JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M112265200 on April 8, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21505-21513, June 14, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/24/21505    most recent
M112265200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scholze, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sitte, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scholze, P.
Right arrow Articles by Sitte, H. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Role of Zinc Ions in Reverse Transport Mediated by Monoamine Transporters*

Petra ScholzeDagger , Lene Nørregaard§, Ernst A. SingerDagger , Michael FreissmuthDagger , Ulrik Gether§, and Harald H. SitteDagger

From the Dagger  Institute of Pharmacology, University of Vienna, Währingerstrasse 13a, A-1090 Vienna, Austria and the § Molecular Neuropharmacology Group, Department of Pharmacology, The Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark

Received for publication, December 21, 2001, and in revised form, April 5, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The human dopamine transporter (hDAT) contains an endogenous high affinity Zn2+ binding site with three coordinating residues on its extracellular face (His193, His375, and Glu396). Upon binding to this site, Zn2+ causes inhibition of [3H]1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ([3H]MPP+) uptake. We investigated the effect of Zn2+ on outward transport by superfusing hDAT-expressing HEK-293 cells preloaded with [3H]MPP+. Although Zn2+ inhibited uptake, Zn2+ facilitated [3H]MPP+ release induced by amphetamine, MPP+, or K+-induced depolarization specifically at hDAT but not at the human serotonin and the norepinephrine transporter (hNET). Mutation of the Zn2+ coordinating residue His193 to Lys (the corresponding residue in hNET) eliminated the effect of Zn2+ on efflux. Conversely, the reciprocal mutation (K189H) conferred Zn2+ sensitivity to hNET. The intracellular [3H]MPP+ concentration was varied to generate saturation isotherms; these showed that Zn2+ increased Vmax for efflux (rather than KM-Efflux-intracellular). Thus, blockage of inward transport by Zn2+ is not due to a simple inhibition of the transporter turnover rate. The observations provide evidence against the model of facilitated exchange-diffusion and support the concept that inward and outward transport represent discrete operational modes of the transporter. In addition, they indicate a physiological role of Zn2+, because Zn2+ also facilitated transport reversal of DAT in rat striatal slices.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The principal physiological action of the monoamine transporters is the removal of synaptically released neurotransmitter by a sodium-driven secondary-active transport mechanism (1). The transporters are situated primarily in the presynaptic membrane and include the transporters for dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin (hDAT,1 hNET, and hSERT, respectively) (1). These transporters form a subfamily within the large class of Na+/Cl--coupled transporters (2). Monoamine transporters have been the focus of intensive research, in particular because they represent targets for clinically important therapeutics, e.g. antidepressant drugs (3), which increase the availability of serotonin and/or norepinephrine by blocking reuptake. Moreover, drugs of abuse such as amphetamine and cocaine target these transporters (4).

It has been well known that the monoamine transporters are not only capable of sodium-dependent transmembrane uptake but also of reverse transport of their substrate (5). Substrate efflux can be observed upon membrane depolarization, if the transmembrane sodium gradient is abrogated, or it can be elicited by extracellular substrates. The latter mechanism is thought to underlie the addictive and reinforcing properties of amphetamine derivatives (4). Furthermore, excitation of glutamatergic receptors at dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra induces reverse operation of hDAT; this contributes to important autoinhibitory effects mediated by the dopamine D2-receptors to regulate overstimulatory inputs of the subthalamic nucleus (6). This novel evidence indicates a critical physiological role for reverse transport; thus, monoamine transporters mediate both inwardly and outwardly directed fluxes of monoamine in the brain.

The bivalent cation Zn2+ is widely distributed in the central nervous system (7). Zn2+ serves as a chelated counter ion for stored neurotransmitters in synaptic vesicles (8) and, upon nerve stimulation, Zn2+ is co-released with the neurotransmitter (9). The same can be observed under pathological conditions, i.e. in brain ischemia. Physiologically, the extracellular concentration of Zn2+ may reach 10-20 µM (10), and these levels may further rise up to 300 µM in pathological situations (9, 11, 12). The release of Zn2+ is very interesting, because the activity of several neurotransmitter receptors and transporters are modulated by micromolar concentrations of Zn2+ (13-16). For example, Zn2+ has recently been reported to block transport-associated ion currents through glutamate transporter subtypes (salamander excitatory amino acid transporter (17) and EAAT1 (15)). Moreover, Zn2+ was found to enhance binding of cocaine analogues to and inhibit uptake of dopamine by synaptosomal membranes (18), an effect that is accounted for by direct binding of Zn2+ to hDAT (19).

The high affinity Zn2+ binding site in wild type hDAT was mapped to three coordinating residues situated on the extracellular face of the transporter, His193 in the large extracellular loop between transmembrane segment (TM) 3 and 4, His375 at the external end of TM 7 and Glu396 at the external end of TM 8 (19, 20). The inhibitory effect on uptake suggests that, by binding to the transporter, Zn2+ constrains relative movements between extracellular loop 2, TM 7, and TM 8 that are critical for the translocation process. Moreover, due to the strict geometric requirements for binding the small zinc(II) ion, and based on several additional engineered Zn2+ binding sites in hDAT, it became possible to deduce a model of the tertiary structure in a putative TM 7/8 microdomain (21). Finally, a simple exchange of corresponding amino acids resulted in the transfer of the high affinity binding properties to the hNET (19, 20) and to the more distantly related rat gamma -aminobutyric acid (GABA) transporter (22). This reveals strong support toward an evolutionary conserved motif in the tertiary structure of Na+/Cl--dependent transporters highly relevant for the translocation process.

The mechanistic basis for transport reversal is poorly understood. Earlier models compared the transporter to a revolving door, which mediates influx or efflux provided that there is a driving force, i.e. the gradient of Na+ and substrate (23). In this model of facilitated exchange-diffusion, inward and outward transport are stoichiometrically linked events and, thus, strictly coupled. Hence, the model predicts that inhibition of influx must result in reduced efflux. Here, we have exploited the ability of Zn2+ to bind specifically to the dopamine transporter to demonstrate that inward and outward transport represent discrete operational modes of a sodium-coupled transporter. Our results show that physiologically relevant concentrations of Zn2+ enhance reverse transport by hDAT (but not by hNET or hSERT), although uptake is blocked. This presumably has physiological implications, because a regulation of dopamine transport by Zn2+ can be recapitulated in striatal slices.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Molecular Biology and Transfection-- cDNA encoding the hDAT and hNET in pRC/CMV were kindly provided by Dr. M. G. Caron (Duke University, Durham, NC (24)); cDNA encoding the hSERT in pcDNA3 (25) was a generous gift of Dr. R. D. Blakely (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN). A detailed description of the hDAT mutant as well as the hNET mutant is given in the recent publications of Norregaard et al. (19) and Loland et al. (20). Stable and/or transient expression of the desired cDNAs in HEK-293 cells was achieved by transfection using the CaPO4-precipitation method (26). Alternatively, LipofectAMINE Plus was used according to the manufacturer's description (Invitrogen). Stable transfected cell lines were grown essentially as described previously (27). At least two different stable cell lines were tested to exclude clonal effects.

Uptake Experiments-- The experiments were performed as described previously (28). In brief, 5 × 105 HEK-293 cells transiently or permanently expressing the hDAT, hNET, hSERT, or mutants were seeded onto poly-D-lysine-coated 48-well plates, and influx was measured 1-2 days after plating. Each well was washed once with 0.5 ml of KRH buffer (Krebs-Ringer-Hepes buffer; Hepes 10 mM, NaCl 120 mM, KCl 3 mM, CaCl2 2 mM, MgCl2 2 mM, glucose 20 mM, final pH 7.4, room temperature). The cells were incubated with [3H]1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ([3H]MPP+, 0.2 µCi, 88.5 Ci/mmol) and various concentrations of unlabeled MPP+ (range: 0.03-300 µM; final volume: 0.1 ml), a well-known substrate of monoamine transporters (Refs. 29-31; see Table I). This uptake was temperature-dependent and sensitive to co-incubation with the non-selective uptake blocker cocaine (100 µM) as well as more specific uptake blockers like nomifensine, nisoxetine, and paroxetine (hDAT, hNET, and hSERT, respectively). After 8 min at room temperature, uptake was terminated rapidly by removal of buffer and washing with 0.5 ml of ice-cold buffer. Cells were lysed with 0.5 ml of 1% SDS and transferred into scintillation vials for liquid scintillation counting. The experiments shown in Fig. 1 were conducted after a preincubation period of 5 min using a constant concentration of [3H]MPP+ (50 nM).

Superfusion Experiments-- We used a superfusion system, which allows for the continuous monitoring of the efflux of substrate from appropriately transfected cells after preloading with radiolabeled substrate (32). Because released substrate is washed away immediately, the confounding effects of ongoing reuptake are minimized by the superfusion system (28). In brief, cells were grown overnight on round glass coverslips (5-mm diameter, 4 × 105 cells per coverslip) then incubated with [3H]MPP+ (0.8 µCi, final concentration 10 µM) for 20 min at 37 °C in 0.1 ml of KRH. Coverslips were then transferred to small superfusion chambers (0.2 ml) and superfused with KRH buffer (25 °C, 0.7 ml × min-1) as described (27). A washout period of 40 min established a stable baseline for efflux of radioactivity; thereafter, the experiment was started with the collection of fractions (2 or 4 min). At the end of the experiment, cells were lysed in 1% SDS.

To obtain quantitative data on efflux, the cells were incubated with a range of different [3H]MPP+ concentrations (2-128 µM). Intracellular [3H]MPP+ concentrations were calculated using the accumulated radioactivity in the cells, a cell number of 27,000 per glass coverslip, and a cell volume of 1.08 pl/cell ± 0.12 (mean ± S.E. of four independent determinations; [3H]H2O-[14C]inulin method (27)).

In experiments in which high K+ was used or Na+ was omitted, NaCl was iso-osmotically replaced by KCl or choline chloride, respectively.

Female Sprague-Dawley rats (200-250 g, Forschungsanstalt für Versuchstierzucht, Himberg, Austria) were used to perform ex vivo experiments (see also Ref. 33). In brief: After decapitation and removal of the brain, striata were prepared and cut into 0.3-mm-thick slices using a McIlwain tissue chopper. The slices were then incubated for 60 min at 37 °C in 0.5 ml of KRH containing 0.25 µM [3H]MPP+, washed twice, and inserted into the superfusion chambers; KRH was supplemented with 10 µM EDTA, and the slices were superfused at 25 °C and at a flow of 0.7 ml/min. This washout period of 60 min served to establish a stable basal efflux of radioactivity and to chelate free zinc; superfusate samples were collected at 2-min intervals. Under the given EDTA concentration, Zn2+ was added at 20 µM resulting in a concentration of 10 µM free Zn2+. At the end of the experiment, the slices were homogenized in 1.2 ml of KRH by sonication (Branson sonifier B 15; Branson Sonic Power, Danbury, CT).

Tritium in the superfusate fractions, the SDS cell lysates, and slice homogenates was determined by liquid scintillation counting. Release of 3H label is expressed as a fractional rate, i.e. the radioactivity released during a fraction was expressed as the percentage of the total radioactivity present in the cells at the beginning of that fraction.

Chemicals-- Tissue culture reagents were from Invitrogen Life Technologies. [3H]MPP+ was from Invitrogen (Boston, MA). D-Amphetamine was kindly donated by SmithKline & French (Welwyn Garden City, Herts, UK). Cocaine HCl was from Dolda AG (Basel, Switzerland). Unlabeled MPP+ was from Research Biochemicals International (Natick, MA). All other chemicals were from commercial sources.

Data Calculation-- Vmax, Km, EC50, and IC50 values were calculated by performing non-linear regression analysis using Prism 3.02 fitting and plotting software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Statistical significance was evaluated by Student's t test (paired or unpaired as appropriate).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Zinc Inhibits Uptake of MPP+ at the hDAT wt Only with High Affinity-- Previous observations showed that Zn2+ blocked uptake of [3H]dopamine by hDAT, because it interacted with an endogenous Zn2+ binding site (19). In the present study, we used [3H]MPP+ as a substrate rather than dopamine for the following reasons: (i) [3H]MPP+ is metabolically stable, i.e. resistant to degradation by monoamine oxidase, and hydrophilic such that it is trapped within the cell; back diffusion does not confound the interpretation of uptake and, more importantly, of release experiments from preloaded cells. (ii) Because diffusion is minimal, it is, in addition, possible to preload the cells and to determine the intracellular concentration, an advantage that is instrumental if the kinetics of reverse transport are to be analyzed (see below). (iii) [3H]MPP+ is a substrate for all monoamine transporters (i.e. DAT, NET, SERT); thus, it is ideally suited for a comparative analysis. Fig. 1 illustrates the effect of Zn2+ on uptake of [3H]MPP+ by hDAT (Fig. 1A), hNET (Fig. 1B) and hSERT (Fig. 1C). As expected, Zn2+ only blocked hDAT with high affinity (squares in Fig. 1A) whereas uptake by wild type hNET (circles in Fig. 1B) and hSERT (Fig. 1C) required concentrations of Zn2+ that exceeded 100 µM. The endogenous Zn2+ binding site of hDAT was previously mapped, and His193 on the extracellular loop 2 was shown to be of critical importance in forming the coordination sphere. If the binding of Zn2+ to hDAT was impeded by substituting His193 with Lys (i.e. the residue found in the corresponding position of hNET), high affinity inhibition was abrogated and Zn2+ suppressed uptake with a monophasic low affinity inhibition curve (triangles in Fig. 1A). Conversely, the corresponding mutation in hNET (i.e. replacing Lys189 with His) conferred high affinity inhibition by Zn2+ to hNET (triangles in Fig. 1B). The Km values for [3H]MPP+ transport as well as IC50 values for Zn2+ are summarized in Table I. Based on these data we conclude that transport of [3H]MPP+ faithfully reproduces the data previously obtained by evaluating the Zn2+ sensitivity of monoamine transporters using their endogenous substrates (19); it is also safe to conclude from the available evidence that Zn2+ suppresses the transport of all substrates by hDAT.


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   . Effects of Zn2+ on the uptake of [3H]MPP+ by monoamine transporters and mutant constructs. HEK-293 cells expressing wild type monoamine transporters and mutant constructs were distributed in 48-well plates (5 × 105 cells). The washed cells were preincubated in Krebs-Ringer-Hepes (KRH) buffer (0.1 ml) containing Zn2+ in the concentrations indicated. After 5 min, the buffer was replaced by KRH containing Zn2+ and [3H]MPP+ (50 nM). After 8 min at room temperature, uptake was terminated and radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting. For Km, Influx and IC50 values see Table I. A: hDAT wt, black-square; hDAT-H193K, black-triangle. B: hNET wt, ; hNET-K189H, black-down-triangle . C: hSERT wt, black-diamond . Data represent means ± S.E. of three to six experiments performed in triplicate.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Kinetic constants of [3H]MPP+ uptake in HEK-293 cells expressing monoamine transporters and mutant constructs
HEK-293 cells expressing wild type monoamine transporters, and mutant constructs were distributed in 48-well plates (5 × 105 cells). For determination of the KM Influx values, the washed cells were incubated in Krebs-Ringer-Hepes buffer (0.1 ml) containing [3H]MPP+ (0.2 µCi, specific activity 88.5 Ci/mmol) and various concentrations of unlabeled MPP+ (range: 0.03-300 µM). For determination of IC50 zinc values, Zn2+ was added 5 min prior to [3H]MPP+ (50 nM). After 8 min at room temperature, uptake was terminated and radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting. KM Influx and IC50 values were calculated from non-linear regression analysis of uptake data and represent mean values ± S.E. (numbers in parentheses denote number of experimental observations performed in triplicate).

Zinc Enhances Efflux Induced by Amphetamine at hDAT-- Because Zn2+ inhibited uptake of [3H]MPP+ at the hDAT, a similar blockage was to be anticipated for release if efflux simply reflected reversal of transport. This was not the case. Cells that expressed hDAT were preloaded with [3H]MPP+. Upon challenge with a maximally effective concentration of amphetamine (10 µM), transport reversal was induced and this resulted in release of [3H]MPP+ (Fig. 2A). Surprisingly, this amphetamine-elicited efflux was markedly enhanced, rather than inhibited, by the addition of 10 µM Zn2+ to the superfusion buffer (Fig. 2A, open squares). We stress that Zn2+ per se did not affect basal efflux (Fig. 2A). The modulatory effect of Zn2+ was lost upon mutational exchange of all three coordinating residues (hDAT-H193K-H375A-E396Q, n = 3, data not shown). In fact, mutation of a single residue, namely His193 to Lys (the corresponding residue found in hNET), sufficed to abolish the enhancing effect of Zn2+; the extent of amphetamine-elicited release was comparable in hDAT-H193K-expressing cells (cf. closed symbols in Fig. 2, A and B). However, Zn2+ did not affect transport reversal to any appreciable extent (open symbols, Fig. 2B).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Influence of Zn2+ on amphetamine-induced [3H]MPP+ efflux. Cells were preloaded with [3H]MPP+ and superfused upon reaching a stable baseline (basal efflux: mean of the three fractions before drug addition; hDAT wt: panel A, black-square/, basal efflux: 0.247 ± 0.004%·min-1, i.e. 245.6 ± 6.7 dpm·min-1, n = 60 observations of randomly chosen experiments performed on different days; hDAT-H193K: panel B; black-triangle/triangle , basal [3H]MPP+ efflux: 0.433 ± 0.08%·min-1, i.e. 181.2 ± 7.1 dpm·min-1, n = 47; hNET wt: panel C, /open circle , basal [3H]MPP+ efflux: 0.087 ± 0.004%·min-1, i.e. 125.9 ± 5.3 dpm·min-1, n = 60; hNET-K189H: panel D, black-down-triangle /down-triangle, basal [3H]MPP+ efflux for hNET-K189H: 0.147 ± 0.006%·min-1, i.e. 185.2 ± 8.2 dpm·min-1, n = 56). The experiment was started with the collection of 4-min fractions. After three fractions (12 min) of basal efflux, cells were exposed to Zn2+ (10 µM), or left at control conditions as indicated. After six fractions (from 24 min and onward), amphetamine (panels A and B: 10 µM, panels C and D: 1 µM) was added to all superfusion channels. After nine fractions (from 36 min and onward), all channels were switched back to control conditions. Data are presented as fractional efflux, i.e. each fraction is expressed as the percentage of radioactivity present in the cells at the beginning of that fraction. Symbols represent means ± S.E. of six to twelve observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber; all experiments were performed in triplicate).

In contrast to wild type hDAT, release from cells expressing the hNET was not affected by co-application of Zn2+ (Fig. 2C). We have exploited this insensitivity to ask if Zn2+-enhanced outward transport was conferred to hNET upon replacement of Lys189 by the appropriate Zn2+ coordinating ligand (i.e. His). In fact, in cells expressing hNET-K189H, Zn2+ promoted efflux that had been induced by amphetamine (open symbols in Fig. 2D); although the effect was less pronounced than that seen with hDAT wt. Finally, Zn2+ did not affect amphetamine-induced release of [3H]MPP+ via hSERT, and cocaine (100 µM) completely inhibited amphetamine-driven efflux mediated by wild type and mutant transporters irrespective of the presence or absence of Zn2+ (data not shown).

We tested Zn2+ over a wide concentration range; up to 300 µM, Zn2+ did not affect basal release of [3H]MPP+ from preloaded cells that expressed hDAT, hNET, or hSERT (see inset to Fig. 3). Because the physiological significance of higher concentrations is questionable, we did not further investigate the discrepancy between basal release through hSERT and hNET-K189H, which was not affected by 1 mM Zn2+ (see Fig. 3, inset) and efflux through hDAT wt, hNET wt, and hDAT-H193K, which was stimulated to some extent by 1 mM Zn2+ (see Fig. 3, inset).


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   . Concentration-response relationship of amphetamine and Zn2+ induced [3H]MPP+ release. HEK-293 cells expressing hDAT wt (black-square; [amphetamine]: 10 µM), hDAT-H193K (black-triangle; [amphetamine]: 10 µM), hNET wt (; [amphetamine]: 1 µM), hNET-K189H (black-down-triangle ; [amphetamine]: 1 µM), or hSERT wt (black-diamond ; [amphetamine]: 10µM; basal [3H]MPP+ efflux: 0.224 ± 0.007%·min-1, i.e. 243.8 ± 10.9 dpm·min-1, n = 40) were preloaded with [3H]MPP+ and superfused, and 2-min fractions were collected. After three fractions (6 min) of basal efflux, cells were exposed to Zn2+ or left at control conditions. After seven fractions (from 14 min onward), amphetamine was added to all superfusion channels for the following five fractions. Vefflux/Vefflux 0 values were generated by division of the value (mean of the last 6 min of fraction collection) in the presence of amphetamine and Zn2+ by the value in the absence of Zn2+. Inset, influence of Zn2+ on basal [3H]MPP+ efflux. The fractional rates of Zn2+-related [3H]MPP+ efflux were generated by subtraction of the value of basal efflux (mean of the first 6 min of fraction collection under control conditions) from the value of efflux in the presence of Zn2+. Symbols represent means ± S.E. of six to ten observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber; all experiments were performed in duplicate).

In the presence of amphetamine, the efflux-enhancing effect of Zn2+ at hDAT-expressing cells was concentration-dependent; maximum enhancement was observed at 3 to 30 µM Zn2+; higher concentrations caused inhibition of efflux resulting in a bell-shaped concentration-response curve (squares in Fig. 3). A reasonably similar bell-shaped curve was observed if the effect of Zn2+ was evaluated on amphetamine-induced efflux through hNET-K189H (downward triangles in Fig. 3). In contrast, over a similar concentration range, Zn2+ did not enhance efflux in HEK-293 cells expressing hDAT-H193K, hNET wt, or hSERT wt (upward triangles, circles, and diamonds, respectively, in Fig. 3).

Efflux Induced by the Substrate MPP+ Is Also Enhanced by Zinc-- At a concentration that caused a substantial inhibition of inward transport by hDAT wt (10 µM, see Fig. 1A), Zn2+ promoted outward transport. Thus, the data presented so far suggested that, in the presence of Zn2+, inward transport of amphetamine was not a prerequisite for release. In other words, we surmised that sole binding of substrate on the extracellular side, rather than binding and inward transport, sufficed to initiate transport reversal (provided that there is enough substrate on the intracellular side). However, amphetamine is notorious for its ability to accumulate in cells by diffusion. Because the pKa of amphetamine is close to the extracellular pH, the modest transmembrane pH gradient is sufficient to trap protonated amphetamine within the cell. Zn2+-promoted efflux may thus also result from an additional effect of amphetamine that arises from an intracellular site of action. To rule out this possibility, we have employed MPP+ to verify our conjecture. Because MPP+ is a substrate for monoamine transporters, the compound can also induce reverse transport albeit less efficiently than amphetamine (34). In cells that had been preloaded with [3H]MPP+, Zn2+ markedly enhanced efflux induced by MPP+ only if the cells expressed hDAT wt (open symbols in Fig. 4A) or hNET-K189H (open symbols in Fig. 4D). It is, however, evident from Fig. 4 (B and C) that efflux through hDAT-H193K and hNET wt, respectively, was essentially identical in the absence and presence of Zn2+. The same was true for hSERT wt (data not shown). Thus, the results obtained with MPP+-induced outward transport of [3H]MPP+ also supported the interpretation that release does not require inward transport of substrate.


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Influence of Zn2+ on MPP+ induced [3H]MPP+-efflux. Time course of the effects of Zn2+ on MPP+-induced efflux from HEK-293 cells expressing hDAT wt (A, black-square/ ), hDAT-H193K (B, black-triangle/triangle ), hNET wt (C, /open circle ), or hNET-K189H (D, black-down-triangle /down-triangle). Cells were preloaded with [3H]MPP+ and superfused, and 4-min fractions were collected. After three fractions (12 min) of basal efflux, cells were exposed to Zn2+ (10 µM), or left at control conditions as indicated. After six fractions (from 24 min onward), MPP+ (100 µM) was added to all superfusion channels. After nine fractions (from 36 min and onward) all channels were switched back to control conditions. Data are presented as fractional efflux, i.e. each fraction is expressed as the percentage of radioactivity present in the cells at the beginning of that fraction. Symbols represent means ± S.E. of six to twelve observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber; all experiments were performed in triplicate).

An Artificially Introduced Zinc Binding Site Cannot Replace the Endogenous Binding Site in hDAT wt-- The effect of Zn2+ could be conferred hNET by introducing a Zn2+ binding site; however, this Zn2+ binding site was created at a position homologous to that of the endogenous Zn2+ binding site of hDAT. We have therefore also addressed the specificity of the endogenous Zn2+ binding site by testing if Zn2+ promoted release indiscriminately, provided that it was bound on the extracellular surface of hDAT. We analyzed a mutant hDAT that contained an engineered Zn2+ binding site: In this mutant, His193 was changed to Lys and a new Zn2+ coordinating histidine was inserted in position 377 resulting in a tridentate Zn2+ binding site with His375, His377, and Glu396 as coordinating residues (21). This mutant transported [3H]MPP+ with a Km that was comparable to wt hDAT (Table I). Contrary to hDAT wt, in this hDAT-H193K-V377H, the inhibition curve for Zn2+ was monophasic (triangles in Fig. 5A). This discrepancy possibly reflects the fact that the engineered Zn2+ binding site had a less favorable geometry; thus the low affinity, inhibitory component was less resolved from the newly created high affinity component to allow for a robust biphasic curve fitting and hence resolution of two sites. Nevertheless, a fit to the overall inhibition curve gives a minimum estimate for the inhibitory potency of Zn2+ on [3H]MPP+ uptake (IC50 = 12.4 µM; see Table I). Most importantly, the engineered Zn2+ binding site failed to support enhancement of amphetamine induced efflux (Fig. 5B).


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   The influence of Zn2+ on uptake and efflux of [3H]MPP+ in a mutant dopamine transporter that contains an artificially engineered Zn2+ binding site. A, uptake of [3H]MPP+ by HEK-293 cells expressing hDAT-H193K-V377H in the presence of Zn2+; for comparison, see uptake inhibition by Zn2+ at hDAT wt (dotted line) and hDAT-H193K (dashed line). For experimental details, see legend to Fig. 1A. Symbols represent data obtained in three independent determinations ± S.E. (performed in duplicate). B, amphetamine (10 µM) induced efflux from HEK-293 cells expressing hDAT wt, hDAT-H193K-V377H, and hDAT-H193K in the presence or absence of Zn2+. The cells were preloaded with [3H]MPP+ and superfused, and 2-min fractions were collected. After three fractions (6 min) of basal efflux, cells were exposed to Zn2+, or left at control conditions. After seven fractions (from 14 min onward) amphetamine was added to all superfusion channels for the following five fractions. Release is expressed as the percentage of that induced in the presence of amphetamine alone. Bars represent means ± S.E. of six observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber; all experiments were performed in duplicate).

Quantitative Aspects of Zinc Enhancing Amphetamine-induced Efflux of MPP+-- The enhancement exerted by Zn2+ may reflect a change in substrate affinity at the intracellular binding site of the transporter. Alternatively, Zn2+ may enhance the efficiency of reverse transport. To differentiate between these two possibilities, we preloaded the cells with varying amounts of [3H]MPP+ and estimated the intracellular concentration by correcting for the cellular water space. Efflux of [3H]MPP+ was induced by amphetamine (10 µM) in HEK-293 cells that expressed hDAT wt, hDAT-H193K, and hNET wt. The resulting saturation isotherm showed that Zn2+ (10 µM) clearly enhanced the Vmax of outwardly directed transport induced by amphetamine only at the hDAT wt (Fig. 6A). In contrast, the Km, EFFLUX was not affected by Zn2+ (Table II). As expected, Zn2+ did neither affect Vmax for outward transport of [3H]MPP+ nor Km, EFFLUX in hDAT-H193K and hNET wt (Fig. 6, B and C).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Quantitative measurements of amphetamine induced [3H]MPP+ release in the presence or absence of Zn2+. Cells were preloaded with different concentrations of [3H]MPP+ (2-128 µM) and superfused. According to the experimental protocol given in the legend to Table II, the cells were challenged with amphetamine in the presence or absence of Zn2+. Efflux rates (VEFFLUX, pmol/106 cells/min) were calculated from the mean value of the last three fractions with subtraction of basal efflux (first three fractions), with a number of 27,000 cells/coverslip and an intracellular volume of 1.1 pl (see "Methods"). A, hDAT wt (in the presence (black-square) or absence () of Zn2+). B, hDAT-H193K (in the presence (black-triangle) or absence (triangle ) of Zn2+). C, hNET wt (in the presence () or absence (open circle ) of Zn2+). Each symbol represents one observation of three to six experiments (all experiments were performed in duplicate).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Kinetic constants of [3H]MPP+ efflux performed with HEK-293 cells expressing monoamine transporters and mutant constructs
HEK-293 cells expressing wild type monoamine transporters and mutant constructs were seeded onto glass-coverslips in 96-well plates (4 × 105 cells), loaded with different concentrations of [3H]MPP+ (final concentration range, 2-128 µM), and superfused. Upon reaching a stable baseline, the experiment was started with the collection of 4-min fractions. After three fractions (12 min) of basal efflux, cells were exposed to Zn2+ (10 µM), or left at control conditions. After six fractions (from 24 min and onward), amphetamine (hDAT wt, hDAT-H193K: 10 µM, hNET wt: 1 µM) was added to all superfusion channels. Efflux rates (VEfflux; pmol/106 cells/min) were calculated from the mean value of the last three fractions with subtraction of basal efflux (first three fractions), with a number of 27,000 cells/coverslip and an intracellular volume of 1.1 pl (see "Methods"). Vmax,Efflux and KM Efflux values were calculated from non-linear regression analysis of release data and represent mean values ± S.E. (three to six experimental observations performed in duplicate).

Efflux of MPP+ Induced by Depolarizing Conditions Is Also Enhanced by Zinc-- Although widely studied, drug-induced transport reversal does not reflect a physiological phenomenon. Under physiological conditions, transport reversal may be induced by Na+ influx (e.g. due to membrane depolarization). Alternatively, in brain ischemia, the transmembrane Na+ gradient dissipates because of ATP depletion, which prevents Na+ extrusion, and glutamate release, which promotes Na+ entry. To test if facilitation of efflux by Zn2+ is physiologically relevant, we removed extracellular Na+, and we depolarized the cells by eliminating the K+ gradient. Efflux induced by iso-osmotic replacement of Na+ by choline was neither enhanced by Zn2+ (10 µM) at the hDAT wt nor at the mutant hDAT-H193K (data not shown). In contrast, the efflux elicited by elevating the extracellular K+ concentration (from 3 to 120 mM) was significantly enhanced in the presence of Zn2+ (10 µM) at the hDAT wt (Fig. 7A); as expected, this facilitation of transport reversal was not seen with the mutant form hDAT-H193K (Fig. 7B).


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Influence of Zn2+ on [3H]MPP+ efflux-induced high potassium conditions. Time course of the effects of Zn2+ on MPP+-induced efflux from HEK-293 cells expressing hDAT wt (A, black-square/) or hDAT-H193K (B, black-triangle/triangle ). Cells expressing hDAT wt (A, black-square/) or hDAT-H193K (B, black-triangle/triangle ) were preloaded with [3H]MPP+ and superfused, and 2-min fractions were collected. After three fractions (6 min) of basal efflux, cells were exposed to Zn2+ (10 µM), or left at control conditions as indicated. After seven fractions (from 14 min onward), buffer conditions were changed from KRH containing NaCl to KCl. Data are presented as fractional efflux, i.e. each fraction is expressed as the percentage of radioactivity present in the cells at the beginning of that fraction. Symbols represent means ± S.E. of nine observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber; all experiments were performed in triplicate). The statistical significance was assessed by Student's t test for paired samples (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01).

Amphetamine-induced Efflux of MPP+ Is Also Enhanced by Zinc in Rat Striatal Slices-- The endogenous Zn2+ binding site of the DAT is highly conserved among species orthologues. We exploited this fact to explore if Zn2+ also facilitated transport reversal by a DAT expressed in its native environment. Striatal slices were prepared from rat brain and superfused with KRH in the presence of EDTA (10 µM) to chelate Zn2+ released due to tissue trauma. As predicted from the experiments carried out on transfected cells (cf. baselines in Figs. 2-4), Zn2+ alone (free concentration ~10 µM) did not enhance basal [3H]MPP+ efflux (Fig. 8, open squares, min 2-14). In contrast, efflux elicited by amphetamine (10 µM) was enhanced by Zn2+ (Fig. 8, min 14-24). A comparison of four separate experiments (with slices from two animals) showed that the difference in area under the curve (mean ± S.D. = 5.85 ± 2.56 and 8.39 ± 3.56%·min for amphetamine and amphetamine plus Zn2+, respectively) was significantly different (p = 0.02, t test for paired data). Slice preparations have technical limitations; transport reversal cannot be studied under depolarizing conditions in slices, because Ca2+-induced exocytosis occurs upon depolarization (due to opening of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and of glutamatergic and nicotinic ligand-gated ion channels). Hence, it has not been possible to document the combined effect of depolarization and Zn2+ in rat striatal slices.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Influence of Zn2+ on amphetamine-induced [3H]MPP+ efflux in rat striatal slices. Rat striatal slices were preloaded with [3H]MPP+ and superfused using KRH supplemented with EDTA (10 µM), and 2-min fractions were collected. After three fractions (6 min) of basal efflux, cells were exposed to KRH containing Zn2+ (20 µM, ), or left at control conditions (black-square). After seven fractions (from 14 min onward) amphetamine (10 µM) was added. Data are presented as fractional efflux, i.e. each fraction is expressed as the percentage of radioactivity present in the slices at the beginning of that fraction. Symbols represent means ± S.E. of twelve observations (one observation equals one superfusion chamber; all experiments were performed in triplicate).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

It has generally been assumed that amphetamine, methylenedioximethamphetamine ("ecstasy") and related drugs of abuse induce reversal of transport in the monoamine transporters, because they are substrates for inward transport. The transporter-mediated influx of such substrate has been considered a prerequisite for non-exocytotic release of neurotransmitter by reversed transport. Thus, the core assumption of the facilitated exchange-diffusion model (23) predicts that the transporter operates like a revolving door. If this model is correct, inward transport of amphetamine (or congeners), of the Cl- counterion and of Na+ is tightly coupled to efflux of neurotransmitter (34). Conversely, the model of facilitated exchange-diffusion has to be refuted, if efflux and influx can be separated. In several previous studies, the kinetics of transport were difficult to reconcile with a tight coupling of inward and outward transport, but it has proven difficult to obtain unequivocal evidence against the facilitated exchange-diffusion model, because it was not possible to separate inward and outward transport (27, 35).

In the present study we demonstrate that Zn2+ discriminated between inward and outward transport mediated by hDAT; Zn2+ blocked uptake of substrates but promoted efflux. The actions of Zn2+ were specific and not accounted for by any site of action other than the transporter molecule hDAT per se, because (i) it was abrogated by mutation of a single His residue Zn2+ (His193) that participates in the coordination of the transition metal. (ii) Based on the Zn2+ resistance of hSERT and hNET, we rule out an action on other cellular Zn2+-binding proteins that are relevant for establishing the driving force for transport (e.g. Na+/K+-ATPase (36)). (iii) In hNET, mutational replacement of Lys189, the residue homologous to His193 in hDAT, is predicted to result in the formation of a tridentate coordination sphere for Zn2+, because the other two residues are conserved at the homologous positions (19, 20). Accordingly, [3H]MPP+ release was enhanced by Zn2+ in hNET-K189H. Although qualitatively similar (i.e. of comparable affinity), the effect of Zn2+ on hNET-K189H was less pronounced in magnitude than that on wild type hDAT. Most likely, this difference can be rationalized by subtle structural and functional differences between the two transporters. Thus, the observation that Zn2+ can enhance substrate release while simultaneously blocking substrate uptake invalidates the facilitated exchange-diffusion model. Zn2+ enhanced MPP+-induced efflux; contrary to amphetamine, MPP+ cannot enter the cells by simple diffusion to any appreciable extent. It is therefore conceivable that binding of the substrate to the extracellular site of the transporter rather than substrate influx suffices to induce transport reversal. Accordingly, influx and efflux must represent discrete operational modes of the transporter.

It has been generally assumed that, under physiological conditions, monoamine transporters operate exclusively in the inward mode; their main physiological task is to rapidly remove exocytotically released neurotransmitter from the synapse (37). The importance of reverse transport, which results in non-exocytotic, Ca2+-independent release of neurotransmitter (38), has long been relegated to pathophysiological situations (e.g. ischemia, see Ref. 38) or to drug abuse (e.g. amphetamine derivatives and other psychostimulants, see Ref. 34). However, most recently, a physiological role was reported for the reverse mode of operation: Upon excitation of glutamatergic input from the subthalamic nucleus, dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra release dopamine due to transport reversal. This non-exocytotically released dopamine suffices to support dendrodendritic autoinhibition (6). In many brain regions, Zn2+ is stored in synaptic vesicles and co-released together with glutamate; under basal conditions, the extracellular levels of Zn2+ are low (~10 nM; see Refs. 39, 40). Upon neuronal stimulation, however, Zn2+ is co-released with the neurotransmitters and, consequently, the free Zn2+ concentration may transiently reach values that range from 10-20 µM (10) up to 300 µM (11). The concentrations of Zn2+ shown in this study, required for the stimulation of dopamine release (as well as inhibition of uptake), covered this physiologically relevant range, with maximum stimulation occurring at 3-30 µM. It is therefore conceivable that the action of Zn2+ on hDAT does not merely reflect a biochemical peculiarity but that it is physiologically relevant. This conjecture is supported by the finding that the facilitating action of Zn2+ can also be demonstrated in rat striatal slices. Furthermore, we showed, in transfected cells, that efflux induced by membrane depolarization is also enhanced by Zn2+. Interestingly, reversal of the Na+ gradient per se (by iso-osmotic replacement of Na+ with choline) was not enhanced by Zn2+. The mechanistic basis for this discrimination remains obscure, and its implication is unclear, because in neurons, where DAT is expressed physiologically, there is no reversal of the Na+ gradient without depolarization. Transport reversal by depolarization has recently been documented in neurons ex vivo; it was suggested that the release of glutamate depolarized the dendrites resulting in transport reversal and subsequent release of dopamine non-exocytotically from the dendritic region (6). Thus, when Zn2+ is co-released with glutamate, it may greatly augment the efflux of dopamine.

Interestingly, the enhancement of substrate-induced release was only observed for the endogenous Zn2+ binding site; the engineered Zn2+ binding site in which a His residue was introduced in TM7 at position 377, i.e. on top of coordinating His371 (21). Thus, two of the three coordinating residues (i.e. His371 and Glu396 in TM8) were the same as in the endogenous Zn2+ binding site. Because of the distance constraints, the transition metal ion cannot assume a position that differs vastly from that in the endogenous Zn2+ binding site. Nevertheless, Zn2+ failed to enhance outward transport, although inward transport was potently suppressed. This discrepancy points to a critical role for extracellular loop 2, which carries His193 in mediating the action of Zn2+ on reverse transport. But how can Zn2+ binding concomitantly lead to inhibition of inward transport and facilitation of outward transport? Previous data have shown that Zn2+ inhibits translocation but not substrate binding to the transporter (19). This led to the conjecture that Zn2+ imposed a conformational constraint on the transporter, which impeded movements critical for the translocation process (19). As a result, the turnover rate was predicted to be diminished with stabilization of the transporter mainly in a conformation with the substrate binding site open to the extracellular environment (outward facing conformation (19)). Clearly, the present data are inconsistent with a simple inhibition of the transporter turnover rate in the presence of Zn2+. Rather they suggest that Zn2+ binding facilitates the return step of the transporter in a way that increases the chances that a substrate molecule is carried with the transporter from the intracellular to the extracellular environment. As a net result, the transporter still primarily accumulates in the outward facing conformation. However, when assessed in a quantitative manner, efflux of MPP+ did not increase due to an altered affinity of MPP+ for the transporter from the intracellular side; the increased probability of outward transport is solely accounted for by the higher efficiency with which substrate is carried to the extracellular side in the presence of Zn2+ (Fig. 6). However, Zn2+ cannot per se induce efflux; thus, substrate needs to be bound simultaneously at the outward and the inward facing end of the permeation pathway. This is difficult to envisage if the transporter is viewed as a monomeric unit that contains a single permeation pore. It may therefore be interesting to consider the possibility that the transporter does not operate by a simple alternating access scheme. For example, the conformational constraint that Zn2+ imposes on the tertiary structure may facilitate the opening of the alternative pathway that allows intracellular substrate to permeate through the hydrophobic core of the transporter. Alternatively, a parsimonious explanation of the data is the hypothesis that there is only a single path for substrate but that the functional unit is not the monomeric transporter. Precedent for oligomeric channels or transporters with more than one pore per functional unit include Cl- channels (two pores/homodimer, Ref. 41) and aquaporins (four pores/tetramer, Ref. 42). In the presence of Zn2+, binding of extracellular substrate to one transporter favors translocation of intracellular substrate by the second transporter unit in the oligomer. This scheme is supported by the fact that transporters constitutively form oligomers (43, 44). Based on this model, mutants that are defective in oligomerization ought to be incapable of supporting reverse transport. This prediction is currently being explored.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the Austrian Science Foundation (Grant P-14509 to H. H. S, Grant P-15034 to M. F.), by the Danish Natural Science Research Council, by National Institutes of Health Grant P01-DA-12408, by the Lundbeck Foundation, and by the NOVO Nordisk Foundation (to U. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 43-1-4277-64188; Fax: 43-1-4277-64122; E-mail: harald.sitte@univie.ac.at.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 8, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M112265200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: hDAT, human dopamine transporter; hNET, human norepinephrine transporter; hSERT, human serotonin transporter; HEK-293, human embryonic kidney 293 cells; MPP+, 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium; wt, wild type; TM, transmembrane segment; CMV, cytomegalovirus.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Rudnick, G. (1997) in Neurotransmitter Transporters: Structure, Function, and Regulation (Reith, M. E. A., ed) , pp. 73-100, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
2. Nelson, N. (1998) J. Neurochem. 71, 1785-1803[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Iversen, L. (2000) Mol. Psychiatry 5, 357-362[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Seiden, L. S., Sabol, K. E., and Ricaurte, G. A. (1993) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 33, 639-677[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Levi, G., and Raiteri, M. (1993) Trends. Neurosci. 16, 415-419[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Falkenburger, B. H., Barstow, K. L., and Mintz, I. M. (2001) Science 293, 2465-2470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Perez-Clausell, J., and Danscher, G. (1985) Brain Res. 337, 91-98[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Berneis, K. H., Pletscher, A., and Da Prada, M. (1969) Nature 224, 281-282[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Howell, G. A., Welch, M. G., and Frederickson, C. J. (1984) Nature 308, 736-738[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Vogt, K., Mellor, J., Tong, G., and Nicoll, R. (2000) Neuron 26, 187-196[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Assaf, S. Y., and Chung, S. H. (1984) Nature 308, 734-736[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Koh, J. Y., Suh, S. W., Gwag, B. J., He, Y. Y., Hsu, C. Y., and Choi, D. W. (1996) Science 272, 1013-1016[Abstract]
13. Westbrook, G. L., and Mayer, M. L. (1987) Nature 328, 640-643[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Laube, B., Kuhse, J., Rundstrom, N., Kirsch, J., Schmieden, V., and Betz, H. (1995) J. Physiol. 483, 613-619[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Vandenberg, R. J., Mitrovic, A. D., and Johnston, G. A. (1998) Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 189-196[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Schetz, J. A., Chu, A., and Sibley, D. R. (1999) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 289, 956-964[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Spiridon, M., Kamm, D., Billups, B., Mobbs, P., and Attwell, D. (1998) J. Physiol. 506, 363-376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Richfield, E. K. (1993) Mol. Pharmacol. 43, 100-108[Abstract]
19. Norregaard, L., Frederiksen, D., Nielsen, E. O., and Gether, U. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4266-4273[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Loland, C. J., Norregaard, L., and Gether, U. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 36928-36934[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Norregaard, L., Visiers, I., Loland, C. J., Ballesteros, J., Weinstein, H., and Gether, U. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 15836-15846[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. MacAulay, N., Bendahan, A., Loland, C. J., Zeuthen, T., Kanner, B. I., and Gether, U. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 40476-40485[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Fischer, J. F., and Cho, A. K. (1979) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 208, 203-209[Free Full Text]
24. Giros, B., el Mestikawy, S., Bertrand, L., and Caron, M. G. (1991) FEBS Lett. 295, 149-154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Ramamoorthy, S., Bauman, A. L., Moore, K. R., Han, H., Yang, F. T., Chang, A. S., Ganapathy, V., and Blakely, R. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2542-2546[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Chen, C., and Okayama, H. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2745-2752[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Sitte, H. H., Hiptmair, B., Zwach, J., Pifl, C., Singer, E. A., and Scholze, P. (2001) Mol. Pharmacol. 59, 1129-1137[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Scholze, P., Sitte, H. H., and Singer, E. A. (2001) Neurosci. Lett. 309, 173-176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Javitch, J. A., and Snyder, S. H. (1985) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 106, 455-456
30. Buck, K. J., and Amara, S. G. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 12584-12588[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Cesura, A. M., Ritter, A., Picotti, G. B., and Da Prada, M. (1987) J. Neurochem. 49, 138-145[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Pifl, C., Drobny, H., Reither, H., Hornykiewicz, O., and Singer, E. A. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 47, 368-373[Abstract]
33. Valenta, B., Drobny, H., and Singer, E. A. (1988) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 245, 944-949[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Sitte, H. H., Huck, S., Reither, H., Boehm, S., Singer, E. A., and Pifl, C. (1998) J. Neurochem. 71, 1289-1297[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Pifl, C., and Singer, E. A. (1999) Mol. Pharmacol. 56, 1047-1054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Hexum, T. D. (1974) Biochem. Pharmacol. 23, 3441-3447[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Povlock, S. L., and Amara, S. G. (1997) in Neurotransmitter transporters: Structure, Function, and Regulation (Reith, M. E. A., ed) , pp. 1-28, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ
38. Attwell, D., Barbour, B., and Szatkowski, M. (1993) Neuron 11, 401-407[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Frederickson, C. J., Howell, G. A., and Kaserkis, E. J. (1984) Neurology and Neurobiology , Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York
40. Frederickson, C. J. (1989) Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 31, 145-238[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Dutzler, R., Campbell, E. B., Cadene, M., Chait, B. T., and MacKinnon, R. (2002) Nature 415, 287-294[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Sui, H., Han, B. G., Lee, J. K., Walian, P., and Jap, B. K. (2001) Nature 414, 872-878[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Schmid, J. A., Scholze, P., Kudlacek, O., Freissmuth, M., Singer, E. A., and Sitte, H. H. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3805-3810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Hastrup, H., Karlin, A., and Javitch, J. A. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 10055-10060[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.