Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M106449200 on April 8, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21231-21236, June 14, 2002
Role of Calcium and Membrane Organization on Phospholipase D
Localization and Activity
COMPETITION BETWEEN A SOLUBLE AND AN INSOLUBLE SUBSTRATE*
Karim El
Kirat
§,
Françoise
Besson
,
Annie-France
Prigent¶,
Jean-Paul
Chauvet
, and
Bernard
Roux
From
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie Biologique,
Unité Mixte de Recherche (UMR) Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique (CNRS) 5013, Bâtiment Chevreul, 43 Boulevard du
11/11/1918, F-69622 Villeurbanne, Université Claude
Bernard-Lyon 1, France, ¶ Laboratoire de Biochimie et
Pharmacologie, Institut National de la Santé et de la
Recherche Medical U352, Bat. Pasteur, 20 Avenue Albert Einstein,
F-69621 Villeurbanne, Institut National des Sciences
Appliquées de Lyon, France, and
Laboratoire
d'Ingénierie et de Fonctionnalisation des Surfaces, UMR CNRS
5621, 36 Avenue Collongue, F-69131 Ecully, Ecole Centrale de Lyon,
France
Received for publication, July 10, 2001, and in revised form, April 3, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The phospholipase D (PLD) from Streptomyces
chromofuscus is a soluble enzyme known to be activated by the
phosphatidic acid-calcium complexes. PLD-catalyzed hydrolysis of
phospholipids in aqueous medium leads to the formation of phosphatidic
acid (PA). Previous studies concluded on an allosteric activation of
PLD by the PA-calcium complexes. In this work, the role of PA and
calcium was investigated in terms of membrane structure and dynamics.
The role of calcium in PLD partitioning between the soluble phase and
the water-lipid interface was tested. The monomolecular film technique
was used to measure both membrane dynamics and PLD activity. These
experiments provided information on PLD activity at a water-lipid
interface. Moreover, the ability of PA to enhance PLD activity toward
phosphatidylcholine was correlated to the physical properties of
PA itself, affecting the rheology of the membrane. The effect of
calcium was investigated on PLD binding to lipids and on the catalytic
process by competition experiments between a soluble and a vesicular
substrate. These experiments confirmed the absolute PLD requirement for
calcium and pointed out the importance of calcium for PLD catalytic
process and for the enzyme location at the water-lipid interface.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Phospholipase D (PLD)1
catalyzes the hydrolysis of the phosphoester bond between the
phosphatidyl moiety and the choline headgroup of phosphatidylcholine
(PC) liberating choline and phosphatidic acid (PA). This reaction
involves a molecule of water for the nucleophile substitution on the
phosphatidyl enzyme intermediate to liberate PA, and if the nucleophile
is an alcohol, a phosphatidyl alcohol is produced. This latter activity
is called transphosphatidylation and is specific for the PLD (1). The
hydrolytic activity catalyzed by PLD occurs with the P-O bond cleavage
of PC as demonstrated previously
(2).
The phospholipase D from Streptomyces chromofuscus belongs
to the phospholipase D superfamily as well as some endonucleases, some
helicases, some lipid synthases, and a lot of enzymes capable of
catalyzing the hydrolysis and/or the formation of phosphodiester bonds
(3).
Stieglitz et al. (4) have demonstrated that bacterial PLD is
activated by anionic lipids and also that it exhibits a high affinity
for these lipids. Recently, the role of bacterial PLD on the
aggregation, leakiness, or fusion of vesicles has been demonstrated
(5).
The PLD from Streptomyces species has been widely studied, a
crystal structure of this protein has been solved recently (6). Until
now, its hydrolase activity has been determined by several means (7):
by radioactive assay using radiolabeled PC, by pH-stat 1H
NMR (8), by a choline oxidase electrode (9), and by polarization modulation infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy on lipid monolayers at the air-water interface (10). All of these studies concluded on an activation of PLD by phosphatidic acid and calcium.
The PLD from S. chromofuscus is a soluble enzyme that
catalyzes the hydrolysis of the PC contained into macromolecular
insoluble structures (i.e. the lipidic vesicles). Therefore,
there must be some factors enhancing PLD interaction with such a
macrostructural substrate.
In this work, the role of membrane structure on PLD activity was
investigated. To study membrane structure, an assay based on the
monomolecular film technique was developed. The role of calcium on PLD
activity and interactions was also studied. To distinguish the effect
of calcium on the lipidic vesicles from their effect on PLD itself, a
spectrophotometric assay based on the use of a soluble substrate has
been developed. These two methods gave complementary results on the
effect of PA and calcium on PLD activity. These results provided
information on the influence of membrane structure on PLD activity as
well as some information on the enzyme partitioning between the soluble
phase of the medium and the water-lipid interface. Some factors
responsible for PLD activation or inhibition previously described on
liposomes were also tested.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
L-
-Dipalmitoyl-[2-palmitoyl-9,10-3H(N)]phosphatidylcholine
was purchased from PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Coomassie Brilliant Blue
R and TLC aluminum sheets Silica Gel 60F254 were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). L-
-Phosphatidylinositol (PI) from
bovine brain, L-
-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC),
L-
-dimyristoylphosphatidic acid (DMPA),
L-
-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC),
L-
-dipalmitoylphosphatidylserine (DPPS),
N-octyl-
-D-glucopyranoside (
-OG), Triton
X-100, bis(para-nitrophenyl)phosphate (bis(pNP)P), and phospholipase D from S. chromofuscus were purchased from Sigma and used without further
purification. The SDS-PAGE analysis of PLD gave the same three bands as
those obtained by Geng et al. (11). These proteins have been
previously identified by sequence analysis (11) as the intact PLD and
its two proteolytically processed fragments.
Monolayer Technique--
All experiments were performed at
constant temperature (21 °C). The film balance was built by R&K
(Wiesbaden, Germany) and equipped with a Wilhemy-type surface pressure
measuring system. The subphases were aqueous buffer solutions
containing different concentrations of CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. The
maximum PLD activity has been described previously for 20 µM calcium (9). Therefore, PLD activity was assayed
between 2 and 65 µM calcium.
Phospholipids were spread at the air-water interface in hexane/ethanol
(9:1 (v/v)) at 0.175 mM to reach a final quantity of 8.75 nmol of lipids. After 15 min, the monolayer was compressed to a lateral
pressure of 35 mN·m
1 to obtain a control isotherm. The
pressure then was fixed at 30 mN·m
1, and the enzyme (15 µg of protein) was injected in the subphase after the monolayer
stabilization. The subphase was stirred with one magnetic stirrer
spinning at 100 rpm. Surface elasticity moduli were calculated from the
pressure-area data obtained from the monolayer compressions using the
following equation (12)
|
(Eq. 1)
|
where A is the molecular area at the indicated
surface pressure
and high Ks values
correspond to low interfacial elasticity among packed lipids forming a
monolayer (13). This finding suggests that the higher the
Ks value of a monolayer is, the more difficult it is
to deform it.
Spectrophotometric Assay--
The bis(pNP)P was
solubilized in various concentrations of CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. The
reaction was monitored with an Uvikon spectrophotometer thermostated at
a constant temperature (37 °C) at 420 nm. The reaction time was <1
min. Under these conditions, the molar absorption factor of the
para-nitrophenol released by PLD activity on
bis(pNP)P was 18,500 M
1·cm
1 at 420 nm. The
substrate was first incubated at 37 °C to test its stability, and
then the reaction was initiated by the addition of PLD.
Vesicle Preparation--
The lipids (i.e. DMPC and
DMPA or DPPS or PI) were dissolved in hexane/ethanol (9:1 (v/v)) at 5 mM. The lipid mixture containing varying molar ratio of
DMPA was dried under nitrogen for 2 h. The lipidic film then was
resuspended by vigorous agitation within 15 min in 65 µM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, and 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, to reach a final concentration of
total lipid of 5 mM. The lipid suspension was heated at
60 °C in a thermostated bath and submitted to vigorous agitation for
15 min to obtain the multilamellar vesicles. Vesicles solubilization
was performed in 10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, and
65 µM CaCl2 containing 2.5 mM
bis(pNP)P) with successive additions of
-OG at 37 °C
and monitored as a decrease of the turbidity at 450 nm.
Radioactive Assay--
PLD activity on lipidic bilayers was
determined with radiolabeled vesicles of DMPC/DMPA (50:50 (mol/mol))
and 20 µCi of [3H]DPPC. The multilamellar vesicles were
prepared exactly the same way as described above with the same final concentration.
To measure PLD activity, the vesicles corresponding to 2 µCi were
incubated with PLD at 37 °C in a 200-µl final volume. The reaction
was stopped with 2 ml of chloroform/methanol/HCl (0.1 M)
(1:1:0.002 (v/v/v)) and 1 ml of HCl (1 M) containing 5 mM EDTA. The tubes were subjected to vigorous
agitation and then centrifuged to 400 × g for 5 min at
4 °C. The organic phases containing the lipids were then deposited
on TLC plate with DMPC and DMPA standards. After development in ethyl
acetate/isooctane/acetic acid (90:50:20 (v/v/v)), the plate was
revealed with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R (14). The spots were then
scraped off and counted for radioactivity determination (Wallac
WinspectralTM 1414 Liquid Scintillation Counter, Turku, Finland).
Calcium Content Determination--
Plasma emission spectroscopy
(Service Central d'Analyze, CNRS, Vernaison, France) was used to
determine calcium content in buffers.
 |
RESULTS |
Properties of the DMPC/DMPA Monolayers--
The mixtures
containing increasing molar ratio of DMPA over DMPC were spread at the
air-water interface. The subphase was always the same with 65 µM CaCl2 and was thermostated at 21 °C. The influence of DMPA content of the monolayer on the apparent molecular area was first tested. The pressure-area isotherms (Fig. 1) show that the increasing DMPA content
in the DMPC monolayer decreased the apparent molecular area. These
isotherms were useful to estimate the molecular area, at zero surface
pressure, of DMPC (80 A2/molecule) (Fig. 1, isotherm
A) and of DMPA alone (40 A2/molecule) (Fig. 1,
isotherm F). These values are in agreement with those
determined in previous studies (15).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Pressure-area isotherms of DMPC monolayers
containing increasing molar percentage of DMPA. DMPA molar ratios
in DMPC monolayer were 0 (A), 10 (B), 15 (C), 20 (D), 50 (E), and 100%
(F). The subphase was 65 µM CaCl2,
150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0 at
21 °C.
|
|
In addition, the surface elasticity modulus was calculated for all the
monolayers before injection of PLD at various DMPA molar percentages
(Fig. 2, open circles,
dashed line). This result indicates that an increasing molar ratio
of DMPA in the monomolecular film of DMPC decreases its
Ks value. This means that the more the monolayer
contains DMPA, the more it can be deformed.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Influence of DMPA molar percentage in the
monomolecular film of DMPC on the surface elasticity modulus of the
monolayer and on the lag time before the PLD begins the reaction.
The surface elasticity modulus of the monolayers was calculated for 30 mN·m 1 surface pressure (open circles,
dashed line). The lag time was determined for all the monolayers
as the time preceding a 5% decrease in the apparent molecular area
(closed circles, solid line). The subphase was 65 µM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, at 21 °C. One unit corresponds to 61 min for the lag time and 100 mN·m 1 for the surface
elasticity modulus.
|
|
Influence of DMPA on PLD Activity toward DMPC
Monolayer--
According to the decrease of the molecular area of
the monolayer of DMPC with growing molar percentage of DMPA, if the PLD hydrolyzes DMPC into DMPA, it will lead to a decrease of the apparent molecular area at a constant surface pressure. After the stabilization of the monolayer at 30 mN·m
1 (known to be the internal
pressure of biological membranes), the PLD was injected in the subphase
buffer. For the monomolecular film of DMPC alone, after injection of
PLD, the apparent molecular area slowly decreased. The reaction was
monitored within 10 h, and then the monolayer was
compressed. The molecular area finally reached 40 Å2/molecule, which is the DMPA molecular area. This
experiment showed that the activity of PLD can be monitored as the
decrease in apparent molecular area with the time at the fixed surface pressure.
As shown in Fig. 3, the increasing
concentration of DMPA in the monolayer decreased the observed lag time
(defined as the time preceding a 5% decrease in the apparent molecular
area). This resulted also in a significant increase of the velocity of DMPC hydrolysis by PLD with the rising DMPA content of the
monolayer. This finding is consistent with the findings of Geng
et al. (8) who measured PLD activity with 1H NMR
and described a phosphatidic acid-induced enhancement of its
hydrolytic activity and a decrease of the lag time. Moreover, the
representation of the lag time as a function of DMPA molar percentage
in the monolayer (Fig. 2, closed circles, solid
line) showed a strong relationship with the surface elasticity
modulus. Both curves present the same profile, the increasing molar
content of DMPA decreased the lag time and the surface elasticity
modulus in the same way. At high DMPA content, the monolayer was more sensitive to deformation and the lag time before the PLD activity was
considerably reduced. PLD activity was also tested twice on a DMPC/DPPC
(50:50 (mol/mol)) monolayer. At 30 mN·m
1 surface
pressure, this monolayer had a surface elasticity modulus of ~55
mN·m
1, and after PLD injection, the observed lag time
was 12 ± 2 min (data not shown). This monolayer has the
same surface elasticity modulus and the same lag time than the
DMPC/DMPA (85:15 (mol/mol)) monolayer at 30 mN·m
1
surface pressure. However, the velocity of PLD reaction for the DPPC-containing monolayer was approximately two times less than that
for the 15 molar percent DMPA-containing monolayer. This velocity increased while PA was produced by PLD in the monolayer. This
observation indicates that the same low surface elasticity modulus of
these two monomolecular films could allow the PLD to create local
deformations in the lipidic monolayer. These deformations seemed to be
important for the beginning of the PLD-catalyzed hydrolysis of PC but
had no effect on the velocity of the reaction itself.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Influence of DMPA molar percentage in the
monomolecular film of DMPC on PLD activity. The apparent molecular
area has been normalized to compare the different reactions at 30 mN·m 1. DMPA molar ratios in DMPC monolayer were 0 (A), 5 (B), 10 (C), 15 (D),
30 (E), and 50% (F). The subphase was 65 µM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, and the temperature was fixed at
21 °C.
|
|
Role of Calcium on PLD Activity toward DPMC/DMPA
Monolayers--
The role of calcium on PLD activity was determined
with the monomolecular film technique at a constant surface pressure
(30 mN·m
1). For this monolayer assay, the molar ratio
of DMPA was fixed to 50%, because the reaction velocity was maximal
under these conditions. The calcium concentration varied from 2 to 65 µM in the subphase. In the absence of enzyme, the
increasing concentration of calcium had no effect on the isotherm of
the DMPC/DMPA (50:50 (mol/mol)) monolayer (data not shown). After
stabilization of the monolayer at 30 mN·m
1 and
injection of the PLD in the subphase, the velocity of the apparent
molecular area decrease was calculated. The influence of calcium on
this velocity is presented in Fig. 4,
open circles, dashed lines. The velocity
increased with rising concentrations of calcium. A saturation of this
activity was reached at 20 µM calcium. Moreover,
the calcium concentration in the subphase did not significantly affect
the lag time preceding PLD-catalyzed hydrolysis of DMPC (data not
shown). Therefore, it seems that the lag time observed for different
DMPC/DMPA ratio (Fig. 2) is only correlated to the decrease of the
surface elasticity modulus with rising DMPA monolayer content.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Role of calcium on PLD activity. The
influence of calcium was measured on PLD activity toward the
bis(pNP)P (closed circles, solid line)
and toward the DMPC/DMPA (50:50 (mol/mol)) monolayer (open
circles, dashed line). For the monomolecular film assay, PLD
activity was expressed as the velocity of the apparent molecular area
decrease. For the monolayer assays, the subphase was 150 mM
NaCl and 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, containing various
concentrations of CaCl2 at 21 °C. The curves were
determined from the Hanes-Woolf linearization of the experimental
data.
|
|
Role of Other Anionic Lipids on PLD Activity toward DMPC in
Monolayers--
To compare the effect of phosphatidic acid with other
anionic lipids, monomolecular films containing PI or DPPS mixed with DMPC were tested. At 30 mN·m
1 surface pressure, the
mixtures of DMPC/PI (50:50 (mol/mol)) and DMPC/DPPS (70:30 (mol/mol))
revealed a surface elasticity modulus of 80 and 30 mN·m
1, respectively. The results obtained for the
PLD-catalyzed hydrolysis of those two monolayers (Fig.
5I, curves E and
D) show that the PI-containing monolayer is less affected by
PLD activity than the DPPS-containing monolayer. The lag times
determined for these two monolayers were 60 min for DMPC/PI (50:50
(mol/mol)) and 20 min for the DMPC/DPPS (70:30 (mol/mol))
monolayer.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Influence of anionic lipids on PLD activity
toward a DMPC monolayer. I, PLD activity was assayed at
30 mN·m 1 with the anionic lipids either alone or in
mixture with DMPC. A, DMPC; B, DPPS;
C, PI; D, DMPC/DPPS (70:30 (mol/mol)); and
E, DMPC/PI (50:50 (mol/mol)). II, the
phospholipids were also tested alone at 10 mN·m 1 to
allow their PLD-catalyzed hydrolysis. A, DMPC; B,
DPPS; and C, PI. The apparent molecular area has been
normalized to allow the comparison of the different reactions. The
subphase buffer was 65 µM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, at
21 °C.
|
|
PLD activity was also measured at 30 mN·m
1 on
monolayers containing only one phospholipid (DMPC, DPPS, or PI) (Fig.
5I, curves A, B, and C,
respectively). DPPS seemed to be easily hydrolyzed by PLD in comparison
with DMPC and PI. Their Ks were slightly different
at 30 mN·m
1 surface pressure, 100 mN·m
1
for DMPC, 70 mN·m
1 for DPPS, and 80 mN·m
1 for PI. These results could explain why DPPS was
rapidly hydrolyzed by PLD at 30 mN·m
1. However, without
information on the affinity of PLD toward each of these lipids, it is
difficult to compare their hydrolyses.
PLD activity was also measured toward DMPC, DPPS, and PI alone at low
surface pressure (10 mN·m
1) to test their hydrolyses
(Fig. 5II, curves A, B, and
C, respectively). Under these conditions, PI was found to be
a substrate for PLD. At 10 mN·m
1 surface pressure, both
DMPC and PI monolayers have a surface elasticity modulus of ~45
mN·m
1, and the DPPS monolayer has a
Ks of 30 mN·m
1. The lag times were
low: 10 min for DMPC, 7 min for DPPS, and 34 min for PI. Moreover, PI
alone was still hydrolyzed at 30 mN·m
1 but at a lower
extent than for 10 mN·m
1 surface pressure (Fig.
5I, curve C). PLD activity was also tested on
vesicles containing either PC or PI alone at 5 mM (calcium concentration was 1 mM). After 30-min incubation at
37 °C, TLC analysis of lipids revealed that PLD activity on both
types of vesicles generates PA. This finding demonstrates that PI
hydrolysis in monolayers was because of PLD activity. These results
show that PI, DPPS, and DMPC are substrates for PLD (as seen at 10 mN·m
1 surface pressure), whereas DMPA is not.
Therefore, it is difficult to investigate the role of each lipid on the
PLD-catalyzed hydrolysis of DMPC in mixed monolayers.
Determination of the Kinetic Parameters for the PLD-catalyzed
Hydrolysis of bis(pNP)P--
To measure PLD activity in an homogeneous
medium, a spectrophotometric-based assay using
bis(pNP)P was developed. The kinetic parameters of PLD
toward this soluble substrate were determined at pH 8.0 with 65 µM calcium. These experiments were repeated four times
with bis(pNP)P concentrations used from 0.01 to 5 mM. The linearizations of these results gave a
Vmax of ~131.5 ± 0.3 µmol·min
1·mg
1 for the PLD-catalyzed
hydrolysis of bis(pNP)P. The Michaelis-Menten constant for
S. chromofuscus PLD toward the bis(pNP)P was also determined, Km of 0.6 ± 0.1 mM.
This Km is identical to that determined for S. chromofuscus PLD activity toward liposoluble PC (16) and toward
soluble dibutyrylphosphatidylcholine (11).
Role of Calcium on PLD Activity toward the bis(pNP)P--
In this
case, the system is totally free from liposomes and macrostructural
substrate, and the calcium could interact with the phosphate group of
the bis(pNP)P. The effect of calcium was measured from 2 to
65 µM on PLD activity toward bis(pNP)P (Fig. 4, closed circles, solid line). Compared with the
measurement of calcium effect on monolayer, an identical profile with
the same saturation of PLD activity at 20 µM calcium was
obtained. PLD dependence upon Ca2+ under other conditions
(with small unilamellar PC vesicles) with the choline oxidase electrode
has been determined previously (9), and their results are consistent
with ours. Consequently, calcium is important for PLD activity
independent of the nature or the concentration of the substrate. This
finding suggests that PLD activity dependence upon calcium is strongly
related to the enzyme itself, and it should be attributed to an
involvement of this divalent cation in the catalytic process. The
apparent dissociation constant, KD, for the calcium
was found to be 10 ± 1.5 µM.
Competition between Insoluble and Soluble Substrate for
PLD--
In these experiments, the PLD activity in the soluble phase
of the medium was assayed with the soluble substrate
bis(pNP)P in the presence of vesicles (Fig.
6, closed circles, solid
line). To identify the factors that enhance PLD location at the
lipid-water interface (i.e. vesicles or monolayers), the
competition between vesicles and bis(pNP)P was tested under
different concentrations of calcium. As a consequence, when the PLD
interacts with the vesicles to catalyze the hydrolysis of DMPC into
DMPA, its activity toward the bis(pNP)P will be reduced.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Role of anionic lipids and calcium on the
behavior of PLD in a heterogeneous medium. The vesicles were made
of DMPC mixed with DMPA (circles), DPPS
(triangles), or PI (crosses) at different molar
percentages. The concentration for all of the assays was 0.025 mM lipids. Two concentrations of calcium were tested, 65 µM (closed symbols, solid lines)
and 3 mM (open symbols, dashed
lines). Buffer composition was 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, the concentration of bis(pNP)P
was kept constant in all experiments (2.5 mM), and
temperature was fixed at 37 °C.
|
|
To determine the amount of DMPA generated after a 1-min incubation with
0.3 mM DMPC/DMPA (50:50 (mol/mol)), PLD activity was assayed on vesicles with the radiolabeled PC at 37 °C. Under these conditions, 15% DMPC was converted into DMPA. If the vesicles are ten
times less concentrated (0.025 mM) according to the
Michaelis-Menten equation, the percentage of hydrolyzed DMPC should be negligible.
In these competition experiments, the vesicles of DMPC mixed with DMPA,
PI, or DPPS were first incubated at 37 °C with bis(pNP)P at various concentrations of calcium. The PLD then was added to the
mixture, and its activity toward the bis(pNP)P was measured for <1 min. For the two calcium concentrations tested (65 µM and 3 mM), PI had no effect on PLD
activity toward bis(pNP)P (Fig. 6, crosses,
solid line for 65 µM calcium and dashed
line for 3 mM). At low calcium concentration, the
activity of PLD on bis(pNP)P decreased with increasing DMPA
and DPPS content (Fig. 6, closed circles for DMPA and
closed triangles for DPPS, solid lines), and this
decrease was maximal for 50% DMPA and 50% DPPS vesicles, a 50% loss
of activity toward bis(pNP)P. This important decrease of PLD
activity toward the bis(pNP)P to the benefit of vesicles is
surprising. Considering the concentration of the soluble substrate (2.5 mM), which is one hundred times higher than the lipid
concentration (0.025 mM), the probability for the PLD to
meet the bis(pNP)P is greater than the probability for the
vesicles. This finding indicates that there must be a factor that
enhances PLD interaction with the vesicles.
The role of calcium in this inhibition has been tested (Fig. 6,
open circles for DMPA and open triangles for
DPPS, dashed lines). The vesicles of DMPC mixed with DMPA or
DPPS were incubated with 3 mM calcium at 37 °C. Under
these conditions, there was no decrease in PLD activity on
bis(pNP)P in the presence of vesicles at any concentration
from 0.025 to 0.3 mM lipids) (data not shown). This finding
indicates that a large part of the enzyme interacts with the soluble
substrate but not with liposomes. It seems that for 65 µM
calcium, the divalent cation interacts with the vesicles, and this
interaction is more efficient when the DMPA (or DPPS) ratio is
increased up to 50%. This observation suggests that DMPC/DMPA and DMPC/DPPS vesicles could remove the calcium from the soluble fraction of the medium, reducing its quantity available for
PLD-catalyzed hydrolysis of bis(pNP)P. These results are
consistent with those obtained on vesicle binding studies of PLD
reported previously (4).
Role of Detergents on PLD Activity Measured with
bis(pNP)P--
The influence of a detergent, the
-OG, was also
tested on the competition between vesicles and bis(pNP)P for
PLD activity. In this assay, 0.3 mM vesicles of DMPC/DMPA
(50:50 (mol/mol)) and DMPC/DPPS (50:50 (mol/mol)) were first incubated
with bis(pNP)P (2.5 mM) at 37 °C in the
presence of low calcium concentration (65 µM) to allow
competition. The solubilization (Fig. 7,
open circles, dashed line) of these vesicles by
-OG occurred at low concentrations of detergent and was totally
accomplished at 6 mM. In parallel, the PLD activity on
bis(pNP)P was measured (Fig. 7, closed circles
for DMPA and closed triangles for DPPS, solid lines). A total inhibition of PLD activity toward the
bis(pNP)P was observed in the absence of detergent for
DMPA-containing vesicles, whereas only a 80% inhibition was found for
the DPPS-containing vesicles. However, for the two types of vesicles,
an enhancement of PLD activity occurred with increasing
-OG
concentrations. This finding indicates that the progressive
solubilization of the vesicles (DMPA- and DPPS-containing ones) (Fig.
7, open circles and triangles, respectively,
dashed lines) seems to liberate the enzyme that was first
associated to the lipids. The same experiment was performed on vesicles
containing only DMPC (data not shown), but in this case, the PLD was
not sequestrated by the lipids, and the solubilization did not modify
its activity toward the soluble substrate bis(pNP)P. This
observation is consistent with previous findings where millimolar
concentrations of divalent cations are needed to drive the PLD at the
PC vesicle surface (4).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of -OG on the
interaction of PLD with DMPC vesicles containing DMPA or DPPS in 50:50
molar ratio at low calcium concentration. Two parameters were
measured on DMPA (circles) and DPPS (triangles)
containing vesicles. The solubilization of the vesicles was measured by
turbidity at 450 nm (open symbols, dashed lines),
and PLD activity on bis(pNP)P was measured at 420 nm
(closed symbols, solid lines). The measurements
were done at 37 °C with 0.3 mM vesicles in 65 µM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, and 2.5 mM
bis(pNP)P.
|
|
The influence of
-OG and Triton X-100 on PLD activity assayed with
bis(pNP)P alone has also been investigated (from 0 to 60 mM for
-OG and from 0 to 10 mM Triton
X-100). Under these conditions, the data on the effect of detergents on
the PLD itself were obtained. None of the two tested detergents had any
effect on the hydrolysis of the bis(pNP)P by the enzyme
(data not shown), whereas PLD activity toward monomeric
dibutyrylphosphatidylcholine has been shown to be increased by
~3.75-fold with 40 mM
-OG and by 2-fold with 10 mM Triton X-100 (11, 17). The explanation for the
enhancement described on dibutyrylphosphatidylcholine could be the
interaction of the monomeric PC with detergents that could not occur
with the soluble substrate bis(pNP)P.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Role of the Membrane Structure on PLD Activity--
The monolayer
technique is a powerful method for assaying the PLD-catalyzed
hydrolysis of various lipids. This method requires only small amounts
of substrate and provides information on the structure of the
macromolecular substrate.
The measurements of PLD activity on monomolecular films of DMPC/DMPA at
various molar ratios suggested that PLD is activated by DMPA, inducing
a decrease of the lag time that occurs before DMPC hydrolysis and
leading to an increase of the velocity of this hydrolysis. This latter
effect might be attributed to the lateral segregation of DMPA induced
by calcium (18). The surface elasticity modulus of the monolayers at 30 mN·m
1 decreased with increasing DMPA content. The
representation of the lag time of the reaction as a function of DMPA
molar ratio in the monolayer gave the same profile as the one for the
surface elasticity modulus. This finding indicates that there is a
relationship between the membrane dynamic and the lag time before the
onset of PLD activity. If the monolayer is deformed, the PLD will have no difficulty in reaching the phosphate site of DMPC and will catalyze
its conversion into DMPA. The increasing DMPA content in the monolayer
attributed to PLD hydrolysis of DMPC will enhance this deformity, and
as a consequence, PLD activity also will be enhanced. PLD activity was
also tested on a DMPC/DPPC (50:50 (mol/mol)) monolayer. This monolayer
had a Ks similar to that of the DMPC/DMPA (85:15
(mol/mol)) monolayer (55 mN·m
1). The PLD-catalyzed
hydrolysis of those two monomolecular films was identical in terms of
lag time. However, the 15% DMPA-containing monolayer was hydrolyzed
two times faster than the 50% DPPC-containing monolayer. Therefore,
the lag time seems to be independent of the presence of anionic lipids
in the monolayer. Recently, Stieglitz et al. (5) have
described the insertion of PLD into lipidic vesicles leading to
leakiness. This insertion of PLD could be favored by the high deformity
induced by phosphatidic acid.
Role of Calcium on PLD Location in a Heterogeneous
Medium--
The PLD from S. chromofuscus is
water-soluble, whereas its natural substrate is not and forms
macromolecular associations. Hence, the PLD activity takes place in a
heterogeneous medium, and some factors could enhance the enzyme removal
from the soluble part of the medium (i.e. aqueous solution)
to the particular part (i.e. the lipidic vesicles or monolayer).
A number of protocols have been developed to measure PLD activity (7,
19), but there are no assays based on the hydrolysis of a soluble
substrate. The bis(pNP)P was useful in characterizing some
of the factors responsible for the location of PLD at the surface of
the vesicle. PLD-catalyzed hydrolysis of this soluble substrate showed
the same dependence on calcium as PC (9). The Km
values of PLD for PC and bis(pNP)P also were similar (11,
16). The results obtained for competition between the lipidic
vesicles and the soluble substrate indicate that calcium plays a key
role in PLD partitioning between the monomeric and the macromolecular
substrate. The PI-containing vesicles had no effect on PLD activity
toward the bis(pNP)P. When the vesicles contained DMPA or
DPPS, there was a competition between the activity on lipids and the
activity on bis(pNP)P. Only a small amount of DMPA was
necessary to obtain inhibition, whereas the molar percentage of DPPS
needed to obtain the competition was in a higher range (of >20 molar
percent). This competition was dependent on calcium concentration,
which is consistent with the findings of Stieglitz et al.
(4). For the lowest concentration of calcium (65 µM) and
the highest concentration of vesicles (0.3 mM), the
divalent cation content was not sufficient to interact with both the
lipids and the soluble substrate. As a consequence, all of the calcium seemed to interact with the DMPA or DPPS-enriched vesicles, leading to
a loss of PLD activity on bis(pNP)P. The excess of calcium in the medium in regard to the DMPA concentration induced no inhibition of the bis(pNP)P hydrolysis, indicating that PLD was located
where it could find calcium ions. Thus, this protein should be
activated by the substrate-calcium complex. This means that it is not
the calcium-protein interaction that provokes the translocation of S. chromofuscus PLD from the soluble phase of the medium to
the lipid-water interface. Furthermore, the gradual solubilization of
DMPC/DMPA (or DPPS) (50:50 (mol/mol)) vesicles with
-OG induced a
gradual recovery of PLD activity on the soluble substrate. This finding
indicates that the solubilization of anionic lipid-calcium domains
liberates the PLD from the vesicles. Therefore, the anionic lipid
(i.e. DMPA or DPPS) interaction with calcium is necessary to
enhance PLD activity toward the vesicles.
Role of Calcium on PLD Activity--
It is possible to consider
the calcium as an assistant of the nucleophile substrate for PLD in
phosphodiester-bound hydrolysis. The dependence of PLD activity upon
calcium concentration can be described by the Michaelis-Menten
equation. The same saturation was observed for different assays
involving different substrates (bis(pNP)P and PC) at
different concentrations (for review on PC vesicles see, Ref. 9).
Therefore, the saturation attributed to the divalent cation is
independent of the amount and the nature of the substrate. As a
consequence, to reach the 20 µM calcium saturation of the
activity, there must be a limiting step in the catalytic process that
could be the formation of the enzyme-substrate covalent intermediate
(20). This result shows that calcium should play a key role in the
phosphatidyl enzyme geometry for the nucleophilic attack of water on
the P-O bond.
As a conclusion, the effect of various lipids on PLD activity should be
investigated in terms of affinity for these lipids, interaction between
ions and lipids, and membrane dynamic and structure induced by these
lipids (21, 22). Our results show the great importance of the physical
state of membranes on PLD activity. Moreover, the study of membrane
rheology should lead to a better understanding of PLD catalytic
mechanism and affinities. Another important point is the possibility
for PLD location and activity to be modulated by physiological
(i.e. micromolar) concentrations of calcium. This divalent
cation is known to be cytotoxic at submicromolar concentrations, which
suggest that PLD requirements for calcium should be in the same range.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 33-4-72431542;
Fax: 33-4-72431543; E-mail: elkirat@univ-lyon1.fr.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M106449200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PLD, phospholipase D;
PC, phosphatidylcholine;
PA, phosphatidic acid;
PI, phosphatidylinositol;
DMPC, L-
-dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine;
DMPA, L-
-dimyristoylphosphatidic acid;
DPPC, L-
-dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine;
DPPS, L-
-dipalmitoylphosphatidylserine;
-OG, N-octyl-
-D-glucopyranoside;
bis(pNP)P, bis(para-nitrophenyl)phosphate;
Ks, surface elasticity modulus;
mN, millinewton.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Yu, C. H.,
Liu, S. Y.,
and Panagia, V.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
157,
101-105[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Holbrook, P. G.,
Pannell, L. K.,
and Daly, J. W.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1084,
155-158[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Ponting, C. P.,
and Kerr, I. D.
(1996)
Protein Sci.
5,
914-922[Abstract]
|
| 4.
|
Stieglitz, K. A.,
Seaton, B. A.,
and Roberts, M. F.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
35367-35374[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Stieglitz, K. A.,
Seaton, B. A.,
and Roberts, M. F.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
13954-13963[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Leiros, I.,
Secundo, F.,
Zambonelli, C.,
Servi, S.,
and Hough, E.
(2000)
Structure
8,
655-667[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Morris, A. J.,
Frohman, M. A.,
and Engebrecht, J.
(1997)
Anal. Biochem.
252,
1-9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Geng, D.,
Chura, J.,
and Roberts, M. F.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12195-12202[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Yamamoto, I.,
Konto, A.,
Handa, T.,
and Miyajima, K.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1233,
21-26[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Estrela-Lopis, I.,
Brezesinski, G.,
and Mohwald, H.
(2001)
Biophys. J.
80,
749-754[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Geng, D.,
Baker, D. P.,
Foley, S. F.,
Zhou, C.,
Stieglitz, K. A.,
and Roberts, M. F.
(1999)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1430,
234-244[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Dumaual, A. C.,
Jenski, L. J.,
and Stillwell, W.
(2000)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1463,
395-406[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Li, X. M.,
Momsen, M. M.,
Smaby, J. M.,
Brockman, H. L.,
and Brown, R. E.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
5954-5963[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Bechoua, S.,
Dubois, M.,
Némoz, G.,
Lagarde, M.,
and Prigent, A-F.
(1998)
J. Lipid Res.
39,
873-883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Albrecht, O.,
Gruler, H.,
and Sackmann, E.
(1981)
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
79,
319-338[CrossRef]
|
| 16.
|
Imamura, S.,
and Horiuti, Y.
(1979)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
85,
79-95[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Davis, L. L.,
Maglio, J. J.,
and Horwitz, J.
(1998)
Lipids
33,
223-227[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Kondo, T.,
Kakiuchi, T.,
and Shimomura, M.
(1994)
Thin Solid Films
244,
887-889[CrossRef]
|
| 19.
| Beisson, F., Tiss, A., Rivière, C., and Verger, R. (2000)
Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 133-153
|
| 20.
|
Iwasaki, Y.,
Horiike, S.,
Matsushima, K.,
and Yamane, T.
(1999)
Eur. J. Biochem.
264,
577-581[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Yamamoto, I.,
Mazumi, T.,
Handa, T.,
and Miyajima, K.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1145,
293-297[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Vinggaard, A. M.,
Jensen, T.,
Morgan, C. P.,
Cockcroft, S.,
and Hansen, H. S.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
319,
861-864
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Wagner and G. Brezesinski
Phospholipase D Activity Is Regulated by Product Segregation and the Structure Formation of Phosphatidic Acid within Model Membranes
Biophys. J.,
October 1, 2007;
93(7):
2373 - 2383.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yang and M. F. Roberts
Phosphohydrolase and transphosphatidylation reactions of two Streptomyces phospholipase D enzymes: Covalent versus noncovalent catalysis
Protein Sci.,
September 1, 2003;
12(9):
2087 - 2098.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Zambonelli and M. F. Roberts
An Iron-dependent Bacterial Phospholipase D Reminiscent of Purple Acid Phosphatases
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 11, 2003;
278(16):
13706 - 13711.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|