Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201918200 on March 28, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21300-21305, June 14, 2002
Repair of Clustered DNA Lesions
SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC INHIBITION OF LONG-PATCH BASE EXCISION REPAIR
BY 8-OXOGUANINE*
Helen
Budworth
§,
Irina I.
Dianova
,
Vladimir N.
Podust¶
, and
Grigory L.
Dianov
**
From the
Medical Research Council Radiation and
Genome Stability Unit, Harwell, Oxfordshire OX11 0RD, United
Kingdom, the ¶ Department of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt
University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232 and the
§ Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford
OX1 3QU, United Kingdom
Received for publication, February 26, 2002, and in revised form, March 27, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
Ionizing radiation induces clustered DNA damage
where two or more lesions are located proximal to each other on the
same or opposite DNA strands. It has been suggested that
individual lesions within a cluster are removed sequentially and that
the presence of a vicinal lesion(s) may affect the rate and fidelity of
DNA repair. In this study, we addressed the question of how
8-oxoguanine located opposite to normal or reduced abasic sites would
affect the repair of these sites by the base excision repair system. We
have found that an 8-oxoguanine located opposite to an abasic site does
not affect either the efficiency or fidelity of repair synthesis by DNA
polymerase
. In contrast, an 8-oxoguanine located one nucleotide
3'-downstream of the abasic site significantly reduces both strand
displacement synthesis supported by DNA polymerase
or
and
cleavage by flap endonuclease of the generated flap, thus inhibiting
the long-patch base excision repair pathway.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Random energy deposition by ionizing radiation induces a wide
array of different DNA lesions (1). Ionizing radiation induces damage
in DNA by direct ionization and through generation of hydroxyl radicals
that attack DNA, resulting in single strand breaks
(SSBs)1 and oxidative damage
to sugar and base residues (2). Two or more DNA lesions of the same or
different nature may be produced proximal to each other on opposite DNA
strands, generally within two helical turns of the DNA. These various
types of DNA damage, known as "clustered DNA lesions", may include
strand breaks that contain damaged DNA termini accompanied by multiple
base lesions of varying complexity. 8-oxoguanine is one of the most
abundant types of oxidative base damage and is frequently found as a
component of clustered lesions (3, 4). For densely ionizing
radiation (such as
-particles), the yield of clustered DNA damage is
high, with >50% of the SSB having a vicinal lesion (3). Recently, using enzymatic methods, it was demonstrated that ionizing radiation indeed induces clustered DNA damage containing oxidized bases and that
this type of clustered damage constitutes about 50-80% of the total
DNA damage (4).
Base excision repair (BER) pathways and the SSB repair pathway are the
major repair systems that contribute to the processing of oxidative
lesions (5-7). BER involves several steps, i.e. removal of
a damaged base by a DNA glycosylase, nicking of an AP site by AP
endonuclease, repair synthesis, and finally the sealing of the nick by
DNA ligase (8). All of these reactions may be affected by the presence
of a neighboring lesion. Several groups (reviewed in Refs. 9 and 10)
have extensively studied the effects of opposing or multiple tandem
lesions on DNA glycosylases and AP endonucleases. However, very little
is known about the effect of these lesions on subsequent BER steps. In
particular, both the fidelity and efficiency of the DNA repair
synthesis step, supported by DNA polymerase
(pol
) and
(pol
), may be affected by the presence of a base lesion on the
template strand.
AP sites or SSBs inhibit the processing of 8-oxoguanine when they are
closely located on the opposite DNA strand (11). Thus, in the
course of repair, clustered lesions containing an 8-oxoguanine opposed
by either another oxidized base or an abasic site (e.g. 5-hydroxycytosine or an AP site opposite to 8-oxoguanine) will be
converted into a lesion consisting of 8-oxoguanine opposite to a
5'-sugar phosphate-containing SSB. Depending on the status of the
5'-sugar phosphate (normal or oxidized/reduced), this lesion can be
repaired via short- or long-patch repair. Short-patch BER involves the
incorporation of one nucleotide by DNA pol
(12) accompanied by
removal of the 5'-sugar phosphate moiety by the same enzyme (13) and
finally the rejoining of the DNA ends by DNA ligase (14). All three
reactions may be affected by the presence of 8-oxoguanine in the
template strand. Long-patch repair may also involve DNA pol
. DNA
polymerase
/
adds 2-4 additional nucleotides into the repair
gap, displacing the 5'-sugar phosphate as part of a flap that is
further removed by a flap endonuclease (FEN1), and then DNA ligase
seals the DNA ends (7). In this pathway an additional lesion present in
the template DNA strand may affect the efficiency of repair even if it
resides several nucleotides 3'-downstream of the lesion in the opposite
strand. In this study, we have employed oligonucleotide duplexes
containing 8-oxoguanine located either directly opposite or one
nucleotide 3' to an SSB containing a 3'-OH end and either a normal or
reduced 5'-sugar phosphate end. Using these substrates and purified
human BER proteins, we characterized the effect of 8-oxoguanine on the repair of clustered lesions via short- and long-patch BER.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials--
Synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides purified by
high performance liquid chromatography were obtained from MWG Biotech.
[
-32P]dATP, [
-32P]dCTP and
[
-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol) were purchased from
PerkinElmer Life Sciences. Recombinant human pol
was
overexpressed and purified as described previously (15). Human APE1 and
uracil-DNA glycosylase with 84 amino acids deleted from the
amino terminus were purified as described (16, 17). DNA ligase I was a
gift from A. Tomkinson.
Substrate Labeling--
A 30-mer oligonucleotide containing a
uracil residue at position 20 (5'-AATAAGCTTGATCGGCCGGUCGCGGTATAT-3')
was 5'-end labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase and
[
-32P]ATP. Unincorporated labeled nucleotides were
removed on a Sephadex G-25 spin column.
Substrates--
To prepare the oligonucleotide duplex, labeled
oligonucleotide containing a uracil residue was annealed to its
complementary strand containing guanine or 8-oxoguanine at the
indicated position. The equimolar solution of both oligonucleotides in
TE, 100 mM KCl, was incubated at 90 °C for 3-5
min, and the solution was allowed to cool slowly to 25 °C. Prior to
the assembly of the excision reaction, the DNA substrate (500 ng, 50 pmol) was pretreated with uracil-DNA glycosylase (200 ng, 6.25 pmol) in
10 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 1 mM EDTA, and 100 mM KCl. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for
1 h. When indicated, the resulting AP site was reduced by the
addition of sodium borohydride to 0.1 M and, after
incubation on ice for 10 min, the reaction buffer was exchanged to TE
by filtering through a Sephadex G-25 spin column.
DNA Polymerase Assay--
The reactions (10 µl) contained 45 mM Hepes, pH 7.8, 70 mM KCl, 7.5 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 2 mM ATP, 20 µM each of dATP,
dGTP, dCTP, and dTTP, and a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide
substrate (10 ng, 1 pmol). The reactions were preincubated at 37 °C
for 5 min. with 5 ng (128 fmol) of APE1, and then pol
or pol
was added at the amount indicated in the figure legends. Reactions with
pol
also included 100 ng (860 fmol) of proliferating cell nuclear
antigen. After an additional incubation for the indicated time at
37 °C, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 10 µl of
gel-loading buffer (95% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.02%
bromphenol blue, and 0.02% xylene cyanol). Following incubation at
80 °C for 2 min, the reaction products were separated by
electrophoresis in a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel containing 8 M urea in 89 mM Tris-HCl, 89 mM boric acid, and 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0.
Reconstituted BER Reaction--
The 30-mer oligonucleotide
containing a single uracil residue at position 20 was 5'-end labeled
and annealed to the complementary strand containing guanine or
8-oxoguanine at the indicated position. Prior to the assembly of the
excision reaction, the oligonucleotide substrate (100 ng) was
pretreated with uracil-DNA glycosylase (100 ng) in 10 mM
Hepes, pH 7.9, 1 mM EDTA, and 70 mM KCl. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. Because of the instability of the AP-containing DNA, the substrates were prepared just
before performing the BER reactions. BER reactions were reconstituted in a reaction mixture (10 µl) that contained 45 mM Hepes,
pH 7.8, 70 mM KCl, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 7.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 2 mM ATP, 20 µM each of the indicated dNTPs,
and 32P-labeled oligonucleotide substrate (10 ng, 1 pmol).
The reactions were initiated by the addition of purified APE1, pol
,
and DNA ligase I at the amount indicated in the figure legends. After incubation for the indicated time at 37 °C, the reactions were stopped by the addition of 10 µl of gel-loading buffer (95%
formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.02% bromphenol blue, and 0.02%
xylene cyanol). Following incubation at 80 °C for 2 min, the
reaction products were separated by electrophoresis in a 20%
denaturing polyacrylamide gel.
Flap Excision Reaction--
A 28-mer oligonucleotide containing
a uracil residue at position 19 (5'-AATAAGCTTGATCGGCCGUCCGCGGTAT-3')
was annealed to the complementary 30-mer containing two extra
nucleotides (TA) at the 5'-end and labeled by filling the protruding
ends using an Escherichia coli DNA polymerase Klenow
fragment in the presence of [
-32P]dATP and cold TTP.
Unincorporated labeled nucleotides were removed on a Sephadex G-25 spin
column. Prior to the assembly of the excision reaction, the
oligonucleotide substrate (100 ng) was pretreated with uracil-DNA
glycosylase (100 ng) in 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 1 mM EDTA, and 70 mM KCl. The reaction mixture
was incubated at 37 °C for 1h. The resulting AP site was reduced by
the addition of sodium borohydride to 0.1 M and, after
incubation on ice for 10 min, the reaction buffer was exchanged to TE
by filtration through a Sephadex G-25 spin column. The excision
reactions were reconstituted in a reaction mixture (10 µl) that
contained 45 mM Hepes, pH 7.8, 70 mM KCl, 7.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM ATP, 2 mg/ml bovine
serum albumin, 20 µM each of dATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP,
and a 32P-labeled oligonucleotide substrate (10 ng, 1 pmol)
and APE1, FEN1, and pol
at the amount indicated in the figure
legends. The reactions were initiated by adding substrate
oligonucleotides and, after incubation for the indicated time at
37 °C, the reactions were stopped by addition of 10 µl of
gel-loading buffer (95% formamide, 20 mM EDTA, 0.02%
bromphenol blue, and 0.02% xylene cyanol). Following incubation at
80 °C for 2 min, the reaction products were separated by
electrophoresis in a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. All experiments were repeated at least 3-5 times, and representative phosphorimages of the gels are shown.
 |
RESULTS |
8-Oxoguanine in a Template Strand Does Not Affect Either the
Efficiency or Fidelity of Short-patch DNA Repair--
During
short-patch BER, after removal of a damaged base and incision of the AP
site by AP endonuclease, DNA polymerase
incorporates a single
nucleotide into the repair gap and removes a 5'-sugar phosphate. To
accomplish repair, DNA ligase seals the DNA ends (8). To investigate
whether 8-oxoguanine located within the repair gap would affect
short-patch BER, we constructed a substrate oligonucleotide duplex
containing a strand break with a 5'-sugar phosphate moiety opposing an
8-oxoguanine on the template strand (Fig.
1A). We first examined the DNA
repair synthesis step and found that at the concentrations used in our
experiments, pol
efficiently bypassed 8-oxoguanine and was also
able to extend repair synthesis beyond one nucleotide (Fig.
1B). We also found that, with this substrate, dCMP was
exclusively incorporated opposite to 8-oxoguanine because repair
synthesis was completely blocked in the absence of dCTP, although dATP,
dGTP, and TTP were added to the reaction at the normal concentration
(data not shown). Moreover, in an assay where equal amounts of dCTP and
dATP were used, only the incorporation of dCMP was observed (Fig.
1C). We thus conclude that 8-oxoguanine located in the
repair gap does not affect either the efficiency or the fidelity of
repair synthesis.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of 8-oxoguanine on short-patch
BER. A, schematic representation of the
32P-5'-labeled (*) oligonucleotide substrate used.
B, 1 pmol of the 5'-end-labeled substrate oligonucleotide
duplex containing 8-oxoguanine (left panel) or
the guanine (right panel) opposite to the SSB
with the 5'-sugar phosphate (pR) was incubated for 20 min at
37 °C with the indicated amount of pol in conditions described
under "Experimental Procedures." After incubation, reactions were
stopped by the addition of gel-loading buffer and, following incubation
at 80 °C for 2 min, the reaction products were separated by
electrophoresis in a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. C,
1 pmol of the unlabeled substrate oligonucleotide duplex containing
8-oxoguanine opposite to the SSB with 5'-sugar phosphate
(pR) was incubated for 20 min at 37 °C with the indicated
amount of pol in conditions described under "Experimental
Procedures" in the presence of equal amounts (20 µM
each) of dCTP and dATP, of which either dCTP (left
panel) or dATP (right panel) was
labeled. After incubation, reactions were stopped by the addition of a
formamide-dye solution and processed as described above.
|
|
To investigate whether a neighboring 8-oxoguanine residue affects
removal of the 5'-sugar phosphate or the ligation step, we
reconstituted short-patch BER with purified human APE1, pol
, and
DNA ligase. Incubation of the substrate with APE1 resulted in a 19-mer
product generated by the incision of the oligonucleotide at the AP site
(Fig. 2, lane 2). DNA
polymerase pol
and DNA ligase, when added to the reaction,
stimulated the complete repair and restoration of the full-length
30-mer product within 20 min for both control (Fig. 2, lanes
7-10) and 8-oxoguanine-containing substrates (Fig. 2, lanes
3-6). We thus conclude that repair of the 5'-nicked AP site
opposite to 8-oxoguanine was as effective as repair of the control
oligonucleotide duplex containing a 5'-nicked AP site opposite to
guanine.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Short-patch BER reconstituted with purified
proteins. A, schematic representation of the
32P-5'-labeled (*) oligonucleotide substrates used.
B, 1 pmol of the 5'-end-labeled substrate oligonucleotide
duplex containing the 8-oxoguanine (left panel)
or the guanine (right panel) opposite to the
abasic site (R) was incubated for the indicated time in the
buffer containing magnesium, dNTPs, 60 fmol of APE1, 70 fmol of pol
, and 80 fmol of DNA ligase I. Reactions were stopped by the
addition of an equal volume of formamide-dye solution, and products
were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide
gel. Lane 1 contains untreated substrate (UT),
and lane 2 contains substrate incised (I) with
APE1.
|
|
Effect of 8-Oxoguanine in a Template Strand on Long-patch DNA
Repair Synthesis by pol
--
To address the effect of 8-oxoguanine
on long-patch repair, we used substrates containing a reduced AP site
and 8-oxoguanine located opposite to it or one nucleotide downstream to
the AP site (Fig. 3, A and
B). Polymerase
is not able to remove a reduced 5'-sugar
phosphate, and the incorporation of at least 2-4 nucleotides is
required to accomplish the repair of reduced AP sites (13, 18). We
found no effect of reduction of the 5'-sugar phosphate on polymerase
synthesis through 8-oxoguanine located opposite to the nick (Fig.
3C); however, the position of 8-oxoguanine in the template
strand had a dramatic effect on the efficiency of bypass. When
8-oxoguanine was moved one nucleotide downstream of the nick, pol
was able to insert a nucleotide opposite the base preceding
8-oxoguanine but was unable to efficiently bypass the 8-oxoguanine
itself (Fig. 3D, left panel). In a
control experiment with a substrate containing guanine instead of
8-oxoguanine, pol
readily generated strand displacement even at the
lowest concentration used (Fig. 3D, right
panel).

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of 8-oxoguanine on long-patch repair
synthesis by pol . A and B,
schematic representation of the 32P-5'-labeled (*)
oligonucleotide substrate used. 1 pmol of the substrate oligonucleotide
duplex containing 8-oxoguanine opposite to the SSB with a reduced
5'-sugar phosphate was incubated for 20 min at 37 °C with the
indicated amount of pol in conditions described under
"Experimental Procedures." After incubation, reactions were stopped
by the addition of gel-loading buffer and, following incubation at
80 °C for 2 min, the reaction products were separated by
electrophoresis in a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. C,
1 pmol of the substrate oligonucleotide duplex containing 8-oxoguanine
(left panel) or guanine (right
panel) positioned one nucleotide downstream opposite to the
SSB with a reduced 5'-sugar phosphate was incubated for 20 min at
37 °C with indicated amount of pol in conditions described under
"Experimental Procedures." After incubation, reactions were stopped
by the addition of formamide-dye solution and processed as described
above.
|
|
The presence of 8-oxoguanine on the template strand may directly affect
the polymerization step itself or indirectly affect the DNA synthesis
reaction by reducing the efficiency of strand displacement by DNA
polymerase. To evaluate the contribution of these components to the
observed repair synthesis block, we tested whether 8-oxoguanine in the
same sequence would block polymerization by pol
in a primer
extension reaction. We found that pol
readily bypassed 8-oxoguanine
(second nucleotide in a template strand), and only a moderate reduction
in the rate of addition of the nucleotide opposing 8-oxoguanine was
observed (Fig. 4). These data indicate that the major delay may be attributed to the inhibition of the strand
displacement reaction. If strand displacement efficiency plays a major
role in the inhibitory effect of 8-oxoguanine, then the inhibitory
effect should be less pronounced in an AT-rich sequence. To test this
surmise, a substrate containing 8-oxoguanine in an A:T-rich
sequence context was constructed (Fig.
5A). Using this substrate, we
find that although 8-oxoguanine still inhibits the strand
displacement reaction (Fig. 5B), the effect is not as
dramatic as that with the G:C-rich substrate (compare Figs. 3D and 5B).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Bypass of 8-oxoguanine by pol
during primer extension reaction.
A, schematic representation of the
32P-5'-labeled (*) oligonucleotide substrate used.
B, 1 pmol of the substrate oligonucleotide containing
8-oxoguanine was incubated for 20 min at 37 °C with the indicated
amount of pol in conditions described under "Experimental
Procedures." After incubation, reactions were stopped by the addition
of gel-loading buffer and, following incubation at 80 °C for 2 min,
the reaction products were separated by electrophoresis in a 20%
denaturing polyacrylamide gel.
|
|

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of sequence context on 8-oxoguanine
bypass during long-patch repair synthesis by pol
. 1 pmol of the 5'-end-labeled substrate
oligonucleotide duplex containing 8-oxoguanine (left
panel) or guanine (right panel)
positioned one nucleotide downstream opposite to the SSB with a reduced
5'-sugar phosphate (A) was incubated for 20 min at 37 °C
with the indicated amount of pol in conditions described under
"Experimental Procedures." After incubation, the reactions were
stopped by the addition of gel-loading buffer and, following incubation
at 80 °C for 2 min, the reaction products were separated by
electrophoresis in a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel
(B).
|
|
8-Oxoguanine in a Template Strand Inhibits Flap Removal by
FEN1--
During long-patch BER, the incorporation of several
nucleotides into the repair gap leads to the generation of a flap
containing 5'-deoxyribose phosphate. The FEN1 protein alone is not able
to remove 5'-deoxyribose phosphate but rather releases it as part of a
small oligonucleotide (2-4-mer) (18). Impaired strand displacement caused by the presence of 8-oxoguanine in a template strand may also
affect flap excision and, as a consequence, the entire long-patch BER
pathway. To address this, we have 3'-end labeled a substrate containing
a reduced AP site and an 8-oxoguanine one nucleotide 3'-downstream in
the opposite strand (Fig. 6A)
and measured the excision of the pol
-generated flap by the FEN1
protein in a reconstituted system containing human APE1, pol
, and
FEN1 proteins. We found that, after APE cleaved the AP site (Fig. 6,
Time: 5 min), the flap generated by
pol
was readily removed from the control substrate containing
guanine (Fig. 6, left panel). However, 8-oxoguanine in the template strand significantly reduced the rate of
flap removal (Fig. 6, right panel).

View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of 8-oxoguanine in a template strand
on flap removal by FEN1. A, schematic representation of
the 32P-3'-labeled (*) oligonucleotide substrate used.
B, 1 pmol of the 3'-end-labeled substrate oligonucleotide
duplex containing 8-oxoguanine residing one nucleotide downstream to
the abasic site (R) was incubated for the indicated time in
the buffer containing magnesium, dNTPs, 100 fmol of APE1, 25 fmol of
pol , and 60 fmol of FEN1. Reactions were stopped by the addition of
an equal volume of formamide-dye solution, and products were analyzed
by electrophoresis in a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel.
|
|
Effect of 8-Oxoguanine in a Template Strand on Long-patch DNA
Repair Synthesis by pol
--
Although it was recently demonstrated
that pol
is responsible for the initiation of both the short- and
long-patch pathways of BER (19), either pol
or pol
may
contribute to further incorporation during long-patch BER (20, 21).
Thus, it was interesting to test whether 8-oxoguanine would also
interfere with strand displacement by pol
. Using the same
oligonucleotide substrate, we found that 8-oxoguanine on the template
strand also constitutes a strong block for pol
. The polymerization
reaction was nearly completely blocked after addition of the first
nucleotide (Fig. 7, left
panel), although with a control substrate we observed efficient strand displacement synthesis, resulting in complete strand
displacement and accumulation of the 30-mer full-length product (Fig.
7, right panel).

View larger version (89K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of 8-oxoguanine on long-patch repair
synthesis by pol . A, schematic
representation of the 32P-5'-labeled (*) oligonucleotide
substrate used. 1 pmol of the substrate oligonucleotide duplex
containing an 8-oxoguanine (left panel) or a
guanine (right panel) positioned one nucleotide
downstream opposite to the SSB with a reduced 5'-sugar phosphate was
incubated for 20 min at 37 °C with the indicated amount of pol in the presence of 100 ng of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. After
incubation, reactions were stopped by the addition of gel-loading
buffer, and following incubation at 80 °C for 2 min the reaction
products were separated by electrophoresis in a 20% denaturing
polyacrylamide gel.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
About 70-80% of radiation-induced DNA lesions are the result of
reactive oxygen species generated by the hydrolysis of water in the
vicinity of DNA (1). Although it was earlier proposed that a high
density of hydroxyl radicals induced by irradiation may induce multiple
closely spaced DNA lesions (23), until recently these lesions were
considered as regular oxidative lesions that can be repaired by BER.
The first indication of the unique nature of radiation-induced DNA
damage emerged from the theoretical studies of radiation-induced track
structures (24, 25). Later on, the existence of complex DNA lesions
induced by radiation was demonstrated experimentally (3, 4, 26).
Theoretically, these complex lesions (known as clustered lesions) may
include different combinations of base lesions or SSB and base lesions. Early studies indicated that the complexity of clustered DNA lesions poses a significant challenge to repair systems and may cause infidelity of repair, resulting in mutations and inefficient repair that could potentially lead to the formation of deletions and chromosome rearrangements (27-30). In this report, we have studied the
repairability of clustered lesions by different BER pathways and
demonstrated that the damaging effect of such lesions depends on the
sequence in which they occur as well as on the relative positioning of
primary lesions within a cluster. Short-patch BER is normally
accomplished by the removal and replacement of a single nucleotide
(12). For this repair pathway, the major threat may be the repair of
simultaneous modifications of complementary bases. The processing of
one of the lesions would generate an AP site or an SSB that would block
removal of the opposing modified base (31-33) and would lead to the
presence of a modified base in the repair gap on the template strand.
To model this scenario, we studied the repair of an AP site located
opposite to 8-oxoguanine. We have found that 8-oxoguanine in a repair
gap does not affect either the fidelity (dCMP is normally incorporated
opposite to 8-oxoguanine) or the efficiency of repair (in a
reconstituted system, the rate of repair of the AP site located
opposite to guanine or 8-oxoguanine is similar). Although this report
shows the first data on the tolerance of both the 5'-deoxyribose
phosphate lyase activity by pol
and the efficiency of DNA ligase to
the presence of 8-oxoguanine in the repair gap, the fidelity and the rate of bypass of 8-oxoguanine by pol
have been studied before by
several groups (34-36). It is generally accepted now that
8-oxoguanine bypass depends on the DNA polymerase and the structure of
the substrate used (34). Indeed, pol
has evolved as a distributive polymerase designed to fill one-nucleotide gaps in short-patch BER and
has increased activity and fidelity on single-nucleotide gap substrates
(35, 36), which is in good agreement with our data. However, when the
fidelity of the bypass was measured on substrates with longer gaps or
in primer extension reactions catalyzed by pol
, both the efficiency
and fidelity of DNA synthesis were reduced (34).
To accomplish the repair of chemically modified AP sites via long-patch
BER, either pol
or pol
should incorporate at least 2 nucleotides into the repair gap before FEN 1 would be able to remove
the generated two-nucleotide flap (18). As we demonstrate in this
report, 8-oxoguanine in the template strand strongly inhibits strand-displacement DNA synthesis by both DNA polymerases
and
(Figs. 3D and 7B) and, as a consequence. inhibits
flap excision, thus blocking long-patch BER (Fig. 6). This is an
unexpected result, because a previous study (22) has shown that
both pol
and pol
can bypass 8-oxoguanine reasonably well in a
primer extension reaction. Indeed, we also observed a reasonable bypass
of 8-oxoguanine in a primer extension reaction (Fig. 4). However,
8-oxoguanine bypass was significantly reduced under strand displacement
conditions. In support of the "strand displacement model" for the
explanation of the bypass block by 8-oxoguanine present in the repair
gap, we demonstrated that the severity of the polymerase block depends on the sequence around 8-oxoguanine; the more G:C base pairs, the more
difficult it is for DNA polymerase to unwind DNA and, at the same time,
bypass 8-oxoguanine. In conclusion, as we demonstrate here, the
repairability of clustered lesions significantly depends on the
relative location of the primary DNA lesions as well as on the sequence
context of the damaged DNA. Certain lesion combinations within a
cluster that will block lesion processing by DNA repair enzymes may
result in genetic instability and reduced cell viability.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank David Sherratt and Peter O'Neill
for fruitful discussions; Sarah Allinson and Kate Sleeth are thanked
for critical reading of the manuscript and Alan Tomkinson for providing
DNA ligase I.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM52948 (to
Ellen Fanning).
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-1235-824-563;
Fax: 44-1235-834-776; E-mail: g.dianov@har.mrc.ac.uk.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201918200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
SSB, single-strand
break;
8-oxoguanine, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine;
BER, base excision
repair;
AP, apurinic/apyrimidinic or abasic;
pol
, DNA polymerase
;
pol
, DNA polymerase
;
FEN1, flap endonuclease;
APE1, apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1;
TE, 10 mM Tris, pH
8.0, 1 µM EDTA.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Ward, J. F.
(1988)
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.
35,
95-125[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Wallace, S. S.
(1988)
Environ. Mol. Mutagen.
12,
431-477[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Cunniffe, S.,
and O'Neill, P.
(1999)
Radiat. Res.
152,
421-427[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Sutherland, B. M.,
Bennet, P. V.,
Sidorkina, O.,
and Laval, J.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
103-108[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Wallace, S. S.
(1997)
in
Oxidative Stress and the Molecular Biology of Antioxidant Defenses
(Scandalios, J. G., ed)
, pp. 49-90, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 6.
|
Dianov, G.,
Bischoff, C.,
Sunesen, M.,
and Bohr, V. A.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
1365-1368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Dianov, G. L.,
Thybo, T.,
Dianova, I. I,
Lipinski, L. J.,
and Bohr, V. A.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
11809-11813[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Lindahl, T.,
and Wood, R. D.
(1999)
Science
286,
1897-1905[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Dianov, G. L.,
O'Neill, P.,
and Goodhead, D. T.
(2001)
Bioessays
23,
745-749[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Weinfeld, M.,
Rasouli-Nia, A.,
Chaudhry, M. A.,
and Britten, R. A.
(2001)
Radiat. Res.
156,
584-589[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
David-Cordonnier, M. H.,
Boiteux, S.,
and O'Neill, P.
(2001)
Biochemistry
40,
11811-11818[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Dianov, G.,
Price, A.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
1605-1612[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Matsumoto, Y.,
and Kim, K.
(1995)
Science
269,
699-702[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Tomkinson, A. E.,
Chen, L.,
Dong, Z.,
Leppard, J. B.,
Levin, D. S.,
Mackey, Z. B.,
and Motycka, T. A.
(2001)
Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol.
68,
151-164[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Kumar, A.,
Widen, S.,
Williams, K.,
Kedar, P.,
Karpel, R.,
and Wilson, S.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
2124-2131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Slupphaug, G.,
Eftedal, I.,
Kavli, B.,
Bharati, S.,
Helle, N. M.,
Haug, T.,
Levine, D. W.,
and Krokan, H. E.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
128-138[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Strauss, P. R.,
Beard, W. A.,
Patterson, T. A.,
and Wilson, S. H.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1302-1307[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
DeMott, M. S.,
Shen, B.,
Park, M.,
Bambara, R. A.,
and Zingman, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
47,
30068-30076
|
| 19.
|
Podlutsky, A. J.,
Dianova, I. I.,
Podust, V. N.,
Bohr, V. A.,
and Dianov, G. L.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
1477-1482[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Frosina, G.,
Fortini, P.,
Rossi, O.,
Carrozzino, F.,
Raspaglio, G.,
Cox, L. S.,
Lane, D. P.,
Abbondandolo, A.,
and Dogliotti, E.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
9573-9578[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Klungland, A.,
and Lindahl, T.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
3341-3348[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Shibutani, S.,
Takeshita, M.,
and Grollman, A. P.
(1991)
Nature
349,
431-434[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Ward, J. F.
(1985)
Radiat. Res.
103,
103-111
|
| 24.
|
Goodhead, D. T.,
Thacker, J.,
and Cox, R.
(1993)
Int. J. Radiat. Biol.
63,
543-556[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Goodhead, D. T.
(1994)
Int. J. Radiat. Biol.
61,
7-17
|
| 26.
|
Milligan, J. R.,
Aguilera, J. A.,
Nguyen, T. T. D.,
Paglinawan, R. A.,
and Ward, J. F.
(2000)
Int. J. Rad. Biol.
76,
1475-1483[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Dianov, G. L.,
Vasyunina, E. A.,
Ovchinnikova, L. P.,
Sinitsina, O. I.,
and Salganik, R. I.
(1986)
Mutat. Res.
159,
41-46[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Dianov, G. L.,
Timchenko, T. V.,
Sinitsina, O. I.,
Kuzminov, A. V.,
Medvedev, O. A.,
and Salganik, R. I.
(1991)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
225,
448-452[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Kokontis, J. M.,
Tsung, S. S.,
Vaughan-Johnson, J.,
Lee, H.,
Harvey, R. G.,
and Weiss, S. B.
(1993)
Carcinogenesis
14,
645-651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Blaisdell, J. O.,
and Wallace, S. S.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
7426-7430[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Chaudhry, M. A.,
and Weinfeld, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15650-15655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Harrison, L.,
Hatahet, Z.,
and Wallace, S. S.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
290,
667-684[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
David-Cordonnier, M. H.,
Boiteux, S.,
and O'Neill, P.
(2001)
Nucleic Acids Res.
29,
1107-1113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Miller, H.,
Prasad, R.,
Wilson, S. H.,
Johnson, F.,
and Grollman, A. P.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
1029-1033[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Ahn, J. W.,
Kraynov, V. S.,
Zhong, X. J.,
Werneburg, B. G.,
and Tsai, M. D.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
331,
79-87[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Chagovetz, A. M.,
Sweasy, J. B.,
and Preston, B. D.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27501-27504[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Malyarchuk, R. Castore, and L. Harrison
DNA repair of clustered lesions in mammalian cells: involvement of non-homologous end-joining
Nucleic Acids Res.,
September 1, 2008;
36(15):
4872 - 4882.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Gembka, M. Toueille, E. Smirnova, R. Poltz, E. Ferrari, G. Villani, and U. Hubscher
The checkpoint clamp, Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex, preferentially stimulates the activity of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 and DNA polymerase {beta} in long patch base excision repair
Nucleic Acids Res.,
April 10, 2007;
(2007)
gkl1139v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. G. Pearson, N. Shikazono, J. Thacker, and P. O'Neill
Enhanced mutagenic potential of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine when present within a clustered DNA damage site
Nucleic Acids Res.,
January 9, 2004;
32(1):
263 - 270.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Budworth and G. L. Dianov
Mode of Inhibition of Short-patch Base Excision Repair by Thymine Glycol within Clustered DNA Lesions
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 7, 2003;
278(11):
9378 - 9381.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.