![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 20895-20902, June 7, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(ICAP-1
) Interacts Directly with the Metastasis Suppressor nm23-H2,
and Both Proteins Are Targeted to Newly Formed Cell Adhesion Sites upon
Integrin Engagement*
,
,
From the Laboratoire d'Etude de la Différenciation et de
l'Adhérence Cellulaires, UMR UJF/CNRS 5538, Institut Albert
Bonniot, Faculté de Médecine de Grenoble, Domaine de la
Merci, 38706 La Tronche Cedex, France, the § Department of
Molecular Medicine, Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Am
Klopferspitz 18A, D-82152-Martinsried, Germany, and
INSERM U402,
Faculté de Médecine Saint Antoine, 27 rue Chaligny,
75012 Paris, France
Received for publication, January 8, 2002, and in revised form, March 18, 2002
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell adhesion-dependent
signaling implicates cytoplasmic proteins interacting with the
intracellular tails of integrins. Among those, the integrin
cytoplasmic domain-associated
protein 1 Cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix is mediated mainly by
integrin clusters organized in transient focal complexes and more
stable focal adhesions (1-3). These structures are linked physically
to the actin cytoskeleton. Besides being the mechanical anchors of the
cells, focal adhesions participate in outside-in and inside-out
signaling. Integrin cytoplasmic domains have no known catalytic
function, but they play a key role in the control of cytoskeleton
organization and in signal transduction by recruiting many structural
and signaling proteins (4). Although it is well documented that the
adhesive function of most members of the integrin family can be
activated in a phenotypically similar fashion, it is unclear whether
common or independent cellular pathways underlie this apparent
uniformity. Several proteins interacting with specific integrin
cytoplasmic tails have been identified recently, suggesting that
although the cytoplasmic domains of integrin Although it is clear that ICAP-1 To elucidate the molecular basis of the ICAP-1 Reagents--
Human fibroblasts (Hs-68) were kindly provided by
Dr. C. Gauthier-Rouvière (Montpellier, France). Fibronectin was
extracted from human plasma as described previously (27). The
pAS2-1/ICAM-1 and pACT2/ Generation of Anti-ICAP-1 Yeast Two-hybrid Assays--
A cDNA fragment encoding the
full-length human ICAP1- Purification of Proteins--
Recombinant His-tagged ICAP-1 Solid Phase-based Binding Assays--
The interaction between
recombinant ICAP-1 Protein Pull-down Assays--
His-tagged ICAP-1 Coimmunoprecipitation Experiments--
CHO cells were
transiently transfected with pcDNA3.1/ICAP-1 Immunofluorescence Staining of Cells--
Hs68 cells were
cultured as a monolayer in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
containing 10% fetal calf serum and harvested with trypsin/EDTA. The
cells were plated on coverslips that were precoated with 25 µg/ml
human plasma fibronectin and incubated for different lengths of times
(as specified for each experiment) in a 37 °C incubator under a 5%
CO2, 95% air atmosphere to obtain cells at different
stages of spreading. Within the first hour of plating, extensive
membrane ruffling was observed in many of the cells that were spreading
on fibronectin. Under these experimental conditions, most of the cells
were fully spread within 4 h. The cells were fixed with 3%
paraformaldehyde in PBS and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in
PBS. Nonspecific sites were blocked in 10% goat serum for 1 h at
room temperature. Cells were stained for 1 h with either
monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies in a moist chamber. Anti-nm23-H2
monoclonal (Seigakaku) and polyclonal antibodies were used at a final
concentration of 1 µg/ml. Anti ICAP-1 Identification of nm23-H2 as a Binding Partner of
ICAP-1 Nm23-H2 Binds to ICAP-1 ICAP-1
Despite the observed association of ICAP-1
Previous studies have shown that ICAP-1 Targeting of Both ICAP-1 Recent studies suggest that individual integrin Confocal fluorescence microscopy revealed unambiguously the subcellular
co-localization of both proteins in lamellipodia and ruffles during the
early stages of cell spreading. Moreover, the specificity and
physiological relevance of the peripheral staining of ICAP-1 In line with the concept of lamellipodia extension, this view could
provide the functional significance of nm23-H2 association with
ICAP-1 In conclusion, the interaction between ICAP-1
(ICAP-1
) has been shown to interact
specifically with the
1 integrin cytoplasmic domain. Although it is likely that this protein plays an important role
in controlling cell adhesion and migration, little is known about its
actual function. To search for potential ICAP-1
-binding proteins, we
used a yeast two-hybrid screen and identified the human metastatic
suppressor protein nm23-H2 as a new partner of ICAP-1
. This direct
interaction was confirmed in vitro, using purified
recombinant ICAP-1
and nm23-H2, and by co-immunoprecipitation from
CHO cell lysates over-expressing ICAP-1
. The physiological relevance
of this interaction is provided by confocal fluorescence microscopy,
which shows that ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 are co-localized in lamellipodia
during the early stages of cell spreading. These adhesion sites are
enriched in occupied
1 integrins and precede the
formation of focal adhesions devoid of ICAP-1
and nm23-H2, indicating the dynamic segregation of components of matrix adhesions. This peripheral staining of ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 is only observed in
cells spreading on fibronectin and collagen and is absent in cells
spreading on poly-L-lysine, vitronectin, or laminin. This is consistent with the fact that targeting of both ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 to the cell periphery is dependent on
1 integrin
engagement rather than being a consequence of cell adhesion. This
finding represents the first evidence that the tumor suppressor nm23-H2 could act on
1 integrin-mediated cell adhesion by
interacting with one of the integrin partners, ICAP-1
.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
subunits are quite
similar, they are coupled to distinct functional pathways. For
instance,
3-endonexin binds specifically to the
3 integrin cytoplasmic tail (5) and increases the
affinity of the integrin
IIb
3 (6). A
2 integrin cytoplasmic domain-binding protein,
cytohesin-1, has been found to increase
L
2-mediated cell adhesion (7). TAP-20
interacts with the
5 integrin and negatively regulates
v
5-dependent adhesion and
focal adhesion assembly (8). Finally, the integrin
cytoplasmic domain-associated protein 1
(ICAP-1
)1 interacts
specifically with the C-terminal NPXY motif of the
1 integrin cytoplasmic domain (9, 10) and impairs cell
spreading when expressed as the T38D mutant, which potentially mimics
ICAP-1
phosphorylated on threonine 38 (11).
