Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201642200 on March 28, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 23, 21095-21102, June 7, 2002
Functional Proteolytic Complexes of the Human Mitochondrial
ATP-dependent Protease, hClpXP*
Sung Gyun
Kang,
Joaquin
Ortega,
Satyendra K.
Singh,
Nan
Wang,
Ning-na
Huang,
Alasdair C.
Steven, and
Michael R.
Maurizi
From the Laboratory of Cell Biology, NCI and Laboratory of
Structural Biology, NIAMS, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received for publication, February 18, 2002, and in revised form, March 27, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Human mitochondrial ClpP (hClpP) and ClpX (hClpX)
were separately cloned, and the expressed proteins were purified.
Electron microscopy confirmed that hClpP forms heptameric rings and
that hClpX forms a hexameric ring. Complexes of a double heptameric ring of hClpP with hexameric hClpX rings bound on each side are stable
in the presence of ATP or adenosine 5'-(3-thiotriphosphate) (ATP
S),
indicating that a symmetry mismatch is a universal feature of Clp
proteases. hClpXP displays both ATP-dependent proteolytic activity and ATP- or ATP
S-dependent peptidase activity.
hClpXP cannot degrade
O protein or GFP-SsrA, specific protein
substrates recognized by Escherichia coli (e) ClpXP.
However, eClpX interacts with hClpP, and, when examined by electron
microscopy, the resulting heterologous complexes are indistinguishable
from homologous eClpXP complexes. The hybrid eClpX-hClpP
complexes degrade eClpX-specific protein substrates. In contrast, eClpA
can neither associate with nor activate hClpP. hClpP has an extra
C-terminal extension of 28 amino acids. A mutant lacking this
C-terminal extension interacts more tightly with both hClpX and eClpX
and shows enhanced enzymatic activities but still does not interact
with eClpA. Our results establish that human ClpX and ClpP constitute a
bone fide ATP-dependent protease and confirm
that substrate selection, which differs between human and E. coli ClpX, is dependent solely on the Clp ATPase. Our data also
indicate that human ClpP has conserved sites required for interaction
with eClpX but not eClpA, implying that the modes of interaction with
ClpP may not be identical for ClpA and ClpX.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Protein remodeling and protein degradation carried out by the Clp
family of molecular chaperones and their proteolytic complexes with
ClpP have important physiological functions in many organisms. Clp
proteases, together with other ATP-dependent proteases,
such as the Lon protease and the membrane-associated protease FtsH are
responsible for most intracellular protein degradation in eubacteria,
helping to maintain proper protein homeostasis, contributing to protein
quality control, and modulating the intracellular concentration of
important global regulatory proteins (1-3). The ATPase/chaperone components of ATP-dependent proteases target unique
substrates for degradation, although some overlap exists in the
recognition of misfolded or other abnormal forms of proteins (4-7). In
the bacterial Clp system, two separate ATPases, ClpX and ClpA, interact with different protein substrates and confer specific protein degrading
ability to ClpP (8).
Clp proteases, Lon, and FtsH are conserved in most eukaryotes, where
they are found in organelles, such as mitochondria, peroxisomes, and
chloroplasts (2, 9, 10). In yeast, Lon and FtsH homologs have been
shown to play important roles in assembly and quality control over
membrane protein complexes (11) and in the degradation of misfolded
proteins (9, 12). In humans, mutations in paraplegin, an FtsH homolog,
have been implicated in the progressive loss of mitochondria function
in the hereditary neurodegenerative disease spastic paraplegia (13).
The function of mitochondrial Clp proteins has not been identified.
The human genome encodes both ClpP, on chromosome 19 (14), and ClpX, on
chromosome 15 (15). mRNAs for both human
(h)1 ClpP and hClpX have been
found in greatest abundance in liver, heart, and testes, all of which
are mitochondrially rich tissues (14-16). The human CLPP and CLPX
sequences encode putative N-terminal mitochondria targeting signals
(16, 17). The size of hClpP detected by immunoblotting of human
mitochondria suggests that the mature protein has about 56 amino acids
removed from the N terminus of the primary gene product (17), whereas
maturation of mouse ClpX involves removal of about 65 amino acids from
the N terminus (16). The sequences of the human proteins show extensive similarities to their Escherichia coli counterparts (hClpP,
56% identity and 71% similarity in a 192-amino acid overlap; hClpX, 44% identity and 62% similarity in a 415-amino acid overlap), including conservation of all of the known catalytic residues of the
E. coli proteins. Although hClpX and hClpP are expected to
interact to form a functional proteolytic complex, no protease or
peptidase activity has been reported for isolated hClpP or hClpXP complexes.
A unique feature of bacterial ClpXP (and the analogous ClpAP) complexes
is the symmetry mismatch between the ATPase and the protease. Complexes
are formed by the interaction of six-membered rings of ClpX and
seven-membered rings of ClpP. Although a similar symmetry mismatch
apparently exists in the 26 S proteasomes between the six ATPase
subunits of the 19 S regulatory particle and the seven
subunits of
the 20 S proteasome, such mismatches are not the rule in
ATP-dependent proteases; for example, HslUV (ClpYQ) is a
symmetrical complex between six-membered rings of both components. Further, no mismatch is possible in ATP-dependent dependent
proteases such as Lon and FtsH, which are oligomers of single
polypeptide chains with independently folding ATPase and protease
domains. The mechanistic consequences of symmetry mismatch are not
understood, and until now, it has not been known whether it is a
universal feature of ClpXP or ClpAP proteases.
Because Clp proteases play important and even essential regulatory
roles in many organisms, we have undertaken an investigation of the
activity and substrate specificity of the human mitochondrial ClpXP.
Our results confirm that symmetry mismatch between ClpX and ClpP is
conserved in human ClpXP complexes. We also show that contacts between
the two components are conserved well enough to allow complex formation
between heterologous components from E. coli and humans.
Finally, we show that the bacterial and human ClpXP proteases degrade
different proteins and that ClpX is responsible for substrate selection.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Isolation of cDNA Clones for hClpP and DNA Sequencing--
A
probe was made with an EcoRI fragment of cDNA clone
HFBCC47 originally reported by Adams et al. (18) to have a
sequence similar to E. coli ClpP. This probe was used to
screen by filter hybridization a human hippocampal cDNA library
(Stratagene). The cDNA inserts from the positive phage clones were
rescued as phagemids by in vivo excision. The size of the
insert was determined by EcoRI digestion and agarose gel
electrophoresis. One clone, pBluescript SKII/hClpP11, contained an
insert of about 1.1 kb. The sequence on both strands was determined by
the dideoxy chain termination method on an ABI automated DNA sequencer
using universal T7 and T3 oligonucleotide primers as well as custom
primers. The sequence confirmed the presence of the entire coding
region for hClpP.
Construction of Plasmids Expressing hClpP and Mutant Forms of
hClpP--
hClpP and mutated forms were cloned into the pVEX11 vector
(Novagen), in a position that allowed hClpP expression in E. coli BL21 (DE3) clpP::kan after
induction of T7 RNA polymerase with isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside. A gene
encoding mature hClpP was first amplified by PCR using the primers,
5'-CGACCCGGCATATGCCGCTCATTCCCATCGTGGTGGAG-3' and
5'-GAGGCCAAGCTTTCAGGTGCTAGCTGGGACAGGTTCTGC-3', which
resulted in NdeI and HindIII sites at the 5' and
3' ends, respectively, of the coding region of hClpP. The digested PCR
fragment was inserted between the NdeI and
HindIII sites of pVEX11, creating pVEX11hClpP. His6 was attached to the C terminus of hClpP by PCR to
facilitate the purification of hClpP. The above NdeI primer
was used with a HindIII primer,
5'-CCTCCACATAAGCTTTCAGTGATGGTGATGGTGATGGGTGCTAGCTGGGACAGGTTCTGCTGC-3', for PCR. The product was digested with NdeI and
HindIII and inserted into pVEX11, creating pVEX11hClpPhis.
For hClpP lacking the C-terminal extension, PCR was performed with the
above 5'-NdeI primer and a 3'-HindIII primer,
5'-ATCCTCAAGCTTTCAATTACGGTGGATCAGAACCTTGTCTAAGATGCC-3', which removed
28 codons of hClpP and inserted the E. coli (e) ClpP
C-terminal codons for Arg and Thr. The recombinant plasmids to produce
the mutant form at Ser-97 to Ala or Cys were constructed using the
QuikChange system (Stratagene) as described in the manufacturer's manual. pVEX11/hClpP(his) plasmid was used as the template. The mutagenic oligonucleotides for changing Ser-97 to Ala were
5'-CCAGGCCGCCGCCATGGGCTCCCTGCTTCTCGCCGCC-3' and
5'-GGGAGCCCATGGCGGCGGCCTGGCCCACGCACCAGG-3'. The primers for Ser-97 to
Cys were 5'-CCAGGCCGCCTGCATGGGCTCCCTGCTTCTCGCCGCC-3' and
5'-GGGAGCCCATGCAGGCGGCCTGGCCCACGCACC- AGG-3'.
Purification of hClpP--
The cells carrying pVEX11/hClpP
plasmids were grown with shaking in LB medium at 37 °C in the
presence of 50 µg/ml ampicillin. The overnight cultures were
transferred to fresh medium and grown to A600 = 0.5. Isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside (0.5 mM) was added, and growth was continued for an additional
3 h. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation, and the
cells were suspended in 50 ml of ice-cold 50 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.5, 0.1 M KCl, and 10% (v/v) glycerol (buffer B). The
cells were then disrupted in a French pressure cell at 20,000 p.s.i.,
and the insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 30,000 × g for 30 min.
The purification of hClpP is reported
elsewhere.2 For purification
of hClpP-His6, the supernatant after centrifugation was passed over a 1-ml talon column (CLONTECH)
according to the manufacturer's instructions. Binding buffer
containing 10 mM imidazole was used to remove loosely bound
protein. hClpP-His6 was eluted using binding buffer
containing 300 mM imidazole, pH 8.0. hClpP-His6
was further purified by gel filtration on a 1.6 × 60 cm Superdex
200 column (Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with 50 mM
Tris buffer, pH 8.0. For hClpP
C, the 0.05% poly(ethyleneimine)
supernatant was loaded onto a 1.4 × 8-cm column of SP-Sepharose
(Amersham Biosciences). The protein was eluted with a gradient of
0.1-0.4 M KCl. hClpP
C was precipitated with 65%
saturated ammonium sulfate, dissolved in buffer with 0.1 M
KCl, and passed over a 1.6 × 60-cm column of Superdex 200 in the
same buffer. The hClpP
C was collected, loaded onto a 10/10 MonoS
column (Amersham Biosciences), and eluted with a gradient of KCl.
Cloning and Expression of Mouse and Human ClpX--
To produce
functional hClpX and mClpX in E. coli, expression vectors
were constructed using pVEX11. The template for hClpX was a human
cDNA clone obtained from P. Bross (Aarhus University Hospital,
Aarhus, Denmark) and for mClpX, a mouse cDNA clone obtained from
Dr. S. Santagata (Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY). For
hCLPX, the primers were hclpXD64_t,
5'-ACACCAGCACATATGGCCTCAAAAGATGGGATAAGTAAAGATGG-3', and hclpX_b,
5'-CCGCAATATAAGCTTTTAGCTGTTTGCAGCATCTGCTTGGCGGG-3'. For
mCLPX the primers were mclpXD65_t,
5'-CCGCGTGGACATATGGCCTCAAAAGACGGGGCAAACAAGGATGGC-3', and
mclpX_b,
5'-TGAGAGTCTAAGCTTTTAGCTGTTTGCACGATCCGCTTGACGAGG-3'. The
primers introduced NdeI and HindIII sites at the
5' and 3' ends, respectively, and were designed to encode the
full-length ClpX protein starting from codon 65 of the hClpX or codon
66 of the mClpX reading frame. The
NdeI/HindIII-digested PCR fragments were inserted
between NdeI and HindIII sites of pVEX11,
creating pVEX11/hClpX-N
65pVEX11/hClpX-N
64 and
pVEX11/mClpX-N
65.
Purification of hClpX and mClpX--
BL21 (DE3) RP cells
(Stratagene) with a null mutation in clpP and carrying the
plasmid pVEX11/hClpX
65 or pVEX11/mClpX
65 were grown as described
above in the presence of 10 µg/ml chloramphenicol and 50 µg/ml
ampicillin. Following the 3-h induction, the cells were harvested and
suspended in 50 ml of ice-cold binding buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 M KCl, 10 mM
MgCl2, and 10% glycerol). The cells were then disrupted by
French press, and the insoluble material was collected by
centrifugation. The insoluble material was suspended in 50 ml of
binding buffer containing 6 M urea, and after 1 h of
incubation at 4 °C, any residual insoluble material was removed by
ultracentrifugation. The supernatant protein was refolded by stepwise
removal of the urea in the presence of 0.5 mM ATP, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 10 µM
ZnCl2. After refolding the protein, any residual insoluble
material was removed by ultracentrifugation. The supernatant was loaded
onto a 1.4 × 8-cm hydroxyapatite column (Bio-Rad) equilibrated
with 5 mM potassium phosphate buffer (5 mM
phosphate, pH 7.5, 0.1 M KCl, 10 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 10% glycerol)
and eluted with a linear gradient of 5-300 mM potassium
phosphate, pH 7.5. The fractions containing hClpX or mClpX were pooled
and loaded onto a 0.7 × 2.5-cm Hitrap-Heparin (Amersham
Biosciences) equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH
8.0 (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 M KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and
10% glycerol). The protein was eluted with a linear gradient of 0-1.0
M NaCl, and the fractions with mClpX were pooled. The purity was estimated by SDS-PAGE.
Enzymatic and Other Assays--
The buffer used for most assays
was 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, with 0.1 M KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.02% Triton X-100. For nucleotide-dependent reactions, 10 mM
MgCl2 and either 1 mM ATP
S or 4 mM ATP were included. The assays for [3H]
O
protein degradation and ATPase activity were described by Grimaud
et al. (19); degradation of [3H]
-casein,
fluorogenic peptides, and cleptide (FAPHMALVPV) and the
derivatives were described previously (20, 21). The protein concentration was analyzed by the Bradford method (30). SDS-PAGE was
performed according to the method of Laemmli (22).
Analytical Gel Filtration--
Gel filtration was performed with
a 0.32 × 30-cm Superdex 200 column (Amersham Biosciences). The
columns were equilibrated with buffer B with or without 1 mM ATP
S. The samples were loaded in volumes of 50-100
µl of the same buffer, and the flow rates were 0.08 ml/min. The
protein was monitored at 280 nm, and the fractions were collected at
1-min intervals.
Electron Microscopy and Image Analysis--
The procedures for
specimen sample preparation, recording of electron micrographs, and
digital image analysis were previously reported (23). With hClpP
protein, concentrations of 50 µg/ml in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 0.2 M KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and
10% (v/v) glycerol were used. With ClpX, conditions were similar
except that 2 mM ATP
S was added to the buffer. hClpXP
complexes were made with 1 mg/ml hClpX and 0.5 mg/ml hClpP in the
presence of 2 mM ATP
S, and diluted 1:10 or 1:20 for
microscopy. The scanned images were analyzed for symmetry using the
rotostat procedure described previously (24). After scanning of the
micrograph, correlation averaging of typically 500 particles was
performed with PIC-III (25). Images were obtained after further
symmetry averaging: 6- or 7-fold rotational symmetry operations for
ClpX or ClpP and two 2-fold symmetry operations (top to bottom and left
to right) for 2:1 complexes.
Inactivation of ClpP--
Enzymatically inactive ClpP was
prepared by incubating ClpP in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, and 10% glycerol (v/v). At different times, the
reaction was stopped, and the protein was separated from unreacted
diisopropyl fluorophosphate by precipitation with 2 volumes of
cold acetone. ClpP was dissolved in buffer B and run over a small
Sephadex G-25 column in buffer B to remove residual solvent and reagents.
 |
RESULTS |
Purification of Bacterially Expressed hClpP--
Sequence
alignment of hClpP with the amino acid sequence of E. coli
ClpP showed that hClpP possesses an N-terminal extension of about 42 amino acids, and this extension displays properties of typical
mitochondrial targeting sequences (14, 26, 27). Based on alignment with
mature E. coli ClpP (Fig.
1A), we chose Pro-57 between
the first negatively charged residue (Glu-64) and the closest upstream
arginine residue (Arg-54) for the start site. Our hClpP start site
differs from the hClpPs cloned previously, which were either one amino
acid shorter (14) or longer (17). Expression of hClpP in E. coli produced a band with an apparent molecular mass of 24 kDa on SDS-PAGE; most of the expressed protein was found to be soluble.
hClpP was purified to over 95% homogeneity (Fig.
2A). N-terminal sequencing
confirmed that the first amino acid was proline, indicating processing
of the N-terminal methionine in vivo (data not shown). We
also expressed and purified a truncated mutant of hClpP, hClpP
C,
which lacks the C-terminal 28 amino acids of hClpP (Fig.
2A).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Sequence alignments for the N-terminal
portions of hClpP and hClpX. A, hClpP. The hClpP
(hP) coding region contains a mitochondrial targeting
sequence followed by a continuous sequence of 194 amino acids that
overlaps with eClpP (eP). The N-terminal sequence of the
mature form of eClpP is italicized. For cloning, a
methionine start codon was placed in front of Pro-57 of hClpP.
B, hClpX. hClpX (hX) has a putative mitochondrial
targeting sequence followed by a region of homology with eClpX
(eX). The N-terminal sequence of eClpX is shown in
italics. The N terminus of mature hClpX is not known. For
cloning of hClpX, a start codon was placed in front of Ala-65,
just upstream of a sequence of five amino acids identically
conserved near the N terminus of eClpX. mX,
mClpX.
|
|

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Purified bacterially expressed hClpP and
hClpX. Purified hClpP and hClpX proteins were run on 12%
polyacrylamide gels in the presence of SDS and stained with Coomassie
Blue. A, hClpP variants. All of the clones have Pro-57 as
the N terminus. Lane 1, broad range molecular mass
(M.W.) standards (Bio-Rad); lane 2, hClpP;
lane 3, hClpP-His6; lane 4,
hClpP-S97A-His6; lane 5,
hClpP-S97C-His6; lane 6, hClpP C.
B, lane 1, molecular mass markers; lane
2, eClpX; lane 3, hClpX (N terminus Ala-65); lane
4, mClpX (N terminus Ala-66).
|
|
Peptidase Activity of hClpP--
Earlier studies had indicated
that purified hClpP or extracts containing expressed hClpP did not
degrade short fluorogenic peptides, such as succinyl-Leu-Tyr
aminomethylcoumarin (14). This peptide as well as several other
fluorogenic and chromogenic peptides were not degraded by our hClpP
(Table I), hClpP
C, nor by any hClpXP
complexes (data not shown). However, we found that when peptidase
activity was monitored by direct observation of peptide products
separated by reverse phase chromatography, several other peptides could
be degraded by hClpP alone (Table I). hClpP degraded oxidized insulin B
chain (Table I) as well as the peptide, FAPHMALVPV (cleptide), which is
very rapidly degraded by eClpP (22). Insulin B chain was cut primarily
at single sites in an apparently nonprocessive manner (data not shown).
Cleptide was cut at the same site cleaved by eClpP, and the cleavage
rate was stimulated about 20-fold in the presence of hClpX (Table
II). Thus, contrary to the implications
of previous reports, hClpP has significant peptidase activity; however,
it might not have good amidase activity, or the bulky aromatic group
might interfere with positioning the peptide in the substrate-binding
site.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Peptide degradation by hClpP and eClpP
Peptidase activity was measured in 50 µl of standard reaction
solution with 10 pmol of human or E. coli ClpP14.
Peptides (1 mM succinyl-Leu-Tyr-AMC, 1.0 mM
cleptide, or 0.6 mM insulin B chain) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
hClpXP and eClpXP recognize different protein substrates
All assays contained 4 mM ATP and 10 mM
MgCl2 in standard assay buffer at 37 °C. The enzymes
(E. coli or human form as indicated), and substrate proteins
were present as follows: 0.1 µM each of ClpX and ClpP
with 0.60 M [3H] O; 0.5 µM each
of ClpX and ClpP with 1 µM GFP-SsrA; 0.4 µM
each of ClpX and ClpP with 4 µM -casein; or 1 mM cleptide with 0.4 µM ClpP and 0.1 mM ClpX. The units of activity for protein degradation are
µg/min 1/µg ClpP and for peptidase activity are
nmol/min/nmol ClpP tetradecamer.
|
|
Expression and Purification of Human ClpX--
hCLPX and mCLPX
genes have been identified and cloned (15, 16), and the encoded
proteins have been shown to be located in mitochondria. mClpP from cell
extracts was shown to bind to a glutathione
S-transferase-mClpX fusion protein immobilized on a GSH
affinity column (16), suggesting that ClpP and ClpX interact in
mammalian mitochondria. However, in some eukaryotes, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, only the ClpX chaperone and not
ClpP is present (28). To investigate the structure and enzymatic properties of the hClpXP complex, we expressed and purified hClpX. To
maximize the alignment with eClpX (Fig. 1B), translation was initiated from codon 65 of hClpX. hClpX was purified from the soluble
fraction (Fig. 2B) or from inclusion bodies; structural and
enzymatic properties of both forms were similar. Purified mClpX had a
somewhat greater tendency to aggregate but otherwise had properties
similar to the human protein.
Assembly of hClpXP Complexes and Heterologous Complexes of hClpP
with mClpX and eClpX--
As initially purified, hClpX was in a mixed
oligomeric state, but addition of ATP
S promoted formation of a
monodisperse species that migrated as a hexamer on a Superdex 200 gel
filtration column (Fig. 3A).
Electron micrographs of negatively stained hClpX in the presence of
ATP
S (Fig. 4A) were
analyzed for symmetry, and a strong 6-fold symmetry component was found
(Fig. 4H). Averaging of the images showed top views of
six-membered rings (Fig. 4C) similar to those observed with
eClpX. We also confirmed that our purified hClpP particles had 7-fold
symmetry (Fig. 4H) and presented easily discernable
seven-membered rings in the averaged images (Fig. 4E). Thus,
as reported earlier (17), ClpP assembles into rings of seven subunits.
Mixtures of hClpX and hClpP run over a gel filtration column in the
presence of ATP
S eluted as a high molecular mass complex (Fig.
3B). Electron micrographs of hClpXP complexes assembled in
the presence of ATP
S showed characteristic side views (Fig.
4B), with four parallel striations representing two rings of
hClpP in the middle flanked on both sides by a single ring of hClpX
(Fig. 4D). Similar complexes were observed between hClpP and
mClpX (Fig. 4F), which was expected because the sequence of
mClpX is virtually identical (98%) to that of hClpX.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Oligomeric state of hClpX. A,
gel filtration of hClpX in the absence (dashed line and
upper inset) or presence (solid trace and
lower inset) of ATP S. Purified hClpX was passed over a
Superdex 200 gel filtration column in buffer with or without ATP S.
The fractions were collected at 1-min intervals, and the distribution
of hClpX was determined by SDS-PAGE gels stained with Coomassie Blue.
The gel lanes are positioned over the corresponding fractions.
B, gel filtration of hClpP (dashed trace and
upper inset) or complexes of hClpP and hClpX (solid
trace and lower inset). hClpP alone or a mixture
containing a 2-fold molar excess of hClpP over hClpX in ATP S was run
on a Superdex 200 column in the presence of ATP S. The samples were
treated as in A.
|
|

View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Electron micrographs and averaged images of
oligomeric forms and complexes of hClpX and hClpP. Images of
negatively stained proteins were obtained and averaged as described
under "Materials and Methods." A, a typical field of
hClpX in the presence of ATP S showing the uniform, disc-like
appearance of the majority of particles, most of which appear to lie
with the flat surface attached to the grid. B, a typical
field of hClpXP complexes, most of which are seen from the side as
multi-layered discs or rings. C-G, the averages represent
particles that by inspection appeared to represent the majority
(70-95%) in their respective fields. C, hClpX in the
presence of ATP S. D, hClpXP in the presence of ATP S.
E, hClpP. F, heterologous complex of mClpX and
hClpP in the presence of ATP S. G, heterologous complex of
eClpX and hClpP in the presence of ATP S.
|
|
hClpP also formed stable complexes with eClpX, and the complexes were
nearly identical in appearance (Fig. 4G). Surprisingly, eClpA did not bind to hClpP by any criteria tested, including gel
filtration, electron microscopy, or enzymatic assay (see below). We
also could not detect the reverse heterologous complex between hClpX
and eClpP by any of these criteria. The formation of hybrid eClpX-hClpP
complexes allowed us to compare the activity and specificity of
homologous and heterologous complexes.
Protease Activity of hClpXP: hClpX and eClpX Have Different
Specificities--
When hClpXP complexes were tested for activity
against
O protein and GFP-SsrA, protein substrates degraded by
eClpXP, no activity was observed (Table II). However, hClpXP was able
to degrade
-casein (Fig.
5A), a substrate not degraded
by eClpXP. hClpXP also degraded
-casein and
-casein, neither of
which is degraded by eClpXP.
-Casein degradation shown in Fig.
5A was carried out with hClpX-hClpP
C, indicating that the
C terminus of hClpP is not required for interaction with hClpX or for
enzymatic activity.
-Casein was degraded to acid-soluble products by
hClpXP with an S0.5 of about 6 µM
(Fig. 5B) but with the rather low turnover number of
0.4
min
1 (calculated as casein monomers degraded per ClpX
hexamer). The degradation rates were slightly (20%) faster when
hClpP
C was used.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Proteolytic activity of hClpXP.
Lanes 1, casein plus hClpX; lanes 2, casein plus
hClpP; lanes 3, casein plus hClpX and hClpP at zero time;
lanes 4, casein plus hClpX and hClpP after 1 h.
A, degradation of different caseins by human ClpXP.
-Casein, -casein, or -casein (2 µM) was
incubated with 0.4 µM hClpX or 0.4 µM hClpP
or both components for 1 h in assay buffer with 4 mM
ATP. The samples were removed, mixed with SDS sample buffer, heated,
loaded on an SDS gel, and stained. B, time course of
-casein degradation by hClpXP. [3H] -Casein (either
4 or 16 µM) was incubated with 0.2 µM hClpX
and 0.5 µM hClpP in 100 µl of assay buffer plus 4 mM ATP. At the times indicated, the aliquots were
withdrawn, and the amount of acid-solubilized casein was determined.
Degradation is expressed as µg of casein degraded per µg hClpP.
C, substrate dependence of -casein degradation by hClpXP.
[3H] -Casein amounts were varied, and degradation was
assayed by acid solubilization after 10 min in the presence of 4 µM hClpXP.
|
|
To test whether ClpX unfoldase activity or ClpP peptidase activity was
rate-limiting, we used a peptide substrate, FAPHMALVPV (cleptide), that
is degraded very rapidly by eClpP when activated by either eClpX (19)
or eClpA (21). Cleptide was degraded by hClpXP at about 2% of the rate
seen with eClpXP (Table II). With hClpXP
C, the rate was more than
doubled with an estimated turnover number/complex of about 500 min
1. Cleavage of cleptide by hClpXP occurred exclusively
between Met and Ala, the same site cleaved by eClpP (22) and hClpP
alone. Thus, hClpX can activate both protease and peptidase activity of
hClpP. Human and E. coli ClpXs recognize different protein substrates, and hClpX activity is likely to be much higher on its
specific substrates.
Activity of Heterologous Complexes of hClpP with eClpX--
During
gel filtration in the presence of Mg2+ and ATP
S, hClpP
and eClpX migrated together in a high molecular mass peak (data not
shown), and electron microscopy confirmed that the two proteins formed
a 2:1 complex with a eClpX hexamer bound at each end of a
double-heptameric ring of hClpP (Fig. 4G). We found that the complex of eClpX-hClpP was active on several E. coli ClpXP
substrates. Cleavage of cleptide by hClpP was activated >20-fold in
the presence of eClpX, and, when eClpX was saturating, the rate of
cleptide cleavage by hClpP was 2-5% that observed with eClpXP (Table
II). Thus, the heterologous interaction of eClpX with hClpP, as with eClpP, induces a conformational change that makes the active site accessible to oligopeptides and increases the catalytic efficiency of
peptide bond hydrolysis. Interestingly, eClpA was not able to promote
cleptide cleavage by hClpP (data not shown), even though cleptide is
cleaved by eClpP in the presence of either ClpX or ClpA (20, 22). The
lack of activation by eClpA was consistent with our inability to see
complexes between eClpA and hClpP under any circumstances (data not shown).
eClpX targets several specific proteins for degradation by eClpP
in vivo and in vitro, including
O protein and
proteins with a C-terminal extension referred to as SsrA (7). The
hybrid eClpX-hClpP complex was tested on
O protein and GFP-SsrA in
the presence of ATP. The complex of eClpX and hClpP degraded both proteins in the presence of ATP (Fig.
6A and Table II). Degradation was much faster in the presence of ATP, although, as seen with eClpXP,
slow degradation was seen when ATP
S was used in place of ATP. hClpP
did not show any proteolytic activity in the presence of eClpA (data
not shown). Translocation of GFP-SsrA to hClpP was measured with eClpX
and proteolytically inactive hClpP(S97A) (see below). The rate of
translocation was similar to that observed with the eClpX-eClpP(S97A)
complex (Fig. 6B). Thus, the heterologous complex has
unfolding, translocating, and peptide cleavage activities similar to
those of the homologous E. coli complex.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
hClpP degrades GFP-SsrA in the presence of
eClpX. A, degradation of GFP-SsrA was monitored by loss
of fluorescence in assay buffer plus 4 mM ATP. At the end
of the incubation, an aliquot was run on an SDS gel, and the proteins
were stained with Coomassie Blue (inset). GFP-SsrA (1 µM) was incubated alone (thick line and
lane 1 in the inset), with 1 µM
eClpX and 1 µM eClpP (thin line and lane
2 in the inset), or with 1 µM eClpX and 1 µM hClpP (dashed line and lane 3 in
the inset). B, substrate translocation into
inactive hClpP. Fluorescence of GFP-SsrA was monitored with time of
incubation in assay buffer plus 4 mM ATP. GFP-SsrA (1 µM) was incubated alone (thick line and
lane 1 in the inset), with 1 µM
eClpX and 1 µM eClpP (thin line and lane
2 in the inset), and with 1 mM eClpX and 1 µM hClpP-S97A-His6 (dashed line
and lane 3 in the inset).
|
|
hClpX Does Not Bind to or Activate eClpP--
We tested the
ability of hClpX to interact with and activate eClpP. Gel filtration
and electron microscopy studies failed to show stable interaction
between these proteins. As expected, hClpX did not promote eClpP
proteolytic activity against the
O protein or GFP-SsrA, but it also
did not promote proteolysis of the caseins degraded by hClpXP and did
not activate cleptide cleavage in the presence of ATP
S, which is
usually the most sensitive assay for interaction between Clp ATPases
and ClpP. To test whether eClpP could compete with hClpP for binding to
hClpX, we added a 16-fold excess of eClpP over hClpP to casein
degradation assays in which hClpX was limiting. No inhibition of casein
degradation was observed, indicating that eClpP could not compete for
binding to hClpX and prevent activation of hClpP (Fig.
7).

View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Peptide bonds cleaved by hClpP in model
substrates. Insulin B chain was degraded with hClpXP, and the
major peptide products (representing about 90% of the original
material) were isolated by reverse phase chromatography and sequenced.
The arrows above the sequence indicate the sites cleaved.
For comparison, the sites cleaved by eClpP (31) are also shown.
|
|
Relative Affinities of hClpX and eClpX for hClpP--
Cleptide
cleavage requires association of ClpX with ClpP but not ATP hydrolysis.
By holding the ClpX concentration fixed and varying ClpP, we obtained
relative binding affinities between different combinations of the human
and E. coli components. eClpX and eClpP had the highest
relative affinity (Fig. 7). Surprisingly, eClpX and hClpX showed similar affinities for hClpP, but both displayed
about 1 order of magnitude weaker binding than seen with eClpXP (Fig.
7). Both eClpX and hClpX had higher affinity for hClpP
C than for the
intact hClpP protein. The lower activity of hClpP observed in assays is
partly due to incomplete saturation with ClpX. As indicated above, no
interaction was evident between hClpX and eClpP.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Concentration dependence of ClpP activation
by hClpX and eClpX. Propeptide degradation was measured in the
presence of ATP S and a fixed concentration (0.1 µM) of
either hClpX or eClpX. hClpP and eClpP were added at the concentrations
shown, and the initial rates of propeptide cleavage were determined
(see "Methods and Materials").
|
|
Specificity of Peptide Bond Cleavage by hClpP--
As mentioned
above, hClpP cleaved cleptide, FAPHMALVPV, only between Met and Ala,
the same site cleaved by eClpP (21). This site was cleaved with hClpP
alone or when activated by either hClpX or eClpX. To further test the
cleavage specificity of hClpP, several variants of cleptide with
substitutions in the P-1, P-2, and P-3 positions were used (Table
III). These variants are all cleaved
exclusively after the methionine by both eClpP and hClpP (data not
shown). Although most cleptide variants were cleaved at comparable
rates by hClpP and eClpP, hClpP was more sensitive to the presence of a
tryptophan residue in either the P-1 or the P-2 position. Also, hClpP
did not cleave cleptide with a glycine residue at P-3. The ATPase does
not affect the cleavage specificity of ClpP. The rates of cleavage by
ClpXP (Table III) are very similar to those previously obtained with
ClpAP (21). Also, cleavage rates by hClpP were the same whether hClpX
or eClpX was used for activation (data not shown).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Cleavage of cleptide variants by hClpXP
1 mM cleptide was incubated for 20 min with 0.1 µM hClpXP or eClpXP in the presence of 4 mM
ATP and 10 mM MgCl2. All of the peptides were
cleaved only once, between positions five and six.
|
|
With oxidized insulin B chain as a substrate, the peptide products
generated by hClpXP and eClpXP were quite similar, but a few
significant differences were observed (Fig. 8). hClpP did not cut after
Leu-6 but instead gave quantitative cleavage after Gly-8. Thus, hClpP
and eClpP have similar specificities in peptide bond cleavage. Cleavage
after Gly by both eClpP and hClpP indicates that occupancy of the P-1
binding pocket is not essential and that the peptide binding groove
surrounding the active site triad plays the major role in positioning
the scissile bond for cleavage.
Mutation of the Catalytic Active Site Ser-97 of
hClpP--
Alignment of the hClpP and eClpP protein sequences
indicates that the active site triad typical of many serine proteases
(Ser-97, His-122, and Asp-171) was conserved in hClpP. (For consistency with the mature form of eClpP, numbering of hClpP starts with the
N-terminal Ala-1 after processing of the initiator methionine.) Although eClpP is sensitive to reagents that typically target catalytic
residues of serine proteases, hClpP is resistant to such inhibitors or
is affected in noncanonical residues. No loss of activity of hClpP was
observed after incubation with diisopropylfluoro phosphate either alone
or in the presence of hClpX, and no significant radioactivity was
incorporated into hClpP after incubation with [3H]diisopropylfluoro phosphate for 3 h (data not
shown). hClpP was also resistant to phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride,
N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone,
N-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone, and
3,4-dichloroisocoumarin. The active site-directed inhibitor,
N-carbobenzoxy-Leu-Tyr chloromethyl ketone, which
inactivates eClpP, did inhibit hClpP; however, the peptide was found
linked to residues expected to be outside of the proteolytic active
site and not to the putative active site histidine of
hClpP.3
To confirm that Ser-97 is the catalytic residue of hClpP, site-specific
mutagenesis was used to replace this residue with Ala or Cys. To
facilitate isolation of mutant ClpPs, a His6 tag was
attached to the C terminus of hClpP, and the expressed proteins were
purified by metal chelate chromatography. Degradation of cleptide and
O by purified wild type hClpP-His6 was
similar to hClpP (Table III), and stable interaction of
hClpP-His6 with eClpX was demonstrated by gel filtration
(data not shown). Purified hClpP-S97A and hClpP-S97C were assayed in
the presence of hClpX with
-casein as substrate and in the presence
of eClpX with
O and propeptide as substrates. The mutant hClpPs were
inactive on all substrates (data not shown). Proteolytically inactive
eClpP acts as a trap for GFP-SsrA, which is unfolded and translocated into the aqueous chamber of eClpP by eClpX (29). In the presence of
eClpX, hClpP-S97A also trapped but did not degrade GFP-SsrA (Fig.
6B), indicating that the mutant protein forms a functional complex with eClpX by lacks proteolytic activity. These data suggest that hClpP is a serine protease and that Ser-97 is the catalytic residue. An explanation for the low reactivity of the active site residues in hClpP must await further studies.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The chaperone and proteolytic functions of Clp proteases are
highly conserved and, in many organisms, perform essential functions necessary for cell growth or for adaptation to environmental stress or
changes in nutritional conditions. Single genes have been identified for human ClpX on chromosome 15q22.1 (15) and for human ClpP on
chromosome 19 (30). Both proteins appear to be targeted exclusively to
mitochondria. Our data establish that mammalian ClpX and ClpP combine
to form a functional ATP-dependent protease that has
structural and enzymatic properties similar to the well characterized
bacterial ClpXP protease. ClpX appears to be the only Clp ATPase
present in mammals. Coding regions with homology to subdomains of ClpA are present, but the human genome does not have a homolog containing all of the functional domains of ClpA.
Two differences in enzymatic properties stand out between hClpXP and
eClpXP. First, the peptidase and protease activities of purified hClpXP
are only 1-5% of those of eClpXP. We do not have a complete
explanation for the low activity. The low activity is also reflected in
the poor reactivity with active site-directed inhibitors. Inhibitors
such as diisopropylfluoro phosphate and peptide chloromethyl ketones
generally require an activated nucleophile for rapid covalent
modification, so it appears that even in a complex with hClpX, the
active site residues of hClpP are not all in an activated state. It is
possible that hClpX blocks access of these reagents to the active site
of hClpP, but given the number of inhibitors tried, this seems
unlikely. Moreover, eClpP also has unusual kinetics of reaction with
diisopropylfluoro phosphate (31), despite the indication from the
crystal structure that all of the active sites of eClpP are in the same
"active" conformation (32). Coordinated activity of all 14 active
sites of ClpP might depend on the state of the complex with ClpX or on
the presence of substrate or other effectors. These effects could be
less pronounced in the bacterial enzyme where the peptide products are
of less consequence but may play a role in determining the nature of
the peptide products produced by the mammalian ClpXP. Although physical properties suggest that our purified hClpP and hClpX are both well
folded, we are also planning to isolate hClpXP expressed in eukaryotic
cells to see whether maturation and folding under different conditions
affect the enzymatic properties.
The second major difference in enzymatic properties is that hClpX and
eClpX recognize different substrates. Substrate selection by Clp
proteases is dependent on the Clp ATPase. In E. coli, ClpA and ClpX target different proteins for degradation both in
vivo and in vitro, although ClpA also has a weak
ability to degrade most ClpX substrates. In vivo,
specificity is sufficiently stringent that increased stability of
target proteins caused by mutations in ClpX confers distinct phenotypes
on the cell. Few studies of heterologous complexes composed of ClpX and
ClpP from different organisms have been reported. We show here that
eClpX can recognize its specific substrates even in the context of a
heterologous complex with hClpP and moreover can efficiently target
those substrates to hClpP. Human ClpX, however, does not recognize the
same substrates recognized by eClpX, although it can target other
specific proteins to hClpP for degradation. Substrate recognition
appears not to be dependent on a homologous ClpX-ClpP interaction and
not to be specific for the surface or substrate channel of a particular ClpP. If ClpP does influence the rate or specificity of degradation, the effect should be mediated through surface features conserved between E. coli and human ClpP.
The specificity of hClpX could in part underlie the low activity
observed in vitro; perhaps the substrates used in our
studies are simply not optimal ones for hClpXP. In fact, the
heterologous complex, eClpX-hClpP, degrades
O protein and GFP-SsrA
about as fast as eClpXP and without accumulation of intermediates,
indicating that when substrates are recognized by the ATPase component
and presented efficiently to hClpP, they can be rapidly degraded. Identifying physiological substrates and particular sequence or structural motifs recognized by hClpX should help in characterization of the enzymatic properties of hClpXP.
hClpP and eClpP also differ somewhat in determinants for positioning
the substrate scissile bond for cleavage within the active site.
Although there is considerable overlap in the peptide bonds cleaved in
model peptide substrates by hClpP and eClpP, the role of the subsites,
particularly P-3 and P-2', appear to differ. Human ClpP may require an
aliphatic side chain at the P-3 and P-2' positions, because a glycine
at P-3 drastically reduced the rate of cleavage of a model peptide, and
a glycine at P-2' decreased cleavage at position 6 of insulin B chain.
The crystal structure of eClpP suggests that the peptide-binding pocket
accommodates an extended chain that interacts with several subsites to
place the scissile bond in position to be cleaved. We are currently analyzing the crystal structure of hClpP2 to compare the
substrate-binding cleft with that found in eClpP. It will also be
important to determine whether the difference in peptide bond cleavage
by hClpP has a physiological role. The difference could simply reflect
the composition of the most common substrates cleaved in mammalian
mitochondria in contrast to those in E. coli. Alternatively,
the differences could serve to optimize peptide products for their
subsequent metabolism. For example, the peptide products of hClpP might
be better suited for presentation of mitochondrial antigens. The length
or composition of peptide products could influence whether they are
degraded within the mitochondria or transported out of the matrix by
the oligopeptide transporter found in the inner membrane (33).
eClpX and eClpA interact equally well with eClpP, but only eClpX can
bind to hClpP. eClpA did not activate or show significant affinity for
hClpP. The inverse heterologous complex, hClpX-eClpP, cannot be formed
under our experimental conditions. These data indicate that the
mechanism of binding between Clp ATPases and ClpP may involve more than
one region of Clp ATPase. All of the Clp ATPases that interact with
ClpP have a conserved motif, IG(L/F), found in a region of otherwise
variable length and sequence composition in the D2 ATPase domain near
the junction with the small domain (34, 35). In ClpA, this motif lies
in a loop located on the surface that interacts with
ClpP.4 The IGL motif in hClpX
is in a somewhat longer connecting region than in eClpX, possibly
leading to more flexibility and weakened affinity for ClpP. In fact,
the homologous interaction of hClpX with hClpP is also weaker than that
between eClpX-eClpP. The inability of eClpA to bind to hClpP suggests
either that there is another element involved in these interactions or
that some steric interference occurs between eClpA and hClpP that is
absent in the eClpX-hClpP interface. Alignments between the two
proteins indicate that there are numerous differences in the surface
residues in hClpP and eClpP, as well as a long C-terminal extension of
28 amino acids in hClpP. Because the surfaces of both ClpP and ClpA
have numerous charged residues, it is possible that they also
contribute to binding interaction during complex formation. We are
currently analyzing the contributions of these residues to stability
and activity of complexes between Clp ATPases and the ClpP protease.
The high degree of conservation and the retention of chaperone and
proteolytic activity of human ClpXP point to a potential role for these
proteins in protein quality control and in the regulation of regulatory
protein levels within mitochondria. Although no physiological
substrates or in vivo functions of hClpXP have yet been
identified, other ATP-dependent proteases play a critical role in mitochondrial functions. In yeast, the matrix Lon protease (36,
37) and the membrane-associated AAA proteases, Yme1 and Yta10/12 (38),
are required for assembly of membrane complexes in mitochondria, as
well as functioning to remove misfolded proteins. Lon protease also has
a regulatory role affecting messenger RNA splicing (39). Protease
defects may underlie certain human diseases, such as spastic
paraplegia, in which the primary lesion is in the gene for a homolog of
the yeast mitochondrial membrane AAA protease (40). In plant
chloroplasts, ClpP has been shown to be important for degradation of
the partly assembled cytochrome b6f
complex (41), and attenuation of ClpP activity resulted in a decreased
ability to adapt to elevated levels of CO2. These examples
suggest that ClpXP is likely to have important functions in human
mitochondria as well.
Considerable attention has also been paid to the role of mitochondria
not only as a major metabolic organelle but as a source for critical
signaling pathways that lead to apoptosis and cell death. Import and
steady state control of regulatory proteins and mitochondrial enzymes
thus are profoundly important to the cell. We expect that the purified
ClpX and ClpP proteins will be useful for identifying interacting
proteins in mitochondrial extracts, providing useful leads to identify
physiological roles for human ClpXP.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: NCI, Bldg. 37 Room
1B09, 37 Convent Dr., MSC 4255, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255. E-mail: mmaurizi@helix.nih.gov.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201642200
2
B. Ahvazi, S. G. Kang, M. T. Thompson,
M. R. Maurizi, and T. Mueser, manuscript in preparation.
3
S. G. Kang and M. R. Maurizi,
manuscript in preparation.
4
F. Guo, M. R. Maurizi, L. Esser, and D. Xia, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
h, human;
e, E. coli;
ATP
S, adenosine
5'-O-(thiotriphosphate);
m, mouse;
GFP, green fluorescent
protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Gottesman, S.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(1992)
Microbiol. Rev.
56,
592-621[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Suzuki, C. K.,
Rep, M.,
van Dijl, J. M.,
Suda, K.,
Grivell, L. A.,
and Schatz, G.
(1997)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
22,
118-123[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Schirmer, E. C.,
Glover, J. R.,
Singer, M. A.,
and Lindquist, S.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
289-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Gottesman, S.,
Clark, W. P.,
de Crecy-Lagard, V.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
22618-22626[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Levchenko, I.,
Luo, L.,
and Baker, T. A.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2399-2408[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Wojtkowiak, D.,
Georgopoulos, C.,
and Zylicz, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
22609-22617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Gottesman, S.,
Roche, E.,
Zhou, Y.,
and Sauer, R. T.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1338-1347[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Gottesman, S.,
Wickner, S.,
Jubete, Y.,
Singh, S. K.,
Kessel, M.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(1995)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
60,
533-548[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Langer, T.,
and Neupert, W.
(1996)
Experientia
52,
1069-1076[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Adam, Z.,
Adamska, I.,
Nakabayashi, K.,
Ostersetzer, O.,
Haussuhl, K.,
Manuell, A.,
Zheng, B.,
Vallon, O.,
Rodermel, S. R.,
Shinozaki, K.,
and Clarke, A. K.
(2001)
Plant Physiol.
125,
1912-1918[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Arlt, H.,
Tauer, R.,
Feldmann, H.,
Neupert, W.,
and Langer, T.
(1996)
Cell
85,
875-885[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Stuart, R. A.,
Cyr, D. M.,
and Neupert, W.
(1994)
Experientia
50,
1002-1011[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Pearce, D. A.
(1999)
Hum. Genet.
104,
443-448[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Corydon, T. J.,
Bross, P.,
and Holst, H. U.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
331,
309-316[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Corydon, T. J.,
Wilsbech, M.,
Jespersgaard, C.,
Andresen, B. S.,
Borglum, A. D.,
Pedersen, S.,
Bolund, L.,
Gregersen, N.,
and Bross, P.
(2000)
Mamm. Genome
11,
899-905[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Santagata, S.,
Bhattacharyya, D.,
Wang, F. H.,
Singha, N.,
Hodtsev, A.,
and Spanopoulou, E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
16311-16319[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
de Sagarra, M. R.,
Mayo, I.,
Marco, S.,
Rodriguez-Vilarino, S.,
Oliva, J.,
Carrascosa, J. L.,
and Castano, J. G.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
292,
819-825[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Adams, M. D.,
Kerlavage, A. R.,
Fields, C.,
and Venter, J. C.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
4,
256-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Grimaud, R.,
Kessel, M.,
Beuron, F.,
Steven, A. C.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12476-12481[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Maurizi, M. R.,
Thompson, M. W.,
Singh, S. K.,
and Kim, S. H.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
244,
314-331[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Thompson, M. W.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18201-18208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Ortega, J.,
Singh, S. K.,
Maurizi, M. R.,
and Steven, A. C.
(2000)
Mol. Cell.
6,
1515-1521[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Kocsis, E.,
Trus, B. L.,
Cerritelli, M.,
Cheng, N.,
and Steven, A. C.
(1995)
Ultramicroscopy
60,
219-228[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Trus, B. L.,
Kocsis, E.,
Conway, J. F.,
and Steven, A. C.
(1996)
J. Struct. Biol.
116,
61-67[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
von Heijne, G.,
Steppuhn, J.,
and Herrmann, R. G.
(1989)
Eur. J. Biochem.
180,
535-545[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Gavel, Y.,
and von Heijne, G.
(1990)
Protein Eng.
3,
433-442[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
van Dyck, L.,
Dembowski, M.,
Neupert, W.,
and Langer, T.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
438,
250-254[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Singh, S. K.,
Grimaud, R.,
Hoskins, J. R.,
Wickner, S.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
8898-8903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Bross, P.,
Andresen, B. S.,
Knudsen, I.,
Kruse, T. A.,
and Gregersen, N.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
377,
249-252[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Thompson, M. W.,
Singh, S. K.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
18209-18215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Wang, J.,
Hartling, J. A.,
and Flanagan, J. M.
(1997)
Cell
91,
447-456[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Young, L.,
Leonhard, K.,
Tatsuta, T.,
Trowsdale, J.,
and Langer, T.
(2001)
Science
291,
2135-2138[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Singh, S. K.,
Rozycki, J.,
Ortega, J.,
Ishikawa, T., Lo, J.,
Steven, A. C.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
29420-29429[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Kim, Y. I.,
Levchenko, I.,
Fraczkowska, K.,
Woodfuff, R. V.,
Sauer, R. T.,
and Baker, T. A.
(2001)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
8,
230-233[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Suzuki, C. K.,
Suda, K.,
Wang, N.,
and Schatz, G.
(1994)
Science
264,
273-276[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Wagner, I.,
Arlt, H.,
van Dyck, L.,
Langer, T.,
and Neupert, W.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
5135-5145[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
van Dyck, L.,
and Langer, T.
(1999)
Cell. Mol. Life Sci.
56,
825-842[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
van Dyck, L.,
Neupert, W.,
and Langer, T.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
1515-1524[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Casari, G., De,
Fusco, M.,
Ciarmatori, S.,
Zeviani, M.,
Mora, M.,
Fernandez, P., De,
Michele, G.,
Filla, A.,
Cocozza, S.,
Marconi, R.,
Durr, A.,
Fontaine, B.,
and Ballabio, A.
(1998)
Cell
93,
973-983[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order articl |