![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21261-21268, June 14, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, January 25, 2002, and in revised form, March 13, 2002
Xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) is a 300-kDa
homodimer that can exist as an
NAD+-dependent dehydrogenase (XD) or as
an O2-dependent oxidase (XO) depending on the
oxidation state of its cysteine thiols. Both XD and XO undergo limited
cleavage by chymotrypsin and trypsin. Trypsin selectively cleaved both
enzyme forms at Lys184, while chymotrypsin cleaved XD
primarily at Met181 but cleaved XO at Met181
and at Phe560. Chymotrypsin, but not trypsin, cleavage also
prevented the reductive conversion of XO to XD; thus the region
surrounding Phe560 appears to be important in the
interconversion of the two forms. Size exclusion chromatography showed
that disulfide bond formation reduced the hydrodynamic volume of the
enzyme, and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of
chymotrypsin-digested XO showed significant, disulfide bond-mediated,
conformational heterogeneity in the N-terminal third of the enzyme but
no evidence of disulfide bonds between the N-terminal and C-terminal
regions or between XOR subunits. These results indicate that
intrasubunit disulfide bond formation leads to a global conformational
change in XOR that results in the exposure of the region surrounding
Phe560. Conformational changes within this region in turn
appear to play a critical role in the interconversion between the XD
and XO forms of the enzyme.
Xanthine oxidoreductase
(XOR)1 plays an important
function in vertebrate metabolism by catalyzing the oxidation of
xanthine to uric acid, the rate-limiting step in purine degradation
(1). Native XOR is a 300,000-dalton dimer composed of identical and catalytically independent subunits. Each subunit consist of 1333-1358 amino acids, depending on the species, and contains binding sites for
molybdopterin, iron, and flavin co-factors (2, 3). The genes and
full-length coding regions for XOR from mammals, chickens, insects, and
fungi have been described (4-10). Analysis of these cDNAs has
shown that the amino acid sequence of XOR is highly conserved across
the phylogenetic spectrum. The enzymes from rats, mice, humans, and
cattle exhibit ~90% identity, while the chicken and
Drosophila enzymes exhibit, respectively, 70 and 52%
identity with mammalian enzymes (3).
In mammals, XOR can exist in two enzymatic forms: a dehydrogenase (XD;
EC 1.1.3.204) which utilizes NAD+ as an electron
acceptor and an oxidase (XO; EC 1.1.3.22) which utilizes
O2 as an electron acceptor (11, 12). Both enzymatic forms
are the product of the same gene and are identical in size, subunit
composition, and co-factor requirements (2, 3). To date, XD appears to
be the predominant enzyme form in freshly prepared mammalian tissues
(11-13); however, it is often isolated in the XO form during
purification (2). It is unclear if XD and XO serve distinct biological
roles. High levels of the XO have been associated with tissue injury
and certain diseases (14, 15) and are thought to contribute to
oxidative damage of cells through the generation of cytotoxic oxygen
metabolites (H2O2 and O The cellular mechanism(s) that regulate the relative tissue levels of
the XD and XO forms of XOR are poorly defined. XD can be converted to
XO in a reversible process by heating or oxidation of cysteine thiols
to form disulfide bonds (11, 17). The oxidative conversion of XD to XO
has been shown to be associated with the oxidation of selected
cysteines (17), loss of NAD+ binding affinity (3),
alterations in redox and kinetic properties (18, 19), and
conformational changes at the flavin-binding site (20, 21). However,
specific protein domains involved in these changes have not been
identified, and the underlying molecular basis of the redox-mediated XD
to XO conversion is still uncertain. In addition, it is unclear to what
extent conformational changes within the flavin-binding site reflect
larger changes in the global conformation of XOR and whether such
changes are necessary for the conversion of XD to XO. XD can also be
irreversibly converted to XO by proteolysis (6, 11, 17). Recent
crystallographic studies have shown that proteolysis of XD leads to
structural alterations near the flavin cofactor domain (22). However,
the crystallographic structure of intact XO generated by cysteine oxidation has not been solved, and thus it is unclear how similar the
structure of disulfide-bonded XO is to proteolyzed XO. In the present
study we have used peptide mapping, chromatography, and two-dimensional
gel electrophoresis to identify differences in the solution
conformations of XD and XO and to investigate the role conformation
changes play in the XD to XO conversion.
Materials--
XOR (2.5-3.1 IU/mg) isolated from bovine milk in
the oxidase form (XO) according to Waud et al. (23) was a
generous gift from Dr. Joseph McCord (Webb-Waring Antioxidant Research
Institute, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center). Sequencing
grade trypsin and chymotrypsin were purchased from Boehringer-Ingleheim Inc. BS3 (bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate) was purchased from Pierce.
Polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hyperbond) were purchased from Beckman Instruments Inc. Centricon ultrafiltration membranes were
purchased from Amicon Inc. Other chemicals and reagents were obtained
from either Sigma or Fischer Scientific.
Preparation of XD and Determination of XD and XO
Isoforms--
Purified XO was converted to XD by incubation with 5-10
mM DTT at room temperature for 1-2 h (17). The enzyme was
then cooled to 4 °C and subjected to ultrafiltration at 4 °C
using Centricon 10,000-Da cut-off membranes to remove DTT. Enzymatic
activity specifically associated with either XD
(xanthine:NAD+ oxidoreductase activity) or XO
(xanthine:O2 oxidoreductase activity) was calculated as the
allopurinol-sensitive rates of aerobic formation of uric acid from
xanthine in the presence (XD) or absence (XO) of 0.6 mM
NAD+, and the ratio of XD to XO activities (D/O) was
calculated according to Waud and Rajagopolan (12) as described
previously (24). Total XOR activity (both XD and XO activities) was
routinely assayed by the reduction of dichloroindophenol using xanthine
as a substrate (xanthine/dichloroindophenol assay) as described
previously (24). Total protein was quantified using the bicinchoninic
acid method (25).
Protease Digestion--
XOR (5-20 µg) in the XD or XO form
was incubated at room temperature (25 °C) with 1/20 (w/w)
chymotrypsin or trypsin in 50 mM Tris, 150 mM
NaCl, pH 8, for 90 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The samples were then assayed for enzyme
activity and/or processed for SDS-PAGE analysis as described below.
Electrophoretic Analyses in One and Two
Dimensions--
Electrophoresis was performed using a mini-Protean II
gel apparatus (Bio-Rad) with 0.75-mm spacers. For one-dimensional
electrophoresis samples were diluted with an equal volumes of 2×
concentrated SDS-PAGE sample buffer (0.125 M Tris, 4% SDS,
20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, pH 6.5), heated for 3 min at
95 °C, and separated by electrophoresis in 10% acrylamide gels
containing 0.1% SDS at room temperature. For two-dimensional
electrophoresis samples were diluted with equal volumes of 2×
concentrated SDS-PAGE sample buffer without 2-mercaptoethanol, heated
for 3 min at 95 °C, and subjected to electrophoresis in 10%
acrylamide gels as described above. When the tracking dye reached the
bottom of the gel, electrophoresis was stopped and the
protein-containing lanes were excised and prepared for electrophoresis
in the second dimension by incubation in 3 ml of SDS-PAGE sample buffer
containing 5% 2-mercaptoethanol for 1 h at 60 °C. After
reduction the lanes were layered on top of the second dimension gel
(10% acrylamide, 0.1% SDS) perpendicular to the direction of
electrophoresis. Gaps were sealed with melted agarose (1%) containing
2% SDS, 50 mM DTT. After electrophoresis protein bands
were detected by silver staining (26).
Chemical Cross-linking Studies--
XO was cross-linked by
reaction with a 50-fold molar excess of BS3 in phosphate-buffered
saline, pH 7.5, according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Protein Sequence Determination--
N-terminal amino acid
sequence analyses were performed by automated Edman degradation of
proteins electroblotted to polyvinylidene difluoride (27) using an
Applied Biosystems Inc. model 477A automated protein sequencing
instrument equipped with an in-line model 120 HPLC.
Size Exclusion-HPLC Analysis--
HLPC-size exclusion
chromatography (HPLC-SEC) analysis was performed on a Beckman System
Gold Instrument using a 7.8 × 600-mm SEC-3000 column (Phenomenex
Inc.) equilibrated in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.5. Chromatography
was performed at room temperature at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The
elution of protein and enzyme activity were monitored at 220 nm using
an online UV detector and (where indicated by collecting fractions)
using an electronically activated fraction collector (Gilson, FC 203B)
that was synchronously integrated to sample injection. Determination of
XD and XO retention times was performed using a 25-µl injection loop
and sample protein concentrations of 1 mg/ml. XO was converted to XD by
incubation with 10 mM DTT at room temperature for at least
1 h prior to analysis. Mean retention times of each enzyme form
were determined from a minimum of five HPLC-SEC analyses. The SEC
properties of cross-linked XO were determined using a 100-µl
injection loop. Eluted protein was collected into 0.3-ml fractions. XO
activity was determined using the xanthine/dichloroindophenol assay.
The electrophoretic characteristics of the cross-linked protein were
determined by SDS-PAGE analysis and silver staining as described above.
XD and XO Have Different Proteolytic Digestion
Patterns--
Differences in the environment surrounding the flavin
co-factor binding regions of XD and XO have been reported previously (20, 21). To determine whether these differences reflect broader structural changes we investigated the trypsin and chymotrypsin digestion patterns of both catalytic forms (Fig.
1). Chymotrypsin cleavage of XO (D/O = 0.1; 90% XO form) generated three major cleavage products with
estimated molecular weights on SDS-PAGE of 85,000 (band 1),
64,000 (band 2), and 44,000 fragments (band 3). In contrast,
chymotrypsin cleavage of XD (D/O = 7.1; 88% XD form) yielded a
single major product with an estimated molecular weight of 125,000 (band 5) and minor amounts of a 44,000 fragment (band 6). Trypsin
cleavage of either isozyme of XOR generated a single 125-kDa fragment
(Fig. 1B, bands 7 and 8). In agreement with earlier studies
(6, 11, 17) neither chymotrypsin nor trypsin digestion affected total
XOR activity or altered the apparent molecular weights of the isozymes
(data not shown).
The identities of the cleavage sites were determined by N-terminal
sequencing and comparing the experimentally determined sequences to the
deduced sequence of bovine XD cDNA (7). Table I shows the sequences of the first 7 amino acids of the major XD and XO cleavage products, the position of
these sequences within the enzyme, and the corresponding cleavage site.
The N-terminal sequences of the 125-kDa fragments (bands 7 and 8)
generated by trypsin digestion of XD or XO correspond to
Lys185-Leu191 and are consistent with cleavage
of both enzyme forms at Lys184. The sequence of the 125-kDa
fragment (band 5) generated by chymotrypsin digestion of XD corresponds
to Asn182-Thr188 and is consistent with
cleavage at Met181. Based on the deduced amino acid
sequence of bovine XD the calculated molecular mass values for peptide
fragments from Asn182 to Val1331 (the C
terminus of bovine XD) and Lys185-Val1331 are
127,225 and 126,854 kDa, respectively (28). These values are in good
agreement with SDS-PAGE size estimates (~125 kDa) for the major
fragments generated by trypsin digestion of XD or XO and chymotrypsin
digestion of XD, and indicate that these fragments contain the C
terminus of XOR.
The N-terminal sequence of the 85-kDa fragment (band 1) generated by
chymotrypsin digestion of XO corresponds to
Gln561-Gln567 and is consistent with cleavage
at Phe560. The sequence of the 64-kDa fragment (band 2)
corresponds to the N terminus of purified XOR
(Thr2-Phe7). The sizes of the 64- and 85-kDa
fragments by SDS-PAGE agree reasonably well with the predicted
molecular masses of the N-terminal (Thr2-Phe560; 61,678 daltons) and C-terminal
(Gln561-Val1331; 84,829 daltons) peptide
fragments generated by cleavage at Phe560. These results
suggest that the 64- and 85-kDa fragments are primary products of
chymotrypsin digestion of XO. The sequence of the first 7 amino acids
of the 44-kDa fragment (band 3) corresponds to
Asn182-Thr188 and is consistent with cleavage
at Met181. The size of this fragment agrees with that
predicted for a peptide fragment from Asn182 to
Phe560 (42,413 daltons) and suggests that the 44-kDa
fragment is generated by cleavage of the 64-kDa fragment at
Met181. Hydropathy analysis (28) of the amino acid
sequences surrounding the cleavage sites (Fig.
2) shows that Met181 and
Lys184 lie in a hydrophilic region, while
Phe560 is in a relatively hydrophobic region of XOR. These
results demonstrate that native XD and XO possess distinct solution
conformations characterized, in part, by exposure of a hydrophobic
region containing Phe560 in the XO form.
XD and XO Possess Different Hydrodynamic Properties--
To
determine whether the conformational differences in XD and XO
represented global changes in their conformations we investigated their
hydrodynamic properties by size exclusion chromatography. Fig.
3 shows the elution properties of XD
(D/O = 6.2) and XO (D/O < 0.1) during HPLC-SEC at pH 7.5. Both forms of the enzyme eluted as single peaks (the small amount of
absorbance at later retention times in the XD sample is due to DTT used
to prepare XD) and appeared to be homogenous in composition. However,
the average retention time of XO (17.52 ± 0.11 min;
n = 6) was longer than that of XD (17.13 ± 0.07 min; n = 5). These results indicate that disulfide bond
reduction leads to a significant change in the frictional coefficient
of XOR and is consistent with an increase in the hydrodynamic volume of
the enzyme. The nature of the disulfide bonds within XO was
investigated by two-dimensional peptide mapping of
chymotrypsin-digested XO under nonreduced and reduced conditions.
Organization of Disulfide Bonds in XO--
A representative
two-dimensional peptide map of chymotrypsin-digested XO is shown in
Fig. 4A. The digested enzyme
was denatured in SDS in the absence of reducing agents and subjected to
SDS-PAGE under nonreducing (first dimension) and reducing (second
dimension) conditions. In addition to residual intact XO at 145 kDa,
prominent bands at 85, 64, and 44 kDa were observed to lie on the
diagonal indicated by arrowheads. Additional bands were also
observed to the right of the diagonal at 64 and 44 kDa. The lack of
significant staining to the left of the diagonal indicates that there
are few, if any, disulfide bridges between undigested XO subunits or
between the 85-, 64-, and 44-kDa fragments generated by chymotrypsin digestion. The presence of groups of bands spreading horizontally to
the right of the 64- and 44-kDa bands indicates the existence of
electrophoretic heterogeneity within these fragments. Since the first
dimension was carried out in SDS under nonreducing conditions and
fragments within each group have the same size, this observation suggests that this heterogeneity is due to disulfide bond-mediated conformational differences within these fragments. To verify that the
electrophoretic heterogeneity within the 64- and 44-kDa fragments is
the result of disulfide bonding, XO was first digested with chymotrypsin and then incubated with 5 mM DTT prior to
two-dimensional peptide mapping. Fig. 4B shows that under
these conditions the 85-, 64-, and 44-kDa fragments appear as tight
bands on the diagonal (arrowheads), and there is no evidence
of electrophoretic heterogeneity associated with these fragments.
Cross-linking Prevents Thiol-mediated Conversion of XO to
XD--
To determine whether a conformational switch is required for
the conversion of XO to XD we investigate the effects of cross-linking on the conversion process. Table II shows
the effects of cross-linking XO with the amine-specific reagent BS3 on
the ability of DTT to convert XO to XD as indicated by an increase in
the D/O ratio. The initial D/O values of cross-linked and
non-cross-linked (control) enzyme were <0.1. After incubating with 10 mM DTT for 2 h the D/O of control XO increased to
nearly 4, whereas the D/O value of the cross-linked enzyme was still
less than 0.1. BS3 did not react with cysteine thiols or interfere with
the ability of DTT to reduce XO cysteine thiols (data not shown).
Moreover it did not interfere with the XD activity of enzyme that was
reduced prior to adding cross-linking reagent (Table II). Thus, the
inability of DTT to convert BS3 cross-linked XO to XD does not appear
to be due to a specific interference of BS3 with XD enzymatic activity or its reaction with cysteine thiols.
The nature of the BS3 cross-linked enzyme was characterized by HPLC-SEC
and SDS-PAGE. The majority of the cross-linked enzyme eluted with the
same retention time as native XO (Fig.
5). SDS-PAGE analysis of cross-linked XO
(Fig. 5, inset) showed that it was composed of bands between
180 and 200 kDa as well as bands near the top of the gel and at ~150
kDa. The results demonstrate that cross-linking primarily occurs
within, and/or between, individual XO subunits and that there is
relatively little cross-linking between enzyme molecules or formation
of large cross-linked enzyme aggregates. Therefore, cross-linking also
does not appear to influence the assembly state of the enzyme. Together
these results suggest that cross-linking with BS3 prevents a
conformational change that is necessary for the reductive conversion of
XO to XD.
Cleavage of XO at Phe560 Prevents Conversion to
XD--
Since exposure of the region containing Phe560 is
a distinct feature of the XO conformation we tested the possibility
that alterations to this region by proteolytic cleavage would interfere
with conversion to XD by thiol reduction. Fig.
6 shows the effects of trypsin and
chymotrypsin digestion on the ability of DTT to convert XO to XD (Fig.
6A) and on the conversion of XD to XO (Fig. 6B).
XO digested with trypsin for up to 2 h could still be converted to XD by incubation with 5 mM DTT for 1 h; however,
digestion with chymotrypsin for as little as 30 min completely
prevented conversion. In contrast, neither chymotrypsin nor trypsin
digestion led to significant conversion of XD to XO. Since chymotrypsin
and trypsin cleave XO and XD at proximal sites (Met181 and
Lys184, respectively) within their N-terminal regions it is
unlikely that cleavage within this region is responsible for the
failure of DTT to convert chymotrypsin-cleaved XO to XD. Conversely,
the selective cleavage at XO at Phe560 by chymotrypsin
suggests that structural alterations within this region are responsible
for the inability of XO to be converted to XD by DTT reduction.
It is well established that mammalian XOR can be reversibly
converted from an NAD+-dependent dehydrogenase
to an O2-dependent oxidase by oxidation of
cysteine thiols to disulfide bonds (11, 12). The present study
demonstrates that the conversion of XD to XO involves a global
conformational change that is coupled to a reduction in the apparent
hydrodynamic size of XOR. The conformational change was mapped to a
specific region surrounding Phe560 and was shown to be a
necessary step in the conversion process.
Although the specific activities of our preparations indicate that
30-50% of the purified enzyme is catalytically inactive (2), evidence
from the literature and from the present studies suggests that active
and inactive XOR molecules possess similar structures and undergo
equivalent conformational changes. First, catalytically inactive forms
are present in many highly purified and physically homogenous XOR
preparations (2). The inactive forms appear to result from specific
alterations of the molybdopterin cofactor (2) and not from alterations
in the structural properties of the protein. Second, the hydrodynamic
and electrophoretic properties of our purified XOR preparations
demonstrate that the enzyme is intact and is composed of a relatively
homogenous population of molecules. Size exclusion chromatography of
the XD and XO isoforms also indicates that there is a uniform response
to thiol reduction of XO. Third, the precise proteolytic patterns
observed for both the XD and XO isoforms indicate that within a given
isoform population the overall conformations are relatively homogenous.
The limited and highly selective cleavage of XD and XO by trypsin and
chymotrypsin is consistent with previous proteolysis studies of rat and
bovine XOR (6, 29) and with subtilisin cleavage of chicken XD (8) and
indicates that the native conformations of both isoforms are highly
ordered and that homologous forms of avian and mammalian XOR have
similar structural domains. Trypsin selectively cleaved the bovine XD
and XO isoforms at Lys184. The absence of significant
amounts of additional trypsin cleavage products indicates this region
is highly accessible in the native conformations of both enzyme forms
and that the degree of local segmental motion within this region is
significantly greater than that of other regions of the enzyme (30,
31). Chymotrypsin selectively cleaved XD and XO at an adjacent site in
this region (Met181). The close proximity of the
Met181 and Lys184 sites combined with earlier
findings that trypsin cleaves rat liver XD at Lys185 (6)
and subtilisin cleaves chicken liver XD at a homologous site
(Lys248) suggests that flexible structural
properties are a general feature of this region in both mammalian and
avian XOR molecules. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of
mammalian and avian enzymes shows that Lys184 and
Met181 are located in a highly conserved, hydrophilic
region of the enzyme at the boundary between the iron-sulfur and
flavin domains (8, 10, 22).
In contrast to the high susceptibility of Met181 and
Lys184 to proteolytic attack in both XD and XO isoforms,
Phe560 is cleaved by chymotrypsin only when it is in the XO
form. Hydropathy analysis shows that Phe560 is in a
relatively hydrophobic region of the enzyme that would be expected to
exhibit reduced solvent exposure under physiological conditions. The
observation that this site becomes accessible to chymotrypsin only
after XD is converted to XO therefore suggests that disulfide bond
formation produces significant structural changes within this region of
XOR. Based on sequence alignment comparisons of XOR family members (32)
and crystallographic studies of bovine XD (22), the Phe560
site appears to be in an unstructured region near the boundary of the
flavin and molybdopterin domains. Thus, disulfide bond formation
appears to produce conformational changes that delineate the extent of
the flavin-binding region of XOR. Furthermore, size exclusion analysis
indicates that disulfide bond formation reduces the hydrodynamic size
of XOR. These results extend previous observations (20, 21) of
conformational changes within the flavin-binding site following thiol
oxidation-dependent conversion of XD to XO by demonstrating
that the conversion involves specific structural alterations and global
changes in the hydrodynamic properties of XOR.
The pattern of chymotrypsin digestion of bovine milk XD is different
from that previously reported for rat liver XD (11). In this earlier
study, chymotrypsin cleavage of XD generated significant amounts of 64- and 44-kDa fragments. However, the D/O value of enzyme used in these
studies was 1.3; thus their preparation appeared to contain significant
amounts of the XO form. In addition, the digestion was carried out at
37 °C, which potentially leads to local unfolding (30) and has been
reported to result in the conversion of XD to XO (17). Therefore, the
basis for the difference in chymotrypsin cleavage pattern may reside in
the relative XD/XO composition of the sample and/or
temperature-dependent conformational changes, rather than
actual differences in the conformations of the rat and bovine enzymes.
This conclusion is supported by the similarity of the chymotrypsin
cleavage pattern of chicken XDH at 25 °C (33) to that reported here
for bovine XDH. Since avian XOR exists only in the XDH form (8) and
contains a region that is highly homologous to that surrounding
Phe560 of bovine XOR (8), it is likely that the
inaccessibility of the Phe560 region to chymotrypsin is a
general feature of the XDH isoform.
Initial studies of the XD to XO conversion suggested that the cysteine
residues affecting the dehydrogenase activity of XOR were located in
the cysteine-rich N-terminal region (6, 17). However, recent studies of
rat liver XOR have led to the proposal that Cys535 and
Cys992 are involved in the conversion through the formation
of disulfide bonds between these residues (34). Our two-dimensional
electrophoresis results provide evidence of significant disulfide bond
formation within the N-terminal region of XOR (the 44- and 64-kDa
fragments) but not between residues located in the C-terminal fragment
(the 85-kDa band, which contains Cys992) and N-terminal
fragment (the 64-kDa band, which contains Cys535). Since
these residues are conserved in all mammalian enzymes studied to date,
our data suggest the Cys535 and Cys992 form
disulfide bonds with as yet unidentified Cys residues in the 64- and
85-kDa regions, respectively.
The basis of the disulfide bond heterogeneity in the N-terminal region
of XO is unknown. However, milk XO appears to be formed by the action
of a membrane-bound sulfhydryl oxidase during the secretion process
(13, 35). If the conformation of XD leads to clustering of cysteine
residues it is possible that this enzyme might catalyze formation of
disulfide bonds within groups of closely associated cysteine residues
resulting from the generation of XO molecules with different disulfide
bond combinations and consequently different conformations and
electrophoretic mobilities. The formation and rearrangement of
disulfide bond isomers by folding catalysts such as protein-disulfide
isomerase are known to occur during the folding of nascent proteins and
are part of the process of generating proper native conformations (36).
A similar process may occur in the conversion of XD to XO during milk
secretion and lead to the formation of disulfide bond isomers of
XO.
Two lines of evidence from the present study demonstrate that the
conversion of XO to XD is dependent on specific structural changes
associated with disulfide bond reduction. The first is that
cross-linking XO prevents the reductive conversion of XO to XD.
Cross-linking did not interfere with XOR activity, and the majority of
the cross-linking was intramolecular and occurred without major changes
in the conformation of XO. Thus it appears that the inability of DTT to
convert cross-linked XO to XD is not due to alterations in substrate
utilization or artifactual intermolecular interactions between
cross-linked XOR dimers. The second is that selective cleavage of XO at
Phe560 prevents conversion to XD by DTT. Because trypsin
and chymotrypsin cleave XO at nearby sites in the N-terminal region but
only chymotrypsin cleavage prevents conversion to XD, it appears that
structural changes within the region around Phe560 are
critical for the conversion process. As yet it is unclear if cleavage
at Phe560 alone or a combination of cleavage at
Phe560 and Met181 is required to prevent
reductive conversion of XO to XD. However, time course studies indicate
that Phe560 cleavage occurs first and that cleavage at this
site correlates with the inhibition of the XO to XD
conversion.2 Support for the
importance of the region surrounding Phe560 comes from
observations that modification of Cys535 of rat liver XOR
converts XD to XO (34) and from crystallographic data that show that
this region is disordered in intact bovine XD and proteolyzed bovine XO
and constitutes a linking segment between the flavin and molybdopterin
domains (22). Our results do not support earlier conclusions, based on
proteolytic digestion of rat XOR, that alterations within the
cysteine-rich N-terminal region by cleavage at Lys185 are
responsible for the XD to XO conversion (6, 17). As indicated above,
technical differences, especially the use of elevated temperatures for
proteolytic digestion experiments, may be the basis for this
discrepancy. In fact, more recent studies of rat liver XOR have shown
that cleavage at Lys185 does not induce the D to O
conversion of rat XOR (34). Together with evidence from recent
investigations of the role of cysteine residues in the XD to XO
conversion (34), the results from our study indicate that the XD-XO
interconversion requires a conformational switch in the region
surrounding Phe560. Alterations that affect the structure
of this region, such as proteolysis, decouple this switch and interfere
with the interconversion process.
Although the conversion of XD to XO represents a pathologically
important event due to increased production of cytotoxic reactive oxygen species by the XO form (37), the biological importance of the
conformational change associated with the conversion is less
established. A potential physiological function of this conformational change is in milk lipid secretion. It has been known for nearly a
century that XOR is highly enriched in cow's milk (2). Numerous studies have documented that the primary form of the milk enzyme is XO
(11, 13, 38), and it has been demonstrated that XOR is a major protein
constituent of the membrane that surrounds lipid globules in milk (39).
Immunofluorescence studies have shown that XOR is selectively
associated with the apical plasma membrane in lactating cattle (40),
and histochemical evidence suggests that the membrane-associated form
is XO (41). We recently demonstrated that the primary form of XOR in
mouse mammary tissue is XD, that rapid conversion of the XD form to the
XO form occurs during milk secretion, and that membranes surrounding
milk lipid globules contain an enzyme capable of converting XD to XO
(13). Thus, it is possible that the conformational changes associated with the XD to XO conversion, in particular the exposure of the hydrophobic region around Phe560, are important in the
association of XOR with the apical membrane in mammary epithelial cells
and may play a role in milk lipid secretion. Electron microscopic
studies have shown that the proteins on the inner surface of milk fat
globule membranes are structurally organized into highly ordered
hexagonal arrays (42). It will be interesting to determine whether
changes in the conformation of XOR contribute to the organization of
these structures.
We thank Drs. Richard Wright and Margaret
Neville for helpful discussions and critically reading the manuscript.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants HL 45582-05AZ and P01CHD38129. Microsequencing was performed at
the UCHSC Cancer Center's Protein Chemistry Core Laboratory supported by Grant CA46934 from the NCI, National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology and
Biophysics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. 9th
Ave., Denver, CO 80262. Tel.: 303-315-7093; Fax: 303-315-8110; E-mail:
jim.mcmanaman@uchsc.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 25, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M200828200
2
J. L. McManaman, unpublished observations.
The abbreviations used are:
XOR, xanthine
oxidoreductase;
XO, xanthine oxidase;
XD, xanthine dehydrogenase;
BS3, bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
SEC, size
exclusion chromatography;
HPLC, high pressure liquid
chromatography.
Structural and Conformational Analysis of the Oxidase to
Dehydrogenase Conversion of Xanthine Oxidoreductase*
§ and
Department of Physiology and Biophysics and
¶ Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado
Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Trypsin and chymotrypsin digestion patterns
of XD and XO. XD (D/O = 7) and XO (D/O < 0. 1) were
incubated with trypsin or chymotrypsin at 25 °C at an enzyme to
protease ratio of 20/1 for the indicated times. The reaction was
stopped with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and the digestion pattern
was analyzed by SDS-PAGE using a 10% acrylamide gel. A
shows the chymotrypsin digestion patterns of XD and XO. B
shows the trypsin digestion patterns of XD and XO. The migration
positions of molecular weight marker proteins (Kalidoscope standards,
Bio-Rad) are shown on the right in each panel.
Identification of trypsin and chymotrypsin cleavage sites

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Hydropathy profile of regions surrounding
Met181 and Phe560 of bovine XOR. Kyte and
Doolittle hydropathy profiles of bovine XOR from
Val101-Phe201 (A) and from
Gly502-Asn601 (B). The hydropathy
profiles are based on the amino acid sequence deduced from bovine XOR
cDNA (7). The locations of trypsin and chymotrypsin cleavage sites
are indicated in each panel.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Size exclusion chromatography analysis of XD
and XO. Samples of XD (D/O = 6.2) and XO (D/O < 0.1),
each containing 20 µg of protein, were analyzed by HPLC-SEC in
phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.5, using a 7.8 × 600-mm SEC-3000
column (Phenomenex, Inc.). Eluting material was monitored at 220 nm.
The dashed and solid lines show representative
chromatograms of XD and XO, respectively. The mean retention times of
XD (17.13 ± 0.07 min; n = 5) and XO (17.52 ± 0.11 min; n = 6) were significantly different;
p < 0.01.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Two-dimensional electrophoresis of
chymotrypsin-digested XO. XO was digested with chymotrypsin (20/1)
at room temperature and then analyzed by two-dimensional
electrophoresis under nonreducing conditions (first dimension) and
reducing conditions (second dimension). A, shows the
two-dimensional electrophoresis pattern of XO incubated with
chymotrypsin for 1 h. B, two-dimensional
electrophoresis of XO incubated with chymotrypsin for 2 h and then
with 5 mM DTT for 2 h. Protein fragments were detected
by silver staining. The orientation of electrophoresis in each
dimension is shown at the top and right side of
each gel. The size of each band is shown on its right. The
arrowheads indicate the position of the diagonal.
The effect of cross-linking on the conversion of XO to XD by DTT

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Size exclusion chromatography of cross-linked
XO. XO (50 µg; D/O = 0.1) was cross-linked with BS3 and
analyzed by HPLC-SEC in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.5. Fractions
were collected every 0.3 min starting 12 min after injection. The
elution of protein (solid line) and XO activity
(dotted line with triangles) are shown as a
function of column retention time. The inset shows the
SDS-PAGE and silver stain analysis of selected fractions across the
peak. The numbers adjacent to the XO activity profile
indicate the fractions assayed by SDS-PAGE. The elution of protein was
monitored at 220 nm and the elution XOR activity was monitored using
the xanthine/dichloroindophenol assay ("Experimental Procedures")
and is shown as the relative rate of xanthine oxidation/min per 20-µl
aliquot.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effects of trypsin and chymotrypsin digestion
of interconversion of XD and XO. A shows the effects of
trypsin and chymotrypsin digestion on the conversion of XO to XD
by DTT. XO was incubated with trypsin or chymotrypsin at room
temperature for the indicated times, at a ratio of enzyme to protease
of 20/1. The reactions were stopped with phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
and the samples were then incubated with 5 mM DTT for
1 h at room temperature and assayed for XD and XO activities as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The control sample shows
the D/O of undigested XO that was incubated with 5 mM DTT
for 1 h. The total XOR activity (D + O) in control and
protease-digested samples averaged 17.1 ± 2 µmol of uric
acid/ml/min. B shows the effects of trypsin and chymotrypsin
digestion on the conversion of XD to XO. XD (D/O = 7) was
incubated with trypsin or chymotrypsin at room temperature for the
indicated times. The reactions were stopped with phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride and the samples were assayed for XD and XO activities.
The control sample shows the D/O of undigested XD incubated at room
temperature for 2 h. The total XOR activity (D + O) in control and
protease-digested samples averaged 15.4 ± 2.8 µmol of uric
acid/ml/min. In both A and B the mean D/O values
(bars) of duplicate samples are shown as a function of
digestion time for each protease. The values above each
bar show the percentage of the enzyme in the XD form.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Stryer, L.
(1988)
Biochemistry
, 3rd Ed.
, W. H. Freeman and Co., New York
2.
Bray, R. C.
(1975)
in
The Enzymes
(Boyer, P. D., ed), Third Ed., Vol. XII
, pp. 299-419, Academic Press, New York
3.
Hille, R.,
and Nishino, T.
(1995)
FASEB J
9,
995-1003[Abstract]
4.
Ichida, K.,
Amaya, Y.,
Noda, K.,
Minoshima, S.,
Hosoya, T.,
Sakai, O.,
Shimizu, N.,
and Nishino, T.
(1993)
Gene (Amst.)
133,
279-284[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Terao, M.,
Cassaniga, G.,
Ghezzi, P.,
Bianchi, M.,
Falciani, F.,
Perani, P.,
and Garattini, E.
(1992)
Biochem. J.
283,
863-870
6.
Amaya, Y.,
Yamazaki, K-I.,
Sato, M.,
Noda, K.,
Nishino, T.,
and Nishino, T.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
14170-14175 7.
Bergland, L.,
Rasmussen, J. T.,
Andersen, M. D.,
Rasmussen, M. S.,
and Petersen, T. E.
(1996)
J. Dairy Sci.
79,
198-204[Abstract]
8.
Sato, A.,
Nishino, T.,
Noda, K.,
Amaya, A.,
and Nishino, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
2818-2826 9.
Lee, C. S.,
Curtis, D.,
McCarron, M.,
Love, C.,
Gray, M.,
Bender, W.,
and Chovnick, A.
(1987)
Genetics
116,
67-73 10.
Glatigny, A.,
and Scazzocchio, C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
3534-3560 11.
Stirpe, F.,
and Della Corte, E.
(1969)
J. Biol. Chem.
244,
3855-3863 12.
Waud, W. R.,
and Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1976)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
172,
354-364[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
McManaman, J. L.,
Neville, M. C.,
and Wright, R. M.
(1999)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
371,
308-316[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Cross, C. E.
(1987)
Ann. Intern. Med.
107,
526-545[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Southorn, P. A.,
and Powis, G.
(1988)
Mayo Clin. Proc.
63,
390-408[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Becker, B. F.
(1993)
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
14,
615-631[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Waud, W. R.,
and Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1976)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
172,
365-379[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Saito, T.,
and Nishino, T.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
10015-10022 19.
Hunt, J.,
and Massey, V.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
21479-21485 20.
Massey, V.,
Schopfer, L. M.,
Nishino, T.,
and Nishino, T.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
10567-10573 21.
Saito, T.,
Nishino, T.,
and Massey, V.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
15930-15935 22.
Enroth, C.,
Eger, B. T.,
Okamoto, K.,
Nishino, T.,
Nishino, T.,
and Pai, E. F.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
10723-10728 23.
Waud, W. R.,
Brady, F. O.,
Wiley, R. D.,
and Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1975)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
169,
695-701[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
McManaman, J. L.,
Shellman, V.,
Wright, R. M.,
and Repine, J. E.
(1996)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
332,
135-141[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Smith, P. K.,
Krohn, R. I.,
Hemanson, G. T.,
Mallial, A. K.,
Gartner, J. H.,
Provenzano, M. D.,
Fujimoto, E. K.,
Goeke, N. M.,
Olson, B. J.,
and Klenk, D. C.
(1985)
Anal. Biochem.
150,
76-85[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Wray, W.,
Boulikas, T.,
Wray, V. P.,
and Hancock, R.
(1981)
Anal. Biochem.
118,
197-203[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Matsudaira, P.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
10035-10038 28.
Appel, R. D.,
Bairoch, A.,
and Hochstrasser, D. F. A.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
258-260
29.
Nagler, L. G.,
and Vartanyan, L. S.
(1976)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
427,
78-90[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Fontana, A.,
Fassina, G.,
Vita, C.,
Dalzoppo, D.,
Zamai, M.,
and Zambonin, M.
(1986)
Biochemistry
25,
1847-1851[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Hubbard, S. J.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1382,
191-206[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Ramao, M. J.,
and Huber, R.
(1998)
Struct. Bonding
90,
69-95
33.
Coughlan, M. P.,
Betcher-Lange, S. L.,
and Rajagopalan, K. V.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
10694-10699 34.
Nishino, T.,
and Nishino, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29859-29864 35.
Clare, D. A.,
Blakistone, B. A.,
Swaisgood, H. E.,
and Horton, H. R.
(1981)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
211,
44-47[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Gilbert, H. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29399-29402 37.
McCord, J. M.
(1985)
N. Engl. J. Med.
312,
159-163[Abstract]
38.
Nakamura, M.,
and Yamazaki, I.
(1982)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
92,
1279-1286 39.
Mather, I. H.,
and Keenan, T. W.
(1998)
J. Mam. Gland Biol. Neoplasia
3,
259-273
40.
Jarasch, E. D.,
Grund, C.,
Bruder, G.,
Heid, H. W.,
Keenan, T. W.,
and Franke, W. W.
(1981)
Cell
25,
67-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Fredricks, W. M.,
and Marx, F. J.
(1993)
Histochem. Cytochem.
41,
667-670[Abstract]
42.
Bucheim, W.
(1982)
Naturwissenschaften
69,
505-507[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Pacher, A. Nivorozhkin, and C. Szabo Therapeutic effects of xanthine oxidase inhibitors: renaissance half a century after the discovery of allopurinol. Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2006; 58(1): 87 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishino, K. Okamoto, Y. Kawaguchi, H. Hori, T. Matsumura, B. T. Eger, E. F. Pai, and T. Nishino Mechanism of the Conversion of Xanthine Dehydrogenase to Xanthine Oxidase: IDENTIFICATION OF THE TWO CYSTEINE DISULFIDE BONDS AND CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF A NON-CONVERTIBLE RAT LIVER XANTHINE DEHYDROGENASE MUTANT J. Biol. Chem., July 1, 2005; 280(26): 24888 - 24894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Wright, L. A. Ginger, N. Kosila, N. D. Elkins, B. Essary, J. L. McManaman, and J. E. Repine Mononuclear Phagocyte Xanthine Oxidoreductase Contributes to Cytokine-Induced Acute Lung Injury Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2004; 30(4): 479 - 490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kuwabara, T. Nishino, K. Okamoto, T. Matsumura, B. T. Eger, E. F. Pai, and T. Nishino Unique amino acids cluster for switching from the dehydrogenase to oxidase form of xanthine oxidoreductase PNAS, July 8, 2003; 100(14): 8170 - 8175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||