plays important roles in the
regulation of cell adhesion, the mechanism of ICAP-1
function in the
signaling pathways has not yet been completely understood, due in part
to the lack of information of the protein-protein interactions
involving ICAP-1
.
signaling pathway, we
have carried out a yeast two-hybrid screen to identify its binding
partners. Here we report that ICAP-1
interacts with the human
metastatic suppressor protein nm23-H2 (called also NDP kinase B) (12),
a cellular protein belonging to a family of highly conserved proteins
in eukaryotes. Nm23 family proteins possess a nucleoside diphosphate
kinase activity (13-15). Eight different genes of this family have now
been identified in humans and were named nm23-H1,
nm23-H2, to nm23-H8 (16). Apart from their role in
nucleotides metabolism, nm23 isoforms are reportedly involved in a
variety of cellular functions (17). Nm23-H2 has been shown to bind to
the nuclease hypersensitive element of the c-myc and
PDGF-A (platelet-derived growth factor A) promoter (12, 18).
Interestingly, expression of the nm23 genes is linked
to suppression of tumor metastasis, differentiation, apoptosis,
proliferation, and DNA mutation (19-21). Introduction of nm23-H1 or
-H2 reduces the metastatic potential and in vitro cell
motility of tumor cells (22, 23). Kantor et al. (24) report
that murine melanoma cell lines and human breast carcinoma cells stably
transfected with nm23-H1 lose their ability to migrate in response to
different factors. Zhu et al. (25) report that nm23-H1
interacts with the Ras-related GTPase member Rad and reversibly
converts GDP-Rad to GTP-Rad, thus acting as an exchange factor and a
GTPase-activating protein for Rad. More recently, an association
between nm23-H1 and Tiam1, a product of an invasion and
metastasis-inducing gene, has been shown. This interaction could lead
to the down-regulation of Rac1 activity (26). The mechanism of tumor
suppression by nm23 is still poorly understood, although some
speculations about the role of the enzyme have been presented (19). In
this report, we show that ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 interact directly,
co-localize and concentrate in peripheral ruffles, and are recruited to
1 integrin-rich cell adhesion sites in cells spreading
on fibronectin and collagen. This particular cell localization supports
the view that this association is relevant to a physiological process
during the early stages of cell adhesion. It is the first report
linking the tumor suppressor protein nm23-H2 to the cell adhesion and migration machinery.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-actinin-1 vectors were kindly provided by
Dr. A. Duperray (Grenoble, France). Monoclonal antibodies against
nm23-H1 or -2 were purchased from Seigakaku (distributed by Coger,
Paris, France). Rhodamin-phalloidin was from Sigma-Aldrich.
Rabbit anti-ICAP-1
antiserum was raised in our laboratory by
immunizing rabbits with purified recombinant ICAP-1
as described
previously (11). Polyclonal antibodies directed against nm23-H2,
provided by Dr. I. Lascu (University of Bordeaux, France), were
affinity-purified and depleted of antibodies cross-reacting with
nm23-H1. The monoclonal antibody 12G10 directed against
1 integrin was kindly provided by Dr. M. J. Humphries
(University of Manchester, UK). The monoclonal antibody 4B7R, directed
against human
1 integrin, was purchased from Neomarkers
(distributed by MedGene Science, Pantin, France), monoclonal
antibody anti-Rac1 was from Transduction Laboratories (distributed by
Interchim, Montlucon, France), monoclonal antibody directed against
tubulin and vimentin were from Sigma-Aldrich and Roche Molecular
Biochemicals, respectively. Goat anti-mouse IgG and goat anti-rabbit
IgG coupled to horseradish peroxidase were from Bio-Rad Laboratories
and Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (distributed by Beckman
Coulter, Roissy, France), respectively. Laminin, vitronectin,
polylysine, and collagens I and IV were from Sigma-Aldrich.
Antibodies--
Mouse monoclonal
anti-ICAP-1
antibodies (4D1D6 and 9B10) were prepared using
recombinant His-tagged ICAP-1
protein as antigen. Briefly, hybridoma
supernatants were screened initially by ELISA and Western blotting
using recombinant His-tagged ICAP-1
protein. The monoclonal antibody
4D1D6 was further selected for reactivity in immunofluorescence
studies. Recombinant His-tagged ICAP-1
protein was also used for the
production of rabbit polyclonal antibodies (Elevage des Dombes,
Romans, France) that have been tested by Western blot
using recombinant ICAP-1
and mammalian cell lysates.
