Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111402200 on March 23, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21140-21148, June 14, 2002
Pathway Complexity of Prion Protein Assembly into Amyloid*
Ilia V.
Baskakov
§,
Giuseppe
Legname
¶,
Michael A.
Baldwin
¶
,
Stanley B.
Prusiner
¶**, and
Fred
E.
Cohen
**
§§
From the
Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases,
the ¶ Department of Neurology, the
Department of
Pharmaceutical Chemistry, the ** Department of Biochemistry
and Biophysics, and the 
Departments of
Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology and of Medicine, University of
California, San Francisco, California 94143
Received for publication, November 29, 2001, and in revised form, March 14, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
In vivo under pathological
conditions, the normal cellular form of the prion protein,
PrPC (residues 23-231), misfolds to the pathogenic isoform
PrPSc, a
-rich aggregated pathogenic multimer.
Proteinase K digestion of PrPSc leads to a proteolytically
resistant core, PrP 27-30 (residues 90-231), that can form amyloid
fibrils. To study the kinetic pathways of amyloid formation in
vitro, we used unglycosylated recombinant PrP corresponding to
the proteinase K-resistant core of PrPSc and found
that it can adopt two non-native abnormal isoforms, a
-oligomer and
an amyloid fibril. Several lines of kinetic data suggest that the
-oligomer is not on the pathway to amyloid formation. The
preferences for forming either a
-oligomer or amyloid can be
dictated by experimental conditions, with acidic pH similar to that
seen in endocytic vesicles favoring the
-oligomer and neutral pH
favoring amyloid. Although both abnormal isoforms have high
-sheet
content and bind 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonate, they are dissimilar
structurally. Multiple pathways of misfolding and the formation of
distinct
-sheet-rich abnormal isoforms may explain the difficulties
in refolding PrPSc in vitro, the need for a
PrPSc template, and the significant variation in disease
presentation and neuropathology.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Protein misfolding is a hallmark of the prion diseases. In
vivo and recent in vitro experiments demonstrate that
the misfolded pathological isoform of PrP1
(prion protein), designated PrPSc,
directs the conversion of PrPC, the normal cellular
isoform, into PrPSc (1). This conversion requires a
substantial conformational change: PrPC is a proteinase K
(PK)-sensitive,
-helical monomer,
whereas PrPSc is a PK-resistant, aggregated
-sheet-rich
multimer (2). Upon PK digestion, PrPSc loses residues 23 to
~89, and the PK-resistant core, PrP 27-30 (residues ~90-231),
forms amyloid fibrils (3). PrP 27-30 remains fully infectious and
retains high
-sheet content (4). The infectivity of
PrPSc and PrP 27-30 presumably owes to the ability of the
protein to traffic to the brain and templates the conversion of
PrPC to PrPSc.
Different strains of prions have unique neurohistological and
biochemical features as well as distinct clinical patterns (5, 6).
Clinicopathological features include the specific incubation time, the
neuroanatomic distribution, and the degree of PK resistance (7). These
features, which are stable following serial transmission in a given
animal, have been attributed to conformationally distinct multimeric
arrangements of PrPSc. During the past several years, a
considerable body of evidence has accumulated arguing that the
properties of prion strains are enciphered in their conformations
(8-12). Although it seems clear that prion strains are comprised of
different conformers of PrPSc, glycosylation patterns and
specific polymorphisms may add to strain diversity (13). Here we
examine the ability of unglycosylated recombinant (rec) PrP with an
intact disulfide bond and without a GPI anchor to form different
non-native
-sheet-rich isoforms in vitro.
Recent studies by J. Y. Chang and co-workers (14, 15) demonstrated
that the reduced form of recPrP 23-231 exists in four
-sheet-rich
isoforms as judged by their distinct retention times in reverse-phase
chromatography. However, other differences in the physicochemical
properties of these isoforms have not been characterized. Because
PrPSc and PrPC both maintain a disulfide bridge
(16), we believe that it is important to focus on the ability of a
nonreduced form of recPrP to adopt non-native conformations. Several
recent studies have reported that nonreduced recPrP forms oligomeric
-sheet-rich isoforms (17-19). Unfortunately, a consistent picture
of the differences between these distinct abnormal isoforms has yet to emerge.
By studying mouse and Syrian hamster PrP (designated Mo recPrP 89-231
and SHa recPrP 90-231, respectively), we demonstrated that the protein
can adopt the
-helical native isoform, two non-native
-sheet-rich
isoforms, a
-oligomer, and an amyloid fibril. These two abnormal
isoforms may coexist under certain experimental conditions; however,
the
-oligomer is not on the kinetic pathway to amyloid formation and
is not a substructure in the assembling fibril. Instead, we have
identified two novel multimeric transient intermediates in amyloid
formation. The preferences for forming either a
-oligomer or amyloid
can be dictated by experimental conditions, with acidic pH similar to
that observed in endocytic vesicles favoring the
-oligomer and
neutral pH favoring amyloid. Although both abnormal isoforms have high
-sheet content and bind 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonate (ANS), they
are dissimilar structurally. In the amyloid form, residues 90-120 are
buried in a manner reminiscent of PrP 27-30, whereas in the
-oligomer, this region is available for antibody binding. After PK
digestion, the amyloid form is digested into a number of small
fragments, whereas residues 122-221 of the
-oligomer remain intact.
Analysis of the oligomerization state using electrospray ionization
mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) indicates that the
-oligomer is
predominantly octameric. Our data demonstrate that PrP is capable of
forming several abnormal isoforms and that the preference to fold into
a particular abnormal isoform is influenced substantially by
experimental conditions.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Protein Preparation and Refolding--
The expression and
purification of Mo recPrP 89-231 and SHa recPrP 90-231 were performed
as described previously (20). The purified protein was seen to be a
single pure species with an intact disulfide bond as confirmed by
SDS-PAGE and electrospray mass spectrometry (Applied Biosystems
Mariner; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
recPrP folds into its native
-helical conformation upon dilution
from 10 M urea (20 mM sodium acetate, pH 3.7)
to 1 M urea (20 mM sodium acetate, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 5.5). To refold the protein into the
-oligomeric isoform, recPrP was diluted from 10 to 5 M
urea (20 mM sodium acetate, 0.2 NaCl, pH 3.7) and incubated overnight at room temperature in 5 M urea (18). The process of assembling to the
-oligomer was monitored by CD and size
exclusion chromatography (SEC). Once recPrP was refolded into the
-oligomer, it remained stable after dilution from 5 to 1 M urea in 20 mM sodium acetate, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 5.5.
Dye Binding--
The binding of Congo red (Sigma) was
monitored using absorption spectroscopy. A fresh solution of Congo red
was prepared by dissolving the dye in 5 mM potassium
phosphate and 150 mM NaCl, filtering it five times with a
0.22-mm filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA), and adjusting the
concentration to 0.3 mM. The difference spectra were
obtained by subtracting the Congo red spectra obtained in the absence
of protein from the Congo red spectra measured in the presence of
protein. These measurements were corrected for light scattering as
described by Klunk et al. (21).
Thioflavin T (ThT; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) fluorescence was
monitored using a LS50B fluorimeter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) at 482 nm (excitation at 450 nm; excitation slit was 5 nm; emission slit was
10 nm; 0.4-cm rectangular cuvettes) as described (22). The fluorescence
of ANS (Sigma) was monitored at 475 nm (excitation at 385 nm;
excitation slit was 5 nm; emission slit was 10 nm; 0.4-cm rectangular
cuvettes) as described (23). In the time course of amyloid formation,
aliquots of recPrP were diluted 20 times by phosphate buffered saline,
pH 7.0, and incubated with either 5 µM ThT or 110 µM ANS for 15 min at room temperature before monitoring fluorescence.
Negative Staining and Electron Microscopy--
Negative staining
was performed on carbon-coated, 600-mesh copper grids that were
glow-discharged prior to staining. The samples were adsorbed for
30 s, stained with freshly filtered 2% ammonium molybdate or 2%
uranyl acetate, dried, and then viewed in a JEOL 100CX II electron
microscope (Tokyo, Japan) at 80 kV at standard magnifications of 40,000 and 80,000 as described previously (24).
Epitope Presentation--
The pattern of epitope presentation of
the amyloid isoform of SHa recPrP 90-231 was assayed by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay as described by Peretz et al. (25).
Circular Dichroism--
CD spectra were recorded with a J-720 CD
spectrometer (Jasco, Easton, MD) scanning at 20 nm/min, with a band
width of 1 nm and data spacing of 0.5 nm using a 0.1-cm cuvette as
described previously (18). Three individual scans were averaged, and
the background spectra were subtracted.
Size Exclusion Chromatography--
All of the separations were
performed at 23 °C with a flow rate of 1 ml/min using a TSK-3000
HPLC gel filtration column (300 mm × 7.80 mm) equilibrated in a
running buffer (pH 3.7) of 20 mM sodium acetate, 0.2 M NaCl, and 1 M urea. During the time course of
amyloid formation, the aliquots of recPrP were diluted twice using the
running buffer and immediately analyzed by SEC.
Dynamic Light Scattering--
All of the measurements were
carried out using a DynaPro-801 TC Dynamic Light Scattering Instrument
(Protein Solution Inc., Lakewood, NJ). The samples (30 ml) were
filtered through 100-nm membrane filters (Whatman Inc., Ann Arbor, MI),
placed in the quartz cuvette of DynaPro-MSTC, and measured at a
constant temperature of 23 °C (26).
Proteinase K Digestion--
recPrP was incubated with PK at a
40:1 ratio at 37 °C in 20 mM sodium acetate, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 5.5. The digestion was stopped by adding
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to a 1 mM final concentration and Pefabloc (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) to a 3 mM final
concentration. The samples were analyzed by 16% Tris SDS-PAGE followed
by Western blot or by HPLC-MS (26).
Mass Spectrometry--
The PK digestion products were separated
by reverse-phase HPLC-MS as described previously (26). HPLC was carried
out with an Applied Biosystems 140B syringe pump solvent delivery
system using a 1 × 150-mm C-18 Vydac column with a 300-Å pore
size and a 5-µm particle size, connected to a 759A UV detector with a
35-nl capillary flow cell. Solvent A was 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and solvent B was acetonitrile with 0.08% trifluoroacetic acid, with a
linear gradient of 5-95% over 30 min at a flow rate of 50 ml/min. The
eluate was split such that ~10% was introduced into the electrospray
ionization source of the orthogonal accelerated time of flight mass
spectrometer (Applied Biosystems). The mass spectra were recorded
continuously at 5-s intervals over the range of 600-2000
m/z. UV chromatograms recorded at 215 nm
were compared with total ion current traces obtained from the mass
spectrometer. Either ESI-MS spectra corresponding to peaks in the UV
and total ion current traces were selected for averaging and
deconvoluted using the software provided with the mass spectrometer, or
spectra containing signals from multiple unresolved peptides were
deconvoluted manually by visual inspection and by selection of related
multiply charged ions. Deconvolution converted each multiply charged
ion series into a single peak of zero charge, giving the relative molecular masses of the peptides. The experimentally determined values
were compared with calculations for all possible fragments of the Mo
recPrP 89-231 sequence. The calculated values were based on
monoisotopic atomic masses for the smaller peptides (<3000 Da) and on
average masses for the larger peptides, for which the isotopic
components could not be resolved.
For supramolecular ESI-MS, salt was removed from the protein samples by
dialysis, and organic solvent (20% methanol or other solvent) was
added to the buffer to enhance vaporization. The solutions were sprayed
into the mass spectrometer, giving multiply charged ions of the
oligomers in the gas phase with the pattern of peaks shown in Fig.
5a. This pattern was deconvoluted to give the oligomeric
species shown in Fig. 5b.
 |
RESULTS |
In a previous study, we showed that recPrP can be folded either to
its native, monomeric
-helical isoform or to a
-sheet-rich, oligomeric form (18). There is an equilibrium between the
-helical and the
-sheet-rich isoforms, where partially denaturing conditions (acidic pH and urea) and increased concentrations of PrP favor conversion to the
-oligomer. The conformational transition from the
-helical to the
-sheet-rich isoform is separated by a large energy barrier that is associated with unfolding and with a higher order kinetic process related to the oligomerization. Because of the
height of the energy barrier, the conformational transition from the
-isoform to the
-isoform occurs very slowly, and PrP is
kinetically trapped in its native
-helical conformation. Based on
our preliminary data, we suggested that the
-oligomer could be a
thermodynamically stable, on-pathway intermediate in amyloid formation.
To explore further the pathway of amyloid formation, we studied the
behavior of the
-oligomer in greater detail. We incubated the
-oligomer at 37 °C under constant shaking, which led to the formation of amyloid fibrils as measured by ThT binding (Fig. 1). The kinetics of fibrillogenesis
exhibit a lag phase followed by an exponential increase in fibril
formation. The length of the lag phase was a function of pH, ranging
from 10 h at pH 6.1 or pH 7.2 to 3 days at pH 3.7 (Fig.
1a). Additionally, the lag phase could be prolonged by
increasing concentrations of urea (Fig. 1b). We found that
after the kinetic trace reached a plateau, additional incubation of
samples at 37 °C resulted in a decrease in the ThT binding. Under
these conditions or following dialysis out of urea, fibrils tended to
aggregate into large insoluble particles as seen by electron microscopy
(Fig. 1c). Both Mo recPrP 89-231 and SHa recPrP 90-231
formed amyloid fibrils under similar conditions, but each had a
distinct morphology. Fibrils of Mo recPrP were formed by twisted
protofibrils with a diameter of ~20 nm (Fig. 1d), whereas
those of SHa recPrP had a diameter of 10-15 nm (Fig. 1c).
The addition of a 0.5% seed of prefolded amyloid to the fresh reaction
substantially reduced the lag phase of the process, demonstrating that
the process can be induced by seeding (data not shown).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The -oligomer of
recPrP assembles into fibrils. The kinetics of fibril formation
for 0.4 mg/ml of SHa recPrP 90-231 in 20 mM sodium acetate
buffer and 0.2 M NaCl as monitored by ThT fluorescence are
shown. a, kinetic traces as a function of pH values at fixed
concentration of 4 M urea. , pH 3.7; , pH 4.1; ,
pH 5.0; , pH 6.1; , pH 7.2. b, kinetic traces as a
function of concentration of urea at pH 3.7. , 2 M urea;
, 3 M urea; , 4 M urea. c,
electron micrographs of amyloid fibrils of SHa recPrP 90-231 stained
immediately upon dilution from 4 M urea (left
panel) and upon dialysis out of 4 M urea (right
panel). The left micrograph was taken at 40,000×
magnification, and the right micrograph was taken at
20,000× magnification. d, electron micrographs of fibrillar
Mo recPrP 89-231 taken at 40,000× (left panel) and
80,000× magnification (right panel). The bars in
c and d represent 0.1 µm.
|
|
Spectroscopic measurements were used to distinguish the
-oligomer
from the fibrillar form. In contrast to the
-oligomer, the fibrils
bind Congo red and ThT (Fig. 2), a common
feature of amyloid structures. The binding of Congo red was detected as a typical red shift in its absorbance spectra (Fig. 2a) and
as birefringence under polarized light (data not shown). Congo red binding was saturated at a 5:1 ratio of dye molecule to polypeptide chain. Specific binding of ThT resulted in substantial increases of
fluorescence with a maximum at 482 nm (Fig. 2b).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Fibrils of Mo recPrP 89-231 possess
properties different from the -oligomer.
a, top panel, absorbance spectra of free Congo
red at ten concentrations. Spectra show (from bottom to
top) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, and 18 µM,
respectively. Middle panel, corrected absorbance spectra of
fibrillar Mo recPrP 89-231 (2.2 µM) at the same ten
concentrations of Congo red listed for the top panel.
Bottom panel, difference spectra obtained at six different
concentrations of Congo red (from bottom to top)
in the presence of fibrillar Mo recPrP 89-231: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 µM. b, fluorescence spectra of ThT in the
presence of 24 µg/ml of Mo recPrP 89-231 folded to the fibrillar
form (solid line), 200 µg/ml of the -oligomer form
(dotted line), and in the absence of protein
(dashed line). c, fluorescence spectra of
ANS in the presence of the fibrillar form (solid line),
the -oligomer form (dotted line), and the -monomer form
(dotted and dashed line) of Mo recPrP 89-231
(22 µg/ml) and in the absence of protein (dashed
line).
|
|
ANS has been used to study the partially folded states of globular
proteins as well as the binding pockets of a number of carrier proteins
and enzymes. ANS has also been used to characterize fibrillar forms of
amyloidogenic proteins and infectious isoforms of PrP (27, 28).
According to Safar et al. (23), ANS binds to PrP 27-30, as
detected by increased ANS fluorescence and a blue shift of its
fluorescence maxima from 540 to 490 nm. Similarly, ANS binding to
fibrils of Mo recPrP 89-231 was accompanied by a substantial increase
in the fluorescence yield and a blue shift of its fluorescence spectrum
(Fig. 2c). However, similar changes in the fluorescence
spectra were observed when ANS was added to a solution of the
-oligomer. The
-helix-rich monomeric structure did not show any
evidence of ANS binding (Fig. 2c). Hence, ANS binds to both
-sheet-rich forms, amyloid fibrils, and the
-oligomer but not to
the
-helical isoform.
The process of amyloid formation of recPrP can be used as a model to
study the self-propagating conformational transition of PrP. However,
in vitro formation of the
-oligomer and amyloid has not
produced infectious prions thus far. Because these refolded molecules
are not equivalent to the infectious form, we sought to characterize
the structural similarities of these isoforms with PrPSc.
One of the properties that distinguishes PrPSc from
PrPC is the loss of antigenicity of residues 90-120.
Accessibility of this epitope can be determined from a difference in
the reactivities of specific antibodies to the nondenatured and
denatured forms of PrP (25). To determine whether residues 90-120 are
exposed or buried in the amyloid form of recPrP, we probed the binding of two antibody fragments (Fabs), D13 and 3F4, which are specific to
epitopes 96-106 and 108-112, respectively. Binding of both Fabs to
the nondenatured amyloid was relatively weak, whereas their
reactivities were substantially greater after denaturation of the
amyloid (Fig. 3). The increased
reactivities of these Fabs reflect the greater exposure of epitope
96-112 to the solvent upon denaturation. In contrast to the epitope
96-112 of the N-terminal region, the C-terminal epitope 225-231 is
exposed in the PrPSc isoform (25). The accessibility of
this region in the amyloid form of recPrP was assayed using R1 and R2
Fabs, both of which bind to residues in the epitope 225-231. The
reactivities of these Fabs were very similar regardless of whether or
not the amyloid fibrils were denatured. A similar epitope presentation
in the amyloid of SHa recPrP 90-231 and PrP 27-30 indicates that both forms have some common features.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Amyloid of SHa recPrP 90-231 has an epitope
presentation similar to PrP 27-30 (25). Reactivity of four
different Fabs (top to bottom panels): D13, 3F4,
R1, and R2, to nondenatured ( ) and denatured ( ) amyloid tested by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
|
|
Kinetics of Amyloid Formation Probed by Multiple Methods--
To
understand the basic principles involved in the conformational
transition and oligomerization of PrP, we studied the kinetic pathway
of amyloidogenesis in vitro. One question we wanted to address is whether the
-oligomer is on the pathway to amyloid formation. To dissect the in vitro folding pathway, the
kinetics of amyloid formation were monitored in parallel by three
biophysical techniques: SEC, ThT binding, and ANS binding. Employing
SEC, we found four isoforms of Mo recPrP 89-231 with distinct
oligomerization states (Fig.
4a). The isoform with an
elution volume of 10.2 ml corresponded to the monomer, had an
-helical conformation as measured by CD, and was characterized by
the absence of ThT and ANS binding. The isoform eluted at 7.2 ml
corresponded to the
-oligomer and did not bind ThT but bound ANS.
There were two distinct multimeric forms of recPrP with very similar
elution volumes of 5.45 ml (multimer I) and 5.22 ml (multimer II)
(Table I). Because of their similar
elution volumes, both multimers appeared as one asymmetrical peak in
most SEC experiments (Fig. 4b). However, these two
multimeric isoforms could be distinguished following a 15-h incubation.
Under these conditions, the multimer I and II peaks were equally
populated (Fig. 4b). Both multimeric isoforms were enriched
in
-sheet content and bound ANS. However, only multimer II bound ThT
(data not shown). The properties of all PrP isoforms identified by SEC
during the time course of amyloid formation are summarized in Table
I.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Kinetics of amyloid formation of Mo recPrP
89-231 (0. 6 mg/ml) in 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.0, 0.2 M NaCl, and 1 M urea incubated at 37 °C under continuous agitation.
a, SEC profiles of (bottom to top)
original sample and upon incubation for 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 21, 31, 36, and 57 h. b, the multimer peak from SEC profiles
obtained upon incubation of PrP for (bottom to
top) 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 21, 25, and 31 h. c,
the kinetics of amyloid formation of recPrP that was initially refolded
to the -monomer form. Top panel,
time-dependent change of ThT fluorescence ( ), and the
population of the -monomer ( ), the -oligomer ( ), and the
multimer ( ) as monitored by SEC. Middle panel, kinetic
trace of ANS fluorescence ( ), the combined populations of nonmonomer
isoforms ( ), and the population of multimer that does not penetrate
through the SEC column ( ). Bottom panel, the elution
volume of multimer peak I ( ) and multimer peak II ( ).
d, the kinetics of amyloid formation of recPrP that was
initially refolded to the -oligomer form. The symbol definitions are
the same as for c.
|
|
To study the relationships between these four isoforms, the
-monomer,
-oligomer, and multimers I and II, we monitored the time-dependent change in the populations of these forms
during the process of amyloid formation. Because of the very similar elution volumes for the peaks of multimers I and II, a single kinetic
trace represents the sum of both isoforms. A decrease in the
-monomer population was accompanied by an immediate and simultaneous
growth of both the
-oligomer and the combined population of the
multimers (Fig. 4c). Because there was no time delay between the kinetic traces of the formation of the multimer and
-oligomer, it was difficult to judge whether the
-oligomer was an on- or off-pathway intermediate to amyloid fibril formation.
To investigate this further, we monitored the kinetics of
amyloidogenesis starting from the
-oligomer of Mo recPrP 89-231 (Fig. 4d). A decrease in the
-oligomer population
coincided with a growth in the
-monomer population, whereas the
kinetics of accumulation of the multimer showed a lag phase (Fig.
4d). The multimer fraction started to increase only after
the
-monomer concentration reached a certain level. As soon as the
multimer appeared, its population grew rapidly. This coincided with a
rapid decrease in the population of the
-monomer (Fig.
4d). It seems that the conversion of the
-oligomer into
the
-monomer was slower than the consumption of the
-monomer
during amyloidogenesis. Thus, the population of the
-monomer was
exhausted after 20 h, and then temporarily increased again because
of a slow dissociation of the
-oligomer. These data indicate that
the
-oligomer may be off the pathway to amyloid formation and that
the refolding and dissociation of the
-oligomer back into the
-monomer most likely precede fibril formation.
Comparison of the kinetic traces monitored by SEC and ThT binding
provides important insight into the mechanism of amyloidogenesis. The
kinetics of ThT binding was delayed relative to multimer formation (Fig. 4c). The initial growth of ThT fluorescence
corresponded to the time point when multimer II appeared (Fig.
4c, bottom panel). This agrees with our previous
result that the conversion from multimer I to multimer II is critical
with respect to ThT binding (Table I). ThT binding continued to
increase even after the trace for the combined population of multimers
reached a plateau. Consequently, at this stage of the amyloidogenic
process, the growth of ThT fluorescence cannot be explained solely by
the increased multimer II population. Instead, we observed that
increased ThT signals coincided with a gradual shift of the elution
volume of multimer II from 5.25 to 5.0 ml (Fig. 4c). Because
the SEC column has nonlinear properties in the range of 5.0-6.0 ml,
even a modest change in the elution volume of multimer II corresponded
to a substantial increase in its molecular mass.
Hence, the kinetic trace of ThT fluorescence may
represent two processes, (i) an increase in the population of multimer
II and (ii) a growth in the size of multimeric species. Furthermore,
the shift in the elution volume of the multimer II peak was followed by
a decrease in the peak area (Fig. 4c, middle
panel). It is likely that the disappearance of this peak was
caused by an inability of the species to penetrate the SEC column as a
result of the substantial size of multimer II. In addition, both
kinetic experiments showed that the species identified by ANS binding
coincided with that representing the total population of all isoforms
excluding the
-monomer. This suggests that ANS binds nonselectively
to all
-sheet-rich isoforms. The level of ANS fluorescence remained
stable during the last stage of the fibrillogenic process, whereas the
area of the multimer peak eluted from SEC decreased. This result also
indicates that the last stage of amyloidogenesis monitored by SEC
represents an elongation of multimer II, which affects its ability to
penetrate the column. Overall, our kinetic experiments indicate that
the
-oligomer is not on a direct path to amyloid formation.
Furthermore, our data argue that the transition from the
-oligomer
to the multimer occurs through the dissociation of the
-oligomer
with refolding to form the
-monomer.
Amyloid Form and the
-Oligomer Have Distinct Conformational
Properties--
To probe the conformational differences between the
-oligomer and the amyloid isoform, we employed limited PK digestion
combined with ESI-MS. PK digestion has been used widely to distinguish PrPSc from PrPC as well as to probe the
differences between PrPSc strains (8, 11). After treatment
for 1 h at 37 °C with a 1:40 ratio of PK to protein, the
-oligomer was cleaved into short peptides corresponding to the
N-terminal region, whereas the central and C-terminal regions (residues
122-221) remained intact (Fig. 5a). Epitope mapping confirmed
that residues 122-221 comprise the proteinase-resistant core of the
-oligomer. Fab D13, which binds to the epitope including residues
96-106, does not bind the proteinase-resistant core, whereas Fabs D18
and R72, which are specific to epitopes 133-157 and 152-163,
respectively, bind the PK-resistant core, as shown on Western blots
(Fig. 5c). Surprisingly, the amyloid form was digested into
mostly short peptides with no apparent PK-resistant core (Fig.
5b). Clearly, the polypeptide chains of the
-oligomer are
assembled differently than those of the amyloid isoform.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Limited PK digestion of abnormal isoforms of
Mo recPrP 89-231. HPLC-MS analysis of the peptides produced by
digestion of the -oligomer (a) and amyloid form
(b) after 1 h of incubation with PK (1:40 ratio) at
37 °C. The peptides identified by MS in the course of separation by
HPLC are shown on top of the peaks. The
numbers correspond to the N- and C-terminal amino acids of
PrP. c, immunoblots of PK-digested products of the
-oligomer treated with three Fabs: D13 (left panel), D18
(middle panel), and R72 (right panel). The
fractions migrated to the molecular masses indicated (in kDa).
|
|
Structural studies of the
-sheet-rich PrPSc isoform have
been hampered by the lack of a soluble homogeneous preparation.
Although the
-oligomer has not been found to be infectious, it may
provide a useful surrogate for biophysical characterization by NMR
spectroscopy or x-ray crystallography. Thus, we probed the
stoichiometry and heterogeneity of the
-oligomer using dynamic light
scattering, supramolecular ESI-MS, and SEC. The Stokes radius of the
-oligomer was 6.5 nm as measured by dynamic light scattering (data
not shown). Assuming an ideal spherical shape, this translates into an
average molecular mass of 300 kDa. Analysis of the squared
variance of the SEC peak that corresponds to the
-oligomer indicates
that it is a relatively heterogeneous population (29). To probe the stoichiometry of the
-oligomers, we employed supramolecular ESI-MS (Fig. 6a). We observed two
distinct groups of peaks: (i) narrow, well resolved peaks in the
800-2000 m/z region representing a monomeric
protein with an molecular mass of 16,197 Da and (ii) broader peaks in
the 2500-4000 m/z region (Fig. 5a).
Deconvolution of these broad peaks suggested a maximum molecular mass
of 129,867 Da (Fig. 6b), a value equivalent to the molecular
mass of eight recPrP 89-231 molecules and an additional ~290 Da
attributable to salt or buffer ions. Additional broad peaks in the
3500-4000 m/z region, which were difficult to
deconvolute, indicate the presence of a smaller amount of species with
different and possibly higher oligomerization states. A comparison of
the areas under the peaks suggests that the oligomers are predominant
in solution even under experimental conditions employed for ESI-MS.
Changing the organic component from methanol to acetonitrile or
trifluoroethanol gave a higher proportion of the monomer, showing that
this isoform was formed by dissociation in solution (data not shown).
Regardless of the solvent conditions, the ESI-MS spectra showed that
only two species, the monomer and the oligomer (predominantly octamer), were present. This confirms that there were no significantly populated stable intermediates in the dissociation of the octamer.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Stoichiometry of the
-oligomer as probed by mass spectrometry.
a, ESI-MS of Mo recPrP 89-231 refolded into the
-oligomer sprayed from 20% methanol at a nozzle voltage of 150 V. The labels on the peaks indicate the
mass/protonation (charge) ratio of the species. b,
deconvolution of the group of peaks with mass/charge ratio from +40 to +48 shown in Fig. 4a results in a peak
with a maximum of 129,867 Da, which is 290 Da greater than the
predicted molecular mass for the octamer. c, ESI-MS of the
-oligomer sprayed from 20% methanol at a nozzle voltage of 50 V.
|
|
We obtained a similar result by fragmenting the ions within the mass
spectrometer after evaporation of the solvent by applying higher nozzle
voltage. At low voltage (50 V), we observed predominantly oligomers
(>99%) (Fig. 6c). By progressively increasing the velocity of the ions as they passed through residual gas molecules, we were able
to break up the oligomers into monomeric products (data not shown) in a
manner akin to that found by varying the solvent conditions. These
results support our previous observation that the assembly of the
-monomer into the
-oligomer is cooperative (18, 26). The fact
that the
-oligomeric species remains assembled even in a gas phase
in the absence of hydrophobic forces indicates that major contributions
to the thermodynamic stability of the complex should be due to hydrogen
bonds and electrostatic interactions. This exceptional stability could
account for the PK resistance of the
-oligomer.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Protein misfolding appears to play a central
role in prion disorders and a variety of other neurodegenerative
diseases (1, 30). A unifying feature of these diseases is the existence
of a native, stable monomeric isoform that is easily reached from the
unfolded state and a multimeric
-sheet-rich isoform that is
substantially more stable. Our recent studies indicate that the folding
of PrP to its native,
-helical conformation is under kinetic rather
than thermodynamic control (18). In addition, many proteins unrelated
to neurodegenerative and conformational diseases are capable of
adopting an alternative
-sheet-rich amyloid fold (31-34). These
findings suggest that amyloidogenesis is a general phenomenon in
protein folding, related to physicochemical properties of the
polypeptide backbone (32, 35). This may require us to readdress many
basic issues of protein folding, such as kinetic traps in the folding
pathway, the complexity of the energy landscape of protein folding, and
the position of the native state in this landscape. These
considerations highlight the need for compartmentalization to improve
the fidelity of in vivo folding (36).
Here, we demonstrate that recPrP is able to form two structurally
distinct non-native isoforms: the
-oligomer and an amyloid isoform.
Our initial assumption that the
-oligomer might be an intermediate
on the pathway to an amyloid isoform is not supported by current
results. Instead, the kinetic experiments indicate that the
amyloidogenic process occurs through a pathway different from the one
that leads to the
-oligomer (Fig. 7).
The
-oligomer and the amyloid have different structural
organizations as judged by PK digestion. Hence, the
-oligomer is not
a substructure of the amyloid isoform. The
-oligomer must dissociate
and refold to form the amyloid isoform. PK digestion argues that the
-oligomer is more like PrP 27-30, whereas epitope mapping
demonstrates some structural similarities of the amyloid isoform with
PrP 27-30. However, our inability to demonstrate to date that both the
-oligomer and the amyloid isoform are efficient infectious agents
implies that the refolding protocols used in this study do not mimic
the cellular misfolding process directed by PrPSc under
pathological conditions.
Solution conditions play a substantial role in determining the
particular route of misfolding and preferences to forming a particular
abnormal isoform. The conformational transition from the
-monomer to
the
-oligomer occurs at pH <5. The rate of conversion is
significantly facilitated by partially denaturing concentrations of
urea (4-5 M). In contrast, the optimal solution conditions for amyloidogenesis include neutral to slightly acidic pH values and
the presence of a low concentration of urea (1-2 M). Both the decrease of pH from 7 to 3.7 and the increase in the concentration of urea from 2 to 4 M substantially prolonged the lag phase
of amyloid formation (Fig. 1), providing an additional argument that the
-oligomer is not on the pathway to amyloid fibril formation. The
conformational transition from the
-monomer to the
-oligomer was
a reversible process in which the relative populations of the isoforms
were a complex function of pH and protein concentration. By contrast,
amyloidogenesis was an essentially irreversible process. The initiation
of amyloidogenesis was controlled by specific conditions, including the
concentration of protein and continuous agitation at 37 °C (data not
shown). Once the process of amyloidogenesis was initiated, it proceeded
until the
-monomer was depleted. Hence, environmental factors,
mainly pH and agitation, determine the preferences for the formation of
the particular non-native isoform.
Elucidation of the kinetic pathways and intermediate steps of
amyloidogenesis in vivo are important for our understanding of prion replication. To the extent that our in vitro system
captures important features of the in vivo process, this
work can provide insight into the events underlying the conversion of
the
-rich monomeric PrPC form into the amyloidogenic
isoform, PrPSc. Our data argue that the
-oligomer is not
on the pathway to amyloid formation (Fig. 7). Instead, multimer I, a
-sheet-rich isoform that binds ANS but not ThT, appears to be a
better candidate for an on-pathway role. It converts to a higher
molecular mass isoform, designated multimer II, with the acquisition of
ThT binding, a feature associated with amyloidogenic isoforms. We have
yet to resolve the molecular events that are critical to the conversion of multimer I to multimer II and the formation of ThT-binding sites.
Although the
-oligomer of recPrP 89-231 is not on the pathway to
the in vitro amyloid isoform, two other recombinant
molecules, recPrP 106 and recPrP 23-231, form similar
-oligomeric
isoforms (15, 26). When expressed in transgenic mice, all three
proteins support PrPSc replication and lead to scrapie
neuropathology (37, 38). In the case of recPrP 89-231 and recPrP
23-231, the
-rich monomer and the
-oligomer are separated by a
substantial kinetic barrier. This has been attributed to the relative
stability and structural complexity of the pretransition
-monomer
isoform (18). For recPrP 106, however, the process of assembly of the
-oligomer occurs more rapidly and does not require the partially
denaturing acidic conditions needed by recPrP 89-231 (26). Deletion of residues 141-176 destabilizes the
-helical conformation. Thus, we
found that the
-oligomer is a preferred in vitro isoform
of recPrP 106. However, despite differences between the pretransition states of recPrP 106 (unfolded) and recPrP 89-231 (folded
-helical), both molecules share a similar region that adopts a
-sheet-rich, PK-resistant structure upon conversion to the
-oligomer (Fig. 8) (26). Unlike PrP
27-30, the infectious PK-resistant core of PrPSc, the
PK-resistant core of the
-oligomer corresponds to the
-helical folded domain of the PrPC isoform.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Schematic diagram of recPrP 106 and recPrP
89-231. The regions that correspond to the three -helices
(boxes A, B, and C) and the two
-strands in the -helical isoform are shaded. Residues
141-177 are deleted in recPrP 106. The PK-resistant core of the
-oligomer is composed of residues 134-217 in recPrP 106 and of
residues 122-221 in recPrP 89-231.
|
|
At present, the biological significance of the
-oligomeric form is
not clear. The formation of nonfibrillar oligomeric forms has been
observed in other neurodegenerative diseases. Recent studies have
suggested that the nonfibrillar, soluble oligomeric form of A
peptides possesses neurotoxic properties and may therefore play a role
in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (39). Rochet et
al. (40) proposed that nonfibrillar oligomers of
-synuclein, rather than the end product fibrils, are associated with the
pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. It remains to be established
whether either of the abnormal forms of recPrP, the
-oligomer or the
amyloid form, can cause neuronal degeneration or prion disease.
For a variety of technical reasons, biophysical studies of the
conformational diversity of misfolded isoforms of the prion protein and
the conformational conversion between the normal cellular isoform and
the pathological conformations have failed to provide us with a clear
picture of these events. Controversy remains as to whether recPrP can
be converted into a monomeric
-sheet-rich isoform (41) or whether an
oligomeric structure is required (15, 42). Although the reduced form of
recPrP exists in four different
-sheet-rich oligomeric isoforms as
judged by reverse-phase chromatography (14, 15), it is the oxidized
form that causes disease (16). Oxidized recPrP with the disulfide bond
intact can form a
-sheet-rich isoform. Initially, this
-sheet-rich isoform was identified in an equilibrium unfolding
experiment as a monomeric intermediate following the denaturation of
the
-monomer (43, 44). More recent studies have showed that this
-sheet-rich isoform is formed only upon oligomerization of recPrP in
which acidic pH and an increased ionic strength of the solution favor
its formation (18, 19). All in vitro refolding studies are
conducted in a concentration range in excess of physiologic conditions.
Clearly, this could impact the relevance of our observations. However,
PrP is normally concentrated at the cell surface in cholesterol-rich rafts, and its mobility is limited to diffusion in the plane of the
cell membrane. Thus, the local effective concentration may be
substantially larger than most estimates.
Previous studies have failed to distinguish between the
-sheet-rich
oligomeric and the fibrillar forms (17, 19). Our work illustrates clear
differences between the oligomeric and fibrillar isoforms. Although the
two abnormal isoforms may coexist under certain experimental
conditions, the
-oligomer is not on the kinetic pathway to fibril
formation and cannot be regarded as a substructure of the fibrillar
form. Instead, we identified two novel multimeric transient
intermediates in PrP amyloid formation. Under appropriate nonreducing
conditions, recPrP can be refolded either into the
-oligomeric or
fibrillar isoform. We believe that a careful study of the refolding
conditions and the identification of obligatory auxiliary molecules
will lead to the in vitro replication of infectious prions.
Current efforts appear to have fallen short of this goal (45, 46).
With the recognition that a common feature of all prion diseases is the
misfolding of PrP, it is important to understand what causes the
significant variation in disease phenotypes and the broad range of
clinical manifestations and neuropathologic changes. Our finding that
unglycosylated recPrP forms two distinct abnormal
-sheet-rich
isoforms suggests that the misfolding pathways in vivo may
also be heterogeneous. The different misfolding pathways that yield
distinct abnormal isoforms may be one of the possible sources of
diversity among prion diseases and could contribute to the difficulty
of refolding PrPSc or PrP 27-30 in vitro.
However, a better understanding of the conformational diversity of
misfolded forms of PrP and the kinetic routes that they follow to the
various
-sheet-rich isoforms should improve our understanding of the
molecular mechanism of PrPSc formation and the specific
roles that cellular compartments play in shepherding this process.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work and mass spectrometry were supported by grants
from the National Institutes of Health as well as by a gift from the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Medical Biotechnology Center, University of
Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Baltimore, MD 21201.
§§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cellular and
Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, Box
0450, San Francisco, CA 94143. E-mail:
cohen@cmpharm.ucsf.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 23, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111402200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PrP, prion protein;
PK, proteinase K;
ANS, 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonate;
ESI, electrospray ionization;
MS, mass spectrometry;
Mo, mouse;
rec, recombinant;
SEC, size exclusion chromatography;
SHa, Syrian hamster;
ThT, thioflavin T;
HPLC, high pressure liquid
chromatography.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Prusiner, S. B.
(1997)
Science
278,
245-251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
793-819[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Prusiner, S. B.,
McKinley, M. P.,
Bowman, K. A.,
Bolton, D. C.,
Bendheim, P. E.,
Groth, D. F.,
and Glenner, G. G.
(1983)
Cell
35,
349-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Pan, K.-M.,
Baldwin, M.,
Nguyen, J.,
Gasset, M.,
Serban, A.,
Groth, D.,
Mehlhorn, I.,
Huang, Z.,
Fletterick, R. J.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
10962-10966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Bessen, R. A.,
and Marsh, R. F.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
2096-21011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Hecker, R.,
Taraboulos, A.,
Scott, M.,
Pan, K.-M.,
Torchia, M.,
Jendroska, K.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
1213-1228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Scott, M. R.,
Groth, D.,
Tatzelt, J.,
Torchia, M.,
Tremblay, P.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1997)
J. Virol.
71,
9032-9044[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Bessen, R. A.,
and Marsh, R. F.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
7859-7868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Telling, G. C.,
Haga, T.,
Torchia, M.,
Tremblay, P.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1736-1750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Caughey, B.,
Raymond, G. J.,
and Bessen, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
32230-32235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Safar, J.,
Wille, H.,
Itri, V.,
Groth, D.,
Serban, H.,
Torchia, M.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1998)
Nat. Med.
4,
1157-1165[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Peretz, D.,
Scott, M.,
Groth, D.,
Williamson, A.,
Burton, D.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(2001)
Protein Sci.
10,
854-863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Somerville, R. A.
(1999)
J. Gen. Virol.
80,
1865-1872[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Lu, B. Y.,
Beck, P. J.,
and Chang, J. Y.
(2001)
Eur. J. Biochem.
268,
3767-3773[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Lu, B. Y.,
and Chang, J. Y.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
13390-13396[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Turk, E.,
Teplow, D. B.,
Hood, L. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1988)
Eur. J. Biochem.
176,
21-30[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Swietnicki, W.,
Morillas, M.,
Chen, S. G.,
Gambetti, P.,
and Surewicz, W. K.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
424-431[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Baskakov, I. V.,
Legname, G.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Cohen, F. E.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19687-19690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Morillas, M.,
Vanik, D. L.,
and Surewicz, W. K.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
6982-6987[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Mehlhorn, I.,
Groth, D.,
Stöckel, J.,
Moffat, B.,
Reilly, D.,
Yansura, D.,
Willett, W. S.,
Baldwin, M.,
Fletterick, R.,
Cohen, F. E.,
Vandlen, R.,
Henner, D.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
5528-5537[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Klunk, W. E.,
Jacob, R. F.,
and Mason, R. P.
(1999)
Methods Enzymol.
309,
285-305[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
LeVine, H.
(1993)
Protein Sci.
2,
404-410[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Safar, J.,
Roller, P. P.,
Gajdusek, D. C.,
and Gibbs, C. J., Jr.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
8375-8383[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Wille, H.,
Zhang, G.-F.,
Baldwin, M. A.,
Cohen, F. E.,
and Prusiner, S. B.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
259,
608-621[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Peretz, D.,
Williamson, R. A.,
Matsunaga, Y.,
Serban, H.,
Pinilla, C.,
Bastidas, R. B.,
Rozenshteyn, R.,
James, T. L.,
Houghten, R. A.,
Cohen, F. E.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Burton, D. R.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
273,
614-622[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Baskakov, I. V.,
Aagaard, C.,
Mehlhorn, I.,
Wille, H.,
Groth, D.,
Baldwin, M. A.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Cohen, F. E.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
2792-2804[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Litvinovich, S. V.,
Brew, S. A.,
Aota, S.,
Akiyama, S. K.,
Haudenschild, C.,
and Ingham, K. C.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
280,
245-258[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Kayed, R.,
Bernhagen, J.,
Greenfield, N.,
Sweimeh, K.,
Brunner, H.,
Voelter, W.,
and Kapurniotu, A.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
287,
781-796[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Baskakov, I. V.,
and Bolen, D. W.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
18010-18017[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Carrell, R. W.,
and Lomas, D. A.
(1997)
Lancet
350,
134-138[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Guijarro, J. I.,
Sunde, M.,
Jones, J. A.,
Campbell, I. D.,
and Dobson, C. M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
4224-4228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Chiti, F.,
Webster, P.,
Taddei, N.,
Clark, A.,
Stefani, M.,
Ramponi, G.,
and Dobson, C. M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3590-3594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Konno, T.,
Murata, K.,
and Nagayama, K.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
454,
122-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Fändrich, M.,
Fletcher, M. A.,
and Dobson, C. M.
(2001)
Nature
410,
165-166[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Dobson, C. M.
(1999)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
24,
329-332[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Sigler, P. B., Xu, Z.,
Rye, H. S.,
Burston, S. G.,
Fenton, W. A.,
and Horwich, A. L.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
581-608[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Supattapone, S.,
Bosque, P.,
Muramoto, T.,
Wille, H.,
Aagaard, C.,
Peretz, D.,
Nguyen, H.-O. B.,
Heinrich, C.,
Torchia, M.,
Safar, J.,
Cohen, F. E.,
DeArmond, S. J.,
Prusiner, S. B.,
and Scott, M.
(1999)
Cell
96,
869-878[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Fischer, M.,
Rülicke, T.,
Raeber, A.,
Sailer, A.,
Moser, M.,
Oesch, B.,
Brandner, S.,
Aguzzi, A.,
and Weissmann, C.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1255-1264[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Lambert, M. P.,
Barlow, A. K.,
Chromy, B. A.,
Edwards, C.,
Freed, R.,
Liosatos, M.,
Morgan, T. E.,
Rozovsk |