Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201330200 on April 1, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 21080-21085, June 7, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/23/21080    most recent
M201330200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berlot, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berlot, C. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

A Highly Effective Dominant Negative alpha s Construct Containing Mutations That Affect Distinct Functions Inhibits Multiple Gs-coupled Receptor Signaling Pathways*

Catherine H. BerlotDagger

From the Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8026

Received for publication, February 8, 2002, and in revised form, March 27, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To investigate the subcellular organization of receptor-G protein signaling pathways, a robust dominant negative alpha s mutant containing substitutions that alter distinct functions was produced and tested for its effects on Gs-coupled receptor activity in HEK-293 cells. Mutations in the alpha 3beta 5 loop region, which increase receptor affinity, decrease receptor-mediated activation, and impair activation of adenylyl cyclase, were combined with G226A, which increases affinity for beta gamma , and A366S, which decreases affinity for GDP. This triple alpha s mutant can inhibit signaling to Gs from the luteinizing hormone receptor by 97% and from the calcitonin receptor by 100%. In addition, this alpha s mutant blocks all signaling from the calcitonin receptor to Gq. These results lead to two conclusions about receptor-G protein signaling. First, individual receptors have access to multiple types of G proteins in HEK-293 cell membranes. Second, different G protein alpha  subunits can compete with each other for binding to the same receptor. This dominant negative alpha s construct will be useful for determining interrelationships among distinct receptor-G protein interactions in a wide variety of cells and tissues.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Stimulation of heterotrimeric G proteins by cell surface receptors activates signaling pathways that mediate specific responses to hormones and neurotransmitters. Cells express a wide variety of G protein-coupled receptors as well as numerous G protein alpha , beta , and gamma  subunits. Many receptors can activate more than one type of G protein, and the G protein subunits can interact with many different types of receptors. The manner in which signaling specificity is maintained in the midst of this vast range of potential interactions is not well understood. This report investigates the interdependence of distinct signaling pathways activated by receptors with broad G protein specificities using a receptor-sequestering dominant negative G protein alpha  subunit.

Many potential mechanisms could establish that distinct receptor-G protein interactions will be independent of each other. Among these, one possibility is that specific receptor-G protein complexes localize to separate membrane compartments (1, 2). Differential associations with particular proteins or lipids (3, 4) or covalent modifications such as phosphorylation (5) may result in subpopulations of receptors and G proteins that have restricted access to each other. Although G proteins are often expressed at much higher levels than their receptors are (6), there is evidence that different receptors utilize separate pools of G proteins (7, 8). An alternative potential mechanism for isolating distinct receptor-G protein interactions is that receptors utilize separate regions for binding different G proteins. If this is the case, then multiple types of receptor-G protein interaction can occur simultaneously without affecting each other. Localization of G protein-binding sites have indicated that separate receptor regions may specify interactions with distinct G proteins (9, 10).

Dominant negative G protein alpha  subunits can test potential mechanisms for separating the distinct G protein interactions of broad specificity receptors. For instance, if interactions with different G proteins are localized to separate subcellular compartments and/or receptor regions, signaling from a receptor to one type of G protein alpha  subunit will be blocked by a dominant negative version of that alpha  subunit, whereas the other signaling pathways will be unperturbed. Alternatively, if each receptor has access to multiple types of G protein and these different G proteins can compete with each other for receptor binding, then a dominant negative alpha  subunit will block all of the G protein signaling pathways activated by the receptor.

Several dominant negative G protein alpha  subunits have been developed previously, but they inhibit G protein signaling incompletely and therefore are not optimal for investigating receptor-G protein signaling pathways. One dominant negative alpha s mutant contains three substitutions that disrupt different alpha  subunit functions, but it is extremely unstable (11), which contributes to its inability to inhibit signaling completely (12, 13). Xanthine-binding mutants of alpha o, alpha 11, and alpha 16 can inhibit signaling of specific G protein-coupled receptor families, but inhibition of receptor-mediated phospholipase C stimulation is incomplete (14, 15). alpha  subunit carboxyl-terminal fragments exhibit dominant negative activity (16), but inhibition of Gs signaling is only partial (13).

This report describes the development of a highly effective dominant negative alpha s mutant that contains substitutions that alter distinct alpha  subunit functions, each of which should stabilize the receptor-bound, nucleotide-free state of Gs. One set of mutations, located in the alpha 3beta 5 loop region, specifically increases receptor affinity and decreases receptor-mediated activation without affecting nucleotide handling (17) and also disrupts activation of adenylyl cyclase (18). G226A increases affinity for beta gamma (19, 20), and A366S decreases affinity for GDP (21). Although A366S alone causes alpha s to be thermolabile, alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S), containing all three sets of mutations, is expressed at close to wild-type levels and blocks signaling from the luteinizing hormone receptor to Gs by up to 97%. The effects of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) on signaling by the calcitonin receptor to Gs and Gq are tested in transiently transfected HEK-293 cells. The results demonstrate that this dominant negative alpha s mutant can block multiple G protein signaling pathways, which indicates that each receptor has access to multiple types of G protein and that these G proteins can compete with each other for receptor binding.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Construction of alpha s Mutant Constructs-- alpha s mutant constructs in the expression vector pcDNAI/Amp (Invitrogen) were generated from the rat alpha s cDNA (22) containing the EE epitope (23), which was generated by mutating alpha s residues DYVPSD (residues 189-194) to EYMPTE. Mutations were generated by oligonucleotide-directed in vitro mutagenesis using the Bio-Rad Muta-Gene kit except for those in the alpha 3beta 5 region, which were produced by subcloning mutagenic oligodeoxynucleotide cassettes. Subcloning and mutagenesis procedures were verified by restriction enzyme analysis and DNA sequencing.

Transient Expression and Assays for cAMP Accumulation and Inositol Phosphate Formation-- HEK-293 cells (ATCC, CRL-1573) (106 per 60-mm dish) were transfected with plasmids as described in the figure legends using 10 µl of LipofectAMINE 2000 Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. 24 h after transfection, the cells were replated in 24-well plates and labeled with either [3H]adenine or [3H]inositol.

After an additional 24 h, intracellular cAMP levels in cells labeled with [3H]adenine and inositol phosphate levels in cells labeled with [3H]inositol were determined as described previously (24). cAMP accumulation was measured in the presence of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine and in the presence or absence of agonist as indicated in the figure legends. Inositol phosphate formation was measured in the presence of 5 mM LiCl and in the presence or absence of agonist as indicated in the figure legends. The cells were cultured and assayed at 37 °C.

To determine EC50 values for stimulation of cAMP or inositol phosphate formation, the observed activity was fitted to Equation 1,
Y=b+(a−b)/(1+(X/c)<SUP>d</SUP>) (Eq. 1)
where X is the concentration of agonist; Y is the observed cAMP or inositol phosphate formation; a is the cAMP or inositol phosphate formation observed in the absence of agonist; b is the maximum observed cAMP or inositol phosphate formation; c is the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) of the agonist; and d is the slope factor.

Transient Expression and Assays for Ligand Binding-- HEK-293 cells (6.25 × 106 per 150-mm dish) were transfected with 0.2 µg/106 cells of plasmid encoding the rat luteinizing hormone receptor in pCIS (25) or 0.04 µg/106 cells of plasmid encoding the rabbit C1a calcitonin receptor in pBKCMV (9) and 2 µg/106 cells of vector (pcDNAI/Amp) using 62.5 µl of LipofectAMINE 2000 Reagent. 24 h after transfection, the cells were replated in 24-well plates. Assays for ligand binding were performed after an additional 24 h.

Receptor numbers per cell were determined by fitting data from saturation binding assays using 125I-labeled hCG1 (26, 27) or sCT (9) to Equation 2,
Y=(B<SUB>max</SUB>)(X)/(K<SUB>d</SUB>+X) (Eq. 2)
where X is the concentration of agonist; Y is the specific binding; Bmax is the maximum number of binding sites, and Kd is the equilibrium dissociation constant. In each case, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed once with binding medium (20 mM HEPES-buffered minimal essential medium with Earle's salts without bicarbonate containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). The medium was then removed and replaced with binding medium containing 0.062-15 nM 125I-labeled hCG in the presence or absence of 0.44 µM unlabeled hCG or 0.030-15 nM 125I-labeled sCT in the presence or absence of 1 µM unlabeled sCT. The cells were incubated for 1 h at room temperature, washed three times with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and solubilized with 0.5 N NaOH. The samples were collected and counted in a gamma counter.

Membrane Preparations and Immunoblots-- HEK-293 cells (6.25 × 106 per 150-mm dish) were transfected with 37.5 µg of plasmid using DEAE-dextran (28). 48 h after transfection, membranes were prepared as described (24). 25 µg of membrane proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (10%), transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with a monoclonal antibody to the EE epitope (23). The antigen-antibody complexes were detected using an anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-linked antibody according to the ECL Western blotting protocol (Amersham Biosciences).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Combining Substitutions in the alpha 3beta 5 Loop Region of alpha s with Mutations That Alter beta gamma and GDP Binding Results in Highly Effective Dominant Negative Activity-- Replacing five alpha s residues in the alpha 3 helix and the alpha 3beta 5 loop (29) with the homologous alpha i2 residues (N271K, K274D, R280K, T284D, and I285T) results in an alpha s construct, alpha s(alpha 3beta 5), that exhibits increased affinity for and a decreased ability to be activated by the beta 2-adrenergic receptor (17). Independently, the mutations also disrupt activation of adenylyl cyclase by alpha s (18). These properties suggested that alpha s(alpha 3beta 5) might be able to sequester Gs-coupled receptors and exhibit dominant negative activity. Indeed, when alpha s(alpha 3beta 5) was transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells that were co-transfected with plasmid encoding the luteinizing hormone receptor, cAMP accumulation in response to 20 ng/ml hCG was inhibited by 42% (S.E. = 3%, n = 3) (Fig. 1).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Combining mutations in the alpha 3beta 5 region with mutations that inhibit beta gamma dissociation and increase GDP dissociation results in an alpha s mutant that can block receptor signaling by 97%. For each data point, 106 HEK-293 cells were transfected with 0.2 µg of plasmid encoding the rat luteinizing hormone receptor in pCIS (25) and 2 µg of vector (pcDNAI/Amp) or plasmid encoding one of the indicated constructs. The average receptor number per cell was 8,400 (S.E. = 370, n = 3). cAMP accumulation was measured in the absence (dark gray bars) or presence (light gray bars) of 20 ng/ml hCG (CR-127, National Hormone and Peptide Program). All values represent the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

With the goal of producing more effective dominant negative activity, additional mutations predicted to stabilize the receptor-G protein complex were introduced into alpha s in combination with the alpha 3beta 5 substitutions. The effects of adding each of three mutations, G226A, E268A, and A366S, to alpha s(alpha 3beta 5) were tested. When combined, these three mutations produce partial dominant negative activity in alpha s (11). G226A impairs activating conformational changes in switch II required for dissociation of alpha s from beta gamma (19, 20). E268A disrupts a salt bridge with Arg-231 that may stabilize the activated conformation of alpha s (30). A366S elevates basal GDP release, causing alpha s to be constitutively activated and to spend more time in the empty state (21). alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S) inhibited cAMP accumulation in response to 20 ng/ml hCG by 69% (S.E. = 1%, n = 3) (Fig. 1).

When introduced into alpha s(alpha 3beta 5), both G226A and A366S produced increased dominant negative activity (Fig. 1). alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A) inhibited the cAMP response to 20 ng/ml hCG by 74% (S.E. = 2%, n = 3), whereas alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/A366S) inhibited the response by 61% (S.E. = 2%, n = 3). In addition, alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/A366S) increased basal cAMP stimulation, consistent with the elevating effect of A366S on GDP release (21). In contrast, alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/E268A) exhibited the same dominant negative activity as alpha s(alpha 3beta 5) did (Fig. 1). Combining the two mutations that increased the dominant negative activity of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5), G226A and A366S, with the alpha 3beta 5 substitutions resulted in a highly effective dominant negative alpha s construct that inhibited the cAMP accumulation response to 20 ng/ml hCG by 97% (S.E. = 0.2%, n = 3) (Fig. 1). No further increase in dominant negative activity resulted when the E268A substitution was added to alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) (Fig. 1).

The dominant negative alpha s mutants, alpha s(alpha 3beta 5), alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S), and alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S), decreased the effectiveness of signaling from the luteinizing hormone receptor to Gs both by increasing the EC50 value of the cAMP response to hCG and by decreasing the magnitude of cAMP responses to hCG (Fig. 2 and Table I). Compared with alpha s(alpha 3beta 5) and alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S), the effects of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) on both of these parameters were greater. These incremental effects of combining the alpha 3beta 5, G226A, and A366S mutations are consistent with their independent sites and mechanisms of action.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) causes greater inhibition of the cAMP response to luteinizing hormone receptor stimulation than alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S) and alpha s(alpha 3beta 5) do. For each data point, 106 HEK-293 cells were transfected with 0.2 µg of plasmid encoding the luteinizing hormone receptor and 2 µg of vector (pcDNAI/Amp), or plasmid encoding alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S), alpha s(alpha 3beta 5), or alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S). cAMP accumulation was measured in the absence or presence of the indicated amounts of hCG. All values represent the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
EC50 values and percent inhibition of cAMP responses to hCG in HEK-293 cells expressing the luteinizing hormone receptor in the absence or presence of alpha s mutants
Values were determined in three experiments. Each value is the mean ± S.E.

Substitutions in the alpha 3beta 5 Loop Rather Than in the alpha 3 Helix Produce Dominant Negative Activity-- To investigate how altering the alpha 3beta 5 loop region of alpha s produces dominant negative activity, the effects of smaller numbers of substitutions in this region were tested. Of the five alpha i2 homolog substitutions, two are located in the alpha 3 helix (N271K and K274D) and three (R280K, T284D, and I285T) are in the alpha 3beta 5 loop. Based on their location, only the loop residues are likely to interact directly with receptors (17). Separately testing the effects of substitutions in these two regions showed that the dominant negative effect is due predominantly to the substitutions in the alpha 3beta 5 loop, rather than those in the alpha 3 helix (Fig. 3). alpha s(R280K/T284D/I285T) was only slightly less effective as a dominant negative than alpha s(alpha 3beta 5) was, whereas alpha s(N271K/K274D) exhibited the same basal and receptor-stimulated cAMP accumulation as alpha s did. Therefore, the dominant negative phenotype of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5) appears to result from the alteration of a receptor contact site on alpha s.


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Mutations in the alpha 3beta 5 loop rather than the alpha 3 helix of alpha s produce dominant negative activity. For each data point, 106 HEK-293 cells were transfected with 0.2 µg of plasmid encoding the luteinizing hormone receptor and 2 µg of vector (pcDNAI/Amp) or plasmid encoding one of the indicated constructs. cAMP accumulation was measured in the absence (dark gray bars) or presence (light gray bars) of 20 ng/ml hCG. alpha s(R280K/T284D/I285T), containing mutations in the alpha 3beta 5 loop, exhibits dominant negative activity, whereas alpha s(N271K/K274D), containing mutations in the alpha 3 helix, exhibits normal basal and receptor-mediated activation. All values represent the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.

Individual substitutions of each of the alpha 3beta 5 loop residues decreased receptor-mediated activation of alpha s but did not produce dominant negative activity (Fig. 3). alpha s(R280K) exhibited very little basal or receptor-stimulated activity, whereas the activities of alpha s(T284D) and alpha s(I285T) were decreased relative to that of alpha s. The dominant negative activity produced by simultaneously substituting the three residues may result from additive defects in receptor interaction or may involve conformational changes in the loop due to interactions among the mutated residues.

The alpha 3beta 5 Substitutions Compensate for the Instability Caused by the A366S Mutation-- A previously reported limitation of alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S) is its instability (11), due to the A366S mutation, which increases the amount of time alpha s spends in the thermolabile nucleotide-free state (21). To determine whether the greater dominant negative activity of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) compared with alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S) is due in part to a stabilizing effect of the alpha 3beta 5 substitutions, the expression levels of these alpha s constructs in membranes of transfected HEK-293 cells were compared (Fig. 4). The expression level of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5) was similar to that of alpha s, whereas that of alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S) was much lower. The expression level of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) was reduced somewhat relative to that of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5) and of alpha s but was much higher than that of alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S). Thus, the alpha 3beta 5 substitutions appear to counteract the destabilizing effect of A366S.


View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Expression levels of dominant negative alpha s mutant constructs. HEK-293 cells (6.25 × 106) were transfected with 6 µg/106 cells of vector (pcDNAI/Amp) or plasmid encoding alpha s(alpha 3beta 5), alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S), alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S), or alpha s. alpha s(G226A/E268A/A366S) is expressed at much lower levels than alpha s is, whereas the expression level of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) is only slightly reduced relative to that of alpha s. Similar results were obtained in two additional experiments.

alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) Inhibits Signaling of the Calcitonin Receptor to Gs and Gq-- To investigate how dominant negative alpha s activity affects the signaling pathways of Gs-coupled receptors that also interact with other G protein heterotrimers, signaling of the calcitonin receptor to Gs and Gq was monitored in the presence and absence of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S). alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) completely blocked alpha s-mediated cAMP accumulation in response to up to 0.48 nM sCT (Fig. 5A). Even at saturating amounts of sCT, this response was inhibited by 82.3% (S.E. = 0.3%, n = 3). alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) increased the EC50 for stimulation of cAMP accumulation by sCT by a factor of 10 (Table II). As shown previously (9, 31), the calcitonin receptor coupled less efficiently to Gq than to Gs (Fig. 5 and Table II). In the presence of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S), alpha q-dependent inositol phosphate formation in response to all doses of sCT was blocked entirely (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) inhibits signaling from the calcitonin receptor to Gs and Gq. 106 HEK-293 cells were co-transfected with 0.04 µg of plasmid encoding the rabbit C1a calcitonin receptor in pBKCMV (9) and 2 µg of vector (pcDNAI/Amp) (filled circles) or plasmid encoding alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) (open circles). The average receptor number per cell was 282,000 (S.E. = 61,600, n = 3). A, inhibition of receptor-dependent cAMP accumulation by alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S). cAMP accumulation was measured in the absence or presence of the indicated amounts of sCT. B, inhibition of receptor-dependent inositol phosphate (IP) formation by alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S). Inositol phosphate formation was measured in the absence or presence of the indicated amounts of sCT. All values represent the mean ± S.D. from triplicate determinations in a single experiment. Two other experiments gave similar results.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
EC50 values of responses to sCT in HEK-293 cells expressing the calcitonin receptor in the absence or presence of alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S)
EC50 values were determined in three experiments. Each value is the mean ± S.E. IP, inositol phosphate.

The ability of a dominant negative alpha s mutant to block signaling from the calcitonin receptor to both Gs and Gq leads to two conclusions regarding calcitonin receptor-G protein signaling. First, each calcitonin receptor has access to both alpha s and alpha q in transfected HEK-293 cells, suggesting that these alpha  subunits share a common pool of receptors. Second, alpha s can compete with alpha q for binding to the calcitonin receptor.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Combining substitutions in three different regions of alpha s results in dominant negative alpha s activity that can inhibit signaling from Gs-coupled receptors by close to 100%. The substitutions affect distinct alpha s interactions as follows: increasing receptor affinity, decreasing receptor-mediated activation, and decreasing activation of adenylyl cyclase (alpha 3beta 5 substitutions), increasing affinity for beta gamma (G226A), or decreasing affinity for GDP (A366S). Together, these mutations appear to stabilize the nucleotide-free alpha beta gamma -receptor complex. The incremental increases in dominant negative activity that result from combining these mutations are consistent with their independent sites and mechanisms of action. Although the nucleotide-free state, which is increased by the A366S mutation, is inherently unstable, alpha s(alpha 3beta 5/G226A/A366S) is expressed at a level close to that of wild-type alpha s. This is most likely because the increased receptor affinity caused by the alpha 3beta 5 substitutions stabilizes the empty state, which has the highest receptor affinity (32). The alpha 3beta 5 substitutions, on their own, do not affect the nucleotide handling properties of purified alpha s (17).

The ability of dominant negative alpha s activity to block signaling of the calcitonin receptor to multiple G protein pathways suggests that, at least in HEK-293 cells, distinct receptor-G protein complexes are not strictly compartmentalized into separate membrane domains. However, some mechanisms for compartmentalizing distinct receptor-G protein signaling pathways might not be detected using a dominant negative alpha s mutant. For instance, association of receptor subpopulations with distinct beta gamma combinations could restrict potential alpha  subunit interactions. Inactivation of specific G protein subunits using antisense (33-37) and ribozyme (38, 39) strategies has demonstrated a remarkable specificity of interaction between receptors, alpha beta gamma combinations, and effectors. In particular, in HEK-293 cells, ribozyme-mediated suppression of gamma 7 specifically reduced expression of beta 1 and disrupted activation of Gs by beta -adrenergic but not prostaglandin E1 receptors (38). Such beta gamma specificity requirements might be overcome by a dominant negative alpha s mutant with increased affinity for both receptors and beta gamma . In addition, although the ratio of Gs to its receptors in cells is generally ~100:1 (6), factors important for compartmentalization might become limiting when a dominant negative alpha s mutant is overexpressed. If this is so, then coexpressing potential compartmentalization factors with this alpha s mutant would be predicted to narrow the range of its inhibitory capacities.

The effect of dominant negative alpha s activity on other G protein pathways may depend on the cell and/or receptor type. For instance, cell-specific factors such as the caveolins, which have been reported to interact preferentially with particular G protein subunits (3), may restrict the accessibility of G proteins to receptors. HEK-293 cells do not have caveoli, although beta -adrenergic receptors and adenylyl cyclase V/VI localize to low buoyant density membrane domains in these cells (40). In addition, membrane fractionation studies have provided evidence for microdomains in the plasma membranes of neuroblastoma cells (41) and neutrophils (42) that have differences in their G protein content, and polarized epithelial cells differentially sort G protein alpha  subunits (43) and G protein-coupled receptors (44). It will be of interest to use the dominant negative alpha s mutant described here to sort out the potential role of intracellular compartmentalization in regulating G protein signaling pathways in a wide range of cells and tissues.

The ability of a dominant negative alpha s mutant to inhibit signaling to Gq provides a molecular insight into receptor-G protein interactions in that it demonstrates that different types of G proteins can compete for binding to the calcitonin receptor. Previous studies of calcitonin receptor isoforms containing insertions or deletions identified distinct regions important for specific interactions but did not rule out mutually exclusive binding of different alpha  subunits. The first intracellular loop (45-47) and an intact seventh transmembrane helix (9) appear to be important for coupling of this receptor to alpha q but not alpha s. The ability of different G proteins to compete for receptor binding despite these differences in specificity requirements indicates that either there is overlap in the receptor binding sites for different alpha  subunits or that binding of one type of alpha  subunit to a receptor sterically or allosterically blocks the association of a different one.

Competition between different G proteins for receptor binding raises the possibility that changes in the expression level of a particular G protein may affect other G protein signaling pathways as well. Alterations in G protein alpha  subunit expression levels can take place on several time scales. Short term changes in the expression level of alpha s due to decreased stability of the activated state have been observed (48). More long term changes in the expression levels of alpha s (49) and alpha i2 (50) can occur during and play a role in development. In addition, pseudohypoparathyroidism is associated with decreased levels of functional alpha s (51).

The dominant negative alpha s mutant described here will have many applications to the investigation of how receptor-G protein signaling is regulated. In cell types for which there is strong evidence of subcellular compartmentalization, such as neurons and polarized epithelia, it may inhibit receptor subpopulations and be useful for determining which proteins coexist in the same membrane microdomains. In addition, it can be used to investigate the role of receptor-G protein interactions in the targeting of these proteins. For instance, if receptors are involved in the targeting of G protein subunits, receptor sequestration by a dominant negative alpha  subunit may alter the localization patterns of wild-type subunits. The localization patterns of dominant negative alpha  subunits as well as those of wild-type G protein subunits and receptors can be studied using fusions of these proteins to green fluorescent protein (52-55).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I thank Thomas Hynes for helpful discussions and critical reading of the text.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM50369 and American Heart Association Established Investigator Grant 9740043N.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 203-785-3202; Fax: 203-785-4951; E-mail: catherine.berlot@yale.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201330200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; sCT, salmon calcitonin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Neubig, R. R. (1994) FASEB J. 8, 939-946[Abstract]
2. Neubig, R. R. (1998) Semin. Neurosci. 9, 189-197[CrossRef]
3. Oh, P., and Schnitzer, J. E. (2001) Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 685-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Moffett, S., Brown, D. A., and Linder, M. E. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 2191-2198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Daaka, Y., Luttrell, L. M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1997) Nature 390, 88-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Ostrom, R. S., Post, S. R., and Insel, P. A. (2000) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 294, 407-412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Graeser, D., and Neubig, R. R. (1993) Mol. Pharmacol. 43, 434-443[Abstract]
8. Simmons, M. A., and Mather, R. J. (1991) J. Neurosci. 11, 2130-2134[Abstract]
9. Shyu, J. F., Inoue, D., Baron, R., and Horne, W. C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31127-31134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Wade, S. M., Lim, W. K., Lan, K. L., Chung, D. A., Nanamori, M., and Neubig, R. R. (1999) Mol. Pharmacol. 56, 1005-10013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Iiri, T., Bell, S. M., Baranski, T. J., Fujita, T., and Bourne, H. R. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 499-504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Skoglund, G., Hussain, M. A., and Holz, G. G. (2000) Diabetes 49, 1156-1164[Abstract]
13. Vezza, R., Rokach, J., and FitzGerald, G. A. (2001) Mol. Pharmacol. 59, 1506-1513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Yu, B., and Simon, M. I. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30183-30188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Yu, B., Gu, L., and Simon, M. I. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 71-76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Gilchrist, A., Vanhauwe, J. F., Li, A., Thomas, T. O., Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T., and Hamm, H. E. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 25672-25679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Grishina, G., and Berlot, C. H. (2000) Mol. Pharmacol. 57, 1081-1092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Berlot, C. H., and Bourne, H. R. (1992) Cell 68, 911-922[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Miller, R. T., Masters, S. B., Sullivan, K. A., Beiderman, B., and Bourne, H. R. (1988) Nature 334, 712-715[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Lee, E., Taussig, R., and Gilman, A. G. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 1212-1218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Iiri, T., Herzmark, P., Nakamoto, J. M., Van Dop, C., and Bourne, H. R. (1994) Nature 371, 164-168[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Jones, D. T., and Reed, R. R. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 14241-14249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Grussenmeyer, T., Scheidtmann, K. H., Hutchinson, M. A., Eckhart, W., and Walter, G. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 7952-7954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Medina, R., Grishina, G., Meloni, E. G., Muth, T. R., and Berlot, C. H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 24720-24727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. McFarland, K. C., Sprengel, R., Phillips, H. S., Kohler, M., Rosemblit, N., Nikolics, K., Segaloff, D. L., and Seeburg, P. H. (1989) Science 245, 494-499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Kosugi, S., Mori, T., and Shenker, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 31813-31817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Min, L., and Ascoli, M. (2000) Mol. Endocrinol. 14, 1797-1810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R. E., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Smith, J. A., Seidman, J. G., and Struhl, K. (eds) (1987) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , pp. 9.2.1-9.2.6, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
29. Sunahara, R. K., Tesmer, J. J. G., Gilman, A. G., and Sprang, S. R. (1997) Science 278, 1943-1947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Iiri, T., Farfel, Z., and Bourne, H. R. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 5656-5661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Chabre, O., Conklin, B. R., Lin, H. Y., Lodish, H. F., Wilson, E., Ives, H. E., Catanzariti, L., Hemmings, B. A., and Bourne, H. R. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 551-556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. De Lean, A., Stadel, M., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 7108-7117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Kleuss, C., Hescheler, J., Ewel, C., Rosenthal, W., Schultz, G., and Wittig, B. (1991) Nature 353, 43-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Kleuss, C., Scherubl, H., Hescheler, J., Schultz, G., and Wittig, B. (1992) Nature 358, 424-426[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Kleuss, C., Scherubl, H., Hescheler, J., Schultz, G., and Wittig, B. (1993) Science 259, 832-834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Macrez-Lepretre, N., Kalkbrenner, F., Morel, J. L., Schultz, G., and Mironneau, J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 10095-10102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Dippel, E., Kalkbrenner, F., Wittig, B., and Schultz, G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1391-1396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Wang, Q., Mullah, B., Hansen, C., Asundi, J., and Robishaw, J. D. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26040-26048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Wang, Q., Mullah, B. K., and Robishaw, J. D. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 17365-17371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Rybin, V. O., Xu, X., Lisanti, M. P., and Steinberg, S. F. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 41447-41457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Ott, S., Costa, T., and Herz, A. (1989) J. Neurochem. 52, 619-626[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Jesaitis, A. J., Tolley, J. O., Bokoch, G. M., and Allen, R. A. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 109, 2783-2790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Stow, J. L., Sabolic, I., and Brown, D. (1991) Am. J. Physiol. 261, F831-F840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Saunders, C., Keefer, J. R., Kennedy, A. P., Wells, J. N., and Limbird, L. E. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 995-1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Moore, E. E., Kuestner, R. E., Stroop, S. D., Grant, F. J., Matthewes, S. L., Brady, C. L., Sexton, P. M., and Findlay, D. M. (1995) Mol. Endocrinol. 9, 959-968[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Gorn, A. H., Rudolph, S. M., Flannery, M. R., Morton, C. C., Weremowicz, S., Wang, T. Z., Krane, S. M., and Goldring, S. R. (1995) J. Clin. Invest. 95, 2680-2691[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Nussenzveig, D. R., Thaw, C. N., and Gershengorn, M. C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28123-28129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Levis, M. J., and Bourne, H. R. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 1297-1307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Wang, H.-Y., Watkins, D. C., and Malbon, C. C. (1992) Nature 358, 334-337[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Watkins, D. C., Johnson, G. L., and Malbon, C. C. (1992) Science 258, 1373-1375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
51. Levine, M. A., Downs, R. W., Jr., Moses, A. M., Breslau, N. A., Marx, S. J., Lasker, R. D., Rizzoli, R. E., Aurbach, G. D., and Spiegel, A. M. (1983) Am. J. Med. 74, 545-556[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Kallal, L., and Benovic, J. L. (2000) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 21, 175-180[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Jin, T., Zhang, N., Long, Y., Parent, C. A., and Devreotes, P. N. (2000) Science 287, 1034-1036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Hughes, T. E., Zhang, H., Logothetis, D. E., and Berlot, C. H. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 4227-4235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Janetopoulos, C., Jin, T., and Devreotes, P. (2001) Science 291, 2408-2411[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. D. White, M. Coetsee, K. Morgan, C. A. Flanagan, R. P. Millar, and Z.-L. Lu
A Crucial Role for G{alpha}q/11, But Not G{alpha}i/o or G{alpha}s, in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor-Mediated Cell Growth Inhibition
Mol. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 22(11): 2520 - 2530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Okazaki, S. Ferrandon, J.-P. Vilardaga, M. L. Bouxsein, J. T. Potts Jr, and T. J. Gardella
Prolonged signaling at the parathyroid hormone receptor by peptide ligands targeted to a specific receptor conformation
PNAS, October 28, 2008; 105(43): 16525 - 16530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. R. Zurita and L. Birnbaumer
The same mutation in Gs{alpha} and transducin {alpha} reveals behavioral differences between these highly homologous G protein {alpha}-subunits
PNAS, February 19, 2008; 105(7): 2363 - 2368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
T. Dean, J.-P. Vilardaga, J. T. Potts Jr., and T. J. Gardella
Altered Selectivity of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) and PTH-Related Protein (PTHrP) for Distinct Conformations of the PTH/PTHrP Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 22(1): 156 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
M. Nakamura, B. Han, T. Nishishita, Y. Bai, and K. Kakudo
Calcitonin targets extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway in human cancers
J. Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 39(6): 375 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
O. G. Chepurny and G. G. Holz
A Novel Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Responsive Luciferase Reporter Incorporating a Nonpalindromic Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Response Element Provides Optimal Performance for Use in G Protein Coupled Receptor Drug Discovery Efforts
J Biomol Screen, August 1, 2007; 12(5): 740 - 746.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Tanaka, K. Ishii, K. Kasai, S. O. Yoon, and Y. Saeki
Neural Expression of G Protein-coupled Receptors GPR3, GPR6, and GPR12 Up-regulates Cyclic AMP Levels and Promotes Neurite Outgrowth
J. Biol. Chem., April 6, 2007; 282(14): 10506 - 10515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
S. Lariviere, G. Garrel, V. Simon, J.-W. Soh, J.-N. Laverriere, R. Counis, and J. Cohen-Tannoudji
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Couples to 3',5'-Cyclic Adenosine-5'-Monophosphate Pathway through Novel Protein Kinase C{delta} and -{epsilon} in L{beta}T2 Gonadotrope Cells
Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 1099 - 1107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Dean, A. Khatri, Z. Potetinova, G. E. Willick, and T. J. Gardella
Role of Amino Acid Side Chains in Region 17-31 of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) in Binding to the PTH Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., October 27, 2006; 281(43): 32485 - 32495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Pereira and R. A. Cerione
A Switch 3 Point Mutation in the {alpha} Subunit of Transducin Yields a Unique Dominant-negative Inhibitor
J. Biol. Chem., October 21, 2005; 280(42): 35696 - 35703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. A. Vortherms, C. H. Nguyen, C. H. Berlot, and V. J. Watts
Using Molecular Tools to Dissect the Role of G{alpha}s in Sensitization of AC1
Mol. Pharmacol., December 1, 2004; 66(6): 1617 - 1624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. H. Cleator, R. Ravenell, D. T. Kurtz, and J. D. Hildebrandt
A Dominant Negative G{alpha}s Mutant That Prevents Thyroid-stimulating Hormone Receptor Activation of cAMP Production and Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Turnover: COMPETITION BY DIFFERENT G PROTEINS FOR ACTIVATION BY A COMMON RECEPTOR
J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36601 - 36607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-L. Wu, S. B. Hooks, T. K. Harden, and H. G. Dohlman
Dominant-negative Inhibition of Pheromone Receptor Signaling by a Single Point Mutation in the G Protein {alpha} Subunit
J. Biol. Chem., August 20, 2004; 279(34): 35287 - 35297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
A. A. Roy, K. E. Lemberg, and P. Chidiac
Recruitment of RGS2 and RGS4 to the Plasma Membrane by G Proteins and Receptors Reflects Functional Interactions
Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2003; 64(3): 587 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/23/21080    most recent
M201330200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berlot, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berlot, C. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement