JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M201547200 on March 28, 2002

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 277, Issue 24, 21691-21696, June 14, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/24/21691    most recent
M201547200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eicken, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sacchettini, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eicken, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sacchettini, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Crystal Structure of Lyme Disease Variable Surface Antigen VlsE of Borrelia burgdorferi*

Christoph EickenDagger , Vivek SharmaDagger , Thomas KlabundeDagger §, Matthew B. Lawrenz, John M. Hardham||, Steven J. Norris, and James C. SacchettiniDagger **

From the Dagger  Center for Structural Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-2128 and Albert B. Alkek Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Houston, Texas 77030-3303 and the  Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas 77225

Received for publication, February 14, 2002, and in revised form, March 28, 2002

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

VlsE is an outer surface lipoprotein of Borrelia burgdorferi that undergoes antigenic variation through an elaborate gene conversion mechanism and is thought to play a major role in the immune response to the Lyme disease borellia. The crystal structure of recombinant variant protein VlsE1 at 2.3-Å resolution reveals that the six variable regions form loop structures that constitute most of the membrane distal surface of VlsE, covering the predominantly alpha -helical, invariant regions of the protein. The surface localization of the variable amino acid segments appears to protect the conserved regions from interaction with antibodies and hence may contribute to immune evasion.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Lyme disease is a multistage, tick-borne infection that is endemic to regions of the United States, Europe, and Asia (1). The causative bacteria are a family of closely related spirochetes, including Borrelia burgdorferi, Borrelia garinii, and Borrelia afzelii, and are transmitted from one mammal to another by Ixodes ticks. Lyme disease borrelia cause persistent infections and chronic neurologic, cardiovascular, and arthralgic manifestations that can last for months to years in humans and other mammals if not treated successfully, indicating that the spirochetes can effectively evade the host's immune defenses.

The mechanisms of immune evasion are not well understood at this time but are thought to include at least one form of antigenic variation. The variable major protein (VMP)-like sequence (vls)1 locus of B. burgdorferi (2) is a complex antigenic variation system that in many ways resembles the more thoroughly characterized variable major protein system of relapsing fever borrelia (3). The vls locus of B. burgdorferi B31 consists of the expression site vlsE and a contiguous set of 15 vls silent cassettes. The exact function of the 35-kDa surface-exposed lipoprotein VlsE is unknown; however, it is thought that the vls system may play an important role in mammalian infection because loss of the encoding linear plasmid lp28-1 results in reduced infectivity (4, 5).

The overall primary structure of VlsE consists of N-terminal and C-terminal constant domains flanking a central cassette region. The cassette region exhibits ~90% sequence identity with the silent cassettes, and most of the sequence differences are concentrated in six variable regions (VR1-VR6) interspersed among six invariant regions (IR1-IR6). Both the vlsE cassette region and the silent cassettes are demarcated by 17-bp direct repeats (DR). During experimental infection of mice, segments of the silent cassettes recombine into the vlsE cassette region through a gene conversion mechanism (2, 6). The sequence changes are detectable within 4 days after experimental infection of mice; by 28 days every isolate from skin or other tissues is unique and contains roughly 9-13 recombination events (7). It has been hypothesized that the humoral immune response is unable to respond effectively to the seemingly continuous generation of new VlsE variants, thus permitting immune evasion and persistent infection (2, 7). Paradoxically, VlsE induces a strong antibody response in Lyme disease patients and infected animals, and recombinant VlsE protein and a peptide corresponding to IR6 have been found to be useful in the serodiagnosis of Lyme disease (8-10). Thus a dilemma has existed between the high immunogenicity of VlsE and its possible role in immune evasion.

To better understand the relationship between VlsE structure and antigenicity and to gain insight into its possible function(s), we have determined the three-dimensional structure of VlsE from B. burgdorferi B31. For these studies, a recombinant form of VlsE1, the first variant of VlsE identified (2), was utilized. The signal peptide sequence (corresponding to aa 1-19 of the full-length sequence) was omitted from the recombinant construct to permit isolation and crystallization of a protein lacking the lipid moiety. The resulting protein thus contained the N-terminal region (aa 20-115), the cassette region (aa 116-310), and the C-terminal region (aa 311-346) of the mature protein. The recombinant protein also contained an N-terminal polyhistidine sequence to aid in the purification process (8).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein Expression and Purification-- B. burgdorferi B31, initially isolated from an Ixodes scapularis tick, was cultured in BSK II medium as described previously (11). B31-5A3 is a low passage number clone that has retained its ability to cause disease in C3H/HeN mice and harbors the VlsE-encoding linear plasmid, lp28-1 (2, 5, 11). The 1,227-bp vlsE gene of B31-5A3 was amplified by PCR, expressed as a polyhistidine fusion protein (VlsE1-His) from the pQE30 (Qiagen) expression system in Escherichia coli SURE2 (Stratagene), and purified as described before (8). The resulting fusion protein (VlsE-His) includes an N-terminal polyhistidine tag followed by the full-length, mature VlsE1 sequence but lacks the native N-terminal lipoprotein signal sequence (8). Selenomethionylated VlsE1-His was produced by standard methods (12) and purified using the same procedure as described for the native protein.

Crystallization and Data Collection-- Initial crystals were obtained using the microbatch method in condition no. 43 of the Crystal Screen I from Hampton Research. High diffraction quality crystals were produced to a size of ~0.5 × 0.3 × 0.05 mm in 10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 15% (w/v) polyethylene glycol 1,500 and with a protein concentration of 10-15 mg ml-1. After soaking in cryoprotectant solution (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 20% polyethylene glycol 400, 20% polyethylene glycol 1,500) or paratone oil for a few seconds, the crystals were flash-cooled to 100 K. Crystals of the selenomethionine protein were observed in the space group P2 with a = 85.2 Å, b = 59.2 Å, c = 116.2 Å, and beta  = 104.6° and contain four VlsE1 monomers in the asymmetric unit. Multiwavelength anomalous dispersion (MAD) data were collected at beamline 14-BM-D at the Advanced Photon Source (APS), Argonne National Laboratory to 2.3 Å resolution on a charge-coupled device area detector (ADSC Q4) at three wavelengths near the selenium absorption edge (see Table I). All reflection data were processed and scaled using DENZO and SCALEPACK (13).

Structure Determination and Refinement-- Initial phases were determined by MAD (14) using a selenomethionine derivative of VlsE1-His. The program SOLVE (15) was used to locate the eight selenium sites in the asymmetric unit. Phases obtained from SOLVE had a mean figure of merit of 0.42-2.8 Å (Table I) and were improved by solvent flattening and non-crystallographic symmetry (NCS) averaging as implemented in DM (16) and CNS (17). The molecular coordinates were initially constructed using NCS-averaged and phase-combined electron density maps with the computer program O (18) and refined with CNS (17).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Data collection and refinement statistics


    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Overall Structure of VlsE1-- The VlsE1 crystal structure (Fig. 1a) was refined to a resolution of 2.3 Å and a final R-factor of 20.4% (Rfree of 28.2%). Both the N-terminal and C-terminal regions of the protein appear to be quite flexible in VlsE1, as we were unable to locate the first 16 N-terminal and the last 12 C-terminal residues in the electron density maps. In 2 of 4 molecules in an asymmetric unit, as many as 32 N-terminal residues are disordered. The final model exhibited good stereochemistry with over 90% of the residues in the most favored regions. VlsE1 crystallizes such that four molecules (each 80 × 37 × 31 Å3) are found in the asymmetric unit (Fig. 1b). The four molecules were refined without non-crystallographic symmetry restraints because of slight differences in their conformation. A single molecule of VlsE1 contains eleven alpha -helices and four short beta -strands (Fig. 1a). The four helices alpha 1 (aa 37-48), alpha 2 (aa 68-87), alpha 3 (aa 114-139), and alpha 11 (aa 306-341) are in close proximity to form the membrane proximal part of VlsE. In contrast, helices alpha 4 through alpha 10 define the core region of the membrane distal part of the protein. They are widely covered by connecting loop regions of which some show different conformations for each molecule. The four beta -strand segments are short (3 amino acids each) and are located in the membrane distal region. The amino acid residues 93-112 connecting alpha 2 and alpha 3 are disordered in all four polypeptide chains and are missing in the final model.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The structure of VlsE1. a, ribbon diagram (alpha -helices in blue, beta -strands are orange). The bottom of the figure represents the membrane proximal part. b, the asymmetric unit showing the crystal packing of the four VlsE1 molecules. c, Calpha trace in stereoview. Numbering corresponds to the residues in the full-length sequence of VlsE (see Fig. 3). All figures have been prepared using the programs SwissPdbViewer (34) and POV-Ray (www.povray.org).

Analytical ultracentrifugation and gel filtration chromatography experiments were performed in our laboratories in analogy to analyses of other surface proteins (19) and indicate that recombinant VlsE1 is primarily monomeric in solution (data not shown). In the crystal structure, the interface between neighboring VlsE1 molecules in the asymmetric unit buries ~13% of the accessible surface area of each monomer (Fig. 2b). Whereas this interface does not exhibit any significant hydrophobic patches, it does suggest a possibility that VlsE could exist as a dimer on the spirochete surface in the arrangement shown in Fig. 2b. Very recent thermal denaturation data support the formation of oligomeric VlsE under low ionic strength conditions (20).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   VlsE primary structure domains and tertiary structure. a, orientation of the molecule is similar to Fig. 1. The unique conserved N- and C-terminal regions are colored gray, direct repeats are red, invariant regions of the cassette are blue, whereas variable cassette regions are orange. b, schematic representation of the primary structure (color code as used in a). c, dimeric model of VlsE based on the crystal structure (see Fig. 1), illustrating how the formation of potential dimers could effectively shield invariant regions at the monomer-monomer interface.

The Cassette Region-- The protein segment encoded by the first 17-base pair direct repeat (DR1), representing the beginning of the cassette region, is part of helix alpha 3 at the membrane proximal end of VlsE1 and is exposed on the surface of the protein (Fig. 2). DR2 at the end of the cassette region is also surface-exposed; however, it is located at the membrane distal portion. The cassette region forms the membrane distal surface and a portion of the lateral surface of VlsE1 (Figs. 2 and 3).

All six VRs are predominantly loop structures entirely covering the surface of the membrane distal end of the protein (Figs. 2 and 3). Approximately 50% of the theoretical maximum surface area of the VRs is exposed on the surface of a subunit of VlsE1. Amino acid positions that undergo changes during the antigenic variation by cassette exchange are concentrated in three major areas on the membrane distal portion of the protein surface (Fig. 3c). The variable amino acids constitute only a portion of the VR sequences; however, it is likely that changes in these residues alter the overall conformation of the random coil structures and hence reconfigure the epitopes throughout each VR. Although less than 26% of the primary sequence is located in VRs, these regions represent about 37% of the total surface area of the VlsE1 monomer. The location of these variable regions on the most membrane distal end of the molecule suggests that immune evasion may occur via the shielding of the conserved regions of VlsE from antibody binding.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Primary and secondary structure of VlsE1. a, residue positions are numbered according to the VlsE1 B31 strain. The mature protein starts with residue 20. Sequence of recombinant VlsE1 (rvlsE1) used in this study is listed at the top. The secondary structure is superimposed on the bottom of the alignment. Orange triangles mark sequence positions that actually change through cassette exchanges upon antigenic variation. This figure was generated by ALSCRIPT (35). b, location of the different VRs on the molecular surface of VlsE1. The orientation on the left is identical to that of Fig. 1, whereas the model in the middle is rotated by 90° around the vertical axis. The representation on the right shows the membrane distal part of the protein. c, specific amino acid positions in the cassette region that change during the antigenic variation of VlsE in B. burgdorferi are colored orange on the molecular surface. All sequence positions within VlsE that are strictly conserved through all antigenic variations based on cassette exchanges are gray. Solvent was excluded for all representations during the building of the molecular surface in the program SwissPdbViewer (34).

In contrast to the VRs, the IRs of the cassette consist of distinct elements of secondary structure (alpha -helices and beta -sheet structures) and have very limited surface exposure. As shown in Fig. 2, the IRs form helices alpha 3 through alpha 10, connected by the VR loops. Although 59% of the cassette primary structure is located in IRs, these regions account for less than 40% of the cassette surface area as calculated with SPOCK (21). In particular, IR5, IR6, and IR3 exhibit only 6.5, 13.7, and 17.2% of their theoretical maximal surface area, respectively. IR1 (38.7%) and IR4 (35.8%) are the invariable regions within the cassette that are the most solvent-exposed.

Structure and Antibody Reactivity-- A large body of literature is available regarding the antigenic properties of different portions of the VlsE primary structure. Because the N- and C-terminal unique conserved regions do not undergo sequence variation (see Fig. 2), they are the most obvious targets for use in diagnostic tests and vaccination experiments. Although no experiments examining the antigenicity of the invariant N-terminal region have been reported, data about the unique C-terminal region became available recently (22). Mice immunized with a 50-aa peptide called Ct corresponding to the C-terminal region of VlsE of B. burgdorferi B31 induced a strong antibody response, indicating that this region is highly immunogenic. Similarly, sera from mice and monkeys infected with B. burgdorferi B31 exhibited a high reactivity with Ct by enzyme immunoassay (22). Mouse antibodies against this peptide could immunoprecipitate extracted VlsE but did not bind at detectable levels to the surface of intact B. burgdorferi (23). The three-dimensional structure indicates that this region is membrane proximal and surface-exposed in monomeric VlsE (Fig. 2). However, the close packing of VlsE or binding of VlsE to other protein(s) on the membrane surface may block antibody binding to the lateral surfaces of the protein. In addition, Liang et al. (22) reported that antisera against the C-terminal peptide exhibited poor reactivity with VlsE of other Lyme disease borrelia isolates, although antibodies against IR6 reacted consistently with VlsE in these strains. The interpretation of these results was that the primary structure of the C-terminal region of VlsE was poorly conserved among Lyme disease borrelia.

The antigenic properties of the IRs within the cassette region have been investigated in a series of studies by Liang et al. (9, 24-26). In peptide-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays using sera from infected humans, monkeys, and mice, IR6 was found to be consistently reactive; IR2 was also reactive, but only with sera from infected mice (24). In addition, anti-IR6 mouse antiserum could immunoprecipitate detergent-solubilized VlsE but did not bind at detectable levels to intact B. burgdorferi (9). The three-dimensional structure of VlsE1 reveals that IR6 forms a helix (alpha 10) that is almost entirely buried within the center of the membrane distal region. IR6 is second only to IR5 in terms of its low surface exposure to the number of residues ratio (14 Å3/residue). In comparison, the VRs have surface area exposure ratios of 46-66 Å3/number residues. It is possible that this limited exposure is sufficient to cause immunoprecipitation but that the IR6 epitope(s) is not accessible in intact bacteria. In our modeling studies, even evoking a high degree of conformational flexibility to the covering loop regions does little to improve the surface accessibility of IR6. Thus, based on the structure, interaction of anti-IR6 antibodies with intact VlsE would be restricted to just a few amino acid residues, primarily Lys-276, Gln-279, Lys-291, and Lys-294.

Structural Comparison-- The overall fold of VlsE is very different from any other protein structures solved so far. However, comparison to the outer surface protein C (OspC) from B. burgdorferi (27, 28) reveals that both proteins share some general features like neighbored N/C termini and long helices forming the membrane proximal portion of the molecule. It is important to note that OspC exhibits considerable sequence heterogeneity between different Borrelia strains and that these sequence differences tend to be localized on the surface of the membrane distal region, as is the case with the VlsE variable regions. Thus antibody accessibility to regions on the surface of B. burgdorferi may be a driving force not only for the evolution of antigenic variation (as in the vls system) but also in the selection of heterogeneity of ospc among different strains.

Biological Role of VlsE-- The function of VlsE is currently unknown, but there is evidence that it is an important virulence factor in the mammalian host. Loss of the encoding plasmid, lp28-1, correlates with greatly reduced infectivity in the mouse model (4, 5); studies are underway to determine whether this decrease in infectivity is attributable to the vls system or to other genes present on lp28-1. vlsE gene expression is increased following exposure of B. burgdorferi to endothelial cell membranes or intact endothelial cells in vitro (29), indicating that VlsE may fall into a growing class of genes that are up-regulated in the mammalian environment. Furthermore, vlsE recombination occurs at a rapid rate during infection of either immunocompetent or immunodeficient mice but has not been detected during in vitro culture (7, 30). It was reported by Ohnishi and de Silva (31) that B. burgdorferi in ticks inoculated by feeding on infected mice contained vlsE sequence variants that either arose within the ticks or were selected during the second feeding. However, vlsE recombination was not detected in recent studies in which ticks were inoculated with B. burgdorferi clone 5A3 by capillary feeding (32). Thus the recombination mechanism appears to be up-regulated in mammalian tissues as compared with either the arthropod or in vitro culture environments.

It is possible that VlsE may fulfill some additional function during mammalian infection that requires surface exposure and that its antigenic variation permits surface expression without resulting in destruction of the bacterium by the host's antibody response. The three-dimensional structure of VlsE demonstrates that the membrane-distal surface of the protein is comprised primarily of the variable regions, which undergo rapid sequence changes during infection. The variable regions on the outermost surface may thus mask the invariant regions of the protein. In this manner, the Lyme disease spirochete may stay one step ahead of the mammalian host by producing a myriad of variants that do not bind effectively to anti-VlsE antibodies elicited by previous versions of the protein. At present, we can only speculate on how the primarily invariant, lateral surfaces of the protein are protected from antibody binding. These surfaces may be sequestered by interactions with neighboring VlsE molecules or other proteins. A precedent for this type of interaction has been set by studies with the Borrelia protein P66, in which the protein is protected from proteolytic cleavage in B. burgdorferi expressing high levels of the outer surface protein OspA (33). The structure of VlsE will be useful in determining its role in B. burgdorferi surface topology and host-parasite interactions.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the Advanced Photon Source beamline operators for assistance at beamline 14-BM-D and Julie C. Holding for excellent assistance in the laboratory.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, the Texas Advanced Technology Program, and the Welch Foundation.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The atomic coordinates and the structure factors (code 1L8W) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).

§ Present address: Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Chemical Research, Molecular Modeling, Bldg. G838, D-65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

|| Present address: Pfizer, Inc., Animal Health Biological Discovery, Eastern Point Rd., Groton, CT 06340.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 979-862-7636; Fax: 979-862-7638; E-mail: sacchett@tamu.edu.

Published, JBC Papers in Press, March 28, 2002, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M201547200

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: vls, variable major protein (VMP)-like sequence; VR, variable region; DR, direct repeat; IR, invariant region; aa, amino acids.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Steere, A. C. (2001) N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 115-125[Free Full Text]
2. Zhang, J. R., Hardham, J. M., Barbour, A. G., and Norris, S. J. (1997) Cell 89, 275-285[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Barbour, A., and Restrepo, B. (2000) Emerg. Infect. Dis. 6, 449-457[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Labandeira-Rey, M., Baker, E., and Skare, J. T. (2001) J. Infect. Immun. 69, 446-455
5. Purser, J. E., and Norris, S. J. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 13865-13870[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Zhang, J. R., and Norris, S. J. (1998) Infect Immun 66, 3698-3704[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Zhang, J. R., and Norris, S. J. (1998) Infect. Immun. 66, 3689-3697[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Lawrenz, M. B., Hardham, J. M., Owens, R. T., Nowakowski, J., Steere, A. C., Wormser, G. P., and Norris, S. J. (1999) J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 3997-4004[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Liang, F. T., Alvarez, A. L, Gu, Y., Nowling, J. M., Ramamoorthy, R., and Philipp, M. T. (1999) J. Immunol. 163, 5566-5573[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Liang, F. T., Steere, A. C., Marques, A. R., Johnson, B. J., Miller, J. N., and Philipp, M. T. (1999) J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 3990-3996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Norris, S. J., Howell, J. K., Garza, S. A., Ferdows, M. S., and Barbour, A. G. (1995) Infect. Immun 63, 2206-2212[Abstract]
12. Davies, C., Heath, R., White, S., and Rock, C. (2000) Struct. Fold. Des. 8, 185-195[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276, 307-326
14. Hendrickson, W. A., Horton, J. R., and LeMaster, D. M. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 1665-1672[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Terwilliger, T., and Berendzen, J. (1999) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 55, 849-861[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Cowtan, K. (1994) Joint CCP4 and ESF-EACBM Newsletter on Protein Crystallography 31, 34-38
17. Brünger, A. T., Adams, P. D., Clore, G. M., DeLano, W. L., Gros, P., Grosse-Kunstleve, R. W., Jiang, J. S., Kuszewski, J., Nilges, M., Pannu, N. S., Read, R. J., Rice, L. M., Simonson, T., and Warren, G. L. (1998) Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 54, 905-921[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Jones, T., Zou, J., Cowan, S., and Kjeldgaard, M. (1991) Acta Crystallogr. Ser. A 47, 110-119[CrossRef]
19. Zückert, W. R., Kerentseva, T. A., Lawson, C. L., and Barbour, A. G. (2001) J. Biol. Chem 276, 457-463[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Jones, K., Guidry, J., and Wittung-Stafshede, P. (2001) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 289, 389-394[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Christopher, J. A. (1998) SPOCK: The Structural Properties Observation and Calculation Kit (Program Manual) , The Center for Macromolecular Design, TexasA&M University, College Station, TX
22. Liang, F., Bowers, L., and Philipp, M. (2001) Infect. Immun. 69, 3224-3231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Liang, F., Jacobs, M., and Philipp, M. (2001) Infect. Immun. 69, 1337-1343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Liang, F. T., and Philipp, M. T. (1999) Infect. Immun. 67, 6702-6706[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Liang, F. T., and Philipp, M. T. (2000) Infect. Immun. 68, 2349-2352[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Liang, F. T., Nowling, J. M., and Philipp, M. T. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 3597-3601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Eicken, C., Sharma, V., Klabunde, T., Owens, R. T., Pikas, D. S., Hook, M., and Sacchettini, J. C. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 10010-10015[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Kumaran, D., Eswaramoorthy, S., Luft, B. J., Koide, S., Dunn, J. J., Lawson, C. L., and Swaminathan, S. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 971-978[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Hudson, C., Frye, J., Quinn, F., and Gherardini, F. (2001) Mol. Microbiol. 41, 229-239[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Sung, S., McDowell, J., and Marconi, R. (2001) J. Bacteriol. 183, 5855-5861[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Ohnishi, J, P. J., and de Silva, A. M. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98, 670-675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Indest, K. J., Howell, J. K., Jacobs, M. B., Scholl-Meeker, D., Norris, S. J., and Philipp, M. T. (2001) Infect. Immun. 69, 7083-7090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Bunikis, J., and Barbour, A. G. (1999) Infect. Immun. 67, 2874-2883[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Guex, N., and Peitsch, M. (1997) Electrophoresis 18, 2714-2723[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Barton, G. (1993) Protein Eng. 6, 37-40[Free Full Text]


Copyright © 2002 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CVIHome page
T. B. Ledue, M. F. Collins, J. Young, and M. E. Schriefer
Evaluation of the Recombinant VlsE-Based Liaison Chemiluminescence Immunoassay for Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi and Diagnosis of Lyme Disease
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., December 1, 2008; 15(12): 1796 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
M. E. Embers, M. B. Jacobs, B. J. B. Johnson, and M. T. Philipp
Dominant Epitopes of the C6 Diagnostic Peptide of Borrelia burgdorferi Are Largely Inaccessible to Antibody on the Parent VlsE Molecule
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., August 1, 2007; 14(8): 931 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
S. Al-Robaiy, J. Knauer, and R. K. Straubinger
Borrelia burgdorferi Organisms Lacking Plasmids 25 and 28-1 Are Internalized by Human Blood Phagocytes at a Rate Identical to That of the Wild-Type Strain
Infect. Immun., September 1, 2005; 73(9): 5547 - 5553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
C. V. Hamby, M. Llibre, S. Utpat, and G. P. Wormser
Use of Peptide Library Screening To Detect a Previously Unknown Linear Diagnostic Epitope: Proof of Principle by Use of Lyme Disease Sera
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., July 1, 2005; 12(7): 801 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. B. Lawrenz, R. M. Wooten, and S. J. Norris
Effects of vlsE Complementation on the Infectivity of Borrelia burgdorferi Lacking the Linear Plasmid lp28-1
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2004; 72(11): 6577 - 6585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
F. T. Liang, J. Yan, M. L. Mbow, S. L. Sviat, R. D. Gilmore, M. Mamula, and E. Fikrig
Borrelia burgdorferi Changes Its Surface Antigenic Expression in Response to Host Immune Responses
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2004; 72(10): 5759 - 5767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
D. Grimm, C. H. Eggers, M. J. Caimano, K. Tilly, P. E. Stewart, A. F. Elias, J. D. Radolf, and P. A. Rosa
Experimental Assessment of the Roles of Linear Plasmids lp25 and lp28-1 of Borrelia burgdorferi throughout the Infectious Cycle
Infect. Immun., October 1, 2004; 72(10): 5938 - 5946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. H. Kim, J. Singvall, U. Schwarz-Linek, B. J. B. Johnson, J. R. Potts, and M. Hook
BBK32, a Fibronectin Binding MSCRAMM from Borrelia burgdorferi, Contains a Disordered Region That Undergoes a Conformational Change on Ligand Binding
J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 41706 - 41714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
W. R. Zuckert, J. E. Lloyd, P. E. Stewart, P. A. Rosa, and A. G. Barbour
Cross-Species Surface Display of Functional Spirochetal Lipoproteins by Recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi
Infect. Immun., March 1, 2004; 72(3): 1463 - 1469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
M. Labandeira-Rey, J. Seshu, and J. T. Skare
The Absence of Linear Plasmid 25 or 28-1 of Borrelia burgdorferi Dramatically Alters the Kinetics of Experimental Infection via Distinct Mechanisms
Infect. Immun., August 1, 2003; 71(8): 4608 - 4613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
J. Ohnishi, B. Schneider, W. B. Messer, J. Piesman, and A. M. de Silva
Genetic Variation at the vlsE Locus of Borrelia burgdorferi within Ticks and Mice over the Course of a Single Transmission Cycle
J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2003; 185(15): 4432 - 4441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/24/21691    most recent
M201547200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eicken, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sacchettini, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eicken, C.
Right arrow Articles by Sacchettini, J. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.