Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M202154200 on March 29, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 20991-20998, June 7, 2002
Chemical Quenched Flow Kinetic Studies Indicate an
Intraholoenzyme Autophosphorylation Mechanism for
Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent Protein Kinase
II*
J. Michael
Bradshaw
,
Andy
Hudmon§, and
Howard
Schulman¶
From the Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University,
Stanford, California 94305
Received for publication, March 5, 2002, and in revised form, March 25, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Autophosphorylation of
-Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase
II (CaM kinase II) at Thr-286 generates Ca2+-independent
activity that outlasts the initial Ca2+ stimulus. Previous
studies suggested that this autophosphorylation occurs between subunits
within each CaM kinase II holoenzyme. However, electron microscopy
studies have questioned this mechanism because a large distance
separates a kinase domain from its neighboring subunit. Moreover, the
recently discovered ability of CaM kinase II holoenzymes to
self-associate has raised questions about data interpretation in
previous investigations of autophosphorylation. In this work, we
characterize the mechanism of CaM kinase II autophosphorylation. To
eliminate ambiguity arising from kinase aggregation, we used dynamic
light scattering to establish the monodispersity of all enzyme
solutions. We then found using chemical quenched flow kinetics that the autophosphorylation rate was independent of the CaM kinase II
concentration, results corroborating intraholoenzyme activation. Experiments with a monomeric CaM kinase II showed that phosphorylation of this construct is intermolecular, supporting intersubunit
phosphorylation within a holoenzyme. The autophosphorylation rate at
30 °C was ~12 s
1, more than 10-fold faster than past
estimates. The ability of CaM kinase II to autophosphorylate through an
intraholoenzyme, intersubunit mechanism is likely central to its
functions of decoding Ca2+ spike frequency and providing a
sustained response to Ca2+ signals.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase
II (CaM kinase II)1 is
involved in numerous cellular processes including cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, protein secretion, and gene expression (1-3).
In the brain, CaM kinase II is essential for long term potentiation, a
hypothesized cellular mechanism for learning and memory (4, 5).
Autophosphorylation plays a central role in the function of CaM kinase
II. In the basal state, the enzyme is inactive because of the
intramolecular binding of an autoinhibitory sequence to the kinase
active site (Fig. 1A). As the
intracellular Ca2+ concentration rises above 200 nM, Ca2+-bound calmodulin
(Ca2+/CaM) begins to bind CaM kinase II, displacing the
autoinhibitory segment, and allowing the kinase to phosphorylate itself
at Thr-286 (
-subunit; 287 for other subunits). This
autophosphorylation has several important functional consequences: 1)
it allows CaM kinase II to retain enzymatic activity in the absence of
CaM (6); 2) it causes a greater than 1,000-fold decrease in the
dissociation rate of CaM from the enzyme, a phenomenon referred to as
"CaM trapping" (7-10); 3) it gives CaM kinase II the ability to
decode the frequency of Ca2+ oscillations and translate
this information into different levels of enzymatic activity (11). The
biological significance of Thr-286 autophosphorylation has been
established using a "knock-in" mouse mutant in which the endogenous
CaM kinase II contains Ala instead of Thr at residue 286 (12). Although
the mutation does not alter the level of kinase protein or the ability
of the kinase to be activated by Ca2+/CaM, the mutant mouse
does not display hippocampal long term potentiation and is deficient in
spatial learning.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Structure of the CaM kinase II
holoenzyme. A, domain organization of -CaM kinase
II. The catalytic domain (gold), regulatory segment
(gray), and association domain (blue) are shown.
The regulatory segment comprises a stretch of amino acids which
contains both an autoinhibitory sequence (purple) and a CaM
binding motif (orange). B, shaded surface view
from the side of -CaM kinase II (20). Each holoenzyme consists of 12 CaM kinase II polypeptide chains. The association domain of each
polypeptide chain (shown in blue) forms a phalange-shaped
structure; each catalytic domain (shown in gold) emanates
outward from the center of the structure as a foot-like process. The
structure is arranged so that the catalytic domains are grouped into
two sets of six with one ringed set of catalytic domains at the
"top" of the assembly and the other at the "bottom." Overall,
the structure has 622 symmetry. C, top view of the
holoenzyme. This representation shows only the domains comprising the
top part of the holoenzyme (20).
|
|
A striking feature of CaM kinase II is that it assembles to form a
~600-kDa holoenzyme consisting of 12 subunits, each containing a
kinase domain. This molecular arrangement suggests three possible mechanisms by which autophosphorylation of Thr-286 might occur: 1)
within the same polypeptide chain (intraholoenzyme, intrasubunit autophosphorylation), 2) by a different polypeptide chain within the
same molecular assembly (intraholoenzyme, intersubunit
autophosphorylation), and 3) by a kinase domain from a different
assembly (interholoenzyme autophosphorylation). Previous studies have
attempted to distinguish among these mechanisms. It has been found that
the rate of autophosphorylation is not dependent on CaM kinase II
concentration, a result that would be expected only if
autophosphorylation were intraholoenzyme (13-15). Further experiments
employing CaM kinase II holoenzymes that have been engineered to
contain both kinase-active and kinase-inactive subunits suggest that
autophosphorylation occurs in an intersubunit fashion within each
holoenzyme (15-17).
Although biochemical studies of CaM kinase II have supported an
intraholoenzyme, intersubunit autophosphorylation mechanism, structural
evaluations of the enzyme do not readily suggest how this type of
autophosphorylation might occur. Although no crystal structure of CaM
kinase II has yet been obtained, several studies have probed the
structure using transmission electron microscopy (18-21). A recent
three-dimensional view of CaM kinase II has provided considerable
detail regarding the architecture of the enzyme (Fig. 1, B
and C) (20). Here it was demonstrated that the association domains of CaM kinase II form a gear-shaped core for the holoenzyme, and the kinase domains emanate as foot-like processes outward from the
center forming two hexameric ring structures. Importantly, a large
distance (~50 Å) separates neighboring kinase domains. Because
intraholoenzyme, intersubunit autophosphorylation would require that
neighboring kinase domains be in close proximity and this is not seen
in the structure, the recent electron microscopy analysis does not
favor an intraholoenzyme, intersubunit mechanism.
