![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21691-21696, June 14, 2002
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the
Received for publication, February 14, 2002, and in revised form, March 28, 2002
VlsE is an outer surface lipoprotein of
Borrelia burgdorferi that undergoes antigenic variation
through an elaborate gene conversion mechanism and is thought to play a
major role in the immune response to the Lyme disease borellia. The
crystal structure of recombinant variant protein VlsE1 at 2.3-Å
resolution reveals that the six variable regions form loop structures
that constitute most of the membrane distal surface of VlsE, covering
the predominantly Lyme disease is a multistage, tick-borne infection that is endemic
to regions of the United States, Europe, and Asia (1). The causative
bacteria are a family of closely related spirochetes, including
Borrelia burgdorferi, Borrelia garinii, and
Borrelia afzelii, and are transmitted from one mammal to
another by Ixodes ticks. Lyme disease borrelia cause
persistent infections and chronic neurologic, cardiovascular, and
arthralgic manifestations that can last for months to years in humans
and other mammals if not treated successfully, indicating that the
spirochetes can effectively evade the host's immune defenses.
The mechanisms of immune evasion are not well understood at this
time but are thought to include at least one form of antigenic variation. The variable major protein (VMP)-like sequence
(vls)1 locus of
B. burgdorferi (2) is a complex antigenic variation system
that in many ways resembles the more thoroughly characterized variable
major protein system of relapsing fever borrelia (3). The
vls locus of B. burgdorferi B31 consists of the
expression site vlsE and a contiguous set of 15 vls silent cassettes. The exact function of the 35-kDa
surface-exposed lipoprotein VlsE is unknown; however, it is thought
that the vls system may play an important role in mammalian
infection because loss of the encoding linear plasmid lp28-1 results in
reduced infectivity (4, 5).
The overall primary structure of VlsE consists of N-terminal and
C-terminal constant domains flanking a central cassette region. The
cassette region exhibits ~90% sequence identity with the silent cassettes, and most of the sequence differences are concentrated in six
variable regions (VR1-VR6) interspersed among
six invariant regions (IR1-IR6). Both the
vlsE cassette region and the silent cassettes are demarcated
by 17-bp direct repeats (DR). During experimental infection of mice,
segments of the silent cassettes recombine into the vlsE
cassette region through a gene conversion mechanism (2, 6). The
sequence changes are detectable within 4 days after experimental
infection of mice; by 28 days every isolate from skin or other tissues
is unique and contains roughly 9-13 recombination events (7). It has
been hypothesized that the humoral immune response is unable to respond
effectively to the seemingly continuous generation of new VlsE
variants, thus permitting immune evasion and persistent infection (2,
7). Paradoxically, VlsE induces a strong antibody response in Lyme disease patients and infected animals, and recombinant VlsE protein and
a peptide corresponding to IR6 have been found to be useful in the serodiagnosis of Lyme disease (8-10). Thus a dilemma has existed between the high immunogenicity of VlsE and its possible role
in immune evasion.
To better understand the relationship between VlsE structure and
antigenicity and to gain insight into its possible function(s), we have
determined the three-dimensional structure of VlsE from B. burgdorferi B31. For these studies, a recombinant form of VlsE1, the first variant of VlsE identified (2), was utilized. The signal
peptide sequence (corresponding to aa 1-19 of the full-length sequence) was omitted from the recombinant construct to permit isolation and crystallization of a protein lacking the lipid moiety. The resulting protein thus contained the N-terminal region (aa 20-115), the cassette region (aa 116-310), and the C-terminal region
(aa 311-346) of the mature protein. The recombinant protein also
contained an N-terminal polyhistidine sequence to aid in the
purification process (8).
Protein Expression and Purification--
B.
burgdorferi B31, initially isolated from an Ixodes
scapularis tick, was cultured in BSK II medium as described
previously (11). B31-5A3 is a low passage number clone that
has retained its ability to cause disease in C3H/HeN mice and harbors
the VlsE-encoding linear plasmid, lp28-1 (2, 5, 11). The 1,227-bp
vlsE gene of B31-5A3 was amplified by PCR, expressed as a
polyhistidine fusion protein (VlsE1-His) from the pQE30 (Qiagen)
expression system in Escherichia coli SURE2 (Stratagene),
and purified as described before (8). The resulting fusion protein
(VlsE-His) includes an N-terminal polyhistidine tag followed by the
full-length, mature VlsE1 sequence but lacks the native N-terminal
lipoprotein signal sequence (8). Selenomethionylated VlsE1-His was
produced by standard methods (12) and purified using the same procedure as described for the native protein.
Crystallization and Data Collection--
Initial crystals were
obtained using the microbatch method in condition no. 43 of the Crystal
Screen I from Hampton Research. High diffraction quality crystals were
produced to a size of ~0.5 × 0.3 × 0.05 mm in 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 15% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 1,500 and
with a protein concentration of 10-15 mg ml Structure Determination and Refinement--
Initial phases were
determined by MAD (14) using a selenomethionine derivative of
VlsE1-His. The program SOLVE (15) was used to locate the eight selenium
sites in the asymmetric unit. Phases obtained from SOLVE had a mean
figure of merit of 0.42-2.8 Å (Table
I) and were improved by solvent
flattening and non-crystallographic symmetry (NCS) averaging as
implemented in DM (16) and CNS (17). The molecular coordinates were
initially constructed using NCS-averaged and phase-combined electron
density maps with the computer program O (18) and refined with CNS
(17).
Overall Structure of VlsE1--
The VlsE1 crystal structure (Fig.
1a) was refined to a
resolution of 2.3 Å and a final R-factor of 20.4%
(Rfree of 28.2%). Both the N-terminal and
C-terminal regions of the protein appear to be quite flexible in VlsE1,
as we were unable to locate the first 16 N-terminal and the last 12 C-terminal residues in the electron density maps. In 2 of 4 molecules
in an asymmetric unit, as many as 32 N-terminal residues are
disordered. The final model exhibited good stereochemistry with over
90% of the residues in the most favored regions. VlsE1 crystallizes
such that four molecules (each 80 × 37 × 31 Å3) are found in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 1b).
The four molecules were refined without non-crystallographic symmetry
restraints because of slight differences in their conformation. A
single molecule of VlsE1 contains eleven
Analytical ultracentrifugation and gel filtration chromatography
experiments were performed in our laboratories in analogy to analyses
of other surface proteins (19) and indicate that recombinant VlsE1 is
primarily monomeric in solution (data not shown). In the crystal
structure, the interface between neighboring VlsE1 molecules in the
asymmetric unit buries ~13% of the accessible surface area of each
monomer (Fig. 2b). Whereas
this interface does not exhibit any significant hydrophobic patches, it
does suggest a possibility that VlsE could exist as a dimer on the spirochete surface in the arrangement shown in Fig. 2b. Very
recent thermal denaturation data support the formation of oligomeric VlsE under low ionic strength conditions (20).
The Cassette Region--
The protein segment encoded by the first
17-base pair direct repeat (DR1), representing the
beginning of the cassette region, is part of helix
All six VRs are predominantly loop structures entirely covering the
surface of the membrane distal end of the protein (Figs. 2 and 3).
Approximately 50% of the theoretical maximum surface area of the VRs
is exposed on the surface of a subunit of VlsE1. Amino acid positions
that undergo changes during the antigenic variation by cassette
exchange are concentrated in three major areas on the membrane distal
portion of the protein surface (Fig. 3c). The variable amino acids
constitute only a portion of the VR sequences; however, it is likely
that changes in these residues alter the overall conformation of the
random coil structures and hence reconfigure the epitopes throughout
each VR. Although less than 26% of the primary sequence is located in
VRs, these regions represent about 37% of the total surface area of
the VlsE1 monomer. The location of these variable regions on the most
membrane distal end of the molecule suggests that immune evasion may
occur via the shielding of the conserved regions of VlsE from antibody
binding.
In contrast to the VRs, the IRs of the cassette consist of distinct
elements of secondary structure ( Structure and Antibody Reactivity--
A large body of literature
is available regarding the antigenic properties of different portions
of the VlsE primary structure. Because the N- and C-terminal unique
conserved regions do not undergo sequence variation (see Fig. 2), they
are the most obvious targets for use in diagnostic tests and
vaccination experiments. Although no experiments examining the
antigenicity of the invariant N-terminal region have been reported,
data about the unique C-terminal region became available recently (22).
Mice immunized with a 50-aa peptide called Ct corresponding to the
C-terminal region of VlsE of B. burgdorferi B31 induced a
strong antibody response, indicating that this region is highly
immunogenic. Similarly, sera from mice and monkeys infected with
B. burgdorferi B31 exhibited a high reactivity with Ct by
enzyme immunoassay (22). Mouse antibodies against this peptide could
immunoprecipitate extracted VlsE but did not bind at detectable levels
to the surface of intact B. burgdorferi (23). The
three-dimensional structure indicates that this region is membrane
proximal and surface-exposed in monomeric VlsE (Fig. 2). However, the
close packing of VlsE or binding of VlsE to other protein(s) on the
membrane surface may block antibody binding to the lateral surfaces of
the protein. In addition, Liang et al. (22) reported that
antisera against the C-terminal peptide exhibited poor reactivity with
VlsE of other Lyme disease borrelia isolates, although antibodies
against IR6 reacted consistently with VlsE in these
strains. The interpretation of these results was that the primary
structure of the C-terminal region of VlsE was poorly conserved among
Lyme disease borrelia.
The antigenic properties of the IRs within the cassette region have
been investigated in a series of studies by Liang et al. (9,
24-26). In peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using sera
from infected humans, monkeys, and mice, IR6 was found to
be consistently reactive; IR2 was also reactive, but only
with sera from infected mice (24). In addition, anti-IR6
mouse antiserum could immunoprecipitate detergent-solubilized VlsE but
did not bind at detectable levels to intact B. burgdorferi
(9). The three-dimensional structure of VlsE1 reveals that
IR6 forms a helix ( Structural Comparison--
The overall fold of VlsE is very
different from any other protein structures solved so far. However,
comparison to the outer surface protein C (OspC) from B. burgdorferi (27, 28) reveals that both proteins share some general
features like neighbored N/C termini and long helices forming the
membrane proximal portion of the molecule. It is important to note that
OspC exhibits considerable sequence heterogeneity between different
Borrelia strains and that these sequence differences tend to
be localized on the surface of the membrane distal region, as is the
case with the VlsE variable regions. Thus antibody accessibility to
regions on the surface of B. burgdorferi may be a driving
force not only for the evolution of antigenic variation (as in the
vls system) but also in the selection of heterogeneity of
ospc among different strains.
Biological Role of VlsE--
The function of VlsE is currently
unknown, but there is evidence that it is an important virulence factor
in the mammalian host. Loss of the encoding plasmid, lp28-1, correlates
with greatly reduced infectivity in the mouse model (4, 5); studies are underway to determine whether this decrease in infectivity is attributable to the vls system or to other genes present on
lp28-1. vlsE gene expression is increased following exposure
of B. burgdorferi to endothelial cell membranes or intact
endothelial cells in vitro (29), indicating that VlsE may
fall into a growing class of genes that are up-regulated in the
mammalian environment. Furthermore, vlsE recombination
occurs at a rapid rate during infection of either immunocompetent or
immunodeficient mice but has not been detected during in
vitro culture (7, 30). It was reported by Ohnishi and de Silva
(31) that B. burgdorferi in ticks inoculated by feeding on
infected mice contained vlsE sequence variants that either
arose within the ticks or were selected during the second feeding.
However, vlsE recombination was not detected in recent studies in which ticks were inoculated with B. burgdorferi
clone 5A3 by capillary feeding (32). Thus the recombination mechanism appears to be up-regulated in mammalian tissues as compared with either
the arthropod or in vitro culture environments.
It is possible that VlsE may fulfill some additional function during
mammalian infection that requires surface exposure and that its
antigenic variation permits surface expression without resulting in
destruction of the bacterium by the host's antibody response. The
three-dimensional structure of VlsE demonstrates that the
membrane-distal surface of the protein is comprised primarily of the
variable regions, which undergo rapid sequence changes during
infection. The variable regions on the outermost surface may thus mask
the invariant regions of the protein. In this manner, the Lyme disease
spirochete may stay one step ahead of the mammalian host by producing a
myriad of variants that do not bind effectively to anti-VlsE antibodies
elicited by previous versions of the protein. At present, we can only
speculate on how the primarily invariant, lateral surfaces of the
protein are protected from antibody binding. These surfaces may be
sequestered by interactions with neighboring VlsE molecules or other
proteins. A precedent for this type of interaction has been set by
studies with the Borrelia protein P66, in which the protein
is protected from proteolytic cleavage in B. burgdorferi
expressing high levels of the outer surface protein OspA (33). The
structure of VlsE will be useful in determining its role in B. burgdorferi surface topology and host-parasite interactions.
We thank the Advanced Photon Source beamline
operators for assistance at beamline 14-BM-D and Julie C. Holding for
excellent assistance in the laboratory.
*
This work was supported by the National Institutes of
Health, the Texas Advanced Technology Program, and the Welch
Foundation.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1L8W) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).
§
Present address: Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Chemical
Research, Molecular Modeling, Bldg. G838, D-65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 979-862-7636;
Fax: 979-862-7638; E-mail: sacchett@tamu.edu.
Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201547200
The abbreviations used are:
vls, variable major protein (VMP)-like sequence;
VR, variable region;
DR, direct repeat;
IR, invariant region;
aa, amino acids.
Crystal Structure of Lyme Disease Variable Surface Antigen
VlsE of Borrelia burgdorferi*
,
,
§,
,
**
Center for Structural Biology, Texas A&M
University, College Station, Texas 77843-2128 and Albert B. Alkek
Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Houston, Texas 77030-3303 and
the ¶ Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and
Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Medical
School at Houston, Houston, Texas 77225
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helical, invariant regions of the protein.
The surface localization of the variable amino acid segments
appears to protect the conserved regions from interaction with
antibodies and hence may contribute to immune evasion.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1. After
soaking in cryoprotectant solution (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 20% polyethylene glycol 400, 20% polyethylene glycol 1,500) or paratone oil for a few seconds, the crystals were flash-cooled to 100 K. Crystals of the selenomethionine protein were observed in the space
group P2 with a = 85.2 Å, b = 59.2 Å,
c = 116.2 Å, and
= 104.6° and contain four
VlsE1 monomers in the asymmetric unit. Multiwavelength anomalous
dispersion (MAD) data were collected at beamline 14-BM-D at the
Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory to 2.3 Å resolution on a charge-coupled device area detector (ADSC Q4) at three
wavelengths near the selenium absorption edge (see Table I). All
reflection data were processed and scaled using DENZO and SCALEPACK
(13).
Data collection and refinement statistics
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helices and four short
-strands (Fig. 1a). The four helices
1 (aa 37-48),
2 (aa 68-87),
3 (aa 114-139), and
11 (aa 306-341) are in
close proximity to form the membrane proximal part of VlsE. In
contrast, helices
4 through
10 define the core region of the
membrane distal part of the protein. They are widely covered by
connecting loop regions of which some show different conformations for
each molecule. The four
-strand segments are short (3 amino acids
each) and are located in the membrane distal region. The amino acid
residues 93-112 connecting
2 and
3 are disordered in all four
polypeptide chains and are missing in the final model.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The structure of VlsE1. a,
ribbon diagram (
-helices in blue,
-strands
are orange). The bottom of the figure represents
the membrane proximal part. b, the asymmetric unit showing
the crystal packing of the four VlsE1 molecules. c, C
trace in stereoview. Numbering corresponds to the residues in the
full-length sequence of VlsE (see Fig. 3). All figures have been
prepared using the programs SwissPdbViewer (34) and POV-Ray
(www.povray.org).

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
VlsE primary structure domains and tertiary
structure. a, orientation of the molecule is similar to
Fig. 1. The unique conserved N- and C-terminal regions are colored
gray, direct repeats are red, invariant regions
of the cassette are blue, whereas variable cassette regions
are orange. b, schematic
representation of the primary structure (color code as used in
a). c, dimeric model of VlsE based on the crystal
structure (see Fig. 1), illustrating how the formation of potential
dimers could effectively shield invariant regions at the
monomer-monomer interface.
3 at the membrane
proximal end of VlsE1 and is exposed on the surface of the protein
(Fig. 2). DR2 at the end of the cassette region is also
surface-exposed; however, it is located at the membrane distal portion.
The cassette region forms the membrane distal surface and a portion of
the lateral surface of VlsE1 (Figs. 2 and 3).

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Primary and secondary structure of
VlsE1. a, residue positions are numbered according to
the VlsE1 B31 strain. The mature protein starts with residue 20. Sequence of recombinant VlsE1 (rvlsE1) used in this study is
listed at the top. The secondary structure is superimposed
on the bottom of the alignment. Orange triangles
mark sequence positions that actually change through cassette exchanges
upon antigenic variation. This figure was generated by ALSCRIPT (35).
b, location of the different VRs on the molecular surface of
VlsE1. The orientation on the left is identical to that of
Fig. 1, whereas the model in the middle is rotated by 90° around the
vertical axis. The representation on the right
shows the membrane distal part of the protein. c, specific
amino acid positions in the cassette region that change during the
antigenic variation of VlsE in B. burgdorferi are colored
orange on the molecular surface. All sequence positions
within VlsE that are strictly conserved through all antigenic
variations based on cassette exchanges are gray. Solvent was
excluded for all representations during the building of the molecular
surface in the program SwissPdbViewer (34).
-helices and
-sheet structures)
and have very limited surface exposure. As shown in Fig. 2, the IRs
form helices
3 through
10, connected by the VR loops. Although
59% of the cassette primary structure is located in IRs, these regions
account for less than 40% of the cassette surface area as calculated
with SPOCK (21). In particular, IR5, IR6, and
IR3 exhibit only 6.5, 13.7, and 17.2% of their theoretical maximal surface area, respectively. IR1 (38.7%) and
IR4 (35.8%) are the invariable regions within the cassette
that are the most solvent-exposed.
10) that is almost entirely buried
within the center of the membrane distal region. IR6 is
second only to IR5 in terms of its low surface exposure to
the number of residues ratio (14 Å3/residue). In
comparison, the VRs have surface area exposure ratios of 46-66
Å3/number residues. It is possible that this limited
exposure is sufficient to cause immunoprecipitation but that the
IR6 epitope(s) is not accessible in intact bacteria. In our
modeling studies, even evoking a high degree of conformational
flexibility to the covering loop regions does little to improve the
surface accessibility of IR6. Thus, based on the structure,
interaction of anti-IR6 antibodies with intact VlsE would
be restricted to just a few amino acid residues, primarily Lys-276,
Gln-279, Lys-291, and Lys-294.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Present address: Pfizer, Inc., Animal Health Biological
Discovery, Eastern Point Rd., Groton, CT 06340.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Steere, A. C.
(2001)
N. Engl. J. Med.
345,
115-125 2.
Zhang, J. R.,
Hardham, J. M.,
Barbour, A. G.,
and Norris, S. J.
(1997)
Cell
89,
275-285[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Barbour, A.,
and Restrepo, B.
(2000)
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
6,
449-457[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Labandeira-Rey, M.,
Baker, E.,
and Skare, J. T.
(2001)
J. Infect. Immun.
69,
446-455
5.
Purser, J. E.,
and Norris, S. J.
(2000)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
97,
13865-13870 6.
Zhang, J. R.,
and Norris, S. J.
(1998)
Infect Immun
66,
3698-3704 7.
Zhang, J. R.,
and Norris, S. J.
(1998)
Infect. Immun.
66,
3689-3697 8.
Lawrenz, M. B.,
Hardham, J. M.,
Owens, R. T.,
Nowakowski, J.,
Steere, A. C.,
Wormser, G. P.,
and Norris, S. J.
(1999)
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37,
3997-4004 9.
Liang, F. T.,
Alvarez, A. L, Gu, Y.,
Nowling, J. M.,
Ramamoorthy, R.,
and Philipp, M. T.
(1999)
J. Immunol.
163,
5566-5573 10.
Liang, F. T.,
Steere, A. C.,
Marques, A. R.,
Johnson, B. J.,
Miller, J. N.,
and Philipp, M. T.
(1999)
J. Clin. Microbiol.
37,
3990-3996 11.
Norris, S. J.,
Howell, J. K.,
Garza, S. A.,
Ferdows, M. S.,
and Barbour, A. G.
(1995)
Infect. Immun
63,
2206-2212[Abstract]
12.
Davies, C.,
Heath, R.,
White, S.,
and Rock, C.
(2000)
Struct. Fold. Des.
8,
185-195[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Otwinowski, Z.,
and Minor, W.
(1997)
Methods Enzymol.
276,
307-326
14.
Hendrickson, W. A.,
Horton, J. R.,
and LeMaster, D. M.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
1665-1672[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Terwilliger, T.,
and Berendzen, J.
(1999)
Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr.
55,
849-861[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Cowtan, K.
(1994)
Joint CCP4 and ESF-EACBM Newsletter on Protein Crystallography
31,
34-38
17.
Brünger, A. T.,
Adams, P. D.,
Clore, G. M.,
DeLano, W. L.,
Gros, P.,
Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W.,
Jiang, J. S.,
Kuszewski, J.,
Nilges, M.,
Pannu, N. S.,
Read, R. J.,
Rice, L. M.,
Simonson, T.,
and Warren, G. L.
(1998)
Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr.
54,
905-921[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Jones, T.,
Zou, J.,
Cowan, S.,
and Kjeldgaard, M.
(1991)
Acta Crystallogr. Ser. A
47,
110-119[CrossRef]
19.
Zückert, W. R.,
Kerentseva, T. A.,
Lawson, C. L.,
and Barbour, A. G.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem
276,
457-463 20.
Jones, K.,
Guidry, J.,
and Wittung-Stafshede, P.
(2001)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
289,
389-394[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Christopher, J. A.
(1998)
SPOCK: The Structural Properties Observation and Calculation Kit (Program Manual)
, The Center for Macromolecular Design, TexasA&M University, College Station, TX
22.
Liang, F.,
Bowers, L.,
and Philipp, M.
(2001)
Infect. Immun.
69,
3224-3231 23.
Liang, F.,
Jacobs, M.,
and Philipp, M.
(2001)
Infect. Immun.
69,
1337-1343 24.
Liang, F. T.,
and Philipp, M. T.
(1999)
Infect. Immun.
67,
6702-6706 25.
Liang, F. T.,
and Philipp, M. T.
(2000)
Infect. Immun.
68,
2349-2352 26.
Liang, F. T.,
Nowling, J. M.,
and Philipp, M. T.
(2000)
J. Bacteriol.
182,
3597-3601 27.
Eicken, C.,
Sharma, V.,
Klabunde, T.,
Owens, R. T.,
Pikas, D. S.,
Hook, M.,
and Sacchettini, J. C.
(2001)
J. Biol. Chem.
276,
10010-10015 28.
Kumaran, D.,
Eswaramoorthy, S.,
Luft, B. J.,
Koide, S.,
Dunn, J. J.,
Lawson, C. L.,
and Swaminathan, S.
(2001)
EMBO J.
20,
971-978[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Hudson, C.,
Frye, J.,
Quinn, F.,
and Gherardini, F.
(2001)
Mol. Microbiol.
41,
229-239[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Sung, S.,
McDowell, J.,
and Marconi, R.
(2001)
J. Bacteriol.
183,
5855-5861 31.
Ohnishi, J, P. J.,
and de Silva, A. M.
(2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
98,
670-675 32.
Indest, K. J.,
Howell, J. K.,
Jacobs, M. B.,
Scholl-Meeker, D.,
Norris, S. J.,
and Philipp, M. T.
(2001)
Infect. Immun.
69,
7083-7090 33.
Bunikis, J.,
and Barbour, A. G.
(1999)
Infect. Immun.
67,
2874-2883 34.
Guex, N.,
and Peitsch, M.
(1997)
Electrophoresis
18,
2714-2723[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Barton, G.
(1993)
Protein Eng.
6,
37-40
Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. B. Ledue, M. F. Collins, J. Young, and M. E. Schriefer Evaluation of the Recombinant VlsE-Based Liaison Chemiluminescence Immunoassay for Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi and Diagnosis of Lyme Disease Clin. Vaccine Immunol., December 1, 2008; 15(12): 1796 - 1804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Embers, M. B. Jacobs, B. J. B. Johnson, and M. T. Philipp Dominant Epitopes of the C6 Diagnostic Peptide of Borrelia burgdorferi Are Largely Inaccessible to Antibody on the Parent VlsE Molecule Clin. Vaccine Immunol., August 1, 2007; 14(8): 931 - 936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Al-Robaiy, J. Knauer, and R. K. Straubinger Borrelia burgdorferi Organisms Lacking Plasmids 25 and 28-1 Are Internalized by Human Blood Phagocytes at a Rate Identical to That of the Wild-Type Strain Infect. Immun., September 1, 2005; 73(9): 5547 - 5553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. V. Hamby, M. Llibre, S. Utpat, and G. P. Wormser Use of Peptide Library Screening To Detect a Previously Unknown Linear Diagnostic Epitope: Proof of Principle by Use of Lyme Disease Sera Clin. Vaccine Immunol., July 1, 2005; 12(7): 801 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Lawrenz, R. M. Wooten, and S. J. Norris Effects of vlsE Complementation on the Infectivity of Borrelia burgdorferi Lacking the Linear Plasmid lp28-1 Infect. Immun., November 1, 2004; 72(11): 6577 - 6585. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. T. Liang, J. Yan, M. L. Mbow, S. L. Sviat, R. D. Gilmore, M. Mamula, and E. Fikrig Borrelia burgdorferi Changes Its Surface Antigenic Expression in Response to Host Immune Responses Infect. Immun., October 1, 2004; 72(10): 5759 - 5767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Grimm, C. H. Eggers, M. J. Caimano, K. Tilly, P. E. Stewart, A. F. Elias, J. D. Radolf, and P. A. Rosa Experimental Assessment of the Roles of Linear Plasmids lp25 and lp28-1 of Borrelia burgdorferi throughout the Infectious Cycle Infect. Immun., October 1, 2004; 72(10): 5938 - 5946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Kim, J. Singvall, U. Schwarz-Linek, B. J. B. Johnson, J. R. Potts, and M. Hook BBK32, a Fibronectin Binding MSCRAMM from Borrelia burgdorferi, Contains a Disordered Region That Undergoes a Conformational Change on Ligand Binding J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 41706 - 41714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. R. Zuckert, J. E. Lloyd, P. E. Stewart, P. A. Rosa, and A. G. Barbour Cross-Species Surface Display of Functional Spirochetal Lipoproteins by Recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi Infect. Immun., March 1, 2004; 72(3): 1463 - 1469. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Labandeira-Rey, J. Seshu, and J. T. Skare The Absence of Linear Plasmid 25 or 28-1 of Borrelia burgdorferi Dramatically Alters the Kinetics of Experimental Infection via Distinct Mechanisms Infect. Immun., August 1, 2003; 71(8): 4608 - 4613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ohnishi, B. Schneider, W. B. Messer, J. Piesman, and A. M. de Silva Genetic Variation at the vlsE Locus of Borrelia burgdorferi within Ticks and Mice over the Course of a Single Transmission Cycle J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2003; 185(15): 4432 - 4441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |