![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21431-21439, June 14, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From
Received for publication, February 20, 2002, and in revised form, March 18, 2002
The biosynthesis of CoA from pantothenic acid
(vitamin B5) is an essential universal pathway in
prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The CoA biosynthetic genes in bacteria have
all recently been identified, but their counterparts in humans and
other eukaryotes remained mostly unknown. Using comparative genomics,
we have identified human genes encoding the last four enzymatic steps
in CoA biosynthesis: phosphopantothenoylcysteine synthetase (EC
6.3.2.5), phosphopantothenoylcysteine decarboxylase (EC 4.1.1.36),
phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase (EC 2.7.7.3), and dephospho-CoA
kinase (EC 2.7.1.24). Biological functions of these human genes were
verified using a complementation system in Escherichia coli
based on transposon mutagenesis. The individual human enzymes were
overexpressed in E. coli and purified, and the
corresponding activities were experimentally verified. In addition, the
entire pathway from phosphopantothenate to CoA was successfully
reconstituted in vitro using a mixture of purified recombinant enzymes. Human recombinant bifunctional phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase/dephospho-CoA kinase was kinetically characterized. This enzyme was previously suggested as a point of CoA biosynthesis regulation, and we have observed significant differences in mRNA levels of the corresponding human gene in normal and tumor cells by
Northern blot analysis.
CoA is an indispensable cofactor in all living organisms, where it
functions as an acyl carrier and carbonyl-activating group in a number
of central biochemical transformations, including the tricarboxylic
acid cycle and fatty acid metabolism. It has been estimated that
~4% of all known enzymes utilize CoA as an obligate cofactor (1).
Many bacteria as well as plants and yeast are capable of de
novo CoA biosynthesis from aspartate and ketovalerate via
pantothenic acid. In contrast, animals and some pathogenic microbes
lack a de novo route, and they are totally dependent on
scavenging exogenous pantothenic acid (pantothenate, vitamin
B5). Dietary vitamin B5 deficiency in mammals
causes many systemic effects such as impaired motor response, depressed
heme synthesis, altered growth and maturation of the small intestines during neonatal and prenatal periods, and increased prenatal mortality. Levels of CoA are affected during metabolic stress such as starvation, alcoholism, and diabetes as well as in certain tumors (2). Recently,
the first gene of the universal CoA biosynthetic pathway was linked
with the neurodegenerative Hallervorden-Spatz syndrome in humans (3)
and with aberrant mitosis and meiosis in flies (4), setting a precedent
for the importance of this pathway in many aspects of cellular and
metabolic development.
The biosynthesis of CoA from pantothenate contains five universal steps
(see Fig. 1). Pantothenate is first phosphorylated by pantothenate
kinase (EC 2.7.1.33). 4'-Phosphopantothenate is conjugated with
cysteine by phosphopantothenoylcysteine synthetase (PPCS1; EC 6.3.2.5) and then
converted to 4'-phosphopantetheine by phosphopantothenoylcysteine
decarboxylase (PPCDC; EC 4.1.1.36). The final two steps are adenylation
by phosphopantetheine adenylyltransferase (PPAT; EC 2.7.7.3) to form
dephospho-CoA and phosphorylation by dephospho-CoA kinase (DPCK; EC
2.7.1.24) to form CoA. Mechanistic details of CoA biosynthesis were
studied in bacteria, yeast, and mammals, and most of the corresponding
enzymes were at least partially purified and characterized (for the
last reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). However, as neither CoA nor any of
its phosphorylated precursors can be transported across the cell
membrane, classical auxotrophic mutant analysis methods could not be
used, and the identification of CoA biosynthetic genes was
significantly delayed.
Pantothenate kinase, the first gene in this pathway, was initially
identified in Escherichia coli (coaA) (5). In the
last 2 years, E. coli genes were identified for the last
four enzymatic steps: coaBC (previously dfp),
encoding a bifunctional PPCS/PPCDC (6, 7); coaD (previously
kdtB), encoding PPAT (8); and coaE (previously
yacE), encoding DPCK (9). Orthologs of all of these genes
are preserved in all bacteria, except some obligate intracellular
parasites such as Mycoplasma, Rickettsia, and
Chlamydia, suggesting that these organisms have developed a
specialized CoA (or dephospho-CoA) transport system.
When we began this study, only the gene for pantothenate kinase, which
revealed no sequence similarity to bacterial CoaA, had been identified
in the mammalian CoA biosynthetic pathway (10, 11). Our goal was to
identify, via a comparative genomics approach, human genes encoding the
four remaining enzymatic steps in CoA biosynthesis to enable further
genetic and expression studies of this critically important pathway in
health and disease.
We report here the identification and experimental verification of
human genes encoding PPCS, PPCDC, PPAT, and DPCK, thereby completing
the CoA biosynthetic pathway in humans. The human PPAT domain was
identified based on biochemical evidence of a bifunctional PPAT/DPCK
protein and reveals no sequence similarity to the previously described
bacterial CoaD enzyme family. This is the first representative of the
novel PPAT family present in eukaryotes and archaea. For this reason
and the previous implication that PPAT/DPCK is involved in regulation
of CoA biosynthesis (2), we have studied this protein in more detail.
Steady-state kinetic parameters were obtained, and the possibility of
transcriptional regulation of PPAT/DPCK gene expression was addressed
using Northern blot analysis of various human healthy tissues and
cancer cell lines.
Strains, Plasmids, and Other Reagents--
E. coli
strains DH5 Comparative Genome Analysis--
Most of the comparative
analysis was performed using ERGO (previously WIT), a genomic data base
and set of tools for comparative analysis (available by subscription
from Integrated Genomics, Inc.) as previously described (12).
Additional public bioinformatics resources used in this study were
GenBankTM 2; the
Saccharomyces Genome
Database3; BLAST, PSI-BLAST,
and Genomic BLAST4;
PFAM5; and
SCOP.6
PCR Amplification and Cloning--
The three predicted complete
coding regions were amplified using the three sets of primers indicated
below. Introduced restriction sites (NcoI or
BspHI for the 5'-end and SalI for the 3'-end) are shown in boldface; nucleotides not present in the original sequence are
shown in lowercase. PPCS (gi 13638573): no mutations
introduced, 5'-gggccATGGCGGAAATGGATCCGGTAGCC and
3'-ggggtcgacTCAGTTTCTGTCACCTATAAAAGCTGTGTGTCGAG; PPCDC (gi 14042206): AGT (Ser) codon inserted after the first codon,
5'-gggtcatgagtGAACCAAAGGCCTCCTGTCCAGCTG and
3'-ggggtcgacTCAACTCTGCTGGAAGCCACTGTGCTG; and PPAT/DPCK
(gi 17981024): second codon mutated from GCC
PCR amplification was performed using human brain cDNA and the
Advantage cDNA PCR kit (both from CLONTECH).
The corresponding PCR fragments matching to their predicted size
(950 bp (PPCS), 632 bp (PPCDC), and 1709 bp (full-length
PPAT/DPCK)) were cloned into expression vector pPROEX-HT3a, cleaved by
NcoI and SalI. All constructs were verified by
DNA sequencing, including a predicted full-length coding region for the
three-domain PPAT/DPCK protein (gi 17981024).
Verification by Complementation in E. coli--
We performed
functional complementation analysis in E. coli based on a
genetic footprinting technique that has been recently described.7 This technique,
based on saturating transposon mutagenesis in E. coli,
allows the identification of essential genes. The genes essential for
E. coli survival were identified in the generated population
of 1 × 105 random transposon mutants as those open
reading frames that do not contain transposon insertions after
outgrowth. By this analysis, all of the E. coli genes in the
universal CoA biosynthetic pathway (coaA, coaBC,
coaD, and coaE) were revealed as
essential.7 Here, we performed the same analysis in the
presence and absence of expression plasmids containing the predicted
human CoA biosynthetic genes. Functional expression of human CoA
biosynthetic genes was expected to complement the loss of function that
would result from transposon insertion into the corresponding E. coli genes as revealed by PCR mapping.
Briefly, transposomes were preformed by incubating 7 ng/µl artificial
transposon EZ::TN Protein Overexpression and Purification--
Recombinant
proteins were overexpressed as an N-terminal fusion with a
His6 tag and a tobacco etch virus protease cleavage site in
E. coli strain BL21. Cells were grown to
A600 = 0.8-1.0 at 37 °C;
isopropyl- Coupled Enzyme Assays--
All coupled assays were performed in
500 µl of 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0) and 2 mM
MgCl2 using a Beckman DU-640 spectrophotometer to monitor
the change in absorbance at 340 nm in a six-cuvette assembly
thermostatted at 37 °C. Additionally, the results of CoA
biosynthetic enzyme assays were verified by direct HPLC analysis as
described below, monitoring formation and/or consumption of ATP, ADP,
AMP, dephospho-CoA, and CoA at 254 nm.
PPCS Activity Assay--
The release of PPi was
coupled to the oxidation of NADH to NAD and detection at 340 nm as
modified (13). Briefly, 1.5 mM 4'-phosphopantothenate was
incubated with 5 mM cysteine, 1 mM either ATP
or CTP, ~0.5 µg/ml partially purified human PPCS, and 200 µl of
pyrophosphate reagent.
PPCDC Activity Assay--
An assay was developed in which
formation of 4'-phosphopantothenate was coupled to consecutive
enzymatic CoA formation and release of PPi, which was
detected utilizing the same technique as described above.
4'-Phosphopantothenoylcysteine was incubated with 50 µg/ml partially
purified PPCDC, 25 µg/ml purified PPAT/DPCK, 5 mM ATP,
and 200 µl of pyrophosphate reagent. Control samples lacking PPCDC
showed no signal above the background rate.
Forward PPAT Activity Assay--
PPAT activity was verified by
detecting the release of PPi as described above. Briefly,
5-500 µM 4'-phosphopantetheine was incubated with 5 mM ATP and 0.15-0.3 µg/ml purified human PPAT/DPCK in
the presence of pyrophosphate reagent detection mixture.
Reverse PPAT Activity Assay--
The reverse PPAT reaction assay
was performed by coupling the release of ATP to the reduction of NADP
to NADPH and detection at 340 nm as described (14). Briefly, 5-500
µM dephospho-CoA was incubated with 2 mM
PPi, 5 mM glucose, 1 mM NADP, 2 units of hexokinase, 1 unit of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and 0.5-1.0 µg/ml purified human PPAT/DPCK.
DPCK Activity Assay--
The DPCK activity of the full-length
PPAT/DPCK protein was determined by a standard technique: coupling the
release of ADP to the oxidation of NADH to NAD as described (12).
Briefly, 5-100 µM dephospho-CoA was incubated with 1 mM ATP, 2 mM phosphoenolpyruvate, 0.3 mM NADH, 2.5 units of lactate dehydrogenase, 1.25 units of pyruvate kinase, and 0.15-0.3 µg/ml purified human PPAT/DPCK.
To obtain kinetic parameters for the bifunctional PPAT/DPCK enzyme, the
apparent Km of one substrate was determined by
varying the concentration of that substrate while keeping the second
substrate at a constant saturating concentration. An NADH or NADPH
extinction coefficient of 6.22 mM In Vitro Reconstitution of CoA Biosynthesis from
4'-Phosphopantothenate--
Conversion of 4'-phosphopantothenate to
CoA using purified recombinant enzymes was determined by HPLC. The
reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 10 mM MgCl2, 20 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM
4'-phosphopantothenate, 2 mM ATP, 1 mM
cysteine, and 1-10 µg/ml concentrations of all three purified
recombinant proteins: PPCS, PPCDC, and PPAT/DPCK. Following overnight
incubation at 37 °C, reactions were filtered through Microcon 10-MW
(Millipore Corp.), and samples were diluted 1:10 in 100 µM fresh dithiothreitol to reduce dephospho-CoA
disulfide. Samples were analyzed using a Gilson HPLC system with a
Model 322 pump, UV/VIS-152 detector, and Model 234 auto-sampler.
Isocratic separation was performed at 1.5 ml/min on a Supelcosil
LC-18 column (5 × 4.6 cm, 5 µm; Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA)
with UV detection at 250 nm. The eluent was 100 mM sodium
phosphate (pH 5.5), 8 mM tetrabutylammonium bromide, and
10% acetonitrile. Molar areas were determined using calibration with
standard solutions of dephospho-CoA and AMP under the same
chromatographic conditions.
Northern Blot Analysis--
Blots with 2 µg of mRNA from
normal human tissues and human cancer cell lines were analyzed by
hybridization with a radiolabeled DNA probe following the
manufacturer's protocol (CLONTECH). Briefly, the
DNA probe (PCR fragment corresponding to the central domain (PPAT) of
human PPAT/DPCK) was radiolabeled with [ Prediction of Human CoA Biosynthetic Genes Using Comparative
Genomics--
The universal CoA biosynthetic pathway is presented in
Fig. 1. Previous biochemical analysis
established the activity of the CoA biosynthetic enzymes in humans (for
review, see Ref. 2). However, before we began this study, only the gene
for human pantothenate kinase was known (3). The bacterial genes for
the CoA biosynthetic enzymes have all been recently elucidated (for
review, see Ref. 1). Given the conservation at the functional level of
this pathway between humans and bacteria, we attempted to project the genes from bacteria to humans using comparative genomics.
PSI-BLAST searches allowed us to identify three proteins in the human
cDNA sequence data base available from GenBankTM as
strong homologs of E. coli CoA biosynthesis enzymes. One
homolog was found for PPCDC (gi 14042206, P-score ~ 10
The predicted human PPCDC appeared to be a monofunctional enzyme. This
is in contrast to most bacteria, in which PPCDC is fused with PPCS,
forming a bifunctional CoaBC protein. Early biochemical data indicate
that human PPCDC and PPCS activities in fact reside in two separate
proteins (15, 16). Enzymatic activity was recently verified for the
plant PPCDC ortholog (17), which was previously described as a
halotolerance protein (18) and characterized at the three-dimensional
structure level (19). Homologs of human PPCDC were found in all
analyzed eukaryotic genomes.
Among prokaryotic genomes, only streptococci and enterococci contain
monofunctional PPCDC genes. Bacterial monofunctional PPCDC from these
organisms shows the highest sequence similarity to human monofunctional
PPCDC. In the same bacterial genomes, PPCS is also monofunctional and
is found in the same operon with PPCDC. Using this unique
monofunctional PPCS from Streptococcus pneumoniae (gi
14972712), we were able to identify a candidate for human
monofunctional PPCS (gi 13638573) with a reliable similarity (P-score ~ 10
At this stage of analysis, the only remaining gene "missing" in
human CoA biosynthesis was PPAT. Previous biochemical analysis in rat
and pig suggested the existence of a non-dissociable complex, potentially a bifunctional fusion protein, of PPAT and DPCK (14). As
mentioned above, uncharacterized DPCK homologs can be found in the
human genome and in all analyzed eukaryotic genomes. Based on the
biochemical evidence of PPAT/DPCK fusion, additional searches in the
human expressed sequence tag data base were performed, revealing
that one of the predicted human DPCK open reading frames (gi 13376838)
was potentially 5'-truncated. A larger contiguous cDNA of 2340 base
pairs encoding a 565-amino acid putative protein (Fig. 2B)
was assembled, amplified, cloned and verified by sequence analysis
(gi 17981024). Comparative analysis of this putative human
protein revealed the presence of three distinct domains as determined
by comparison with monofunctional forms of PPAT and DPCK in other
eukaryotic genomes: (i) an N-terminal domain of unknown function (amino
acids 1-179), (ii) a central domain (amino acids 180-358) encoding
the putative nucleotidyltransferase, and (iii) and a C-terminal domain
(amino acids 359-565) encoding DPCK. The second human DPCK candidate
(gi 13623688) could not be extended from the 5' terminus and is thus
hypothesized to be a monofunctional DPCK.
Homologs of the human PPAT/DPCK protein were found in mouse
(gi 12836393) and fly (gi 10728128). The central domain in all of these proteins contains the conserved HXXH motif, which,
in combination with a predicted Rossman fold, is characteristic of the
nucleotidyltransferase superfamily (21, 22). Homologs of this central
domain were found in the form of a monofunctional protein (Fig.
2C) in many organisms such as S. cerevisiae, A. thaliana, and M. jannaschii in which a gene encoding PPAT had remained
uncharacterized. Some of these proteins are annotated as "putative
nucleotidyltransferase" or "predicted cytidylyltransferase" based
on the weak similarity to bacterial glycerol-3-phosphate cytidylyltransferase. The corresponding gene in yeast (YGR277C) is
essential for viability, consistent with its expected functional role
in the CoA biosynthetic pathway (Saccharomyces Genome Database). Bacterial PPAT belongs to the same superfamily (23), but PSI-BLAST revealed no overall sequence similarity between any representative of
the bacterial PPAT family and eukaryotic or archaeal homologs of the
predicted human PPAT. In the absence of sequence similarity, we were
able to use the biochemical evidence of a human bifunctional protein to
identify a novel PPAT family in eukaryotes and archaea.
The analysis of publicly available human genomic data allows us to
establish chromosomal localization of all genes encoding the final four
steps of CoA biosynthesis. Most of them exist as single copies, such as
PPCS on chromosome 1, PPCDC on chromosome 15, and PPAT/DPCK as well as
monofunctional DPCK with unconfirmed function on chromosome 17. Additionally, fragments of PPCS were detected on chromosome 6.
Verification by Complementation in E. coli--
Functional
verification of the cloned human PPCS (gi 13638573) and PPCDC
(gi 14042206) genes and the predicted full-length PPAT/DPCK gene
(gi 17981024) was performed using complementation analysis based on
genetic footprinting in E. coli. Due to the essentiality of
the universal CoA biosynthetic genes in E. coli,7 in vivo inactivation of these genes
by transposon mutagenesis is possible only in the presence of a
complementing functional analog provided on an expression plasmid.
E. coli strains transformed with expression plasmids
containing individual human CoA biosynthetic genes were mutagenized by
random insertion of transposons throughout the genome. After selective
outgrowth, the total chromosomal DNA from the population of surviving
mutants was analyzed for the presence of transposon inserts in E. coli CoA biosynthetic genes by PCR mapping. The results of this
analysis are illustrated in Fig. 3. As
can be seen, genes coaBC, coaD, and
coaE do not contain transposon inserts in the presence of
the pPROEX vector used as a control. Multiple transposon insertions
appear in these three genes when corresponding human functional analogs
are introduced on the expression plasmids. This experiment provided
evidence of the biological activity of the predicted human CoA
biosynthetic genes. This method of "complementation by genetic
footprinting" can be extended to address the biological activity of
various uncharacterized genes.
Expression and Characterization of Human Recombinant CoA
Biosynthetic Enzymes--
The three human genes were overexpressed in
E. coli, and the corresponding recombinant proteins were
purified using standard affinity tag techniques. Human recombinant
PPCDC is a bright yellow protein, with a UV spectrum having two maxima
at 382 and 458 nm, characteristic of flavins. Although earlier results
had classified mammalian PPCDC as a pyruvoyl-dependent
enzyme (24), our results are consistent with those for the E. coli bifunctional PPCS/PPCDC protein, where the tight binding of
FMN was directly proven by mass spectrometry (7) and led to the
proposal of a novel redox mechanism of decarboxylation (25). Our data
indicating approximately equimolar FMN binding in the evolutionarily
distant human monofunctional PPCDC support the mechanistic importance
of the FMN cofactor for the whole family.
Using coupled enzyme assays, we have confirmed the predicted activity
of all four human recombinant enzymes. In agreement with previous
biochemical data (15), we observed that human PPCS can utilize ATP for
the activation of substrate in the ligation reaction four times more
efficiently than CTP. In contrast, E. coli PPCS shows a
strong preference for CTP over ATP (7). This difference in the
cosubstrate specificity may account for the low sequence similarity
between human and E. coli PPCS. The biological implications
of this difference are yet to be understood.
Due to the structural dissimilarity between human PPAT/DPCK and the
previously characterized bacterial PPAT and the implication that
PPAT/DPCK is a point of regulation in CoA biosynthesis, we chose to
study this protein in more depth. Kinetic parameters were obtained for
both the forward PPAT reaction (4'-phosphopantetheine + ATP
The ultimate verification of the human CoA biosynthetic pathway was
achieved by the successful in vitro reconstitution of the
four-step biochemical transformation of the committed precursor 4'-phosphopantothenate to the CoA cofactor. The reaction mixture contained 4'-phosphopantothenate, cysteine, ATP, and 0.25-2.5 µg/ml
concentrations of all three purified recombinant proteins: PPCS, PPCDC,
and PPAT/DPCK. The conversion to CoA approached 100%, as monitored by
HPLC (Fig. 4). When the bifunctional
PPAT/DPCK enzyme was replaced with a C-terminally truncated enzyme with only PPAT activity, the reaction proceeded only to formation of dephospho-CoA. Incubation with only the first two enzymes
quantitatively yields phosphopantetheine as evidenced by AMP
formation.
Northern Blot Analysis of Human PPAT/DPCK--
We used Northern
blot analysis of mRNAs from various human healthy tissues and
cancer cell lines to assess the possibility of PPAT/DPCK regulation at
the level of transcription (Fig. 5). The
overall level of transcription of PPAT/DPCK in normal tissues varied
between different cell types within a range of ~10-fold (as
normalized by actin), being lowest in peripheral blood leukocytes and
highest in kidney and liver, supporting potential transcriptional regulation of PPAT/DPCK activity. One may also notice a general tendency of tumor cells to have a consistently higher overall transcriptional activity of this gene, such that all cancerous tissues
examined had higher expression of the PPAT/DPCK mRNA than any of
the normal tissues, with the exception of skeletal muscle, liver, and
kidney. In examples where tissues may be compared, such as normal lung
tissue versus lung carcinoma and normal colon tissue
versus colorectal adenocarcinoma, the cancerous tissues expressed 2-4 times the PPAT/DPCK mRNA of the normal tissues.
Two PPAT/DPCK transcripts ~2200 and 2600 nucleotides long were
detected in all examined tissues, with the possible exception of blood
leukocytes. Both transcripts are significantly larger than the
full-length coding region (1692 nucleotides). In healthy tissues, a
mass distribution between the two transcripts varied from almost 1:1 in
the majority of tissues with a relatively low overall expression level
to an ~3 times predominance of the smaller transcript in kidney and
liver and up to an ~2 times bias toward the larger transcript in
skeletal muscle and placenta. In all tumor cell lines, a larger
transcript was the clearly predominant and in some cases the only
detectable form of PPAT/DPCK mRNA.
With the sequencing of the human genome complete, the next great
challenge has become the identification of genes involved in key
cellular pathways. On the basis of comparative genome analysis, we have
identified human genes responsible for the last four enzymatic reactions in CoA biosynthesis. The biological functions of these human
enzymes were verified by a high-throughput complementation technique based on transposon mutagenesis and genetic
footprinting in E. coli. Capitalizing on the previously
observed essentiality of E. coli genes involved in these
last steps of CoA biosynthesis, we used the cloned human genes
(cDNAs) to complement the loss of the endogenous enzymatic
functions in E. coli. Introduction of the complementing
human CoA biosynthetic genes into the expression vector made the
corresponding E. coli genes nonessential as revealed by the
appearance of transposon insertions. This approach can be
systematically applied for preliminary functional analysis of
uncharacterized biosynthetic genes in a number of pathways shared
between E. coli and humans.
The individual human CoA biosynthetic enzymes were overexpressed in
E. coli and purified, and the predicted activities were experimentally confirmed. Moreover, we have shown that CoA is quantitatively formed in vitro from the committed precursor
4'-phosphopantothenate, ATP, and L-cysteine by incubation
with a mixture of all four human recombinant enzymes.
Based on sequence similarity, human PPCS, PPCDC, and DPCK belong to the
same families as recently described bacterial enzymes (6, 7, 9). Human
PPAT reveals no sequence similarity to the bacterial CoaD family,
establishing the existence of two structurally distinct families of
nucleotidyltransferases performing adenylation of
4'-phosphopantetheine. The prediction and verification of a novel PPAT
in humans allowed us to project this function to orthologs from other
eukaryotic and archaeal genomes. Identification of human PPAT in the
form of a fusion protein with DPCK is in agreement with previous
biochemical data (14). The function of the third (N-terminal) domain of
this protein is unclear. Based on our experimental data, this domain
may be involved in protein folding. Additional roles in intracellular
compartmentalization to the mitochondrial matrix as well as
interactions with other CoA biosynthetic enzymes or regulatory factors
may be hypothesized.
Due to the structural dissimilarity between human PPAT/DPCK and
previously described bacterial enzymes and the implication of PPAT as a
possible point of regulation in human CoA biosynthesis, we chose to
study this enzyme in more depth. The two half-reactions of the
PPAT/DPCK enzymes (transfer of the adenyl moiety and consecutive phosphorylation) reveal comparable catalytic efficiencies as estimated by kcat/Km(app), suggesting
that in vitro both steps are partially rate-limiting (Table
I). Previous biochemical data suggested PPAT as a rate-limiting step
based on the absence of dephospho-CoA accumulation in vivo
(10). This may be reconciled as a potential consequence of the
proximity of the two active sites in the bifunctional enzyme,
supporting at least a partially non-dissociable mechanism (tunneling).
Further kinetic and structural studies are required to assess this
possibility. Alternatively, the additional monofunctional DPCK
(gi 13623688), which was identified by our homology searches, may be
responsible for increasing in vivo efficiency of
dephospho-CoA to CoA conversion. Tentative identification of this
monofunctional DPCK is in agreement with biochemical data indicating
that although both PPAT and DPCK activities are associated with the
mitochondrial matrix, only DPCK is present in the intermembrane space
and in the outer membrane fraction (26).
To assess the possibility of regulation of the CoA biosynthetic pathway
at the level of PPAT/DPCK gene expression, we have analyzed mRNA
levels in both normal human tissues and human cancer cell lines using
Northern blot hybridization (Fig. 5). The overall expression of the
PPAT/DPCK transcript and the distribution between the larger and
smaller transcripts varied significantly among the tissues analyzed. As
we found only a single copy of a PPAT/DPCK gene in the human genome,
the observed microheterogeneity may reflect alternative splicing.
Although understanding the physiological role of such differences in
PPAT/DPCK gene expression cannot be achieved without further studies, a
role is suggested for this enzyme in regulating tissue-specific
processes. Additionally, there is an overall tendency of tumor cells to
have a greater abundance of PPAT/DPCK mRNA compared with normal
tissues. Differential expression of the CoA biosynthetic genes may play
a significant developmental role because the level of CoA consumption
may vary significantly in various types of cells. One may expect higher production and consumption of CoA in rapidly growing cells, including tumor cells, where fatty acid synthase is known to be significantly up-regulated (see, for example, Ref. 27).
On the basis of our characterization of four enzymes in human CoA
biosynthesis and the previously characterized mammalian pantothenate
kinase (10) and human sodium-dependent pantothenate transporter (28), the minimal set of human genes required for the
uptake and utilization of vitamin B5 is presently known.
Completion of the human CoA biosynthetic pathway will allow further
analysis of its role in health and disease.
The conservation of this pathway in all three kingdoms of life allowed
the efficient use of comparative genome analysis to reveal previously
uncharacterized human genes. Fig. 2 illustrates remarkable patterns of
"mosaicism" relating the evolutionary relationship within CoA
biosynthetic genes in various taxons. These patterns reflect
conservation, diversification, and multiple gene fusion and
"unfusion" events, which may not be easily reconciled with the
"tree of life," such as built on the basis of 16 S RNA (29). For
example, the first two enzymes (PPCS and PPCDC) in the four-step transformation of 4'-phosphopantothenate to CoA are consistently fused
in bacteria (with the exception of streptococci and enterococci) and
archaea, but "unfused" in all eukaryotes. Remarkably, one of these
two components (PPCDC) is significantly more conserved between
eukaryotes and prokaryotes than the other component (PPCS). A similar
pattern is observed for the two last steps, with DPCK being
significantly more conserved than PPAT. However, with respect to PPAT
sequence conservation, archaea cluster with eukaryotes, and not with
bacteria. In contrast to the PPCS/PPCDC case, a fusion event for the
last two enzymes in the pathway appears to be a relatively modern
invention, as it occurs in mammals and flies, but not in plants, fungi,
or prokaryotes. Interestingly, in humans, which have both a
bifunctional PPAT/DPCK and a monofunctional DPCK, the latter reveals a
higher sequence similarity to bacterial monofunctional DPCK
(P-score ~ 10 Despite significant variations in the sequences of individual enzymatic
components, the overall topology of the universal CoA biosynthetic
pathway appears to be preserved in all taxons. Previous biochemical
data prompted the assertion that an alternate CoA biosynthetic pathway
exists in S. cerevisiae (30). However, the identification of
yeast orthologs for all of the human CoA biosynthetic enzymes described
here, in combination with the essentiality of the corresponding
S. cerevisiae genes, suggests that the CoA biosynthetic
route in yeast is similar to that in E. coli and humans and
that the former interpretation needs to be revised.
With the growing number of sequenced genomes, it is becoming apparent
that numerous pathways and individual components of central metabolism,
such as cofactor biosynthesis, amino acid biosynthesis, fatty acid
metabolism, glycolysis, etc., have a remarkable tendency to be
conserved across the three kingdoms. This tendency, along with the
wealth of genomic sequencing data and advanced tools for comparative
analysis, has significantly improved our ability to accurately identify
entire biosynthetic pathways in complex organisms, as illustrated here
for human CoA biosynthesis.
We are infinitely indebted to Ross Overbeek
and the ERGO development team at Integrated Genomics, Inc., who made
this study possible and to the other colleagues in our laboratory, S. Chowdury, and S. Gerdes for technical and psychological support. We are grateful to T. Begley and E. Strauss (Cornell University) for inspiration, help with this manuscript, discussions, and sharing results on bacterial coaBC studies as well as for providing
synthetic substrates. We thank D. Drueckhammer (State University of New York at Stony Brook) for discussions and sharing results on bacterial coaE. We thank P. Schimmel for help and advice on the
manuscript. We are grateful to N. Grishin and H. Zhang
(University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center) for help with
distant sequence similarity analysis and to S. Mirkin and M. Krasilnikova (University of Chicago) for helping with Northern
blot experiments.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the DDBJ/GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number(s) AF453478.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 312-491-0846 (ext. 213); Fax: 312-491-0856; E-mail:
andrei@integratedgenomics.com.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201708200
2
Available at
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html.
3
Available at
genome-www.stanford.edu/Saccharomyces/.
4
Available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/.
5
Available at www.pfam.wustl.edu/.
6
Available at
www.scop.berkeley.edu/.
7
S. Gerdes, M. D. Scholle, M. D'Souza, A. Bernal, M. V. Baev, M. Farrell, O. V. Kurnasov, M. Daugherty, F. Mseeh,
B. M. Polanuyer, J. W. Campbell, S. Anantha, K. Y. Shatalin,
S. A. K. Chowdhury, M. Y. Fonstein, and A. L. Osterman,
submitted for publication.
The abbreviations used are:
PPCS, phosphopantothenoylcysteine synthetase;
PPCDC, phosphopantothenoylcysteine decarboxylase;
PPAT, phosphopantetheine
adenylyltransferase;
DPCK, dephospho-CoA kinase;
HPLC, high performance liquid chromatography.
Complete Reconstitution of the Human Coenzyme A Biosynthetic
Pathway via Comparative Genomics*
,
,
,
,
,
¶
Integrated Genomics, Incorporated, Chicago,
Illinois 60612 and the § Scripps Research Institute,
La Jolla, California 92037
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and BL21 (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) were used for
cloning and protein overexpression, and DH10B (Invitrogen) was used as
a host strain for complementation analysis by transposon mutagenesis.
For expression of all genes in E. coli, the vector pPROEX-HTa (Invitrogen), containing the trp promoter, a
His6 tag, and a tobacco etch virus protease cleavage
site, was used. Human brain cDNA and multiple-tissue Northern blots
were from CLONTECH (Palo Alto, CA). The DNA probe
radiolabeling kit was from Invitrogen, and Microspin columns for
removal of unincorporated nucleotides were from Amersham Biosciences.
Enzymes for PCR and DNA manipulations were from New England Biolabs
Inc. (Beverly, MA), MBI Fermentas (Vilnius, Lithuania), and
CLONTECH. Plasmid purification kits were from
Promega (Madison, WI). PCR purification kits and
nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin were from QIAGEN Inc. (Valencia,
CA). Oligonucleotides for PCR and sequencing were synthesized by MWG
Biotech (High Point, NC) and Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville,
IA). Substrates for the enzyme assays (4'-phosphopantothenate,
4'-phosphopantothenoylcysteine, and 4'-phosphopantetheine) were a
generous gift of Dr. Tadhg Begley (Cornell University). All other
chemicals, including the assay components hexokinase,
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, lactate dehydrogenase, pyruvate
kinase, glucose, phosphoenolpyruvate, NADP, NADH, ATP, inorganic
pyrophosphate (PPi), dephospho-CoA, and pyrophosphate
reagent, were from Sigma.
aCC (Ala
Thr),
5'-gggtcatgaCCGTATTCCGGTCGGGTCTCCTG and
3'-ggggtcgacTCAGTCGAGGGCCTGATGAGTCTTGG.
KAN-2
DNA with 0.1 unit/µl
Tn5 EZ::TN transposase (Epicentre Technologies Corp.,
Madison, WI) for 30 min at 37 °C. Following dialysis against 10 mM Tris acetate (pH 7.5) and 1 mM EDTA on
0.05-µm filters (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA), samples were
transformed by electroporation to DH10B and grown in enriched LB medium
with kanamycin (10 µg/ml) overnight. Chromosomal DNA was isolated
using a Bio-Rad miniprep kit. Detection of transposon inserts was
performed using pairs of nested primers as shown in Fig. 3A.
Each primer pair contained one transposon-specific primer and one
gene-specific primer. Two pairs of nested transposon-specific primers
were used to detect transposons inserted in both orientations. Two
consecutive PCR amplifications were performed, and the products were
analyzed by agarose (0.65%) gel electrophoresis. Image capture and
analysis were performed with 1D Image Analysis software (Eastman Kodak
Co.). PCR products above a threshold relative intensity of 0.05 were
used for insert mapping within a genome sequence. The same analysis was
performed under identical conditions with E. coli DH10B: 1)
transformed by the pPROEX plasmid (control); 2) cotransformed by two
pPROEX-derived plasmids, one containing human PPCDC and the other
containing human PPCS and a kanamycin resistance marker in place of the
ampicillin resistance marker; and 3) transformed by a pPROEX-derived
plasmid containing human PPAT/DPCK.
-D-thiogalactopyranoside was added to 0.8 mM; and harvesting was performed after ~12 h of shaking
at 20 °C. All proteins were purified from 50-ml cultures using
nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose minicolumns as described
previously (12). Protein size, expression level, distribution between
soluble and insoluble forms, and extent of purification were monitored
by SDS-PAGE. In all three cases, a significant yield of soluble
purified proteins was obtained (>0.5 mg for a 50-ml culture). A
three-domain PPAT/DPCK protein was additionally produced at larger
scale (6 liters) and subjected to two-step purification by
nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose chromatography and gel filtration
on a HiLoad Superdex 200 16/60 column (Amersham Biosciences) for more
detailed kinetic analysis and crystallization trials. Truncated
versions of this protein (domains I and II (amino acids 1-358) and
domains II and III (amino acids 180-565)) were PCR-amplified using a
corresponding set of primers and cloned in the same expression vector.
The C-terminally truncated version (domains I and II) was
expressed with a comparable yield of the soluble protein, preserved
PPAT activity, and no DPCK activity. The second, N-terminally truncated
version produced inactive protein in the form of inclusion bodies.
1
cm
1 was used for rate calculations.
-32P]dATP
using a commercially available kit (Invitrogen), and
unincorporated nucleotides were removed using Microspin G-50
columns. The normal cell multiple-tissue blot and multiple-cancer cell
line blot (CLONTECH) were preincubated for 30 min
in ExpressHyb solution supplied by the manufacturer. The labeled DNA
probe was mixed with fresh ExpressHyb solution and incubated with the
membranes for 1 h at 68 °C. The blots were rinsed several times
as suggested by the manufacturer and then exposed to x-ray film at
-70 °C. The blots were subsequently washed and rehybridized with
radiolabeled
-actin to normalize for mRNA loading levels.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Universal coenzyme A biosynthetic
pathway. PANK, pantothenate kinase (coaA in
E. coli); PPCS, coaB; PPCDC, coaC;
PPAT, coaD; DPCK, coaE.
12), and two homologs were found for DPCK (gi 13623688
and gi 13376838, P-score ~ 10
27 and
10
15, respectively). No reliable homologs could be found
for E. coli PPCS or PPAT.
7). The marginal similarity of PPCS
domains of bacterial bifunctional proteins to putative human
monofunctional PPCS (P-score ~ 0.02 for the E. coli
PPCS domain) was insufficient to predict this candidate with any degree
of certainty. Homologs of the putative human PPCS are readily
identified in other eukaryotes, including Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (YIL083C) and Arabidopsis thaliana
(hypothetical protein T7H20.130). The YIL083C gene was found to be
essential for yeast viability in a systematic gene knockout study
(Saccharomyces Genome Database) (see Ref. 20), providing additional
support for this functional prediction. A comparison of eukaryotic
(human and yeast), archaeal (Methanococcus jannaschii), and
bacterial (E. coli) PPCS/PPCDC structural organizations is
schematically presented in Fig.
2A.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Structural comparison of CoA biosynthetic
genes across all three kingdoms and reconstruction of a full-length
cDNA encoding human PPAT/DPCK. A, comparison of the
predicted human PPCDC and PPCS with the homologous proteins in lower
eukaryotes (represented by S. cerevisiae), the predicted
bifunctional homolog in archaea (M. jannaschii), and the
confirmed PPCS/PPCDC protein in E. coli. Amino acid residues
identical to the human proteins are shown as black bands,
and the overall score (P-score) is shown below each protein or domain.
B, construction of a full-length cDNA and a predicted
open reading frame (ORF) for human PPAT/DPCK.
Boxes represent protein coding sequences, and black
lines represent nucleotide sequences. All numbers indicate
nucleotide numbers, with 1 representing the first base pair of the
complete reconstructed human cDNA encoding PPAT/DPCK. Labels
indicate identifiers in GenBankTM with their respective
annotations. C, comparison of the predicted
human three-domain PPAT/DPCK protein with representatives of the other
three kingdoms as described for A. The highly conserved
nucleotidyltransferase (NTase) motif (HXXH)
region is shown. No comparison could be made with archaeal DPCK, as
this gene, as well as the gene for pantothenate kinase, remains
missing in all archaea.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Verification by complementation in E. coli. Genetic footprinting by random saturating
transposon mutagenesis in E. coli was performed to determine
the essentiality of the CoA biosynthetic genes with and without
complementation by the corresponding human genes. A,
schematic of genetic footprinting based on nested PCR. Transposon
insertion into a gene of interest (GeneA) is detected and
mapped using two sets of nested primers, indicated as double
arrows: (i) specific for a corresponding locus in the E. coli chromosome and (ii) specific for transposon flanking regions.
Using these sets of primers for the analysis of the total chromosomal
DNA from a population of surviving transposon mutants allows the
mapping of the positions of transposon insertion throughout the
corresponding locus. B, agarose gel analysis of PCR
fragments in genetic footprinting. The results of the analysis are
shown for the two loci of the E. coli chromosome containing
genes coaD (PPAT) and coaE (DPCK). PCR
amplification with the corresponding sets of primers was performed
without complementation (Vector Control) or with functional
complementation by the corresponding human gene (Human
PPAT/DPCK) provided in the expression vector. The regions on the
agarose gel corresponding to the boundaries of insertions within the
CoA biosynthetic genes are boxed: coaD gene
(solid boxes) and coaE gene (dashed
boxes) boundaries. Each condition is represented by two lanes
corresponding to the detection of both possible orientations of the
transposon by two different sets of transposon-specific primers.
Lane M contains 1-kb DNA ladder markers. C,
mapping of the transposon insertions within E. coli CoA
biosynthetic genes. Genetic footprinting and agarose gel analysis of
PCR fragments were performed in the three loci of the E. coli chromosome containing genes coaBC (PPCS/PPCDC),
coaD (PPAT), and coaE (DPCK). The positions of
detected transposon insertions mapped in the corresponding loci are
shown by vertical lines. CoA biosynthetic genes are shown as
black arrows, and the adjacent genes are shown as
white arrows. Insertions in the experiment without
complementation (Vector Control) are shown above the
respective genes. The three genes coaBC, coaD,
and coaE are essential for E. coli growth and
survival, and they do not contain transposon insertions in the
experiment without complementation. Coexpression of the two human
enzymes PPCS and PPCDC provided on the plasmids complements for the
loss of function of coaBC, as evidenced by the appearance of
transposon insertions within the boundaries of this gene (shown below
the locus representation). Similarly, the vertical lines
below the coaD and coaE loci reflect functional
complementation of these genes in the presence of human bifunctional
PPAT/DPCK.
dephospho-CoA + PPi) and the reverse reaction
(dephospho-CoA + PPi
4'-phosphopantetheine + ATP) as
well as the DPCK reaction (Table I). The
PPAT reaction equilibrium state is established at roughly
equimolar concentrations of all substrates and products, beginning from either direction, as revealed by HPLC analysis after
extensive incubation with C-terminally truncated human protein depleted
of DPCK activity. In the presence of full-length PPAT/DPCK, the
adenylyltransferase reaction becomes irreversible due to the consecutive phosphorylation of dephospho-CoA and formation of the
final product, CoA. All attempts to express an isolated DPCK domain
failed to produce any soluble protein, and the kinase activity was
characterized using the full-length PPAT/DPCK protein and dephospho-CoA
as a substrate. Moreover, although the function of the N-terminal
domain remains unknown, it is absolutely required for the proper
expression and folding of the protein when overexpressed in E. coli.
Kinetic parameters obtained for human PPAT/DPCK

View larger version (10K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
In vitro reconstitution of CoA
biosynthesis from phosphopantothenate using purified human
enzymes. All samples contained 4'-phosphopantothenate, cysteine,
ATP, partially purified human PPCS, and partially purified human PPCDC
(~5 µg/ml each). In addition, the sample in B contained
10 µg/ml purified human PPAT (lacking the DPCK domain and
corresponding activity), and the sample in C contained 1 µg/ml purified human PPAT/DPCK. Samples were incubated for 2 h,
and protein was removed by ultrafiltration. Following dilution in fresh
dithiothreitol solution, samples were subjected to isocratic
separation. Locations corresponding to standards (AMP, ADP, ATP,
dephospho-CoA (dPCoA), and CoA) incubated and separated
under the same conditions are indicated on the chromatograms.

View larger version (77K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Expression of the PPAT/DPCK mRNA in human
tissues and cancer cell lines. mRNAs from normal human tissues
(A) and human cancer cell lines (B) were analyzed
by Northern blot hybridization with a radiolabeled probe corresponding
to the central domain (PPAT) of human PPAT/DPCK. Blots were exposed to
an x-ray film at -70 °C. The blots were subsequently washed and
rehybridized with radiolabeled
-actin to normalize for mRNA
loading levels. RNA marker positions are shown.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
42 with DPCK from Bacillus
subtilis) than to the DPCK domain of human bifunctional PPAT/DPCK
(P-score ~ 10
19). The observed evolutionary
mosaicism underscores the importance of using a diverse collection of
organisms to increase the predictive power of comparative genome
analysis. In particular, only monofunctional PPCS proteins present in a
small group of bacteria (streptococci and enterococci) allowed the
prediction of a human PPCS, whereas the sequence similarity to PPCS
domains present in other bacterial genomes was insufficient to do so.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Begley, T. P.,
Kinsland, C.,
and Strauss, E.
(2001)
Vitam. Horm.
61,
157-171[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Tahiliani, A. G.,
and Beinlich, C. J.
(1991)
Vitam. Horm.
46,
165-228[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Zhou, B.,
Westaway, S. K.,
Levinson, B.,
Johnson, M. A.,
Gitschier, J.,
and Hayflick, S. J.
(2001)
Nat. Genet.
28,
345-349[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Afshar, K.,
Gonczy, P.,
DiNardo, S.,
and Wasserman, S. A.
(2001)
Genetics
157,
1267-1276 5.
Song, W. J.,
and Jackowski, S.
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
6411-6417 6.
Kupke, T.,
Uebele, M.,
Schmid, D.,
Jung, G.,
Blaesse, M.,
and Steinbacher, S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
31838-31846 7.
Strauss, E.,
Kinsland, C., Ge, Y.,
McLafferty, F. W.,
and Begley, T. P.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
13513-13516 8.
Geerlof, A.,
Lewendon, A.,
and Shaw, W. V.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
27105-27111 9.
Mishra, P.,
Park, P. K.,
and Drueckhammer, D. G.
(2001)
J. Bacteriol.
183,
2774-2778 10.
Rock, C. O.,
Calder, R. B.,
Karim, M. A.,
and Jackowski, S.
(2000)
J. Biol. Chem.
275,
1377-1383 11.
Calder, R. B.,
Williams, R. S.,
Ramaswamy, G.,
Rock, C. O.,
Campbell, E.,
Unkles, S. E.,
Kinghorn, J. R.,
and Jackowski, S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2014-2020 12.
Daugherty, M.,
Vonstein, V.,
Overbeek, R.,
and Osterman, A.
(2001)
J. Bacteriol.
183,
292-300 13.
O'Brien, W. E.
(1976)
Anal. Biochem.
76,
423-430[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Worrall, D. M.,
and Tubbs, P. K.
(1983)
Biochem. J.
215,
153-157[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Abiko, Y.
(1967)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
61,
290-299 16.
Abiko, Y.
(1967)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
61,
300-308 17.
Kupke, T.,
Hernandez-Acosta, P.,
Steinbacher, S.,
and Culianez-Macia, F. A.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
19190-19196 18.
Espinosa-Ruiz, A.,
Belles, J. M.,
Serrano, R.,
and Culianez-Macia, F. A.
(1999)
Plant J.
20,
529-539[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Albert, A.,
Martinez-Ripoll, M.,
Espinosa-Ruiz, A.,
Yenush, L.,
Culianez-Macia, F. A.,
and Serrano, R.
(2000)
Structure Fold Des.
8,
961-969[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Winzeler, E. A.,
Shoemaker, D. D.,
Astromoff, A.,
Liang, H.,
Anderson, K.,
Andre, B.,
Bangham, R.,
Benito, R.,
Boeke, J. D.,
Bussey, H.,
Chu, A. M.,
Connelly, C.,
Davis, K.,
Dietrich, F.,
Dow, S. W., El,
Bakkoury, M.,
Foury, F.,
Friend, S. H.,
Gentalen, E.,
Giaever, G.,
Hegemann, J. H.,
Jones, T.,
Laub, M.,
Liao, H.,
Davis, R. W.,
et al..
(1999)
Science
285,
901-906 21.
Venkatachalam, K. V.,
Fuda, H.,
Koonin, E. V.,
and Strott, C. A.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
2601-2604 22.
Bork, P.,
Holm, L.,
Koonin, E. V.,
and Sander, C.
(1995)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
22,
259-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Izard, T.,
and Geerlof, A.
(1999)
EMBO J.
18,
2021-2030[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Scandurra, R.,
Moriggi, M.,
Consalvi, V.,
and Politi, L.
(1979)
Methods Enzymol.
62,
245-248[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Strauss, E.,
and Begley, T. P.
(2001)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
123,
6449-6450[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Skrede, S.,
and Halvorsen, O.
(1983)
Eur. J. Biochem.
131,
57-63[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Kuhajda, F. P.,
Pizer, E. S., Li, J. N.,
Mani, N. S.,
Frehywot, G. L.,
and Townsend, C. A.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
3450-3454 28.
Wang, H.,
Huang, W.,
Fei, Y. J.,
Xia, H.,
Yang-Feng, T. L.,
Leibach, F. H.,
Devoe, L. D.,
Ganapathy, V.,
and Prasad, P. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
14875-14883 29.
Olsen, G. J.,
Woese, C. R.,
and Overbeek, R.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
1-6 30.
Bucovaz, E. T.,
Tarnowski, S. J.,
Morrison, W. C.,
Macleod, R. M.,
Morrison, J. C.,
Sobhy, C. M.,
Rhoades, J. L.,
Fryer, J. E.,
Wakim, J. M.,
and Whybrew, W. D.
(1980)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
30,
7-26[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Rubio, L. Whitehead, T. R. Larson, I. A. Graham, and P. L. Rodriguez The Coenzyme A Biosynthetic Enzyme Phosphopantetheine Adenylyltransferase Plays a Crucial Role in Plant Growth, Salt/Osmotic Stress Resistance, and Seed Lipid Storage Plant Physiology, September 1, 2008; 148(1): 546 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bosveld, A. Rana, P. E. van der Wouden, W. Lemstra, M. Ritsema, H. H. Kampinga, and O. C. M. Sibon De novo CoA biosynthesis is required to maintain DNA integrity during development of the Drosophila nervous system Hum. Mol. Genet., July 1, 2008; 17(13): 2058 - 2069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Miller, J. Ohren, R. W. Sarver, W. T. Mueller, P. d. Dreu, H. Case, and V. Thanabal Phosphopantetheine Adenylyltransferase from Escherichia coli: Investigation of the Kinetic Mechanism and Role in Regulation of Coenzyme A Biosynthesis J. Bacteriol., November 15, 2007; 189(22): 8196 - 8205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rubio, T. R. Larson, M. Gonzalez-Guzman, S. Alejandro, I. A. Graham, R. Serrano, and P. L. Rodriguez An Arabidopsis Mutant Impaired in Coenzyme A Biosynthesis Is Sugar Dependent for Seedling Establishment Plant Physiology, March 1, 2006; 140(3): 830 - 843. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Overbeek, T. Begley, R. M. Butler, J. V. Choudhuri, H.-Y. Chuang, M. Cohoon, V. de Crecy-Lagard, N. Diaz, T. Disz, R. Edwards, et al. The Subsystems Approach to Genome Annotation and its Use in the Project to Annotate 1000 Genomes Nucleic Acids Res., October 7, 2005; 33(17): 5691 - 5702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |