikon Inc., Tokyo, Japan). An
imaging system was used for analysis of instantaneous velocities of
leukocytes, WSCAN-Array-3 (Galai, Migdal-Ha'emek, Israel) as described
previously (27). Accumulation of rolling leukocytes on the test fields was determined by computerized cell motion tracking. Adhesive interactions of transiently tethered cells were also manually analyzed
as described (27). The frequency of rolling cells was defined as the
number of cells out of the cell flux that initiated persistent rolling
on the adhesive substrate lasting at least 3 s after initial
tethering. Transient tethers were cells that attached only briefly to
the substrate (< 0.2 s). Frequency of each category of tethers
was expressed in % units; 1% unit measured at 1.75 dyn/cm2 corresponded to tethering rate of 5.25 × 10
3 event × cell
1 mm
1
s
1.
To block GPCRs on target leukocytes, cells suspended in binding medium
were preincubated for 45 min at 37 °C with 0.5 µg/ml soluble
chemokines and perfused into the chamber. For blocking Gi-protein signaling, PBL were cultured for 15 h at
37 °C in culture medium alone or in the presence of 100 ng/ml PTX.
For blocking JAK/STAT pathway stimulation by chemokines, lymphocytes
were preincubated for 2 h at 37 °C with 150 µM
JAK inhibitor, tyrphostin AG490, or with control Me2SO
solution (0.1%, v/v). To inhibit metabolic energy without interfering
with intact L-selectin rolling activity (29), lymphocytes were
pretreated with 0.05% sodium azide for 2 min at room temperature, and
perfused unwashed into the chamber. To adsorb SDF-1
on an
endothelial monolayer, SDF-1
(100 ng/ml) was overlaid for 5 min on
an L-selectin ligand-expressing ECV-304 cell monolayer assembled on the
lower plate of the flow chamber. Unbound chemokine was removed by
extensive washing. Overlaid chemokine remained bound to the monolayer
throughout the assay, as confirmed in repetitive experiments after
extensive washings.
Dissociation Kinetics of Individual Transient Tethers and
Successive Rolling Tethers--
Microkinetics of individual cells
exhibiting jerky rolling on medium density GlyCAM-1 was analyzed on
digitized video segments using the WSCAN-Array-3 software as described
previously (27). Individual cell displacement analysis at 0.02-s
intervals monitored changes in instantaneous cell velocities in the
flow direction, depicted as successive transient pauses (27). The
natural log of the number of all pauses or tethers formed by a given
number of perfused leukocytes that remained bound after a given
duration was plotted as a function of time, yielding tether
dissociation curves with slopes representing
koff.
 |
RESULTS |
Immobilized Chemokines Suppress Rolling Activity of L-selectin on
Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes--
To study the effect of chemokine
encounter by rolling lymphocytes on the dynamic stability of their
selectin contact, the ability of L-selectin-expressing leukocytes to
tether to and roll on surfaces bearing both purified L-selectin ligands
and chemokines was investigated in a parallel plate flow chamber. Human
PBL were perfused on a substrate coated with PNAd or GlyCAM-1,
prototypic lymph node HEV-derived L-selectin ligands (15, 16). At
physiological shear stresses, freely flowing PBL rapidly tethered to
and established continuous rolling on PNAd or GlyCAM-1 coated alone
(data not shown) or co-adsorbed with a nonfunctional secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine (SLC, CCL21) (Fig.
1A). However, PBL perfused over substrates containing identical densities of PNAd or GlyCAM-1 each
co-adsorbed with functional SLC failed to accumulate on the ligands
(Fig. 1A, and videos A and B available
as supplemental information in the on-line version of this article).
The distribution and intrinsic functional activity of GlyCAM-1 were
unaffected by SLC adsorption, because human neutrophils, which lack
CCR7 and do not respond to SLC (30), rolled normally on GlyCAM-1, regardless of SLC presence (data not shown). Indeed, pre-exposure of
lymphocytes to soluble SLC at levels saturating its GPCR, CCR7, completely eliminated the suppressive effect of immobilized SLC on
L-selectin-mediated lymphocyte rolling (Fig. 1A, and video C available as supplemental information in the on-line
version of this article) without altering intrinsic L-selectin activity (Fig. 2).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Immobilized chemokines destabilize
L-selectin-mediated PBL rolling on an
endothelial L-selectin ligand. Figure shows
accumulation of rolling human PBL (T lymphocyte) as a function of
perfusion time on substrates containing the L-selectin ligands PNAd
(coated at 100 ng/ml; left panel) or GlyCAM-1
(100 sites/µm2; middle panel), each
co-immobilized with either active (+) or inactivated SLC ( ) at 4 µg/ml. For SLC pretreatment, lymphocytes were preincubated with the
chemokine (0.5 µg/ml) in binding medium for 45 min. Data points
represent the means ± range of flow experiments performed at a
shear stress of 1.75 dyn/cm2 taken in two fields of view.
Mean rolling velocities ± S.E. are indicated near respective
accumulation plots. Representative segments of video frames taken at
t = 5 s, which depict lymphocytes interacting with
GlyCAM-1 under the three experimental conditions mentioned above, are
shown at the right panels. Blue images
depict continuously rolling lymphocytes; green images depict
transiently tethered lymphocytes. The experiment shown is
representative of six independent experiments using different donor
lymphocytes.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of soluble chemokines and of the
density of immobilized chemokine on
L-selectin-mediated PBL adhesion to
GlyCAM-1. Figure shows frequency and type of tethers formed by PBL
perfused at a shear stress of 1.75 dyn/cm2 over substrates
coated with GlyCAM-1 (100 sites/µm2) co-immobilized with
SLC or inactivated SLC ( ) at 4 µg/ml. Where indicated, PBL were
pretreated with soluble chemokines, each at 0.5 µg/ml for 45 min
before perfusion over GlyCAM-1. Tethers (shown in stacked
bars) were classified as stable (i.e. followed by
rolling) or transient as explained under "Experimental Procedures."
Accumulation profiles of lymphocytes rolling on GlyCAM-1, which
correspond to the fourth and fifth
stacked bars, are shown in the right
panel with mean rolling velocities ± S.E. indicated
near respective accumulation plots. *, p < 0.001 compared with mean rolling velocity of cells rolling on GlyCAM-1 alone.
The experiment shown is representative of three independent
experiments.
|
|
Notably, short exposure of lymphocytes to saturating levels of soluble
SLC or to SDF-1
(CXCL12), a chemokine ligand of the CXCR4 GPCR,
expressed by most circulating PBL (31), did not alter their ability to
tether to and roll on substrates containing GlyCAM-1 (Fig. 2), although
this treatment triggered robust
Gi-protein-dependent ERK activation (data not
shown). Importantly, the ability of SLC to destabilize lymphocyte
rolling on a fixed GlyCAM-1 density decreased with reduced chemokine
coating density (Fig. 2). Low density SLC, in contrast to high density
chemokine, had a dual effect on L-selectin-mediated rolling on GlyCAM-1
co-immobilized with the chemokine; it partially reduced the fraction of
tethered lymphocytes capable of rolling on GlyCAM-1 and increased the
velocity of this rolling fraction. Thus, the rapid suppressive activity of SLC on L-selectin-mediated rolling adhesion depends on both the mode
and density of chemokine presented to lymphocytes in juxtaposition to
the L-selectin ligand to which they are tethered.
Chemokine Destabilization of L-selectin Rolling Does Not Involve
Selectin Shedding or Gi-protein Signaling--
L-selectin
rolling velocity can be affected by proteolytic shedding of the
selectin by a cell surface protease (21). Interestingly, although
soluble chemoattractants induce L-selectin shedding in myeloid cells
(5), soluble SLC or SDF-1
failed to induce L-selectin shedding in
PBL (Fig. 3A). Furthermore,
the suppressive activity of SLC on rolling of T cells pretreated with
the potent protease inhibitor Ro31-9790, confirmed to significantly
block PMA-induced L-selectin shedding in lymphocytes (Fig.
3A, right panel), could not be rescued
by the inhibitor (Fig. 3B) or by another hydroxamic acid-based L-selectin sheddase inhibitor, KD-IX-73-4 (data not shown).
The protease inhibitor also did not augment L-selectin-mediated rolling
of PBL on substrate coated with GlyCAM-1 alone (Fig. 3B), suggesting that spontaneous L-selectin shedding in lymphocytes does not
take place during rolling on purified ligand, as reported previously
for neutrophils (21, 32). Indeed, L-selectin lacking a protease
recognition site has been reported to retain wild type activity when
expressed in a lymphocyte line (33). L-selectin suppression was also
induced by immobilized SDF-1
, and, as with SLC, suppression could
not be rescued by inhibition of L-selectin shedding (Fig.
3B). Thus, chemokine destabilization of L-selectin-mediated rolling did not involve in situ L-selectin shedding on
tethered lymphocytes.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Neither L-selectin shedding nor
Gi-protein signaling is involved in chemokine-suppression
of L-selectin-mediated rolling.
A, left panel, effects of PBL
treatment with saturating levels of soluble SDF-1 (0.5 µg/ml;
solid black line) or SLC (0.5 µg/ml;
gray line) for 45 min on their surface
L-selectin, determined by immunostaining with the L-selectin-specific
mAb DREG-200; right panel, flow cytometry
analysis of L-selectin on PMA-activated PBL. PBL preincubated with
carrier solution (gray solid line) or
with the protease inhibitor (S.I., sheddase inhibitor),
Ro31-9790 (solid black line) were
treated for 15 min with 100 ng/ml PMA and subsequently stained with
anti-L-selectin mAb DREG-200. In both panels, the dashed
black line indicates L-selectin staining of
intact lymphocytes; the dotted line indicates PBL
staining with an isotype matched control mAb. All experiments were
carried out at 25 °C. B, effect of blocking L-selectin
shedding with the protease inhibitor Ro31-9790 on the frequency and
type of tethers formed by lymphocytes perfused over GlyCAM-1 coated at
100 sites/µm2 and co-immobilized with inactivated
SDF-1 ( ) or active SLC or SDF-1 (each at 4 µg/ml).
C, effect of a 45-min PBL exposure to saturating levels of
soluble chemokines (0.5 µg/ml) or of PBL pretreatment with PTX on
rolling and transient tethering to GlyCAM-1 at 100 sites/µm2. The ligand was coated alone or in the presence
of SLC. Adhesion assays depicted in B and C were
performed at a shear stress of 1.75 dyn/cm2 and are each
representative of five independent experiments with different donor
PBL.
|
|
Immobilized chemokines signal to target lymphocytes within subseconds
of contact by binding their seven spanner receptors and activating
their associated heterotrimeric Gi-proteins (2). Surprisingly, however, PTX inactivation of these
Gi-proteins on PBL, which did not interfere with intrinsic
L-selectin adhesive activity (Fig. 3C), also had no effect
on chemokine suppression of L-selectin rolling (Figs. 3C and
4A). Consistent with the
G-protein independence of this process, an SDF-1
mutant, P2G, with
retained affinity to the SDF-1
receptor, CXCR4, but lost signaling
capacity (17, 34) and GPCR internalization activity (data not shown), fully reproduced the suppressive activity of native SDF-1
on intact
or PTX-treated lymphocytes (Fig. 4A). Nevertheless,
destabilization of L-selectin-mediated rolling by chemokine required
metabolic energy, because lymphocyte pretreatment with low levels of
sodium azide could rescue chemokine-induced suppression of L-selectin rolling, whereas it did not affect spontaneous L-selectin rolling (Fig.
4A). The suppressive activity of chemokines on
L-selectin-mediated rolling appeared GPCR-specific, because rescue of
rolling suppression by immobilized SLC could be achieved only by
pre-exposure of lymphocytes to saturating levels of soluble SLC or to a
second CCR7 ligand, ELC (CCL19) but not to SDF-1
(Fig.
3C). Taken together, these results suggest that chemokine
destabilization of L-selectin-mediated rolling, although
receptor-mediated and energy-dependent, did not involve
Gi-protein signaling by the chemokine receptor and was not
the result of L-selectin shedding.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Immobilized but not soluble
SDF-1 reduces effective
L-selectin density on tethered lymphocytes at
local adhesive contacts while increasing CXCR4 density.
A, effect of signaling capacity and context of presentation
of SDF-1 on the frequency and type of tethers formed by PBL
interacting with PNAd at a shear stress of 1.75 dyn/cm2.
PNAd was coated at 100 ng/ml, and either SDF-1 or the nonsignaling
SDF-1 derivative, P2G, were coimmobilized with it. Where indicated,
PBL were pretreated with either soluble SDF-1 (0.5 µg/ml) or
0.05% azide, as described under "Experimental Procedures."
B, frequency and type of tethers mediated by PBL perfused
over substrates coated with L-selectin-specific mAb DREG-200 (at 0.1 µg/ml) in the presence of inactive ( ) or active SDF-1 or P2G.
Tethers were measured at 1 dyn/cm2. For comparison, effect
of SDF-1 on frequency of PBL tethers formed with surface-bound
4 integrin-specific mAb HP1/2 is shown. C,
frequency and type of tethers mediated by PBL perfused at 0.75 dyn/cm2 over surface-bound anti-CXCR4 mAb (0.1 µg/ml)
coated with inactive ( ) or active SDF-1 or the P2G derivative
(each at 2 µg/ml). Note that co-immobilized SLC does not induce any
adhesive activity in this setting. The scheme depicts a CXCR4-bearing
microvillus tethered to a substrate coated with anti-CXCR4 mAb and
SDF-1 . The experiments shown in A-C are each
representative of three.
|
|
Leukocyte tethering to immobilized mAbs is inefficient under flow and
is not followed by rolling adhesions, but serves as a sensitive measure
of antigen density or availability on the surface of the tethered
leukocyte at subsecond contact sites (9, 17). To investigate whether
chemokine suppression of L-selectin rolling involves interference with
local surface density of L-selectin at these tether sites, SDF-1
was
co-immobilized with an anti-L-selectin mAb and its effect on lymphocyte
tethering to the mAb was determined. Consistent with such interference,
immobilized SDF-1
and SLC (data not shown), but not their soluble
counterparts, strongly suppressed the ability of T lymphocytes to
tether to anti-L-selectin mAb (Fig. 4B). In contrast,
SDF-1
dramatically augmented lymphocyte tethering to an immobilized
4 integrin-specific mAb (Fig. 4B), consistent
with its ability to induce in situ VLA-4 clustering at
lymphocyte-substrate contact zones (17). Similar to the effects of
SDF-1
on suppression of L-selectin rolling on authentic ligand (Fig.
4A), intact signaling capacity through the GPCR was not essential for the chemokine to suppress L-selectin binding to mAb,
because suppression was insensitive to PTX pretreatment and could be
induced by the non signaling SDF-1
mutant, P2G (Fig. 4B).
Thus, lymphocyte binding to both authentic carbohydrate ligands and to
an L-selectin-binding mAb was similarly sensitive to suppression by
immobilized chemokines.
To further understand the specific requirement for immobilized
chemokines in destabilization of L-selectin rolling, anti-CXCR4 mAb was
immobilized alone or with SDF-1
(Fig. 4C). Specificity of
the assay was confirmed by the ability of SDF-1
, but not of SLC, to
augment CXCR4-dependent lymphocyte adhesion to immobilized anti-CXCR4 mAb (Fig. 4C). Notably and consistent with its
inability to destabilize L-selectin-mediated rolling (Fig. 2), soluble
SDF-1
did not augment or suppress CXCR4-dependent mAb
adhesion in this assay (Fig. 4C). On the other hand, and
consistent with its suppressive effects on L-selectin rolling and
L-selectin mAb binding (Fig. 4, A and B), P2G
could significantly augment CXCR4-dependent PBL adhesion in
this assay (Fig. 4C). SDF-1
-augmented PBL adhesion to
anti-CXCR4 mAb was also PTX-insensitive (Fig. 4C) and
azide-sensitive (data not shown), reminiscent of SDF-1
suppression
of L-selectin rolling (Fig. 4A). Thus, the ability of
SDF-1
to destabilize L-selectin rolling of PBL correlated with
ability to augment CXCR4-dependent binding of these PBL to
immobilized CXCR4-binding mAb. Assuming that this binding depends on
locally elevated densities of CXCR4 on the PBL surface at the site of
immobilized CXCR4 ligand, SDF-1
, it appears that local clustering of
CXCR4, induced by immobilized, but not by soluble SDF-1
, underlies
the ability of SDF-1
to suppress L-selectin-mediated adhesion at
subsecond contacts.
Chemokine Suppression of L-selectin Rolling Is Shared among
Different Leukocytes and Requires GPCR Recognition--
The
destabilizing effects of chemokines on L-selectin-dependent
rolling were not restricted to human PBL. The ability of murine B
lymphocytes to establish rolling following tethering to GlyCAM-1 was
similarly abolished in the presence of immobilized SDF-1
or B cell
attracting chemokine 1 (BCA-1, CXCL13), both potent B cell chemokines
(Fig. 5, A and B).
As in PBL, soluble chemokines did not suppress L-selectin rolling in
these cells, but could selectively rescue suppression of rolling by
immobilized counterparts (Fig. 5B and data not shown). The
suppressive effects of chemokines on L-selectin rolling were also not
restricted to endothelial L-selectin ligands or to lymphoid cells, as
they could be also observed with neutrophils interacting with a
nonendothelial L-selectin ligand, PSGL-1 (Fig. 5C).
Interleukin 8 (IL-8, CXCL8), a key chemokine implicated in neutrophil
recruitment to inflamed endothelial sites (35), strongly suppressed
neutrophil rolling on PSGL-1 (Fig. 5C). PSGL-1 immobilized
with inactive chemokines or with SLC supported efficient rolling of
neutrophils (Fig. 5C), consistent with low expression levels
of the SLC GPCR, CCR7, on these leukocytes (data not shown). SLC
strongly suppressed, however, L-selectin-mediated rolling of PBL on
PSGL-1 (data not shown). Thus, the correct GPCR on a target leukocyte
is required for its ligand to suppress L-selectin-mediated rolling.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Multiple chemokines destabilize
L-selectin-dependent rolling of
different leukocytes types expressing suitable GPCRs. A,
accumulation of murine B lymphocytes on GlyCAM-1 (100 sites/µm2) co-immobilized with inactivated
( ) or active BCA-1 or SDF-1 . B, effect of saturating
levels of soluble chemokines on B lymphocyte rolling and transient
tethering to GlyCAM-1 coated with inactivated ( ) or active BCA-1 or
SDF-1 . C, IL-8 but not SLC suppress neutrophil rolling on
a nonendothelial ligand. Neutrophil accumulation on a substrate coated
with PSGL-1 (110 sites/µm2) coimmobilized with inactive
chemokine ( ) or with active SLC or IL-8 (each at 4 µg/ml). Mean
rolling velocities ± S.E. are indicated near respective
accumulation plots. Experiments are representative of three independent
tests.
|
|
Interestingly, the L-selectin rolling activity of PSGL-1 did not depend
on its native mucin scaffold, because short PSGL-1-derived peptides,
corresponding to the NH2-terminal selectin-binding region of PSGL-1, supported efficient L-selectin-mediated lymphocyte rolling
when immobilized through a biotin spacer on an avidin-coated substrate
(Fig. 6A), comparable with
that of native PSGL-1 (Fig. 6B). Notably, when SDF-1
was
co-adsorbed with the biotinylated PSGL-1 peptide on an avidin-coated
substrate through its non GPCR-binding COOH terminus, it could
efficiently suppress L-selectin-dependent PBL rolling on
the PSGL-1 peptide, through its functionally exposed NH2
terminus (Fig. 6A, N'-ter). In contrast,
SDF-1
, coupled to the avidin-coated substrate via its
NH2-terminal CXCR4 binding site, lost its ability to
destabilize L-selectin-mediated PBL rolling (Fig. 6A). Thus,
a functionally intact GPCR binding domain is required for immobilized
SDF-1
to suppress L-selectin-mediated rolling, whereas the mode of
chemokine presentation, either direct, by a plastic surface (Fig.
6B) or by an avidin scaffold (Fig. 6A), does not
affect the capacity of the chemokine to suppress L-selectin
rolling.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
GPCR binding domain is necessary for
chemokine-suppressed L-selectin-mediated
rolling. A, rolling of PBL on a PSGL-1-derived
biotinylated peptide (0.1 µg/ml) co-immobilized with equimolar
concentrations of control biotinylated peptide ( ) or with
biotinylated SDF-1 (+). PSGL-1 peptides were labeled with a single
biotin at their COOH terminus and were co-immobilized together with the
biotinylated SDF-1 to substrates pre-coated with avidin (see
"Experimental Procedures"). N'-ter, SDF-1 modified in
its COOH terminus with biotin was anchored on avidin leaving its
NH2 CXCR4 binding domain functionally exposed.
C'-ter, SDF-1 modified in its NH2 terminus
with biotin, and anchored on avidin leaving its COOH terminus
functionally exposed. Where indicated, PBL were pretreated with 0.5 µg/ml soluble SDF-1 . B, effect of chemokines on
L-selectin-mediated rolling of PBL on native PSGL-1 (110 sites/µm2), coimmobilized with inactive chemokine ( ) or
active SLC or SDF-1 (each at 4 µg/ml). Data points in A
and B represent the means ± range of measurements
taken in two fields of view. Mean velocities of rolling cells ± S.E. are indicated near various accumulation plots. Experiments were
all conducted at a shear stress of 1.75 dyn/cm2 and are
representative of triplicate experiments.
|
|
Chemokine Suppresses Stable Rolling but Not Transient
Tethers--
To destabilize L-selectin rolling, chemokines must be
properly displayed on endothelial surfaces. We next tested the ability of cell surface determinants to display SDF-1
in a conformation capable of suppressing L-selectin-mediated rolling. In light of low
ligand expression on endothelial-derived cell lines, we made use of a
human umbilical vein endothelial cell-derived line, ECV-304, stably
transfected with
-1,3-fucosyltransferase and
N-acetylglucosamine 6-O-sulfotransferase (26),
two key regulators of L-selectin ligand biosynthesis on lymph node HEV
and inflamed endothelia (36, 37). A murine pre-B lymphocytic cell line
expressing CXCR4 but lacking endogenous L-selectin and transfected with
human L-selectin cDNA could establish persistent rolling on these
ligand-expressing ECV-304 cells under physiological shear flow (Fig.
7A). As observed with purified
proteins, SDF-1
immobilized on the ECV-304 cell surface strongly
suppressed L-selectin-mediated rolling of the L-selectin transfected B
cells, without interfering with initial capture (Fig. 7, A
and inset). SDF-1
also strongly destabilized L-selectin
rolling of these cells on purified GlyCAM-1 (Fig. 9A). In
contrast to the pre-B transfectants, PBL captured only transiently to
the same ligand-expressing ECV-304 monolayers and failed to establish
rolling (Fig. 7A, inset). Strikingly, transient
PBL tethers, although L-selectin-dependent, were completely
resistant to SDF-1
suppression (Fig. 7A,
inset). This result suggested that chemokines do not
interfere with transient tethers mediated by weak L-selectin-ligand
interactions. To further delineate this observation, we next tested how
the suppressive effect of a chemokine varies with the density of
L-selectin ligand on the substrate. Reminiscent of the inability of
SDF-1
to suppress transient PBL tethering (Fig. 7A,
inset), immobilized SLC effectively suppressed L-selectin
rolling of PBL observed on high or medium physiological GlyCAM-1
densities, but could not suppress either the formation or the duration
of transient L-selectin-mediated PBL tethers to low density GlyCAM-1
(Fig. 7B). Taken together, these findings suggest that
chemokine binding to a tethered leukocyte selectively suppresses
L-selectin-mediated rolling adhesions without interfering with
transient L-selectin tethers.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Endothelial displayed
SDF-1 suppresses
L-selectin-mediated rolling but not transient
tethering. A, L-selectin pre-B transfectants were
perfused over either intact monolayer of ECV-304 cells expressing
L-selectin ligands ( ) or over a monolayer that had been overlaid with
SDF-1 . Blockage of CXCR4 on the L-selectin transfectant with soluble
SDF-1 rescued all rolling (data not shown). Inset,
frequency and type of tethers formed by the transfectants during the
accumulation period in the figure. Frequency and type of tethers formed
by PBL interacting with a similar monolayer are depicted in the
third and fourth bars. Data points
represent the means ± range of measurements taken in two fields
of view. The experiment shown is representative of three independent
experiments. B, frequency and type of tethers formed by PBL
perfused over substrates coated with the indicated densities of
GlyCAM-1 co-immobilized with SLC or inactivated SLC ( ) at 4 µg/ml.
Tethers were classified as stable (i.e. followed by rolling)
or transient, as explained under "Experimental Procedures." Mean
duration (ms) of transient tethers to GlyCAM-1 (20 sites/µm2) is indicated on top of
bars. The experiment shown is representative of three
independent experiments using different donors.
|
|
Chemokine Suppresses a Subset of High Avidity L-selectin Tethers
Independently of Cytoskeletal Association of the Selectin--
To gain
further insights into the kinetics of GPCR-mediated suppression, the
motion of individual T lymphocytes interacting with medium density
GlyCAM-1 and SLC (Fig. 7B) was next compared by computerized
image analysis (27). The duration of L-selectin tethers comprising
leukocyte rolling motions was shown to be progressively shorter at
reduced bond numbers within each tether (12). Thus, tether duration can
serve as a sensitive reporter of effective L-selectin avidity at the
contact zone. Upon initial tethering to the ligand-coated surface,
captured lymphocytes continued to roll on the ligand through engagement
of closely spaced successive tethers (Fig. 6A,
right panel). Over 80% of these tethers
dissociated from the ligand with a first order dissociation rate
corresponding to a t1/2 of 19.5 ms (Fig.
8A, left panel, open circles). The remaining
tethers lasted significantly longer, with a t1/2 of
43 ms (Fig. 8A, left panel,
closed circles). As reported earlier, lymphocytes interacting with GlyCAM-1 in the presence of immobilized SLC could not
establish rolling (Fig. 8B, right
panel) and engaged with the L-selectin ligand exclusively
through short-lived tethers (Fig. 8B, left
panel; t1/2 of 17.8 ms). PBL pretreated
with soluble SLC engaged with GlyCAM-1 co-immobilized with SLC with
microkinetics nearly identical to that of intact PBL interacting with
GlyCAM-1 in the absence of SLC (Fig. 8, A and C,
left panels). Thus, persistent PBL rolling on
GlyCAM-1 is mediated by a subset of prolonged tethers with a
t1/2 of 45 ± 2 ms, which make up about one
fifth of all L-selectin-mediated tethers (Fig. 8, A and
C). Chemokine suppression of rolling adhesions in this
system is therefore associated with the ability to suppress this subset
of nascent tethers by reducing their lifetime to a t1/2 shorter than 20 ms.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of immobilized chemokine on the
microkinetics of L-selectin-mediated tethering
and rolling of PBL on GlyCAM-1. A, the duration of
instantaneous velocity drops (pauses) of 5-20 PBL continuously rolling
on medium density GlyCAM-1 (100 sites/µm2 coated with
inactive SLC) at a shear stress of 1.75 dyn/cm2 was
determined and used to calculate the dissociation kinetics of all
pauses. Data points that fit a first order dissociation curve are
connected by straight lines, with slopes
equal to koff. The fraction of the total
tethers that dissociated with the indicated koff
values are shown. r, coefficient of correlation.
Right panel, instantaneous velocities of a
representative lymphocyte interacting with the GlyCAM-1 substrate.
B, motion analysis of lymphocytes tethered to GlyCAM-1 (100 sites/µm2) coated with active SLC (4 µg/ml). The
koff value was determined as in A. A
velocity pattern of a representative tethered lymphocyte detaching from
the substrate shortly after initial tethering is depicted in the
right panel. C, motion analysis and
koff values of PBL pretreated with soluble SLC
and allowed to tether to and roll on a substrate coated with GlyCAM-1
co-immobilized with SLC, identically as in B. Right panel, instantaneous velocities of a
representative SLC-treated lymphocyte interacting with the substrate.
Background L-selectin-independent tethering to the substrates was
determined in the presence of EDTA. Values represent the mean of two
independent experiments with a total of 70 transient events analyzed
for each experimental group.
|
|
The cytoplasmic domain of L-selectin has been shown to regulate
leukocyte rolling under shear flow through stabilizing association of
L-selectin with the cell actin cytoskeleton (25, 38). An L-selectin
mutant lacking the carboxyl-terminal 11 residues of the cytoplasmic
domain, with deficient cytoskeletal association, expressed on pre-B
cells, can establish weak but persistent rolling on high density
L-selectin ligands (39). Notably, SDF-1
could fully destabilize the
rolling adhesions mediated by this tail-truncated L-selectin mutant on
high density GlyCAM-1, despite of the very fast rolling mediated by
this mutant (Fig. 9, A and
B). Thus, chemokine destabilization of L-selectin-mediated
rolling does not require an intact cytoplasmic domain of L-selectin,
suggesting that the suppressive signals exerted by chemokine do not
require L-selectin association with the cytoskeleton.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
The cytoplasmic domain of
L-selectin is not required for chemokine
destabilization of rolling. Accumulation at 1.75 dyn/cm2 of pre-B cells transfected with
wild-type (A) or tail-truncated (B) human
L-selectin on a substrate containing GlyCAM-1 (200 sites/µm2) co-immobilized with inactive ( ) or active
SDF-1 (4 µg/ml). Mean velocities of rolling cells ± S.E. are
indicated near the accumulation plots. Insets, frequency and
type of tethers formed by L-selectin-expressing cells during the
accumulation periods in each panel. Data points represent the
means ± range of measurements taken in two fields of view. Data
are representative of three independent experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Selectin-mediated tethering and rolling are prerequisite for
leukocytes to survey the endothelial lining for proadhesive and promigratory signals, primarily apical chemokines (3, 10). Rolling
leukocytes must integrate chemokine signals within subsecond contacts
along the direction of flow (17, 40, 41). Here we suggest that apically
displayed endothelial chemokines may not merely transmit
integrin-activating signals to rolling leukocytes, but in fact directly
modulate the rolling process itself, through an in situ
reduction of selectin tether stability. Thus, rolling adhesions that
allow a captured leukocyte to sample the endothelium for specific
chemokines are subjected to a negative feedback mechanism by these very
chemokines. Rather than being discrete and sequential events (42),
reversible selectin interactions and chemokine receptor occupancy
events appear to simultaneously operate at particular adhesive zones
bearing immobilized chemokines juxtaposed to L-selectin ligands. As a
result, selectin-mediated rolling, which has been predicted to increase
encounter of endothelium-displayed chemokines (43), is in fact
attenuated by this encounter. Attenuation of rolling is predicted to be
more robust at sites of leukocyte interaction with high densities of
L-selectin ligand, probably at endothelial regions within lymph node
HEV enriched with L-selectin ligands (11). In addition, because the
local density of chemokine on endothelial surfaces is heterogeneous
(35), this attenuation mechanism may result in multiple dynamic
outcomes. In regions of low chemokine density, L-selectin-mediated
rolling is expected to be accelerated (Fig. 2), whereas
L-selectin-mediated rolling on specific regions expressing high density
chemokine is expected to be strongly suppressed (Fig. 2). This would
cause a rolling leukocyte to detach from such sites, while allowing it
to jerk and rebind ligand at an adjacent downstream sites. Furthermore, chemokine distribution on individual endothelial cells is nonuniform, as chemokines can be found in clusters on endothelial microvilli (35).
These domains could be preferential sites of chemokine destabilization
of L-selectin rolling. The jerky nature of L-selectin rolling is not
controlled solely by chemokines. Anti-adhesive glycoproteins like CD43
(44), topological heterogeneity of both leukocyte and endothelial
surfaces (45), as well as intrinsic properties of L-selectin bonds (46,
47) can each contribute to the jerky nature of L-selectin-mediated
rolling of leukocytes along various blood vessels. The existence of
such multiple mechanisms for attenuating L-selectin rolling suggests
that the jerky nature of L-selectin-mediated rolling is of major
physiological significance. One possible outcome of such suppression of
rolling could be to attenuate direct integrin activation by L-selectin,
a process that depends on L-selectin ligation by ligand and bypasses
chemokine regulation of leukocyte arrest on integrin ligands
(48-50).
Spontaneous and chemoattractant-induced proteolytic shedding of
L-selectin was traditionally proposed as a major negative feedback
mechanism of L-selectin-mediated leukocyte rolling (21, 51). However,
the Gi-protein-independent chemokine destabilization of
L-selectin rolling studied here did not involve L-selectin shedding,
previously shown to involve activation of GPCR signaling (4, 51). The
insensitivity of chemokine suppression of rolling to PTX blockage of
Gi signaling, demonstrated here, also rules out the
possibility that chemokines suppress L-selectin rolling through
Gi-protein-dependent phosphorylation of the
L-selectin cytoplasmic tail (52). Indeed, even lymphocytes expressing
tail-truncated L-selectin were sensitive to chemokine suppression of
rolling. Similar to our finding of an accelerated L-selectin rolling
induced by low level chemokine (Fig. 2), Campbell and co-authors (40) reported 2-fold faster L-selectin-dependent rolling of
murine lymphocytes on PNAd co-immobilized with chemokines. The study attributed the accelerated rolling to chemokine blockage of L-selectin binding carbohydrates on the substrate. Our evidence that chemokines suppress L-selectin binding to mAb, an L-selectin-binding protein that
lacks any selectin-binding carbohydrates, rules out the possibility of
L-selectin ligand masking by chemokine. Furthermore, our finding that
chemokines fail to suppress L-selectin adhesion to low density ligand
(Fig. 7B) also rules out a direct blockage of ligand
activity by chemokine. Instead, our data strongly suggest that
chemokines induce rapid redistribution of both chemokine receptors and
L-selectin at adhesive contact sites, possibly through extracellular or
membranal associations of their receptors with juxtaposed L-selectin
molecules. Recent electron microscopic analysis of the chemokine
receptors for SDF-1
and RANTES (regulated on activation normal T
cell expressed and secreted), CXCR4 and CCR5, respectively, in PBL has
demonstrated that these GPCRs localize to lymphocyte microvilli (53),
where L-selectin as well as
4 integrins are
preferentially co-expressed (8, 9, 54, 55). These observations suggest
that these chemokine receptors and probably other GPCRs of endothelial
chemokines, including CCR7, CXCR5 and CXCR1/2, receptors for SLC/ELC,
BCA-1, and IL-8 or Gro
(CXCL1), respectively, may also be found on
leukocyte microvilli. We propose a model whereby, upon binding
immobilized chemokines juxtaposed to endothelial L-selectin ligands,
the leukocyte-based GPCRs may cluster in proximity to L-selectin
molecules, sterically hindering L-selectin clustering with high density
ligand (Fig. 4C, inset). Such selectin/ligand
clusters appear essential to stabilize a newly formed tether at
subsecond endothelial contacts (12, 56-58).
We have previously demonstrated that PBL GPCR occupancy by immobilized,
but not by soluble chemokines, induces rapid
4 integrin avidity at adhesive contacts containing chemokine and integrin ligand
(17). The present study suggests the reverse activity of GPCR occupancy
by immobilized chemokines, i.e. interference with L-selectin
avidity to ligand. The ability of chemokine to suppress L-selectin
rolling is closely correlated with the ability of immobilized chemokine
to augment binding of its GPCR to a GPCR-binding mAb on a
countersurface (Fig. 4C). This suggests that the local density of the leukocyte GPCR at sites containing immobilized chemokine
must be rendered high to effectively destabilize selectin avidity to
respective ligands. Notably, to suppress selectin rolling, immobilized
chemokines do not need to activate Gi-protein signaling or
trigger GPCR internalization. We considered that chemokine-induced GPCR
clustering could activate JAK/STAT signaling cascades independent of
Gi-protein signaling (59). However, blockage of JAK
activation with the specific inhibitor tyrphostin AG490 did not block
chemokine suppression of L-selectin rolling in PBL (data not shown).
Notably, suppression of L-selectin rolling appeared to require
specialized GPCR-associated machinery, because engagement of a non-GPCR
cytokine receptor, IL-2 receptor, by high level IL-2 co-immobilized
with L-selectin ligand had no effect on L-selectin-mediated rolling of
PBL. Nevertheless, suppression of L-selectin-mediated rolling by
chemokine-occupied GPCRs required metabolic energy, consistent with an
involvement of active cellular machinery in chemokine suppression of
L-selectin function.
The new notion that chemokines can reciprocally modulate selectin and
integrin adhesiveness predicts that a proper balance and coordinated
timing of these opposite chemokine activities at leukocyte/endothelial
contacts must be maintained to allow optimal conversion of
selectin-mediated rolling into integrin-mediated leukocyte arrest.
Chemokine recognition by a rolling leukocyte poses a regulatory hurdle
in the propagation of multistep L-selectin initiated adhesive cascades,
not previously realized. This novel activity of chemokines and its
unique G-protein-independent mode of action should be considered when
using specific chemokine antagonists to attenuate pathological
L-selectin-mediated leukocyte recruitment at various target tissues.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. S. D. Rosen, G. S. Kansas, E. L. Berg, J. J. Campbell, F. Baleux, T. K. Kishimoto, P. Loetscher, P. Altevogt, R. T. Camphausen, R. Lobb,
N. Fujii, R. Kannagi, and E. A. Bayer for gifts of reagents. We
thank Dr. S. Schwarzbaum for editorial assistance and Dr. L. Flaishon
for help in B cell isolation. We give special thanks to Drs. P. Altevogt, I. Shachar, and S. W. Feigelson for helpful discussions.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the United States-Israel
Binational Science Foundation, the Israel Science Foundation founded by
the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, and the
Abisch- Frenkel Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The on-line version of this article (available at
http://www.jbc.org) contains digitized Quick-TimeTM videos
showing characteristic segments from real-time recordings of
lymphocytes perfused for 10 s over a substrate coated with
GlyCAM-1 (100 sites/µm2) coimmobilized with inactive SLC
(A) or active SLC (B). Lymphocytes pretreated
with SLC and then perfused over a field of GlyCAM-1 coimmobilized with
SLC are shown in movie C. Note the complete rescue of the
suppressed rolling upon lymphocyte pretreatment with chemokine.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
§
Incumbent of the Tauro Career Development Chair in Biomedical
Research. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 972-8-9342482; Fax: 972-8-9344141; E-mail:
ronalon@wicc.weizmann.ac.il.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 21, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201763200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptor;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
GlyCAM-1, glycoprotein cell adhesion molecule 1;
HEV, high endothelial venule;
HSA, human serum albumin;
IL, interleukin;
mAb, monoclonal antibody;
JAK, Janus kinase;
PNAd, peripheral node addressin;
PBL, peripheral blood lymphocytes;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate;
PSGL-1, P-selectin glycoprotein
ligand;
PTX, pertussis toxin;
SDF-1
, stromal cell-derived
factor-1
;
SLC, secondary lymphoid tissue chemokine;
STAT, signal
transducers and activators of transcription;
VLA-4, very late antigen
4.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Kansas, G. S.
(1996)
Blood
88,
3259-3287[Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Mackay, C. R.
(2001)
Nat. Immunol.
2,
95-101[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Campbell, J. J.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(2000)
Curr. Opin. Immunol.
12,
336-341[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Smith, C. W.,
Kishimoto, T. K.,
Abbassi, O.,
Hughes, B.,
Rothlein, R.,
McIntire, L. V.,
Butcher, E.,
Anderson, D. C.,
and Abbass, O.
(1991)
J. Clin. Invest.
87,
609-618[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Alexander, S. R.,
Kishimoto, T. K.,
and Walcheck, B.
(2000)
J. Leukocyte Biol.
67,
415-422[Abstract]
|
| 6.
|
Kaplanski, G.,
Farnarier, C.,
Tissot, O.,
Pierres, A.,
Benoliel, A. M.,
Alessi, M. C.,
Kaplanski, S.,
and Bongrand, P.
(1993)
Biophys. J.
64,
1922-1933[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Alon, R.,
Hammer, D. A.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1995)
Nature
374,
539-542[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Picker, L. J.,
Warnock, R. A.,
Burns, A. R.,
Doerschuk, C. M.,
Berg, E. L.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(1991)
Cell
66,
921-933[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
von Andrian, U. H.,
Hasslen, S. R.,
Nelson, R. D.,
Erlandsen, S. L.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(1995)
Cell
82,
989-999[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Warnock, R. A.,
Askari, S.,
Butcher, E. C.,
and von Andrian, U. H.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
205-216[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Stein, J. V.,
Rot, A.,
Luo, Y.,
Narasimhaswamy, M.,
Nakano, H.,
Gunn, M. D.,
Matsuzawa, A.,
Quackenbush, E. J.,
Dorf, M. E.,
and von Andrian, U. H.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
191,
61-76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Chen, S.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
185-200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kishimoto, T. K.,
Jutila, M. A.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
2244-2248[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Hemler, M. E.,
Huang, C.,
Takada, Y.,
Schwarz, L.,
Strominger, J. L.,
and Clabby, M. L.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
11478-11485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lasky, L. A.,
Singer, M. S.,
Dowbenko, D.,
Imai, Y.,
Henzel, W. J.,
Grimley, C.,
Fennie, C.,
Gillett, N.,
Watson, S. R.,
and Rosen, S. D.
(1992)
Cell
69,
927-938[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Berg, E. L.,
Robinson, M. K.,
Warnock, R. A.,
and Butcher, E. C.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
114,
343-349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Grabovsky, V.,
Feigelson, S.,
Chen, C.,
Bleijs, R.,
Peled, A.,
Cinamon, G.,
Baleux, F.,
Arenzana-Seisdedos, F.,
Lapidot, T.,
van Kooyk, Y.,
Lobb, R.,
and Alon, R.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
192,
495-505[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Somers, W. S.,
Tang, J.,
Shaw, G. D.,
and Camphausen, R. T.
(2000)
Cell
103,
467-479[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Marttila, A. T.,
Laitinen, O. H.,
Airenne, K. J.,
Kulik, T.,
Bayer, E. A.,
Wilchek, M.,
and Kulomaa, M. S.
(2000)
FEBS Lett.
467,
31-36[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Preece, G.,
Murphy, G.,
and Ager, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
11634-11640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Walcheck, B.,
Kahn, J.,
Fisher, J. M.,
Wang, B. B.,
Fisk, R. S.,
Payan, D. G.,
Feehan, C.,
Betageri, R.,
Darlak, K.,
Spatola, A. F.,
and Kishimoto, T. K.
(1996)
Nature
380,
720-723[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Carr, M. W.,
Alon, R.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1996)
Immunity
4,
179-187[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
English, D.,
and Anderson, B. R.
(1974)
J. Immunol. Methods
5,
249-252[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Flaishon, L.,
Hershkoviz, R.,
Lantner, F.,
Lider, O.,
Alon, R.,
Levo, Y.,
Flavell, R. A.,
and Shachar, I.
(2000)
J. Exp. Med.
192,
1381-1387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Kansas, G. S.,
Ley, K.,
Munro, J. M.,
and Tedder, T. F.
(1993)
J. Exp. Med.
177,
833-838[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Kimura, N.,
Mitsuoka, C.,
Kanarmori, A.,
Hiraiwa, N.,
Uchimura, K.,
Muramatsu, T.,
Tamatani, T.,
Kansas, G. S.,
and R., K.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
4530-4535[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Dwir, O.,
Kansas, G. S.,
and Alon, R.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
18682-18691[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Lawrence, M. B.,
and Springer, T. A.
(1991)
Cell
65,
859-873[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Dwir, O.,
Shimron, F.,
Chen, C.,
Singer, M.,
Rosen, S. D.,
and Alon, R.
(1998)
Cell. Adhes. Commun.
6,
349-370 |