protein was inserted into the
NdeI/BamHI sites of pAS2-1 vector
(CLONTECH distributed by Ozyme, Montigny le
Bretonneux, France). The sequence of the bait
construct was verified by DNA sequencing, and the construct was
introduced into Y190 yeast cells using a lithium acetate transformation
protocol. The resulting construct (pAS2-1/ICAP-1
) was used as bait
to screen a human placenta MATCHMAKER cDNA library (6 × 106 independent clones) according the manufacturer's
protocol. Briefly, Y190 ( pAS2-1/ICAP1
) cells transformed by the
library plasmids were selected by plating on SD medium lacking
tryptophan and leucine (SD-WL). Interaction of proteins encoded by
pAS2-1/ICAP-1
and by the pACT2 library vectors was tested by growing
the cells in the presence of 25 mM 3'-amino-1,2,4,-triazole
(SD
WLH + 3AT). Histidine-positive colonies were further tested
for LacZ activation. The growth of blue colonies in the
histidine-deficient medium indicated a positive interaction. 42 positive yeast colonies, as indicated by activation of both reporter
genes (histidine and lacZ) were independently identified and
isolated. Plasmids were isolated from positive yeast clones by a glass
beads/phenol-chloroform extraction protocol provided by the
manufacturer (CLONTECH). Escherichia coli 1066 bacteria were then electroporated with purified plasmids according to the protocol provided by Qiagen. The pACT2 plasmids were
isolated from E. coli 1066 and restriction
(HindIII)-mapped. Subsequently, the sequences of the inserts
were determined by DNA sequencing (Genaxis, Nimes, France). The
specificity of positive colonies with respect to the protein/protein
interaction was further confirmed by testing ICAM-1 cytoplasmic domain
inserted in pAS2-1, an irrelevant protein in this context and
-actinin-1 inserted in pACT2, a protein present in focal adhesions.
protein was purified from BL21(DE3) E. coli strain
transformed with the prokaryotic expression vector pET19b/ICAP-1
(pET19b plasmid purchased from Novagen). The expression of ICAP-1
was induced with 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside at 30 °C for
3-5 h. Bacteria resuspended in PBS were sonicated and centrifuged
(20,000 × g, 30 min, 4 °C). Soluble His-tagged ICAP-1
protein was purified by affinity for nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Ni-NTA, Qiagen), washed with 40 ml of wash buffer (60 mM imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.9), and eluted with elution buffer (1 M
imidazole, 500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.9). After dialysis against PBS to eliminate imidazole, the protein
purity was checked on SDS-PAGE. The same protocol was used for
ICAP-1
fragments. Recombinant Nm23-H2 protein and NDPK from
Dictyostelium discoideum, provided by Dr. I. Lascu, were prepared as described previously (28).
and recombinant nm23-H2 was analyzed using a
solid phase assay. Briefly, a 96-well tray (MaxiSorp, Nunc) was coated
with either ICAP-1
proteins (40 µg/ml) or NDPK proteins (nm23-H2
or NDPK from D. discoideum; 10 µg/ml), for 16 h at
4 °C and blocked with a PBS, 3% BSA solution for 1 h at room
temperature. Increasing concentrations of soluble nm23-H2 or ICAP-1
were incubated for 1 h. After three washes in PBS, 0.1% Tween 20, detection of bound nm23-H2 or ICAP-1
was performed using the
affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies directed against nm23-H2 or
monoclonal antibody 9B10 directed against ICAP-1
. Nonspecific
binding to BSA-coated wells was subtracted from the results as background.
fragments,
cloned into pET19 vectors (Novagen), were purified from the soluble
fraction of BL21(DE3) E. coli strains by affinity for
cobalt-charged TALON resin (CLONTECH). The
ICAP-1
-bound resin was washed with PBS, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole, blocked with PBS, 3% BSA, and used for
pull-down experiments. Interaction assays were performed for 30 min at
room temperature using recombinant nm23-H2 or HeLa cell lysates as the
source of cellular nm23-H2. Purified recombinant nm23-H2 (5 µg) was
diluted in PBS, 3% BSA, 300 mM NaCl, 5 mM
imidazole, and HeLa cells were lysed in 1% Nonidet P-40, 10%
glycerol, 20 mM Tris, pH 8, 137 mM NaCl
containing protease inhibitors. Bound proteins were washed with PBS,
300 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole, eluted by boiling
in Laemmli sample buffer, and analyzed by Western blotting using an
affinity-purified anti-nm23 polyclonal antibodies specific to
nm23-H2.
or pcDNA3.1
vector using Exgen (Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France).
Twenty-four hours after the transfection, the cells were lysed in 1%
Nonidet P-40/glycerol buffer containing protease and phosphatase
inhibitors for 45 min. The cell lysates (500 µg of proteins) were
incubated with 20 µl of 9B10 ascites containing anti-ICAP-1
monoclonal antibody for 2 h. Subsequently, the samples were mixed
with 60 µl of immobilized protein G (Sigma-Aldrich). After incubation
for 1 h, the beads were washed four times with the lysis buffer,
and the bound proteins were released from the beads by boiling in 20 µl of SDS-PAGE Laemmli sample buffer for 5 min. The samples were
analyzed by Western blotting with either rabbit polyclonal
anti-ICAP-1
antibodies (to check the immunoprecipitation of
ICAP-1
) or affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal anti-nm23-H2 antibodies (to evaluate the interaction between ICAP-1
and
endogenous nm23-H2). Immunological detection was achieved with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody, and the staining
was carried out with ECL according to the manufacturer's instructions (Amersham Biosciences).
4D1D6 monoclonal from
hybridoma supernatant was used at a ratio of 1:3 and anti
ICAP-1
polyclonal antibodies were used at 1:500. The 4B7R monoclonal
antibody specific for human
1 integrin was used at 5 µg/ml, anti-Rac1 was used at 2.5 µg/ml, and anti-tubulin at 1:100.