How might the seemingly contradictory structural and biochemical data
be reconciled? One hypothesis derives from the propensity of CaM kinase
II to form supramolecular assemblies of many holoenzymes. This property
of CaM kinase II has been characterized recently in vitro
(22, 23) and has also been shown to occur within neurons (24, 25). If
CaM kinase II was in a supramolecular form in previous biochemical
evaluations of the autophosphorylation mechanism, the results obtained
in these studies may be ambiguous: it is possible that the
autophosphorylation was occurring between different holoenzymes but
appeared to be intraholoenzyme because of the supramolecular, or
aggregated, state of the kinase.
In this work we investigated the autophosphorylation mechanism of CaM
kinase II in light of the recent three-dimensional electron microscopy
structure. To eliminate experimental ambiguity arising from the state
of aggregation of the kinase, dynamic light scattering was used to
establish that CaM kinase II is monodisperse during autophosphorylation. The autophosphorylation process was then characterized using chemical quenched flow kinetics, the first application of this approach to study CaM kinase II. It was determined that the rate of autophosphorylation of a monodisperse CaM kinase II
holoenzyme solution was independent of CaM kinase II concentration, supporting an intraholoenzyme autophosphorylation mechanism. Further studies with a monomeric version of CaM kinase II (mCaMKII)
demonstrated that this molecule phosphorylates through an
intermolecular process, suggesting that autophosphorylation within the
holoenzyme is intersubunit. The rate constant for autophosphorylation
at near physiological temperatures was ~12 s
1, more
than 10-fold faster than previous estimates of the CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation rate.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Protein Expression and Purification--
The rat
-CaM kinase
II cDNA in the vector pBakPak9 (CLONTECH) and
virus containing the cDNA were gifts from Dr. Neal Waxham (8). The
-CaM kinase II gene was subcloned previously into the vector pFasBak
for expression in the baculovirus Sf21 cell expression system
(Invitrogen) (10). Virus containing the
-CaM kinase II cDNA was
first produced in monolayer Sf21 cultures as described by the
manufacturer. For protein expression, virus was added to a 500-ml
Sf21 suspension culture for 60-72 h; cells were then harvested
and either stored at -80 °C or used immediately for protein
purification (10).
-CaM kinase II was purified as described by Singla et al.
(10) with a few modifications. Briefly, cell pellets were resuspended, lysed by Dounce homogenization and sonication, and clarified by centrifugation. The supernatant was loaded onto a 10-ml
phosphocellulose column (P-11 cation exchange resin, Whatman) and
eluted in a 120-ml gradient from 0.1 to 0.5 M NaCl. The
appropriate fractions were pooled. For one light scattering experiment,
the material was purified further using a CaM-Sepharose column as
described (10). In all other experiments, the material was then applied
at 0.8 ml/min to a Sephacryl S-300 Sepharose gel filtration column
(Amersham Biosciences) that had been equilibrated in previously 20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 200 mM KCl, 0.1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol. Pure fractions were pooled
and stored on ice until further use. If necessary, the enzyme was
concentrated at 4 °C in a Centriprep centrifugal filter device
(Amicon) with a YM-50 membrane. Both monomeric
-CaM kinase II and
-CaM kinase II (T286A) were purified in the same manner as wild
type. CaM was purified as described (10).
The concentration of
-CaM kinase II was evaluated using an
extinction coefficient of 66,350 M
1
cm
1 obtained from the protein sequence (26, 27). All
reported concentration units for CaM kinase II represent the
concentration of single CaM kinase II polypeptide chains, not the
concentration of holoenzymes. An extinction coefficient of 44,890 M
1 cm
1 was used for the mCaMKII
construct, which is formed from residues 1-326 of CaM kinase II.
Dynamic Light Scattering--
Dynamic light scattering
experiments were performed with a DynaPro 801 instrument (Protein
Solutions, Ltd.). Protein samples were either centrifuged at
10,000 × g or sterile filtered to remove dust
particles before analysis. The samples were then illuminated at 780 nm
using a solid state laser. Each sample was evaluated at least 20 times,
with the quoted values being the mean of these independent evaluations.
Dynamic light scattering experiments provide a direct determination of
the diffusion coefficient (D) of the particles in solution (www.protein-solutions.com). Using the diffusion coefficient, the hydrodynamic radius (RH) of the particles
can be calculated from the Stokes-Einstein equation
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where k is the Boltzmann constant, T is
the absolute temperature, and
is the solvent viscosity. Approximate
molecular weights for each of the species were determined from
RH by the analysis software using a reference
standard curve. For experiments in which CaM kinase II holoenzymes were
autophosphorylated before analysis, the autophosphorylation reaction
time was 1 min.
Chemical Quenched Flow and Bench Top Kinetic
Experiments--
Chemical quenched flow experiments were performed
with a model RQF-3 chemical quenched flow device from Kintek
Corporation (Austin, TX). The instrument was maintained at the
experimental temperature using either a circulating,
temperature-controlled bath or an ice water bath. Before the quenched
flow analysis, all solutions were maintained on ice. To initiate a
quenched flow experiment, Ca2+/CaM was first added to CaM
kinase II (in gel filtration buffer: 20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 200 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
-mercaptoethanol). The solution was immediately added to sample loop
A. Then, a buffered Mg2+/ATP solution was added to loop B. In our experimental setup, 11.5 µl of sample from loop A was mixed
rapidly with 11.5 µl from loop B, and the solution was then quenched
with 67 µl of the quench solution (20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 200 mM KCl, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 50 mM
EDTA, 1 mM EGTA). The solution conditions during the
autophosphorylation reaction were (except where noted) 20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 200 mM KCl, 500 µM Ca2+, 10 µM CaM, 500 µM ATP, and 2 mM Mg2+.
Experiments at 0.58, 0.14, and 0.035 µM mCaMKII were slow
enough to be evaluated with bench top experiments. Here, 11.5 µl of
both the Ca2+/CaM/CaM kinase II mixture and the
Mg2+/ATP solution were pipetted together to initiate
autophosphorylation. After varying times, the reaction was quenched
with 67 µl of quench buffer and evaluated for autonomous activity as
described below.
Autonomous Activity Assays--
After quenching of the
autophosphorylation reaction, the level of autonomous activity of the
enzyme solution was evaluated immediately. Here, 10 µl of the
quenched solution was added to 40 µl of the autonomous kinase assay
mixture. For all experiments, the Ca2+/CaM activity of the
quenched solution was also evaluated. The solution conditions of the
assay mixtures were 50 mM PIPES pH 7.0, 20 mM
Mg2+, 200 µM ATP, 0.1% bovine serum albumin,
50 µM autocamtide-2 kinase substrate, and 1 µCi of
[32P]ATP; in addition, the autonomous assays contained 1 mM EGTA, whereas the Ca2+/CaM assays contained
500 µM Ca2+ and 2 µM CaM. For
both autonomous and Ca2+/CaM assays, experiments were
performed in duplicate. When high concentrations of CaM kinase were
used, solutions were first diluted in quench buffer before addition to
kinase assays so that the final enzyme concentration was ~10
nM. Enzyme activity was evaluated for 1 min at 30 °C.
20-µl aliquots of kinase assay were then spotted on P-81
phosphocellulose paper, placed in 0.5% phosphoric acid, washed in
water, dried, and evaluated with scintillation counting. The specific
Ca2+/CaM activity of the holoenzyme was typically 5-20
µmol/min/mg, whereas that of the mCaMKII was 4-15 µmol/min/mg.
32P Incorporation Experiments--
For the
experiments in which Thr-286 autophosphorylation was monitored by
32P incorporation, the initial experimental setup was
identical to the chemical quenched flow experiments described above
except that the 11.5 µl of Mg2+/ATP solution also
contained 0.5 µCi of [32P]ATP. After quenching, 20 µl
of the solution was added to 10 µl of SDS-PAGE loading buffer and run
on 10% SDS-PAGE. Protein bands corresponding to CaM kinase II were
excised and evaluated using scintillation counting.
Kinetic Data Analysis--
Data analysis was performed with the
program Scientist (Micromath, Salt Lake City, UT). For experiments with
the holoenzyme, the ratio of autonomous to Ca2+/CaM
activity was determined at each data point. This ratio multiplied by
100 was then fit to the following increasing exponential function to
determine the first order rate constant for autophosphorylation.
|
(Eq. 2)
|
Here A is the percent autonomy, M is the
maximal autonomy, k1 is the first order rate
constant for intraholoenzyme autophosphorylation, and t is time.
Unlike intraholoenzyme autophosphorylation, intermolecular
autophosphorylation requires that the kinetic data be fit with the
dependent variable in units of concentration rather than percent autonomy. Hence, for experiments with mCaMKII, the percent autonomy was
first determined at each data point. Then this value was multiplied by
the concentration of monomer in the experiment to determine the
concentration of phosphorylated monomer (P) at each data
point. The values of P were then fit to the following
expression to determine the second order rate constant
(k2) for intermolecular
autophosphorylation.
|
(Eq. 3)
|
Here, C is the total concentration of CaM kinase II
monomer in the experiment.
To evaluate the temperature dependence of CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation, the data were analyzed in terms of the Arrhenius equation
|
(Eq. 4)
|
where Ea is the activation energy of the
process, R is the gas constant, T is the absolute
temperature, and B is a constant.
Decay of Enzyme Activity with Temperature--
To monitor the
decay of enzymatic activity with temperature after autophosphorylation,
9.2 µl of 0.5 µM CaM kinase II was mixed with a
2.3-µl mixture of 2.5 mM Ca2+ and 10 µM CaM and incubated at the various temperatures. A
11.5-µl solution of 4 mM Mg2+ and 1 mM ATP was added, and autophosphorylation was allowed to occur for 15 s, 1 min, or 3 min. The quench solution was then added, and the Ca2+/CaM activity was assessed.
 |
RESULTS |
Evaluation of the Self-association State of CaM Kinase II
Holoenzymes--
Dynamic, or quasi-elastic, light scattering was used
to evaluate the state of aggregation
-CaM kinase II holoenzymes and
-CaM kinase II mutants (29, 30). This technique monitors the
fluctuation in scattering intensity of particles in solution illuminated using a monochromatic light source
(www.protein-solutions.com). Through an autocorrelation analysis of the
scattering intensity fluctuations, one can determine whether the
particles in solution are all of uniform size (monodisperse) or varying
sizes (polydisperse). This is evaluated using the base-line parameter
(See Table I) (www.protein-solutions.com). In addition, dynamic light scattering also
allows a determination of the particle hydrodynamic radius, and this
provides an approximate molecular weight of the scattering particles.
In the following analysis, solutions were concluded to be free of
aggregation only if they contained an approximate molecular weight
appropriate for the particle under investigation and also a base-line
parameter within (or very close to) the monodisperse range.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Dynamic light scattering data
The dynamic light scattering device provided the hydrodynamic radius
(RH ± S.D.), approximate molecular mass (molecular
mass ± S.D.), and base-line parameter for solutions of CaM kinase
II holoenzyme (CaMKII) and monomer (mCaMKII). If the base-line value
falls in the range of 0.997-1.001, the solution is monomodal. If it is
greater than 1.005, the solution is polydisperse. If the value is in
the range 1.002-1.005, the solution is primarily monomodal but
contains a few large particles.
|
|
Table I summarizes the dynamic light scattering data for wild type and
mutant forms of
-CaM kinase II.
-CaM kinase II purified as
described under "Experimental Procedures" was monodisperse. If 500 µM Ca2+ and equimolar CaM were added to
-CaM kinase II, the material remained monodisperse but now gave a
slightly higher approximate molecular weight, consistent with the
molecular weight of the
-CaM kinase II holoenzyme plus 12 CaM
molecules. If, in addition to Ca2+/CaM, a solution of 2 mM Mg2+ and 500 µM ATP was added
to facilitate autophosphorylation, the solution also remained
monodisperse as evidenced by the base-line parameter. The concentration
of CaM kinase II in these experiments was typically 3-5
µM; however, experiments at 10 µM CaM
kinase II gave nearly identical results. Solutions of a CaM kinase II (T286A) mutant and mCaMKII were also established to be monodisperse.
Several conditions produced solutions that did not contain monodisperse
holoenzymes. If CaM kinase II was purified using a CaM-Sepharose column
(rather than the standard purification with a gel filtration column), a
monodisperse preparation was not obtained. Furthermore, if ADP replaced
ATP in the autophosphorylation reaction, particles with a substantially
larger radius of hydration than found in single holoenzymes were
formed. Finally, it was observed that whether or not
-CaM kinase II
remained monodisperse during autophosphorylation was dependent on
experimental solution conditions. If experiments were performed at pH
7.0 and no added salt, rather than at the standard conditions of pH 7.4 and 200 mM KCl,
-CaM kinase II aggregated during
autophosphorylation (Table I). These findings are consistent with
previous results demonstrating that aggregation of
-CaM kinase II
during autophosphorylation is influenced by both pH and ionic strength
(23).
Characterization of the Time Course of CaM Kinase II
Autophosphorylation by Chemical Quenched Flow Kinetics--
The
dynamic light scattering experiments described above established
experimental conditions under which CaM kinase II does not aggregate
during autophosphorylation. The kinetics of CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation were then explored under the same conditions. Two
different methods of monitoring Thr-286 autophosphorylation were
utilized. The first was the autonomous activity of CaM kinase II (the
activity in the absence of Ca2+/CaM), which has previously
been determined to reflect the level of Thr-286 autophosphorylation
(31). The second was the level of 32P incorporation into
the enzyme after autophosphorylation with [32P]ATP
(32).
Fig. 2 compares the time courses of
autonomous activity generation and 32P incorporation for
chemical quenched flow experiments performed under identical solution
conditions (0 °C, 2.5 µM ATP). It was observed that
the time courses of autonomy generation and 32P
incorporation were nearly identical, suggesting that both methods are
reflecting accurately the level of Thr-286 autophosphorylation under
these conditions. Fitting the data to an exponential function to obtain
the autophosphorylation rate constant for each experiment gave values
of 0.064 and 0.056 s
1 for the autonomy and
32P incorporation experiments, respectively. The autonomous
activity saturated at a level that was ~70% of the activity in the
presence of Ca2+/CaM, a maximal autonomous activity similar
to that observed in previous studies (11). The maximal 32P
incorporation approached 1 mol of phosphate/1 mol of subunit. Control
autophosphorylation experiments that employed a CaM kinase II mutant
(CaM kinase II (T286A)) had <1% of both the maximal autonomous
activity and maximal 32P incorporation of the wild type
enzyme, further indicating that both probes reflect the level of
Thr-286 autophosphorylation under these conditions accurately.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Time course of CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation monitored by chemical quenched flow kinetics.
A, generation of autonomous activity as a function of
autophosphorylation time. Plotted is the percentage of autonomous
enzymatic activity compared with Ca2+/CaM activity (±S.D.,
n = 2) versus time (in seconds).
B, incorporation of phosphate into CaM kinase II monitored
using [32P]ATP as a function of time. Plotted is the mol
ratio of phosphate to CaM kinase II subunit (±S.D., n = 4) versus time. For both experiments, the
autophosphorylation conditions were 20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 200 mM KCl, 500 µM Ca2+, 10 µM CaM, 2.5 µM ATP, 2 mM
Mg2+, 0.46 µM CaM kinase II, 0 °C.
|
|
To study the mechanism of CaM kinase II autophosphorylation, conditions
must first be established in which ATP binding to the enzyme is not the
rate-limiting step of autophosphorylation. To ascertain these
conditions experimentally, the rate of autophosphorylation of CaM
kinase II was evaluated at different concentrations of ATP (Fig.
3). At the lowest concentration of ATP
examined (2.5 µM), the rate of autophosphorylation was
0.062 s
1. However, at concentrations of 100, 500, and
2,500 µM ATP, an autophosphorylation rate of ~0.4
s
1 was observed (Table II).
Hence, at ATP concentrations greater than 100 µM, the
experimentally observed rate constant reflects an event involved in the
autophosphorylation process, not ATP binding. These results are
consistent with the previously determined ATP Km
for autophosphorylation of ~20 µM (33).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Time course of CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation at different ATP concentrations. Plotted is
the percentage of autonomous enzymatic activity compared with
Ca2+/CaM activity (±S.D., n = 2)
versus time (in seconds). The solid lines are
nonlinear least squares best fits of each data set to Equation 2. The
ovals, diamonds, squares, and
triangles represent experiments at 2,500, 500, 100, and 2.5 µM ATP, respectively.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Kinetic data for the CaM kinase II holoenzyme
Shown are the concentration of CaM kinase II, concentration of ATP, and
temperature of quenched flow experiments. The best fit parameters were
the first order rate constant (k1) and the maximal
autonomy. Error values represent the S.D. of the nonlinear least
squares best fit to Equation 2. The autophosphorylation conditions were
20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 200 mM KCl, 500 µM Ca2+, 10 µM CaM, and 2 mM Mg2+.
|
|
Concentration Dependence of the CaM Kinase II Holoenzyme
Autophosphorylation Rate--
To determine whether autophosphorylation
of CaM kinase II is intra- or interholoenzyme, we examined how the rate
of autophosphorylation varied with the CaM kinase II concentration.
Intraholoenzyme and interholoenzyme autophosphorylation reactions would
be expected to show different kinetic signatures (34, 35). If
autophosphorylation was intraholoenzyme, it would be best modeled as a
first order transition governed by the first order rate constant
k1. In this case, the reaction time course would
be an exponential that would be independent of the enzyme
concentration. However, if autophosphorylation were interholoenzyme, it
would require interaction of two holoenzymes and hence be a second
order process. Here, the reaction time course would be parabolic and
strongly dependent on enzyme concentration.
Chemical quenched flow experiments were performed at seven different
concentrations of CaM kinase II between 0.05 and 12.72 µM. It was observed that the time courses of autonomy
generation were similar at all concentrations (Fig.
4A), demonstrating only slight
differences in their level of maximal autonomy. Each time course fit
well to an exponential function, and the rate constant for the
autophosphorylation process was between 0.33 and 0.63 s
1
for all experiments. The plot of the observed rate constant
versus CaM kinase II concentration in Fig. 4B
illustrates that the rate of autophosphorylation is independent of
holoenzyme concentration.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of different CaM kinase II
concentrations on autophosphorylation. A, time course
of CaM kinase II autophosphorylation at different CaM kinase II
concentrations. Plotted is the percentage of autonomous enzymatic
activity compared with Ca2+/CaM activity (±S.D.,
n = 2) versus time (in seconds). For
clarity, only four of seven experiments are shown. The solid
lines are nonlinear least squares best fits of each data set to
Equation 2. The diamonds, ovals,
triangles, and squares represent experiments at
4.61, 1.61, 0.461, and 0.161 µM CaM kinase II,
respectively. B, concentration dependence of CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation rate. Plotted is the first order rate constant for
autophosphorylation (k1) versus CaM
kinase II concentration (µM). Error bars
represent the S.D. of the best fit to the time course data.
|
|
We probed the mechanism of autophosphorylation further by asking
whether addition of a high concentration of
-CaM kinase II (T286A),
a form of the enzyme which is just as active as wild type but does not
display autonomous activity, increased the rate of autophosphorylation
of wild type
-CaM kinase II. If autophosphorylation is
interholoenzyme, it would be expected that wild type
-CaM kinase II
would be phosphorylated more rapidly in a solution that also contained
a high concentration of
-CaM kinase II (T286A) compared with one
that did not. However, if autophosphorylation is intraholoenzyme, the
addition of
-CaM kinase II (T286A) would be expected to have no
effect on the rate of wild type
-CaM kinase II phosphorylation at
Thr-286. Table II shows the results of a quenched flow experiment with
a 0.46 µM solution of
-CaM kinase II plus 3.4 µM
-CaM kinase II (T286A). Under these conditions the
autonomous activity is generated at the same rate as in the absence
-CaM kinase II (T286A). These results, together with the lack of
concentration dependence of the autophosphorylation rate, indicate that
autophosphorylation of CaM kinase II occurs intraholoenzyme.
Concentration Dependence of the Autophosphorylation Rate for a
Monomeric CaM Kinase II--
We studied the concentration dependence
of the autophosphorylation rate for mCaMKII to determine whether CaM
kinase II autophosphorylation within holoenzymes occurs by an inter- or
intrasubunit reaction. In this form of the protein, the oligomerization
domain has been deleted, but the kinase domain and regulatory segment
have been retained. Previous studies have found that this construct is
nearly identical to wild type in its activation by calmodulin, its
activity toward peptide substrates, and the site specificity at several autophosphorylation sites (15). Here it was observed that the time
course of autophosphorylation was strongly dependent on enzyme concentration. This is best illustrated by examining the half-times of
the reactions (t1/2), the time it takes for half
of the molecules to be autophosphorylated (Table
III). The t1/2 for
autophosphorylation of the mCaMKII varied from 17.8 to 899 s
depending on mCaMKII concentration, whereas those for the CaM kinase II
holoenzyme were constant at around 2 s.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Kinetic data for the monomeric CaM kinase II
Shown are the concentration of monomeric CaM kinase II in the quenched
flow experiments and the half-time (t1/2) of the
autophosphorylation time course. The best fit parameter was the second
order rate constant (k2). Error values represent the
S.D. of the nonlinear least squares best fit to Equation 3. The
autophosphorylation conditions were 20 mM Hepes pH 7.4, 200 mM KCl, 500 µM Ca2+, 10 µM CaM, 500 µM ATP, 2 mM
Mg2+, and 0 °C.
|
|
The fact that the t1/2 values were highly
dependent on the mCaMKII concentration suggested that the data should
be analyzed in terms of an intermolecular process (see "Experimental
Procedures"). Fig. 5 shows the
concentration of phosphorylated mCaMKII as a function of time for four
different experiments. Fitting each data set to the parabolic time
course expected for an intermolecular process provided a good fit and
gave a value of ~25,000 M
1 s
1
for the second order rate constants for each data set. Fitting each
data set to an exponential function did not provide a better fit to the
data. The fact that mCaMKII phosphorylates in an intermolecular fashion
supports the notion that autophosphorylation within the holoenzyme
occurs intersubunit.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Time course of mCaMKII autophosphorylation at
different mCaMKII concentrations. Plotted is the concentration of
phosphorylated mCaMKII (±S.D., n = 2)
versus time (in seconds). The solid lines are
nonlinear least squares best fits of each data set to Equation 3. The
diamonds, ovals, triangles, and
squares represent experiments at 2.15, 0.58, 0.14, and 0.035 µM mCaMKII, respectively.
|
|
Temperature Dependence of CaM Kinase II
Autophosphorylation--
The experiments described thus far were
performed at 0 °C to ensure monodispersity of the enzyme solution
even during long incubation periods. We next wanted to ascertain how
quickly autophosphorylation occurs near physiological temperature.
We first established that CaM kinase II holoenzymes remained
monodisperse during 1-min autophosphorylation reactions at temperatures as high as 30 °C (Table I). We then explored whether the
autonomous activity of CaM kinase II could still be used as a
quantitative probe for Thr-286 autophosphorylation at temperatures
greater than 0 °C because the enzyme has been shown to lose some
enzymatic activity during autophosphorylation at higher temperatures
(22). CaM kinase II was autophosphorylated for varying times at 23, 30, and 37 °C and then assayed for Ca2+/CaM activity to test
for temperature-dependent instability (Fig. 6A). The data indicate that
enzyme activity can be used as a probe for Thr-286 autophosphorylation
at temperatures as high as 30 °C as long as reaction times are kept
under 1 min.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of temperature on CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation. A, loss of Ca2+/CaM
enzyme activity with autophosphorylation time. Plotted is the
percentage of original Ca2+/CaM activity (±S.D.,
n = 2) versus autophosphorylation time (in
minutes). The circles, diamonds, and
ovals represent experiments performed at 37, 30, and
23 °C, respectively. B, time course of CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation at different temperatures. Plotted is the
percentage of autonomous enzymatic activity compared with
Ca2+/CaM activity (±S.D., n = 2)
versus time (in seconds). The solid lines are
nonlinear least squares best fits of each data set to Equation 2. The
diamonds, ovals, triangles, and
squares represent experiments at 30, 23, 12, and 0 °C,
respectively. C, Arrhenius plot of CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation rate. Plotted is the natural log of the first order
rate constant for autophosphorylation (k1)
versus 1,000/temperature (K). Error bars
represent the S.D. of the best fit to the time course data. The
solid line is the linear best fit of the data.
|
|
CaM kinase II autophosphorylation was examined at 12, 23, and 30 °C
(Fig. 6B). As expected, the rate of autophosphorylation increased with increasing temperature (Table II). At 30 °C,
k1 was 12 s
1, 30-fold greater than
the value of 0.4 s
1 at 0 °C. A plot of ln
k1 versus 1/T (Arrhenius
plot) revealed a straight line (Fig. 6C). From the slope, an
activation energy of 18.0 kcal/mol was calculated for the
autophosphorylation process (see "Experimental Procedures"),
indicating that a significant energy barrier must be overcome for
autophosphorylation to take place. Extrapolating the straight line fit
to 37 °C suggests that autophosphorylation would occur at a rate of
~20 s
1 at this temperature. This value is greater than
an order of magnitude faster than previous estimates of the
autophosphorylation rate of CaM kinase II at physiological
temperature (15, 36, 37).
It is conceivable, albeit unlikely, that at temperatures closer to
physiological temperature interholoenzyme autophosphorylation could
contribute more significantly to the autophosphorylation mechanism of
CaM kinase II than it does at 0 °C. To explore whether interholoenzyme autophosphorylation occurs at higher temperatures, the
rate of autophosphorylation at 23 °C was explored at both 0.5 and
8.6 µM CaM kinase II. At both protein concentrations the rate constant for autophosphorylation was ~5 s
1 (Table
II), indicating that interholoenzyme autophosphorylation is not
significant at 8.6 µM CaM kinase II even at temperatures well above 0 °C.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The notion that CaM kinase II autophosphorylation is an
intraholoenzyme reaction occurring between two neighboring subunits has
been challenged by structural studies that indicate that the distance
between subunits is too large to permit such autophosphorylation. In
this study, we have characterized the CaM kinase II autophosphorylation process using dynamic light scattering and chemical quenched flow kinetics under conditions that address ambiguities in the previous analyses. The results support an intraholoenzyme, intersubunit mechanism for autophosphorylation and also reveal that
autophosphorylation is a relatively rapid process, occurring with at a
rate of ~12 s
1 at near physiological temperature.
Several previous biochemical studies had also suggested that CaM kinase
II autophosphorylation occurs intraholoenzyme (13, 14, 17). However,
the observation that CaM kinase II could readily be induced to form
aggregates during autophosphorylation (22-25) created significant
doubt about the experiments used to identify this mechanism. For
instance, it had been observed that the rate of CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation is independent of CaM kinase II concentration (13,
14), suggesting intraholoenzyme autophosphorylation if CaM kinase II
were monodisperse. Monodispersity was not experimentally established,
however, and if the holoenzymes were self-associated, interholoenzyme
autophosphorylation would also not show a concentration dependence
because the phosphorylation would be occurring within an assembly of
holoenzymes. Likewise, experiments in which active CaM kinase II
holoenzymes were mixed with inactive holoenzymes did not show
phosphorylation of the inactive CaM kinase II molecules (16, 17),
suggesting that autophosphorylation occurs intraholoenzyme. However, if
the holoenzymes were self-associated here, few active and inactive
holoenzymes would gain access to one another, thus leaving open the
possibility that autophosphorylation might still occur interholoenzyme.
Given that the recent electron microscopy structure that shows a ~50 Å distance between subunits also does not readily indicate how intraholoenzyme, intersubunit autophosphorylation might take place (20), it was reasonable in this work to explore the mechanism of CaM
kinase II autophosphorylation further. By providing data that support
an intraholoenzyme, intersubunit autophosphorylation mechanism under
conditions in which CaM kinase II is monodisperse, the uncertainty
regarding intraholoenzyme autophosphorylation that arose from the
characterization of CaM kinase II supramolecular aggregation has been eliminated.
How might an intraholoenzyme, intersubunit autophosphorylation
mechanism be reconciled with the three-dimensional electron microscopy
structure of
-CaM kinase II? One idea is that upon CaM binding, a
small part of the regulatory segment traverses the distance between
kinase domains and becomes autophosphorylated. This could occur without
a global rearrangement of the holoenzyme structure, and if the segment
of protein that traverses the distance is small, it would be invisible
to electron microscopy.
A second possibility is that CaM kinase II has dynamic properties that
allow it to change conformation rapidly. This could allow two
neighboring kinase domains to come into close proximity transiently so
that autophosphorylation could occur. If the overall amount of time in
the conformation with the kinase domains close together is much less
than the time spend in the conformation with the kinase domains far
apart, this conformational change would not be visible in the
structural analyses of CaM kinase II. This type of dynamic
conformational change could take several forms, including a
"swiveling" of the foot-like kinase domains to bring them into
proximity. The biochemical demonstration of intersubunit
autophosphorylation described here would suggest that the gear-like
shape of the holoenzyme, with a hole at its center (20), may be
designed to enable a large movement of subunits.
The rate constant for autophosphorylation showed no concentration
dependence between 0.05 and 12.72 µM CaM kinase II (Fig. 4). Two conclusions can be drawn from this information: 1)
-CaM kinase II is capable of phosphorylating itself via an intraholoenzyme mechanism, and 2) intraholoenzyme autophosphorylation is the dominant mechanism of autophosphorylation at concentrations up to about 10 µM CaM kinase II. Our findings do not exclude the
possibility that interholoenzyme autophosphorylation could potentially
take place. However, this process must be significantly slower than intraholoenzyme autophosphorylation. Furthermore, because the concentration of CaM kinase II studied here was nearly as high as the
estimated concentration of CaM kinase II in hippocampal dendritic
spines (predicted to be up to 50 µM (38)),
interholoenzyme autophosphorylation likely contributes little to CaM
kinase II activation even at the high concentrations found in neurons.
Our data indicate that a viable structural model of CaM kinase II autophosphorylation needs to at least account for the ability of the
kinase to autophosphorylate between subunits of the same holoenzyme if
it also incorporates autophosphorylation through an interholoenzyme process.
An intraholoenzyme, intersubunit autophosphorylation mechanism bestows
CaM kinase II with many biologically advantageous properties. For
instance, the intersubunit nature of autophosphorylation is central to
the ability of CaM kinase II to decode the frequency of
Ca2+ oscillations (11). This is physiologically important
because increases in cellular Ca2+ do not usually take
place in a graded manner but rather occur as spikes of increased
concentration which occur with a given frequency (39, 40). Frequency
detection is believed to arise molecularly from the requirement of two
CaM molecules for each autophosphorylation event: one to a "kinase"
subunit that catalyzes autophosphorylation and the other to a
"substrate" subunit that becomes autophosphorylated (15, 17).
Computer modeling suggests that the requirement for coincident binding
of CaM to two neighboring subunits of a holoenzyme is critical for
proper spike frequency detection (41). If autophosphorylation occurred
intrasubunit, rather than intersubunit, two CaM molecules would not be
required, and CaM kinase II presumably would not be able to detect
Ca2+ spike frequency. An interholoenzyme reaction would
require two CaM molecules, one on each holoenzyme, but such a scheme
would likely show a reduced dependence on the frequency of
Ca2+ spikes. CaM kinase II is not unique in utilizing CaM
binding to both a kinase and substrate molecule to facilitate
phosphorylation of the substrate. Phosphorylation of CaM kinase IV by
CaM kinase kinase also employs this mechanism (42, 43). However, CaM kinase II is unique in that its signaling cascade is self-contained within a single, self-associated molecular machine.
Studies of the temperature dependence of
-CaM kinase II
autophosphorylation revealed that the rate increased with temperature from 0.4 s
1 at 0 °C to 12 s
1 at
30 °C. Based on this trend, it was estimated that
autophosphorylation would occur at ~20 s
1 at 37 °C.
No carefully determined value for the autophosphorylation rate of CaM
kinase II had been reported previously. However, most estimates had
placed the rate considerably slower, usually about 0.5-1.0
s
1 (15, 36, 37, 44, 45).
The ability of CaM kinase II to autophosphorylate rapidly is especially
biologically significant if, as evidence suggests (28, 46), the
extent of CaM kinase II activation is limited by the amount of CaM
available in the cell. In this case, CaM kinase II would be only
partially saturated with CaM during each spike in cellular
Ca2+ because CaM kinase II has a lower affinity for
Ca2+/CaM than most other CaM-binding proteins (7). Rapid
autophosphorylation would ensure that each CaM kinase II subunit
available for autophosphorylation becomes autonomous during the limited
time before CaM dissociates. Because CaM dissociates from
unphosphorylated CaM kinase II with a rate constant of ~2
s
1 (10), a rate of autophosphorylation of ~20
s
1 indicates that autophosphorylation will occur nearly
every time CaM molecules bind the holoenzyme in the proper orientation.
The elucidation in this work of the rate constant and mechanism of CaM
kinase II autophosphorylation should provide the foundation for further
mechanistic studies of CaM kinase II. Additional kinetic studies of CaM
and ATP recognition, as well as substrate binding and phosphorylation,
will be required to provide a more complete understanding of the
activation mechanism of CaM kinase II. Other issues regarding
autophosphorylation, such as whether it is propagated in a defined
direction within each hexameric ring of the holoenzyme, also still
remain unresolved. Future studies will probe these issues, and in so
doing will provide a better understanding of the role of CaM kinase II
in long term potentiation and other signaling processes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Armando Villasenor for aid with
dynamic light scattering; Katrin Karbstein for assistance with chemical
quenched flow experiments; and Ulli Bayer, Chris Devry, and Jennifer
Tsui for critical reading of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants GM40600 and GM30179.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Fellow of the Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research.
§
Fellow of the American Heart Association.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Neurobiology, Stanford University, 299 Campus Dr. West, Fairchild
Building, Stanford, CA 94305. Tel.: 650-723-7668; Fax:
650-725-3958; E-mail: schulman@stanford.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 29, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M202154200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
CaM kinase II, Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II;
Ca2+/CaM, Ca2+-bound calmodulin;
-CaM kinase
II,
-subunit of CaM kinase II;
mCaMKII, monomeric CaM kinase II;
PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Schulman, H.,
and Braun, A.
(1999)
in
Calcium as a Cellular Regulator
(Carafoli, E.
, and Klee, C., eds)
, pp. 311-343, Oxford University Press, New York
|
| 2.
|
Soderling, T. R.,
Chang, B.,
and Brickey, D.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
3719-3722[Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
| Hudmon, A., and Schulman, H. (2002) Annu. Rev. Biochem.
71, in press
|
| 4.
|
Malenka, R. C.,
and Nicoll, R. A.
(1999)
Science
285,
1870-1874[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Lisman, J.,
Schulman, H.,
and Cline, H.
(2002)
Nat. Rev. Neurosci.
3,
175-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Saitoh, T.,
and Schwartz, J. H.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
100,
835-842[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Meyer, T.,
Hanson, P. I.,
Stryer, L.,
and Schulman, H.
(1992)
Science
256,
1199-1202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Putkey, J. A.,
and Waxham, M. N.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29619-29623[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Waxham, M. N.,
Tsai, A.-L.,
and Putkey, J. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
17579-17584[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Singla, S. I.,
Hudmon, A.,
Goldberg, J. M.,
Smith, J. L.,
and Schulman, H.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
29353-29360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
DeKoninck, P.,
and Schulman, H.
(1998)
Science
279,
227-230[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Giese, K. P.,
Fedorov, N. B.,
Filipkowski, R. K.,
and Silva, A. J.
(1998)
Science
279,
870-873[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Kuret, J.,
and Schulman, H.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
6427-6433[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Lai, Y.,
Nairn, A. C.,
and Greengard, P.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
4253-4257[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Hanson, P. I.,
Meyer, T.,
Stryer, L.,
and Schulman, H.
(1994)
Neuron
12,
943-956[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Mukherji, S.,
and Soderling, T. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13744-13747[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Rich, R. C.,
and Schulman, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28424-28429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Woodgett, J. R.,
Davison, M. T.,
and Cohen, P.
(1983)
Eur. J. Biochem.
136,
481-487[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Kanaseki, T.,
Ikeuchi, Y.,
Sugiura, H.,
and Yamauchi, T.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1049-1060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Kolodziej, S. J.,
Hudmon, A.,
Waxham, M. N.,
and Stoops, J. K.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
14354-14359[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Morris, E. P.,
and Torok, K.
(2001)
J. Mol. Biol.
308,
1-8[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Hudmon, A.,
Aronowski, J.,
Kolb, S. J.,
and Waxham, M. N.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
8800-8808[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Hudmon, A.,
Kim, S. A.,
Kolb, S. J.,
Stoops, J. K.,
and Waxham, M. N.
(2001)
J. Neurochem.
76,
1364-1375[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Dosemeci, A.,
Reese, T. S.,
Petersen, J.,
and Tao-Cheng, J. H.
(2000)
J. Neurosci.
20,
3076-3084[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Tao-Cheng, J.,
Vinade, L.,
Smith, C.,
Winters, C. A.,
Ward, R.,
Brightman, M. W.,
Reese, T. S.,
and Dosemeci, A.
(2001)
Neuroscience
106,
69-78[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Gill, S. C.,
and von Hippel, P. H.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
182,
319-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Pace, C. N.,
Vajdos, F.,
Fee, L.,
Grimsley, G.,
and Gray, T.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
2411-2423[Abstract]
|
| 28.
|
Teruel, M. N.,
Chen, W.,
Persechini, A.,
and Meyer, T.
(2000)
Curr. Biol.
10,
86-94[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Ferre-D'Amare, A. R.,
and Burley, S. K.
(1994)
Structure
2,
357-359[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Schonfeld, H. J.,
Poschl, B.,
and Muller, F.
(1998)
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
26,
753-758[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Ikeda, A.,
Okuno, S.,
and Fujisawa, H.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
11582-11588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Lou, L. L.,
and Schulman, H.
(1989)
J. Neurosci.
9,
2020-2032[Abstract]
|
| 33.
|
Colbran, R. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
7163-7170[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Gutfreund, H.
(1995)
Kinetics for the Life Sciences: Receptors, Transmitters, and Catalysts
, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U. K.
|
| 35.
|
Sobieszek, A.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
11855-11863[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Okamoto, H.,
and Ichikawa, K.
(2000)
Biol. Cybern.
82,
35-47[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Zhabotinsky, A. M.
(2000)
Biophys. J.
79,
2211-2221[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Erondu, N. E.,
and Kennedy, M. B.
(1985)
J. Neurosci.
5,
3270-3277[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Meyer, T.,
and Stryer, L.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem.
20,
153-174[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Berridge, M. J.
(1997)
Nature
386,
759-760[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Kubota, Y.,
and Bower, J. M.
(2001)
J. Comp. Neurosci.
11,
263-279[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Selbert, M. A.,
Anderson, K. A.,
Huang, Q. H.,
Goldstein, E. G.,
Means, A. R.,
and Edelman, A. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
17616-17621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Soderling, T. R.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
232-236[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Miller, S. G.,
and Kennedy, M. B.
(1986)
Cell
44,
861-870[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Kubota, Y.,
and Bower, J. M.
(1999)
Neurocomputing
26-27,
29-38[CrossRef]
|
| 46.
|
Persechini, A.,
and Cronk, B.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
6827-6830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg