|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201330200 on April 1, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 21080-21085, June 7, 2002
A Highly Effective Dominant Negative s Construct
Containing Mutations That Affect Distinct Functions Inhibits
Multiple Gs-coupled Receptor Signaling Pathways*
Catherine H.
Berlot
From the Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale
University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8026
Received for publication, February 8, 2002, and in revised form, March 27, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
To investigate the subcellular organization of
receptor-G protein signaling pathways, a robust dominant negative
s mutant containing substitutions that alter
distinct functions was produced and tested for its effects on
Gs-coupled receptor activity in HEK-293 cells. Mutations in
the 3 5 loop region, which increase receptor affinity,
decrease receptor-mediated activation, and impair activation of
adenylyl cyclase, were combined with G226A, which increases affinity
for  , and A366S, which decreases affinity for GDP. This triple
s mutant can inhibit signaling to Gs from the luteinizing hormone receptor by 97% and from the calcitonin receptor by 100%. In addition, this s mutant blocks all
signaling from the calcitonin receptor to Gq. These results
lead to two conclusions about receptor-G protein signaling. First,
individual receptors have access to multiple types of G proteins in
HEK-293 cell membranes. Second, different G protein subunits can
compete with each other for binding to the same receptor. This dominant negative s construct will be useful for determining
interrelationships among distinct receptor-G protein interactions in a
wide variety of cells and tissues.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Stimulation of heterotrimeric G proteins by cell surface receptors
activates signaling pathways that mediate specific responses to
hormones and neurotransmitters. Cells express a wide variety of G
protein-coupled receptors as well as numerous G protein , , and
subunits. Many receptors can activate more than one type of G
protein, and the G protein subunits can interact with many different
types of receptors. The manner in which signaling specificity is
maintained in the midst of this vast range of potential interactions is
not well understood. This report investigates the interdependence of
distinct signaling pathways activated by receptors with broad G protein
specificities using a receptor-sequestering dominant negative G protein
subunit.
Many potential mechanisms could establish that distinct receptor-G
protein interactions will be independent of each other. Among these,
one possibility is that specific receptor-G protein complexes localize
to separate membrane compartments (1, 2). Differential associations
with particular proteins or lipids (3, 4) or covalent modifications
such as phosphorylation (5) may result in subpopulations of receptors
and G proteins that have restricted access to each other. Although G
proteins are often expressed at much higher levels than their receptors
are (6), there is evidence that different receptors utilize separate pools of G proteins (7, 8). An alternative potential mechanism for
isolating distinct receptor-G protein interactions is that receptors
utilize separate regions for binding different G proteins. If this is
the case, then multiple types of receptor-G protein interaction can
occur simultaneously without affecting each other. Localization of G
protein-binding sites have indicated that separate receptor regions may
specify interactions with distinct G proteins (9, 10).
Dominant negative G protein subunits can test potential mechanisms
for separating the distinct G protein interactions of broad specificity
receptors. For instance, if interactions with different G proteins are
localized to separate subcellular compartments and/or receptor regions,
signaling from a receptor to one type of G protein subunit will be
blocked by a dominant negative version of that subunit, whereas the
other signaling pathways will be unperturbed. Alternatively, if each
receptor has access to multiple types of G protein and these different
G proteins can compete with each other for receptor binding, then a
dominant negative subunit will block all of the G protein signaling
pathways activated by the receptor.
Several dominant negative G protein subunits have been developed
previously, but they inhibit G protein signaling incompletely and
therefore are not optimal for investigating receptor-G protein signaling pathways. One dominant negative s mutant
contains three substitutions that disrupt different subunit
functions, but it is extremely unstable (11), which contributes to its
inability to inhibit signaling completely (12, 13). Xanthine-binding mutants of o, 11, and
16 can inhibit signaling of specific G protein-coupled
receptor families, but inhibition of receptor-mediated phospholipase C
stimulation is incomplete (14, 15). subunit carboxyl-terminal
fragments exhibit dominant negative activity (16), but inhibition of
Gs signaling is only partial (13).
This report describes the development of a highly effective dominant
negative s mutant that contains substitutions that alter distinct subunit functions, each of which should stabilize the receptor-bound, nucleotide-free state of Gs. One set of
mutations, located in the 3 5 loop region, specifically increases
receptor affinity and decreases receptor-mediated activation without
affecting nucleotide handling (17) and also disrupts activation of
adenylyl cyclase (18). G226A increases affinity for  (19, 20), and A366S decreases affinity for GDP (21). Although A366S alone causes
s to be thermolabile,
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S), containing all three sets of
mutations, is expressed at close to wild-type levels and blocks
signaling from the luteinizing hormone receptor to Gs by up
to 97%. The effects of s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) on
signaling by the calcitonin receptor to Gs and
Gq are tested in transiently transfected HEK-293 cells. The
results demonstrate that this dominant negative s mutant
can block multiple G protein signaling pathways, which indicates that
each receptor has access to multiple types of G protein and that these
G proteins can compete with each other for receptor binding.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Construction of s Mutant
Constructs--
s mutant constructs in the expression
vector pcDNAI/Amp (Invitrogen) were generated from the rat
s cDNA (22) containing the EE epitope (23), which
was generated by mutating s residues DYVPSD (residues 189-194)
to EYMPTE. Mutations were
generated by oligonucleotide-directed in vitro mutagenesis
using the Bio-Rad Muta-Gene kit except for those in the 3 5
region, which were produced by subcloning mutagenic
oligodeoxynucleotide cassettes. Subcloning and mutagenesis procedures
were verified by restriction enzyme analysis and DNA sequencing.
Transient Expression and Assays for cAMP Accumulation and
Inositol Phosphate Formation--
HEK-293 cells (ATCC, CRL-1573)
(106 per 60-mm dish) were transfected with plasmids as
described in the figure legends using 10 µl of LipofectAMINE 2000 Reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
24 h after transfection, the cells were replated in 24-well plates
and labeled with either [3H]adenine or
[3H]inositol.
After an additional 24 h, intracellular cAMP levels in cells
labeled with [3H]adenine and inositol phosphate levels in
cells labeled with [3H]inositol were determined as
described previously (24). cAMP accumulation was measured in the
presence of 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine and in the presence or absence
of agonist as indicated in the figure legends. Inositol phosphate
formation was measured in the presence of 5 mM LiCl and in
the presence or absence of agonist as indicated in the figure legends.
The cells were cultured and assayed at 37 °C.
To determine EC50 values for stimulation of cAMP or
inositol phosphate formation, the observed activity was fitted to
Equation 1,
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where X is the concentration of agonist; Y
is the observed cAMP or inositol phosphate formation; a is
the cAMP or inositol phosphate formation observed in the absence of
agonist; b is the maximum observed cAMP or inositol
phosphate formation; c is the half-maximal effective
concentration (EC50) of the agonist; and d is
the slope factor.
Transient Expression and Assays for Ligand Binding--
HEK-293
cells (6.25 × 106 per 150-mm dish) were transfected
with 0.2 µg/106 cells of plasmid encoding the rat
luteinizing hormone receptor in pCIS (25) or 0.04 µg/106
cells of plasmid encoding the rabbit C1a calcitonin receptor in pBKCMV
(9) and 2 µg/106 cells of vector (pcDNAI/Amp) using
62.5 µl of LipofectAMINE 2000 Reagent. 24 h after transfection,
the cells were replated in 24-well plates. Assays for ligand binding
were performed after an additional 24 h.
Receptor numbers per cell were determined by fitting data from
saturation binding assays using 125I-labeled
hCG1 (26, 27) or sCT (9) to
Equation 2,
|
(Eq. 2)
|
where X is the concentration of agonist; Y
is the specific binding; Bmax is the maximum
number of binding sites, and Kd is the equilibrium
dissociation constant. In each case, the medium was removed, and the
cells were washed once with binding medium (20 mM
HEPES-buffered minimal essential medium with Earle's salts without
bicarbonate containing 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). The medium was
then removed and replaced with binding medium containing 0.062-15
nM 125I-labeled hCG in the presence or absence
of 0.44 µM unlabeled hCG or 0.030-15 nM
125I-labeled sCT in the presence or absence of 1 µM unlabeled sCT. The cells were incubated for 1 h
at room temperature, washed three times with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline, and solubilized with 0.5 N
NaOH. The samples were collected and counted in a gamma counter.
Membrane Preparations and Immunoblots--
HEK-293 cells
(6.25 × 106 per 150-mm dish) were transfected with
37.5 µg of plasmid using DEAE-dextran (28). 48 h after
transfection, membranes were prepared as described (24). 25 µg of
membrane proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (10%), transferred to
nitrocellulose, and probed with a monoclonal antibody to the EE epitope
(23). The antigen-antibody complexes were detected using an anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase-linked antibody according to the ECL Western blotting protocol (Amersham Biosciences).
 |
RESULTS |
Combining Substitutions in the 3 5 Loop Region of
s with Mutations That Alter  and GDP Binding
Results in Highly Effective Dominant Negative Activity--
Replacing
five s residues in the 3 helix and the 3 5 loop
(29) with the homologous i2 residues (N271K, K274D,
R280K, T284D, and I285T) results in an s construct,
s( 3 5), that exhibits increased affinity for and a
decreased ability to be activated by the 2-adrenergic
receptor (17). Independently, the mutations also disrupt activation of
adenylyl cyclase by s (18). These properties suggested
that s( 3 5) might be able to sequester Gs-coupled receptors and exhibit dominant negative
activity. Indeed, when s( 3 5) was transiently
expressed in HEK-293 cells that were co-transfected with plasmid
encoding the luteinizing hormone receptor, cAMP accumulation in
response to 20 ng/ml hCG was inhibited by 42% (S.E. = 3%,
n = 3) (Fig. 1).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Combining mutations in the
3 5 region with mutations
that inhibit  dissociation and
increase GDP dissociation results in an
s mutant that can block receptor
signaling by 97%. For each data point, 106 HEK-293
cells were transfected with 0.2 µg of plasmid encoding the rat
luteinizing hormone receptor in pCIS (25) and 2 µg of vector
(pcDNAI/Amp) or plasmid encoding one of the indicated constructs.
The average receptor number per cell was 8,400 (S.E. = 370, n = 3). cAMP accumulation was measured in the absence
(dark gray bars) or presence (light gray bars) of
20 ng/ml hCG (CR-127, National Hormone and Peptide Program). All values
represent the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments
performed in triplicate.
|
|
With the goal of producing more effective dominant negative activity,
additional mutations predicted to stabilize the receptor-G protein
complex were introduced into s in combination with the 3 5 substitutions. The effects of adding each of three mutations, G226A, E268A, and A366S, to s( 3 5) were tested.
When combined, these three mutations produce partial dominant negative
activity in s (11). G226A impairs activating
conformational changes in switch II required for dissociation of
s from  (19, 20). E268A disrupts a salt bridge
with Arg-231 that may stabilize the activated conformation of
s (30). A366S elevates basal GDP release, causing
s to be constitutively activated and to spend more time
in the empty state (21). s(G226A/E268A/A366S) inhibited cAMP accumulation in response to 20 ng/ml hCG by 69% (S.E. = 1%, n = 3) (Fig. 1).
When introduced into s( 3 5), both G226A and A366S
produced increased dominant negative activity (Fig. 1).
s( 3 5/G226A) inhibited the cAMP response to 20 ng/ml hCG by 74% (S.E. = 2%, n = 3), whereas
s( 3 5/A366S) inhibited the response by 61% (S.E. = 2%, n = 3). In addition,
s( 3 5/A366S) increased basal cAMP stimulation,
consistent with the elevating effect of A366S on GDP release (21). In
contrast, s( 3 5/E268A) exhibited the same dominant
negative activity as s( 3 5) did (Fig. 1). Combining the two mutations that increased the dominant negative activity of
s( 3 5), G226A and A366S, with the 3 5
substitutions resulted in a highly effective dominant negative
s construct that inhibited the cAMP accumulation
response to 20 ng/ml hCG by 97% (S.E. = 0.2%, n = 3)
(Fig. 1). No further increase in dominant negative activity resulted
when the E268A substitution was added to
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) (Fig. 1).
The dominant negative s mutants,
s( 3 5), s(G226A/E268A/A366S), and
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S), decreased the effectiveness of signaling from the luteinizing hormone receptor to Gs both
by increasing the EC50 value of the cAMP response to hCG
and by decreasing the magnitude of cAMP responses to hCG (Fig.
2 and Table I). Compared with
s( 3 5) and
s(G226A/E268A/A366S), the
effects of s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) on both of these
parameters were greater. These incremental effects of combining the
3 5, G226A, and A366S mutations are consistent with their
independent sites and mechanisms of action.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S)
causes greater inhibition of the cAMP response to luteinizing hormone
receptor stimulation than
s(G226A/E268A/A366S) and
s( 3 5)
do. For each data point, 106 HEK-293 cells were
transfected with 0.2 µg of plasmid encoding the luteinizing hormone
receptor and 2 µg of vector (pcDNAI/Amp), or plasmid encoding
s(G226A/E268A/A366S), s( 3 5), or
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S). cAMP accumulation was measured
in the absence or presence of the indicated amounts of hCG. All values
represent the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments
performed in triplicate.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
EC50 values and percent inhibition of cAMP responses to hCG in
HEK-293 cells expressing the luteinizing hormone receptor in the
absence or presence of s mutants
Values were determined in three experiments. Each value is the
mean ± S.E.
|
|
Substitutions in the 3 5 Loop Rather Than in the 3 Helix
Produce Dominant Negative Activity--
To investigate how altering
the 3 5 loop region of s produces dominant negative
activity, the effects of smaller numbers of substitutions in this
region were tested. Of the five i2 homolog substitutions, two are located in the 3 helix (N271K and K274D) and
three (R280K, T284D, and I285T) are in the 3 5 loop. Based on
their location, only the loop residues are likely to interact directly
with receptors (17). Separately testing the effects of substitutions in
these two regions showed that the dominant negative effect is due
predominantly to the substitutions in the 3 5 loop, rather than
those in the 3 helix (Fig. 3).
s(R280K/T284D/I285T) was only slightly less effective as
a dominant negative than s( 3 5) was, whereas
s(N271K/K274D) exhibited the same basal and
receptor-stimulated cAMP accumulation as s did.
Therefore, the dominant negative phenotype of
s( 3 5) appears to result from the alteration of a
receptor contact site on s.

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Mutations in the
3 5 loop rather than
the 3 helix of
s produce dominant negative
activity. For each data point, 106 HEK-293 cells were
transfected with 0.2 µg of plasmid encoding the luteinizing hormone
receptor and 2 µg of vector (pcDNAI/Amp) or plasmid encoding one
of the indicated constructs. cAMP accumulation was measured in the
absence (dark gray bars) or presence (light gray
bars) of 20 ng/ml hCG. s(R280K/T284D/I285T),
containing mutations in the 3 5 loop, exhibits dominant negative
activity, whereas s(N271K/K274D), containing mutations
in the 3 helix, exhibits normal basal and receptor-mediated
activation. All values represent the mean ± S.E. of three
independent experiments performed in triplicate.
|
|
Individual substitutions of each of the 3 5 loop residues
decreased receptor-mediated activation of s but did not
produce dominant negative activity (Fig. 3). s(R280K)
exhibited very little basal or receptor-stimulated activity, whereas
the activities of s(T284D) and s(I285T)
were decreased relative to that of s. The dominant
negative activity produced by simultaneously substituting the three
residues may result from additive defects in receptor interaction or
may involve conformational changes in the loop due to interactions
among the mutated residues.
The 3 5 Substitutions Compensate for the Instability Caused by
the A366S Mutation--
A previously reported limitation of
s(G226A/E268A/A366S) is its instability (11), due to the
A366S mutation, which increases the amount of time s
spends in the thermolabile nucleotide-free state (21). To determine
whether the greater dominant negative activity of
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) compared with
s(G226A/E268A/A366S) is due in part to a stabilizing
effect of the 3 5 substitutions, the expression levels of these
s constructs in membranes of transfected HEK-293 cells
were compared (Fig. 4). The expression
level of s( 3 5) was similar to that of
s, whereas that of s(G226A/E268A/A366S) was much lower. The expression level of
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) was reduced somewhat relative to
that of s( 3 5) and of s but was much
higher than that of s(G226A/E268A/A366S). Thus, the
3 5 substitutions appear to counteract the destabilizing effect of A366S.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Expression levels of dominant negative
s mutant constructs. HEK-293 cells
(6.25 × 106) were transfected with 6 µg/106 cells of vector (pcDNAI/Amp) or plasmid
encoding s( 3 5),
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S),
s(G226A/E268A/A366S), or s.
s(G226A/E268A/A366S) is expressed at much lower levels
than s is, whereas the expression level of
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) is only slightly reduced
relative to that of s. Similar results were obtained in
two additional experiments.
|
|
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) Inhibits Signaling of the
Calcitonin Receptor to Gs and Gq--
To
investigate how dominant negative s activity affects the
signaling pathways of Gs-coupled receptors that also
interact with other G protein heterotrimers, signaling of the
calcitonin receptor to Gs and Gq was monitored
in the presence and absence of s( 3 5/G226A/A366S).
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) completely blocked s-mediated cAMP accumulation in response to up to 0.48 nM sCT (Fig. 5A).
Even at saturating amounts of sCT, this response was inhibited by
82.3% (S.E. = 0.3%, n = 3).
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) increased the EC50
for stimulation of cAMP accumulation by sCT by a factor of 10 (Table
II). As shown previously (9, 31), the
calcitonin receptor coupled less efficiently to Gq than to Gs (Fig. 5 and Table II). In the presence of
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S), q-dependent inositol phosphate formation in
response to all doses of sCT was blocked entirely (Fig.
5B).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S)
inhibits signaling from the calcitonin receptor to Gs and
Gq. 106 HEK-293
cells were co-transfected with 0.04 µg of plasmid encoding the rabbit
C1a calcitonin receptor in pBKCMV (9) and 2 µg of vector
(pcDNAI/Amp) (filled circles) or plasmid encoding
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) (open circles). The
average receptor number per cell was 282,000 (S.E. = 61,600, n = 3). A, inhibition of
receptor-dependent cAMP accumulation by
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S). cAMP accumulation was measured
in the absence or presence of the indicated amounts of sCT.
B, inhibition of receptor-dependent inositol
phosphate (IP) formation by
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S). Inositol phosphate formation
was measured in the absence or presence of the indicated amounts of
sCT. All values represent the mean ± S.D. from triplicate
determinations in a single experiment. Two other experiments gave
similar results.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
EC50 values of responses to sCT in HEK-293 cells expressing the
calcitonin receptor in the absence or presence of
s( 3 5/G226A/A366S)
EC50 values were determined in three experiments. Each value is
the mean ± S.E. IP, inositol phosphate.
|
|
The ability of a dominant negative s mutant to block
signaling from the calcitonin receptor to both Gs and
Gq leads to two conclusions regarding calcitonin receptor-G
protein signaling. First, each calcitonin receptor has access to both
s and q in transfected HEK-293 cells,
suggesting that these subunits share a common pool of receptors.
Second, s can compete with q for binding
to the calcitonin receptor.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Combining substitutions in three different regions of
s results in dominant negative s activity
that can inhibit signaling from Gs-coupled receptors by
close to 100%. The substitutions affect distinct s
interactions as follows: increasing receptor affinity, decreasing
receptor-mediated activation, and decreasing activation of adenylyl
cyclase ( 3 5 substitutions), increasing affinity for 
(G226A), or decreasing affinity for GDP (A366S). Together, these
mutations appear to stabilize the nucleotide-free   -receptor
complex. The incremental increases in dominant negative activity that
result from combining these mutations are consistent with their
independent sites and mechanisms of action. Although the
nucleotide-free state, which is increased by the A366S mutation, is
inherently unstable, s( 3 5/G226A/A366S) is
expressed at a level close to that of wild-type s. This
is most likely because the increased receptor affinity caused by the
3 5 substitutions stabilizes the empty state, which has the
highest receptor affinity (32). The 3 5 substitutions, on their
own, do not affect the nucleotide handling properties of purified
s (17).
The ability of dominant negative s activity to block
signaling of the calcitonin receptor to multiple G protein pathways suggests that, at least in HEK-293 cells, distinct receptor-G protein
complexes are not strictly compartmentalized into separate membrane
domains. However, some mechanisms for compartmentalizing distinct
receptor-G protein signaling pathways might not be detected using a
dominant negative s mutant. For instance, association of
receptor subpopulations with distinct  combinations could restrict potential subunit interactions. Inactivation of specific G
protein subunits using antisense (33-37) and ribozyme (38, 39)
strategies has demonstrated a remarkable specificity of interaction
between receptors,   combinations, and effectors. In
particular, in HEK-293 cells, ribozyme-mediated suppression of
7 specifically reduced expression of
1 and disrupted activation of Gs by
-adrenergic but not prostaglandin E1 receptors (38). Such  specificity requirements might be overcome by a dominant negative s mutant with increased affinity for both
receptors and  . In addition, although the ratio of Gs
to its receptors in cells is generally ~100:1 (6), factors important
for compartmentalization might become limiting when a dominant negative
s mutant is overexpressed. If this is so, then
coexpressing potential compartmentalization factors with this
s mutant would be predicted to narrow the range of its
inhibitory capacities.
The effect of dominant negative s activity on other G
protein pathways may depend on the cell and/or receptor type. For
instance, cell-specific factors such as the caveolins, which have been
reported to interact preferentially with particular G protein subunits (3), may restrict the accessibility of G proteins to receptors. HEK-293
cells do not have caveoli, although -adrenergic receptors and
adenylyl cyclase V/VI localize to low buoyant density membrane domains
in these cells (40). In addition, membrane fractionation studies have
provided evidence for microdomains in the plasma membranes of
neuroblastoma cells (41) and neutrophils (42) that have differences in
their G protein content, and polarized epithelial cells differentially
sort G protein subunits (43) and G protein-coupled receptors (44).
It will be of interest to use the dominant negative s
mutant described here to sort out the potential role of intracellular
compartmentalization in regulating G protein signaling pathways in a
wide range of cells and tissues.
The ability of a dominant negative s mutant to inhibit
signaling to Gq provides a molecular insight into
receptor-G protein interactions in that it demonstrates that different
types of G proteins can compete for binding to the calcitonin receptor.
Previous studies of calcitonin receptor isoforms containing
insertions or deletions identified distinct regions important for
specific interactions but did not rule out mutually exclusive binding
of different subunits. The first intracellular loop (45-47) and an
intact seventh transmembrane helix (9) appear to be important for
coupling of this receptor to q but not s.
The ability of different G proteins to compete for receptor binding
despite these differences in specificity requirements indicates that
either there is overlap in the receptor binding sites for different subunits or that binding of one type of subunit to a receptor sterically or allosterically blocks the association of a different one.
Competition between different G proteins for receptor binding raises
the possibility that changes in the expression level of a particular G
protein may affect other G protein signaling pathways as well.
Alterations in G protein subunit expression levels can take place
on several time scales. Short term changes in the expression level of
s due to decreased stability of the activated state have
been observed (48). More long term changes in the expression levels of
s (49) and i2 (50) can occur during and
play a role in development. In addition, pseudohypoparathyroidism is
associated with decreased levels of functional s
(51).
The dominant negative s mutant described here will have
many applications to the investigation of how receptor-G protein signaling is regulated. In cell types for which there is strong evidence of subcellular compartmentalization, such as neurons and
polarized epithelia, it may inhibit receptor subpopulations and be
useful for determining which proteins coexist in the same membrane
microdomains. In addition, it can be used to investigate the role of
receptor-G protein interactions in the targeting of these proteins. For
instance, if receptors are involved in the targeting of G protein
subunits, receptor sequestration by a dominant negative subunit may
alter the localization patterns of wild-type subunits. The localization
patterns of dominant negative subunits as well as those of
wild-type G protein subunits and receptors can be studied using fusions
of these proteins to green fluorescent protein (52-55).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
I thank Thomas Hynes for helpful discussions
and critical reading of the text.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM50369 and American Heart Association Established Investigator Grant 9740043N.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 203-785-3202;
Fax: 203-785-4951; E-mail: catherine.berlot@yale.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 1, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201330200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
hCG, human chorionic
gonadotropin;
sCT, salmon calcitonin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Neubig, R. R.
(1994)
FASEB J.
8,
939-946[Abstract]
|
| 2.
|
Neubig, R. R.
(1998)
Semin. Neurosci.
9,
189-197[CrossRef]
|
| 3.
|
Oh, P.,
and Schnitzer, J. E.
(2001)
Mol. Biol. Cell
12,
685-698[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Moffett, S.,
Brown, D. A.,
and Linder, M. E.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
2191-2198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Daaka, Y.,
Luttrell, L. M.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1997)
Nature
390,
88-91[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Ostrom, R. S.,
Post, S. R.,
and Insel, P. A.
(2000)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
294,
407-412[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Graeser, D.,
and Neubig, R. R.
(1993)
Mol. Pharmacol.
43,
434-443[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Simmons, M. A.,
and Mather, R. J.
(1991)
J. Neurosci.
11,
2130-2134[Abstract]
|
| 9.
|
Shyu, J. F.,
Inoue, D.,
Baron, R.,
and Horne, W. C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31127-31134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Wade, S. M.,
Lim, W. K.,
Lan, K. L.,
Chung, D. A.,
Nanamori, M.,
and Neubig, R. R.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
56,
1005-10013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Iiri, T.,
Bell, S. M.,
Baranski, T. J.,
Fujita, T.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
499-504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Skoglund, G.,
Hussain, M. A.,
and Holz, G. G.
(2000)
Diabetes
49,
1156-1164[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Vezza, R.,
Rokach, J.,
and FitzGerald, G. A.
(2001)
Mol. Pharmacol.
59,
1506-1513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Yu, B.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
30183-30188[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Yu, B., Gu, L.,
and Simon, M. I.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
71-76[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Gilchrist, A.,
Vanhauwe, J. F., Li, A.,
Thomas, T. O.,
Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T.,
and Hamm, H. E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
25672-25679[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Grishina, G.,
and Berlot, C. H.
(2000)
Mol. Pharmacol.
57,
1081-1092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Berlot, C. H.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1992)
Cell
68,
911-922[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Miller, R. T.,
Masters, S. B.,
Sullivan, K. A.,
Beiderman, B.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1988)
Nature
334,
712-715[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Lee, E.,
Taussig, R.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1212-1218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Iiri, T.,
Herzmark, P.,
Nakamoto, J. M.,
Van Dop, C.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1994)
Nature
371,
164-168[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Jones, D. T.,
and Reed, R. R.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
14241-14249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Grussenmeyer, T.,
Scheidtmann, K. H.,
Hutchinson, M. A.,
Eckhart, W.,
and Walter, G.
(1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
82,
7952-7954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Medina, R.,
Grishina, G.,
Meloni, E. G.,
Muth, T. R.,
and Berlot, C. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24720-24727[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
McFarland, K. C.,
Sprengel, R.,
Phillips, H. S.,
Kohler, M.,
Rosemblit, N.,
Nikolics, K.,
Segaloff, D. L.,
and Seeburg, P. H.
(1989)
Science
245,
494-499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Kosugi, S.,
Mori, T.,
and Shenker, A.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31813-31817[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Min, L.,
and Ascoli, M.
(2000)
Mol. Endocrinol.
14,
1797-1810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R. E., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Smith, J. A., Seidman, J. G., and Struhl, K.
(eds)
(1987)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, pp. 9.2.1-9.2.6, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 29.
|
Sunahara, R. K.,
Tesmer, J. J. G.,
Gilman, A. G.,
and Sprang, S. R.
(1997)
Science
278,
1943-1947[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Iiri, T.,
Farfel, Z.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5656-5661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Chabre, O.,
Conklin, B. R.,
Lin, H. Y.,
Lodish, H. F.,
Wilson, E.,
Ives, H. E.,
Catanzariti, L.,
Hemmings, B. A.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1992)
Mol. Endocrinol.
6,
551-556[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
De Lean, A.,
Stadel, M.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
7108-7117[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Kleuss, C.,
Hescheler, J.,
Ewel, C.,
Rosenthal, W.,
Schultz, G.,
and Wittig, B.
(1991)
Nature
353,
43-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Kleuss, C.,
Scherubl, H.,
Hescheler, J.,
Schultz, G.,
and Wittig, B.
(1992)
Nature
358,
424-426[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Kleuss, C.,
Scherubl, H.,
Hescheler, J.,
Schultz, G.,
and Wittig, B.
(1993)
Science
259,
832-834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Macrez-Lepretre, N.,
Kalkbrenner, F.,
Morel, J. L.,
Schultz, G.,
and Mironneau, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10095-10102[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Dippel, E.,
Kalkbrenner, F.,
Wittig, B.,
and Schultz, G.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
1391-1396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Wang, Q.,
Mullah, B.,
Hansen, C.,
Asundi, J.,
and Robishaw, J. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
26040-26048[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Wang, Q.,
Mullah, B. K.,
and Robishaw, J. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17365-17371[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Rybin, V. O., Xu, X.,
Lisanti, M. P.,
and Steinberg, S. F.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
41447-41457[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Ott, S.,
Costa, T.,
and Herz, A.
(1989)
J. Neurochem.
52,
619-626[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Jesaitis, A. J.,
Tolley, J. O.,
Bokoch, G. M.,
and Allen, R. A.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
2783-2790[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 43.
|
Stow, J. L.,
Sabolic, I.,
and Brown, D.
(1991)
Am. J. Physiol.
261,
F831-F840[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Saunders, C.,
Keefer, J. R.,
Kennedy, A. P.,
Wells, J. N.,
and Limbird, L. E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
995-1002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Moore, E. E.,
Kuestner, R. E.,
Stroop, S. D.,
Grant, F. J.,
Matthewes, S. L.,
Brady, C. L.,
Sexton, P. M.,
and Findlay, D. M.
(1995)
Mol. Endocrinol.
9,
959-968[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Gorn, A. H.,
Rudolph, S. M.,
Flannery, M. R.,
Morton, C. C.,
Weremowicz, S.,
Wang, T. Z.,
Krane, S. M.,
and Goldring, S. R.
(1995)
J. Clin. Invest.
95,
2680-2691[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Nussenzveig, D. R.,
Thaw, C. N.,
and Gershengorn, M. C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
28123-28129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Levis, M. J.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
1297-1307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Wang, H.-Y.,
Watkins, D. C.,
and Malbon, C. C.
(1992)
Nature
358,
334-337[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Watkins, D. C.,
Johnson, G. L.,
and Malbon, C. C.
(1992)
Science
258,
1373-1375[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 51.
|
Levine, M. A.,
Downs, R. W., Jr.,
Moses, A. M.,
Breslau, N. A.,
Marx, S. J.,
Lasker, R. D.,
Rizzoli, R. E.,
Aurbach, G. D.,
and Spiegel, A. M.
(1983)
Am. J. Med.
74,
545-556[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Kallal, L.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(2000)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
21,
175-180[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Jin, T.,
Zhang, N.,
Long, Y.,
Parent, C. A.,
and Devreotes, P. N.
(2000)
Science
287,
1034-1036[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Hughes, T. E.,
Zhang, H.,
Logothetis, D. E.,
and Berlot, C. H.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
4227-4235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Janetopoulos, C.,
Jin, T.,
and Devreotes, P.
(2001)
Science
291,
2408-2411[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. D. White, M. Coetsee, K. Morgan, C. A. Flanagan, R. P. Millar, and Z.-L. Lu
A Crucial Role for G{alpha}q/11, But Not G{alpha}i/o or G{alpha}s, in Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor-Mediated Cell Growth Inhibition
Mol. Endocrinol.,
November 1, 2008;
22(11):
2520 - 2530.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Okazaki, S. Ferrandon, J.-P. Vilardaga, M. L. Bouxsein, J. T. Potts Jr, and T. J. Gardella
Prolonged signaling at the parathyroid hormone receptor by peptide ligands targeted to a specific receptor conformation
PNAS,
October 28, 2008;
105(43):
16525 - 16530.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. R. Zurita and L. Birnbaumer
The same mutation in Gs{alpha} and transducin {alpha} reveals behavioral differences between these highly homologous G protein {alpha}-subunits
PNAS,
February 19, 2008;
105(7):
2363 - 2368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Dean, J.-P. Vilardaga, J. T. Potts Jr., and T. J. Gardella
Altered Selectivity of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) and PTH-Related Protein (PTHrP) for Distinct Conformations of the PTH/PTHrP Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol.,
January 1, 2008;
22(1):
156 - 166.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Nakamura, B. Han, T. Nishishita, Y. Bai, and K. Kakudo
Calcitonin targets extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway in human cancers
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
December 1, 2007;
39(6):
375 - 384.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. G. Chepurny and G. G. Holz
A Novel Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Responsive Luciferase Reporter Incorporating a Nonpalindromic Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Response Element Provides Optimal Performance for Use in G Protein Coupled Receptor Drug Discovery Efforts
J Biomol Screen,
August 1, 2007;
12(5):
740 - 746.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Tanaka, K. Ishii, K. Kasai, S. O. Yoon, and Y. Saeki
Neural Expression of G Protein-coupled Receptors GPR3, GPR6, and GPR12 Up-regulates Cyclic AMP Levels and Promotes Neurite Outgrowth
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 6, 2007;
282(14):
10506 - 10515.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Lariviere, G. Garrel, V. Simon, J.-W. Soh, J.-N. Laverriere, R. Counis, and J. Cohen-Tannoudji
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Couples to 3',5'-Cyclic Adenosine-5'-Monophosphate Pathway through Novel Protein Kinase C{delta} and -{epsilon} in L{beta}T2 Gonadotrope Cells
Endocrinology,
March 1, 2007;
148(3):
1099 - 1107.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Dean, A. Khatri, Z. Potetinova, G. E. Willick, and T. J. Gardella
Role of Amino Acid Side Chains in Region 17-31 of Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) in Binding to the PTH Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 27, 2006;
281(43):
32485 - 32495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Pereira and R. A. Cerione
A Switch 3 Point Mutation in the {alpha} Subunit of Transducin Yields a Unique Dominant-negative Inhibitor
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 21, 2005;
280(42):
35696 - 35703.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. A. Vortherms, C. H. Nguyen, C. H. Berlot, and V. J. Watts
Using Molecular Tools to Dissect the Role of G{alpha}s in Sensitization of AC1
Mol. Pharmacol.,
December 1, 2004;
66(6):
1617 - 1624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Cleator, R. Ravenell, D. T. Kurtz, and J. D. Hildebrandt
A Dominant Negative G{alpha}s Mutant That Prevents Thyroid-stimulating Hormone Receptor Activation of cAMP Production and Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Turnover: COMPETITION BY DIFFERENT G PROTEINS FOR ACTIVATION BY A COMMON RECEPTOR
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 27, 2004;
279(35):
36601 - 36607.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-L. Wu, S. B. Hooks, T. K. Harden, and H. G. Dohlman
Dominant-negative Inhibition of Pheromone Receptor Signaling by a Single Point Mutation in the G Protein {alpha} Subunit
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 20, 2004;
279(34):
35287 - 35297.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. A. Roy, K. E. Lemberg, and P. Chidiac
Recruitment of RGS2 and RGS4 to the Plasma Membrane by G Proteins and Receptors Reflects Functional Interactions
Mol. Pharmacol.,
September 1, 2003;
64(3):
587 - 593.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|