After rinsing, coverslips were incubated with appropriate Alexa-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes, distributed by
Interchim) for 30 min. For actin staining, coverslips were incubated
with TRITC-phalloidin. The cells were mounted in Mowiol solution and
viewed using a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 410).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
--
To identify the proteins directly involved in
ICAP-1
-mediated transduction signals, we used the full-length
ICAP-1
cDNA fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain as bait in a
yeast two-hybrid system to screen a human placenta cDNA library.
Forty-two positive clones were obtained and sequenced. BLAST searches
in cDNA data bases revealed that four inserts overlap with the
cytoplasmic domain of
1 integrin, confirming the
reported ICAP-1
/
1 integrin interaction already
described (9). Four additional inserts coded for the human protein
named nm23-H2. Introduction of only pAS-2/ICAP-1
or pACT2/nm23-H2
construction did not result in activation of both reporter genes,
indicating that neither ICAP-1
nor nm23-H2 can activate the reporter
genes in the absence of the other binding partner (Fig.
1). In additional control experiments, another "bait," the cytoplasmic domain of ICAM-1, and another "prey,"
-actinin-1, were tested for interaction with nm23-H2 and
ICAP-1
, respectively. In all of these cases, no detectable
-galactosidase activity was observed, characterizing the specificity of our screen.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Two-hybrid analysis for specificity of
ICAP-1
/nm23-H2 interaction. A,
Y190 yeast strain that contains pAS2-1, pAS2-1/ICAP-1
, or
pAS2-1/ICAM-1 was transformed with pACT2, pACT2/
1
integrin cytoplasmic domain, pACT2/nm23-H2, or pACT2/
-actinin-1 and
screened for histidine transactivation. The left column
confirms the presence of the bait and library plasmids by growth on
tryptophan- and leucine-deficient plates (
WL). Right
panels, the transformants were tested for their ability to grow on
tryptophan-, leucine-, and histidine-deficient plates containing 25 mM 3'-amino-1,2,4,-triaozole (
WLH + 3AT). The
blue color shows also the ability of the transformants to
transactivate the lacZ reporter gene as described under
"Experimental Procedures." The cytoplasmic domain of ICAM-1 and
-actinin-1 were used as negative control.
in Vitro and ex Vivo--
To confirm
the direct interaction of nm23-H2 with ICAP-1
, we carried out an
ELISA-based solid phase binding assay. These experiments revealed a
saturable binding of ICAP-1
to nm23-H2 and vice versa (Fig.
2A). In contrast, NDPK from
D. discoideum did not bind to ICAP-1
. In an independent
approach to corroborate these results, we incubated recombinant
His-tagged ICAP-1
bound to a cobalt chelating resin with a solution
of purified recombinant nm23-H2 protein or with HeLa cell lysates
containing endogenous nm23-H2 (Fig. 2B). In both cases,
nm23-H2 bound to ICAP-1
protein as revealed by Western blot
analysis. The results obtained with these pull-down assays indicate
that recombinant ICAP-1
interacts with recombinant nm23-H2 protein
detected as a monomer and an SDS-resistant dimer. When endogenous
nm23-H2 from HeLa cells was used instead, only the dimeric form of
nm23-H2 was retained by ICAP-1
. We presume that this dimer is due to
oxidative conditions in our experimental
procedure.2 The interaction
with nm23-H2 was also tested with recombinant protein containing the
N-terminal (1-99) or C-terminal (100-200) half of ICAP-1
protein
by pull-down assay (Fig. 2B) and solid phase assay (Fig.
2C). Only the C-terminal polypeptide was able to interact
strongly with recombinant or cellular nm23-H2, supporting the idea that
the nm23-H2 binding site is localized at the ICAP-1
C-terminal half.
To determine whether the interaction between ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 also
occurred ex vivo, we expressed ICAP-1
by transient
transfection in CHO cells. Soluble extracts were prepared as described
under "Experimental Procedures." Only in ICAP-1
-transfected
cells, immunoprecipitation of ICAP-1
using the anti-ICAP-1
9B10
monoclonal antibody resulted in a co-immunoprecipitation of endogenous
nm23-H2 as detected by Western blot analysis using an affinity-purified
polyclonal antibody (Fig. 2D). Thus, consistent with
ICAP-1
/nm23-H2 interaction detected in yeast cells and in vitro, ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 form a complex in mammalian
cells.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Nm23-H2 interacts with ICAP-1
through
ICAP-1
C terminus domain. A, left panel,
interaction between recombinant nm23-H2 and recombinant ICAP-1
was
measured by ELISA. Briefly, a 96-well tray (MaxiSorp, Nunc) was coated
with either ICAP-1
protein (left graph) or NDPK proteins
(nm23-H2 or NDPK from D. discoideum; right graph)
and then blocked with a PBS, 3% BSA solution for 1 h at room
temperature. Increasing concentrations of Nm23-H2 (left
graph) or ICAP-1
(right graph) were incubated in PBS
for 1 h at 37 °C. After three washes in PBS/0.1% Tween 20, detection of nm23-H2 or ICAP-1
was performed using the
affinity-purified polyclonal antibody directed against nm23-H2 or
monoclonal antibody 9B10 directed against ICAP1-
. Both graphs show
the ability of recombinant ICAP-1
to bind to human nm23-H2
(solid lines) and not to D. discoideum NDPK
(dotted line). Nonspecific binding on BSA has been
subtracted from the results. Data shown are the means of triplicate
determinations, and error bars represent standard
deviations. The figure illustrates one representative experiment of
four performed with similar results. Right panel, Coomassie
staining of the purified proteins used in these experiments.
B, pull-down experiments were performed as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Left panel, recombinant
nm23-H2 was incubated with empty resin (
) or resin bound to the
indicated recombinant His-tagged ICAP polypeptides (full-length
(FL) ICAP-1
; 1-99 N terminus; 100-200 C
terminus). Retained nm23-H2 was then detected by Western blotting
(WB) with affinity-purified polyclonal anti-nm23-H2.
Right panel, alternatively, HeLa cell lysates were used as a
source of endogenous nm23-H2. The amount of recombinant His-tagged
ICAP1-
proteins retained by resin was checked by Western blotting
the same membranes with the polyclonal anti-ICAP-1
antibodies.
C, solid phase assay was performed using recombinant
ICAP-1
-(1-99) (dotted line) or
ICAP-1
-(100-200) (solid line) fragments as coated
proteins to show their ability to interact with nm23-H2. The procedure
used is described above in A. D, CHO cells were
transfected with pcDNA3.1 or pcDNA3.1/ICAP-1
vector as
indicated. Upper panel, interaction between ICAP-1
and
nm23-H2 was determined by nm23-H2 immunoblot on ICAP-1
immunoprecipitates (IP) performed with anti-ICAP-1
9B10
monoclonal antibody. Lower panel, immune complexes were
probed with a polyclonal anti-ICAP-1
to show the amount of ICAP-1
immunoprecipitated with the monoclonal antibody 9B10.
and nm23-H2 Co-localize in Peripheral Ruffles and Are
Recruited to
1 Integrin-rich Cell Adhesion Sites in
Cell Spreading on Fibronectin--
To ascribe a physiological
role to the association between ICAP-1
and nm23-H2, we examined
their co-localization in vivo. To analyze the subcellular
localization of ICAP-1
, we generated a monoclonal ICAP-1
antibody
that recognizes both recombinant and endogenous human ICAP-1
in
immunofluorescence studies. By immunoblotting with His-tagged fusion
proteins containing different domains of the ICAP-1
protein, we
showed that this antibody recognizes an epitope located within the
N-terminal 100 amino acid residues (not shown). This antibody was
specific because it reacted neither with a His-tagged fusion protein
containing the C-terminal region of ICAP-1
nor with other irrelevant
His-tagged fusion proteins (data not shown).
with the cytoplasmic
domain of
1 integrin, we obtained no evidence for
ICAP-1
accumulation at
1 integrin- or vinculin-rich
focal adhesion sites in fully spread cells. ICAP-1
was found
primarily in the cytosol, with some concentrations in the perinuclear
or nuclear region. We therefore analyzed the subcellular localization
of ICAP-1
in cells during the early stages of spreading. Hs68 cells
newly plated on fibronectin-coated coverslips were stained with either polyclonal or monoclonal anti-ICAP-1
antibodies. ICAP-1
was observed to be highly concentrated at the edge or at peripheral ruffles
of spreading cells (Fig. 3). A similar
localization of nm23-H2 was observed with the monoclonal as well as the
specific polyclonal antibodies. Noticeably, until 45 min of adhesion,
ICAP-1
co-localized with nm23-H2 in many cell adhesion sites
resembling ruffles or lamellipodia at the cell periphery, suggesting
that ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 are involved in integrin-mediated cell
spreading (Fig. 3). As cells spread further (1 h after seeding), both
ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 staining at the cell edges decreased. Thus, high
concentrations of ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 appear transiently at the cell
periphery during the process of spreading. We noted that immunostaining with anti-ICAP-1
antibodies showed a labeling similar to that of
stress fibers in fully spread cells.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
ICAP-1
co-localizes
with nm23-H2 in peripheral ruffles in spreading Hs68 cells.
A, Hs68 cells were plated on fibronectin, fixed with
paraformaldehyde at the indicated times after plating, and stained with
polyclonal anti-ICAP-1
and monoclonal anti-nm23-H2 antibodies.
ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 co-localize at the cell edges in membrane ruffles
during early cell spreading. B, cells were plated on
coverslips coated with fibronectin, fixed after 30 min, processed as
described in A, and observed using a confocal laser scanning
microscope. Fluorescence intensity of ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 (arbitrary
units) was determined across the lamellipodia of the cell as shown by
the arrow. C, Hs68 cells plated 30 min on fibronectin were
co-stained with monoclonal 4D1D6 anti-ICAP-1
and affinity-purified
polyclonal anti-nm23-H2. Visualization of a single section and image
capture were done with a confocal microscope. The bar
represents 10 µm in all cases.
5
1
integrins accumulate in the peripheral ruffles of cells spreading on
fibronectin (29). We confirmed such a localization of
1
integrin at the edge of the spreading cells and showed in addition
co-localization of
1 integrins with ICAP-1
in the
peripheral ruffles by co-staining the cells with a monoclonal
anti-
1 integrin antibody (Fig.
4). When Hs68 fibroblasts adhered to the
extracellular matrix protein fibronectin, F-actin-containing membrane
ruffling was stimulated as the initial response upon Rac1 activation as
described by others (1). Indeed, additional co-staining in the early
state of spreading (30 min of spreading) showed the peripheral
co-localization of ICAP-1
with actin and Rac1, but not with tubulin
or vimentin, allowing a better characterization of these areas (Fig.
4).

View larger version (67K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Characterization of
ICAP-1
-containing peripheral
ruffles. Hs68 cells were plated on fibronectin, fixed with
paraformaldehyde 30 min after plating, and co-stained with polyclonal
anti-ICAP-1
antibodies and rhodamin-phalloidin for actin staining or
monoclonal antibodies directed against tubulin, vimentin, integrin
(4B7R), or Rac1. ICAP-1
co-localizes with actin,
integrin, and Rac1. Visualization of a single section and image capture
were done with a confocal microscope. The bar represents 10 µm in all cases.
and nm23-H2 Are Recruited to Areas Enriched in Occupied
1 Integrins--
Like other integrins,
1
integrins can exist in different functional states with respect to
ligand binding. These changes involve both affinity modulation, by
which conformational changes in the integrin heterodimer govern
affinity for individual extracellular matrix proteins, and avidity
modulation, by which changes in lateral mobility and integrin
clustering affect the binding of cells to multivalent matrices. Here we
used the monoclonal antibody 12G10, which recognizes a ligand-induced
binding site (30), to investigate the functional state of
1 integrins co-localized with ICAP-1
and nm23-H2.
During initial cell spreading, the 12G10 monoclonal antibody recognized
engaged integrins at the cell edge after 30 min of spreading (early
spreading) and in focal adhesions after 4 h of spreading (late
spreading). Fig. 5 shows that as cells spread further, 12G10 staining decreased at the cell edges, indicating that localization of occupied integrins at the cell edges precedes the
formation of focal adhesions. In contrast, although ICAP-1
or
nm23-H2 co-localized with engaged
1 integrins at the
edges of the cells during initial spreading, they were never detected in focal adhesions (Fig. 5).

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
ICAP-1
and nm23-H2
are localized at the edges of cell in lamellipodia containing occupied
integrins. Cells were plated on coverslips coated with
fibronectin, fixed after 30 min or 4 h, and stained with
polyclonal anti-ICAP-1
antibodies or nm23-H2 and monoclonal 12G10
antibody directed against occupied
1 integrin. ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 proteins co-localize with
1-occupied
integrins only during the early state of spreading (30 min). Focal
adhesions observed at 4 h of spreading contained neither ICAP-1
nor nm23-H2. Visualization of a section and image capture were done
with a confocal microscope. The bar represents 10 µm in
all cases.
and nm23-H2 to the Cell Periphery
Depends on the Integrins Engaged with the Extracellular Matrix
Substrate--
Our observations presented above imply that the
targeting of both ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 proteins is spatially and
temporally linked to initial cell spreading. As ICAP-1
interacts
specifically with
1 integrins, we hypothesized that
ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 targeting to peripheral cell membranes during
initial cell spreading should be observed on typical
1
integrin substrates and not on substrates specific for other integrins.
In other terms, the composition of the extracellular matrix substrate
should control the localization of both ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 proteins
at the cell periphery. Indeed, we observed peripheral staining of both
ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 in cells spreading on fibronectin and collagen,
typical ligands of
1 integrins. However this
localization was not observed when the cells were spread on
poly-L-lysine, laminin 1, or vitronectin (Fig.
6). The involvement of
6
1 integrin in early spreading on laminin
was ruled out because fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis and
immunofluorescence studies showed, on one hand, a very low level of
6 subunit in Hs68 cells, and on the other hand, the
absence of
6 and
1 subunits in ruffles
induced by laminin (data not schown). This observation indicates that
the targeting of both ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 to the cell periphery is
dependent on an engagement of
1 integrins interacting
with fibronectin or collagen and is not just a consequence of cell
adhesion.

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effects of matrix composition on targeting of
ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 to the cell edges.
Cells were plated on coverslips coated with 25 µg/ml of collagen I
(Co 1), collagen IV (Co 4), fibronectin
(FN), vitronectin (VN), polylysine
(PL), or laminin (LM), fixed after 30 min, and
stained with polyclonal anti-ICAP-1
and monoclonal anti-nm23-H2. We
observed a peripheral staining in Hs68 fibroblasts spread on collagen
and fibronectin, which was not evident when they were spread on
vitronectin, laminin, or polylysine. Visualization of a section and
image capture were done with a confocal microscope. The bar
represents 10 µm in all cases.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/
heterodimers can play unique roles in the regulation of cell migration, growth, survival, and differentiation (31-36). These regulatory functions of integrins involve specific interactions between the cytoplasmic domains of individual integrins and intracellular proteins
involved in signal transduction or other aspects of cell regulation.
The protein ICAP-1
is particularly interesting in this regard
because it has been identified as a specific partner of the cytoplasmic
domain of
1 integrin (9) controlling cell adhesion (11)
and cell migration (37). Using two-hybrid analysis, in vitro
interaction studies, and co-immunoprecipitation of expressed proteins
in cells, we demonstrate that ICAP-1
interacts directly with nm23-H2
through its C terminus and that this novel interaction can occur under
physiological conditions. As endogenous or recombinant nm23-H2 exists
as in a hexameric form in solution and as this oligomerization
is necessary for its function (38-40), the form interacting with
ICAP-1
should be hexameric.
and
nm23-H2 during the early stages of cell spreading is underlined by the
fact that it was observed only when cells were plated on fibronectin
and collagen, both of these matrices that engage
1 integrins. Indeed, this is consistent with the known
specificity of ICAP-1
for
1 integrins and strongly
suggests that nm23-H2 targeting to specific occupied
1
integrins at the cell periphery is mediated by ICAP-1
.
Co-localization of ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 at the cell edges precedes the
formation of focal adhesions devoid of both proteins. Both ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 are recruited only into these nascent substrate adhesion
sites. This points out the molecular diversity of cell-matrix
adhesions, indicating dynamic changes in the morphology, molecular
composition and locations of cell matrix adhesions depending on
spreading time. Therefore the recruitment of ICAP-1
and nm23-H2
is spatially and temporally linked to the formation of newly formed
adhesion sites and may play a role in regulating focal adhesion
assembly and/or downstream events initiated at
integrin-dependent focal contacts, such as altered
cytoskeletal organization or intracellular signaling. Complementing
this idea, we have recently shown that ICAP-1
quickly disassembles
focal adhesions, probably because of a competition with talin for
binding to the
1 integrin
tail.3 At the leading edge of
the migrating or spreading cell, ICAP-1
could thus prevent focal
adhesion assembly, contribute to lamellipodia extension, and promote
integrin functions not requiring focal adhesion formation. This
hypothesis is strengthened by the observations of Reddy et
al. (41), who show that conversely to ICAP-1
and nm23-H2, talin
colocalizes with integrins in focal adhesions but is absent from cell
periphery at 30 min of spreading.
. A previous report suggested that ICAP-1
interactions with
the
1 integrin tail may support cell migration (37).
Indeed, in these experiments, over-expression of ICAP-1
in COS-7
cells was associated with increased
1
integrin-dependent cell migration on fibronectin. Furthermore,
mutations of the ICAP-1
binding sites localized on
1
integrin cytoplasmic tail abolished adhesion, invasion, and metastasis
(42). On the other hand, numerous observations suggested that the
nm23/NDPK protein family may perform more sophisticated roles in the
cell physiology than the mere catalysis of a nonspecific exchange of
phosphoryl groups between nucleotides (17, 19, 20, 43). Notably,
nm23-H2 has been described as a metastasis suppressor in tumor cell
lines (44). For example, the S122P and H118Y mutations were identified
in melanoma of high metastatic potential as tested by cell inoculation
into mice or cell transfection (45-47). More recently, results
obtained from Otsuki et al. (26) showed that the
related family member nm23-H1 is able to associate with a Rac1-specific
nucleotide exchange factor, Tiam1, involved in control of metastatic
potential. These authors suggest that nm23-H1 negatively regulates
Tiam1 and therefore inhibits Rac1 activation in vivo.
Because nm23-H2 is able to form heterohexamers with other nm23 isoforms
and because Rac is co-localized with ICAP-1
and controls
lamellipodia extension (for review see Ridley (3)), one can speculate
that the interaction of ICAP-1
with nm23-H2 may contribute to the
overall regulation of Rac activity at the cell periphery. We can not
rule out the possibility that the interaction between nm23-H2 and
ICAP-1
might also counterbalance the interaction between ICAP-1
and
1 integrin, given the possibility of the
dynamic of ruffles during cell spreading. Because the
phosphorylation state of ICAP-1
could control cell adhesion, one can
speculate that NDPK in the vicinity could somehow control phosphate
donor availability.
and nm23-H2 may
drastically change the understanding of the metastasis suppressor function of the nm23 protein family and will provide an alternative interpretation of the implication of these proteins in tumor invasion and metastasis. Focal adhesions form and disappear continuously during
cell migration, and the cell spreading process as well as the
interaction between ICAP-1
and nm23-H2 provide novel insight into
the molecular basis of the dynamic nature of focal adhesion.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We are very grateful to Dr. Ioan Lascu for
providing recombinant nm23 proteins and anti-nm23-H2 antibodies and for
helpful comments and critical review. We thank Alain Duperray for
providing pAS2-1/ICAM-1 and pACT/
-actinin constructs. We thank also
Geneviève Tavernier and Brigitte Peyrusse for technical assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by CNRS and by grants from the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer, and the Association Espoir and the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by a fellowship from the Ministère de la Recherche
et de l'Enseignement Supérieur.
¶ Supported by a fellowship from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratoire d'Etude de la Différenciation et de l'Adhérence Cellulaires, Institut Albert Bonniot, Faculté de Médecine de Grenoble, Domaine de la Merci, 38706 La Tronche Cedex, France. Tel.: 33-476-54-95-51; Fax: 33-476-54-94-25; E-mail: marc.block@ujf-grenoble.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 27, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200200200
2
TALON resin should not be exposed to high
concentrations of a strong reducing agents such as dithiothreitol,
dithioerythritol, or
-mercaptoethanol. These reagents reduce the
cobalt ions and thereby prevent them from binding His-tagged proteins.
3 D. Bouvard, L. Vignoud, S. Dupé-Manet, N. Abed, C. Marie, R. Fässler, and M. R. Block, submitted for publication.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: ICAP, integrin cytoplasmic domain-associated protein; BSA, bovine serum albumin; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; NDPK, nucleoside diphosphate kinase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; ICAM-1, intercellular adhesion molecule 1; TRITC, tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Clark, E. A.,
King, W. G.,
Brugge, J. S.,
Symons, M.,
and Hynes, R. O.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
573-586 |
| 2. | Zamir, E., and Geiger, B. (2001) J. Cell Sci. 114, 3583-3590[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Ridley, A.
(2000)
J. Cell Biol.
150,
F107-9 |
| 4. |
Calderwood, D. A.,
Shattil, S. J.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
22607-22610 |
| 5. |
Shattil, S. J.,
O'Toole, T.,
Eigenthaler, M.,
Thon, V.,
Williams, M.,
Babior, B. M.,
and Ginsberg, M. H.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
807-816 |
| 6. |
Kashiwagi, H.,
Schwartz, M. A.,
Eigenthaler, M.,
Davis, K. A.,
Ginsberg, M. H.,
and Shattil, S. J.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
1433-1443 |
| 7. | Kolanus, W., Nagel, W., Schiller, B., Zeitlmann, L., Godar, S., Stockinger, H., and Seed, B. (1996) Cell 86, 233-242[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. |
Tang, S.,
Gao, Y.,
and Ware, J. A.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
147,
1073-1084 |
| 9. |
Chang, D. D.,
Wong, C.,
Smith, H.,
and Liu, J.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
1149-1157 |
| 10. |
Chang, D. D.,
Hoang, B. Q.,
Liu, J.,
and Springer, T. A.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
8140-8145 |
| 11. | Bouvard, D., and Block, M. R. (1998) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 252, 46-50[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Postel, E. H.,
Berberich, S. J.,
Flint, S. J.,
and Ferrone, C. A.
(1993)
Science
261,
478-480 |
| 13. | Parks, R. E. J., and Argawal, R. P. (1973) The Enzymes , Vol. 8 , pp. 307-334, Academic Press, New York |
| 14. |
Wagner, P. D.,
and Vu, N. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
21758-21764 |
| 15. | Lascu, I., and Gonin, P. (2000) J. Biomembr. Bioenerg. 32, 237-246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 16. | Lacombe, M. L., Milon, L., Munier, A., Mehus, J. G., and Lambeth, D. O. (2000) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 32, 247-258[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Lombardi, D., Lacombe, M. L., and Paggi, M. G. (2000) J. Cell. Physiol. 182, 144-149[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Ma, D.,
Xiang, Z.,
Liu, B.,
Pedigo, N. G.,
Zimmer, S. G.,
Bai, Z.,
Postel, E. H.,
and Kaetzel, D. M.
(2002)
J. Biol. Chem.
277,
1560-1567 |
| 19. | de la Rosa, A., Williams, R. L., and Steeg, P. S. (1995) Bioessays 17, 53-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Hartsough, M. T., and Steeg, P. S. (2000) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 32, 301-308[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Otero, A. S. (2000) J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 32, 269-275[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Leone, A., Flatow, U., King, C. R., Sandeen, M. A., Margulies, I. M., Liotta, L. A., and Steeg, P. S. (1991) Cell 65, 25-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Baba, H.,
Urano, T.,
Okada, K.,
Furukawa, K.,
Nakayama, E.,
Tanaka, H.,
Iwasaki, K.,
and Shiku, H.
(1995)
Cancer Res.
55,
1977-1981 |
| 24. |
Kantor, J. D.,
McCormick, B.,
Steeg, P. S.,
and Zetter, B. R.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
1971-1973 |
| 25. |
Zhu, J.,
Tseng, Y. H.,
Kantor, J. D.,
Rhodes, C. J.,
Zetter, B. R.,
Moyers, J. S.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
14911-14918 |
| 26. |
Otsuki, Y.,
Tanaka, M.,
Yoshii, S.,
Kawazoe, N.,
Nakaya, K.,
and Sugimura, H.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
4385-4390 |
| 27. | Engvall, E., and Ruoslahti, E. (1977) Int. J. Cancer 20, 1-5[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Gonin, P., Xu, Y., Milon, L., Dabernat, S., Morr, M., Kumar, R., Lacombe, M. L., Janin, J., and Lascu, I. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 7265-7272[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Tawil, N.,
Wilson, P.,
and Carbonetto, S.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
261-271 |
| 30. | Mould, A. P., Garratt, A. N., Askari, J. A., Akiyama, S. K., and Humphries, M. J. (1995) FEBS Lett. 363, 118-122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Pozzi, A.,
Wary, K. K.,
Giancotti, F. G.,
and Gardner, H. A.
(1998)
J. Cell Biol.
142,
587-594 |
| 32. |
Farrelly, N.,
Lee, Y. J.,
Oliver, J.,
Dive, C.,
and Streuli, C. H.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
1337-1348 |
| 33. | Liu, S., Thomas, S. M., Woodside, D. G., Rose, D. M., Kiosses, W. B., Pfaff, M., and Ginsberg, M. H. (1999) Nature 402, 676-681[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. |
Lochter, A.,
Navre, M.,
Werb, Z.,
and Bissell, M. J.
(1999)
Mol. Biol. Cell
10,
271-282 |
| 35. |
Sastry, S. K.,
Lakonishok, M., Wu, S.,
Truong, T. Q.,
Huttenlocher, A.,
Turner, C. E.,
and Horwitz, A. F.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
1295-1309 |
| 36. |
Lee, J. W.,
and Juliano, R. L.
(2000)
Mol. Biol. Cell
11,
1973-1987 |
| 37. |
Zhang, X. A.,
and Hemler, M. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11-19 |
| 38. | Dumas, C., Lascu, I., Morera, S., Glaser, P., Fourme, R., Wallet, V., Lacombe, M. L., Veron, M., and Janin, J. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3203-3208[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Morera, S., Lacombe, M. L., Xu, Y., LeBras, G., and Janin, J. (1995) Structure 3, 1307-1314[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Webb, P. A., Perisic, O., Mendola, C. E., Backer, J. M., and Williams, R. L. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 251, 574-587[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. |
Reddy, K. B.,
Bialkowska, K.,
and Fox, J. E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
28300-28308 |
| 42. | Stroeken, P. J., van Rijthoven, E. A., Boer, E., Geerts, D., and Roos, E. (2000) Oncogene 19, 1232-1238[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | Xu, J., Liu, L. Z., Deng, X. F., Timmons, L., Hersperger, E., Steeg, P. S., Veron, M., and Shearn, A. (1996) Dev. Biol. 177, 544-557[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
Miyazaki, H.,
Fukuda, M.,
Ishijima, Y.,
Takagi, Y.,
Iimura, T.,
Negishi, A.,
Hirayama, R.,
Ishikawa, N.,
Amagasa, T.,
and Kimura, N.
(1999)
Clin Cancer Res.
5,
4301-4307 |
| 45. | Hamby, C. V., Mendola, C. E., Potla, L., Stafford, G., and Backer, J. M. (1995) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 211, 579-585[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. |
Schaertl, S.,
Geeves, M. A.,
and Konrad, M.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
20159-20164 |
| 47. | Hamby, C. V., Abbi, R., Prasad, N., Stauffer, C., Thomson, J., Mendola, C. E., Sidorov, V., and Backer, J. M. (2000) Int. J. Cancer 88, 547-553[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |