Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112265200 on April 8, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21505-21513, June 14, 2002
The Role of Zinc Ions in Reverse Transport Mediated by Monoamine
Transporters*
Petra
Scholze
,
Lene
Nørregaard§,
Ernst A.
Singer
,
Michael
Freissmuth
,
Ulrik
Gether§, and
Harald H.
Sitte
¶
From the
Institute of Pharmacology, University of
Vienna, Währingerstrasse 13a, A-1090 Vienna, Austria and the
§ Molecular Neuropharmacology Group, Department of
Pharmacology, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200
Copenhagen N, Denmark
Received for publication, December 21, 2001, and in revised form, April 5, 2002
 |
ABSTRACT |
The human dopamine transporter (hDAT) contains an
endogenous high affinity Zn2+ binding site with three
coordinating residues on its extracellular face (His193,
His375, and Glu396). Upon binding to
this site, Zn2+ causes inhibition of
[3H]1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium
([3H]MPP+) uptake. We investigated the effect
of Zn2+ on outward transport by superfusing hDAT-expressing
HEK-293 cells preloaded with [3H]MPP+.
Although Zn2+ inhibited uptake, Zn2+
facilitated [3H]MPP+ release induced by
amphetamine, MPP+, or K+-induced depolarization
specifically at hDAT but not at the human serotonin and the
norepinephrine transporter (hNET). Mutation of the Zn2+
coordinating residue His193 to Lys (the corresponding
residue in hNET) eliminated the effect of Zn2+ on efflux.
Conversely, the reciprocal mutation (K189H) conferred Zn2+
sensitivity to hNET. The intracellular
[3H]MPP+ concentration was varied to generate
saturation isotherms; these showed that Zn2+ increased
Vmax for efflux (rather than
KM-Efflux-intracellular). Thus, blockage of inward
transport by Zn2+ is not due to a simple inhibition of the
transporter turnover rate. The observations provide evidence against
the model of facilitated exchange-diffusion and support the concept
that inward and outward transport represent discrete operational modes
of the transporter. In addition, they indicate a physiological role of
Zn2+, because Zn2+ also facilitated transport
reversal of DAT in rat striatal slices.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The principal physiological action of the monoamine transporters
is the removal of synaptically released neurotransmitter by a
sodium-driven secondary-active transport mechanism (1). The
transporters are situated primarily in the presynaptic membrane and
include the transporters for dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin
(hDAT,1 hNET, and hSERT,
respectively) (1). These transporters form a subfamily within the large
class of Na+/Cl
-coupled transporters (2).
Monoamine transporters have been the focus of intensive research, in
particular because they represent targets for clinically important
therapeutics, e.g. antidepressant drugs (3), which increase
the availability of serotonin and/or norepinephrine by blocking
reuptake. Moreover, drugs of abuse such as amphetamine and cocaine
target these transporters (4).
It has been well known that the monoamine transporters are not only
capable of sodium-dependent transmembrane uptake but also of reverse transport of their substrate (5). Substrate efflux can be
observed upon membrane depolarization, if the transmembrane sodium
gradient is abrogated, or it can be elicited by extracellular substrates. The latter mechanism is thought to underlie the addictive and reinforcing properties of amphetamine derivatives (4). Furthermore,
excitation of glutamatergic receptors at dopaminergic neurons of the
substantia nigra induces reverse operation of hDAT; this contributes to
important autoinhibitory effects mediated by the dopamine
D2-receptors to regulate overstimulatory inputs of the
subthalamic nucleus (6). This novel evidence indicates a critical
physiological role for reverse transport; thus, monoamine transporters
mediate both inwardly and outwardly directed fluxes of monoamine in the brain.
The bivalent cation Zn2+ is widely distributed in the
central nervous system (7). Zn2+ serves as a chelated
counter ion for stored neurotransmitters in synaptic vesicles (8) and,
upon nerve stimulation, Zn2+ is co-released with the
neurotransmitter (9). The same can be observed under pathological
conditions, i.e. in brain ischemia. Physiologically, the
extracellular concentration of Zn2+ may reach 10-20
µM (10), and these levels may further rise up to 300 µM in pathological situations (9, 11, 12). The release of
Zn2+ is very interesting, because the activity of several
neurotransmitter receptors and transporters are modulated by micromolar
concentrations of Zn2+ (13-16). For example,
Zn2+ has recently been reported to block
transport-associated ion currents through glutamate transporter
subtypes (salamander excitatory amino acid transporter (17) and
EAAT1 (15)). Moreover, Zn2+ was found to enhance
binding of cocaine analogues to and inhibit uptake of dopamine by
synaptosomal membranes (18), an effect that is accounted for by direct
binding of Zn2+ to hDAT (19).
The high affinity Zn2+ binding site in wild type hDAT was
mapped to three coordinating residues situated on the extracellular face of the transporter, His193 in the large extracellular
loop between transmembrane segment (TM) 3 and 4, His375 at
the external end of TM 7 and Glu396 at the external end of
TM 8 (19, 20). The inhibitory effect on uptake suggests that, by
binding to the transporter, Zn2+ constrains relative
movements between extracellular loop 2, TM 7, and TM 8 that are
critical for the translocation process. Moreover, due to the strict
geometric requirements for binding the small zinc(II) ion, and based on
several additional engineered Zn2+ binding sites in hDAT,
it became possible to deduce a model of the tertiary structure in a
putative TM 7/8 microdomain (21). Finally, a simple exchange of
corresponding amino acids resulted in the transfer of the high affinity
binding properties to the hNET (19, 20) and to the more distantly
related rat
-aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter (22). This reveals
strong support toward an evolutionary conserved motif in the tertiary
structure of Na+/Cl
-dependent
transporters highly relevant for the translocation process.
The mechanistic basis for transport reversal is poorly understood.
Earlier models compared the transporter to a revolving door, which
mediates influx or efflux provided that there is a driving force,
i.e. the gradient of Na+ and substrate (23). In
this model of facilitated exchange-diffusion, inward and outward
transport are stoichiometrically linked events and, thus, strictly
coupled. Hence, the model predicts that inhibition of influx must
result in reduced efflux. Here, we have exploited the ability of
Zn2+ to bind specifically to the dopamine transporter to
demonstrate that inward and outward transport represent discrete
operational modes of a sodium-coupled transporter. Our results show
that physiologically relevant concentrations of Zn2+
enhance reverse transport by hDAT (but not by hNET or hSERT), although
uptake is blocked. This presumably has physiological implications,
because a regulation of dopamine transport by Zn2+ can be
recapitulated in striatal slices.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Molecular Biology and Transfection--
cDNA encoding the
hDAT and hNET in pRC/CMV were kindly provided by Dr. M. G. Caron
(Duke University, Durham, NC (24)); cDNA encoding the hSERT in
pcDNA3 (25) was a generous gift of Dr. R. D. Blakely
(Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN). A detailed description of the
hDAT mutant as well as the hNET mutant is given in the recent
publications of Norregaard et al. (19) and Loland et
al. (20). Stable and/or transient expression of the desired cDNAs in HEK-293 cells was achieved by transfection using the CaPO4-precipitation method (26). Alternatively,
LipofectAMINE Plus was used according to the manufacturer's
description (Invitrogen). Stable transfected cell lines were grown
essentially as described previously (27). At least two different stable
cell lines were tested to exclude clonal effects.
Uptake Experiments--
The experiments were performed as
described previously (28). In brief, 5 × 105 HEK-293
cells transiently or permanently expressing the hDAT, hNET, hSERT, or
mutants were seeded onto poly-D-lysine-coated 48-well
plates, and influx was measured 1-2 days after plating. Each well was
washed once with 0.5 ml of KRH buffer (Krebs-Ringer-Hepes buffer; Hepes
10 mM, NaCl 120 mM, KCl 3 mM,
CaCl2 2 mM, MgCl2 2 mM,
glucose 20 mM, final pH 7.4, room temperature). The cells were incubated with [3H]1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium
([3H]MPP+, 0.2 µCi, 88.5 Ci/mmol) and
various concentrations of unlabeled MPP+ (range: 0.03-300
µM; final volume: 0.1 ml), a well-known substrate of
monoamine transporters (Refs. 29-31; see Table I). This uptake was
temperature-dependent and sensitive to co-incubation with the non-selective uptake blocker cocaine (100 µM) as well
as more specific uptake blockers like nomifensine, nisoxetine, and
paroxetine (hDAT, hNET, and hSERT, respectively). After 8 min at room
temperature, uptake was terminated rapidly by removal of buffer and
washing with 0.5 ml of ice-cold buffer. Cells were lysed with 0.5 ml of 1% SDS and transferred into scintillation vials for liquid
scintillation counting. The experiments shown in Fig. 1 were conducted
after a preincubation period of 5 min using a constant concentration of
[3H]MPP+ (50 nM).
Superfusion Experiments--
We used a superfusion system, which
allows for the continuous monitoring of the efflux of substrate from
appropriately transfected cells after preloading with radiolabeled
substrate (32). Because released substrate is washed away immediately,
the confounding effects of ongoing reuptake are minimized by the
superfusion system (28). In brief, cells were grown overnight on round
glass coverslips (5-mm diameter, 4 × 105 cells per
coverslip) then incubated with [3H]MPP+ (0.8 µCi, final concentration 10 µM) for 20 min at 37 °C
in 0.1 ml of KRH. Coverslips were then transferred to small superfusion chambers (0.2 ml) and superfused with KRH buffer (25 °C, 0.7 ml × min
1) as described (27). A washout period of 40 min
established a stable baseline for efflux of radioactivity; thereafter,
the experiment was started with the collection of fractions (2 or 4 min). At the end of the experiment, cells were lysed in 1% SDS.
To obtain quantitative data on efflux, the cells were incubated with a
range of different [3H]MPP+ concentrations
(2-128 µM). Intracellular
[3H]MPP+ concentrations were calculated using
the accumulated radioactivity in the cells, a cell number of 27,000 per
glass coverslip, and a cell volume of 1.08 pl/cell ± 0.12 (mean ± S.E. of four independent determinations;
[3H]H2O-[14C]inulin method
(27)).
In experiments in which high K+ was used or Na+
was omitted, NaCl was iso-osmotically replaced by KCl or choline
chloride, respectively.
Female Sprague-Dawley rats (200-250 g, Forschungsanstalt für
Versuchstierzucht, Himberg, Austria) were used to perform ex vivo experiments (see also Ref. 33). In brief: After decapitation and removal of the brain, striata were prepared and cut into
0.3-mm-thick slices using a McIlwain tissue chopper. The slices were
then incubated for 60 min at 37 °C in 0.5 ml of KRH containing 0.25 µM [3H]MPP+, washed twice, and
inserted into the superfusion chambers; KRH was supplemented with 10 µM EDTA, and the slices were superfused at 25 °C and
at a flow of 0.7 ml/min. This washout period of 60 min served to
establish a stable basal efflux of radioactivity and to chelate free
zinc; superfusate samples were collected at 2-min intervals. Under the
given EDTA concentration, Zn2+ was added at 20 µM resulting in a concentration of 10 µM
free Zn2+. At the end of the experiment, the slices were
homogenized in 1.2 ml of KRH by sonication (Branson sonifier B 15;
Branson Sonic Power, Danbury, CT).
Tritium in the superfusate fractions, the SDS cell lysates, and slice
homogenates was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Release of
3H label is expressed as a fractional rate, i.e.
the radioactivity released during a fraction was expressed as the
percentage of the total radioactivity present in the cells at the
beginning of that fraction.
Chemicals--
Tissue culture reagents were from Invitrogen Life
Technologies. [3H]MPP+ was from Invitrogen
(Boston, MA). D-Amphetamine was kindly donated by
SmithKline & French (Welwyn Garden City, Herts, UK). Cocaine HCl was
from Dolda AG (Basel, Switzerland). Unlabeled MPP+ was from
Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA). All other chemicals
were from commercial sources.
Data Calculation--
Vmax,
Km, EC50, and IC50 values
were calculated by performing non-linear regression analysis using
Prism 3.02 fitting and plotting software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
Statistical significance was evaluated by Student's t test
(paired or unpaired as appropriate).
 |
RESULTS |
Zinc Inhibits Uptake of MPP+ at the hDAT wt Only with
High Affinity--
Previous observations showed that Zn2+
blocked uptake of [3H]dopamine by hDAT, because it
interacted with an endogenous Zn2+ binding site (19). In
the present study, we used [3H]MPP+ as a
substrate rather than dopamine for the following reasons: (i)
[3H]MPP+ is metabolically stable,
i.e. resistant to degradation by monoamine oxidase, and
hydrophilic such that it is trapped within the cell; back diffusion
does not confound the interpretation of uptake and, more importantly,
of release experiments from preloaded cells. (ii) Because diffusion is
minimal, it is, in addition, possible to preload the cells and to
determine the intracellular concentration, an advantage that is
instrumental if the kinetics of reverse transport are to be analyzed
(see below). (iii) [3H]MPP+ is a substrate
for all monoamine transporters (i.e. DAT, NET, SERT); thus,
it is ideally suited for a comparative analysis. Fig.
1 illustrates the effect of
Zn2+ on uptake of [3H]MPP+ by
hDAT (Fig. 1A), hNET (Fig. 1B) and hSERT (Fig.
1C). As expected, Zn2+ only blocked hDAT with
high affinity (squares in Fig. 1A) whereas uptake
by wild type hNET (circles in Fig. 1B) and hSERT
(Fig. 1C) required concentrations of Zn2+ that
exceeded 100 µM. The endogenous Zn2+ binding
site of hDAT was previously mapped, and His193 on the
extracellular loop 2 was shown to be of critical importance in forming
the coordination sphere. If the binding of Zn2+ to hDAT was
impeded by substituting His193 with Lys (i.e.
the residue found in the corresponding position of hNET), high affinity
inhibition was abrogated and Zn2+ suppressed uptake with a
monophasic low affinity inhibition curve (triangles in Fig.
1A). Conversely, the corresponding mutation in hNET
(i.e. replacing Lys189 with His) conferred high
affinity inhibition by Zn2+ to hNET (triangles
in Fig. 1B). The Km values for
[3H]MPP+ transport as well as
IC50 values for Zn2+ are summarized in Table
I. Based on these data we conclude that transport of [3H]MPP+ faithfully reproduces
the data previously obtained by evaluating the Zn2+
sensitivity of monoamine transporters using their endogenous substrates
(19); it is also safe to conclude from the available evidence that
Zn2+ suppresses the transport of all substrates by
hDAT.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
. Effects of Zn2+ on the uptake of
[3H]MPP+ by monoamine transporters and mutant
constructs. HEK-293 cells expressing wild type monoamine
transporters and mutant constructs were distributed in 48-well plates
(5 × 105 cells). The washed cells were preincubated
in Krebs-Ringer-Hepes (KRH) buffer (0.1 ml) containing Zn2+
in the concentrations indicated. After 5 min, the buffer was replaced
by KRH containing Zn2+ and
[3H]MPP+ (50 nM). After 8 min at
room temperature, uptake was terminated and radioactivity was
determined by liquid scintillation counting. For
Km, Influx and IC50 values
see Table I. A: hDAT wt, ; hDAT-H193K, . B:
hNET wt, ; hNET-K189H, . C: hSERT wt, . Data
represent means ± S.E. of three to six experiments performed in
triplicate.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Kinetic constants of [3H]MPP+ uptake in HEK-293 cells
expressing monoamine transporters and mutant constructs
HEK-293 cells expressing wild type monoamine transporters, and mutant
constructs were distributed in 48-well plates (5 × 105
cells). For determination of the KM Influx
values, the washed cells were incubated in Krebs-Ringer-Hepes buffer
(0.1 ml) containing [3H]MPP+ (0.2 µCi, specific
activity 88.5 Ci/mmol) and various concentrations of unlabeled
MPP+ (range: 0.03-300 µM). For determination of
IC50 zinc values, Zn2+ was added 5 min prior to
[3H]MPP+ (50 nM). After 8 min at room
temperature, uptake was terminated and radioactivity was determined by
liquid scintillation counting. KM Influx
and IC50 values were calculated from non-linear regression
analysis of uptake data and represent mean values ± S.E.
(numbers in parentheses denote number of
experimental observations performed in triplicate).
|
|
Zinc Enhances Efflux Induced by Amphetamine at hDAT--
Because
Zn2+ inhibited uptake of [3H]MPP+
at the hDAT, a similar blockage was to be anticipated for release if
efflux simply reflected reversal of transport. This was not the case.
Cells that expressed hDAT were preloaded with
[3H]MPP+. Upon challenge with a maximally
effective concentration of amphetamine (10 µM), transport
reversal was induced and this resulted in release of
[3H]MPP+ (Fig.
2A). Surprisingly, this
amphetamine-elicited efflux was markedly enhanced, rather than
inhibited, by the addition of 10 µM Zn2+ to
the superfusion buffer (Fig. 2A, open squares).
We stress that Zn2+ per se did not affect basal
efflux (Fig. 2A). The modulatory effect of Zn2+
was lost upon mutational exchange of all three coordinating residues (hDAT-H193K-H375A-E396Q, n = 3, data not shown). In
fact, mutation of a single residue, namely His193 to Lys
(the corresponding residue found in hNET), sufficed to abolish the
enhancing effect of Zn2+; the extent of
amphetamine-elicited release was comparable in hDAT-H193K-expressing
cells (cf. closed symbols in Fig. 2, A
and B). However, Zn2+ did not affect
transport reversal to any appreciable extent (open symbols, Fig. 2B).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Influence of Zn2+ on
amphetamine-induced [3H]MPP+ efflux.
Cells were preloaded with [3H]MPP+ and
superfused upon reaching a stable baseline (basal efflux: mean
of the three fractions before drug addition; hDAT wt: panel
A, / , basal efflux: 0.247 ± 0.004%·min 1, i.e. 245.6 ± 6.7 dpm·min 1, n = 60 observations of
randomly chosen experiments performed on different days; hDAT-H193K:
panel B; / , basal [3H]MPP+
efflux: 0.433 ± 0.08%·min 1, i.e.
181.2 ± 7.1 dpm·min 1, n = 47;
hNET wt: panel C, / , basal
[3H]MPP+ efflux: 0.087 ± 0.004%·min 1, i.e. 125.9 ± 5.3 dpm·min 1, n = 60; hNET-K189H:
panel D, / , basal [3H]MPP+
efflux for hNET-K189H: 0.147 ± 0.006%·min 1,
i.e. 185.2 ± 8.2 dpm·min 1,
n = 56). The experiment was started with the collection
of 4-min fractions. After three fractions (12 min) of basal efflux,
cells were exposed to Zn2+ (10 µM), or left
at control conditions as indicated. After six fractions (from 24 min
and onward), amphetamine (panels A and B: 10 µM, panels C and D: 1 µM) was added to all superfusion channels. After nine
fractions (from 36 min and onward), all channels were switched back to
control conditions. Data are presented as fractional efflux,
i.e. each fraction is expressed as the percentage of
radioactivity present in the cells at the beginning of that fraction.
Symbols represent means ± S.E. of six to twelve
observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber; all
experiments were performed in triplicate).
|
|
In contrast to wild type hDAT, release from cells expressing the hNET
was not affected by co-application of Zn2+ (Fig.
2C). We have exploited this insensitivity to ask if
Zn2+-enhanced outward transport was conferred to hNET upon
replacement of Lys189 by the appropriate Zn2+
coordinating ligand (i.e. His). In fact, in cells expressing hNET-K189H, Zn2+ promoted efflux that had been induced by
amphetamine (open symbols in Fig. 2D); although
the effect was less pronounced than that seen with hDAT wt. Finally,
Zn2+ did not affect amphetamine-induced release of
[3H]MPP+ via hSERT, and cocaine (100 µM) completely inhibited amphetamine-driven efflux
mediated by wild type and mutant transporters irrespective of the
presence or absence of Zn2+ (data not shown).
We tested Zn2+ over a wide concentration range; up to 300 µM, Zn2+ did not affect basal release of
[3H]MPP+ from preloaded cells that expressed
hDAT, hNET, or hSERT (see inset to Fig.
3). Because the physiological
significance of higher concentrations is questionable, we did not
further investigate the discrepancy between basal release through hSERT
and hNET-K189H, which was not affected by 1 mM
Zn2+ (see Fig. 3, inset) and efflux through hDAT
wt, hNET wt, and hDAT-H193K, which was stimulated to some extent by 1 mM Zn2+ (see Fig. 3, inset).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
. Concentration-response relationship of
amphetamine and Zn2+ induced
[3H]MPP+ release. HEK-293 cells
expressing hDAT wt ( ; [amphetamine]: 10 µM),
hDAT-H193K ( ; [amphetamine]: 10 µM), hNET wt ( ;
[amphetamine]: 1 µM), hNET-K189H ( ; [amphetamine]:
1 µM), or hSERT wt ( ; [amphetamine]:
10µM; basal [3H]MPP+ efflux:
0.224 ± 0.007%·min 1, i.e. 243.8 ± 10.9 dpm·min 1, n = 40) were
preloaded with [3H]MPP+ and superfused, and
2-min fractions were collected. After three fractions (6 min) of basal
efflux, cells were exposed to Zn2+ or left at control
conditions. After seven fractions (from 14 min onward), amphetamine was
added to all superfusion channels for the following five fractions.
Vefflux/Vefflux 0 values
were generated by division of the value (mean of the last 6 min of
fraction collection) in the presence of amphetamine and
Zn2+ by the value in the absence of Zn2+.
Inset, influence of Zn2+ on basal
[3H]MPP+ efflux. The fractional
rates of Zn2+-related [3H]MPP+
efflux were generated by subtraction of the value of basal efflux (mean
of the first 6 min of fraction collection under control conditions)
from the value of efflux in the presence of Zn2+.
Symbols represent means ± S.E. of six to ten
observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber; all
experiments were performed in duplicate).
|
|
In the presence of amphetamine, the efflux-enhancing effect of
Zn2+ at hDAT-expressing cells was
concentration-dependent; maximum enhancement was observed
at 3 to 30 µM Zn2+; higher concentrations
caused inhibition of efflux resulting in a bell-shaped
concentration-response curve (squares in Fig. 3). A
reasonably similar bell-shaped curve was observed if the effect of
Zn2+ was evaluated on amphetamine-induced efflux through
hNET-K189H (downward triangles in Fig. 3). In contrast, over
a similar concentration range, Zn2+ did not enhance efflux
in HEK-293 cells expressing hDAT-H193K, hNET wt, or hSERT wt
(upward triangles, circles, and
diamonds, respectively, in Fig. 3).
Efflux Induced by the Substrate MPP+ Is Also Enhanced
by Zinc--
At a concentration that caused a substantial inhibition
of inward transport by hDAT wt (10 µM, see Fig.
1A), Zn2+ promoted outward transport. Thus, the
data presented so far suggested that, in the presence of
Zn2+, inward transport of amphetamine was not a
prerequisite for release. In other words, we surmised that sole binding
of substrate on the extracellular side, rather than binding and inward
transport, sufficed to initiate transport reversal (provided that there
is enough substrate on the intracellular side). However, amphetamine is
notorious for its ability to accumulate in cells by diffusion. Because
the pKa of amphetamine is close to the extracellular pH, the modest transmembrane pH gradient is sufficient to trap protonated amphetamine within the cell. Zn2+-promoted
efflux may thus also result from an additional effect of amphetamine
that arises from an intracellular site of action. To rule out this
possibility, we have employed MPP+ to verify our
conjecture. Because MPP+ is a substrate for monoamine
transporters, the compound can also induce reverse transport albeit
less efficiently than amphetamine (34). In cells that had been
preloaded with [3H]MPP+, Zn2+
markedly enhanced efflux induced by MPP+ only if the cells
expressed hDAT wt (open symbols in Fig.
4A) or hNET-K189H (open
symbols in Fig. 4D). It is, however, evident from Fig.
4 (B and C) that efflux through hDAT-H193K and
hNET wt, respectively, was essentially identical in the absence and presence of Zn2+. The same was true for hSERT wt (data not
shown). Thus, the results obtained with MPP+-induced
outward transport of [3H]MPP+ also supported
the interpretation that release does not require inward transport of
substrate.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Influence of Zn2+ on
MPP+ induced
[3H]MPP+-efflux. Time course of the
effects of Zn2+ on MPP+-induced efflux from
HEK-293 cells expressing hDAT wt (A, / ),
hDAT-H193K (B, / ), hNET wt (C, / ), or
hNET-K189H (D, / ). Cells were preloaded with
[3H]MPP+ and superfused, and 4-min fractions
were collected. After three fractions (12 min) of basal efflux, cells
were exposed to Zn2+ (10 µM), or left at
control conditions as indicated. After six fractions (from 24 min
onward), MPP+ (100 µM) was added to all
superfusion channels. After nine fractions (from 36 min and onward) all
channels were switched back to control conditions. Data are presented
as fractional efflux, i.e. each fraction is expressed as the
percentage of radioactivity present in the cells at the beginning of
that fraction. Symbols represent means ± S.E. of six
to twelve observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber;
all experiments were performed in triplicate).
|
|
An Artificially Introduced Zinc Binding Site Cannot Replace the
Endogenous Binding Site in hDAT wt--
The effect of Zn2+
could be conferred hNET by introducing a Zn2+ binding site;
however, this Zn2+ binding site was created at a position
homologous to that of the endogenous Zn2+ binding site of
hDAT. We have therefore also addressed the specificity of the
endogenous Zn2+ binding site by testing if Zn2+
promoted release indiscriminately, provided that it was bound on the
extracellular surface of hDAT. We analyzed a mutant hDAT that contained
an engineered Zn2+ binding site: In this mutant,
His193 was changed to Lys and a new Zn2+
coordinating histidine was inserted in position 377 resulting in a
tridentate Zn2+ binding site with His375,
His377, and Glu396 as coordinating residues
(21). This mutant transported [3H]MPP+ with a
Km that was comparable to wt hDAT (Table I). Contrary to hDAT wt, in this hDAT-H193K-V377H, the inhibition curve for
Zn2+ was monophasic (triangles in Fig.
5A). This discrepancy possibly reflects the fact that the engineered Zn2+ binding site had
a less favorable geometry; thus the low affinity, inhibitory component
was less resolved from the newly created high affinity component to
allow for a robust biphasic curve fitting and hence resolution of two
sites. Nevertheless, a fit to the overall inhibition curve gives a
minimum estimate for the inhibitory potency of Zn2+ on
[3H]MPP+ uptake (IC50 = 12.4 µM; see Table I). Most importantly, the engineered
Zn2+ binding site failed to support enhancement of
amphetamine induced efflux (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
The influence of Zn2+ on uptake
and efflux of [3H]MPP+ in a mutant dopamine
transporter that contains an artificially engineered Zn2+
binding site. A, uptake of
[3H]MPP+ by HEK-293 cells expressing
hDAT-H193K-V377H in the presence of Zn2+; for comparison,
see uptake inhibition by Zn2+ at hDAT wt (dotted
line) and hDAT-H193K (dashed line). For experimental
details, see legend to Fig. 1A. Symbols represent
data obtained in three independent determinations ± S.E.
(performed in duplicate). B, amphetamine (10 µM) induced efflux from HEK-293 cells expressing hDAT wt,
hDAT-H193K-V377H, and hDAT-H193K in the presence or absence of
Zn2+. The cells were preloaded with
[3H]MPP+ and superfused, and 2-min fractions
were collected. After three fractions (6 min) of basal efflux, cells
were exposed to Zn2+, or left at control conditions. After
seven fractions (from 14 min onward) amphetamine was added to all
superfusion channels for the following five fractions. Release is
expressed as the percentage of that induced in the presence of
amphetamine alone. Bars represent means ± S.E. of six
observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber; all
experiments were performed in duplicate).
|
|
Quantitative Aspects of Zinc Enhancing Amphetamine-induced Efflux
of MPP+--
The enhancement exerted by Zn2+
may reflect a change in substrate affinity at the intracellular binding
site of the transporter. Alternatively, Zn2+ may enhance
the efficiency of reverse transport. To differentiate between these two
possibilities, we preloaded the cells with varying amounts of
[3H]MPP+ and estimated the intracellular
concentration by correcting for the cellular water space. Efflux of
[3H]MPP+ was induced by amphetamine (10 µM) in HEK-293 cells that expressed hDAT wt, hDAT-H193K,
and hNET wt. The resulting saturation isotherm showed that
Zn2+ (10 µM) clearly enhanced the
Vmax of outwardly directed transport induced by
amphetamine only at the hDAT wt (Fig.
6A). In contrast, the
Km, EFFLUX was not affected by
Zn2+ (Table II). As expected,
Zn2+ did neither affect Vmax for
outward transport of [3H]MPP+ nor
Km, EFFLUX in hDAT-H193K and hNET wt
(Fig. 6, B and C).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Quantitative measurements of amphetamine
induced [3H]MPP+ release in the presence or
absence of Zn2+. Cells were preloaded with different
concentrations of [3H]MPP+ (2-128
µM) and superfused. According to the experimental
protocol given in the legend to Table II, the cells were challenged
with amphetamine in the presence or absence of Zn2+. Efflux
rates (VEFFLUX, pmol/106 cells/min)
were calculated from the mean value of the last three fractions with
subtraction of basal efflux (first three fractions), with a number of
27,000 cells/coverslip and an intracellular volume of 1.1 pl (see
"Methods"). A, hDAT wt (in the presence ( ) or absence
( ) of Zn2+). B, hDAT-H193K (in the presence
( ) or absence ( ) of Zn2+). C, hNET wt (in
the presence ( ) or absence ( ) of Zn2+). Each
symbol represents one observation of three to six
experiments (all experiments were performed in duplicate).
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Kinetic constants of [3H]MPP+ efflux performed with
HEK-293 cells expressing monoamine transporters and mutant constructs
HEK-293 cells expressing wild type monoamine transporters and mutant
constructs were seeded onto glass-coverslips in 96-well plates (4 × 105 cells), loaded with different concentrations of
[3H]MPP+ (final concentration range, 2-128
µM), and superfused. Upon reaching a stable baseline, the
experiment was started with the collection of 4-min fractions. After
three fractions (12 min) of basal efflux, cells were exposed to
Zn2+ (10 µM), or left at control conditions.
After six fractions (from 24 min and onward), amphetamine (hDAT wt,
hDAT-H193K: 10 µM, hNET wt: 1 µM) was added
to all superfusion channels. Efflux rates (VEfflux;
pmol/106 cells/min) were calculated from the mean value of the
last three fractions with subtraction of basal efflux (first three
fractions), with a number of 27,000 cells/coverslip and an
intracellular volume of 1.1 pl (see "Methods").
Vmax,Efflux and
KM Efflux values were calculated from
non-linear regression analysis of release data and represent mean
values ± S.E. (three to six experimental observations performed
in duplicate).
|
|
Efflux of MPP+ Induced by Depolarizing Conditions Is
Also Enhanced by Zinc--
Although widely studied, drug-induced
transport reversal does not reflect a physiological phenomenon. Under
physiological conditions, transport reversal may be induced by
Na+ influx (e.g. due to membrane
depolarization). Alternatively, in brain ischemia, the transmembrane
Na+ gradient dissipates because of ATP depletion, which
prevents Na+ extrusion, and glutamate release, which
promotes Na+ entry. To test if facilitation of efflux by
Zn2+ is physiologically relevant, we removed extracellular
Na+, and we depolarized the cells by eliminating the
K+ gradient. Efflux induced by iso-osmotic replacement of
Na+ by choline was neither enhanced by Zn2+ (10 µM) at the hDAT wt nor at the mutant hDAT-H193K (data not shown). In contrast, the efflux elicited by elevating the extracellular K+ concentration (from 3 to 120 mM) was
significantly enhanced in the presence of Zn2+ (10 µM) at the hDAT wt (Fig.
7A); as expected, this
facilitation of transport reversal was not seen with the mutant form
hDAT-H193K (Fig. 7B).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Influence of Zn2+ on
[3H]MPP+ efflux-induced high potassium
conditions. Time course of the effects of Zn2+ on
MPP+-induced efflux from HEK-293 cells expressing hDAT wt
(A, / ) or hDAT-H193K (B, / ). Cells
expressing hDAT wt (A, / ) or hDAT-H193K (B,
/ ) were preloaded with [3H]MPP+ and
superfused, and 2-min fractions were collected. After three fractions
(6 min) of basal efflux, cells were exposed to Zn2+ (10 µM), or left at control conditions as indicated. After
seven fractions (from 14 min onward), buffer conditions were changed
from KRH containing NaCl to KCl. Data are presented as fractional
efflux, i.e. each fraction is expressed as the percentage of
radioactivity present in the cells at the beginning of that fraction.
Symbols represent means ± S.E. of nine observations
(one observation equals one superfusion chamber; all experiments were
performed in triplicate). The statistical significance was assessed by
Student's t test for paired samples (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).
|
|
Amphetamine-induced Efflux of MPP+ Is Also Enhanced by
Zinc in Rat Striatal Slices--
The endogenous Zn2+
binding site of the DAT is highly conserved among species orthologues.
We exploited this fact to explore if Zn2+ also facilitated
transport reversal by a DAT expressed in its native environment.
Striatal slices were prepared from rat brain and superfused with KRH in
the presence of EDTA (10 µM) to chelate Zn2+
released due to tissue trauma. As predicted from the experiments carried out on transfected cells (cf. baselines
in Figs. 2-4), Zn2+ alone (free concentration ~10
µM) did not enhance basal
[3H]MPP+ efflux (Fig.
8, open squares, min 2-14).
In contrast, efflux elicited by amphetamine (10 µM) was
enhanced by Zn2+ (Fig. 8, min 14-24). A comparison of four
separate experiments (with slices from two animals) showed that the
difference in area under the curve (mean ± S.D. = 5.85 ± 2.56 and 8.39 ± 3.56%·min for amphetamine and amphetamine plus
Zn2+, respectively) was significantly different
(p = 0.02, t test for paired data). Slice
preparations have technical limitations; transport reversal cannot be
studied under depolarizing conditions in slices, because
Ca2+-induced exocytosis occurs upon depolarization (due to
opening of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and
of glutamatergic and nicotinic ligand-gated ion channels). Hence, it
has not been possible to document the combined effect of depolarization
and Zn2+ in rat striatal slices.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Influence of Zn2+ on
amphetamine-induced [3H]MPP+ efflux in rat
striatal slices. Rat striatal slices were preloaded with
[3H]MPP+ and superfused using KRH
supplemented with EDTA (10 µM), and 2-min fractions were
collected. After three fractions (6 min) of basal efflux, cells were
exposed to KRH containing Zn2+ (20 µM, ),
or left at control conditions ( ). After seven fractions (from 14 min
onward) amphetamine (10 µM) was added. Data are presented
as fractional efflux, i.e. each fraction is expressed as the
percentage of radioactivity present in the slices at the beginning of
that fraction. Symbols represent means ± S.E. of
twelve observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber;
all experiments were performed in triplicate).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
It has generally been assumed that amphetamine,
methylenedioximethamphetamine ("ecstasy") and related drugs
of abuse induce reversal of transport in the monoamine transporters,
because they are substrates for inward transport. The
transporter-mediated influx of such substrate has been considered a
prerequisite for non-exocytotic release of neurotransmitter by reversed
transport. Thus, the core assumption of the facilitated
exchange-diffusion model (23) predicts that the transporter operates
like a revolving door. If this model is correct, inward transport of
amphetamine (or congeners), of the Cl
counterion and of
Na+ is tightly coupled to efflux of neurotransmitter (34).
Conversely, the model of facilitated exchange-diffusion has to be
refuted, if efflux and influx can be separated. In several previous
studies, the kinetics of transport were difficult to reconcile with a
tight coupling of inward and outward transport, but it has proven
difficult to obtain unequivocal evidence against the facilitated
exchange-diffusion model, because it was not possible to separate
inward and outward transport (27, 35).
In the present study we demonstrate that Zn2+ discriminated
between inward and outward transport mediated by hDAT; Zn2+
blocked uptake of substrates but promoted efflux. The actions of
Zn2+ were specific and not accounted for by any site of
action other than the transporter molecule hDAT per se,
because (i) it was abrogated by mutation of a single His residue
Zn2+ (His193) that participates in the
coordination of the transition metal. (ii) Based on the
Zn2+ resistance of hSERT and hNET, we rule out an action on
other cellular Zn2+-binding proteins that are relevant for
establishing the driving force for transport (e.g.
Na+/K+-ATPase (36)). (iii) In hNET, mutational
replacement of Lys189, the residue homologous to
His193 in hDAT, is predicted to result in the formation of
a tridentate coordination sphere for Zn2+, because the
other two residues are conserved at the homologous positions (19, 20).
Accordingly, [3H]MPP+ release was enhanced by
Zn2+ in hNET-K189H. Although qualitatively similar
(i.e. of comparable affinity), the effect of
Zn2+ on hNET-K189H was less pronounced in magnitude than
that on wild type hDAT. Most likely, this difference can be
rationalized by subtle structural and functional differences between
the two transporters. Thus, the observation that Zn2+ can
enhance substrate release while simultaneously blocking substrate uptake invalidates the facilitated exchange-diffusion model.
Zn2+ enhanced MPP+-induced efflux; contrary to
amphetamine, MPP+ cannot enter the cells by simple
diffusion to any appreciable extent. It is therefore conceivable that
binding of the substrate to the extracellular site of the transporter
rather than substrate influx suffices to induce transport reversal.
Accordingly, influx and efflux must represent discrete operational
modes of the transporter.
It has been generally assumed that, under physiological conditions,
monoamine transporters operate exclusively in the inward mode; their
main physiological task is to rapidly remove exocytotically released
neurotransmitter from the synapse (37). The importance of reverse
transport, which results in non-exocytotic,
Ca2+-independent release of neurotransmitter (38), has long
been relegated to pathophysiological situations (e.g.
ischemia, see Ref. 38) or to drug abuse (e.g. amphetamine
derivatives and other psychostimulants, see Ref. 34). However, most
recently, a physiological role was reported for the reverse mode of
operation: Upon excitation of glutamatergic input from the subthalamic
nucleus, dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra release dopamine due to transport reversal. This non-exocytotically released dopamine suffices to support dendrodendritic autoinhibition (6). In many brain
regions, Zn2+ is stored in synaptic vesicles and
co-released together with glutamate; under basal conditions, the
extracellular levels of Zn2+ are low (~10 nM;
see Refs. 39, 40). Upon neuronal stimulation, however, Zn2+
is co-released with the neurotransmitters and, consequently, the free
Zn2+ concentration may transiently reach values that range
from 10-20 µM (10) up to 300 µM (11). The
concentrations of Zn2+ shown in this study, required for
the stimulation of dopamine release (as well as inhibition of uptake),
covered this physiologically relevant range, with maximum stimulation
occurring at 3-30 µM. It is therefore conceivable that
the action of Zn2+ on hDAT does not merely reflect a
biochemical peculiarity but that it is physiologically relevant. This
conjecture is supported by the finding that the facilitating action of
Zn2+ can also be demonstrated in rat striatal slices.
Furthermore, we showed, in transfected cells, that efflux induced by
membrane depolarization is also enhanced by Zn2+.
Interestingly, reversal of the Na+ gradient per
se (by iso-osmotic replacement of Na+ with choline)
was not enhanced by Zn2+. The mechanistic basis for this
discrimination remains obscure, and its implication is unclear, because
in neurons, where DAT is expressed physiologically, there is no
reversal of the Na+ gradient without depolarization.
Transport reversal by depolarization has recently been documented in
neurons ex vivo; it was suggested that the release of
glutamate depolarized the dendrites resulting in transport reversal and
subsequent release of dopamine non-exocytotically from the dendritic
region (6). Thus, when Zn2+ is co-released with glutamate,
it may greatly augment the efflux of dopamine.
Interestingly, the enhancement of substrate-induced release was only
observed for the endogenous Zn2+ binding site; the
engineered Zn2+ binding site in which a His residue was
introduced in TM7 at position 377, i.e. on top of
coordinating His371 (21). Thus, two of the three
coordinating residues (i.e. His371 and
Glu396 in TM8) were the same as in the endogenous
Zn2+ binding site. Because of the distance constraints, the
transition metal ion cannot assume a position that differs vastly from
that in the endogenous Zn2+ binding site. Nevertheless,
Zn2+ failed to enhance outward transport, although inward
transport was potently suppressed. This discrepancy points to a
critical role for extracellular loop 2, which carries
His193 in mediating the action of Zn2+ on
reverse transport. But how can Zn2+ binding concomitantly
lead to inhibition of inward transport and facilitation of outward
transport? Previous data have shown that Zn2+ inhibits
translocation but not substrate binding to the transporter (19). This
led to the conjecture that Zn2+ imposed a conformational
constraint on the transporter, which impeded movements critical for the
translocation process (19). As a result, the turnover rate was
predicted to be diminished with stabilization of the transporter mainly
in a conformation with the substrate binding site open to the
extracellular environment (outward facing conformation (19)). Clearly,
the present data are inconsistent with a simple inhibition of the
transporter turnover rate in the presence of Zn2+. Rather
they suggest that Zn2+ binding facilitates the return step
of the transporter in a way that increases the chances that a substrate
molecule is carried with the transporter from the intracellular to the
extracellular environment. As a net result, the transporter still
primarily accumulates in the outward facing conformation. However, when assessed in a quantitative manner, efflux of MPP+ did not
increase due to an altered affinity of MPP+ for the
transporter from the intracellular side; the increased probability of
outward transport is solely accounted for by the higher efficiency with
which substrate is carried to the extracellular side in the presence of
Zn2+ (Fig. 6). However, Zn2+ cannot per
se induce efflux; thus, substrate needs to be bound simultaneously
at the outward and the inward facing end of the permeation pathway.
This is difficult to envisage if the transporter is viewed as a
monomeric unit that contains a single permeation pore. It may therefore
be interesting to consider the possibility that the transporter does
not operate by a simple alternating access scheme. For example, the
conformational constraint that Zn2+ imposes on the tertiary
structure may facilitate the opening of the alternative pathway that
allows intracellular substrate to permeate through the hydrophobic core
of the transporter. Alternatively, a parsimonious explanation of the
data is the hypothesis that there is only a single path for substrate
but that the functional unit is not the monomeric transporter.
Precedent for oligomeric channels or transporters with more than one
pore per functional unit include Cl
channels (two
pores/homodimer, Ref. 41) and aquaporins (four pores/tetramer, Ref.
42). In the presence of Zn2+, binding of extracellular
substrate to one transporter favors translocation of intracellular
substrate by the second transporter unit in the oligomer. This scheme
is supported by the fact that transporters constitutively form
oligomers (43, 44). Based on this model, mutants that are defective in
oligomerization ought to be incapable of supporting reverse transport.
This prediction is currently being explored.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the Austrian Science Foundation
(Grant P-14509 to H. H. S, Grant P-15034 to M. F.), by the Danish Natural Science Research Council, by National Institutes of Health Grant P01-DA-12408, by the Lundbeck Foundation, and by the NOVO Nordisk Foundation (to U. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.:
43-1-4277-64188; Fax: 43-1-4277-64122; E-mail:
harald.sitte@univie.ac.at.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112265200
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
hDAT, human dopamine
transporter;
hNET, human norepinephrine transporter;
hSERT, human
serotonin transporter;
HEK-293, human embryonic kidney 293 cells;
MPP+, 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium;
wt, wild type;
TM, transmembrane segment;
CMV, cytomegalovirus.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Rudnick, G.
(1997)
in
Neurotransmitter Transporters: Structure, Function, and Regulation
(Reith, M. E. A., ed)
, pp. 73-100, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
|
| 2.
|
Nelson, N.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
71,
1785-1803[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Iversen, L.
(2000)
Mol. Psychiatry
5,
357-362[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Seiden, L. S.,
Sabol, K. E.,
and Ricaurte, G. A.
(1993)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
33,
639-677[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Levi, G.,
and Raiteri, M.
(1993)
Trends. Neurosci.
16,
415-419[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Falkenburger, B. H.,
Barstow, K. L.,
and Mintz, I. M.
(2001)
Science
293,
2465-2470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Perez-Clausell, J.,
and Danscher, G.
(1985)
Brain Res.
337,
91-98[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Berneis, K. H.,
Pletscher, A.,
and Da Prada, M.
(1969)
Nature
224,
281-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Howell, G. A.,
Welch, M. G.,
and Frederickson, C. J.
(1984)
Nature
308,
736-738[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Vogt, K.,
Mellor, J.,
Tong, G.,
and Nicoll, R.
(2000)
Neuron
26,
187-196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Assaf, S. Y.,
and Chung, S. H.
(1984)
Nature
308,
734-736[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Koh, J. Y.,
Suh, S. W.,
Gwag, B. J., He, Y. Y.,
Hsu, C. Y.,
and Choi, D. W.
(1996)
Science
272,
1013-1016[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
Westbrook, G. L.,
and Mayer, M. L.
(1987)
Nature
328,
640-643[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Laube, B.,
Kuhse, J.,
Rundstrom, N.,
Kirsch, J.,
Schmieden, V.,
and Betz, H.
(1995)
J. Physiol.
483,
613-619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Vandenberg, R. J.,
Mitrovic, A. D.,
and Johnston, G. A.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
54,
189-196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Schetz, J. A.,
Chu, A.,
and Sibley, D. R.
(1999)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
289,
956-964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Spiridon, M.,
Kamm, D.,
Billups, B.,
Mobbs, P.,
and Attwell, D.
(1998)
J. Physiol.
506,
363-376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Richfield, E. K.
(1993)
Mol. Pharmacol.
43,
100-108[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Norregaard, L.,
Frederiksen, D.,
Nielsen, E. O.,
and Gether, U.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4266-4273[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Loland, C. J.,
Norregaard, L.,
and Gether, U.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
36928-36934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Norregaard, L.,
Visiers, I.,
Loland, C. J.,
Ballesteros, J.,
Weinstein, H.,
and Gether, U.
(2000)
Biochemistry
39,
15836-15846[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
MacAulay, N.,
Bendahan, A.,
Loland, C. J.,
Zeuthen, T.,
Kanner, B. I.,
and Gether, U.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
40476-40485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Fischer, J. F.,
and Cho, A. K.
(1979)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
208,
203-209[Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Giros, B.,
el Mestikawy, S.,
Bertrand, L.,
and Caron, M. G.
(1991)
FEBS Lett.
295,
149-154[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Ramamoorthy, S.,
Bauman, A. L.,
Moore, K. R.,
Han, H.,
Yang, F. T.,
Chang, A. S.,
Ganapathy, V.,
and Blakely, R. D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
2542-2546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Chen, C.,
and Okayama, H.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2745-2752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Sitte, H. H.,
Hiptmair, B.,
Zwach, J.,
Pifl, C.,
Singer, E. A.,
and Scholze, P.
(2001)
Mol. Pharmacol.
59,
1129-1137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Scholze, P.,
Sitte, H. H.,
and Singer, E. A.
(2001)
Neurosci. Lett.
309,
173-176[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Javitch, J. A.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1985)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
106,
455-456
|
| 30.
|
Buck, K. J.,
and Amara, S. G.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12584-12588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Cesura, A. M.,
Ritter, A.,
Picotti, G. B.,
and Da Prada, M.
(1987)
J. Neurochem.
49,
138-145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Pifl, C.,
Drobny, H.,
Reither, H.,
Hornykiewicz, O.,
and Singer, E. A.
(1995)
Mol. Pharmacol.
47,
368-373[Abstract]
|
| 33.
|
Valenta, B.,
Drobny, H.,
and Singer, E. A.
(1988)
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
245,
944-949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Sitte, H. H.,
Huck, S.,
Reither, H.,
Boehm, S.,
Singer, E. A.,
and Pifl, C.
(1998)
J. Neurochem.
71,
1289-1297[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Pifl, C.,
and Singer, E. A.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
56,
1047-1054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Hexum, T. D.
(1974)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
23,
3441-3447[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Povlock, S. L.,
and Amara, S. G.
(1997)
in
Neurotransmitter transporters: Structure, Function, and Regulation
(Reith, M. E. A., ed)
, pp. 1-28, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
|
| 38.
|
Attwell, D.,
Barbour, B.,
and Szatkowski, M.
(1993)
Neuron
11,
401-407[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Frederickson, C. J.,
Howell, G. A.,
and Kaserkis, E. J.
(1984)
Neurology and Neurobiology
, Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York
|
| 40.
|
Frederickson, C. J.
(1989)
Int. Rev. Neurobiol.
31,
145-238[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Dutzler, R.,
Campbell, E. B.,
Cadene, M.,
Chait, B. T.,
and MacKinnon, R.
(2002)
Nature
415,
287-294[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Sui, H.,
Han, B. G.,
Lee, J. K.,
Walian, P.,
and Jap, B. K.
(2001)
Nature
414,
872-878[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Schmid, J. A.,
Scholze, P.,
Kudlacek, O.,
Freissmuth, M.,
Singer, E. A.,
and Sitte, H. H.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
3805-3810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Hastrup, H.,
Karlin, A.,
and Javitch, J. A.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
10055-10060[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

