JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M111402200 on March 23, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21140-21148, June 14, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/24/21140    most recent
M111402200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baskakov, I. V.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, F. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baskakov, I. V.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, F. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Pathway Complexity of Prion Protein Assembly into Amyloid*

Ilia V. BaskakovDagger §, Giuseppe LegnameDagger , Michael A. BaldwinDagger ||, Stanley B. PrusinerDagger **, and Fred E. CohenDagger ||**Dagger Dagger §§

From the Dagger  Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases, the  Department of Neurology, the || Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, the ** Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, and the Dagger Dagger  Departments of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology and of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143

Received for publication, November 29, 2001, and in revised form, March 14, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In vivo under pathological conditions, the normal cellular form of the prion protein, PrPC (residues 23-231), misfolds to the pathogenic isoform PrPSc, a beta -rich aggregated pathogenic multimer. Proteinase K digestion of PrPSc leads to a proteolytically resistant core, PrP 27-30 (residues 90-231), that can form amyloid fibrils. To study the kinetic pathways of amyloid formation in vitro, we used unglycosylated recombinant PrP corresponding to the proteinase K-resistant core of PrPSc and found that it can adopt two non-native abnormal isoforms, a beta -oligomer and an amyloid fibril. Several lines of kinetic data suggest that the beta -oligomer is not on the pathway to amyloid formation. The preferences for forming either a beta -oligomer or amyloid can be dictated by experimental conditions, with acidic pH similar to that seen in endocytic vesicles favoring the beta -oligomer and neutral pH favoring amyloid. Although both abnormal isoforms have high beta -sheet content and bind 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonate, they are dissimilar structurally. Multiple pathways of misfolding and the formation of distinct beta -sheet-rich abnormal isoforms may explain the difficulties in refolding PrPSc in vitro, the need for a PrPSc template, and the significant variation in disease presentation and neuropathology.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein misfolding is a hallmark of the prion diseases. In vivo and recent in vitro experiments demonstrate that the misfolded pathological isoform of PrP1 (prion protein), designated PrPSc, directs the conversion of PrPC, the normal cellular isoform, into PrPSc (1). This conversion requires a substantial conformational change: PrPC is a proteinase K (PK)-sensitive, alpha -helical monomer, whereas PrPSc is a PK-resistant, aggregated beta -sheet-rich multimer (2). Upon PK digestion, PrPSc loses residues 23 to ~89, and the PK-resistant core, PrP 27-30 (residues ~90-231), forms amyloid fibrils (3). PrP 27-30 remains fully infectious and retains high beta -sheet content (4). The infectivity of PrPSc and PrP 27-30 presumably owes to the ability of the protein to traffic to the brain and templates the conversion of PrPC to PrPSc.

Different strains of prions have unique neurohistological and biochemical features as well as distinct clinical patterns (5, 6). Clinicopathological features include the specific incubation time, the neuroanatomic distribution, and the degree of PK resistance (7). These features, which are stable following serial transmission in a given animal, have been attributed to conformationally distinct multimeric arrangements of PrPSc. During the past several years, a considerable body of evidence has accumulated arguing that the properties of prion strains are enciphered in their conformations (8-12). Although it seems clear that prion strains are comprised of different conformers of PrPSc, glycosylation patterns and specific polymorphisms may add to strain diversity (13). Here we examine the ability of unglycosylated recombinant (rec) PrP with an intact disulfide bond and without a GPI anchor to form different non-native beta -sheet-rich isoforms in vitro.

Recent studies by J. Y. Chang and co-workers (14, 15) demonstrated that the reduced form of recPrP 23-231 exists in four beta -sheet-rich isoforms as judged by their distinct retention times in reverse-phase chromatography. However, other differences in the physicochemical properties of these isoforms have not been characterized. Because PrPSc and PrPC both maintain a disulfide bridge (16), we believe that it is important to focus on the ability of a nonreduced form of recPrP to adopt non-native conformations. Several recent studies have reported that nonreduced recPrP forms oligomeric beta -sheet-rich isoforms (17-19). Unfortunately, a consistent picture of the differences between these distinct abnormal isoforms has yet to emerge.

By studying mouse and Syrian hamster PrP (designated Mo recPrP 89-231 and SHa recPrP 90-231, respectively), we demonstrated that the protein can adopt the alpha -helical native isoform, two non-native beta -sheet-rich isoforms, a beta -oligomer, and an amyloid fibril. These two abnormal isoforms may coexist under certain experimental conditions; however, the beta -oligomer is not on the kinetic pathway to amyloid formation and is not a substructure in the assembling fibril. Instead, we have identified two novel multimeric transient intermediates in amyloid formation. The preferences for forming either a beta -oligomer or amyloid can be dictated by experimental conditions, with acidic pH similar to that observed in endocytic vesicles favoring the beta -oligomer and neutral pH favoring amyloid. Although both abnormal isoforms have high beta -sheet content and bind 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonate (ANS), they are dissimilar structurally. In the amyloid form, residues 90-120 are buried in a manner reminiscent of PrP 27-30, whereas in the beta -oligomer, this region is available for antibody binding. After PK digestion, the amyloid form is digested into a number of small fragments, whereas residues 122-221 of the beta -oligomer remain intact. Analysis of the oligomerization state using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) indicates that the beta -oligomer is predominantly octameric. Our data demonstrate that PrP is capable of forming several abnormal isoforms and that the preference to fold into a particular abnormal isoform is influenced substantially by experimental conditions.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein Preparation and Refolding-- The expression and purification of Mo recPrP 89-231 and SHa recPrP 90-231 were performed as described previously (20). The purified protein was seen to be a single pure species with an intact disulfide bond as confirmed by SDS-PAGE and electrospray mass spectrometry (Applied Biosystems Mariner; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

recPrP folds into its native alpha -helical conformation upon dilution from 10 M urea (20 mM sodium acetate, pH 3.7) to 1 M urea (20 mM sodium acetate, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 5.5). To refold the protein into the beta -oligomeric isoform, recPrP was diluted from 10 to 5 M urea (20 mM sodium acetate, 0.2 NaCl, pH 3.7) and incubated overnight at room temperature in 5 M urea (18). The process of assembling to the beta -oligomer was monitored by CD and size exclusion chromatography (SEC). Once recPrP was refolded into the beta -oligomer, it remained stable after dilution from 5 to 1 M urea in 20 mM sodium acetate, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 5.5.

Dye Binding-- The binding of Congo red (Sigma) was monitored using absorption spectroscopy. A fresh solution of Congo red was prepared by dissolving the dye in 5 mM potassium phosphate and 150 mM NaCl, filtering it five times with a 0.22-mm filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA), and adjusting the concentration to 0.3 mM. The difference spectra were obtained by subtracting the Congo red spectra obtained in the absence of protein from the Congo red spectra measured in the presence of protein. These measurements were corrected for light scattering as described by Klunk et al. (21).

Thioflavin T (ThT; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) fluorescence was monitored using a LS50B fluorimeter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences) at 482 nm (excitation at 450 nm; excitation slit was 5 nm; emission slit was 10 nm; 0.4-cm rectangular cuvettes) as described (22). The fluorescence of ANS (Sigma) was monitored at 475 nm (excitation at 385 nm; excitation slit was 5 nm; emission slit was 10 nm; 0.4-cm rectangular cuvettes) as described (23). In the time course of amyloid formation, aliquots of recPrP were diluted 20 times by phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.0, and incubated with either 5 µM ThT or 110 µM ANS for 15 min at room temperature before monitoring fluorescence.

Negative Staining and Electron Microscopy-- Negative staining was performed on carbon-coated, 600-mesh copper grids that were glow-discharged prior to staining. The samples were adsorbed for 30 s, stained with freshly filtered 2% ammonium molybdate or 2% uranyl acetate, dried, and then viewed in a JEOL 100CX II electron microscope (Tokyo, Japan) at 80 kV at standard magnifications of 40,000 and 80,000 as described previously (24).

Epitope Presentation-- The pattern of epitope presentation of the amyloid isoform of SHa recPrP 90-231 was assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as described by Peretz et al. (25).

Circular Dichroism-- CD spectra were recorded with a J-720 CD spectrometer (Jasco, Easton, MD) scanning at 20 nm/min, with a band width of 1 nm and data spacing of 0.5 nm using a 0.1-cm cuvette as described previously (18). Three individual scans were averaged, and the background spectra were subtracted.

Size Exclusion Chromatography-- All of the separations were performed at 23 °C with a flow rate of 1 ml/min using a TSK-3000 HPLC gel filtration column (300 mm × 7.80 mm) equilibrated in a running buffer (pH 3.7) of 20 mM sodium acetate, 0.2 M NaCl, and 1 M urea. During the time course of amyloid formation, the aliquots of recPrP were diluted twice using the running buffer and immediately analyzed by SEC.

Dynamic Light Scattering-- All of the measurements were carried out using a DynaPro-801 TC Dynamic Light Scattering Instrument (Protein Solution Inc., Lakewood, NJ). The samples (30 ml) were filtered through 100-nm membrane filters (Whatman Inc., Ann Arbor, MI), placed in the quartz cuvette of DynaPro-MSTC, and measured at a constant temperature of 23 °C (26).

Proteinase K Digestion-- recPrP was incubated with PK at a 40:1 ratio at 37 °C in 20 mM sodium acetate, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 5.5. The digestion was stopped by adding phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride to a 1 mM final concentration and Pefabloc (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) to a 3 mM final concentration. The samples were analyzed by 16% Tris SDS-PAGE followed by Western blot or by HPLC-MS (26).

Mass Spectrometry-- The PK digestion products were separated by reverse-phase HPLC-MS as described previously (26). HPLC was carried out with an Applied Biosystems 140B syringe pump solvent delivery system using a 1 × 150-mm C-18 Vydac column with a 300-Å pore size and a 5-µm particle size, connected to a 759A UV detector with a 35-nl capillary flow cell. Solvent A was 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid, and solvent B was acetonitrile with 0.08% trifluoroacetic acid, with a linear gradient of 5-95% over 30 min at a flow rate of 50 ml/min. The eluate was split such that ~10% was introduced into the electrospray ionization source of the orthogonal accelerated time of flight mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems). The mass spectra were recorded continuously at 5-s intervals over the range of 600-2000 m/z. UV chromatograms recorded at 215 nm were compared with total ion current traces obtained from the mass spectrometer. Either ESI-MS spectra corresponding to peaks in the UV and total ion current traces were selected for averaging and deconvoluted using the software provided with the mass spectrometer, or spectra containing signals from multiple unresolved peptides were deconvoluted manually by visual inspection and by selection of related multiply charged ions. Deconvolution converted each multiply charged ion series into a single peak of zero charge, giving the relative molecular masses of the peptides. The experimentally determined values were compared with calculations for all possible fragments of the Mo recPrP 89-231 sequence. The calculated values were based on monoisotopic atomic masses for the smaller peptides (<3000 Da) and on average masses for the larger peptides, for which the isotopic components could not be resolved.

For supramolecular ESI-MS, salt was removed from the protein samples by dialysis, and organic solvent (20% methanol or other solvent) was added to the buffer to enhance vaporization. The solutions were sprayed into the mass spectrometer, giving multiply charged ions of the oligomers in the gas phase with the pattern of peaks shown in Fig. 5a. This pattern was deconvoluted to give the oligomeric species shown in Fig. 5b.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In a previous study, we showed that recPrP can be folded either to its native, monomeric alpha -helical isoform or to a beta -sheet-rich, oligomeric form (18). There is an equilibrium between the alpha -helical and the beta -sheet-rich isoforms, where partially denaturing conditions (acidic pH and urea) and increased concentrations of PrP favor conversion to the beta -oligomer. The conformational transition from the alpha -helical to the beta -sheet-rich isoform is separated by a large energy barrier that is associated with unfolding and with a higher order kinetic process related to the oligomerization. Because of the height of the energy barrier, the conformational transition from the alpha -isoform to the beta -isoform occurs very slowly, and PrP is kinetically trapped in its native alpha -helical conformation. Based on our preliminary data, we suggested that the beta -oligomer could be a thermodynamically stable, on-pathway intermediate in amyloid formation.

To explore further the pathway of amyloid formation, we studied the behavior of the beta -oligomer in greater detail. We incubated the beta -oligomer at 37 °C under constant shaking, which led to the formation of amyloid fibrils as measured by ThT binding (Fig. 1). The kinetics of fibrillogenesis exhibit a lag phase followed by an exponential increase in fibril formation. The length of the lag phase was a function of pH, ranging from 10 h at pH 6.1 or pH 7.2 to 3 days at pH 3.7 (Fig. 1a). Additionally, the lag phase could be prolonged by increasing concentrations of urea (Fig. 1b). We found that after the kinetic trace reached a plateau, additional incubation of samples at 37 °C resulted in a decrease in the ThT binding. Under these conditions or following dialysis out of urea, fibrils tended to aggregate into large insoluble particles as seen by electron microscopy (Fig. 1c). Both Mo recPrP 89-231 and SHa recPrP 90-231 formed amyloid fibrils under similar conditions, but each had a distinct morphology. Fibrils of Mo recPrP were formed by twisted protofibrils with a diameter of ~20 nm (Fig. 1d), whereas those of SHa recPrP had a diameter of 10-15 nm (Fig. 1c). The addition of a 0.5% seed of prefolded amyloid to the fresh reaction substantially reduced the lag phase of the process, demonstrating that the process can be induced by seeding (data not shown).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The beta -oligomer of recPrP assembles into fibrils. The kinetics of fibril formation for 0.4 mg/ml of SHa recPrP 90-231 in 20 mM sodium acetate buffer and 0.2 M NaCl as monitored by ThT fluorescence are shown. a, kinetic traces as a function of pH values at fixed concentration of 4 M urea. , pH 3.7; open circle , pH 4.1; black-down-triangle , pH 5.0; down-triangle, pH 6.1; black-square, pH 7.2. b, kinetic traces as a function of concentration of urea at pH 3.7. , 2 M urea; black-down-triangle , 3 M urea; black-square, 4 M urea. c, electron micrographs of amyloid fibrils of SHa recPrP 90-231 stained immediately upon dilution from 4 M urea (left panel) and upon dialysis out of 4 M urea (right panel). The left micrograph was taken at 40,000× magnification, and the right micrograph was taken at 20,000× magnification. d, electron micrographs of fibrillar Mo recPrP 89-231 taken at 40,000× (left panel) and 80,000× magnification (right panel). The bars in c and d represent 0.1 µm.

Spectroscopic measurements were used to distinguish the beta -oligomer from the fibrillar form. In contrast to the beta -oligomer, the fibrils bind Congo red and ThT (Fig. 2), a common feature of amyloid structures. The binding of Congo red was detected as a typical red shift in its absorbance spectra (Fig. 2a) and as birefringence under polarized light (data not shown). Congo red binding was saturated at a 5:1 ratio of dye molecule to polypeptide chain. Specific binding of ThT resulted in substantial increases of fluorescence with a maximum at 482 nm (Fig. 2b).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Fibrils of Mo recPrP 89-231 possess properties different from the beta -oligomer. a, top panel, absorbance spectra of free Congo red at ten concentrations. Spectra show (from bottom to top) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 14, and 18 µM, respectively. Middle panel, corrected absorbance spectra of fibrillar Mo recPrP 89-231 (2.2 µM) at the same ten concentrations of Congo red listed for the top panel. Bottom panel, difference spectra obtained at six different concentrations of Congo red (from bottom to top) in the presence of fibrillar Mo recPrP 89-231: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 µM. b, fluorescence spectra of ThT in the presence of 24 µg/ml of Mo recPrP 89-231 folded to the fibrillar form (solid line), 200 µg/ml of the beta -oligomer form (dotted line), and in the absence of protein (dashed line). c, fluorescence spectra of ANS in the presence of the fibrillar form (solid line), the beta -oligomer form (dotted line), and the alpha -monomer form (dotted and dashed line) of Mo recPrP 89-231 (22 µg/ml) and in the absence of protein (dashed line).

ANS has been used to study the partially folded states of globular proteins as well as the binding pockets of a number of carrier proteins and enzymes. ANS has also been used to characterize fibrillar forms of amyloidogenic proteins and infectious isoforms of PrP (27, 28). According to Safar et al. (23), ANS binds to PrP 27-30, as detected by increased ANS fluorescence and a blue shift of its fluorescence maxima from 540 to 490 nm. Similarly, ANS binding to fibrils of Mo recPrP 89-231 was accompanied by a substantial increase in the fluorescence yield and a blue shift of its fluorescence spectrum (Fig. 2c). However, similar changes in the fluorescence spectra were observed when ANS was added to a solution of the beta -oligomer. The alpha -helix-rich monomeric structure did not show any evidence of ANS binding (Fig. 2c). Hence, ANS binds to both beta -sheet-rich forms, amyloid fibrils, and the beta -oligomer but not to the alpha -helical isoform.

The process of amyloid formation of recPrP can be used as a model to study the self-propagating conformational transition of PrP. However, in vitro formation of the beta -oligomer and amyloid has not produced infectious prions thus far. Because these refolded molecules are not equivalent to the infectious form, we sought to characterize the structural similarities of these isoforms with PrPSc. One of the properties that distinguishes PrPSc from PrPC is the loss of antigenicity of residues 90-120. Accessibility of this epitope can be determined from a difference in the reactivities of specific antibodies to the nondenatured and denatured forms of PrP (25). To determine whether residues 90-120 are exposed or buried in the amyloid form of recPrP, we probed the binding of two antibody fragments (Fabs), D13 and 3F4, which are specific to epitopes 96-106 and 108-112, respectively. Binding of both Fabs to the nondenatured amyloid was relatively weak, whereas their reactivities were substantially greater after denaturation of the amyloid (Fig. 3). The increased reactivities of these Fabs reflect the greater exposure of epitope 96-112 to the solvent upon denaturation. In contrast to the epitope 96-112 of the N-terminal region, the C-terminal epitope 225-231 is exposed in the PrPSc isoform (25). The accessibility of this region in the amyloid form of recPrP was assayed using R1 and R2 Fabs, both of which bind to residues in the epitope 225-231. The reactivities of these Fabs were very similar regardless of whether or not the amyloid fibrils were denatured. A similar epitope presentation in the amyloid of SHa recPrP 90-231 and PrP 27-30 indicates that both forms have some common features.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Amyloid of SHa recPrP 90-231 has an epitope presentation similar to PrP 27-30 (25). Reactivity of four different Fabs (top to bottom panels): D13, 3F4, R1, and R2, to nondenatured () and denatured (open circle ) amyloid tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Kinetics of Amyloid Formation Probed by Multiple Methods-- To understand the basic principles involved in the conformational transition and oligomerization of PrP, we studied the kinetic pathway of amyloidogenesis in vitro. One question we wanted to address is whether the beta -oligomer is on the pathway to amyloid formation. To dissect the in vitro folding pathway, the kinetics of amyloid formation were monitored in parallel by three biophysical techniques: SEC, ThT binding, and ANS binding. Employing SEC, we found four isoforms of Mo recPrP 89-231 with distinct oligomerization states (Fig. 4a). The isoform with an elution volume of 10.2 ml corresponded to the monomer, had an alpha -helical conformation as measured by CD, and was characterized by the absence of ThT and ANS binding. The isoform eluted at 7.2 ml corresponded to the beta -oligomer and did not bind ThT but bound ANS. There were two distinct multimeric forms of recPrP with very similar elution volumes of 5.45 ml (multimer I) and 5.22 ml (multimer II) (Table I). Because of their similar elution volumes, both multimers appeared as one asymmetrical peak in most SEC experiments (Fig. 4b). However, these two multimeric isoforms could be distinguished following a 15-h incubation. Under these conditions, the multimer I and II peaks were equally populated (Fig. 4b). Both multimeric isoforms were enriched in beta -sheet content and bound ANS. However, only multimer II bound ThT (data not shown). The properties of all PrP isoforms identified by SEC during the time course of amyloid formation are summarized in Table I.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Kinetics of amyloid formation of Mo recPrP 89-231 (0. 6 mg/ml) in 20 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.0, 0.2 M NaCl, and 1 M urea incubated at 37 °C under continuous agitation. a, SEC profiles of (bottom to top) original sample and upon incubation for 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 21, 31, 36, and 57 h. b, the multimer peak from SEC profiles obtained upon incubation of PrP for (bottom to top) 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 21, 25, and 31 h. c, the kinetics of amyloid formation of recPrP that was initially refolded to the alpha -monomer form. Top panel, time-dependent change of ThT fluorescence (), and the population of the alpha -monomer (black-square), the beta -oligomer (black-down-triangle ), and the multimer () as monitored by SEC. Middle panel, kinetic trace of ANS fluorescence (), the combined populations of nonmonomer isoforms (black-down-triangle ), and the population of multimer that does not penetrate through the SEC column (). Bottom panel, the elution volume of multimer peak I () and multimer peak II (open circle ). d, the kinetics of amyloid formation of recPrP that was initially refolded to the beta -oligomer form. The symbol definitions are the same as for c.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Identification and characterization of recPrP isoforms with different oligomerization states

To study the relationships between these four isoforms, the alpha -monomer, beta -oligomer, and multimers I and II, we monitored the time-dependent change in the populations of these forms during the process of amyloid formation. Because of the very similar elution volumes for the peaks of multimers I and II, a single kinetic trace represents the sum of both isoforms. A decrease in the alpha -monomer population was accompanied by an immediate and simultaneous growth of both the beta -oligomer and the combined population of the multimers (Fig. 4c). Because there was no time delay between the kinetic traces of the formation of the multimer and beta -oligomer, it was difficult to judge whether the beta -oligomer was an on- or off-pathway intermediate to amyloid fibril formation.

To investigate this further, we monitored the kinetics of amyloidogenesis starting from the beta -oligomer of Mo recPrP 89-231 (Fig. 4d). A decrease in the beta -oligomer population coincided with a growth in the alpha -monomer population, whereas the kinetics of accumulation of the multimer showed a lag phase (Fig. 4d). The multimer fraction started to increase only after the alpha -monomer concentration reached a certain level. As soon as the multimer appeared, its population grew rapidly. This coincided with a rapid decrease in the population of the alpha -monomer (Fig. 4d). It seems that the conversion of the beta -oligomer into the alpha -monomer was slower than the consumption of the alpha -monomer during amyloidogenesis. Thus, the population of the alpha -monomer was exhausted after 20 h, and then temporarily increased again because of a slow dissociation of the beta -oligomer. These data indicate that the beta -oligomer may be off the pathway to amyloid formation and that the refolding and dissociation of the beta -oligomer back into the alpha -monomer most likely precede fibril formation.

Comparison of the kinetic traces monitored by SEC and ThT binding provides important insight into the mechanism of amyloidogenesis. The kinetics of ThT binding was delayed relative to multimer formation (Fig. 4c). The initial growth of ThT fluorescence corresponded to the time point when multimer II appeared (Fig. 4c, bottom panel). This agrees with our previous result that the conversion from multimer I to multimer II is critical with respect to ThT binding (Table I). ThT binding continued to increase even after the trace for the combined population of multimers reached a plateau. Consequently, at this stage of the amyloidogenic process, the growth of ThT fluorescence cannot be explained solely by the increased multimer II population. Instead, we observed that increased ThT signals coincided with a gradual shift of the elution volume of multimer II from 5.25 to 5.0 ml (Fig. 4c). Because the SEC column has nonlinear properties in the range of 5.0-6.0 ml, even a modest change in the elution volume of multimer II corresponded to a substantial increase in its molecular mass. Hence, the kinetic trace of ThT fluorescence may represent two processes, (i) an increase in the population of multimer II and (ii) a growth in the size of multimeric species. Furthermore, the shift in the elution volume of the multimer II peak was followed by a decrease in the peak area (Fig. 4c, middle panel). It is likely that the disappearance of this peak was caused by an inability of the species to penetrate the SEC column as a result of the substantial size of multimer II. In addition, both kinetic experiments showed that the species identified by ANS binding coincided with that representing the total population of all isoforms excluding the alpha -monomer. This suggests that ANS binds nonselectively to all beta -sheet-rich isoforms. The level of ANS fluorescence remained stable during the last stage of the fibrillogenic process, whereas the area of the multimer peak eluted from SEC decreased. This result also indicates that the last stage of amyloidogenesis monitored by SEC represents an elongation of multimer II, which affects its ability to penetrate the column. Overall, our kinetic experiments indicate that the beta -oligomer is not on a direct path to amyloid formation. Furthermore, our data argue that the transition from the beta -oligomer to the multimer occurs through the dissociation of the beta -oligomer with refolding to form the alpha -monomer.

Amyloid Form and the beta -Oligomer Have Distinct Conformational Properties-- To probe the conformational differences between the beta -oligomer and the amyloid isoform, we employed limited PK digestion combined with ESI-MS. PK digestion has been used widely to distinguish PrPSc from PrPC as well as to probe the differences between PrPSc strains (8, 11). After treatment for 1 h at 37 °C with a 1:40 ratio of PK to protein, the beta -oligomer was cleaved into short peptides corresponding to the N-terminal region, whereas the central and C-terminal regions (residues 122-221) remained intact (Fig. 5a). Epitope mapping confirmed that residues 122-221 comprise the proteinase-resistant core of the beta -oligomer. Fab D13, which binds to the epitope including residues 96-106, does not bind the proteinase-resistant core, whereas Fabs D18 and R72, which are specific to epitopes 133-157 and 152-163, respectively, bind the PK-resistant core, as shown on Western blots (Fig. 5c). Surprisingly, the amyloid form was digested into mostly short peptides with no apparent PK-resistant core (Fig. 5b). Clearly, the polypeptide chains of the beta -oligomer are assembled differently than those of the amyloid isoform.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Limited PK digestion of abnormal isoforms of Mo recPrP 89-231. HPLC-MS analysis of the peptides produced by digestion of the beta -oligomer (a) and amyloid form (b) after 1 h of incubation with PK (1:40 ratio) at 37 °C. The peptides identified by MS in the course of separation by HPLC are shown on top of the peaks. The numbers correspond to the N- and C-terminal amino acids of PrP. c, immunoblots of PK-digested products of the beta -oligomer treated with three Fabs: D13 (left panel), D18 (middle panel), and R72 (right panel). The fractions migrated to the molecular masses indicated (in kDa).

Structural studies of the beta -sheet-rich PrPSc isoform have been hampered by the lack of a soluble homogeneous preparation. Although the beta -oligomer has not been found to be infectious, it may provide a useful surrogate for biophysical characterization by NMR spectroscopy or x-ray crystallography. Thus, we probed the stoichiometry and heterogeneity of the beta -oligomer using dynamic light scattering, supramolecular ESI-MS, and SEC. The Stokes radius of the beta -oligomer was 6.5 nm as measured by dynamic light scattering (data not shown). Assuming an ideal spherical shape, this translates into an average molecular mass of 300 kDa. Analysis of the squared variance of the SEC peak that corresponds to the beta -oligomer indicates that it is a relatively heterogeneous population (29). To probe the stoichiometry of the beta -oligomers, we employed supramolecular ESI-MS (Fig. 6a). We observed two distinct groups of peaks: (i) narrow, well resolved peaks in the 800-2000 m/z region representing a monomeric protein with an molecular mass of 16,197 Da and (ii) broader peaks in the 2500-4000 m/z region (Fig. 5a). Deconvolution of these broad peaks suggested a maximum molecular mass of 129,867 Da (Fig. 6b), a value equivalent to the molecular mass of eight recPrP 89-231 molecules and an additional ~290 Da attributable to salt or buffer ions. Additional broad peaks in the 3500-4000 m/z region, which were difficult to deconvolute, indicate the presence of a smaller amount of species with different and possibly higher oligomerization states. A comparison of the areas under the peaks suggests that the oligomers are predominant in solution even under experimental conditions employed for ESI-MS. Changing the organic component from methanol to acetonitrile or trifluoroethanol gave a higher proportion of the monomer, showing that this isoform was formed by dissociation in solution (data not shown). Regardless of the solvent conditions, the ESI-MS spectra showed that only two species, the monomer and the oligomer (predominantly octamer), were present. This confirms that there were no significantly populated stable intermediates in the dissociation of the octamer.


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Stoichiometry of the beta -oligomer as probed by mass spectrometry. a, ESI-MS of Mo recPrP 89-231 refolded into the beta -oligomer sprayed from 20% methanol at a nozzle voltage of 150 V. The labels on the peaks indicate the mass/protonation (charge) ratio of the species. b, deconvolution of the group of peaks with mass/charge ratio from +40 to +48 shown in Fig. 4a results in a peak with a maximum of 129,867 Da, which is 290 Da greater than the predicted molecular mass for the octamer. c, ESI-MS of the beta -oligomer sprayed from 20% methanol at a nozzle voltage of 50 V.

We obtained a similar result by fragmenting the ions within the mass spectrometer after evaporation of the solvent by applying higher nozzle voltage. At low voltage (50 V), we observed predominantly oligomers (>99%) (Fig. 6c). By progressively increasing the velocity of the ions as they passed through residual gas molecules, we were able to break up the oligomers into monomeric products (data not shown) in a manner akin to that found by varying the solvent conditions. These results support our previous observation that the assembly of the alpha -monomer into the beta -oligomer is cooperative (18, 26). The fact that the beta -oligomeric species remains assembled even in a gas phase in the absence of hydrophobic forces indicates that major contributions to the thermodynamic stability of the complex should be due to hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions. This exceptional stability could account for the PK resistance of the beta -oligomer.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein misfolding appears to play a central role in prion disorders and a variety of other neurodegenerative diseases (1, 30). A unifying feature of these diseases is the existence of a native, stable monomeric isoform that is easily reached from the unfolded state and a multimeric beta -sheet-rich isoform that is substantially more stable. Our recent studies indicate that the folding of PrP to its native, alpha -helical conformation is under kinetic rather than thermodynamic control (18). In addition, many proteins unrelated to neurodegenerative and conformational diseases are capable of adopting an alternative beta -sheet-rich amyloid fold (31-34). These findings suggest that amyloidogenesis is a general phenomenon in protein folding, related to physicochemical properties of the polypeptide backbone (32, 35). This may require us to readdress many basic issues of protein folding, such as kinetic traps in the folding pathway, the complexity of the energy landscape of protein folding, and the position of the native state in this landscape. These considerations highlight the need for compartmentalization to improve the fidelity of in vivo folding (36).

Here, we demonstrate that recPrP is able to form two structurally distinct non-native isoforms: the beta -oligomer and an amyloid isoform. Our initial assumption that the beta -oligomer might be an intermediate on the pathway to an amyloid isoform is not supported by current results. Instead, the kinetic experiments indicate that the amyloidogenic process occurs through a pathway different from the one that leads to the beta -oligomer (Fig. 7). The beta -oligomer and the amyloid have different structural organizations as judged by PK digestion. Hence, the beta -oligomer is not a substructure of the amyloid isoform. The beta -oligomer must dissociate and refold to form the amyloid isoform. PK digestion argues that the beta -oligomer is more like PrP 27-30, whereas epitope mapping demonstrates some structural similarities of the amyloid isoform with PrP 27-30. However, our inability to demonstrate to date that both the beta -oligomer and the amyloid isoform are efficient infectious agents implies that the refolding protocols used in this study do not mimic the cellular misfolding process directed by PrPSc under pathological conditions.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Kinetic scheme for the amyloid formation of recPrP 89-231.

Solution conditions play a substantial role in determining the particular route of misfolding and preferences to forming a particular abnormal isoform. The conformational transition from the alpha -monomer to the beta -oligomer occurs at pH <5. The rate of conversion is significantly facilitated by partially denaturing concentrations of urea (4-5 M). In contrast, the optimal solution conditions for amyloidogenesis include neutral to slightly acidic pH values and the presence of a low concentration of urea (1-2 M). Both the decrease of pH from 7 to 3.7 and the increase in the concentration of urea from 2 to 4 M substantially prolonged the lag phase of amyloid formation (Fig. 1), providing an additional argument that the beta -oligomer is not on the pathway to amyloid fibril formation. The conformational transition from the alpha -monomer to the beta -oligomer was a reversible process in which the relative populations of the isoforms were a complex function of pH and protein concentration. By contrast, amyloidogenesis was an essentially irreversible process. The initiation of amyloidogenesis was controlled by specific conditions, including the concentration of protein and continuous agitation at 37 °C (data not shown). Once the process of amyloidogenesis was initiated, it proceeded until the alpha -monomer was depleted. Hence, environmental factors, mainly pH and agitation, determine the preferences for the formation of the particular non-native isoform.

Elucidation of the kinetic pathways and intermediate steps of amyloidogenesis in vivo are important for our understanding of prion replication. To the extent that our in vitro system captures important features of the in vivo process, this work can provide insight into the events underlying the conversion of the alpha -rich monomeric PrPC form into the amyloidogenic isoform, PrPSc. Our data argue that the beta -oligomer is not on the pathway to amyloid formation (Fig. 7). Instead, multimer I, a beta -sheet-rich isoform that binds ANS but not ThT, appears to be a better candidate for an on-pathway role. It converts to a higher molecular mass isoform, designated multimer II, with the acquisition of ThT binding, a feature associated with amyloidogenic isoforms. We have yet to resolve the molecular events that are critical to the conversion of multimer I to multimer II and the formation of ThT-binding sites.

Although the beta -oligomer of recPrP 89-231 is not on the pathway to the in vitro amyloid isoform, two other recombinant molecules, recPrP 106 and recPrP 23-231, form similar beta -oligomeric isoforms (15, 26). When expressed in transgenic mice, all three proteins support PrPSc replication and lead to scrapie neuropathology (37, 38). In the case of recPrP 89-231 and recPrP 23-231, the alpha -rich monomer and the beta -oligomer are separated by a substantial kinetic barrier. This has been attributed to the relative stability and structural complexity of the pretransition alpha -monomer isoform (18). For recPrP 106, however, the process of assembly of the beta -oligomer occurs more rapidly and does not require the partially denaturing acidic conditions needed by recPrP 89-231 (26). Deletion of residues 141-176 destabilizes the alpha -helical conformation. Thus, we found that the beta -oligomer is a preferred in vitro isoform of recPrP 106. However, despite differences between the pretransition states of recPrP 106 (unfolded) and recPrP 89-231 (folded alpha -helical), both molecules share a similar region that adopts a beta -sheet-rich, PK-resistant structure upon conversion to the beta -oligomer (Fig. 8) (26). Unlike PrP 27-30, the infectious PK-resistant core of PrPSc, the PK-resistant core of the beta -oligomer corresponds to the alpha -helical folded domain of the PrPC isoform.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Schematic diagram of recPrP 106 and recPrP 89-231. The regions that correspond to the three alpha -helices (boxes A, B, and C) and the two beta -strands in the alpha -helical isoform are shaded. Residues 141-177 are deleted in recPrP 106. The PK-resistant core of the beta -oligomer is composed of residues 134-217 in recPrP 106 and of residues 122-221 in recPrP 89-231.

At present, the biological significance of the beta -oligomeric form is not clear. The formation of nonfibrillar oligomeric forms has been observed in other neurodegenerative diseases. Recent studies have suggested that the nonfibrillar, soluble oligomeric form of Abeta peptides possesses neurotoxic properties and may therefore play a role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (39). Rochet et al. (40) proposed that nonfibrillar oligomers of alpha -synuclein, rather than the end product fibrils, are associated with the pathogenesis of Parkinson's disease. It remains to be established whether either of the abnormal forms of recPrP, the beta -oligomer or the amyloid form, can cause neuronal degeneration or prion disease.

For a variety of technical reasons, biophysical studies of the conformational diversity of misfolded isoforms of the prion protein and the conformational conversion between the normal cellular isoform and the pathological conformations have failed to provide us with a clear picture of these events. Controversy remains as to whether recPrP can be converted into a monomeric beta -sheet-rich isoform (41) or whether an oligomeric structure is required (15, 42). Although the reduced form of recPrP exists in four different beta -sheet-rich oligomeric isoforms as judged by reverse-phase chromatography (14, 15), it is the oxidized form that causes disease (16). Oxidized recPrP with the disulfide bond intact can form a beta -sheet-rich isoform. Initially, this beta -sheet-rich isoform was identified in an equilibrium unfolding experiment as a monomeric intermediate following the denaturation of the alpha -monomer (43, 44). More recent studies have showed that this beta -sheet-rich isoform is formed only upon oligomerization of recPrP in which acidic pH and an increased ionic strength of the solution favor its formation (18, 19). All in vitro refolding studies are conducted in a concentration range in excess of physiologic conditions. Clearly, this could impact the relevance of our observations. However, PrP is normally concentrated at the cell surface in cholesterol-rich rafts, and its mobility is limited to diffusion in the plane of the cell membrane. Thus, the local effective concentration may be substantially larger than most estimates.

Previous studies have failed to distinguish between the beta -sheet-rich oligomeric and the fibrillar forms (17, 19). Our work illustrates clear differences between the oligomeric and fibrillar isoforms. Although the two abnormal isoforms may coexist under certain experimental conditions, the beta -oligomer is not on the kinetic pathway to fibril formation and cannot be regarded as a substructure of the fibrillar form. Instead, we identified two novel multimeric transient intermediates in PrP amyloid formation. Under appropriate nonreducing conditions, recPrP can be refolded either into the beta -oligomeric or fibrillar isoform. We believe that a careful study of the refolding conditions and the identification of obligatory auxiliary molecules will lead to the in vitro replication of infectious prions. Current efforts appear to have fallen short of this goal (45, 46).

With the recognition that a common feature of all prion diseases is the misfolding of PrP, it is important to understand what causes the significant variation in disease phenotypes and the broad range of clinical manifestations and neuropathologic changes. Our finding that unglycosylated recPrP forms two distinct abnormal beta -sheet-rich isoforms suggests that the misfolding pathways in vivo may also be heterogeneous. The different misfolding pathways that yield distinct abnormal isoforms may be one of the possible sources of diversity among prion diseases and could contribute to the difficulty of refolding PrPSc or PrP 27-30 in vitro. However, a better understanding of the conformational diversity of misfolded forms of PrP and the kinetic routes that they follow to the various beta -sheet-rich isoforms should improve our understanding of the molecular mechanism of PrPSc formation and the specific roles that cellular compartments play in shepherding this process.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work and mass spectrometry were supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health as well as by a gift from the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§ Present address: Medical Biotechnology Center, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Baltimore, MD 21201.

§§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California San Francisco, Box 0450, San Francisco, CA 94143. E-mail: cohen@cmpharm.ucsf.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 23, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111402200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PrP, prion protein; PK, proteinase K; ANS, 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonate; ESI, electrospray ionization; MS, mass spectrometry; Mo, mouse; rec, recombinant; SEC, size exclusion chromatography; SHa, Syrian hamster; ThT, thioflavin T; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Prusiner, S. B. (1997) Science 278, 245-251[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 793-819[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Prusiner, S. B., McKinley, M. P., Bowman, K. A., Bolton, D. C., Bendheim, P. E., Groth, D. F., and Glenner, G. G. (1983) Cell 35, 349-358[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Pan, K.-M., Baldwin, M., Nguyen, J., Gasset, M., Serban, A., Groth, D., Mehlhorn, I., Huang, Z., Fletterick, R. J., Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10962-10966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Bessen, R. A., and Marsh, R. F. (1992) J. Virol. 66, 2096-21011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Hecker, R., Taraboulos, A., Scott, M., Pan, K.-M., Torchia, M., Jendroska, K., DeArmond, S. J., and Prusiner, S. B. (1992) Genes Dev. 6, 1213-1228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Scott, M. R., Groth, D., Tatzelt, J., Torchia, M., Tremblay, P., DeArmond, S. J., and Prusiner, S. B. (1997) J. Virol. 71, 9032-9044[Abstract]
8. Bessen, R. A., and Marsh, R. F. (1994) J. Virol. 68, 7859-7868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Telling, G. C., Haga, T., Torchia, M., Tremblay, P., DeArmond, S. J., and Prusiner, S. B. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 1736-1750[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Caughey, B., Raymond, G. J., and Bessen, R. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32230-32235[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Safar, J., Wille, H., Itri, V., Groth, D., Serban, H., Torchia, M., Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1998) Nat. Med. 4, 1157-1165[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Peretz, D., Scott, M., Groth, D., Williamson, A., Burton, D., Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (2001) Protein Sci. 10, 854-863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Somerville, R. A. (1999) J. Gen. Virol. 80, 1865-1872[Abstract]
14. Lu, B. Y., Beck, P. J., and Chang, J. Y. (2001) Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 3767-3773[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Lu, B. Y., and Chang, J. Y. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 13390-13396[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Turk, E., Teplow, D. B., Hood, L. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1988) Eur. J. Biochem. 176, 21-30[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Swietnicki, W., Morillas, M., Chen, S. G., Gambetti, P., and Surewicz, W. K. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 424-431[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Baskakov, I. V., Legname, G., Prusiner, S. B., and Cohen, F. E. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 19687-19690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Morillas, M., Vanik, D. L., and Surewicz, W. K. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6982-6987[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Mehlhorn, I., Groth, D., Stöckel, J., Moffat, B., Reilly, D., Yansura, D., Willett, W. S., Baldwin, M., Fletterick, R., Cohen, F. E., Vandlen, R., Henner, D., and Prusiner, S. B. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 5528-5537[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Klunk, W. E., Jacob, R. F., and Mason, R. P. (1999) Methods Enzymol. 309, 285-305[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. LeVine, H. (1993) Protein Sci. 2, 404-410[Abstract]
23. Safar, J., Roller, P. P., Gajdusek, D. C., and Gibbs, C. J., Jr. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 8375-8383[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Wille, H., Zhang, G.-F., Baldwin, M. A., Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 259, 608-621[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Peretz, D., Williamson, R. A., Matsunaga, Y., Serban, H., Pinilla, C., Bastidas, R. B., Rozenshteyn, R., James, T. L., Houghten, R. A., Cohen, F. E., Prusiner, S. B., and Burton, D. R. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 273, 614-622[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Baskakov, I. V., Aagaard, C., Mehlhorn, I., Wille, H., Groth, D., Baldwin, M. A., Prusiner, S. B., and Cohen, F. E. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 2792-2804[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Litvinovich, S. V., Brew, S. A., Aota, S., Akiyama, S. K., Haudenschild, C., and Ingham, K. C. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 280, 245-258[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Kayed, R., Bernhagen, J., Greenfield, N., Sweimeh, K., Brunner, H., Voelter, W., and Kapurniotu, A. (1999) J. Mol. Biol. 287, 781-796[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Baskakov, I. V., and Bolen, D. W. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 18010-18017[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Carrell, R. W., and Lomas, D. A. (1997) Lancet 350, 134-138[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Guijarro, J. I., Sunde, M., Jones, J. A., Campbell, I. D., and Dobson, C. M. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 4224-4228[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Chiti, F., Webster, P., Taddei, N., Clark, A., Stefani, M., Ramponi, G., and Dobson, C. M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3590-3594[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Konno, T., Murata, K., and Nagayama, K. (1999) FEBS Lett. 454, 122-126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Fändrich, M., Fletcher, M. A., and Dobson, C. M. (2001) Nature 410, 165-166[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Dobson, C. M. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 329-332[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Sigler, P. B., Xu, Z., Rye, H. S., Burston, S. G., Fenton, W. A., and Horwich, A. L. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 581-608[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Supattapone, S., Bosque, P., Muramoto, T., Wille, H., Aagaard, C., Peretz, D., Nguyen, H.-O. B., Heinrich, C., Torchia, M., Safar, J., Cohen, F. E., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B., and Scott, M. (1999) Cell 96, 869-878[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Fischer, M., Rülicke, T., Raeber, A., Sailer, A., Moser, M., Oesch, B., Brandner, S., Aguzzi, A., and Weissmann, C. (1996) EMBO J. 15, 1255-1264[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Lambert, M. P., Barlow, A. K., Chromy, B. A., Edwards, C., Freed, R., Liosatos, M., Morgan, T. E., Rozovsk